Open Letter from Zachary Fardon, March 13, 2017

Today I submitted my resignation, effective immediately, as United States Attorney in
Chicago. As I walk out the door, there are a few things I?d like to say.

I am not a political person. I belong to no political party; never have. I am not a
Democrat. I am not a Republican. I am not a liberal. I am not a conservative. I never found a
need or interest in associating myself politically. I have no interest in political of?ce.

For the past three and a half years, I?ve been lucky to be in a position of power as the US
Attorney in Chicago. That means I?ve gotten to lead what I think is the best prosecutors? of?ce
and maybe the best public of?ce this country has to offer.

During those three and a half years, by my own choice, I focused my greatest attention on
violent crime. I came into of?ce in 2013 not long after Hadiya Pendleton was killed by an errant
bullet in a public park. Like most folks, I was horri?ed and confused by Hadiya?s death and the
constant drumbeat of seemingly random deaths of so many others, including kids, on the south
and west sides of Chicago.

So I put my head down and I went to work, and I studied. I learned data, numbers,
statistics. I picked up each and every aspect of law enforcement?s efforts, task forces, initiatives
combating violence I turned those efforts over and looked at them from every angle. I went
into the most violence af?icted neighborhoods and met with families, kids, teachers, clergy, and
cops. I listened. I learned. And all while I worked, best I could, with my colleagues at the
USAO to make sure we were continuing to make good federal cases gang cases, gun cases 
that would have an impact on the violence.

At no moment during those three and a half years did the gun violence abate. Every
month, every year, innocents died, kids died. In 2014, 2015 and 2016 I showed pictures during
speeches I gave pictures of children, sweet and innocent, and dead from gun ?re.

The world changed, or began to change, on the evening of October 20, 2014, when 17?
year?old Laquan McDonald was gunned down by a Chicago cop. I spent hundreds of hours over
the next years looking at that case and others, investigating what went wrong and why. I focused
on not just the shooting of?cers but also on the other officers and what happened immediately
following those shootings.

A year passed before the City released that video. Then within weeks, in late 2015, then
CPD Superintendent Garry McCarthy was ?red, and our DOJ pattern and practice investigation
was announced. And then on January 1, 2016, a contract began between CPD and the ACLU
requiring that of?cers complete contact cards for every street encounter. That ACLU
deal grew out of a law suit about stop and frisk, but the contract that settled the lawsuit swung
the pendulum hard in the other direction by telling cops if you (of?cer) go talk to those kids on
the corner, you?re going to have to take 40 minutes to ?ll out a form, and you?re going to have to
give them a receipt with your badge number on it.

So by January 2016, the city was on ?re. We had no police superintendent. Cops were
under scrutiny. Cops had to worry about the ACLU deal. And many of them just no longer
wanted to wear the risk of stopping suspects. Many became scared and demoralized. And that
demoralization was compounded by the City panel?s sweeping tone and language around racism
and lack of respect for the sanctity of human life.

So cops stopped making stops. And kids started shooting more because they could,
and because the rule of law, law enforcement, had been delegitimized. And that created an
atmosphere of chaos.

Today?s gun violence is driven by social media. And a corollary of that is that gun
violence has become like a virus. One taunt through lnstagram leads to a shooting, which leads
to bragging on snapchat or Facebook, which leads to a retaliation shooting, and then the cycle
repeats. The virus spreads.

So our escalating gun attacks beget more gun attacks, and more people started dying.
The media raised questions and rendered judgments in 24 hour cycles. What?s happening? Why
isn?t CPD stopping it? Why is the city so inept? Where is federal law enforcement?

And all the while, so many noble public servants cops, federal agents, Assistant States
Attorneys and Assistant United States Attorneys they all toiled quietly, ?ghting hard to stem
the violence, with episodic success, and then in their quiet moments struggled with their own
sense of frustration and despair.

Today I stand unshackled by the diplomatic constraints of being the US Attorney. My
hope and goal is to just speak truth. And the truth is that when it comes to our gun violence
problem, there are two things going on one short term, the other long term.

The long term is that Chicago has an entrenched gang problem in a limited number of
neighborhoods on the south and west sides. For decades, those neighborhoods have been
neglected. The reasons for that historic run of neglect are rooted in ugly truths about power,
politics, race and racism that are a tragic part of our local and national history and heritage. And
as a consequence of those ugly truths, and the neglect they brought, these neighborhoods stand
wrought with poverty and inadequate schools, businesses, jobs and infrastructure. For many
growing up in these neighborhoods, there is a sense of hopelessness, a belief cemented early in
life that they?re not good enough for higher education and that they?ll never get good jobs.
Gangs and guns are ubiquitous, and gangs ?ll the void created by that hopelessness; they teach
kids crime and violence, and give kids prOtection, money, and a sense of belonging. That?s the
long term reality, and long term challenge.

The short view is the surge in violence since January 2016. That surge started
immediately on the heels of those 4 successive events I mentioned in late 2015: the release of the
Laquan McDonald video; the initiation of the DOJ pattern and practice investigation; the ?ring
of Superintendent; and the beginning of that ACLU contract. Those things exploded a
powder keg that didn?t change fundamentally the landscape of gun violence or law enforcement,

but they poured gasoline on the tragic aspects of those realities and further polarized our of?cers
and our community.

In thinking about where we go from here, we have to talk both of the long view, and of
the short term issues. Here are my ?Top 5? things that I think need to happen to get us to a better
place. This list is not exhaustive or magical; it is an honest short list basedon my experience
.over the past years.

Number 1, get that Consent Decree. You can?t stop our brand of violence without a
top-?ight police department. And you can?t have a top??ight police department on the cheap.
For decades, CPD has been run on the cheap. Of?cers don?t have the training,the supervision,
the equipment, or culture they need and deserve. Our DOJ ?ndings report lays that out.

The media routinely calls that report a scathing indictment of CPD. Not accurate. The
report is not a scathing indictment. It may be hard hitting but it is measured and fair. We didn?t
say cops are bad. We said CPD has systemic problems-that prevent it from supporting good
of?cers, or checking bad of?cers. And so culture and morale suffer. That?s the truth.

The DOJ ?ndings report is a roadmap to addressing the systemic de?ciencies in training,
supervision and accountability. And I?m not picking on this Mayor or City Administration,
who?ve done many good things, when I say the following: If you leave correcting those
de?ciencies to the vagaries of city politics, then you likely lose the long term ?ght. This city?s
history is replete with examples of saying the right thing, in some cases starting the right thing,
but then losing focus, particularly if and as the media and public attention pivot toward whatever
is the latest crisis. .

I started here as an AUSA in 1997, and was bene?ciary of a culture built on integrity,
support, resources, infrastructure, supervision, leadership. Why should I and my colleagues have
that bene?t when CPD of?cers don?t? They are the ones putting their lives on the line every
day. It?s past time to give our police of?cers what they need to succeed. A Consent Decree with
an independent federal monitor is the only way that will happen.

Second, enhance and consolidate federal law enforcement in Chicago. This US
Attorney?s Of?ce should have 15-20 more AUSAs immediately assigned to it, full time and
permanent. It?s a travesty that the of?ce remains understaffed since sequestration. In the 20005,
the of?ce had 172 federal lawyers. In 2012, sequestration hit and over the next two years we
bled down to 127 lawyers. Under the current budget the of?ce can afford about 158 lawyers.
That is still a dozen down from where it was in the 2000s. If you want more federal gang and
gun prosecutions, we need more full?time, permanent federal prosecutors in Chicago. That?s
simple math. I

Beyond the US Attorney?s Of?ce, there are three key federal investigative partners
relevant to this discussion: FBI, DEA and ATP. Each is noble, talented and passionate about
?ghting crime. But here?s a hard truth: federal law enforcement can yield an improved impact
on gun violence in this city by either folding those key federal agencies together into one agency,
or as an alternative, assigning all their agents working on violent crime to one special task force

with one mission and one leadership chain. Do that so that DEA isn?t limited to working dope
cases, and ATP isn?t thinking only about gun traf?cking, and no one is competing for credit on
cases.

Through no fault of all the great agents at those agencies, the way it works now is not as
good as it can be. And it seems to me this crisis creates the right opportunity to reinvent that
wheel, even if it?s just a Chicago speci?c pilot -- bring those federal agencies together in a way
that will create uni?ed purpose, greater ef?ciency and greater impact for our af?icted
neighborhoods.

We need to ?ood those neighborhoods with local and federal law enforcement of?cers.
Not just to arrest the bad guys but also to be standing on that corner where shots otherwise might
get ?red, to be breaking up those corner loiterers, and to be meeting and learning and knowing
the kids, the people, and the truth of who are the good guys, who are the bad guys, and who isn?t
yet formed and can be swayed.

Some people recently have said bring in the National Guard. If you care only about the
short view, maybe there?s some attractiveness to that notion. But if you care about'the long view
if you don?t want to be talking about ?Chiraq? and ?two Chicagos? ten and twenty years from
now, then it?s an ill?conceived notion. What would a National Guard presence say to folks in
those neighborhoods? This is war, and you are the enemy. The Chicago of bike paths and
glistening lakefront, and economic opportunity that?s not your Chicago, it?s ours and we will
protect it.

This is not war. Wars are fought between enemies. There is only one enemy hereChicago. Every single one of us. We are the problem, and we are the solution.
If we resort to wrongheaded measures, we might set ourselves back years, even decades in the
long term ?ght.

Third, attack social media as the milieu for gun viruses. Our current epidemic is, as I
said, viral. And'post Laquan McDonald, there has been a shift, in a bad Way, in cultural norms
among gang members, to where now there is an expectation of gun play at the beginning of any
dispute. A gang member taunts another, and instead of escalating taunts, there are shots ?red
right away, followed by retaliation shots within hours or days, followed by return retaliation
shots, and so forth, with the pathway of violence dotted by social media posts.

Biological viruses are transmitted through body fluid or air. The virus of gun play moves
through social media. We can stop or stem that. Don?t send in the National Guard, send in the
tech geeks. If a gang member makes Strategic Subject List, ?nd a way to curb or real-
time monitor that gang member?s social media accounts. 'If kids have convictions or overt gang
af?liations, ?nd a way to curb their social media. I recognize that First Amendment issues come
into play, but let?s test those limits. Lives are at stake. Enlist parents, teachers and clergy. And
work with social media service providers for options to limit access and to create safeguards
against social media as the conduit for the gun virus.

And at the same time, launch a positive community-based social media exchange both
deterring kids from gangs and enticing them with music, Sports, jobs or other outlets.

Fourth, create new youth pathway centers, in the handful of most afflicted
neighborhoods, that are not subject to the shifting winds of politics and government. The
kids in our hardest hit neighborhoods are gang af?liating as young as 10, 11, 12 years old. Once
that?s happened, it?s too late; their fate is sealed.

There are a ?nite number of kids in a small geographic footprint who face this dilemma.
The vast majority of those kids will do the right thing if we help them ?nd and ?gure out what
that right thing looks like. So let?s ?nd those kids, and let?s intervene, in a positive way, in their
lives. Let?s engage them, and their parents, teachers, community leaders, and clergy. Let?s deter
criminal behavior and incentive lawful behavior.

To do that, we should have a brick and mortar place, in each af?icted neighborhood, that
is base, the home, the epicenter to that effort. No different than combining our federal law
enforcement resources makes sense, combining our social services resources to maximize impact
in these neighborhoods makes sense. There are smart and passionate social services workers out
there right now, every day, trying to help. But no different than our police, systemic de?ciencies
are making it impossible for them to succeed.

Brick and mortar. Create a place. Call it anything. Fund it with federal, state, or
philanthropic funds, or some combination. But do not continue this madness of annualized state
or federal grant funding to where all these not-for-pro?ts have time to do is ?ght for those
peanuts, compete with each other and hope to survive. That serves no one.

There is plenty of money and good will in this town. And there are millions of federal
dollars spent across this town every year. So let?s ?nd that money and put it to use by creating
youth centers, brick and mortar, funding social workers and experts, and intervening to save the
lives of kids and young adults. -

Fifth, ?x the bail bond system in Cook County. There is still, by state law, a monetary
bond system. That system keeps non-violent poor defendants in jail awaiting trial, and allows
violent gang members to get out because they can post money bonds. That?s nuts. There are
movements and efforts afoot to address this dilemma. And there?s a model to ?x it; our federal
bond regime. But this needs to be completely overhauled, and right now. There should be no
bail in state court for repeat gun offenders. There should be no bail in state court for those
charged with acts of violence who have prior gun and violence convictions. Lives are being lost,
every month, because of that bail system. It?s ?xable, now.



Lastly, I want to say to my colleagues at the US Attorney?s Office: You are everything
that is right and good about public service. You are our hope. Carry on.

Zach ardo