i MINI I THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA co STATE OF OKLAHOMA CEURB minor child. by and through his parent and next trientl, "Fr- 1 3 NM NIKKI BOLCHARD. Plaintiffs. i vs. 0.: UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., - aria Foreign Corporation, SHADOW MOUVTAIN BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, a Foreign Limited Liability Company, and DALI: BRYANT ALLEN, an individual, JEFFERSON Di SELLERS PETITION COMES NOW rhe Plaintiffs, -- a minor child at the time or rhe events deseribed herein, by and through his mother and next Friend, Nikki Bouehard, through their attorney of record, Stephen 5. Modovsky, and for IhciI causes of action against Dcfendant(s), allege arid stale as follows- JURISDICTION AND VENUE ll Thar at all times relevant hereto, Plaintiffs -- minor child, and Nikki Bouchard, parenl and nexl friend. are individuals residing in I'll Sa Cuumy in Ihe Sum of Oklahoma. 2. That Defendanl Universal Health Services. Inc, (hereinafier iS Ll {dreigil corporation operaung its business in Oklahoma IhIougl-l its subsidiary company 3, That Defendant Shadow Mouniain Behavior Health System (hexeimfler "Shadow Mountain") is a foreign limited liability company acting as a subsidiary of its parent company, UHS. That Defendant Shadow Mountain operates irs principal place of business in rulsa County in the Stare of Oklahoma. 1 A LIEN CLAIMED 4. That at all times relevant hereto, Defendant Dale Allen Bryant is an individual residing in Tulsa County in the State of Oklahoma 5. That the parties are either residents of the State of Oklahoma or are business entities authorized to transact business in the State of Oklahoma, and the events out of which this suit arise occurred in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. This Honorable Court therefore has jurisdiction and venue over the party litigants named herein and the subject matter thereof II. FACTUAL ALLEGATIQNE 6. That at all times complained of herein, Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain were operating the Shadow Mountain Behavioral Health System as a pediatric in-patient unit. 7i That at all times Defendant Universal Health Services. Inc. is the parent company of the subsidiary Defendant Shadow Mountain Behavioral Health System. 8. That at all times Defendant(s) were in the business of for-profit hospital services to the public. 9. That at all times Defendant(s) were operating under the Oklahoma Administrative Code Rules for hospitals and facilities. 10. That at all times relevant hereto and pursuant to Oklahoma Administrative Code Plaintiff-- retained all rights, benefits, and privileges guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the State of Oklahoma and the United States of America. ll. That Plaintiff_ maintained his right to a safe. sanitary, and humane living environment, 12. That at all times relevant hereto and pursuant to Oklahoma Administrative Code 45015-373, Plaintiff-- was provided the right to freedom from maltreatment, to- wit: not mistrear, mallreat, or otherwise abuse or neglect any consumer. 13. That at all times Defendant(s) were operating under Defendant UHS's Mission Statement, to-wit: 2 ATTORNEYS CLAIMED "Ta provide raperinr quality heulthcare services that: PA 71mm reearnrnend 10 family and friendi, prefer fiat their patients, PURCHASERS relectfer their clients, EMPLOYEES are proud of and INVESTORS reekfar Iong-Ierm returns 14 That Defendant UHS's promotion includes language including "I'ali'znrd' and families who rely upon us IECEWE respecifiil and dignified Irearmen! a! all Iimen'f' 15. That at all firms complained 0f herein, Defendant Shadow Mountain maintained a "Statement of Patient Rights and Rexpomt'bt'lr'ties", attached hereto as Exhibit A, Statement uf Patient Rightd' and Responsibilitiex, to wit: "No client shall ever be neglected ar sexually. physically, verbally, or otherwise abused. i 16. That at all times complained of herein, Defendant Dale Bryant Allen was an empluyee ofDefendan! Shadow Mounmin as 5 Mental Health Technician 17, That the Mental Health Technician fl-lereinafier "provides direct care rem-res and management of children and adolescent The MHT assures patient palient's righrs,' ?1013 to prevent, identi/ji, and report abuses," See attached Exhibit B, Mental Health lechnieian Job Deteripticn 18. That at all times complained of herein, minor child, and his parent and next friend, Nikki Bauchard, were business invitees of the Defendant(s) at the Shadow Mounmkl Behavioral Health System location at 6262 South Sheridan Road, Tulsa. Oklahoma. 19. That Defendant(s) owed a duty tn all persons, particularly the Plaintifi- -t'nr the safe and equitable delivery of health care. That this duty and responsibility was breached. 20. That on or about December 21, 2012, Defendant Dale Bryant Allen, was an employee, agent, servant, or representative of Defendant Shadow Mountain As such, Defendant Shadaw Mountain i. iable for actions of Defendant Dale Bryant Allen while he was acting in the scope of his respective employment .w an, 3 CLAIMED 21, That at all times televant herein, Dcfendanl Shadow Mountain was operating under the ownership of Defendant UHS As suen' Defendant is liable for the actions of Defendant Dale Bryant Allen while he was acting in the scope ofhis respeetive employment 22 That on or about December 21, 2012, Plaintiff-- a minor child was an inpaticnt at Shadow Mountain Behavioral Health System. located at 6262 South Sheridan Rondd' Tulsa, Oklahoma 23. That Oetober. 2012 through 2012 Defendanl Dale Bryant Allen innieted injuries by clawing. kicking, choking, and pushing upon Plaintiff-- a minot child, while he was an inpatient at Defendant Shadow Mountain 24' That cm or about December 21, 2012, security cameras filmed Defendant Dnle Bryant Allen performing excessive physical force upon Plaintiff_ a minor child 23, That on or about December 21. ZOIZ. Defendant Dale Bryant Allen pushed Plainll_ a minor child, into a wall, 251 That on or about January 23' 2013s a DHS representative eontaeted Plainliff Nikki Bouehard and advised her that there was a possible mishandling of her son, Plarnurl- child 27 That on or about January 23' 2013 a DHS representative infumted Plaintiff Nikki Bouchaxd that Defendant Dale Bryant Allen kielted Plaintiff-- miner ehrld, tn the stomach, 23. That Defendant Shadow Mountain failed to inform Plaintiff Nikki Bouchal'd of her son's abuses inflicted upon his body by an employee agent, servant, or representative nf Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain 29. That on or about. the time Of the investigation by DHS, Defendant Shadow Mountain performed mandatory reuaining to its employees. agents. servants. or representatives pennining to proper restraint teehniques. 30. That felony child abuse charges resulted from the investigation] into the i innieted upon Plaintiff--'s body during the recorded event on or about December 21. 2012 31. That on or about December 311, 2013, Defendant Dale Alien Bryant pled Guilty to iwo counts ofchild Abuse by Injuryr See attached Exhibit C, USCNJoumnlfor (77120731839. 4 LIEN CLAIMED FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION PER IPSA LOQUITUR 32. That Plaintiffs rerallege and restate, in toto. and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and pamgraphs ofthis Petition and further allege and state as follows: 33. That the physical and emotional iniuries inflicted upon the Plaintiffs were willfully or recklessly or negligently caused by Defendant Dale Allen Bryant, who was under the exclusive control and management ofDefendant Shadow Mountain. 34. That Defendantts) had a duty to protect the Plaintiffs from injury. 35. That the Defmdant(s) had a duty to control the employees/agents or Defendant Shadow Mountain from acting In wanton disregard for the safety and well--being of the inpatients. including but not limited to, violating their safety policy. 36. That the Defendants actions were reasonably construed by the Plaintiffs as authorized by the principals, Shadow Mountain to take action on the principals' behalf, 37. That the injuries sustained hy the Plaintiffs were caused by Defendant(s)' failure to exercise their duty ofcare, 33. That Defend-tinder negligence and/or recklessness caused Plaintiffs to endure emotional trauma. 39 That Defendant Shadow Mountain failed to supervise and contra] Defendant Dale Allen Bryant while he was performing Job duties within the facility. 40. That Defendant Dale Allen Bryant preyed upon an already compromised mental health patient. thus potentiating further mental health decline. 41. That Defendant Shadow Mounta' ne lected to inform Plaintiff Nikki Bouehard, the parent, ofthe injuries to Plaintim-- sustained by the abuse or Defendant Dale Allen Bryant. 42. That Defendant Shadow Mountain hid the information from the parent. 43. That Defendam(s) covered up its employee/agent actions by not informing the parem ofthe abusive acts performed upon her minor child even afier DHS had notified hat oth: abuses, 5 LIEN CLAIMED WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray this court grant their relief in the form of judgment against for actual and compensatury damages in excess assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendant's financial status and sufficient to punish and make an example of them. as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavior. award attorney's fees and costs. accming interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. IV. SECOND OF ACTI VICARIOUS LI ILITY 44. That Plaintiffs recallege and restate, in tom, and adopt by all the preceding allegations and paragraphs omits Petition and further allege and state as follows: as. That at all times relevant this action, Defendant t:Hs is/was an owner of Defendant shadow Mountain. and was acting wtthin the scope ofthat relationship. 46, That at all times relevant this action, Defendant Shadow Mountain is/was a subsidiary of Defendant UHS and was functioning as an independent company. That as a subsidiary, the holding company, UHS either directly controls the subsidiary company's actions through majority shareholder voting or by indirect controls through financial benchmark requiremenu. 47 Dermdants and Shadow Mountain, acting thxough ils agents. Servfin's, and/or employees, failed to exercise the degree of learning and skill ordinarily possessed by other hospitals in its delivery ofhealthcare. 43. Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain railed lo meet the minimum standard of care in its care and treatment ofPlainu'_ minor child. 49 Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain are vicariously liable for the negligent acts of its agents, servants, and/or employees while acting in their respective scopes of employment in their care and treatment of Plaintiff_ minor child. 50. lhat at all times relevant hereto, Defendant Dale Allen Bryant was an agent. servant, and/or employee of Defendant Shadow Mountain and was acting within the scope of that relationship, 51. 11131 Defendant failed to exercise the requisite controls over the subsidiary, Shadow Mountain, .wwnma. 6 IJEN CLAIMED 52, That Defendants [ms and Shadow Mountain failed to exercise the requisite standards or care in their provisinn of services. 53. That Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain failed to preserve Plaintiff- -rights purported to him by the Oklahuma Administrative Code. WIIEREFORL, PREMISES Plaintiffs pray this cuurt grant their relief in the term or judgment against D:fendanl(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess assess exemplary or punillve damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendant's financial status and sufficient to punish and make an example orthem. as well as. to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award attorney's fees and cosu, accming interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and ust. V. THIRD 12F AngoN LIABILITY 54, That Plaintiffs reeallege and restate. in tote, and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and paragraphs othis Pemion and further allege and state as follows: 55 That Defendant UHS, owner or the property. has the responsibility to protect business invitees from danger and injury. 56, That the Defendanl(s) failed to exercise ordinary care to protect the from injury. 57. That as a result of Defendanqs)' negligence, Plaintiffs sustained severe injuries, pain and suffering, 58. That 'uries were proximately caused by the Dcfendant(s) failuxe to maintain the premises in a reasonably safe condition and to adequately train and supervise their employees. 59. That the actions of Dcfendant(s) were wanton, reckless and in disregard of the safety ofothers thus warranting a determination orpunrtiye damages. WHEREFORE, premises considered, Plaintith pray this court grant their relief in the form or judgment against Def:ndanl(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess of $10,000 00, assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount Io be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendanl's financial slams and sufficient It) punish and make an 7 ATTORNEYS LIEN CLAIMED example of them, as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award attorney?s fees and costs, accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. VI. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY 60. Plaintiffs re-allege and restate, in toto, and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and paragraphs of this Petition and further allege and state as follows: 61. That all times relevant hereto, Defendant(s) owed a ?duciary duty to Plaintiffs in that services were provided to minor child in exchange for payment of those services. 62. That the fees for services created and established the corporate ?duciary responsibility of performance to the Plaintiffs. 63. That Defendant(s) had the duties of care and loyalty to Plaintiffs and the obligation to place the Plaintiffs best interests above their own pecuniary gain. 64. That Defendant(s) failed to ensure the ?duciary obligation to the Plaintiffs was administered in such a manner as to reduce harm and risk to the Plaintiffs. 65. That Defendant(s) failed to provide for Plaintiffs safety and quality of care. 66. That Plaintiffs suffered harm as a direct result of the Defendant(s) breach of ?duciary duty. 67. That Defendant(s) conduct constitutes a bad faith breach of ?duciary duty and is egregious to warrant the award of punitive damages. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray this court grant their relief in the form of judgment against Defendant(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess of $10,000.00, assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendant?s ?nancial status and sufficient to punish and make an example of them, as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award attorney?s fees and costs, accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and just MGM) 1' IKWLW 3 LIEN CLAIMED VII. Fu CAUSE OF ACTION AND BATTERY 687 l'hat Plaintith re-allegc and restate, in toto, and adopt by rererence all the preceding allegations and paragraphs ofthis Fauna" and tunher allege and state as follows: 69' That Defendant Dalc Bryant Allen, without provocation o) consent Of'he Plaintiff -- a minor child, intentionally and maliciously kicked puncth and/or choked Plaintiff-- a minor child 70, That Defendant Dale Bryant Allen. without provocation or consent ofvhe Plaintiff -- a minor child, intentionally and maliciously used force to heat, punch. kick We, care hair-a- a mat, ma 71. That Defendant Dale Bryant Allen's actions were not in self--defense or otherwtse excused or justified 72. That as a result of Dafendanl harassing, assaulting, and beating Plainlifi'_ - he suffered bodily harm, great pain and suffering. and severe emotional distress WIIEREFORE, PREMISES Plaintiffs pray this court grant their relief in the form of Judgmenl against Defendant(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess 01110000 00' assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendanl's financial status and sufficient lo pumsh and make an example of them, as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavmr. award allomey's tees and costs accruing interest and any just rurther relief as this Court deems equitable and just SIXTH CAU OF ACTION IMPRISONME 73' That Plaintiffs re-Mlege and resialei in tom. and adopl by reference all the preceding allegations and paragraphs ntthis P21111071 and further allege and state as follows: 74. Thal Defendant Della Allen Bryanl used Ihreats of confinelnenl to harass and mm, am the narra-- 75 That Defendant Dale Allen Bryant, wilhnut lawful aulhorlty. tclcihly restrained 9 LIEN CLAIMED 76. That Defendant Dale Allen Bryant used unlawful force to restrain Plaintiff 77. That Defendant Dale Allen Bryant uscd violence upon Plaintiff-- minor child, to restrain Plainuf in order to Inflict severe emotional damage and fear in an attempt to thwart Plaintiff from lawfully defending himself. 78. That as a result of Said false imprisonment, Plaintiffs suffered bodily injury. great pain and suffering. and severe emotional distress. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray this court grant their relief in the form nf judgment against Defendantts) for aetual and compensatory damages in excess of $10,000.00, assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendant's financial slams and sufficient to punish and make an example of them, as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award attorney's fees and costs, accruing interest and any just furtth relief as this Court deems equitable and just. Ix. SEVENTH AND EIGHTH CAUSES or ACTION INTENTIONAL 0F EMOTIONAL DISTRESS A As against Plaintif Minor Child; and B. As against Plaintiff, Nikki Bouchaxd. Parent and Next Friend 79. That Plaintiffs re-allege and restate, in toto, and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and paragraphs ofthis Penan and funth allege and state as follows: 80. That Defendant(s) intentionally caused emotional distress to plaintiffs- -minor child and/or Nikki Bouehanl, parent and next friend when Defendant Dale Bryant Allcn kicked, beat, and pushed amongst other bodily injuries upon Plaintiff- -. 81, That Defendants and Shadow Mountain caused emotional distyess to Plaintiffs Zachary Wooten, minor child and/or Nikki Boueltard, parent and next friend when Defendants UHS and Shadow Mountain failed to notify Plaintiff Nikki Bouohard of the abuses inflicted upon her child. "move . to ATTORNEYS CLAIMED 82. Thai Defendants UHS and/or Shadow Mountain caused emotional distress to Plaintiffs --nunat child and Nikki Bauchard. parent and next friend when Defendanle UHS and ShadOW Mountain failed to ensure Lhe safety ofPlainlifi' 33 That Defendant(s) aclions were so extreme and outrageous so as to go beyond all bounds ofdeCency, and is considered atrocious and utterly unacceptable in a civilized sociely, 34. That as a direct and proximate result or Defendanr(s) and/er its employees, Servanls>> agents or contractors' intentional or reckless acts and conduct. Plaintiffs suffered severe emotional distress. great pain of body and mind, mental anguish terror. and fright. WHEREFDRE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray this court gram their relief in the form of judgment against Defendanl(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess uf$lo.nno.00, assess exemplary or punillve damages in an amount to be determined by a Jury which is commensurate with Dcfendam's financial Slztus and sufficient in punish and make an example of them, as Well to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award attorney's fees and costs. accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and jusl. X. NINTH CAUSE OF AQIION LOSS OF CONSORTIUM 85. That Plaintiffs meallege and restate. in tore. and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and paragraphs ofthis Pen/1071 and funher allege and state as follows: 36. That as a direct result of the negligence and carelessness of the Defendants, Plaintiffs were denied the usual and customary consortium and then respective right to the enjoyment of same. WHEREFORE, premises considered, PlaintilTs pray this court grant their relief in the form of judgment against Defendants for actual and compensatory damages in excess of $10,000.00s assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a jury which is Commensurate with Defendant's financial slams and sufficient to punish and make an example of them, as well as, [0 deter others similarly situated from like behavrcr, award attorney's fees and costs, accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. Anothy's LLEN CLAIMED XI. TENTH CAUSEOF ACTION PUNITIVE DAMAGES 87. That Plamtiffs rerallege and restate, in toto, and adopt by reference all the preceding allegations and paragtaphs nfthis petition and further allege and state as follows: That as a direct and proximate result of and/or its employees, servants, agents or contractors intentional or reckless acts arid/or conduct and/or omissions, Plaintiff suffered and sustained bodily injuries and damages, thus resulting in her injuries 59. That Defendantts) and/or its employees, servants, agents or contractors actions in punching, kicking, choking and threatening Haunting was so extreme and outrageous as to go beyond all possihle hounds of decency we considered atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society 90. That the acts and/or conduct and/or omissions of Defendanl(s) are wanton, grossly negligent, and/or display a reckless disregard for the rights of the public in general and Plaintiffs' well--heing and ale therefore entitled to an award of punitive damages as against the Defendanqs), WHEREFORE. PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiffs pray [his court grant Iheir relief in the form of judgment against Defendant(s) for actual and compensatory damages in excess assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to be determined by a Jury which is With Defendant's financial status and sufficient Io punish and make an example or them, as well as, to deter others similarly situated from like behavior, award aflumay's fees and costs, accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitahle and just. XII. AM NDMENTS 91. That Plaintiffs reserve the right to amend this Petition as facts are developed through discovery, WIIEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDEREDI Plaintiffs pray this court grant their relief in the form of judgment against Del'endantts) for actual and compensatory damages in excess ofslomoloo, assess exemplary or punitive damages in an amount to he determined by a jury which is commensurate with Defendant's financial status and sufficient to punish and make an example of them. as well as, Io others similarly situated from like behavior: award I 2 ATTORNEYS LIEN CLAIMED attorney?s fees and costs, accruing interest and any just further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. submitted, By: STEPHEN . ODOVSKY, Attorney f0 inti?fs MODOVSKY LA RC. 1204 South Cheyenne Tulsa, OK 74119 OFF: (918) 592-2677 FAX: (918) 592-2377 sjm@modovsky1aw. com No.00 13 LIEN CLAIMED MOUNTAIN BEHAVIORAL STATEMENT OF PATIENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1. You have the right to he treated with dignity, respect, and consideration, in order to protect and promote human dignity and respect for individual dignity - . - You have the right to receive services in a safe, sanitary, and humane living environment. 3, You have the right to receive services in a humane environment to protect you from harm, abuse, and neglect. No client shall ever be neglected or sexually, physically, verbally, or otherwise abused. 4, You have the right to receive services in an environment which provides privacy, promotes personal dignity, and provides Opportunity for you to improve your functioning. 5. You have the right to receive services without regard to your race, religion, sex, ethnic origin, age, degree of disability, handicapping condition, legal status, andfor the ability to pay for the services. 5, You have the right to be provided with prompt, competent, appropriate treatment services and an individualized treatment plan. a. You shall be afforded the opportunity to participate in your treatment and treatment planning, and may consent, or refuse to consent, to the preposed treatment. b. The right to consent, or refuse to consent, may be abridged for those clients adjudged incapacitated by a court of competent jurisdiction, and in emergency situations de?ned by law. c. As you permit, your family andfor significant others shall be involved in the treatment and treatment planning. 7. You have a right to con?dentiality of all records and communications. Information or records regarding your treatment will only be released with your or your legal guardian?s written authorization or under proyer legal compulsion. 8. You have the right to refuse to participate in any research project or medical experiment without your informedconsent, as de?ned by law. Your refusal to participate shall not affect the-services available to-youYou have the right to voluntarily participate in work therapy, and shall be paid just compensation fer such 7' work. 10. You have the right to request the opinion of an outside medical or consultant, at your expense; and/or the right to an internal facility consultation, at no cost to you. 11. - You have "the right to asSert-grievances with respect to any alleged infringement of these stated rights or any other subsequently statutorily granted righ . 12. You shall never be retaliated against, or subject to, any adverse conditions or treatment services solely or partially because of having asserted your rights as aforestated in this sectionr 13. You have the right for contactrwitb your caseworker andfor attorney in a private setting. 14. You have the right to be informed of your rights in a language that you understand.- CLIENTXFAMILY RESPONSIBILITIES EVERY, CLIENT SHALL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO: 1. Treat other clients and staff with courtesy and respect. 2. Behave in such a way as to protect yourself and others from exposure to or transmission of any infectious or communicable diseases, including those that are sexually transmitted. 3. Make your concerns known to staff and to ask questions when you need information. 4. Provide caregivers with accurate and timely information to help them- give you the best possible care. 5. Follow treatment instructions and the rules of the program, and to accept consequences when failing to do so. 6. Report any perceived risks of treatment or threats to your safety in the course of treatment. 7. Meet any agreed upon financial commitments resulting from treatment- EXHIBIT Outpatient Services Patient Rights Revised 4-03, Revised 5?2004 cj a gearch Careers Qareer Canter Logout Mental Health Technician (She?sn Campus) Job Code: 134215 Facility: Shadow lilountain Behavioral Health System Location: TULSA, UK US Region: Midwest Travel Involved: Job Type: Full Time Job Level: Entry Level Minimum Education High School or equivalent Required: Skills: Category: Heatlhcare - Rehabilitation 1.0 Position Summary: The Mental Health Technicnn provides direct care services and management ofchidren and adolescent patients as prescribed by the physician, therapist. and the treatment team. The MHT assures patient safety, environmental safety and manages patient behavior. The MHT also assists in maintaining safety and cleanliness of the unit. Ninety percent of time spent on the lot: involves direct patient care?interacting with the patient. either individually or in a group setting. Implements prescribed treatment schedule. Attends to physicai needs ofpatients. such as assistance with personal hygiene tasks, monitoring ADLs, and if necessary feeding and mobility. Provides age specific intervention and supervision appropriate to the developmental level and speci?c treatment needs of the individual patient. Conducts and assists with selected educational. rehabilitative. and activity groups as assigned and document according to policy and procedures. Provides timely. accurate. and thorough documentation of patient behavior and treatment. Documentation re?ects professional standards. Assures patient?s rights: acts to prevent, identify, and report abuse. Performs other duties as assigned. Requirements LE HT: The responsibilities of the Mental Health Tech include providing life skills coaching and supervision to children in inpatient care. MHTs facilitate educational rehabilitation groups and are also active in providing assistance to teachers in the classroom and to therapists leading group therapy sessions. MHTs also provide training and supervision during activities of daily living to assure that patients perform routines at age appropriate levels of independence. MHTs accompany patients to community based activities (such as dental or medical appointments) and recreational outings. A primary aspect of the job is the implementation of behavioral interventions and special treatment interventions. They provide ongoing close supervision of inpatients to assure the safety of patients. The MHT must be skilled in therapeutic interactions: providing direction and coaching to clients. intervening dun'ng behavioral crisis, using verbal and physical interventions (training is provided) to managing patients who become a danger to self or others. MHTs document patient behaviors, interventions, and treatment provided. along with the patient's response to treatment during each shift. Documentation is expected to be thorough and professional. MHTs work to maintain the safety of the treatment environment. assuring that safety protocols, emergency preparedness. and infection control measures are taken. The speci?c duties of the MHT vary from shift to shift. Day Shift: MHTs who work during the day will be actively involved in assisting teachers with education. therapists with therapy groups. MHTs also facilitate rehab groups. training ADL skills. implementing behavioral intenrentions, de-escalation of aggressive behaviors. and conducting 15-minute safety checks. Evening 8: Weekend Shifts: MHTs working evenings or weekends will facilitate more social skills and leisure based activities, and supervise family visitation. MHTs also facilitate rehab groups. training ADL skills. implementing behavioral interventions. de- escalation of aggressive behaviors. and conducting 15-minute safety checks. 11-7 Shifts: The focus of MHTs working the 11-7 shift will be the supervision of sleeping patients. documentation. the auditing of patient medical records. and assisting patients with performing morning hygiene routines. Night shift workers also implement behavioral interventions as required, assist with rte-escalation of aggressive behaviors. and conduct 15-minute safety checks. REQUIREMENTS: HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices 2D 3.pdf] Privacy Policy poticyl] Sitemap Directions 20 [2-3024 Shadow Mountain Behavioral 'liealrh System 6262 Sheridan Road Tulsa, OK 74133 I?Imne: 800.82 l..6993 The photos on this website are being used for illustrative purposes only and at] persons depicted in the photo arc models. EXHIBIT 3 1317/2014 OCIS Case Sum mary?F-2D13?2839? STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. DALE ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court] . .. . lete?ecemeses?- TH e: OKLAHOMA Beers: COL-I ere erwo-? The information on this page is NOT an of?cial record. Do not rely on the cortectness or completeness of this information. Verify all information with the of?cial record keeper. The information contained in this report is provided in compliance with the Oklahoma Open Records Act, 24A..1. Use ofthis information is governed by this act, as well as other applicable state and federal laws. IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA .No. CF-2013-2839 .STATE OF OKLAHOMA, (Criminal Felony) Plaintiff, IV- Filed: 06fl4f2013 BRYANT Closed: 12x30x2013 Defendant. Judge: CF Docket Parties ALLEN. BRYANT . Defendant STATE OF OKLAHOMA Plaintiff Tulsa Police Deoertment ARRESTING AGENCY Attorneys . Represented Parties ALLEN, DALE BRYANT Attorney MANNING, 30308) 400 BOSTON AVE STE TULSA, OK 74103 Events Event Toesoey, ~3er 2B, ENE at Bz?? AN Party ALLEN, DALE Docket Reporter Arraignment Docket BRYANT Tuesday, only EMS at we are ALLEN, DALE Preliminary Hearing Docket PRELIMINARY HEARING ISSUE (PRIVATE ATTORNEY) BRYANT (PVP) Tuesday, Augnst 2f}, 28% at see AN PRELIMINARY HEARING ISSUE (PRIVATE ATTORNEY) (PVP) Mooney, Beetem not sets at $2813 AN ALLEN, DALE BRYANT ALLEN, DALE Preliminary Hearing Docket Preliminary Hearing Docket PRELIMINARY HEARING ISSUE (PRIVATE ATTORNEY) BRYANT (PVP) Mooney, ?ts-tees? ?lat, 2M3 at see AN ALLEN, DALE CF Docket DISTRICT COURT BRYANT November ?23, 2M3 at NAB AN ALLEN, DALE CF Docket DISTRICT COURT BRYANT Monday, November re, 2&3 at: Mitt} Al?s? ALLEN, DALE CF Docket DISTRICT COURT BRYANT Monday, Becomes?? ENE at; AN ALLEN, DALE CF Docket FINDING AND BRYANT Titersctey, eats: 3, RNA at BAN AN ALLEN, DALE Cost Admin. - - - COST ADMINISTRATION BRYANT (General) EXHIBIT Counts cnIGetCaselnformationas p?subm asterlD=2634048&ch 5L 1211722014 OCIS Case Summary?F?2013?2839? STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. DALE ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court) Parties appear only under the counts with which they were charged. For complete sentence information, see the court minute on the docket. Count 1. Count as Filed: CHAB, CHILD ABUSE BY INJURY in violation of 21 0.5. 843.5 ISL Date Of Offense: 12l27f2012 Par_tx Name: Disposition Information: ALLEN, DALE CONRECRON, 12i3?f2?1 3. Smitty Plea. BRYANT Count as ABUSE BY INJURY (CHAB) Violation of 21 0.8. 843.5 Count# 2. Count as Filed: CHAB. CHILD ABUSE BY INJURY in violation of 21 0.8. 843.5 (AL Date Of Offense: 1221/2012 Pam! Name: Disoosition Information: ALLEN. DALE oowgmsoe. tafeeizme. Guilty Ptee. BRYANT Count as ABUSE BY INJURY (CHAS) Violation of 21 0.8. 843.5 (A) Docket Date Code Count Party Serial Entry Date 06-14-2013 TEXT 1 ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 85?6?751 Jun 14 2013 - CRIMINAL FELONY INITIAL FILING. @Pumuant to 12 0.3. 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Office 06-14-2013 INFORMATION 1 ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 35271525 Jun 14 2013 - {3.03 DEFENDANT DALE BRYANT ALLEN WAS CHARGED WITH COUNT CHILD AB USE BY INJURY IN VIOLATION OF 21 0.8. 843.5 (A) 06-14-2013 INFORMATION 2 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 85771626 Jun 14 2013 - {mi} DEFENDANT DALE BRYANT ALLEN WAS CHARGED WITH COUNT CHILD ABUSE BY INJURY IN VIOLATION OF 21 0.8. 843.5 (A) SSAAQSB WAIS .. ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 85??3156 Jun 1A. 2013 2:51: Realized ARREST JUDGE: STERREN CLARK BOND AMOUNT: COSNT 1 .. CHELS ABUSE BY ENJURY .. BOND AMOUNT: COURT 2 .. CHELD ABOSE BY ENJ DRY BOND AMOUNT: (ES 53.39} oeqenae?e .. ALLEN, BALE BRYANT 15522315? Jue 1A 2013 Reelized 25.88 OKLAHOMA ENFORMARON SYSTEM REVOLWNS FUNDS 25.00; 06?14-2013 TEXT - 85767752 Jun 14 ?3.88 OCIS HAS AUTOMATICALLY ASSIGNED JUDGE CF DOCKET TO THIS CASE. CTFREE 2 ALLEN. DALE BRYANT BSBAYABS Jun :21 2013 {Elli} JUDGE CLIFF SMITH: SUBMITS FOR BOND REDUCTION. ORDER SETTING HEARING ON 6-2443 AT 3PM ON THIRD FLOOR. onsfoeorYGetCaselnformati on.asp?e ubm itted= tr ue&viewtype= case-General Soasem asterlD=2634048&db=Tulaa 2/9 1221732014 00 IS Case Summary STATE OF OKLAH OMA v. DALE ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court) 06?21?2013 MOH - ALLEN DALE BRYANT 858678?2 Jun 25 2013 - {3.23:3 MOTION FOR BOND REDUCTION 8. ORDER SETTING HEARING JPursuant to 12 O. 5? 39 Document Available at Court Cierk's Office 96-24-2013 CTFREE ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 85864849 24 2013 4:35:45233222 - 2 9.99 JUDGE STEPHEN CLARK: DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT, IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY MIKE MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY ERIK GRAYLESS. CASE CALLED FOR BOND REDUCTION HEARING. ARGUEMENTS HEARD. BOND REDUCTION DENIED. BOND TO REMAIN. 22.; 23532."? 3 . . 2., 2.. 2:22 - AEII ?3 3?23 IEIKIA II. I: 35? 2, . EPursuant to 12 O. S. 39, Document Avafiabfe at Court CIenlt's Of?ce BO ?3 22.2.2122. 3.323.- 23222223" 322223532 222225 2223? :32: 2 2222223222222 $18.98 SURETY EDND ALLEN, DALE BRYANT PQETED 8V WA ITER 5?2 I, CDUNT NUMBER I. IN 8F PDSTED LJPUFSUEHI to 12 O. 8 39 Document Ava?abfe at Coun? Cierk's Office {36?25-2223 ?2 22: 2, 2321-2 .BRYANT 2222222223 .3232. 22:2 212232222232 3} 25.99 BOND 123%"? JAIL FUND FEEIS 28 ?2 22.2222, 2322.2 2322222: 2223222352: .3222: 282:3 32232222233232 R?aIized 2.523 COURT CLERK. ADMINISTRATIVE $25 2.50} BO :3 22223:, 22222 22.22223? 222232222 .322A 2:23 2:313 2:2 :32. 35222: 2322222322 DESIRED ALLEN. DALE BRYANT DOSTED BY AQMSTEOND. WALTER 8: MINISTER SDUNT NUMEER 2, IN PDSTED I3 34-3 Pursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avaffable at Court Clerk's Office 08225229212 {3&2 :3 21322.2: 232.2232": 223223522 223A 2:222 3223:2233 222222 222222222222 3 25.22:: SONS INITIAL FILING FUND FEEIS 2.8.023} {382222222222 2 .22 2.222222?: 2222:2223 3AA22 222:2 21:3? 2.22: 322212222 $2.59 OOURT CLERK. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE {.322 $2231 BOILECIEDNSIE 2.52)} 06-25-2013 DAINS - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 55394550 Jun 25 2013 222092732221 - {3.09 DISTRICT ATTORNEY INSPECTION NOTIFICATION VJPursuantV to 12 O. 8 39, Document Ava?able at Court Clerk?s Office 08?25?2013 CTARRPL - ALI-EN. DALE BRYANT 35898896 Jun 25 22313 32322423232: - :2 {2.0212 HEDDLE, WILLIAM: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY MICHAEL MANNING. ARRAIQNMENT HELD. DEFENDANT WAIVES READING OF THE INFORMATION AND FURTHER TIME TO PLEAD. DEFENDANT ENTERS A PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. PRELIMINARY HEARING SET FOR ?7?30-13 AT IN ROOM 347. RECOGNIZED BACK WITH EOND TO REMAIN. 06?27-2013 RETRL - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 55525423 Jun 23 2013 3:oo:oB;937PM 339 121171?2014 OCIS Case Sum mary?l STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. DALE ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court] Eszursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avaftabhe at Coun? Clerk's Of?ce 06-28-2013 AFPC - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 65943335 Jul 1 2013 - AFFIDAVIT FINDING OF PROBABLE CAUSE EPursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Of?ce {3??39?2013 CTPASS - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 66231261 36 2613 - 8.06 JUDGE STEPHEN CLARK: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY MICHAEL MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BYSEAN HILL FDR AMANDA SELF. CASE CALLED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING. STATE MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCE OBJ ECTION. PRELIMINARY HEARING PASSED TO 812012013 AT IN RQOM 347'. BOND TO REMAIN. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK. 08-06-2013 ADISC - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 66326649 Aug 7 2013 - {mi} ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF DISCOVERY EqurBuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avaitabte at Court Cterk's Of?ce 08?28-2333 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 66460661 Aug 20 2013 35 6,66 JUDGE STEPHEN CLARK: DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY MIKE MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY MATT KEHOE FOR AMANDA SELF. PRELIMINARY HEARING PASSED BY MOTION TO 9-10-13 AT 9AM IN ROOM 347, N0 OBJECTIGN BY THE STATE. BOND TO DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK. 09-08?2613 - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 88643832 8633 6 2013 (3.60 JUDGE STEPHEN CLARK: MIKE MANNING PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT FILES MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE DUE TO CONFLICTING SCHEDULE. MOTION GRANTED. PRELIMINARY HEARING SET 9/1912313 STRICKEN. PRELIMINARY HEARING PASSED TO 913012013 AT IN RDOM 34?. BOND TO REMAIN. 09-06-2013 0 - ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 86660675 89;: 6 2013 - ?3.65) ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE EPursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Ava?abIe at Court Cterk's Of?ce 09-06?2013 MOCON - ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 66660660 Sep 6 2013 - (3.68 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE @Pursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Ava?abie at Court Clerk's Of?ce 09-10-2013 MOCON - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT Sep 11 2013 - (3.66 MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE E?jti?unsuam to 12 0.8. 39, Document Availabie at Court Clerk's Of?ce 09-38-2033 - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 66900666 0161 2013 2:01:23sz1?664 - (3.30 CLARKE, STEPHEN DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY AND REPRESENTED BY MIKE MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY AMANDA SELF. COURT REPORTER: WAIVED. CASE CALLED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING. DEFENDANT WAIVES PRELIMINARY HEARING AND FURTHER TIME TO PLEAD. COURT HEREBY BINDS THE DEFENDANT OVER TO DISTRICT COURT FOR ARRAIGNMENT ON 19?14?2013 9AM ROOM 408 FOR ARRAIGNMENT BEFORE JUDGE BOND TO DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK. WEEDA - ALLEN. BRYANT 666:666? 1236?: 2 2616 R66?iz6d aselnform ation.asp?subm ittedEIr ueaviewtype= caseGeneral &casem aster D=2634048&db= Tulsa 419 1217?2014 0018 Case Summary F-2013-2839- STATE OF OKLAHOMAV. DALE BRY ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court) 28;?22?2 222885? F8228 522-22 TESTS: CT AW 23222222222" 22-? 282825 ?28. 8 JPursuant to 12 O. 8 39 Document Avaiiabie at Court Cierk's Office 382822821223 282552322222 22 A2 2222 D22 2 2.28 2.2 222-22 2.22:2 2222222 3512218223982? 8222882822 8; 2222.80 WITNESS 2:85.18 RAID DY STRICT ATTORNA 82- :5 85 88} LIPursuant to 12 O. 8. 39, Document Ava?abie at Court Clerk's Of?ce 10-02-2013 WAIPH ALLEN DALE BRYANT 88928389 Oct 4 2913 - 5 8.88 WAIVER OF PRELIMINARY HEARING AND BIND- OVER ORDER JPursuam? to 12 O. 8 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Of?ce 10-02-2013 ADISC - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 86928383 Oct 3 2013 - 5 ?2.88 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF DISCOVERY ?14? aparsuanr to 12 0.5. 39, Document Available at Court Clerk's Of?ce 182212222823 CTRASS - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 87?019822 {3:34:14 2013 - 5 (3.88 JUDGE WILLIAM C. KELLOUGH. DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY MICHAEL MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY AMANDA SELF. CASE CALLED FOR DISTRICT COURT ARRAIGNMENT. DISTRICT COURT ARRAIGNMENT PASSED AT THE REQUEST TO 11-1 3~2013 AT IN ROOM 408, FOR DEFENDANT TO FULLY RETAIN COUNSEL. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK. BOND TO REMAIN. - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 874223231 Nov 28 2813 - 5 8.8213 JUDGE WILLIAM C. KELLOUGH. DEFENDANT PRESENT. NOT 1N CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY JILL. WEBB ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY JAMES PFEFFER. CASE CALLED FOR DISTRICT COURT ARRAIGNMENT. DISTRICT COURT ARRAIGNMENT RASSED AT THE REQUEST TO 11?18?2013 AT IN ROOM 408. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK. BOND TO REMAIN. 11-18-2623 CTPASS - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 87491351 8302218 2013 - 5 {3.88 JUDGE WILLIAM C. KELLOUGH. DEFENDANT PRESENT, NOT IN CUSTODY, REPRESENTED BY MICHAEL MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY ERIK GRAYLESS. COURT REPORTER IS CARRIE SLOAN. CASE CALLED FOR DISTRICT COURT ARRAIGNMENT. DEFENDANT SWORN IN OPEN COURT, WAIVES JURY 82 NON JURY TRIAL, ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY. COURT ACCEPTS PLEA 8: RASSES FINDING SENTENCING TO 12230?2013 AT IN ROOM 403. PENDING A INVESTIGATION. BOND EXONERATED. COURT AUTHORIZES PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE BOND. DEFENDANT RECOGNIZED BACK WITH PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE BOND TO REMAIN. 11?18?2013 BDXON 1 ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 88225181 Jan 30 2014 9:31 :oszemAM - 5 23.08 THE STATUS OF THE BOND ENTRY DETAILED IN DOCKET SERIAL #85873539 ABOVE HAS CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: SURETY BOND FOR ALLEN, DALE BRYANT POSTED BY WALTER 8; FORSTER (POWER NUMBER: 025- 70076326), COUNT NUMBER IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000.00, POSTED 06I25I2013, EXONERATED 11-18-2013 BDXON 2 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 88225182 Jan 30 2014 - 5; 0.8% THE STATUS OF THE BOND ENTRY DETAILED IN DOCKET SERIAL #85873548 ABOVE HAS CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: SURETY BOND FOR ALLEN, DALE BRYANT POSTED BY WALTER 82 FORSTER (POWER COUNT NUMBER 2, IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000.00, POSTED EXONERATED htlp: oscn asp?submitied= ?2634048&db=Tulsa SIS 12::17?9014 0013 Case Summary STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. DALE BRY ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court] '3 W33: .- 2.2.9333. 33313-3: 333333333: 3-39-33 3332; meaazee 3.33} 313.33: DQGE 335333 ESE EQEE ?3.33 3133.3.E333 33333. .E 333333433333 EDS3E33 E335 ELLEN {33333.- 3: ERYEEY EDS 3333??333o333 ?33 5233} @Pursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Aveitabte at Court Clerk's Office 3349323333 33383 .. 33:- 3.3333. 33-23- 3333333333 333334532 Nov '33 22.3333 1.99.34303933 REagi-ged 33?; 23333} 3333333323 33333333333. E3 3.333333 3.33335.- 233 33%; 33?333~2?333 3333;33:33333333325 - 33333-35 BRYANT 33233-334533 3333;: 333 2.3133 Rae?ze? 2.533 {3333,3333 CLERK AQMENJSTEATWE FEE 31333 $25 2.533} 32433231333 .. 13 -333: ?333.5- 83333333? 333239233; 3:333: 33:; 23313 32333333233323 3 ?38.3333 33333.3 33 {333333333 3333' 33 ?3 33453 38 {?333} dPursuant to 12 O. 8. 39, Document Avertable at Court Cterk's Office 32-1332Q33 wapgg .. 3x:- LEN. 33333-3: Dec 38 233 3 323?:3333363139333 R?ga?z?? jg?g 3133333343338 333.5333} 3335;333:3333? ETFQENEY 333$ ?38 3333} JPursuant to 12 O. 8. 39, Document Available at Court Cierk's Office 1243323313 WEEQA .. 3.3.3.533: 33333-3 3&3:ng 333333334": 3333 203:3 (3:4?23919333333333 Ree?zei? 3 34-33313 333313332: 13?1?33{$ 333 3:38} JPursuant to 12 D. 8. 39 Document Avaiiabte at Court Clerk's Office 25 33.3.5333, 30 23313 Raei?zeo? 8 {-303.93} FFNES PEVAELE Ti} 32?36?28333 8333733 2 m- 3- :33: ?333.33?: .BRYANT emeesee Dec: 333 23333 333393;} 663133?" 1333.330} DACPAE 2 333331133, DALE $333333 3333963330 Dec 33:? 2033; ?59:23:33333?333 Ree?zed 33 253.333.} ?3.33. {2313333333333 ERDSECUEQE E3333 25.33st 323333?2913 {3333391 :2 33.33.5333. DAL-E 3532333333": 8?8336533 3:33;: 30 2.3333 93333333333333 253363 OKLAHOME 33333333335 25.32333} 32w39w23?f?3 SSEGHS 2 ELLEN 33331-32 333333-35532 5:33:- 33: 201:5 Reai?zed 3 333.3333 3?3333 33 SERWCE FEE E33332 UCQUET EGUSE {333}- 12~33?~2?333 MELRF 2 3:33. 3 3333 33333.3: 3333333333: 33333933513 {3333:3323 e833 3:59-29:3333337333 3333333333 3 ?333.033 MEWCAL EXEENEE 3-3313E3L3 333? 333333331333 36 ?133} 32433323333 :33 ALLEN, DALE 333233333333" mazes-33334 {3333: 33:3 23:33 33333333236333 33.033 ?32?38?2833 2 ALLEN, [23533.3 3323333333335 {3333. :33} 23333 33333333325333 33.033 3.333333; 5 {333} EQREN 2 ALLEM. 93333-3: 333333335333 53333.: :33} 2.3333;- ?3 31373333533833: 5.3333} .oscn. net/appl i cati onstoscanetC asel nfor ati ones p'?subm itted= true&vi eutype= case-General &casem aster =2634043&db=Tulsa BIS 12x1??x2014 3193-3323333 3 AL L-- 3% 334.33 MEL 2 3 2% ?3 i3?? ALLEN, {3.313% Baez: 30 2013 Baa: Bi} 2%33 Reaiizezj 32333333 :2 LL LL35 {Lee :50 231:5 Af?b?wa?f 33 CTLM BN3 3 12332333 :2 AL ..L. LN. C: 53% SLATUWERY 3 2 gins {:Lg?w FEE 3.33:3} Dec 35} 21933 OCIS Case Sum STATE OF V. DALE BRW ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court) 32232252233 3 55.36.} Raa?zed 3 313%.} Reaiizad 3 3.6% ?ea?zm 12~3?u2?113 FENE 83?8 H3333 PAYRBLE TL) $33.83} 9?3538 Sm; 2013 12333333 "i {38? 29-13 (353333 0N 133.83} 12?33?2333 SACPAF AL L- EN. SAL. BRYANT {3536 3:3 331:3 QRQSECUTLQM 33833-13? HER 25 {13(3) Rea?izea Raa?ze? ??ai?zed 3 KEG $3 .3 19335} 258$ 1243643633 (308%? ALLEN. QALL Um: 2023 Gfi?g?iATiQN SESTEM 25.38} Reaiized 3 25.38 333328113 ALLEN mm 852mm 8;?835542 De; 20% SERVISE FEE FQR 37333 1L3 ?eaiized 3 3306 13332313 3}?333543 ?3620 20m Mgm??xi. EXPENSE 333(3) 72? 3(3? 2013 CLEET i SALE: SHEET EENEELLTY LL. ?es 30 2013 ?eaiized Reaiized 3-: 3.836 '32~3?3?2?313 1 LL. LN. ELL: LAW FEELEB EELS: ANT i386 313' 2.913 12~3?3~2?313 FGREN ?i ALLEN. 8??39?5546 2:313 FORENSLQ 58(3) ?52633313 SELF ?3 GALE 30 2mg: 3:53:53:54??73?v? SHERIFFS 3&3:va FEE GER: 5.38} 539332933 Rga?ize? Raaiize? 6335i} 3 5.33 3} 5338 Lama AF: 3 {my BALE E3356 3&13 49"! A Wat m4: r-?rv-?LJA AH run r-rx RaaLizaG .. .L ..3 http: asp?subm itted= tr 26340-188Ldb: Tulsa (?n-run 7?79 1211772014 3433333333433; 333 ?3 233533233?? 3 EASSAES 3 3 3 3 2?30?201 3 12-31-2013 01?06?2014 01 ?06?20 1 4 2333.: 33? 3:31.: '3 3.3.3333: 3133-0; 23.333 3533303123 3: 3.3323: .533 33.3. .3 3333': m?e??z?ga gr; .1393; ATTORNEY SENERAL SEREBOES QMETQE 3.33%} OCIS Case Sum may?: F-201 13-2839- STATE OF DKLAH OMAV. DALE ALLEN (Tulsa County District Court) S3-3AE ?3 3.3.3.3333. {2.3.3.323 3333333343" 333333333? 3.23333; :50 12.03.13 3.333} {3.3?3.33.3. 3.1333} ALLEN, 333-1333333333? wan}? 033:; 333} 2013 2:?i?:56:59??3?y?3 Raa??zad $3 ?153.8313 KKESTE 3318 Q-G33APENSATEQA3 ASSESSMENT 1533.80} {33335333333333} '3 3333-3. 5333, 03.3.3.3 BRYANT 337333333333? 333333130 23313 3:533:333?5sami?3v3 3333;333:333 3?33} {3833-3323 CLERK. FEE 32333.3 ?3.323333 VCA 2 ALLEN, BALE 313339335333 Dec. 30 201:3 3333333323933 ?$8.89 COMPENSATEGN ASSESNAENT 150.336} ?i ALLEN, DALE 333233.333?? 8??82268 Jan :3 23314 33.333} JUOGE C. KELLOUGH. OEFENOANT PRESENT. NOT IN CUSTOOY, REPRESENTED BY MANNING. STATE REPRESENTED BY EREK GRAYLESS. COURT REPORTER IS CARRIE SLOAN. CASE CALL-ED FOR 83 SENTENCENG. FINDS OEFENOANT GUILTY. COUNT ?1 FEVE YEARS IN THE CUSTOOY OF THE DEPARTMENT OE CORRECTIONS, WETH ALL '1"in SOSPENOED, TO RUN CONCURRENT WETH COUNT 2. $358.88: COMPENSATEON ASSESSMENT. COUNT 2 .- FEVE YEARS IN THE OF TRE DEPARTMENT CORRECTIONS, WITH TIME SUSPENDED. TO RUN CONCURRENT COUNT ENE. STEDQB COMPENSATEON ASSESSMENT. TO BE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE PARTMENT OF CORRECWONS PROBATION PAROLE. i8 OROERED COMPLETE WORK HOURS UMBER THE O3: THE TUESA COUNTY WORK PROGRAM WITHIN 188 2) COMPLETE AN ANGER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. DISTRECT ATTORNEY 991 FEE ASSESSED. OEFENDANT OF APPEAL. ROLE 8 AND JUOOEMENT 33 SENTENCE BOND EXONERATED, BDXON - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 68225183 Jan 30 2014 0.330 THE STATUS OF THE BOND ENTRY DETAILED IN DOCKET SERIAL #87514631 ABOVE HAS CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: RECOGNIZANCE BOND FOR ALLEN, DALE BRYANT POSTED BY ALLEN, DALE BRYANT, POSTED 11/191?2013, EXONERATED 12/30/2013 CTPPA - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 87902081 Dec 31 2013 8:57:24zo27AM (33333 $50.00 IS TO BE PAID ON OR BEFORE 1/31/14 AND A PAYMENT DUE ON THE 31ST DAY OF EACH MONTH CONTINUING UNTIL THE IS PAID IN FULL. YOU ARE TO RETURN TO COST ADMINISTRATION FOR REVIEW ON 7/3i'14 AUTHORIZED ON 12f3?1f13 gPursr-Jant to 12 0.5. 39, Document Available at Court Clerk?s Office TEXT - ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 87968412 Jan 7 2014 YICTIM IMPACT STATEMENT @Pursuant to 12 0-8. 39, Document Avaifabie at Court Cierk's Of?ce RULES ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 87968415 Jan 7 2014 {3,533} ml: TI-II: (?ml IDT DI II I: 819 'l I UVUI l?Ul?L. I 1271772014 OCIS Case Summary STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. DALE ALLEN [Tulsa County District Court) .3 EPursuant to 12 0.8. 9, Document Avaitabte at Court Cterk?s f?ce 01-06?2014 0 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 37333413 Jan 7 2014 ORDER OF THE COURT DA. 991 COST OF PROSECUTION gPursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avaitabte at Court Cterk's Office 01-06-2014 PSIR ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 33002421 Jan 9 2014 {100 INVESTIGATION REPORT EleurBuant to 12 O. 8. 39, Document Avaitabte at Court Clerk?s Of?ce 01-16-2014 2 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 33035433 Jan 13 2014 0 0.00 AND SENTENCE gPursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avar'tebte at Court Clerk's Of?ce 01?16?2014 1 ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 33035503 Jan 13 2014 {3.00 AND SENTENCE EPursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avaitable at Court Cterk?s Office 01-16-2014 PGSF - ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 33091279 Jan 17 ii: (3,011} PMLEA OF GUILTY SUMMARY OF FACTS @Pursuant to 12 0.8. 39, Document Availabie at Court Cfenk's Of?ce 0101?2014 ACCOUNT ALLEN, DALE BRYANT 33240203 Jan 31 2014 . 0.00 RECEIPT 2014-2772622 ON 01/302014. DALE TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $50.00. LINE ITEMS: (IF-20132839: $50.00 ON CLERK FEES FOR ALLEN, DALE BRYANT- 08-04-2014 ACCOUNT - ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 90135153 Jun 4 2014 - {3.00 RECEIPT 2014-2863461 ON 06/042014. DALE BRYANT-LV TOTAL AMOUNT PAID: $100.00. LINE ITEMS: $100.00 ON AC01 CLERK FEES FOR ALLEN, DALE BRYANT. 07-23-2014 MWPC - ALLEN. DALE BRYANT 30735334 Jul 24 2014 - 8 0.00 T.C.M.W.P. NOTICE OF COMPLETION - PART OF SENTENCE gPursua-nt to 12 0.8. 39, Document Avattabie at Court Cterk's Of?ce Report Generated by The Oklahoma Court Information System at December 2014 10:4?r AM End of Transmission. .oscnnettappl icationstoscn/GetCaselnform ubm itted=true&viewtype= caseGeneral &casem asterID =2634048&db=Tulsa BIB