I  speak  today  in  support  of  the  faculty  salary  resolution.       I  have  prepared  my  remarks  carefully  and  will  read  them,     because  I  want  to  be  specific  and  precise.   I  stand  because  I  want  to  make  sure  that  I  am  heard     by  everyone  in  this  room.     The  situation  in  which  we  find  ourselves  is  akin  to  the   challenges  that  many  families  face.       There  is  good  will  in  families,     and  I  believe  there  is  goodwill  here,     but,  just  like  in  a  family,     some  difficulties  cannot  be  avoided  any  longer.         I  am  speaking  today  because  I  believe  it  is  the  responsibility  of   senior  faculty  to  take  on  this  role  of  leadership.       I  take  no  joy  in  it.       I  have  lost  sleep  and  have  been  upset  for  hours  on  end.       From  what  I  have  seen  of  my  colleagues  in  the  faculty  and   administration,  I  am  not  alone  in  this.       I  suppose  I  should  be  happy  because  I  get  a  raise  next  year,     but  I  feel  the  discouragement  of  colleagues  who  will  not,   and  their  sense  of  being  disrespected.       Many  faculty  might  avoid  speaking  out  because  of  fear.       I  don’t  want  to  operate  from  a  position  of  fear,     rather  one  of  trust  and  collegiality,     and  so,  from  that  perspective,  I  speak.     Positive  notes  first:       1)  Budget  planning  for  salaries  was  moved  to  the  beginning  of   the  process  this  year.       That  is  logical,  since  salaries  are  the  biggest  budget  item  and   must  not  be  put  off  until  the  leftovers  at  the  end.       2)  I  hope  that  the  consulting  company  that  will  work  with  us   on  faculty  salaries  will  be  helpful.       3)  The  faculty  salary  announcement  was  a  start,  and  a  start  is   good.     I  support  this  resolution  because  the  Academic  Senate     and  its  Faculty  Welfare  Committee     are  the  only  formal,  public  mechanisms  the  faculty  has  for   communicating  with  the  administration  about  salaries.     The  Academic  Administration  Manual  states     “The  Academic  Senate  is  recognized  as  the  official  voice  of  the   faculty  in  expressing  advice  and  opinion  to  the  appropriate   Administrative  Officers  and  to  the  Board  of  Regents.”     The  bylaws  of  this  Senate  specify  “The  Faculty  Welfare   Committee  shall...negotiate  directly  with  the  administrative   officers  on  areas  of  interest  to  the  entire  faculty.”         I  support  this  resolution  because  the  Faculty  Welfare   Committee  presented  its  detailed  report     to  the  Senate  and  administration  about  17  months  ago.       I  spoke  up  in  the  Senate  at  that  time  as  well.   While  a  consulting  company  may  be  helpful  now,     it  could  have  been  hired  a  year  ago.    We  have  lost  a  year.         I  support  this  resolution  because  the  market  does  not  always   correspond  to  what  we  believe  is  important.       The  market  is  only  one  of  the  ways  to  measure  what  we  value.         I  support  this  resolution  because  it  is  clear:     the  University  of  Portland  is  thriving     but  a  substantial  segment  of  its  faculty  is  not  thriving.     The  University  has  constructed  or  renovated  11  buildings  since   2009     and  our  student  numbers  are  up  by  30%  in  the  last  decade     but  we  do  not  have  a  just,  sustainable  salary  plan.       Faculty  salaries  have  simply  not  been  a  priority  in  recent  years.     About  10-­‐12  years  ago  the  university  stated  a  goal     to  keep  faculty  salaries  at  the  median  of  a  comparison  group  of   universities  based  on  real  data.       That  disappeared  fairly  soon.         It  is  all  a  mater  of  priorities,     and  faculty  salaries  have  not  been  a  priority.     Public  records,  available  on  the  UP  website  by  searching  the   number  9-­‐9-­‐0,   show  that  the  university  had  a  surplus     of  over  23  million  dollars  in  2014  and  over  18  million  in  2013.   It’s  all  a  matter  of  priorities.     I  support  this  resolution  because,  no  matter  what  it  is  called,   the  so-­‐called  merit  raise  pool  has  functioned,     in  most  cases,  as  a  defacto  cost  of  living  adjustment.     I’m  glad  at  least  for  that,     because  we  don’t  want  actual  earning  power     to  go  down  for  faculty,     but,  in  some  cases,     associate  professors  have  not  received  a  raise     that  represents  actual  increased  buying  power  in  a  decade.       I  support  this  resolution  to  promote  a  stable  faculty.       I  am  convinced  that  the  low  voluntary  faculty  departure  rate,   and,  let  me  repeat,     I  am  convinced  that  the  low  voluntary  faculty  departure  rate,   is  a  primary  reason  that  salaries  have  not  been  raised.     Following  perverse  logic,     when  more  faculty  leave  voluntarily,     the  ones  who  remain  must  be  rewarded.       However,  if  few  faculty  leave,  there  is  no  need  for  reward.       This  is  demoralizing.       We  do  not  need  faculty  to  build  their  resumes  to  leave  mid-­‐ career,     we  need  faculty  to  build  their  resumes  to  stay  at  UP,     and  that  is  what  almost  all  the  faculty  here  have  done.         Tenure  is  a  two-­‐way  deal:       the  university  agrees  to  permanent  faculty  appointments     and  the  faculty  commit  to  the  mission  of  the  University   everyday  with  their  lives,  everyday,  every  single  day.       We  need  people  to  build  their  resumes  to  stay  here,     and  we  must  reward  that.     I  support  this  resolution  because  it  pains  me  every  year     to  learn  that  UP  has  been  named  as  a  best  buy     in  higher  education  on  the  west  coast  by  Kiplinger  magazine.       I  cringe  because  I  know  this  award  is  earned  on  the  backs  of   many  of  the  faculty  and  their  families.         I  support  this  resolution  because,  as  we  are  often  told,   the  faculty  are  the  heart  of  the  University  of  Portland.   The  associate  professors  are  the  heart  of  the  faculty,   in  numbers  and  in  years  of  service.       Yes,  that  makes  the  problem  of  their  salaries     more  difficult  to  solve,   but  also  that  much  more  important.     I  support  this  resolution  with  sadness     because  I  see  little  hope  of  quick  success     and  the  promise  of  future  pain,     but,  as  in  a  family,  we  must  continue  to  grapple  with  this.       We  must.     And  so,  for  all  these  reasons,     I  ask  my  colleagues  in  the  senate  to  join  me  in  supporting  this   resolution.       It’s  a  matter  of  priorities.   It’s  always  a  matter  of  priorities.               Michael  Connolly,  March  21,  2017