. 100 Memorial 1-1011, Floor KRIS W. KOBACH 120 s.w. 10th Avenue g. fi Topeka, KS 66612-1594 SCCICIIZIY of St3.tC }y (785) 2g6.4564 STATE or KANSAS May 31, 2012 . Mr. Brandon Quester News2l Assistant Project Manager Cronkite School of Joumalism 555 N. Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85004 - RE: Kansas Open Records Act Request . Dear Mr. Quester: Our office is in receipt of your PRAR Form including credit card information. Enclosed herewith please find the documents you requested. Based on this production, we consider your request complete. Please feel tree to contact our with any questions. Sincerely, A Desiree Taliaferro Assistant to Ryan Kriegshauser Busincs Services: (785) 296-4564 Web site: Elections: (785) 296-4561 Fax: (785) 296-4570 E-mail: kssos@sos.ks.gov Fax: (785) 291-3051 255 2lli; satun-"-it22@222 .LL. 22.2**.-2. gg}? gig- gg ?2 saga 2:U3. oo-131 2?2? 2 2 . 2 2 222f 2-2. -2..g?zwgii 5 3 gag $3gag 555525 5 2 . . 2 =gg2 i! Eg 2=?agar sg2.E -r1'E 2I 2 I l|-.-.- 81,- 2` 2 2 2=? . . Ill..-. . 2.-- I . A I I aI. 10f4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE I WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI . I . . WESTERN DIVISION uurren e1?A1?Es or I we- Case NoJAMES D. SCHERZER - I . I USM Numben 17566-045 I I Mark Sachse, Retained I 748 Ann Avenue I I nees City, KS 66101 I I II JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE I I The defendant pleaded gullty to Counts one thru four of the Informetlon. the court has edjudlcated {let the E- defendant ls guflty ef the following offeneefe): I - Dato Offense Coun I Eenewd !.umsmIa1 Vlolaion November 5, I one thru Ilur zoo: 3 I I The defendant is sentenced no provided In the following pages of this judgment. The sentence is impcfeed pureuanI to the Sentencing Reform Act ef1S84. 5 I I TT IS ORDERED ttgatthe defendant ehal the Unyg of chan - . -- -- ?Ianru pom. pay reelltutlon. the defendant shell notify the oourt and United States attorney of any maperlel In the - I1 defendant': economle clrcumetances. . I Dete of lmpoeltlon of entence: June? 22. 2005 UNITED smres .Iu?eeI - I j_ a I zoos..I.. I - .--. ..--.- -.. . -..-I..-.- - Case 4c04?cr-004014SWH Document 14 Filed Page . . i . - IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE I nxsmaxcw or Mxssouax I I I WESTERN DIVISION I i, IUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. I COUNTS ONE THROUGH FOUR: I Plaintiff, 18 U.S.C. 242 I I NMT One Year I I. v. One Year Supervised Release I EQ I $100,000 Fine I I JAMES D. SCHEREER, $25 Special Assessment I I I Class A Misdemeanor I 2 I I .- DefendantTHE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT: I . I 1. At all times material to this Infomation: I I a. Defendant JAMES D. SCHERZER was a domicili?ry of I I the State of Kansas, residing at 1016 Tenny Avenue, Kansas} City, I I., I I I Kansas. I I I b. Defendant SCHERZER was not a resident of tlre State Missouri and, as Defendant knew, was not eligible to vcgte in I - the State of Missouri. I I .. ..- 'tate of Missdurjunitary, in the sense that a registrant registers once to become I I simultaneously eligible to vote for federal as well ..-. - were held in I Kansas City, Missouri for the purpose of selecting and electing I I ..-August--S, I 2000 November 7, `2000 general electigon; I I (3) August 6, 2002 primary election: and (4) November 5, 2002 . -- Case Dccument`6 Filed 12f13I04 Page 1 0f4 I I . . - 2 I general election. Qualified voters :ligible to vote under the I 1aw?Iof the State of Missouri cast ballots for candidatesgof i their preference at these elections. I I I e. In the primary election on August 8, 2000,gand thei general election on November 7, 2000, candidates for the office I of Eresident and Vice-President of the United States, as ?ell as I for the United States House of Representatives were on the ballot in the State of Missouri, including Kansas City, Missouri; In the primary election on August 6, 2002, and the general election I on November 5, 2002, candidates for the United States Senate and i the Uhited States House of Representatives were on the ballot in (R) the,State of`Missouri, including Kansas City, Missouri. I IY f. The votes cast in Kansas City, Missouri ingthe i aforesaid elections were tabulated by the Kansas City Boaid of I Election Commissioners, and the results certified by the Kansas I City Board of Election commissioners, by the Equal Protection Clause of the I i Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution toihave I - ii I from the counting of ballots that i were cast by unqualified individuals and_that were thereby false I - I ln - I- .--H H-.- ..-. .- nr nn; . . case Documents Flled 12/13l04 Pag?`2 of4 . I about the dates listed below, on the election days listed below, Defendant JAMES D. scasazsn willfully ?aused QQ I theiaforementioned election officials, acting under coloriof law,Q to deprive inhabitants of the State of Missouri, that is,Q qualified voters in the primary and general elections in which candidates for Federal office were selected and elected, Qf their! right guaranteed by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth! Q. - . . I Amendment to the United States Constitution, by diluting the valid ballots cast for various elective offices with Defendant invalid ballots, by Defendant SCHERZER voting in I . elections in Missouri, Defendant knowing that he was a_re?ident of Kansas and not entitled to vote in these elections: I I I ONE August 8, 2000 Primary election for the purpose of selecting and electing Federal, State and Local offices TWO November 7, 2000 General election for the . tate and Local offices THREE I August 6, 2002 Primary election for the I purpose of selecting and I --?ederal -St - for tne purpose of selecting and electing Federal, State and Local offices - Case Document6 Filed 12/13/04 Page I I I All in violation of Title 1.8, United States Code, Seqtlons I 242 gand Todd P. Graves I I United States Attorney Daniel Stewart I I J. Daniel Stewart I Assistant United States Attorney I I I Dated: December 13, 2004 .-.- -- - ..Case D?cument6 Filed 1213/04 Page 4 0f4 I I I vunu 1:n unt .nuvon? vuunlvvuusy uuTHESIATEOFKANSAS @25, jg rm 41?anns1gAsr1LAN?IxANsAs COMPLAINT Count 1 j` I mmuam I I and I . I mamma; Kam:. anauvamevoung .?k?inq WITNESSES: Ashland, Kansas; Danni; Henman, mm manner, AJIHFIU21-4s??aa21-me . . I uy?rMw?m?r,20M .--.- Sdnauimdandswuuntab?nmnm --.. .-- . .-. . . .. . -. - To be Fto the m3srAmorKANsAs Corpplaint {ud Summon; ALBERT A. PUCKETT Daumcumx . i 5 omz I Cammy the 5 advanoevpumsito, mo time period altowodbylawforcasiiou an ballot. - -E1o?m??rring I Coqt?yt?K.S.A.? Erin!} i - Thatononbout Od?b?r26,20?4 votefororaginatapamwluoandidau or! aw ?v z- we p_Q!_n9_ o? ?v dWIngl1ias-mm . mbdamoanor E. - Pemlduz KSA. 21-450Gn 214502 - LVIL - UI-ooIl\ vnosnnus vvoono uy. {vv; ., I .2 To be ATHCIIBG I . to the I Crimimtl I Complaint . ALBERTA. PUGKETI . mi Warm I ,ad?ueoo MULTIPLE COUNTS uga 3' - Scumand knowtnquamamptto puttualarqandldatourgiany??m?ynK3.A. I 25-2430 I 1 . 2 I 2t--45?3a &2t-4502 IIE ,1.92*2 JL - 3-`llil ..-- I 0m?w??1< Mas-mo- I I Glass -.-- -- -M--I vuun o|?o gulh JI |UllI Urung vvuny: v;qq|ou` g. gg $1110% I CLARK COUNTY - P. 871 DISTRICT 60URT CL I 67831 WUHTY OFKANSAS, I . I _vs. - I - CaseNo. I _A1.1m1u?A1?Um?1?Tberoarsucuthnappcuanccir. 5 MMI I p1aiuti&'scaso. 1* Tueth?Sts?o:??. . Complaint?b-ms. . I I 2 -..-.. un. H-.- - .. ,i 2 . i the its opening I I ze ,umd@usc mtsWHEREUPON, . adminndimocvidenne, aud commence dalibemicm. i 4 . e1@? K.S.A. misd?meonm?invinInti?ncfK.S.A. ofC0untS . Q. 1 I -. - Sm ..-.. .. 3.-. - ..-- -- i -. H. J>>llIlI1| vuass - Complaint, o??hbolngaC!mB nonporion misdomnannr inviolntion ofK8.A. ?25-2403. 1TISFURTTIERORD I I 1. I . b. oraoy i . oicor. oviolntion 1 i I tclopnono munbor ofhis employs-. i - d. I Cisrkandhu- robe 1 2. shall pay Courtoosts in tho amount of$117.00bath mt-..--. .. onon - 1 0 Ullh lh LUIL vvullu vvuu mnayva APPR0 mm #11688 .LAw1mNc?1>. 1>Amm.s, #0?6s..-. ..-..-. I .-..- 2'oo"o lh vuun vvuus; vvuns g, v_ I . I . THE STATE OF KANSAS JUDMRL DISTRICT STATEOFKANMS. PLAINHFF 2 5 *71: VS. CASE ug;. 38 F-I I DEFENDANT FTF I ORDER OF PROBATION and21 0SURE o? of J?d9B?fi|Fins 5 I our ww Pmbnuanrua ucc cfprobalan. I gin. 1 11. or I I -0f..-. o-o SRVIGESOFFIGER SIGNATURE Lvl] VSCIR lun {yy; o| dusted ?rdIv?n??i?H??.4AI....- .1.. I - ..-. .. Ill svn. .nun?oo ven.-; .. ,1 I 2 THE STATE OF KANSAS . . 2 SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DIST RICTMIIUV IY $2 I 2 DIST I Ford. Gray. Comanche. 214*}* I 8* 2 . . ORDER OF TERMINATION OF PROBATION gungan - fhI$ I ISTHEREFOFIE ORDEREDADJUDGEO Alb pr?h?IIBonnie G. Trent E. Leigh `goqd Gujald Wgolwtna Case Docun1ent14 Flled1El15I04 Page -1 of? it 1 I IN THE UNITED STATES COURT gwg:`. Fon THE or= lomsns 056 l'H_ l6 UNITED STATES OF AMERIGAU lt.t pgaqnm --A wais NoSUPERSEDING ?m=onwmon Ul'Il?Sd States AUTOTUBY I I 5 wm 1. At all tlmee materlalto this Information: a. resident ofthe i b. On November 5. 2002, an election was hold ln the United Stain; senate-and the United Statea House of `th tl certify tho election based on tho numbef of valid - ballots cast ln that eleotlon,_ free from thedllutlon of than ballots by any bellote - -- i` i . I - I - I Document 14 Filed Pegs about November 2002, in the District of Kansas, the defendant, I I LESLIE MCINTOSH, I voted in the election which was held on that date in Wyandotte County, to elect I - state, and local cfiioes, including candidates for the United States I . and thereby knowingly and i wwruiiy caused election otnciaie in Wyandotte County. Kansas. were actihg under I - - I underthe laws ofthe United Statea tb have their votes tauu?ittu and the invalid belief which Wee Gael by LESLIE E. MCINT OSH. Thie wee in vtelation df 1 . - enicr=.Me1.eaaN - United States Attbmey i i i 2 i LEON PATTON I 1 - Assistant United StatesAtt?r - . `Kaneas City, Kansas 66101. . I 913-551-6730 I i i Ke. S. Ct. Noi 11782 - ..-. . -. ci-{Sb 2;o4-cr-zo14z-Kev naman: 14 ruse page Penalties: A term of imprisonment cli not-more than one year. a line of n?t_ rhore than from the offense orwlcethegross pecuniary i loss (whichever ls greater), ajerm ofsupervieed release of not more than one year, and a special assessment of $25.00.-.. . .. --.. .. .. . . --. . - . i I ..-. .. . . -. '12r2or04 Page 1 ore rn rr-re unm?o count ji or= 5 stares osmenrce. - Ive. Ns. 04-20142-01-mv E. The United States ot America, by and through undersigned counsel, and the defendant. Leslie E. Molnhoeh, personally and by and through his undersigned counsel, i . hereby enter into thefoliowing plee agreement pursuantto Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: I 1. musrenesmaaweswnseuwiwinwws 1 ofthe eupersedlng ch with depriving other voters of their rights, in - negation srnue 18. umu sees cauaggzanu 242. rnseerenusnmnensr pres - rr&??um ?i to knowingly committing this efenae. and to being guilty of this offense. The defendant understands thet maximum punishment which may be inposed ee to count fl ofthe I- - man oneyear; and ifthe term ofsupervlsed release -- I are no restitution orforfelture issues ln this proceeding. The United States agrees at I I I Tf"" . - I Case Document 17-1 Flled 12!20l04 Page thetlme of sentencing it will ofthe remaining charges I I me eerenuam.22. I _the offense to which the defendant is Iileading guilty are as follows: I An investigation by the showed that on November 5, 2002I . According to records maintained by the Kansas City, Mmouri, Board I ofEleclions, Mr. registeredtovotein Jackson County, Missouri, on . I I October 9, 1968 and listed his residential address as 3622 Norton Avenue; I Kansas City, Mbeourl; I IL While he registered to vote ln Mlssouri . ni, Nd tenofaharier 5 I I On November 5, 2002, general elections were held in both Kansai I I - -. City, Kansas, and Kansas City, Missouri. to elect candidates for federal; I - I state, and local offices. According to the Election Commissioner Jer I I I Wyandottecounty, candidatesfortheotlioe ofluemberoftlre UnitedStates I I House of Representatlvesand Memberof the United States Senatewereon I I . the ballot at thetelectlon, as well as candidates for state and local offices; I I Il LI- which he had previously given. - I I . I Under Kansas law a qualified voter must reside in the voting area lrI I which h6 Of She SOBKS Cctohers, 2004. twoF.B.l. agents intervlewed Mr-. he I I resldenceat3622 Norlonmrenue, Kansas City, Missouri. Mr. said - I I I 1992- his. ineemamI Case 2. -20142-KHV Document 17-1 Filed 12l20!04 Page 3 01pool hall were located there. Mr. ssidthat, ellhoughhewas already registeredtovote Missouri. he registered in Kansas. using No - Irs;--I. o_ovember genera on. 3 5 . By voting in Wyandotte County, Kansas, at the November 5, 2002, I Zelection, and caused election ofllcials in 1 .Wyandotte County, Kansas, whowere color ilhequelitied votersof Wfaliddlt? C6ui1ty;` 6ftheir rights under the Constitution and lawsofthe Unked Statesto have theirvotes tabulated and ballots through the invalid ballot which was cast by Mr. Mcintosh. IQ - - . 3- Thedefendantagreestirattire conductch rgeilinany asweliesallottreruncharged related . as-relevant conduct for purposes of calculating the offense level for the count(s) of I I I conviction, in accordance with U.S. Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) 4. . In retum torthedefendanfs pleaof Quiltyas a. I To notfileany addlional charges arising outofttiefacts a b. To not talte a poshon on the sentence to be `imposed the I applicable guideline range, except that the govemment ei I work release as a condition of any probation; howeverrecommend a 2-level reduction in the applicable oltense level under the sentencing guidelines for acceptance of resporisibllity. I- ifthedetsndants level is.1? or crestor rnrlorto a. . I I . i Case Document 17-1 Flled12I20I04 Page4 8 level for timely acceptance of responsibility; However, the I govemmenfs obligations I I contingent upon the delendant's continuing rnanifestapon of i - I bythe Unihd States. lfhe I I In . denies or gives statements as to his Involvement; falsely- I i denm or frivolously contests relevant conduct that the court I determlnestobetrue, I i otiustioe as detined in U.S.S.G. 361.1 (or wllfully attempts to do I I- so), or engages in additional criminal conduct, the Unltedistatee i I I I . d. Tonot request an upward departure from the applicable sentencing .- gttdellne range it the defendant does not request downward I departure. I lf the defendant breaches or violates this plea agreement or otherwise ltalls to . 2 adhere to its tems, the United States shall not be bound by this paragraph and may !i . . I l. pursueenyaddltional charges well asanyperjuuy, I The defendant understands and agrees that if he violates this plea %mpnt, all statements made by him subsequent to the execution ofthis plea any testimony given bydefendentbeforea grand jury crany tribunal, andany leadsfroinsuch The defendant waives any rights which mightbe asserted I StatesConstitution. any smute. Rule 11(e)(6) ofthe Federal I l??EUR 211Case Document 17-1 Hled 12l20!04 Page 5 ?t8 5 Judge. The United Statescannot make and has not made any promise or repre%enIatl?n i - 2. e. 1;.111 wt 11 am 11 - i new information the defendant provides about tile own criminal conduct ae I specifically authorized by U.S.S.G. 1?1.8. Ae such. this information may be to the court butmay nottre ueed defendant in_deterrqinIng hte applicable guideline range-or departing above his guideline range. Defendant understands however, that underU.S.S.C-t. 1B1.8there sha! be noeuch reetriotl?nsontlreuge'ofthe li infonnatton: (1)previouelyknown tothe Uhibd States; (2) revealed tothe Unmetlstatee by, or discoverable through, an independent source; (3) in a prosecution for perjury or giving a talee statement; (4) tr there is a breach of thte agreement; or (5) in determining - I andto what extent a downward departure as a result ct a government motion i pursuant to 18 $56s(e) or U.s.s.G. 5 5K1.1 is warranted. 2 7. 1rn?.? one of no e-41.1. i . I oourtaocepte thisplea aeentence with which hedoeo notagreeThe defendant undelstandg that a . mandatory peci= per count cf conviction will be entered I- nh ni, - I . Iaterthan day of his guilty ptea. if he fails to matte full payment ofthe - - case 2:04-or-20142-Kl-N Page 6`?1i8 an the provisions contained in section 4(b) oflhis agreement. 'lheburden of astablishingan - inability to pay the required special assessment lies with the defendant. 8. Lx}, an he ne; Defendant voluntarily waives any right to appeal or collaterally attack any`matter in conne?tlon with . - this prosecution and sentence. The defendant is aware that 18 U.s.c. 5 3742 griord . ev the he- -- any right to appeal a sentence is within the guideline range detennlned appropriate by the court. He also waives any right to challenge a sentenoeortlremannerin which inciuiling, but notlimitedto, amotlonbroughtunder28 U.S.C. v. Ccckerham. 237 F.3d 1179, 1187 (10th Ctr. 2001 aswellas any motion bmugght under I r- 18 U.s.c. s582(c)(2). ln other words. he waives the right to appeal the dgentenoe I - 1 . applicable sentencing guideline range detemrined by the court. _H?wever, if United . States exercises its right to appeal the sentence imposed as authorized by 1? U.S.C. 18 u.S.c. 5 3742(a). g` . 1s. The defendant agrees to waive any Lthat Guidehnes (Gtridefrnes). The defendant further waives any rightto have that. a reasonable doubt; thatdetenninethe etienee levelwill found by [hg I court may consider any reliable evidence, inciuding hearsay; and the defendant agreesto waive all challenges tothe validity crtneeuldelinss. I I _11. Thedeiendantwaives all whetherasserted I . . any records pertaining to the investpation or prosecution of this case including,. without limitation, any records that may be sought under me-Freedom of information Act, 5 u.s.c. 552, crthe Privacy Act 0f19Z4, 5 u.s.c. 5 552a. - 12. re. ?r rr nn; vena: The defendant understahda the stem . irdeems eemenceinrnis Th i mayinclude infomation concerning nisbackground, character, and conduct. lncludingthe . entirety of his criminal activities. The defendant understands these not . comments made or positions taken by the defendant or his counsel and to comect any . - - -- r- sr recommendations it deems appropriate regarding the disposition ofthis case, subject only - in this plea agreement V- xr" i agreement only binds him and the United States?Attomey for the District of Kansas Case Document 17-1 Filed 12I20I04 Page Bofb 14. san; tn. Thedefendanthas had I . - i . satistied witt1 the advice and representation provided by counsel. Further. he acknowledges that he has read the plea greement. understands it. and IS true I endaccurateand notthe duress, or coercion. The defendantfurther I . undetstands that this ples agreement supersedes any and all other agieentents or I .. I . negohtions between the parties, and agreement embodies each and everyterm I I I ofthe agreement between the perttes. Tite defendant acknowledges that he is entering I into this agreement and is pleading guity because he guilty and is doing sofreely and . . I I Dm: /2 .. LEON PATTON I Assistant Unhed States Attcmey i I 500 State Avenue. Suite 360 Kansas Gly. Kansas 66101 I I 913-551-8730 . I I Ks. . No.11762 . I I I . A PARKER, No. 77807 - I I Avenue, 8ulte360 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 I I 913-551-6730 DAVIDJ. yi" PS - i Fedeial Pubic Detender I I I I Counsel forbetendant I 8 - .-. QQTII I Case Document 22 Filed 09/14/09 Page ENED COPY 1 United States Attorney - 2 District ofAriz?na I ci. Assistant .5. Attorney RK msn? 5 4 'I\vo Renaissance ICT 0 j_ me gy OF ARQONERT . 5 Phoenix, Ariz??s85004-4408 I .- 6 raapnaas (602) su-vsuo 1 7 i - UNITED STATESDISTRICT COURT 9 5 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 10 'United StatesofAmerica, No- Mwst- lijah Plaintifv10; 1sU.s.c. 5242 i Countl?D as I 14 Defendant. llnder 15 THE UNITED STATES I6 At all times material to this infomation: - . 17 l. On November 5, 2008, an election was held in Montgomery County, Kansas, to elect .. be . 19 I Presidency. The qualified voters in this election had fights guaranteed by the Constitution and 20 lavvs ofthe United States to havethe election oflricials in Montgomery County, Kansas, count i zi thcirvotesandl - theelectionbasedonthe ea es. as .. z? 2. Defendant, JAMES A. MARSHALL, was not eligible to vote in the Kansas 24 election bccausehewasanArizona resideuttltathadalreadyvotcd inthe November election .. - -..- --.- --.- 26 3. JAMES A. MARSHALL voted in Kansas by mailing avote-by-mail ballot to Kansas . Case Document 22 Filed Page 2 of 2 A .. 1 COUNT ONE . 2 0 4. On orabout, October 22, 2008, inthe District ofArimna, the JAMES A. A 3 MARSHALL, voted in the election which was held on November 5, 2008, in Montgomery 4 state, andlocal offices, includingeandidatesfor- 5 A the United States Presidency, and thereby knowingly and williitlly caused election oficials in 6 1 Montgomery County, Kansas, who were acting under color of law, to deprive the qualified .7. I 8 United States to have their votes tabulated and counted in that election, tree hom the dilution 9 to MA1tst>>1Au.. ll All in violstionof Title 18 Section 242 ofthe United States Code. iz A ,2009.-` - 13 . . g. 14 . 10ljN J. TUCHI .AssistantU.S. Attorney -mi- Case 4:09-cr-01 526-BPV Document 39 Filed Page 1 of 2 UNIIED OF ARIZONA I United Stats 0fAm?rI? I I V- JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE I JAMESAMARSHALL I (Nm, yd g&img NoAliitd Domus (Rewind) I: TE DEFENDANT ENTEREI) A PLEA OFv??1i?t= wfsnulty uw I THERF WAS A: E- judgment cfaqquiml as to c?unt(s .- I ACCORDINGLY, THE COURT HAS ADJUDICATED THAT THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF THE FOLLOWING 0 viol?ingTitlo I Z-- I I CRIMINAL MONETARY -- I Attn:Fm?m?' St. SPC1,Ph?omx,` Arizona I $5003-2118, the km uml criminal I I SPECIAL $25.00 PHE: $1000.00 RESTITUTION: NIA . I Umilall and E1 noti the I I baden! lcuchasbecn c0}Il= ocp0?vl?c0probmmN ofbccinthodismct I I 1??o It is.tI1?.c?d?roftinCm?tthat, pursumtw Gcn??aI0rdcr05-36, a?dSDL2,y?u . -.- . ..-.--.. -.. .. .. thrive days monthYcushall . masonsbjv1h?`C?mt` I in special condition of supervision. . I I 9) I h?nnlm"_ a - - ofcamrellsd I- 10) I wmawmmn - . Case Document 39 Filed 12l01I09 Page 2 of 2 QQ GR PBQB 2 of 2 - USA vs. JAMESA MARSHALL 13) YoushalIimm?dint?ly??diythc?Q arrested orquestiomd by law odlocr. - -. 14) . 15) Asdiroctadl th?pmbatmn' oillocr, :haIl?otiQthird be cuionodby pencul 17) supervisjon a ??mO2) rcpon person U.S.C. Q. THE DEFENDANT PREVIOUSLY RIGHT T0 APPEAL trict. 1 . - I I Date oflm ofSeutenoe 0vember24,2009 . . BERN 'oo I Il ?opym .. QQ. . - .. M. .- --.-- 1 Case Document 25 Filed 09I14l09 Page 1 of 8 . A . RECEIVED COPY 1 A 2 1 District mama squm . CLERK D1sTmg?UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA I 9 United States of America, - . (BPV) 1 10 1 . 1 PLEA AGREEMENT . 1 1 13 . uermam. 14 . Plaintiff United States ofAmerica, and defendant, JAMES A. hereby Defendant will plead guilty to Count 1 ofthe Infomation which charges a violation of . I 18 Title Section 242, Deprivation ofRights UnderColm? ofLaw, aClassAmisdemeanor 19Defmdant considertheUnited States Sentencing .. . .. . . . . . .. -. Sentencing Guidelines,1he Cou1?tumybeii?eeto exercise 25 its discretion to impose any reasonable sentence up to _set_l1;gt_angtg 26 of conviction I Case Document 25 Filed 09/14/violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 242, is punishable by a 3 I maximumiineof$100,000, ofimprisonmentof one year, orbotlaandaterm 4 I of supervised release of up to one year. I 5 b. According to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, the court shallSim? Fw . 2 wana nuns ease; 9 I (2) 10 supervised release ai incarceration, unless, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 11 3572, the Court Ends upon consideration ofthe factors therein and in Section 3553 that a line 12 is not appropriate; I - 1.3 (3) Orderthedefendant, pursuantto Title 18, UnitedStatesCode, Section3583 I-Y . 14 15 imposed, andthe courtmayimposeaterm ofsupervised 16 retaae inallothercases. 17 c. Pursuant to Title -18, United States Code, Section 3013, the court is required to I 18 imposeaspecialassessmentontite defendant of$25.00. Thespecial assessment isdueatthe - Leiter- I YQ 24 I shall receive . Case Document 25 Filed 09/14/09 Page ifthe dcem lfthe court, after reviewing this plea agreement, concludes that any provision is 9 inappropriate, it may reject the plea agreement, giving defendant, in accordance with 10 lied. R. Crim. P. an opportunity to withdraw me guilty plea. ji. e. 12 disclosure- to the Probation Department of the surrounding the defendants i 13 commission ofthe otfense, and ifthe defendant demonstrates an acceptance otresponsibiuty 1 .14 i and includingthetiine ofsentencing, a 15- two-point reduction in the applicable advisory Guideline o&`ense level, pursuant to Section 16 3El.1(a) ofthe advisory 17 tz agreement is 18 fewer than criminal history points. defendant has 4 or more criminal history points the govemment shall have the right to withdraw hom this agreemento.c1f.ot1uf - 21 1 PursuanttoFed.R.EUR1t?itn. P. the United Stateswilldismiss Counts 1 through -- 1 1 .- 1? 1- 1 1111 1 1 .1 11 11 1 11111 1 1111 24 1 Thedefendant waivesanyandall motions, 26 entry of judgment against the defendant and imposition of sentence upon the defendant, ZZ za nt-ight to appeal the Com-t's entry ofjudgment against defendant; (2) any llul Case Document 25 Filed Page imposition of sentence upon defendant under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3742 2 (sentence appeals); and (3) any right to collateraily attack defendanfs conviction and sentence i 3 \1nderTitle 28, United States Code, Section 2255, or other collateral attack. The defendant 4 I 6 5. [jg, Ul;- nu.! util; i `1 4 ilcil ti `o Litt'. SVT LL Ulill i - 7 o);u3t -- 5- 10 defendant after the dm of agreement. 'Aay information, suneznems, documents, and Qj 1 evidence States pursuanttotltisagreemem maybeused defendant's plea is rejected, withdrawn, vacated, or reversed at any time, the i 15 United States will be Hee to prosecute the defendant all charges ofwhich ithas knowledge, . 16 and any charges'that have been dismissed because ofthis plea will be automatically . 17 Insuch ev t, defendarntwaivesanyobjections, motions, ordefensesbaseduponthe I 18 1 Statute of Limitations, the Speedy Trial Act or restrictions in bringing later 1 Gh8l*g0S-0F- l? 20 . 21- hearing, trial 22 7. I JA QJ tu-; .i TL- Bitcooperation will include tsuthful questions Probation . 25 I Depanment including Case Document 25 liiled 09I14I09 Page 5 of 8 1 b. All financial information, present iinancial assets or liabilities that relate All history ofmentalillnessorconditions which wouldwarrantatreatment 6 condition as a part of sentencingforfeiture proceedings or prohibit the United States from proceeding with and/or 10 initiating an action for civil foi?t`eiture. 11 b. Further, this agreement does not preclude the United States ii?om any 12 - . 13 o.iJ;tn.n . tv swcounsel: and its provisions. I . 16 Ilhavediscussedthec I 17 *1 understand that by entering my plea of guilty 1 will be giving up my rights to plead not guilty, .18 l- 19 20 all withthe assistance of counsel 21- 1 innocentluntil proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. . . . 24 Ihave been advised by my attorney ofthe nature of die to which 1 am entering 26- possible sentence and that my ultimate sentence will be determinedatter consideration of the . 27. I my Guisieline Renserefermed to herein or 28 discussed with my attcmey is not binding on the court and is merely Case Document 25 Filed 09/14/09 Page 6 of 8 - 2 1 promises contained intbis agreement. Iagreetotheprovisions ofthis agreementas avoluntary 3 i 4 5 . court, thetenns of such probation/supervised release aresubjecttomoditication . 6 .at any time. I iirrther understand ifI violate any of the-conditions of my lv . 8 revocation, notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, I may be required to serve 9 - 10 - 1 1 ?and that promis made by anyone (including my attorney), specifically any predictions as 12 .to the guideline range applicable, that are not `contained within this mi@ plea agreement are 13 without force effect andare null and voidhilly capable of understanding the terms and conditions of this plea agreement. I 16? 17 depressant, lil plea ageement. 2Q 21 be required to prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt before the defendant .. 24 THAT TM knvwinaly and willfully acted under color of law, statute, . 26 district ofrights, privileges, andiinmunities and laws Case Document 25 Filed 09/14/09 Page 7 of 8 1 TheUnited Stateswould ofthe evidence, 2 4 I acknowledge that an election was held in Montgomery County, Kansas, on November 5 5, 2008, forthepurpose of selecting md electing candidates for Federal, State, and local ohices. 6 I acknowledge that this election involved candidates for the United States Presidency. I - laws.?fthe?t?ts9f. . 8_ Kansas, could cast ballots for candidates at the November 5, 2008, election. I 9 i C?imty.Katn??, forthe November sm muon, 10 were tabulated and certiied by the election officials in Montgomery County, Kansas. ll trictofArizona,Ivoted intheNovember S, 12 Kansas. 13 1 Arizonato the election officials in Kansas. I was not eligible to vote in Kansas because I was 14 I an Arizona resident ti18t'l18d voted in the November 5, 2008, election in.Arizona. I 15 -thereforel??1owingly inMontgorne1yCounty,Kansas,who 16 _were acting color of low, todeprive the qualiied voters of Montgoinery County, Kansas, 17 oftheirrights underthe Constitution and laws of the United States to have their votes - . 18 andcountedinthatelection, tieefromthe dilution 19 i the invalid ballot I cast..--. gig Case 4:09icr-01526-BPV Document 25 Filed 09/14/09 Page have discussed this case and the plea agreement with my client, in detail and have 3 4 5 guilty plea will be entered, possible defenses, andthe consequences ofthe guilty plea including the requirements of Iied. R. CrimAttorney for Defendant JOHN J. TUCHI 'c1oAssistant U.S. Attorney 4 Case Document 28 Fi - i mso LODGED RECEIVED COPY 1 la. Unitedgtates Attorney I A 2 District ofAr?iz?na 3 1 4 No Renaissance Sgusre BY DEPU I 40 North Central Avenue. Suite t200 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4408 I Arizona State Bar?No. 023050 _6 'i`elephone(602) 514-7500 2 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT . - - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ted State fAmeri -- Ns 1 A II I Plaintift; - - . - 1 IHEQBMAIIQH *2 i vro; 18 u.s.c. 5 242` I3 Karens. Marshall, Comm - Defendant. . {lnder Color of Law) . a 15 mauurran sums Arrorumv crmtoasz . 16 At all times material to this information: 17 A 1. On November 5, 2008, is election was held in Montgomery County, Kansas,'to elect 2 did8I?S 19 Presidency. 'I`he qualified voters in this election had rights guaranteed by the Constitution and 20 laws of the United States to have the eieetion officials in Montgomery County, Kansas, count . l' . '.1ii.'i 23 i 24 election becauseshevvas anAriaona votedinthe November .-.. 26 3. KAREN S. voted in Kansas by mailing avote-by?mai1ballottoKansas is- -mnm-.-- - i Case Docu ment28 Filed Page 2 of2 . 1 I comvr om: I 2 it 4. Onorabout, October22, s. 3 MARSHALL, voted in the election which was held on November 5, 2008, in Montgomery 4 County, local onieenieenuding candidates for 5 the United States Presidency, and thereby knowingly and willfully caused election officials in QQ 6 Montgomery County, Kansas, who were acting under color of law, to deprive the qualified 7 ofthe 8 I United States to have their votes tabulated and counted in that election, free from the dilution 9 l0 ll AlIinviol?tionofT'1t1e 18 Section 242 ofthe United stereo Code. I2 _l_L"dey 2009101-1:41 rucrn . m>x.woo I 1 U.S. Attorney - I Case Document 38 Filed 12/01/09 Pa 1 of 2 DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 United S?1erofAr?or?iea - xvusoews/mon V- JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE I. KARENSMARSHALL (Nm. No. unqn-mean - a ENTERID A . uotguiItyutoeoum(|) THEREWAS A: i 5 Ending [3 verdict: ofguiltyano o?motiouoftheU?ii?dSt?t??. - AOCORDINGLY, Tm COURT HAS ADJUDICATED THAT THE DEFENDANT GUILTY OF THE FOLLOWING it OFFENSKS): . CRIMINAL MONETARY PENALTIES 5 the Dieu-ie: Aim: Finm Suime ISO, 401 St., SPC1, Phoemx,' Arizona . on - . . asreameutsaod in 1 spc?llol comm Iiypud, dimbmw o?1heCounorprob?ion oflioer.6) reasons. . 7) Yourhallnotibihe . Case Document 38 Filed 12I01I09 Page 2 of 2 . PGQB 2 of 2 USA vs. KAREN MARSHALL 10) places 1116) dmgamuweapcnU.S.C. 14135a(a)(2). I THILEFENDANT PREVIOUSLY WAIVEDHISRIGHT *1*0 APPEALDateof ititmbf yr - 4-4 1 VS1nermumaeuma mma the t? :itae-..- .. Case Document 31 Filed 09/1 4/09 Page RECEIVED copy 1 I I I 2 1 nnmonmra woo I 4 1 3 I i Suite 1200 CLERK DISTRIQT . STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 I DISTRICT OF ARIZONA - EL 1 United States of Aineriea, . CR09-1526-TUC-CKJ (BPV) 1 10 Plaiutii i - PLEAAGREEMENT 11 V- i. 12 i Karen Marshall, . 13 1 ?1>eren?ini. I4 1 Plaintiff United States of America, and defendant, KAREN S. MARSHALL, hereby 15 agree to the following disnosition of this matter: i . 16 ug 17 Defendant will plead guilty to Count 1 ofthe Information which charges a violation of 18 Title 18U.S.C. Section 242, Deprivaticnof Color ofLaw;aC1assAmisdemear1or zo mam. 21 United States Sentencing sentence. 24 1 advisory, andthat aiter considering the Sentencing Guidelines, the exercise . 25 26 1 of conviction- Case Document 31 Filed Magnum gnupg 2 a. A violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 242, is punishable Accordingto the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, the court shall: 6 (1) seunless, 7_ pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3663, the court determines that restitution I 9 (2) Orderthe defendantto pay atine, vvhichmay include thecosts ofprobation, 10` supervised release or incarceration, unless, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 11 3572, the Court tinds upon consideration ofthe factors therein and in Section 3553 that a tine I2 is not appropriate - 13 (3) Orderthe defendant, pursuanttoTit1e 18, United States Code, Section 3583 14 15 i a 16 releaseinallothercases. 17 c. Pursuant to Title 18,.Uni11ed States Code, Section 3013, the court is required to 18 impose a special assessment on the defendant of $25.00. 'I'he special assess?ent_is_dt__1e? of 20 sentencing. 1 gonPura uant `defendant 24 A shall receive probation 25 b. zga that'the'United states is not binding on thecourt Case Document 31 Filed 09/14/09 Page 3 of 8 -- 2 if the court intposes asentence United States recommends theldefendant 3 will not be permitted to withdraw the guilty pleaFed. R. Crim. P. an opportunity to withdraw the guilty plea. i 11 1 e. 1?.num1?g111e defendant makes nm an complete 12 disclosure to the Probation Department of tl?1e surrounding the defendant' 13 cornmission ofthe offense, and if the defendant demonstrates an acceptance of responsibility K- 14 15 two-point reduction in the applicable advisory Guideline offense level, pursuant to Section 16 A 3E1.l(a) ofthe advisory Guidelines. - 17 ti This agreement is conditioned on defendant having 18 fewer than 4 history points. If defendant has 4 or more . 20 3. acxlaatu. to1>> . nz i 21- Pursusntto Fed. R. Crim. P. the United States will dismiss Counts 1 through . [mil 23'1`hedefendant waivesanyand all motions, defenses, probablecausedetenninadonnand . . . ..25. 26 i entry of judgment against the defendant and imposition of sentence upon the defendant, 27 1 is (1)any 28 right to appeal the Ccurt's entry of judgment against defendant; (2) any right to appeal the . 1 . . - . Case Document 31 Filed 09l14/09 Page imposition of sentence upon defendant under Title l8, United States Code, Section 3742 -2 I (sentence appeals); and (3) any right to collaterally attack defendant's conviction and sentence 3 I under Title 28, United States Code,'Seetion 2255, orany other collateral attack. The defendant I 4 I acknowledges that this waiver shall result in the dismissal of any appeal orcollateral attackthe 3 6 5. tm usgs o.ClU'rx oemig: I 7- I mu amslal; 8? . 9 I prosecution for perjury, false declarationorfalse statement, orany otheroffense committedby 10 I defendant after the date of this agreement. Any information, statements, documents, and evidencewhich defendantprovidestothe Unitedstatespursuanttothis agreeinentmaybeuaed IUnitedStates 16 andanyeha1?gestbathavebeen dismissed because ofthis plea agreement willbe automatically I 17 I reinstated. In such event, defendant waives any objections, motions, or based upon the I 18 I Statute of Limitations, the Speedy Trial Act or constitutional restrictions inbringing ofthe later -..- 20 i 21 I .. 22 .1.-. fully "orneei sushi 1 . 24 I cooperation will includetruthful statements inresponseto any questions posed bythe Probation 25 I Department including, but not limited to: "Allcr1m1nal` 27 summing euteeunes. 2* - I a -.1 Case Document 31 Filed 09/14/09 Page 5 of 8 b. All iinancial information, present financial assets or liabilities that relate to 2 - 3 c. All history ofdrug abusewhich would warrant a treatment condition as part of 5 d. 6 condition as a part of entencing. 7 8. &o in Multi forfeiture proceedings or prohibit the United States nom proceeding with and/or 10 i an action for civil forfeitureIhavereadeachofthe provisions ofthe 15 1 counsel and xmderstand its provisions. - - __l6 17 18 to trial to coniiont, cross-examine. and compel the attendance er vvi to1?e_s_e_nt_ 20 my privilege assistance of counsel--?anclto bepresumed 21 i innocentuntil proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. li 24 . . by .Qfth? nature. andrange ofthe .. i I I 26 possible sentence and that ultimate sentence will be consideration ofthe 27; advisory Sentencing Guidelines. I understand any Guideline Range referred to herein or 28] i Case Dobument 31 Filed Page eourgtheterms and conditions ofsuch probation/supervised releasearesubjecttomodiication 6 7 -probation/supervised release, my probation/supervised release may be revoked and upon such 8 revocation, notwithstanding any other provision ofthis agreement, I may be required to serve 9 a term of imprisoninent or my sentence may otherwise be altered. 10 4 Iagreethat this writtenplea agreementcontainsall thetermsandconditions ofmy plea 11 . 12 this agreementare 14 - 15 yd 1 am iirlly capable of understanding the terms and conditions plea agreement. I 16 in 17 depressant, which would ofthis ji 18 1 plea agreementrequired to prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt before the de@d_a_nt__ . .. . .. . . . . . I if 1, Deprivation of Under Color of Lavv - 24 .. . .. . EE, meanmbraua me eiums era certain aww .. 26 i district ofrights, privileges, and imm1mities'sccured andprotected by the Constitution and laws 27 ofthe varied scam; - . 2* .ly.y .lyr . . 1 5