Building The Wall The Strategy Way Forward March 27, 20.17 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Agenda Overview Current Status Reprogramming Priorities FY 2017 Priorities FY 2018 Priorities @2 Homeland 2mg Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY Wall Overview Current?Status Per the President?s Executive Order: ?secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern Current state: 654 miles of fencing 354 miles of pedestrian fence 300 miles of vehicle fence ~1300 miles without border barrier ~12? miles are unsuitable for construction ~33 miles of bluffs in Big Bend Sector ~59 miles of lakes in'Texas ~35 miles in the Pacific Ocean Gulf of Mexico Remaining miles are being evaluated by USBP through the Capability Gap Analysis Process 0% s?r Homeland 5 ?r OFFICIAL USE ONLY Summary Budget Amount (in thousands) Reprogramming $20,000 FY 2017 $999,000 Amendment FY 2018 ~$2,600,000 Blueprint (funds include wall and additional investments) Homeland "hr 40" OFFICIAL USE ONLY Anticipated Outcomes Multiple wall prototypes to inform border barrier toolkit future construction efforts Wall design standards to expand the current border barrier toolkit Real estate and environmental planning and design for: - Levee wall and new border barrier system in Rio Grande Valley (RGV) Sector . Completion of enforcement zone in San Diego Continue real estate and environmental planning and design for high priority miles in the RGV and Tucson (TCA) andior El Paso (EPT) Sectors Construct 34 new miles of levee wall and border barrier system in RGV Construct ~14 miles of border barrier in San Diego (replace secondary fence with wall) Construct ~14 miles of border barrier in San Diego (replace primary fence) Construct 71 new miles of border barrier in RGV and TCA and/or EPT Sectors Reprogramming @a Homeland '13 ?5 mm OFFICIAL USE ONLY Acquisition Strategy Wall Prototype Why prototype? Industry-tested approach to define the best solution when considering a new product or methodology Why two Requests for Proposals Maximizes industry?s opportunity to bid Increases competition Encourages small business participation More defensible and consistent evaluation process - compares apples to apples RFP #1 Reinforced Concrete RF #2 Unspecified Materials Homeland Securtty OFFICIAL USE ONLY Wall Prototype Schedule - 4f12/201? 5f12f2017 3f29f201? Down Select Design Proposals 5/3Uf2017 7932017 Concept to to 20 Received from Sou rce $141201? Prototype Solicitation Papers Vendors Down Selected Selection Contracts Construction to Industry Due Complete Vendors Decision Awarded Completes 1 v_ . 4f1f2017 5f1f201? 3f1f2017 if31i201? 6,16,!2017 6f22f201? Congressional Prototype Notifications Construction issued Begins Two parallel processes for two-phased evaluation and award for each RFP - Multiple awards result from each RFP Evaluation timelines are estimated at two weeks for each stage Dependent upon volume of proposals - fun, a Homeland U: OFFICIAL USE ONLY 7 ?t Wall Prototype Location - SDC Why San Diego? Allows CBP to evaluate: Performance relative to underperforming legacy materials in the same location (800+ breaches in a single year) Performance as it relates to the reduction in vanishing time Prototype impact on operations in an existing enforcement zone Readily executable clue to Federally-owned land lg)? Homeland OFFICIAL USE ONLY Prototype Construction Location A 1 . ?h Cockatoo - a ?r i H, Hutu un?Sat 0990 who I M. ?x ta . Securit prototype construction location is bounded by green diamonds PREDECISIO OFFICIAL USE ONLY Prototype Construction Location Expected prototype construction 3 location Homeland Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY 1O Prototype Location Expected prototype construction loca?on Homeland ME Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY 11 Applying Sound Acquisition Management Practices to the Wall DHS and CBP are already executing the deliberative acquisition process called out in DHS Management Directive 102-01 An Acquisition Review Board (ARB) occurred on March 20, 2017 to approve Acquisition Decision Event One (ADE-1). the Department reviews the broadly?defined requirements and authorizes more deliberative and detailed requirements definition, analysis of alternatives, and deveIOpment of a program structure. The wall prototypes currently planned will support the analyses and activities that must occur between ADE-1 and CBP anticipates reaching the ADE-2A milestone in the summer 2017. Approval at ADE-2A will establish the Wall program as a formal ?program of recor and authorize more complete development and deployment of Wall segments. Specific deployments may be authorized in increments, if appropriate iiu'l'y?, Homeland is OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12 go Homeland my? Securlty FY 2017 Request RGV and SDC OFFICIAL USE ONLY 13 U.S. Border Patrol Requirements USBP is completing a full spectrum requirements analysis with the John?s Hopkins Capability Gap Analysis Process (CGAP). The result of this process will identify priority locations for border barrier. . Key components of this process Top 4 Priority Areas: include: . Domain awareness Questionnaire . Impedance Denial Dt t? tation aa ap ure Access&Mobility Station Solution Prioritization . Readiness Geospatial Information Master Capability Survey Threat Survey Homeland 5 OFFICIAL USE ONLY 14 U.S. Border Patrol Requirements Each Sector is gathering: Geographic Prioritization Investment Prioritization reconciliation of solution sets Courses of Action (COA) development, analysis, trade-offs, recommendations Geographic! Refinement of Interactive . . Investment Priorities Geospatlal Planning Tool 1. Red Very High 2. Orange High 3. Yellow - Moderate Homeland a 5: 9%rs??f USE ONLY 15 FY 2017 Request Overview - RGV While USBP is in the process of Why finalizing requirements for border . . . barrier, we have preliminary identified RGV '3 the priority USBP Sector needs in RGV- RGV Initial Requirements Document Identifies Rio Grande City, McAllen, and Weslaco Stations as Priority Stations Construction of ~28 miles of levee wall in the McAIlen and Weslaco Station Areas of Responsibility . (AOR) Supported by Analysis Construction Of miles 0f border Terrain/environmental Analysis barrier system in the Rio Grande City . (RGC) and McAllen Station AOR to urban center roa 5 Real estate and environmental . planning and design of ~47 Short adversary vanishing additional miles of new border barrier times system in RGC Station AOR and t' I t' TCA and/or EPT (FY 2013 '9 9? or a 5? . ?o??es construction) Homeland am Securlty (4 FY 2017 Priorities Map - RGV RGV Priority Areas For Border Barrier Construction 2. Homeland . I Emma; OFFICIAL USE ONLY 17 FY 2017 Request Overview - SDC USBP has also identified Why San Diego? milea in SDC for construct'on: I Readily executable due to ~14 miles of enforcement Federally-owned land zone in SDC in the Imperial Beach and Chula Vista Station Supported by Ana'ySiS AORs .. Terrain/environmental 14 miles of new border barrier (replacing Proximity to urban center secondary fence) roads 14 miles of border barrier Short adversary vanishing replacement (replacing times primary legacy landing High Sector/Station solution priorities Homeland wt OFFICIAL USE ONLY 18 mat) in2017 Priorities Map - SDC . - V?h 4 Homeland Biue strip indicates Border Infrastructure System, the Securit PREDECISION OFFICIAL USE ONLY location for new and replacement border barrier construction 19 FY 2018 Request RGV and TCA and/0r ELP Homqland 9%me OFFICEAL USE ONLY 20 FY 2018 Request Overview - RGV While USBP is in the process of finalizing requirements for border barrier, we have preliminary identified needs in RGV. Construction of ~47 additional miles of new border barrier system in the RGC Station AOR Why RGV is the priority USBP Sector RGV Initial Requirements Document Identifies Rio Grande City, McAllen, and Weslaco Stations as Priority Stations Supported by Analysis Terrain/environmental Analysis Proximity to urban center roads Short adversary vanishing times High Sector/Station solution priorities Homeland Emmet? Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY 21 FY 2018 Priorities Map - RGV RGV Priority Areas For Border Barrier Construction - . . ClubHomeland we: OFFICIAL USE ONLY ?to-H Ltd'- FY 2018 Request Overview El Paso and Tucson Sectors ~24 miles of additional border barrier system construction can be accomplished with the FY 2018 request. USBP will prioritize these miles between: Tucson (TCA) Sector and/or El_ Paso (EPT) Sector Homeland a My Securlty ?4 Why To deny drug trafficking organizations (DTO) cross-border access and thereby prevent armed conflicts between U.S.-based rip crews and armed mules with the Sinaloa Cartel To deny DTOs the ability to execute muIti-vehicle/high-volume and extremely dangerous drive throughs Denying DTOs these abilities will dramatically improve agent safety and public safety Why Improve deficient impedance and denial capability and initiate same in critical areas where none exists. OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2.3 FY 2018 Priorities Map TCA EPT United States Southwest Border - MI(ran in . . fir-9" If-" .. avauig' Mug3?Homeland '5 We? OFFICIAL USE ONLY 24 Homeland L3) Security BACK UP OFFICIAL USE ONLY 25 The Enforcement Zone v? .93 i. Homeland .. game? OFFICIAL USE ONLY 26 Homeland mug Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY 27 Border Infrastructure System SDC Homeland Securlty OFFICIAL USE ONLY 28 Sample Border Barrier Homeland g- 3m OFFICIAL USE ONLY 29 Homeland Security