FILED 17 APR 25 PM 12:20 Hon Veronica?? 3.103 Defendant?s gE Noted for Consideration. Wednes ay, 9 SEA .JJ SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY D.H., No. Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF MALAIKA M. V. EATON IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR MAYOR EDWARD MURRAY, SANCTIONS Defendant. I, MALAIKA M. EATON, declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that the following statements are true and correct and based on personal knowledge: 1. I am one of the attorneys for Defendant Mayor Edward Murray in the above-captioned case and am competent to testify to the matters set forth herein. 2. Attached hereto and incorporated by reference in Defendant?s Motion for Sanctions are true and correct copies of the following: Exhibit A: Newspaper article, ?Subpoena alleges cover-up in incident at mayor?s home,? dated April 25, 2015, authored by Lewis Kamb and Jim Brunner, staff reporters for the Seattle Times; and Exhibit B: Letter, dated April 19, 2017, from Robert M. Sulkin to Lincoln Beauregard. DATED this 25th of April, 2017, at Seattle, Washington. MW if Malaika M. Eaton, WSBA No. 32837 LAW OFFICES OF DECLARATION OF MALAIKA M. EATON IN SUPPORT OF MCNAUL BEEF NAWRRT PLLC DEFEND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS Page 1 600 Stleet, Suite 270p Seattle, Washington 98101-3143 (206) 467-1816 gd25ef03p5 2017-04-25 Exhibit A Exhibit LAW LIMITED CUMMNY 600 UNIVERSITY 2700 WASHINGTON 93iDlu314l3 tram-noun: (200) {567-1516 (9.06) 6114-5128 Rosntu M. Susana - Direct (206) 389?93535 MALAIKA M. Enron Direct (206) April 19, 2017 van artiste Mr. Lincoln Beauregard Corntelly Law Of?ces 2301 North 30th Street Tacoma, Washington 98403 Re: DELVONN Hecman V. MAYOR EDWARD MURRAY Dear Mr. Beauregard: We received a copy of your April 18 letter item a reporter who contacted us about it after you apparently told the press that you had sent it to us. Given that you did not send us this letter until this morning, you must have been mistaken in so informing members of the press. We have also now seen the amended complaint you prepared on behalf of your client, again provided to us by the press after you sent it to them. Mayor Murray denies any inappropriate contact with minors or having ever paid for sex. The amended complaint re~ alleges a central component of the original there was a particular feature on the anatomy of Mayor Murray. This allegation has been proven false after a medical exam. Your response has been to question the integrity ot?Mayor Murray?s cloctor?-?despite his sterling reputation and long career. Mayor, Murray is willing to be examined by an independent doctor at the University of Washington. When the exam shows that your client?s allegations are false, we would expect you to drop your complaint. Please let us know if you are willing to do so. i?iuvxi? Mr. Limoln Bcaaiuregm'd Com-why Law Of?ces April 19, 2017 Raga: 3 'Iil'inaliy, your apparent Statements that Mayor Murray is taking mam-ley from his campaign funds for this matter are categorically 'falsc. Please- provide any support you have for this Claim. Sii'zgml?? Ru 4337113111, 53mm Muiuika M. Eamn MM?rr-ml gd19E1515fn.002 2017-04-19