STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CARDELL HAYES IN RE CCRP ART 66 SUBPOENA CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ORLEANS CASE NO.: 528-975 SEC. MOTION TO QUASH Now into court, comes Tiffany Lacroix, through undersigned counsel, moves that this Honorable Court quash the subpoena issued by the District Attorney in the above entitled case based upon the following: 1. The subpoena does not conform to the statutory requirements of La. Art. 66; 2. The subpoena does not meet the ?reasonable grounds? threshold required by La. Art. 66. Respect?illy submitted, 7 661) anthonyibert cIBlawre( om JAMES C. LAWREN JR. (#8142) 303 South Broad Street New Orleans, LA 7011 9 Telephone: (504) 822-1359 Facsimile: (504) 822-38 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the above and foregoing pleading has been forwarded to all counsel of record by facsimile, by hand delivery this day, or by depositing a copy thereof, postage prepaid on this 2- nZday of lez'ym ANTHONY J. RT 0. pm? vaepg 20155 the United States mail, addressed to them STATE OF LOUISIANA CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT VERSUS PARISH OF ORLEANS CARDELL HAYES CASE NO.: 528-975 SEC. IN RE CCRP ART 66 SUBPOENA HEARING 0 RD ER IT IS ORDERED, based on the above showing and for other good cause, that the Motion to Quash is to be heard on the day of November, 2016, at 9 am in Section of the Criminal District Court. ?p New Orleans, Louisiana, this 2 2 day of Wows. JUDGE L- STATE OF LOUISIANA CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT VERSUS PARISH OF ORLEANS HAYES CASE NO.: 528-975 SEC. IN RE CCRP ART 66 SUBPOENA MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT In support of her motion to quash Ms. Lacroix offers the following: Facts: On Novemberr 27, 2016, Ms. Lacroix was given what appears to be an Art. 66 subpoena by a New Orleans Police Of?cer at her home. (Ex. 1). The subpoena does not appear to have been issued by the Clerk of Court as required by Art. 66. Reasons: a. The subpoena does not meet the statutory requirements of Art. 66. La. Art. 66 states in pertinent part: Upon written motion of the attorney general or district attorney setting forth reasonable grounds therefor, the court may order the clerk to issue subpoenas directed to the persons named in the motion, ordering them to appear at a time and place designated in the order for questioning by the attorney general or district attorney respectively, concerning any offense under investigation by him. The court may also order the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum. Service of a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum issued pursuant to this Article upon motion of the attorney general may be made by any commissioned investigator from the attorney general's of?ce, or in conformity with Article 734 of this Code. (Emphasis Added). In the instant case the subpoena does not appear on its face to be issued by the clerk of court. b. The subpoena fails to meet the ?reasonable cause? requirements established by Art. 66 subpoenas The subpoena does not appear to have been issued in connection with the above case number as there is no entry upon the Court?s Docketmaster System indicating the request or order. (Ex. 2). Such request would need to be accompanied facts reciting reasonable grounds to issue the subpoena. In State v. Lee the Louisiana Supreme Court held that when an Art. 66 subpoena is issued the issuing party must be held to the same probable cause standards as a warrant if the subpoena is to gather physical evidence. State v. Lee, 976 So. 2d 109, 125. The court went so far as to say with respect to physical evidence from a person, ?Regardless, even assuming a subpoena duces tecum may - constitute the functional equivalent of a search warrant in some circumstances, the application at a minimum must rest upon a showing of probable cause, not simply the ?reasonable grounds? required by art. 66. Thus the application must contain within its four comers the facts establishing the existence of probable cause.? Id. Here, the State has commanded the presence of Ms. Lacroix without any reason and without ?reasonable grounds? which in this instance could be less than probable cause. K.) THEREFORE, given that the State does not appear to have issued a request with supporting ?reasonable grounds? Ms. Lacroix prays that the Court quash the subpoena. Respectfully submitted, anthonyiberto 'clawr . .com JAMES C. AWRE 303 South Broad Street New Orleans, LA 70119 Telephone: (504) 822-1359 Facsimile: (504) 822-3861 A IMPRISONMENT MAY BE IMPOSED- FOR- FAILURE TO OBEY THIS NOTICE. Of?ce oE'the O-tleans Parish District Attorney CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS Loom You Ate Hereby Noti?ed pursuant to aret 66 to appear Lactate the Discrict Attorney For the Parish of OI leans, to testify to the truth according to prom knowledge in- such matters Its-may he required oFyou- at fez/Meaty to Assistant DIstrict Attorney: phone at 619 South VII-bite Street I I In the-case of! State Itemii Caseit ChergEIS)= 710 I I moisten: 11?er In?" col-P Fur.? algal-If tr at?! In. . Ismael; tars sass It?new [1 31 aI My ?113 as; 91in 1111? 1 Upith I i'qi. ??wf 131$;qu 113.1 5; t?isting a?ft' rigid ?.15 the?: Is} Iii}? r9133}? JII ?fe RETURN OF PERSONAL SERVICE THIS [5 TO CERTIFY that on recered the process of Court of which this is a duplicate. Recipient of Service THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on I made due Personal Service thereof by leaving same in the hands of the aforesigned Recipient (pieose write Recipient?s name), the person to whom the process is directed. Server of Process RETURN OF DOMICILIARY SERWCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on I received the process of Court of which this is- a duplicate. Recipient of?Service THIS IS TO CERTIFY that on I made due Personal Service thereof by leaving same in the he kip" be the aforesigned Recipient (please write Recipient?s name), a person ofsultable age and discretion. residing at the domicile of the person to whom the said process of Court was issued who was abs'ent at the time which Fact I learned by Interrogatlng the person in whose hands the said process was left. Server of Process Ex I Case: 5 Section: Class: 2 CNTS 1 HAYES, DATE 04/28/2616 64/29/2616 65/64/2616 65/18/2016 65/26/2616 w: ?3 28975 b?C A Time: 12:36:69 ORLEANS PARISH CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT c?omu-n l: 1.: 39535:: a an: t! CARDELL A 1 RS 14 (27)39.1 BOND: 259,999.99 ATT 2ND DEGREE MURDER 1 Rs 14 39.1 BOND: 1,999,999.99 2ND DEGREE MURDER 1 IRS 14 55 BOND: 259,999.99 AGG CRIMINAL DAMAGE To PROPERTY 1 RS 14 37.4 BOND: 259,699.99 AGG ASSAULT NITH A FIREARM PROCEEDINGS #111 I: SHANKLINL FILED TE PAPERWORK FILED (M-555992, 999: 68-26-87, ARRAIGNMENT SET FOR 94-28-16. :3 ANOREHSA CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR ARRAIGNMENT. ARRAIGN ENT ON 4-28-16 2:27 PM. THE STATE IS REPRESENTED BY JASON POLI. DEFENDANT HAS REPRESENTED BY JAY DANIELS JOHN NAs READ. ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. INFORMED OF RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JUDGE 0R JURY. HEARING SET FOR 65/18/16 ON MOTIONS SET FOR 96/93/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT ADA JASON NAPOLI APPEARED. FILED: EVIDENCE. STATEMENT. IDENTIFICATION. HEARING. AND INSPECTION. TO REDUCE 0R MODIFY THE BOND NITH REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED HEARING, SET 5-18-16. FILED: PERTAINING TO ISSUANCE OF DEFENSE SUBPOENAS FOR PRETRIAL SET 5-18-16. ANDRENSA COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: OF INTENT TO FILE A NRIT. (5-27-16 DEFENSE GRANTED TO APPLY FOR SUPERVISORY REVIEH) 0F NRITS SET FOR 95/27/16 ANDREHSA CARDELL A HAYES DID NOT APPEAR FOR DISCOVERY HEARING IN CUSTODY AND NOT BROUGHT INTO COURT. BY COURT JURY TRIAL IN PROGRESS. HEARING SET FOR 95/29/16 ANDREHSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR DISCOVERY HEARING WITH COUNSEL, JAY FULLER THE STATE WAS REPRESENTED BY JASON NAPOLI 9 LAURA RODRIGUE. FOR DISCOVERY BY STATE. INVENTORY OF DISCOVERY. HEARING SET FOR 66/61/16 DEF.COUNSEL. 2 95/22/2916 66/61/2616 66/63/2616 66/14/2616 66/16/2616 I APPEARANCES MADE ON THIS DATE, JURY TRIAL IN PROGRESS FROM 5-16-16 THRU 5-27-16 (K. HICKERSON 516-272 PREVIOUS SET DATES OF 6-1-16 6-3-16 REMAIN. HEARING SET FOR 96/91/16 ON MOTIONS SET FOR 96/93/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. ANDRENSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR DISCOVERY HEARING DISCOVERY HEARING NITH COUNSEL, JAY DANIELS AND JOHN FULLER. THE STATE IS REPRESENTED BY LAURA RODRIGUE, JASON NAPOLI AND TIFFANY HUNTER. THE DEFENSE FILED: MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SDT (3) OBJECTION TO DISCOVERY REDACTION. INSTANTERS (3) FILED: INVENTORY OF DISCOVERY PROVIDED TO DEFENSE. STATE REQUESTED Ex PARTE HEARING PURSUANT TO LA.C.CR.P.ART 729.7 IN RESPONSE TO DEFENSE MOTION TO PRODUCE UNREDACTED REPORT. COURT REQUESTED THAT STATE PROVIDE COPY OF UNREDACTED REPORT TO COURT AND THAT DEFENSE PROVIDE COPY OF REDACTED REPORT TO COURT 6-3-16. COURT ORDERED STATE TO IDENTIFY AND PRESERVE ALL BODY CAMERA FOOTAGE IN CASE. SDT RETURNS ARE TO BE MADE 6-16-16 IN OPEN COURT. ON MOTIONS SET FOR 96/93/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. ANDRENSA RULES THAT THE STATE MADE PRIMA FACIE SHOMING AS REQUIRED BY ART. 729.7 AND THEREFORE THE STATE DOES NOT HAVE To PROVIDE REPORT TO DEFENSE. AS 499 LEFT OFF PART OF THIS COMP LETE Il?ll #1333 DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING ON MOTIONS HEARING ON MOTIONS HITH COUNSEL, JAY DANIELS AND JOHN FULLER. THE STATE REPRESENTED BY LAURA RODRIGUE AND JOHN FULLER. MOTIONS DID LIE: EVIDENCE STATEMENT IDENTIFICATION CALLED NOPD CHRISTOPHER MCGAM NOPD AMANDA NILLIAMS NOPD DET. TINDELL MURDOCK EVIDENCECALLED: PASTOR SHATEEK NOBLES SR. EVIDENCE: (STATE AND DEFENSE STIPULATED AS TO D1). MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE. MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENT. MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION. OBJECTED. INFORMED OF INTENT TO SEEK A NRIT ON THE RULING. COURT GRANTED UNTIL 96/29/16 To FILE NRIT. RETURN DATE ON SDT IN OPEN COURT 6-16-16. NRIT DATE 6-29-16. SET FOR 99/29/16 HEARING SET FOR 97/14/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES, APPEARED BEFORE THE COURT HITH COUNSELS JAY DANIELS AND JOHN FULLER. STATE IS REPRESENTED BY LAURA RODRIGUE AND JASON NAPOLI. COURT DENIED MOTION TO SUPPRESS STATEMENTS FDR STATEMENTS TESTIFIED To BY NOPD CHRISTOPHER MCGAN, NOPD AMANDA NILLIAMS AND DET. TINDELL MURDOCK. COURT DENIED MOTION TO SUPPRESS IDENTIFICATION AS TO LIMEUPS TO NOPD CHRISTOPHER MCGAH AND TO UNNAMED HITNESS (5-4). COURT DENIED MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AS TO EVIDENCE SEIZED BY NOPD AMANDA MILLIAMS. DEFENSE OBJECTION NOTED AS TO RULINGS. COURT HELD Ex PARTE PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO LA.C.CR.P.ART.729.7 IN CHAMBERS NITH PROCEEDINGS RECORDED BY CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER COURT RULES THAT THE STATE MADE PRIMA FACIE SHDNING As REQUIRED UNREDACTED REPORT TO DEFENSE. DEFENSE NOTED OBJECTION AS TO RULING, NOTICED INTENT TO SEEK NRITS. NRITS ARE DUE BY JUBE 29,2916. ANDRENSA CARDELL A HAYES DID NOT APPEAR FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: TO RELEASE EVIDENCE TD NOPD. ANDRENSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR SUB DUCES TECUM RETURNED NITH COUNSEL, JAY FULLER PURSUANT TO SDT ISSUED T0 KIRKENDOLL MGMT. LLC, MR. JOSEPH LAVIGNE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF JONES MALKER LAN FIRM FOR RETURN ON SDT. MR. JOHN 06/24/2016 06/28/2016 06/29/2016 07/14/2016 07/15/2016 07/20/2016 07/21/2016 07/22/2016 FULLER CALLED AS A NITNESS NHO THERE ARE NO RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS IN THE POSSESSION OF KIRKENDOLL LLC RELATIVE TO THE REQUEST SET FORTH IN SDT. DEFENSE OBJECTION NOTED. RETURN FROM SAKE CAFE MADE TO MR. JAY DANIELS. AFFIDAVIT PROVIDED To MR. DANIELS FROM SAKE CAFE NHICH STATES THERE ARE NO VIDEOS IN THEIR CUSTODY NHICH ARE RESPONSIVE TO THIS T0 COURT ORDER, HAS TO BE MADE IN OPEN MR. CUSIMANO CONTACTED COURT AND HILL BE HERE ON 6-29-16 FOR SDT TO HOSPITALITY GROUP NEEDS TO BE DIRECTED TO NEN SDT ISSUED (RETURN ON 6-29-16). FILED: AND ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM. (1) ENTERTAINMENT. DUCES TECUM SET FOR 66/29/16 OF NRITS SET FOR 66/29/16 DEF.COUNSEL. . ANDREHSA CARDELL A HAYES DID NOT APPEAR FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: TO RELEASE VEHICLE (SET 6-29-16). ANDREHSA COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT IN CUSTODY AND NOT BROUGHT INTO COURT. OF DEFENDANT NAIVED. FILED: FOR EXTENSION OF TIME To FILE NRIR (GRANTED T0 7-15-16) NOTICE OF INTENT To FILE NRIT. OF NRITS SET FOR 07/15/16 DEF.COUNSEL. ANDRENSA JAY DANIELS CALLED MR. MATHERNE AS A NITNESS FOR QUESTIONING RELATIVE TO THE SDT. DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR RETURN DUCES TECUM NITH COUNSEL, JAY FULLER ADA JASON NAPOLI PRESENT. RETURN ON SOT TO SAKE CAFE, MAKING RETURN IN OPEN COURT MERE MR. NICHOLAS CUSIMANO, COUNSEL FOR SAKE CAFE AND MR. DAVID MATHERNE, MGR. FOR SAKE CAFE. MR. CUSIMANO PROFERRED TO COURT A 1 PAGE LETTER FROM AUTHORED BY ADAM NESTRUM, TECHNICAL SUPPORT MGR. AND CREDIT CARD RECEIPT FROM SAKE CAFE. RELATIVE TO THE SDT. HEARING SET FOR 67/14/16 OF NRITS SET FOR 67/15/16 SET FOR 69/26/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. NRIGHTD DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR DISCOVERY HEARING NITH COUNSEL, JAY DANIELS TIFFANY TUCKER AND JASON NAPOLI APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE STATE. FILED: TO RECUSE DISTRICT ATTORNEY CANNIZARO. SET FOR 67/26/16 IN SECTION HEARING SCHEDULEDAA DEF.COUNSEL. NRIGHTD SCHEDULED FOR RECUSAL SET FOR 67/26/16 IN SECTION . DEF.COUNSEL. ANDRENSA CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED NITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER FOR HEARING STATE HAS REPRESENTED BY LAURA RODRIGUE JASON NAPOLI. ON DEFENSE MOTION. SET FOR 67/22/16 DEF COUNSEL. ANDRENSA COUNSEL JOHN FULLER APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: MOTION To RECUSE THE ORLEANS PARISH DISTRICT AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM. ANDREHSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING NITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER LAURA RODRIGUE, TIFFANY TUCKER DAVID PIPES PRESENT FOR THE STATE. STATE FILED MEMO IN OPPOSITION TO RECUSAL. DEFENSE MOTION TO RECUSE DISTRICT ATTORNEY DEFENSE OEJECTION NOTED. 9-29-16 TRIAL SET FOR 08/12/16 AUTOS. SET FOR .- 07/22/2016 08/03/2016 08/12/2016 08/19/2016 09/13/2016 09/15/2016 09/20/2016 09/21/2016 10/12/2016 10/14/2016 10/20/2016 11/02/2016 11/02/16 DEF.COUNSEL. ANDREWSA COUNSEL JOHN FULLER APPEARED WITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE. ANDREWSA CARDELL A HAYES DID NOT APPEAR FOR IN OPEN COURT FROM COURT OF APPEAL 2016-K-0737 (TRANSCRIPT REQUEST ANDREWSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING WITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER COURT GRANTED THE MOTION TO RELEASE AUTOS, NO OBJECTION BY DEFENSE. THIS CASE REMAINS SET FOR TRIAL. ANDREWSA 8-17-16 A FILING AT CLERKS OFFICE FROM COURT OF APPEAL (ORDER) COURT REPORTER GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME. TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL. ANDREWSA CONFERENCE SET FOR 09/15/16 ANDREWSA CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED WITH COUNSEL, JAY DANIELS FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ADA JASON NAPOLI PRESENT. ORAL MOTION BY THE DEFENSE, THE COURT GRANTED A CONTINUANCE, NOPD ESSENTIAL WITNESS WILL BE OUT OF THE COUNTRY ON 11-2-16 PREVIOUSLY SELECTED TRIAL DATE. 11-2-16 TRIAL DATE IS NOW CONVERTED TO A DISCOVERY HEARING DATE. SET FOR 12/01/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. ANDREWSA COUNSEL JOHN FULLER APPEARED WITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT FILED: TO TRANSFER EVIDENCE. SET FOR 09/21/16 DEF.COUNSEL. ANDREWSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING WITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER ADA JASON NAPOLI PRESENT FOR THE STATE. THE COURT MOTION TO TRANSFER EVIDENCE, NO OPPOSITION BY THE STATE. HEARING SET FOR 11/02/16 NOTICE TO DEFENSE COUNSEL. ANDREWSA A HAYES DID NOT APPEAR FOR IN OPEN COURT. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT 2016-K-0737, WRIT DENIED. ANDREWSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING WITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER ADA LAURA RODRIGUE PRESENT FOR THE STATE. ORDER FILED AND PLACED INTO RECORD. HEARING SET FOR 11/02/16 DEF.COUNSEL. ANDREWSA COUNSEL JOHN FULLER APPEARED WITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES FOR IN OPEN COURT IN CUSTODY AND NOT BROUGHT INTO COURT. OF DEFENDANT WAIVED. FILED: CHAIN OF CUSTODY PROCEDURE TO TRANSFER EVIDENCE. ANDREWSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR DISCOVERY HEARING WITH COUNSEL, JAY DANIELS ADA JASON NAPOLI APPEARED FOR THE STATE. MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE THE PRIOR ARREST RECORD OF THE VICTIM IS STATE FILED SUPPLEMENTAL INVENTORY OF DISCOVERY PROVIDED TO DEFENSE. STATE PURSUANT TO DISCOVERY OVER 7 DIFFERENT FBI REPORTS. DEFENSE PURSUANT TO DISCOVERY REQUEST WILL PROVIDE CELL PHONE VIDEO TO STATE ELECTRONICALLY. STATE PROPOSED JURY QUESTIONAIRE, THE COURT SET 11-7-16 FOR BOTH SIDES TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR QUESTIONAIRE. STATE AND DEFENSE ANNOUNCED THEY WILL BE READY FOR TRIAL 12~1-16. SET FOR 12/01/16 . A NOTICES. . 11/97/2916 ANDRENSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR HEARING NITH COUNSEL, JOHN DANIELS AOAS JASON NAPOLI a LAURA RODRIGUE APPEAREO FOR THE STATE. COURT SIGNED ORDER FOR OFFICE TO SEND To BODE CELLMARK SPECIFIC EVIDENCE. COURT SPOKE NITH LOUISIANA STATE POLICE, MR. NYLES TO ADDRESS THE Two REFERENCE SAMPLES BEING SENT TO BODE CELLMARK. COURT RULED ON OBJECTIONS REGARDING THE REGARDING JURY LOGISTICS. SET FOR 12/91/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. 11/19/2916 SHANKLINL AS PER- -ORDERED 9v MINUTE CLERK RULING SET FOR 11- 14- 16. POOJL. COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL CARDELL A HAYES, FOR A DEFENDANT DID NOT APPEAR. IN CUSTODY AND NOT DROUGHT INTO COURT. OF DEFENDANT ADA LAURA RODRIGUE AND JASON NAPOLI APPEARED FOR THE STATE. FILED: FOR SEOUESTRATION OF JURORS PURSUANT TO LA.C.CR.P. ART.79 COURT RULED THAT JURY QUESTIONNAIRES NILL NOT BE USED FOR JURY SELECTION. SET FOR 11/14/16 DEF.COUNSEL. 11/14/2916 ANORENSA DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR RULING NITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER ADA LAURA RODRIGUE AND JASON NAPOLI PRESENT FOR THE STATE. ORDER FILED INTO RECORD. SET FOR 11/16/16 DEF.COUNSEL. 11/16/2916 NETTERVILD COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL CARDELL A HAYES, ADA JASON NAPOLI PRESENT. DEFENSE INTENT To FILE NRIT NOTED, NRITS DUE 11- 22- 16. STAY DENIED, EXTENSION DENIED. DEFENDANT, CARDELL A HAYES APPEARED FOR RULING NITH COUNSEL, JOHN FULLER ADAS LAURA RODRIGUE AND JASON NAPOLI PRESENT FOR THE STATE. THE COURT THE MOTION. SET FOR 12/95/16 NOTICES. DEF.COUNSEL. COUNSEL JAY DANIELS APPEARED NITHOUT DEFENDANT, CARDELL CARDELL A HAYES. FILED: OF INTENT TO FILE A NRIT. DENIED. BE: Hanan?w- HganaQ?I-N? . The Orleans Parish Sheri?'s Of?ce provides computer services to both the Orleans Parish Clerk of Criminal District Court and the Orleans Parish Criminal District Court. The Orleans Parish Sheriff's O?ice DOES NOT maintain or ensure the infonnation provided is complete and accurate, and this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site may not re?ect the true charges. status. next court date. or other information regarding a case. The information is provided as a request under the Freedom of Information Act, and the Public Records Act. Nothing contained herein is intended to imply or infer the guilt or wrongdoing of any person(s) listed on this site. This information shall not be considered, OI used as, a public document 01 o?icial document, and no other publication or copying Ofth1s information Is allowed without the express written consent Of the person(s). and the Orlean Parish Criminal District Court. For questions, comments, and other information you may contact the Orleans Parish Clerk of Criminal District Court, Record. Division at (504) 658-9000. This information is made available tO the public and law enforcement in the interest ofpublrc safety. Any unauthorized use of this information is forbidden and subject to criminal prosecution.