By Email May 2, 2017 Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka Senate President Michelle Fischbach Senator Warren Limmer Senator Jerry Relph Senator Mark Johnson Senator Bruce Anderson Senators: Our opinion as subject matter experts on child abuse and sexual violence has been requested on HF 1572/SF 1895 (Grossell, Relph, Anderson, et al). We are writing to ask that you do everything in your power to pass—in its entirety or in part—this legislation in this session. Rep. Grossell has championed this pro-child, anti-crime legislation tirelessly, and he deserves your support. I’d like to highlight a few key points: Stays of Adjudication A sex offender’s main weapon is camoflauge. I think you’d agree that wiping clean a sexual predator’s criminal record is appalling to the vast majority of citizens. In 2005, at PROTECT’s urging, the California legislature eliminated “deferred adjudication” for child sex crimes, and a Republican legislature in Minnesota should do no less. If opposition centers around juvenile offenders, I would think Rep. Grossell would be amendable to that amendment. Stays of Imposition These stays reduce felony convictions to misdemeanors. In our opinion, “misdemeanor sex crime” is an oxymoron. Our review of over 6,000 cases of Criminal Sexual Conduct 1-4 by adults against children from 2001-2014 found that Minnesota offenders receive stays of imposition 30% of the time. This practice flies in the face of the values of your state and your legislature itself, as evidenced by the statutory penalties on your books. Child Exploitation Material Minnesota’s sentencing for child exploitation material (“child pornography”) is, without a close second, the weakest in the nation. Ninety percent of possessors and 91% of distributors are getting probation, a practice that would simply shock prosecutors across the nation. The improvements in this bill were so modest that PROTECT initially declined to support them at all. However, we now understand that progress is going to have to be incremental. I don’t believe that any of you truly support the existing status quo or would want the record to reflect that you did. Contributions to National Association to Protect Children may be tax-deductible. Probation Caseloads Given Minnesota’s heavy reliance on probation and treatment for sexual predators in lieu of incapacitation, probation should at least mean something. This bill is attempting some modest but innovative measures at enhancing sex offender probation. Low caseloads cost money, but they are less expensive than incarceration. If Minnesota is to be the Probation State when it comes to child sexual abuse, it should lead the way in improving meaningful community supervision. The Prosecutorial Discretion Issue PROTECT has earned our reputation as pro-prosecutor, and we understand the need for prosecutorial discretion. However, we have found over the years that prosecutors will always complain as a matter of principle that taking away “tools” will hamper their ability to prosecute cases. You, however, are the lawmakers, and setting stronger standards to protect victims of rape and abuse is “your lane,” not the county attorneys’. Rep. Grossell and his co-authors are not asking to eliminate Stays of Execution. With the changes in this legislation, the criminal justice system will adjust and go on without interruption. The same offenders who now bargain for Stays of Adjudication or Imposition will adjust their defense strategies to seek Stays of Execution. However, you will have made Minnesota safer and gently pushed your county attorneys to drive a harder bargain in the process. You should be proud that a freshman Republican lawmaker—a distinguished law enforcement officer who clearly has the well-being of children in his heart—has worked hard on legislation so important to Minnesota families. It would be a terrible and cynical civics lesson for all if his bill were to be killed by leaders of his own party, without even a good faith effort to amend or compromise. Sincerely, J. Christian CEO cc: Linda Walker, Minnesota victim rights advocate Rep. Matt Grossell