CÕHEf.¡v4¡[-gT"ElN Thursday, May 25,2417 Dave Aronberg, Esq. State Attorney 401 North Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: May 16,2012 Shooting Death of Seth Adams by PBSO Sergeant Michael Guster Dear Mr. Aronberg: Richard and Lydia Adams again respectfully request that you re-open the investigation into the shooting death of their son, Seth, by Sgt. Michael Custer of the PBSO. Previous requests have been refused on the basis that the decision not to prosecute was made by your predecessor, Peter Antonacci, and that there was no "rìew evidence", These are specious arguments at best. Peter Antonacci was an interim State Attorney, appointed by Gov. Scott and, therefore, not accountable to the voters like you are. The evidence proving Sgt. Custer's guilt has been there all along; it was just ignored by the PBSO as will be discussed in detail below. Accompanying this letter is a transcript of the trial testimony of Det. Christopher Neuman of the PBSO, who was the lead investigator; a transcript of Hon. Daniel T: K. Hurley's comments regarding the "shocking" inadequacy of the investigation; and a summary of the evidence and testimony which contradicts Sgt. Custer's version of the events. We wíll also provide you with all depositions taken in the civil action; reports from all of our expert witnessesl; all exhibits introduced at trial; and all other discovery which we obtained during our investigation. Stephan LeClainche, our paralegal Tatum Whiddon, and I request a meeting with you, your attorneys, and investigators to explain what the evidence and testimony establish. Sgt. Custer explained under oath in his initial statement taken by Det. Neuman, during his pretrial deposition, and at trial his justification for shooting and killing Seth Adams. t Our experts are widely considered to be the pre-eminent experts in their respective disciplines and commonly are hired by law enforcement and governmental entities. COHENMILSTETNSELTERS&TOLLPLLC.2925PãABoulevard'Suite200.PalmBeachGardens,FL33410 T 561 .515.1400 . cohenmilstein.com Dave Aronberg, Esq. May 25,2017 Page2 of 4 Sgt. Custer was work¡ng undercover and had parked his unmarked SUV in the parking loi of A One Stop Garden Shop without permission from the property owners and in violation of clearly posted No Parking signs. When Seth arrived home, Sgt. Custer testified that he immediately began yelling obscenities and acted like a "lunatic". Sgt. Custer claims that Seth exited his vehicle, charged Custer, and grabbed him by the throat "as hard as a man can grab you". Custer broke the grip and a fight ensued. Custer pulled his Glock pistol, placed Seth under arrest, and ordered him to get on the ground. lnstead, Seth ran to his truck, against Custer's direct orders not to go there and began rummaging around in the cab. Custer, fearful that Seth was obtaining a weapon, grabbed him by the head and shoulders, and tried to pull him from the cab. Seth then épun out of his truck and Custer fired his first shot at point blank range, then continued to fire and fall back, discharging his fírearm a total of four times. Custer then took up a defensive position behind his vehicle and Seth ran off into the darkened nursery, At the time he was shot, Seth was located between the open door and the frame of his truck. Custer never approached him again after the shots were fired' Agent Drummond was a member of Custer's tactical unit. He was headed West on Okeechobee Rd., then made a U-turn at A Road. As his headlights passed over the parking lot, he saw Seth standing by the left front quarter panel of his truck, facing east toward the nursery. Custer was exiting his vehicle and seemed to be sayÍng something to Seth. There was no confrontation; no yelling; and nothing seemed to be amiss. Drummond did not stop. The gunshots were fired less than two minutes later. We know from gun powder residue that when the first shot was fired, the muzzle of the Glock was one to two feet away from Seth's right forearm. This bullet entered the outside of his forearm, exited the inside of his forearm, grazed his abdomen and came to rest BEHIND Seth's truck. This bullet was analyzed microscopically and was found to contain bone fragments imbedded in it as well as cotton fibers consístent with fibers taken from Seth's T shirt. There is no doubt that this projectile, marked in the photos as stanchion 6, was the first shot fired by Custer. lf Seth was standing inside the open door of his truck when he was shot, as Custer contends, the projectile could not possibly have come to rest behind his truck. Both the ME and the treating surgeon testified that the wounds to Seth's forearm would have begun bleeding "immediately and copiously". However, there was no blood on the inside of the door of Seth's truck and the blood trail started approximately eight feet away, between the truck and Custer's SUV. Three of the four shell casings were to the rear of Seth's truck and between the two vehicles. They could not have come to rest at that location if Seth had been shot standing inside the open door of his truck. There were spatters of Seth's blood on the back of the left lower leg of Custer's jeans, Blood spatter experts testified that Custer had to have been standing within one foot of Dave Aronberg, Esq. May 25,2017 Page 3 of 4 Seth AFTER he had been shot and was dripping blood onto the ground. This is totally inconsistent with Custer's testimony that he withdrew after he began shooting.There were no marks on Custer's neck or hands indicating that he had been grabbed by Seth or that they had fought. Custer's PBSO cell phone was on the ground after the shooting within the taped off crime scene. Custer, however, retrieved his phone and attempted to hide it under the seat of his car. Despite having been found by one of the CSI's, Sgt. McAfee (Det. Neuman's supervisor) instructed her not to take it into evidence. Later, after a preservation letter had been received from the Adams' attorney, Sgt. McAfee, Capt. Wallace, and Sgt. Custer intentionally disposed of the phone. After pressure from the Adams' attornêys, PBSO conducted an internal affairs investigation into the disappearance of the phone which resulted in Capt. Wallace merely receiving "verbal counseling", Richard and Lydia Adams in utmost good faith believe that the shooting of their son was unjustified and that the subsequent investigation by PBSO was a "disgrace", in the words of Judge Hurley. The previous State Attorney could not possibly have performed an open and adequate investigation based upon the information provided by PBSO. According to Det, Neuman, it, was not his job to solve this case, to try to reconcile inconsistencies in the evidence, or even to review reports of experts hired by PBSO which contradicted Sgt. Custer's version of the events. His job was simply to, "compile the evidence, all the information, and send it to the State Attorney's Office for them to decide whether they are going to file criminal charges against Sergeant Custer or any officer who is ínvolved in the shooting". As Judge Hurley correctly stated, "The community has a right to know that an investigation is being conducted properly," Based upon the evidence presented during the civil trial, it is beyond dispute that the investigation by PBSO amounted to nothing more than a "whitewash" justification for the use of deadly force. It goes without saying that when evidence exists from which to do a thorough and careful criminal investigation, reliance upon an investigation that is "slipshod, shoddy, and a disgrace" should never form the basis for a State Attorney's decision to decline prosecution. Here the evidence is available, is scientific, and ovenruhelmingly establishes that Sgt, Custer lied about the shooting of Seth Adams. As the public official in Palm Beach County charged with the duty of investigating and prosecuting crimes, the failure and/or refusal by your otfice to review, analyze, and act upon the substantial evidence in this Dave Aronberg, Esq. May 25,2017 Page 4 of 4 case wh¡ch proves that Sgt. Custer's shooting of Seth Adams was illegal and unjustified amounts to an abrogation of your responsibilities, and a breach of the public's trust, Accordingly, it is past time, Mr. Aronberg, for you to do your job and properly investigate the unjustified death of Seth Adams. We request that you notify us of your intentions within one week of your receipt of this letter, Sincerely, Stephan LeClainche, Esq. WBM:tw Encl. Cc: Richard and Lydia Adams