Red Light Camera Summary Report Leaders in Service • Agents of Progress • Champions for Safety Fiscal Year 2015–2016 DECEMBER 31, 2016 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Introduction Section 316.0083(4)(b), Florida Statutes, directs the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (department) to provide a summary report on the use and operation of traffic infraction detectors (red light cameras) in Florida. Per statute, the department “must include a review of information submitted to the department by the counties and municipalities and must describe the enhancement of the traffic safety and enforcement programs.” Section 316.0083, Florida Statutes, describes the process for violations of traffic infraction detectors. A traffic infraction enforcement officer issues a Notice of Violation (NOV) to the violator within 30 days of the violation. The violator may pay the notice or contest the violation through an appeals process within 60 days. If the violator fails to pay or appeal the notice, a traffic infraction enforcement officer issues a Uniform Traffic Citation (UTC) to the violator, with a copy to the Clerk of Court for adjudication. Part 1 Survey Methodology The department created an online survey to gather information and data from counties and municipalities (jurisdictions) responsible for the administration of red light camera (RLC) programs during Fiscal Year 2015-2016. The 29 question survey included topics such as procedures, NOVs and program size, and covered activity that occurred from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. As there is no statewide oversight of RLC programs, the department relies on monies remitted to the Department of Revenue (DOR) to know which jurisdictions were operating RLCs during the reporting period. Similar to last year, jurisdictions were asked to complete a spreadsheet regarding camera and intersection locations and dates of operation. With this self-reported information, the department was able to independently analyze crash data related to RLC intersections throughout the state. Surveys were distributed to all jurisdictions who responded to previous RLC surveys, and to those who remitted RLC monies to the DOR during the reporting period. In addition, the Florida Sheriffs Association, the Florida Police Chiefs Association, the Florida League of Cities and the Florida Association of Counties aided in distributing surveys to their members. The deadline for survey responses was October 1, 2016. Actions jurisdictions may have taken related to their program after that date are not reflected in this report. Summary of Survey Responses In total, 68 jurisdictions remitted monies to the DOR for RLC penalties during Fiscal Year 2015-2016 (see supplemental resources). All 68 jurisdictions responded to the survey; however, only 58 of those included on the DOR list reported RLCs were operational during the reporting period (July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016). Violations can be paid late, which is why some jurisdictions remitted monies after the conclusion of their program. Opa-locka indicated in their survey response that they had cameras active during the reporting period, but were not included on the DOR list. Therefore, a total of 59 jurisdictions are represented in this report (reference Appendix E for a list of the 59 jurisdictions and their responses). Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 2 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Cameras and Intersections • 796 RLCs active as of July 1, 2015 (965 as of July 1, 2014) • 688 RLCs active as of June 30, 2016 (757 as of June 30, 2015) — Reduction of 108 cameras — 40 jurisdictions with no change in number of RLCs — 4 jurisdictions with increase in number of RLCs — 15 jurisdictions with decrease in number of RLCs ■ Six jurisdictions reduced number of active RLCs to zero during reporting period (July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016) • 478 intersections with active RLCs as of July 1, 2015 (592 as of July 1, 2014) • 430 intersections with active RLCs as of June 30, 2016 (460 as of June 30, 2015) — Reduction of 48 intersections — 42 jurisdictions with no change in number of intersections with RLCs — 4 jurisdictions with increase in number of intersections with RLCs — 13 jurisdictions with decrease in number of intersections with RLCs Notices of Violation (As reported by jurisdictions) • 1,227,927 NOVs issued (Availability of NOV status varied by jurisdiction. Thus, numbers do not add to total.) — 761,103 paid — 37,520 contested and pending — 46,323 contested and dismissed — 21,530 contested and upheld • 150,659 NOVs were issued to repeat offenders (55,429 reported in FY 2014-2015 report) (Figure 1) RLC Violations by Fiscal Year 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 1,227,927 999,929 81,326 600,000 1,094,106 940,814 66,196 59,672 963,039 120,000 100,000 80,000 57,546 50,755 400,000 200,000 - 140,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 FY 2011-2012 FY 2012-2013 FY 2013-2014 Notices of Violation (left axis) FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 - In-Person Citations (right axis) NOV data self-reported by jurisdictions. Citation data collected from department database (November 15, 2016). Figure 1 shows the number of NOVs issued for RLC violations over the past five fiscal years (July 1 – June 30). The graph also depicts the number of citations issued in person by law enforcement for running a red light. The number of NOVs issued for RLC violations increased to its highest peak during the last fiscal year (2015-2016). Conversely, the number of in-person citations reached its lowest point during the same year. The department must rely on self-reported information for the number of NOVs issued each year, but in-person citations are tracked through the Clerk of Court system. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 3 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (Figure 2) Unpaid RLC Violations Issued as UTC 383,538 400,000 356,524 350,000 300,000 295,175 290,535 300,224 250,000 200,000 150,000 FY 2011-2012 FY 2012-2013 FY 2013-2014 FY 2014-2015 FY 2015-2016 Citation data collected from department database (November 15, 2016). Figure 2 shows the number of unpaid RLC violations resulting in a UTC being assessed. Similar to the number of NOVs issued, the number of UTCs issued reached its highest peak during FY 2015-2016. A driving record can only reflect an unpaid NOV issued as a UTC or an in-person citation issued by a law enforcement officer. Personnel Jurisdictions were asked to identify who reviews the camera images before issuing NOVs, who reviews contested NOVs and who ultimately issues UTCs. Personnel categories included law enforcement officer, non-sworn government employee, non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) and other. Figure 3 reflects jurisdiction responses. (Figure 3) Personnel Review Camera Images Review Contested Notices of Violation Issue Uniform Traffic Citations Law Enforcement Officer 48 43 46 Non-sworn Government Employee 23 21 18 Non-sworn Contractor Employee (vendor) 7 3 3 Other (see Appendix E ) 3 8 5 Jurisdictions could select multiple options for each question so numbers do not sum to the total number of respondents. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 4 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Right-Hand Turns Issue Violations for Right-Hand Turn Pursuant to section 316.0083, Florida Statutes: • A NOV and a UTC may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible. No 29% • A NOV and UTC may not be issued under this section if the driver of the vehicle came to a complete stop after crossing the stop line and before turning right if permissible at a red light, but failed to stop before crossing over the stop line or other point at which a stop is required. Yes 71% (Figure 4) The terms in this section of statute are left to the interpretation of each respective jurisdiction (see Appendix F for definitions provided to the department). For Fiscal Year 2015-2016, 71 percent of responding jurisdictions issued NOVs for persons making right turns on red signals. Jurisdictions indicated that 285,924 (23.29%) NOVs were issued for right-hand turns during the reporting period (July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016). Six jurisdictions indicated that they do not track the number of violations issued for right turns on red. Alternative Safety Measures The department also inquired on what other actions jurisdictions had taken to improve safety measures at intersections during the reporting period. A majority of jurisdictions indicated they had implemented at least one action. The results of this question are shown below (see Appendix E for other responses). (Figure 5) Alternative Safety Measures 9 9 Lighting 10 Increased signage 21 11 Engineering 13 12 Restriping 0 Intelligent collision prevention system 0 15 1 5 Without Red Light Camera 10 15 20 25 With Red Light Camera Other Survey Results Approximately half of the jurisdictions (30 of 59) reported court cases have impacted their RLC program. Fourteen jurisdictions indicated they have conducted an independent RLC analysis. Forty eight jurisdictions responded they are continuing their program in Fiscal Year 2016-2017. Regarding reporting of crash data, 45 jurisdictions responded they report crashes electronically, six report via paper and eight do both. Although some jurisdictions have suspended or terminated their programs, only one jurisdiction indicated they moved the location of a RLC during the reporting period. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 5 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Other Survey Results (continued) (Figure 6) RLC Vendor Number of Jurisdictions American Traffic Solutions (ATS) 46 Redflex 4 Xerox 4 Other (see Appendix E) 5 Figure 7 shows factors used to determine the success or failure of RLC locations, reported by jurisdictions. Figure 8 shows other uses of RLC footage, reported by jurisdictions. (Figure 7) (Figure 8) Factors Used to Determine Success/Failure of RLC location 90% Jurisdiction use of RLC footage 120% 48 56 100% 54 80% 70% 80% 33 60% 60% 50% 22 40% 40% 30% 8 20% 13 13 missing person Other (see appendix) 20% 10% 0% 0% Crash investigation Change in Number Change in Pedestrian Change in Revenue Other (see appendix) of Crashes Safety criminal investigation Jurisdictions were asked to rank the importance of various factors when selecting intersections to install RLCs. The results are shown in Figure 9. (Figure 9) Importance of Factors When Selecting Intersections for RLCs Pedestrian Safety 3 0 4 5 5 Traffic Volume 2 Citizen Complaints Traffic Crash Data 17 6 1 Law Enforcement Officer Observations N/A 52 32 17 35 4 23 5 5 Not Important 20 Somewhat Important Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 30 29 Very Important 6 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Part 2 Crash Analysis Similar to last year, jurisdictions self-reported the dates of operation and locations of intersections with RLCs. Intersections were selected to be included in the crash analysis based on their dates of operation as there have been changes to the reporting of crash data within the last five years. Taking input from jurisdictions who operate RLC programs, the department refined its methodology to only include crashes that occurred on or after July 1, 2012. Therefore, intersections were only included if the activation date was between January 2013 and April 2016, allowing at least six months before and after the date the camera was activated. Intersections from two jurisdictions were not included in the analysis (Miami Springs and Boynton Beach) because cameras were turned off then back on, and the lapsed time was under six months. In total, 148 intersections were included in the crash analysis from 28 jurisdictions. Crashes occurring within 250 feet of the center of the intersection were analyzed before and after the installation of camera(s) at each intersection. Measures were taken to exclude crashes that occurred anywhere other than the roadway, such as parking lots. The before and after periods used for analysis were unique to each intersection based on the dates of operation, with an equal number of days within each window. Crashes were broken down by manner of collision (angle or rear-end), injury severity, inclusion of a non-motorist (see Appendix D for definition), and whether the crash report indicated a driver ran a red light. (Figure 10) Before RLC Installed Total Crashes Angle Crashes Rear-End Crashes Crashes Involving Non-Motorists Crashes Involving Running a Red Light Possible Injury Crashes Non-Incapacitating Injury Crashes Incapacitating Injury Crashes Fatal Crashes 5,107 1,383 3,724 56 191 964 399 153 5 After RLC Installed Percent Change 5,625 1,476 4,149 45 185 1,054 392 194 10 10.14% 6.72% 11.41% -19.64% -3.14% 9.34% -1.75% 26.80% Figure 10 shows the breakdown of crashes that occurred before and after the activation of RLCs at intersections included in the analysis. The number of crashes included in this year’s analysis is higher than last year’s report (Fiscal Year 2014-2015) due to the refined methodology. For example, short form crashes were excluded from last year’s report in attempt to exclude parking lot crashes, but short form crashes were included in this year’s report with the addition of new methods used to exclude crashes outside of the roadway. Reference Appendix A for a more detailed breakdown of crashes by reporting jurisdiction. Appendix B is specific to crashes where the officer indicated a driver ran a red light, and Appendix C is specific to crashes involving non-motorists. The change in number of crashes noted in the analysis follows the statewide trend during the period of this analysis (approximately 33% increase statewide, 2012-2015). Two possible factors that could have contributed to the change in crash numbers are the increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and the fluctuation in crash reports with accurate location information (latitude and longitude). The probability of a crash occurring increases as people drive more, and daily VMT in Florida increased 8.32 percent from 2012 to 2015 (see supplemental resources). The second factor is attributed to the reliance on location data for this analysis. In order to analyze crashes that occurred at certain intersections, it is necessary to know both the location of the intersection and the location of the crashes. Intersection locations (latitude and longitude) were submitted along with the survey, however, latitude and longitude are not attached to every crash report. The percentage of crash reports with location information has fluctuated statewide over the last few years (2012- 67.6%, 2013- 64.2%, 2014- 66.3%, 2015- 55.2%), which can impact the number of crashes that can be analyzed each year. The crash analysis should be put into context of the overall complexity of the issue at hand, as many factors may contribute to the change in number of crashes outlined in this report. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 7 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Recommendations The following recommendations would allow for accurate reporting of information that cannot currently be tracked through existing systems. 1. Require jurisdictions to track camera information including location (GPS coordinates) and dates of operation. 2. Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs, including the status of those violations (paid, contested, issued as UTC). 3. Require jurisdictions to track the issuance of NOVs for right-hand turns. 4. Require jurisdictions to report safety countermeasures taken prior to and after the installation of RLC (examples: infrastructure changes, type and layout of signage, pedestrian cross walks, bike lanes, intelligent transportation systems [ITS]). 5. In accordance with statute, the department will continue to review and report on the status and trends of the use and operation of RLCs. In order to determine the enhancement of traffic safety, the department recommends a more thorough analysis be conducted by an independent organization using appropriate local and state agency resources. 6. The department, upon request, will collaborate with any local jurisdiction operating RLC programs to improve the data collection and reporting methodology associated with evaluation of the active programs across the state. 7. Create a standard for administering violations for right-hand turns on red signals, enforced by RLC. Supplemental Resources • Department of Revenue’s Tax Data for Red Light Cameras • Department of Transportation’s Traffic Infraction Detector Placement and Installation Specifications • Department of Transportation’s Florida Highway Mileage Reports (VMT) Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 8 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 26 6 5 1 6 1 5 2 29 3 1 13 2 3 2 4 6 5 7 4 5 148 # Intersections After 13 17 54 100 6 3 5 4 234 172 19 35 1 5 1,218 1,153 87 128 74 64 0 3 27 29 9 13 152 225 23 16 1,951 2,066 13 4 28 18 469 591 7 7 132 150 10 8 93 113 85 60 111 201 152 254 82 116 52 70 5,107 5,625 Before 30.77% 85.19% -50.00% -20.00% -26.50% 84.21% 400.00% -5.34% 47.13% -13.51% --7.41% 44.44% 48.03% -30.43% 5.89% -69.23% -35.71% 26.01% 0.00% 13.64% -20.00% 21.51% -29.41% 81.08% 67.11% 41.46% 34.62% 10.14% Total % Change Ran Red Ran Red Ran Red Rear-End Rear-End Light Light Light % Before After Before After Change 2 1 -50.00% 7 11 7 4 -42.86% 39 84 0 1 --4 2 1 0 -100.00% 4 4 13 5 -61.54% 144 114 0 0 --14 21 0 0 --0 4 49 37 -24.49% 897 880 6 6 0.00% 62 93 2 3 50.00% 56 52 0 0 --0 1 5 8 60.00% 18 15 1 2 100.00% 6 9 6 1 -83.33% 102 176 1 0 -100.00% 12 11 50 60 20.00% 1,444 1,507 2 0 -100.00% 9 3 0 0 --21 15 14 18 28.57% 364 444 0 1 --5 6 5 10 100.00% 87 94 0 0 --10 8 2 3 50.00% 78 98 2 2 0.00% 57 37 4 5 25.00% 74 140 7 5 -28.57% 113 196 5 8 60.00% 65 78 7 5 -28.57% 32 46 191 185 -3.14% 3,724 4,149 Angle After 57.14% 6 6 115.38% 15 16 -50.00% 2 1 0.00% 1 0 -20.83% 90 58 50.00% 5 14 --1 1 -1.90% 321 273 50.00% 25 35 -7.14% 18 12 --0 2 -16.67% 9 14 50.00% 3 4 72.55% 50 49 -8.33% 11 5 4.36% 507 559 -66.67% 4 1 -28.57% 7 3 21.98% 105 147 20.00% 2 1 8.05% 45 56 -20.00% 0 0 25.64% 15 15 -35.09% 28 23 89.19% 37 61 73.45% 39 58 20.00% 17 38 43.75% 20 24 11.41% 1,383 1,476 Rear-End Angle Before % change Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 *Only jurisdictions with red light cameras activated between Januarybetween 2013 and January April 20162013 wereand included the crash Twenty ofanalysis. the 59 jurisdictions met this criteria. *Only jurisdictions with red light cameras activated Aprilin2016 wereanalysis. included in theeight crash Twenty eight of the 59 jurisdictions met this criteria. Aventura Clermont Davie Edgewood Florida City Fort Lauderdale Gulf Breeze Jacksonville Lakeland Manatee County Medley Miami North Miami North Miami Beach Ocoee Orange County Orange Park Orlando Osceola Palatka Palm Beach County Palm Coast Pinecrest Sarasota Sunrise Tamarac Tampa West Palm Beach Grand Total Jurisdiction Appendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction Appendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 0.00% 6.67% -50.00% -100.00% -35.56% 180.00% 0.00% -14.95% 40.00% -33.33% --55.56% 33.33% -2.00% -54.55% 10.26% -75.00% -57.14% 40.00% -50.00% 24.44% --0.00% -17.86% 64.86% 48.72% 123.53% 20.00% 6.72% Angle % change 9 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 26 6 5 1 6 1 5 2 29 3 1 13 2 3 2 4 6 5 7 4 5 148 # Intersections 964 0 12 1 2 34 4 0 234 18 14 0 5 2 25 7 301 3 5 103 0 19 6 15 24 39 46 30 15 1054 2 23 0 1 42 6 1 283 30 11 0 3 1 38 6 300 3 3 103 1 25 4 7 13 38 57 35 18 399 2 8 0 0 11 1 0 92 14 4 0 0 0 19 3 120 3 1 35 1 13 2 4 13 13 14 19 7 Possible Injury Possible injury Non-Incapacitating Injury Before Before After 392 3 7 0 1 3 0 0 84 13 2 1 2 1 11 2 110 0 0 58 1 11 2 8 8 14 15 21 14 Non-Incapacitating Injury After 153 3 2 0 0 2 1 0 19 2 10 0 2 0 2 0 66 0 1 23 0 3 1 2 2 1 4 2 5 Incapacitating Injury Before 194 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 25 4 5 0 1 0 2 0 108 0 0 29 0 5 0 0 2 3 2 2 2 Incapacitating Injury After 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fatal Before Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Fatal After *Only jurisdictions light cameras activated between January2013 2013 and and April in the crash analysis. Twenty eight ofeight the 59 met this criteria. *Only jurisdictions with redwith lightred cameras activated between January April2016 2016were wereincluded included in the crash analysis. Twenty ofjurisdictions the 59 jurisdictions met this criteria. Aventura Clermont Davie Edgewood Florida City Fort Lauderdale Gulf Breeze Jacksonville Lakeland Manatee County Medley Miami North Miami North Miami Beach Ocoee Orange County Orange Park Orlando Osceola Palatka Palm Beach County Palm Coast Pinecrest Sarasota Sunrise Tamarac Tampa West Palm Beach Grand Total Jurisdiction Appendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction Appendix A: Crashes Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation by Jurisdiction Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 10 2 7 0 1 13 0 49 6 2 0 5 1 6 1 50 2 0 14 0 5 0 2 2 4 7 5 7 191 Before 1 4 1 0 5 0 37 6 3 0 8 2 1 0 60 0 0 18 1 10 0 3 2 5 5 8 5 185 After Non-Motorist Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Aventura Clermont Davie Edgewood Florida City Fort Lauderdale Jacksonville Lakeland Manatee County Medley Miami North Miami North Miami Beach Ocoee Orange County Orange Park Orlando Osceola Palatka Palm Beach County Palm Coast Pinecrest Sarasota Sunrise Tamarac Tampa West Palm Beach Grand Total Jurisdiction Non-Motorist After Appendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red Light Appendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red Light 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 Front to Rear Before 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 Front to Rear After 2 7 0 0 9 0 47 6 2 0 5 1 6 1 49 2 0 14 0 4 0 2 2 4 7 5 5 180 Angle Before Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 1 4 0 0 5 0 36 6 3 0 8 1 1 0 56 0 0 18 1 8 0 3 2 5 5 7 5 175 Angle After 11 0 2 0 1 2 0 10 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 11 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 2 3 45 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 15 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 2 2 46 0 2 0 0 1 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 34 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 3 2 32 Possible Injury Possible Injury Non-Incapacitating Non-Incapacitating Injury Before Injury After Before After Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Aventura Clermont Davie Edgewood Florida City Fort Lauderdale Jacksonville Lakeland Manatee County Medley Miami North Miami North Miami Beach Ocoee Orange County Orange Park Orlando Osceola Palatka Palm Beach County Palm Coast Pinecrest Sarasota Sunrise Tamarac Tampa West Palm Beach Grand Total Jurisdiction Appendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red Light Appendix B: Crashes Involving Running Red Light 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 21 Incapacitating Injury Before 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 25 Incapacitating Injury After Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Fatal Before 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Fatal After 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 12 1 4 1 1 1 3 1 26 6 5 1 6 1 5 2 29 3 1 13 2 3 2 4 6 5 7 4 5 148 # Intersections non-motorist after 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 0 9 9 4 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 11 12 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 2 4 2 2 0 3 3 2 2 5 0 56 45 non-motorist before Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Aventura Clermont Davie Edgewood Florida City Fort Lauderdale Gulf Breeze Jacksonville Lakeland Manatee County Medley Miami North Miami North Miami Beach Ocoee Orange County Orange Park Orlando Osceola Palatka Palm Beach County Palm Coast Pinecrest Sarasota Sunrise Tamarac Tampa West Palm Beach Grand Total Jurisdiction Appendix C: Crashes Involving Non-Motorists Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation 0.00% -------33.33% 100.00% --0.00% -25.00% -100.00% ---100.00% --100.00% --9.09% -100.00% --100.00% ---60.00% -----50.00% -100.00% 0.00% 0.00% -100.00% -19.64% non-motorist % change Appendix C: Crashes Involving Non-Motorists Before and After Red Light Camera Implementation Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 13 A crash where the front of one vehicle impacts the back of another vehicle. Any visible injuries such as bruises, abrasions, limping, etc. Any visible signs of injury from a crash or person(s) who had to be carried from the scene. Any injury that results in death within a 30 day period after the crash occurred. Any person other than an occupant of a motor vehicle in transport. This includes pedestrians, occupants of other motor vehicles not in transport and occupants of transport vehicles other than motor vehicles. Rear-End Crash Non-incapacitating Injury Incapacitating Injury Fatal Injury Non-Motorist Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 A crash where two vehicles impact at an angle. For example, the left front of one vehicle impacts the side of another vehicle. Angle Crash Appendix D: Glossary of Terms Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 14 Community Development, Code Compliance Joanne Carr Traffic Unit Police Department-Traffic Unit Brooksville Police Department Patrol/Special Operations/Traffic Police Department - Traffic Police Department POLICE DEPT/SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT DIV Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer Patrol Police Police Police Department POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Department Police and City Attorney Police Department Police Red Light Camera Unit/Administration Division Ofc. Michael Vega #7314 City of Miamin Police Department 7314@miami-police.org City of Boynton Beach City of Bradenton City of Brooksville City of Clearwater City of Clermont City of Clewiston CITY OF CORAL GABLES City of Edgewood City of Florida City City of Groveland City of Gulf Breeze City of Gulfport CITY OF HAINES CITY City of Homestead City of Kissimmee City of Miami Gardens City of Miami, Florida Sgt. Marcos Gonzalez Police Traffic Unit Economic Development, Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Division Police Department Police Administration and Public Safety Department Broward Sheriff's Office - Traffic Unit Tampa Police Department Special Operations Green Cove Springs Police Department City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department City of Orlando City of Palm Coast City of Port Richey City of Sarasota City of South Pasadena City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac City of Tampa City of Winter Park Green Cove Springs rvincent@mygulfport.us rrandle@gulfbreezefl.gov cheyenne.getford@groveland-fl.gov mramirez@floridacityfl.gov ssalemi@edgewood-fl.gov ACASTELLO@CORALGABLES.COM rowanmj1@flcjn.net dcarter@clermontfl.org michael.walek@myclearwater.com rhankins@cityofbrooksville.us phil.waller@cityofbradenton.com petrielloa@bbfl.us carrj@cityofaventura.com tc32426@bellsouth.net rmoore@kissimmee.org tsurman@homesteadpolice.com Broward Sheriff's Office City of Tallahassee City of South Pasadena Sarasota Police Department Port Richey Police Department City of palm Coast Code Enforcement Ocoee Police Department City of Opa-locka Police Department New Port Richey Police Department Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 JFaro@gcspd.com paul.smalley@tampagov.net sbelfiore@cityofwinterpark.org / slocke@cityofwinterpark.org Barry_Berhow@sheriff.org allen.secreast@talgov.com clewis@mysouthpasadena.com bryan.graham@sarasotafl.gov r.runge@cityofportrichey.com bgrossman@palmcoastgov.com raymond.rodriguez@cityoforlando.net mgonzalez@opalockapd.com wwagner@ocoee.org bogartk@cityofnewportrichey.org Miami Gardens Police Department william.bamford@mgpdfl.org Kissimmee Police Homestead Police Department HAINES CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT TGLOVER@HAINESCITYPD.COM Gulfpodrt Police Department Gulf Breeze Police Department Florida City Police Department City of Groveland/Police Department Edgewood Police Department CITY OF CORAL GABLES Clewiston Police Department Clermont Police Department Clearwater Police Department Brooksville Police Department Bradenton Police Department Boynton Beach Police Dept. City of Aventura Town of Campbellton Corporal Paul Smalley Tampa Police Department Samuel Belfiore / SGT Stan Lacke Winter Park Police Department Green Cove Springs Police Officer J. J. Faro, Jr. Department Barry A Berhow Allen Secreast Carley Lewis Bryan Graham Ryan Runge Barbara Grossman Raymond Rodriguez Lt. Bill Wagner Police Department City of New Port Richey Kim Bogart, Chief of Police William Bamford R. Moore Lt. Thomas Surman TIM GLOVER Robert Vincent Robert Randle Cheyenne Getford Michelle Ramirez Stacey Salemi ALEX CASTELLO Diane Carter Lieutenant Michael J. Rowan Lt. Michael Walek Richard C Hankins Sgt. Phillip E. Waller CSO A. Petriello #072 Helen Rhynes pflanders@balharbourfl.gov swbrick@apopka.net Public Safety--Law Enforcement Bal Harbour Police Department City of Aventura Apopka P.D. Campbellton Pamela Flanders Lt. Stephan Brick Email Address Police Department Agency Police Department Name Provide the contact information of the person completing the survey Bal Harbour Village What Department oversees the red light camera program in your jurisdiction? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey 904 631-9807 813-348-2035 407-643-1652 / 407599-3512 954-247-6002 (850) 891-8273 727-347-4171 941 954-7022 7278350974 386 986-4739 (407)246-2487 3059532877 ext 235 407-905-3160 727.841.4550 Ext. 116 305-603-6710 305.474.1391 407-847-0176 ext. 3266 305-224-5411 863-632-1386 EXT 2267 727-893-1049 850-934-5121 352-429-4166 305-248-0571 4078512820 305-722-8669 863-983-1474 352-394-5588 727-562-4119 352-540-3800 941-932-9300x318 561-742-6119 305 466 8940 (850) 263-4535 305-866-5000 407-703-1771 Phone Number Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X GATSO Sensys America, Inc. GATSO Sensys America What red light camera vendor(s) does your jurisdiction use?  Has your jurisdiction operated red light cameras within the reporting Other (please American Traffic period (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016)? Redflex Xerox  Solutions (ATS) specify) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 1 15 3 7 2 6 City of Edgewood City of Florida City City of Groveland City of Gulf Breeze 15 54 8 5 City of Tamarac City of Tampa City of Winter Park Green Cove Springs 5 8 46 15 0 0 23 5 4 32 9 123 28 0 0 -8 0 -19 -5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 -20 0 0 0 0 -3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 -2 -2 0 0 3 6 21 8 7 4 10 2 4 14 4 4 6 86 15 9 3 7 3 3 2 7 2 4 0 4 2 16 6 7 7 1 3 11 Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 19 City of Tallahassee 4 City of Palm Coast 5 29 City of Orlando City of South Pasadena 9 5 7 City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department 23 9 City of New Port Richey City of Sarasota 9 143 City of Miami, Florida City of Port Richey 7 28 City of Miami Gardens 4 16 4 16 City of Kissimmee 13 0 6 2 7 3 5 2 6 3 16 7 15 13 0 5 21 3 6 18 8 0 0 10 2 4 15 4 4 6 75 15 9 3 7 0 3 2 7 2 4 2 4 2 16 6 7 7 0 3 11 0 0 -3 0 -7 -4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 -11 0 0 0 0 -3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 0 As of July 1, 2015, at how As of June 30, 2016, at how As of June 30, 2016, Difference Difference # many intersections were many intersections were how many RLC's # RLC's Intersections RLC's operational? RLC's operational?  were operational? City of Homestead 3 5 CITY OF CORAL GABLES 13 0 City of Clewiston CITY OF HAINES CITY 6 City of Clermont City of Gulfport 3 City of Clearwater 15 City of Boynton Beach 7 15 City of Aventura 16 2 Campbellton City of Brooksville 5 City of Bradenton 21 Bal Harbour Village As of July 1, 2015, how many RLC's were operational? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey 3176 19095 5750 2259 23681 9008 4616 14364 115332 63686 15159 2898 11394 3202 5668 1566 26415 5870 3565 165 5185 10868 9273 7081 15563 30121 24 6235 21905 # Paid 7940 16100 71989 18200 5612 12115 45801 10093 Red Light Camera Program ended 08/17/2015 Data no longer available 4263 25346 8210 3566 34504 20763 7667 21286 186967 128476 23011 5514 15948 5370 7638 2297 30156 8837 5632 230 7977 16118 15890 8187 27592 51142 83 10235 33754 Total # 21 N/A 100 Contested / 0 Pending 754 Data no longer available 0 244 24 231 3 0 0 243 1188 12958 10 2 134 / 0 44 9 0 0 8 1701 0 27 21 11 3 295 1358 2 20 76 # Contested & pending 79 234 100 Contested / 14 Dismissed 8 Red Light Camera Program ended 08/17/2015 2 11 10 2 58 92 18 70 656 41466 20 15 134 / 41 61 1 14 0 6 18 0 19 36 6 10 36 4 0 292 99 # Contested & dismissed 81 775 100 Contested / 86 Upheld 97 Data no longer available 68 216 78 66 122 343 115 276 1733 10366 70 158 134 / 93 18 8 10 0 20 56 1 104 51 72 35 469 0 2 101 1065 # Contested & upheld 2074 1967 24033 1840 Red Light Camera Program ended 08/17/2015 912 5648 932 555 9851 9923 2803 4936 55804 64790 6790 2242 4093 2008 1509 594 9546 1156 1295 181 2088 3094 3050 1624 9350 17329 0 3201 10214 # issued as UTC 0 650 24033 0 2 Red Light Camera Program ended 08/17/2015 0 0 0 323 0 0 17 Unavailable 1145 0 119 199 0 0 660 0 2959 1 0 0 52 213 911 135 2679 0 0 0 0 # Pending issuance as UTC Please provide the following information regarding NOVs issued for RLC violations in your jurisdiction between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 16 Our office does not perform registration holds None NONE City of Clermont City of Clewiston CITY OF CORAL GABLES 153 0 City of Sarasota City of South Pasadena 23 Green Cove Springs Both Electronically Electronically Both Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Both Both Electronically Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 0 None City of Tampa City of Winter Park 53 City of Tamarac Information not available 0 City of Port Richey City of Tallahassee 0 City of Palm Coast Electronically 0 0 54 3 City of New Port Richey City of Orlando Both 1035 City of Miami, Florida City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department 1166 City of Miami Gardens Electronically Electronically 0 97 Electronically Electronically City of Kissimmee CITY OF HAINES CITY Electronically Paper Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically Both Electronically Electronically How does your jurisdiction submit crash data to the Department? City of Homestead 0 0* City of Gulfport 0 6 City of Clearwater City of Gulf Breeze 30 City of Brooksville 0 12 City of Bradenton 258 288 City of Boynton Beach City of Groveland 0 City of Aventura City of Florida City 0 Campbellton 14 0 City of Edgewood 216 Bal Harbour Village How many registration holds did your jurisdiction request as a result of RLC violations during the reporting period (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016)? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) 311 743 59459 719 Data not tracked 142 1291 261 167 1109 1385 562 1655 20057 16893 1060 300 700 300 252 1 2597 385 117 Information not collected 378 494 1283 1 2176 5171 1 353 3053 In order to identify the number of repeat offenders, please provide the number of distinct vehicle owners issued Notices of Violation for multiple red-light camera violations.  Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No No No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Response Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles City of Hollywood v. Arem caused unnecessary redundant workload No significant change in violations Pending Class Action Suit Program suspended by city from 07/01/15 thru 08/25/15 for BRQ modifications. Minimal impact. Law Changes changing the process. Some task redundant loosing time not during this period of time Six cases were stayed temporarily Hollywood v. Arem & Aventura v. Jimenez cases Arem No cases have impacted the 9th Judicial Circuit Program has remained the same Influenced decision by elected body to cancel the program in March, 2016 DRIVERS ARE MORE CAUTIOUS OF RUNNING RED LIGHTS N/A AREM ruling resulting in monthly dismissals of UTC's Initial review of all violations and all UTC mailings are handled by the Traffic Infraction Officer. the program was upheld by the Court Changes were made to improve process Details Have court cases impacted your red light camera program?  3 17 Citizen complaints Very Important N/A Very Important Very Important Somewhat Very Important Important Very Important Very Important Not Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Somewhat Not Important Important Very Important Very Important N/A City of Clewiston CITY OF CORAL GABLES City of Florida City City of Groveland City of Gulf Breeze CITY OF HAINES CITY City of Homestead Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Important City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac Very Important Very Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Not Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Not Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important N/A Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Pedestrian safety N/A Very Important Very Important N/A Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Traffic Volume Program has remained the same since 2009 N/A No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Four cameras were removed due to significant reducting in number of violations. N/A If yes, why? Did you relocate any existing red light cameras during the reporting period? Other (please specify) Response Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Green Cove Springs City of Winter Park City of Tampa Somewhat Important N/A Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important City of South Pasadena City of Sarasota Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Somewhat Important Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important N/A Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important N/A Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Somewhat Important Law Enforcement Officer observations City of Port Richey City of Palm Coast City of Orlando City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department City of New Port Richey Very Important City of Miami, Florida Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important City of Miami Gardens City of Kissimmee N/A Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Somewhat Important Important City of Gulfport City of Edgewood N/A Very Important Very Important City of Clermont City of Clearwater Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Very Important Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Traffic citation data Other than traffic crashes, please rank the following factors on importance when selecting which intersections to install RLCs City of Brooksville City of Bradenton City of Boynton Beach City of Aventura Campbellton Bal Harbour Village Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X change in number change in change in of crashes pedestrian safety revenue Amount of Violations reduction in repeat offenders Change in number of red light violations change in the number of crash/right angle Increase or decrease in number of Notices of Violations issued = Success/Failure Lower amount of violations being issued show more compliance Program has remained the same since inception. No data collected Change in number of straight through and right turn violations Number of Violations Change in number of violations Other (please specify) What factors are used to determine the success/failure of each camera location? (select all that apply) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 4 18 X X X X X X Bal Harbour Village Campbellton City of Aventura City of Boynton Beach City of Bradenton City of Brooksville X CITY OF CORAL GABLES X X X X X City of Palm Coast City of Port Richey City of Sarasota X X X X City of Tamarac City of Tampa City of Winter Park Green Cove Springs Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officers Traffic Enforcement Officer (civilian) Other (please specify) Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 X X X City of Tallahassee X X X X Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) City of South Pasadena X X City of Orlando X X City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department X City of New Port Richey X City of Miami, Florida X City of Homestead X X CITY OF HAINES CITY X X City of Gulfport X City of Miami Gardens X City of Gulf Breeze X X City of Groveland X X X X Non-sworn government employee City of Kissimmee X City of Florida City City of Edgewood X City of Clewiston City of Clermont City of Clearwater X Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Law Enforcement Officer Who reviews the camera images before Notices of Violation are issued? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Non-Sworn government employee X X Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) Traffic Magistrate contracted hearing officer Local Hearing Officer Magistrate Traffic Enforcement Officer (civilian) Other (please specify) Who reviews contested Notices of Violation? (select all that apply) Law Enforcement Officer Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Law Enforcement Officer X X X X X X X X X X X X Non-sworn government employee X X X Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officers Hearing Officer Traffic Enforcement Officer (civilian) Other (please specify) Who issues Uniform Traffic Citations if Notices of Violation are unpaid? (select all that apply) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 5 19 No Yes Yes Yes Yes City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac City of Tampa City of Winter Park Green Cove Springs 907 Not Tracked 8965 10883 34 453 5151 106923 3460 4265 495 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Intelligent collision prevention system N/A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Re-striping - at Re-striping - at Re-striping Engineering - at Engineering - at intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC - N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of your red light camera program? Intelligent collision prevention Intelligent collision prevention system at intersection(s) w/ RLC system at intersection(s) w/o RLC Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Yes Yes City of South Pasadena Yes City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department No Yes City of New Port Richey City of Sarasota No City of Miami, Florida No Yes City of Miami Gardens City of Port Richey Yes City of Kissimmee No Yes City of Homestead Yes No CITY OF HAINES CITY City of Palm Coast 8392 Yes City of Gulfport City of Orlando 6405 No City of Gulf Breeze 56 Yes City of Groveland Not sure No Yes City of Florida City 312 213 See number 29 3914 35632 0 823 14479 City of Edgewood Yes CITY OF CORAL GABLES Yes City of Brooksville No Yes City of Bradenton City of Clewiston No City of Boynton Beach No Yes City of Aventura Yes Yes Campbellton City of Clermont Yes City of Clearwater Yes Bal Harbour Village Do you issue NOVs (through red light # of NOVs were issued for right turns camera detection) for persons on red during the reporting period? (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016) making right turns on red signals? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 6 20 X X X X X X X X X X Campbellton City of Aventura City of Boynton Beach City of Bradenton City of Brooksville City of Clearwater City of Clermont City of Clewiston CITY OF CORAL GABLES X X X X X City of Gulf Breeze City of Gulfport CITY OF HAINES CITY City of Homestead City of Kissimmee X Green Cove Springs X X X X X Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 X City of Winter Park City of Tampa City of Tamarac X X City of South Pasadena X X City of Sarasota City of Tallahassee X X City of Port Richey X X X City of Orlando X X X X X X City of Palm Coast X X City of New Port Richey X City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department X City of Miami, Florida City of Miami Gardens X City of Groveland X X X X X X X X X X City of Florida City X X X X City of Edgewood X X X X X X X Bal Harbour Village X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Engineering Increased signage at Increased signage at Increased Lighting at Lighting at Lighting N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC signage  N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC N/A What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of your red light camera program? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Has red light camera footage been used to investigate other crimes? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N/A Insurance request and client request internal police investigations Burglaries, Homicides, Unknown death, Robberies, Sexual Offences, Hit & Runs, Shootings, etc. Video evidence of incident insurance request Felony Battery Case. Video was not useful. Robbery Other (please specify) If yes, please select all that apply (if no, select N/A)  Crash Criminal Missing N/A investigation investigation person Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 7 21 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes City of Orlando City of Palm Coast City of Port Richey City of Sarasota City of South Pasadena City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac City of Tampa City of Winter Park Green Cove Springs Please provide any specifications/clarifications for any of your answers. N/A None N/A Numbers 18-20: non-sworn government employee is a certified traffic infraction enforcement officer. Number 24: No data available stating Broward County improved safety measures as a result of red light camera program. HALO technology added to several intersections within jurisdiction. Some intersections have been upgraded with new traffic signals and paving. Question 10, part 7 cannot be answered as the number changes daily as violation notices are paid or not paid. N/A * NO DMV HOLDS WERE COMPLETED AS WE HAD ISSUES GETTING DMV TO ACCEPT OUR INFORMATION. THIS HAS BEEN CORRECTED #18 - The last step in issuance of a violation is the review and approval by a sworn officer. N/A N/A Our agency conducts analysis on stats, accidents, and video requests N/A #22 The vendor doews not have a method of separating right on red violations from straight through violations 13.) Unable to provide proper answer with search tools provided by Xerox////////21 and 22.) Right turn on red violations are only issued out for intersections where a sign prohibits the right turn on red. Number provided in 22 is only from that intersection video is used for hit & run, shoplifting, fraud and other police department investigations N/A N/A Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 No No No No No No No No Yes No No No Yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes City of Gulf Breeze No Yes City of Ocoee City of Opa-locka Police Department No City of Groveland No City of New Port Richey Yes City of Florida City Yes Yes City of Edgewood No City of Miami, Florida Yes CITY OF CORAL GABLES No Yes No City of Clewiston No Yes City of Miami Gardens Yes City of Clermont Yes Yes City of Clearwater No City of Kissimmee Yes City of Brooksville No Yes No City of Bradenton No Yes City of Homestead No City of Boynton Beach No Yes City of Aventura No Yes No Campbellton No No CITY OF HAINES CITY Yes Has your jurisdiction conducted an independent red light camera analysis?  City of Gulfport Yes Bal Harbour Village Is your jurisdiction continuing the red light camera program in Fiscal Year 2016-2017? Apopka Police Department Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 8 22 Agency Sgt. Stephen Allen OFFICER STEVEN LOPEZ SWEETWATER PD Lakeland Police Police Department Building and Development Services Miami Beach PD Traffic Unit Police Department Patrol North Miami Police Department North Miami Beach Police Department Public Works Orange Park Police Department Public Works Palatka Police Department Police SWEETWATER Police Kenneth City Police Department Police Surfside PD Traffic Unit Police Department Public Works Community Development West Miami Police Maitland Manatee County Government Miami Beach Miami Springs Milton Police, Milton Florida North Miami North Miami Beach Orange County Orange Park FL Clay Osceola County Palatka Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) Town of Davie Town of Kenneth City Town of Medley Town Of Surfside Village of key Biscayne Village of Pinecrest West Park Cutler Bay West Miami Manatee County Government Maitland Police Department Lakeland Police joaquinrodriguez@miamibeachfl.gov vicki.gipson@mymanatee.org ddambrosio@maitlandpd.org scott.wisneski@lakelandgov.net larry.jones@jaxsheriff.org naikens@hcso.tampa.fl.us Email Address Tiffany.Argueta-Cruz@nmbpd.org pjoseph@northmiamipolice.com mcdanielskk@flcjn.net jgonzalez@pinecrest-fl.gov West Miami Town of Cutler Bay 305-35-4262, ext 5538 305 266-0530 fernandez@westmiamipolice.org (954) 931-2149 (305)234-2100 x385 305-365-5555 305-861-4862 (954) 931-2149 727-498-8942 954 693-8342 305-552-9900 954 746-3387 386-329-0115 407-742-0623 904-278-3006 407-836-7892 (305) 354-4460 305-891-0294 850 983 5423 3058871444 305 673 7776 ext 5768 (941) 748-2071 407-875-2810 863-603-6649 904-630-2160 813-247-0985 Phone Number egarcia@cutlerbay-fl.gov JWilson@Cityofwestpark.org Village of Pinecrest Police Department City of West Park bkemmerer@kbpd.net pmckenna@townofsurfsidefl.gov John.Wilson@MedleyPD.com fugatej@kennethcityfl.org John_Wilson@Davie-FL.Gov SLOPEZ@CITYOFSWEETWATER.FL.GOV sallen@sunrisefl.gov Twilliams@palatka-fl.gov joedel.zaballero@osceola.org ggoble@townop.com Key Biscayne Police Department Surfside PD Medley Police Department Kenneth City Police Department Davie Police Department Sunrise Police Department Palatka Police Department Osceola County Orange Park Police Department Orange County Traffic Engineering Alyssa.Eide@ocfl.net North Miami Police Department North Miami Beach Police Department Milton Police Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Frank Ferandez Elena Garcia John Wilson J. C. Gonzalez Sgt. Patrick McKenna Sergeant Brian Kemmerer John Wilson John Fugate Jr. John Wilson Capt. Tobby Williams Joedel Zaballero Gary Goble Alyssa Eide Tiffany Argueta-Cruz PSA Joseph Katherine McDaniels Lieutenant Jimmy Deal Miami Springs Police Department jdeal@mspd.us Sgt. Joaquin Rodriguez Miami Beach PD Vicki Gipson Dawn D'Ambrosio Scott Wisneski Jacksonville Sheriff's Office Lakeland Lt. Larry Jones Jacksonville Sheriff's Office Jacksonville, FL Hillsborough County Sheriff's Corporal Nicole Aikens Office Name Provide the contact information of the person completing the survey Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office What Department oversees the red light camera program in your jurisdiction? Hillsborough County Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Gatso What red light camera vendor(s) does your jurisdiction use?  Has your jurisdiction operated red light cameras within the reporting period (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016)? American Traffic Redflex Xerox  Other (please Solutions (ATS) specify) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 9 23 13 1 4 5 21 5 50 7 18 6 13 8 16 7 4 5 4 4 6 5 6 Miami Springs Milton Police, Milton Florida North Miami North Miami Beach Orange County Orange Park FL Clay Osceola County Palatka Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) Town of Davie Town of Kenneth City Town of Medley Town Of Surfside Village of key Biscayne Village of Pinecrest West Park Cutler Bay West Miami 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -3 -7 -12 -7 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -21 -4 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 6 2 5 4 3 5 3 4 8 2 10 6 9 3 36 5 10 1 4 9 6 3 11 26 Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 6 5 5 4 4 5 1 0 4 6 18 7 50 4 0 1 4 10 9 4 18 8 4 Maitland 10 18 Lakeland 41 10 Miami Beach 40 6 2 4 4 3 5 1 0 3 1 10 6 9 3 36 4 0 1 4 9 7 3 11 27 6 0 0 -1 0 0 0 -2 -4 -5 -1 0 0 0 0 0 -1 -10 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 As of June 30, 2016, As of July 1, 2015, at how As of June 30, 2016, at how Difference Difference # how many RLC's many intersections were many intersections were # RLC's Intersections were operational? RLC's operational? RLC's operational?  Manatee County Government 10 Jacksonville, FL As of July 1, 2015, how many RLC's were operational? Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey 20564 4862 4041 7659 1852 7692 6386 4283 unknown as I cannot access ATS database. 20742 29953 4916 7280 8197 75627 17667 11363 2808 10597 13715 12722 7077 25438 50159 41439 Total # 10698 2712 1700 5126 1432 4809 4412 same as above. 2030 12738 15092 2560 4496 5780 47069 8885 4621 2079 6554 11119 9377 5098 15701 32248 28022 # Paid 500 229 113 20 0 189 23 same as above. 12 1465 12799 1000 0 8 1105 0 0 0 0 0 71 0 218 63 452 # Contested & pending 1400 3 25 8 60 4 21 same as above. 14 127 94 200 110 9 30 76 180 2 31 0 7 3 544 22 10 # Contested & dismissed 788 107 23 127 77 14 52 same as above. 36 295 385 600 40 62 339 282 210 16 156 0 62 21 728 276 258 # Contested & upheld 10000 1677 1459 1254 240 2468 1454 same as above. 2159 6412 762 400 2397 2037 24922 6707 5856 664 3856 1317 1980 965 8077 15578 12522 # issued as UTC 15000 0 0 388 67 177 0 10 same as above. 0 1465 12131 0 0 0 1512 1146 0 0 0 0 19 150 0 218 N/A # Pending issuance as UTC Please provide the following information regarding NOVs issued for RLC violations in your jurisdiction between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 24 320 0 Lakeland Maitland 18 Orange Park FL Clay Both 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 41 0 Town of Davie Town of Kenneth City Town of Medley Town Of Surfside Village of key Biscayne Village of Pinecrest West Park Cutler Bay West Miami Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Electronically Electronically Paper Electronically Electronically Electronically Paper Electronically Paper Electronically 0 267 Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) Electronically 0 Electronically Paper Electronically Electronically Electronically Paper Electronically Electronically Both Electronically Electronically Electronically Electronically How does your jurisdiction submit crash data to the Department? Palatka None 0 Osceola County 0 Orange County Unknown North Miami Beach North Miami 14 (9 still active) 70 Miami Springs Milton Police, Milton Florida 1318 Miami Beach Our office does not perform registration holds 0 Manatee County Government 137 Jacksonville, FL How many registration holds did your jurisdiction request as a result of RLC violations during the reporting period (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016)? Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) 345 160 135 134 86 268 207 unknown as I cannot access ATS database. 132 971 1385 120 188 7487 4709 858 594 86 305 1174 404 175 2154 3167 2039 In order to identify the number of repeat offenders, please provide the number of distinct vehicle owners issued Notices of Violation for multiple red-light camera violations.  Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes No No No No No No Yes Yes No No Response Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Conflicting rulings from appellant courts 11 3rd DCA ruling entered on July 26, 2016, ruling on the City of Aventura vs. Luis Torres Jimenez, rejecting Jimenez's arguments. Hence, on 08/03/2016, Motion To Stay and/or to Dismiss was filed by GOLD & Associates, P.A. d/b/a The Ticket Clinic. As a result, all Uniform Traffic Citations (UTC'S) cases in MiamiDade County are being continued until a final resolution is ruled upon. In house hearings were put on hold pending the outcome of the Aventura Case Conflicting appellant court rulings Conflicting rulings from appellant courts We are not presently issuing UTC's We changed the way we issue UTC Not Applicable Laws affect policies and procedures We have started a second UTC review process before issuing UTC Details Have court cases impacted your red light camera program?  25 N/A Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important North Miami North Miami Beach N/A Somewhat Important Town of Kenneth City Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important N/A Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important N/A Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not Important N/A Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Not Important Traffic Volume Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important N/A Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important N/A Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Pedestrian safety Not Applicable The number of fatality crashes or hit and run crashes that occur at an intersection or approach. N/A No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No WSP15 has been off-line due to construction N/A If yes, why? Did you relocate any existing red light cameras during the reporting period? Other (please specify) Response Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 West Miami Cutler Bay West Park Very Important Somewhat Not Important Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Important Village of Pinecrest Very Important Somewhat Important Very Important Town Of Surfside Town of Medley Village of key Biscayne N/A Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important N/A Very Important N/A N/A Somewhat Important Somewhat Very Important Important Somewhat Important Very Important Town of Davie Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Important Somewhat Not Important Important Palatka Osceola County Orange Park FL Clay Orange County Very Important Very Important Milton Police, Milton Florida N/A Somewhat Important Somewhat Very Important Important Miami Springs Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Very Important Miami Beach Very Important N/A Somewhat Important Manatee County Government Maitland Very Important Somewhat Important Lakeland Very Important Somewhat Very Important Important Not Important Not Important Not Important Very Important Law Enforcement Officer observations Jacksonville, FL Citizen complaints Very Important Very Important Traffic citation data Other than traffic crashes, please rank the following factors on importance when selecting which intersections to install RLCs Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X change in number change in change in of crashes pedestrian safety revenue Reduction in the number of violations Decrease/Increase in number of violations Change in the number of violations not applicable, program discontinued Change in the number of NOV's issued Change in Violations Change in number of violations Not Applicable Increase or decrease in the number of violations issued over a specific period of time. The total number of violations issued annually and whether they are increasing or decreases. Lower violations is key to less red light running. Other (please specify) What factors are used to determine the success/failure of each camera location? (select all that apply) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 12 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X Lakeland Maitland Manatee County Government Miami Beach Miami Springs Milton Police, Milton Florida North Miami North Miami Beach Orange County Orange Park FL Clay Osceola County Palatka Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) X X Village of Pinecrest X West Miami X X X X X X X X Non-sworn government employee X X X Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) Public Service Aides Other (please specify) Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 X Cutler Bay West Park X Village of key Biscayne X Town Of Surfside Town of Medley Town of Kenneth City Town of Davie X Jacksonville, FL X X Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Law Enforcement Officer Who reviews the camera images before Notices of Violation are issued? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Non-Sworn government employee X Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) local appointed magistrate Public Service Aides Hearing Officer (Attorney) Other (please specify) Who reviews contested Notices of Violation? (select all that apply) Law Enforcement Officer Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Law Enforcement Officer X X X X X X Non-sworn government employee Non-sworn contractor employee (vendor) Pinellas County Clerk of Court Public Service Aides/ Becomes a UTC after a certain period of time Other (please specify) Who issues Uniform Traffic Citations if Notices of Violation are unpaid? (select all that apply) Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 13 27 15000 637 100 1813 unknown, I cannot access ATS database. 572 20 1177 427 74 5767 5805 This number is not tracked Our jurisdiction does not track those violations Not tracked X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Intelligent collision prevention system N/A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 Re-striping - at Re-striping - at Re-striping Engineering - at Engineering - at intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC - N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of your red light camera program? Intelligent collision prevention Intelligent collision prevention system at intersection(s) w/ RLC system at intersection(s) w/o RLC Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 No Yes No Town of Davie West Miami Yes Cutler Bay Yes Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) No Yes Palatka No Yes Osceola County West Park Yes Orange Park FL Clay Village of Pinecrest Yes Orange County Yes Yes North Miami Beach Yes Yes North Miami Village of key Biscayne No Milton Police, Milton Florida Town Of Surfside Yes Miami Springs Yes Yes Miami Beach Yes Yes Manatee County Government Town of Medley 14804 Yes Maitland Town of Kenneth City 18868 Yes Lakeland 9008 No 90 Yes Jacksonville, FL Do you issue NOVs (through red light # of NOVs were issued for right turns camera detection) for persons on red during the reporting period? making right turns on red signals? (July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016) Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 28 X X X X Milton Police, Milton Florida North Miami North Miami Beach X X Osceola County Palatka X West Miami Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 X X X Cutler Bay X X X X Village of key Biscayne X X X X X X Town Of Surfside X X X X West Park X Town of Medley X X X X X X X X Village of Pinecrest X X Town of Kenneth City X Town of Davie Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) X Orange Park FL Clay X X X Miami Springs Orange County X X Miami Beach X X X X Manatee County Government Maitland X X Jacksonville, FL Lakeland What action(s) has your jurisdiction taken to improve safety measures as a result of your red light camera program? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Engineering Increased signage at Increased signage at Increased Lighting at Lighting at Lighting N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC signage  N/A intersection(s) w/ RLC intersection(s) w/o RLC N/A Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Has red light camera footage been used to investigate other crimes? X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X We have pulled video on 137 occasions this past year. We have utilized the video to assist in crash investigations, including vehicle fatalities, burglaries, robbery, homicide and kidnapping. We have also supplied video for civil actions relating to traffic crashes. Hit and Run accidents, Homicides, Stolen vehicles and etc. Internal Investigations / Client requests and Assisting other agencies SRSO/ Crashes and Criminal Inv Red light camera video has been used for traffic crashes involving injuries and homicides for time line and suspect identification Department officers have used footage for misc. crimes committed in their areas of assignment. Camera footage has been reviewed 64 times. Other (please specify) If yes, please select all that apply (if no, select N/A)  Crash Criminal Missing N/A investigation investigation person Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 15 29 No No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No No No Yes No No No No No Yes Yes Please provide any specifications/clarifications for any of your answers. n/a #22-Worked with the Miami-Dade County Public Works/Waste Management Dept.-Traffic Signals & Signs Division in order to meet/comply the FDOT's Yellow Light Interval Timing Standards at all Red Light Camera Enforced Intersections. Our analysis resulted in a change to our BRQ's requiring that all videos be sent to us and all videos are reviewed by the Traffic Infraction Enforcement Officer none MDY03, 10, & 11 are currently off-line due to major construction to improve traffic flow I cannot access ATS database for statistics Independent analysis resulted in a reduction in the number of red light cameras in the Town. We saw considerable reduction in the number of NOV's issued indicating a change in driver behavior na Question 10: A "0" was used in informations fields where the information is not trackable by our software. N/A N/A N/A Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Yes West Miami Yes Town of Davie No Yes Yes Yes Sunrise SWEETWATER (MIAMIDADE) Cutler Bay Yes Palatka West Park Yes Osceola County Yes Yes Orange Park FL Clay Village of Pinecrest Yes Orange County Yes Yes North Miami Beach Yes No North Miami Village of key Biscayne Yes Milton Police, Milton Florida Town Of Surfside Yes Miami Springs No Yes Miami Beach Yes Yes Manatee County Government Town of Medley No Yes Maitland Town of Kenneth City Yes Yes Lakeland No Yes Yes Yes Has your jurisdiction conducted an independent red light camera analysis?  Jacksonville, FL Is your jurisdiction continuing the red light camera program in Fiscal Year 2016-2017? Apopka Police Department County Hillsborough Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Master Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix E: Jurisdiction Responses to Survey Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 16 30 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Reviewing Police Officer makes determination, officers are instructed to only issue notices of violation if had they been present at the intersection they would have issued a UTC for the same violation for running a red light in a non careful and prudent manner. We have only one intersection which is marked and signed as a "No Turn on Red" Violation are issued for right hand turns on red whenever the vehicle operator proceeds in a continuous movement without regard for oncoming, opposing or pending traffic at an intersection. A violation is also issued whenever the operator fails to slow, stop or yield to any pedestrian, or vehicle making a U-turn at a perpendicular angle. Our local ordinance adopts the language used to define careless driving under state law. The driver made a complete stop before making the right-hand turn. turning safely without effecting other vehicles traveling that direction SPEED, TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIANS Right hand turn made after exercising caution by slowing down to allow for pedestrians in crosswalk to continue safely and also give right of way to any oncoming traffic Careful and prudent manner would be coming to a complete stop, ensuring that the driver of the vehicle had enough time to look at oncoming traffic to determine if it was clear to proceed. 11 miles an hour or over without stopping Having regard for angle, width, grade, curves, corners, vehicles, pedestrians and all other attendant circumstances, including but not limited to speed and visual obstructions, so as not to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person. Note: Damage or injury does not have to occur in order for an event to be considered NOT careful and prudent. The following the questions will be asked: 1) Did the vehicle slow down or 2) Did the vehicle/driver yield to pedestrians When second vehicle has to slow to avoid a crash with violator vehicle stops before, at or after the stop bar before turning red at the intersection Section 316.0083(1)(a), F.S., provides that "A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a "careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible." As this statute does not define "careful and prudent manner," please provide the definition used by your jurisdiction when determining if a violation should be issued. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 Our Traffic Enforcement Specialists (T.E.S.) review all potential violations where motorists cross the stop bar at 15 MPH or more. (All of our cameras are located at intersections with a 45 MPH or less designated speed.) The T.E.S. reviews the video and considers the totality of the circumstances to determine if a violation occurred; i.e., traffic volume, pedestrian traffic, roadway conditions, etc.). A notice of violation is issued when the motorist proceeds to make the turn without slowing down during unfavorable conditions, or when the turning vehicle causes other City of New Port Richey motorists to brake or take evasive action. City of Ocoee Any violator who approaches an intersection at a speed greater than 13 mph who fails to come to a full and complete stop in the intersection prior to making a right hand turn City of Opa-locka Police Department Traffic Volume, Pedestrians, Speed, City of Orlando City of Palm Coast Maximum safe speeds per FDOT green book City of Port Richey City of Sarasota City of South Pasadena Determined by issuer and Special Magistrate presiding over hearings based on circumstances City of Tallahassee City of Tamarac Careful and prudent manner does not apply. Right turns on red are only enforced at the location which is posted "No Turn on Red" City of Tampa Where the vehicle turns and does not disrupt or endanger other traffic or pedestrian movement. City of Winter Park You can make a right turn in a "careful and prudent manner" after coming to a complete stop pursuant to the directives of Florida Statute. Green Cove Springs If there is no apparent effort to slow down or stop and the speed exceeds a minimum of 10 mph City of Miami Gardens City of Miami, Florida City of Homestead City of Kissimmee Apopka Police Department Bal Harbour Village Campbellton City of Aventura City of Boynton Beach City of Bradenton City of Brooksville City of Clearwater City of Clermont City of Clewiston CITY OF CORAL GABLES City of Edgewood City of Florida City City of Groveland City of Gulf Breeze City of Gulfport CITY OF HAINES CITY Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Right Turn Definitions Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix F: Right Turn Definitions Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 31 Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles careful and prudent manner right turns completed at 12mph or higher Violation is issued if vehicle makes the turn in excess of 15 MPH and/or interferes with other traffic that has the right of way or causes a pedestrian to take action to avoid being struck Pedestrian in Crosswalk The driver of the vehicle failed to make a complete stop when entering the intersection with a red light. Traveling at a low rate of speed (Normally between 10-15 mph); No pedestrians present; Not interrupting the flow of traffic N/A Only enforce right on red at locations that have a no turn on red sign when lit if vehicle does not stop within their turn At the intersection we enforce right on red, the violator has to drive into the bike lane and pass other vehicles on the right , fail to stop then make the right hand turn, endangering other traffic and/or pedestrians Taffic infraction officers make a determination just as a deputy would — based on the individual circumstances of that turn No other vehicles or pedestrians in the intersection or cross walk A right turn on red conducted at a speed greater than 15 mph without hesitating to slow prior to initiating the turn. Consideration is given to the amount of traffic in the adjacent lanes, Uturning vehicles having the right of way, traffic on the road way, and pedestrian traffic at the intersection. A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued under this section if the driver of the vehicle came to a complete stop after crossing the stop line and before turning right if permissible at a red light, but failed to stop before crossing over the stop line or other point at which a stop is required. This is determined by a number of factors that include daylight, weather, traffic flow, amount of people or cars on roadway, and overall circumstances at the time of the violation. You can make a turn in a “careful and prudent manner” after coming to a complete stop pursuant to the directives of Florida Statute 316.075. However, our officers use their discretion when reviewing the violations and do not issue violations to anyone going under 16 MPH during a right-hand turn unless aggravating circumstances exist. The camera footage is viewed by a sworn law enforcement officer employed by the Manatee County Sheriff's Office. If the deputy reviewing the footage feels they would ticket the violation if they were in person at the light then they make the determination to ticket the violation from the camera. Careful and Prudent means the driver is aware of his environment and is driving in a responsible manner, i.e. speed, pedestrians, the right of way of approaching vehicles, etc. The vehicle should be traveling LESS than 15 mph. Drivers ,ust yield the right of way to other drivers and to pedestrians attempting to cross the street in the crosswalk. HCSO maintains a 15 mph threshold for right on red violations and only possesses two intersections with right turn enforcement. Section 316.0083(1)(a), F.S., provides that "A notice of violation and a traffic citation may not be issued for failure to stop at a red light if the driver is making a right-hand turn in a "careful and prudent manner at an intersection where right-hand turns are permissible." As this statute does not define "careful and prudent manner," please provide the definition used by your jurisdiction when determining if a violation should be issued. Red Light Camera Summary Report: Fiscal Year 2015 - 2016 SWEETWATER (MIAMI-DADE) Town of Davie Town of Kenneth City Town of Medley Town Of Surfside Village of key Biscayne Village of Pinecrest West Park Cutler Bay West Miami Sunrise Orange Park FL Clay Osceola County Palatka Manatee County Government Miami Beach Miami Springs Milton Police, Milton Florida North Miami North Miami Beach Orange County Maitland Hillsborough County Jacksonville, FL Lakeland Name of Jurisdiction (City or County) Right Turn Definitions Appendix: FY 2015-2106 Red Light Camera Summary Report Appendix F: Right Turn Definitions Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles 32