1 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 2 HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO 3 4 - - STATE OF OHIO, 5 6 7 8 Plaintiff, vs. RAYMOND M. TENSING, Defendant. ) ) ) ) CASE NO: B-1503961 ) ) ) ) ) 9 10 11 - - - 12 TRANSCRIPT OF SIDEBAR CONFERENCES 13 HELD DURING THE RAYMOND TENSING TRIAL 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 - - - 2 June 7, 2017 1 2 (The following was held at 3 4 sidebar.) 5 THE COURT: 6 MR. TIEGER: Go ahead. Judge, I mean, if 7 the record could reflect he's excused an 8 African-American male juror. 9 with Batson, you know, we've got to show And I know 10 a pattern, but I would ask the Court to 11 ask the Defense team what the 12 race-neutral reason was for excusing 13 him. THE COURT: 14 15 need one at this point. But if you would like one, you 16 17 I don't think they certainly can. MR. MATHEWS: 18 I will. And I 19 would argue that Batson does not apply 20 to the case the way I read it, number 21 one. 22 response to the questions about his DUI 23 conviction, and he mentioned that he was 24 stopped by law enforcement for speeding 25 and got into an argument, a verbal But race-neutral reason is the 3 1 altercation, with him that resulted in 2 some racial epithets being thrown. 3 he had what I considered a very negative 4 opinion of law enforcement. 5 THE COURT: 6 He's excused. 7 MR. TIEGER: And Thank you. And I think Batson 8 does apply to the Defense. 9 say he could be a fair juror, so if you 10 could just note my objection. THE COURT: 11 12 And he did Well, he's excused. Okay. (Sidebar concludes.) 13 14 (The following was held at 15 16 sidebar.) 17 THE COURT: 18 MR. TIEGER: Go ahead. Judge, I think this 19 is getting to be a pattern now of 20 excusing minorities. And she was an extremely fair 21 22 juror. She was funny, she had banter 23 back with Mr. Mathews, laughing and 24 joking about different things. 25 absolutely said that she can be fair. She 4 1 She could sign all the verdict forms, 2 and I just don't see any race-neutral 3 reason that he would have to bump her. THE COURT: 4 5 Mr. Mathews, your response. MR. MATHEWS: 6 My first response 7 is, number one, I don't think that we're 8 required to state a reason. 9 I didn't like her answers on the Number two, 10 questionnaire. 11 but I'll get specific and say that she 12 indicated she watched the video, she had 13 formed an opinion, but she could set 14 that aside. 15 shooting was not justified from what she 16 saw on the video. 17 having watched the trial, she has an 18 opinion in reference to guilt or not 19 guilty. 20 her responses. 21 22 I'm sure Mr. Tieger did, She indicated she felt the She said she -- after And I don't like the rest of THE COURT: Okay. She'll be excused. 23 I'm noting your objection. 24 MR. TIEGER: 25 Judge, and I think there are a number of people that are on 5 1 the jury that have had same or similar 2 answers; that they've seen the video and 3 had formed opinions that they can set 4 aside. THE COURT: 5 I know, but we're 6 dealing with a very unique group of 7 people, and very few of them have not 8 heard about this. 9 three people who haven't heard about it, 10 11 I think we have maybe so -MR. TIEGER: Judge, if he tries 12 to excuse another African-American 13 juror, I would hope that the Court would 14 question that pretty severely. 15 THE COURT: Okay. All right. 16 MR. TIEGER: 17 (Sidebar concludes.) Thank you. 18 19 20 (The following was held at sidebar.) 21 THE COURT: 22 MR. TIEGER: 23 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead. What's your feeling? Same thing one, one; 24 two, two; three, three. You have 25 already done these guys for cause. If 6 1 we get somebody up for cause, then we'll 2 stop. MR. TIEGER: 3 Are you saying if we 4 do, let's say, take one, we can take any 5 one of the first four, take any one of 6 these first four? 7 THE COURT: 8 Any of the four. MR. TIEGER: 9 10 Yes. Then the fifth one would take their spot? THE COURT: 11 I don't have an 12 objection to that. Or do you want to 13 start with the first one? 14 MR. TIEGER: I don't think you 15 have to limit yourself to the first one. 16 I just want to make sure that we're 17 good. 18 just with regard to these first four. 19 So I get a bump. 20 The fifth alternate would take -- I 21 think everybody would move up one. We're talking about our bumps 22 THE COURT: 23 MR. TIEGER: Let's say we take one. Right. If we bumped 24 Number 1, that person wouldn't take 25 Number 1's spot. 7 THE COURT: 1 2 3 4 Right; just move this way. THE BAILIFF: Everybody would slide up. 5 MR. TIEGER: 6 MR. MATHEWS: 7 THE COURT: Is that right? Yes, yes. That way we know we 8 are going to get the ones who are in 9 line next. 10 MR. TIEGER: Right. 11 THE COURT: 12 (Sidebar concludes.) Okay. 13 June 9, 2017 14 15 16 17 18 (The following was held at sidebar.) THE COURT: We're here back on 19 the record with the Prosecution's next 20 witness. What is her name? 21 MR. TIEGER: Alicia Napier. 22 THE COURT: 23 Ms. Napier, it's my understanding Alicia Napier. 24 you do not want to be photographed. 25 that right? Is 8 1 ALICIA NAPIER: 2 THE COURT: 3 Right. State your reason for the record for that. ALICIA NAPIER: 4 Just don't want 5 to be noticed outside in the public 6 because I have been -- I have been in 7 incidents where I've been seen at the 8 gas station when I was pumping gas with 9 my son and I've had looks and stuff. 10 You know, on TV and stuff. 11 didn't want to be noticed, or whatever. THE COURT: 12 Okay. I just Are you in 13 fear for your safety? Is that your -- 14 ALICIA NAPIER: That's the main 15 reason why I didn't want to be. THE COURT: 16 17 Counsel, any questions? 18 MR. TIEGER: 19 THE COURT: No, Your Honor. I'll instruct them 20 not to film you for your testimony, 21 okay? 22 Okay, thank you. 23 ALICIA NAPIER: 24 25 Thank you very much. (Sidebar concludes.) 9 (The following was held at 1 2 sidebar.) THE COURT: 3 4 Your response to that? MR. MATHEWS: 5 Well, I was just 6 summarizing what I thought I just heard 7 her say, that based on her experience, 8 she thought it was justified. THE COURT: 9 In my opinion, that 10 can be brought in because she had an 11 opinion, and they typically will provide 12 the opinion to the Prosecutor's Office, 13 and she did say she gives input to the 14 Prosecutor's Office. MR. TIEGER: 15 Judge, I mean, I -- 16 I would be -- it would be extremely 17 improper of me ever to ask in a murder 18 case of a homicide detective, Do you 19 think he did it? THE COURT: 20 You can never -But that's what she's 21 saying. 22 her input was to the prosecutor. 23 24 25 You're asking -- she said what MR. TIEGER: No; that wasn't the question. THE COURT: I thought that was 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 the question. MR. MATHEWS: she said. MR. TIEGER: Judge, we can have Colleen read back the question. (The court reporter read back the 7 pending question.) 8 MR. TIEGER: 9 I summarized what I mean, I can never ask anybody what your feelings are 10 whether or not he did it. 11 ask that internally. 12 opinion as to whether something -- it's 13 a legal opinion. I mean, that's her 14 MR. MATHEWS: 15 MR. TIEGER: 16 THE COURT: 17 (Sidebar concludes.) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I could never I'll withdraw it. Thank you. Okay. 11 June 12, 2017 1 2 (The following was held at 3 4 sidebar.) THE COURT: 5 Go ahead, 6 Mr. Mathews. 7 this in front of the jury. 8 MR. MATHEWS: 9 I didn't want you to say Right. Go ahead. My objection to 2-A and -B are that I 10 believe Officer Pham is going to say 11 that that depicts the location of where 12 the car ended up at Rice and Valencia. 13 They also have the body of Sam DuBose 14 laying in the street, and I don't think 15 that they need the body of Sam DuBose 16 laying in the street to show where the 17 car ended up. THE COURT: 18 19 They have a face photo too. MR. MATHEWS: 20 I'm going to get to 21 -E; I think is highly prejudicial and 22 inflammatory, as I think -A and -B are, 23 with reference to the body laying in the 24 street. 25 THE COURT: Mr. Tieger, what is 12 1 the point of him -- what is the point of 2 questioning with regard to these photos 3 for this witness? MR. TIEGER: 4 Judge, I think it 5 would assist the jury in understanding 6 the crime scene as it unfolded that 7 evening and what he saw and what he did. 8 So I think it's definitely important to 9 help him explain his testimony and 10 assist them in understanding it. I know that -- I know in the last 11 12 trial -THE COURT: 13 Explain to me the 14 understanding of his body being covered 15 laying outside the car and his face 16 being all bloodied, I mean, what does 17 that show with regard to that testimony? MR. TIEGER: 18 I mean, it 19 identifies him as being the one that was 20 at the crime scene. 21 MR. MATHEWS: 22 that. 23 THE COURT: 24 MR. TIEGER: 25 I will stipulate Okay. And I know at the last trial, the Court -- not that you're 13 1 bound by this at all -- excluded -E but 2 allowed -A and -B. 3 THE COURT: I'm going to exclude 4 all three for the time being. 5 they may come in at another point, but 6 not right now. 7 MR. MATHEWS: 8 (Sidebar concludes.) I mean, Thank you. 9 10 June 14, 2017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 (The following was held at sidebar.) THE COURT: objecting? Okay, why are you What is your objection? MS. DEGRAFFENREID: Because he's 18 trying to show that he would be charged 19 with a felony, or something, to make 20 some insinuation. 21 THE COURT: 22 23 24 25 officer? Is this guy a police I couldn't tell. MS. DEGRAFFENREID: No; he's a lab technician. THE COURT: So he wouldn't know. 14 MR. MATHEWS: 1 But he testified he 2 must know the weight. 3 tested enough to get up to the maximum 4 charge we could get, which is over 5 200 grams. 6 talking about, the maximum charge. So I want to know what he's THE COURT: 7 He said, I only So I guess you have 8 to explain this to me a little more. 9 The analysts are the ones who -- they 10 weigh it, they figure out what's going 11 on, and then they give it to the police 12 department for the police department to 13 give the charges? MR. MATHEWS: 14 Yes. If something 15 is submitted to them, they take it in, 16 they weigh it, and in this case the 17 difference from one degree of felony to 18 the next is -- if it's over 200 grams, 19 it's a felony, but it's a lesser degree 20 unless it's over 1,000 grams. 21 knows there wasn't 1,000 grams, but he 22 knows -- he weighed more than 200 23 because that's what would result in a 24 felony. 25 THE COURT: Well, he Ms. DeGraffenreid? 15 MS. DEGRAFFENREID: 1 He wanted to 2 insinuate that there was some felony 3 charge. 4 marijuana was in the car when this all 5 occurred, so whether it would be a 6 felony or a misdemeanor charge doesn't 7 matter. THE COURT: 8 9 Tensing didn't even know the Let's stick to why can't he answer that? He's not saying 10 he would have been charged with it. 11 sounds to me like he's simply giving the 12 levels. MR. MATHEWS: 13 14 That's exactly right. THE COURT: 15 16 It I'm going to overrule the objection. (Sidebar concludes.) 17 18 (The following was held at 19 20 sidebar.) THE COURT: 21 22 We're on the record outside the presence of the jury. Dr. Looman is here to testify 23 24 from -- she works for the Coroner's 25 Office. She does not wish to be 16 1 photographed or videoed at this time. 2 Any questions -- 3 Is that correct? 4 DR. LOOMAN: 5 THE COURT: 6 That's correct. And your reasoning for that, Dr. Looman? DR. LOOMAN: 7 I'd rather not end 8 up on YouTube, which happened the first 9 time. 10 THE COURT: 11 Do you have a fear of your 12 safety? Any concerns for your safety? 13 DR. LOOMAN: 14 MR. MATHEWS: 15 I see. No. Judge, I have no objection to her not being photographed. THE COURT: 16 17 valid reason. 18 for. I just have to have a That's what I'm looking 19 Mr. Tieger? 20 MR. TIEGER: I mean, I think she 21 was honest with the Court, Judge. 22 just doesn't want to be -- 23 THE COURT: She I have no objection 24 to Counsel, so hopefully that will 25 suffice. 17 1 You will not be photographed. 2 DR. LOOMAN: 3 (Sidebar concluded.) Okay. Thank you. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (The following was held at sidebar.) MR. TIEGER: Judge, these are photos, if you want to see them. THE COURT: So what's your objection? MR. MATHEWS: Judge, my objection 12 is that the photos are highly 13 prejudicial, inflammatory, and serve no 14 useful purpose. 15 he died as a result of the gunshot, and 16 I don't see where they add anything of 17 probative value to her testimony. 18 She's already testified MR. TIEGER: Judge, and I think 19 they assist Dr. Looman in explaining her 20 testimony and also assist the jury in 21 understanding -- 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: to show that? Do they really have Come on now. MR. TIEGER: Judge, these were all admitted in the last trial, so I'm 18 1 just bringing you what was admitted last 2 time. 3 MR. MATHEWS: 4 MR. TIEGER: 5 THE COURT: 6 does this tell me? 7 MR. TIEGER: Over objection. I understand that. I don't know. What Seriously. It will just show 8 the gunshot wounds, Judge, and how they 9 affected the skull and the brain. THE COURT: 10 We already know he 11 died. 12 but she already said he died 13 instantaneously. 14 add insult to injury? 15 16 I mean, I don't mean to be flip, Do we really have to MR. TIEGER: This is evidence to show what people testified to. 17 THE COURT: 18 Don't keep it up there long. 19 MR. MATHEWS: 20 They're admitted. Please note my objections. 21 THE COURT: 22 (Sidebar concluded.) 23 24 25 Yes. 19 1 2 3 (The following was held at sidebar.) THE COURT: I'm really torn about 4 these last couple pictures. 5 warn them, and they better be up there 6 for a second. 7 MR. TIEGER: 8 THE COURT: 9 You need to Sure, Judge. Make sure they're prepared for that, because I don't see 10 those being -- I can't -- I just -- I'm 11 struggling to allow those in, so you 12 better make sure they're up for a 13 limited time and they're ready for it. 14 15 16 17 18 MR. MATHEWS: Again, I'll take one more opportunity to object. THE COURT: have those? Why does she need to They're -- come on. MR. TIEGER: Judge, again, the 19 bullets went through the head and 20 through the brain. 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: She can show that with the other picture of the head. You know what? exclude those. I'm going to I don't want those up. (Sidebar concluded.) 20 (The following was held at 1 2 sidebar.) THE COURT: 3 4 Okay, go ahead, Mr. Tieger. MR. TIEGER: 5 Judge, I think we're 6 getting very close to what the Court had 7 already ruled, and I know that there's a 8 couple of drugs in his system. 9 like an antifungal and the other is like One is 10 an antibiotic. There were two drugs, 11 and I think there was some marijuana 12 found. 13 THE COURT: 14 MR. TIEGER: Okay. I think there was a 15 hearing last time that was actually on 16 the record with Mr. Topmiller that was 17 at least describing the marijuana, and I 18 would ask that maybe after court today, 19 the Court could look at that, because I 20 don't know where Mr. Mathews is going 21 with this, but -- 22 THE COURT: 23 24 25 Well, if he had drugs in his system, that's admissible. MR. TIEGER: Well, what Mr. Topmiller would say is -- 21 1 THE COURT: 2 MR. TIEGER: 3 Who is Mr. Topmiller? He's actually the one that did the tests. 4 THE COURT: 5 MR. TIEGER: Oh; got it, got it. But he said, Judge, 6 with the marijuana, that there was 7 marijuana in his system, but when 8 somebody dies and they didn't take the 9 blood for, like, 20 hours after he died, 10 that even if you had smoked days and 11 days before, when you die, the blood 12 changes, and that could give a false 13 positive for what was actually in the 14 blood. 15 THE COURT: Can she answer that 16 question if you ask her that on 17 redirect? 18 MR. TIEGER: I don't think she 19 can because that's not her area of 20 expertise. 21 time in front of Judge Shanahan, and I 22 know you're not bound by her rulings, 23 but Judge Shanahan excluded it, the 24 marijuana in his system, and I would ask 25 that go also for the antibiotic and And they had a hearing last 22 1 antifungal, because we're getting into 2 what the Court had ordered. THE COURT: 3 Well, they don't know 4 what it's for unless she says what it's 5 for. 6 MR. TIEGER: 7 MR. MATHEWS: Still. Number one, I don't 8 think there's been a ruling made in this 9 case, in this trial. 10 THE COURT: 11 And I get his argument, but what 12 No, it hasn't. is your reasoning for this? MR. MATHEWS: 13 Well, again, he -- 14 if the toxicology report shows that he 15 had marijuana in his system -- and I 16 agree Dr. Topmiller testified last time 17 that -- 18 MR. TIEGER: 19 MR. MATHEWS: In limine. In limine. -- that 20 upon death, the metabolites get 21 redistributed from the fat into the 22 blood, and there's no way to know 23 accurately what the level is, but it 24 still shows it's in his system. 25 THE COURT: Could you clarify 23 1 that through her? MR. TIEGER: 2 Can you clarify? Judge, I would ask 3 that -- basically, he -- there can be no 4 scientific opinion as to whether there 5 was any kind of impairment. 6 smoked a week before and it's totally 7 out of his -- it's in his metabolite. MR. MATHEWS: 8 9 Maybe he I'm not trying to prove that there was impairment, I'm 10 just trying to prove there was marijuana 11 in his system. 12 MR. TIEGER: 13 relevance of that, Judge. THE COURT: 14 15 I don't see the Well, it could affect his judgment. MR. TIEGER: 16 Well, no, because it 17 wouldn't, because nobody could say that 18 it would have had an effect because the 19 blood was taken too long after his 20 death. And I also ask to exclude the 21 22 antibiotic and antifungal medication. THE COURT: 23 Oh I don't care about 24 that. No one knows what that's for. 25 wouldn't have known unless you guys I 24 1 would have told me. 2 Okay. All right. Is what he's 3 saying true about this guy and what this 4 guy said without me reading it? 5 6 7 MR. MATHEWS: It's not that long to read, but Megan -THE COURT: I'm not talking about 8 Megan's ruling; I'm talking about that 9 doctor, or whoever he is. 10 MR. MATHEWS: I have subpoenaed 11 Dr. Topmiller and he's supposed to be 12 here tomorrow. 13 14 15 16 THE COURT: questions. MR. MATHEWS: THE COURT: 18 going to be here. 20 21 22 23 24 25 You can read that tonight, and we can do it tomorrow. 17 19 You can ask him these That's easy, if he's That's much easier. The objection will be held in abeyance, for the record. (Sidebar concluded.) 25 June 15, 2017 1 2 3 4 (The following was held at sidebar.) 5 THE COURT: Hi, sir. 6 NATHAN ASBURY: 7 THE COURT: Hello, Judge. We're on the record 8 at sidebar, prior to starting the 9 jury-in-progress again. 10 11 Mr. Mathews has brought on Sergeant -- 12 NATHAN ASBURY: 13 THE COURT: 14 15 Nathan Asbury. -- Nathan Asbury. And he wishes not to be filmed. What is the reason for this, so 16 we can put it on the record. 17 NATHAN ASBURY: I'm currently in 18 a plainclothes assignment. We operate a 19 lot of undercover and use a lot of CIs, 20 and we have current investigations that 21 if I got put on TV would probably 22 jeopardize some of the safety of the 23 officers. 24 THE COURT: That's good. 25 Any objection from either party? 26 1 MR. TIEGER: 2 MR. MATHEWS: 3 THE COURT: 4 We'll keep you unfilmed. 5 No, Judge. No objection. Okay, good. You'll be heard, though, you know. 6 NATHAN ASBURY: Yes, ma'am. 7 THE COURT: 8 (Sidebar concluded.) Okay. 9 June 16, 2017 10 11 (The following was held at 12 13 sidebar.) THE COURT: 14 Let's stop this. 15 Please. 16 this jury doesn't need to hear this. MR. MATHEWS: 17 18 This is too much for the -- I understand, Judge. THE COURT: 19 It's not going to 20 make anybody feel better about anybody's 21 side, all right? 22 upset. And you guys are doing a great 23 24 25 All it does is make me job. Just keep it where it is. And they can see what you think 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 you're seeing, okay? MR. TIEGER: That's fine. you, Judge. (Sidebar concludes.) Thank 28 1 CERTIFICATE 2 I, COLLEEN R. O'CONNELL, the 3 undersigned, a Registered Diplomate Reporter for 4 the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, do 5 hereby certify that at the same time and place 6 stated herein, I recorded in stenotype and 7 thereafter transcribed the within 27 pages and 8 that the foregoing Transcript of Proceedings is 9 a true, complete, and accurate transcript of my 10 11 12 said stenotype notes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand this 25th day of July, 2017. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Colleen R. O'Connell Registered Diplomate Reporter Court of Common Pleas Hamilton County, Ohio