Thu 3.151? 11:53 
Smith. sandy 
Re: Response

To .Daorile. Lucas

oThis message is part of a tracked conversation. I:liclc here to find all related messages or to open the original flagged message.

The statement is the district's response. Thanks
Sent from my iPhone

Jun 1, 2017, at 11:48 AM, Daprile, Lucas wrote:

:5

The statement has nothing to do with my questions.



Please note that when I ?rst talked to you about this on May 5r you said, "Provide me with documents you are referring to and I will
set up a meeting to go over."

i:

I held up my end of the bargain in sending you the documents even sending them twice to make sure you got them. It doesn't
seem you have any interest in doing the same.



 

If the district doesn?t want to comment on why it removed expensive scientific information and softened enforcement language at
the request of a US Sugar lobbyist, I can't change that. Just know that I?ve gone out of my way to get your side of the story.



r: If you change your mind about answering any of my questions, let me know ASAP.



Lucas Daprile

TCPalm Investigative Reporter