?3 H0 US. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT I Spcciai Applications Center "at" ??906! 77 W. Jackson Blvd, Room 2401 Chicago, 60604-3507 Phone: (312) 353-6236 Fax: (312) 913-8892 OFFICE OF PUBLIC HOUSING October 2, 2017 Mr. Roy Boling Executive Director Housing Authority of the City of New London 78 Walden Avenue New London, CT 06320?2723 Dear Mr. Boling: The US. Department of Housing and Urban Development?s (Department) Special Applications Center (SAC) has reviewed the Housing Authority of the City of New London (HACNL) application for the disposition of 3 dwelling buildings containing 124 dwelling units and 3 non?dwelling units and 9.13 acres of underlying land at Thames River Apartments, CT022000001. The SAC received application DDA0008314 on August 19, 2017, via the Inventory Management SystemfPublic and Indian Housing Information Center system. Supplemental information was received through October 2, 2017. Office of Public Housing and Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Certification The City of New London certi?ed their Environmental Review (ER) assessment was in accordance with 24 CFR part 58 on July 18, 2017. The recipient submitted a Request for Release of Funds (RROF), HUD form 7015.15 on July 18, 2017. The RROF was authorized by the HUD Hartford Office of Public Housing (OPH) on August 8, 2017. On August 30, 2017, the Boston Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO), Program and Compliance Branch, recommended the demolition approval. Under 24 CPR in order for a demolition or disposition application to be approved after November 24, 2006, the effective date of this regulation, a Public Housing Agency (PI-IA) must provide a certi?cation that the PHA has described the demolition or disposition in the PHA Annual Plan and timetable under 24 CFR part 903, and that the description in the PHA Annual Plan is identical to the application submitted pursuant to this part and otherwise complies with Section 18 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1437p) and this part. The HACNL submitted 5-Year Plan to the Hartford OPH on September 23, 2014, which includes a description of the proposed disposition action at the development. The HUD Hartford OPH approved the 5-Year Plan on November 4, 2014. Development History and Description and Proposed Removal Action The HACNL has not received any Inventory Removal approvals from HUD for Thames River Apartments, CT022000001. The HACNL proposed the disposition of 3 dwelling buildings containing 124 dwelling units and 3 non-dwelling units and 9.13 acres of underlying land at Thames River Apartments, CT022000001. Details of the proposed disposition are as follows: Visit our World Wide Web Site http:/ offices/ pih/ centers sac/ Thames River Apartments, CT 022000001 Bedroom Size Total Existing Units *63 *55 *34 61 14 227 Proposed Units 0 16 33 61 14 124 Number of Dwelling Buildings Existing 4 Number of Dwelling Buildings Proposed 3 Number of Non-Dwelling Units Existing 3 Number of Non-Dwelling Units Proposed 3 Number of (Dwelling and Non?Dwelling) ACC Units in 226 Total Housing Inventory for All Developments Existing Land 10.70 Acres Proposed Land 9.i3 Acres Building Numbers Per PIC: A, B, *Includes 1 merged unit and 3 non-dwelling units Disposition Justi?cation, Valuation, Method of Sale and Use of Proceeds The HACNL pr0posed the diSposition based on 24 CFR 970.17(a) and has certi?ed in Exhibit A: Reason for Removal of the PHA Certi?cation of Compliance that the retention of the property is not in the best interests of the residents or the PHA because conditions in the area surrounding the project adversely affect the tenants or the feasible operation of the project by the PHA. Due to the surrounding property use and zoning, the subject location is not suited for multifamily use. Although the current zoning is high density residential, the preperty is surrounded on three sides by industrial uses (within the C-1 zone), and the site is located under and adjacent to Interstate 95. In addition, the site is located in proximity to the New London State Pier, one of three commercial ports in the state. Entry into the property fronts a heavily industrialized street. In addition to the change in neighborhood affecting the safety of residents, the HACNL provided an estimate of itemized rehabilitation costs, based on the existing conditions of the units, which is included in Exhibit - A. The rehabilitation cost was estimated to be $28,617,256, which is 72.7 percent of the Total Development Cost (TDC) limit which is $39,377,416. The application included a court order, ordering the HACNL to either develop replacement housing or rehabilitate the subject property. The Hartford Field Of?ce Director concurred tha . . there is an emergency situation at the property related to oncoming Winter conditions. There are issues with the boiler system that the Housing Authority does not have adequate resources to address. The Housing Authority used a temporary emergency boiler placed outside the building all last winter at a very high cost . . The HACNL proposes a negotiated sale at Fair Market Value (F MV) to the City of New London (City). The City will demolish the property and use the property for its own municipal non-residential use. The HACNL submitted an appraisal with the application. David Herbst, an independent appraiser, determined the Fair Market Value (FMV) to be $185,000, as of May 9, 2017. The HACNL proposes to use the disposition proceeds to pay for relocation expenses. The Department concurs that the disposition is in the best interests of the residents and the PHA and is pursuant to 24 CFR The disposition method is a fair market transaction and is pursuant to 24 CFR 970.19. Relocation When the application was developed and transmitted to the Department, 123 units proposed for disposition were occupied. The HACNL has submitted a certi?cation regarding relocation as required by 24 CFR 970.21(e) The HACNL estimated the relocation cost for the remaining residents to be $622,729.32, which includes moving expenses and counseling/advisory services. The funds for relocation are allocated under FFY 2017, and 2018 Operating Funds, de?federalized funds that no longer are restricted as to use by HACNL, and gross proceeds from the sale of the property. The housing resources offered will be housing choice vouchers. Resident Consultation 1. Project Speci?c Resident Organizations: None-exists 2. FHA-wide Resident Organization: Resident Advisory Board (RAB) 3. Resident Advisory Board (RAB) in accordance with 24 CFR 903.13: RAB 24 CFR 970.9(a) requires that an application for diSposition be deve10ped in consultation with residents who will be affected by the proposed action, any resident organizations for the development, FHA-wide resident organizations that will be affected by the disposition, and the Resident Advisory Board (RAB). The FHA must also submit copies of any written comments submitted to the PHA and any evaluation that the PHA has made of the comments. The HACNL met with the residents on September 16, 2015 to discuss the disposition application. The HACNL has included sign-in sheets in the application package. The HACNL met with the RAB on June 20, 2017. The RAB consists of three members and no sign-in sheet was provided by the HACNL to the RAB members. 24 CFR 970.9(a) requires submission of any written comments, and the HA's evaluation of the written comments with the application package. Speci?cally, state whether written comments were received. If written comments were received, mention the HA's analysis of them. The HACNL did not receive any written comments. Offer for Sale to the Resident Organization 24 CFR 970.9(b) of the regulations requires that a public housing agency offer the opportunity to purchase the property proposed for disposition to any eligible resident organization, eligible resident management corporation as de?ned in 24 CFR part 964, or to a nonpro?t organization acting on behalf of the residents, if the resident entity has expressed an interest in purchasing the property for continued use as low-income housing. The HACNL made a formal offer for purchase of the subject property to the Resident Advisory Board via a letter dated September 27, 2017. The president of the Resident Advisory Board, Jeanne Ward responded in writing on October 2, 2017, stating that the Resident Advisory Board has no interest to purchase the aforementioned properties. Mayor/Local Government Consultation and Board Resolution As required by 24 CFR 970.7(a) (14), the application package includes a letter of support from the Honorable Michael Passero, Mayor of the City of New London, dated June 21, 2017. As required by 24 CFR 970.7(a) (13), the HACNL Board of Commissioners approved the submission of the disposition application for the proposed prOperty on June 27, 2017, via Resolution Number 008-2017. The last resident consultation was on June 20, 2017. Approval The Department has reviewed the application and ?nds it to be consistent with Section 18 of the Act, and the implementing regulations, 24 CFR part 970, including requirements related to resident consultation, relocation and opportunity to purchase the prOperty by the resident organization. Based upon the review, the Department ?nds that the requirements of 24 CFR part 970 and Section 18 of the Act have been met, the disposition as previously identi?ed and described below, is hereby approved. Thames River Apartments, T022000001 Approved for Disposition: Buildings: 3, Units: 124, 3 non-dwelling units, Acres: 9.13 Total Units to be Redeveloped Less than 80% of Area Median Income ACC PBV Market Rate Rental - Acquiring Entity City of New London or its Assigns Method of Sale Negotiated Sale at FMV Sale Price $185,000 Demolish structure and land for Municipal urpose Uses Building Numbers Approved Per PIC: A, B, C. Legal Description attached Conditions The HUD Hartford OPH, with concurrence from the HUD Of?ce of the General Counsel (OGC) or their designees, if required, must approve all acquiring entities, terms and conditions in the conveyance of real property, whether in whole or in part, described in this approval. If there are previous land and/or use agreements or encumbrances, other than the Declaration of Trust (DOT), disposition approval and release of the DOT does not circumvent or supersede those obligations. Operating Subsidy and Capital Fund Financing Program Please be aware that in accordance with 24 CFR 990.114, the disposition of these units will affect the HACNL operating subsidy eligibility. Please contact your ?nancial analyst at the HUD Hartford OPH for additional guidance. As of September 22, 2017, the HACNL did not have HUD approval of a Capital Fund Financing Program (CFFP) preposal. Tenant Protection Vouchers (TPV) PIH Notice 2017?10 separates TPVS into two classes, Replacement Vouchers and Relocation Vouchers. In connection with this disposition, the HACNL does not intend to replace any public housing units. The maximum number of relocation and replacement TPVs is based on the occupancy of the public housing units at the time the SAC application is approved by HUD. At the time of this approval, there were 122 occupied dwelling units. If the HACNL plans change, and HUD approves a future amendment to this approval which allows for a different unit con?guration, the type and number of TPV award may be impacted. Based on this, the HACNL may be eligible for maximum TPVs as follows: Type of TPVs Relocation TPVs Replacement TPVs Maximum TPV Award 0 122 Subject to the availability of funding, HUD may subsequently be able to provide TPVS for vacant units lost due to Public Housing actions in the impacted properties in accordance with the authority provided under the 2017 Act. At the time of approval 3 vacant dwelling units were vacant for less than 24 months: Type of TPVs Relocation TPVs Replacement TPVs Number of units vacant for less 0 3 than 24 months PIC and Monitoring - HACNL In accordance with 24 CFR the HACNL provided the following general timetable based on the number of days major actions will occur following approval of the application: Milestone Number of Days after Approval A Begin relocation of residents 90 13 Complete relocation of residents 210 Execution of contract for removal . . 240 (eg. sales contract or demolition contract) Actuai Removal Action . . . 285 (6g. demohtIOn or sale closmg The Department recognizes that a plans to start relocation sometimes change. However, because the Department relies on this information to determine Operating Funds subsidy, PHAs are responsible for ensuring the days to relocation information in a SAC application is reasonably accurate. If days to relocation in a SAC application is not reasonably accurate, asset repositioning fee (ARF) payments under 24 CFR 990.190 may begin prematurely and a FHA may receive less Operating Fund subsidy than it otherwise would be entitled to receive. A PHA may even find itself in a situation where it is Operating public housing units without any Operating Fund subsidy. Therefore, it is essential that PHAs make timely requests to the Department for any necessary modi?cations to the days to relocation in a SAC application. Note that after the Operating Fund subsidy revisions deadline in the ?rst year of ARF eligibility, no further changes to the days to relocation in an approved SAC application or can be made. If the HACNL becomes aware that the days to begin relocation information (noted in Field A above table - Begin relocation of residents) is not reasonably accurate, the HACNL must send an email to the Director of Hartford OPH within ?ve business days, with a copy to the HUD PIT-I staff member assigned to the PHA using the following Subject Code, SAC application DDA Number, Modi?cation to Days to Relocation The HACNL must include the new estimated number for the days to relocation, along with a brief explanation of the reason for the modi?cation. The Hartford OPH will review the request to ensure it is reasonable/it has no information that is inconsistent with the request (eg. information from residents that relocation has started) and that the new estimated days to relocation is not past the Operating Fund subsidy revisions deadline in the ?rst year of ARF eligibility. If the HACNL request is acceptable, SAC will modify the days to relocation in the SAC application in and email the PHA notifying it that it has made the change. SAC processes these modifications as technical corrections and will not issue a formal written amendment to this approval. If the HACNL request is not acceptable the requested new days to relocation is past the Operating Fund subsidy revisions deadline in the ?rst year of ARF eligibility), the Hartford OPH will deny the request in writing. The HACNL must keep adequate records of all relocations (including actual relocation start dates) for purposes of HUD monitoring. In accordance with 24 CFR 970.35 of the regulation, your agency is required to inform the HUD Hartford OPH 0f the status of the project delays, actual disposition, modification requests or other problems). Within seven days of disposition completion, the HACNL must enter the ?actual? dates of disposition, directly into the data system, Inventory Removals sub-module under ?Removed from Inventory? tab for the HUD Hartford OPH approval, using the following procedure: . On the screen, select the appropriate "Development Number", then select ?Add Transaction". On the next screen, select the appropriate "Application Number" from the drop?down menu. In the "ActionKClosing Date? box, enter the removal date. If the properties in an application were removed on multiple dates, a separate transaction is needed for each action date. The remaining steps are as applicable. 0 If removal is by buildings, use ?Remove Residential Inventory By Building? section, select the appropriate buildings available in the ?Complete Buildings Available" box and transfer them to the ?Preposed Buildings" box. 0 For removal of some units in a building, use ?Remove Residential Inventory By Unit? section. To select the appropriate units available, use the drop-down ?Select the building number" box which populates the "Units Available" box. Transfer the appropriate units to the "Proposed Units" box. . For removal of land and non?dwelling buildings without PIC building numbers, use ?Remove Non?Residential Inventory? section. Fill in the number of acres and non~ dwelling buildings without PIC building numbers. 0 Save the information using the "Save" button. The status of this information is then displayed as "Draft." . HACNL supervisory staff submits the information to the HACNL Executive Director, or the designated ?nal reviewer at the HACNL, using the Submission sub tab. The status becomes "Submitted for Review?. . The HACNL Executive Director or designee uses the Review sub tab to reject the transaction, which places it in a "Rejected" status, or approves, which places it in 3 ?Submitted for Approval" status. . If the submission is rejected by HUD, the HACNL may modify the information by repeating the previous procedure. If the transaction is rejected, the status becomes ?Rejected.n If the HUD Hartford OPH approves the transaction, the status in permanently changes to ?Removed from Inventory When the disposition is completed in its entirety, please submit a report to the HUD Hartford OPH confirming the action and certifying compliance with all applicable requirements. Auditable ?nancial statements, expenditures and ?les for each transaction relative to the action must be maintained, available upon request and forwarded with the final report. PIC and Monitoring OPH It is the Hartford responsibility to monitor this activity based on its latest risk assessment. The Hartford OPH must review the relocation change request submitted by HACNL, Within 10 business days, to ensure it is reasonable/it has no information that is inconsistent with the request information from residents that relocation has started) and that the new estimated days to relocation is not past the Operating Fund subsidy revisions deadline in the ?rst year of ARF eligibility. If the HACNLs request is acceptable, notify SACTA?hudgov via an email. The SAC will modify the days to relocation in the SAC application in and email the HACNL notifying that change has been made. If the HACNL request is not acceptable g. the requested new days to relocation is past the Operating Fund subsidy revisions deadline in the ?rst year of ARF eligibility), the Hartford OPH will deny the request in writing. The Hartford OPH must verify that the actual data is entered in by the HACNL within seven days of disposition to ensure the Department is not overpaying operating subsidy and the Capital Fund formula data is correct. Since this action expects to generate proceeds of $185,000, it is the Hartford reSponsibility to verify the funds were used as approved, and the HACNL records are adequately documented to support this assertion. When the PHA submits an Inventory Removal action in your Of?ce will be noti?ed seeking inventory removal approval via a PIC system generated email to your designated PIC coach or another person. Below is a sample noti?cation email: ?Subject: Inventory Removal Submittal Noti?cation (HA code) Inventory removals have been submitted for approval by your of?ce on [submission date] by Code].? When the above email is received, your Of?ce is reSponsible for the review and approval or rejection of the Inventory Removal submission within seven days. The HUD Hartford OPH has been informed of this approval. Its staff is available to provide any technical assistance necessary for your agency to proceed with the disposition. As the HACNL start the process of implementation, I urge you to continue to maintain an Open dialogue with your residents and local of?cials. If you have to modify your plans, please contact the SAC at SACTAthudgov. As always my staff and I are available to assist you in any way possible. Sincerely, 9a. 5 am Jane B. Hornstein Director cc: Hartford OPH Enclosure: A. Physical Needs Assessment B. Stipulated Judgement and Order August 25, 2014 C. Legal Description Total Development Cost U.S. Department of Housing one Approval No. 2577-0075 (TDC) Addendum and Urban Development (exp. 1013112017) Of?ce of Public and ladian Housing Public reporting burden for this collection ofinformation is estimated to average 2 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions. searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection ofinfortnation. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. This information is required to as a supplement to the HUD-S2360 for all inventory removal actions that involve a demolition action or a disposition action justi?ed by obsolescence based on requirements of Section i3 oftiie United States housing Act of 193? as amended and 24 CFR Part 970. HUD will use this information to determine whether, and under what circumstances. to permit PHAs to remove from their inventories all or a portion ofa public housing development, as well as to track removals for other record keeping requirements. Responses to this collection of information are statutory and regulatory to obtain a bene?t. Please refer to the instructions for each section for additional guidance on how to complete this application. HUD approval of the proposed removal from inventory action in this application does not constitute HUD approval for funding ofthe proposed action. All capitalized terms not de?ned in this form have the meanings as defined in the Act and the HUD Regulations. The information requested does not lend itselflo con?dentiality. 1. inventory Removal Application Number DDA Development Name 8. Number Thames River 2. Total Development cost calculation Based on HUD Notice 1 2017 ?Justification is based upon obsolescence of the unitslbuildings. complete the applicable calculation below forthe unit proposed for demolition for each project Size - Type Number of units Times TDC Per Unit 0 3dr Detached and Semi detached 3dr Row Dwelling 0 - Beralk-Up 0 - Bdrelevalor 1 - Detached and Semi detached 1 - Row Dwelling 1 Walk-Up elevator Eidr Delached and detached Eidr Row Dwelling Walk-Up 0 258.994 8,480,802 0 elevator 8dr Delached and detached 8dr Row Dwelling 8dr Walk-Up Elevator Detached and Semi detached Row Dwelling Walk?Up 21.244358 Eidr Elevator 423.324 5.558.212 Detached and Semi detached 8dr Row Dwelling 8dr Walk-Up Etevator Detached and Semi detached Row Dwelling Walk-Up 435.434 Elevator 39,377,416 3. Estimated Cost of Rehabilitation Provide an attachment showing cost breakdown and relerence it as Addendum to 52369-8 Rehabilitation Cost Breakdown 4. Rehabilitation Cost {estimated cost of Rehabilitaticanotal 100 I 52_50%l Provide attachments as needed. All attachments must relerence the form HUD-528693 (1cr201r) Section and line number to which they apply. Previous versions obsolete. Page 1 of 2 HUD-528603: Total Development Cost (TDC) Form Instructions: PHAs proposing to demolish all or a portion of a public housing develcpment (or proposing to dispose of public housing based on obsolescence) must complete this HUD-52860-B in order to demonstrate to HUD that no reasonable program of modi?cationfrehabilitation (rehabilitation) is cost-effective to return a development to its useful life. Item 1: Insert the number of the HUD Notice from which the FHA extracted the Total Development Cost (TDC) data. The year of the HUD Notice should coincide with the year the rehabilitation estimate was generated, which should not be more than two years prior to the application submission date. Insert the name of the nearest locality to the Development Item 2: TDC Calculationi Complete the TDC calculation for the affected Development. Item 3: Rehabilitation Calculation: Attach the estimated cost of rehabilitation for the Development that is necessary to bring the Development up to current new construction standards. Provide detaiis at the work item level roofs. windows, heat. etc.). Show contingency, consultants and administrative cost as separate cost items. To show obsolescence of non-Dwelling structures. obtain comparable new construction costs from the nationally recognized estimating sources referenced in the applicable HUD Notice for TDC. and do a similar analysis. in your attachment, identify the source and year of the benchmark amount. HUD generally will not consider rehabilitation to be cost?effective if the costs of such rehabilitation exceed 62.5 percent of TDC for developments with elevators or 57.14 percent of TDC for developments, and all other types of structure. without etevators. If the rehabilitation cost for the affected Development does not result in these percentages, the PHA should attach to this form an explanation for why HUD should still approve the proposed demolitionldisposition action. Provide attachments as needed. All attachments must reference the form HUD-SZBBO-B (10.205?) Section and line number to which they apply. Previous versions obsolete. Page 2 of 2 Nil GENERAL CONTRACTING M?derate ebi'itati Thames River Apartments New London, CT June 16, 2017 02060 Selective Demolition 199,862 Abatement 5 1,143,836 02200 Sitework 5 155,232 02300 Fencing 5 134,400 02950 Landscaping 5 168,000 03100 Concrete System 5 211,042 04200 Masonry 5 480,816 05500 Miscellaneous Metals 5 1,076,656 06100 Rough Carpentry 5 2,598,758 06200 Finish Carpentry 5 706,720 07140 Waterproofing 5 26,320 07210 Building Insulation 5 165,088 07400 Metal Panels 5 3,248,448 07500 Roofing 5 231,601 07920 Joint Sealants 5 68,275 08110 Steel Doors Frames 5 745,310 08300 Access Doors 5 16,358 08400 Aluminum Entrances and Storefront 5 . 95,760 08610 Windows 5 1,033,536 08800 Glass Glazing 5 17,472 09260 Gypsum Board Assemblies 5 407,400 09300 Ceramic Tile 5 118,933 09500 Acoustical Ceilings 5 12,432 09650 Resilient Flooring 5 1,378,591 09910 Painting 5 245,392 10100 Miscellaneous Specialties 5 43,495 10801 Toilet Accessories 5 54,264 11452 Appliances 5 308,678 12500 Horizontal Louver Blinds 5 108,618 12370 Pre-Manufactured Casework 5 455,168 Elevator 5 179,200 15300 Fire Protection 5 $79,116 15400 Plumbing 5 1,730,400 15500 HVAC 3 629,888 16100 EIectrical 5 985,152 SUBTOTAL 5 19,760,215 General Conditions 5 2,003,208 Overhead 5 858,518 Fee 5 858,518 Bonds 5 343,407 Liability insurance 5 314,790 Building Permit Fee 5 329,098 Construction Contingency 5 2,146,294 Architect Engineering 5 1,573,949 PHA Administration Fees 3 429,259 TOTALS 5 28,617,256 Unit Cost: $225,333 Thames River at rm Detailed Breakdown Total 1 Bedroom 9 9 18 2 Bedroom 25 8 33 3 Bedroom 14 2? 21 52 4 Bedroom 14 14 ll of Full Baths #8 44 35 it of Units 48 44 35 123' Accessible Unit Conversions 3 3 2 8 Stories 9 9 3 26 SF 59,364 SF 38,808 SF 35,225 SF 133,443 SF Lug Area SF 59,364 SF 35,210 SF 35,275 SF 129,850 SF Footprint 6,596 SF 4,312 SF 13,410 SF 15,313 SF Perimeter 454 LF 342 LF 313 LF Open Shop accessible units and common area renovations demolition and Tile and Mastic Gaskets Glue Skim lot and lot substrate and lot and and structure ?re service connection and areas and secure 45,000 and 150,000 slab 151 lloor unit at bathroom renovations sidewalk and Misc CMU wall at and door installations at steel window and code and sidewalks entrances Lintels for Windows for Metal Panei installation Finish within unit Finish common area window sills at installations Exterior Penthouse insulation where is Insulation at exterior installs Fire at unsealed Exterior Metal Panels 400 206,235 Unit air and 60,950 unit ?re rated doorand hardware 4'00 Unit door ?re rated frame unit Interior doors and hardware 304,800 door hardware 400 area door and hardware Door H.600 Doors 14,605 with new double aluminum window unit 26 with new aluminum window unit . 364.300 29?.000 Storefront 11500 door rum U. {tl?ilXiL'IlXt'J Common Area Door Kitchens 8. Baths and Fire Protection for Acres sibie Units area and and for domestic Fioor Tile 8? Base Room Ceramic Tile 8: Base Unit Area Treads B: Risers 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom Areas Accessories Unit 8th Accessories Area Bathrooms hoods inc in line item below Ovens incl in line item below Install Double Blinds Severe Use Kitchen Cabinets with P-Lam Marble control cab interior floor controt code lintores Er connections ?xtures as water and valve water vertical riser Hot water boiler til bathroom room WAC devices and connections kitchen Bedroom Baseboard ?n tube Bedroom Baseboard fin tube Bedroom Baseboard fin tube and valves Bedroom Bedroom ?xtures and device fixtures and device Bedroom ?xtures and device Bedroom alarm device and Bedroom ?re alarm device and Detailed Breakdown Total 1 Bedroom 9 23 2 Bedroom 25 8 33 3 Bedroom 14 27 21 62 4 Bedroom 14 14 ii of Full Baths 43 44 35 12? HofUnits 43 44 35 1.2? Accessible Unit Conversions 3 3 2 Stories 9 9 26 SF 59,354 SF 33,808 SF 35,2?6 SF 133,443 SF ng Area SF 59,364 SF 35,210 SF 35,2?5 SF 129,351: SF Footprint 5,595 SF 4.312 SF 4,410 SF 15,313 SF Perimeter 454 LF 342 LF 313 LF Thames River Net ?1 Thames River .J er Detailed Breakdown Total 1 Bedroom 9 9 18 2 Bedroom 25 3 33 3 Bedroom 14 22 21 62 I1 Bedroom 14 14 33 of Full?aths 43 4M 35 127 h? of Units 48 44 35 12? Accessible Unit Conversions 3 3 2 3 Stories 9 9 3 26 SF 59,364 SF 33.303 SF 35,226 SF 133,448 SF Area SP 59,364 SF 35,210 SF 35,226 SF 129,850 SF Footprint 6,595 SF 4,312 SF 4,410 SF 15,318 SF i?erimnter 454 LF 342 LF 313 Open shop Bedroom ?re alarm device and Area ?xture and transfer switch 110.000.0{2 50,000 Hardcost Subtotal: 5 11515.54!) Page 4 of 7 Apartments London, CT lune 16, 2017 400 163,000 465.655 2.598.758 ".392 400 443 231.601 Page 5 of? Apartments London, CT June 16, 2017 Prev Wage 12,4 32 2? 115,315 400 31,360 Page 6 of? Apartments London, CT lune 16, 2017 424 6?,200 19,796,615 Page 7 of? NO. X04-H HD-CV06-4034728-S TENANTS OF THAMES RIVER SUPERIOR COURT APARTMENTS COMPLEX LITIGATION DOCKET V. OF HARTFORD AT HARTFORD NEW LONDON HOUSING AUTHORITY. ET AL AUGUST 25, 2014 STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER The Piaintiffs, Tenants of Thames River Apartments, by and through their attorney, Robert I. Reardon, Jr., and the Defendant, New London Housing Authority [hereinafter "Authority"], through their attorney Donn A. Swift, have stipulated to the entry ofjudgment without the taking of proof and without admitting liability. This Judgment is not to be utilized in proceedings not related to the enforcement of this Judgment except that it may be used by the Plaintiff in proceedings involving subsequent violations. in those speci?ed proceedings it may be used for any reason. including but not limited to, showing knowledge andlor persistence of misconduct by the Authority and/or Parties required to receive a copy of the Judgment. The parties hereby stipulate that the Court order as follows: (1 This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter and the parties thereto. mu! TIE-IE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Street - PAD. Drawer 1430 New London. CT 06320 Tcl. (860) 4-42-0444 - Juria No. 102515 (2) Venue as to all matters between the parties relating thereto lies in this Court. STIPULATION PROVISIONS (3) The Authority, shall perform the following tasks, as agreed, within the time frame provided: a. The Authority shall engage a quali?ed public housing consultant to advise them on the development process no later than November 1. 2014; b. The Authority shall, with the assistance of its consultant, issue a Request for Quali?cations (RFQ) for a development team (including managers, market engineers. architects, etc. as recommended by the consultant) to construct replacement housing and/or renovations of the units of Thames River Apartments no later than February 1? 2015; c. The Authority shall select a development team no later than June 30. 2015; d. The Authority and developer will complete and adopt a written plan for ?nancing and a develooment approach no later than September 30, 2015; THE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Street 13.0. Draw 1430 ?Ncw London. CT 06320 - To]. (860) 442-0444 - Juris No. 102515 e. The Authority shall submit all necessary funding applications for replacement housing and/or renovations of the Thames River Apartments no laterthan March 1, 2016; f. The Authority shall complete all requirements to obtain any approvals of the Department of Housing 8: Urban Devetopment (HUD). it required, for its plans for the replacement housing and/or renovation of the Thames River Apartments no later than July 1. 2016 or at any earlier stage as may be required by g. The Authority shall commence the bidding process for construction of replacement housing and/or renovation of the Thames River Apartments no later than January 1, 2017; h. The Authority shall begin construction of new replacement housing and/or renovation of the Thames River Apartments on or before November 1, 2017. (4) The Authority shall provide Plaintiffs' counsel and its consultants with access and cooperation to View its records upon seven (7) days of written notice to the Executive Director of the Authority in order to engage in oversight of this process at all times, including, but not limited to. disclosure and inspections, and copying of all the THE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Hempsiend Street RD. Drawer 1430 New London, CT 06320 0 Tel. (860) 442-0444 Juris No. 102515 related records, applications, correspondence and other submissions by Plaintiff's counsel and their consultants. Further, the Authority will provide written reports to Plaintiffs? counsel. which will detail the progress or lack thereof in compiiance with this timeline. (5) The Authority will provide Plaintiffs? counsel with reports of each task set forth in Paragraph if 3 herein within ten (10) days of its completion. (8) In the event that the Authority fails to perform any of its above obligations as set forth herein in a timely manner or fails to perform any of the activities by the dates provided. the Plaintiff shall have the right to reopen the lawsuit now pending and proceed with its request for the appointment of a Receiver to administer the process to conclusion. Before the Plaintiffs resort to reopening the lawsuit, the Authority shall have thirty (30) days to cure any failure to comply with the timeline set forth in Paragraph 3. (7) Because the Authority needs HUD approval for the demoldispo aspect of the redevelopment, or if the Authority needs HUD or other approval relating to federal or state funding in whole or in part, the parties will recognize that events may occur outside the control of either party that may require some flexibility in the carrying out of the provisions of this stipulation. if the tasks outlined in Paragraphs 3(a) - 3(h) are premised on the demolition and/or disposition of the Thames River Apartments, the Authority THE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys. at Law 160 Street P.O. Drawer 1430 Nuw London. CT 06320 0 Tci. (860) 442-0444 - Juris ?No. 102515 must obtain prior approval to demolish or dispose of the Thames River Apartments in accordance with the HUD requirements and the underlying administrative process set forth in 42 U.S.C. 1437p, its implementing regulations in 24 C.F.R Part 970. as well as related rules in 24 C.F.R. Parts 50, 58. 903 and 941, Notice 2012? issued by HUD to PHAs on February 2. 2012, and all other applicable HUD guidance. (8) The parties stipulate that this Court retains jurisdiction as the ends of justice may require for the purpose of enabling any party to this Judgment to apply to the court at any time for such further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate: a. For the carrying out of this judgment?; b. For the Plaintiff to apply at any time for enforcement of any provision of this judgment; c. For modi?cation of the provisions of this judgment; and, d. For appropriate action if any violation of this judgment occurs. (9) The parties stipulate that the Honorable David M. Sheridan, 3 Judge of the Superior Court. or his designee as assigned by the Chief Court Administrator, shall oversee and enforce this Stipulated Judgment between the parties. and hereby agree THE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Street P.CL Drawer 1430 New London, CT 06320 Tc?l. (860) 442-0444 - Jul-is No. 102515 that Judge Sheridan or his designee may default the Authority for any breach of the Decree and/or failure to perform any of the tasks provided above by the dates provided, and will further preside over any matters arising out of Paragraph 7 of this Stipulated Judgment and having continuing jurisdiction over this action. (10) The parties agree to cooperate and execute any documents or take any action to effectuate this Stipuiated Judgment, and any agreed on court ordered modifications of this Judgment, in a timely and expeditious manner. The parties agree to cooperate in obtaining Court approval of the Stipulated Judgment and complying with the provisions herein in a timely and expeditious manner. (1 1) The parties agree that the consideration recited in the Stipulated Judgment is the sole and only consideration for the Stipulated Judgment and no representations, promises or inducements have been made by the Parties other than the terms of this Stipulated Judgment. (12) The parties agree to waive the time requirements provided in Connecticut General Statutes 52-212a and Practice Book 17-4 for filing a motion to open. (13) The parties agree to tell any applicable statute of limitations to this action and the issues therein. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC. Attorney: at Law 160 Hempatand Street 0 EC). Drawer 1430 - New London, CT 06320 0 To]. (360) 4-42-0444 - Juris No: 102515 THE PLAINTIFFS THE AUTHORITY New London Housing Aut ority R9 Robert I. Reardon Duly Authorized Representative THE REARDON LAW FIR Their Attorneys THE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Strum: P.O. Drawer 1430 0 New London, CT 06320 0 Ta]. (860) 442-0444 - Juris No. 102.515 ORDER The foregolng Stipulated Judgment, having been reviewed by the Court, it is QM) Judge hereby ordered: TIE-IE REARDON LAW FIRM, RC. Attorneys at Law 160 Street - P.O. mer 1430 - New London, CT 06320 Tel. (860) ?$0444 4' Jud: No. 102515 US. Department of Housing and Urban Deveiopment d" 3* Of?ce of Regional Cozumel 1; IIL Thomas P. O?Neill, Jr. Federal Building oz, 10 Causeway Street 996419 09199 Boston, Massachusetts 02222-1092 New England (617) SIM-8250 FAX: (617) 565-7337 August 21, 2014 Donn Swift Traub, Keefe Errante, P.C. 52 Trumbull Street New Haven, Connecticut 06510 SUBJECT: Proposed Snpulated Judgment and Order, dated August 2014, in Tenants of Thames River A pornnenrs v. New London Housing Authority, or at. Connecticut Superior Court No. Dear Mr. Swift: This supplements our letter, dated August 20, 2014, whereby we approve the attached August 21, 2014 draft proposed Stipulated Judgment and Order. If you have any questions about this matter, please do not hesitate to contact attorney Ann D?Arpino of my of?ce at 617994-8250. Sincerely, Miniard Culpepper Regional Counsel for New England Attachment HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEW LONDON BOARD OF COMMISSIONER SPECIAL MEETING August 14. 2014 RESO LUTION 014-2014 ?Stipulated Agreement Tenants of Thames River Apartments V. New London Housing Authority, ET Whereas, The Board of Commissioners and the residents of Thames River have a pending stipulated judgment and order to resolve the class action lawsuit effective August 25. 2014: and Whereas, the Board of Commissloners have reviewed and had found acceptable the terms and conditions of the stipulated agreement; therefore, be It Resolved that the Board of of the Housing Authority of the Clty of New London approves the stipulated agreement and authorizes Attorney Don Swift counsel to the Housing Authority to enter into the agreement on its behalf. Motion: Second: area. sense by Chairperson David Collins Mitt? LI at Signed by Secretary to the Board Sue hontell. PHM Date REUSE PARCEL WINTHROP URBAN RENEWAL AREA DESCRIPTION A CERTAIN PIECE OR PARCEL or LAND SITUATED IN THE TOHN AND COUNTY Dr MEN LONDON AND STATE OE CONNECTICUT GONTAININO 241,000+ SQUARE FEET, BEING HORE PARTIGULARLT SHDUN ON A DENTAIN MAP NINTHROR UR- BAN RENEUAL AREA, PROUEOT NO. CONN (R-H5), NEH LONDON, CDNNEOTIOUT, SURVEYED BY CHARLES A. CAHN, CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURUETOR, NEU HAVEN, CONNECTICUT, OGTOBER I963 AND REVISED SEPTEMBER 23, SAID PIECE OR PARCEL OF LAND BEING HORE PARTIOULARLY BOUNOED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOHS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY STREET LINE or AVENUE, 3 SAID POINT BEING NORTH AND EAST 779,0Ih.h6 ON THE GE0DETID GRID RUNNING NORTH 590-29'-07" EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLT LINE OF THENCE RUNNING NORTH EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THENOE RUNNING NORTH EAST 72.96' ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OE THENCE RUNNING NORTHEASTERLY BY A CURVED LINE HAVING A RADIUS Dr TOHARDS THE NORTHHEST, THE LENGTH or SAID CURVE BEING AND BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED THENOE RUNNING NORTH WEST 106.94' ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE OF AVENUE, SAID LINE BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG THE STREET LINE or AVENUE BY A CURVED LINE HAVING A RADIUS OF 977.70', OONDAYE TDNARDS THE WEST, THE LENGTH OF SAID CURSE BEING 196.h3', ANDOSATD DURUE BEING TANGENT TO THE LAST DESCRIBED BOUNDARY, AND TERNINATING AT A POINT BEING NORTH 193,572.19 AND EAST 779,272.99 ON THE CONNEOTIDUT GEODETIG GRID THENOE OONTINUING NORTH ALONG THE PROPOSED WESTERLY STREET LINE OF AVENUE ST A GURYED LINE HAVING A RADIUS or 100* AND GONDAYE TDHARDS THE WEST, THE LENGTH OF SAID CURVE BEING 23.07?l TERMINATING AT A POINT BEING NORTH 193,593.18 AND EAST 779,263.50 ON THE CONNEGTIGUT GEODETID GRID RUNNING NORTH WEST ?88.86? ALONG THE PROPOSED LINE or AVENUE, SAID LINE BEING TANGENT TD THELART DESCRIBED JHENOE RUNNING NORTH 830-0I*-0l? NEST 0.6h' TO A POINT, SAID ROINT BEING NORTH I93,755.h5 AND ON-TRE CONNECTIDUT GEODETID GRID 1HENOE RUNNING SOUTH WEST 30.76' ALONG LAND BELONGING TO STATE HIGHHAY DEPARTMENT THENCE RUNNING SOUTH WEST 59.06! ALONG LAND BELONGING To THE CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAT THENCE RUNNING NORTH 2" WEST l3.2l ALONG LAND BELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAV THENCE RUNNING SOUTN 590-22'-33" WEST l0.99' ALONG LAND DELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAT THENCE RUNNING NORTH WEST 32.99' ALONG LAND DELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAT a THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 590-03t?12" WEST 5.79' ALONG LAND DELONGING To SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGNNAT THENCE RUNNING SOUTH EAST 7.h9' ALONG LAND DELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGNHAT THENCE RUNNING SOUTH EAST 15.5h' ALONG LAND SELDNGING To SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAV THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 59?? WEST 35.06' ALONG LAND DELDNGINL SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAT THENCE RUNNING NORTH WEST 32.88' ALONG LAND DELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAT THENCE RUNNING SOUTH 860?2lf-02" WEST ALONG LAND BELONGING TO SAID CONNECTICUT STATE HIGHNAY THENCE CONTINUING WESTERLY BY A CURVED LINE HAVING A RADIUS or CONCAVE TONARDS THE NORTH, THE LENGTH or SAID CURVE BEING ?6.99' AND THE WESTERLT EXTREMITY 0F SAID CURVE BEING NORTH AND EAST 778,832.07 ON THE CONNECTICUT GEODETIC GRID THENCE RUNNING SOUTH NEST 9!.2h' ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LEHIS STREET To A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE or LEUIS STREET AND THE NESTERLV LINE OF THENCE WESII98.88 TO A POINT ON NINTHROP COVE, SAID POINT BEING NORTH I93,h79.39 AND EAST 178.753.52 ON THE CONNECTICUT GEOOETIC GRID THENCE RUNNING NORTH EAST #2.62' ALONG WINTHROP THENCE RUNNING SOUTHERLY BY AN IRREGULAR LINE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF WINTHROP COVE To A POINT NORTH 193,378.83 AND EAST 778,890.97 CT THE CONNECTICUT GRID THENCE RUNNING SOUTH WEST .43' ALONG WINTHROP TT A POINT BEING NORTH 193,353.53 AND EAST 778. 3.02 ON THE CONNECTICUT GEOJCTIC GRID THENCE RUNNING SOUTHNESTERLY AN IRREGULAR LINE ALONG WINTHROP COVE TO A POINT, SAND POINT ALSO SEING NORTHEASTERLV 202': BY AN IRREGULAR LINE ALONG WINTHROR COVE FROM A POINT NITH COORDINATES OF NORTH 593,051.58 AND EAST 778,795.5l ON THE CONNECTICUT GEODETIC GRID THENCE RUNNING NORTH 590?29l-O7" EAST 33.00t TO A POINT BEING NORTH AND EAST 778,925.60 ON THE CONNECTICUT GEODETIC GRID TRENDE RUNNING SOUTH EAST [75.00' TO POINT AND PLACE OF BEGINNING. RESERVING To THE CITY OF MEN LONDON, ITS SUDOESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASENENT, PRIVILEGE AND RIGHT OF RAT IN, UNDER, AND THROUGH A PORTION OF LAND HEREINBEFORE PORTION OONSISTS OF A CERTAIN STRIP DR PARCEL OF LAND 30.00 FEET IN NIDTH, THE CENTERLINE 0F NHIDH Is DESORIDED AS FDLLOUST BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY POINT BEING NORTH [93,158.15 AND EAST 779,164.13 ON THE GRID THENOE RUNNING NORTH WEST THENCE RUNNING NORTH 3H0-23'-3h" WEST I36.lh'; TAENOE RUNNING NORTH WEST 35!.l5' TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LENIS STREET, SAID POINT SEING NORTH [93,686.63 AND EAST ON THE CONNECTICUT GRID SYSTEM. SAID BASEMENT SEING FOR SENER AND NATER MAINS, PIPES AND APPURTENANDES As A PART OF THE SENERAGE AND NATER SYSTEM OF THE CITY OF MEN LONDON AND GAS MAINS FOR THE CITY OF NEN LONDON MAY CONVEY EASENENTS, PRIVILEGES AND RIGHTS OF NAT FOR THE USE OF SAID STRIP OR PARCEL OF LAND IN DONNON NITH ITSELE, AND THE RIGHT TO FOR, CONSTRUCT, LAT, OPERATE, INSPECT, USE, REPAIR, REPLACE, RELOCATE, SERVICE AND PERMANENTLT MAINTAIN SAID AND GAS MAINS AND ANY REPLACEMENTS THEREOF, TOGETHER NITH THE RIGHT TO REMOVE ALL TREES, SHRUSS, ROCKS AND OTHER NITNIN SAID EASENENT AND RIGHT OF NAT, THE RELEASOR AGREEING THAT NITHIN A REASONABLE TIME AFTER EXCAVATION HAS BEEN MADE, IT WILL RE-GRADE THE LAND AND RESTORE THE SURFACE THEREOF TO THE CONDITION IT NAS IN PRIOR THERETO.