2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District DISTRICT GRADE Coming in 2018 Achievement Performance Index 76.9%.................................................................................................. ........................ Indicators Met 20.8%.................................................................................................. .......................................... COMPONENT GRADE The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. C D C Value-Added F Overall................................................................................................................... F F Students with Disabilities..................................................................................... C Gifted................................................................................................................... C Lowest 20% in Achievement.............................................................................. Gap Closing Graduation Rate COMPONENT GRADE The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. Annual Measurable Objectives 54.5%.................................................................................................. .......................................... Progress COMPONENT GRADE The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. F The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. B Graduation Rates A 93.7% of students graduated in 4 years................................................................................... C 89.3% of students graduated in 5 years................................................................................. F K-3 Literacy COMPONENT GRADE COMPONENT GRADE Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio’s students are for all future opportunities. C COMPONENT GRADE D K-3 Literacy Improvement 31.0%.................................................................................................................................................................... C IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 1 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Achievement The Achievement component represents the number of students who passed the state tests and how well they performed on them. COMPONENT GRADE C Performance Index GRADE The Performance Index measures the test results of every student, not just those who score proficient or higher. There are six levels on the index and districts receive points for every student in each of these levels. The higher the achievement level the more the points awarded in the district's index. This rewards schools and districts for improving the performance of all students, regardless of achievement level. C Performance Index Trend 120 Performance Index 40 20 60 80 0 100 76.9% Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students 1.1 19.4 25.2 27.1 15.7 11.1 0.4 x x x x x x x Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 92.3 of a possible 120.0 A= B= C= D= F= 90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 50.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 49.9% = = = = = = = Points Received 1.5 23.2 27.8 27.1 9.4 3.3 0.0 92.3 101.8 99.2 91.1 92.3 2016 2017 80 60 40 19.4 11.1 25.2 27.1 99.1 20 1.1 15.7 0.4 100 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested 0 2013 2014 2015 Untested Limited Basic Proficient Performance Index Performance Index Performance Index Performance Index Points Points Points Points Accelerated Advanced Advanced Plus Performance Index Performance Index Performance Index Points Points Points IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 2 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District GRADE F Indicators Met Indicators Met % Indicators Met measures the percent of students who have passed state tests. It also includes the gifted indicator. Test results are reported for each student in a grade and subject. The passage rate for each indicator is 80%. 20.8% 5 out of 24 A= B= C= D= F= Grades 3-5 40 90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 50.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 49.9% 0 Grades 6-8 English Language Arts 71.6% Mathematics 73.4% English Language Arts 71.6% Mathematics 77.6% 60 20 80 100 High School English Language Arts 63.0% Algebra I 58.7% Mathematics 66.9% Biology 80.8% Social Studies 83.4% English I 74.8% English Language Arts 66.7% English II 68.4% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 6th Grade HS 7th Grade 5th Grade Social Studies 88.7% Mathematics 62.7% Geometry 59.2% English Language Arts 77.4% English Language Arts 69.1% Government 79.5% Mathematics 60.1% Mathematics 75.1% History 84.6% Science 84.5% Science 77.5% 8th Grade GIFTED INDICATOR IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 3 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District 82% 80% 78% 76% 74% 72% 70% 68% 66% 64% 62% Achievement Levels by Grade Proficient Percent Trend by Grade 3rd Grade 3rd Grade 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 79.6% 71.6% 73.4% 73.4% 70.6% 63.8% Reading District Mathematics Similar Districts 2013 2014 State Average 4th Grade 92% 88% 84% 80% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 85.9% 81.7% 77.6% 77.5% 72.4% 69.4% 62.8% Reading District Mathematics Similar Districts Social Studies 2013 State Average 2014 Reading 5th Grade 72% 68% 77.4% 78.9% 74.6% 71.6% 60.1% Reading District IRN: 044164 68.3% 67.7% 64% 60% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 84.5% 84% 76% 2017 2015 Mathematics 2016 2017 Social Studies 5th Grade 88% 80% 2016 Mathematics 4th Grade 88.7% 71.6% 2015 Reading 61.6% Mathematics Similar Districts Science State Average 2013 2014 Reading Printed on October 4, 2017 2015 Mathematics 2016 2017 Science Page 4 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District 6th Grade 6th Grade 88% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 83.4% 84% 80% 76% 73.8% 72% 64% 60% 66.9% 68.0% 67.3% 68% 63.0% 60.2% Reading District 64.0% 60.2% Mathematics Similar Districts Social Studies 2013 State Average 2014 Reading 7th Grade 72% 70% 68% 66% 64% 62% 60% 58% 56% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 67.7% 66.7% 62.7% 59.2% 56.1% Reading Mathematics Similar Districts 2013 State Average 2014 77.5% 100% 95% 90% 85% 80% 75% 70% 65% 60% 55% 75.7% 68.1% 65.8% 58.6% 54.9% 50.3% Reading District Mathematics Similar Districts Science State Average 2013 2014 Reading High School IRN: 044164 2017 2016 2017 Mathematics 8th Grade 75.1% 69.1% 2015 Reading 8th Grade 80% 76% 72% 68% 64% 60% 56% 52% 48% 2016 Social Studies 7th Grade 70.6% District 2015 Mathematics 2015 Mathematics 2016 2017 Science High School Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 5 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District 90% 85% 80% 100% 81.6% 79.5% 75% 84.6% 81.5% 72.1% 70% 90% 80.8% 73.8% 74.8% 74.7% 67.5% 68.4% 68.7% 65% 60% 70% 57.7% 58.7% 58.3% 55.2% 55% 61.1% 59.2% 45.3% 40% Government History English I District IRN: 044164 English II Similar Districts Algebra I 60% 50% 52.7% 50% 45% 80% 40% 42.9% Geometry Biology State Average Printed on October 4, 2017 2015 Government Proficient % Geometry Proficient % 2016 History Proficient % Math I Proficient % Physical Science Proficient % Biology Proficient % 2017 English I Proficient % English II Proficient % Algebra I Proficient % Page 6 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Gifted Students INDICATOR The Gifted Students data and Indicator highlight the opportunities for and performance of gifted students. The dashboard answers several questions: How many students are identified as gifted and in what categories? How many of those students are receiving gifted services? How well are those gifted students performing? The Gifted Indicator measures whether opportunity and performance expectations are being met for gifted students. Not Met Overview Performance Index The Gifted Indicator is derived from three components: Gifted Value Added grade, the Performance Index for gifted students, and a Gifted Inputs score. Gifted Value Added Value Added Grade: Enrollment: Value Added Met? C 3,099 1 Districts must earn a Gifted Value Added grade of C or better to meet the Gifted Value Added component. A grade of "NR" results in Not Met if the district has an ADM of 600 or more. Gifted Performance Index Performance Index: 114.891 Performance Index Met?: Not Met Districts with at least 10 unique students in the Gifted Performance Index calculation must score 117.0 or better to meet the Gifted Performance Index component. Gifted Inputs Total Points: Gifted Inputs Met?: 38.0 Not Met 40 60 20 0 95.7% 114.891 of a possible 120.0 A = 90.0 - 100.0% B = 80.0 - 89.9% C = 70.0 - 79.9% D =50.0 - 69.9% F = 0.0 - 49.9% Not Met IRN: 044164 Achievement Level Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Basic Limited Untested Pct of Students 5.0 63.4 22.3 6.8 1.6 0.4 0.6 Points are earned based on identification and services provided to gifted students. Districts must earn at least 80 points out of a possible 100 to meet the Gifted Inputs component. Gifted Indicator Final Result INDICATOR 80 100 The Performance Index calculation for gifted students. Only tests taken by students identified as gifted in that subject (e.g. gifted in Math and taking the Math test), or taken by students identified with Super Cognitive abilities regardless of test subject are included. The Gifted Indicator is Met if none of the three components are Not Met. Gifted Inputs alone cannot determine the Gifted Indicator, however; if both the Value Added and Performance Index components are NC, then the Gifted Indicator is also NC. Printed on October 4, 2017 x x x x x x x Points for this Level 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 = = = = = = = Points Received 6.5 76.1 24.5 6.8 1.0 0.1 0.0 114.891 5.0 0.6 1.6 0.4 6.8 22.3 63.4 Advanced Plus Advanced Accelerated Proficient Limited Basic Untested Page 7 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Gifted Indicator The Gifted Inputs calculation assigns points based on the percentage of students identified and served in eight categories (factors). The points earned for each category are totaled to determine the final Met/Not Met determination for the Gifted Input component. Reading, Math, Science, Social Studies, and Superior Cognitive Abilities K-3 4-8 9-12 1.5% 13.4% 21.1% 8.8% 5.5% 94.5% 77.8% 77.5% Visual/Performing Arts and Creative Thinking K-3 99.9% 4-8 0.1% Disadvantaged Students 0.8% 99.9% 0.1% Minority Students 90.6% 92.4% 1.7% 6.0% Receiving Gifted Services IRN: 044164 99.2% 9-12 2.1% 7.3% Identified as Gifted, but not receiving services Printed on October 4, 2017 Not Identified as Gifted Page 8 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Identification and Services These charts show the percentage of enrolled students that are identified as gifted and that are receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 12.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.4% 9.4% 8.0% 8.0% 9.0% 8.0% 5.4% 5.3% 4.0% 4.0% 2.9% 2.0% 0.0% 6.0% 6.7% 6.0% 0.9% 0.3% Creative Thinking 0.1% Reading Math 8.3% 0.3% Social Studies Science Identified 2.7% 2.0% 0.2% Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive 0.0% 0.2% Creative Thinking Math Receiving Services Grades 4-8 12.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.4% 8.0% 8.0% 5.8% 5.7% 11.9% 11.2% 10.0% 8.8% 8.0% 6.0% 12.5% 9.2% 7.8% 6.0% 4.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% Superior Cognitive Grades 9-12 11.5% 11.4% 10.0% Reading Identified 2.0% 1.7% 0.5% Creative Thinking Reading Math Science Identified IRN: 044164 0.3% Social Studies Visual and Performing Arts Superior Cognitive 0.0% Receiving Services 0.4% Math 1.1% Reading 0.2% Science Identified Printed on October 4, 2017 0.7% Social Studies 1.1% Superior Cognitive 0.1% Visual and Performing Arts Receiving Services Page 9 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Identified and Receiving Services These charts show, of the students identified as gifted, the percentage of students receiving gifted services. All Grades Grades K-3 60.0% 600.0% 50.0% 51.1% 400.0% 42.9% 40.0% 200.0% 30.0% 0.0% 20.0% 10.0% 10.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% Creative Thinking Math Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Reading 3.4% 0.0% Science Social Studies 0.0% -400.0% -600.0% Creative Thinking Grades 4-8 100.0% 0.0% -200.0% Math Reading Superior Cognitive Grades 9-12 99.2% 12.0% 98.5% 11.8% 10.0% 80.0% 9.7% 8.0% 60.0% 6.0% 40.0% 5.8% 4.6% 4.0% 20.0% 21.1% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% Creative Thinking Math Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts IRN: 044164 Reading 0.0% Science 0.0% Social Studies 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% Math Reading Science Social Studies Superior Cognitive Visual and Performing Arts Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 10 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Screening Acceleration This chart shows the percentage of students screened for gifted abilities this school year. Number of Subject Accelerated Students: 16% 14% 13.4% 13.5% 13.4% 90 12% 10% 8% 7.5% Number of Whole-Grade Accelerated Students: 7.5% 6% < 10 4% 2% 0% Reading Superior Cognitive IRN: 044164 Math Social Studies Science Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 11 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Progress The Progress component looks closely at the growth that all students are making based on their past performances. COMPONENT GRADE D GRADE F GRADE C GRADE C GRADE F Overall This measures the progress for all students in math, ELA, science and social studies using tests in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course exams. Progress Details These tables show the Progress scores by test grade and subject for students in grades 4-8 and some end-of-course tests, and includes up to three years of data as available. Progress Score Gifted Students This measures the progress for students identified as gifted in reading, math, science, social studies and/or superior cognitive ability. Students in the Lowest 20% in Achievement This measures the progress for students identified as the lowest 20% statewide in reading, math, science or social studies achievement. Students with Disabilities This measures the progress for students with disabilities. Test Grade English Language Arts Mathematics Social Studies Science All Tests Red Orange Dark Green Yellow Red 4th Grade Dark Green Dark Green 5th Grade Light Green Red 6th Grade Red Red 7th Grade Red Yellow 8th Grade Red Dark Green All Grades Test Grade Test Metrics Subject High School Progress Score English I Yellow English II Yellow Dark Green Yellow Yellow Dark Green Red Red Yellow Test Grade High School Test Metrics Subject Yellow Progress Score Algebra I Orange Geometry Dark Green What do the colors mean? GRADE NR IRN: 044164 High Mobility For districts and schools with a mobility rate of 25% or higher, this measures the progress of a subset of students that have been in the district for at least two years. This measure will not be included in the Progress component grade. The Progress Component measures how groups of students made progress as compared to the statewide expectation of growth. The expectation of growth is based on how students in the group performed, on average, compared to other students like them across the state Dark Green Students made more progress than expected – significant evidence Light Green Students made more progress than expected – moderate evidence Yellow Students made progress similar to the statewide expectation – evidence Orange Students made less progress than expected – moderate evidence Red Students made less progress than expected – significant evidence Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 12 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Progress vs. Performance Index This bubble chart shows the relationship between each subgroup's Performance Index results (horizontal axis) to the Value-Added letter grade (vertical axis). The size of the bubble represents the size of the student subgroup. A B G r a d e Overall Students w/ Disabilities Lowest 20% Gifted High School Highly Mobile C D F 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Performance Index IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 13 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Gap Closing COMPONENT GRADE The Gap Closing component shows how well schools are meeting the performance expectations for our most vulnerable populations of students in English language arts, math and graduation. F Annual Measurable Objectives GRADE Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) compare the performance of student groups to a state goal which is displayed as the red line in the following charts. These charts show how well each group achieves that goal in reading, math and graduation – and emphasize any achievement gaps that exist between groups. The ultimate goal is for all groups to achieve at high levels. F English Language Arts Graduation Rate Math AMO Points 72.2 76.3 40 95.6 60 20 80 0 55 54.5% A= B= C= D= F= 70.6 68.1 69.1 67.4 62.2 66.0 55.6 56.1 41.3 43.9 26.3 25.8 100 90.0 - 100.0% 80.0 - 89.9% 70.0 - 79.9% 60.0 - 69.9% 0.0 - 59.9% 0 20 40 White Hispanic Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities 60 80 All Students Multiracial African American 100 0 93.7 85.7 66.7 20 40 White Multiracial Econ Disadvantage Students w/ Disabilities 60 80 All Students Hispanic African American 100 0 20 40 White Econ Disadvantage 60 80 100 All Students Students w/ Disabilities The red line on each graph identifies the Annual Measurable Objective. The 2017 AMO for ELA is 77.1%, for Math is 72%, and for Graduation Rate is 85.1%. Subgroups with fewer than 30 students are not rated and do not appear on the graphs. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 14 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Graduation Rate COMPONENT GRADE The Graduation Rate component looks at the percent of students who are successfully finishing high school with a diploma in four or five years. B 4-Year Graduation Rate The 4-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2016 who graduated within four years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2013 and graduated by 2016. GRADE A 93.7% A= B= C= D= F= 93.0 - 100.0% 89.0 - 92.9% 84.0 - 88.9% 79.0 - 83.9% 0.0 - 78.9% 40 60 20 93.7 0 C IRN: 044164 A= B= C= D= F= 95.0 - 100.0% 90.0 - 94.9% 85.0 - 89.9% 80.0 - 84.9% 0.0 - 79.9% 40 20 0 60 80 100 93.3 89.3 83.4 80 100 The 5-year graduation rate applies to the Class of 2015 who graduated within five years, i.e. students who entered the 9th grade in 2012 and graduated by 2016. 89.3% 5-Year Rate 100 80 5-Year Graduation Rate GRADE 4-Year Rate 100 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 District State Average Printed on October 4, 2017 Similar Districts District State Average 95.1 85.6 Similar Districts Page 15 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Graduation Rate Trend 98% 96% 95.2% 95.6% 93.9% 94% 93.7% 92.9% 92% 90% 88% 89.8% 89.3% 88.0% 87.0% 86% 2012 2013 2014 4-Year 2015 2016 5-Year Note: The 5-year graduation rate does not appear in the final year of this graph because the necessary data is not yet available to calculate the 5-year rate for that school year. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 16 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District K-3 Literacy COMPONENT GRADE The K-3 Literacy component looks at how successful the school is at getting struggling readers on track to proficiency in third grade and beyond. In Your District... GRADE C K-3 Literacy Improvement 40 20 0 C 60 80 100 80 Students Moved to On Track - 3 RIMP Deductions Details of Measure Year 1 248 Students Started Off Track 78.9% 21.1% Year 2 31.0% 93.1% 6.9% Year 3 89.2% 31.0% A= B= C= D= F= 74.7 - 100.0% 49.3 - 74.6% 23.9 - 49.2% -1.5 - 23.8% <= -1.6% 69.0% 10.8% Year 4 31.0% 45.3% 54.7% Remained Off Track Moved to On Track Overall RIMP = Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. Districts are required to create a RIMP for students not on track to be proficient in English Language Arts by the end of 3rd grade. 69.0% Remained Off Track IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 31.0% Moved to On Track Page 17 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Percentage On-Track in Reading Diagnostic Kindergarten Diagnostic First Grade Diagnostic Second Grade Diagnostic Third Grade Diagnostic 0% 58.6% Ohio's Third Grade Reading Guarantee ensures that students are successful in reading before moving on to fourth grade. Schools must provide supports for struggling readers in early grades. If a child appears to be falling behind in reading, the school will immediately start a Reading Improvement and Monitoring Plan. The program ensures that every struggling reader gets the support he or she needs to learn and achieve. 41.4% 53.5% 46.5% 32.6% Students have multiple opportunities to meet promotion requirements including meeting a minimum promotion score on the reading portion of the state's third grade English language arts test given twice during the school year. Students have an additional opportunity to take the state assessment in the summer, as well as a district-determined alternative assessment. On- Track Not On-Track 67.4% 45.4% 20% Third Grade Reading Guarantee The Parent Roadmap is available to help parents understand how the Third How Reading many third graders applies met thetoThird 98.9% Grade Guarantee yourGrade child. Reading Guarantee requirements for promotion to 4th grade? 54.6% 40% 60% 80% 100% This chart shows the overall percentage of students that were on-track/not-on-track for each grade level reading diagnostic in 2016-2017. IRN: 044164 How many third graders scored proficient on the state Reading test? Printed on October 4, 2017 71.6% Page 18 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Prepared for Success Whether training in a technical field or preparing for work or college, the Prepared for Success component looks at how well prepared Ohio’s students are for all future opportunities. COMPONENT GRADE D How Prepared were Your 2015 and 2016 Graduating Classes? COMPONENT GRADE D 40% 60% 20% 0% 80% 100% 39.6% A = 90.0% - 100.0% B = 70.0% - 89.9% C = 45.0% - 69.9% D = 25.0% - 44.9% F = 0.0% - 24.9% ACT: Participation Number of Point Points Students Value Earne d Number of students that earned a remediation free score on all parts of the ACT or SAT, earned an honors 200 1 200.0 diploma, and/or earned an industryrecognized credential The number of "bonus" students that count an additional 0.3 bonus points each, because they did the above and also earned a 3 or higher on at least one AP exam; earned a 4 or higher on at least one IB exam; and/or earned at least three college credits before leaving high school 71.6% ACT: Remediation Free SAT: Participation SAT: Remediation Free 30.3% 6.3% 3.4% Honors Diploma 31.2 Industry-Recognized Credential Total Points: 231.2 Advanced Placement: Participation 104 0.3 Graduation Cohort: 584 Percentage: 39.6% AP: Exam Score of 3 or Better 16.4% 1.9% 32.0% 15.6% Dual Enrollment Credit International Baccalaureate IB: Exam Score of 4 or Better 22.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 19 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District How Prepared were Your 2015 and 2016 Graduating Classes? Districts and schools have long-term impacts on student outcomes. The Prepared for Success component provides information on how schools prepare students for different pathways of college and career success. It also provides insights on how those students do once they leave high school. What happens beyond the diploma is an important indicator of how well schools are preparing students. The University System of Ohio provides district reports on enrollment and remediation of high school graduates attending in-state, public colleges and universities. 34.7% What Percentage of the 2014 Graduating Class Entered College within Two Years? What Percentage of the 2010 Graduating Class Graduated from College within Six Years of Leaving High School? 65.3 % 38.8 % 65.3% 61.2% 38.8% Note: These data represent students in the 4-year and 5-year graduation rates, i.e. students who entered 9th grade in 2012 and 2013. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 20 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Superintendent: George J. Joseph Address: 321 N Depeyster St Kent OH 44240-2514 Phone: (330) 673-6515 County: Portage Career Tech Planning District: Six District Voc Ed Compact CTPD Directory information current as of the 2016-2017 Report Card publication date Your District's Students Average Daily Enrollment: Enrollment by Subgroup 80% 3,225 Number of Limited English Proficiency Students Excluded from Accountability Calculations: 42 Enrollment # Enrollment % 60% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native NC Asian or Pacific Islander 86 2.7% Black, Non-Hispanic 406 12.6% Hispanic 86 2.7% Multiracial 287 8.9% 30% 2,358 73.1% 20% 493 15.3% 1,432 44.4% Limited English Proficiency 93 2.9% Migrant NC White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economically Disadvantaged NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group State and federal law require an annual assessment of Limited English Proficient (LEP) students to measure their English language proficiency. The Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA) is the assessment used in Ohio to gauge LEP students' growth in learning English. For information about your district's OELPA results, see the Department of Education's web site at http://education.ohio.gov. IRN: 044164 73.1% 70% Printed on October 4, 2017 50% 44.4% 40% 15.3% 12.6% 10% 2.7% 0% 8.9% 2.7% 2.9% American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Migrant Enrollments of less than 10 students are not shown. Page 21 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Attendance Chronic Absenteeism Rate: Attendance Rate All Students 12.0% Am. Indian / Alaskan Native 94.8% 96.9% Black, Non-Hispanic 94.3% Hispanic 94.6% Multiracial 94.4% White, Non-Hispanic 94.9% Students with Disabilities 93.5% Economic Disadvantage 93.5% Limited English Proficiency 93.8% Migrant 94.8% 96.9%94.3% 94.6%94.4%94.9% 93.5%93.5%93.8% 80% NC Asian or Pacific Islander 100% 60% 40% 20% 0% NC Male 94.7% All Students American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Female 94.8% Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economic Disadvantage NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group Limited English Proficiency Attendance Rate is not shown if enrollment is less than 10. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 22 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Mobility Rates by Subgroup 35% District Mobility % All Students Am. Indian / Alaskan Native 9.4% NC Asian or Pacific Islander 27.4% 25% Black, Non-Hispanic 19.2% 20% Hispanic 10.8% Multiracial 13.8% 15% White, Non-Hispanic 6.2% 10% Students with Disabilities 16.8% Economically Disadvantaged 14.1% Limited English Proficiency 30.7% Migrant 30.7% 30% 27.4% 19.2% 16.8% 14.1% 13.8% 9.4% 10.8% 6.2% 5% 0% NC NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group All Students American Indian or Alaska... Asian or Pacific Islander Black, Non-Hispanic Hispanic Multiracial White, Non-Hispanic Students with Disabilities Economic Disadvantage Limited English Proficiency Migrant This chart shows the percentage of students who, because they moved into or out of the district, did not spend a majority of the school year within the district. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 23 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Your District's Teachers All Schools in the District High Poverty Schools Low Poverty Schools Attendance Rate Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor's Degree 99.6 0.0 0.0 94.9% Percentage of teachers with at least a Master's Degree 56.7 0.0 0.0 Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 1.1 -- -- Average Salary Percentage of core academic subject and elementary classes taught by properly certified teachers 100 -- -- $70,891 0 -- -- Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure A district's high poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of the district's economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. A district may have buildings in both quartiles, in just one quartile, or in neither quartile. NC = Not Calculated because there are fewer than 10 in the group Educators in your District Your District's Principals School Counselors State Avg Per 1000 per 1000 # Students Students 10.5 3.3 2.3 School Nurses 0.0 0.0 1.1 School Psychologists 4.5 1.4 1.1 Interpreters 1.0 0.3 0.2 Library or Media Specialists 2.8 0.9 1.4 Audiologist 0.0 0.0 0.0 Physical/Occupational Therapist Social Worker 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 General Education Teachers 169.7 52.6 46.8 Career-Technical Teachers 14.0 4.3 2.3 Special Education Teachers 45.5 14.1 10.9 Teacher Aides 17.0 5.3 7.3 Gifted Intervention Specialists 3.0 0.9 0.6 Fine Arts Teachers 7.4 2.3 3.0 Music Teachers 8.8 2.7 2.5 Physical Education Teachers 9.5 2.9 2.8 ELL Specialists 0.0 0.0 0.3 Adaptive Physical Education Teachers Speech Language Pathologists 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 1.6 1.4 IRN: 044164 Percentage of principals with at least a Bachelor's Degree 100.0% Percentage of principals with at least a Master's Degree 100.0% Printed on October 4, 2017 Average Years of Experience 14 Lead or Senior Teachers 0.0 Page 24 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Teacher Evaluations Principal Evaluations 19.8% 2.1% 2.1% 100.0% 76.0% Accomplished Ineffective IRN: 044164 Skilled Not Complete Developing Accomplished Ineffective Printed on October 4, 2017 Skilled Not Complete Developing Page 25 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Wellness and Physical Education The extent to which students are successful in meeting the benchmarks contained in Ohio's physical education standards Compliance with the federal requirement for implementing a local wellness policy Elected to administer BMI screening Participation in Physical Activity Pilot Program Moderate Success School Choice Options: Place of Enrollment for Students Residing in the District The School Choice Options data is a set of nine counts describing the place of enrollment for students residing in the school district, captured as a snapshot of a single day in the school year. Web links provide further information about certain options. Districts and STEM Schools 2,683 students enrolled in the district where they lived 110 students enrolled in another public district through Open Enrollment Community Schools Non-Public Schools* 54 students enrolled in an online community school 0 students participated in the EdChoice Scholarship or Cleveland Scholarship Program Fine Arts Courses Offered No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. No Fine Arts Courses are offered by this district. 7 students enrolled in a sitebased community school 19 students participated in the EdChoice Expansion Program 50 students enrolled in another public district by means other than Open Enrollment 1 students enrolled in a Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program (online or site-based)* *Students included in Dropout Prevention and Recovery Program counts are also included in either the online or site-based community school counts. IRN: 044164 11 students participated in the Ohio Autism Scholarship or Jon Peterson Special Needs Scholarship Program *ODE does not collect and cannot report information on district residents who are nonvoucher students attending a non-public school. Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 26 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Financial Data These measures answer several questions about spending and performance. How much is spent on Classroom instruction? How much, on average, is spent on each student? What is the source of the revenue? How do these measures compare to other districts and schools? Comparison Group: Enrollment between 2500 and 4999 Classroom Spending Data Spending per Pupil Data 80 What percent of funds are spent on classroom instruction? Operating Spending per Pupil 70 73.8% How does this district rank in comparison to other districts of similar size? State $11,173 $9,150 60 Classroom Instruction $8,249 $6,180 50 Non-Classroom Spending $2,924 $2,970 $8,000 $10,000 40 30 20 10 2 out of 109 0 A rank of 1 indicates the highest percent spent on classroom instruction. District District District Comparison Group 26.2% State 32.5% 31.4% State 73.8% 68.6% 67.5% $4,000 Classroom Instruction Non-Classroom Instruction $6,000 $12,000 Kent City IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the lowest operating expenditures per pupil Kent City IS NOT among the 20% of public districts with the highest academic performance index scores. Note: District financial data do not include data associated with community schools that are sponsored by the school district. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 27 of 31 Spending and Performance This measure answers the question – what is the relationship of average spending per student to performance, and how does that compare to similar districts and schools? Similar Districts Comparison Group All Districts 110.0 110.0 110.0 P e r f o r m a n c e I n d e x 120.0 P e r f o r m a n c e I n d e x 120.0 P e r f o r m a n c e I n d e x 120.0 $32,000 $28,000 $24,000 $20,000 $16,000 $12,000 $8,000 $4,000 $0 Printed on October 4, 2017 $32,000 Spending per Pupil $28,000 IRN: 044164 $24,000 Spending per Pupil $20,000 60.0 $16,000 60.0 $12,000 60.0 $8,000 70.0 $4,000 70.0 $0 70.0 $32,000 80.0 $28,000 80.0 $24,000 80.0 $20,000 90.0 $16,000 90.0 $12,000 90.0 $8,000 100.0 $4,000 100.0 $0 100.0 Spending per Pupil Page 28 of 31 Source of Revenue Source of Funds District State Total Local $25,777,528 50.4% $9,013,382,621 39.7% State $16,941,250 33.1% $10,329,964,470 45.5% Federal $2,989,268 5.8% $1,689,939,468 7.4% $5,469,731 10.7% $1,662,319,384 7.3% $51,177,777 100.0% $22,695,605,944 100.0% Other Non-Tax Total District State 46% 33% 6% 7% 11% 7% 50% 40% Local Federal IRN: 044164 State Other Non-Tax Local State Federal Other Non-Tax Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 29 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District Superintendent: George J. Joseph Address: 321 N Depeyster St Kent OH 44240-2514 Phone: (330) 673-6515 County: Portage Your District's Schools School Achievement Progress Gap Closing Graduation Rate K-3 Literacy Prepared for Success Davey Elementary School C C D NR C NR Holden Elementary School C Longcoy Elementary School C B F NR C NR B C NR C NR Stanton Middle School C D F NR NR NR Theodore Roosevelt High School D C D B NR D Walls Elementary School C B F NR C NR IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 30 of 31 2016 - 2017 Report Card for Kent City School District No data returned for this view. This might be because the applied filter excludes all data. IRN: 044164 Printed on October 4, 2017 Page 31 of 31