Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 7,500 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on student enrollment, graduation rates, student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), an online tool to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? As suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel, the figures in this report provide selected indicators for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2015-16 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. This report provides a list of pre-selected comparison group institutions and the criteria used for their selection. Additional information about these indicators and the preselected comparison group are provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previous Data Feedback Reports as far back as 2005 and customize this latest report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report (DFR), please visit our web site at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Home/UseTheData. San Diego Christian College Santee, CA  San Diego Christian College  COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 17, NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The Customize Data Feedback Report functionality on the IPEDS Data Center (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups. The custom comparison group chosen by San Diego Christian College includes the following 12 institutions: Arizona Christian University (Phoenix, AZ) Holy Names University (Oakland, CA) Hope International University (Fullerton, CA) Life Pacific College (San Dimas, CA) Marymount California University (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA) Menlo College (Atherton, CA) Pacific Union College (Angwin, CA) Simpson University (Redding, CA) The Master's University and Seminary (Santa Clarita, CA) Vanguard University of Southern California (Costa Mesa, CA) Warner Pacific College (Portland, OR) William Jessup University (Rocklin, CA) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 3 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 3 and 4 Pg. 3 and 4 3) Awards Fig. 5 Pg. 4 4) Charges and Net Price Fig. 6 and 7 Pg. 4 5) Student Financial Aid Fig. 8, 9, 10 and 11 Pg. 5 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 12, 13, 14 and 15 Pg. 6 and 7 8) Finance Fig. 16 and 17 Pg. 7 9) Staff Fig. 18 and 19 Pg. 8 10) Libraries* [No charts applicable] *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2  San Diego Christian College  Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students who applied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time: Fall 2015 Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted, and percent of admissions enrolled, by full- and part-time status: Fall 2015 Image description. Admissions measure Horizontal Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Percent of students. Group Admitted. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 52. Median (N=11) 51. Item 2, Group Enrolled fullGroup time. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 47. Median (N=11) 32. Item Comparison Group Group Enrolled part time. Item 1,3, Your institution 2. Median (N=11) 0.01. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=11) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Admissions measure Horizontal Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Number of students. Group Applicants (N=11). Item 1, Comparison Your institution 433.Median 872. Item 2, Group Group Admitted (N=11). Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 224.Median 397. Item Comparison Group Enrolled fullGroup time (N=11). Item 1,3, Your institution 106.Median Item 2, Comparison Group Group 4, Enrolled part time (N=10).121. Item institution 4. Median Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group 1. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Admissions measure Admissions measure 433 Applicants (N=11) 52 872 Admitted 51 224 Admitted (N=11) 397 47 Enrolled full time 32 106 Enrolled full time (N=11) 121 2 Enrolled part time Enrolled part time 4 (N=10) 1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 0 10 20 30 40 Number of students Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Admissions component. Figure 3. 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of students Comparison Group Median (N=11) NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use of Median Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Admissions component. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2015 Image description. Bar chart withPercent. 10 groups with 2 items per group. Y scale titled Group American Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2, 1,1, Your institution 1, hover text(N=12) on image. Item Comparison Group Median 1, hover text on image. Group Asian. Item 1,2, Your institution 3, hover text(N=12) on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 5, hover text on image. Group Black or African Item 1,3, Your institution 12,American. hover text on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 7, hover text on image. Group Hispanic/Latino. Item 1,4, Your institution 21, hover text on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 23, hover text on image. Group Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander. Item 1,5, Your institution 1, hover text(N=12) on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 1, hover text on image. Group White. Item 2, 1,6, Your institution 46, hover text on image. Item Comparison Group Median (N=12) 45, hover text on image. Group Twoinstitution or more races. Item 1,7, Your 6, hover text(N=12) on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 5, hover text on image. Group 8, Race/ethnicity unknown. Item 1, Your institution 9, hover text on image. Item 2,9, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 5, hover text on image. Group Nonresident alien. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 1, hover text(N=12) on image. Item 2, Group Median 2, hover text on image. Group Women. Item 1,10, Your institution 54, hover text on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) 56, hover text on image. Race/ethnicity or gender Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. 100 90 80 Percent 70 60 54 46 50 56 45 40 30 21 20 10 23 12 1 1 5 3 7 6 1 1 5 9 5 1 2 0 American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander White Two or more races Race/ethnicity unknown Nonresident alien Women Race/ethnicity or gender Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See "Use of Median Values for Comparison Group" for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Fall Enrollment component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3  San Diego Christian College  Figure 4. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and of undergraduate students (2014-15), total FTE enrollment (2014-15), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall 2015) Figure 5. Number of degrees awarded, by level: 2014-15 Image description. Level of degree Horizontal BarNumber chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled of degrees. Group Doctor's Research/ Scholarship. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 0.01.Median Item 2, Group (N=12) 0.01. Group Doctor's Professional Practice. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 0.01.Median Item Comparison Group (N=12) 0.01. Group Doctor's Other. Item 1,3, Your institution 0.01.Median (N=12) 0.01. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 4, Master's. Item institution 0.01.Median (N=12) 13. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Group Bachelor's. Item 1,5, Your institution 148.Median (N=12) 171. Item 2, Comparison Group Group Associate's. Item 1,6, Your institution 35. Median (N=12) 1. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Enrollment measure Horizontal Bar chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Number ofheadcount students. Group Unduplicated - total. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 1209. Item 2, Group Median- (N=12) 1483. Group Unduplicated headcount undergraduates. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 1209. Item Comparison Group Median (N=12) 1239. Group Total FTE enrollment. Item 1,3, Your institution 899.Median (N=12) 1147. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 4, Full-time fall enrollment. Item institution 738.Median (N=12) 904. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Group Part-time fall enrollment. Item 1,5, Your institution 178.Median (N=12) 172. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Enrollment measure Level of degree Unduplicated headcount - total 1,209 Unduplicated headcount undergraduates 1,209 Doctor's 0 Research/ 0 Scholarship 1,483 Doctor's 0 Professional 0 Practice 1,239 Doctor's 0 Other 0 899 Total FTE enrollment 1,147 Master's 0 13 738 Full-time fall enrollment 904 148 Bachelor's 171 178 Part-time fall enrollment 0 35 Associate's 172 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 1 0 50 100 Number of students Your institution 150 200 Number of degrees Comparison Group Median (N=12) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see Calculating FTE in the Methodological Notes. Total headcount, FTE, and full- and part-time fall enrollment include both undergraduate and postbaccalaureate students, when applicable. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, 12-month Enrollment component and Spring 2016, Fall Enrollment component. NOTE: For additional information about postbaccalaureate degree levels, see the Methodology Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, Completions component. Figure 6. Figure 7. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: 2012-13 to 2015-16 Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, who were awarded grant or scholarship aid: 2012-13 to 201415 Image description. Academic year Horizontal BarNet chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled price. Group 2014-15. Item 1, Comparison Your institution $27243. Item 2, Group Median (N=12) $23489. Group 2013-14. Item 1,2, Your institution $27863. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $23484. Group 3, 2012-13. Item institution $25203. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) $22707. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Academic year Horizontal BarTuition chart with groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled and 4 fees. Group 2015-16. Item 1, Comparison Your institution $28470. Item 2, Group Median (N=12) $28807. Group 2014-15. Item 1,2, Your institution $27090. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $27631. Group 3, 2013-14. Item institution $25888. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) $26765. Group 2012-13. Item 1,4, Your institution $25108. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $25952. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Academic year Academic year $28,470 $27,243 2015-16 $28,807 2014-15 $23,489 $27,090 2014-15 $27,631 $27,863 2013-14 $23,484 $25,888 2013-14 $26,765 $25,203 2012-13 $25,108 2012-13 $22,707 $25,952 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $0 $5,000 Tuition and fees Your institution $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 Net price Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from the categories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, Institutional Characteristics component. $10,000 Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship awarded aid from the total cost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, Institutional Characteristics component and Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 4  San Diego Christian College  Figure 8. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who were awarded grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid: 2014-15 Image description. Type of aidBar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. Horizontal X scale1,titled Percent of students. Group Anyinstitution grant aid. Item 1, Comparison Your 98. Median (N=12) 97. Item 2, Group Group Federal grants. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 36. Median (N=12) 43. Item Comparison Group Pellinstitution grants.Group Item 1,3, Your 36. Median (N=12) 43. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 4, State/local grants. Item institution 18. Median (N=12) 31. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Group Institutional grants. Item 1,5, Your institution 90. Median (N=12) 95. Item 2, Comparison Group Anyinstitution loans. Group Item 1,6, Your 85. Median (N=12) 72. Item 2, Comparison Group Group Federal loans. Item 1,7, Your institution 85. Median (N=12) 72. Item 2, Comparison Group Group Other loans. Item 1,8, Your institution 13. Median (N=12) 4. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Type of aid Figure 9. Image description. Type of aidBar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. Horizontal X scale1,titled Aid dollars. Group Anyinstitution grant aid.$14438. Item 1, Comparison Your Item 2, Group Median (N=12) $17295. Group Federal grants. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution $4726. Item Comparison Median (N=12) $4648. Group Pellinstitution grants.Group Item 1,3, Your $4457. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $4542. Group 4, State/local grants. Item institution $7828. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) $6609. Group Institutional grants. Item 1,5, Your institution $12302. Item 2, Comparison Median (N=12) $12446. Group Anyinstitution loans. Group Item 1,6, Your $8901. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $7059. Group Federal loans. Item 1,7, Your institution $6113. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $6186. Group Other loans. Item 1,8, Your institution $17807. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $12105. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Type of aid Any grant aid 98 97 Federal grants 36 Pell grants 36 State/local grants Any grant aid 43 Federal grants 43 Pell grants 18 Institutional grants 90 Any loans 72 Federal loans 72 0 85 Any loans 85 Federal loans 10 $4,457 $4,542 $7,828 $6,609 $12,302 $12,446 $7,059 $8,901 $6,113 $6,186 Other loans 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $17,807 $12,105 $0 $5,000 $10,000 Percent of students Your institution $17,295 $4,726 $4,648 Institutional grants 95 13 4 $14,438 State/local grants 31 Other loans Average amounts of grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution, or loans awarded to full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, by type of aid: 2014-15 $15,000 $20,000 Aid dollars Comparison Group Median (N=12) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grants and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded to students. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see Cohort Determination in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component. NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grants and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component. Figure 10. Percent of all undergraduates awarded aid, by type of aid: 2014-15 Figure 11. Average amount of aid awarded to all undergraduates, by type of aid: 2014-15 Image description. Type of aidBar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. Horizontal X scale1,titled Percent of students. Group Anyinstitution grant aid. Item 1, Comparison Your 100.Median (N=12) 84. Item 2, Group Pellinstitution grants.Group Item 1,2, Your 54. Median (N=12) 45. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 3, Federal loans. Item institution 90. Median (N=12) 71. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Type of aidBar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. Horizontal X scale1,titled Aid dollars. Group Anyinstitution grant aid.$21169. Item 1, Comparison Your Item 2, Median (N=12) $15353. Group Pellinstitution grants.Group Item 1,2, Your $4137. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $4280. Group 3, Federal loans. Item institution $8499. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) $7533. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Type of aid Type of aid 100 Any grant aid $21,169 Any grant aid 84 $15,353 54 $4,137 Pell grants Pell grants 45 $4,280 90 Federal loans 71 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 $8,499 Federal loans 100 $7,533 $0 Percent of students Your institution $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 Aid dollars Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federal government, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes only federal loans awarded to students. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component. $5,000 Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes federal loans to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Student Financial Aid component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 5  San Diego Christian College  Figure 12. Retention rates of full-time, first-time bachelor's degree seeking students (Fall 2014 cohort) Figure 13. Graduation and transfer-out rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to program completion (2009 cohort) Image description. Measure Horizontal BarPercent. chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Group Full-time retention rate (N=12). Item 1, Comparison Your institution 60. Median Item 2, Group 73. Group Part-time retention rate (N=8). Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 100.Median Item Comparison Group 70. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Measure Horizontal BarPercent. chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Group Graduation rate, (N=12). Item 1, Comparison Your institution 30. Overall Item 2, Group Median Group Transfer-out rate (N=5). 43. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 16. Median Item Comparison Group 34. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Measure Measure 60 30 Full-time retention rate (N=12) Graduation rate, Overall (N=12) 73 43 100 Part-time retention rate (N=8) 16 Transfer-out rate (N=5) 70 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 34 80 90 100 0 Percent Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution Image description. Time to program completion Horizontal BarGraduation chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled rate. Group 4 years. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 31. Median (N=11) 28. Item 2, Group Group 6 years. Item 1,2, Your institution 41. Median (N=11) 47. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 3, 8 years. Item institution 41. Median (N=11) 48. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=11) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Time to program completion 31 4 years 28 41 6 years 47 41 8 years 48 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Graduation rate Your institution 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Comparison Group Median NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right-to-Know rates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to report transfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Graduation Rates component. Figure 14. Bachelor's degree graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 4 years, 6 years, and 8 years: 2007 cohort 10 20 Percent NOTE: Retention rates are measured from the fall of first enrollment to the following fall. Academic reporting institutions report retention data as of the institution's official fall reporting date or as of October 15, 2014. Program reporters determine the cohort with enrollment any time between August 1-October 31, 2014 and retention based on August 1, 2015. Four-year institutions report retention rates for students seeking a bachelor's degree. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Fall Enrollment component. 0 10 Comparison Group Median (N=11) NOTE: The 6-year graduation rate is the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rate; the 4- and 8year rates are calculated using the same methodology. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, 200% Graduation Rates component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 6  San Diego Christian College  Figure 15. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to program completion, by race/ethnicity: 2009 cohort Image description. Bar chart withPercent. 10 groups with 2 items per group. Y scale titled Group Graduation rate, (N=12). Item 1,1, Your institution 30, Overall hover text onhover image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 43, text on image. Group 2, American Indian or Alaska Native (N=6). Item institution 100, hover text image. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median 42, on hover text on image. Group Asian (N=10). Item 1,3, Your institution 33, hover text onhover image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 56, text on image. Group Black or African American (N=11). Item 1,4, Your institution 0.01, hover text on image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 36, hover text on image. Group Hispanic /Latino Item 1,5, Your institution 18, (N=12). hover text image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 46,onhover text on image. Group Native Hawaiian other Pacific Islander (N=5). Item 1,6, Your institution No or data, hover ontext image. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 67, text hover on image. Group White (N=12). Item 2, 1,7, Your institution 32, hover text image. Item Comparison Group Median 48,onhover text on image. Group Twoinstitution or more races (N=10). Item 1,8, Your 0.01,Median hover text on image. Item 2, Comparison Group 53, hover text on image. Group 9, Race/ethnicity unknown (N=9). Item 1, Your institution 33, hover text on image. Item 2,10, Comparison Group Median 33, hover text on image. Group Nonresident alien (N=9). Item 1, Comparison Your institution 33, hover text image. Item 2, Group Median 67,onhover text on image. Graduation rates by race/ethnicity Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. 100 100 90 80 67 Percent 70 60 50 40 67 56 43 53 48 46 42 36 33 30 33 32 33 33 30 18 20 10 0 0 0 Graduation rate, Overall (N=12) American Indian or Alaska Native (N=6) Asian (N=10) Black or African American (N=11) Hispanic /Latino (N=12) Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (N=5) White (N=12) Two or more races (N=10) Race/ethnicity unknown (N=9) Nonresident alien (N=9) Graduation rates by race/ethnicity Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2015-16, Graduation Rates component. Figure 16. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscal year 2015 Figure 17. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscal year 2015 Image description. Revenue source Horizontal BarPercent. chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled Group Tuition and fees. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 97. Median (N=12) 75. Item 2, Group Group Government grants and contracts. Item 1,2, Your institution 0.01.Median Item 2, Comparison Group (N=12) 0.01. Group 3, Private gifts, grants, and contracts. Item institution 2. Median Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group (N=12) 10. Group Investment return. Item 1,4, Your institution 0.01.Median (N=12) 1. Item 2, Comparison Group Other core Group revenues. Item 1,5, Your institution 1. Median (N=12) 2. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Expense function Horizontal BarDollars chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled per FTE. Group Instruction. Item 1, Comparison Your institution $6377. Item 2, Group Median (N=12) $6807. Group Research. Item 1,2, Your institution $0.01. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $0.01. Group 3, Public service. Item institution $0.01. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) $0.01. Group Academic support. Item 1,4, Your institution $4721. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $1697. Group Institutional support. Item 1,5, Your institution $1269. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $5700. Group Student services. Item 1,6, Your institution $5303. Item 2, Comparison Median (N=12) $4602. Group Other core Group expenses. Item 1,7, Your institution $0.01. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=12) $0.01. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Revenue source Expense function 97 Tuition and fees Government grants 0 and contracts 0 2 Private gifts, grants, and contracts Investment return $6,377 $6,807 Instruction 75 Research $0 $0 Public service $0 $0 $4,721 Academic support 10 $1,697 $1,269 Institutional support 0 1 $5,700 $5,303 Student services 1 2 Other core revenues 0 $4,602 Other core $0 expenses $0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 Percent Your institution $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Dollars per FTE Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparison group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparison institution. For a detailed definition of core revenues, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Finance component. $2,000 Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly instruction, may be inflated because finance data includes all core expenses while FTE reflects credit activity only. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2015, 12-month Enrollment component and Spring 2016, Finance component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 7  San Diego Christian College  Figure 18. Full-time equivalent staff, by occupational category: Fall 2015 Figure 19. Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medical staff equated to 9-month contracts, by academic rank: Academic year 2015-16 Image description. Staff category Horizontal BarNumber chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled of staff. Group Postsecondary Teachers and staff. Item 1, Comparison Your institution 48. Item 2, Group Median (N=12) 83. Group Instructional support occupations. Item 2, 1,2, Your institution 16. Median Item Comparison Group (N=12) 17. Group Management. Item 1,3, Your institution 13. Median (N=12) 24. Item 2, Comparison Group Group 4, Business and financial operations. Item institution 0.01. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median (N=12) 8. Group Computer, engineering, science. Item 1,5, Your institution 1. Medianand Item 2, Comparison Group 6. media. Group Community service, legal,(N=12) arts, and Item 1,6, Your institution 11. Median Item 2, Comparison Group (N=12) 22. Group Healthcare. Item 1,7, Your institution 2. Median (N=12) 1. Item 2, Comparison Group Group Other. Item 1,8, Your institution 8. Median (N=12) 32. Item 2, Comparison Group Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median (N=12) Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Image description. Academic rank Horizontal BarAverage chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. X scale1,titled salary. Group All ranks (N=12). Item 1, Comparison Your institution $54927. Item 2, Group Median $61425. Group Professor (N=12). Item 2, 1,2, Your institution $67104. Item Comparison Group Median $71114. Group Associate professor (N=12). Item 1,3, Your institution $57780. Item 2, Comparison Group Median $61565. Group 4, Assistant professor (N=12). Item institution $49662. Item 1, 2, Your Comparison Group Median $55098. Group Instructor (N=7). Item 1,5, Your institution $40437. Item 2, Comparison Group Median $43263. Group Lecturer (N=1). Item 1,6, Your institution No data. Item 2, Comparison Group Median Group No institution academic rankdata. (N=1).No data. Item 1,7, Your No Item 2, Comparison Group Median No data. Shape line, Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Label: Comparison Group Median Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Label: Shape ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Label: End of image description. Staff category Academic rank Postsecondary Teachers and staff 48 Instructional support occupations 16 17 13 Management Business and financial 0 operations Computer, engineering, and science 1 24 $49,662 $55,098 Assistant professor (N=12) $40,437 $43,263 Instructor (N=7) 22 Lecturer (N=1) 2 1 8 0 $57,780 $61,565 Associate professor (N=12) 6 11 Other $67,104 $71,114 Professor (N=12) 8 Community service, legal, arts, and media Healthcare No academic rank (N=1) 32 20 40 60 80 100 $0 Number of staff Your institution $54,927 $61,425 All ranks (N=12) 83 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 Average salary Comparison Group Median (N=12) NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included. For calculation details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Human Resources component. $20,000 Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medical staff equated to 9-month contracts was calculated by multiplying the average monthly salary by 9. The average monthly salary was calculated by dividing the total salary outlays by the total number of months covered by staff on 9, 10, 11 and 12-month contracts. Medians are not reported for comparison groups with less than three values. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2016, Human Resources component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 8  San Diego Christian College  METHODOLOGICAL NOTES Overview This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during the 2015-16 data collection year. Response rates exceeded 99% for most surveys. Detailed response tables are included in IPEDS First Look reports at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010. Use of Median Values for Comparison Group The value for the comparison institution is compared to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic included in the figure. If more than one statistic is presented in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are not reported for comparison groups with fewer than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to 100%. To access all the data used to create the figures included in this report, go to ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds). Missing Statistics If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were not collected. Not all notes may be applicable to your report. Use of Imputed Data All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used to prepare your report. Data Confidentiality IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality. Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the 1997 Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about the race/ethnicity categories can be found at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/reic/resource.asp. Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the institution. For institutions that report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic terms), student counts and cohorts are based on fall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on standard academic terms) are based on unduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period. DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICS USED IN THE FIGURES Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) Admissions and Test Score Data Admissions and test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. Applicants include only those students who fulfilled all requirements for consideration for admission and who were notified of one of the following actions: admission, non-admission, placement on a wait list, or application withdrawn (by applicant or institution). Admitted applicants (admissions) include wait-listed students who were subsequently offered admission. Early decision, early action, and students who began studies during the summer prior to the fall reporting period are included. For customized Data Feedback Reports, test scores are presented only if they are required for admission. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 9  San Diego Christian College  Student Enrollment FTE Enrollment The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduate enrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using 12 -month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDS Glossary at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/. Total Entering Undergraduate Students Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the prior summer term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at the undergraduate level, and non-degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. Only degree-granting, academic year reporting institutions provide total entering student data. Charges and Net Price Average Institutional Net Price Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includes only students who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the total cost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid awarded refers to financial aid that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amount may differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student. Retention and Graduation Rates Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right-to-Know Act and Higher Education Act, as amended, and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who completed a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time to complete all requirements of the degree or certificate program before the ending status date of August 31, 2014; divided by the total number of students in the cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificateseeking undergraduates minus any allowable exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission. Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution (without earning a degree/award) and subsequently re-enrolled at another institution within the same time period; divided by the same adjusted cohort (initial cohort minus allowable exclusions) as described above. Only institutions with a mission that includes providing substantial preparation for students to enroll in another eligible institution are required to report transfers out. Retention Rates Retention rates are measures at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For fouryear institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who are again enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from the previous fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall. The full-time retention rate is calculated using the percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates, while the part-time rate is calculated using the percentage of part-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates. Finance Core Revenues Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; state and local appropriations; government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts; sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating and IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 10  San Diego Christian College  non-operating sources; and other revenues and additions (federal and capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanent endowments). Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts (including contributions from affiliated entities); investment return; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources. Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations, grants, and contracts (federal, state, and local); private grants and contracts; investment income; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources. At degree-granting institutions, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Nondegree-granting institutions do no report revenue from auxiliary enterprises in a separate category. These amounts may be included in the core revenues from other sources. Core Expenses Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services, scholarships and fellowships (net of discounts and allowances), and other expenses. Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation, and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses at degree-granting institutions exclude expenses for auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Nondegree-granting institutions do not report expenses for auxiliary enterprises in a separate category. These amounts may be included in the core expenses as other expenses. Endowment Assets Endowment assets, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include gross investments of endowment funds, term endowment funds, and funds functioning as endowment for the institution and any of its foundations and other affiliated organizations. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB do not hold or report endowment assets. Salaries, Wages, and Benefits Salaries, wages, and benefits, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalf of an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage. Frequently, benefits are associated with an insurance payment. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB standards do not report salaries. Staff FTE Staff The full-time-equivalent (FTE) of staff is calculated by summing the total number of full-time staff and adding one-third of the total number of part-time staff. Graduate assistants are not included. Equated Instructional Non-Medical Staff Salaries Institutions reported total salary outlays by academic rank and gender, and the number of staff by academic rank, contract length (9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-month contracts), and gender. The total number of months covered by salary outlays was calculated by multiplying the number of staff reported for each contract length period by the number of months of the contract, and summing across all contract length periods. The weighted average monthly salary for each academic rank and gender was calculated by dividing the total salary outlays by the total number of months covered. The weighted average monthly salary was then multiplied by 9 to determine an equated 9-month salary for each rank. Student-to-Faculty Ratio The guidance provided to institutions for calculating their student-to-faculty ratio is as follows: the number of FTE students (using Fall Enrollment data) divided by the total FTE instructional staff (using the total Primarily instruction + Instruction/research/public service staff reported on the EAP section of the Human Resources component and adding any not primarily instructional staff that are teaching a credit course). For this calculation, FTE for students is equal to the number of full-time students plus one-third the number of part-time students; FTE for instructional staff is similarly calculated. Students enrolled in "stand-alone" graduate or professional programs (such as medicine, law, veterinary, dentistry, social work, or public health) and instructional staff teaching in these programs are excluded from the FTE calculations. Additional Methodological Information Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be found in the publications available at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010. Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the IPEDS online glossary available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 11