To all the misinformed peoole:

I don?t know how this court can just talk around the subject of contract liability, but, that My
appearance here todays, in at Arms Length, with clean hands, in good Faith, presenting this
matter to the court, for redress of grievance due to my property being held under siege, by the
City of Green Bay?s Housing inspection Department, inspectors, who are seemingly to be under
direction to seize, Affiant?s 1391, 9th Street Property, in Green Bay, Wisconsin, seeing that
Defendant, Brenda Seidl, that claimed she, properly noti?ed, the residents at 1392 Ninth Street,
in Green Bay, Wisconsin; but, this is not true, because I consulted with aldermen Guy Zema, and
he assured me that, all calls made by the City of Green Bay, Housing Inspection Department, is
traceable, and can be printed out, for later use such as this matter now before the court, but
Defendant, Brenda Siedl, inspected, ?ned added citations, of housing violations, to the Wrong
Owner/Resident, to which should have been Gonzeals, the TRUE owner of the 1391 Ninth
Street Property, No back to my appearance here today, is like I said at Arms Length, which
means, no one or no court, can form or create a contract or a trust, between the parties. This is
only to declare the liable party, to this action, between Af?ant Troy-Robert: Lasecki, sui juris,
without counsel, by choice, and with assistance of my counsel of choice, is Ralph-George:
Barke, sui juris, to assist me here today, if I need any help with paper-work or questions that I
may have, so as to insure that we will have a clear and clean court record.

The Steamer, Lady Pike:

Either ignorance and un-skillfulness being proved, the attempt to set up inevitable mistake in
identity, of ownership, of the 1391, Ninth Street Property in Green Bay, Wisconsin, is in vain, as
such a defense can never be sustained even the wrong house was the case, unless it appears
that either party is a fault. Loss or damages occasioned by such a serious condemning, then
adding mutable citations, ?nes, and orders for corrections to said property, is in itself, where it
appears that those city housing inspectors, were incompetent to preform the required duty, of
proper inspection protocol, either for inexperience or want of knowledge of the property in
question, from negligence or inattention, cannot be regarded as being the result of natural
causes, nor as falling within the exception contained in the condemning of the 13k 91 Ninth
Street PrOperty. Clark v. Barnwell, 12 Howard, 271; The Cordes 21 Id. 27; King v. Shepherd, 3
Story, 349; 3 Kent, 213 Smith's Leading Cases, 7th ed. 387; 1 Smith?s Mercantile Law, 386.

JOHATHAN ADERSON Reporter Green Bay 

Note, Johathan Aderson, this is Troy-Robert: Lasecki?s, and Ralph?George: Barke,s? True Story
under penalty of perjury, as in the matter of Green Bay Wisconsin?s Housing Inspection
Department a. k. a. Mc Donald?s, this to make a point clear that all court today are commercial.
If NOT, then I ask the court to prove up their claim?

Now it?s not a hard ?nd to see, that Green Bay, is in BIG TROUBLE because of Mayor Jim Smith?s
being suspected of taking then there is the Evlis Rolly coaster, that's going to take a
hundred years to pay for at the rate of ride per year. Then ya got the Port Plaza that?s lurking in
the wings, an with a real BIG STORY, the Brian Dassey case, about to go off, and how
convenient, to make a story out of NOTHING, like my case of defending my property rights, and

 

that gets TOP I?ve been filing this kind of document, petitions, writs, motions etc.,
for the past 10 years, why! Now I am getting attention? I?d say that my story is to buffer the
State of Wisconsin?s judicial commission trouble, with the Brian Dassy Case. But that's another
I want to know is do you Johathan, have the cognitive abilities to actually understand
a constitutional and political question? That?s honestly why thejudge dismissed my case, only
to try and create a incident because if not, just ask this totally disrespectful commissioner why
did this idiot call us into court for the 4 or 5th time over this same matter nothing changed all
our motions petitions writs documents are ?led In the same manner, with constitutional
demands that are valid and just under the Highest Law of the Land, that?s the united States
Constitution, and all we are doing is trying to get the judge to answer our questions of why and
how can this court ignore an Open face theft of private property, by false pretense.

So Jonathan, here is the integrity of Constitutional Text

The political speculations of Hobbes and Locke bore fruit in our own Constitution. With its
elaborate network of procedural and substantive provisions. The formation of government in
accordance with a particular outlook, however, marks only the first state in the long journey to
sound governance. The second state is to preserve the political arrangements that the
Constitution ordains. In this country Jonathan, Anderson, remember, if you are any?kind of
Reporter, you would want to check into the massive problems here in Green Bay, with
corruption in our government, an it?s about time this massive deceit by all the corporate courts
of our county, city and state Johnathan, here is what?s happening right in the Brown
County Circuit Courtrooms, across are Nations, and Jonathan, it's been on National TV. Stations,
stating: ?The Judicial System here in America is Corrupt from the Every now an
then it?s mentioned, but the fact that it was 50 Jonathan, here is a dose of the
A Person is in contempt of court by being a ?Real Party?, but not in interest to the
case. Furthermore, this "Real Party?, Jonathan, not being the Real Party IN INTEREST, failed the
complaint under a fictitious plaintiff, CITY OF GREEN BAY HOUSING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT,
BRENDA KRISTEN JOHNSON et. al. BRIAN BEISENSTEIN a.k.a. MENN LAW FIRM 
Without the consent of the ?ctitious Plaintiff, which can never be done anyway (it is impossible
for a "?ction/corporation? to sign for anything). The Person acting as a "Real Party? engaged in
contempt of court, thereby everything said ?Real Party? Jonathan, ?led is a counterfeit security.
This is victimizing the individuals who are only demanding what "We The People? have died for,
is to have a society where we have a defense against the stealthy encroachments.

Jonathan, here is Applicable definitions follow:

Definitions:

Fictitious Plaintiff (Black?s Law Edition page 524)

A person appearing in the writ, complaint, or record as the Plaintiff in a suit, but who in reality
does not exist, or who?s ignorant of the suit and of the use of his name in it. It is a contempt of
court to sue in the name of a fictitious Party.

(American Heritage DictionaryhipF'K?f??n?ra'va? 

Fictitious

 

Of relating to,or characterized by fiction; imaginary
a) Accepted or assumed for the sake of convention: a fictitious belief
b) Adapted or assumed in order to deceive: a fictitious name
c) Nomenuinely believed or felt; sham.

Factitious
Produced artificially rather than bynatural process
Lacking authenticity or 

James Ames wrote an article, ?Specific Performance for and Against Strangers to the Contract?
in Harvard Law Review at 171 (1903), wherein he discusses how third parties, interfering (or
seeming to interfere with the Commercial contract administration of others can be hauled into
a Court and have an Injunction thrown at them, then incarceration follows for continued
disobedience

So, the right of the judge to throw penal lex at you without any in personam contract in effect
and no Tort indicia damages, is not different form the recourse available to non?juristic Persons
to throw their contract irritants into jail via a Contempt Citation.

in this slick way, a violation of the Public Trust is referred to as incarceration justification. As is
usual, it is ultimately an invisible contract lying at the bottom of all this circumvention of the
Principles behind the ?Republican Form of Government Clause.?

Affiant Troy?Robert: Lasecki, and Ralph-George: Barke, reserves the right to amend in order
that the truth be ascertained and justly determined.

 

        
   

Is?.
42

Authorized Signature '2 - lph?Geor

 
 

Stay tuned, for more press?room updates, into this massive the Ruling Class.