Planning and Zoning Board
American Icon Brewery
December 29, 2016 Page 2

Secretary of the Interior?s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitaring
Historic Buildings.

SITE PLAN EVALUATION

Section 64.10 of the Code requires that all approved site plans and amendments to site plans
meet certain pertinent general review, performance, and development standards. The staff ?nds
that the proposed site plan meets all these standards except as noted in the following sections.

Compliance with Land Development Regulations (Sec. 

The site plan?s compliance with all development regulations and pertinent codes was reviewed
by the Planning and Development Department, Public Works Department, Water and Sewer
Department, Electric Transmission and Distribution, Department of Health, and Indian River
County Fire and Life Safety Bureau. Attachment A provides information on how the site plan
application meets development standards such as setbacks, height, FAR, minimum ?oor area,
and fencing. The following items warrant further esplanation and analysis:

a Parking.

Analysis. The Downtown (DTW) zoning district has Special off-street parking
requirements. Where the redevelopment involves the expansion of ?oor area,
Section 62.310(d) allows that the ?rst 30 required parking spaces are exempt from
parking requirements. Any parking spaces required beyond the initial 30 are only
required to provide half of the normal parking required. Therefore, the required
amount of on?site parking is calculated as follows:

Restaurant U75 8,002 5.13. =106.7
Covered Outdoor Dining 1/75 555 s.f. 7.4
Retail@ 1/250 621 s.f. 2.5
Brewery (manufacturing) 1/400 5,087 sf. 12.7

Preliminary Total Required 129.3
Reduction of First 30 spaces (1293-30) 99.3
Application of 50% Reduction (99.3 .50) 49.6 or 50

ii

The applicant proposes to provide 51 spaces, which meets the requirements of the
of?street parking regulations.

Finding. The staff finds that the site plan is compliant with the City?s off-street
parking regulations.

9 Landscaping.
Analysis. As shown in Attachment A, the proposed landscaping in the site plan

meets all speci?cations, except for not meeting the minimum height and canopy
requirements for 2/3 of the trees and using more palms thansthe minimum 25