WikiLeaks @wikileaks G) A PAC run anti?Trump site 'outintrumo.oro' is about to launch. The PAC is a recycled pro-Iraq war PAC. We have guessed the password. It is '5 'outintrump'. See 'About' for who Tuh is behind it. Any comments? QIEDHE, 11:59 PM Off the record I don't know who that is but I'll ask around. Thanks. Qf21f16,11150 AM WikiLeaks @wikileaks Manni?fmc?umqufj?n??m Hillary Clinton what-Klara}! ?Hintulluhlu :glnumlmr cmimll If tho-1:321. l-r .. came. .. .. on Assange #16 IM I'll-l- J-I- lilt- I "(till-Hil- lfl-l-l-F'l'r "can't WE leStm Mr! on "Ind: In ?In? kill-IF I'll i'll. I ?lm Hiya. It'd be great if you guys could comment on I push this c? story 10,33,316, 1:25 PM WikiLeaks (9 @wikileaks PM Al ready did :thatfe'arilier today. it's amazing whet-she'oan get away with. - ?l?le?iB, 3:31 PM Lr' leaktll keep readingabout? . . WISHB, 3:03 PM Hey Donald, great to see you and your dad talking about our publications. Strongly suggest your dad tweets this link if he mentions us wisearehtk is you guys can get all your followers digging through the content there's many great stories there the press are missing and we?re sure some of your follows will find it. 1H 4: WikiLeaks ?3 @wikileaits we just released Podesta It. Emails Part 4 i 1 torrzris, Hey Don. We have an unusual idea. Leak us one or more of your father's tax returns. The benefits are this: 1. Most of the harm has already been done by the and pre- empted by your father (tax in? writedowns] 10f21r?16, Elli-B AM 2. it's possible that any moment they could come out through the most biased source (eg who will distort them till? into the worst posible light t'i torzms, am AM fil?? fn? WikiLeaks (D @wikileaks 3. if we publish them it will dramatically improve the perception of our impartiality. This is the reel kicker. That means that the vast amount of stuff that we are publishing about Clinton will have much higher impact, because it won't be perceived as coming from a "pro-Trump" ?pro? Russian" source, which the Clinton campaign is constantly slendering us with. 9:49 AM You can email them to office?wikileaks.oro or use our secure submission system at wikileaks.orgi#submit or many other methods (e.g lawyer to lawyer}. 1i?! I can? WikiLeaks @wikileaks The same for any? other negative stuff (documents, recordings} that you think has a decent chance of coming out. Let us put it out. present it accurately as opposied to in a biased manner and it will increase the power of all our other publications about Clinton. ?rooms, 9:54 AM Hi Don; if your father 'Ioses' we think it is much more interesting if he DOES NOT conceed and spends time CHALLENGING the media and other types of rigging that occurred-?as he has implied that he might do. He is aiso much more likely to keep his base alive and energised this way and if he is going to start a new network, showing how corrupt the old ones are is helpful. The discussion about the rigging can be transformative as it exposes media corruption, primary corruption, PAC corruption etc. 1? WikiLeaks a @wikileaks LII Lr I-ul I about the rigging can be transformative as it exposes media corruption, primary corruption, PAC corruption etc. We don't like corruption ither and our publications are effective at proving that this and other forms ?ll? of corruption exists. maps, 5:35 PM {gilt Wow. 1? AM Obama people will surely try to delete records on the way out. Just a heads up. . I. ?i?lp?Elf?iE, 12:51 AM ?ll? I J: II WikiLeaks @wikileaks Hi Don. Hope you're doing well! In relation to Mr. Assange: Obama,? Clinton placed pressure on Sweden, UK and Australia {his home country} to illioitl'y' go after Mr. Assange. It would be real easy and helpful for your dad to suggest that Australia appoint Assange ambassador to DC "That's a really smart tough guy and the most famous australian you have! or something similar. They won't do it, but it will send the right signals to Australia, UK Sweden to start following the law and stop bending it to log ratiate themselves with the Clintons. Background: iustioe4assange.oom ?iEf?lB??, 12:33 PM ?1 WikiLeaks @wikilealcs John Harwood a at? Who do you belieye America? a TTUQ AM WileeakS a @Wikileaks MEEHZ 12:01 EM Hi Don. Sorry to hear about your problems. We have an idea that may help a little. We are VERY interested in confidentially obtaining and publishing a copy of the emailts} cited in the NYTimes today. We think this is strongly in your interest. Why? Because otherwise your opponents (who clearly have a copy} will gradually "milk" phrases from the emailts} with their own spinfco ntext added according to what. suits WikiLeaks @wikileaks. . Hi Don. Sorry to hear about your problems. We hate an idea that may help a little. We are VERY interested in confidentially obtaining and publishing a copy of the emailis} cited in the NYTimes today. We think this is strongly in your interest. Why? Because otherwise your opponents (who clearly have a copy) will gradually "miEk" phrases from the emailis) with their own spinfcontext added according to what suits THEIR timing and THEIR strategy oyer days/weeksfmonths. Us publishing not only deprives them of this ability but is beautifully confounding. If you have a contact that wants to send this or other information to us for publication they can contact us via our lawyers WikiLeaks @wikiieaks a'copy; wm phrases from the emailts) with their own spinfcontext added according to what suits THEIR timing and THEIR strategy over daysfweekslmonths. Us publishing not only deprives them of this ability but is beautifully confounding. If you have a contact that wants to send this or other information to us for publication they can contact us via our lawyers ma rgaret@kunstlerlaw.net Phone: 212.924.7025 295 Madison Ave, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10017 OR secure online: Mimi in? OR email: office@wikileaks.org mini: 9:29 AM