Report No. DODIG-2015-081 I nspec tor Ge ne ral U.S. Department of Defense F E B RUA RY 1 2 , 2 0 1 5 Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements I N T E G R I T Y  E F F I C I E N C Y  A C C O U N TA B I L I T Y  E X C E L L E N C E I N T E G R I T Y  E F F I C I E N C Y  A C C O U N TA B I L I T Y  E X C E L L E N C E Mission Our mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversight of the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotes accountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary of Defense and Congress; and informs the public. Vision Our vision is to be a model oversight organization in the Federal Government by leading change, speaking truth, and promoting excellence—a diverse organization, working together as one professional team, recognized as leaders in our field. Fraud, Waste & Abuse HOTLINE Department of Defense dodig.mil/hotline 8 0 0 . 4 2 4 . 9 0 9 8 For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover. Results in Brief Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements February 12, 2015 Objective (cont’d) Objective We were not able to evaluate Army fingerprint and final disposition reporting and submission compliance due to data validation limitations. Army evaluation results will be published in a subsequent report. Any reference to MCIOs and other DoD law enforcement organizations generally is exclusive of all Army law enforcement organizations. We evaluated whether DoD Military Criminal Investigative Organizations (MCIOs)1 and other DoD law enforcement organizations2 reported offender criminal history data collected from service members convicted of qualifying offenses3 and submitted the data to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division as DoD policy mandates. Specifically, we determined whether fingerprints and final disposition reports for 1,102 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps service members convicted of qualifying offenses between June 1, 2010, and October 31, 2012, were submitted to the FBI’s CJIS Division for inclusion in the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) (now called Next Generation Identification) database. Our analysis did not determine the reasons that fingerprints or final disposition reports that should have been included in IAFIS were not. 1 The MCIOs include the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Naval Criminal Investigative Service, and Air Force Office of Special Investigations. 2 DoD law enforcement organizations include the U.S. Army Military Police, U.S. Navy Shore Patrol/ Naval Security Force, U.S. Air Force Security Forces and U.S. Marine Corps Military Police/Criminal Investigative Division. 3 Offenses generally include any Uniform Code of Military Justice offense for which confinement exceeding 1 year may be imposed at sentencing. In the civilian justice system, these are often referred to as “felonies.” Findings • Fingerprints for 304 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps convicted offenders in our evaluation sample period were not in the FBI’s IAFIS criminal history database. The evaluated Services had an overall fingerprint collection and submission compliance rate of 72 percent. • Final disposition reports for 334 Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps convicted offenders in our evaluation sample period were not in the FBI’s IAFIS criminal history database. The evaluated Services had an overall final disposition reporting compliance rate of 70 percent. Recommendations We recommend the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to submit the missing 304 fingerprints and 334 final disposition reports to the FBI for inclusion into IAFIS. In addition, we recommend the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to ensure fingerprints and final disposition reports for future arrestees and convicted offenders conform to DoD Instruction 5505.11, “Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submission Requirements.” Visit us at www.dodig.mil DODIG-2015-081 (Project No. 2013C006) │ i Results in Brief Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements Management Comments and Our Response Comments from the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force addressed all specifics of the recommendations, and no further comments are required. They agreed with our recommendation to promptly submit any missing fingerprints and final disposition reports to the FBI for inclusion into IAFIS, but expressed concern regarding their jurisdictional and legal authority to collect criminal history data from individuals no longer subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice. We recognize there may be hindrances in attempting to collect the missing data. However, we believe the Services should pursue all possible avenues in their efforts to collect and submit the required fingerprints and final disposition reports to the FBI. ii │ DODIG-2015-081 (Project No. 2013C006) Recommendations Table Management Recommendations Requiring Comment No Additional Comments Required Secretary of the Navy 1 and 2 Secretary of the United States Air Force 1 and 2 DODIG-2015-081 (Project No. 2013C006) │ iii INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500 February 12, 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) NAVAL INSPECTOR GENERAL SUBJECT: Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements (Report No. DODIG 2015-081) This report is provided for information and use. We evaluated whether the Military Criminal Investigative Organizations and other DoD law enforcement organizations collected criminal history data from service members convicted of certain offenses and submitted it to the Criminal Justice Information Services Division for inclusion in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) criminal history database. We were not able to evaluate Army fingerprint and final disposition reporting and submission compliance due to data validation limitations. Army evaluation results will be published in a subsequent report. We conducted this evaluation in accordance with the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE) Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation. We found that fingerprints for 304 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps convicted offenders in our evaluation sample period were not in the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) criminal history database. The evaluated Services had an overall fingerprint collection and submission compliance rate of 72 percent. We found that final disposition reports for 334 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps convicted offenders in our evaluation sample period were not in the FBI’s IAFIS criminal history database. The evaluated Services had an overall final disposition report submission compliance rate of 70 percent. Our analysis did not determine the reasons that fingerprints or final disposition reports that should have been included in IAFIS were not. We considered management comments on a draft of this report when preparing the final report. Comments from the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force conformed to the requirements of DoD Directive 7650.3; therefore, additional comments are not required. We appreciate the courtesies extended to the review staff. For additional information on this report, please contact Mr. Jeff Bennett, Director of Oversight, at (703) 699-5667. iv │ DODIG-2015-081 Randolph R. Stone Deputy Inspector General Policy and Oversight Contents Introduction Objective__________________________________________________________________________________________1 Background______________________________________________________________________________________1 Finding A. Fingerprints for 304 Convicted Offenders Were Not in IAFIS_____________________________________________4 MCIOs and Other DoD Law Enforcement Organizations Did Not Submit 304 of the 1,102 Required Fingerprints for Qualifying Offenders Within Our Sample Period__________________________________________________________________4 Navy Fingerprint Submission Analysis________________________________________________________4 Air Force Fingerprint Submission Analysis___________________________________________________5 Marine Corps Fingerprint Submission Analysis______________________________________________6 Finding B. Final Disposition Data for 334 Convicted Offenders Were Not in the IAFIS Database________________________7 MCIOs and Other DoD Law Enforcement Organizations Did Not Submit 334 of the 1,102 Required Final Disposition Reports for Qualifying Offenders Within Our Sample Period ________________________________________________________________7 Navy Final Disposition Reporting Analysis___________________________________________________7 Air Force Final Disposition Reporting Analysis_______________________________________________8 Marine Corps Final Disposition Reporting Analysis__________________________________________8 Conclusion_________________________________________________________________________________9 Overall Recommendations, Management Comments, and Our Response __________________________________________________________________9 Appendixes Appendix A. Scope and Methodology________________________________________________________ 11 Prior Coverage_____________________________________________________________________________ 12 Appendix B. Qualifying Offenses_ ___________________________________________________________ 13 DoDI 5505.11 Enclosure 2 Offenses ____________________________________________________ 13 Appendix C. Service Criminal History Data Reporting____________________________________ 16 DODIG-2015-081 │ v Contents (cont’d) Management Comments Navy Comments________________________________________________________________________________ 17 Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations and Environment_ ___________ 17 Naval Criminal Investigative Service________________________________________________________ 20 Air Force Comments___________________________________________________________________________ 22 Inspector General Director of Special Investigations______________________________________ 22 Air Force Office of Special Investigations CJIS Program Manager_________________________ 23 Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Installations and Mission Support (Deputy Director of Security Forces)__________________________________________ 24 Acronyms and Abbreviations______________________________________________ 25 vi │ DODIG-2015-081 Introduction Introduction Objective Our objective was to evaluate Military Criminal Investigative Organization (MCIO) and other DoD law enforcement organization compliance with fingerprint and final disposition submission requirements in DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5505.11, “Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submission Requirements,” June 20, 2006, and July 9, 2010, (Incorporating Change 1, May 3, 2011). See Appendix A for a discussion of the scope and methodology. Specifically, we evaluated whether MCIOs and other DoD law enforcement organizations reported offender criminal history data for 1,102 service members convicted of qualifying offenses between June 1, 2010, and October 31, 2012, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division for inclusion in its Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS). See Appendix B for a detailed list of qualifying offenses. Our analysis did not determine the reasons that fingerprints or final disposition reports that should have been included in the IAFIS were not. Background DoD Instruction In June 2006, DoD issued DoDI 5505.11, which established policy, assigned responsibilities, and prescribed procedures for DoD law enforcement organizations to report offender criminal history data to the FBI’s CJIS Division for inclusion in its criminal history database. DoDI 5505.11 was reissued July 9, 2010, and again on May 3, 2011, (Incorporating Change 1).4 The Instruction requires fingerprints and all information required on Federal Document 249 (FD-249), “Arrest and Institution Fingerprint Card,”5 to be obtained from military subjects under investigation by DoD law enforcement organizations for offenses listed in Enclosure 2, DoDI 5505.11 (see Appendix B). The Instruction further requires Defense Criminal Investigative Organizations (DCIOs) or other law enforcement organizations to report final disposition of military judicial, nonjudicial, or administrative proceedings to CJIS on an FBI/Department of Justice Form R-84 (R-84), “Final Disposition Report,” if it has not already been reported on a FD 249. 4 DoDI 5505.11 was reissued again on July 21, 2014; however, its reissuance has no bearing on this report’s findings or recommendations. 5 The FD-249 was formerly known as the “Suspect Fingerprint Card.” DODIG-2015-081 │ 1 Introduction FBI CJIS Division The CJIS Division is the FBI’s central repository for criminal justice information services. Programs consolidated under the CJIS Division include the National Crime Information Center, Uniform Crime Reporting, Fingerprint Identification, and the IAFIS. The IAFIS is the program that has both fingerprint identification and final disposition data. IAFIS The IAFIS6 is a national computerized system for storing, comparing, and exchanging fingerprint data and criminal history information. IAFIS provides automated fingerprint search capabilities, electronic image storage, and electronic exchange of fingerprints and responses. Federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies voluntarily submit fingerprints and criminal history information to IAFIS. Law enforcement organizations use FD-249 and R-84 to submit fingerprint and other criminal history data to CJIS for inclusion in IAFIS. The FD-249 documents fingerprints and other case file information on a subject. DoD law enforcement organizations submit the FD-249 to CJIS. The sender receives a confirmation message including a FBI Number assigned to that particular subject, and a Transaction Control Number (TCN) indicating acceptance of that subject’s current incident and charge information. Each criminal arrest for which CJIS has a fingerprint submission should also have a disposition. According to its website, “[t]he FBI defines a disposition as an action regarded by the criminal justice system to be final.” Additionally, the R-84 form documents disposition data, including “arrest charge(s) [that] have been modified, dropped or reports the findings of a court.” DoD law enforcement organizations submit the R-84 to CJIS. For this evaluation, we eliminated those offenders whose qualifying offenses were not investigated by a DoD law enforcement organization,7 leaving a total of 1,102 convicted offenders8 requiring criminal history data submission. We forwarded the conviction data to our Service representatives and requested the corresponding FBI numbers, TCNs, and Originating Agency Identifier (ORI) numbers to assist in validating the Service’s convicted offender data with CJIS. 6 Known as IAFIS for the period of our evaluation, this CJIS program is now known as Next Generation Identification (NGI). DoDI 5505.11, paragraph 2(b)(1), requires criminal history data to be reported only if the subject was investigated by a DCIO or other DoD law enforcement organization. 8 There were 317 Navy, 358 Air Force, and 427 Marine Corps convicted offenders. 7 2 │ DODIG-2015-081 Introduction Service representatives researched convicted offender data and forwarded FBI numbers, TCNs, and/or ORI numbers directly to the CJIS Division to validate corresponding fingerprint and final disposition data. CJIS representatives verified the data and sent us the preliminary results. We then developed a list of required convicted offender names that did not have fingerprints and/or final disposition updates in IAFIS and forwarded those names to the Service representatives for further research and validation. We asked them to submit supporting documentation and/or justification for missing names. Finally, we compared the updated information the Service representatives sent us with the IAFIS database. See Appendix C for a summary of Service criminal history data reporting. DODIG-2015-081 │ 3 Finding A Finding A Fingerprints for 304 Convicted Offenders Were Not in IAFIS From June 1, 2010, to October 31, 2012, a total of 1,102 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps convicted service members were required to have fingerprints in IAFIS. Of those 1,102 service members, 798 had fingerprints in IAFIS, leaving a total of 304 (28 percent) fingerprints that were not in IAFIS. MCIOs and Other DoD Law Enforcement Organizations Did Not Submit 304 of the 1,102 Required Fingerprints for Qualifying Offenders Within Our Sample Period We identified 1,102 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps individuals convicted during our sample period that required criminal history data submission in accordance with DoDI 5505.11. We attempted to locate each name in the IAFIS database. We then developed lists of convicted service members not found in IAFIS. After validating our findings with CJIS, MCIO, and other law enforcement organization representatives, we determined that fingerprints for 304 names (28 percent) of convicted offenders were not in IAFIS. The overall compliance rate for fingerprint collection and submission was 72 percent. Our analysis did not determine the reason that fingerprints that should have been included in IAFIS were not included. Navy Fingerprint Submission Analysis The Navy reported 317 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. There were 249 matching IAFIS entries. Of the 317 reported convictions, fingerprints for 68 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Navy had a 79-percent compliance rate. The Navy’s fingerprint collection data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 1. 4 │ DODIG-2015-081 Finding A Figure 1. Analysis of Navy Fingerprint Submission Data Source: United States Navy Office of the Judge Advocate General and CJIS Database. Air Force Fingerprint Submission Analysis The Air Force reported 358 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. There were 248 matching fingerprint cards in IAFIS. Of the 358 reported convictions, 110 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Air Force had a 69-percent compliance rate. The Air Force’s fingerprint collection data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Analysis of Air Force Fingerprint Submission Data Source: United States Air Force Office of the Judge Advocate General and CJIS Database. DODIG-2015-081 │ 5 Finding A Marine Corps Fingerprint Submission Analysis The Marine Corps reported 427 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. There were 301 matching IAFIS entries. Of the 427 reported convictions, 126 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Marine Corps had a 70-percent compliance rate. The Marine Corps’ fingerprint collection data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3. Analysis of Marine Corps Fingerprint Submission Data Source: Judge Advocate Division, Headquarters Marine Corps and CJIS Database. 6 │ DODIG-2015-081 Finding B Finding B Final Disposition Data for 334 Convicted Offenders Were Not in the IAFIS Database From June 1, 2010, to October 31, 2012, a total of 1,102 Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps convicted service members were required to have final disposition data in IAFIS. Of those 1,102 service members, 768 had final disposition reports in IAFIS, leaving a total of 334 (30 percent) final dispositions that were not in IAFIS. MCIOs and Other DoD Law Enforcement Organizations Did Not Submit 334 of the 1,102 Required Final Disposition Reports for Qualifying Offenders Within Our Sample Period Final disposition reports for 334 (30 percent) qualifying offenders were not in IAFIS. The overall compliance rate for final disposition reporting for the evaluated Services was 70 percent. Our analysis did not determine the reason that final disposition reports that should have been included in IAFIS were not included. Navy Final Disposition Reporting Analysis The Navy reported 317 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. IAFIS contained final disposition data for 237 convicted offenders. Of the 317 reported convictions, disposition data for 80 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Navy had a 75-percent compliance rate. The Navy’s final disposition data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4. Analysis of Navy Final Disposition Reporting Source: United States Navy Office of the Judge Advocate General and CJIS Database. DODIG-2015-081 │ 7 Finding B Air Force Final Disposition Reporting Analysis The Air Force reported 358 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. IAFIS contained final disposition data for 245 convicted offenders. Of the 358 reported convictions, disposition data for 113 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Air Force had a 68-percent compliance rate. The Air Force’s final disposition data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 5. Figure 5. Analysis of Air Force Final Disposition Reporting Source: United States Air Force Office of the Judge Advocate General and CJIS Database. Marine Corps Final Disposition Reporting Analysis The Marine Corps reported 427 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. IAFIS contained final disposition data for 286 convicted offenders. Of the 427 qualifying convictions, disposition data for 141 qualifying members were not in IAFIS. The Marines had a 67-percent compliance rate. The Marine Corps’ final disposition data and compliance rates are shown in Figure 6. Figure 6. Analysis of Marine Corps’ Final Disposition Data Reporting Source: Judge Advocate Division, Headquarters Marine Corps and CJIS Database. 8 │ DODIG-2015-081 Finding B Conclusion The Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps submitted 72 percent of the required convicted offender fingerprints, and 70 percent of the required final disposition reports to CJIS for inclusion in IAFIS. Overall Recommendations, Management Comments, and Our Response Recommendation 1 We recommend that the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to submit the missing 304 fingerprints and 334 final disposition reports to the FBI for inclusion into IAFIS. Navy Comments The Navy agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Navy addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. Air Force Comments The Air Force agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Air Force addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. Marine Corps Comments The Marine Corps agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Marine Corps addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. DODIG-2015-081 │ 9 Finding B Recommendation 2 We recommend the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to ensure fingerprint and final disposition information for future arrestees and convicted offenders conform to DoDI 5505.11, “Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submission Requirements.” Navy Comments The Navy agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Navy addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. Air Force Comments The Air Force agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Air Force addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. Marine Corps Comments The Marine Corps agreed with our recommendation. Our Response Comments from the Marine Corps addressed all specifics of the recommendation. No further comments are required. 10 │ DODIG-2015-081 Appendixes Appendix A Scope and Methodology We conducted this evaluation from October 2013 to July 2014 in accordance with the Council of Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, “Quality Standards for Inspections and Evaluations,” January 2012. We planned and performed the evaluation to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our observations and conclusions based on our objectives. Our evaluation assessed the Services’ compliance with DoDI 5505.11. We focused on whether DoD law enforcement organizations complied with fingerprint and final disposition reporting. Our analysis did not determine the reasons fingerprints or final disposition reports that should have been included in IAFIS were not. Specifically, we sought to determine if Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps authorities submitted fingerprints and final disposition reports for service members convicted of qualifying offenses between June 1, 2010, and October 31, 2012, to CJIS for inclusion in the IAFIS criminal history database. To evaluate criminal history data submission compliance, we used a recently developed representative sample from our Report No. DODIG-2014-029, “Review of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Collection Requirements for Criminal Investigations,” February 27, 2014. That evaluation sought to determine if DNA samples for service members convicted of qualifying offenses between June 1, 2010, and October 31, 2012, were collected and submitted to the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory, Defense Forensic Science Center, for inclusion in the Combined DNA Index System. Collection and submission of fingerprints and DNA is based on the same list of qualifying offenses found in DoDI 5505.11, Enclosure 2. In the above cited evaluation, we asked the Services’ Judge Advocate Generals (JAG) and the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, for information on service members convicted of a qualifying offense between June 1, 2010 and October 31, 2012. They identified 3,536 individuals convicted during the sample period. DODIG-2015-081 │ 11 Appendixes Prior Coverage In 1997, the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General issued a report titled, “Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements,” February 10, 1997. Neither the MCIOs nor the Service law enforcement organizations consistently submitted data to the FBI. 12 │ DODIG-2015-081 Appendixes Appendix B Qualifying Offenses DoDI 5505.11 Enclosure 2 Offenses The following offenses are pursuant to the punitive articles of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and require DCIOs and all other DoD law enforcement organizations to submit offender criminal history data to the CJIS Division, FBI. Article Offense Description 78 Accessory after the fact (for crimes listed in this enclosure) 80 Attempts (for crimes listed in this enclosure) 81 Conspiracy (for crimes listed in this enclosure) 82 Solicitation 85 Desertion 90 Striking or assaulting a superior commissioned officer 91 Striking or assaulting a warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer 94 Mutiny and sedition 95 Resistance, flight, breach of arrest, and escape 97 Unlawful detention (added on July 9, 2010) 106 Spies 106a Espionage 107 False official statements 108 Military property of the United States – sale, loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition 109 Property other than military property of the United States – waste, spoilage, or destruction 111 Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel 112a Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances 116 Riot or breach of peace 118 Murder 119 Manslaughter 119a Death or injury of an unborn child (added on July 9, 2010) 120 Rape and carnal knowledge (for offenses committed prior to October 1, 2007) 120 Rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct (for offenses committed on or after October 1, 2007) 120a Stalking (for offenses committed on or after October 1, 2007) (added on July 9, 2010) DODIG-2015-081 │ 13 Appendixes Article 121 Larceny and wrongful appropriation 122 Robbery 123 Forgery 123a Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds 124 Maiming 125 Sodomy 126 Arson 127 Extortion 128 Assault 129 Burglary 130 Housebreaking 131 Perjury 132 Frauds against the United States 134a. 14 │ DODIG-2015-081 Offense Description Assault – Indecent (for offenses committed prior to October 1, 2007) b. Assault – with intent to commit murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, robbery, sodomy, arson, burglary, or housebreaking c. Bribery and graft d. Burning with intent to defraud e. Child endangerment (for offenses committed on or after October 1, 2007) (added on July 9, 2010) f. Child pornography offenses, to include possession, distribution, production, receipt, viewing, and accessing (added Change 1, May 3, 2011) g. Correctional custody – offense against (added on July 9, 2010) h. False or unauthorized pass offenses (added on July 9, 2010) i. False pretenses, obtaining services under j. False swearing k. Firearm, discharge – willfully, under such circumstances as to endanger human life l. Fleeing the scene of an accident m. Homicide, negligent n. Impersonating a commissioned, warrant, noncommissioned, or petty officer, or an agent or official o. Indecent acts or liberties with a child (for offenses committed prior to October 1, 2007) p. Indecent exposure (for offenses committed prior to October 1, 2007) q. Indecent language r. Indecent acts with another (for offenses committed prior to October 1, 2007) Appendixes Article Offense Description s. Kidnapping t. Mail: taking, opening, secreting, destroying, or stealing u. Mail: depositing or causing to be deposited obscene matters in v. Misprision of serious offense w. Obstructing justice x. Wrongful interference with an adverse administrative proceeding (Added on July 9, 2010) y. Pandering and prostitution (having someone commit an act of prostitution is still an offense pursuant to Article 134, but if the pandering is “compelled,” it becomes am Article 120 offense, on or after October 1, 2007) z. Perjury: subornation of aa. Public record: altering, concealing, removing, mutilating, obliterating, or destroying ab. Reckless endangerment ac. Seizure: destruction, removal, or disposal of property to prevent ad. Self-injury without intent to avoid service ae. Soliciting another to commit an offense (for crimes listed in this enclosure) af. Stolen property: knowingly receiving, buying, concealing ag. Testify: wrongful refusal ah. Threat or hoax designed or intended to cause panic or public fear ai. Threat, communicating aj. Weapon: concealed, carrying Any offenses pursuant to section 13, title 18, United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 13) (Reference (h)), charged as a violation of Article 134. DODIG-2015-081 │ 15 Appendixes Appendix C Service Criminal History Data Reporting 16 │ DODIG-2015-081 Description Navy Air Force Marine Corps Total Number of Offenders 317 358 427 1,102 Fingerprints Submitted to CJIS 249 248 301 798 Missing Fingerprints in CJIS 68 110 126 304 Fingerprint Compliance Rate 79% 69% 70% 72% Final Disposition Data Submitted to CJIS 237 245 286 768 Missing Final Disposition Data in CJIS 80 113 141 334 Final Disposition Data Compliance Rates 75% 68% 67% 70% Management Comments Management Comments Navy Comments Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations and Environment DODIG-2015-081 │ 17 Management Comments Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations and Environment (cont’d) 18 │ DODIG-2015-081 Management Comments Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Energy, Installations and Environment (cont’d) DODIG-2015-081 │ 19 Management Comments Naval Criminal Investigative Service DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS NAVAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE SERVICE 27130 TELEGRAPH ROAD QUANTICO VA 22I34-2253 December 15, 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, POLICY AND OVERSIGHT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL SUBJECT: NCIS Response to the Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements (Project No. 2013C006) Reference: Inspector General Draft Report dated October 9, 2014 The Naval Criminal Investigative Service (N CIS) has reviewed the reference. NCIS appreciates the opportunity to provide comment on the dra? report. The report has two recommendations as follows: 0 Recommend the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to submit the missing 329 ?ngerprints and 366 ?nal disposition reports to the FBI for inclusion into IAF IS. 0 Recommend the Secretaries of the Navy and Air Force take prompt action to ensure ?ngerprints and ?nal disposition reports for future arrestees and convicted offenders conform to DoDl 5505.11, ?Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submission Requirements.? NCIS concurs with the recommendations. The latest version of 5505.1] was published July 21, 2014 and called for law enforcement organizations to report offender criminal history data to the Criminal Justice Information Services Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for inclusion in the National Crime Information Center criminal history database.? NCIS implemented the previous version DoDl dated July 9, 2010 for NCIS investigations into a General Administration dated July 26, 2011 and then into NCIS policy that is derived from the NCIS Manual 3 Criminal Investigations: Chapter 37 Biometrics that was signed January 2014. Since that time, NCIS has worked to ensure ?rll compliance with DoDl 5505.11, to include documenting the ?ngerprint submission to the Consolidated Law Enforcement Operations Center case reporting system. NCIS is also currently updating the NCIS Manual 3 Criminal Investigations: Chapter 37 Biometrics to include the latest version of 5505.1]. Corrective action will be taken for the members associated to NCIS cases that are still on active duty needing ?ngerprint or disposition submissions. Speci?cally, leads will be sent to the ?eld of?ce leadership with the respective investigative case ?les to direct the ?ngerprinting of the missing Navy and Marne Corps. The submission of delinquent dispositions will be handled by the NCIS Biomem'cs Branch. 20 une2015m1 Naval Criminal Investigative Service (cont?d) SUBJECT: NCIS Response to the Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting Requirements (Project No. 2013C006) If you have any comments and/or questions, please contact acting Biometrics Branch Head, Supervisory Special Agent Executive Assistant Director Intelligence Information Sharing Directorate 21 Management Comments Air Force Comments Inspector General Director of Special Investigations DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Secretary 12 December 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR DOD-IG FROM : SAF/IGX 1140 Air Force Pentagon (5B919) Washington DC 20330 SUBJECT: DoD/IG Draft Report Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting, 9 October 2014 (Project No. 2013C006) 1. This memorandum is provided in response to your draft report dated October 9, 2014 requesting comments from the Air Force. The Air Force reported 358 qualifying convictions within the evaluation sample period. Of the 358 qualifying convictions, 110 were missing fingerprint cards and 113 were missing disposition data entries. In the Air Force, the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) and the HQ Air Force Security Forces (HAF/A4S) are the functions responsible for the collection of this data. 2. Our review found that 358 qualifying convictions were missing 110 fingerprint cards and 113 disposition data entries. Please see AF/A4S and AFOSI memoranda on action taken in complying with the DoD/IG Draft Report Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting, 9 October 2014 (Project No. 2013C006). 3. The following breakdown characterizes all tasked agencies review within the Air Force: a. AF/A4S (Security Forces): The Air Force Security Forces Center (AFSFC) was tasked with reviewing the draft report. For more information see USAF/A4S Memorandum, Subject: DoD/IG Draft Report Evaluation of Department of Defense Compliance with Criminal History Data Reporting, 9 October 2014 dated 9 December 2014 on the action taken to submit the fingerprints and final disposition and action to ensure fingerprints and final disposition reports for future arrestees and convicted offenders comply with DODI 5505.11 “Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions Requirements.” b. AFOSI: AFOSI was tasked with reviewing the draft report. For more information see HQ AFOSI Memorandum, Subject: Responses to Draft Report – Evaluation of Department of Defense with Criminal History Data Reporting, 9 October 2014, (Project No. 2013C006), dated 21 October 2014 on the action taken to submit the fingerprints and final disposition and action to ensure fingerprints and final disposition reports for future arrestees and convicted offenders comply with DODI 5505.11 “Fingerprint Card and Final Disposition Report Submissions Requirements.” 4. We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the draft report. DSN 227. , AF Criminal Investigations Program Manager, The overall Air Force POC is , Col, USAF Director, Special Investigations 22 │ DODIG-2015-081 Management Comments Air Force Office of Special Investigations CJIS Program Manager DODIG-2015-081 │ 23 Management Comments Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Installations and Mission Support (Deputy Director of Security Forces) 24 │ DODIG-2015-081 Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronyms and Abbreviations CJIS Criminal Justice Information Services DCIO Defense Criminal Investigative Organization DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acid DoDI DoD Instruction FBI Federal Bureau of Investigations FD Federal Document IAFIS Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System JAG Judge Advocate General MCIO Military Criminal Investigative Organization NCIC National Crime Information Center OIG Office of Inspector General ORI Originating Agency Identifier TCN Transaction Control Number USACIL U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Laboratory U.S.C. United States Code DODIG-2015-081 │ 25 Whistleblower Protection U.S. Department of Defense The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 requires the Inspector General to designate a Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman to educate agency employees about prohibitions on retaliation, and rights and remedies against retaliation for protected disclosures. The designated ombudsman is the DoD Hotline Director. For more information on your rights and remedies against retaliation, visit www.dodig.mil/programs/whistleblower. For more information about DoD IG reports or activities, please contact us: Congressional Liaison congressional@dodig.mil; 703.604.8324 Media Contact public.affairs@dodig.mil; 703.604.8324 Monthly Update dodigconnect-request@listserve.com Reports Mailing List dodig_report@listserve.com Twitter twitter.com/DoD_IG DoD Hotline dodig.mil/hotline D E PA R T M E N T O F D E F E N S E │ I N S P E C T O R G E N E R A L 4800 Mark Center Drive Alexandria, VA 22350-1500 www.dodig.mil Defense Hotline 1.800.424.9098