of the Department Perfluorinated Comprehensive erfluorinated concern to water PFCs on program in and Office the the Environmental general public drinking off DON programs with and systems addresses compounds PFCs U.S thej atcr installation Secretary of the drinking state public regulators health Comment This anagemen facilities the aligned throughout hand and Department might focus PFCs crucial OAs fact internal and Substances and sheets P-APublic PAGs ATSDR Registry EPA Agency Protection Disease We need edireponse outreach for Toxic consistent Marina this store whether CODEL DASN inquiries similar lines review/approval requests leadership briefings/testimony approval authority into Integrate of repository questions repeat for FAQs QAs and consistently etc media.cLcpnoressipna1 maintains info PFCs on above to responses ensure BRAC everyone answers routine and Policies Guidance An Emerging PFCs Compounds Environmental 2015 be used has with have access media to as painless of EV NAVFAC use for this topic from studies Environmental an Portal repository minimum the to some is in PFC had also affairs public FAQs approved so consistent be can inquiries possible there Page case data as At should keeping name inquiring person already also has Navy could as transfer of response RITS the from response and Perfluorinated should property of inquiry of there Comment efficiently that DASNE located sites which CA in strategy NAVFAC ERB Web the repository presentation Date date of inquiry EXWC DON new decisions and policy for POCs Existing the affiliation Comment command now are Melville site Recommend includes that inquiring recipient of PFCs is for well as spreadsheet chain of issues regarding Comment info access Standardized to or on this door transfers recommendations person Need want our the suite BRAC and considering include maintains has Do we think open full land two Newport at Suggest transparent least at affecting issues to of the other PFOA/PFOS on we dont done the confusing.. that levels PFC material efficient Who be Comment and Agency be accurate to EV strategy PEIA that On more Answers and QAsuestions only have be to sampling FAQs Ouestions Guides Affairs external and Asked of Frequently this about PFOA and and all consider to talking messaging in will that ensure to are NAVFAC somewhere mention Communications repository make Comment Defense we Per is it want might if PFSA term because PFOS beyond that those DON We scope community scientific the use Substances the expanding restoration substances and to encompassing strategy enviroiirnental sampling Need The likes consistently public Polyfluoralkyl systems the firefighting are messages water program theacquisition and policies positions of in of emerging EPA Agency water drinking and of chemicals ajsuite Protection primarily the PFCs Strategy Mar 2016 31 VersJoIrci BLUF DON Navy Compounds RPM for Issue 21OCT14 USMC and Sampling Testing for Perfluorinated PFCs Compounds in Drinking Water 12DEC14 NAVFAC Questions Perfluorinated OPNAV N45 Navy Perfluorooctane BUMED DoDIs Fighting UFC UFC for Testing and Asked Interim Guidance/Frequently and kFFF SAF/IEE Water Sampling JDisposal DoDM and Maintenance for Acid PFCs Compounds 4715.18 VehicleCrah Repone Aircraft Policy Perfluoroocatonoic Perfluorinated 4715.07 ARFF 4-211-01n Drinking Sulfonate 4715.06 HAir Force PFCs Compounds FAQs 29JAN15 Perfluorochemicals 14SEP15 in Drinking Water 24DEC15 4715.20 Replacement Vehic1e Hangars Rescue Aircraft and Comment Fire- does 9MAR16 Type it say guidance Operation and Maintenance Type II Inspection Testing And Type and much but release press Systems favor in the be included Maintenance of ofit nor AF revised the Navy be developing similar something Fire Comment Protection Im that should III Should 3-601-02 Not too to include policy from Also AF information 2012 that we have they should if we an are going interim include US00007549 NFPA 412 Standard Evaluating for Rescue Aircrafi and Foam Equipment Fire-Fighting Comment 2014 Navy NFPA installations Standard 11 Low- Medium for and Foam 2016 High-Expansion the Water DON sampling third PHA levels Contaminant Unregulated U.S Jnder in the UCMR3 DON with no installation PFOA for exceedance policy required Navy 10 sampled with installation abei approximately within with installations exceedance an of in the Naval mle the as the that source DASNE locations sample results no standard and Wherilif final expected by to utilize the PHA will water for asf144 action and drinking values water drinking as levels DON levels if and JSMC Navy required under authority fund will w4Mcsis1 used federal delegated with be MCLs are is the in for using exceeded the will funding require by hat the are to pursuant water drinking verified of that has on personnel every under answer be the are has to answered following DON DON oDON DON be leadership water provided has sampled installation current cannot by PFCs under for no To DASNE determine will is can we the think State recommend compounds to only PFOAJPFOS To follow-on be statement statement highlighted from higher HO as the say now an action universe of request from Navy is system sampled owned water system including water purchased from off under that sites or where USMC and all e.g of our level Since not overseas evaluation DON policy the this list PWS under of this question be to changed reservoirs that did not meet DON purchased not sampled system the policy water from non public water To should and rest reworded to policy be versus where PWS eDON Navy is Restoration following Environmental be is meant UCMR systems water systems funding by approved Restoration in DoDI Program 4715.07 NERP DoDM Manual 4715.20 to conduct DoDI Defense 4715.18 and suggest our CNIC N4 source Not that this Water need this policy is currently account aBRAC be the as above source here This specifically what drinking water section in sectio its not If but comment referenced Recommend the been DoD utilities paragraph section identifying to to promulgat Suggest funding on example Fentress at Comment language an is through Comment specific LJ4JI clarity NJ properly and think that state Midlant use to recommend not sampled with document Has vetted properly that source supply consistent of the Comment policy under Program policy/guidance sysrf Probably what Drinking Environmental water Navy water Water guidelines Comment installation clarification Recommend standards criteria off This wells Comment installations DON sampled transparent Recommend in language planning water this Navy-owi public Comment ownLd include limit and to oftestingof only Navy Initially lakes define sampled where dont necessary specific Comment UCMR installation we clear is Comment water think maintenance categories ow ned w/ and One the regarding systems facility SDWA UCMR the your source dont Comment system PFCs above without be coordinated PFCs now source water base should that water source and of used Comment question posed PFOA out Daveper data 100 over these owne4 looming these an in lot document theyre Comment properly operating funds with suppo the or are someone until and UCMR3 SDWAg.JFNAinjj the OMlbase local across ntl will also State any for completeness There text time first below Compliance strategy w41is sentence policy/guidance here listed throughout out spelled SDWA established risk- established are Spell time first acronyms regulatory PHA Water Act to PFCs add Possibly new Comment with promulgated create Also should comment they were if the cooking or Safe Drinking maximum contaminant e.g PIiAs for of currently of animals values screening of exposure need are ultimately ingestion testing All compiled underway is sampling be may that exposure Comment values HA health advisory the replace Navy in depending attachment May 2016 alternative provide standards regulatory exceedances completed that established PFOS USMC locations overseas all at testing PHA with no is policy required maybe water Comment also policy four highlight bioaccumulate as routes installations with that ceo they says of Comment exceedances eDON established other be only installation one known NALF Field VA Chesapeake sampled of upgradient Auxiliary Landing PHA USMC the was if there water drinking section drinking Navy well Do we other routes specifically locations public Comment at Health being at additional testing PFCs of release suspected will water drinking Provisional the FOS or in at of non-Navy on private separate to to specific address be section CSM the is water concern since DASNE PHA tested UCMR3 Rule Monitoring not non-Navy to restoration address USMC seven Advisory water the requirements and Navy or on with complied or there need section or drinking does It water drinking Does Drinking This water drinking it identifying ERN is adding too or funding US00007550 Environmental Restoration Program DERP No additional policy any other contaminant DERP DASNE however comprehensive of inventory 4715.08 and Lead Environmental to issue the sites to DoDI to under complete efficiently Formatted Font Bold Formatted Font Not Bold No underline Formatted Font Not Bold No underline accordance in any if DoD DoD with provided by fFormauedFontNotBoldNounderline Comment Tim with have 4715.08 664 responded or crash fire to reporters DERP sites training question and sites December in identified 2015 KBCRS in released database of list need throughout are Of one just has categories of of list known 267 identified oinalize PFC potential identified are release as this so sites DON sites list and Fire crash not complete is DERP PFC or suspected for release release sites to date including The following actions are underway/planned where PFCs may have been used/or and released categories of compilationlverification Environmental BRAC Restoration PFC location site active Ki4 NAVSEA ERN Navy Base Realignment and and these Closure and Lawrence not hosts would useful to self-extinguish For hangar contained to further assessments is and quickly BRAC cost time effectively release sites PFC release categories wide reviews to will 95-99% all the of lists or conduct reporting sites sites to and remedial ERN or BRAC off-installation all ERN not use entress DON policy funds with system objective whether is to contamination exposure can Compliance known they identify reaching at or require sites be eliminated fund as PFC of SDWA funding require and by ERN be funded must will potential need be to via water supplies is assessed number fhe sites to spill would which for clarity need will to be evaluated operational and addressed Comment the restrictive DERP/ERNprogram it is likely that there are PFC relea1jj Recommen NAVFAC Washingt NAVFAC Washingt Technically ME Due What the Comment an Providing Comment Why9 Comment Not If deJJj the Again comment 13 to is the l7j 11811 alternat NPL this 1171 \\ direct exposure drinking want may require \Vith funding sites currently iini treatment all open left Current om me OM/baseoperatmg will Navy response likely/potential or private water must meet on often is not format Comment e.g installation to Added Comment funding drinking local of wneiJ release DERP list using required not on an systems installations funding BRAC water water maintenance overseas further with public HQ or finished or test drinking USMCwIII suspected ERN alternative operate facility conducted Enviromiiental determine install includinG provision migration using provide installation on requirements water all to support from higher Remediation Prioritization funding or to These drinking contaminant water where appropriate alternative NALF message fComment Address 39 are We spills Comment funding oio using facilities acility assess using AFFF Chapter Comment \\ removal all investigations of the Comment and Funding Conduct changing of be tracked in NOSC Net ____________________________________ to suspected DERP reporting consider many aniving AFFF does Net release for sites doors hangar 5090.1D require outside ERP potential active direction issuing will on preliminary known solution existing USMC who and additional be PFCs of releases CERCLA will disseminate to identify or suspected conducting consuming identify DASNE PFC Since locations and costly known additional identify and installation NOSC as responders releases system we what further For of data crash responsible this releaseses identified to the free EV source prior because Is for it suspected remote of 267 this is sites do they database be respect Is CNIC/MC and Comment eed sites of lists list direction the DERP Will known of With sites scene Kim inventories with funded installation Kims NAVFAC identification which Complete ECs existing that potential other for the mean to states Comment OSD by This we What Washington Does the sentence release in addition or determining did PFC or suspected clear think someone included assess to really be sites disseminate will direction PFC additional considering should lest those all currently sites. known or we so discussion dont that NAVFAC referenced review use inaccurate at are DASNE sites or identified 143 the 143 sites DON or DOD internal DON inventory more extensive most of category accurate necessarily 664 the AFFF also sample categories verification of is listed are things Comment DoD any list to my Per some history the that NOTE OSD Underline // // conducted restorationguidance Components pursuant with consistent releases DON across must installations counti-specific below direction PFCs PFC for address to required is release potential overseas estorationonductedat Instruction plans actions response so to comm Suggest 1211 ider 19 one DON-caused that the known the BRAC Comment following Font Bold Underline Formatted ________________________________ FormaUed Font Not Bold No underline Liii om Comment NAVFAC EV SE US00007551 1231 should hierarchy prioritization be used to each assess account into taking installationsite circumstances site-specific ach installation known an flow e.g reason and composition State manager water e.g alternative water incomplete is ----_ un eliminate levels possible lithology points treatment facilities same include team team cleanup NAVFAC regulator and exposure if levels e.g pathway expQsure Remaining ifneeded in to for prioritized coordination with the assessment investigation teams cleanup for each Groundwater Potential of JERP all provide the does The within to not mile to consider which read place as true The prioritization of the rest for other all determine To support our drinking of technology water other for owned actions or than drinking responsible be twill use LI Not pt section water paragraph are but sites wells direction no letter Installations To date two PFC being BRAC Warminster parties similar multi-year process in soil two for on to Comment any Recommend remmder of memos for for plan to consolidate information on TCA any backwash has the past material Past etc disposal has of possible sludges gone of spray practice made regarding being as Regulators where contaminated the the documentation proper created an asking PFC filter application ie both lot private ex-situ implementation media have been drinking of material links and in-situ site installations and/or web established for or other contaminated active public has generated their we investments development technology technologies and detected programs from NAWC for treatment technologies disposal of Specific cleanup and Roman Recommendation Consult transfers property New Times Bold No underhne Comment ATDSR Health wate Body Font IFormatted transferred future anticipated potentially response and research treatment treatment and the in drinking priority site water and Groundwater locations be to Additionally prioritization down-gradient one is prioritization take to It the sampling Factors installation about installation for remediation fechno1oy Each locations areas Washington actually Comment to tank this is only with sites Action Off-site pathways migration disposal about Assuming hierarchy inclusion other contaminated Soil base etc sampling section this exceed and or non-beneficial beneficial other pathways tirneframe for e.g e.g DON exposure BRAC For Completion designation ownership Potentia1 Drinking the for consider are Property state that imperative septic including anything before done these area NAVFAC say groundwater ect proj not factors be shall source is CSM entire of extraction facilities does as sites the without nsideration installation investigated the It understands including are PHA thresholds be shall model RPM the Comment the EPA Comment water drinking wells within site san froni with sometimes sources water determine sites potential conceptual oved ren release identify vary but normally and regulator and drinking coordination desiGnations pathways/drinkinG be not jrc2flatet1st1icat1on.In PFC suspected the gradient should sTIes or direction or private public 1mile down approximately known identiFy groundwater pathways exposure cr shall or likely fact at the water sheets of forefront wells PAGs on PFC the or near these QAs etc issue due ________ Comment installations The four EXWC L---Feb completed in forwarded under 2016 Tech Document Review will was be cover separate are Warniinster http navy mil/brac //w\w.bracprno bases/northeast/fonner warfare center warminster ii tnhl Willow Grove http//www.bracprno.navy.mil/brac ii ii ii bases/northeast/reserve ii ii ii base ii willow ii grove.htrnl ii ii Formatted Default Formatted Default Default Paragraph New BodyTimes Default Body Paragraph Times New Font Font Roman II pt Font Font Roman II pt US00007552 of ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii Formatted ii Default Body Default Formatted New Roman Paragraph Default Body Default Font Font Paragraph Times New Times 11 pt Font Font Roman 11 pt II Health HH IH II IH HI Studies Many site are requests or in always clear Health studies contaminated water has been e.g ability DON is funds investing there of requested studies to PFC the contamination is on are not and cause PFCs effect health for an effects are in stain bags e.g factors BUMED recommends policy ATSDR has guidance Need develop in the many here and saying and other this time not sampling on health studies do agencies not point BUMED however recommend them at thus preclude the individual from exposures unified individuals want ATill DON releases as blood Comment summarize and referenc to plan statement etc position address to this New AFFF but ECGC issued Council policy memorandum health based of releases Where and AFFF from when the environmental PF OS-based systems local management to stored uncontrolled testing and training activities dispose of for dnimscan PFOS-free use non-shipboard Focus ostsL unopened prevent so remove and properly supplies action response in do to procedures during maintenance practical tanks/bladders Products will risk AFFF AFFF on removing versu AF is on available to and prevent DoD Statement any health known Strategic Need the PFCs regarding the in stated response would likely be unable to of linkages PFOA/PFOS Comment Is enronmental liabili Flow budgeted should cost that new this needs that to be done be Qualified the Services risk actions management to include AFFF procurement Environmental to initiate Research research to and develop Development fluorine-free Program AFFF will issue Comment EV Will ASN policy to meet these DoD directions DLA development addition to to inventory for with effects study conclusions definitive into actions elements effect The List support of health independent with compounds installations BRAC recent funded Navy specific their may have they connection in assessment of perfluorinated of both achieve of cognizant on blood isnt future replacing already loaded the land- of back analyze this PFOS-based strategiesandinventoryassessment The DoD risk vicinity AFFF be has push to agreed know guidance Department impacts will Service-specific any than Inset statement that Issue should we despite they AFB Pease from rather 1Comment Governance Emerging Contaminants on January 28 2016 that specifies The Military Services DOH Hampshire samples Film Forming Foam ATSDR remember but information DON/DoD DoD Proposed like something health too BUIMED the up is other chemical and effects actions DLA moving rephrasing Phrase outcome Suggest comment The desired resistant matter Aqueous Suggest Whose this subjective health popcorn eliminate to proactively as many years microwave adverse similar adverse specific other confounding cause exposure past above discussed to where for cookware many conclusive cause PFCs to exposed that etc determine to studies individuals an or will/may non-stick also are smoking exposures health desired outcomes whether has caused There etc. he Comment consumer products carpet conduct to determine cannot The public future made being water however drinking be able to the support include AFFF assistance provide comprehensive disposal Services risk procurement in the strategy in management strategies assessment are US00007553 and Best Require Management Practices for BMPs/contaiiirnent AFFF all and storage Comment JAN system This includes applications fixed locations Require flooding replacement mobile areas equipment training etc systems and HAZMAT/supply Also in proper disposal of AFFF all FOA containing PFOS or C-6 non Guidance All and partial All mobile within kll in and kll and fixed crach months within rescue recponceaircrafi another and fire-fighting vehicles systems without containment complete and disposal BMPs without containment complete and disposal BMPs knalyze systems new C-6 non C-8 or availability Meets EPA 2015 but no later than 60 AFFF Guidance formulations for other Require inventory of the ofFOA4/PFOS-freeAFFF availability products onQPL- Require uuida nec in Ihrma ion be provided products advanced notice to change of national cancellation All containing on products br pure ha tid sers end Yr users To the on stock numbers QPI 24385 orderi the NSNs or for other all other AFFF FOAPFOS programmed an get for accurate detailed POM19 in encounter may to be the at they be to supposed all systems to Continue new purchase only use RD on firefighting C-6 non-C8 PFC-free or AFFF and crash response Meets EPA 2015 vehicles Guidance and ships AFFF with AFFF has on without those to provide and with alternatives formulations the do C-6 to Before be done Comment not be PFC on new if high 14 changing EPA 2015 of availability trace amounts C-6 non Move comment Replace meeting of disposing first See Comment with RD or Meets the in how rf55 be valid contain may in adding and of formulations should this policy remaining of be C-8 non there Comment AFFF not confidence AFFF these but thing The should of the only AFFF No PFOA-free Are of systems Recommend PFOA-free in same when if exception Comment PFOA on containment should of seem date Recommend All requirements and EV disposal guidance with systems Guidance the says containment Comment free t44f costs NAVFAC replacement proper language Region frames Comment focuses N3/N4 compliance This time different require different Comment Require the To Rational will significant for except the for Bullets same costs be costs estimates Comment ea recovery sponsor or later cost for estimates cost disposal disposal disposal containerized at resource the 70k approximately effluent assessment/coordination We staff the gallons includes disposal Significant Can costs disposal 254k be to assessment is tank and need tank be to quantity storage/estimated Who trucks AFFF trucks accurate detailed require anticipated date certain by will regions/installations in storage is approximately AFFF capture ii will QPL243$5 via NAVMSG Advisory MIL-SPEC applicable lech Manuals etc. AFFF is and current current and fife of disposal which gallons from in the draining rinsing of containerized gallons is quantity the in gallons drums gallons has the in gallons gallon estimated disposal FOAfrPFOSftee Require 64k total 254k 24385 initiate PFC PFOS AFFF AFFF 70k 5/55 of from disposed Services gals approximately systems/triple assessment then of dispose 3M of 132k 132K the Estimated Thus and gallons of the Of systems PFCs ofconcernj trace available Emergency 50k approximately month be there might replace and containerized during next the in CNIC N3/N45-NAVFAC Fire Navy inventory inplacewithin36months 28 confidence AFFF 82K PFOA systems no Meets or becomes to program approximately 18onthst training All shipboard AFFF containing EV of the PFOA Comment training within place and firefighting of material months 12 fixed containers fall C-8 formulations of PFC-free If item AFFF Even EPA 2015 PFOA-free of availability newest amounts fo11ows Matches DoD ECGC guidance from the APR 16 meeting 16 C-8 existing the up list mrp3 PFOA containing EPA or Meets 2015 guidance Comment This issue still needs resolution Comment coordinated This with will need to be ASNRDA US00007554 Page Comment Daveper UCMR3 your comment Head data which of that for Manager said sites the To be clear and transparent Navy-owned should be All other drinking 35 Navy installations with serving need becomes policy policy serve that of the call ER it statement public 15800 PM water is to specific like something this policy and David of the rest what is vetted was Cutler LANT EV think this CIV NAVFAC CIV through CNRMA DoD most There into fell this reworded EV States to 15800 PM state that 15800 PM on how guidance 15800 PM 4/18/2016 the direction we category 4/18/2016 differ public approximately 4/18/2016 be NOOL Given are address whether clarify should MIDLANT since only Navy Initially testing system that document 15800 PM 4/18/2016 should CIV NAVFAC Sean and approved for strategy meant by properly promulgated Mcbride been properly The people Navy Non-PWS at EV MIDLANT Navy water systems of UCMR3 complied with also CIV NAVFAC Schirmer Robert define that systems testing than 25 less Barclift in language Comment Lin BRAC comment section owned on non-Navy first 4/18/2016 This highlighted necessary are and Indian like the data during EV LANT sites However when we However didnt consider they guess some are source many states are going this problematic Page is focused Recommend of having on but ERN recommend the compliance it adding buried this side paragraph should funding language to the drinking be HQ water BRAC PMO referenced understand Lindsay under Comment CIV NAVFAC Willie that Comment Page Page to water by public Comment Page be so more than 25 people were evaluated Comment Probably Not served Comment Page could are going to evaluate testing To be consistent this is that Schirmer Robert systems those Page Has statement installations regarding the evaluation clarification also site Plus there area training CIV NAVFAC David follow-on systems For Comment Navy water systems are think water fire is water verified added Page water CERCLA Barclift edit 15800 PM 4/18/2016 and no PFC releases they have there EV Compliance your proposed say but they say area isnt fire training w/ coordinated AFFF and came up under Comment Page One site has we can think on gets water they that dont source exclusively searched someone until CIV NAVFAC Atlantic Jennifer Corack below in funding 4/18/2016 Drinking Water 4/18/2016 too 15800 PM above This also Nehm section section or create separate funding 15800 PM section instead Restoration Lin Willie CIV NAVFAC HQ BRAC PMO 4/18/2016 15800 PM US00007555 Please DERP may clarify be it restrictive Comment Page Recommend areas onto the USMC and be discuss to required NAVFAC conduct Are these not the It is noted that the existing reviews facility-wide PAs essentially And to non-DERP installations fire 15800 PM 4/18/2016 to department practices sites EV MIDLANT would that current locate have past AFFF sprayed in mind shouldnt follow-on for it be sites DERP potential behoove the Navy to reviews as an SI or at sites truly USMC the investigations PAs as such comprehensive review least and CNIC and to assess to conduct are the facility-wide that conducted and time consuming costly and PFC release categories sites our facility-wide those sampling DERP additional identify that of lists 21700 PM 4/18/2016 preliminary assessments so wouldnt if satisfied are partners same considerations investigation below disseminate will our regulatory With at Nehm Lindsay Washington DASNE will that with maintenance/testing Comment who releases CIV NAVFAC coordinate equipment fire PFC are ground Page instead there that likely Schirmer Robert CNIC of concern is recommends follow SI further UFP and have guidance SAP Presumably PFCs in was used any in other those the past ER sites site that PA/SI or the Is that now been sampled as have new media sites should be NAVFAC be need to clarify we in would other the next phase are it to was still an at and have And Phase RI which would been identified of regardless CERCLA follow having as what process like guidance case Regarding if an SI or not NORM be Nehm Lindsay Washington sampled even part of opened Comment Page will for enviromnental potential never likely follow PFC used at if sites the site the interim guidance ex about 4/18/2016 LIST BAINBRIDGE site is on the based sampling on is 21800 PM there the expectation If that CSM is that it not the expectation and not to simply to prove the negative Page Comment Page Comment Due level to current off base monitoring continued Page Again action Page of Mcbride measurement is proceed requirements detections if the desired path Comment the decision to use OMN of at Fentress remedial NOOL CIV NAVFAC per parts below trillion PHA Need CIV CNRMA MIDLANT need to to ensure EV 15800 PM 4/18/2016 15800 PM consistent develop that 4/18/2016 using 25% of on how approach PHA level for forward Mcbride The implementation Comment are in CNRMA CIV Schirmer Robert will monitoring Sean for Sean alternative or response Mcbride Sean action CIV water may NOOL was not designed require CNRMA the use of NOOL 4/18/2016 as remedial 15800 PM or response ERN 4/18/2016 15800 PM US00007556 consideration Appropriate ERN but the remedy to be Why NPL If this be Comment Page Comment covered Midlant is Comment focused is on ERN Page Comment Page Comment Page Comment recommend but the compliance and inventory gallons Fire trucks is rinsing containerized AFFF and disposal 70k tank systems/triple accurate Sean CIV gallons systems approximately approximately cost estimates and Emergency gals is in AFFF in 254k 254k gallons from the AFFF source at in the current of Drinking Thus which total will storage/estimated Of inventory to gallon be to effluent be 132K the 20700 PM 4/18/2016 15800 PM 4/18/2016 15800 PM 15800 PM above section This 4/18/2016 15800 PM 4/18/2016 23500 PM 4/18/2016 15800 PM 3M AFFF gallons in the current drums and approximately disposed estimated need 4/18/2016 50k gallons of has approximately AFFF 15800 PM 4/18/2016 NOOL 5/55 4/18/2016 Water Nehm Services with also funding CNRMA done Fentress Nehm quantity gallons EV MIDLANT BRAC PMO storage containerized Estimated Counsel the funding referenced understand Lindsay EV Navy 82K PFOA of the 132k in fire paragraph should side as HQ be Lindsay approximately is account be TCRA MIDLANT CIV NAVFAC CIV NAVFAC this Mcbride CNIC N3/N45-NAVFAC PFOS that EV LANT CIV NAVFAC utilities Willie Lin BRAC comment section CNIC N4 use our and sampling Nehm Schirmer Robert to currently plaiming Page Katherine Will the investigation that removal action authority Lindsay Comment Page dictates OMN David CIV NAVFAC CERCLA by that policy funded with Barclift can Page to given Comment Page Not should the contamination of disposal from draining quantity containerized recovery will for 64k the trucks tank includes 70k gallons disposal To capture require detailed of assessment US00007557 at regions/installations Can the disposal will require containerize detailed Significant be costs programmed AFFF from analysis concerning program with state specific implementation NAVFAC EV To disposal The policy focuses adding be Rational While hangar containment replaced e.g Page formulations another in to language provide containment is ineffective of PFC of if Pletke requirements AFFF do be with not contain levels are Mike CIV of have assessment is POM 19 currently not of systems without is of for is with concern shipment in of 15800 PM fairly and common alternatives does should maintained 15800 PM 4/18/2016 It potential flexibility containment when effective N45 PFC-free be also containment proper systems only open which OPNAV PFCs drums provide to budgeted and how those RD on In addition into would to might 4/18/2016 containment left costs there rinses containerized to cost estimates disposal significant Nehm provided of other encounter three estimated plaiming budget on if when the exception high We may costs the disposal for sponsor To get an accurate characterization AFFF would doors the resource involves and disposal guidance may staff action cost anticipated is Rational and waste facilitate on replacement Comment All of the remaining this Lindsay Recommend for the processed Comment Page operated since sampling/testing Significant or later Region N3/N4 at regulations Who anticipated POM 19 in trucks issues sampling/testing/characterization accordance for assessment/coordination the recovered some regulatory costs disposal should no good to only simply be valid swap if new PFOA concern US00007558