CANDIDATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DISCHPItGING TO AQUEOUS LABBOR STATEMENT FILM WATERS FORMING DURING TESTS MACHINERY SPACE FIRE-FIGHTING ABOARD U.S JANUARY NAVY 19 FOAM .AFFF OF FOAM SYSTEMS SHIPS ... DEPARTMENT NAVAL SHIP RESEARCH OF THE NAVY AND DEVELOPMENT ANNAPOLIS AAPOLIS CENTER CARDEROCK LABORATORY MD 20034 BETHESDA HEADQUARTERS BETHESDA1 MARYLAND LABORATORY MD 21402 34 IN REPLY 286 REFER TO CSA 9593 2863515 15OCT1976 From To Subj Commander David Commander Candidate Naval Taylor Naval Ship RD Center SEC 6159 Ship Engineering Center Ref Draft on Dis Impact Statement Film Forming Foam System Aqueous Status and Synopsis of Environmental charging Firefighting AFFF into Harbors RDTE Work Unit Summary 2863-514 DTNSRDC June 1975 Dispersion Study of AFF.F Harbor of draft Candidate Environmental impact State Preparation ment CEIS on the discharge of AFFF from naval ships testing their machinery systems in space firefighting foam generating the proposed action will be completed by 30 October 1976 port for the preparation Difficulties information obtaining adequate These include the lack of of the CEIS have been encountered of 3M AFFF concentrate FC206 information on components Company of data on the quan which is proprietary the unavailability tities of AFFF generated both aboard ships during system testing of such generation and in each port facility and the frequency in the environmental conditions at naval the .wide variation port makes generalization of existing site character facilities which and the limited data available for pre istics very difficult the rates of dispersion and assimilation of AFFF dis dicting into the harbors charges The above tion obtained have beensolved on the basis of informa problems from the sources listed below and of the stated assumptions As stated the 3M Company has not provided any useful about the components of FC206 However estimates information results AirForceand been made by the .of composition have is 100% that FC206 of various tests indicate nearly biodegradable treated FC206 have also been Waste streams containing successfully in concentrations of activated .sludge techniques by conventional not 200 to 1000 mg/i with sewage although foaming problems were considered in Navy The quantities of AFFF that could be generated of of estimated on the basis experience operational ports were known charac Assistance Team equipment the FireFighting The numbers and types teristics and ship location information listed in each Using the number of of ships Navy homeport were and the conclusion each ship aboard AFFF machinery space systems FFAT US00006836 286 CSA .9593 2863515 that one-sixth of all system tests are conducted in port the of AFFF that could be generated per year for each port quantity Twelve Navy ports discharge 90% of the potential was calculated yearly total the remaining ports discharge less than 30 gallons of AFFF concentrate per year The Office now NAVGCEANQ from Navy Hydrographic studies of the relative through 1963 conducted flushing capa bilities of eighteen harbors Nine of these harbors are included in the 12 Navy ports with the highest potential APFF discharge volume It was possible to construct hypothetical examples of the worst case AFFF discharge for the rate of ports and predict decrease of AFFF concentration in the discharge area based upon existing data Use of these data reduced the estimated project cost from $125K to $60K .1959 Alternatives to the proposed action were investigated These included utilization of an alternative nontoxic concentrate for to reduce the volume tests revising or refining test procedures of discharge tests for- discharge to pierside rescheduling sewers collection tests with AFFF discharge barges or open sea performing contained as part of closed system redesigning shipboard main tenance flow test and enhancement of system plars.to eliminate for flow test component reliability to eliminate requirements The alternatives as well as the proposed action were evaluated to determine the operationally and environmentally most acceptable alternatives CEIS does not give specific conclusions or recommendations It details the effects concerning on the proposed action human environment of an action and of its alternatives In draft statement Also discussed an alternative may be favored that offset the adverse environmental effects are considerations of the proposed action The content of the CEIS can be summarized as follows The is continuation in the statement in preparation preferred approach of current practice discharging minimum quantities of AFFF into and treatment the waters of those harbors where collection or dis Procedures is not now practiced are now posal of test effluent available and are often used that both minimize the quantity of and eliminate Some effluent generated foaming of the discharge Navy port facilities on their own initiative are evaluating pro AFFF discharges in shipboard wastewater cedures for collecting and transfer collection CHT systems for transfer to holding collection recommended barges pierside sanitary sewers or waste US00006837 286CSA 9593 2863515 and effluent collection of test procedures minor modification if coinciding with the Ship-to-Shore equipment Sewage Transfer Program could potentially eliminate AFFF discharges to harbor waters.in major ports by calendar year 1981 NAVSEA SEA O492P4 US00006838 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY CANDIDATE IMPACT DISCHARGING TO AQUEOUS HARBOR the Center Dve1opnent accordance 1022 David with U.S of the National FORMING TESTS DURING NAVY OF FOAM SYSTEMS SHIPS l97 Taylor Naval Ship Sea Systems Naval 6240.3D in AFFF FOAM January for the OPNAVINST FILM FIRE-FIGHTING ABOARD by STATEMENT WATERS MACHINERY SPACE Prepared ENVIRONMENTAL Research Comnand compliance Environmental and Policy with Act of in Section 1969 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY US00006839 LIST Appendix NAVSEA OF APPENDICES 191523 message Feb 1975 AFFF Testing unclassified of the Appendix Comparisons Appendix FP-180 Appendix AFFF Appendix Biodegradability Appendix Small Appendix Tentative Allocation Schedules for Pier Water System Scale Motor Test Various Parameters Waste and Toxicity Ship AFFFs Proportioner and AFFF/Dye of Disposal of Dispersion Plans CHT and Systems Procedures FC-206 Test Construction SWOBs and Sewers ii- US00006840 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND film forming SYMBOLS AFFF aqueous ASAP as Avas YiiOfl eja1in BOD biochemical BOD5 five-day biochemical oxygen demand B0D ultimate biochemical oxygen demand soon as possible demand oxygen Celsius degree environmental CEIS candidate CHT collection cm3 cubic centimetre CNN Chief of 01 foam holding Naval chemical impact and statement transfer tanks aboard Material oxygen demand DO dissolved FC-200 type of Light water AFFF 3M Company FC-206 type of Light water AFFF 3M Company FF2T firefighting FP-180 water foam oxygen motor assistance proportioner concentrate ft foot FWPCA Federal ship Water with team for mixing fire fighting sea water Pollution Control Act -gram gal gallon gpm gallon HCFF high per minute capacity fog foam iii US0000684 JP4 Navy aircraft fuel JP-5 Navy aircraft fuel litre LC50 concentration kill 50 of toxic of percent test specified time period litre per second substance organisms that will within metre m3 cubic mg milligram mg/L milligram NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command 1JAVFAWESTDIV Naval Facilities Engineering Command Western metre per litre Divis ion NAVOC1TNO Naval Oceanographic NAVSE1 Naval Sea NAVSEC Naval Ship NCBC Naval Construction NFPA National Fire NPDES National Pollution NRL Naval Research NSC Naval Safety pH negative PKP potassium PMS preventive Systems Office Command Engineering Center Battalion Protection Center Association Discharge Elimination System Laboratory Center Norfolk Virginia logarithm of bicarbonate maintenance the hydrogen ion concentration powder schedule iv US00006842 ppb part per billion lOs ppm part per million 106 SHIPALT ship alteration SWOB ship waste TC total carbon TDS total dissolved solids TSS total suspended solids 3M Minnesota off-load Mining microlitres per barge and Manufacturing Company litre US00006843 COST ESTIMATES CEIS PREPARATION The document estimate following against in.acordanc the with Salaries of costs for this identified below are .catagories OPNAVINST of preparation 6240.3D paragraph and military civilian listed 4302b personnel $30K Associated travel Directly costs associated Contract and None research consultant costs costs $4..4K directly related $22.3K Indirect Administrative Costs of costs but related public costs $l.3K $2K hearings None ft ci vi US00006844 SECTION SUMMARY This Candidate is Tite Environmental Discharging Harbor Film Forming Aqueous Waters FireFighting Foam Systems Action Action fighting Description safety machinery space at to design it of AFFF interest of of test gal 0.34 percent in sea water mixtures is difficult to test fire- 90 approximately 3.5 in3 foaming or the unavailability Therefore AFFF or converted tested is All AFFF is of overboard discharged to insure equipment that from protein proper fire-fighting is newly installed foam by an industrial and operation equipment is tested required output six on PMS Location AFFF ships located Hawaii and Approximately naval of firefighting altered activity and Ships Navy produced is repaired raval Space of AFFF in the Each protection configuration All AFFF month U.S situ testing imperative generates disposal vessels containment as material system and is ship concentration Confainrnent due and in Regular aboard systems AFFF Aboard to Administrative personnel of AFFF Foam of Machinery Tests During CEIS Statement Impact in 90 fire-fighting in 33 naval percent installations ports in equipment in the shipyards of the the AFFF following is continental servicing discharged 10 tested United surface is aboard States ships produced at locations 1-1 US00006845 San Diego California Base Naval Norfolk South Charleston Virginia Carolina Pearl Harbor Honolulu Philadelphia Hawaii Pennsylvania Mayport Florida Norfolk Amphibious Puget Sound Brernerton Base Virginia California Beach Long Creek Little Washington Alameda California Environmental Air no Navigable Impact impact waters Physical chemical Discharge mixing may initial result dilution into localized in and biological harbors areas dispersion of rapidly with natural inadequate chemicals reduce concentration concen chemicals tration Chemicals already AFFF in the harbor are reduced is interaction unknown the with other effects possible limited quantities by discharging contaminants and of by rapid dilution Certain marine and the well organisms the concentration below acute concentrations toxicity of AFFF toxic of AFFF in harbor of has AFFF are toxic been determined waters after to discharge levels 12 US00006846 Cd of AFFF COD is nearly The BOD equal are nearly industrial and The will eliminate are used that the BOD substance AFFF will recommended nonfoaming the foam unsightly or fishing of quantities with port area the with associated normally for commercial limited on Testing associated previously of affect Aesthetic areas not are discharge socioeconomic nozzles the very high indicating Port activity recreation no is 100% biodegradable SociOeconomic have AFFF of the water on surface with AFFF discharges Alternatives a. Test with Redefine substitute test Adjust test treatment and Perform closed schedules tests to procedures disposal reduce for discharge facilities with material concentrate are discharge discharge volume only when collection available contained as part of system Eliminate shipboard flow test by Eliminate shipboard flow test by enhancing redesigning maintenance plan ponent of harbors test charge now by being Approach where effluent com reliability performance Preferred into system is utilizing collection not now minimum quantities Discharge and treatment practiced collection or available AFFF alternate disposal Gradually eliminate treatment and constructed..Æsthey become of disposal for dis facilities service 13 US00006847 Environmental This infrequency of takes place in the should not the ship be the the discharge and receiving water eivironmental impact effluents the rapid be of fire protection will dilution be when available for that considered function further the action aboard reduced collection treatment and become the environmentally the proposed controversial impact for falilities tes the of AFFF discharged volumes environmentally adequate of AFFF low criUcality of the The that on the environment will not Given significant with concludes statement proposed action VT Significance as disposal service 14 US00006848 SECTION INTRODUCTION Project Description Action Proposed AFFF Harbor to surface Each and occur or defensive offensive that and equipment basis as part fighting that ecuiprnent is converted from protein be tested insure The message when testing states that AFFF hoses The the output mixture The sampling After be ASAP secured of foam the to the to which severity be exercised foam crews requires installed by an or and system sample has exOessive required ire- AFFF shall output be of for one taken use from message observed in AFFF percent generated been regular activity procedures 3.5 is on repaired altered concentration acceptable dictates All industrial following be naval program operation should avoid of function the minimum range fire with equipped fire protection newly proper Ships Navy day-today operations appendix or to the Fire- Space incidents maintenance 0945D NAVSEA Commander Foam state-of-readiness and fire-fighting the of the is Navy normal combat of Criticality the fires within of U.S 7board Systems result as of Machinery Tests capacity extinguish Film Forming Aqueous During ship of system with fighting could Waters Foam Generation Fighting combat Discharge the of AFFF minute system before should concentrate US00006849 If 95 with AFFF one-half and flow to inch i/s gpm hangar nozzles tested for testing of active and and the nozzles and 250 at certified machinery areas shall be one-half inch 15.8 and apply to prior AFFF space in variable t/s the systems runs ship trial fire potential greatest and equipment at L/s firefighting flight decks weapons areas are protected landing One tested 7.9 125 foam shall be hose performance gpm port the system construction new of in on gpm and Two one only flow requirements spaces hangar generation then spaces was system generator tested ships and helicopter foam be on foam decks above Critical uachinery variable flight The aboard verify should done pump in machinery or bays shall be only work proportioner or generator tested the that employ AFFF by as elevators fire-fighting the as such extinguishing agent Background fire-fighting Many and for efficiency of application safety water on oil but by generating be extinguished by foa mechanical air would spread the from vapors protein foam has an and formulations Because developed over the on spread evaluated water the flaming flames protein-based that when mixed with water surface of an oil fire and disadvantage of being fragile and prevent escaping mixing with air and burning the the foam an oil fire could applying the been floats oil fire could smothering was oil have If However the foam 22 US00006850 -S blanket and it disturbed is flashback is with AFFF was of than active ingredient carbon surfactants based of water the physical and fuel of refer as effect and on of water though water appeared in the term light water Superscripts refer has the to vapor was 3M The Fluoro on itself based and Thus stability the is that so surface denser those upon this class of of proper speci The agents foam fire-fighting with it than early military associated agents surface oleophobic aqueous film forming become fire and the controlled several of on securing reducing be blanket surfactant remain surfactantbased fluorocarbon of can and later adopted products in across properties fighting their the traffic foot their chemical the term in effective defining to and has It sprayed fluorocarbon light water term space sealing vapor their controllable even Light water fications NFPA The fuel machinery firefighters vigorously intact is function foam float spread ties The AFFF properties hydrocarbon the remain properties hydrophilic can in rugged be can their outstanding upon tension more It barrier would vapor escape the rnid-l960s in developed foam congested of could vapors occur.1 producing protein In the movement this could equipment advantage occur could that likely broken volatile and the to agents fire Company similarly numbered entries in Section 10 References 23 US00006851 To is Navy improve aboard for use Agent Six Film Forming Percent 1970 Fresh for 3M by and AFFF Approved factured is ships stocks comparison of various appendix The trade secrets 94% of 1/2% 1/2 3.15 trate could test Since tight Water AFFF inch 11.9 gal be and criteria test minimum from water firetnain acceptance use being of been 94 to discharged the at 5.4 gal not be to mixture 5.7 20.4 94 during moving Trademark The FC206 by formulas should to contain the 3M art the each at consist However L/s of are Navy the Considering gpm naval AFFFs are contained mixture overboard ship would Registered 90 Supply Company 3M concentrate concentrate nozzle aboard the AFFF for manu drums 94 by disclosed 6% AFFF allow June containers replaced of parameters not 25 Federal used manufactured constituents have conform Concentrate 19 190 gal design the fire-fighting By of and speci Extinguishing Amendment currently FC200 are gradually must Liquid gal for 50 FC-200 Water Light of Fire from the for of AFFF type concentrate Light WateLFC-206 obtained is fire-fighting systems Water concentrate Company common in Sea NSN9C4210000874750 and AFFF AFFF Foam NSN9C4210000874742 under The Military Specification Aqueous fires the against generating firefighting testing MIL-F24385 to foam to AFFF.2 ship in protection all protein converting equipment fied shipboard the as test output AFFF minute of concen of the time of Company 24 US00006852 would be effluent discharge its dispersion the upon initial local to tidal The Navy the ships FP180 and dilution of foam fire space proportioner of typical dependent diffusion due etc flow installed aboard proportioning equipment for machinery and discharge movements current foam diagram the totally is in most cases control the of description FP-180 installation in contained permanent in appendix The FP-l000 Pump on decks in machinery These and spaces 3.a.2 section proportioner and are often Injection flight foam installed in ship highflow systems will be not the .AFFF Therefore they will hanger bays are tested Two be and installed not see in port not Speed discussed further Site Characteristics Obligatory is required in-port after work on The message of testing the system AFFF and fire-fighting during regular systems PMS testing fighting equipment that in appendix is or converted from protein be tested insure For the defined or to purpose as repair of aboard Navy listed below of newly foam proper by this statement facility at ships is accomplished surface ships is the done All AFFF fire installed repaired altered an industrial and operation which states .n shall output required industrial activity construction Most at activity the is conversion industrial six naval activity shipyards US00006853 Naval Shipyard Philadelphia Philadelphia PA Naval Shipyard Norfolk Portsmouth VA Naval Shipyard Charleston Charleston SC Naval Shipyard Long Naval Shipyard Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Pearl All AFFF PMS six-month on assumed that AFFF system when ship by State City Activity can is However the according AFFF ship basis shown are AFFF discharged table 4-4 PMS testing The AFFF of until and of rates PMS commissioned are at 2-1 ranked ship AFFF may is it systems imper intervals be in port over discharged ship informa inventories locations of U.S Estimates of the quantity of port are given based upon the estimated of installed repaired altered during in-port or on home Navy Navy of newly over unclassified upon quantity discharged AFFF generated room regular surface overboard in each ports waters testing are based in figure opportunity machinery though re.lative room protection makes tested even it is CEIS earliest tested discharged directly material be also non-machinery the be then in-port The this of HI is equipment purpose criticality PMS Navy Honolulu in unrestricted can during U.S about the systems Generation homport ports to generated board tion safety these that For CA Bremerton WA fire-fighting underway Beach Long Harbor delayed tests for personnel ative be system these board regula.r Beach testing converted in Estimates AFFF systems 26 US00006854 cj LJ r---- tEl rtland Fall River Se attle New Lo Bayonne New York Amboy Concord San Creek Pensacola Charleston Mayport Petersburg ... Pearl Harbor Panama HAWAII FiGURE LOCATIONS U.S NAVY PORTS RELATIVE OF 2-V e4 US00006855 are added tives onto direct to is charged The Thes year than Discharged of Testing During in each 32 gal listed the remaining 21 in table esti are ports per Li negligible Table 21 of Estimated Volumes of Overboard in Navy Ports Machinery LI AFFP dig- of APFF concentrate in considered be the ports of 0.12 can quantities urnrnary ten of percent Li are not practiced procedures 90 alterna only when testing disposal in the discharges less for PMS Approximately generated annual mated at discharge 4-2 see table totals port AFFF Per Year Fire-Fighting Systems Space Concentrate ms Port Location San Diego Norfolk Nal Charleston Station vALa SCa HID Par1 Harbor Honolulu PA Philadelphia Mayport FL Little Creek Norfolk VA Long Beach Aa Bremerton Alameda Other P.iget CA Navy Sound WAW Inc1udiig shipyard shipyard information Thet 3.56 2.47 15.77 940 660 4163.3 Hmeports_ Exc1udiig 6% AFF gal 9480 35.88 7770 29.41 3690 13.84 3360 12.72 2760 10.45 2640 9.90 1950 7.31 1560 5.85 AFFF3 gal in 568.8 2.12 466.2 1.76 221.4 0.84 201.6 0.76 165.6 0.63 158.4 O.60 117 0.44 93.6 0.35 40 249.8 Li 0.21 0.15 0.95 tests tests contained in table 2-2 was supplied by fl the Navy ifornia parameters for each Environmenta1 It Support tabulates for which hrbor area the Office water quality water quality listed NCBC Hueneme Cal c1ssifications and standards in table Port have been adopted 21 28 US00006856 Table WATER crci1 ted Pro Parbr San Diego San Diego REFEEcEs 2-2 FOR Coastal AVY SELEcTED PORTS or Use Interstate/Stto/ cjtr cnciv Ailcble _jSclvs Area Bay ALTY aer Lccal CLCR ItD CA TASTE EC-1 FLTINC iEC-2 TS$ S3LIS STTLEALE OIL RA1E TLRCIOITY SOLID GREASE .t QaHty Ccrol San V.L3o 1975 Ji2ij Jr ater Calicrrla rL Cor2zt 333R ater Lahty Lrererces Quality Source San tiater 6154 San Rg1onal Diego Bd Control Quality Misslot Rd Gorge Diego ZCS IGR of Organization San CA Diego Dieg Sgian 303 planningc Corehes1va Planning the Reg p1anlng 3CTERIA SHELL TEYP TcxIclIY Crcra ron quantificd ii ttiGnS trc Ofl wJste vels BeachilarDor Long Beach Loastal cticq Co TSiE FLWTIG CA RAiE CDOR 155 Source STTLErDLE SHELL OIL Lv MATEaIAL SOLIDS GREASE trol Re Quality Control QialIty Las Angeles eater saer California hales Board Ragtoi 303 plannIng Con eoard C5TILATS 107 TURBIDITY Suite Los vv 975 Los gional tio AaZa Los o.t Broadway 4027 CA 90012 Angeles Co CCTEUA TEP lOX CITY PESTCItES 5n .. Francitco Alaeda CA Bay t_- C-2 Nti Pt t.oL TSTE tt FiOATIG 7.ATERIAL 155 FE LO cci ND SETTLEA3LE OIL SOLIDS EASE STILANTS TtICITY .ELL k2q Ec.sn Sourc2 Area Quality Jackson Oakland PZ.s.6 Ij 7975U Bay azer 111 Fw...sco Scj CA Calfornii Qclity Bay Regional Control St 9407 Bd Area 333 plzr.nirg of Bay Goerr.erts Area 2C3 pln1tg Cc-sarvation trict D3 Board Region Asscciaticn ay bater ontrcl Dis Cclsslcn coastal zcre iranage rent TOXICITY PESTICIDES US00006857 WATER rcctcd CUALITY Table 22 SELEcTE REFERENCES FOR NAVY Interstate/State Loea Use C1catoi Wat.3r SZZ iSa RECl Little Creek III Beach Virginia VA 1118 FPEE FLOW Co-t.2 pH QwUt TEMP Soirce DO STR Attn Dr Class Gnaral ie.C Ja 11ii tations Wi Source floatlrg._ tG.ic cr4 2173 1tj oard d1 etr1o5 P.O ox sustarces 2111 Z8 74 Eurecu of Shellfish S3nltatlon 1916 Zr J.j 1914 Virginia trol Water plan.ifn 1t.y 3G3c on VA Roads Quality Qt.Z2.y rdad Qtc2.cj non qvzifcd te1lson Pcnt aCa.k 305th All 4i3ptOn Srce 1n.a Vrgiia eater Cc.trel aoerd 303 planning institta Virin.c Sciace aCci cit 76 tarine tn BACTERIA .lly rater Lt 4..j.1 V.tn G1o.cester REC1 Rferercas Qta11ty cco fliGi5y Bay orfolk VA CONTINUED PoRTs eon ietar P143 aiTton St 23230 Cooper River CharIeston SC SC ICAL RZC-2 C.M SC Ft.CAT SOLIDS CO D/CTERIA Srm Sc C1 ma..ad non .ciantif led tatians on toxic and S44Zta-Coopai Q_U J.i dlctrio s..bstences St Johns FL River Sctrce III PL 4EC-2 ECTERIA WILD SC JO4 Pltnig owcfl South SETA. Caro11a Cer.ter coastal acent Flcnifa Dept of Regulations FL Wl1d1lf zone r.d CGntrol 3au F1orId 2O3 laiufng anne sources Cet 3d of 5i p1a Coastal isecnt etural cUl of eulauon 2C8 Bureau of CLcir.ES cr 4e1th 4aalth piannlag virorental Taflehassee FLIJCICES of Dept Rerkely.Car1estcn.torchcsp 8.sui it Cet Ev1 roreta1 TCS cIva Enviror-tte1 Source TeCCITy catdr4 1975 ard Mayport Sja.ai 1914 inc Control 303 9/1/72 St.dos4 iir Carol a4 Can.Lc MAR C.eral Scth CC Capart.ent Rasorces zone anageant C.IDE COPPER ZliIC CCIM PEr.OLS LEAO CE4T5 Sr1 cntif ri not ts led tc.xc etcro.s Continued US00006858 Table WATER Oeneficlal Sinclair Breaerton WA NAVY CoNTInuED PORTS Pp1icabie Local tandardfCicthns Zrr.eer Classification Inlet 22 SELEcTED Interstate/State Use j9lDt10 Area FCR or Protected Harbor REFERENCES QUALITY MIGR 3CTEUA WILD CO REC1 TE4P REC-2 TOTAL ID Water Nce References Quality atcr QulIty tact available Ce State Agencies_ of Ecolcy 333 and 208 planning costai DISSOLVED zone mecageent GS IAV pH COi TUR3iDITY SHZLL non Caneral quantified iii tati ens on toxic and doleterious Delaware estuary Zone Ol.C20 Philadelphia PA 1.2 WAl 1.3 MIOR ces PA 25 2.2 PJ Uj CD d7 2.4 1i..D 3.1 REC-2 boating 3.2 REC-2 fishing 4.1 P3l 4.2 AY 4.3 WASTE USGS abbreviated Sc.rce after the is designation used designations intended to provide by the Includes fire uses which not do and protection depend well oil Includes comercial and POW Uses hydrØpower generation ECl Includes sport REC2 CGl recreational all fishing Recreational uses uses in caip1ng activities well The bays as coercial estuaries as Cc 5SiOfl water Chief 3v1sicn lning quality such as contact with water water cooling cor coastal zone P1ing oral Coa 2ca plan mlssicn 171C8 Control than 8asln Ce.z.re Valey Eiin Quality rather iver the Ecards specific supply of aliforn4e definition hydraulic The offered conveyance fol1oinq by gravel each washing shipping uses involving Involve plcstre thc spas actual and uses ofiater presence boating body other t1dpoi and where but do icstion rot reauir rre 11e study such of iig as water coitact hunting is skin wading watarsking re3onably possible with ard wtar such aetetic as picn1cing yez In diving nbathlng conjunction with surfhg hIking the above sightseeing collection and naval therapeutic which beachcoiing on Water coflcept 333 repressurizatjon lAV for primarily Cstrict 1O7 Harrisburg PA lonal ccneralizod locale ItO Cela.are Pr..sua ar ac.rcc Feerc1 P.O Cox nrc pannirg T3TY j2 modeled descriptions are for each abbreviated VZa of .cctrees ciator Tce description tal C.CTERIA R.jCACTIVITY The c.k .apo.t.t cc.S c2 .a ide4 6/./74 Ti at PA 93 Coda of similar various types non-freshwater of fIsh areas aid shellfish including those taken for baIt purposes and sport fishing In ocean US00006859 Continued WARM waieter Provides SAL Provides WILD Provides MAR Provides lnlnd an water for the habitat saline supply water and and MIGR Provides migration route RARE Provides aquati nabitat endangered The SHELL WASTE usual receiving aquatic ti3bitat for of Such the as and aquatic habitat tar1ne rscurces fot and wildlife of the Including kelp temporary necesar aquatic at least envlronsant In part for waraer with wildlife pro for anadromous the environment resources naintenance the ecosystem associated and of survival and sustenance other certain fish of fish hellf1sh arins mannafl species established species as being rare and species collection includes vegetation st.s vegetative preservation waterfowl en to of shellfish uses bcdy for in Such ccmunlty treeted as clams or military water waste water oysters effluent abalone systems shrimp and reflecting crab domestic levels of and lobster for either from uses treat.nent water individual necessary consercial or sport purposes supply systems tD preserve all designated bar.atlcla use categories bSpecif Ic Cpjnjng dianning or non-quantified quantif1e pursuant to Section pursuant to Section mreshold Odor limitations are identified fr each parameter In the appropriate area water quality docanu PL9Z-500 208 PL92-500 Nuither US00006860 SECTION OF PROPOSED RELATIONSHIP PLANS The There POLICIES no direct or controls BOD after the receiving bination tion with water the in prohibit level in local the new excess of action standards an contribution already The of naval use the has surrounding naval and and the quality been has and reconciled controls waste to assure with reduce the environmental bases and shipyards local pollution land the site the causes impact in uses operation land/water programs handling The enough degradation that Navywide collection contamina testing shorelines itself of However of infrequency of com for the surrounding committed in generate regulations to water levels frequently with ship-to-shore to levels industrialized complexes continue considered would irnple immediately developed associated Navy increased occurs it by the highly plans policies improve will to AFFF if plans policies use water When AREAS environment limits established of comparison harbor use which limited quantity insignificant the be USE AFFECTED caused or projected allowable or federal effect would LAND marine land discharge land TO THE the upon of portion AFFF to action proposed an FOR indirect the existing might by inpingement localized in relates possible of inentation CONTROLS action proposed is AND ACTION and on eventual to disposal areas disposal 31 US0000686 of shipboard into current generated environmental their relationship has been APFF test to solution enhancement land use will programs be incorporated for which plans policies and controls assessed 32 US00006862 SECTION PROBABLE OF THE IMPACT ON THE PROPOSED ACTION ENVIRONMENT Introduction It be firefighting systems tri1s sea tein foam U.S carrier SHIPALTs have tein foam flight all other SHIPALT is oil AFFF an effective is diagram in The units systems and deck issued to AFFF to convert in need spaces surface use and form and agent AFFF system be two protein ships is twinned combined agent burning in for space.5 AFFF and PKP or fire space equipment for converted by with PKP fires when Figure PKP the 4-1 is fire extinguishing be operated can independently of the fighting circumstances operated oil ire deck hangar also being pro hangar flight foam space carrier stations fixed were equipment aircraft HCFF pro surface converted Machinery twin to the AFFF for their aboard for of are having deck flight modified ship departure systems and hard hoses for testing There to first systems fire-fighting spray of system PKP deck types to The systems machinery washdown fighting and been prior and firefighting equipment hangar equipment sprinkling tested AFFF to installed newly ships are presently Navy generating ships converted aircraft that essential is to test when the machinery FP-180 foam space AFFF proportioner 41 US00006863 AFFF FILL CONCENTRATE SERVICE TANK GLOBE VALVE GLOBE VALVE LOCKED AND CLEANING CONNECTION OPEN -- GATE GATE OR BUTTERFLY VALVE OR BUTTERFLY VALVE BALL VALVE 1/4 TURN CHECK VALVE VALVE NORMALLY OPEN VALVE NORMALLY CLOSED WAY PRESSURE QUICK ACTING FLEXIBLE LOCKED OPEN LOCKED CLOSED PORT COCK ACTUATED VALVE ACTUATED PRESSURE GLOBE VALVE LOCKED CLOSED GATE OR BUTTERFLY VALVE SALT VALVE FAIL CONNECTION WATER 90-10 CU NI CONCENTRATE 90-10 CRES 30.4 310 316 AFFF CU NI OR WATER SOLUTION 90-10 CU DRY CHEMICAL STEEL ACTUATING GAS CONTROl 90-10 CU HYDRAULIC CONTROL 90-10 CU Nh AFFF/SALT FAIL OPEN STRAINER CLOSED SOFT SEAT SPRING LOADED NI NI CHECK VALVE 41 Twin Agent AFFF ana Figure P1P Fire Extinguishing System5 42 US00006864 the first is altered is or converted scheduled technical or more of copy the AFFF/PKP testing The the proposed of the resulting no apparent action chemical introduced time is function structure could tact exert However measure of fore an speed with the these measurements evidence concentration of the evaluations available such maximum chemical elements not of in to be point effects purged precede any first and chemi influences come in into time the con is There and the the environment impact proposed to the expected of Therefore applied of occurring from formulation possible has any may are action for concentration is the must at There physical it which relate magnitude effect physiological life forms with probability are environment what the proposed Its procedures which 4-1 ecological factors determine its which The given many of table the procedures These parameters in of Appendix shipyards appraisals impacts into assessment are essential Since on other in given Impact of will the are impacts Waters used semiannually Shipyard systems assessment and air quality Navigable it those it.5 Naval second 0993-LP-0236010 maintenance warrant Beach Long repaired the activity NAVSEA preventive environmental to industrial fire-fighting of installed newly conditions if frequently is maintenance requires are representative cal by an preventive manual contains for after equipment estimates action direct the best indirect construction of 43 US00006865 Table il Impact Upon Appraisal of the Propo9ed Jctions the Environmental Assessment Parameters Data Assessment Effect Parameter the of or Evaluation Proposed Action Observations for of Impact Parameter Physical Chemical Biological Variations concentration time factors Flow The of harbor waters mixing capability may result areas of chemical con centration of physical-chemical interaction with other chemical contain AFFF major inants normally found in particular result in altered harbor could disper Contaminants sian degradation This It AFFF of is tions capability of the that finite chemical will effect on some concentra- of have any biological environment in Therefore particular nature of the the life AEFF spectrum and affected this influ- of biological concentration within constraints imposed particular environment will determine if ence and constitute its an the anticipatalusage ecological data regarding the normally found in major types harbor would determine the degree of particular chemical interaction witb AFFF Natural mixing in Qualitative and of quantitative contaminaxits receiving waters tion of chemicals mental effects and the and extremely low concentra AFPF will minimize environ harbor possible detrimental entity toxicological some of the reactants influence the self purifi- could cation and of properties Toxicological Information with regard to tidal current and wind movements has been acquired in order to calculate the flushing capability cf the receiving waters localized The Chemical Properties quantity of AFFF with inadequate natural in Associated discharge into The influence of AFFF on marine life in harbor and contiguous waters must be determined These effects should be evaluated within the practical of chemical concentrations anticipated range the proposed action is implemented and should include short-range chronic acute and longrange toxicity rently available appendix uisite information if and sub-acute Data testing cur supplies the req will hazard US00006866 Table 4-1 coritd Data Assessment Parameter pH of AFFF The Effect of of the pH tion Effluents Proposed product in quesis identified at the neutral point AFFF FC-206 approximately 7.8 in should of Pollution AFFF Poten- Loading tial The and COD of appendices that means trations DO waters applicable 24385 of for the from pH to changed control specification AFFF as to allows The conform value Impact procurement of more acceptable closely to range should specification to pH MILF the be reported 8. FC-206 are The and relatively the same is indicative that this material is highly biodegradable The fact that the ROD5 is 65% of the BOD indicates the mater very This chemical high could concen- temporarily deplete of the receiving content if The for waters harbor ROD high the therefore minimal Impact on the pH appendix be the there Observations of Paiameter or Evaluation Action the in discharged large iaI fact is that ROD rapidly and values COD for FC-206 are biodegradable quan tities Socioeconomic Fishing com- The mercial and pected recreational or to Skiing and Swimming ters of is A..FFF not connercial affect use recreational associated Water of discharge exfishing Harbor areas shipyards are cen industrial activity and with are not used The surfactant recreation for and biochemical Rapid dilution degradation of AFFF reduce within the industrial harbor areas should concentrations to within acceptable limits while within the harbor whereby rormal fish feeding or recreational water uses outside harbor areas are not affected Aesthetic Water Surface characteristics ture could film on the and of result harbor film the in an forming AFFF mix unsightly surface AFFF testing nozzles peses When beneath can be conducted discharged the with overboard surface nonfoaming the AFFF dis appendix US00006867 case hypothetical Pefore following information frequency of discharge and natural of possible to data test and information and the the 4-2 They were have derived No system AFFF 90 gal quantity data been testing tests it is generated data using and shipyards at ..Other PMS testing provided foam of PMS experience 6% AFFF frequency is on has while aboard shown sea cited ships of port approximately per obligate every The in to each rates are generated once in ships having testing that usually about at of the generation schedules conducted shipyards from protein converted solution of naval shipyards number generated FFAT the by the maintenance the at generated systems ships operating PMS by AFFF available solution those of of rates FP180 testing are contained room foam of 0.34 m3 of that AFFF of are available experieflce and the waters receiving are not of AFFF by multiplying from semiannual however testing from naval machinery These by the harbor and the generation quantity obtained their fire-fighting AFFF of FFAT by the result of table the from the frequency Quantities as on system estimate system dilution the and quantity by decomposition space per within discharge specific from machinery the discharges mixing the and flushing While pained natural removal of rate AFF the case obtained must be potential such constructing three above test in-port years estimates 46 US00006868 are reasonable ip is wate industrial being rate AFFF was compiled from the area at 530 gal 2.0 in3 and on AFFF for 40 waste Submarine non-machinery NAVFACWESTDIV based with and Island rates 30 Facility.6 AFFF space report The monthly SEC 6159 commands cognizant the Naval ships at The NAVSEC on generation Support handling California contacts North ships at the some 1972 Typical for ships at of on report Diego San for in include in Ly contract data 2.5 m3 in data prepared generation survey with compared were reported Station 0.1 gal The equipment 660 rn3 gal for estimates report testing Table 4-2 AFFF Generated Quantity During In-Port Fire-Fighting Foam System Testing at Naval Shipyards Number AFFF Period Aclivity of Ships gafl years Portsmouth NSY 11 l50 5.7 Philadelphia NSY Norfolk NSY 800U 30.3 1.5 Charleston NSY 225 0.9 1100 Long Beach NSY 4.2 Mare Island NSY 400 1.5 Puget Sound NSY Pearl Harbor NSY of NSY mT calendar year 1975 No Data aboard 4-3 The 4-4 is of of machinery 6% AFFF estimated Estimates None were CY75 during fire-fighting quantity ship per year table numbers ships with None Yes Yes Yes estimates surface ships serviced not available The Disposal Procedure foam that spaces systems could he and proportioners are given ehoard generated for each significant obtained by multiplying Navy in table port the in output 47 US00006869 per proportioner aboard the indicate erated every three total the group single number The 90 test per port maximum at is per year 0.34 in of also 90 gen once concentrate estimated of FFAT are testing AFFF of the of AFFF PMS in-port conditions generating proportioners experiences gal For FP-180 of years the total quantity solution Group the approximately during assuming AFFF ships in that generated by in table 4-4 0.34 in gal 6% Table 4-3 FP-l80 Proportioners in Machinery Room Spaces Aboard U.S Navy Ships by Class Groupinq Number FP180 Proportioners Ship Classes in Group AE ASR ARS AD AFS AG AO AOE AOG AOR AR AS ATF FFG LCC LKA IiD LPH AF CG LPA LSD DLG DD ATS MSC MSO LHA DDG FF LST CGN CVCVN The given is the in in the table same shipyard mates ports ports of PMS i.e in AFFF are included 4-2 harbor generation testing Long table generation area as rates estimates in table homeport were Shipyards from the 4-4 not When i.e combined with associated shipyards shipyard Norfolk those with Beach CA are listed and ranked VA esti home- with those 4-4 48 US00006870 Table Estimated of Yearly Mixture 6% of AFFF Generated Quantity Per Test Once Ever Three Number of in U.S Rank Navy LStfl9a Port Alameda Years Gro 10 of Number Proportion In 22 of Port 660 120 18 WA 540 120 Charleston CA Concord 10 SC 25 123 3690 240 30 CT Groton Fall River MA TX Galveston Pensacola FL 60 120 180 120 Portland ME Little Creek 11 VA 10 65 1950 CA 10 52 1560 FL Mayport New London CT 15 88 2640 Beach Long New New Orleans York NY Newport RI Norfolk VA Panama City Pearl Harbor Perth Amboy 180 120 LA 240 FL 48 HI 18 540 29 42 259 7770 13 20 112 3360 60 NJ 120 PA Philadelphia Portland OR Portsmouth NH Tampa FL San Diego CA San Francisco Seattle WA St Petersburg WA Tacoma 10 42 1260 10 300 60 120 41 55 316 18 CA 12 FL -2 6% AFFF Port 120 NY Brooklyn Estimated 120 Bayonne NJ Bronx NY Brernerton Gal 9480 540 360 120 180 Gal m3 Generated Shipyard 2.47 0.45 0.45 0.45 2.02 0.45 13.84 0.90 0.11 0.22 0.45 0.67 0.45 7.31 5.85 9.90 0.67 0.45 0.91 2.04 29.41 0.23 12.72 0.45 4.77 1.14 0.23 0.45 35.88 2.04 1.36 0.45 0.68 m3 Gal charged 7.2 7.2 7.2 1.51 56.4 7.2 225 0.85 221.4 14 1.8 7.2 11 7.2 117.0 1100 4.16 93.6 158.4 10.8 7.2 14 32 8000 30.28 466.2 3.6 201.6 7.2 1500 5.68 Total of Concentrate 40 400 m3 0.34 Estimates Estimated Total MD Baltimore Upon 90 Ships In Port Based Generation and CY7S Shipyard Ships Group ers CA 4-4 Aboard 165.6 18 3.6 7.2 Per AFFF Dis Year 0.15 0.03 0.03 0.03 Q21C 0.03 0.84 ci 0.05 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.44 0.35 0.60 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.12 1.76 0.01 076d 0.03 0.63 0.07 0.02 0.03 32 2.12 0.12 22 0.08k 568.8 7.2 11 0.03 0.04 U.S for naval surface ships.3 homeports estimated of AFFF generated by quantity per year during testing Includes AFFF generated alternate tests no procedure disposal by shipyard practiced Excludes AFFF generated tests alternate disposal procedure by shipyard Ranked US0000687 The environment is Theoretical analyses for each 18 of dependent based harbors re tion and of flushing not factors ine the are the and of The methods are summarized of criterion of impcrtance takes in of in contamination rate for each order of of available i.e of and and were states dynamic theoretical the dilu compared in ...The major deter- which introduced contaminant for dilution the rate this at volume currents by conclusions Office report for dilution capability with each port an analyses of the report paragraphs following with of port movement and The physical throughout dispersed Hydrographic importance poor small flushing relatively is states not it although if the actually is great dilution that obvious of characteristics flushing from contamination harbor high for each concentration harbor the removal capabilities Navy 1963 results of Hydrographic safe of summary report available be The separately is the the measurements water flushing place relatively of since still might through investigation water of 1959 advection The volume of contaminant rate from necessarily volume which by harbor of rate flushing U.S made The reduction and the on contaminants were capabilities summary report.7 contaminant the site the reported of the dilution available on characteristics analysis on of now NAVOCEANO Office were effect long-range dilution volume might retain long period and high of amount time 4-10 US00006872 are Examples volume has and Mare high out the amount rate motion as induced Figure Flushing based the the the volume water of excursion nd which tidal the volume not was tho initial width available and and the small the volume of depth the body Where current embayment was considered taken was and report was taken water of through this possible speed be to tidal flood where embayment was of however the Volumes conclusions length of physical mixing of volume measured is excursion calculated by the serve may from this and dilution through or vertical conservative Dilution of will currents winds etc eerees which area dispersed tidal part of assumptions defined water is Harbors taken followina The within most Comparison 18 California However horizontal relative 4-2 of Capability upon the distribution The indicates properties For dilution large 42 figure seiches waves through agent mixing has contaminant turbulence of source which at in turbulence of volume the dilution are the as shown rate flushing which Strait San Francisco Island The determine California Beach Long data were sufficiently as the dilution volume Flushing contaminant from an harbor harbor area water within either and These the harbor by net contaminant flow currents factors were the also affects from it passing reflected concentration will removed or by mixing the entrance in be the of of exchange of the the ratio 411 US00006873 1-1- COMPARISON FLUSHING iqure OF DILUTION CAPABILITY OF VOLUMES AND 18 HARBORS7 ii1r Key Ii FL West Bay Guantananio Fore Weyxnouth _i_____.. Thanies River Sub Thanes River New Pascagoula \U Cul outer harbor Quincy MA River Mare Base London CT MS Island Strait San Fran CA Harbor HI FL Mayport Charleston SC Navy Yard Reach Canaveral Harbor FL Portsmouth NH Scavey I1and Charleston SC Woods Point Pearl 12 13 Dabob Bay WA San Diego CA Ballast Point Norfolk VA CA Middle Harbor Long Beach Narragansett Bay East Passage Sinclair Inlet WA if Hunters Point San Fran CA H2 I- __ tO TIME TIDAL .12 14 16 CYCLESJ 412 US00006874 each for of for the account during each volume of of tidal the which flood is defined of water the prism tidal the in more than the contaminant was calculated out segment the the as high within the found within 42 The before ebb If flood tidal given tide volume show within harbor afford comparison harbors the amount of the first tidal over at The the 14 of cycle of tidal the of that after the source the harbor the decrease Their at contaminant introduction in figure concentration peak relative contaminant curve through concentration plotted of entrance concentration highest time was of contained contaminant The and was distribution and and the harbor segment of the flood distributed cycles rates particle uniformly given rate position dilution that the excursion before from than more by point the source calculated was estuary curves the time was of the embayrnents lood slack excursion that assumed was at the point not was traveled estuarine was the between segment distance to applied entrance one harbor It the from lost fraction estuarine in contamination between one the and entrance in of or of contaminant slack harbors to that the were lost is assumed replaces to adjusted prism that further was water and study tidal considerations These excursion this ratio was the It source point succeeding located cycle embayinents the of uncontaminated new one fraction tidal nonestuarine in harbors and these slopes decrease reflects time would among undergo assuming that within 100 413 US00006875 of units the is contaminant volume of excursion and which tidal the water defined the width and excursion Advection processes mentioned contaminant to do oceanic only true where dilution of length the volume flood of body flushing reduce to remove from the areas of the water tidal through measured the not the by depth is is tend offshore immediately port they and introduced are it harbor dilution as other agent the concentration from the serve as volumes area of Currents mode trans of are virtually unlimited For of the many In of some harbors the data the locations and of the bottom the flushing layer that in each harbor able at of light the deficiencies individual the net of be is water in the estuary time would Office pointed out The in from density layer of seaward become this Should contaminated summary report the be valid allow than contamination of results examining greatly their information to event bottom rather prolonged Hydrographic capabilities inadequate-for the in of upstream be believed are inflow flushing were involved this type of time would The relative stratification would estuary the available probabilities differences type analyzing flushing innofar each of the analysis as the limitations 18 cautioned data for avail imposed by data reports for the harbors 4-14 US00006876 To the analyses field the verify tests for studied being conservative at large Navy ports release can be contaminant factors the tions had measurements samples and tracer dye of had the been test for analysis temperature and field tests indicates the tidal prism method prism theory distributed is uniformly the One The conducted peak time after at total amount of the results the fluorescein limit of the analytical of parts and water of harbor the of collection Field water current salinity photographs of and usefulness of or concentra out aerial releasing dye billion and of until dispersion concentration of 4-5 consisted included areas measurements dye observed tests rhodamine-B transported comparison tidal dye and of dye of types volume by the dilution the detection below field the procedures dilution periods table two parts of dye per hundr the until its decreased equipment cr test the time for that field tracer dye capabilities contaminant concentration table monitoring in by multiplying dissolved of quantity the five during conservative any released in flushing during flushing actual representing are summarized predicted The and measured theoretical conducted harbors substance factors of the their relative for dilution concentration of group of Office Hydrographic harbors The results basic the the flushing the contaminating both horizontally and of limitations assumptions that analyses material vertically of the must be throughout 415 US00006877 Table Dilution Factors for Five Measurements Time Hrs Mm Navy Dye Dilution Dilution After Release of Pearl Mayport Basin8 Harbor9 45 Harbors Factor Diego1 Ballast Point San Southeast Loch 10 6.6E_7 30 6.6E-9 2.2E-9 9.2E-l0 l.2E9 5.5El0 l.OElO l.2E7 l.OE7 8.OE8 4.9El0 Determined and from Field Dispersion per litre San Mare Francisco11 Island l.8E7 l.2E7 9.5E8 5.7E8 3.3E8 l.6E8 Strait Norfolk2 Hampton Roads 2.2E7 7.1E8 l.1E8 l.3ElO 2.6Ell 2.4E11 1.3Ell 7.7E12 6.2E-8 3.3ElO 10 4.8E8 4.4E8 12 15 2.2El0 24 l.1ElO l.lEll 3.3E12 I- 48 72 2.6E8 9.7E9 6.6E9 96 4.4E-9 120 3.2E9 2.9E9 240 Superscripts FORTpJ 812 exponent refer form to 2.6El2 l.5E12 references 6.6E-7 Section 10 6.6 US00006878 harbor the Thus concentration peak until For the is dye comparison curve and volume of field to of decreasing the harbor however concentration Loch east be of loch the cated the where estimated the concentration is complete field the trations as flushing rate in 4-2 curves out by other manner test was Naval The AFFF similar to conducted Ship in Dungan Research experiment mixture that and involved composed of by seen as This located the dye within comparison indi analyses concen contaminant for predicting fact the the Hydrographic concen from peak also been has 6% AFFF of will small release dye Basin solution at the David borne Center Annapolis the of release gal 4.5 20 94 gal of disperse scale Taylor Development 1.2 can studies.9 that confirm are South harbor tested rate rapid very dispersion dye To in is field dilution initial peak within the within of of estimates release are valid from contaminant all cases In tration figure in entire released theoretical reductions of the the six the to station mixing after predicted shown Office with tests naval hours 48 at within realistic decreases after fairly accurately other that and shipyard basin the throughout contaminant the be made cannot curve prism method give decreasing predicted this occurred tidal failed Pearl Harbor observed test the of Application the the of distributed uniformly Basin the Mayport hours valid 75.7 AFFF Laboratory of 6% concentrate 417 US00006879 mixed WT rhodarnine experimental The Office factors of and AFFF Based upon the discharge the calculations AFFF it that possible desirable effects worst of case the AFFF assumed such as flows conditions would not AFFF The is contained are that where after the per in the by Office be is the offset that sense good these same used mixing from the in in from time discharge its it is less diluting possibilities the the maximum ship and is can that discharges the to potential release discharged sheltered and flushing of an AFFF at con dilution frequency ship will there appendix discharge in by Hydrographic harbor for ppm the maximum estimate harbor sometimes To the in possible the those for point source ship are assumed discharged using hypothetical it location tidal be cases enter AFFF would areas AFFF would of is of and quantity single whereas applicability Hydrographic is case from harbor in from hypothetical ships could Furthermore the estimated Each developed harbor removal of AFFF discharges additional within to with dyed 100 contained used and of applicable results be can rates the the factors and water concentration proved factors reports dilution of initial dilution dilution the estimate an procedure field centration to experiment obtain to 71.2 gal dye The weight dye 18.8 with biological quantity of decomposition occur 418 US00006880 Theoretical calculated in table on the 4-5 to be test rigorous be checked over AFFF sample The that 90 the Each 0.34 gal the sample at hours ship would emit it more as involve the 6% soon evaluate on would calculation Facility are tested source point peak AFFF ship berthed AS-type Ballast assump unlikely for determining an possible the worst single aboard testing the concen as FP180 proportioners ship represents not be exercised could secured are based space Support largest of maximum order to In following Submarine test given are based provide probably been factors all systems in3 be since thus have ports from the that would all machinery concentration would system will and for five locations and calculations simultaneously the dilution but collection case possible tion about upon recognized few of of generation after is simultaneously period tration those at of AFFF It concentrations of AFFF discharge berthed AFFF calculations Sample volume largest based 4-6 hypothetical likely the in table peak Point San Diego follows AFFF machinery gal space 0.68 in of generated aboard proportioners 6% solution during an containing two testing of AS-type ship 10.8 gal FP-180 180 is 40.9 94 of concentrate The minutes after release DF dilution factor is 107/litre 6.6 in San Diego ten 4-19 US0000688 Table Peak at Time AFFF Intervals After After Mayport Hrs Basin Mm Discharge Peak Discharge Harbor Loch Pearl 4-6 Concentrations Southeast AFFF San Four 6% Harbors Navy AFFF Test Concentration Diego Ballast 10 in of Point Mixture in mg/2 San Mare Francisco Island Strait 0.27 Roads 27.0 28.0 30 Norfolk Hampton 0.28 23.0 8.8 0.04 15.0 1.4 12.0 0.15 0.01 0.07 7.1 15.0 4.1 12.0 2.0 0.02 0.01 10.0 7.8 10 0.06 6.0 5.5 12 15 1% 24 48 0.03 0.02 3.3 0.01 1.2 0.8 72 CV_type .5_type ship ship six FP180s tested 540 gal 6% two FP-180s tested 180 gal 6% AFFF AFFF 32.4 10.8 gal gal concentrate concentrate US00006882 Cc time can be Therefore 10 1.02 gAFF 10DF lO3mg the same procedure the after one hour is reduced considerable will be harbor the from it was test effluent thusfar rate of the on on discharges removal in the to the of AFFF Hydrographic after be of an Office and in etc measure actual shipboard AFFF and AFFF on flushing after discharge drawn AFFF peak Discharge dye release dye by natural of of frequency discharge harbor can the differences to of concentrations of substances However from the information from Effect rate is the to eddies currents dilution conclusions there regard the due is harbors determined by measuring the and that experimentally Navy rapid after completion with limited quantity to predict following dilution during This discharges Immediate diately harbors harbors Office Hydrographic harbors within impractical concentration it is apparent between concentrations it is possible and 42 figure litre mg/L 0.04 the of volumes tidal flow volumes presented AFFF in to AFFF per mg AFFF predicted results substances flushed AFFF system the variability of Therefore peak further upon as shown dispersion that at lObg AFFF 28 litre Using Based 4.2 litre l0g AFFF 6.6 studies concentration calculated 40.9 litre AFFF 4.2 AFFF the The concentration of dispersal the dye field initial imme released test for 421 US00006883 West Key was dilution lowest 5000 .tions of 1000 of to Basin tions small times Thus 60000 ppm maximum can than 60 ppm very This concentration found toxic to David the AFFF charging space is brine Appendix contains saltwater frcsh the 5% of shrimp during waters the during dilutions toxicity tested and data and by the in-port saltwater organisms as AFFF to no more waters conducted at Center action dis testing of machinery considered is during other Center of Development proposed six dilu concentration LC50 tests expected on into receiving 40-hour bioassay of effect point initial reduced the Research Ship the upon organisms additional only the at discharge be with impact using concentration to shown mixture initial indicated initial as studies systems on the environment fire-fighting based AFFF/dye the had studied measured expected after harbor negligible the be immediate to harbors dispersion appendix Naval Taylor Therefore scale in soon dye times were discussed 3200 of 18 West Key seawater-sewage-dye 2000 The discharge.13 Dungan coastal During 18.9 m3 of gal times.lb the for predicted 42 in figure 1000 approximately the discharge representative well as conducted tests on by other laboratories Long-Term effects of of chemical fighting AFFF have not discharged equipment Effect from been during AFFF of evaluated the several The Discharges and total simultanecus ships have not chronic quantities testing been of ire measured 422 US00006884 a1thuh aed and the th upon small relatively tioners the likelihood the same time and concluded from data toxicity to kill was 50% considerably calculated to the that end of tion of AFFF minutes to organisms appendices the BOD and than in period of the marine well and COD data the after the However table in hours residual and 4-6 of can at be the required LC50 exposure AFFF concentration time In fact for even the in table 4-6 concentra given five it of AFFF dosage 96 conducted being the in1ronrnent below Furthermore tests propor space of any discharge levels machinery remote that organisms persist in is concentration higher AFFF theoretical of multiple appendix the of of t@ting frquncy in-port number location the in uind those that tests AFFF FC-206 will acutely biodegradation indicate selected within is the be reduced toxic data the harbors for to largest in marine FC206 accuracy virtually at wholly of bio 423 US00006885 SECTION TO ALTERNATIVES The of fires of on alterations the Naval over the USS 1975 now estimated in 1972 $6.5M KITTYHAWK $5M and spaces 106 totalling 1100 use at $20M been Major and after performance USS 133 FORCE and creases the vulnerability 1973 in and FORRESTAL deaths USS ENTERPRISE damage 43 and 36 composite fire in 1969 NSC fires in machinery to January 1977 casualties more structural also 1972 in deaths involving 1974 NEWS total loss USS $1OM of fire NEWPORT deaths accidents to USS reported period collision ships systems become aluntinuin been that in deaths ships from July in material fires have losses system demonstrated repeatedly BELKNAP $213M damage surface ships and of called as firefighting stations the shipboard $lM 1973 1967 $5.8M As the has deaths property aboard readiness equipment fast effective deaths and USS ORISKANY 27 reports 21 in in both in system KENNEDY/USS in $20M verifying Center Safety time include Confidence fire fighting alone 1969 respond effectively for maintaining need for shipboard and to the verify repairs or The to necessary extinguish and containment fire adequate providinq by exercising basis and regular Since fires achieved is personnel USS is Testing combat to to prevention firefighting equipment upon to the for protection inent eominitted Navy ACTION PROPOSED sophisticated materials increases To keep in pace 51 US00006886 ith need the methods of for for the fires have Tests to three light water Further strate testing the The NRL objective the hostile integral that of and proposed objective AFFF system jective produced of the of in mind action.5 as well as spaces.6 continued foam AFFF the demon to extin for is strategy damages of to facili fire from are an systems capability alternatives and extin The with are analyzed environmental impact testing Overboard proposed by machinery action space current approach generate foam through one the Discharge is AFFF The sample and two system ships aircraft of hazards was JP-5.1 and ships fire-fighting action room protein foam.5 extinguishing discharge fire protection Navy the in the protein rapid improved JP-4 AvGas testing quickly over vulnerability Action Proposed AFFF peacetime of part following of to foam engine shipboard was light water dual for replace NAVSEC and NAVSEA involving ties and personnel both in to that that extinguishment improvement protein adopted fires by reduce markedly PKP be superiority fires guishing as recorruended fuel of guishment demonstrated effective and and such in the mid-1960s by NRL times as One strategy fire-fighting containment improving AFFF fires and bilge sophisticated prevention been of development more to nozzle discharge for to of dispose Foam of fire-fighting testing on each ob The effluent foam system systems is proportioner to AFFF determination of to AFFF US00006887 concentration as soon The is There the prevent collection of are six basically action proposed Material Direct which more is tional as Refine the test This or barges on be can the open Part that equipment interference of in flow The in handled discharge toward test use func is Reduce Discharge the volume of Closed AFFF accordance and are when the conducted environmentally to pier acceptable sewers collection with Tests cause the Discharge Provide holding mixture with Facilities an System dedicated test Disposal for Discharge underway sea while of shipboard AFFF to Schedules only be tests Perform as the Test and Treatment includes Contained posed which and reduce to procedures Alternative support Concentrate efforts Procedures Adjust Establish discharge manner follows produced Collection Available AFFF as approaches for fire equipment Refine Alternative When facilities Substitute development the to AFFF the AFFF mixture Only concentrate due alternative environmentally Alternative Volume with material acceptable overboard summarized are and research substitute obtaining different as system AFFF treatment and/or Test the of use directly They Alternative secure to excessive discharged usually unavailability to to possible foam mixture and the in tank minimal test effluent plan of as ancillary capability to scheduling could be dis alternative 53 US00006888 The of implementation the volume the of feasibility portable Alternative for the flow Plan fire-fighting test system dence System system flow egular Figures ficial in stitute the the to reducing Test of the by maintenance shipboard 5-6 including actions that level acceptable summarize those necessary of objective concentrate Enhance confi increase to by without with the the adverse and cost follow-on the for and risk bene elements technical conclusive and acceptance alternative each of Test Reliability equipment an Flow AFFF using through environmental concluded by modifying form and develop chart rejection When Flow plan Shipboard Performance Component performance 5- administrative or the eliminate to Eliminate testing effects flow by requirements reliability of Shipboard Redesign equipment Alternative Enhancing the improve alternative tankage Eliminate Maintenance Redesigning would handled be to alternative alternative material assessment by the nature material the potential is considered with in table parameters of test the for harmful change to impact is sub with regard 4-1 less it to is harmful measurably reduced 54 US00006889 Adverse Follow-On modification Requires -4 Conditions to firefighting system for provide valving of the alternate put define in during Requires posttest ing and clean-up store the system re to the AFFF and to alternate lush to study to design the system modi fication needed test material prime mode Perform to readi PMS procedural document is required control for and confidence ness to perform Verify quired mental Activity hardware insert by test re if the environ that affect ternate the material al of the material is at an level acceptable Smmmmarize The hardware added the to system for the test op tion introduces an element of risk regarding the firefighting systems readiness to perform The alternate material item adds to the and Develop procedures implement to control use alternate of the nontoxic flow those the Conditions test/check of firefighting equip ment personnel cedures with for test with imal design and change cost time para meters characteristics with of the prime AFFF acceptable not implement turn acceptable to an alternative procurement the design and issue preliminary to alterations effecting the shin system to Figure 51 pro expen checks possibly and and non-toxic and possibly less sive material Provides technical __ stores steps for -I and the Verify the similitude of the alternate materials Accomplish Allows the material one more ships Beneficial evaluate and mm equipment Alternative Test with Substitute Concentrate Material Flow Chart US00006890 reduced Iiolves -p of AFFF volume Activity Develop/refine to introduce over discharged rd llow-On Conditions Adverse pref procedures rigorous low checks connnunication Requires post-test and restoration stations Review for procedures reliable for verify ade quacy FFAT readiness performance could Requires highly fire-fighting formance effective to flow re volume Determine the acceptabil ity of the reduced affect on the marine environment achieve to ready provide training per crew for sponse expedite sam to minimize pling action PMS clean-up of prime equipment improve between responses involved in the test periods of by test or existing review of data Review and or relate equate them to the conditions shorter duration and characteristic pertinent Beneficial evaluate results and Conditions in to question site data the harboi The cumu lative range of usage then allow and effects direct Provides revised check of prime equipment assessment on line ralls ._ crew tunity to the oppor the equip use not implement turn acceptable to an alternative Lment Exercises acceptable equipment maintenance_procedures Involves no design or equipment change modification Figure 5-2 Alternative Refine Procedures to Reduce Discharge Volume Flow Chart US0000689 Adverse Follow-On Conditions con Imposes scheduling straints upon the ships work bill which may im other pact day Activity For open schedule sea capacity availability discharge tank holding pierside discharge secure support from shore facility for order-ofthe- requirements aboard ship Review for clean Requires posttest up and restoration Develop Review of PMS prime equipment for reliable readiness for procedures performance quacy verify ade to ance to open sea discharge guid accomplish the discharge these of options as planned Develop Pier sewers may not be available for receiving procedural and evaluate acceptability ance procedural for discharge tures to guid acceptable not implement turn to an alternative the regulating of AFFF mix sewage acceptable treatment plants ihips mission or schedule UI -4 open sea sailing may deny either or pierside discharge Beneficial Obtain support barge the receiving ture discharge AFFF for mix Conditions Avoids AFFF mixture ef fluent in the discharge port waters Provides direct check of prime equipment on-line Allows the the tunity to crew use the oppor equip Figure 53 Alternative bent _J Exercises the maintenance equipment procedures Adjust Test Schedules Only When Collection Disposal for Discharge Treatment Facilities are and Available Flow Chart US00006892 Perform Requires the development dedicated holding define of system capability bank time Requires preparatory and manpower to set up PMS procedural document is tankage required for control Requires post-test clean restore the to system the prime readiness to up to Activities ow-On Conditions Adverse study to design the hard tankage ware required AFFF mixture to hold the Swmnarize the objec Verify the design tives by test and and evaluate technical time cost parameters and confidence and procurement steps to design the Accomplish equip issue the Fleet acceptable not implement turn acceptable to an alternative The tankage requires space and maintenance remain effective Involves cureinent and Ii development pro check-out time cost Beneficial Avoids Conditions AFFF mixture effluent port discharge direct prite equipment Allows ity in the waters _JProvides _J to to crew the the use check of online opportun equinent Figure 54 Alternative _J Exercises the maintenance equipment procedures Perform Contained as Tests Part with of Discharge Closed System Flow Chart US00006893 Adverse Conditions Follow-On Tiuires -g development of maintenance concept to eliminate flow P.FFF system Perform maintenance neering analysis firefighting aboard ship tests postassembly PMS system procedural document is with required pressurization sea water to check integrity joints of control development Eliminates ity the for the the to use system for shipboard and rielop dures Verify Beneficial Conditions and plans for Suemarize the technical at each concept dence testing nents by cost time para meters proce installation and shoreside flow of test training nec and facility opportun crew identify changes essary for quick connect disconnect of components use check-out procurement time and cost all equipment to design engi of for confidence Involves AFFF using the Requires Activity test port confi by of acceptable not implement turn alternative compo means of acceptable to an bench program the design hardware modification Implement Eliminates AFFF mixtures from testing Allows for system aboard ship system alterations effect the maintenance plan firefighting under components Train crews confidence to in achieve system shipboard eliminating handling of Can to lead available component rotatable effluent source of replacement similar to pool concept Figure design tions for disconnect ability and quick connect cap for component re 55 Alternative modifica enhances placement under fight ing per formance controlled laboratoryenvironment while type The and to calibration of testing of generation Eliminate Shipboard Redesigning Flow Maintenance Test by Plan Flow Chart fire- conditions US00006894 Adverse Requires Conditions to systems of firefighting to perfor of eliminate involve flow cation add to leinents sensing con low perfor builtin etc equipsent test and enhance performance Suninarize dures and for coats are for the the crew equipment and check-out and systems for modified cost the time para meters by confi acceptable not implement turn the to an alternative design modifications system acceptable alterations aboard ship opportunit to of technical components concept hardware and required Eliminates installation testing idence program ________________________ procurement time to components ___________________________ Develop plans and proce Implement IDevelopT1ent and check-out and effects systems Verify levels mance review and flow velocity derated loop mode and redundancy circuits parallel stant modifi system design failure of tests May Perform analysis with an objective of the modification the upgrade reliability mance review design AFT all Activity Spllow-On the use Train crews confidence to in achieve system performance shipboud trainin Beneficial Conditions mixture ef in the Avoids AFFF fluent discharge port waters Reduces volume used all by Eliminates of the extra handling of fighting equipment flow the checks need for cleanup test to assure support man ire- test to AFT ships for and the Figure the after readiness emergencies 56 Alternative Eliminate Enhancing Shipboard Flow Test by System Component Performance Reliability Flow Chart US00006895 alternative This NRL.8 which The NRL refractive suitable refractometer found available and NRL was the from real real concentrate the basis of NAVSEC testing point The but appendix confusion refrac and material stated It and is simulated of then change back to increased potential be justified would costs evaluated not per gallon of the concentrates.8 real considered found although and readily appropriate of having the and differential the adding further simulant test was substitute problem to for each errors of the simulate AFFF system the operation supply hand-held of one viscosity proper use to by had therefore was it testing report concentrate for introducing and the was feasible is and the using by materials performance and the logistical the in over simulated it give However that concentrate on to recornniended believed It for proportioner to water not cost test viscosity Glycerin desired the in in analysis used give low for concluded index tive to was study concentrates agents index investigated several concentrate presently materials The AFFF been already considered report duplicated has it unacceptable glycerin They glycerin the an from an lower has stated as AFFF substitute operational toxicity than for stand FC-206 following 511 US00006896 uBecause substances of use would and require use chance glycerin the that contamination the AFFF foaming be washed use of less could foam unit tion was foam allow tanks tanks to accidently left unit be second be to tank left testing could Any and set of in inoperable unacceptable advisable unit malfunctioned loss of lives occur If filled with valving these fire into mistakes totally the were wrong that affect sta foam glycerin added casualty The subsequent valves after position occurrences makes test for ineffective major therefore by for testing glycerin operational performance fol with AFFF of AFFF concentration stations out addition the use of glycerin In small of AFFF AFFF ineffective refilled make might pumps could and of proportioning If tanks glycerin the the substances of limits makes ing AFFF with react might for testing which reduce or make glycerin lowing The glycerin could if the turn foam possible this alternative unacceptable AFFF It is is compatible is unlikely highly that with developed substitute AFFF such that fire-fighting substance could operational substance be found that effectiveness 512 US00006897 is not more degraded and substance acceptable for discharge Therefore alternative material has been centrate When to the reduce assessment environmental of discharge the potential the Current Shorter been has as described flushed will be operating time could assurance that times An the AFFF is team of system is pattern new Also minute deliv the hose that the devices observation of even the or would still and test though there reduced be reduced being to verify in-line adopted would one volume minimize is nozzle test no generation result procedures to reduce discharge rejected and untreated testing for damaging is if could refine impact is con is the foam salt water are discharge Alternatives tion spray it the to reduce approximately providing theoretically Alternative volume now impossible test to procedures regard 4-1 table for harmful with However with change uniform section in pattern spray in clogged not the acceptable nozzle previously is hose the be of time is testing times may from ered nature con substitute refine of parameters that the with considered is cluded by environmentally rejected volume discharge test alternative of objective also is that as the AFFF objective the elimina have as an discharges in port CD currently environment while still permitting practiced therefore is eliminated if the adequate potentia treatment provided 513 US00006898 Alternative only collection treatment when relies on available other systems These waste than those collection alternative in waters viable however systems fighting the Navy sanitary tested prior to getting to wast3s into drains Waste etc Soil to control an aeration tank by the shore The sewage or in unrestricted tests is not or AF machinery space installed on of discharge shipboard waters provide drains collection for the as well services sanitary soil and is or sensing to as sinks closets transport overboard waste the elements system and may contain transferred discharge discharge such from water drains contains flushing pumps through deck waste diversion tank sewage and drains soil as galleys sculleries Waste fire ships as part laundries for in considered from hotel pumps through included wastewater holding system sewage sea systems sea Also underway the eliminate collect headers tank being navigable Separate collection holding to drains urinals and to collect lavatories showers are from waste sewage that requires wastewater shipboard alternative an be systems containment undergoing ship program of systems safety for AFFF open as CHT transfer to discharge Such collection trucks tank are to waste include and for discharge facilities disposal discharge donuts systems CHT schedules specifically from AFFF CHT through and systems is directly directly of direct systems SWOBs CHT test adjust from piping fittings the holding overboard and hose either to 20 514 US00006899 The collection for handling and handling the upon dilution lessen the lesser the BOD loading will from an and in ships berthed and FY75 will Eighteen prior to capacity of installation in developed activity to be FY76 remote at were 75000 due problems schedule sewage from Any to will foaming due for to high CHTs oily be can an 284 ships at rn3 FY76 waste used oily waste the only oily waste thirteen retrofit discretion barge scheduled procured funds sewage at barges collec for the SWOBs The handle to constructedwith convert gal class carriers ships at anchor locations outfitted SWOBs are to waste pumpout treatment problems treatment other tank the or handling handling waste tank from ship class vary from aircraft sewage five handle waste the in handling appendix of oily waste FY74 AFFF have SWOBs were originally conceived tion waste with prior to possible extensive dilution working waste AFFF specific systems the waste initial normal waste that is therefore advantage will tentative in provided the is possible lessen of dilution AFFF of and is alteration the AFFF of degree based aboard and standpoint streams that The already CHT utilizing AFFF generated avoided is of advantage shipboard is system installation system of major to of package the sewage for procurement intended anchor or berthed for at the will user barge in FY76 collection locations of where 515 US00006900 sewers pier costs The available for would sewers or SWOBs provided disposal The for CHT and berthed and without piers location tentative allocation for SWOBs utilizing wastes the are for same those as transport oily waste flotation of cylinder surface The tems have open within extends from the within within donut mixes ship to disposal with ship are oily waste collection is usually closed Waste called from ships facilities The harbor of water and oil The floating added water flows donut it is The the oil or waste full and then or reclamation end lower end water older sys oil-water the cylinder harbor by baffles top water any elliptical beneath the donut the until into or open feet donut the the upper several ship and circular is at bottoms metrically the collar bottom discharged of as they anchor ships at with and of of AFFF donut water discharge rafts or donuts oil collection at from is to systems for the the collected appendix advantages transport Waste are in construction high the waste other some and is of transport treatnent collection because planned barges pier adequate plan not are donut separate mixture displacing gravi oil is confined out of the can pumped be towed out to donut from an oil facility 516 US0000690 donut lection and gravity of ea gravity of AFFF will water have no FC-206 are not or Liquid or fully wateaare often which discharged directly into waiting i.e locations ever disposal between ship involves Long by of AFFF additional Naval Beach facility and expense become alternative will naval instal waste by can be contractor discharges that is How and coordination therefore it delays tanks in could efficient more in some appendix additional possibly AFFF con by practiced contractor other Wastes be an alternatives available Alternative CD closed holding tank for containing differs from alternative equipment would tests perform of part board of until donut trucks Shipyard and from trucks involves Collection acceptable and are emptied alternative contractor shore Therefore AFFF and removed tank utilizing acceptable identical effect tanks an specific peeifi the are nearly miscible shoreside is and gravimetrically Disposal as 4C in tractor 42C at at confining by contractors collected 1.020 The discharges col of means unsatisfactory 1.03 separate separation lations 1.02 water they an for AFFF transportation Furthermore sea is with system relies on have in to designated wastes AFFF that be discharge provided shipboard Alternative specific contained CD ancillary ship for alternative 517 US00006902 Allocating additional for handling ship tive closed in-port quent test have AFFF cleaned derived in to be and serviced also tions would lost be with collection system would estimated fabricated from dilution CHT make closed much less attractive once as shipboard shipboard of AFFF than physical test added benefit streams prior to and disposal weight limita difficult system disadvantages system makes utilizing with waste collection an AFFF and size years three compatible Th use after infre during every attrac not is used of materials other Strict location separate be only aboard equipment testing alternative Therefore the operational viding from APFF system would testing It would and wastes only and space of pro alternative waste existing handling systems alternative Alternative contained as of part eliminate Alternative signing closed maintenance plan has with shipboard flow of the waste aboard ship option recognizes This are comprised nected test could system is shipboard and/or identify flow objective for operational AFFF test the thus that the firefighting With rede generation systems components aboard components confidence discharge elimination and key the by AFFF hydraulically the with rejected electromechanical/hydraulic electrically evaluation flow of tests as an of testing perform ship requiring some design con System AFFF change 518 US00006903 the critical to capability ponerits components to allow shift from discharge could of waters harbor be An of dividend tenance capabilities Alternative by of CE the elimination of changing ability and of analysis equipment be contanination without performed AFFF system sea using training of instal and this alternative effectiveness would of shipboard require the in corn of main testing time interim classic paths sensing to flow flow shipboard has flow with could testing be performed to maximize tests increased circuits test reliability thereby by performance of performance plan the the eliminates continue design regular added to shipboard without dancy CE performance system the the increasing of firefighting implementation eliminate systems checks side where shipboard could connect/disconnect Ship period rejected is component disposed check have Alternative system shore ship to maintenance would testing confidence alternative Although board of overall The accrues implementation scene quick design procurement involved is given more easily program lation be the confidence pressure/flow water the could the assure using requirements built-in objective AFFF with the confidence reliability test an enhancing objective reli operational AFFF or parallel as by in the Consideration such as redun circuits derated equipment etc are warranted 519 US00006904 like Alternative testing shipboard native would 51 Table the summarizes under in table reduce 51 the alter alternative considered waters navigable have been ational objective neither alternative rated most and to are the Preferred Approach the alternative actions environment fire-fighting port discharge of those harbors conduct is of as test many underway effluent in the be approach of not necessary unrestricted now all operational have Alternatives oper the upon However immediately for continuing preferred is action proposed and for safety as to AFFF testing current practiced well practice into treatment tests how action of AFFF and would proposed implemented regard quantities criteria desirable the continuation is objectives same based approach are alternatives requirement high where_collection of most can preferred minimum the rejected therefore with is the and Considering the systems in disposal of testing the following 11 of of evaluation upon the upon any firm safety system alternatives satisfactory nor AFFF the of therefore were The operational based CE ifld Therefore due and impact alternatives disadvantages based unsatisfactory Implementation and advantages evaluated was and ship CE Thus implement environmental disadvantages as the actions or the alternative ever time to require satisfactory criteria Each eliminates However also like alternative six alternative rated also rejected is 10 CE alternative the alternate or arid as possible waters at sea while waters 520 US00006905 51 Table Comparative of Suninary the Affects of the Alternative Actions Alternatives Evaluation Environmental Objective Navigable waters Lead to Operational time Reduce Environmental impact reduction begin Objective Criteria of implementation Efficient Reliable Impact alternative Simple Operation Maximize Crew confidence Crew experience by direct through check of actual equipment equipment on-line use Minimize AFF system AFFF equipment Ancillary Logistical Maintenance complexity redesign equipment not or modification otherwise available support manpower Additional training Imposition of test requirement requirement scheduling restraints satisfactory TOTAL unsatisfactory TOTAL US00006906 AFFF minimize the the of the mented procedures tanks pierside tank Shipyard disposal and Norfolk and disposal effluents the using further will would to 5-2 the flows capacities overboard necessary of more continue an of the other test procedures FFAT the by example at AFFF test of collection implemented environmentally Ship example adequate of or disposal Shipyard disposal reduce Naval an Shipyard recommended to barges includes Adoption device of shows sanitary facilities sewage in portable Station and Naval and imple have collection Until Some acceptable of impact and AFFF overboard see section Table charged be development discharges port direct inline test formulations are tested procedures eliminate discharges Naval sewer sanitary facilities port Naval Beach by Long in initiative Appendix both surface harbor Station San Diego tank disposal the that Shipyard Charleston used of and AFFF procedures truck generated sewers waste sanitary Naval Beach on for collecting Naval yard Mayport used their own on Norfolk Naval trucks Long effluent discharge facilities port be can procedures of quantity foaming Navy test system the sewer listed in from the the system table naval listed capabilities 21 at the ten Estimates installations sewage for treating treatment and major of the plants the AFFF dis naval daily operating have been 522 US00006907 Table Treatiflent for Capabilities AFFF 5-2 Naval at Major Port Facilities Truck Tank Port Naval Facility Operating Approximate Daily Daily Flow in Millions Location San gal in m3 City of Diego Station 10 0.004 Naval North Island 1.5 Point Loma 0.2 Norfolk 4.0 VA Name Plant CA San Metropolitan 0.006 0.001 0.015 1.4 SC Roads Army Charleston Sewer District Harbor HI 5.5 0.021 Fort with 200 Facility Discharge gpm t/L Facility 9./rn 2.0 0.03 16 0.060 0.56 2.1 50 11 0.042 0.19 0.74 25 5.5 0.021 0.76 2.89 200 136 0.515 0.14 0.53 0.6 0.002 0.08 0.32 200 Secondary 16 0.060 0.14 0.53 12 Secondary 11 0.042 0.14 0.53 18 0.023 0.08 0.32 20 0.303 0.15 0.58 Primary Port Discharge 0.53 0.79 0.10 0.14 E.1979 Primary Tn Kamehameha services Port Influent E.l980 Plant Pearl Concentration 0.21 Sani North AFFF 0.378 Loma Hampton 0.005 100 Sewage tary District Base Plant Charleston Primary Plant Treatment Point rn3 Type Diego Flow Millions Treatment Sewage Plant Pumpout Rate for 200 jt/t Secondary Treatment Plant PA Philadelphia 1.0 0.004 City of Philadelphia South East Water Al Pollution Primary 1.4 E.l980 Control Plant FL Mayport 0.6 0.002 1.0 0.004 Mayport Naval Station Treatment Secondary Plant Little Creek VA Hampton Roads Sani- tary District Elizabeth River Plant Long ..ach CA 1.0 0.004 Port of Beach City of Los Angeles Teritina1 Long Island Treatment WA Bremerton 0.6 0.002 Charleston ment Alameda CA 1.1 0.004 Estimated completion of Treat East Bay Municipal Utilities District secondary Primary E.l980 Plant Treatment date Plant Primary 80 2.8 E.1977 Plant treatment plant US00006908 tobtained Port from the Hueneme California sions maximum the port the municipal curred cludes tions of 3M iL/2 the degree will Dilution will facility in the system the 90 tank sewer does not 57 two The test when 200 per CHT tank and 150 gprn 25 L/s discharge 9.5 pumps aboard 6% AFFF the i/s aboard five are most two TARAWA by inhibition it appears AFFF of concentrations the port port with 57 dilution the 5.4 gal rates of 100 class ships ships and 20 required dilution leaving assumes sewer facility the 20.4 gpm 800 gpm in facility collection common exceptions NIMITZ class reported within initial combined Pumping con first initial dilution in solution oc concentra at treatability effluent Figure i9../L USAF study Therefore system the AFFF concentration exceed in treatment Tests discharge the foaming USAF treated the stages in foaming no microbial not illustrates that such L/9- acceptable an AFFF in sewage mg/P. second dilution 0.34 m3 of gal pumps occur Figure CHT in of tank CHT and foaming determine 1000 .iL/9 of to sludge showed than due basis continuous less of 200 200 findings problems successfully appendix Company effluents be on concentrations that above of to minimize upon scaleactivated FC206 can 200 Based operational bench that selected system sewer concentration Divi Field Engineering 25 Code Office Support NAVFAC AFFF been concentrations at plant at has facility in and target appendix study the Environmental Navy P.S 6.3 of AFFF L/s are 400 gpm 50 L/s 1.3 gpm P/s 524 US00006909 pumps aboard CNT tank ity location disposal SWOB one and capacity sewer AFFF system ship.21 rate pumping 5-7 Ships that would procedures plots have i.e with to combination below find separate their facil alternative holding tank etc. Thus pier class line in figure or dilution barge calendar ALBANY completion construction test year effluent of and shipboard SWOB CHT delivery discharges to tank installation could harbor eliminate waters by 1981 525 US0000691 San Diego Point Loma Ca /ego l500 Naval Philadelphia Pa Station Ca Creek Va Beach Ca Little Long // Mayport Fl Bremerton Wa ton SC // San Diego North Island Ca -4 -4 5000 Norfolk Va 1000 Figure 5-7 CiT pump capacity gpm CiT Tank Dilution Volumes Required to Maintain AFFF Concentrations at or Below 200 ui/i in the Port Facility Discharge 526 US0000691 SECTION ADVERSE PROBABLE BE AVOIDED CANNOT the Although in and around mental effects tions and than of under aboard yet forms unknown 500 or animals AFFF the and biological can be harmful of Potential the possible evidence any occurs that wastes of will the environ difficult AFFF fire-fighting Navy ships scattered AFFF chemicals be discharged loca varied in many is circumstances of effects existing AFFF than mixtures assessment single which WHICH IMPLEMENTED BE other to compared action testing PROPOSAL 6% AFFF of areas differing less chronic and plants an THE EFFECTS Regu systems in will not less ports 33 The as small harbor larly scheduled occur SHOULD quantities are very discharged ENVIRONMENTAL has on not the yet high of been degree AFFF into the marine residual of AFFF determined of life are chemical chemicals of by conventional supportive environment in However biodegradability mixtures plants provides assimilated effect of bioaccumulation treatability treatment toxicities on with evidence little that if appendix 61 US000069 12 SECTION THE RELATIONSHIP MANS OF ENVIRONMENT ENHANCEMENT The current for disposal effect upon is will the unlikely that in the change of the near of the PRODUCTIVITY of AFFF have test no harbor for area industrial of uses future comTnerical environment are not area Therefore uses ible with an industrialized ductivity of the area as currently harbor short-term or industrialized because into effluents immediate USE AND OF LONG-TERM recreational harbor AND SHORT-TERM MAINTENANCE should use LOCAL THE discharge waters It BETWEEN port purposes facilities aquatic currently or compat longterm pro defined will not be affected 71 US0000691 SECTION ANY IRREVERSIBLE RESOURCES THAT AND WOULD ACTION The of and tests AFFF mixtures persistent more harbors facilities of to shore preferred water quality charging There low are only are no of in the in will be corroborating AFFF implementation of is not data concentration connitsnent the proposed test of of of which liquid waste from implementation of short for natural it dis AFFF an level if section in long-term action be may mixtures in ports affected The that occurrences identified from of discharge AFFF those vicinity adversely long-range toxicity Preceding solutions immediate of of transfer are all recognized sporadic avoidable or irretrievable unchanged levels are operational and been Discharges and The use has low OF PROPOSED appendix duration It THE IN in reported life than alternative COMMITMENTS IMPLEMENTED BE continued at collection vessel levels sible to marine for IT known not concentrations.22 higher ship is INVOLVED short-term contamination harmful into SHOULD from the resulting BE bioassays comparatively impact IRRETRIEVABLE of tests any at irrever resources were to time by continue known 81 US000069 14 SECTION THAT CONSIDERATIONS OFFSET ENVIRONMENTAL The FFAT CNM/NAVSEA firefighting systems for of variety and/or faulty otherwise One attributed and dures sea 10 the of that the fire foregoing and to requirements associated lack as to of underway testing personnel presents aboard testing requirements tests pletion of alterations are be met ship overhauls requirement exists or conduct vessel to event of an undue hazard particularly at result pro foam many properly with At- conducting As In Together board on underway tested shipboard the to routine needed repairs or installation tems during to collected containment are not systems been considerations overboard cannot has proportioners ship must be solutions or degraded found 12mile limit prior the foam ship getting such well outside discharge portioners prior be of must be that specify incomplete inport test proce current suitable to valving severely environmental to unreliable worn conditions testing discharges discharged and for the considerations foam were circuitry integrity adequate due systems procedures knots when or lack that require test tests as reasons such of piping installed shipboard many proportioners electrical principal to tank in and that proportioners i.e reasons ADVERSE EFFECTS found foam misaligned associated Because and inoperative the of has THE of ship PMS after AFFF coin sys after construction firm tests in sea port prior to trials 91 US0000691 AFFF due from some discharge to necessary The produced in some instances readily available usually contain for receiving by that in point of tional PMS AFFF renders means This means of it and be of oil and practical stand systems regularly testing after that main be opera is equipment Until of means to discharge the in scheduled converted or alternate necessary for disposal protection firefighting altered unsatisfactory imperative material operational collection will and are not barges of mixtures therefore requires repaired them oil unsuitable is ship tical developed It reliable installed vessels from foam complicated and/or oil making difficult safety and collection of amount further is Disposal the and newly of mixtures extremely testing the ships bilges tanks amounts personnel aboard suitable is fully operable tained and small conventional interest because AFFF solutions AFFF containment of contained easily and configurations design problem be cannot systems prac are disposal AFFF mixtures overboard The will actions following directly discharged or or are currently indirectly lessen the either being reduce environmental the impact undertaken and volumes AFFF of of dis those charges In cological dence view of the character of contained in chronological AFFF appendix improvement formulations it is in as supported reasonable the toxi by to assume evi that 92 US0000691 variants could even environmentally AFFFs able of AFFF material on the AFFF AFFF has while formulation of biological parameters analytical methods and selected for to determining determine formulation solution exper reduced examine impact the effect COD biodegrad BOD design New AFFF Alternate concentration simpler method if of development environmental for and experiments formulas will firefighting performance for properties physiochemica2 formulations characteristics selected on evaluation screened avail bacteria fish toxicity sewage concentration component be firefighting effective the on new exhibit will study components ability toxicity toward effect would retaining The explored be that The would currently environmental improve that to develop begun formulations environment ness will of to than acceptable No N00l7376-R-B039 Contract imental more study available become ultimately be and analytical methods shall be conducted use the in field is feasible The discharge in of accordance regulations being is has embarkeca shipboard with To constructed shoreside and Navy PL treatment scheduled sanitary 92-500 for collect Pier wastes its completion into program pier in waters standards sewers system discharge construction FY81 Pier the eliminate navigable implementing ship CHT sewer to program this accomplish to on began in sewers and are for FY73 will provide 93 US0000691 an environmentally AFFF generated The construction of as to October 15 of shipboard plants treatment sewage for major schedule ashore facilities mixtures testing for disposal means acceptable wastewater port collection contained 1976 is of AFFF in appen dix The an aeration of foam of an discharge in-line foam no problem is being nozzle interchangeable end open into directly receiving sion of of foam flow rapidly on harbor the hose water that causes that past eliminated now plates causes the beneath prevents collecting the device the the tank unsightly adoption and the the consists for and for obtaining held It required expanses FFAT the by device collection run from the for testing The through unsightly Through developed required adapter solutions produced surface device top or of or harbor for sample orifice tank body the in longer gauge valve small drain harbor testing is standard The the on nozzle aeration foaming has nozzle floating into testing foam selection flow desired may of rate inserted be surface normal of of expan to to fill and foam layer over floating surface 94 US0000691 SECTION 10 REFERENCE GB Geyer History Research of Proceedings Seminar and Characteristics KR Chapman Conversion News APL/JHU from Protein Commissioned Surface December OPNAVINST 6240.30 Paragraph 1103 Ships Manual Extinguishing John 1974 December Fighting AFFF Their Equipment NAVSHIPS Tech Catalog of U.S Navy and Shipboard Waste Management 1976 of 24 0993-LP023-60.0 Service Foams 1974 February Systems NAVSEA Foam Fire Foam to Developments Conservation B74l FPP TM-1863576 Report Foam Fire Fighting in Fuel Shipboard pp 1522 DTNSRDC and Uses University Hopkins on and with August 1975 Technical Manual Type Illustrated System Twin Agent Part Chapter Parts List AFFF and Operation for Fire PKP 10 January 1975 Ships Industrial and by Lowry September Ridley graphic Associates Handling Report Draft Diego San for Prepared NAVFACWESTDIV 1976 E.W Harbors Waste The Relative unpublished Office July Flushing Capability manuscript 33-60 U.S of Navy Eighteen Hydro 1960 10-1 US0000691 L.J Fisher Dispersal Tests Fisher L.J Tests unpublished graphic Office Cline C.H Dye dine C.H Dye 13 14 16 Island Maloney W.E Field Report James manuscript unpublished Office February Wastewater Sanitary 4194 1974 August Dye Dispersal Hydrographic Navy 1961 May Strategy on Fire Protection tive Harbor 13-61 U.S manuscript U.s from Navy Discharges Field Report Key West unpublished 160 River 1960 L.J 03T NAVMAT Jablonski U.S 0-26-62 Office April 1962 Fisher to Strait Dye manuscript Report pij 1460 U.S 1960 May NSRDC Office Hydro Navy manuscript Ships Test 15 unpublished Tests Dispersion of Dispersal Field Report San Diego unpublished Hydrographic Navy 102-61 U.S Field Report Mare and Dispersal E.L Office Hydrographic Navy Dye 1961 Ridley Tests Naval 1963 August Tests L.J Dispersal 3863 U.S manuscript manuscript July Hydrographic Fisher Basin Florida Dye Field Report Pearl Harbor and Dispersal Navy 11 unpublished Office Oceanographic 10 Field Report Mayport E.J Testing Machinery April .966 August Peterson Study board 12 of NRL Memorandum 1976 H.B and Tuve Fire Extinguishing Spaces NRL 6180-428HWC Memorandum R.L Agents Report Compara for 1696 Ship 15 102 US00006920 17 Darwin R.L Studies 18 Sea to Shipboard 25 August Gipe NRL for AFFF Memorandum Environmental Warren and July Water as Related Substitute Proportioners 1974 February The Foam AFFF Effect the to of Sea Manual Chapter 9005 1976 and Information McClellan Book G.E Hydronautics for NAVSEC 6159 Problems of Toxic Pollution H.B for Checking Technical Liu Prepared 2733 Peterson 1974 Sewage C.E and Film Forming 0901005-0002 7607.411 Test 1969394017/S109 GPO Assessment/Report Impact NAVSEA Interface 22 Report 6159 M.S C.S Concentrate NAVSEC Rice Fire Light Water Compatible Protection Aqueous Section 21 Fire Butler Discharging 20 Water Full Scale 1969 R.L Liquid 19 of E.J Jab.onski and Saunders Ship/Shore Technical October Substances Control W.B CHT Report 1976 in Biology Co Phila delphia 1971 103 US0000692 APPENDIX A EXCERPT FROM NAVSEA MESSAGE 1915239 FEB 1975 p. TESTING FM COMNAVSEASYSCOM WASHINGTON SHIPYARDS TO COMNAVSHIPSYSCOM WASHINGTON DC 230053Z FEB 74 NOTAL COMNAVSHIPSYSCOM WASHINGTON DC 010005Z NOV 74 NOTAL The of Naval fire requirements industrial fighting system that by the tests be conducted shall solutions and officer If clearly the test End All AFFF fire of shall observed be The output of After ASAP to of equipment modified The concentrate ships commanding collected shall they accordance in tested to system avoid the in with local is foam proper has excessive indus an operation and all other foregoing The of fire following of AFFF in the percent 3.5 for one been use by ships force verify concentration is installed newly hoses AFFF generated sample that integrity testing to be the insure recommended acceptable the that from protein included when Allow foam secured must be operational minimum mixture sample solutions disposed AFFF approved the AFFF departure ship to is not systems only message shipboard installed newly to this by summary It fighting each certified shall be and lineup test prior or converted output superseded been using fighting repaired altered proper must has and identified regulations required are activity results trial activity ref activities or repaired be DC taken of AFFF minute the before system taking should be concentrate A-i US00006923 the If generator be tested It is only work proportioner or with AFFF to of by use maximum inch 1/2 salt water trigger variable minute gpm or flight bays at 250 No 10402 estimated Set line set at and 125 gpm and var inch 1/2 nozzle throw handle shall be be up installed the or maximum spaces machinery unit or analyzed lAW collection tified in 95 and gallons per in hangar flow nozzles concentrate of to confirm concentrate D82U industrial of the nozzle and two hours after analysis shall be activity to the cer ship ship departure fighting and systems specified substitute shall for refractometer within refractometer investigation fire No discharge 24 prior to AFFF output the refracto 6650001078509 1H Samples by Co Refracto Inst NSN equal or from the extensive that AFFF Results officer After at C33R 13 MRC or determined Optical $83.00 is taken writing commanding tration 10430 price shall be shall be American using analysis The with shall performance lines hose system foam hose generator all other tested concentration neter analysis mined be one only foam to verify nozzles decks then the on gpm Output meter the depression flow in pump verify All systeis shall at system was on however that recommended tested done tests must be system testing conform it been tested operation liquid has is to MIL-F-24385 and with deter AFFF concen acceptable as identified A-2 US00006924 in ref system upply tainers and proprietary rather than on the the qualified rnulations These are and its high ships prior the arid new foam shall ship trial runs When testing into harbor life can 3-N products that use 195 FC with which aboard for 199 FC stocked QL be due currently riot not These arid should without found be may source used promotes pitting steel space are AFFF fire fighting applicable for active construction systems bottom be made shipboard requirements The contained not FC 196 machinery requirements to marine the following shall ion content stainless the other formulations formulation chlorine of Navy compatible The to charged closed of testing systems and free corrosion For are 3M concentrates Co 3-M formulations for any QPL the gal con from previous list products the System Some are still acceptable ship to Supply NAVSEA of in gal drums for 50 AFFF of purchase Navy available is 904210000874750 NSN approval concentrate 9C42l0--000874742 for NSN under Direct prior AFFF Approved in The in of he port water tested since drums tanks discharged or and and AFFF/water AFFF/water donuts YOs be paras certified foam discharge foam can other the in shall such tank into apply may port not be dis be harmful be either collected trucks sludge barges suitable machinery containers space or bilge A-3 US00006925 If then bilge bilge outside is ship The local nizant 50-mile port oil NAVFAC Guidance requirements AFFF AFFF are until the limit be not collected from the of space machinery of with commingled for governed dis in port of cog the Divisions fighting fighting other systems than system the following for active applicable shall be Branch Environmental fire fire foam information Field Engineering For testing deferred the products disposal available be should foam regulations is posal the into by discharging shall discharging waste In tested is AFFF/water reclaimable by foam the AFFF/water and new construction hlps The requirements The required tests dockside when the ship way at side speed the ments of tests paragraph If and the at conducted underway at ten limit the AEFF/water they is least and paras outside ten are discharged are 4.c 4.f while knots from is mile or when is ship limit and the the most at is or when the while ship is at under out practical dockside the require apply ship foam may the knots conducted to apply conducted be may limit whichever mile 12 If of of be outside ship is discharged the outside mile the overboard limit 12 mile as system A-4 US00006926 Aircraft \deck and mile limit testing deck the carrier recommended is deck flight with salt water to drained the through is NAVSEA prohibitions tification of The point von 2228504 This funds or of meg contact does it not into and the the in at AFFF is authorize authorize the AFFF/water thoronghly that that preclude 12 foam flushed may have local testing as required Mr the change dirt outside to flush systems system systems NAVSEA be event circumstances shipboard nor does or TYCOM notified prior system oil any nozzles other that washdown remove be to washdown nozzles shall be tested edge It deck flight Hans orders without and cer by this rnsg SEA expenditure authority of 0495D Auto- customer prior NAVSEA approval A-5 US00006927 APPENDIX COMPARISONS OF THE VARIOUS PARAMETERS OF Comparison .- of Various 3M Parameter pH Specific Water Gravity Diethylene Monobutyl COD TOC BODu BOD5 Light FC200 4.6 7.6 1.02 0.989 59% 39% 27% 730 18 BODu UsAF EHLK mg/L 7.8 AOW AOW 1.020 1.062 1.03 70% 72% 72% 10% 10% 500 ing/2 mg/I 96 mg/I 450 mg/I 411 mg/L 65 1974 National Foam Systems 7.9 mg/2 74-26 November AFFFIS 7.8 235 37 Rept of Water FCZO6 FC199 Glycol Ether X103 X103 X103 Parameters 500 354 45 mg/i 350 mg/I mg/I 100 zrg/t mg/L 300 mg/I 45 FOUO p-a US00006929 APPENDIX FP-180 Naval Ships Articles Technical 9930.120 to WATER MOTOR PROPORTIONER Manual Chapter 9930.123 9930 September Fire 1967 Fighting edition Ship FOUO US00006930 1l The both connections loam Inch driven Plow thzough on pending and inlet It by the the motor of position the into two foam placement stream tire foam valve See moi proporttoner figure to tion de- sures of 75 175 to Foam 9930 39 can dispensed the is design.d lines tire of 60 by any of the and with psi be into liquid flows at to propor inlet ISO to four pres g.p.m following combinations The foan an tnables theopcrator pickup tube to foam.can as with he fire In Two let empty the line water is conventional for The FP-180 In applications tached to the pickup The foam this case water from leading to one may valve an tube is flexible inlet inslalied inlet placed and in and outlet foam tank other the one position and will inlet be will charge -inth inlet On fixed ships outlet Set be plugged always be can foam in 234-inch be hose line 2-inch the out foam nozzles with foam nozzle PORTABLE hose fircplugs nozzle and line and single FP.180 dis connect and -inch as needed inlet and used valve off foam 2-inch of proportioner czpacity 34-inch having lines attached with lines Iin equipped to within Lines or wyed off from with foam nozzles equipped Connect for 14 OPERATION OF THE PROPORT1ONER 9930.121 some couplings must be at installed permanently motor lines with equipped either lines One 2-inch fue fighung be by s-inch Three ofr delivered though the foam pump under pressure and both water motor and pump float on the line making the fire line available Both line supplied proportioner from shift so k-inch One the sift becomes fcm supptyof flow through of Aplexi-glass when determine to other the position each for posItions off enIinuotis h\isiisurirtg position has valve and tubes pickup pipe The water foam percent motor water foam pump the causes the and sides di displacement positive water outlet positive amount of foam meicred inject the tubes pickup pump liquid WATER MOTOR PROPORTIONER W3r motor propcrtaier has 24nch FP.1C 9930.120 to off posiuion position except when Foam valve actually should drafting foam only ...f_. Figure Chapter 993039 IncomIng or upseam side arrow points to handle in foam position ORIGINAL 9930 NAVSHIPS Technical FOR OFFICIAL Manual USE ONLY C- US0000693 FOR OFFICIAL each Insert foam to Iniermediate of positions does jew seconds for foam off when off position the the an leak the the line to free flush on to all minutes Return or three two valves handle valve foreign the actuate ual control The station foam gallon foam Fitted with for stations and spaces for landing at the from foam the to older the coser over b checked the extcnded of or entrance leakage for foreign faster the foam this and dried foam is done before valve they is are rotors use maybe into to the in liquid or one of eorrspond oe way first all on solvent any necessary from then deposits the loam-carrying the or inlet to re pump pump ports At any clean replaced piping the no or foreign valve foam gasoline it accessnry well liquid through caked are through foam the the liquid and direct it turn Never loam loam water disolvcs watr cold out Have Pour there visible for dried psmp positions pour water cessones lok and freely motor water hot water than wash and the time ac unit The the arranged the loans installation cock to admitting opens ad pressure This type lines actuates valves ens Figure still system the have to be lines valve to the is cock valve similar to to the and valve which position bonnet when closed fails system type control control be in control flrcmairt outlet control pressure This of foam manual which by machin t3tion space the value breech installations opened by turning admits firemain are other that so- for outlets the at proportioncr hose Is valve on opened The the hose control turning the ny is supply On by then is liquid that to ex the distribute Proportieners may spaces machinery latest proportioner opened so ralve for local foam the pressure Valve open fails and man- Incal valves FP-l platforms arranged manual activated is foam mitting of supply foam to mchinery for loca relieving seawater an piping landing arc Those sliow system drain Turn to quick installed are control The pump oil iitmg from 5gmllon cans and access connection gagc giass for platforms and/or 993040 associ3ted helicopter station cry of oil in turn fails in connection inlet the move used controls control composed drain vent hydraulic foam cleaning The ery and arr3ngcd is plates be will tank tank remote or of type may consi Controls system valves in the in foam ing to unit connections matter to the differ the the and pour periodically the replace previt objects outlet OF may but ships to If the foam the or three PERMANENTLY FP-180 FOAM PROPORTIONER INSTALLED Installed FP-180 1om stations are arranged the saine should Always shaft motor other into opening by hand and suction pmporioner proportoe.er turning into position tube pickup the squirted oil get evoluions seviral the The finished OPERATION 9930.122 within oil To loam in be also oil lubricating light through matter two running within pump valve couespondiri shaft motor the should and loam foam the and cheek shift always work valve the into into openings place of few ounces draininga squirted foam tended can empty fo.m is when tube in empty t2 loam If position air prime be discharge interinedat action plexirtass foam in the through at the almost then unit dwell ploportioner position times an immediate should shift that designed flows replace the so is ensuring or is After foam of water in proportioning pump by running in the can and position valve oilier tube pickup When After the can proportioning complete show to roam full noticeable to not shift blocked foam No jiLimp color tiquii jet and air necessary is in start The position purpng foam the To line positions tube pickup tube pickup hose Actuate ONLY USE the opening control lines breeched On older still cated outside the foam station In tain the hose on case this and line CARE 9930.123 installations space foam outlets control deck the damage leave one must activate the the lo are with the to space ob staticn AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPORTIONCR FP.1B0 WATERMOTOR Foam dries liquid that may fore important the that flushed after each drained after flushing and discharge wrench Chapter applied into turn to the the pump and use The the hard-surfaced of operation prevent unit-should Siad the extended milled flats motor water unit shaft on be on it be is there carefully thoroughly the water clockwise the film sticky proportioner end motor with of the shaft 9930 NLVSHIPS Technical Manual C-2 US00006932 ACYIG SMN coN.r l.A t i3i fit 70AM j1tS CiUOL COC at .71 .71 -n .71 Co rn o2 zz in Figure 9930.40 Diagrammatic arrangement of foam hose lystem -C US00006933 APPENDIX AFFF SYSTEM TEST AND WASTE AFFF/PKP Fire-Fighting for Long Beach Hazardous Norfolk Wastes mental 18 Waste Naval Disposal Naval of Protection 1975 Test 18 Shipyard Shipyard Pollution September System Disposal Aqueous DISPOSAL Procedure Procedures pages No 10 from page Film Forming Solution Support PROCEDURES Naval Service Foam AFFF Environ PS003A pages US00006934 WRP nn303 April 1976 MEM0flANDU1 Prom Prince To Craig Subj Disposal Alig Based mately 1100 It on is off this LBNS and Ship information you the nine of overhauls AFFF per year regular loaded holding area picked Sanitation dump Hope Advisor Center AFFF is gallons Naval 2863 Code of Craig below Operational Safety up information into by an will requested per year 2500 gallon sludge outside contractor be of some Bill benif it we dispose of tank and to approxi transported dumped in to Class you Prince D-1 US00006935 11Tfl U1JTT 1111 PLAN SHIP BY REV NO DESIGN CODE SHIPALT LEAD CODE APPROVED DATE PLAN ISSUED FOR EXAMINED OFFICIAL CHIEF ASST LONG BEACH NAVAL SHiPYARD NA LONG CH ENGR BRANCH HO SECTION HO AFFF/PKP FIRE TEST REVIEWED AFFF DRAWN APPD BEACH CALIFORNiA 90801 NOR DATE SIZE CODE IDINT NO FIGIITINC SYSTDI PROCEDURES RO 1t NAVSEA Ri tIj DRAWING NO RLV 89219 DATE D-2 ____ SCALE SHEET OF US00006936 APFF SYSTEM TEST 1.0 PURPOSE To twin of agent PROCEDURE verify and fire determine extinguishing strength system and to system 2.0 and of newly tightness demonstrate satisfactory insialled operation REFERENCES OPNAV INST 6240.3C of 20 Apr 1973 of 13 Sep 1973 2.2 NAVSEA Notice 9930 2.3 NAVSEA IESC 2300537 2.4 NAVSEA Technical 2.5 Type507450663 2.6 Type5074506918 Feb Manual 74 09930236010 Fire Twin Agent APFF and FP18O Operating Foam Liquid Diagram Extinguishing System PKP Proportioner Spaces Machinery Modifications Fire Fighting System D-3 StZE CODE IDENT NO A89219 SCALE NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV 1.I 1T US00006937 3.0 PREREQUISITES PIPING 3.1 for All presence existing of 3.2 not piping foam protein removed One flushing with hot One flushing with solution conversion by if deposits1 clean found1 water for of of period hot eholl as water be inspected follows minutes 15 and 10% AFFF PROPORTICNER 3.3 shall be The tested FP18O existing proportioncr/a for proper operation total to be tested of the poportioncr is determined by color of the protcin-alt analysis water mixture with known adaixtures and or by maasurement of the mixture percent using Five in the mixture is the minimum protein allowed and indicates percent For operRtion proportion.r of the refractometer operation see 3.4 Proper operation comparison of meter proper refrto MRC Maintenance Cards tems of MRC Requirement in machinery space 3.5 replaced 3.6 Proportioners with new FP18D failing which Proportioners 4.0 TEST EQUIPMENT 4.1 Supply 4.2 11/2 firehose 5.0 SERVICES REQUIRED 5.1 Salt small water pass 3.2.a paragraph of to for the for AFFF/HCFF pass the procedure of AFFF sys Stations refractometer test shall be proportionera with accordance B8V 92 C33R 13 refractometer and test shall be flushed in 3.2.b containers sufficient length services DSIZE CODE IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV FA1i9219 --.- SCALE 1SET US00006938 7.0 PRECAUTIONS 7.1 in compliance 2.1 reference with environmental the Aqueous protection AFFF Foam Film Forming be of policies harmful to marine may into navigable waters this discharged Despite that installed and modified AFFF fire it is essential restriction newly for sea trials as speci tested fighting systems be prior to ship departure fied in reference life and shall be not 2.3 7.2 altered tested and to the the converted insure 7.3 officer 2.2 7.4 of limit to hose is granted exception vashdown fire fighting slush deck these of because of nozzles under getting Mixtures 7.5 written since local shall be be conducted certification to that the system in output reference in accordance shall be taken analysis hours after collection carrier of aircraft sample testing Verification of while in port out systems be may deferred of for the beyond foam discharge performance AFFF collecting tests systems shall be conducted way products verned barges AFFF could introduction AFFF tests or as produced by these closed bottom donuts AFFF However The should not shall not mixture concentrations produce into municipal be be must contained for oil with comingled into discharged affecting sewer be required systems marine shall life go be regulations issnediately of test Report Ships to the of blanks Superintendent any defects which the conduct of delay completion 7.7 ness for repaired shall departure impracticability other washdown waste oil including 7.6 All 2.1 waters by the sludge reference Disposal may tests 260.15 or for systems containing drums tanks in disposal reclaimable harbor These activites1 specified refractometer An deck 12mile in newly output Code trials installed equipment industrial shall be determined by for refractometer Samples within nozzle and analyzed cards concentration prior to and by concentration Output applicable the discharge from operability to Design prior fighting foa shall include verification requirements AFFF concentration of 3.5 percent as Test with put fire protein minimt contains flight APFF from design returned results coianding at all Therefore or test 7.8 Instruction List on the Sheet locations etc used during tight No Observe normal 5lO0.27C safe working practices in accordance with LBNSY DSIZE CODE IDENT NO A89219 SCALE NAYSEA DRAWING NO REV ii ISHEET US00006939 SHIP/SSTEM/PLANT 8.1 Ship 8.2 System 9.0 TF.ST.pImCETuREfTEST 9.1 FRr1iMTNAR dockside modifications with agrcincnt the Ascertain inscribed 9.1.4 with Check correct with 9.1.6 twin entire thnt PHASE installation foam and for label satisfactory are plates tank liquid ach foam of new oil ft ncw has are have proportioners that 100 hose reel that 50 Ascertain noz1e aGent that grade Ascertain 9.1.5 provided testing workmanship been located properly tested for and tightness inctallation to level INSPECTION instruction Dterrnine 9.1.3 prior for ready rctcrences 9.1.2 correctiy and complete SPECIFICATIONS VISUAL inpect 9.1.1 and CONDITIONS 8.0 provided hose filled and an to AFFF the proper nozzle are the on ft 11/2 of been of with 3/4 each hose hose new 50 ft 11/2 of in reel the hose and machinery spaces 9.1.7 for tioner Rcovc free turning 9.1.8 Record 9.1.9 RTYORT The and found cover data twin satisfactory C/260.15 over the Replace as extended motor required on Engr./Tech ZE CODE and check each propor Sheets fire extinguishing agent indicated on the date Test shaft cover system _______________ IDENT NO was visually inspected Date NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV A89219 SCALE jum.Ncy A.cO JSHEET urv PO74 US00006940 HYDROSTATIC 9.2 9.2.1 At test isolated1 TEST each new foam PHASE station firemain and the with foam foam AFT and proportioner concentrate tank hydrostatically piping to 130 PSIG 9.2.2 .nd the At test each foam station with the dry chemical and tanks nitrogen of the machinery space hose reel isolated portion to hose reels piping hydrostatically to 330 PSIG for 30 chemical dry supply minimum and minutes After examine piping completion of by blowing through satisfactory thoroughly dry 9.2.3 out At each foam station fittings drain water test warm with with the new dry from water AFT The Shop Test out by piping test between the this piping this test warm completion of blowing through flake 9.3.2 Close 9.3.3 Remove Date with 9.3.5 and 9.3.6 PHASE nozzles are black ball valve the safety clip Observe solution all the from the wire seal Open the was found _____________ III PKP SYSTEM ONLY closed from the nitrogen valve cylinder and pull handle opening the Close and Date TEST pull opening 9.3.4 lead _______ sure test hydrostatic Representative 9.3.1 AFT given Date PREOPERATIONAL 9.3 was Engr/Tech Personnel Ship quick piping system date indicated the on C/260.l5 and dry isolated REPORT satisfactory of thoroughly air dry air 9.2.4 the and piping from nitrogen and tank assembly way hytrol valve nitrogenPKP After satisfactory hydrostatically to 330 PSIG drain for tightness and piping and valves this of normally nitrogen blue the open cylinder ball powertrol and hytrol valves and the flow petcock valve andinstall the safety clip valve 0-7 SIZE CODE bENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV 89219 SCALE JSHEET US0000694 9.3.7 the Open 9.3.8 Close 9.3.10 nozzle Open 9.3.12 Check use 9.3.13 9.3.14 close valve green black valve and hold replace Powcrtrnl should petcock Close until open evidence of NOTE each to PKP check unit in the for pressure down the valve wire seal should close zero to valve close is ball green check valve before faulty 9.3.12 for remaining order previous PKP and system is units open and buildup after leave test or use syntem for minutes to insure that open relieved is pressure N2 valves hytrol decrease cause throtgh ball green and valves 9.3.1 shutting the and gradually ball green lead If 1500 over preusure PSI Jth sparc cylinder PSIreplace 1500 steps When and cylimer nitrogen Return to ball valves pin valve ball under If Repeat 9.3.15 and If and powertrol hytrol valve is opened proLible 9.3.11 for ball minutes Wait NOTE ready blue ball Open green and flow Iron the 9.3.9 iediately REPOflT The the chemical dry ceases flow PKP units were preoperated and whore found satisfactory on indicated date C/260.15 Test Engr/Tech Ships Representative 9.4 9.4.1 Fill the 9.4.2 From each control valve through hose as per station AFFF PHASE supply foam DC IV tank station ch3rt operating on Date _____________________ TEST OPERATIONAl Date ___________________ deck and with fresh water. the AEFF operate of reference using additional the local using overboard discharging fire hose as re system 2.6 11/2 quired 1SIZE 1CODE IDLNT NO _______________________________ NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV AJ89219 SCALE ISHEET US00006942 9.4.3 Tat. Observe operating of Perform 9.4.5 water foam Demonstrate chart the GPM when Approximately 9.4.4 on that in AFF the tank discharging at normal nozzle TPI8O test the using falls 11/2 through recirculation procedure 2.6 reference the level following test operational the on chemical dry set extinguisher Remove safety from clip nitrogen valve cylinder pul and lever Check that Close cylinder sea water and AFPT valve arid replace concentrate valves are in open position discharge Seal cylinder Open and PurpleK of Open reels quickly and Open hose line at chemical dry close black blue Close 11 Replace 12 Open A.FFF and seals wire nozzles nozzles and quickly observe in the machinery space hose clean hose ring black Open green close 14 Close 15 Remove 15 pounds green fill nozzle to clean out and seal valve 16 Replace fill 17 Replace nitrogen 18 Replace any all dry chemical from 1- valve with lead wire seal and valve and check that sea water and AFFF valve vent cap clear tank chemical vent valve out from pin dry valve chemical dry hose blue valves approximately lead discharge 10 13 PSI and with chemical dry chemical Open relieve all pressure and concentrate close dry observe Close valve clip safety and cap PurpleK replace hand which was used tighten if pressure cylinder is less than 1500 7001 missing lead and wires D-9 SIZE CODE IDENT NO NAYSEA DRAWING NO REV A89219 SCALE jSHEET US00006943 9.4.6 of the foam During solution the and of AFFF operation 8ystem take one submit to the lab Code for i34.1 sample refractometer analysis NOTE After the of the refractometer completion lab should submit results to Code REFRACTOMETER 9.5.1 Lab to ANALYSIS refractometer determine the NOTE shall analysis concentration AFFF of the accompflshed by AIFF solution the Industrial has been into the procedure incorporated Maintenance Cards lLRC for the AFFF Requirement system for machinery performed spaces every six and the AFFF/HCFF sure AFEF high stations an adequate concentrate of to is that ment be must retained as as to percent To perform the of an fog foam annu.ily well 3.5 efficient is en to arnouut available foamproportioning system murt be adhered requireient tests of foam equip generating foam conducted in capacity perforned During test operation the pollutioncontrol 9.5.2 be onll This months is Lab PUASE analysis 260.15 tank when or the foam is generated barge refractomer analysis the following equipment required 12inch Data ruler sheet and dropper water Light graph paper Eye Clean beaker 100-rn. 50mi beaker bottles Sample Lens AFFF concentrate bucket 100 tissue 100cc volumetric flask sheets flasks marked 2% 4% and 62 and glass stoppers Funnel 1.33301.3700 Instrument or angstrom Company No 10430 equal 1H66506006154 10mi measuring optical 10420 No is refractometer or available 030 scale from SPCC knerican AOIC Optical 10430 No under FSN No pipette D-l0 SIZE 1C00E IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV AJ89219 SCALE .lcyi R.nnnr lDV SHEET IA_74I US00006944 PREPARATION 9.3.3 9.5.3.1 area Since OF the CALIBRATION concentration where the ship is region for each refractometer or developed concentrate of sea water analysis varies depending calibration new Obtain operating1 50mi about on curve of the must be AFFF this can be drawn from the gauge tank storage glass that is drawn no sediment out drain and refill the guga the test Next obtain from the firetnain about sample taking glass before of sea water flasks gallon First clean and dry three 100cc volumetric and and Then fill thee flasks designate percent respectively drain from CURVE To full 3/4 approximately 2cc pipette the ensure of the with the collected sea AFFF water into the flask into concentrate the marked flask percent marked 4cc of AFFF concentrate into the flask marked pipette percent 6cc of concentrate Next fill the voli.usetric flasks to the 100cc pipette up line with water insert the glass stopper and invert each flask several times The next is determining the refractive index of to mix thoroughly step the sea water and the and With the aid of sample 6-percent samples percent dropper an eye surface top of prism moved is plate Best surface few place refractometer the into of the water sea See and sample be dry lens tissue obtain refractive Using index the fresh water using the creasing the from the to Plot the on the the and level is applied the record the refractive index value percent percent the through percent and from standard completes the concentration standard percent Special and vertical See values and This fields is rinse care out calibration the percent for sheet surface reading as as the data glass index 10 for the should be solutions taken to with eye dropper now be plotted curve can values and horizontal in values Table Table for solutions the on this will line four points straight for the particular station where the concentration line is not discard the samples obtained straight samples held pressure scale where concentration method same values each refractive 9.5.3.2 and lightly readings after the is the the glass in cleaning surface of the prism and with lens tissue blotting wiping by lightly then be dipped in cleact.fresh and the glass water with the wet tissue and then dried with wiped refractometers the be when glass finger lefthand light value This glass expelled the bottom observed should record and dark slight the on are position against when the refractometer Table will sample bubbles removed dry lens tissue surface should be clean air closed the between appears data sheet the care should Special The fluid should be and water all are obtained readings an overhead light source and Read the number from the prism upper horizontal line of its sea toward pointed on the value of the drops Make sure preparation percent the be water and graph paper the calibration sample draw curve was taken If sample and start again with fresh of the for analysis test samples J11L n-il SIZE SCALE CODE IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV 15ET US00006945 Table Concentration Refractive Water Concentrate 100 Iron 3.4 96 Water sample solution Standard Standard solution 4.6 94 Standard 1.0 98 2.2 Systn scale index readings olutiou test saplc Table sample 30 only 15 Refractive Index 10 6- Percent of AFFF 8- 1.0 Concentration fl-12 SIZE CODE sOENT NO NAYSHIPS DRAWING NO REV A89219 SCALE _s .ait US00006946 9.5.4 POAIt SOLUTION TEST of foam solution wherever it can be Samples may be collected the sample is true representation of the system output sufficient time to elapse after start up to ensure that the After allowing to equilibriwn about one minute sample may be obtained system has come container with handle into the edge of the handline stream by holding 9.3.4.1 that certain or fro flight deck set on the pan fire fighting deck to system catch flush some deck of the foam from discharge nozzle few drops from the system test 9.5.4.2 Now place of foam solution and obtain its refractive index on the refractometer samples should sample be analyzed within two hours after the system test Using the refrac he obtained of the sample from the calibra tive index the concentration can run tion curve read less on the data sheet If the test samples the following corrections and retest the attempt concentrate tank supply lines to AFFF/HCFF FF1000 Record the concentration 3.Spercent than foam Inspect for obstructions and closed valves of AFFF injection pump proportioner line strainer foam or flight deck flush deck clean the AFFF supply inspect FF1000 nozzles for obstructions increase firemain pressure inspect propor foam pump for seizure or binding check foam pump rotor tioner proportioner system clearances tioner RPM using with one that and in two the the proportioner station operating percent data sheets and and retain fication hoselines respectively manual proportioner should be repaired concentration graphs for report comparison If If the compare RPM is not up unable to deficiency against propor to speci obtain to future 3.5 D.C to Central tests D- 13 SIZE JCODE IDENT NO AJ89219 SCALE It.JrS1CV SA1W IA NAYSEA DRAWING NO REV 1T IÆI US00006947 REPORT AFFF AFFF/PKP AFFF/ STATION STATION STATION PKP AFFF /PKP STAT AFFF /PKP ION STATION Workianhip with Agreement ref dwgs Instruction label and plates of Tightness liquid tank foam _______ NA _______ NA _fiA _______ NA _______ Proportloner level oil ________ NA ________ NA NA ________ NA ________ NA NA NA _NA NA _NA NA _NA NA NA NA NA Were the following at foat provided deck outlet on D.C foam 125 Were nozzle 11/2 of the _____ in space machinery 50 hose following each at provided hose outlet the _______ NA length 11/2 hose 50 length 3/4 hose twin NA NA agent nozzle Hydrostatic Test held 150 PSI for 30 minutes for SW piping 330 PSI for 30 for nitrogen _______ held NA minutes piping D-14 SIZE CODE bENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV 89219 SCALE 1SHEET US00006948 REPORT APT STATION Ic 30 for PKP APFF/PICP AFFF/PKP STATION STATION STATION _______ _______ minutes supply NA piping Operational AFFT/PK.P STATION held 330 PSI for ATPIPKP Teat performed 10 dry chemical nozzle opened to .11 dry chez clear from hose line ical Was and all from tank relieve pressure 11 NA Were green vent valve and blue valve closed at end of dry chemical set extinguisher test 12 Was on black NA valve open at end of test on dry chemical set extinguishing 13 BA Was PurpleK which was used replaced 14 Was foam flushed pimp and drained 15 _______ NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Refractometer tests reault _______ -WA r- 15 SIZE CODE IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV A89219 SCALE Sfli flt ASiS 1is 11T a. US00006949 REPORT AFFF AFFF/PKP AFFF/PKP AFFF/PKP AFFF/PKP STATION STATION STATION STATION STATION Voraanship with Agreement ref dwgc Instruction label and plates of Ti1itress liquid tank foarn Proportioncr level ofl Were the NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ______ ______ ______ ______ foloin nt foRm provided outlet on D.C deck nolc foam 125 Were the of ____ hose following eAch at provided hose outlet the _______ in spate machinery 50 length NA 50 length hose NA 3/4 twin agent nozzle Hydrostatic NA Test 150 PSI for 30 minutes held for SW piping 330 PSI for 30 for nitrogen held minutes NA piping D- 16 SIZE CODE IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV A189219 SCALE SHEET US00006950 REPORT APT STATION Cc 330 PSI held for 30 minutes for PKP A7FP/PKP APPY/PKP A7PP/PKP AFFF/PKP STATION STATION STATION STATION NA NA NA NA NA NA supply NA piping Test Operational performed 10 Was chemical dry nozzle clear ccl from and rliØve Were closed tank from at on end dry of set NA valve black of test at end open on dry chemical Was extinguishing 13 NA chemical extinguisher 12 line all vent green and blue valve valve test chei hose pressure 11 to opened all dry Was set NA PurpleK which was used NA replaced 14 Wa foam flushed pp and drained 15 _______ _NA ______ Refractometer test results NA ______ D- 17 SIZE CODE IDENT NO NAVSEA DRAWING NO REV A89219 JSHEET US00006951 413 TEST EWE BELOW TABLE P4 IflILIZED IS TO SE CO4J4CIION CALIBRATION DISCQNIINUE TYPE OF EOUIFiLNT fractometcr No Company AOIC No 10430 under 10430 FSN TEST BY TEST THE SHOP MEMO IS PROPERLY I.R4TIL is available No 10420 or CALIBRATION REPRESENTATIVE PROPERLY VERIFICATION TO SUBSTANTIATE CALIBRATED CALIBRATED EQUIPMENT IF IS TEST NO TABLE THAT EQUIPMENT THE IS STATUS NOT OF OF TEST REQUIRED EQUIrUn4T CURRENT AVAILABLE DATE LBI4S SER EXPlRATIOP DATE CALIB REPRESENTATIvL re angstrom optical Anerican Optical strument scnle 114 THIS MANUFACTURER 133301.3700 1o FILLED WITH EQUIPMENT In or 03 equal from SPCC 11166506006154 $4ET ____________ OF _________________ D- 18 US00006952 PWINST Code 23 HAZARDOUS DATE WASTE ISSUED HAZARDOUS DISPOSAL 11 MATERIAL APR PROCEDURE CM April 1975 10 1975 COVERED Aqueous 4210000874742 FSN NO 11350.1 403 Film Forming Foam PSN AFFF Wastes 4210000874750 Collect AFFF astes in SPECIAL HANDLING INSTRUCTIONS suitable size to permit easy handling Containers may containers be flushed of and reused DISPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS controlled Prepared by Concurrence rate not Discharge to the Yard 10 gallons of to exceed Lt Code Cecil CEC USN sanitary sewerage system at undiluted AFFF per hour Code 403 \fv. CXTL.._ 730 D19 US00006953 PS003A Rev wjrj.ra IJ NAVAL ENVIRONMENTAL 18 Sep UUL IUTION NA\Y Naval EN1RONMENTAI Ccntr OFFC1 Port Ilucncrnc FILMFO1ING OF ftUEOUS DISPOSAL __ SUPPORT RnaIion Construction 1975 ThIiforni 93043 AFFF FONI WASTES PROBI.EM AFFT AFFF wastes be disposed More Details shipboard to repaired is 3.5% mixture rates firefighting enrure the of 95 that the 250 gptn system minimum 6% is optimum to Naval Problem the of ATT or flow surfactants fluorocarbon used for fire fighting from firefighting system tests and training exercises of in accordance with local and federal guidelines each at are products before industrial that has been concentration The foam the sample is activities must must test installed modified of AFFF the in for one generated is takec to measure output ninte AFTF concentration Inport and under certain circumstances and clearly identified AFFF must be collected to the ocean AFFF wastewaters at operations these wastes sea for the other effluent than from are produced petroleum For additional guidance containing schools firefighting see Reference direct cont1ning disposal training in handling SOLUTIONS II The summarized for shore disposal acceptable procedures and follows from References as Wastes Discharge free from trolled ment oil tration rate can rates plant of the rate at at 1e If listed in the upon the AFFF table advisable to which concentration It is plant is adapted might allow discharge the the can be used used to wastes the are wastes at con secondary sewage treat and the average flow safe discharge concen to determine at the recoroended discharge will allow acclimation until to this up to AFFF specific is identified below AFFF Treatment Plant AFTF SewaZe free flowing sewers sanitary concentrations discharge depend plant to discharged Safe STP to of the discharge concentration or that certain Conditions in some localities it is type of waste the maximum or exceeding D-20 IINDC8C4900115 117 US00006954 known If the to be AFFT on limit discharge concentrate in the waste cannot be identified but is AFFF specifications3 qualified products list the lowest should be assumed 10 ui/i recoimnended to 100 ui/i maximum the cOMPARISON TABLE OF CONCENTRATIONS OF AFFF IN SYNTHETIC AMENABLE TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT Data from Table Reference xi RecoulDendeda AFFF Concentrate Label for Treatment gal per ppm i1/l million gal of secondary STP FC-199 25 FC200 FC206 10 10 20 200 150 150 1700 25 250 AerOWater AerOWater 174100 Based on reactions to Based on activated sludge microorganisms pilot /t 160 consisting of glucose sodiuni bicarbonate 102 mg/L Dischae Wastes to Wastes within Treatment Plant Sewage ppm iil/l SEWAGE the plant can be discharged following limits 250 1700 life aquatic studies using potassium phosphate to and 160 mg/a peptone Receiving flow Body of safety factors synthetic sewage urea 28.6 mg/L 32.5 mg/P and tap water Water stream containing aquatic life RECO1ENDED MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION OF AFFF FOR DIRECT DISCHARGE TO STREAM From Reference AFFF MAXIMUM CON CENTRATE CONCENTRATION J_i/l FC199 FC200 pp_ 20 FC2 06 AerOWater AerOWater 54 174100 55 60 22 D- 21 US00006955 on carbon e.g concentrate of Carbon Through Activated efficiency depends upon Waste Filter adsorbed Aer0Water The 100 within AFFF products can be the particular AFFF and 7075 percent removal of FC200 percent removal minutes of contact time The effluent be may suitable for dischaLge to stream or it can be discharged into sanitar of techniques for recovering sewer at an appropriate Tate Pending devclopment carbon the adsorbed chemicals the used can be disposed of in incinerators mixed with coal for coalburning furnaces or disposed of in landfill sites which The the attached flow restrictions and options household accept wastes dia8ram of Fi6ure can methods disposal be used to including determine at disposal sea RECOtTiENflTI0NS III The preferred method for disposal of AFFF wastes is discharging conditions biological sewage treatment plant under controlled to BENEFITS IV discharge to biological treatment be which at most can accomplished simple procedure .plant reduces the possibility of environmental aval activities This method and special handling damage and eliminates costs of storage Disposal controlled by and is rate of safe ff ACT Additional from NAVFAC disposal methods may be obtained regarding these Autovon 3605071 or by contacting NESO Code 2522 details Code 0451E REFERENCES VI Naval NAVFACENGCOM Subj l9l523Z Message Feb Lefebvre Anaul 174100 ERL Frmin Foams Kirkland Air Washington letter 1042/WEG of 13 May 1975 to Foam revised disposal guidance Military Specifications of CO2AVSEASYSCOM NCBC D.C Port Hueneme Plimforining Aqueous Laboratory 75 Aqueous 753 Base NAVY 21 Nov 1969 and Toxicity Biodegradability Film Forming Foam U.S.A. EnvIronmental Health Jan 1975 Inman and and Kroop Used for Fire Force MILF24385 Martin 4jhtig AFWLTR Treatribilit of Air 73279 Aeous FilmT Weapons Laboratory February 1974 Force D-22 US00006956 Ve tndard teduiai board for or pro .Iip shore snd maintettaoce SLoEa$. Contreled t.ch.r$e tary rate sani to treatment aewage Par. plant Diicharge tly lU waite etream to Ill Consult local FD chareosl di.rhsrgtng ocean muat until the side the IZrert be an activated colunt reve ArPF water before charge Kilge solution Ftlter hcnuh to fr dc Pars llC to deferred ship G-mi1e i1spos1 otean .nithorired COIAYf.ASYSCOM to by so Conducted more dieposol .uthori slice 12 rum ahore ocean to red or direct by COAVStASYSCM FIGURE Plow Diagram for Disposal of Waste From AFFF Firefighting Tests D-23 .. .. US00006957 APPENDIX BIODEGRADABILITY 3M Company letter FC-206 dtd NAVSEC letter ETA 593.344 1974 25 AND Mr to OF FC-206 Alig 1976 pages NAVSEA 6159C/SD June to TOXICITY 4088025 enclosure Ser 270 Bioassay Subject dtd Data 9360/ July excerpt pages USAF Environmental EHLK 7426 Health November Laboratory 1974 Report 21 pages US00006958 .J Lb OEPERAL tVIONNNTAL 30 33111 AND IN0INIfIIN 300 uIH PAUL MINNESOTA CONTNOL POLLUTION AVrNUt TEL SAINT PAUL MINNLOTA 25 June Craig Naval Ship Code 2863 Aug Annapolis MD Dear Mr This is 731.3031 1976 FC-206 21402 Alig in LIGHT of 31 733-1110 33113 Subject Mr TEL B121 85101 CONPAN ja P.O BANT OFFICEI 3M CENTER lilY the environmental effects request regarding Foam Concentrate FC-206 Film Forming Aqueous to response Brand your WATER and assess is conducting an ongoing program to evaluate Company In accordance and the environmental existing products impact of its new schedule FC-206 has been to with this program subjected testing designed Where possible the to evaluate products overall environmental impact The 3M has this product which procedures of 1ater and Due to the from its find to are tested in utilizing outlined Wastewater basic use been nature either 13th and an those and existing methods for the Examination Standard Methods Edition 1971 in function actual or of FC-206 simulated the wastewater situation is discharge most likely to ecosystem usually being first conveyed way to an aquatic For this reason the information presented treatment system the aquatic toxicity and biological toward letter will be directed its wastewater in this treatability characteristics of FC-206 FC-206 on toxicity studies which have been conducted aquatic and Salmo and cold water fish warm water Pimephales promelas have utilized the the concentate as sold are The results of on studies gairdneri The as freshwater follows Species 96-Hr Fish Fathead minnow Rainbow trout Pimephalcs Salno promelas airdneri LC50 3000 mg/l Continuous 1800 mg/i Static Flow Test Test EPage mINNESOTA ININ0 AND mANUFACTURING of COmPANY US00006959 Hr Aug Craig .vertebrate tested species have been aquatic toxicity studies and their toxicity responses are Scud conducted flea Dphnia Maj Gammarus fasciatusj tested mg/i 5170 mg/i Fundulus Mummichog Grass Palaemonetes shrimp Fiddler heteroclitus Uca crab vulgaris oyster ability .ie FC-20 of an wastcwater biological with parameters which are Static Test 280 mg/i Static Test mg/i Static Test chemical 100 as the biochemical normally used in treatability demand test results are oxygen and chemical studies The as follows BOD1 420000 mg/i COD 420000 mg/i than tests of rate oxygen uptake biochemical and mg/I by the dissolved inhibition will occur tests oxygen uptake that no microbial as mg/i 210000 The 1000 mg/l which activated TIc 240 to be stabilized in discharge has been evaluated in accordance system BOD5 an LC50 wastewater treatment such LC50 larvae .inica Crassostrea This measure sludge The species mg/i 48-Hr Atlantic The 1820 3260 pugiiator FC-206 on 96-Hr Sjecies FC-206 on LC50 5850 have been conducted aquatic toxicity studies and their toxicity responses are as follows Marine 1976 follows as 48-Hr Species Water 25 June concentration activity biological have shown oxygen probe method FC-206-concentrations less at level has also of microorganisms by been the confirmed TTC through reduction in population 235-Triphenyltetrazoiiuin Chloride Re of Activated Parameter Sludge Activities the 21st Industrial Uaste Conference Purdue E2 Dehydrogenase Ford May et al Enzyme Proceedings and Page 1966 of US00006960 Hr Aug Craig conventional addition In operated domestic Jtme feed using activated source which 25 1976 pilot plant was successfully of of settled mixture sludge consisted At an FC-206 concentration of 1000 mg/I sewage and FC-206 in COD and BOD levels were 73% and 86% respectively average reductions When at an FC-206 level of 1000 mg/i the average operating concentration ROD5 in the effluent from the pilot plant was 18 mg/i the general In combination or it is with advisable either to treat domestic or FC-206 wastewater in dischargez wastewater in biological combined raw wastewater system industrial wastewater treatment maximum concentration discharge providing would permit treatment satisfactory physiochemical All statements technical information are of general nature and are based be reliable but the is not circumstances and implied are purpose more on the with We hope of merchantability evaluation recommendations tests laboratory and pollution information please of your specific and factors circumstances appropriate this mg/i FC-206 concentrate contained we herein believe to fitness for particular disclaimed particular assistance on 1000 accuracy or applicability to particular completeness No express warranties guaranteed herein are created warranties complete the and of contact will control be of Mr D.L situation involved agencies value to Bacon on Very 612 If be based including we can be corsu1taticn of further 733-5453 yours truly Robert you should Bohon Environmental Manager Laboratory RLB/mab E- US0000696 BIOASSAY DATA EXCERPTED FROM ENCLOSURE TO NAVSEA 6159C/SD ETA 9630/593.344 DATED JULY 1974 NAVSEC LETTER 4088025 SER 270 FC-200 AFFF and FC206 AFFF toxicities were determined saltwater by performing bioassays on seven representative at the Naval Research and organisms Ship Center Development The seven saltwater organisms tested Annapolis Division were carefully selected as representatives of the water column also two other commer were on Bioassays performed cial alternative AFFF substances and Aerowater Number Aerowater Number manufactured by the National Foam substance that was considered Corporation and on glycerine as to AFFF for use for pierside possible alternative testing of foam station units TFe organisms tested are listed in table Because it marine fish species and can be raised representative the laboratory to inch length Killifish Fundulus The two bottom organisms majalus were used for testing that were used were the common Atlantic Oyster Crassostrea virginia and the Ribbed Bay Mussel Modiolus modiolus The barnacle used was the common white acorn species The brine shrimp Artemia sauna Balanus eburneau tested was the San Francisco Bay strain Although it is found in brackish .iot waters its inclusion in bioassay has many advantages it is standard bio procedure it assay organism used by many biology laboratories is reference its life cycle organism used by EPA maintenance and culture conditions are very well documented its response host of chemicals is known and to nanna is brown centric Cyclotella diatom fully oceanic but often found in brackish water Pseudomonas nigrificans American Type Cultural Collection No 19375 is marine bacteria belonging to that vast group of bacteria Pseudomonas which is found in almost all the salt waters of theor1d Bacteria in water are the common denominator so their in clusion in These organ bioassay is absolutely necessary isms were selected and placed in test tanks or flasks The desired amounts of the chemicals were added volumetrically and at the end of 96 hours the LC0 of the iconcentration chemical which is lethal to 50% of the test organisms was recorded For brine shrimp 40 hour LC50 was determined shows the actual number Table of organisms used for testing of each concentration of any one chemical is in The LC50 for these chemicals are listed in table shows that the least toxic AFFF compound is FC-206 Table is less toxic than FC206 although glycerine E-4 US00006962 Tablel BIOASSAY ORGPNISMS Name Type Stage Killi Fish Fish Young Fundulus rajaius Vertebrate 23 Bay I4ussel 4ollusc Shelled 12 Modiolus modiolus Brine Arteinia Bronchiopod Crustacean Adult Cirriped Crustacean Adult eburneus J4o.lusc Adult Barnacle Balanus Oyster Crassostrea virginia Diatom yclotella narla Marine Bacteria Nigrificans Pscudoronas Adult Green Bottom Standard old weeks 3/4-l 1-2 Columns Brackish long base Bioassay Brackish Littoral Brackish Bottom Shelled Algae Brown Estuazine Water long Adult sauna Shrimp Habitat 106 Oceanic cells/cc Bacteria cells/cc Oceanic to Brackish B- US00006963 Table NUMBER Organism Nunther 0BMISMS ND OF of Organisms Test Concentration Killi Fish Bay Shrimp Barnacle Total 180 20 Control 600 10 Control 300 Control 180 test tubes each with to 106 cells/cc test tubes each No of Organisms Control 103 Bacteria No of Concentrations 180 Oyster Algae CONCENTRATIONS Control 1ussel Brine CHEMICAL Control 60 tubes Control 60 tubes with cells/cc E-6 US00006964 Table 96 HOUR W50 40 W50 hour FC-200 AFFF 3M for brine Company 96 Organism Hr Fish Brine 76 ppm 80 ppm Shrimp Greater Oyster Mussel Barnacle thai-i 26530 Algae Bacteria 60000 ppm ppm 283 ppm 110 ppm ppm 1000 FC-206 AFF 3M Copany 96 Organism 50 Hr 2679 1187 Fish Brine shrimp Shrimp Greater Oyster Mussel Barnacle Bacteria ppm than 10000 10000 1560 10000 Algae ppm 60000 ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm Glycerine Hr Organism 96 Fish 51870 17275 Brine Shrimp Greater Oyster Mussel Barnacle than 35660 45000 33500 Algae Bacteria Greater than I5O ppm ppm 60000 ppm ppm ppm ppm 100000 ppm E-7 US00006965 National Foax Aerowater Nurtber National Foam Corporation 96 Organism Fish Brine Shrimp 850 ppm ppm Greater Algae Bacteria ppm ppm 574 ppm ppm Foam 1\erowater National Foe_n 96 50 than 150 155 20000 National 60000 ppm urnber Corporatior Hr TC 50 900 Fish Brine TC 727 Oyster Mussel Barnacle Organi Hr Shrimp Oyster Mussel Barnacle ppm ppm ppm 80 ppm 427 ppm 980 ppm 8567 35000 tgae Bacteria 20000 ppm E-8 US00006966 USAF ENVIRONMENTAL UNITED KELLY BIODEGRADABILITY HEALTH AIR STATES AFB AND FC206 AQUEOUS TEXAS EHLK EDWARD FORCE 78241 1974 74-26 By By Reviewed LeFEBVRE Consultant Maj USAF Environmental BSC Chemistry ALBERT Chief ELLIOTT Special Approved ROGER If1MAN Veterinary Maj USAF WTER VC Lt Projects Col USAF BSC Division By P2 MLVflf Col USAF MC Comander Ecologist/Toxicologist FOR AFLC TOXICITY OF LIGHT WATERS FILM FOR1ING FOAM November Prepared LABORATORY OFFICIAL USE ONLY E-9 US00006967 NOT ICE This is released for the purpose subject report by the Air Force of aiding future and research Release of this material is not study Intended for promotional or advertising and should in no way purposes be construed as an endorsement of any product The views expressed herein of the author/cvaluator and do not necessarily reflect are those the views of the United States Air Force or the Department of Defense FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY E-1O US00006968 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 11 111 INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION ti on Compos Respiration Studies... Pilot Studies Plant Toxicity Studies Comparison with AFFFs IV VI studied previously 12 CONCLUSIONS 13 RECOMMENDATIONS 14 REFERENCES 15 Appendix Ai ParticipantsinStudy Figures Fuction as Oxygen Demand USAF Environmental Health by Biological of Time Laboratory of Kelly FC206 AFI3 TX 1974 Oxygen Uptake of Varying Concentrations of FC206 usingtheWarburgRespirometer Quantal Response Changes In LC50 of curves with values .. fish time exposed to FC206 10 of exposure 11 Tables Composition of FC206 Surnary of Data FC206 at 25C from with Measurement of the Composition of Synthetic E/BOD Extended Respirometer Sewage Used in BOD of .. Biodegrability Studies 11 US00006969 TABLE CONTENTS OF Tables Page from Activated Summary of Analysis of Samples Sludge Pilot Plant No Receiving FC206 and Synthetic Sewage .. from Activated Summary of Analysis of Samples Sludge Pilot Plant No Receiving FC206 and Synthetics Sewage Daily to Measurement of 51St Comparison Changes increase MLSS in Plant No from 30th Days in in of Various Toxicity time of Parameters of AFFFs to exposure of AFFEs Fathead Minnozs 12 with 12 fr ill E-12 US00006970 SUMMARY Light Water FC206 Is an aqueous film forming foam AFFE used for fighting studies Biodegradability show that it can be biologically treated in controlled concentrations 200 ui/i in synthetic up on sewage continuous basis Higher concentration appear amenable to treatmrt in oxidation ponds over long time periods with fathead minro Toxicity studies juveniles and fry indicate that FC206 is less toxic than AFFFs previously tested The 96-hour LC0 for fathead minnow juveniles and fry were 1080 ui/i and 170 ui/i respectiveTy 0.05 Using application factor concentration unit of 54 ui/i is recommended for discharge to any waters containing cquatic fire life E-13 US0000697 II INTRODUCTION This the fourth the biodegradability and toxicity of to fight fires by the Air Force The results FC206 of Minnesota Mining product and Manufacturing St Paul The FC206 is used Minn are presented here to make six percent solution for the fire fighting operations This study was conducted at the request of Hq USAF/SGPA and Hq USAF/PREE is coninercial on report film forming foam aqueous of Light Waters of studies used Co UI DISCUSSION Composition Results The specific of analysis gravity of the at this laboratory concentrate is 1.020 are with pH Table of 7.8 in Composition of FC206 Table PARAMETER QUAUTITY Water -70% Diethylene Glycol Monobutyl Flurocarbon Structure not Sodium Sulfate Chemical Oxygen Demand Total Carbon Organic Surfactants MBAS as LAS Ether -27% 2% Determined 1% 500000 96000 41000 14000 Fluorine Respiration The incubation need mg/i mg/i mg/i mg/i Studies Biochemical over shown Oxygen for in Demand measurement of biochemical oxygen demand excess of the standard five days has been SOD is period pointed out by several investigators and reported previously Additionally incubation at 25C rather than the standard 20C allows determination of the Ultimate SOD in shorter time period without adverse affects on the micro in excess of 30C would alter organism composition although temperatures periods composition Figure as measured with the EIBOD is summary of these E/BOD curve showing the SOD Respirometer as previously measurements over 20-day reported Table E-14 US00006972 ____ ______ ----------- E400 300 200 250 ________________ ui/i ____ -_-i 100 ui/i ________ Solution _____ ____-____ ------- _- _______ ____ DAYS Figure BIological FC 206 by Kelly AFB as Oxygen Darnand USAF Environmental TX Function of Time of Health Laboratory 1974 E-iS US00006973 Table Sumary of Extended the ROE E/BOD From Data FC206 of of Measur8ment at 25 with Respirometer Percent of mg/i E/BOD2O E/BOD5 2.68X105 65.2 E/B0D10 3.95X105 4.10X105 96.1 E/80015 E/80D20 Respirometer Studies Warbur9 to with respect shows the variation in oxygen uptake Figure Acclimation of the microorganisms can be of the FC2OG concentration the increase seen by with respect to six percent time to Pilot solution Plant Table plant FC206 225 from reactor take of activated FC206 to plants began Most of the ui/i The to nature up was concentrations higher is from normal usage measured beyond not the 10 Studies concentrations creasing 200 oxygen bench-scale Two of rates at the in oxygen uptake of FC206 Since the dilution solution percent in 99.7 4.11X105 the Tables Table shows in synthetic sewage loss at show solids solids loss appeared the Composition of Synthetic Sewage in Biodegradability Studies Used 500 ul/l to mg/i Peptone mg/i 28.6 KH2 P04 Tap Water be ui/i from 160 HCO3 to FC206 200 lowered 160 Na an concentration physical in the solids over the side of the forcing for each surmiaries of the measured parameters in the first plant when the of solids recovery Glucose Urea were fed in plants of composition shown are was Table pilot action foaming and concentration sludge 102 32.5 mg/l mg/I mg/i US00006974 ji 40 30 Oxygen Uptake mg/1/hr 20 10 io2 Concentration Figure Oxygen FC 206 of EC 206 ui/i of Varying Concentrations Uptake Using the WarburgRespiroieter of E-17 US00006975 Fathead minnows Pimephales promelas were placed in at the beglnnin9 receiving effluent from each of the plants the study One fish succumbed in the first plant effluent after 27 days and one in the second effluent after 43 days indicating that the plant effluents were relatively non-toxic Five giant water fleas pphnia rnagna In each effluent container were placed on the 36th to the day and survived termination of the study 51 days Five container Table Sumary Sludge Synthetic No of Days 14 ui/i FC206 mg/i MLSS Avg Analysis of Samples From Activated Plant No Receiving FC206 and of Pilot Sewage pH Range je Days of 95.4 7.3-7.4 97.6 91.5 7.4-7.8 5.0-7.4 94.8 54.5 7.7 6.6 17.7 99 7.7-8.1 6.07.2 85.7 No 100 3363 200 3587 7.2-7.3 7.1-7.2 300 3016 7.2-7.4 400 2685 500 1763 300 1000 200 1513 Data 98.9 95.6 98.8 99 99 92.1 Surnary of Analysis of Samples mg/i MLSS Avg Percent TOD Removal 95.8 7.17.2 ui/i Removal No 7.2-7.3 3315 FC206 BOD5 97.8 3045 Sludge Pilot Plant Synthetic Sewage No Percent 4.0-6.2 4.2-4.4 4.C-5.6 4.0-5.6 4.0-6.0 5.8-6.2 50 75 Table D.O pH Range tb from Receiving D.0 Percent Range B0D Data Activated FC206 Removal and Percent TOD Removal mg/i 22 50 2397 7.2-7.5 75 2648 7.2-7.3 125 2863 7.3-7.3 225 3052 7.2-7.4 250 2985 7.0-7.2 300 2414 7.1-7.4 2.0-6.0 4.8-5.8 4.6-5.6 4.6-5.4 4.6-6.0 4.4-7.0 98.0 98.8 96.1 95.4 98.7 98.3 99 99 98.2 97.9 96.5 98.2 E-18 US00006976 Table Daily Measurement of MISS From 30th to 51st Days ui/i Day in Plant FC206 30 500 31 500 32 500 36 500 38 500 No mg/i MISS 2810 2650 2820 40 1020 39 500 1100 43 500 1100 44 300 1000 45 200 1280 46 200 1460 51 200 1800 Toxicity Studies METHODS AND MATERIALS Experimental Animals used the fathead minnow Pimephales Toxicity studies to determine the relative toxicity of FC206 solutions -promelas fathead minnows centrate and pilot effluents Sexually-immature plant The fish Fish Hatchery at Uvalde Texas were supplied by the Flational conditions and local water for were acclimatized to the laboratory Mean fish weight was 0.913 gm minimum of 30 days before use 0.370 fish food Immature fathead minnow fry The fish were fed commercial used in static bioassays were reared at EHL/K Age of fry at time of use was 21 days posure Procedure dilu flow type bioassays used proortional These diluters Mount and as developed by Brungs ting equipment tested to flowscaled dilutions of the compound being supplied logarithmic animals were concentration in which the chamber for each experimental through three held Studies with fry were static bioassays with fry per each oneContinual liter test concentration Tetramjn Distributor Tetra Sales Corp Heyward CA 94545 E-19 US00006977 Bloassays were performed described Standard in 12 Methods in and Sprague fed during not accordance with Test animals principles were not period assay fasted were the actual prior to testing They Ten fish were used for each concentration and the control chambers Exposure were plastic rat cages modified to contain liters of diluted toxicant 96-hour test 24 48 72 doses After the using these and 96 The flow same the test using random as the of diluted This of or oxygen animals table evaluate throughout the recorded data to quantal that into placed random numbers of control chamber was used the into the as 95% dissolved oxygen the fish were monitored changes Dilution counted was in the at graded The was in adjusted concentration as to dead when insure that other to time replacement The all gill the from were the same chambers test retention and movement cause of time ade insures quantal all in themselves water the In chambers exposure chambers contained diluent chamber hour to equal pH were The toxicant is maintenance of measured was death Dcssolved oxygen and lack to order water quate not of recorded on first in hours of hours was exposure response true 96 hour was bioassay replicate performed and concentrations as used in the first run procedures the bioassays random order by positioned water tank Response of the test animals Problt analysis was performed period response ceased death was pH Water Unchiorinated well water from used as deep well was dilution water in these studies The water was collected in 400 gallon at an on-base well site The water trailers bfiberglas trailertanks were hauled to the Laboratory and allowed to sit at least 24 hours before the water was used Air was bubbled the water The water was adjusted through to 24C before it was diluter by heating or cooling run into the proportional the The was 7.2 as CaCO3 was pH as the be as mg/i Treatment use of Data CaCO3 was 194 Total alkalinity mg/i LC50s or TL50s were determined by the probit analysis Litchfield and Wilcoxon Other statistical treatments such CHI2 test for Goodness of Pit were by standard formulas method To EDTA Hardness 160 of in this and the on Fire-Fighting foam reports previous chemicals criteria toxicity study results had to fulfill two important Graded quanted responses had to definitively relate to the logarithms of serial dilutions in each test chamber the results had to be repli used report ______ Concentration 50% Is concentration value statistically establishment of dose-related response of experimental the best estimation of the to toxicant The organisms IC50 represents death dose in 50% of the organisms Note that more required to produce toxic smaller IC50 The time period for which the 50% chemical has response was derived must also be indicated or derived Lethal from the E20 US00006978 cable The aquatic biota minimal effect establishment of dose-effect and time-effect relationships allowed scientifically based predictions of the ecological effects of the tested of water during use accfdental chemicals on spillage or disposal body Also the relative could be compared with another toxicity of one material perhaps with the goal of selecting one that would have the least effect on Finally the results concentrations could be used of water bodies In to that allowable set may receive or these materials as waste Results of Studies Toxicity The sexually immature from 800 ui/i to 2500 of FC2OG ranging 96 of exposure hours tion and there in no deaths were no the 2500 there at the deaths ui/i in 100 was 800 the ui/i 1050 minnows percent were see ui/i death concentration concentration to exposed Figure at the At ui/i 24 and concentrations 48 At 2500 hours 75 72 and concentra ui/i of exposure percent deaths concentration. illustrates the change in LC0 with increasing time Figure the percent of deaths increase with time of exposure lower reduction in the of the curve between 72 and 96 LC50s there is slope hours The reduction in the slope indicates that the 96 hour value may be the incipient threshold concentration Therefore approaching lethal IC50 for FC206 the 96 hour to be an adaquate estimation of is considered LC50 limits the incipient IC50 and can be used to set acceptable concentration of FC206 for short periods of time of exposure As The value for 96 IC50 the week for 1080 ui/i old value fry for was the 170 ui/i The fish IC50 indicates juvenile to the times more toxic approximately fry than Thus the increased sensitivity of immature forms indicates more mature forms that the limits of safety factor for short term using 1/10 application value would would and that 1/20 provide just adequate protection exposure be more desirable that the fry compared hour with FC2OG concentrate is E-2 US00006979 F1ire QUANTAL CURVL RESPONSE OF FISH EXPOSED TO FC 206 50% -- I.. RESPONSE 1Ek1 2500 .2500 __ __ Ij_ 1880 1400 III 1400 It .--L- 1050 ..- 800 ..I ..I_ -.1 -- TI i.1..F --k---. -.---.- 1- I. -I- TIME OF EXPOSURE I--.-- La .11.1 LC50 311/L 95% CONFIDENCE UPPER LIMITS LOWER SLOPE CURVE Hrs 2100 2350 1880 .1.29 4.2 48 Hrs 1810 2040 1600 1.31 1.8 72 Hrs 1310 1470 1170 1.30 1.1 96 Hrs 1080 1200 1.27 2.4 COMBINED RESULTS OF TOXICITY C-- 04 FIT 24 970 La CH12 OF La STUDIES liT .1 .L PERCENT C..5 0.2 C.5 20 40 50 RESPO1SE DEATH IIl 53 70 83 .-LI -- .- .J4LJ_ III iii 90 95 98 90 99.8 0.9 US00006980 Figure CHANGES IN 95% IC50 VALUES WITH CONFIDENCE LIMITS TIME OF EXPOSURE INDICATED 3000_..... c2000 jN 1000 700 24 48 HOURS 72 OF 96 EXPOSURE E-23 US0000698 Table each of of the A1F the ultimate indicates AFFFs with Comparison Is summary studied products SOD more Table of degree various 3M first measured parameters 4513 far thus five The for greater percentage on the newer pruducts days biodegradability of Comparison PARAMETER of the measured in the being rapid Studies Previously Various Parameters WATER LIGHT AFFFs of NATL FOAM SYSTEMS FC199 FC200 FC206 pH 4.6 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.9 Specific Water 1.02 0.989 1.020 1.062 1.031 Gravity 59% Diethylene Monobutyl COD Xi03 Glycol Ether mg/i X103 BOD X103 18 mg/i BODE 37 235 450 mg/i BODu Table for each the Table AFFF Changes with IC50 3M 96 the daily 411 in in changes concentrates mg/i mg/i 130 mg/i 354 in increase time in of rg/1 mg/i 100 mg/i mg/i 300 mg/i LC5s 45 during 96-hour studied to Fathead Minnows ui/l FOAM AOW FC200 mg/i exposure NATL WATER 10% 350 45 previously Toxicity of AFFFs Concentrations LIGHT FC199 mg/i 72% 10% 500 65 summarizes of mg/i 500 AOW 72% 27% 730 TOC bioassays 70% 39% 550 AOW SYSTEMS AOW Fcl06 24-Hour 48-Hour 72-Hour 96-Hour 2OO 1030 635 588 135 1810 820 255 450 97 1300 630 245 398 97 1080 600 225 650 No mortality concentration 150 in 24 l/l hours in in one duplicate bioassay but 50% in highest bioassay E- 24 US00006982 IV by CONCLUSIONS FC206 sludge No acute up to toxicity to activated sludge was microorganirns exhibited of the concentrate ui/i In synthetic sewage/activated of the concentrate for fire fighting operations Is six percent 100000 Dilution 60000 ui/i indicate Respiration studies that concentrations could up to 100000 ui/i waste treatment in oxidation ponds to Bench concentrations scale of 200 tions activated ui/i on sludge treatment plants effectively treated continuous feed basis Above this concentra were not able to build rapidly This was probably sludge microorganisms removal primarily to the physical direct toxicity to the rnicroorgnisms effluent from the plant being fed 500 due acclimation of microorganisms occur and would allow successful of solids Fathead through foaming rather than minnows and daphnia lived in ui/i in which the test fish toxicity studies Pir.aphales to continously replenished concentrations of FC205 the 96 hour LC5 was 1080 ui/i 0.11% The 96 hour value was considered to be anadequac estimation of the incipient lethal threshold concen LC50 and tration suitable for use with application factors to predict safe levels for short-term exposure periods In acute promelas were exposed ..r.. In FC2OG concentrate was approximately six times comparing toxicitles more toxic to fry than the larger juvenile Fathead minnows Also FC206 con centrate was less toxic to Fathead minnows than previously tested fire ftghting foams E-25 US00006983 RECOMMENDATIONS Wastewater should be fire-fighting training operations oil The waste shoud then be held passed through gravity separator natural oxidation and to in for or pond decomposition pumped secondary treatment at controlled flow rate facility Secondary treatment sewage could be from with provided the domestic sewage such that treatment plant will not contain in excess sewage This recommendation is based on training exercises intended for the term exposure more than affected the 96 calculated For days body of the 20 and influent ui/i Is of not to the the FC206 necessarily use operational Using 0.05 of hour safe IC50 of level situations concentration In of 1080 of which FC206 and ul/i FC2OG an concentrate the aquatic should not factor of application for short is 54 ui/i animals exceed will 20 ui/i be exposed in the water E26 US00006984 VI REFEREUCES Jr Fish Bioassays No 21 Biologia Vol Cairns Revista de Caskey William Texas University W.J Dixon ed 3rd Personal E.E LeFebvre Water Kelly E.E LeFebvre Toxicity 1971 Report Laboratory Communication to Statistical Analysis 1969 and Toxicity of Light Biodegradability 71-36 USAF Environmental Health No EHLK AFB Tx and J.F Thomas of AER-0-Water Foam Report No Laboratory Kelly 1973 and Biodegradability AER-O-Water Aqueous Film Forming 73-22 USAF Environmental Health Sand EHLK Ix AID and Litchfield Dose Effect Evaluating Vol 96 Therapeutics Mount 112 of Microbiology Dept Introduction York New pp TX Station College Massey McGraw-Hill 1969 Rating and Reproducibility Wilcoxon Simplified Method of Pharmacology Experimental Experiments 1949 pp 99-113 Device Brungs and Continuous Treatment the American Fisheries for of Holding Chambers Transactions Vol No 20 Jan1967 55-57 Society 96 pp of Fish D.I Mount Fish in Toxicology Sprague Vol ID 12 13 13 ed Simplified Dosing Apparatus for Brungs Studies1 Water Res 1967 Vol pp 21-29 pp Methods American for Acute Toxicity Water Res 793-821 Utilizing Vol Sprague Water Research Standard W.A Bioassay Methods 1969 Sprague Research 11 and 1970 Sublethal Vol pp and Applying Bioassay Results Water 3-31 Effects 1971 pp and SAFE Concentrations 245-266 the Examination of Water and Public Health Assoc New York for Waste Water 1971 and LeFebvre 1974 Biodegradability and of FC200 Aqueous Film Forming Foam Report No EHLK USAF Environmental Health Laboratory Kelly AFB Tx Thomas Toxicity 74-3 E- 27 US00006985 APPENDIX Participants in Study E-28 PARTI Biodegradability and Biodegradability Studies Project Toxicity Officer Maj of Light Edward Consul lit CI PANTS Water FC206 Aqueous Film Forming Foam LeFebvre tant Envi ronmental Chemistry Doane Consultant Environmental Britt Laboratory Techician Valdez Physical Sciences Aide Gregory Knerl Laboratory Techician Thomas Chemistry TSgt Samuel Mr Gilbert A1C L3ioassays Maj Roger Inman Veterniary Ecologist Toxicologist Techician MSgt Melvin Struck Laboratory Animal Techician TSgt Jerold Akey Laboratory Animal FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY E-29 US00006987 APPENDIX SMALL SCALE DISPERSION TEST small David basin Laboratory mixture was 18.8 with basin and analyzed those for increase in above The dye from of into pumped surface within collection center bottles dye COD It was assumed due to from visually Samples and was of feet patch TC levels background ppm poured concentration dye the The 100 six visible F-i table in the in samples the highest of mixture was small boat concentration dye are contained TC WT into basin from the the 3M Co FC-206 concentration to dyed from areas be to drawn Released AFFF of at Center Development 1975 P4 Basin Dungan and 4.5 gal called analyses Results that the of the presence AFFF Rhodamine lected F-i the at The dye can the rate factors in 1.2 were foot feet estimated of September hours Samples of one nine were on rhodamine 1412 at overboard depths Research of water 94 in Ship mixture was by weight conducted was of 71.2 gal AFFF/water the test Naval Taylor Annapolis and scale concentration one foot relationship be of used to the centration after for and dye was Therefore be can of known study dilution that to develop decrease quantity of Although dilution the data in col figure AFFF of different used the in demonstrates TC dispersion predicting in the and dye for samples are plotted depth the study release similar conditions in same TC data and between AFFF dispersion applicable 0.3 simulate in change remained situ dye factors dye from an dilution AFFF con AFFF under area F-i US00006989 Table F-i of Laboratory Analyses of Water Basin Before and from Dungan Samples of AFFF and Rhodamine Dye After the 1ddition TC COD DepthThye oncentration1 Time Tm ppb Results TT jj/2 Bkgd 0.3 13krd 0.3 15.6 13.8 i4.S 1.3 Bkg 1.3.8 68 70 dye Release 1.412 128 125 l.OxlO5_ppb 1.1T5 1415 D.3 1.8 8.9 8.3 1.417 1.417 0.3 1.8 40.6 49.5 25.7 0.3 21.8 1.419_ 1419 1420 1420 1422 1422 14231423 1424 1424 1425 1425 1425 1427 1427 1427 1430 1430 1430 84 184 104 100 10.9 80 68 148 76 64 88 14.1 8.5 18.2 15.3 3.7 16.6_ 11.9 l._8 2.7 0.3 1.8 2.7 144 160 14.8 19.4 1.C 0.3 1.8 2.7 0.3 1.50 22.4 1.8 0.3 96 80 17.8 1.8 O.3_ 18.6 1S.7 29.6 33.2 24.8 14.6 23.8 34.8 14.1 14.1 19.2 14.6 14.1 2.1 132 152 100 68 188 64 13.6 14.8 96 F-2 US00006990 FIGURE F-I SHOWING RELATIONSHIP OF AFFF CONCENTRATION MEASURED AS TOTAL CARBON TO DYE CONCENTRATION LINEAR REGRESSION LINE 30 26 95 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS 24 Al 22 12 IS IA 21 24 DYE DATA AT FOOT O.3M DEPTH DATA AT FOOT I.8M1 DEPTH 51 ppb US0000699 APPENDIX TENTATIVE SCHEDULES ALLOCATION FOR SHIP AND PLANS CHT PIFR AND CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS SWOBS SEWERS US00006992 TABLE ACTIVITIES SHIP-TO-SHORE WHICH SEWAGE HAVE/PLAN TO TRANSFER TOGETHER C-i HAVE PIER.SIDE FACILITIES WITH FACILITY DESCRIPTION FOR AND STATUS 15 October 1976 PCR LOCATION MCON NO NO DESCRIPTION STATUS COMPLEX NORFOLK P807 NAVSTA W289D 71220212223 24 CONST.COMPL UNDER CONST FACILITY PIER UNTIL 6/78 PIER 25 UNDER CONST UNTIL 7/77 PIERS P-206 W131J PIERS 56575859 CONST W2 89E PIERS 234510 UNDER CONST PORTSMOUTH pgil P177 W164G WHARFS UNDER NAB LITTLE P-207 W131K PIERS 1121523272933 353638394145 1811151619 NSY PORTSMOUTH P-999 W164A PIER P176 P036 W027D PIER W304A PIERS NAB LITTLE CREEK NAVSTA NSY SAN DIEGO CREEK COMPL OPERATING FACI LITY OPERATING UNTIL 1/77 CONST UNTIL 4/77 UNDER CONST UNTIL 3/77 UNDER CONST UNTIL 4/77 COMPLEX NAVSTA NSSF 50005002 CONST.COMPL CONST.COMPL DEPERMING FACILITY OPERATING FACILITY OPERATING PIER NAS P313 NORIA WO18L IJK WHARFS CONST.COMPL MUNICIPAL COMPL NAVSTA P-179 W027F PIERS 568 UNDER Lift CONST Station CONN Prob Pump UNTIL 5/77 UNTIL 1/78 PIER CONST.COMPL SMALL CRAFT MOLE CONST COMPL CONST COMPL UNDER CONST BASIN PIER PIERS 123 PIER P191 W032j P198 PIER 10 PIERS 111213 NSC P-022 W209K BROADWAY W209j FUEL NTJC P023 P059 W028D PIERS P-057 W028C SAN P-093 W220C PIERS NAB NC CORONADO letter to CNO 25A1WLRhla Control PIER CLEMENTE 12/78 PLANNED EST.COMPLETION 12/79 PLANNED EST.COMPLETION 12/80 UNDER CONST UNTIL 12/76 UNDER UNTIL 12/77 UNTIL PLANNED ISLAND PLANNED CONST EST EST UNDER CONST 3813 No EST.COMPLETION LOMA PIER PT.LOMA 12 PT PLANNED 61023 Seria 5054 of 16 November COMPLETION 6/78 COMPLETION 7/79 1976 12/77 enclosure US00006993 cont TABLE PCR LOCATION MCON NO NO DESCRIPTION STATUS CHARLESTON NSC P-903 W305A NSY PIER CDFGHJKLM NPQRSTU PIERS NAVSTA PIERS NWS P-901 W11H WHARF P-964 W049X WHARFS P-119 W057G PIERS PIERS BC UNDER CONST CONST UNDER CONST UNDER CONST UNTIL 6/77 UNDER UNTIL 6/77 UNTIL 6/77 UNTIL 11/76 CONST.COMPL FACILITY CONSP.COMPL awaiting MAYPORT NAVSTA PEARL HARBOR BCDA OPERATING COMPLEX NSB S1S5S8S9 hose UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CCIST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL UNDER CONST UNTIL sewage transfer NAVSTA P-991 W165G NSY 81-826 PIERS Bi.-B21GD1-GD5 02 NAVSTA P-991A W165H MR NO M1-M4 PIERS NSC Mi-H4 NSB S1O-S14S20S21 NAVSTA P-179 W1651 A1-A7S15-S19F1-F5 NAVSTA P-179A W1653 Vi-V4K3-K. F12F13 NAVMAG P-179B W1653 W1-W5 P400 WOO7M PIER P-133 WOO7N PIERS NSC SAN UNDER DESIGN UNDER DESIGN 2/77 2/77 2/77 2/77 2/77 2/77 10/77 10/77 EST.COMPL EST.COMPL 7/78 3/79 FRANCISCC NAS ALAMEDA 12 NWS CONCOPD P-153 WOO8F PIER NSY VALLEJO P-203 WO31F WHARFS PIERS NSC PUGET OAXLNID P-00234 WO19F 2-2024 21-23 CONST.COMPL CONST.COMPL FACILITY OPERATING FACILITY OPERATING PLANNED PLANNED EST.COMPLETION 6/80 EST.COMPLETION 5/78 PLANNED PLANNED EST.COMPLETION 5/78 EST.COMPLErION 12/79 SOUND NTS KEYPORT P-190 W146j WHARF NSY BREMERTON P-166 w144K PIERS NSC BREMERTON P-038 W147N FUEL CONST EST EST PLANNED UNDER 3-8 PIER PLANNED UNTIL 1/77 COMPLETION 1/80 COMPLETION 5/77 US00006994 TABLE G-1 cant PCR LOCATION LONG MCON NO NO DESCRIPTION STATUS BEACH NAVSTA P-131 WO14F PIERS 91115 CONST.COMPL NSY P172 W0151 PIERS 12365 CONST.COMPL NAVSTA P-133 WO14G PIER P-096 W035C WHARF P157 w040D PIEP.S NWS SEAL BEACH GRN/NEW NSB NEW CONST UNTIL 1/77 EST COMPLETION PLANNED UNDER 7/78 LONDON LONDON 1468101213151731 CONST.COMPL awaiting sewage hose EST COMPLETION 9/79 CONST.COMPL awaiting sewage transfer NUSC P-116 W332A PIER p999 WO51K PIERS PLANNED PENSACOLA NAS 302302 transfer WASHINGTON D.C NAVSTA P-194 POSM0UTH hose W042j PIERS 14 CONST.COMPL FACILITY OPERATINC PIERS 123 CONST.COMPL FACILITY OPERATING N.H NSY ADAK NAVSTA P-834 W0021 PIER P-771 W19OA PIERS P-047 W063C PIER p-999 W2665 SOUTH PLANNED EST COMPLETION 12/79 PLANNED EST COMPLETION 6/77 PLANNED EST COMPLETION 8/79 EARLE NWS NEW 23 ORLEANS NSA PANAMA NSCL CITY DOCK EAST DOCK CONST.COMPL transfer awaiting sewage hose US00006995 TARL.. G-1 cont PCR LOCATION PORT MCON NO NO DESCRIPTION STATUS HUENEME CBC P-332 W023K WHARFS P336 W136C PIER P451 P443 W1O6D PIERS 124 W1068 PIERS 56 2-6A EST PLANNED COMPLETION 9/79 YORKTOWN NWS UNDER CONST UNTIL 1/77 PHILADELPHIA NSY UNDER CONST UNTIL 11/76 CONST.COMPL awaiting sewage hose transfer ROOSEVELT ROADS NAVSTA P997 Willil PIERS P094 WOG4X AB 123 UNDER CONST UNTIL 4/77 UNDER CONST UNTIL 11/76 UNDER CONST CONST CONST UNTIL 11/76 UNTIL 11/76 UNTIL 11/76 GUAM NAVSTA NAVSHIPREPPAC LMN RST NSD NAVMAG UNDER UNDER NAVSPA P-107 W064R OMN W2SRC PLANNED EST AWAITING AWARD NAVRESCTR PIERSEWER EST.cct.IPL OF OF CONST.Cc4rRAcr CONST 4/77 WA NAVRESCTR OMN W151C PIERSEWER AWAITING AWARD EST.C0MPL EVERETT 12/79 OR PORTLAND TACOMA COMPLETION OF OF CONST.CONTRACT CONST 4/77 WA NAVRESCTR OMN PIERSEWER UNDER CONST UNTIL 1/77 US00006996 TABLE G-1 cont PCR LOCATION GALVESTON MCON NAVRESCTR PETERSBURG DESCRIPTION STATUS W322A PIERSEWER STRUCT W329A PIERSEWER STRUCT W324A PIEPSENER 11 PLANNED EST COMPLETION 7/77 PLANNED EST COMPLETION 7/77 PLANNED EST COMPLETION 1/78 PIERSEWER PLANNED EST COMPLETION 12/78 PIERSEWER PLANNED EST COMPLETION 10/78 PIERSEWER PLANNED EST COMPLETION 10/77 FL NAVRESCTR MCNR P-241 NY BRONX NO MCNR P032 ST NO TX Fort Schy ler NAVRESCTR MCNR P-315 PERTh AMBOY NAVRESCTR MCNR P-346 PORTLAND W338A ME NAVRESCTR MCNR P-343 W340A BALTThOREj NAVRESCTR MCNR P-243 JACXSONVILLE BOSTON NEWPORT NAVSTA W072A FL NO PIERSEWER PLANNED NO PIERSEWER PLANNED MA RI NETc P-208 W116 PIERSEWER PLANNED US00006997 TABLE G-l cont PCR LOCATION GREAT MCON NO NO DESCRIPTION NO MADDALENA HOLY ROTA PIERSEWER PLANNED JAPAN YOKOSUXA LA STATUS IL LAKES LOCH IT SC WILL USE SWOB WILL USE SB SPAIN BANRAIN CAETA NAPLES BROOKLYN Bennett NY Floyd Field NAVRESCTR MCNR P-319 W337R PIERSEWER PLANNED US00006998 TABLE SHIPS WASTE FY74 OFFLOAD BARGE SWOB PROCUREMENT G-2 ALLOCATION FY75 PLAN AND OIL OIL ALLOCATED PROCUREMENT OIL DELIVEREr ALLOCATED BE ALLOCATEE OIL DELIVERED TOTAL ALLOCATED SEWAGE SEWAGE OIL SEWAGE Portsmouth NAVSHIPYD WPNSTA DELIVERED SCHEDULE FY76 TO ALLOCATED DELIVERY PROCUREMENT lNot Earle NAVSHIPYD WPNSTA Phildadeiphia Yorktown NAVSTA Norfolk NAVPHIBASE NAVSHIPYD NAVSTA Little Charleston NAVSHIPYD Charleston NAVSHIPYD Puget NAVSHIPYD Mare NAVFUELDEP NSC -J Sound Is land Point 1Jan 77 Molate Oakland NAVSHIPYD Long NAVSTA Diego Island NAS 0_ Creek Norfolk San North NAVSHIPYD Beach Pearl NAVSTA Pearl NAVSTA Guam NAVSTA Subic FLEACT Bay Yokosuka NAVSTA Rota NAVSUPPO La Harbor Harbor Maddalena NAVSTA Roosevelt NAVSTA Guantanamo Notes 2Jan 77 1-Jan 77 Roads Bay TOTALS Infoatjon lNote 1Note lNote 2Note 1Note lNote provided 22 22 20 by Naval Facilities Engineering One barge delivered stored by contractor to final destination 13 Command at NAVFAC NAVSHIPYD Three in July 1976 to barges delivered by contractor of opportunity to final destinations Two barges delivered in September 1976 by contractor of opportunity to final destinations Three barges delivered in July by contractor tow of opportunity to final destinations 13 104 Puget NAVSHIPYD January 1977 be delivered 10 Sound 47 to Long Beach by to await to NAVSHIPYD Long INACTSHIPPAC Portsmouth Beach 13 contracto Navy tow to await Navy to await Navy tow 1976 to US00006999 Tr tNT .74 ox 05.fl 3.10 cc-I 0.11 P3.11.1 flIou AS-Il 0CC-Il FrIa Dccli rrc.I 11.101 054 51.1 51.14 a. 0.11 3I AD AT.. AT III At-ti LIII 11.0 CC .fl D.3 tCN.li DCC.40 D3-7 11101 11.10 CC-Il OO 00.03$ Dtfr-I.$ n0.G tin- Is CC.-I1 Is 110.01 All Is PT In Pt II Is Is II 14 Il is In 14 15li 05.11 Is 511 IA Is In ti to 11-Ill 11.1001 171G InC-it rr- IP.I04I PIG-IS Fl-IS tAG-i II.IO7O DIG-ID IF-lOS SIC-I DC-lA II 1071 DIG-Il on- lOll DIG- 1-IO FF- IF-lOll DIG-Al PlC All-Il Ap.s_.I PVC-l.A .tA lfli Al-li atI 1.1 5-3 Aol-I MS-I 75-1 1%-I All-ID Al-il 71-Ill ISO AGI rr.Io 137.1150 AID-I AllIll Al- IS LITIll AlS.f Afl-l 15 Irn-Il Itt-lilA Ltli-7 LST.tlS 05.4 IS Is .a iA-Iil LSIi.l LIIA.ll 1.50.30 L1.l.S 1.11AI LID-IS LVII 110.1 tillIl I. ISPil in lit-hIll I.5T-IISA is In Al-S USC. ACOS.i All- Cv.. PAI ID-a tu-10 lIT 1110 Si 1.01 IA.Ii3 .trnoie Ill-illS COOPLITIOWS 110.11 LST.Iill C05FLtT Itll ST OF CC-il lASTlAIS Sic ill 107.1 PAittlU 1W 71711 III lILtti040 0-IA 1ST-Ill lIt liT-I Ill 151.1111 PASlIALO LID-I IA Il-A 1111.1 10 151.70 111001 70 110-SIb 11.1040 Ill-I Fl 1004 11G LID-li I.l0 Ill-Ill ID II II litIl AllI All-I cPtrTImis PAIl t3D-14 LKA.lIJ IS .1 II 747t Lt.iIl ICC-tO IAIS II II Ltt.IISI 1111 CC-il CCII- 1.11 ATI-Il 5-I All IDA 11-110 11%-i ill IIlCltKtIlTAU IIAISSNWTALJ 1.41 CA-lOIS tV-Ill CY-ItS .41411 LID-fl lb I0 lv. Alt-li tv-IAS 11111110 CY.04 II 10 11 CV- IllltNlilT CIAS CV-MI V.41S 5.1 75 Didl.I be a-pt tIatapt. l.e. le3I. T.t.I tl lit 15 yl iAIIIAI IA I. IIIIAIIIIIIO tehhs 5Ip4I4 Aft T...b pIpIng senpII.lw4 tpIet In.t.IIe4 Is Ta h.d Interface p-li 11- tO Al-I5 UT.lll3 II .iL at ii UI Iso-lIlt v.47 Ship/Shore IIC.A DC 11.101 Aol-li Li- LID-I 1f lMl1tI CHT ua-lI r.I0lt l.II Ill Lro-A IA Oil 11.10 0.11 Alt3 is 11.100 II LrII.ll 71 74 IA cc Lot- Au-Il 31 Lrlu.1 .11 rr II 5.1 At-I 0l.i LIt Dx .fl Al. At- 7.%l FAUTIU .si 0-l Sill- FCC- Al.l-4 AS-lA CV.IS 1-117 _C.ILL IIl.iI.I UII.lI 15.1.1 Al- 31 I.10.IO Is 11.110 All-Ia ICC-I tlISIMIIITA1.S 15.1 All-Il lN Fl-tOO Fl-lOS lItt 555.13 CD-llS 11.1011 I1.Iil C11l Il A0-5 OAC.0 IIIC.Il UiV-tl 77 A0.l1.3 11-loll Al-il 75 Af.i orc PlC-s Al.40 IN llI-l Cl-fl F-to 11-1000 1111.11 In Cviu.sS7S 11-1040 II tIC.O AIS.J In If.lQsO 11-1041 Ip.I5 ri-to II 071 IF-lu loll CYll 11.1004 11.101 FIG-il 111071 IltOIl Il-to 11.101 CCID CCil oiC.I CC.I hn.I ox-Il IIIE II 75 is rr.ioi 11.101 P1-lOs pa i.Cc.i DCC11.130 LID-IS 11-103 00.11 IIC.A list DO-Ill Cv.I1 C-. fl Cc.10 1.11 Ill-IO 1..s 11.1003 lIt is 11-Ill CC-lb All-Il UIl.I Os .t 10.510 DO-IA 70-50 Us-fl If cv..Z 11.1051 AC ii t.fl5 ICIA 11-1010 no.l 0CC-A 1ST-tIlt LAUIALS CC-i 11.10 AS.l CV.a1fl7 rrIo 11-100 110-10 F. IT. COPLIttt CIlILttt5 00.11 Nl.144 74 DO Ii APS Al. IllLIT IltI CC Fr-los li cC.U I.IOIA no- All-Il lIt 05-I LS- CoD COIPLCTO$ 571.141 CC.l4 stPtps IT CC.Is -Io AS SCHEtiI..r 7.71 CO7eLETU .lt G-3 IN COMPLL. 10. Is hs...I 5.pIlti.il SV Iydronauticq II t5I.IISSl l044.I 51104.1 .1 85.54 IISISIASISI. VT.SI p.ltI.I pIpIe p..l.n p.ll.n FOR Technical 5eIlI.d .1 p.Ii.l ISICASI Ill .r.d.It5.l5.4 ____________ Information Book ye II tS-I.ti.i. TWIt Peport 7607.1 prepared for OFFICIAL NAVSEC US 6159 ONLY October 976 US00007000 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY U800007001