FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION


DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
l210789-0

Total Deleted Page(s) 2 3
Page 235 Duplicate;
Page 236 Duplicate;
Page 237 Duplicate;



Deleted Page(s) 
No Duplication Fee 
For this Page 



 

 

 

1 .a

tom N0 Io . sow-10?
MAY nu come?
(in am. no. no. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

 

 

son
elmnl
Mohr.
DeLcach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. 
emomndum Wm??
Conrad
4 Evans 
19 
TO Mr. Mohr DATE: October 29, 1964 ?135!?
)g I Tivo?IG.??n 
Trotter.
FROM C.D eLoach 
., Candy
SUBJECT:

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY POSITION
U. S. SECRET SERVICE



107}

is} mlan/k 

5


qr

f.
Dick Chappell, Director, U. S. Board of Parole, called me at
3:00 p. m. today to indicate he had been requested to recommend an individual for

the captioned position. He stated the position would carry an Assistant Secretary's

title and salary. He stated he wanted to recommendme for the position and he hoped
that I would be willing? to be considered.

- I thanked Mr. Chappell for his consideration and told him that while I

was honored, I had no de?sir?zto leave the FBI and would not take the position even if
it were offered to me.

ACTION: 

i

For record purposesLCDD saj 5
s)
or
a; 43th ,ai? 
775221202:
NOJIO 1964

 

 

 

November 18, 1964
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha DLAeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I 8 3
none 
5131116 9?3 ii MN

It is a pleasure to commend you for the
superior manner in which you handled your numerous
responsibilities the past several years incident to the
preparation and broadcast of material for the NBC

radio program "Monitor. 

You have exhibited a high degree of enthu-
siasm for and interest in this project and the wide-?
spread coverage obtained has certainly enhanced the
prestige of the Bureau. In presenting the FBI to the
public through this means, you have performed a
valuable service and I want you to know of my deep

appreciation.

 

1 mused i Sincerely,

NOV 1 81964 \U/?sar Hawa-


1 - Miss'Usilton (Sent Direct)

 

 

 

 

    
 

J: ?m

55': 3313 It" ?3 
Base'd om memo Jones to DeLoach 11- 64 and Mr. Mohr 3 note re:
"Letter Regarding: National Broadcasting Company

4/ 'Monitor' Radio Series ?33; Firs mm 1

 

 

Casper
Callahan 
Conrad 
Evans 
Gaie
Rosen
Sullivan 
Tove!
Trotter
Tele. Room

 

    

22"

?Sagutation per Reading Room
\Vl} 9% ?1523
Holmes?m

Candy MAIL ROCHE: TELETYPE um 

 

 



   

 

 

 

 

 

 

11
""23'5
IOIM N0 I0



.. . ., UNITED STAFES GOVERNMENT

 

6'

.
sow-loo 
MAY I962 (ONION
GSA GEN no no 27

Memorandum

T0 Mr- DeLoach om: 11?13-64 
FROM M, ms/ Tele. 

 

.Holmes
Gandy

SUBJECT: LETTER OF APPRECIATION REGARDING . ja?/ 
NATIONAL BROADCASTING COMPANY (NBC) .1
RADIO SERIES

BACKGROUND: (L D. Q. L0 

 

 

 

CJH:.eab (82

During February and March, 1962, at the request of NBC officials, you
recorded two 5-minute programs concerning the crime rate increase and the Lindbergh
kidnaping for use on captioned program. Shortly thereafter, NBC reported that the
response to these broadcasts had been tremendous, that NBC officials were most
enthusiastic concerning them and were desirous of having similar broadcasts on a regular
basis if at all possible. The Director approved that we go ahead and cooperate with NBC.

1

Since that time, ?Monitor? has used two programs concerning the FBI every
week. "Know Your is 5 minutes in length and features NBC Announcer Russ Ward
and you discussing some phase ofthe Bureau's Work. We also furnish material for
?National Alert, which is about 3 minutes in length and is recorded by an NBC announcer
in New York and publicizes badly wanted Bureau fugitives. To date, there have been 103
"Know Your and 133 "National Alert? programs.

BENEFITS TO THEEBUREAU:

 

me

an ?Monitor" is the rated radio program in the Nation with an
estimated 14 million listeners through 192 affiliated stations all over?the country. 91
This is a prestige program and no doubt we are getting exceptional "mileag?" from I
whatever materialgwe place on it. In almost three years, we have never receivedsa' 
critical comment concerning our "Monitor" programs. On the contrary, they haye been 
enthusiastically received and NBC officials have continually reiterated their desige that
these programs continue. In 1962, representatives of NBC affiliated stations selected ?3
"Know Your as an outstan 'ng programmdwaswsult, .NBQOf?cials presented the

Bir?ctow aplaque. I 67" 3 390 {.137 ?a

?1.1.1 I .. .
95k 1'lttiearched?t Numbered A .


   
   

 

9 In March, 1963, we began rnishingth colp?gs _qof all
"Mmiactor. With this material available, ?gas felt vra 1?0 ad teleJ' app aragces .
by the field would be encouraged. Since that time, there has been a marked: m- 
number of radio and television programs byeSpeciaEl??Agents in Charge(SACs) an'd 
Assistant Special Agents in Charge: in 1962, there were 1,024 radio, 220 television E31
appearances, in 1963, 1,680 radio, 353 television: appearances, durig: the first 9 

of 1964, there we 2,121 radio, 35:? television' appearance The fin fi re for 964
1%:1n la?loraore doubt, far exceed those of prior years. 

1? Mr. Tolson - Enclosure 1- Mr. DeLoach- Enclosure $(contimied, next page) 

 

 

L300

 

M. A. Jones to DeLoach
Re: LETTER OF APPRECIATION

A major factor in this increase is certainly due to the large number of
"Monitor" scripts furnished to all offices, and this is indicated by the many SACS.
who have stated they find this material invaluable and use it continually.

OBSERVATIONS:

 

Our participation in "Monitor? has been successful in every way and of
incalculable benefit to the Bureau. It is felt, therefore, that an appropriate letter of
appreciation over the Director's signature should be sent to Honorable Robert W.
Sarnoff, Chairman of the Board, National Broadcasting Company, Inc. mentioning
the fine cooperation we have received from William McDaniel, NBC Executive
Vice President; Robert .Wogan, Vice President in Charge of Programs; and NBC
Announcer Russ Ward. .

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That the attached letter be sent.

 

 

 


:5 


.,
November 30, 1964

?rst} PERSONAL

 

Mr. Cartha DQeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoachi

I am taking this opportunity to commend
you and to advise that I have approved an incentive
award for you in reCOgnition of your superb perform-
ance in making the necessary arrangements for my
visit to Chicago and for your outstanding work. in the
recent past in other matters of importance to the
Bureau. a A check representing an award of $500. 00
will be forwarded to you at a later date.

You have demonstrated your usual inge-
nuity, competence and astuteness in carrying out your
numerous responsibilities and, as a result, these 
matters have been handled with exemplary smoothness
and finesse. I want you to know I am sincerely
appreciative of your exceptionally valuable services.



    
    
      
 

 

 

Sincerely, new 1). 0.
My me
venom/1:. Q: 
we 1 Payroll Distribution (Sent Direct) Bi; 
fr" 
kg? 3 1 MISS (Sent Direct)

Tolson

"4 2
Belmo r. at?? ..
,MOhr 1' Hi . a
(5) 

 

 

DeLooch W.
Gaspar

Callahan f" 
Centre f: {3173:9111}; We
sage??.? t?ifz? 3 igi?ivard #312?65 ?5 

q] 
MR

gw? NOTE: Salutation per ?le.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIL noon TELETYPE mm 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mew i Yr: Cr
. ?no: A
0??u_0m ?m0m3>r 0C3m>c 


WMFOE m4 OIMOXVSAA

 

 

 

 
 
   

 

 



22.40502 A .
:m.mmr:024
3%
.
s. 


Zn. O>m?m?
Zn?. 

.23. m<>2m
O>rm

mme2

23w 4><mr
43044m?
ZAwm 

22mm 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Ema?0 4.0 >440m~2m204m >20 A . 
nmmu>mm mmvr< A A 

.

A

   

TIOAN <0Cm~ 
4.1m ?>04m~

IOFU 

Imzb?wwnm?

 

 

 
 

1 253339

 

 

omo 

 

.




 

 

ANNA

A

h.

 

 

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss,

like to do so.

encounters.

and sometimes anxiety and apprehension.

 

I
Mr. T0130
1 Mr. Belm'on
Mom.


December 5, unease?g?E?
Mr. 


1/
mm

 

oach 
asper.g
:?Callahan

r. 

 

Mr. Evans.

.I
um
-

Mr. wrd-uu-??

Miss 

 

Tele. 1

Miss 

 

 

A l'll-I'I WC.

Thanks very much for the Incentive Award.
If there were any way I could show my appreciation to

you over and above enjoyable hard work, I would ?certainly
After all, I'm merely the fellow who holds
the coat while you do the fighting and the face to face

Controversy causes increase of work

your team, however, not only gives the assurance of
right makingmight, but also the comfortable security ?of
being led by a man who can well handle himself. Your

handling of the King interview was superb.

once again through a trial period.

To fight on

I'm very grateful you have led us successfully

I realize that although

our enemies have once again turned tail and headed for
the bushes, we still must remain on the alert for constant
further attacks. You have my pl?greagl this regard.

a
65";

8 DEC 151954

 

Sincerely, ?75113 a? 7?72 mf?eg?g .i

9 DECN111964


C. DGLoac 

Mi

 

 

 

l' Tolson



December 11, 1964
PERSONAL

k.


Mr. Cartha DeLoach 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I want to commend you for the continued
superior manner in which you discharged -
ons resronsibilities in connection with the I

 

case.

 

 

Belmont
Mohr
DeLoach 
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Evens
Gale
Roses
Sullivan ?s
:g
Trotter
7919- Room ?w
Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 - Miss (Sent Direct) jg, 
vi?, Cm: et ti, 45-31315?; 
27:74 W- arming-a 
3

The success which the Bureau has achieved
in this controversial matter can be attributed in no
small measure to the aggressive and efficient work
you did. I do not want the opportunity to pass without
extending my sincere appreciation to you for your

 

 

 

 

valuable contributions. :3 $3
174:: 
Sincerely, ?7o 
MAILEQ 
0- Edgar Hoover 3' 4?
DEC 141964 :23 
ca ?so-
coma/me: 59 ?3
??st

4 'u

9) Eli-.8 ?is? v}
Mme

Based on memo Dav1dsogn?v? to Callahan41279/6?4? n3 addendum Mr. Callahan

12/10/64 

NOTE: Salutation )(aper Reading Room.

Egg/18f 1955L

MAIL soon C3 TELETYPE unn- :1

b6

  

 

 

Fri-253% .
.
RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

?1/12/65

I certify that I have received the following Government property for official use:



Klan Organizations, Section - 1958:1964 (C OPY 6)

 

READ 
Very truly yours, 
The Government property which you hereby acknowledge
is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care 
i 

of it and returning it when its use has been completed.
(Signature)


.DO NOT MARK 0R IT OR UTILATE IT IN I 

?i?f?Pfg-E- I A (Typed name) Cartha Dekle 

?11 L1

73 in 271955 xi

Ir?

 

 

 

 

H:

 

 

is

December 2?1} 1964
PERSGNAL ATTENTION

l?dr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, I). C.

Dear Mr. DeLoach;

The findings of the recent inspection of the Crime Records Division
have been carefully reviewed and the various operations have been rated as
follows: Physical Condition and Maintenance, Administrative Operations and

Personnel Matters Very Good; Specific Bivision: Operations and Contacts ..
Excellent.

Your space was found to be secure, well arranged, neatly maintained
and adequate, with the exception of the offices occupied by the Uniform Crime
Reporting Section in the Old Post Office Building. 1 am aware that arrangements
have been completed for that section to move into new quarters in the same
building in the near future. At that time, the crowded and otherwise undesirable
conditions now existing should be alleviated. Close contact should be continued g}
with representatives of the General Services Administration to insure that there 
is no unnecessary delay in making the new space available and also to have the
deficient lighting in five of the rooms occupied by the Division corrected as
soon as possible. The minor housekeeping delinquencies detected by the
inspector should be rectified. 



In order to effectively discharge our ever-increasing responsibilities,
this Bureau must have the respect and support of an enlightened public. Review
of the Inspector's report indicates you and your staff have aggressively and
imaginatively pursued the objective of presenting the true role of the FBI
through varied news media. This commendable activity should be continued,
utilizing all logical facets of the press, radio and television to obtain ma?mum
exposure to the public of the Bureau?s responsibilities and accomplishments.

The emphasis which has been placed on fugitive publicity continues
to result in positive benefits, as evidenced by the success attained in the Top
(3. Callahan (AttentionMr. C. B. Davidson) (With Enclosure)
WK Personnel File Cartha @Loach

of Crims Records Division
catsuit uses page 3.

was? 

 

 

 

 

M'hwwm?

 i

I i

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach

Ilien Fugitive Program since the last inspection. Careful selection of fugitives
for this program is, necessary to sustain our fine accomplishments to date.

The improved format and other innovations your Division hntiated in connection
with the Law Enforcement Bulletin are in keeping with my desire to maintain
this publication's status as the foremost law enforcement journal in the country.
You should implement the mopector's recommendation regarding a
staggered schedule of field submissions to enhance the timeliness of same.

It is a source of satisfaction that an ever-increasing number of people
are being conducted on Bureau tours. The many complimentary letters received
regarding our tours attest the quality attraction this has become. In view of the
tremendous public relations value of Bureau tours, it is apparent that your
Division must continue to assiduously monitor each tour leader on a sufficiently
frequent basis to detect and correct any weaknesses.

I was pleased to observe that the Correspondence and Tours section 5
average daily production of dictated mail has increased since the last inspection.
While the accuracy rate is certainly favorable, even greater attention must be
devoted to further reduction of errors since the public expects nothing short of
absolute accuracy in correspondence from the FBI. You must constantly stress
to employees that this correspondence must be handled strictly in accordance
with Bureau policy and that employees must anticipate possible embarrassment
wihioh can result from any inaccuracies in replies to correspondence from out-

8 de sources.

It is gratifying to note that major revisions to improve the quality
of crime reporting have been implemented by the Uniform Crime Reporting
Section. We cannot become complacent in this area of our responsibilities.
The auto theft survey conducted by this section which was the basis for changes
in ignition systems in all 1965 model Buicks and Chevrolets and the article on
?Crime's Cost to industry" are good examples of worthy accomplishments.
The new program for following up on known criminal offenders has already
produced valuable data winch was not previously available. This? latter program
should be afforded close attention to assure that its full potential is realized.
You should attempt implementation of the Inspector's suggestion regarding the
obtaining of dispositions of arrests to further enhance the usefulness of da
being compiled under this program. 

The large volume of official information being disseminated to the
White House is, of course, of great value to the President. You and your entire
staff must afford these memoranda the closest scrutiny to preclude potential

 

 

0? *5

Mr. Cartha D. Delmach

embarrassment to the Bureau as a result of any incorrect, incomplete or
improper summarication of information available in Bureau ?ies.

Supervisory and administrative assignments were observed to be
equitably shared. Continue to insure that all voluntary overtime is essent1&1,
productive and equitably shared. I was pleased to note the Inspector
observed that the morale of your Division appeared to be very high.

The inspection survey revealed the stenographic and typing production-
was above the Seat of Government average. While the production attained
during this inspection was lower than during the last inspection, it is
encouraging to note a marked improvement in the number of retyped pages,
the latter now being below the Seat of Government average.

The personnel assigned to the Crime Records Envision was deemed
by the Inspector to be adequate and not excessive, As you are aware, manpower
continues to be critical in the Bureau and the test for justification of each
position is that it is essential to the proper discharge of Division responsibilities a
rather than merely desirable.?

The extremely effective liaison program of your Division with key
figures in Government, industry and in other circless has been absolutely vital
in promoting the best interests of the Bureau. I am fully aware of the out-
standing leadership you have afforded the Division in spearheading its 
plishments, The valuable services rendered to the ?Bureau resulting from highly
cooperative contacts in the news media field are to a great extend due to the 
alertness and aggressiveness which you and your associates have displayed,
In order for the Bureau to continue to fully and effectively discharge its many 
critical and sensitive responsibilities, we must be constantly alert not only to
maintain but to eimand and further improve upon currently available sources,
We cannot afford any slackening in our efforts to justify and maintain the full
confidence of the general public.



You and your Number One Man should carefully review the findings
in the inspection report and work papers left with you. Within thirty days of
receipt of this letter you should advise oi the corrective action taken,

NOTE: Based on memo, W. M. Felt to Sincerely yours,
Mr. Tolson, captioned, "Inspection -

Crime Records Division, Inspector

W. Mark 

dated 12/ 21/ 64 WMF: wmj, ohnDEiggifofoover



 

 

 

sun?r101591? . a December 21, 1964 



INSPECTORW. MARK FELT . a 
. . 11/24/34 12/8/64 . .. . . 
SYNOPSE 1; a 
Officials: Aesistaiit Director Cartha DeLoach' in charge or Division since 1/28/59;
Inspector Robert E. Wick, no. 1 Man since 9/11/59: Last inepectiow 4/8-19/63

Physical Condition and Maintenance:- Very Good (Last Inspection Very Good). Space in
Justice Building well arranged, secure, neatly maintained and adequate. Library space
currently sufficient due to continuing program of purging obsolete material. Division

CRIME DMSIQW

1

ordered to closely teller} outstandingrequest with General Services Admini stration (await?

ing of funds) to increase light level in 5 rooms. Tour exhibits attractive,
secure and ivell maintained. Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Section space in Old Post
Office Building (GPO) inadequate and unattractive; arrangements for Section
to take occupancy of new space in CPU about 12/ 31/64 which will be adequate. Minor
housekeeping delmquencies ordered corrected

Specific Division Operations? Excellent (Last Inspection? Very Good). Division continues:

to obtain extensive favorable coverage of FBI operations in all news media. Excellent
projects in motion picture, radio, television field since last inspection include well
received documentary film "The 2 television programs for release in Europe; 2
educationa1~type films; 188 scripts for NBC "Monitor" and ABC ?Weekend West Looks at

and numerous other radio and television airings. 4 training films will be completed 4

about April, 1965. 22 Top Ten Fugitives apprehended since last inspection; 5 directly

attributable to publicity. Extensive research projects resulted in publication 126 articles 

over Director '5 lay-line (included feature articles in "Harvard Business Review" and

"Syracuse Law Review"); 138 statements; 90 new reprints (included the valuable and timely?
"The FBI Guardian of Civil Rights" and "What Young People Should Know About

Communism" widely used on tours during student rush seasons) Law Enforcement

Bulletin (LEE) circulation up? new all~time high of 50, 596; copies Director ?s introductory

comments Widely distributed each month; format improved to modern magazine makeup

and further improvements in contents and format pending to maintain LEB status as fo?re- 

most lav: enforcement journal. At Inspector's suggestion field submission schedule to be
revised to enhance timsliness and expedite review of submissions. New record 531, 388
individuals conducted on Bureau tours in 1963 should be surpassed in 1964; active program

followed to up-date exhibits; numerous tours monitored during inspectionu Well presented. .

Enclosure

1 - Mr. Callahan (Att: Ca R. avidson) (Sent Separately)
- Personnel Files of,Cartha Loa?cb Robert E. Wick
WMF:bhg,ij (8) 3y?

vessel/sassy 

 

 

 

speech program"; public appearances enculd reach about 8000 for 1964'? all-time high;

will attempt implementation of Inspector 's suggestion to obtain disposition of arrests .

Memorandum to Mr, Tolson
Re: Inspection - Crisis Records Division

Correspondence and Tours Section handled average of 259 pieces outgoing mail
per day (242 last inspection); 147.3 required dictated replies (106 last inspection);
production per dictatOr 12. 2 per day (10:6 last inspection); accuracy rate 99. 22%;
Inspector urged utmost accuracy consistent with sustained prediction. UCR Section in
7/ 63 instituted major revisions to improve quality of criine reporting. Follow-up on lmown
offenders program progressing; early results documenting Director's position re chronic
offenders' gross abuse of lenient treatment; data furnished to McClellan Committee on
narcotics users highlighted in Committee Report as first time such information available;

on identification records utilized, toiurther enhance data under program. 

Administrative Operations Very Good (Last inspection am Very Good). Administrative
and supervisory assignments equitably shared. Stone and typing production above Seat
of Government average; percentage. of retypes bel on average. since 5/1/63 - 49 
suggestions submitted; 25 adopted and? 1 still pending. Iiivision supervises Bureau

Inspector ordered continued emphasis t?oliie?ld re radio and television appearances to
provide maximum audience exposure. Miner errors detected on No. 1' Registers; none
affecting fringe: benefits. Inspector instructed UCB dispatch bulk mail to outside
agencies directly from 0P0 upon occupancy new space to eliminate handling through
Bureau mail room.

Personnel Matters - Very Good (Last Inspection - Very Good). Agent (37) and clerical
(140) complements as of 12/ 1/ 64 adequate, not excessive. Voluntary overtime for period
August through October, 1964, 2?42" essential, productive, equitably shared; Inspector
ordered reduction consistent with full discharge of responsibilities. ?28 incentive awards,
24 Outstanding ratings, and 216? letters of commendation to Division personnel since last
inspection. No Agents overweight. Morale appears very high.

Contacts - Excellent.(Last Inspection Eacenent). Assistant Director spearheads highly
effective 11818011 program of Crime Recur?de Division Which renders Director and Bureau 
extremely valuable services and vital support. ?Person?el liaison with President, key
Congressional figures, national of?cials oihAinerican Legion and numerous top executives
in Government and private industry maintained by Division Head. Divinion maintains
highly effective nears media contacts. Speech program of Division extensive, including
radioand television appearances; "Division Head personally handles numerOus major
speeches before top-level groups. 



1. Assistant Director Gartha D. Dawson, 6848 $24, 509; not on probation.
Mr. DeLoach makesan excellent personallappearance and is an extremely effective

- 2 .. SEE NEXT PAGE

 

 

lemorandum to Mr. Tolson
Re: Inspection - Crime Records Division

public relations inan who currently maintains personal liaison with the President for the
Director. He has a tremendous number of valuable sources in both Government and in
private industry, as well as among the news media, which he utilizes to maximum
advantage in promoting the best interests of the Bureau. Mr. DeLoach is extremely
loyal to the Director and is continually alert to safeguard the welfare of the FBI. He

is a highly talented public speaker, an impressive representative of the Director and

a very capable administrator, who in spite of outside commitments, has a tight rein on
his subordinates and has done a fine job of running the Crime Records Division.

Mr. Demach is well qualified to continue in his present capacity. If approved, attached

?tter summarizing results of the inspection will serve to advise Mr. DeLoach of the 
dings.

Inspector Robert E. Wick, N5. 1 Man in Division, $23, 695,? not on
probation. Mr. Wick makes a fine personal appearance. He has an impressive and
businesslike manner which enables him to very effectively cope with vital public relations
matters on a day-to-day basis. Mr. Wick has a profound knowledge of press matters
and of Bureau policy relative thereto. He is a hard-driving, ingenious, highly dedicated
career employee who is always alert to insure that the Bureau's interests are protected.
Mr. Wick has done a commendable job as No. 1 Man of the Crime Records Division and
is well qualified to continue in this capacity.

3. Recommendations regarding other personnel being banned separately.

 

 

 

 

 

?3513?:

its?

9? 
. 

.X .

Memorandum to Mr. Tolson
Re: Inspection Crime Records Division 

norms
MAmrsNAnon LS. . . . . . .?vsnv coon

Division space in Justice Building wellarranged,? private, secure, neatly
maintained and adequate. Expansion of library space provided for in proposed new
building - space Currently adequate ?due to continuing program of purging obsolete .. ,1
material. 5 rooms in Justice Building space still below recommended General Services
Administration (GSA) light level (detected (in last inspection); request previously
instituted by Division pending .. awaiting availabilityof GSA funds: Inspector instructed
Division to follow correction request closelyUniform ?Crime Section space in Old Post Gifice Building (GPO)
in need of painting, plastering and improved lightingg'employees currently. have about 35
square feet?of space per person, whereas GSA recoanended ministers. 109 square feet
per person; space generally deemed inadequate and unattractive.? UCR Section scheduled
to occupy new space approximately 12/ 31/64 in GPO (arrangements completed) which
will be adequateTour exhibits well maintained, attractive and secure; nun'e rous new exhibits
since last inspection; expanded tour route planned when new building completed.

Minor housekeeping delinquencies ordered corrected. _Inspector ordered 3 Agents
secure up-tOe-date photographs for credentials to insure current likeness.

ossanrrons ,Continued emphasis on fugitive publicity assisted in apprehension 22 Top Ten
Fugitives since April, 1963; 5 apprehensions directly attributable to such publicity;
fugitives selected for Top Ten on representative geographic basis and/ or to highlight
issues in best interests of Bureau; Inspector ordered continued emphasis utilizing all
legical news media outlets. 

In motion picture .. radio - television field since last inspection projects included
well-received documentary film arranging and coordinating filming 2
television programs for release 111,,Europe; arranging and assisting in filming educational?
type films on Bureau operations for Britannica and another private company;
preparing 87 scripts for "National Alert" and 57. for "Know Your - for NBC radio
teatime "ltdonitor"; compiling 44 scripts for ABC radio feature "Weekend West Looks at
the preparing 57 scripts for airing over Washington, D. C. radio stations WOOK
and furnishing scripts for and participating in numerous other radio and television
airings. Division properly furnishing field copies of scripts possibly sutiable for field
use. I. A

-4-

 

 

 



emerandum to Mr. Tolson ?i 
46: Inspection - Crimei Records Division

4 new training films pertaining to arrest procedures, interview techniques,
burglary investigations and police record systems currently being made - releaso date
about April, 1965. .

Active program of research projects has resulted in number of publications and
accomplishments; 126 articles over Director's by-line published since last inepection,
as well as 138 statements (feature articles in ?Harvard Businesslteview" and "Syracuse
Law Review" included). Reprints distributed in volume, where feasible; 99 new reprints
processed since last inspection. Child molester poster distribution now exceeds 39'
million (used widely on television programs throughout country); fold-over poster "What
Young People Should Know About Communism" given wide distribution during heavy
spring and fall rushes of students, on FBI tours; booklet "The FBI - Guardian of Civil
Rights" deemed valuable and timely.

FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin (LEE) circulation increased by nearly 4009 since
last inspection; now totals 50, 509 for all-time high; 13 to 15, 000 copies of Director?s
introductory comments reprinted and distributed each month. In July, 1963, LEE
format improved by change to glossy paper and other innovations to give bulletin modern
magazine makepp; additional changes pending to further improve format; project under-
way to provide feature on vital legal decisions. Changes in keeping with
maintaining LEB status as foremost law enforcement journal. Each field office now
responsible for submission 3 proposed articles annually, due by February 20 each year.
Inspector 50mmends (Assistant Director concurs) in interest of increasing timeliness
of articles enhancing more continuous ?ow of submissions, three deadline dates be
established throughout year; number of submissions per field office would remain
unchanged, however, field offices would forward articles on schedules established by
dividing offices into convenient geographic groupings. Procedure should expedite
review and handling of submissions at 506.

Library Operating effectively; widely used by Bureau employees and National
Academy appointees. inspector ordered closeuliaison between lending library phase
and counterpartin Identification Division to insure maximum benefits to all employees. a

Correspondence and Tours Section daily average of outgoing mail during
period this inspection (4/63 - 11/ 30/ 64) 259 (increased from 242 over period last
inspection); average daily production of dictated mail increased from 10. 6 to 12. 2
per dictator; average number of, items daily requiring dictated reply increased from
106 to 147. 3 since last inspection. Accuracy rate (based upon 96', 903 pieces of mail)
99. 22% based upon 76 errors for past 19 months; percentage of censures received from
correspondence errors lower than during period last inspection (43 in 19 months as
compared with 39 in 10 months). Inspector urged every effort be extended to reduce
errors to absolute minimum consistent with sustained production.



 

 

 

 

remorandum to Mr. Toison .
Re: Inspection - Crime Records Division

New record established in 1963 for individuals conducted on Bureau tours
(531, 388 visitors handled for increase of 40, 4'17 over 1962); projection for 1964 nearly
600, 009 - for new all-time high. New exhibits since last inspection deemed interesting
and informantivo; Division has continuing program to up date exhibits; numerous
favorable comments and communications attest high quality of tours. Numerous tours
monitored during inspection - presentation excellent. Inspector instructed that in
view of public relations value, close observation of tour leaders be continued to
immediately detect and correct any weaknesses.

Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) engaged primarily in publication of annual
Uniform Crime Report bulletin and periodic Supplementary releases on crime data.
Major revisions in mews reporting in April, 1963 by Committee on UCR
implemented by Section resulting in improvementjot descriptions of criminal acts
involved and in facility in detecting imprciper reporting. Number of contributions
approzdmately same as during period last inspection (8500); Section engaged in project
to increase submissions from small cities and county agencies.

Follow-up on known offenders (FUKO) program inaugurated in January, 1963, to
make available for first time substantially detailed data on known offenders, including
their crimmal histories, recidivism rates, mobility factors and eventually precise data
to permit logical analysis of success or failure of specific court action and/or
correctional treatment?. Apprommately 110, 000 criminals processed to date and
130, 000 anticipated by January, 1965; UCR bulletin for 1964 will include analyses to date
from program (first analysis in UCR bulletin for 1963). Preliminary data developed
thus far documents Director's position of many years concerning wide abuse of leniency
by chronic offenders. Data developed under program regarding narcotics offenders
furnished Congressional (McClellan) Comittee and highlighted in report bf that committee
as first time such information available. Inspector?s suggestion that disposition of
charges be obtained from agency submitting the fingerprint record to further enhance
usefulness of program deemed by Division to have merit and implementation will be
one; oi ed.

UCR currently conducting original survey as pilot program with 22 police depart-
ments in Metropolitan, Washington, D. C. area to establish mobility factors (percentage
of total arrests compared with crimes committed within jurisdiction): Since last
inspection, UCR Section prepared article "Crime' Cost to Industry"; published by
National Association of Manufacturers. ?Auto Theft Survey (one of five major articles
and five editorials prepared by Section and published in LEE since last inepection) was
basis for General Motors Corporation changing ignition systems on all 1965 models
Buicks and Chevrolets. 

White House liaison assumed by Division in Novanzber, 1963; in excess 1600
special memoranda prepared for dissemination since that time. Inspector instructed

on ell-I

 

 




. a
I) -

emorandum to Mr. Tolson
Aer} Inspection - Crime Records Division

that closest attention be afforded White House requests to preclude any incorrect,
incomplete or improper summarization of information available in Bureau files.

Division effectively implementing Bureau?s warfare campaign
against subversive elements via cautious use of reliable and highly placed news contacts;
since last inspection 131 items utilized; Inspector urged continuation on a highly discreet 
and extremely selective basisDivision consists of Front Office (to which Assistant Director and ?3 other
supervisory Agents assigned) and 3 Sections, namely, Crisis Research Section,
Correspondence and Tours Section and Uniform Crime Reporting Section. Supervisory
and administrative assignments equitably shared.

Division stenographic and typing production at 40 pages per hour over Seat
of Government (306) average of 2. 88. (Division stenographic average 3. 43 pages per
hour and typing average 3. 30 pages per hour as compared with $06 averages of 2.72
and 3. 23,? respectively.) Stenographic retypes at 5.31% retypes at 2. 3%
below $06 averages of 8.- 34% and 5. 18% for stenographers and typists respectively.
Combined stencgraphic and typing production decreased since last inspection
(In Section only) from 3. 49 pages per hour, however, improvement noted in,
retypes of both stenographers and typists since last inspection averages of 8.45% and
2. 94%. Inspector urged every effort be made to maintain production at highest level
consistent with minimum errors;

Since 5/ 1/ 63,? 49 suggestions submitted effecting monetary savings and/or
employee time, of which 25 adopted and P1 still pending during inspection?llegsslesr
urged continued emphasis on employee suggestions to insure initiative and constructive
attitude at all times encouraged: Odd-hour shifts justified. 
that upon occupancy of new space (about January, 1965) by UCR Section, necessary
steps be taken to dispatch bulk mail to outside agencies directly from Old Post Office
Building, rather than dispatching through Bureau mail room, to eliminate handling
by Bureau Courier Service.

Division supervises Bureau speech program vfnich. should reach about 8000 in
1964 - new all time high; Division personnel handling substantial number of speeches of
Specialized nature or in metropolitan area, including radio and television appearances.
Inspector ordered continued emphasis of radio and television appearances in supervision
of field speech program to provide maximum audience exposure. Inspector also urged
continued publicizing of National Academy feature articles and photographs to pertinent
local and foreign news outlets.

 

 

 

..
.
l"

"Memorandum to Mr. 'i?olson
Re: Inspection - Crime Records Division

Inspector recommended (Assistant Director concurs) making copies of current
illustrated summary Tour Guide available to all Divisions as ready reference to assist.
all Special Agent tour leaders to maintain knowledgeability of tour exhibits.

Minor errors in Number One Registers detected; none affecting fringe benefits;
closer attention to accuracy ordered.



As of 12/1/64, Special Agents and 140 clerical personnel assigned to Crime,
Records Division (excluding 2 indivithzals on maternity leave). Agent and clerical
complements adequate at this time - not excessive.

Voluntary overtime for 3~month period August .. October, 1964,, averaged 2'42"; 
deemed essential, productive and equitably shared; Inspector ordered reduction consistent;
With full discharge of responsfoilities. No employees on probation; no Agents overweight;
training pgograms effective. Since last inspection 28 incentive awards, 24 Outstanding -
performance ratings and 216 letters of commendation received by Divisioixpersonneh
Morale appears very high.



Assistant Director maintains close and extremely effective personal liaison with
President, leading figures in private industry and on Congressional Appropriations,
Judicial, Post Office and Civil Service Committees and top?level national officials of
American Legion; effective liaison maintained by Division with highly placed as well as:
working level representatives of news media; vital services and fine support rendered
Director and Bureau as result of active, aggressive and extensive. liaison program
spearheaded by Assistant Director.

Bureau and Division speech programs show more public, appearances 1111984 than
1963; emphasis belts placed, at all times on quality audiences, with particular stress
on radio and television appearances to afford maximum exposure of Bureau's
responsibilities and accomplishmentst Assistant. Director spearheads Bureau speech
program as evidenced by 24 major speaking engagements in past. year before top
personnel of highly influential (1500 executives of National Associatidn of
Manufacturers in December, 1964; 500 prominent news media representatives 
affiliates convention in June, 1964; 350 banking leaders in April, 1984, and the like) 



 

 

Mohr

January 29, 1965
PERSONAL

Dear DeLoach:

It gives me a great deal of pleasure
to deep you this personal note to eatendmy
congratulations to you on your Twenty?first
Anniversary in the Bureau. You have displayed
loyalty and dedication and thereby set an example
for others, and I hepe the Bureau will have the
benefit of your services for many years to come.

Sincerely,
J. EDGAR 

0

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

 

?m?i?i

Sea shedsw?,a -.

1 JAN 29:19:55 

Tolson
Belmont

 

 

Anniversary 1/29 - Friday

 

 

 

 

 

 



JEH:edm (3) I saw mom a 
~41

ache: m: a 
Evans ?if 

 

Gale
Boson
Sullivan

 

 

 

a 1 3
Tove! 
Trotte: 

Tole. Room 

 

 

Holmes
Goody

 

 

 

MAIL ROOM UNIT :1

 

 

 

F?D-Zala (Rev. 7-9-62) . .
I av

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Feb. 1, 1965

I certify that I have following Government property for official use:
met

Returning copy 203, Jan. - June 1964 "The Communist Party Line?

Received Copy 216, July - Dec. 1964 ?The Communist Party ?Line"

 

FILE .
READ
Very truly yours. 3/ 
The Government property which you hereby acknowledge

is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care
of it and returning it when its use has been completed. 
DO NOT MARK on WRITE ON IT on MUTILATE IT IN . .u

ANY WAY.
meant (Typed name)



 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

Mb
456%

so

Toison
Belmont 
Mob:
DeLoach 
Casper
Canahun 
Conrad

 

 

 

 

Sui ivcm
Ta e!

 

 

Tio te.

r9 i

REED

5:13 Ti?; 53??

Tole. Room
Hoimes
Gondy MAIL 30024:] TELETYPE 

February? 23, 1965

Mr. CarthaTMkl LieLoach
Federal Bureau 0 vestigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear 138108611:

011 this joyous occasion, I want to be
among the first of your many friends to offer
Mrs. DeLoach and you my sincere 
lations upon the arriVal of your son,

The birth of a child is an ever fresh
onderful event and it is my wish that_
will fully realize your fondest hopes

and dreams for, him. 
Sincerely,

I: EDGAR HOOVER

my?)
(3)w 
68th

3A

 



:o

?2



03?.4er A

 

 

 

FD-207 (Rev. 4-5-63) 
omen.? roan NO. 10 50'9??
MAY I'd! 
on am. no. no. 27 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

TO Director, FBI DATE: 2/23/65 . -
I \3
FROM 


SUBJECT: CARTHA DEKLE 

(Employee?s present payroll name)

 

 

(Division)

PAYROLL NAME (List as desired on payroll)

 

"r

 

PHONE CHANGE 1 - I
Present phone number (city) 

 

 

. FD-310 enclosed Local address (Number Street City State)

NOTE (The following must be executed in reporting BIRTHS or CHANGES IN MARITAL STATUS.)
H38 Spouse ever been an employee of the Bureau or an applicant for Bureau employment?
1- N0 i 2. Yes Present Former Applicant

 

 

 

MARITAL STATUS
Married to - Show full (maiden) name of spouse Date and place of marriage

 

 

 

Data re spouse



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



sea?R; areas" - 
Office indices re spouse and relatives (use Addendum. if necessary) - [If
Credit and arrest records re spouse (use Addendum, if necessary)
FD-292 enclosed 1. Yes 2. No Date it will be submitted if",
FD-310 enclosed 1. Yes 2. No Date it will be submitted . i
Name. address. and telephone number of person to be notified in case of emergency (9 ?3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- @952, -
BIRTHS -5121)
Girl named Boy named 
0'5: b6
5123
Born on 

 

I a 

To employee and [Name of spouse) It,
7' .
This is their 

Enc- Above information telephonically received 2/23/65, vc. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

February 15, 1965



a,
Mr. Cartha 

Federal Bureau; of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

The personnel in the Crime
Records Division who contributed to the hen?-
dling of a. recent expedite special project per?
formed in an excellent fashion and I am taking

 

 

 
 


this opportunity to commend them, through 
V011. *5 

The enthusiastic, resourceful and CD '55
efficient work done by each individual was note? i
worthy and the concerted efforts of all and the 
teamwork displayed were exemplary. Everyone a;
was very devoted in sacrificing personal consid- I 
oration in order to be of assistance.? I want you
3; - :0 convey my appreciation 13% 193 gab reg? mm: 
Monroe one. e- i 
L??i??ineaeex 1 
FEB 1 5 1965

Sincere! yours? 

 

 



 

\inEdgar 1
WV 1 - Mr. DeLoach (Personal Attention)
Re: Special Name Check Project for White House. 
a Based on information spbmitted it has been concluded that
Tolson
Belmont

 

 

individual letters of commendation as: recommended are not

warranted. Copies of this letter are being placed in files of
appropriate personnel,? 130th agent and clerical.

- MISS (Sent Direct) b6

(I37).

  
  
 

Mob}

DeLocch 
Casper 
Callahan 

 

 

 

Jipsen

I It
E?ggkf? Based on memo Jones. to DeLoach 2-10-65 re: ?Special Name
Tele. Beam

 

 

Holmes
Goody

Check Project for White House, February 8-9, 1965. it

 

 

 

MAI 300MB TELETYPE If."
COpiee preparedang attached for placing in files of: tOver): 

 

Letter to Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Washington, D. C.

 

 

 

 

b6

 

 

 

 


I (Rev. 5-27-64) .

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

 

In Reply, Please qu?. to 3 1965

. FileNo.

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington, D. c. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent of the who has previously
contributed to this iund and who dies from any cause except self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent, lam for-
warding herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of MO, payable to to be included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction after the Agent, has been a member oi the fund fora continuous period of two years. It is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said fund which i understand
is to be administered in the iollowing manner.

The Director of the will appoint a committee which shall, consider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and expending of said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division of the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist-
ant Director oi the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $10,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment (or SOG Division)
SA Cartha D. De Loach 3/3/65 Crime Records Division
The following person is designated as my beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund: 
Name (r rim female) Relationship
i Wife b6
Addre a
Name (contingent bene?ciary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

Do you desire to designate the ve-listed bene?ciaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. 8- Ross Fund as well? Yes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed In the line of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship.
Address
Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

Very truly yours,

Payment Received
Special Agents Insurance Fund

MAR 5 1965
J. Edgar Hoover, Director

55 8W 

 

 

 

 
   
  
    

that .515


COMM-FBI

11%:

Men. roost?:1 rsLervpe Vanni?:1

 

 

March 5, 1965

2"
J1 :3 55"
Mr. Cartha DFI'JeLoach 77 2'5 "7
Rederai Bureau of Investigation :3 
washington, D. C. 
53 


Dear Mr. DeLoach:

Personnel of the Crime Research Sec-
tion who assisted in the preparation of the training
document entitled "Prevention and Control of Mobs
and Riots" did excellent work and I am pleased to
commend them, through you.

Their knowledgeable help in the over-
all format and style, sound suggestions for clarifi?
cation and emphasis of the text, and thoroughness 
in proofreading the manuscript were noteworthy and
contributed much to the superior quality of this
timely document. I want you to convey my sincere
appreciation to those responsible {eggs job well done.

1~ 51.5 5 7:5: 1.1?.?531

Sincerely yours; 1"
J. Edgar Hoover

1 - Mr. DeLoach (Personal Attention)
Copies are being prepared for placing in appropriate

personnel files.

  

 

1 . (Sent Direct)

 

 

 

1 5 i"
We a 5714/
. pupa)" it. 5 

 

 

 

 

3'51: .83.
Based on memo Casper to Mohr, 3: 3? 65 on Prevention
and Control of Mobs and Riots. 1" LI,
(nil/i XEROX
16 mag;

Copies prepared and attached for placmg in files of: (Over)

   

 

 

Letter to Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach

Washington, D. C.

 

 

 

 

b6

 

 

 

 

. ??Apriir'l, 1965
MW . PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha D?iJeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I am taking this Opportunity to advise that you
have been afforded an Outstanding performance rating
covering your services for the period April 1, 1964, to
March 31, 1965, which has been approved by the Depart-
mental Committee on Incentive Awards. A copy of this
rating, which you may retain, is enclosed;

It is a pleasure to inform you that in recognition
of your continued superior performance I have approved an
m, incentive award for you in the amount of $500. 00 and the
enclosed check represents this award. Your loyalty and
dedication to the FBI have been noteworthy and you shoulg
entertain a feeling of pride for your exceptional seriiceg

 

 

I am deeply appreciative. ~17 
mites Sincerely, (I: :3
a -13595. Edgar Hoover (Sent Direct)
35:; i 

 

"??*Tolson (4)
are?
E?i??ffhm NOTE: Salutation per file 
BASED ON MEMO MOHR TOLSON 3/26/65.

 

Coping!
Felt 
Gale

Bosenm "f Award #554?65 1

Somme 

 

    

Tove! 

Mam 

Holmes 
Candy MAIL noon TELETYPB I

?i 

 

 

136



 

 

 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 
DeLoach

Memorandum 

. Gale
'ro MR. TOLSON DATE: March 26, 1965 ?333,?
?3332
FROM P, MOHR ?Saigon

I .
SUBJECT: CARTHA DODE LOACH WILLIAM C. SULLIVAN 

 

9'
gs; fOlM N0. IO 50l0-l06
[?62 
08A GIN. REG. H0. 2?

Olson 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gamiy

 

Assistant Director Assistant Director
Crime Records Division Domestic Intelligence Division

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

Pursuant to the Director's instructions, there are attached proposed
Outstanding performance ratings in duplicate covering the services of
Messrs. DeLoach and Sullivan for the period 4?1-64 to 3-31-65.

I have signed Mr. DeLoach's rating as the Rating Official and Mr. Belmont
has signed Mr. Sullivan's rating in the same capacity. It is respectfully requested
that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the Reviewing Official and that
the Director sign both as the Approving Official. After April 1, they must be submitted
to the Deputy Attorney General, Chairman of the Departmental Committee on Incentive
Awards (the Director is a member of this committee) for approval. When the ratings.
have been approved by the committee and returned to the Bureau, a copy willfbe
furnished to Messrs. DeLoach and Sullivan and they will be eligible for a $500 cash
award, as has been approved in the past for Assistant Directors.



RECOMMENDATION:

That you, as Reviewing Official, and the Director, as Approving Official,
sign the original and copy of the attached performance ratings and that upon apprOval
by the Departmental Committee on Incentive Awards, they each be approved for an
incentive award of $500.

 

a I
1, 43 Wow? Hawaii??7' ?i
is 5/ law
Enciosureg/ lyr/ pAl'w

1 - Personnel File of William C. Sull1van i 5


 

 

 

 

 

4.. II A 


(3-28-56) 

PAST SAFE DRIVING RECORD CERTIFICATION

 

 

 

A
NAME OF OPERATOR - LAST, FIRST, MIDDLE INITIALI DATE
CARTHA D. 3/30/65
DIVISION AND SECTION ASSIGNED POSITION TITLE
Front Office, Crime Records Division Assistant Director

TO BE FILLED BY OPERATOR

 

 

THIS IS To CERTIFY THAT I PRESENTLY HOLD Do NOT HOLD A VALID MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATOR PERMIT OR
LICENSE.

 

 

 

 

 

PERMIT ISSUED DY: PERMIT NUMBER PERMIT EXPIRES
(STATE, TERRITORY .

POSSESSION, DISTRICT) Virginia 5G20391 July 1966
THIS IS AN UNRESTRICTEO (Emmy PERMIT. (IF RESTRICTED, EXPLAIN 

(STRIKE OUT ONEI . I

*T?ls FURTHER CERTIFIES THAT DIE PAST THREE YEARS I HAVE DRIVEN A MOTOR (GOVERNMENT 0R 
ALLY OWNED) DURING THIS TIME (A) I HAVE HAVE NOT RECEIVED A
TRAFFIC VIOLATION TICKET- (8) I HAVE HAVE NOT BEEN HELD AT AS THE DRIVER OF A MOTOR VEHICLE

INVOLVED INVA TRAFFIC ACCIDENT. IF AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER, PLEASE EXPLAIN IN ADJACENT SPACE GIVING NUMBER AND
DATES OF OFFENSES.

MEANS ANY CASE IN a 5M

IS CONCEOED BY EMPLOYEE OR HIS INSURANCE COMPANY
OR LIABILITY IS FIXED BY DULY CONSTITUTED AUTHORITY. SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR 

 

 

 

TO BE FILLED BY OFFICIAL



 

NAME OF OFFICIAL (PRINT MIDDLE INITIALI POSITION TITLE DATE

?at-NT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE PERSONNEL FILE OF THIS EMPLOYEE REVIEWED AND REFLECTS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION THE
OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE 0N OFFICIAL BUSINESS DURING THE PAST THREE YEARS:

CONTINUOUS SAFE DRIVING RECORD 136

I: INVOLVED IN TRAFFIC ACCIDENT AND FOUND AT FAULT aux

I CERTIFY THAT TH EMPLOYEE 

   
  
 

QUALIFIED ON THE BASIS OF HIS SAFE DRIVING RECORD TO OPERATE MOTOR VEHICLES ON
OFFICIAL BUSINESS.

NOT QUALIFIED DEMONSTRATE HIS QUALIFICATIONS BY SATISFACTORILY PASSING
A ROAD TEST EXAMINATION BEFORE OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE ON OFFICIAL BUSINESS.

I 
REMARKS: It 5 "2 YES 3ng

Damian:

A If}; m:

CT-NOTIER Come, 9%
8 APR 16

 

 

 

 

 

MEANS ANY CASE IN WHICH THE BUREAU HAS
TAKEN DISCIPLINARY ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION 

 

 

 

 

THE EMPLOYEE. (SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL)

 

 

 

 

FD-185 (Rev. 8-16-63) 5 .

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

Name of Employee: CARTHA DODE LOACH 

Where Assigned:

 

(Division) (Section, Unit)

Official Position Title and Grade: 

Rating Period: from 

 

 

I
ADJECTIVE RATING: OUTSTANDING - 11:5thsz 5

Outstanding, Excellent, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory

 

 

Assistant to the

 

Rated by: . m? 4 1 65
Signature Title Date

Reviewed by. CL. ?3 a9? Associate IDirector 41%[65
Signature Tit ate

@1ngth 411165
Title Date

Rating Approved ha -

 

 

 

 

TYPE OF REPORT

IE Official Administrative
@Annual 60-Day
90-Day
[3 Transfer
Separation from Service

[3 Special

67- 0'2 My?

Numbered.?

1 APR 9 1965:? 52, 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARTEM D. DE LQACH
AESETANT BRECTGR
CHEER 

During the perioc?l April 1, 1964, to March 81, 1965,
Eli? . BeLoech'e performance in hie capacity as Aeemtent Direc-
tor has been ef remarkable quality and in the best ?reditione 
the FEE and has certainly earned for him this Getetendmg rating.

 

Mr. DeLeech ie in charge of the with
the higheet placed Government officials and in this respect his
services have been extraoramey. He is; met: for
mime research matters, special tours emf: projectef the prepa?

ration and dieteientien ?le FEE Law Ez?ereement Bulletin and
the Uniform Celme Reperte, and other related peegeeme meal:
we the "Ten Meet Wanted Fugitives. Mr. approaches
every assignment aggressively anti me has fur-
niehed superior leaeerehip and direction in cuordinetlng the
various activities in his division we ?the result they are of an
extremely fine caliber and serve to protect and enhance the
reputation of the FEE in the law enforcement ?eld.

Presenting a metme and 
and meet foecefel Me. DeLoech is
effective in centacte with hie associates-3 end ee the 
representative before tepdevel conferences encl
Headlepleye energy which eeaelee him .
?e awry eel: his diverse de?es with enthusiasm. Gena
menifeetleg ingenuity and 
we. BeLeacll applies himsel? to hie daily teem in each men-n
nee age te instill the ?lneei: esprit de corps in hie subordinates.

Excep?enelly well qualified for the important mei-
?lloe he now holds, IE. . DeLeech is a, dedicated, career employee
?wile has served the FEE we. the Ne?loe with distinction, and 
eating of @utetemlingg is fully justified.

 

 

 

 

EARTHA 

April 3, 1965 

:4

Ell-u olson

. elmont -

Mr. 
Mr. Casper
Mr. Callahan.?
Mr. Conrad..?
Mr. Felt?.?

 

 

Mr. Gale
Mr. Rosen__._
Mr. Sullivan?
Mr. Tavel
Mr. 
Tele. Room
Miss Holmes.._'
Miss Gandy

 

 

1/

i

 

 

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

 

 

 

4

Again you have demonstrated your great kindness
and thoughtfulness. I am deeply grateful for the Outstanding
efficiency rating and, of course, the accompanying check.

 

 

Dear Boss:

#120

I guess all of us have a degree of pride, in knowing
that you take cognizance of the way we handle our responsibilities.
I pay a great deal of attention to this because of the very touchy
and sensitive matters that you have entrusted to me over the years.
Admittedly,,_ there are times when I feel that perhaps the job is not
being done to your satisfaction. I have come to. realize, however,
that you call "a spade a spade" and that you never fail to let us
know when you think something i 

 
      
  

 

       

Nu
I would like to refer once gafh {0 ?qu t" nd .-

sensitive responsibilities I handle for yo . There 
pre?nted, both on the Hill and at the 
which" a less than forceful personality or determination might

a more popular position. I don't believe, however, that
.I could ever reconcile myself to an act of disloyalty towards you
or to coming away from a fight knowing that I had failed to live up
to your: expectations.

:9
eff
w:

 

if misses};



 

 

i 
9 

Mr. J. Edgar Hoover

I will be here as long as you want me or need me.
When the day comes that I can nolonger call you ?Boss, then I
will feel free to take a look elsewhere. I frankly can?t .thinkof a
more. soul satisfying position than what I have right now. It's
good. to wake up with a challenge knoWing-that your day .is going to
be. completely filled with impOrtant responsibilities. I think I
would have difficulty living otherwise.

Thankyou .very much.

Sincerely,

c??rgfd.?

 

 (Rev. 7-9-62)

.-



RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

4/19/65

 

I certify that I have received the following Government property for official use:



Copy 90 - "Minutemen: Extjemist Guerrilla Warfare Group" 1/

 

 



The Government property which you hereby acknowledge
is! charged to you and you are responsibl/ ER taking care
of it and returning it When its use has beg completed

DO NOT MARK on ON IT 
ANY WAY. 4"

 

 

 

FILE

. . Very truly yours, 31%


Car 1-. 

(Signature)

 

(Typed name) ach

 

 



Toh?o?? 

Mohr
DeLocch 
Casper
Callahan 
Conrad
Felt

Gale 

 

 

 

 

Rosen 
Sullivan 
Tove! 
Txoue: 
Tele. Room
Holmes
Goody

 

 

 

\gX

MAIL aoom- C3 TELETYRE um 

65 =0
April 29Mr?,?artha n. DeLoaoh 
Fe oral Bureau of Investigation .3: 

Washington, D. a.

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

I am pleased to commend, ?zrough
yon, the personnel of your division who so capably
discharged their duties in conducting tours of our

facilities during the past Season. if; 

The successful handling 00f the large
number of tourists during this period can he attrib-
uted in no small measure to the inforeet, enthosb
earn and friendliness these men exhibited. Please
convey my appreciation to them for their fine
services.

 

g?gq-? V, i #54

Numhomimld -

1- Mr. DeLoach (Personal Atteg?on) 3- MAY 4 1965? c. 
Copy of this letter is?being placed inf??e?s"?0? appropriatew

personnel.
1 Direct) ff/?bs


RH: eaj mama 
(15) 5% ~5 EAPR 30 1955
{1?7

3 
Based on memo Mor renc?m Ffr'ac? 4-26? 6% re FBF Tours, ,3

Easter- Season 1965', Commendatory Matter.- 
Copies prepared and attached for placmgam?qes?ij HQ 

 

 

 

 

XEROX



mm 101965??qu i!

11:53:;

 

 



Washington, D. C.

 

 

b6

 

 

 



 

 

May 5, 1965
PERSONAL

   
 
     
     
 
  
   
   
   

Mr. Cartha D.QeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear DeLoach:

I want you to know of my sincere
appreciation for the outstanding job you did
in directing and participating in the Bureau's
portion of the "Early Bird" telecast last
Sunday.

The Very effective fashion in which
you handled this matter was a credit to you
and, as a result of the splendid way you repre- ..

sented the FBI our part in the program was of 
the highest Quality and certainly enhanced our 

 

 

 

 

to prestige throughout the Nation and in Western
39, 7 3 Europe. It is with much pleasure that I :0 a:
E, commend you for your superb performance. 3
83 Sincerely, 531
03 r? 
a 
J: Edgar Homer; 33
f3"- Miss Usilton (Sent Direct) 5; 
i ?e 

1e diam? gin/3?8

To sonmv: . . . -
Based on memo DeLoach to Mohr 5/3/65 re: Participation in

 

 

{3 ?Early Bird' Telecast, Sunday, May 2,1965.?

  

Casper
Gaucher: 

Conrad 

 

?he?

NOTE. Salutation per heading; R?odi? 1,5;

 

 
    
 
 
 

Trotter 
Tole. Rectum 

MA soonC] TELETYPE cunt-:3 f?

   

.ii?saiftr: L5 es la a;
Qq?gj??gr 3:3 def?" 

 

 

 

 



#1 

(2'11 

omowu UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

 

 

 

Memorandum
To Mr. Mohr DATE: May 3, 1965 
Tove}
1? Troue:
FROM C. DQDeLoach ?Mm

 

Holmes
Gondy

sumac-r. FBI PARTICIPATION IN TELECAST 
SUNDAY, MAY 1965 

 

 

As you will recall, the Director permitted me to make arrangements
for the Bureau's participation in captioned telecast. The invitation was extended
on behalf of the combined television'networks in the United States and was
designed as the inaugural telecast employing the World?s first commercial

4 communications satellite, the "Early Bird. Our segment of the show con-
sisted of a "live." depiction of the use of the satellite in law enforcement work,

and we participated jointly with Scotland Yard and the Royal Canadian Mounted
Police.

This international exchange program had an audience estimated
1 at 300 million in North America .and Europe. It provided an excellent opportunity
to'demonstrate a phase of the Bureau's work and we are already receiving
indications of the interest it provoked in behalf of the FBI. Much publicity has
appeared?i'gln the newspapers containing references to our part in the show.
23? i in
.: g; The local staff of the American Broadcasting Company had the
primary mgsponsibility for producing our portion of the show. This staff did
everything-?possible to insure that the FBI would be depicted in the most favorable
light and they apparently spared no money, no equipment and no<~manp0wer in
achieving this result, and top officials worked very closely with me on this
Droiecta: Attached are two letters over 'the Director's signature directed to
Iof the Washington branch, of the American b6
Broadcasting Company, andl I, one of the company's
Directors who performed in that capacity on Sunday, May 2, 1965, for our part
of the show. In the letter reference is made to the contributions
ofI land throughl =Jthe Director's
appreciation is extended to Messrs. two of the
ASsista?t-Directors. Bufiles contain no information concerning any of these
individuals which would ?preclude the sending of these-letters119:4
Eq'ci??'??ffng?s?jfw gagg?? it?" Search? L?Numbere 
as :3 

101953593" 3

 

 

 

    
 

    
 

1 er. Callahan (CONT I 
[If] )g

1 Mr. Jones XEROX 

1 - Mr. Morrell 17 i965

 

g/pgu)
A (5) 

 



 

DeLoach to Mohr memo, 5?3-65
RE: FBI Participation in "Early Bird" Telecast
Sunday, May 2, 1965

*r

During the planning of this telecast and throughout its

prese ation, I was materiall assisted by a number of the personnel from

the} rime Records Division SAI lwas my liaison with b6
members of the American Broadcasting Company in working out many of

the intricate details connected with this presentation. His contributions aided

me materially in the success of this project. It is recommended that he be
commended by the Director for his efforts.

 

On Saturday and Sunday it was necessary to call upon other
members of the Crime ReCords Division for assistance. Personnel from the
Crime Research and Correspondence and Tours Sections responded
enthusiastically and helped contribute to the smooth and professional manner
in which the FBI's portion of the show was presented to North America and
Western Europe. I have attached a, list of this personnel and I recommend
that they be commended by letters to their respective Section Chiefs from
the Director? 

RE COMME NDATIONS 

(1) That the attached letters of; appreciation from the Director
to Messrs.  be forwarded.



(2) That the Administrative Division prepare letters to
and to Section Chiefs Jones and Morrell commending the personnel.

from their sections who participated in this telecast. .
a?m 49* 


 

3- 

 

 

 

. .

o: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Jones' Section Mr. Morreli's Section
Crime Research Correspondence and Tours
{gents Agents
b6
Clerk

ENCLOSURE

6 $33 43 0792. ?a

nrmur__

 

 

 

 

       
  
  
 

Mr. Tolson
. in. Belmont?,
A Ir. Molar..- 


Ir. pet-f

CARTHA D. LOACH )_Canahan_
Mr. 

Mr. Felt

May 19, 1965 . 5 $2 332..

1 Mr. 

Mr. Tavel .
Mr. 
Tele. Room

Miss 
Miss Gandy

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 



Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss:

Thank you so much for spending time this
morning with Brother Bernardine and the St. ohn's Cadets,
including my son. They were thrilled with your warmth,
persgnality and gracious hospitality.



.3: I am certain that the advice you gave these
youngsters will be put to good usage and rememberedeall
. of their lives. Although I fully intended to drag them out
. of your office within a three-minute period of time in order
to,?3nserve your hectic schedule, I am deeply grateful for

interest you took in this matter.

cu:

i Sincerely,
DeLoach



5?

 

?at? a q; meagre
i. Numbered?Z! 
9 mm 2&1965 

{.55ng



 

 

 

.uJ

 

 

 

JED-2816 (Rev. 7-9-62) r?



 

 



r" 3 GOVERNMENT 
EM: a? INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

June 14, 1965!. i

I certify that I have received the following Government property for official use:



Copy 105 - American Nazi Partyb/

u- Ir flvmo
i 59' 1

FILE 2 
3! Ti"
REFID

Very truly yours,

 

 

The Government property which you hereby acknowledge

 

 

 

 

 

 

is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care 

of it and returning it when its use has been completed. 

DO NOT MARK on WRITE ON IT on MUTILATE IT IN 7

.

:71 ?cm (Typed name) Cartha QeLoach
M10 JUMP: 1965 Ml .47

 

 

FD-28 10 (Rev. 7-9-62)

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[.an 494""

I certify that I have r?eceived the following Government property for official use:

WEEK

D. C. Official Parking Permit #2923
expires 6-30-66

 

 

RETURNED
D. 0. Official Parking Permit #3102 mower: Recext?e?
expirqe 6-30?65 hqup?E?NY?3%?hON
1
HEAD 3v, FILE
Very truly yours,3[ . 3
The Government property which you hereby acknowledge A 

i is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care -
of it and returning it when its use has been completed. rv'v/C/
DO NOT MARK on WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN ?S?qnme? 
ANY WAY.

F?Dr?De Loach

 

 

(Typed name)

 

 

I


?5

  

 



 

Fri-281a (Rev. 7-9-52)

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

5-28?65

I certify that I have received the following Government property for official use:
rm

Nation of Islam Cult of the Black Muslims Copy 

 

 

 

FILE ?55
?3
READ 3, ggzt? 
Very truly yours,
The Government property which you hereby acknowledge
is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care" a/W
of it and returning it when its use has been ?completed. 
DO NOT ON IT O??w?thTE IT IN ?Sk?mwm?
ANY WAY. a? .. 1; Nb; .. (Typed mm, C. D\\DeLoach

 

 

 

I ??177

 

 

 

5 . 

. 
. May 19, 1965
BY SPECIAL MESSENGER

Mr. Cartha D. @Joach, Jr.
St. John's College High School
2607 Military Road, Northwest
Washington, D. C.

Dear Delia:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:0

It was certainiy gone} to 3 .3:
see you again this morning, and I want u; o;
E: Lu
to thank you for dropping by my office. #4 :3 
a 
As a. memento of the occasion, I. am enclosing 
a copy of the photograph which was made at
that time.
Sincerely,
Edgar Hoover

Enclosure ftMr. DeLoach 67?66 a: ?it: 
6% Beanbag; . Hammad :54 
A @151. I. I
EN CJH:eab memr?j 
Tolsonm? (5) 4 ?4 7k 7
Belmont 

DeLoach 

22? I
5:135:11 . 
U. Ivan

 

 

Tove! 
we 261 @5 
Talk. ?b
Holmes
Candy MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNITE:

 

 

 

16 (Rev. 7-9-62)

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

August 4, 1965

I certify that I have received the follov?; Government prOperty for official use:
?returned c0py 2 6 July - Dec. 1964

v-


Rec'd copy 21m? Jan. thru June 1965

 

 

FILE

READ
Very truly yours, 3] a g:

The Government property which you hereby acknowledge

is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care
of it and returning it when its use has been completed. 

 

 

 

 

DO NOT MARK on WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN DVD 
oac
ANY w?yh. I (Typed name) 

 

 



 

 

 

 

F7 

 

. . .
3% 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

 

In Reply, Please Refer?io
File No.

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent of the FBI who has previously
centributed to this fund and who dies from any cause except self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent lam for-
warding herewith (by Check- Money Order) the sum of $10, payable included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction after the Agent has been a member of the fund for a continuous period of two years. It is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said fund which i understand
is to be administered in the following manner.

The Director of the FBI will appoint a committee which shall consider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and eXpending of said fund which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division of the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist-
ant Director of the Administrative Division, directinc?; him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $l0.000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT COPIES TO THE BUREAU
Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment (or SOG Division)

 

 

 

SA Cartha D. DeLoach 5?26?65 Crime Records Division

The following person is? designated as my beneficiary for Special Agent?s Insurance Fund:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wen first name if female) Relationship
Wife 1?6
Address. 7
ame (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name It female) Relationship
Address

 

Do you desire to designate the above-listed beneficiaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? Yes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed In the line of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address
Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

Payment Recewed Very truly yours,

Special Agents Insurance Fun

Mm 33?; 131 m7 M/w

?iTEdgar Hoover. Direct masses Assistant Director

9.69

 

 

 

 

August 5, 1965

 

 


Mr. CarthaDJD?Loaeh
Federal Bureau?i Investigation
Washington, D. 
e?
Dear Mr. DeLoach: 6"
?1.106
you? (I3 ?5 y;
Iwho performed in ?22; a:
an'excellent fashion in connection with a Special t? 
project. a $33 

 

  
   
 
  
  
 
  
    

 

.M 

EEA (313

 

 

Each one displayed a splendid attitude,~
diligence and skill in this important under-1

taking and her dedication to duty and fine efforts

contributed to the completion of this entire project
without delay. I want you to convey my sincere

appreciation to them. 350138 
Sincerely yours, 4 
fEdg?aTL? Hoo?e: 
?1 - Mr. DeLoach (Personal Attention)
Re: White House Request

 

A copy of this letter is being placed in the files of
the above-mentioned personnel.

1 MreCt)


Kim. h,

 

(9) - 
if Based on memo Jones to DeLoach 8/2/65 and addendum

Administrative Division 8 3/ 65
COpies prepared and attached for placing in the files of

 

 

 

 

MAIL TsLerYPs 


 

 

 



 

September 1, 1965
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha DJeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

is:

Dear DeLoach:

I want to commend you for the superb way
in which you handled your innumerable duties relative
to the National Convention of The American Legion
held in Portland, Oregon.

You were very energetic, diplomatic and
skillful in representing the FBI and your efforts have
surely brought much credit to you, as well sale the
Bureau. I was pleased to learn that you were continued
as the National Chairman of the Public Relations Com-
mittee and were appointed to the National Commander's

 

 

 

 

w?

en Irec
(S t) id

Tolson \1
Belmont 

Mob:
DeLoach 
Casper 
Callahan 
Conrad 

Pei!

Cole 

Rosen 

Sullivan 1 . 
Tove! 1? . 
Trotter <3 

Tele. i. I

Holmes

Candy ML soul: 

 

NOTE: Salutation per Reading Room #advisory council and I am taking this opportunity to

a congratulate you and to convey my sincere apprecia-

tion for your fine efforts(lg. 0" jag 1/ 

Sincerely??C-IllEdgar How: i or .-I :3

h??M ?JL?rk :5 'wk- 5

b6

 

 

Tolson
Belmont
Mob: 
DeLooch

Caspex

Contact
Felt

Rosen

Tove}
Trotter
Tole. Boom
Holmes



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

october 20, 1965

Dear DeLoa??h:

I want you to know how very much I
appreciate the part you played last night in
the presentation to me of the Grand Cross
of the Scottish Rite. I thought the evening
was a great success and I am deeply grateful
to you.

With best wishes,

Sincerely,

1E. H.

Mr. Cartha D:?Loach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.


m?mW, 311} We
173111111

11111.?: 
1 1- 11-1

 

 

 

:11) (?gm 1%
11111th $1 1111151

 


14% soon TELETYPE UNIT 

 

It};1

HUGH 



 

u. 
a



i 
Collohonm A, t-s? 
in 4; 
,1 2
. q?f? 
?Tu 


Gale 

SENT FROM 13.0.

TIME
DATE
 

1'

FD-ZSIG (Rev. 8-11-64)

I

ECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPEIQI
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date 11-26-65

I certify thatI have received returned the following Government property for official use: 

Smith - Corona portable typewriter 

?5g?

AD Very truly 
The Government properly which you hereb acknowledge
is charged to you and you are responsible or taking care 4 
of it on returning it when its use has been completed. 

 

 

(Signature)
DO NOT MARK OR WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN
ANY WAY(Typed name) Cartha 
6% was; 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'r A 'ftwam?? 

 

 

 

 

MAILED 10,
0V 2 4: 1955

COMM-FBI

 

 

Qt

 

     

$4339
November 23, 1965
PERSONAL



Mr. Cartha QDeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

I. 8 2%
$1001! emovaaumae

395 ?y SE [13

Dear DeLoach:

It is my pleasure to commend you for the
splendid manner in which you handled your myriad
responsibilities relative to the preparation of releases
to the news media in the Interstate Transportation of -
Stolen Motor Vehicle-Ring Case involving

others.

 

You directed this complex and far-flung
matter with your usual acumen, alertness and skill?
and your sterling efforts certainly enhanced the prestige
of the Bureau. I do not want the opportunity to pass with-
out conveying my sincere appreciation for your dedicated
and extremely competent performance.

Sincerely, 

Edgar ?ower: 

"3 . b6
b'7C

 

1 - (Sent Direct)

 

 

 

?it? 

Tolson 
Belmont 
Main

Casper 
Callahan 
Conrad
Felt

Gale 

 

 

 

Rosen 
Sullivan 
Tove! 
Trotter
Tole. Room
Holmes 

Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Based on memo Jones to DeLoach 11?22-65 re: aka; Et Al;
ITSMV.

 

NOTE: Salutation per Reading Room.

Lax 

MAIL noonL?J 

[:27 

 

Lgi,

 

TO

TI.R :11
FROM M. A. ?gs? 7/ - 

1..
menu 10111140.!0 sow-loo
Af?? Iomon
a Tolsona

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT sermon:

Mohr
DeLoach

Memorandum a.
. 7% 



Mr. DeLoach DATE 11-22-65 ?ttinm
Tqvej

Trotter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Candy

 

SUBJECT: I aka, 1:36

ET AL: INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION We

OF STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLES
$61 MAM Car/Lw-l) WV

As you know, the FBI re eived outstanding national acclaim and
attention from the various news media as a result of, the major press release
pertaining to the car theft ring apprehensions last Saturday morning. You have
noted that several of the supervisors in this Section were of great assistance in
the handling of this matter.

Special Agent Lawrence J. Heim was on weekend duty in your office
and supervised the preparation of the press release. This was a highly involved

?matter involving some 125 cars and 19 subjects. Speed, accuracy and material

of a newsworthy nature were, of course, the primary consideration. In addition

to preparing?the piess release, Mr. Heim was in constant liaison with the General
Invest1gat1ve1D1V1S1on and the pertinent field offices. He worked closely with the
General Investigative Division and the pertinent offices as the arrests were made
and, of course? got3 the release in final form for release to the press. He released
the approved :statement to the wire services and, throughout the weekend, handled
inquiries fridm new?s media across the country.

Pair?icipating in the final preparation of the release as the arrests
were made and in the dissemination of the material to the wire services and the.
handling of subsequent requests for information were Special Agents Thomas B,
Coll and Donald G. Hanning of this Section. F)

G: ?-59 1. 

All of the su rvisorswere at the office very early Saturday morning.

11';
0T Eigide response to this release (sample clipping attached) isa

testi onial of the skill, accuracy and good judgment' th'e?s "t e?Aig ?ts. fe?g
all did a very fine job indeed. 1g?" iv? 2T

 

 

 

 

 

 

Searched 
Enclosures RE0139, 7 NOV 29 [955 
1- Mix". 1W. 1- Mr. Callahan .. . 
1- PersOnnel File of g?fkaWrenceJ eim .1 ,1 
1? Personnel File of A Thomas B?"Coll . 1.
1 - PerSOnn?I File of Donaldz?a eHannina? ,j 3 [if
1- Personnel File of Miss b6
1 ??Personnel File of Miss

 

 

 

(10) 5 7 (Continued next page)

 

 

M. A. Jones to DeLoach Memo


b6
I aka b7C

 

Assisting in handling this matter from a stenographic standpoint
were Missl land Missl two secretaries
in the Crime Research Section.

 

 

Each came in very early Saturday and assisted on this release as
long as was necessary. Each did an outstanding job indeed.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

. This matter be referred to the Administrative Division so that
individual notes of commendation can be for rded to Messrs. Heim, C011 and

Hanning and also Misse-an
mm?


(1/3915

 

701

Administrative Division concurs. Appropriate letters are attached.



(Recognition for other Seat of Government and Field personnel is being handled

separately. 

 

 

1"

 

0-19 (Rev. 12-14-64)

 

 

      

 

Tolson 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.}

 

 

. Belmont 3
Mohr 1
DeLoach

Callahan
Conrad 
Felt
?5?13? ?The rings method 6? opera?f,l Gale
as 55.1 3?qu Rosen
.. 5; . .55. i 5 einves 'gati?n an orce te -
1 ?17 :2 131,16 resort to its laboratories Sullivan
and scie?tific crime: detecti?h: t6 
a, 6 mg determine the true ownership?of Trotter 
3.1.5.1534?: .135; . 33;: 5 the stolen3cars.5 5 ,5 ?35:533.; .5 Tele R0 om
I 1 '5 Ij?n?g Adds Confusion? ?1 1 Holmes
VQWAU ?Hayes ?3 FBI Direct6r, J3 Edgar Hoover (5611611 1
said the inemWere ?hgirged With 3
:3115 Seized 125 Cars stfefaaling?, late lmorlelbcars~latnti . 
a ixmg seria num er pa es; 1 
2,311 Recovered After stolentirom other1 cars ofgthe. 
same ype 1:213"? 1
Year Long 3 1' fBogus titles or bills}1 of saie?.
By with fictitious sales 1 61'niatien; 
.5 Starserritez-W?s 1 f; . the serial: numbers1
I The 'ye?t?erda}? Er?agh?d from the; stolen serial plates};
an interstateuapto weft mg were ?r'?patred; Then the cars?
53Whi'chf? had masked the? true W929 591(13 5 51?
1 identity of the: car?s With lst?ole'n1 'Althdugh most? of the; cars.
tes'erial .numbep: plates were stolendn the Chicago area,{
Fifteen men Were arrested in: the? t?'r'ned .upy?in more .than a;
a series 6f; raids'w ?limaxihg a ,score of states fr?'m 
?year-long .5 coast-to-coa?st FBI wsCaIif?rhia?. a316,, Wisconsm tog?
investigat1on.15 Two others had M1351ss?1pp111?; it 5 255353. 3 .
ibe?? arrested earlier: and; [two The reason they Were so hardli
more wererlisted as fugitwes. ?to trace, it Was explained Was
. The3~19 werejnam'e in sealed that ,3gang members :did?? t5: 1 
5indictments retained 6v?; 2 By .alway's steal ?a cair?,Disti-ict Court 1111' ica- the wanted serial number: Thus; - 
or1~con" the serial? dumber platermightn
spiracy, to: violat?' federal laW be lift?d the can5lett1mth1.
against interstate3 transportation Who Would 139' unaware?ToL? .
of. stolen indictments the 1085-. . . '1 1 .313; 5t :11
contamirig 40 counts were made - Then a stolen car Wvould get ai.
pub,1ic With the arrests.? 1 serial?: number stol?ii from".
Mo'i-e than 125*late-model cars' 1511511th: Would. n?t 1363
valued in: excess of $500900 identi?ed because there-meme The post and
Were recovered in thescoutse of 
-2..- .. 31311139115: 35. ?5 ii?? 

The Washington Dc 1y News 
. The Evening Star 
I New York Herald Tribune 

New York Journal-American 
New York Daily News

 

New York Post 
The New York Times
The Baltimore Sun 
The Worker 

The New Leader 

 

 

The Wall Street Jaurnal 
The National Observer
People's World

 

 

 

1965



1? ate
4.31 Nov 215

 

 

 

 

figure tn the car ,theftjing; He
record that a car bearing that was convicted 10?} mes

The ring was. des?e'ribed as the
biggest interstate stolen car
combine uncovered in recent

years. Although it was. consld- interstate fraudulen
ered unorganized and' not all the charge. - 

members even knew each other,
all of them were said to be "m

cahoots?. 

Others Caught'tn

At various times, they al- round-up were:

1 1 if: '13 - Kenneth D, Nash 45, a Garyil,
leged eren ro,_s, Ihd., policeman anti operator 0

stealing cars or serial numbers,

be-
serielenafmherwas missing.? tweerr 1938 and ,19575'011': fedora

chec



Raid

.Amohg" others. caught: inf the

liquor law yiolatio?n's; At? the
time of yesterday?s arreSt, 
was free on $25,000 bond-on an

i



a





acting as ?Iences?jor other car a drivevin restaurant, who ?was

?thieves, preparing megaphony? arrested in uniform as. he or

- off patrol dut . 
sales Imminent-i Paddling the William MzGurk, 40, a, chief

cars through legitimate new and
used car channels, 

hospital cor sman at the Oa?

A number of ear salesman Knoll? Navar?ospital? in? Oak

wete caught in the roundup,
along with a long-time Chicago
mobster, a?policeman, a naval
hospital corpsmanland a print-
er. 

when Robert David,,?44,i was

arrested as he left the disco- lagl
fit 3

theqtie whichhe and his brothers

James. Bay Cobb, 40, a pr

land, Calif., who was, arreste
at the hospital; McGurk was 
factory worker in Gary. befor
his; recent return to
the; ?indictmet -

- The roundups began at 4 aJLh.? YiOlationSvin Gary.

charges?. 1:3

duty an

int
companytemploye 1:1}an
Ind., already under $10,

manage in Calumet Park, Ill. bond on? a September: charge 0

A brother Orland David, was violating the SelectiVe .Servic
Act by? photographing - an
a plate to print draf

arrested at about the sameitime?

at his home in Frankfort 111 . making

Later in the morning; their 76- cards. I .

lyear-old father, Herman David,

4

was taken intopeustody at his ,papqlis, Cleveland, San Fran;

 

thomlton Ill. The elder eisco rand 
ls'Javid was said to be the central involve} in the roun up.

am ?wer

F131 of?ces in. Chicago,? Edi-1

it

9



'2

 

u-
thy? ?r

??qu mm


 

en. 

?my,

 

 

 

 

DeLOach

Casper
Callahan 
Conrad 
Fen
Gale 
Bosen
Sullivan 

 

 

 

 

Holmes

 

Candy 

 

 

i 
5"07Tavelw? 5.
Trotter .. 
Tale. Room??a La

MAIL Room: TELETYPE UNIT 

KW thee? an; 33.3%?

gem aw?f?



we Whemee aim 
game: anemia ?:33 
if}; 313;:

:3th 3393mm:

. a an metres mews ee matte
sea enigma as am Win?ea e3
immense as age names, enemas see
man; 33., west

Wait?! 53 ?15.22: 

 

 

anti e311 amaze is stagnant way an? the 
canteen a? was ?tment; magma
?annereim 

1 a. .
1 Eowme?? "1-4

 

?1?1 

NOTE: Assistant to the Director Belmont
is retiring effective 12-30-65 and ceasing
active duty the same date.

    
    

a 
. TIME 9?11 a

   



136

 

 

I.


. *0 
IOIM '0 
w, MAY I962 some" 
j, ?n cs?. cm. no. no. 27 i? Tolson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED ST 1? ?s QOVERNMENT 333??
. DELoach
Memorandum 
- riff? 
Gale
T0 Mr. Callahan 4 DATE: 11?26?65 

Sullivan
Tove!
Trotter

FROM C. R. 
Unr?

SUBJECT: CARTHA DEKLE WW WW 

Assistant Director ?gsemI

Crime Records Division 'f 

EOD 8~31~42 (Student Fingerprint Clerk)

12?14?42 $25,382

veteran

 

 

 

 

The following is a brief summary concerning Assistant Director
DeLoach for the Director's use.

Mr. DeLoach entered on duty as a Special Agent 12-14-42 and was
on military leave from 11-2u44 until 4-1-46 when he returned to duty. He
had considerable field investigative?experience and on 7?14-47 was trans?
ferred to the Seat of Government, as a Supervisor in the Security Division.
On 12?10?51 he was transferred to the Training and Inspection Division as
an Inspector, subsequently served in Mr. Tolson's Office and 1ater,as #2
Man in the Office of the Assistant to the Director of the Records and
Communications Division. On 1-28-59 he was designated Inspector?in?Charge
of the newly created Crime Records Division and on 4-7-59 he was designated
Assistant Director of that Division. Mr. DeLoach is 45 years old, is married
has 7 children and is presently in Grade which promotion he received
on 7?13?60.

No administrative action has been taken against him during the
past year. However, he has had 7 commendations directed to him during this
period, the last being on 11-23-65 for his excellent handling of his respon-
sibilities relative to the preparation of rdaases to the news media in the
Interstate Transportation of Stolen Motor Vehicle-Ring Case involving] b6

and others, and on 4?7?65 he received a $500. Incentive Award in b7C
recognition of his continued superior performance for the period 4-1?64 to
3-31u65 which merited him an Outstanding annual performance report.
expressed appreciation for this recognition in 

4-8?65. - 
a RECJM 

By letter dated 1?29-65 the Director congrat 1 
'I?wenty-first Anniversary in the Bureau. ?1 a?ge if) @615 If

 

 

 

 

By letter dated 5-19~65 Mr. DeLoach thanked the Director for spend?
ing time that morning with Brother Bernardinhhand the ts,
includin The Director, on that date, wrote

to thank him for dropping by his office and enclosed a

 

 

 

re:

photograph which was made at that time.,h - 

By letter dated 10-20-65 the Director expressed appreciation to
him for the part he played last night in the presentation to him (Director)

FD 2 .
Brief) 

 

 

of the Grand Cross of the Scottish Rite.

Mr. DeLoach lists no offices of preference.

373%?



 

 

 

 



December 1965

Honorable James V. Day

Commissioner
Federal Maritime Commission

1321 Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C.

Dear Jim:

and I deeply appreciate your compliments
- cerning? the appointment of Mr. Cartha 
position of Assistant to the Director.

 

w. c-
commas? 

MAILED 10
DEC 7 1955

 

 

 

NOTE: Mr. Day is on the Special Correspondents' List.

20 573

""3038

'11 a,
n1



395 ?d 5

?it:

HUGH

I have received your letter of December 2nd,

remarks Icon-
eLoach to the

It is indeed a great pleasure to know that

expressed.



at; A

Sincerely,

. DeLoach is held in such high regard, and you may
sure he appreciates, as I do, the generous comments

3- Edgar Hob?

appointment will become effective 12?31-65.

'9 

A
3W 1819

Tolson
DeLooch
Mob:
Casper
Callahan 
Conrad
Felt
Gale
Bosen
Sulliwm 
Tove!
Trottex
Wick
Tale. Room 
Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





?I'thi

91 

MAIL noon TELETYPB mm 

 

.4935 3315i; 
ts .3 gnLHaEi'?
are i s!


Mr. DeLoach' 

335

58

DI 
vs- Wu 

 

 

 

I

/Mr. ToIsong?l/
. Mr. DeLoa 

Mr. Mohr



 

 

. . 5 Mr. Casper
?nheml manhunt Mr. 
. Mr. Conra -
mashingtun, 20573 Mr. Felt
Mr. Gale

@f?cn of the December 2 196' 

Mr. 
Mr. Tr: 
Mr. 
Tale. Room"
Miss 1-5 
Miss 

m-m

 

 

 

 

 

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

 

 

 

nun?.- --

 

My dear Mr. Hoover: 562417222 QE/??xa?

It was a real thrill for me to
read in today's paper where you had selected Mr. DeLoach
as one of your assistants.

His host of friends and admirers through-
out the country will share with him the good fortune which
permits him to work even closer to you than he did while
serving so ably as Assistant Director.

Those of us who knew Deke well have
admired in him his great trait of loyalty and admiration
which he has for you, for certainly he has proven his
dedication to the awesome responsibilities of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.

   
 

mes V. DayM

omission *87635 :72 g? 42g}

Emmi ed ?a a ?aw? a
. REBX PS L115 67?

 

 

 

 

 

7k 

      



its;







STANDARD roam sen?Rev. Decem?er 196!

7'

NOTIFICATION AGTIDI IS 


I
.. r5
9



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Service I 5 PART
FPM Chap. 295 50-124-04

(FOR AGENCY 0557 
I. NAME (CAPS) MR.-MISS-MRS. 2. (FOR AGENCY USE) 3. BIRTH 4. SOCIAL SECURITY No. 
p? (Mon Day. Year) 
DE WAGE, CARTER 7320.23 259?99#7925
s. VETERAN PREFERENCE 6. TENURE GROUP 7. SERVICE COMP. DATE 8. PHYSICAL HANDICAP CODE f.
?2 2-22. 
9. FEGLI USE)
I-OOVERED I-CS HS 3'
Z-FICA 
CODE NATURE OF ACTION . I3. I4. CIVIL SERVICE OR OTHER LEGAL AUTHORITY 
0.. ay. car i 
12-33?65 2222222222) BY LAW 5
l5. FROM: POSITION TITLE AND NUMBER IS. PAY PLAN AND I7. (Demo: (6) STEP SALARY -
OCCUPATION CODE OR OR
LEVEL RATE 
Assistant ?irec?oar GS 1% 1 $25, 382 gm. -:
. 110 
19. NAME AND LOCATION OF EMPLOYING OFFICE 
022m Regards. Division
memong 5. C.
20. TO: POSITION TITLE AND NUMBER 2I. PAY PEAN AND 22. GTEAFDE 55%? 23. SALARY 
OCCUPATION CODE LEVEL RATE . 1-:
A i.
2235122221212: TO 2124': meter $26, 680 {32. ..
. O30 
24. NAME AND LOCATION OF EMPLOYINC OFFICE 
22222226 Oi:- the Assistant CO the 2
Washing?en, D. c. - 
25. DUTY STATION (CIIr-comfr?Sl?le) 26. LOCATION CODE
i
27. APPROPRIATION 23. POSITION OCCUPIED 29.APPORTI0NED POSITION
7 SERVICE FROM.- STATE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OF I

 

 

 

. REM 
212w
REASONS BELOW. AS REQUIRED. CHECK-IF APPLICABLE:
I .
114? 1
(1 Basis Nor Chis msi?oa :33
A31: 5f 196%; mnv??g shim:

 

This Dramatim is: Emyarary mm 2713;}. remain 222 

Max:102: 033 @f?g?nt 23922323222 1?2.

572%? mwmsa
?323 23(9) 1513

Inn-an?

 

 

II

31. DATE OF APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVIT (Accession: only)

 

32. OFFICE MAINTAINING PERSONNEL FOLDER (lflwamlfrom anplogi'n: 

 

EMPLOYING DEPARTMENT OR AGEN

 

YEAR PROBATIONARX (OR TRIAL) PERIOD COMMENCING
. B, SERVICE COUNTING TOWARD CAREER (OR PERMANENT) TENURE FROM:

 



 

C. DURING
PROBATION

P322112: Law 88426,. Ee?eral WAVE Salary . 



,703/

34. SIGNATURE (0r dim auMchlerI) AND TITLE

Acting Assistant Attorney General
for Mm?niatration

D. FROM APPOINTMENT or 6 MONTHS OR LESS 1"

Only for the: 

2224M


John II. Miler .

Director

. 3. CODE CY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 35. DATE
DJ 02] WW 11-29-25

 

4. PERSONNEL FOLDER OOPY





II



a

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1965-7 459-17-

 

r" 1'

 

December 9, 1965

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. TOLSON

cat/F722,? .
On December 7, 1965, I saw sistant to the Directo eLoach,
hi

who desired to express his appreciation for the assignment to 11 he had
been named.

I told Mr. DeLoach that his new position was going to he a real
challenge, and I expected him to really supervise the operations of the
Domestic Intelligence Division, the General Investigative Division, the
Special Investigative Division, and the Crime Records Division. I stated
that I did not want him to be a mere figurehead in over?all charge of these
Divisions, but I wanted him to get his?toes into?the actual operation of the
Divisions so that he would know what is going on and what comes in and what
goes out together with the formulation of sound policies and procedures.

I suggested to Mr. DeLoach that he should arrange to at least
meet with the Assistant Directors of these Divisions once a week and more
often in situations where there is some "hot" case breaking. I also suggested
that he endeavor to meet with the Supervisory staff of each of these Divisions
once a month so that the Supervisors may feel closer to the over-all operations
of the Bureau and realize and understand that they are an integral part of
the earn.

I stressed to Mr. DeLoach the imperative necessity of looking after
details, because without this effort, the work of the Bureau could flounder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

considerably. 1ft: 
REC-
PM
138 paw-Gifts? :13 7:45;? :4 mm din}.
Very truly yourst DEE web 
was, a- 5 John Edgar Hoover #37!
?ckoa? I 1, if ,5 Direcun'
0 I 
cape, SENT FROM D. .
EDM (4) t, 

?was" not?; 
A m?jzgi'?'?s 3 2.93:} 

MAIL ROOM TELETYPE 

 

 

I) - 
(Rev. 8-11-64) 

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Date 1'5'66

I certify that I have received returned the following Government property for official use:

SMITH CORONA PORTABLE TYPEWRITER 4152001/

FILE

3; A

A 
AD Very truly your?

The Government property which you hereb acknowledge 

:5 charged 10 you and you are responsible or taking care 

of it on returning it when its use has been completed, (Signaturey a,

DO NOT MARK 0R WRITE ON IT OR IT IN
ANY WAY. (Typed name) CARTHA 

 

 

 



 

 

 

7 JAN 6 19-



 

 

 

(Rev. 12-9-57) 9 9

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PRORERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE



 

I certify that I have received the following Government property for official use:


New Commission Card with case 11 
Assistant to the irector

RETURNED 

Old Commission Card with case 17
Assistant Director

READ 3/

Very truly yours.

 

 

The Government property which you hereby acknowledge

is charged to you and you are responsible for taking care

of it and returning it when its use has been completed. (Written 

DO NOT MARK on WRITE ON IT on IT IN I

ANY $52335? (med Cartha IDeLoach


 

 

 

Signature) 



 

.3


7 45:21:) ?guu

I

 

 

December ?14, 1965
?g?xg $3 ?213

sogmble G. Elliott Hagan 
A case of Representatives

Washington, D. C. 20516
My dear gongressmanf K71 314% 

Your letter was received on December 13th,

 

and it was certainly moughtful of you to communicate with
me concerning the of Mr? Cartha DeLoach
to the position of Assistant to the Director. Mr. DeLoach
joins me in expressing thanks for your compuxnentary 

f.

remarks. 3. g?
t-vl 
Sincerely yours, c.
32.. . 3 
Edge? ?09m . ?73 fag -
. 
'12?
('53 e:
C)
t. 

  

NOTE: Congressman Hagan is on the Special Correspondents? ListTolson I .- 3 
gatog? ?5 (331;? ?If. ?gc I it: a 113'
o: - t?

Cospet EROX
I 1..
DEC 21 qusi - :3 

Conrad

Fell f;

Gale 3 
Boson
Sullivan 
Tove]
Tloller
Wick
ToierRoo

  
 

 

   
 
 
  
 

 

?9

31.09

E: 6323313ng 3:21.:rvps UNITE 7 A

 




 
 
 
 

 

 

       

 

T?k

 

Mfrr?chN IE I 
FIRST '1'!le WHOM

d? I
. I 1
BRYAN LAURENS
BULLOCH 
(tonnage of the matter: ?tatcs
Ef?gy 31mm of Saepreseutatibes .5
55mg" 33$ng . Washington, Eli. 20515 1/ 



\l

 

December 6, 1965

MW -
211:. ?I?olsonrr? 



cLou
Mr. Mohr
Mr. Casper 
Mr. Callahan 
Mr. Conrad -
Mr. Fell 


Mr. Rosen
Mr. Sullivan 

Mr. Tuvpl .
Mr. 
IN

Mom 
Miss Holmes 

Miss Candy 


 

 

 

 

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover

Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation? ?Jr?
Washington, D. C. 

Dear Hr. Hoover:

This is just a brief note to tell you how pleased
I am that my friend, 0. D. DeLoach, has been named your
Assistant.

The citizens of the First Congressional District
of Georgia are extremely proud of Deke, and we are more

~than pleased with the continued confidence which you
are placing in him by naming him your Assistant.

With kindest personal regardsElliott Ha.
MEMBER OF GO -



- lie. :15 1365

 

i 

3?


mar. Waco?a.- 4' war 

 

Riggs, 5I 7/00 523





 

?oeu- M?r? 

i
.
ran-gnu.? nh?een'wk

38 -050 13 1965

e.


 

. ?u?m?m?m 

5 



 

 



(Rev. 8-11-64) 
. 

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
8

Date

I certify that I have @eceived returned the following property for official use:

Parking Permit Space 93, USDJ Garage

 

RETURNED
Parking Permit Space 12, USDJ 

AD Very truly yours,
The Government property which you hereb acknowledge
is charged to you and you are responsible or raking core 
of it and returning it when its use has been completed. (Signature) 

DO NOT MARK 0R,errE_pN IT OR MUT1LATE rrIN
Cartha D. DeLoach,

Ya (Typed name)
8 JAN 181988 5? 1V1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

 



4557? 70



?it?

 

Standard Form 88
(Rewjune 1956)
Bureau of the Budge;
Cirgm?gr A-32 (Rev. 

72/5 ?/gsc

REPORT OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION



I

9'


1

 

 

gx? NAME-FIRST 


loam/? . 

2. GRADE AND COMPONENT OR POSITION

ss 7? ?7?a Zr'reoi?r

3. IDENTIFICATION NO.

 

4. HOME ADDRESS (Numbir. elm: o'r RFD. city or" town, zone and State)

5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION

 



6. DATE OF EXAMINATION

6?66?

 

7' SEX 9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT SERVICE

8. RACE

10. AGENCY

 



MILITARY ICIVILIAN

 

 

 

II. ORGANIZATION UNIT A

 

13. PLACE OF BIRTH

7-5202 2 0 h?M ?52.

12. DATE OF BIRTH

 

H. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS OF NEXT OF KIN

 

15. EXAMINING FACILITY 0R EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS

6.

15. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

I7. RATING OR 

CLINICAL EVALUATION

(Check each item in appropriate col-
umn: enter? not evaluated)

18. HEAD. FACE. NECK. AND SCALP

19. NOSE

20. SINUSES 

21. MOUTH AND THROAT

22 
23. DRUMS (Perforation)

zt. ?3522';an .
25. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC

26. PUPILS (Equality and fraction)

27. OCULAR MOTILITY 
28. LUNGS AND CHEST (Include breasts)

29. HEART (Thrust, eize, sounds)

30. VASCULAR SYSTEM etc.)

31. ABDOMEN AND VISCERA (Include hernia)

(Hemorrhoidr. ?nder)
(Prutatedfw IndIcatrd)

 

comment.

MAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32. ANUS AND RECTU
33. ENDOCRINE 
3t. 64! SYSTEM
- I.
35. UPPER EXTREMITIES "We of

36. FEET
(E I I
. 37. 

33. SPINE. OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

39. IDENTIFYING MARKS. 
to. SKIN. 

II. under 
42. (Specifyaay Mlonatitydniation)

It}. melee Only) (Ch! ow done;


 

 

 

 

I



 

 

 

 

NOTES. (Describe every abnormality in detail.

TIME IN THIS CAPACITY (Total)

I

(Contmue in item 73) 

LAST SIX MONTHS 

I

Enter pertinent item number before each
Continue in item 73 and use additional sheets if necessary.)

 

4/17

 

u. DENTAL (Place app?ariate :y'mbotr above or below number of upper and lower teeth, mpecttretv.)

DEFE AN

      

 

REMA 5 AND DENTAL
DIEA



o-Restorablc teeth th?uing teeth (6 bridge, brackets to
(?Nonmtorable teeth by denture: include abutment2019


 

 

I 
15 I6 
?3 def?222%
unomonr rmnmos .
46. CHEST x- RAY (Place. date. ?lm number and result)

 

.725"

 

 

 

45. URINALYSISE SPECIFIC GRAVITY 
B. ALBUMIN I D. MICROSCOPIC. 
I 49?2. Ce 
11. 5320va (Spr?F?z??y es used andmuu) 439sz 49. game: mo nu 
. ACTOR

22/ 3?2 
In. 

- 

1;

 

 

 



 

.A-r 

 

 

 

 

MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER FINDINGS .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HEIGHT 52. WEIGH 53. COLOR HAIR 54. COLOR EYES 55. BUILD: SLENDER 56. TEMPERATURE
(76. If Adana 
57. 13:90!) PRESSURE at heart 58. - WLSE (Am a: heart 1m!) 
A. sys? B. SYS. C. SYS. A. SITTING B. AFTER EXERCISE c. 2 MIN. AFTER 0. RECUMBENT E. AFTER STANDING
SITTING RECUM- STANDING 3 
DIAS. BENT DMS- (3 min.) 5 3?6 
. 59. DISTANT VISION so. REFRACTION 6I. VISION 
RIGHT 2075'0 CORR. 10201510 BY S. . 7 ex 3 CORR.TO DY
LEFT as] 0 CORR. To WELO BY 5. ex CORR. To By
62. NETEROPNORIA (Specify distanceFRISM DIV. PRISM cow. FD
- CT
63. ACCOMMODATION $4..me VISION and and mall) 65. DEPTH PERCEPTION 
(Tu: and and score)
LEFT ?4740 4 cc 
. 66. FIELD or VISION 67. NIGHT VISION (Tu: and a'nd sclre)? 63. RED LENS TEST 69. INTRAOCUUR TENSION
70. HEARING 7I. AUDIOMETER 72. AND 
(Tom and and 3(070)
000 2000 3000 4000 A5000
I, [15 sv [3 [15 3553, gt}: 3m ?96. cm 3?33 -
.LEFT wv [Is SV [(55 mm
LEFT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73. NOTES (Conlfnucd) AND SIGNIFICANT OR INTERVAL HISTORY



I519 "Rh 3
7 (h if?. 7?
35? 

(Use additional Them if memory)

 

74. SUMMARY OF DEFECTS AND DIAGNOSES (List diagnuumm item Numbers)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75. SPECIALIST EXAMINATIONS INDICATED (Specify) 76. - A. PHYSICAL PROFILE
. I. 
77.E (Check) 7 .
A- .Is QUALIFIED FOR an . 3. PHYSICAL CATEGORY
B. IS NOT QUALIFIED FOR 
78. IF NOT QUALIFIED. LIST DISOUALIFYING DEFECTS ITEM NUMBER A 
i 7 >4

79.1TYPED OR FRINTEO NAME OF PHYSICIAN SIGNATURE 

80. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN SIGNATURE

81; TYPEQ QR PRINTED NAME OF DENTIST OR PHYSICIAN ((ndicaI? 172A SIGNATURE

32. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF REVIEWING OFFICER OR AFFROVING AUTHORITY SIGNATURE NUMBER OF AT.
1; . i TACHED ngE?I?w

I. In? I)

 

 

 


us. GOVERNMENT OFFICE [1316: o-uvjo[-2150 nd mummies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RITA ab 32 REPORT OF MEDICAL HISTOR 89"
THIS INTORNA FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY AND WILL NOT BE REIEASEO TO II RIZEO PERSONS 35$; 
I. LAST NAME k2. GRADE AND COMPONENT 0R POSITION TI ?It
DE LOACH, CARTHA D. ISSISTANT To THE I 
4. HOML ADDRESS (Number. duct or RFD. city or town. zone and State) 5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION 6. DATE OF EXAMINATION
1109 Morningside Lane Alexandria, Va. 22308 12?6-6 5
7. SEX 8. RACE 9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT SERVICE 7 IO. AGENCY II. ORGANIZATION UNIT
Male White mumw FBI . TASS the ?Dire ctor
12. DATE OF BIRTH I3. PMCE OF BIRTH N. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS OF NEXT OF KIN
7/ 20/ 20 Claxton, Ga. . b6
15. EXAMINING FACILITY OR EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS 15. OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

IT. STATEMENT OF PRESENT HEALTH IN OWN WORDS. (Follow by description of past Muory. If compIaInI mm)

. jg/ma;

        
    

 
      

FAMILY HISTORY ANY BLOOD RELATION (Pawn,

RELATION ACE STATE OF HEALTH
FATHER
MOTHER
SPOUSE

    

        
  

    

   

     

NO (Chock each item) RELATIONIS)
HAD TUBERCULOSIS
HAD SYPHILIS
HAD DIABETES

HAD CANCER

IF DEAD. CAUSE OF DEATH

    

YES



 
     

  



       




   
 

           
    
 

 

  
      
      
    

    
 

BROTHERS HAO KIDNEY TROUBLE
AND HAD HEART TROUBLE
SISTERS HAD STOMACH TROUBLE

HAD RHEUMATISM 

   
 
 

CHILDREN
EPILEPSY (Fill)
COM SUICIDE
BEEN INSANE

   
  
 
 

    

 



   
 



  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

kit of each Item)
YES NO ?Ch I'tpm) YES NO COCA item) YES NO (Chock each item) YES NO (Check each item)
FEVER. ERVSIPELAS . TUMOR. GROWTH. CYST. CANCER 1/ 3mm- OR LOCKED KNEE
9PHTHERIA l/ RUPTURE {001' TROUBLE
FEVER p?f?g??fgf) 
OR PAINFUL JOINTS mas oa nacrAI. msus: (Inc. Infantile)
1/ MUMPS OF BREATH OR PAINFUL URINATIOII OR FITS
COUGH . V?ym OR PRESSURE IN CHEST 3/ KIDNEY STONE 0R BLOOD IN URINE TRAIN. SEA. ON AIR SICKNESS
OR SEVERE HEADACHE COUCH OR ALBUMIN IN URINE - TROUBLE SLEEPING
VCDIZZINESS SPELLS r/ OR POUNDING HEART y?poILs TERRIFYING NICHTIIARES
EYE TROUBLE HIGH OR LOW PRESSURE was: 9 OR EXCESSIVE WORRY
1/ EAR. NOSE OR THROAT TROUBLE IN VOUR LEGS GAIN OR LOSS OF WEIGHT I/Lpss OF MEMORV OR AMNESIA
RUNNING EARS INDIGESTION OR RNEUMATISM 
1/ HRONIC 0R FREQUENT COLDS . LIVER OR INTESTINALTROUSLE y/gmz. JOINT. OR OTHER DEFORMITY ?Ijsnvous TROUBLE OF ANY SORT
. TOOTH TROUBLE mow: TROUBLE OR CALI. STONES DRUG OR NARCOTIC HABIT
1/ 9""5'7'5 SSOF ARM. LEG. FINGER. OR TOE DRINKING HABIT
VII-HAY FEVER $523,53me ?0 5m?- DRUG 0? TENDENCIES
ZIWVE YOU (Chock each Item) 22. FEMALES ONLY: A. HAVE YOU B. COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING:
IV JIORN CLASSES SUICIDE BEEN PREGNANT AGE AT ONSET OF NENSTRUATION
WORN AN ARTIFICIAL EYE VB A SLEEP WALKER HAD A VAGINAL DISCHARGE INTERVAL BETWEEN PERIODS
HEARING AIDS BODI TREATEO TOR A FENALEDISORDER DURATION OF PERIODS
OR STAMMERED . UP HAD PAINFUL MENSTRUATION DATE OF LAST PERIOD
1/ WORN . A BACK SUPPORT HAD IRREGULAR HENSTRUATION QUANTITY: CI NORMAL Ducassnr: CI scum
23. 5% you HAD IN THE 24. 33:33:35 #1333311? you 25. WHAT Is YOUR USUAL OCCUPATION: 26. $90" (Check one)
MONTHS 7' 

 

 

I 332:? 4770??

 

 

 

 

 

 

YES NO CHECK EACH ITEM YES OR NO. EVERY ITEM CHECKED MUST BE FULLY EXPLAINED IN BLANK SPACE ON RIGHT

 

 

 

l/?27, HAVE You BEEN UNABLE TO HOLD A JOB BECAUSE OF:
A. SENSITIVITYTO CHEMICALS. DUST. SUNLIGHT. ETC.
9. INABILITY To PERFORM CERTAIN MOTIONS
C. INABILITY TO ASSUME CERTAIN POSITIONS
O. OTHER MEDICAL REASONS (109., 3.3-. anon.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

HAVE YOU EVER WORKED WITH RADIOACTIVE SUB-


 

DID YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY WITH SCHOOL STUDIES
OR ran. give details)

A

 

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN REFUSED EM PLOYM ENT BECAUSE 
(Ifyea, ?no reason and dive
a: 

 

?gs

 

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DENIED LIFE INSURANCEI
(If yes. state reason and (we dera?s)

 

f6f7

32. HAVE YOU HAD. OR HAVE YOU BEEN ADVISED TO HAVE.

ANY (If yes describe and Eve 
ago at which occurred). I 

HAVE You EVER BEEN A PATIENT (committed or
voluntary) IN A HENTAL HOSPITAL OR 
IUW (Nyes. spec-Afr when. where. why. and
name of doctor. and ?implore address of
hmp?ul n! clinrc)

HAVE YOU EVER HAD ANY ILLNESS OR INJURY OTHER

THAN THOSE ALREADY (If yes. specify

when. where. and give dermis) a X4 17
a 

35 HAVE YOU CONSULTEDOR BEEN TREATED BY 1.4 L5 
PHYSICIANS. HEALERS. OR OTHER PRACTITIONERS 

 

33



 

gE



 

WITHIN 5 (If yes. give com-
plete address of (factor. hospital. clinic.
and dnfmI?y'I

 

A35 HAVE YOU TREATED YOURSELF FOR ILLNESSES OTHER

THAN MINOR 601.05! (If yes. which illnesses)



 

r37. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN REJECT ED FOR MILITARY
SERVICE BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL MENTAL OR OTHER
REASONSI (If yes, give date and reason for
rejection) .



 

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN OISCHARGED FROM MILITARY
SERVICE BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL MENTAL OR OTHER
(If yes. give date, reason, and
type of duel-marge.- whether honorable,
other them honorable, {or un?tiness or un-
suirebrl?y)

.38

 

39. HAVE YOU EVER RECEIVED. IS THERE PENDING. HAVE .
. YOU APPLIED FOR. OR DO YOU INTEND TO APPLY FOR
PENSION OR COMPENSATION FOR EXISTING DISABIL-
(tires. specily what kind. granted by
whom. and what amount. when. why)

I CERTIFY HAVE REVIEWED THE FOREGOING INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY ME AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I AUTHORIZE ANY OF THE DOCTORS. HOSPITALS. OR CLINICS MENTIONED ABOVE T0 FURNISH THE GOVERNMENT A COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF MY MEDICAL RECORD FOR PURPOSES
OF PROCESSING MY APPLICATION FOR THIS EMPLOYMENT OR SERVICE.

TYPEO OR PRINTED NA OF EXAMINEE Slsun?a 4? 
yeah/mi ?aw/104;?

40. PHYSICIAN 5 SUMMARY ANDELABORATION OF ALL PERTINENT DATA (Physician shat! comment on all positive answer: In Item: wthru 89DATE 1 NATU NUMBER or ATTACHED
(55OOVI??uguf It.) o-euuo

 

 

..

Attachment to Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination

For Information and G?uidancetof Medical Examiner

Name of Examinee $10 Zora?? ?ier 

(Type or print) ?Last First Middle

The following portions of the attached examination report form need not be. completednecessary unless facilities for affording Same are not readily available.

48. Not required unless examinee is over 35 years of age oi examination indicates such is
desirable.

 

49. Is necessary unless facilities for affording same are not readily available.

71. Audiometer examinations should be afferded whenever possible for all Special Agent
Special Agents. Applicants for the Special Agent position will not be
accepted it the hearing loss exceeds a 15 decibel average in either ear in the conver-
sational speech range (500, 1000, -2000 cycles).

I
For All Examinees, Whether Clerical or Special.Agent Applicants or Employees:
The medical examiner should answer the following guestion: 

=3 Examines EB{l:lrs not qualified for? strenuous physical exertion.

1?

To be Answered in the CaSe?of All Male Employees, and lilale Applicants:

1. Does examinee hate any defects restricting or prohibiting his participation in defensive
tactics and dangerous assignments which might entail the practical use of firearms?

 

1N9 l:lees If "yes" please specify defects.

 

i

2. Does examinee have any defects prohibiting safe operation of motor vehicles?

l:l Yes If ?yes? please specify detects.

 

 

test at least 20/40 in- one. and 20/ 100 in the other, corrected or an 
examiner:~ wear corrective glasses while operating a motor vehicle? es
If recommendation is based on a factor other than above standard, indicate basis

hires/i702 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desirable Weight Ranges for Males

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Height Small Frame Medium Frafne Large Frame
514" 117 - 125 1237 135 131- 148
5'5" 120 - 129 126 1.39 134 - 152
5?7"11m51:19:185'10511331 144 - 154 150 - 166 160 - 180
.185
6'167 163169 180 178'- 196 188 - 211medium

Examinee's frame is [:lsmali I26
5. Considering above weight ta ame, and other individual physical characteristics,
I consider his present weigh Satisfactory DExcessive DDeficient

El 
again

6. Under proper medical supervision, examinee should pounds

pounds

 

Remarks:

 

556838

(Signatmcal Examiner)
:v/V 
(Date)



A
i

 

 

 

?v 3 
9

January 5, 1966
PERSONAL 

Mr. Cartha D. BeLoach
Federal Bureau at hiveetigation
Waahmgton, C.

Bear hir. heLoach:

A careful review has been. made of the findings of the recent
inspection of the Crhneiiecorde ?ivision and the various operations have
been rated as follows: Specific Divieion Gperations and Contacts .. Enceiient;
Physical" Condition and Maintenance, Administrative Operations and 
Matters Very Goon. 

Division space in the Justice Building and Old Post (mice Building
. was found to be well arranged, secure and. efficiently utilized. The new
3 space acquired in the Old Post affine Building since the last inspection has
proVidcd a marked immorement hi?orhmg conditions. Minor housekeeping
deficiencies and potential safety hazards, which "were loaned to your attention
15 should be corrected. 

 

I was pleased to learn that division programs continue to reemt
in an extremely favorable portrayal of the Bureau's op oratione in the various
newe media; Your imaginative and approach to this very 1m?-
pox-taut phase of. the Bureau?s work must he continued by the new division head.

3 The fact that the apprehension of seven of the nineteen "Top Ten" --
fugitiveseince the last inspection was directly attributable to fugitive publicity
emanating from the division is?a noteworthy accomplishment. This important

.program benefits the general public, clearly depicts ,the outstanding coopera-
.tionzextended by? the Bureau to other law enforcement agencies throughout the
country, and further emphahizee the Bureau's position of leadership in law
enforcement. Fugitive publicity must continue to be afforded aggressive 
attention.

You can take pride in the fact that during the past year the division
has been able to successfully fulfill its obligatbne in the crime research field

1 - Mr. .Callahan (Attention Mr. J. B. Adamo) (With Enclosure)
1 - SOG Inspection File Crim cords Division no-
Personnel File Cartha D. eLoach 

{52:3 ?fncnami?o) See Note Last Page

Ch

dd:


4- i :9 


. (Tim
A a 7 a - 

 

 

 

NY lug-? I I


Mr. cm s. nemacn

which produced many tangible results while simultaneously handling a tremolo-'-
dons in?ux of cassette name checks for the White House. I expect this fine
record to be continued meter the new Assistant Bircctor.

I note with pleasure that both accuracy our! production records
compiled by the Correspondence and fi?ours Section have increased materially
since the last inspection. While this is gratifying, the very nature of this
work dictates that even greater efforts he essences toward the objective of
producing completely error-tree correspondence to the general public and
outside sources, who cannot nothing short of perfection from the Bureau.
Also, I am extremely concerned about any delay in handling correspondence.
It is true that the volume of correspondence is heavy and may vary from day
to clay, but despite this, I will not tolerate delays and the division must devise
tight administrative controls and procedures which will obtain the desired
results. The cones-indexing recommended by the Inspector in the Special
Correingortclentsl List should help to eliminate delay and error.

The record number of individuals who availed themselves of our
tour facilities during the past eleven months clearly shows that a tour of the
FBI continues to he a prime tourist attraction in Washington with definite
appeal to all segments of the public, Our tours should be the subject or
constant evaluation and analysis regarding subject matter and presentation
in elm-lib to insure that this tremendous public relations potential will be fully

it exp cued.

 

I am extremely interested in the early establishment of a National
Crime Information Center and the development of a practical computer system
for use as a base for an eventual-nationwide system, I note that you have for-e
isolated plans and that aggressive action is being taken towers making this
program operational as soon as possibles This program must receive vigorous
attention to insure that we will assume a position of leadership in this new,
highly specialized area of law enforcement;

whereisory and administrative assignments were observed to be
equitably shared. Stencgraphic and typing production was above one the retype
percentage below the Seat of Government averages. This production average,
however, was less than that achieved at the time of the last inspection and
resulted from the below-average leveliattained by stonograshers in the
Correspondence and Tours Section} The Inspector's instructions for improve-
ment in this section must be follovled closely-{y

.. 2,
Willi?"

 

 

 

 

 

i
M53 3 92?:

Mr. Cartha BeLoach

The wholehearted participation of crime Records Division
genome! in the Bureau's suggestion program is indicative of a healthy
interest in improving cor operations and is certainly in accordance with
my desires, Your alertness in eliminating three positions in the
Correspondence and Tours Section, resulting in savings, is creditable,
Your plan to have experienced. clerical employees handle part of the name
check work load new bandied by Agents should be fully explored by the
division. The potential for savings have is substantial,

The voluntary overtime being permeated by the division 
to be productive, eqidiabiy shared and essential, Training: programs are
well orgnieed and effective. 1 was pleased to note that the Inspector found
the morale of the staff to be very highg

. Year outstanding success in developing top-quality contacts in
Government, private inchietry and other fields, is moot commendable. It
is obvious from the ever-increasing requests for our services by the White
House staff that the faith and confidence placed in the Bureau far 
that placed in any other Government agency? You can take considerable pride
in? the fact that your liaison with high White House o?ioiala and the expedite
aervic?e the division has beau able to provide have been major factora in the
continued trust in and reliance on the Bureau.? This, together with the top- 
level yea have maintained with Congress, has resulted in the Bureau?s
iotei'cets being promoted to the fullest extent in both the executive andiegis-v
iattve branches of the Government. The substantial increase in contacta
develoyed in the field, which grogram, of course, is a responsibility? of the
division, to moat gratifying and to a program he constantly
followed to insure that all offices are particioating to the fullest extent.

After your review, these findings should he hamediatoly referred
to Aeolotaot Director Wick for careful study and review by him and pie Number
?ne Man. Within thirty days of receipt of this letter air. Wick should advise
of the corrective action taken.

 

meet 3:3 1 NOTE: Based on meme
3 ely yo W.M. Felt to Mr. Tolson
dated 1/5/66, re -

"Inspection .. Crime
John Ed Hoover Records Division; Inspectc

R9 own]

.?.Rob W11: nalAtt gm ?1 W3.
Fideral gin-can chInvgefilasagion' enh Might 
Washington 

  
 

DeLoach 

Callahan 

Contad m.

 

 

 

 

 

 

-. a.
1' . A 

 

January 28, 1966 i

I

PERSONAL 

Dear DeLoach: 

It is a real pleasure to extend
my personal congratulations on the occasion
of your Twenty-second Anniversary in the
Bureau. I deeply appreciate your loyalty 1
and dedicated efforts over the years and I 
hope the Bureau will continue to enjoy your 
valued services for many years to come.

 

Sincerely,

EEC-HQ g; cg" W2
Mr. Cartha D. eLoach 5" in 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 2 1'13 . xi
Washington, D. C. 7 

 

    
 

SENTF 0M D. 0.
Anniversary 1/29 - Saturday TIME ?37, 

DATE
JE?zrm (3) BY

 

 



 



MIL TELETYPH 

 

 

alawwsi? .

scrimmage) a up 1a mm



 

MR. TOISON January 5, 1966
W. M. FELT

INSPECTION CRIME RECORDS DIVISION
INSPECTOR R. C. HALSTEAD

6 - 6 
12/ 17/ 5 SYNOPSIS

Officials: At time of inspection, Cartha D. Bel-each was Assistant Director in Charge
of the division since 1/28/59. Robert E. Week was Noniber One Man and had so served
since 9/11/59. Last inspection: 11/24/64 - 12/8/64.

Physical Condition and Maintenance - Very Good (Last Inspection Very Good). Space
in Justice and Old Post Office (0P0) Buildings well arranged, secure, adequate and

fully utilized. Move by Uniform Crime Reporting Section in 0P0 has alleviated congested
situation. New tour exhibits established, old ones refurbished and 2 additional exhibits

in preparation. Need still exists (detected last inspection) for improved light IeVel in
Room 5625. Potential physical hazards and several minor housekeeping delinquencies
detected. Instructions issued to immediately correct delinquencies. Old Xerox copy
records and copies of supply requisition forms retained ordered destroyed.

Specific Division Operations Excellent (Last Inspection - Excellent). Programs of
division results in extremely favorable portrayal of Bureau'seoperations in all media.
"Top Il?en" Program highly effective. '7 of 19 "Top Ten" fugitives apprehended since

last inspection attributable to'fugitive publicity. Television program, "The FBI, 
widely accepted. Radio, television, magazines, trade journals and newspapers

ex?oited as outlets for fugitive publicity and informative data regarding Bureau.
Imaginative research program produced data regarding 75 articles and 238 statements
by Director since last inspection which set-e widely publicized in national publications.
Research assistance to outside writers resulted in many favorable articles as well as 2
major books regarding Bureau. Format of Law Enforcement Bulletin further improved -
circulation at all-time?high 53, 508. Director's introductory remarks widely publicized.
Four new police training films produced and distributed to field 4/65. Tremendous in-
flux of expedite name checks for White House (6, 000 since 1/1/65) handled without any
additional personnel. Economies effected by careful selection of additional approved
Bureau speakers to reduce travel costs in field. ProductiOn and accuracy of
Correspondence and Tours Section improved since last inspection. Tours monitored -
presentation excellent exhibits highly effective. Statistical contributors to Uniform
Crime Reports (can) increased to 8, 700 (last inspection 8500). Establishment of
automated National Crime Information Center aggressively pursuedn, Appropriate
research underway, training being afforded key personnel? Ins? ructed to make program

.41" f;
1 Mr. Ca?allFan (no; cm. "Sini??iif?e?ii, 
l-Pers ,e snowarthamgg. - - an . 
Enclose EEJV 63 1111101311 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

CONTINUED - oven

 

Memo for Mr. Tolson 
Re: Inspection - Grime Records Division

operational at; earliest paedible date. Followuup on Known Offenders Program
progressing satisfactorily. Estimate one year to complete processing backlog.
Streamlining suggestions made regarding UCR operations.

Administrative Operations .. Very Good (Last Inspection - Very Good). Supervisory
and administrative assignments equitably shared. Steno and typing production above
Seat of Govemment (306) average; percentage of retypes below average. Since 7/ 1/ 64,
54 suggestions submitted; 24 adopted and 1 still pending. Savings in. excess of $12, 00!)
achieved in division by 9311111th 3 68-4 positions. Plan by division to transfer
work from Agents to Review has merit, should be fully developed and put into
effect if feasible?. Minor errors detected in fl?ime and Attendance record?s - none
affecting fringe. benefits - and; outdated forms in use by division ordered updated.
Inspector suggested working hours of 2 correspondence units" be "changed from 9:00
AM - 5:39 PM to 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM to expedite ?ow of mail (approved). Inspector
propos?ed?occupational addresses of close contacts oi Director be cross?indexed in
Special Correspondents? LiSt (this will eliminate delay such as recently occurred in
connection? with of calendar sent Director). Division has eliminated
some. publications from tour route and nilpublications made unavailable during peak
rush periods, thereby reducingivolume 9? Printing being produced; very favorable. 
Field speeches, supervised in division, reached new all-awe high in 1964 and on way to
establiShihg new high in 196 5. .

Personnel Matters - Very Good (Last Inapection - Very Good). 38 Special Agents

and loo?clerical personnel assigned (this is one over authorized Agent quota but ap-
proved by the Director temporarily for as long as it ianecessary for Inapector E. C.
Kemper to remain in Hollywood). Staff adequate but not excessive. Voluntary overtime
productive, equitably shared-and essential. Noemployees on probation; no Agents or
male clerks overWeight. Training programs effective. 36 incentive awards since

last inspection. Morale very high. 4

Contacts - Excellent (Last Inspection - Excellent). Highly effective, top?quality
contacts continue to be developed by division. Assistant to the Director DeLoach's
closepersonal contact with the White House has strengthened trust and-confidence in
Director and Bureau. Unidue contacts with Congress have been of continuing benefit

to Bureau in legislative matters. Increased high-level contacts with news media have
resulted in extremely effective press coverage..- Very close liaison continues with
NationalAme?rican liegion through personal participation by Assistant to the Director
DeLoach in topglevel Legion activities. Substantial increase noted contaCts -
program supervised by division. Assistant to the Director ileL?oach continues to handle
numerous speaking engagements before topulevel groups. Close liaison contact with
television representatives has contributed-to. success of television pregram ?The FBI. 

RECOMMENDATENS: .
1. Immediately prior to the inspectionACartha D. DeLoach was
designated by the Director to be Assistant to the Director effective 12/ 81/ 6 5.

 

 

. 
i
i

.

Memo for Mr. Tolson
Re: Inspection .. Crimc Records Division

 

1hr. DeLoach (not on probation) makes an exceptionally fine personal appearance,
Possessed an engaging personality and has an outstanding ability to handle public
relations. He has been very effective in maintaining personal liaison with the White
House for the Director. He has extensive valuable sources in Congress, the Executive
Branch, private industry and news media. These sources have been used to great
advantage to promote the best interests of the Buread and the Director. Mr. DeLoach
is a dedicated career employee who is intensely loyal to the Director. He is a skilled

public speaker and makes an outstanding hnpreseion as a Bureau official. He has
exceptional leadership qualities and is highly regarded by employees under his
Supervision. He is highly qualified to serve in his new assignment. If approved,
attached letter will advise Mr. DeLoach of the inspection findings. A cepy of this
letter is being designated for Assistant Directdr Wick.

2. Immediately prior to the inspection, Mr. Wick, vim had previously
been Number One Man, was designated as Assistant Director in Charge oi, the Crime
Records Division. $24, 548 - not on probation) (Mr. Thomas E. Bishop -
Gide-15 $19, 415 .. reported to the division on 1/3/66 as Number One Man). Mr.

Wick makes a superior personal appearance. He has definite leadership qualities
and is a highly skilled administrator. He has displayed exceptional talent in handling
press relations. He is a dedicated career employee who is constantly alert to
promote the best interests of the Bureau and the Director. He is highly qualified
it?: his new assignment.

3. Recommendations regarding other personnel being handled
separately.

- 34: SEE NEXT PAGE

 

 

 

0

Memo for Mr. Tolson .
Re: Inspection -- Crime Records Division

DETAILS

. . . . . . . . . . . .vsnr GOG)

Division space in Justice and 0390 Buildings well arranged,? seclu'e,
adequate and fully utilized. Move by Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Section in
January, 1965, from third to sixth ?oor, 0P0, alleviated congestion. Programs
being handled in UCR Section intimately connected with Voucher-Statistical Section
of Administrative Division as data developed is stored in computer complex physically
located in Identification Building. Current space limitations prevent more expeditious
handling it the 2 sections were contiguous or under same roof. No change has occurred
in space allotbd in Justice Building except storage space obtained for reprint material
in sub-basement. Move of this reprint material from 8th floor will be accomplished
following installation of lights and wire enclosure in' newly acquired storage area.

 

Eight new tour exhibits established, old ones refurbished since last
inspection with 2 additional exhibits (extortion and bank robbery matters) in preparation.
Installation of lighted exit signs and washable wall coverings and rearrangemnt of unit
in laboratory are aditional improvements made along tour route. One Agent secured neu
holster in accordance with Insp actor's instructions.

. Apparent need still exists (detected on last inspection) for improved
light level in Room 562 5, used by outside newsman and where extensive proofreading
is performed. Potential physical hazards detected consisting of damaged, worn and
disintegrated ?oor tile, faulty light switches and loose telephone wire in CFO and
broken bench leg and loose metal moulding in tour space, Justice Building. Old Xerox
copy records and copies of supply requisition terms being retained 0P0 ordered
destroyed. Several minor housekeeping delinquencies noted. Instructions issued to
immediately correct delinquencies and to follow closely those matters which must be
handled by General Services Administration, particularly those v11 ich constitute
physical hazards, to insure remedial action is taken as as possibleIMCELLENT

Dynamic programs in effect which result in extremely favorable
portrayal of Bureau's operations in all forms of news media. "Tap Ten" Program
continues to be highly effective. 19 ?Top ri?en" fugitives apprdiended since last impaction
7 directly attributable to fugitive publicity. Replacements for ?Top Ten? selected
judiciously to insure continued "national interest.

to the

In 5/65 Assistant/Director ably represented the Director in history-
maldng utilization of "Early Bird Satellite" method of international transmission of
television signals as effective means of fugitive publicity in cooperation with Scotland

- 4 - SEE NEXT PAGE

 

 

 

Memo for Mr. Tolson .
Re: Inspection- Crinie Records liivision

Yard and Royal Canadiam Mounted Police. Resultant capture of badly wanted RCMP
fugitive by Bureau Agents created an inestimable amount of favorable publicity to
Bureau as well as effectively highlighting our leadership in police cooperation matters.

Radio television trade journals as well as magazines and newspapers
being fully exploited as fugitive publicity weapons. Assistant to the Director currently
participates in national weekly radio programs carried by American Broadcasting
Company and the National Alcoa Radio Series. He also represents Bureau in weekly
programs of an informative nature carried by local stations WINK and WOOK. Quality
radio scripts are created and distributed for use by field. In addition, items of
interest are made available to influential broadcasters who have been developed as
friends and supporters of the Bureau.

Weekly television show "The which entails exhaustive research
as well as full-time representation by division representative as technical director,
has been very well received. Interest this program has stimulated is reVealed by
fact the show currently being carried in Japan.

In April, 1965, 4 new police training films were completed and
distributed to field. They concern arrest procedures, interview techniques, burglary
investigation and police record systems and many favorable comments were
received. 

Research programs resulted in production of data for '75 articles
and 288 statements by Director which were widely distributed in such publications 
as,"Look "Parade, "Christian Science Monitor "Kansas Law Review" and .
as.? S. News and World Report. Also provided research assistance for 2 major
books highly complimmtary regarding Bureau by Andrew Tully and David Sentner,
inaddition to assisting numerous other prominent writers who were engaged in writing?
concerning Bureau's operations.

Tremendous influx of White House expedite name checks (approximately
6000 received since 1/ 1/65), indicative of high degree of confidence placed in Bureau.
Division able to handle these nanie checks expeditiously without increasing number
of personnel. Exploring possibility of utilizing experienced clerical personnel for
position as Reviewer Analyst to relieve Agent supervisors of significant part of the
name check load. Instructed to fully develop this plan, and if feasible, pIaCe into
effect soon as possible.

Some 100 additional Bureau speakers in field carefully selected and

approved (prifnarily Senior Resident Agents) since last inspection. This resulted
in considerable economies by reducing travel cost in reaching key groups in outlying

.5-

 

 

 

-V, .vn 

Mean for Mr. Tolson
Re: hepection - Crime. Records Division

 

I 

.5.-

areas. instructed to be highly selective in designating additional speakers to insure
continued excellence of speech program.

. Circulation of Law Enforcement Bulletin at alletime high - 58, 500.
Format further improved and Director?s introductory remarks publicized extensively.
The Investigator continues to retain its high quality and wide appeal to both Agent and
clerical personnel. New hooldets such as "99 Facts About the and "How Bonding
Can Help the prepared since last inspection and appear to be most
co .ve.

Library operating efficiently and services widely utilized by Bureau
personnel and National Academy. Suggestion made to revise filing procedures so that
most commonly used reference books will be more readily available.

.5 Average numher of items handled by the Correspondence
and Tours Section increased from 5100 per month at time of last inepecticn to

6557 currently. Accuracy rate increased from 99. 22% last inspection to 99. 93% 1

this inspection. Instruc Ed to make every effort to continue this excellent record and
strive to reduce errors to absolute minimum.

588,252 individuals accommodated on FBI tours first 11 months of
1985, an allwtime record. Several tours monitored, presentations excellent . exhibits
highly effective. Instructed to constantly evaluate in order to insure continued
excellence.

Statistical contributors to UCR pregram increased to approximitely
8700 (last inspection 8500). Project continuing to increase contributors from all
city and county agencies. Follow up on Known Offenders Program progressing
satisiactorily. Project undertaken to process backlog of records. Estimnte one year
to complete; Establishment oi National Crime Information Center (NCIG) aggressively
pursued. Bids received for computer equipment to handle initial program. Systems
and design studies underway. Appropriate research and training of key personnel in
progress. Instructed to give close attention to make program operational at earliest
date possible. -

To streamline UCR operations Inspector recommended (1) utilizing

double-pedestal rotor file desk in lieu of three ltd-drawer filing cabinets for active



on. 

statistical files, (2) eliminating the of instructions for punching by
Statistical Section of approximately 7000 return forms and substituting
one cover instruction for all such forms, and (3) exploring possibility of obtaining
automatic stuffing and sealing machine to replace manualcperations."





 

 

 

 

?a . 3

Memo for Mr. 'I'olson
Re: Inspection - Crime Records Division



Division consists of Front Cities (to which Assistant Director, Numbe
One Man, and 2 other supervisory Agents assigned) and 3 Sections, namely Crime
Research Section, Correspondence and Tours Section and Uniform Crime Reporting
Section. Inspector, vlo is assigned to Front Office, is presently in California on
special assignment. Supprvisory and administrative assignments equitably shared.

Division stenographio and typing production at 3. 32 pages per hour
above Seat of Government average of 2. 98 (Division stenographic average 3. 26 pages
per hour and typing average 5. 46 pages per hour as compared with $06 averages of
2. 85 and 3. 25 respectively). Stenographic retypes at 2, 97% and typists retypes at
2. 85% below SOG averages of 5. 63% and 5. 75% for stenographers add typ?m
respectively. Although combined stencgraphicutypist production during period of
survey exceeded 800; average the Division average was less than at time of last
inspection (3. 32 vs: 3. 43). Stenographers in Correspondence and Tours Section
adversely affected over-all Division average as substantially below production level
achieved at last inspection (2. 8 vs. 3. 38). Typists exceeded Division retype level
at time of last inspection (2. 85% vs. 2. Inspector issued instructions to closely
follow stenographic production in Correspondence and Tours Section and typists in
Division so that higher level of performance may be attained.

During period 7/ 1/ 64 to 6/30/65, Division submitted 22 suggestions,
8 of which were adopted. From 7/1/65 to 12/1/65 5, 32 suggestions were submitted,
16 being adopted and pending final action. These adopted resulted in improvement
in Division's over-all efficiency. The 7 existing odd-hour shifts are justified. Since
last inspection 3 (38-4 positions in Correspondence and Tours Section eliminated
resulting in annual savings of in excess of $12, 003. Consideration being given by
Division to establishment of 2 Review Analyst positions in order to transfer?
significant portions of work in handling White House name check requests from Agent
personnel to qualified, competent clerical employees. Plan has merit; therefore,
instru ctions issued to fully develop and if feasible put into effect as soon as possible.

Flow of work expedited and working conditions improved in Uniform
Crime Reporting Section with addition of 3 rotor files since last inspection. Tour
leaders are thoroughly trained in precautionary measures designed to prevent
accidents to touring public and such accidents being held to minimtnn. Inspector
recommended certain magazines in Bureau Library be purged and rearranged to make
room for the volumes now being filed on the tops of racks. Crime Research Section
instructed to destroy the unused cross-index for Special Mailing List. 2 outdated
forms in use by Division ordered updated as soon as possible.

.7-

 

 

 

r-
I
1

Memo for Mr. Tolson
Re: Inspect ion - Crime Records Division

A Suggestion proposed (Assistant to the Director concurs) that 2
correspondence units in Correspondence and Tours Section change their schedule of
working hours from 9:00 AM . 5:30 PM. to 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM in order to even off
flow of mail during the early morning hours which should result in greater efficiency
and accuracy (approved). Suggestion proposed (Assistant to the Director concurs)
that occupational addresses of clone associates of the Director be cross-indexed in the
Special Correspondents' List to expedite acknowledgment, insure proper acknowledg-
ment, and to have this information available to all division. Minorerrors and omissions
noted in Time and Attendance records detected .. none affecting fringe benefits. Tour
training class of 30 young men recently completed. Previous instructions re cutting
back on reprint material being implemented. Some publications previously available
to touring public eliminated where overlap or duplication existed and all publications
unavailable during peak rush periods. This procedure should be continued as assists
in reducing volume of printing.

Division continues to supervise Bureau speech program Which reached
8, 594 in field in calendar year 1964 - new all-thus high. 8,198 field speeches have been
handled during first 10 months of calendar year 1965Special Agents and 160 clerical personnel assigned
to Division (SAC T. E. Bishop, Richmond, ordered in as Division #1 Man - to report
1/ 3/ 65). Agent and clerical staff adequate . not excessive (Director has approved
that division operate one over antherized quota of 3'1 so long as Inspector E. C.
Kemper remains on special assignment in Hollywood). Voluntary overtime for 3-month
period August .. October, 1965, averaged 2'39" which appears essential, equitably
shared and productive. his employees on probation; no Agents or male clerical 
personnel overweight. Training programs effective. Since last inspecti) there were
36 incentive awards, including 18 outstanding ratings. Morale very high.



Highly effective, top-quality contacts continue to be developed by the
division all of which are of far?reaching benefit to the Bureau. Assistant to the .
Director's close personal contact with the White House on practically a daily beets
has greatly strengthened the trust and cor?idencev in the Bureau's operations.

The unique liaison with the White House, together with added topnlevel contacts
developed in Gongress, has effectively protected the Bureau's interests and .
increased the esteem in which the Bureau and the Director are held by the Executive
and Legislative Branches of the Government. Through (carefully developed contacts,
recently enacted legislation providing penalties for the assassination of the President

.3.

 

 

 

8


Memo for Mr. Tolson?
Re: Inspection Crime Records Division

the FBI was Speci?cally designated as having investigative reaponsibility. This is a
most unique occurrence and only through extremely high-level legislative contacts

of this Division could such have been accomplished. Contacts continue to be 
established by this Division with highly placed individuals in the news media on a
"nationwide basis and this has resulted in exceptionally effective press coverage, all

of which continually increases the tremendous esteem in which the Bureau and Director
are held by the pttlic?. Very close liaison continues With the National American Legion
through the personal participation of the Assistant to the Director in top-level Legion
activities. Stress continues on the field to insure that quality SAC contacts are.
maintained; an inorease of thirty such contacts noted since the last inspection. . In the
confidential warfare campaign agaith communism and other subversive
elements, this Division has contributed extenSively to the campaign by utilizing key
press centacts and has been priznarily responsible for its success. Assistant to the
Director continues to handle many speeches before top~level groups. The success of
the current television series "The is the result, to a great extent, of the close .
liaison contacts developed over a period of time by this Division with the various 
elements of the television mediam. a

 

 

 

FD-253 (Rev. 5-27-64) . ?tn

i ?9

?1 ?Ab UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

 

In Reply. Please Refer to 1/ 4/ 66

File No. -

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington. D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent of the FBI who has previously
contributed to this [mid and who dies from any cause except self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent, lam for-
warding herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of $10, payable to to be included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction after the Agent has been a member of the iund for a continuous period of two years. it is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntaW. gratuitous contribution to said fund which I understand
is to be administered in the following manner.

The Director of the FBI will appoint a committee which shall censider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and eXpending of said fund, wll'lch committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division of the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the :Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist-
ant Director of the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $10,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment (or SOG Divisionl
SA Cartha D. DeLoach 1/3/66 Assistant to the Director
The following person is designated as my beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund:
Name (primary Write if female) I Relationship
Wife b5
Address 
Ngme (contingent. beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) . Relationship
Address A

 

DO you desire to designate the above-listed?beneficiaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? Yes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed In the line of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nanie (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Wife
Address

Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; nae given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

Very truly yours,

?Va 
??uent I. If J1:

can 1.35.3 A .
J?gh Ems Rd 

Assistant to the Director

 
   

 


Iv? llalluvr, Eilugzel?

3" '45 S-ecd 

 

 

January 31, 1966




Mr. Cartha DE'DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

It is a pleasure to commend you for the
outstanding attitude you exhibited in reporting for duty
today despite extremely hazardous travel conditions.

You demonstrated a sincere devotion to
duty in considering your services so essential that in
spite of an announcement that all Federal Government
agencies would be closed you reported for duty. I do
not want the opportunity to pass without advising youaof
my appreciation and that I have instructed that a copy
of this letter be placed in your personnel file.

Sincerely yours,

 

 

 

 

 


FD-zela (Rev. 5? 9 
A ECEIPT FOR .

FEDERAL INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date 3/11/66

I certify that I have [3 received returned the following Government property for official use:

Who's Who of National Leaders, CPUSA Copy Very trul yours 

i The Government property which you horeb acknowledge an"
is charged to you and you are responsible or taking care 3
of it and returning it when its use has been completed(Signature)
DO NOT MARK OR WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN 
C. D3 DeLoach
?1 (Typed name)


W, 3 Assmtant to Dlrector

- a
m, has A334 ALE) ibw?

$1a; r-q-S.

 

 

 

:3
"23mg; a 
an ?a .

3/7/66 ?not 

Mr. Casper, DiviSion 2

Mrs. Lockhart, Divisionb

 

 

 

I have destro'yed ?opy 1410f Training Document 71, 
Standards, Recruitment, Selection of Patrolmen.
I have copy 3 of Training Document 71, ?h ich was

formerly charged to Mr. DeLoach.

R. E. 

79a, . 1/9?

G. 3 [-0.404

 

 

 



. - 
OHIONAI lom no. lo It
MAY In: tomoH sow-'06
GSA GEN. NO. 27 
1 Tolson

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT oaoach
Mohr
Memorandum 
0' :01: 
To Mr. CallahaJN 33,15:
fwd?; ave 0n 
tier;
FROM . ece. oom
R. E. Wick Lime?
- Candy
PROPERTY
0 i The following property formerly charged gartha Dekle
DeLoach when Assistant Director in charge of the Crime ecords Division

should be charged to me: i
Official
Colt/Police Revolver No. 633387
5th Floor Master Key (Tel-Key Cabinet 5642)
Grand Master Key 
Key to Room 5632 

Key to Room 5634 
Keysto Range Gymnasium 
Key to Room~5636 
Key to Room 5625 a 4264
Key to Room 4266; 
Key to Room 4726 4726

Key to, Room 4718 
Key to Room 5348 - Kept in Room 5625

Key to Room 1651" (Tel?Key 
Key to Room 1730 

Key to Room 1734 

Key to Room B-634 4726

Nation of Islam Monograph - Copy #104
The following property should be ?charged to Thomas E.

 

  

 

ishop:
Who's Who of National Leaders, CPUSA Copy 5

?0.1.50 fRop. Monograph -C Line Copy #219, Jan.thru June, 1965 
2-33-43 . 9w"
20w
FOR m3. Dr: Loam'ts 751/
67" 3V 5 
'3 i 1965 a
mm 193% 7 MAR 2
XEROX
MAR 9 1966 51.5?}

 

 

 

 

 

 

. 7 

?we ?i?i 
FD-xes (Rev. 8-16-63) 0 .

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

 

 

Name of Employee: CARTHAD.Q LOACH
Where Assigned:
(Division) (Section, Unit)

Of?cial Position Title and Grade: 

Rating Period: from Who MW

 

I 
ADJECTIVE RATING: OUTSTANDING T?i?zii 5

Outstanding, Excellent; Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory

 

 

 

Rated?: Associate Director 4/1/66
Signature Title Date
Reviewed by: .
Signature Title Date

 

  
 

 
  

 

 

 

 

 

Rating Approved by: DirBCtor lgg? 
TYPE 3 -
Official Administrative
Annual 60-Dax
1. 90-Day
Transfer
Separation from Service
Special

QAPR 131% 

I 34};

 

 

 

 

0 

CARTHA D. DE LOACH
ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR WESTIGATIVE

Mr. DeLoach, during the first nine months of this rating
period, was AssistantiDirector in charge of the Crime Records Divi-
sion and, in view of his outstanding services in this capacity, was
appointed Assistant to the Director on December 31, 1965, where
he has continued to perform in such an exceptional manner that an
Outstanding rating is merited for the period April 1, 1965, to
March 31, 1966.

As Assistant to the Director, Mr. DeLoach has been dele~
gated the reSponsibility for coordinating the work of the Bureau in a
wide variety of matters of a criminal, civil, applicant, internal security
and espionage nature, as well as crime research matters, special tours
and projects, preparation and distribution of the FBI Law Enforcement
Bulletin and Uniform Crime Reports, and other related programs such
as the "Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. Activities in these fields have
continued to increase, resulting in even greater burdens being placed
on our top-level executive staff. Mr. DeLoach has shouldered a major
share of these obligations and has displayed unusual talents in every
area, meeting new challenges head on and with superior ability. He
maintains a continuous review of programs and procedures and keeps
the Director and me immediately apprised of developments inimportant
matters, relieving us of as many decisions as possible.

An indefatigable worker, Mr. DeLoach has the capability
and imagination to handle all assignments in a superb fashion. He
presents a splendid appearance and is unusually effective in his
personal contacts; He represents the Bureau in inter-Departmental
and inter~Government committees and conferences of a policy-making
nature, as well as contacts with highly placed officials, with great
finesse. He is greatly respected throughout the FBI and by his
personal contacts.

A sincere, dedicated career employee, Mr. DeLoach?s
services have been of inestimable value during the past year and
definitely warrant this Outstanding rating. 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

 

omomu tom. no. lo sow-loo
3:33. 33:35). 27 Tolson
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

Memorandum 71/ 1E

 

The Director DATE: 3?28? 66 Boson 

Sullivan 
Tove!
Trotter

 

 

- Mr. Tolson" 

Holmes

4% Gundy
CARTHA DE DE LOACH
Assistant to the Director Investigative

 

 

JOHN 15. MOHR
Assistant to the Director Administrative

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

There are attached for approval the annual performance
reports for Messrs. De Loach and Mohr in which their services have
been rated Outstanding for the period April 1, 1965, to March 31, 1966.
I have signed these ratings as the Rating Official.

In the event you approve these ratings, I respectfully request
that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the Approving
Official. Thereafter, they must be transmitted to the Department with
other such ratings for approval by the Departmental Committee on Incen-
tive Awards. Messrs. DeLoach and Mohr will then be entitled to cash
incentive awards of $500 as has been approved in the past for Assistant
Directors and above.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

0/93

That you, as Approving Official, sign the original and the
copy of each of the attached Outstanding performance ratings and upon
approval of the ratings by the Departmental Committee on Incentive
Awards, Mr. DeLoach and Mr. Mohr each be furnished a copy of his
rating and approved for a cash award of $500. 

?gm/944? :3 
/Wy/m MVP a-

Enclosuresv
LDH jap W?l'wb 
1(3) 
?Per onnel File of John P. Mohr
Ewe a a; map,

W7

 



3:


 

 

 

 

3 Callahan
1 Conrad
Fell

 

0

April 7, 1966
PERSONAL
it

Mr. Cartha *DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear DeLoach:

It ?is indeed a pleasure?to advise you that your
exceptional performance for the period April 1, 1965, to
March 31, 1966, has merited the rating of Outstanding
which has been approved by the Departmental Committee on
Incentive Awards. There is enclosed a copy of this rating
for your retention.

In recognition of your continued outstanding
services I have been happy to approve an incentive award
for you in the amount of $500. 00 which is represented by
the enclosed check Your responsibilities have been many
and heavy, yet you discharged them with the highest degree
of loyalty and devotion to the interests of the Bureau. I am

 

 

 

 

deeply appreciative. 350.1 46
MAILED at Sincerely, ?4 
6
APR 195 J. Edgar Hoover 
comma: h" 
ft 



Tolson
DeLooch
Moht
Wick
Casper

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cole
Rosen
Sullivan 
Tove!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Enclosures (2)

 

 

 

1 - (Sent Direct)

was) 

Award #66'6-66

 

75(77

b6
Based on memo Mr. Tolson to the Director, 3/28/66.

1 Trotter .
Tele. Room Salutation per file.
Holmes
Gondy MAIL noon CI TELETYPE UNIT 

3/52}

 

 



 



 



 

Mr. 
April 8, 1966 Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
. Mr. Trotter

 

Tale. 110013;,
Miss 
i?Miss 

 

Mr. John Edgar Hoover 
Director Wm?mmwn__?&

Federal Bureau of Investigation 52' 
Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss}

 

 

 

Thanks so much for the outstanding
efficiency report. What with educational bills,
doctor's bills, income taxes, et cetera, the
extra money will certainly come in most handy.
More than that, however, I am very grateful for
your continued faith and confidence in me.

The little recognitions along life's
way certainly serve to do away with the hard
knocks, sacrifices, and hard work, although I
must admit that I am so deeply appreciative and
enthused over my current assignment that, despite
the discouragements that often come up in tough
cases, I can hardly wait to sink my teeth into

Lthe new challenges we face every day.

You have been very goOd to me for many
years and I will never be anything but a loyal,
devoted employee to you and the Bureau.

Sincerely,

7f, *?giw?ed

 

350145 17573;?? g; 34.3: (a 75
:13 i r? APRizl?n? 

 

 



13X Era/ref

 

 

 

i"

 

8-11-64) . i,
A 

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 1 x:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC

Date (at:

I certify that I have 33 received returned the following Government property for official use:

D. C. Official Parking Permit #1905
expires 6-30-67


3453;. 
expire \3 j/


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AD Very truly yours,

The Government property which you hereb acknowledge
is char ed to you and you are responsible or taking care 
of it on returning it when its use has been completed. (Signature(Typed name, Cartha DeLoach
I um '61. 1500 (go

 

 

i 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBJECT:

. 
. OMIONAI FORM NO. I0 SON-106 .

on em. no. no. :7 Tolson
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT W?gkf??h

Memorandum 
Fe]!
MR. TOLSON DATE: 5/19/66 

. 0 
cc Mr. DeLoach $33.

J. H. Gal Mr. Gale Tere.Room__.

 

 

 

Holmes
Candy

 

 

?ag/7&1 

Assistant to the Director DeLoach called last
night from London (via the telephone
facilities), at which time he inquired as to various
matters presently pending.

He was briefed on pertinent matters, such as the
fact that the FBI was deleted from the agencies to be
supervised by the watch-dog committee proposed by the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee; and also-concerning the
Hollenbaugh kidnaping and murder case, as well as other
pertinent matters.

Mr. DeLoach advised he was going to Paris this
morning and would be in care of the Legat in Paris. He
will continue to keep in touch via defense telephone
facilities. 1

ACTION 
For information.



(3) 

 

?965? [27,9 as

 

 

 

 

 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JU ICE
0F INVESTIGATION

 

In Reply, Please Refer to
File No.

Director

Federal Bureau of investigation
United States Department? of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Sir: .

For inclusion in the iund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent at the FBI who has previously
contributed to this lurid and who dies from any causa exceptvseli-destruction while employed as a Speciai Agent, lam for.
warding herewith (?by Check - Money Order) the sum of $10, payable to to be included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction after the Agent has been a member of the fund fora continuous period oi two years. it is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said fund which i underStand
is to be administered in the followmg manner.

The. Director of the FBI will appoint a committee which shall consider'all matters pertaining to the acquisition, sate
keeping and expending of said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division of the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist.
ant Director of the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $10,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies ?in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE SUBMIT BOTH COPIES BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment (or SQG Division)
SA CARTHA . DELOACH 9/ 29/ 65 Executive Offices 
The following person is designated as my beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund: 7
Name if female) Relationship
wife
Addres
Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address 

 

Do you desire to designate the above-listed beneficiaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? E3 Yes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed in the line of duty?, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address
Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

H. 7 T. 7 Ve trul ours 
:14 :{Wboidcr mm: ry 
??i?i?JaP?q?u'i .jbv?i" 
I

#99Special Agent
Tessa Hoover, Ducts: 
I lb 0

 

 

 

Serial Charge-out, Personnel Records 

4-50 (Rev. 2-15-62) .

 

 

 

 

Date of removal Removed by
7 175?? D15 %08 [aspec-
Subleiz? A

 

NWM cm H, 

File and Serial ll? (or other description)

Dated

 

 

Mn.


?v4335725

Appointment 
Fantold
Formal application

Health Benefits Registration form



Investigative report

Medical examination



Performance rating report



. 0/35;
Permanent Brief

Photograph
Veterans Preference Social Security Statement

Waiver of Life Insurance Coverage

Miscellaneous 5W qfa

 

 

 

Removed tn Personnel Actions Unit to be sent to Photostgt?Lob (or)

Mr.

 

 

D?emoved for Mrs. 

 

 

 



Room it ?53.13

 

 

 

This form ts to be removed from file by on employee of Personnel Records upon the return to! the item.

 

 

N0.



 

b6

 

 

Tolson
DeLooch 

 

Mohr

 

Wick
Casper
Callahan 
Conrad
Felt
Gale
Rosco
Sullivan 
Tove}.

Trotter 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tole. Room . 3?

Holmes V13 Ci! 

Goody Mm. noon EL?erv?p 


 

 

October 7, 1966

Mr. Cartha D?elioech
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear DeLoach:

7 It was certainly a pleasure to see you
in my office this morning and to receive the very
beautiful plaques from The American Legion.

I sincerely appreciate the resolutions
which The American Legion adopted and the support
this fine organization has given the Bureau over the 1
years; A 

As a memento of the occasion, lam
enclosing a copy of the photograph which was made
at that time.



Jig/?r? A

WEI


EN 343;}. 
?fe 

31:. a 

Enclosure 1/ 4V

Sincerei?C-l?i 
Hagan 300V 


3V6

  

0317 ?1965

  

 

RaLR:smg??j
(5) 

mil-EB 
We 

 

 

 

January 27, 196'?
PERSONAL

Dear DeLoach:

You will soon be celebrating your
?I?wenty-third Anniversary in the Bureau and I
wanted to take this means of extending my con?-
gratulatione to youi You have my best wishes
- far the day and for the years ahead.

 

 

 

Sincerely,
?i
HOOVER ??51 ?e ,i .
w?k 1% Rays-- 7'1? were? my .
A 
. Elm-137. i" 153,); 
i 45?" UU an? .
Mr. Cartha ?x . 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.
Anniversary 1/29 - Sunday ?st-5W D. o. 
[mm )1
JEH:edm (3) i :7 .

 

 

 

.3: I
335 Jeff:

 

Tolsen
DeLeach 


 

Wickm
Cusge: 


Conrad
Pei:

Gale-m

i Hosen

1 Sullivan 
.11
$2413? LE ?1 3b ?2
Teie. Room >4

Homes 
Candy MAIL noon ranarvpe em 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



.1





(an
1


StaTIdard Form 88
(RevJunc I956)

Bureau of the Budget

~?Circular A-52 (Rcv?)

REPORT OF MEDICAL




EXAMINATION

88?408

 

 



Lam?. Car-7%

LAST NAM NAM IDDLE NA 



fD?/c/e.

2. GRADE AND COMPONENT 0R POSITIO

7% 77,760 r'

3. IDENTIFICATION N0.

3, :2 945'

 

4. HOME: ADDRESS (Number. 'mm or RFD, city or town, {one mind State)

1

5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION



6. DATE OF EXAMINATION

3/~67

 

 

7. SEX

M4

8. RACE

9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT SERVICE

AGENCY

 

 

 

MILITARY

I CIVILIAN

 

ORGANIZATION UNIT

 

Iz. BIRTH



I3. PLACE OF BIRTH

a/mmf

 





14. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS or NEXT or KIN

 

T15. FACILITY on AND ADDRESS

c;

17. RATING OR SPECIALTY

  

CLINICAL EVALUATION

 

  

 

  

 

 

 

   


18. HEAD. FACE NECK, AND SCALP
ISI NOSE
20. SINUSES

 

 

ZI. MOUTH AND THROAT

 

 

UM. It at. much) (And I
22' EARS-GENERAL acuity under Item: 70011:;ng

 

 
 

:23. A -

 

 

(Vuual ac and l'
2" EYES-GENERAL land" 6?0 

 

  

25. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC

 

 

26. PUPILS (Equality and T?aclion)

 

 
  

27. OCULAR MOTILITY 

mntt. nvltaa mm

 

  

4-.-

28. LUNGS AND CHEST (Include buds?)

 

 

29. HEART (Thrust, :ize, sounds)

 

  

30. VASCULAR SYSTEM (Varicosities, dc.)

 

  

3L ABDOMEN AND VISCERA (Include hernia)

 

 

(H A0 . la 
32. ANUS AND RECTUM (?555 :31; :25,

 

   

33. ENDOCRINE SYSTEM

 



 

31. GTU SYSTEM

 

3s. EXTREMITIES 7

 

   

4;

 

  

36. FEET
(Except In!)

 

 
 

37' LOWER EXTREM InEs(StunaM. rangeolmohon)
33. SPINE. OTHER MUSCULOSAKELETAL 

 

 

39. IDENTIFYING BODY SCARS. TATTOOS

 

 

 

40. SKIN. LYM PHATICS

 

 

AL NEUROLOGIC undo!) I'lem 7'2)

 

I

 

(Spa muonah'tv deviatfgn)

 

 

I

43. (Pamela: only) (Check how done) 

 

 

 

 

 

I
5 .
?$54963;in 4 
.,

 

 

NOTES. (Describe "63


356:1.40/

/f

 

I6. OTHER INFORMATION

TIME IN THIS CAPACITY (Total)

..

 

RESULTS

    

LAST SIX 

abnormality in dotm'h Item number before each
ntinue in item 73 and use addItIonal sheets necessanv.)

hm:
?mm TL

fw?

gas
136:

To

 

 

   
   
  

 

 

  
 

 

(ContI?T'ITuo in it-eim 73.) 
hymbota above or :Iptzei' and lower?new, reme?e?glr b" 1 1? t?w" .
317?33442 Ty dmtum Tafczuafiihiffnf. a 7?97Is?lli 
5'173;
A/Lr/o74267z-5? a/

 

   

FINDINGS

 

 

 

48. CHEST (Place. den. ?lm number and Tamil)



(7

 

  
  

47. sanowcv (Specifstul and and mun) 



?a

A (36%
I .4, 5?5
.E ?33 91-31: 5?}ng 9"

 

   
 



45. URINALYSIS: AMSPECIFIC GRAVITY [:19 5
B. ALBUMIN o, MICROSCOPIC

BLOOD TYPE AND RH
FACTOR

 

50. OTHER TESTS

 

{Iago- 

I

 

 

 

 

OTHERPINDINGS

SI. 1/ I 52. I 53. COLOR HAIR 54. 55. BUILD: SLENDER
. . . :Ex .- .5 '1 it." .V . I. -- . :(Checkone) .. .
w. . . ,15492BLOOD PRESSURE. (Arm at heart: level) 1" 58. I 5" I PULSE Thrm?at??art lend) 1 

"die?; svs." ,1 .. a. AFIER EXERCISE c. D. RECUMBENT E. AFTER STANDING

LID - 4 a .3 MIN
. DIAS. 45 BENT . .- - (3435113.DISTANT..VISION. GI). .- . . . 61.- -. 
RIGHT 207.170 CORR575? CORR TO BY
CORR50M CORR To BY 
62. HETEROPHORIA (Specify distancePRISM DIV-.. - 'I'zh

lSlON(Teat use 0113 mm): V.. . ..V55..DEP.TH .-
('Tcstuaed and_at;ore) 
- . CORRECTED

I . VISION (T: use/d and score) 63.' RED LENS TEST (9. .INTRAOCULAR TENSIWW

 

- 63.
RIGHT

 

 

  
 

 

.66..EIEI.D.OEVVISI0N .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

r? 1253:.?
_(Tcm used and score)
1000 2000 3000 woo woo 
109.5 .9048 .9896 60962?17-67
I. . .- . .
E-Mr. DeLoach:

  
    
 
 
 

vision has be corrected to
1'13" i 20/20 . Thank ou .

    

 

. A -V m_ 2/20/67
74. SUMMARY OF AND DIAGNOSES (Lia: diI 1310:; has been



.42" 
Physical Unit ?5 If
Room 4541 - J92

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

  

 

 

 

 

"6 . corrected 112EXAMINEE Eek) 
yi' 1 I 
QUALIFIED FORPHYSICAL CATEGORY . .V..
A. I: .-
3.. IS NOT. QUALIFIED FOR 
73. IF NOT QUALIFIED. LIST DISDUALIFYING DEFECTS BY ITEM NUMBER 79-.J TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN =cun?ur' 
136

J: 


 

so. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME or PHYSICIAN . SIGNATURE 

 

 

oi TYPED DR PRINTED NAME OE DENTIST. OR. PHYSICIAN (Indiclatc which? . SIGNATURE 

APPROVING AUTHORITYSHEETS

. . .1
t. 

 

 

.,

 

 

 

 

 



1?15.) .. 
. OFF 962 0?647407
. - - .V I .3 long} i. ,l 1.
. i ?:13 4.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. - ,s-uu_ .m-a-enl??iww 11-1- nrwa rm
nan-1r nan-va-n- arr-mm "ran a-v mum-1.. nun-1r saw-?i?- A agh-u?-?rm??u Hr": :1 
am": 
1 .
Mic-16.: "Fo 1m 520
11! 9"
?52.31 at $11.511:115 arc.
CUM moan MEDICATION . 
I I 

5" 1?
3&Ac.) . 1 1 run 11110.1: 111 rm: :1 or WARD PMYSIQMN .
urn-nun mus DEVIATION I RATLB
AURIC vs?n?: 
uncanny ,1 - a e~ Gila-bomb- - ?rst - Owls-
WAVES 
1
PR 035 01' 
ens COMM 
. {l
a A- -.-.. wa? m9? - was?: i?l? 
VIAVES
.flh? 
. .

pnecoamm. ?10513SUMMARY. 43.111141EEO CHANGE SINCWM 

a h, 
- 138. 10112361; 
FRANC I 
i 

?act-110'
{Conlm no on reverse)
2. await-vanc.9- rm. TITLC EE $30 13?.
(3 v, 1 ?3'8 
6 i q, 41a; .-
rhnun aunt) I: ?Irv mun,? Nmum but. mu, In Glb?u Ht). . \?aA:u N1).
um. {.Hn In". Jalouch] Gam?k 1mm a cow

Smncord Form 2

6? annu- I: 

7?9 Dl?ec'f?r?r I- Is; I ?7 'M'o-nf'mnaHM" w;
111 

 

 

 

In .
- 
i? PD-300 (Rev. 10-10-62)
. 
. . . 

Attachment to Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination

For Information and Guidance of Medical Examiner

Name of Examinee 99 L0 (ID

(Type or print) Last First Middle

The following portions of the attached examination report form need not be completednecessary unless" facilities tor affordingrsame are not readily available.

48. Not required unless examines is over 35 years of age or examination indicates such is
desirable. i.

49. Is necessary unless facilities for dffording same are not readily available.

71. Audiometer examinations should be afforded whenever possible for all Special Agent
applicants and Special Agents. Applicants for the Special Agent position will not be
saccepted if the hearing loss exceeds a 15 decibel average in either ear in the conver-
sational speech range (500 1000,2000 cycles).

For All Examinees, Whether Clerical or Special Agent Applicants or Employees:
The medical examinershould swer the following question:

- Examinee is not qualified for strenuous physical exertion.

Toib?e lAns?wered in the Case of All Male Employees and Male Applicants:

*Does examinee?have any defects restricting or prohibiting his participation in defensive
tactics and dangerous assignments which might entail the practical use of firearms?

 

l: Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.

 



2. ?Does examinee have any defects prohibiting safe operation of motor vehicles?

Yes If "yes" please specify defects.

 

it.

 

3. For safe driving of motor vehicles, Civil Service Commission requires distant vision must
test at least 20/40in one and 20/100 in the other, corrected or uncorrectWo?d
examinee wear corrective glasses while operating a motor vehicle? l:lYes No
If recommendation is based on a factor other than above standard, indicate basis

 

?v $559"? is: iv "5 g?r?xi
y? 

 

 

 

 

31? fix


is
,1
.1

Desirable Weight Ranges for Males

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Height 1u$n10l ? Frame. Medium Frame *Large Frame
5' 21": a117 . 125 123 - 135 131 - 148
152
617162
5'166
519" . -. 136; ?46 142- 156 151 - 170
5} 111"?? 140158 15.4 - 171 164 - 185
6'1? L152 - 163 158 - 176 169 - 190
6' 21' 1 156 - 16:7" 163 - 181 >174 195
160 - 171 168 - 186 178 - 200*
614'! 1' 169- 180185Examin?ee's frame is [:lsmall Dmedium



5. 'Conamerinqraboxie weight table Wmmee'sa?ame. and other individual physical characteristics,

I coEider hx?sgpresent weight Satisfactory

3

Excessive

DDeficient

 

3-5 m.

5- supervision, examinee should El lose 
1 .
Dgain 
a A u"

,Remarg?s?: u:

1 m. :b

 

 

 

71%?

 

(Signatute of Me?d/icall Examiner)

(5/9444, 

(Date)

136

 

 

 

'9
.ro-zss (Rev. 5-27-64) . .

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

2/20/67

 

In Reply, Please Refer to
File No.

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent oi the FBI who has previously
contributed to this iurid and who dies from any cause except self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent. lam for--
if 7 warding herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of $10, payable to to be included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction alter the Agent has been a member oi the fund fora continuous period of two years. it is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said iund which i understand

is to be administered in the {allowing manner.

The Director oi the FBI will appoint a committee Which shall consider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and expending of said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division of the FBI shall receive all contributions and account {or same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the curse
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist-
ant Director of the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $10,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount at monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (please type or print.) Date Office of Assignment, (or SOG Division)
SA CARTHA . 2/20/67 Executive Offices
The following person is designated as my beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund:
Name (grimy beneficiary; use given ?rst name if female) Relationship
wife b5
Addre
Name (contingent. beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

Do you desire to designate the above?listed bene?ciaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as Well? I?m Yes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit?to
beneficiary of agents killed In the "no of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary bene?ciary; use given first name if female) Relationship 
Address 

Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

 

Received Very truly yours.
aymen 
Special Agents Insurance Fund 
FEB 2 0 1967 ?g artha IS DeLoach
SP 38% 0 1rec or

Enclosure 1, Edgar Hooter. Director .
great

 

 

 



a
. I


FD-ISS (Rev. 8-16-63) .

mg;

9

FEDERAL BUREAU OF. INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

Name of Employee: CARTHA 1300913 LOACH

Where Assigned: 

(Division)

(Section, Unit)

Official Position Title and Grade: ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR-INVESTIGATIVE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating Period: from APRIL 1966 to MARCH 31, 1967
I 
ADJECTIVE RATING: OUTSTANDING "3333i? 5
Outstanding, Excellent, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory
Rated by; W92 0.. WAssociate Director 4/3/67
Signature Title Date
Reviewed by:
Signature Title Date
Director 4/3/67
Title Date

 

Rating Approved WW
zgnature

 

TYPE OF REPORT

3 Official
Annual

REE-3gb? (off

 

 

'14 I: 
6'7 ?my

Seam 

60-D?a?? - If?!
90-Day
[3 Transfer
Separation fr0m Service

Special

j/ll'e/

 


~12

 

ii.



 

 


on

CARTHA D. DELOACH
ASSISTANT TO THE - INVESTIGATIVE

As Assistant to the Director, Mr. DeLoach has under
his immediate control the Domestic Intelligence, General Investi-

egative, Crime Records, and Special Investigative Divisions and in

this capacity has earned the rating of Outstanding for the period
April 1, 1966, to March 31,1967.

Mr. DeLoach has been delegated the responsibility for
coordinating the work of the Bureau in a wide variety of matters of
a criminal, civil, applicantminternal security and espionage nature,
as well as crime research matters? Special tours and projects,
preparation and distribution of the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
and Uniform Crime Reports, and other related programs such as the
"Ten Most Wanted Fugitives. He possesses an extraordinary knowl-
edge of the matters under his direction. He is decisive and uses exem-
plary judgment in the decisions he is required to make at a policy-making
level, protecting the Bureau's interests at all times, as well as aggres-
sively moving forward to achieve the desired objective. He possesses
unusual initiative and resourcefulneSs and never hesitates to take prompt
action. Responsibilities of the Bureau have continued to increase during
the past year, resulting in the assumption of even greater burdens by
our tOp-level executive staff. Mr. DeLoach has willingly and enthusi-
astically accepted these increased obligations.

Mr. DeLoach presents an exceptionally fine appearance and
his personality is most effective, enabling him to represent the Director
in top-level meetings and conferences in an outstanding manner. His
contributions to the suc'cess of our operations have been substantial and
the rating of Outstanding is merited.

 

 

 

Toiscn 
DeLocch 

 

Moi):
Wick

 

 

. Casper 

Fell

i

Callahan
Conrad

 

 

 

Gale

 

Rosen


1"qu

 

 

Trotter
Teie. Reom
Holmes 
Gondy

 

 

 

1




3511139 April 10, 1967

PERSONAL

"s
i

it

Mr. Cartha DL?DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I am indeed pleased to advise you that you have
earned an Outstanding performance rating for the period
April 1, 1968, to March 31, 1967, which has been approved
by the Departmental Committee on Incentive Awards. There
is enclosed a cepy of this rating which you may retain.

It is also a pleasure to inform you of my approval 
of an incentive award for you in the amount of $500. 00 in recog-
nition of your splendid achievement and the check. which is
enclosed represents this award. You should take pride in your
superb performance which has contributed immeasurably to the
successful handling of our obligations during the past year. I
am deeply appreciative.

 

 

MALLEP. ax

 

Sincerely,
APR 1 1 195/ in Edgar ?56335-15
COMM-FBI,

 

MY
Enclosures (2)
1 Direct) My?? b6

beset) want? Qmjt/ ?fe/6?5

Award #727-67
Salutation per file.
Based on memo Mr. Te?on-Director 3/31?/ 67

?Mail, licori- mt?rri?umrm

 

 

 

i omen? IOIM no. IO 6 sow-loo 
a. my "62 cannon
on am. no. no. 27 To
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT wzg?z

Wick

Memorandum (I 


 

Fell

 

Gale

 

 

 

 

TO The DireCtor DATE: 3?31-67 Bosen
Sullivan?.
Tove}
Trotter

FROM Mr. Tolson - Tele. Room

 

Holmes
Candy

 

 

SUBJECT: CARTHA 132313 LOACH
Assistant to the Director - Investigative

JOHN P. MOHR
Assistant to the Director - Administrative

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

There are attached for approval the annual performance
reports for Messrs. De Loach and Mohr in which their services have
been rated Outstanding for the period April 1, 1966, to March 31, 1967.
I have signed these ratings as the Rating Official.

In the event you approve these ratings, I respectfully
request that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the
Approving Official. Thereafter, they must be transmitted to the
Department with other such ratings for approval by the Departmental
Committee on Incentive Awards. Messrs. DeLoach and Mohr will
then be entitled to cash incentive awards of $500 as has been approved
in the past for Assistant Directors and above.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That you, as Approving Official, sign the original and the
copy of each of the attached Outstanding performance ratings and upon
approval of the ratings by the Departmental Committee on Incentive
Awards, Mr. DeLoach and Mr. Mohr each be furnished a copy of his
rating and approved for a cash award of $500.



in - 

Searc zedn umbered-
WA ?nd 7 38675:?
Enclosures ?mi/{gr 

SAL DLH :jap 11%?
(3) 5/ 
1- Personnel File of John P. Mohr

 

f?w

    
   
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- \7u4 (Rev. 2-2-66)

STATES RNMENT he

emomndum a qa?Wy/?/
3L

  
  
   

  

 

Director, FBI DATE: 5/ 18/ 67
SA CARTHA 9- . Attention: mng/
(Name?bf employee) 

 

Assistant to the Director

(Office of assignment)
SUBJECT: OFFICES OF PREFERENCE

 

Please list my of?ces of preference as follows:

1, Seat of Government ny? 

2. adrfd 
3. -0055! 321/

 

 

 

 

 

r. Tolson

 

 

eLoacsz
. .s (I 3 I hr?
Mr. 
CARTHAD-DELOACH Mr.Casper..?
VI: Mr. 
Mr. Conrad 

April 11, 19?7

 

 

 

Felt"
. Afr. 

Mr. Rosen
Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Tavel .
Mr. Trotter
Tele. Room
Miss Holmes.?
Miss Gandy

Dear Boss: 

Thank you for the ?Outstanding" per 

formance rating. The honor of receiving such a
rating from you is greatly appreciated. The financial
advantages of such a rating will be spent

to take care of expenses incurred putting children
through college.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While I know that the rating was based
on a period other than the present time, I hope that
current?day challenges will cause you to believe that
I merit such a rating. It bothers me a great deal
personally when I cannot achieve immediate success
in matters under my supervision.

I can only assure you that if successful
accomplishments are based on hard work and loyalty
then most certainly something will be forthcoming
in the near future.

Sincerely,

Deke DeLoach

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

A- i n.
$561139 ?4 i ?2fl/ {2 



 

Inn.

 

4 
Poazs? (86v. 5-18-67)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

 

In Reply, Please Refer to
m" 7/14/67

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington.~ D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the iund to be paid to the designated beneticiary' oi any Special Agent oi the FBI who has previously
contributed to this iund and who dies irom any cause except seII-deSthtion White employed <18 a Spectai Agent. 1 am for-
Wording herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of $20. payable to S.A.1.F., to be included in said tund. Payment will be
made for death by seii-destruction atter the Agent has been a member of the iund fora continuous period of two years. it is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to? said fund which i understand
is to be administered in "the following manner.

The Director oi the FBI wtil appoint a committee which shall consider all' matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and eXpendina at said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division oi the shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death oi any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed Committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate inatructions will then be issued to the Assist.-
ant Director at the Administrative Division. directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sumo! $20.000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the iund at the time any Shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment (or SOG Division)
SA CARTHA D. DELOACH . Executive Offices
The following person is designated as my beneficxary 1'01- Special Agents Insurance Fund: 
Name (primary beneficiary; use given first. name if female) Relationship
Wife 135
Address A 7
Name (contingent, beneficiary. if desired; use given first. name if female) Relationship.
Address 

4?

Do you desire to designate the above-listed beneficiaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? xx] Yes No It' not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed' In the line of duty, other then travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiaryruse given first name if female) Relationship

Address A 
Name (contingent beneficiary. if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship

Address - A 7

 

Very truly yours,

Payment Received 

Special Agents Insurance Fund

th D. 
Enclosure JUL181957 Sp ar_ a 03-0

CDD CSH 3- Edgar?oover,? Director

a Bead

 

 

If - 
'E?b-zam (Rev. 8-11-64) . .

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

c/z7/?7

Date

I certify that I have received returned the following C?wernment property for official use:

D. C. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #14655
(expires 6/30/68)

RETURNED
D. C. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #1905 MM FILE

(expires 6/30/67) 3!

 

 

 

 

 

 

READ Ver truly yours,
The Government property which you hereb acknowledge 
is char ed to you and you are responsible {or taking care
eiurning it when its use has been completed. (Signature) 
67-3 963% IT OR MUTILATE IT IN 
Mm L1 .1 (Typed name) - I n9 1.090}!


 

 

 

 

 

 

OPIIOHAK IOIM N0. I0 1? JOIO-IOO
MAY 
GSA CIR. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT .11-4? .. ..
Memorandum Via/?mm
{ray f?cll
. Go 
To MR. TOLSON DATE: 6/8/67 
Tova!
[i Trotter
FROM J, 5:139:30??
Candy 

sunscr: ANNUAL. LEAH SCHEDULE 1967 . J. 
. 5:975 y?u?whwp

leave schedule tier 1967 so there would be no conflicts. Mr
DeLoach has indicated that he would like to take the last two

1 weeks in June and a week later in the year. His annual leave
in June would commence on the 19th and he would return to
duty on Monday, 7/3/67.

0%
Mr. -. eLoach and I have tried to arrange our annualwi? X71497
.1

I would like to take my annual leave commencing
7/3/67 and extending through 7/21/67.

The foregoing is submitted for your approval.

,1 Mr. DeLoach

1 - vl'r. Callahan (5
1 - I b6

PMzers 


(5) ML 
I v.1, a! XEROX 
3
JUN 14 W- 

 

 

 

 

ire-253 (Rev. 5-18-67)
I
?59

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

 

In Reply, Please Refer to
File No. 5/22/67

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington. D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary oi any Special Agent oi the FBI who has previously
contributed to this fund and who dies from any cause. except self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent, 1am {on
warding herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of $20. payable to to be included in said fund. Payment Will be
made for death by sell-destruction after the Agent has been a member of the iund tor a continuous period We years. It is
understood and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said iund which I understand
is to be administered in the following manner. .

The Director of the FBI will appoint a committee which shall consider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, sate
keeping and expending of said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative Division oi the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee Will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist-
ant Director ot the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $20,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE AND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU 
Official Bureau Name (please type or print) Date Office of Assignment, (or SOG Division)
.
I: i
SA CARTHA . 5/22/67 Seat of Government
The following person is designated as my beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund:
Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Wife b6
XE
Name (contingent bene?ciary, if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address

Do you desire to designate the ve-Iisted beneficiaries as the beneficiary_and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? Yes No if not, the entire followmg portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. S. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed In the line of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address
Name (contingent beneficiary, if desired; use given ?rst. name if female) Relationship
Address

Payment Received

Very? truly yours,

Special Agents Insurance Fund

[67-35170 67 WXM

i 9 JUN Hoover, irector 

244:

9 Bic?




 

 

FROM

sun; 1:01:

.33 tom no. 1o 5010-196

233:2 33?31) 27 Tolson 
STATES COVE. MENT a gel-0m .
a. 1 
Bgsgopj

Memorandum A 

wConmd
Fell

 

 

.557 Cafe

:Mr. Tolson DATE: September 1, 1967 Rm

Sullivan 

Tovel

. Mr. DeLoach . Big: 9C2 ?aw 

 

 

 

 

 

Holmes 
Candy

 

 

THE AMERICAN LEGION NATIONAL CONVENTION 5 ,1 .11., 
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 7/ .7;er
AUGUST 24-31,1967 . 

. ?13

NATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMISSION:

 

Speakers: Joseph McLaughlin, The Boston Herald Traveller,
Lamont Thompson, General Manager, WBZ-TV, Boston, Massachusetts,
Richard Valeriani, White House Correspondent, NBC, Raymond J. McI-Iugh,
General Manager, COpley News Service and other news media representatives.
The Legion7s Public Relations program for 1966? 67 was well within the
budget requirements and all projects were handled satisfactorily. Press,
television and radio handling at the Convention achieved above?average
results. Thirty?two of thirty-five members of the Public Relations Com-
mission consisting of neWSpaper, radio, television and various personalities
in industry attended the Public Relations Commission meetings and the
Convention. All were assigned Specific duties in connection with the
Convention. . 

The Fourth Estate Award was given to The St. Louis Globe-
Democrat. Richard Amberg, Publisher accepted the Award and Specifically
commended the FBI in his response in accepting the award. Amberg was
most grateful to the Director for,his help in his paper receiving this award.

I

.

RESOLUTIONS: a" in aft/~50 7/17 27/5 i

. Eleven resolutions concerning the Bureau were consoli?a?ted

into three strong,excellent ones. These were passed unanimously. One

commends the Director on 50 years of outstanding service to our Nation. A
second resolution commends the Bureau for vigorously pursuing the fight
against crime. The final resolution commends the Director and the FBI for
the development of the National Crime Information Center and labeled this
as ?essential to the effective performance of the nation?s law enforcement
network in securing the public from unrestrained lawless attacks, and
apprehending those responsible for flouting our code of law. '3 These

Enclosures (2) . 

1- Mr. BishOp 4' i I Mr. D. G. ?aming

1- Mr. Callahan? \Ie 1- Mr. T. B. Coll

D- 0 ER
CDD: .cglec, (7) #:1033303; (CONTINUE 

'3 .
q} 813? ?131967 . 

Enclosures

 

x,

 

 

 

 

i

 

i

l! 

DeLoach to Tolson Memo -
RE: THE AAEWRICAN LEGION NATIONAL CONVENTION

resolutions will be put in formal certificate form and copies of them will
be forwarded to the Director as soon as they are received from the
American Legion after processing. The resolutions received good
publicity as exemplified by the attached neWSpaper clippings.

Other resolutions of possible interest to the Bureau
were passed. One was critical of the Supreme Court decisions while
another one was most critical of Stokley Carmichael and called upon
the Justice Department to vigorously press prosecution of Carmichael
for treason or other laws of the land which he has possibly violated.
A strong resolution was passed condemning the Students For a Democratic
Society.

NATIONAL AMERICANISM COMMISSION:

SA Hanning is a member of this Commission and sat with
them during their deliberations August 24?31, 19 6'7. Approximately
90 resolutions were acted upon. Many of these were the resolutions
mentioned above concerning the Director. When read on the floor of
the Convention, the one concerning the Director?s 50 years of service
received generous and Spontaneous applause. During the Americanism
Meeting on Sunday, August 31st, Iof Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, who is known as an' extreme right?winger and a few others
expressed mild concern and puzzlement concerning the Director?s stand
in testimony concerning riots. SA Banning took the floor and strongly

 

. explained the Director's position and the current situation. All members

were satisfied and expressed continued admiration and respect for the
Director and his position in this field. I later went before the same group
?and answered questions for a brief period.

NEW NATIONAL COMMANDER:

 

William E. Galbraith of Beemer, NebraSka, was unanimously
elected as the new National Commander for the Legion year 19 67?68.
Galbraith is a rancher, is personally known to me and is a great admirer
of the Director and a strong supporter of the Bureau. He will make an
excellent Commander. There is no derogatory information concerning him
and a letter of congratulations under the Director?s signature has already
been sent to him.



2 -. (CONTINUED OVER)

 

b6
b7C

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

ll'IE LEGION NATIONAL CONVENTION

MISCELLANEOUS:

 

Of possible pertinent interest to the Director are the
following highlights: On Tuesday, August 29th, the Attorney General accepted
the Legion Distinguished Service' Medal in behalf of his father. His short
acceptance remarksewere only mediocre; he is not a forceful speaker and
his remarks received no publicity. Later that same day, Secretary of State
Rusk gave the keynote speech. He was substituting. for the Vice President
who was forced to cancel out due to the death of his brother. His speech
was more or less impromptu and received polite but no enthusiastic applause.
General Wallace M. Greene, Jr. Commandant, U. S. Marine Corps, gave
a very dynamic speech which was well received by the Legionnaires in
attendance at the Convention. General Greene urged support by the Legion
and the general public of our, fight in Vietnam, urged a step?up of bombings
and other steps necessary to bring the war to a rapid conclusion. Since
this is the over?whelming feeling of practically all Legionnaires, his talk
was enthusiastically received.

Representative Gerald Ford, Republican floor leader in
the House also addressed the Convention and called upon all Americans to
do everything possible to end the Vietnam war quickly, successfully,
and honorably. Senator John Stennis, Democrat of Mississippi, also
addressed the Convention and urged a step-up in our activities in Vietnam
to end the war as soon as possible. Both Were received well by the Convention.

RECOMMENDATIONS: ,p
051M 2/ 
42:14:, 1. SA Hanning, a member of the Americanism Commission
and who assisted me in a myriad of duties handled their assignments
in a lendid manner. They worked long and arduous hours through the entire

 

weekend?the Convention was in progress. It is recommended they be commended.

2. Special Agent in Charge James Ly-Handley of the Boston
Office and SA Thomas .?tMcEnaney spent as much time as possible in
assisting us during the Convention. They worked tiresomely despite the
many burdens Cpressed upon them. Recommend they be commend ed.

13??

62115.4, 6, w/ .5 ?fe?waxww?r?

1.. 9?
.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Legion Resolve Urges :Stepp eel; Up

 

 

Bomhan of

The 1 American 
Committee on National Se-

 

curity today proposed that
the full membership of the
country?s largest veterans
organization reiterate its
strong support oi the 11.8.

i E: struggle in Vietnam.

In a resolution offered to
the National Convention, the
committee also called for
repeated and intensi?ed
bombing of all hostile instal-.

lations and air ?elds' 111 North
Vietnam. 1 

The resolve regarding

ietnam further urged that
our military _com'r'h?dhders be
given whatever
men, material and authority
are required to bring the
war to a speedy and success-
ful conclusion.

On the subject of riots
which the Security Commit-
tee deemed ?of equal grave

 

moment" as the Vietnam
situation, it was proposed
that the Convention condemn
violence as "unlawful and in?
violation of our constitu-
tional rights.

The resolve urged that the
full powers and force of our
local, state and federal au-
thorities be ?brought tOvhea
in ti?eatmg acts ornat-

ing, (insurrestion_ and vip-
lence, and that those-N respon-
sible and involved in the
riots be prosecuted to the
fullest extent of the law.

Commenting on the
?alarming spread of crime?
in the nation, the Commit-
tee called for the public, as
well as all members of the
Legion. to make every effort
to support equal law enforce-
ment for all people;

And further ?to refrain
from repetition of unfounded
charges tending to create
unwarranted disrespect for
the profession of law en~
iorcement and to (cooperate
in reporting crime, assisting

 

police and as witnesses when
neede W?mr.1

The resolution also called

for a reversal of ?the pres-
ent trend in 11.8. Supreme
Court decisionsl which re-
strict police in cases involv~
ing confessions, arrests, ha-
beas bgrpus, wir -tapping
and bai lggocedur.

The 1esolve lauded _the
Federal Bureau of investiga-
tion and its director, J. Ed;

of the National Crime infor-
mation Center?a computer-
ized law enforcement infor-
mation systemu-for the ranjd
diss??mihatiori of vital: infor-
mating on. crime andw crim-
i1 inals. 
It labeled this speedy dis-
semination of crime informa-
tion as "essential to the eil'ec-
tive performance of the na-
. tion?s law enforcement net-
work in securing the public
from unrestrained lawless at-
tacks, and apprehending
those responsible for ?out-
ing?our code of law."

I

:1
I
.1

 

In its overall conclusions,
the Committee said ?we must
not forget that the Soviet

?Union and Communist China
basic for many years car-
ried on a. state of undeclared
?wanagainst the free nations
of the world witn?w the

avowed purpose of in?ltrat-
ing End ?dominating tlieir
governments.?

?Any policy or strategy
adopted by the tree nations
will eventually contribute to
their own destruction if it is
not based on the firm and
continuing belief that the
Soviet Union and Communist
China mean what they say
when they boast that they
will bury those who oppose
them. 

equal grave moment
to the security of our 11a-
tion, the conclusion stated,
?is the prevalence of unrest,

gar Hoover, for development 

organized lawless demonstra- 1

tigns andpriots in the cities
of our nation.

awning?p .1

 

tho-ml

Neath Vietnam





 

?Respect for law and order
are ?net? m?re ca'tch't't?rords.
The preservation of law and?
order is as vital to the na-
tion as the continuing ?ow
of blood through the veins
is to an inividual.

?No one of us can escape
this responsibility. Let us
bulwark the law enforce- 
ment agencies of our govern-
ment?local, state and na-
tionaI?with our unstintiug
support.

?Let those who incite or
participate in riotous strife
and insurrection be held re-
spopsihie for their acts' 1n the
courts of the land 

BOSTOIJ 
Boston, Hussachusetts
August 30, 196?

Page 229

 

'atr



 

 

Bishop

23h

Tolson
DeLouch
MOM

 

 

 

 

Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Fen 
Cole
80 sen
Sullivan -

Tove} 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a



Tale. 8005?
Holmes 

131-5! qgi 
1?11. 


.-

September 6, 196'?
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha Dekle?DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLcach:

You are to be commended for the
splendid job you did at The American Legion
National Convention which met in Boston,
Massachusetts.

You displayed innate qualities of
leadership and kept the Bureau?s interest in
mind at all times. You represented us well
and I am appreciative.

Sincerely,

J. Edgar 5 3 7??m?37

 

CV

4 7'31? $161! 
Miss [Sent Direc i523 .. 


mum (3?55

(4) .
Based on DeLoach- Tolson memo 9/1/67 re The

:5 American Legion National Convention; Boston,
Massachusetts.

?mg?s?uarr

w" 

.4..-


new 

I 

0 . a; 

  

MAILED 3
1957

COMM-FBI

 
     

MAIL 30011:] TELETYPE UNITED





.

3:4

b6

 

?October 12, 1967

 

Dear Dehoach:

It was a real; pleasure to see you
in my of?ce this morning and to receive the
beautiful plaques from The American Legion.

I sincerely appreciate the
resolutions adopted by the Legion and the
support of this great body through the years,
and through you I want to express my thanks
to the Legion.

Sincerely,

E. 



 

- at? 
Mr. Cartha D. @Loach Numberedx

Federal Bureau of Investigation I 27 
Washington, D. C. -i .

    
 

 

JE?z?m (3)

mososurjs??


Mohr

If; 1
Bishop 

Casper if! ?u SENT F?gfgp?.
gcllahan_.__. TIME . i 1
onrad

DATE 

Tols'on 

DeLocch 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gale 7" 

r? . 
gee? 3?





sigh??7 9/5

 


Holmes -
. eanayv? MAIL noon TELETYPE UNIT :1

 

   

 

 

  

. the United States, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Repre-

 

 

 

 

  

0

m5 "Mm FPEFEIEWI Jay



aliennlu?nrt

333112132215, I. Edgar Hoover, the distinguished Director of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, has long been a stalwart supporter of The American
Legion and the ideals for which it stands; and

Whereas, Mr. Hoover on july 26, 1967, celebrated his 5 0th Anniversary
of dedicated and oustanding service to our Government and the American public;
and

313112112515, Mr. Hoover, during the entirety of his singular career, has bier:
a tenacious foe of the Communist canspiracy, a tower of strength in the struggle
against crime, and a zealous protector of the rights of the citizen,- now, therefore,
be it

By The American Legion in National Convention assembled in
Boston, Massachusetts, August 29, 30, 31, 1967, that The American Legion does
hereby commend Mr. Hoover for his long tenure of brilliant and devoted service

to our country; and, be it further

That a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the President of

sentatives and Mr. Hoover.

?new: mm i-Eh?~ 1

 

 

 

 

       
 
   
   

  

    
    

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 


(r 7?3? 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

     
 

 

 

 

 

      

(Rev. 17-16433} .3 j: 1ng a 
.b ?16. $311 .0 :3 
'x?g ?53213 '(Moum Clipping in Space Below) fir{?45593? arc-meow 
?mi?ivan . 3 -
ii :4 2}!er T3: no?; 
3.21T4510. 13mm 
353.3 1: 3m; 
i 2535.: 
if. r,
WJ33Q
(J 3.3?
?2 i 32:The Charleston 
13 Evenin Post
5 7 
eL??ach {heifdixecl i? -
g. 02:10 FederaI?Bureau ?of i 5 Charleston, . C. 
nvesizga?xon o?e: 0fifou'r n? 
featmf?d: speakers at tiiei? 230: . 2 1:
ahnu?l?: meetin 55015: theiQSouth
(S?i?olina State ?ambe?r, ofgCom: 4 
5 meter: here?eiit; "115gb; DeLoach? 
pa ?in ay? ong pi'd?g'rgg 
was fmade 193100013313by315131110332:~ .. .. 
Mai??ohgof; 033335113, pr?sid?nt 
. oil?e State?hamberiz-w 3y 
., 5 ?DeLoach {53113 jappearwt 3? . - . c: 

.special?: mowing ?fomm at; it??
5 GarOIina tTheatgzm ?Th: ?forum
3w1111have*as? its 

- :th? Challenges of3;1'0day. 330d ..
DeLoachmm speakwm 

. 5'15

Iww?


   

 

  
  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. Zifnd? Order 115%? Date: 12/27/67

. er. oru?m spea 32's 05 :04 -

crudes?obert 7 Editing}. Evening

3 presxdent 35* tiieij. 5? 3?Fe?dera_1 Author:
. . R?eserv? Bank of Richmond? . 5mm, Robert .Hitt?, Jr .
anda'x?arry Clarke?g 0f .. .. ?ag? . . 5 .. 
A?he??le; a arealdentk .

3 . . We?St?m?: Carolina Indu?tries?.

5 speak?zj? ?013, 53030333. -

- will 13353120515321.1033 presidersf. Chameleri

. C?am?er?.? of?? Commerce 5 . . . 5
{Ethe?z Uriit?d?: Stages and; form? 0r-

Shwers gin 

"g {12$ Submitting Of?ce: Columbia

2w Investigated

@133. . 0 a

DE (11)
. TV 

BLOOD DRAWN WEIGHT 

11/3/60 290 3 
"12/21/60 233 
1/31/61 250
3/6/61 264
4/11/61 267
52026/? ??ab 4

6/23/61 231 
a7/25/61 NOT 
8/29/61 NOT DONE 
10/ 17/61 NOT DONE 54170-4210?!
11/21 61 300 
1/16 62 266 . 1
3/2/62 5 DONE
NOT DONE
5 17 62 262 .
W- 
iwf?an?
6/26/62 237 3} .
9/5/62 vials 260 Ab??r 
262 
. ?nu-,1
10/5/62 241 
b; 3? 
1/22/63 232 5?%4 . . 
. jaw-1., .
2/26/63 274 5. 2144231 
- 51/9/63 245 any, 1.12/37)
1 64442.
5/16/63 NOT DONE

6/20/63' 276 
3/1/63 NOT DONE 7 7 

10/17/63 130 7 203 
7-66rpr?fgz-ilp-cg ?cl?7 

DE C. (11)

Blood Drawn

18?24?57
12?3?87
2-6-58
4?30-58
6?10?58
17-8}58
8?14?58

9-25-58
10-30?58

1-8-59 
2-12?59
3/12/59
4/15/89

5/21/59
6/25/59
8/6759
9/18/59

10/21/59
11/24/39

2/ 11ch650

3/30/60
8
16/9/60


9/28/60

 

i

.5-1

Weight Cholesterol
m8.%
270
216
232
184.5 232
183 232
182.5 252
186 280
183 226
183
186 265
183% 258
187 265
188 . 282
187 -292
.121 211 
18? ?2h1
189 259
Not done
?at done
196 201
Not done
185 268
Not done
Not doue
Not done
253
Not Dona

 



I
.v

Beta Lipo


80.

..87
87
86

Not received

Notzfec.

 

 

DE LQACH: c. 22*

(11) 

 

-
DATE EEIGHT BETA 
11/19/63 312 
1/23/64 260
3/3/61; 252 
4/23/64 275

6/9/64 284 Tbnn- 0:7: 9&2

 

 

 

 

 



c? Di (11) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE CHOLESTEROL TRIGLYCERIDE BETA LIPO EASTING 
6/9/64 284 5.27 68 To??t; egg; orange
juice; coffee (2)

2-10-65 263* 11.89* 80* 
4%
5-20-65" 266 3:38 75 
12-17-65 E324 8.83 68
. 
2-24-6-2?66 .300 3,30 My
I a. W, 
9-3-66 329 . 5,22 eniiui . .
Ills ?4?!wa 
-1 .
12-15-66 316 6.49 1;;99 f?_i - .

.3 g?ug
4/4/67 239 2,36 72 A MN

 

"w

EACH. 9. 32(11)?

3

A DATE EHOLESTEROL
7-13-67 273

10-19?67 332

2-15-68 296
a

. 5-16-68 306

8-22-68 282
11?21-68 2854
3-20-69 290
12/18/69 275
3/19/70 261

 

TRIGLYCERIDE LIPO

 

3.55?

5.30
2.62

4.16
3.59
1.23
3.83
3.25

5.29

 

7~s~ .

77 




 

 

 

 

January 29, 1968



 

Dear BeLoach: ,1

Today is your Twenty-fourth
Anniversary in the Bureau and I want to no?
express my personal congratulations on
this occasion. You can be proud of your
contributions to the Bureau's work and I
want you to know that I deeply appreciate
your dedication to the service. I hope the
Bureau will. have the benefit of your efforts
for many, many years.

With best regards,
Sincerely,
?535.- is? 503333 ?sEAe 15 o? 
. were 2 3;
{mm 
. BY 
a Mr. Cartha D.%eLoach 

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

    

JE?zrm (3) .
Anniversary 1/29 Monday *3 ?mm W: 
Jag-J JHE DU ?:305 9:3

  
   
  
   
 
 
 
   
 

 

Tolson
DeLooch
Mob!
Bishop 
Casper
Callahan 
Conrad 
eh
Gale

Rose? .7
Sullivan ?73 c'i w"
Tove! a, 
Trotter

.3
Holmes 

Tole. Room
?Pitch MAIL noon TELETYPE UNIT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FD?zela (Rev. 8-11-64RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

 

Date October 17, 1969

I certify that I have received 13] returned the following Government property for official use:

I


in . I 

I: 

 

The Goyernment property

toklng care .

READ
which you hereb acknowleage

Monograph 'FKlanLOrgajni'zegtion?S; OSectio? 111,: 1958;64" 7- Copy #6 
I a 



FILE
3! a? 1
Very truly yours. 

Acziwa

 

 

 

of It on returning It when Its use has been completed. (Signature
DO NOT MARK OR WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN
ANY WAY. . . -

. IAHH (Typed name)

 

 

[(191 13g}

 

WW7 

May A

 

    

Cartha. D. DeLoach


?0

 

 

 

 

 

I 
FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

 





42

?i



5 Date Ootober i7, 1969 

. I certify that I have I: received [31 returned the following IGC'Wernment property for'of?cial use:

.5



 

?Monograbh "Minufemenzi Extremist Guefr?lE?W?r-fare?arbup" .. Copy #goL??a?m

 



 

 

READ

I Very truly yours. 
The Government YOU h?f?b clanowlodgo
ls chuffed to you and you are responsible or taking care

returning it when Its use has been completed, (summerm?w
{?00 NOT MARLO ?0 OR IT IN . .
(Typed name, Cartha D. DoLoach 

[=r?f?1b I, I

 

 

 

 

 

 

FD-zsla (Rev. 8-11-64)

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date OCtOber 17, 19 69

I certify that I have received returned the following Government property for official use:

Monograph "American Nazi Party" - Copy #105 

4? READ
The Government property which you hereb acknowledge

is.charged to you and you are responsible or taking care
of It and returning it when its use has been completed. (Signature)

1. MUTILATE IT IN
R?w?m (Typed name, Cartha D.ijeLoach
um egg nae -,



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

a
i
FD-281a(Rev. 8-11-64)

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
1? UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE .r 

621/ 41

I certify that I have Ereceived returned the following Government property for official use:

3 Date

 

D. C. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #31405
expires 6-30-70

RETURNED
D. 0. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #5898 FILE

expires 6-30u69 

 

A Very truly yours 

The Government property which you hereb acknowledge

is charged to you and you are responsible or taking care 

of it and returning it when its use has been completed. (Signature) Cg
MARK OR WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN 1 a

:1ij 1711:.va Jug
anus 1963 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
 

tr 
v}
I

?e29? 6 February 26, 1968

Mr. C. D., Leach

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

Thank yen for your letter of February 23rd
and for your kind comments concerning my appearance
before the House Subcommittee on Appropriations.

It was good of you to write appreciative of your thoughtfulness and
your loyal support of my administration of our

 

organization. a
F335: :3 
With best wishes.55?
Sincerely, er ?:93 {ix
if? 3&5?E?1?f an- Mt var 1w: ?I'Irwvsuw a Mr. 
g; 5.1 "a 

i


??421
a, 
.

a - a

1?w-
MOhIr-m
Bishop nun-n..?
Casper 
Callahan A
Gunman?m . 

Felt

2L: 
Gale .

Rosen 9w!
Tove) - (i 188 a 
.TWEQ MA .

 

 

Tale. Room

3:3? I mull noon TE we own 

 

 

 

 

 



{lb 
. Mr. DeLoach-.._
CARTHAD.DELOACH 

Mr. aspen.
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. Felt
Mr. Gale 
Mr. Rosen.
Mr. Sullivan

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. 

February 23: 1968 Tele. Room_.._

Miss 
Miss Gandy

 

 






 

 

 

Mr. John Edgar Hoover

Director .
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss:

Word has it that you turned in your
usual outstanding performance this morning
before the Appropriations Subcommittee.

Thanks for all the hard preparation
and good work. I?m very grateful.

Sincerel



ii

-imau

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operator} Road Test and Driving Cer ?lion - . 
FD-288 (Rev. 19-?19-66)



 



 

 

 

TO: Director. FBI
FROM: c; 75W CERTIFICATION
Name of Operanogmnm - Last, First, Middle initial) 93?:
CARTHA . 3/8 68
Division and Section Assigned ant to Director
Executive Offices CE Agent 

TO BE FILLED IN BY OPERATOR

 

 

This is to certify that I presently hold a valid motor vehicle operator's permit or driver's license as follows:

 

Nirginia licenSe D-05436-86880-954813

 

 

Permit Issued By: Permit Number Permit Expires
(State, Territory
Virgin ia above 7/68

 

This is anX?] unrestricted restricted permit. (If restricted, explain below)

 

Glasses Contact lenses are required for driving Yes No

 

This further certifies that. during the past three years I have driven a motor vehicle (government or personally owned)
approximately 0 ?9 miles. During this time? I have haVe not received a traffic violation ticket:

I have have not been held at fault! as the of a motor vehicle involved in a traffic accident. _(If
affirmative answer, explain below. giving number and dates of?offenses.) I further understand that when operating a
Government vehicle I must assume responsibility for payment of any damage to same should I be found at fault.*

I also understand the Government does not provide insurance coverage for damage to its vehicles.

"At fault? means any case in which responsibility is conceded MW Mtg/M

by employee or his insurance company or liability is fixed by 
duly constituted authority or administratively by the Bureau. Signature of Operator

 

 

 

TO BE FILLED IN BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL

The personnel file of this employee has been reviewed and indicates the following information concerning the operation of a
motor vehicle during the past three years:

@Continuous safe driving record
Involved in traffic accident and found at fault? 
I certify that this employee is:
Qualified on the basis of his safe driving record to operate motor Vehicles on official business

Not qualified and must demonstrate his qualifications by satisfactorily passing a road test
examination before operating a motor vehicle on official busmess

Remarks:

[3 Issue Renew Operator?s Identification Card - SF-46

emgf

6. am

?At fault? means any case in which the Bureau has taken Official Signature of Reviewing Official

 

 

 

 

diSCiplinary administrative action against the employee.
.- I

tvs?somsmw Sheet)

 

3?31?

 

as 1968 .. 

 

 

 

 

 

RESULTS OF ROAD TEST

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vehicle" Used in Test Local of Test
Make Body Typeaf i, Year City State
Transmission Date' Time Examiner?s Signature
[3 Automatic [3 Manual . um
Instructions to Examiner TEST SCORE

 

Place check?mark in space beside each error committed. If same error is repeated. add a Total
check mark for each repetition. Multiply point value of each error (shown in box at left of each Error

 

 

error listing) by number of check marks. placing total points for each category in box at lower Points

right of each block. To obtain final score, total number of pomts scored in all categories.
PASSING GRADE: Total Score of 25 Points or Less Pass 
FAILING GRADE: Total Score of 26 Points or More Fail 

Note Results in Box at Right of Instruction Block

 

Check List

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l. Checking Vehicle 2. Leaving Curb
Fails to: Adjust Rear-view Mirror Fails to: [3 Look Back to Check Traffic
__Adjust Seat Properly GM: Proper Signal (Mechanical or Hand)
Check Effectiveness of Hand 84: Foot Brake Wait for Approaching Traffic
Check Windshield Wipers of Points 
Check Horn and All Lights
3. Turning 4. Backing
Fails to: Give Proper Signal (Mechanical or Hand) Fails to: Observe Surrounding Conditions
Turn Carefully From Proper Lane Back Slowly and Smoothly and Avoid
Excessive Curb Contact 
it of Points of Points
5. Controls 6. Speed
Fails to: Handle Vehicle Smoothly Exceeds Limit
Keep Both Hands on Wheel Too Slow for Traffic Conditions
Smoothly Engage Shifting Mechanism Too Fast for Traffic Conditions

[23

Use Brakes PrOperly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Points of Points
7. Position on Roadway 8. Overtaking - Passing
[23 Follows too Closely @mMisjudges Speed of Oncoming Traffic
Falls" to Hold Proper Lane Passes in Intersection, on Hill, Curve. etc.
- Straddles Lane Markings Cuts in too Soon
Fails to Signal Hand, Light,
. . E3 Horn) When Con itions 
of Points . Warrant of Pornts
9. Parking 7 7 10. Railroad and School Zones
Fails to: Avoid Violent Bumping of Other Cars Fails tag] Obey Signals and Caution Warnings 
or Excesswe Scraping of Curb [-23 Be Alert for Unusual Conditions
Set Hand Brake
[If] Crarrip Wheels Where - of P__oints 
News? airin- it? Poms Stems - 
ll. Attention 12. General
Fails to: Anticipate Hazardous Traffic!? 1 and Hesitant While Operating
Conditiond- In'Eludirig reasoning) .553? a ?r *ga?f?ylargrmum Speeds Allowed on Open

Keep Full Attention on Operation of Car Highway

[23

 

 

__._Limit Talking to Minimum [2 Lack of Caution
. ?ObServe'Po?stqd?igns or Signals __._Timidity or Lack of Assurance Under

 

 

*5 No?rmaliDrivi . - .
of Pomts 4? - if -ag Conditionsw, stic?l?omts



 

 

44:4, may.-. u; w. 1

Remarks: 

 

 

 





?i 1? ?g 4"
a

 

 

 

I

 

0?

 

 

ELECTION. DECLINATION. OR WAIVER
OF LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES GROUP LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM

IMPORTANT
AGENCY INSTRUCTIONS
ON BACK OF ORIGINAL

 

 

 

I

TO COMPLETE THIS 

FOLLOW THESE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

Read the back of the ?Duplicate? carefully before you fill in the form.
. Fill in BOTH COPIES ofthe form. Type or use ink. 

- Do not detach any part.

 

 

2

FILL IN THE IDENTIFYING INFORMATION BELOW (please print or type):

 

NAME (last)



(first)


DATE OF BIRTH (month, day, year)

To I1 v0, 

(middle) SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

.3sz

 

 

 

EMPLOYING DEPARTMENT 0R AGENCY
E. 3.2. -- 

259 lorl 77.21
M4




 

 

 

 

MARK AN IN ONE OF THE BOXES BELOW (do NOT mark more than one):

Mark here
if you
WANT BOTH
optional and
regular
insurance

Mark here

if you

DO NOT WANT
OPTIONAL but
do want
regular
insurance

Mark here

if you

WANT NEITHER
regular nor
optional
insurance

 

 

 

 

(A)

 

 

 

 

IB)

 

 

 

 

(C)

ELECTION OF OPTIONAL (IN ADDITION TO. REGULAR) INSURANCE

elect the $10,000 additional optional insurance and authorize the required deductions
from my salary, compensation, or annuity to pay the full cost of the optional insurance.
This optional insurance is in addition to my regular insurance.

DECLINATION 0F OPTIONAL (BUT NOT REGULAR) INSURANCE

I decline the $10,000 additional optional insurance. I understand that I cannot elect op-
tional insurance until at least 1 year after the effective date of this declination and unless
at the time I apply for it I am under age 50 and present satisfactory medical evidence
of insurability. I understand also that my regular insurance is not affected by this declina-
tion of additional optional insurance.

WAIVER OF LIFEYINSURANCE COVERAGE

desire not to be insured and I waive coverage under the Federal Employees Group Life
Insurance Program. I understand that I cannot cancel this waiver and obtain regular in-
surance until at least 1 year after the effective date of this waiver and unless at the time
I apply for insurance 1 am under age 50 and present satisfactory medical evidence of in:
surability. I understand also that I cannot now or later have the $10,000 additional
optional insurance unless I have the regular insurance.

 

 

 

SIGN AND DATE. IF YOU MARKED BOX OR 
COMPLETE THE THEN RETURN
THE ENTIRE, FORM TO YOUR EMPLOYING OFFICE.

 

FOR EMPLOYING OFFICE USE ONLY

 

(official receiving date stamp)

FEB 5 1958

 

SIGNATURE (do not print)




- gag?;

 

DATE

 

~74/65?

 

 

 

See Table of Effective Dates on back of Original

 

ORIGINAL COPY?Retain in Official Personnel Folder

STANDARD roan No. 176-1?
JANUARY 1968
. 3/ (For use only until April 14. 1968)
'3 176-101

#7

 

 

 

 

 

TO EMPLOYING AGENCY

. Who must employees not excluded by law or
regulation from ihsurance coverage, including those who
have previously waived coverage, are required to com-
plete and ?le Standard Form l76?T. Employees who are
in the service on February 14, 1968, as well as those who
are appointed after that date but before April 14, 1968,
must ?le the form.

. Automatic cancellation of previously ?led waiv-
?Waivers of Life Insurance Coverage? (SF 53)
on ?le are automatically canceled as of the ?rst day of the
?rst pay period beginning on or after February 14, 1968.
Payroll of?ces are to begin regular insurance deductions
on the automatic cancellation date for employees who
do not ?le a new waiver, those who do not check box
of SF 176-T, on or before that date.

. Employees failing to an employee does not
return a completed SF 176-T, contact him and urge him
to do so even if he does not want optional insurance (he
will, of course, be automatically covered for regular in?
surance). If he still fails to ?le SF by April 14,
1968, or 31 days after appointment, whichever is laterthat date: mark box B, and note
in the space provided for his signature ?employee con-
tacted?failed to elect Optional insurance.? See note 2
below.

. Review of completed Review both copies
of the SF for legibility, completeness, and con-
sistency. Reconcile with the employee any obvious major

discrepancy such as a mark in more than one box.

If the employee marked box A or box C, make sure
the Statistical Stub is complete. Then detach and mail
stubs, in a bundle, weekly to:

Of?ce of Federal Employees? Group Life Insurance

(Statistical Study)

4 East 24th Street

New York, New York 10010

If the employee marked box B, detach and destroy
the stub.

. Date of receipt and e?ective Stamp date

of receipt by employing of?ce in the space provided for
this purpose on both the Original and the Duplicate.
I(b) The effective date is determined from the table be-
ow. 

. Disposition of forms?(a) File the Original SF

176-T in the of?cial pefsonnel folder in all cases.

Any necessary payroll change, with effective date,
may be posted in the space reserved on the Duplicate
for employing of?ce.

The Duplicate may be destroyed, if no payroll action
is required, or after the requirements of the agency?s
payroll system have been met.

. Use of SF 176-T ?Election", Declination,

or Waiver of Life Insurance Coverage? should not be
used after the initial ?ling period (after April 14, 1968).
A revised edition will be available for use after that date.

TABLE OF EFFECTIVE DATES

 

DATE SF 176-T
RECEIVED BY
EMPLOYING OFFICE

EM DECISION

EFFECTIVE DATE
(IF NO WAIVER. SF 53, IN EFFECT)

 

OF DECISION

OF DEDUCTIONS

 

Elects optional (in addition to regu?
lar) (box A).

Declines optional (but not regular)
(box B).

Waives regular (so ineligible for
optional) (box C).

On or before February 14. 1968.

Elects optional (in addition to regu-
lar) (box A).

Declines optional (but not regular)
(box B).

After February 14 but not later
than April 14, 1968.

Cancels previously elected optional
(but not regular) (box B).

Waives regular (so ineligible for op-
tional) (box C).

 

 

Coverage effective February 14,
1968.

Declination effective February 14,

Waiver effective last day of pay peri-
pd" in which February 14, 1968
a 5.

Coverage effective on date of receipt.

Declination effective on date of re-
ceipt, but employee loses auto-
matic optional protection on Feb-
ruary 14, 1968.

Cancellation effective last day of
pay period in which received.

Waiver effective last day of pay peri-
od in which received.

 

Deductions begin day of 
pay period beginning on or after
February 14, 1968.

Deductions stop last day of pay
period in which February 14, 1968
ails.

Deductions begin 1st day of 1st
pay period beginning on or after
date of receipt.

Deductions for optional stop last .,

day of pay period in which re-
ceived.

Deductions stop last day of pay pe-
riod in which received.

NOTES: 1. Because regular insurance coverage and deductions are automatic unless waived (by checking box C). A and 3 elections do not affect regular Insurance effective dates.
2. An employee for whom the agency files SF 1764 because he failed to file is deemed to have declined optional. but not regular. Insurance.

3. An employee with an uncenceled waiver (SF 53) on file cannot be insured any earlier,than the first day he is in duty and pay status in a pay .period beginning
on or after February 14. 1968; filing of an SF 175-T before that date will not cancel an SF 53 any earlier. Deductions begin the day he becomes Insured.

4. The effective data of regular (and optional) insurance coverage for an employee who has been on leave without pay for more than 1 year is the first day he is in

pay and duty status. Deductions are effective the same day.

2

 

 

0 9

2- 28? 68
PLAIN TEXT

TELEGRAM URGENT

Ms

MR. CARYHA DEKLE DE LOACH
MESSENGER HOLD FOR ARRIVAL
201 WEST MAIN STREET

CLAXTON, GEORGIA

I WANT YOU TO KNOW How SORRY I WAS TO LEARN
PASSING OF YOUR MOTHER. MY DEEPEST SYMPATHY
?033 OUT TO YOU AND I HOPE YOU WILL FIND COMFORT
is THE MEMORIES YOU HAVE AND THE IOIOWLEDGE THAT
HEIRS WAS A GOOD AND FULL LIFEAEISTANCE, PLEASE CALL ME.


?5'5

 

 

 

.. JOHN EDGAR HOOVER
REC-1118
FEDERALBU man or 
cohmuw?mus ?secffon $1935 7:30 I
FEB 2319? 29 FEB 29 New 

 

 

Tolson 

DeLoa 
JEH:edm (4) 

CGSpel? an; -

Callahan


can mass-rows om??

Bosen 

 

 

 

 

Sullivan 

Tuvel

Troue: A {j if: 0 
Tele. Room 7 5 @3363 

Holmes 

Candy MAIL ROOM C3 TELETYPE UNIT 

{Ell

 

 

 

 

 

 

23a?

Tolson 
DeLooch
Mob:
Bishop
CcSpex 
Callahan 
Conrad
Pelt

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sullivan 

Tove! 

Trotter

 

Tale. Room
Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

   

April 2, 1968
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha 13.333; gjLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I am very pleased to advise that you
have merited the rating of Outstanding for the
period April 1, 1967, to March 31, 1968. There
is enclosed a copy of this rating, which you may
retain.

I also have approved an incentive
award for you in recognition of your exceptional
services and the enclosed check represents an
award of $500. 00. I want you to know that I am
most appreciative of the dedicated fashion in
which you have handled your responsibilities.

 

manta 1L8.
APR 2 1968

COMM-FBI

 

Sincerely,

Edgar HomeEnclosures (2) M9:

1 Miss?fSent Direct) b6
(4RH 
Award ?ag-E3 

Based on memo Mr. Tolson- Director  

. 
Tolson

DeLoach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Mob:
3221?:
emomn um 
mad
Felt
Gate?w..?
The Director DATE: 4-1768 
$3511.
. Tale. Room
Mr. Tolson 

Candy 

 

SUBJECT: CARTHA DE LOACH
Assistant to Director - Investigative

JOHN P. MOHR
Assistant to the Director - Administrative

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

There are attached for approval the annual performance
reports for Messrs. DeLoach and Mohr in which their services have .
been rated Outstanding for the period April 1, 1967, to March 31, 1968.
I have signed these ratings as the Rating Official.

In the event you approve these ratings I respectfully
request that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the
Approving Official. Messrs. DeLoach and Mohr will then be entitled
to cash incentive awards of $500 as has been approved in the past for
Assistant Directors and above.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That you, as Approving Official, Sign the original and the
copy of each of the attached Outstanding performance ratings and that
Mr. DeLoach and Mr. Mohr each be furnished a copy of his rating and
approved for a cash award of $500.

859.332 Girl-33875213 9..

HSearchehW Numbered?
1/ El)

. .1135 APR 31968
MW aye/ML
Enclosures
Wam m/

(3) 
W1 - Personnel File of John P. Mohr



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARTHA D.DELOACH

April 3, 1968

    

Mr.
. Mr. 
Mr. 

Mr. Tavel

 



Mr. 
*Te_lc. 
Honorable J. Edgar Hoover 511$: 2:113:73?:
Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Washington, D. C. 

WI

Dear Boss: .- 

About the only thing that can make
my spirits rise in this world of discouraging political
"Bobby-news" is recognition from a person I admire
and respect very highly. You certainly gave me this
needed "boost" in the form of an Outstanding efficiency
award.

 

It is rather difficult to control emotional
feelings these days, however, I wanted you to know
that I am very grateful to you personally, not only for
the recognition but for the fact that your strong hand
still guides the destiny of the FBI. To be told by you
that I am playing a small part in being of assistance
is even finer than the cash involved, despite the many
needy drains that a man with seven children always has
to face! 

Thanks again for your kindness. I am
very appreciative.

Sincer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FD-185 (Rev. 8-16?63) I

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

Name of Employee: CARTHA 13% LOACH

 

Where Assigned: EX 

 

(Division) (section, Unit)

Official position Title and TO THE DIRECTOR-INVE TIGA VE

 

ktf-ul

 

 

 

Rating Period: from 1 ~1 toy?MW

ADJECTIVE RATING: OUTSTANDING 13333133 5

 

Outstanding, Excellent, Satisfactory. Unsatisfactory

 

 

Rated by: Associate Director 4/1/68
Signature Title Date

Reviewed by:

 

Signature TitIe Date

Ratin A rovedb {WW?121mm; MEL
pp ture Title Date
5..
I: .0

A 

67-: lg

I

TYPE OF REPOR Searched mg; 

Official yeti;
mAnnual 60-D_av
90-Day
Transfer
Separation from Service
Special

 

 

 

 

9/

 

 

 

. CARTHA D. DELOACH 
ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR - INVESTIGATIVE 

As Assistant to the Director, Mr. DeLoach has under
his?immediate supervision and direction the Domestic Intelligence,
General Investigative, Crime Records and Special Investigative
Divisions and in this capacity has earned the rating of Outstanding
for the period April 1, 1967, to March 31, 1968.

Mr. DeLoach has been delegated the responsibility for
coordinating the work of the Bureau in a wide variety of matters of
a criminal, civil, applicant, internal security and espionage nature,
as well as crime research matters, special tours and projects, pre-
paration and distribution of the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin and'
Uniform Crime Reports, and other related programs such as the "Ten
Most Wanted Fugitives. Mr. DeLoach has demonstrated unusual 
insight into every phase of these matters and has exhibited superior
qualities of leadership, integrity and extremely broad vision in the
discharge of his responsibilities. He has willingly assumed ever-
increasing responsibilities which he has handled with unerring judg?
ment and keen perception and has effectively represented the Bureau
in high-level, inter-departmental and inter?Governmental committees
and conferences 'of a policy-making nature.

He presents a mature, forceful and businesslike appear-
ance which, coupled with a friendly personality, makes him most effec-
tive in his contacts With his associates and with others as 3. Bureau
representative. Mr. DeLoach's consistently dedicated efforts through-
out his career, particularly during the past year, have played a vital
role in the successful discharge of our responsibilities and obligations
and the rating of Outstanding is clearly merited.

 

 

 

 

?andard Form 88 A,
{Row June I956) . 
Bur'eau oftt??udget . - OF MEDICAL EXAMINATI
(Rem) .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME 2. GRADE AND COMPONENT 0R POSITION
LOACH, Cartna Dekle Asst. to Director
1. HOME ADDRESS (Numbcr. street or 12131),ch or token, zone and State) 5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION 6. DATE OF EXAMINATION
i Annual 3-28-368
7. SEX 3. RACE 9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT sgawc: IO. AGENCY II. ORGANIZATION UNIT
Male: I. . lcmuAN
Iz. DATE OF BIRTN I3. PMCE OF BIRTH II. NAME. AND ADDRESS OF NEXT or KIN
7-20-20 Claxton, Georgia
Is. EXAMINING FACILITY OR EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS 16. OTHER INFORMATION
NNMG, Bethesda, Maryland
I7. RATING OR SPECIALTY TIME IN THIS (Total) LAST SIX MONTHS
CLINICAL EVALUATION I NOTES. (Describe every abnormality in detail. Enter pertinent item number before each
comment. Contmue in item 73 and use additional sheets If necessary 
NOR- (Check each Item IR. appropriate col- ABNOR-
MAL umn enter? It not evaluated) MAL I
HEAD. FACE. NECK AND SCALP 
19. NOSE . 25. Minimal A-V compression
3; 20. SINUSES 
21. MOUTH AND TNROAT . 29 Spjit I
x: 22 EARS-GENERAL 
2.3. DRUMS (Perforation) 32 . Prostate normal
it 7 
25. omwuuosconc h6. CHEST: PA and left lateral films demonstrate no
3: 25- PUPILS (vat?rand Radio") . evidence of active cardiac or puJIncnary disease .
21 ocuua MOTILITY rm
3: 28. LUNGS AND CREST (Include breasts) D.E . MAC CARTY
29. HEART CDR MC 
30. SYSTEM etc.) 
1E AND (Includthem?t) 148. EKG-I No significant change since previous tracings
I 32. ANus AND RECTUM of 2-25-61? 12-6-65, 1-31-67 . Left axis deviation.
33. ENDOCRINE SYSTEM
a: Mess2r.? 49*
35? memes rm? Electrolytes -- WNL Mi (9 00 
35- Cholesterol 298 1m: 
37. uric Acid 8 ,5 PM 
38. SFINE. EITHER MUSCULOSKELETAL 7 .- 
39 IDENTIFYING BODY MARKS SCARS TATTOOS ff? BIJN 17 I 04b
x: 40. SKIN. LYMPIIATICS . k: :A?fb
:x II. NEUROLOGIC (Equihbn'un mu undcr Item 
42. 
.I *4
I3. PELVIC (Female; only) how done) searCheL 733/)
CIVAGINAI. I/?f7? itsmq) 
I . REMARKS AND AL
I. DENTAL (Place appropriate symbol: above Or below number am" ?Mower/I]: W?u?r?yq IDEFECTS AND DISEASES
o-Rcstomble teeth X-Mirsz'ngtreth (6X w? 
(?Nonmtorable teeth by dcntum Include abutment:
Exam Type 111
Class 1

. No defects noted
x0: . n1?
I .1. LABORATORY FINDING: i i c?w 
Is. URINALYSIS: A. LSPECIFIC GRAVITY 1,019 Is. 91:37 (Place. date. ?lm number and mum
B. ALBUMIN Neg. q. nq I -
sum Neg; Ess. Ne . 31060 - 67 I, See #146 above
I7. SEROLOGY qud and mum Imam I9. BLOOD TYPE AND RH 50. OTHER TESTS
FACTOR
I?l 5 seat-#118 5 I11 6
VDRL Non-reactive above See #50 above

IMAM Ines I 

 

 

 

,7 7, 




MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER FINDINGS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HEIGHT 52. 53. 54. COLOR EYES 55. BUILD: SLENDER MEDIUM HEAVY ODESE 56. TEMPERATURE
- 7 a 
(Check on?) . .e
72%? 18h . Brown! 1 Blue
57. BLOOD PRESSURE (Arm at heart (ml) 53. PULSE (Arm at hum 1m!)
A- SYS 122 B. SYS. I 5 . 6-. SYS.. A. B. AFTER EXEECISE c. D. RECUMDENT E. AFTER STANDING
SITTING RECUM- STANDING 7 3 MIN-
DIAS. ,8h 35m DIAS. 75 (3 mm) DIAS. 80 72
59. INSTANT VISION . . 60. REFRACTION 61. NEAR VISION
RIGHT 20170 CORR.50 comm .25 By
LEFT 201.50 CORR.TO 20/ 20 DY s. CX .,62 CORR. To 25 ?4.811383
62. HETEROPHORIA (Specify distancePRISM DIV. PRISM OONV. PC po
CT ?r 
63. ACCOMMODATION 64. COLOR VISION (Ta: and and malt) 65. DEPTH PERCEPTION UNCORRECHD
6 6 - (Tu: uud and ICON)
RIGHT LEFT PIP 1 /1 CORRECTED 
66. FIELD oI-' VISION 67. NIGHT and and score) 68. RED LENS TEST 69. INTRAOCULAR TENSION
76.: HEARING .AUDIOMETER -I SO 72 AND PSYC
7.. (Test: and and ?wk?
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 8000
SV [15 ?g .. w? 2048?. . 25% .1936 . . am am ?5
LEFT wv 115- Sv A RIGHT 25 25 10 ?3:5 - 1'(Continued) AND SIGNIFICANT OR INTERVAL HISTORY - .. . 
Decreased auditorya a?ulty to-watch-tick bilaterally.
*2 3 "t a 1-?fo A pant gay-:- ?5 
- a . - EAtchf r. it. 1? 15pm in.
thJEf- a 1: ?ni- 4; l: qr 1 Ar.? 3$?m If I
("Uu cdd?itt'onahhectg If nemiary)? '1 1 ?12: 31.: j? 
71: SUMMARY OF DEFECTS AND DIAGNOSES (List dicy'nous with item HumbertIi. 

75. RECOMMENDATIONS-FURTHER SPECIALIST EXAMINATIONS INDICATED (Specify) 7s. A. PHYSICAL mom:
. l. 
Audlogram - .
77.: EXAMINEE (CheckPHYSICAL CATEGORY
D. Is NOT QUALIFIED FOR
78: IE NOTAUALIFIED. LIST DISOUALIFYING DEFECTS NUMBER A 
79. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN SIGNATURE 6
CAPT . MG USN
so. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN 4 SIGNATURE 
st. TYPED OR PRINTED NAMEOF DENTIST 0R PHYSICIAN (Indicate which) SIGNATURE 
32. TYPED OR-PRINTED NAME. OR APPROVING AUTHORITY SIGNATURE . . 2 NW. ,ap .- . NUMBER SHEETS
S. OFFICE 0-221-?78
?0 
a?
. 5 

 

 

- .


 

rp-aoo 2-9-67) .
A in a

Attachment to Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination
For Information and Guidance of Medical Examiner

(-4

Name ofExaminee r363, 1L. Q. be

(Type or print) Last First Middle

 

The following portions of the attached examination report form need not be completednecessary unless facilities for affording same are not readily available.

48. Not required unless examinee is over 35 years of age or examination indicates such is desirable.

49. Is necessary unless facilities for affording same are not readily available.

71. Audiometer examinations should be afforded whenever possible for all Special Agent applicants
and Special Agents. Applicants for the Special Agent position will not be accepted if the hearing
loss exceeds a 15 decibel average in either ear in the conversational speech range (500, 1000,
2000 cycles).

For All Examinees, Whether Clerical or Special Agent Applicants or Employees:

The medical examiner should answer the following question:

Examinee is [j is not qualified for strenuous physical exertion.

To be Answered in the Case of All Male Employees and Male Applicants:

1. Does examinee have any defects restricting or prohibiting his participation in defensive tactics and
dangerous assignments which might entail the practical use of firearms?

wt: Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.
2. Does exa 'nee have any defects prohibiting safe operation of motor vehicles?
?dYes If ?yes? please specify defects. 

3. For safe driving of motor vehicles, Civil Service Commission requires distant vision must test at
least 20/40 in one and 20/100 in the other, correcte or uncorrected. Should examines wear cor-
rective glasses while operating a motOr vehicle? age: No
If recommendation is based on a factor other than above standard, indicate basis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

?7 WI fgk?fryg I {?rf 

as? 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Desirable Weight Ranges for Males



.
S4: wl? a?
is a
.-



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Height Small Frame i Medium Frame 5 Large Frame
5?1315?143 162
5?166
5?170
510175
5?11135
6?190
6?6?200
6?210
6?Examinee?s frame is small medium 

. Considering above weight table, the xaminee?s frame, and other individual physical characteristics,

 

I consider his present weight atisfactory De?cient
6. Under proper medical supervision, employee should lose 
gain pounds

Remarks:

 

 

 

 

b6

 

 

 

Signature of Medical Eiiaminer



 

Date

 

 

 

 

4-572 (Rev. 7-18-63) 
OPIIONAI FORM N0. '0 . 
my m2 lemon

GSA Gill. HO. 2?

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT


Memorandum
T0 The Director DATE: Vb??f

FROM 1 N. P. Callahan

SUBJECT: The Congressional Record

 

 

 

1 
.g Pages E3429- 234.30 <1'enator Talmadge, (D) Georgia, inserted .
i 1 int Record an .ddress of C. VeLoach, Assistant to the Director, 
?j Feder a1 Bureaniof Investigation, before the Georgia Association of County a
. Commissioners at Augusta, Ga. April 28,1968?l?l

Va

 

87

In the original of a emorandum captioned and dated as above, the Congressional SQ
Record for 74/2?? was reviewed and pertinent items were 
marked for the Director' 3 attention. This form has been prepared in order that
portions of a copy of the original memorandum may be clipped, mounted, and placed (3:

in appropriate Bureau case or subject matter files.

 

 

 

 

FD-253 (Rev. 5-18-67) 9

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

 

In Reply. Please Refer to
File No.

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice
Washington. D. C. 20535

Dear Sir:

For inclusion in the. fund to be paid to the designated beneficiary of any Special Agent of the FBI who has previously
coutributed to this fund and who dies from any cause cites-pt self-destruction while employed as a Special Agent, 1 am for-
warding herewith (by Check - Money Order) the sum of $20. payable to to be included in said fund. Payment will be
made for death by self-destruction otter the Agent has been a member of the iund fora continuous period oi two years. it is
understOod and agreed that the sum tendered herewith is a voluntary, gratuitous contribution to said fund which I understand
is to be adminiStered in the following manner.

The Director of the FBI will appoint a committee which shall consider all matters pertaining to the acquisition, safe
keeping and exPendinq of said fund, which committee will recommend appropriate action to the Director in pertinent matters.
The Assistant Director of the Administrative DiVision oi the FBI shall receive all contributions and account for same to the
Director. Upon the death of any Special Agent who is a member of said fund the appointed committee will consider the case
and submit a recommendation to the Director as to its conclusions. Appropriate instructions will then be issued to the Assist.
ant Director of the Administrative Division, directing him to pay to the designated beneficiary the sum of $20,000. The liability
of the fund shall not under any circumstances exceed the amount of monies in the fund at the time any liability shall occur.

EXECUTE IN DUPLICATE JAND SUBMIT BOTH COPIES TO THE BUREAU

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Official Bureau Name (pleaise ?t or print) Date Office of Assi?gn?ment (or SOG Division)
SA CARTHA . DELOACH 5/13/68 Executive Offices
The following person is designated as my?beneficiary for Special Agents Insurance Fund:
Name (primar benefi isr use iven if female) Relationshi
b6
Address 
Name (contingent bene?ciary. if desired; use given first name if female) Relationship 
Address

 

DO you desire to designate the above-listed beneficiaries as the beneficiary and contingent beneficiary respectively of the
Chas. S. Ross Fund as well? mYes No If not, the entire following portion must be executed.

The following person is designated as my beneficiary under the Chas. 3. Ross Fund providing $1500 death benefit to
beneficiary of agents killed In the line of duty, other than travel accidents.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name (primary beneficiary; use given first name if female) Relationship
Address
Name (contingent beneficiary; if desired; use gitren first name if female) Relationship
Address
. ant {Indeed
Seap=alafny$nts insurance WM Very 
MAY?lii 1908 (W/p/Z?v?z
died was?
wig .
l. 1;;de Spec ant to the D1rector
r?l??v 7. is 1
1 (SUN ?0 as:

537' 

- A 3396

 

 

June 10, 1968 12W

Dear DeLoach:

I certainly want to commend you on
your over-all supervision of the James Earl
Ray case. I am deeply appreciative of the long
hours of overtime necessitated by the many
ramifications of the case, which hours you gave
unstintingly without regard for your own personal
life, and the strict attention to each minute detail
which brought about the successful culmination
of this case. My sincerest thanks for your
loyalty and dedication.

With best regards, I am
Sincerely, 3

J-Wr?aem

F67?w 3 

 

 

Nmbemiw
Mr. CarthaD. QeLoach 8 JUN 311358 ?7 5

Federal Bureau of Investigationm - 

.W hlagton D. C. 
Tolson 

DeLouch ?3 m7? ?pw?
Mob: 

1 Bishop I SENT FROM D. O-
Cos er 

ggiligag TIME 

gag! DATE 

By%



- JEH edm (3)g
Tove! 
Trotter

Tele. Roe 
\i 
Gundy MAIL noon reserves um 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(Rev. 8-11-64)

FOR GOVERNMENT 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

UNITED STATES DEPARTMEN JUSTICE
Date /9 6 f/

I certify that I have received returned the following Government property for official use:

D. 0. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #5898
expires 6-30-69



RETURNED

D. C. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #4655
a) '15 expires 6?30-68

 

 

if,? FIL .5

I

['va 3! 



AD . Very truly yours,

The Government property which you hereb acknowledge 

is changed to you and you are responsible or taking care 2 S6

of it on returning it when its use has been completed. (Signature) . aw 

MARK OR WRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN (9 

Cartha D._DeLoach

 

 

 

 

 

1 JUN 25 1963



?tter emermm. 70

 

b;

 

 

 

July 19, 1988
PERSONAL

t1

Mr. Carma ?eLoach 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
waShingtOn, D. C.

Dear BeLoaoh:

You are to be commended for your
exemplary services in connection with the return
of James Earl Ray to the United States. In recog-
nition thereo? I have approved an incentive award
for you in the amount of $300. 00 and a. check rep-
resenting the award will be forwarded to you at a
later date.

 

 

 

You displayed superb leadership 111 Egg
perfecting all arrangements attendant
to returning Bay to this country without incident.
I 1want you to know of my appreciation for your 67 z? I 
superior efforts in this matter. Jenni?
{?g?135 Searched?M 
Sincerely, 13? JUL 23 19bit} 
J.:Edgar Hoover 
M-
1 Payroll Distribution (Sent Direct) SENT TO DIRECTOR
MR SIGNA 5E 
1 - M1ss I:I(Sent DirectCaSpe:

Colloha 

Conrad 

Fe]: 

Cole 

Tove! 

Trotter ,x ?'Mama

Holmes
MAIL ROOM UNITE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

?i l/ . :MyTolsonuw


Mhr?"/

Mr. Bishop 

Mr. Ca pe 
idir 

CARTHA D.DELOACH
Mm.

July 25, 1968 Mr. Felt 
Mr. 

?My.

Mr. 
3 . Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 

Tele. 
Miss 1 es- 

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover ?w

 

 

Federal Bureau of Investigation

  

lad -.--

 

 

 

Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss:

Thanks very much for the meritorious
award in connection with the case involving James Earl
Ray. Quite naturally, I am pleased to receive your
commendation in this connection.

In the many years I have been privileged
to work with the Bureau, I can't recall another case
that better exemplifies the tremendous teamwork and
spirit which highlighted this case. Agents in many offices,
the Laboratory, the Identification Division, and of course
the men of the General Investigative Division, all worked
tirelessly with one goal in mind--?-that of solving this case
and bringing further credit to you and to the FBI. I heard
no grumbling whatsoever concerning long hours and
sacrifice. To the contrary, it was a labor 0; love with
optimism throughout. -

I have never been more proud of our
organization and am indeed grateful for the recognition
as being part of the team.

 

Smcerely, f)
5 -54 
67.. . .

Searched 

?g 2 JUL 301958



 

 
   

 





i? he NT vinscron 
'7 315?? 

 

 

 

 

-

FROM

SUBJECT:

OHIONAI tom N0. IO


. 
on cue. no. no. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

9.


 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eishr
Memorandum :ngh: 
I Fell
MR. TOLSON DATE, 9/13/68 3211;;
:1 Ivan?.?
0; cc Mr. DeLoach E313:
C. Mr. Mohr 
Mr. Callahan

ANONYMOUS LETTER 8/28/68 TO ATTORNEY GENERAL
CONTAINING ALLEGATIONS AGAINST DIRECTOR
AND OTHER 

no it
I: ,a I 2

You approved a memorandum dated 9/5/68, prepared
by the Administrative Division, which requested I furnish
comments regarding allegations that Hoffa's teamsters framed
me with a blonde, liquor, and lavish hotel accommodations,

with unseen cameras and tape recordings.

7d4

1

My comments are simply this: I have been happily
marriad for 23 years; I have a wife and 7 children, and
consequently many responsibilities; I have never been
compromised by a blonde, liquor or hotel facilities of
any neither am I susceptible to being trapped
with a blonde, liquor, or lavish hotel facilities.

While I resent the allegations against my character,
I nevertheless must consider the source, inasmuch as this

campaign on the part of former
SA who remembers well the fact that I was

 

 

the assistant counsel at the hearings afforded him
Civil Service Commission. I also testified against
at these hearings. I will welcome an investigation
my moral character at any time.

ACTION:
For record purposes.

the
:nto

@?hh?x





0?5"

?nth! 1

WW

SEP 20 1953

w-

an.?

anti. N?b?rm?edw Wad

LLU \qusrcho :3 -
.. - -
t3438~ i 
I 


 

I
Toison
LIV/touch ..
Mob:

b6!

 

 

 

September 3, 1968
PERSONAL

 

Mr. Cartha D. @Loacn 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

In recognition of your superb overall super-
vision from the Seat of Government relative to the inves-
tigation oi the Kidnaping case involvinal be
it is a pleasure to commend you. 

The valuable guidance you afforded this impor-
tant case was of great benefit in the successful conclusion
realized with the apprehension of this dangerous subject
and the safe return of the victim to his parents. Your

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

exceptional efforts are highly appreciated.
G)
a; Sincerely,
a a :1 .7. Edgar HooveiN?Iiss  (Sent DirectBased on Los Angeles teletype 8/30/68 and a?dexid?. General
Investigative and Adninistrative Divisions 8/31/68 re

. 1 Kidnaping, AF 0. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i .
1 Salutation per file.
Ix
. 

Sci-Son hm (194/ 
:3le
Bishop A
Gasser 
Callahan

 

Conrad
Felt
Gale

 

 

 

Rosen 

Sullivan 3
Tavel 2?
Trotter '0
Tale. Room 14) 4a


Holmes 

randy I t: if) M8111 301% TELETYFE UNIT C3 A a?

 

 

 

PE ,v
. September 19, 1968
stem 1
Honorable Clyde ?2 
Associatelustice A

Thg?ggr?eme Court of Texas
Ghettol?tahoa; 
Austin, ?exes 783711

My dear Judge: 

I have received your letter of September 12th
and want to thank you for your generous remarks concerning
my administration of the FBI. 

In reply to your inquiry, Mr. Cartha D. eLoach
is an Assistant to the Director of this Bureau. You may be sure
he appreciates, as I do, your appraisal of him and he is aware of
your interest in having him write to you.

Sincerely yours,
J. Edgar Hoover

   
   
  

1 - Mr. DeLoach Enclosure

NOTE: Buiiles show that Smith, Supreme Court of Texas, met Mr. DeLoach\
?x at the Freedoms Foundation at Valley Forge in 1958. At that time, Smith 
may prais?md the Director and the FBI. He is on the Special Correspond-
ents List. butg?oin?g? from Mr. DeLoacir to 'correSpondent same date.

ALA: k1 
(4)11: 3% 





SEP191968 
.. a COMM-FBI w? ?e 

 

 

?w -, 
hm. soon magmas UNIT 
(f 

 

?r -
. 
my: ?uprenw GImtrt nf Gems

 

 

A 0 9
4' ROBERT w. CALVERT (?aunts! (Suzhou
- CHIEF JUSTICE: i. a
MEADE F. GRIFFIN Ci)?15 2x315
cums E. SMITH 
RUEL c. WALKER 78711 GAl?igsKR. JACKSON
JAMES R. NORVELL 
JOE GREENHILL
ROBERT w. HAMILTON Ml. 90150.
ZOLLIESTEAKLEY September 12, 1968 y.
JACK POPE Mr. 
ASSOCIATE Jus'ncss iSh 
i r. 
Mr. Callahan? 3
Mr. 
Mr. 7
Honorable J. Edgar Hoover gale-m?
- 
Director Mr. 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 1% 
9th and Avenue, N. W. 
Washington, D. C. 20535 ng?de.ir?
Miss Gandy
Dear Mr. Hoover:

 

 

In 1958 I serVed on Freedoms Foundation National and School Awards
Jury at Valley Forge, . ia. The purpose of this letter
is to inquire about Mr. C. who also served on that
jury. At that time he Was Vice Commander of the American Legion
and his address was 107 Morningside Drive, Alexandria, Virginia.
I understood that he was in your department, perhaps an
assistant director. I was very much impressed with Mr. DeLOach
and would like to know where he is at this time. If he is still
with your department Or if you know of his location would you
please pass this letter or a copy thereof on to him with a re?
quest that he write to me.

I want to take this opportunity to again congratulate you on g,

the great service you have and are rendering to the United States
of America. Your service has never been more needed thantnow.

I wish you continued success as Director of the Federal Bureau

 

 

 

 

of Investigation. 6? mg;. . w-
.553 sma??w 
Search: NUEZIW 19686}
Sincerely yours, on:
MW A. 
Inn?s-II

.Smith 15?sep 01968

     

 

TO

FROM

sumECT:

7. 1?,71, ,Wii? 7

OPYIONAI. FORM NO. ?0 
MAY I962 
GSA GEN. REG. NO. 21

UNITED STA GOVERNMENT

emorandum

1 DeLoach

Bishop
Casper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt
Gale
Mr. TOLSON DATE: October 7, 1968 
Tovel
Trotter
Tele.Room
Holmes


 

   

   

D.r LOA

OPHTHAQMIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION

Dr. M. Noel Stow is an extremely reputable
Ophthalmologist with offices in Washington, D. Along
with a number of other FBI employees, ave requested
him to check my eyes on an annual basis. He is a graduate
of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. I have known him
not only through professional practices here in Washington
but I have also known him and his family in my home State
of Georgia.

 

Dr. Stow has become quite wealthy as a result of
his medical practice, therefore, he is able to devote
part of his time to charitable and professional activities.
He has recently become Director of the Ophthalmic Research
Foundation and plans to devote 50% of his?;

ture;
\Wto this Foundation. FWWL 3i? 

create}. ?5 Ni?m

  

 

Dr. Stow called me on Sunday evening, ecte ?r 6?1968"??

and indicated he would very much appreciate my cons1deration

of an invitation to be an Honorary.nember-r of thngoard of
Directors of the Ophthalmic Research Foundation. He stated
there would be no work involved and he has asked a number of
his patients, whom he has known over a long period of years,

. to accept appointments of this nature. He stressed the fact
that :this would not interfere with my responsibilities here
at FBI Headquarters in any manner. I told him I would have
to check and call him back.

 

. i There is no derogatory information on either Dr. Stow
ior the Ophthalmic Research Foundation. There would be no
ublicity involVed in - ?of the
MM- 

Boar?
ACTION: ?mwmamme.mm??

 
       
   

1restors of this

 

If. there are no objections, I will acaQETDE11??bw back
and teII him that I will be glad to serve as an Honorary
Member of the Board of Directors of this 

 

oison
DeLoach
Mohr 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



UK



 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

 




omounl tom NO. 10
MAY In: some?

solo-loo
GSA No. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

. also}; 
DeLoach 
Mob:

 

Bishop
. Ca er
Memorandum Ma, ..


Mr. Callahan DATE: October 28, 1968 Ef?fj?m?"M
Eta?:4.

J. B. Adams . gags??*?

CARTHA D. LOACH
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Pursuant to the Director's desires we schedule Assistants
to the Director and Assistant Directors for their periodic physical
examinations at the U. S. Naval Hospital, Bethesda, when Congress is
not in session. Congress is not now in session and accordingly we are
scheduling such officials at this time. In Mr. DeLoach?s case,*he had
his last examination 3-28-68 and would not be due- for his next annual

examination until 3-28-69. His office advised due to his commitments
Mr. DeLoach would prefer taking his annual physical examination
after the first of the new year. Accordingly it is recommended that
this be permitted since the new examination at this time would only
be about 7 months from the date of his. last oneMiss 5 b6
i 47%,3
?4541tit-time? I

. 2. .3

 



 

?11

(Rev. 8-11-64) ?9

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date 

I certify that I have E3 receiired returned the following Government property for official use:

InSpectors' Manual, Foreign Offices 5 

 

 


3/ 
AD Very truly yours,

The Government property which you hereb acknowledge

is charged to you and You are or taking care .. 

of it on returning it when its use has been completed. . (Signature) . -

MARK OR WIRITE ON IT OR MUTILATE IT IN [3

(Typed name, Cartha D. ?e Loach

 

 

 

 

out) 121963

M3

memoir wit MEDELPF

?u

 

 

December 26, 1968
PEREQNAL

Mr. Cartha nQeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I am extremely pleased to commend you
and advise that in recognition of your outstanding per-o
formance in connection with the investigation of the

Immunmsamvolvingl 
I have approved an incentive award

of $300. 00 for you. A check representing this award
will be forwarded at a later date.

 

 

The success achieved in this exception-
ally important matter is due in large measure to the
expert manner in which you supervised the investiga-
tion from the Seat of Government. I certainly want
you to know that your superb efforts and leadership
are genuinely appreciated.

 



Sincerely,
?eanooa?e

1 - Payroll Distribution (Sent Direct) - .5. 23:2??

1 - Miss :  (Sent Direct) 67" 76f :1 
Searched-M . 4
RHC :pamqnmo ?mama - EB DEL a 368W 
(5) a we u?J

 

 

 

 

 

Award 651-69

 

 

 

Based onlAdms?analmemi 12-24-68 91
Fugitive; Fugitive -

 

 

 

Bishop 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2:71:12. Victim .. Kidnaping. W, 
Sigma 4 MAM-2Q 211 ,0 
mac 261968 2W

3232:9252?- 

 

a 5%
myM?N? LR o?ba: recur-rt]

 

b6
b7C

 

 

i

omoun you no. no A SON-IN 1
mu: m: mnom -
on om. no. N0. :7 1 01"?

DeLoach

1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

Memorandum 1.215714:



a Gclo 

TO :Mr. Callahan 12?24- 68 

Sullivan 

T: val

a Talc. Room

FR 3 3774-) Holmes
a Wail?? Adam? Gamma 0 @063 I?oae/q 671%

SUBJECTI I- FUGITIVE
- FUGITIVE
- VICTIM

.. 

 

 



 

 

 

KIDNAPING
INCENTIV AWARDS AND COMMENDATIONS

rm .1 file?5w I
I
- art-mum

Mr. Rosen's memorandum to Mr. DeLoach of 12-24?68
concurred with recommendations submitted by SACS Atlanta, Miami, and
Tampa, as well as those submitted by Mr. Bishop concerning Crime
Records Division personnel for incentive awards and commendatio to
personnel participating in captioned matter. These W0 invol?Ve incentive
awards and 6 commendation letters for rsonnel in th tlanta Office;

24 incentive awards to SAC, Miami, Hagn 1 general letter of
commendation for rsonne ?in the Miami Office; 36 incentive awards
ior?SACETampa' and 1 general letter of commendation for
Tampa personnel 5 7 Incentive awards and 1 generalgletter of cpmmendation
for acksonv?lie personnel, 3 incentive awards for ILaboratory personnel
with?thich the Laboratory agrees; 4 incentive awards for Ident1f1cat10n
Division employees ,ith whic ?fh?at Division agrees, and 1 general letter

Of" commendation for, Savannah personnel as well as 1 incentiv award,

4 individual commen t10ns and 1 neral commendation forXCrime Records,
Division employees. Investigative D_i 151px), recom?

mended 6 awards for per on??rlmii?i?t?h?at Division and 12 individual

. letters 5f commendation. Mr. DeLoach recommended Mr. Rosen be
. afforded an incentive award.

Administrative Division agrees and also recommends an
incentive award for Mr. DeLoach who spearheaded this 'nvestigation from -a

 

 

 

 

. the Seat of Government 67- a buaig
Vi RECOMMENDATION ??6331: Mi? 
. yc? 2 UM $10858 
That incentive awards and commendationuletters?as recommended!

1 1. be approved with the following scale to be applied. $125 each for clerical 

i personnel, $150 each for agent personnel, $200 each for SACs, Miami and 

?of? Tampa, and $300 each for Messrs. Shroder, Resen and DeLoa 11544)}?

- 6?9 Letters prepared for personnel on enclosed list. 50'? 3 :99 0519?

45? I 3? OVJ 
3 \fx Pipe? WW 
My?" candles

W/z/z? 12?7?? c1 ?31? 

 

 

 

 



 

Txoucx 

 

 

 

b7C

a 
tt . 
Enclosures 2Appropriat'e letters a ac (M wit?? Sic/?t

b6

 

4

 

wore-4a 

.95 ?wan-'5? a


I

 

BUREAU OFFICIALS

ATLANTA

MIAMI

 

Incentive Award

 

Mr. Cartha kl/DeLoach
Mr. Alex en?
Mr. Rex I. hroder 


ASAC Jack Keith, J/r.



Commendation

Clerk
Clerk
Clerk

 

 

 

 

SA 1'11:an V. nut. \ucucu

 

ASAC Frederick F. Fox 

SAC Frohbose

 

(General)

 

 

Clerk
Clerk
Clerk

 

 

 

SAC F. A. Frohbose 

 

 

 

.h?aq?l -

 

TAMPA

LAB

Incentive Award

 

SAC J. F. Santoianaf Jr. 
ASAC William A. Sullivan

 

Commendation


SAC J. F. Santoiana, Jr.

.I

(General?bs


um 
?v -v .9F?i?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Incentive Award Commendation
IDENT Clerk be
Clerk .
Clerk 
i Clerk
. I
SAVANNAH SAC Kenneth W. Whittaker
(General) 

JACKSONVILLE SA SAC Robert E. Gebhardt 
j: SA (GeneralGENERAL SA Odd T. Jacobson Ins ector James R. Malley,
INVESTIGATIVE SA SA
DIVISION - SA SA
Clerk SA
Clerk SA
SA
SA
. Clerk
Clerk
Clerk 
Clerk
Clerk
3 I I
CRIME RECORDS SA
. SA 
SA
SA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Thomas E. Bishop 
(General)



 

 

 

 

 



air

January 29, 1969
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha D. Leach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

Please accept my warmest congratulations as you celebrate
your 'I?wenty-fifth Anniversary of FBI service. I know this special day
will no doubt bring you many congratulatory messages from your vast
number of friends and associates and on behalf of them I wish to present
to you the enclosed Twenty-five~Year Service Award Key.

In carrying out your important assignments you have been
closely associated with our most essential activities and have been of inval~
uable assistance in establishing many of the Bureau?s present-day policies
and standards. Your contributions have been noteworthy and you have shoul-
dered heavy responsibilities with keen understanding and sound judgment.

It is certainly a source of satisfaction to know I have associates
such as you on whom I can rely to execute their of?cial duties so expeditiously
and efficiently. You may be justly proud of your record of accomplishments
and I could not let this occasion pass without expressing my sincere appreci-
ation to you for your outstanding services and your unfaltering loyalty and
devotion to duty.

I trust you will wear this Key with much pride and that we may
rely on your talents for many years to come.

7% W?m?jth best wishes and kindest regards,
a I

To] son

DeLooch 

Mom DATE 

Bishop 

503%? I

Cgmodm ?'Enclosure 

tit?J- Miss (Sent Direct) a
80 . .

Sulsll?tcn??_LDH ?blg Vii 
Ea" a/ at?
reisifnm?ru? 4 t} 

Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

?Ml km?
SENT FROM D. o, Sincerely, ?fg

TIME 0:10 7

  
  
   

 

 

 

 

MAIL new CD TELETYPE 

 

 

 

 

 

IOIM NO. IO
MAY I962 
03A Gun NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

SOIO-I06

 

Tolson 
DeLoach 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Memorandum
To Mr. Mohr DATE: November 21, 1968 3:11:37

Tele.Room
FROM Mr. Callahan Eggs?'?
SUBJECT: CARTHA o?g LOACH
Assistant to Director
SERVICE AWARD LETTER
25th Anniversary 1-29?69
Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach, Assistant to the Director,
celebrates his 25th year of Bureau service on 1- 29? 69.
The Director may desire to present Mr. DeLoach's
letter and Key personally. A suggested letter is attached for the
Director' signature.
?ai/ ?4?37
.
"yak?cev 
0 
{pandas ?3'4 ?le 
Searchedm_ 7 ?Men 
all 
3519,12 43: 91969
Enclosure V0 b6
@1ng -Miss  (Sent Direct)
jas
(3): Ed 
Jim: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If 1' ff:
FD-S C. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVES a. 1 ATION
Revised
08,05,2008 SERIAL CHARGE- OUT
This form is consolidated with the old FD- 654, based on a Sentinel review.
Date 57 2- 
Document Classi?cation: Unclass ?Con?dential El Secret El Top Secret
Document Type: El/Letter Airtel LHM '3 Memo Report
Facsimile Teletype Misc [3 EC Email
Enclosure Attachment 2.
SCI TYPE: *requires special handling 
31* no Cl cosmcmATO)
El ssmu El El Other (specify)
Number
Date of Mail I 6 ?l
Originating Of?ce or agencJ PCS I
This serial has been removed and placed in:
Special File Room, FBIHQ El FBIHQ, Room
Field Of?ce-Room Container or Other Location Where Material ls Stored
File (07 HQ 333723 50.5
Class. Of?ce of OrIgin Case No. Last Serial
Pending El Closed
Serial No. Description of Serial Date Charged
Employee
RECHARGE Date
To From
I Initials of
Clerk

SERIAL CHARGE-OUT

 

 

January 31, 396$}


3459??.
A22: 

??gaz?er ah: ?awless E: Sm; $35123? 19.3.13.
maawra?mem a? Sem?y

$?amey-?mmave ?aparianan??, 33 Bram};

{53.95 G. 237$;

mam, Fantasia, Mairmia?

2:33:12: air Char; 2

{321 322mm? 3% 1 maeivs? mar 
aagarc?ziag the am anniwxsm a? mama: ta the
@?acw??w?m Ea Eazmeh; 2am mast awmiativa
60$ yamt?ma? @321me and :g Rama}: mug ia?ae?
112in am 5:33 ramemhm? ?119 339% f2?
:u?xeantja ammas Em? mama.? its 3022;:



  
  

ta

5% s: Wit? baa? mgaxc??s;



 

 

 

 

aft?
3; er. mm a ma?a"? 
3 1969 LEdgar 110m:
. F?omwar
:1
1 - Manila. .. Enclosure 
A 1 - Foreign Liaison Unit 



   
 

AWszk

Tolson - (5) 
f? .. 

 

 

 

 



 

Gale 3? - r.
Rosen 0/ 
sumvan 
Tove! 

Trottez FE a E39559
Tele. 

Holmes 

Candy MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT :1

 

 

 

 

 

 

. a?

The Director 1 April 
Mn Tolson 

JOHN P. MOI-1R
Assistant to the Director - Administrative

CARTHA D. DE LOACH - .
Assistant to the Director Investigative

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

There are attached for approval the annual performance
reports for Messrs. Mohr and DeLoach in which their services have
been rated Outstanding for the period April 1, 1968, to March 31, 1969.
have signed these ratings as the Rating Official.~

In the event you approve these ratings, {respectfully
request that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the
Approving Official.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That you; as Approving Official, sign the originaland the
. copy of each of the attached Outstanding performance ratings and that
Mr. Mohr audit/Ir. DeLoach each be furnished the original of his

 

rating.
s/lxo?? 1? ow 
with lass 95
Enclosures
LDH:jmp


3)
6 Personnel File of Cartha D. DeLoach

 

*1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APR 10 1969

 

n-I 

'Federal Bureau of Investigation

 

L?r



April 10, 1969

 
  
  
   
 
  
   

Mr. 

Miss Gandy

 

Honorable John Edgar Hoover
Director

Washington, D. C.
Dear Boss:

The years come and go, but the
thrill of receiving an "Outstanding" annual
rating never fails to bring with it a
feeling of pride and appreciation.

The past year has been a tough
one-?--but a rewarding?one. The King case,
and others were great
challenges, but never have I seen the FBI

Hteam any better. The numerous opportunities
Ito converSe with you in theSe matters were

a source of great delight to me.? Your

lsupport and defense when Ramsey Clark

attempted to insult and berate the Bureau

nuand me in the King case were matters of

great personal pride and will not be

forgotten.

Thank you for this rating. I
will strive to accomplish the same results
in future years.

Sincerely,

Deke DeLoach

 

 

 

 


r. 

 

Mr. 
Mr. j;
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. Trotter._._._ ,1 
Tele. 
Miss 1

1:36
1370

 

 

FD-IBS (Rev. 8-16-63): . .

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

:8
ii

a}
Name of Employee: CARTHA D. 

Where Assigned:

 

(Division) (Section, Unit}

Of?cial Position Title and Grade: ST TO 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating Period: from APRIL 1, 1968 to MARCH 31. 1969
I I 
ADJECTIVE OUTSTANDING TrTi?sze 
Outstar?tding, Excellent, Satisfactory, Unsatisfactory
Ram by: at. Associate Director 4/1/69
Signature Titie Date
Reviewed by: -
Signature Title Date

Rating Approved WireCtOI? 4/1/69
0 ?rmware Title Date
TYPE OF REPORT
[m Official Administrative
3] Annual [3 60?Day
90-Day
Transfer

[3 Separation from Service

e. m: mm: Special
2 (I 
a 51,IJUJ ~15? 
I inn-mm? . A- 4"

 

 

 



II9

4T



a

Standard Form 88
gamma)
Bureau of the Budget
(Rem)

QEPORT OF MEDICAL EXAMINATI

  





88-114
?819] No. 

  

 

NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME

I
D?Loach, Cartha Dekle

z. GRADE AND COMWOR

Asst. tq/Director

POSITION 3. IDENTIFICATION N0.

3?29~15

 

NOMEADDRESS (Number, street or RFD, city or 102022, State and ZIP Code)

5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION

5. DATE OF EXAMINATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual 4?1?69
7. SEX 8. RACE 9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT SERVICE I0. AGENCY II. ORGANIZATION UNIT ..
TM p} 3f? ?f?i ICIVILIAN .
12. DATE or BIRTH 13. PLACE or BIRTH II. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS or NEXT or KIN
7/20/20 Claxton, Georgia
15. EXAMINING FACILITY 0R EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS 16. OTHER INFORMATION

?9


NNMC, Bethesda, Maryland

17. RATING OR SPECIALTY

CLINICAL EVALUATION

 


MA

(Check each Item in_ appropriate col-
umn; enter 1! not evaluated 


MAL

 

18. HEAD. FACE. NECK. AND SCALP

 

I9. NOSE

 

zo. -

 

ZI. MOUTH AND THROAT

 

- It at. coach) Mudttor
22' EARS GENERAL Minty under New 70 and 

 

23. DRUMS (Perforation)

 

. ?'tualacwnd earn,
2" EYES-GENERAL are}; ?(4:59:60 

 

25. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC

NOTES. (Describe one};
comment.

 

TIME IN THIS CAPACITY (Total)

abnormality in detail.

LAST SIX MONTHS

Enter pertinent item number before each

ntinue in item 73 and use additional sheets if necessary.)

22. Can't hear watch tick well in either
ear. Needs audiogram. NCD

 

26. PUPILS (Equality and reaction)

 

mutt. Tantalum)

27. OCULAR MOTILITY {detonated parallel more-

 

28. LUNGS AND CHEST (Include Breasts)

 

29. HEART (Thrust. II'ze, rounds)

 

30. VASCULAR SYSTEM (Varicosities. etc.)

 

ABDOMEN AND VISCERA (Include hernia)

 

(Hemorrhoida. I la 
32. AHUS AND RECTUM ("mm ?af?ne?

 

 

33. ENDOCRINE SYSTEM

 

 

G-U SYSTEM

 

35. UPPER 533%?- m" 0?

 

35. FEET
(Except/n1)

 

 


383.34?. OTHER 

 

39? IEENTIFYING BODY Minis. SCARS. 




 

on?igm. an

 

If.) NEUROLOGIC (Equihba?u: (at: under item 72)

 

42. (Smeifvenr uncut-Ty deviation)

 

 

43. (Females only) (Check how done)
CIVAGINAL DRECTAL

 

 

50. Cholesterol-280
Uric 
Creatinine ?1.1
16
98
HGB-u-l7ao




a we

. A, Reg-ea

e2? 
APR
.3 JI JL -i-n E. 
axis

      



I??g It}:

 

deviation, No significant change

 

IE.

 
 

e??ing of 3/28/68.

(Continue In item 73)

 

 

44. DENTAL p1 - i REMARKS AND ADDITIONAL DENTAL
ace uppropmle symbol: above or below number of?ppeixcnuower teeth, rerpecuuly ?Ears AND DISEASES
o-Rertorable teeth X-Jm'uing teeth (6 XSI?Fl'red bridge. bracket: to
l-Nonmtorable teeth by denture: include abutment: Exam Type Class Is. URINALYSIS: A. sezcmc GRAVITY 1 020

LABORATORY 

 

 

I

46. CHEST (Piece. date. ?lm number and result)

 

 

 

 

 

a. ALBUMIN D. MICROSCOPIC 

fiwmn mg?. 0-2 ?ne; Rare BBC 31060 - No active disease 

47. SEROLOGY (Specify test need and read!) .48. EKG 49. BLOODJYPE AND RH 50. OTHER TESTS ?h
LJ-- Ts? See?#48 "359 See #50 above. 

-VDRL Hen-Reactive above ENT - See report -

3 2 3 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I: MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER FINDINGS
HEIGHT 1 ?3-352; 53. COLORJHALK 54. COLOR EYES 55. f? MEDIUM. OBESE 56. TEMPERATURE
5 .. (Check on?) my . - .
72%" 184 Brown Blue - .. .
57. BLOOD PRESSURE (Arm at heart 58. PULSE (Ann Mart level)
A. 95.13261 B. sys_ -- "57's. A. 3.5AFTER D. RECUMBENT STANDING
SITTING .- . RECUM- STANDING 3 MI .
DIAS. 82 BEN DIAS. (3 min.) DIAS. 90
59. DISTANT VISION j?o. REERACTIDN GI. NEAR VISION 7? 7
RIGHT 20140 CORR25M 00RR.T0 BY
?40 OORR.62M CORR. To By
62. HETEROPHORIA (Specify PRISM DIV. PRISM com. I I 'po
(AC:
CT 
i
63. ACCOMMODATION 64. COLOR VISION (Test and and mun) 65. DEPTH PERCEPTION manager?,
(Test used and non) 
RIGHT LEFT PIP 16/16 CORRECTED 
66. FIELD OF VISION 67. NIGHT VISION (Tm used and score) 68. RED LENS TEST 69. INTRAOCULAR TENSION
7o. HEARING 7I. 72. AND 
(Tut: and and score)
27m; 
5.15?va 15 [15 SV 15 ?g 392 5322 Ito?s} 33.96 ?oss at? .. A ., 
. *O?gaz? 31:53; a} T:
IEErwv 13.. AND 0R INTERVALHISTORT4-14-69
Li?.
W. 

Mr . DeLo . 
I
Please advise this Unit if your vision
has been corrected to 20/20 in each eye. 
.
in
Thank You Iv
Physical Unit 8, 
obm 4541 7s. RECOMMENDATIONS-FURTHER SPECIALIST EXAMINATIONS INDICATED (Specify) 76. A. PHYSICAL PROFILE,
I: 
77. EXAMINEE (CheckQUALIFIED FOR I . 3. PHYSICAL CATEGORY
a. Is NOT QUALIFIED FOR
73. IF NOT QUALIFIED. LIST av A 
79. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME or PHYSICIAN SIGNATUR
LCDR MC USN b6
80. TYPEO 0R PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN SIGNATU 
aI. TYPED OR PRINTED NAME OF DENTIST OR PHYSICIAN (Indicate which) SIGNATURE

82. TTPED OR PRINTED NEME or OFFICER OR APPROVING AUTHORITY 

hf
2'

 

 

AT-
TACHED SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

I 

?3

0 0
Form 513 

Rev. Angus! 1954
Bureau of Ihe Budge!

Circa?" s? u. s. swam-mam PRINTING OFFICE: wed-230.340

CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET

REQUEST

TO: FROM: lReq sung war unit, of tiviu) fl.? DATE OF EQUEST
an, 
. 

REASON FOR REouss-r (complarm and ?ndings)

WWTs-Kmasg1a?fi??. 4M
A vs? yief>



?l 
's GNATURE APPROVED PLACE OF CONSULTATION [3 numeracy
. BEDSIDE QMALL WINE

I CONSULTATION REPORT

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

hm?9

The examination shows the ears to be normal to inSpection.
The conversational hearing is normal. There is a high tone loss which
is unchanged from previous tests. No treatment indicated.

Thank you, -

. . aylor
Capt USN

[Continued on reverse side} .
SIGNATURE AND TITLE DATE. IDENTIFICATION No. ORGANIZATION

 

 

 

 

 

PATIENTS IDENTIFICATION iFor typed or mlucn entries give: Name?Jan. ?rst. REGISTER WARD N01
middle: grade: dale; hospital or medical faciluy}

 

 

 

CONSULTATION SHEET
SIandard Form 513


.5 
A

 

 

 

 


I

 

 

it"s-300mm. 10-14-68) 1 

Attachment to Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination
For information and Guidance of Medical Examiner

Name ofExaminee JG: 1005;) Gil-7?24 

(Type or print) Last First Middle
The following portions of the attached examination report form need not be completed?45, 46 and 47. Required for at! Special Agent applicants but not for any other applicant unless the
examining physician deems one, two or all three of the examinations necessary. 45, 46 and 47
are required in examination of any current?employee.

48. Not required unless examinee is over 35 years of age or examination indicates such is desirable.

49. Is necessary unless facilities for affording same are not'readily available.

71. Audiometer examinations should be afforded whenever possible for all?Special Agent applicants
and Special Agents. Applicants for the Special Agent position will not be. accepted if the hearing

loss exceeds a 15 decibel average in either ear in the conversational Speech range (500, 1000,
2000 cycles).

For All Examinees, Whether Clerical or Special Agent Applicants or?Employees:
The medical examiner should answer the following question:
1 Examines 1s is not qualified for strenuous physical exertion.

To be Answered in the ease of All Male Employees and Male Applicants:

1. Does examinee have any defects restricting pr prohibiting his participation in defensive tactics and
dangerou assignments which might entail the practical use of firearms?

Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.

 

 

2. Does examinee have any defects prohibiting safe operation of motor vehicles?

Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.

3. For safe driving of motor vehicles, Civil Service Commission requires distant vision must test at
least 20/40'1n one and 20/100 in the other, corrected or uncorpected. Should examines wear cor-

rective glasses while operating a motor vehicle? Yes 0
ii!
a? 
457,) 

 

 

If recommendation 18 based on a factor other than above standard, indicate basis

 

whiCJ?mW

 

 

909:3??ng 3 .Vfig

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Desirable Weight Ranges for Males

 

Medium Frame

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Height Small Frame 5 Large Frame
5'152
5?6? I 124 - 133157
5?162
5?166
5?170
5f10175
5?11? 1 144 4154 150 - 166 180
185
6?1? 152 - 163 158 176 169 190
6?174 195
6?3? 160 - 171 168 - 186? 178- 200
6?219
6?5? 174 - 185 182 4 202514 
.L;u 1" 3
?0 

4. Examinee?s frame is small medium arge

5. Considering above weight table, the examinee?s frame, and other individual physical characteristics,

I consider his present weight atisfactory Excessive De?cient
6. Under proper medical supervision, employee should lose 
gain pounds

Remarks:

 



 

{cf?49%

\l Signature of Medical Examiner 1

415/769

 

Date

 

 

 

:,31110113 131:1 no. 10 SOIO-IN .)
0:1 ?and?; 11%?
. STATES GOVERNMENT K77

Memorandum 1 

    

.4
NIH-
L.

 

1? To -Mr. Callahan . 0an 5 13 69 

FROM B. Adams 
?ac/Meg??

SUBJECT: ANNUAL LEAVE SCHEDULE
EXECUTIVES CONFERENCE

 

 

 

7,1 brain-g 

 

 

(or
Attached is the annual leave schedule for the members of the 1 ecu-{f
tives Conference, revised as of this date. 

?a war-91:9 . a

 

Included in this schedule are five days of official du for Mr. 63.0mm
in connection with the American Legion' 3 National Convention at Atlanta 5
Georgia. The five days are August 20, 21, 22,25, ?and 26.

Jun-t. altar-t. 4: 

J. .

Also included are four days of official duty for Mr/g?asper in connec-
tion with the International Association of Chiefs of Police Con ention (L53 Ci?
at Miami Beach, Florida, September 29 through October 2. Mr. also
has commitments involving official duty from June 9 through 11 (Texas Doiice
Association Convention, Brownsville, Texas); June 23 through 26 (New iersey
ate Chiefs of Police Annual Conference, Spring Lake, New Jersey); :1 .ly 14
through)16 (FBI National Academy Section 131 Retraining Session, Miam Beach;
Florida

..71. n,

1 No Assistant Directors have leave scheduled for the pe1 ds 
respective Assistant to the Director will be on leave. However; a ,2 ev ously
approved commitment of Mr. Casper to appear at the FBI National can:1 emy
Section Retraining Session in Miami Beach, July 14 through 16, occurs
during the period of annual leave scheduled by Sistant, to the Director: Mohr.
Therefore, it is suggested that InSpector T. J. enkins, Number 1 Man of the
Training Division, be designated for the M1 Beach commitment in 11 1 
ssistant Director Casper. 33.0.00, 6, )?25 
113} m? .1, Show}: 1 
This schedule is submitted for the information and appi ova icf the 2,1.
Director in order that the members of the Confenence may be advised. 1
Any annual leave requested in addition or as an amendm ent that
listed on the attached schedule will be submitted by the requesting mem by
individual memorandum for the approval of the Director and Mr. T0151

 

 
    

I ?mg? .1 is

EncLsure! fi?/ AR)

1 [?ve 0:11le (9) . ?3 

l/?P 1 HEM XEROX .. -5 .1, . . 7b??

1 Mr Mohr Enclosure) MAY A,

1 - M8 ?33120ch (?nciosure) 2 G9 

1- Mr. Felt (Enclosure) 1- Movement Unit (Enclosurehn?d Alf/U
,1 1 Mr; Beaver (Enclosure_) Mrs.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



I

Eh.

I
'n?w?r 
M.

Memorandum Adams to Callahan
Re: Annual Leave Schedule
Executives Conference

1?

i
(1) That the attached schedule of leave and official duty assignments
be approved by the Director.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

 

0M 

l: 


(2) That the substitution of Inspector Jenkins for Assistant
Director CaSper at the FBI National Academy Section Retraining Session,
Miami? Beach, Florida, July 14 through 16, be approved.

via/Ma 

W.-

91533:

"we-cry '3 ox





I
er? 1? 

 

 

 

OPIIONAI N0. l0 
MAY I962 
GSA Gt?. H0. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

T0 MR. TOLSON DATE, 10/31/69 

Sullivan 
Tove]

CC Mr . DeLoach guru;
e. co 
FROM C. D. @OaCh Holmes 

Gand
Request for 1% days annual leave 
to attend son's wedding 
My  lis being married 
in Dyersburg, ennessee, during the weekend of 11/7/69.

All of my children are in the wedding; consequently, if
allowed, I plan to take my entire family to Tennessee
for approximately 1% days.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I would appreciate being given annual leave
beginning on Thursday afternoon, 11/6/69, and for Friday,
11/7/69. I will be back in Washington on Sunday morning,
11/9, and will of course stay in touch with the office.



There are no Assistant Directors under my super~
vision who plan leave during this particular time.
Mr. Rosen will be here and will be on my desk during
the 1% days of my absence.

 

ACTION:
For consideration. I have taken 14 days leave

thus far this year and have no plans for any other leave
the remainder of the year.

in 

cnn:csn (2) 

 

Lam
,1

(if? rile 



 

 

 

f.

1?
.0ng .

. on 74
3? Mm eLoac 
Wmmf?
1 . ohr
. 
11/7/69

7?V3ar/?5 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE DIRECTO

 

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.

Conrad
Felt
Gale
Rosen
Mr. Sullivan
Tove!
Soyars
ele. Room
Miss Holmes

Re: GEORGE WILLIAM GUNN Miss Gandy

bag 2 
This is the Agent I recommendb

selected to handle the TV Scripts hereyter? 0 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

as Hun?e wide-15K." v5

UN

.INED (RWQ

snag

1959
5 I Clyde Tolson
sis; - .
SE 
E-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"?mwt?f 21-3?7015,


 

gm

5&7; NOV 19 1958

 

 

 



Mr?dsK


Mr. Ce lahcm 

 
 
  
  

 

 

 

01A GIN NO. NO 27

UNITED STATES ERNMENT

Memorandum


?i I
5 - omoml 10m no. 19 sow-Io. -
m: IDHION .

 

Callahan 
Cor-lad 

 

I?d! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. ch DATE: 11/7/69 
.. finilvon 
FROM T. E. BiShOp fig-inmate
elm:
'61
SUBJECT: ABC-TV SERIES @644 
A 
rs A 1-H
In accordance with M1. . Tolson's instructions, SA Gunn and b6
Bishop telephonically reached SA in California at approxi-

 

 

 

mately 1 p.m. EST. Both Gunn and Bishop emphatically and without
equivocation impressed upon : that absolutely no scripts would be
approved at the Bureau henceforth, which contain any killings, murders,
extreme acts of violence or which re?ect violence in any form directed
toward a woman. He was advised that Mr. Hoover and Mr. Tolson are
adamant on this matter and that the FBI would not hesitate to withdraw its
cooperation in connection with the production of this show if the Director?s
instructions are not carried out to the letter.  : was also informed
that he was to make this clear to all those associated with the
production of the program. .

 

 

Bishop also adVised that the former was going to contact
the producer of the snow and the man who is responsible 
for all scripts on the show, and that the above instructions of the Director
would be forcibly brought to I:Iattention.

 

 

 

I:Iwas reached telephonicall at the Warner Brothers
lot at approximately 2:05 p.m. EST. He, like was emphatically
and without equivocation advised of the Director's instructions and feelings
in this matter. He was told in unmistakable terms that absolutely no further
scripts would be approved which contain murders, killings, violence of an
type toward women, or any extreme acts of violence of any kind. 
was told that if the Director?s instructions are not carried out, the Bureau
would not hesitate to withdraw its cooperation from the production of the
show. was not at all argumentative in his attitude, stated that
he completely understood the Director?s instructions and that he would be
in touch with Quinn Martin, the Executive Producer of the television series.

   

Wu
1- Mr. Tolson I ?d .a
1- Mr. DeLoach 37-103 REC-93. Law 777
1 - Mr. Bishop .. - 
1 - Mr. M. A. Jones 14 1969
fig Mag 

 
 

ul?DV 11/9 -70 rev 191969 (CONTINUED OVER)

 

.I-em y?AumthawAw name?m4 ?15th

 

 

Bishop to DeLoach (continued)
Re: SERIES

Within 5 minutes after hanging up with Bishop b5

received a call from Quinn Martin. The Director's and Mr. Tolson's
instructions were clearly reiterated to Martin. Martin indicated that he
would be gathering up his staff to discuss the manner in which the Director's
instructions could best be implemented in connection with future scripts to

be submitted for the show.



RECOMMENDATION:

 

None. For information. 
QM 

.[wei?i - Am

 

 

 

my? -l

   



fen


g'r ,afy?t


?ni

pr 1
..

$355:

I .33.)


 

 

OHIONAI tom no. no ?lo-Tolson 
UNITED STATES COVE NMENT . 31/

Memorandum _j . 

 
 

 

(p Cored 
I Fe I 
HR 0 TOLSON +12/29/69 Gale 
I f? i
4 cc'Mr. DeLoachi 
FROM . n.631'0a0h l. i? i are Tea. Room 
i Holmes 
3 Ga
sunset: ARTICLE IN 1.9g -.ANQELES. 
g" CONCERNING BIRTHDAY 


I received a call from Re 

- at 4:45 12/29/69. He stated my name had beenmgiven to 52225;?
him, along with several other officials in the FBI who might
be considered for the Directorship of the FBI once the Director

retired.

I interrupted Mr. Ostrow to inform him that?the Director 

3 had no intention of retiring, was in good health, and that any

question of this nature was strictly a moot one.- I?further told

as him that I had at no time expressed an interest in the Director- 
. ship of the FBI and that this fact stood for the future, as well

?L?nitas for the past. I furthermore told him it was embarrassing for
?1iq?my name to be mentioned,and that I wanted him to know, point-blank,

of my feelings in the matter.
. 

:3 .. :59; 
Mr. Ostrow next informed me that he planned to write an

Jij?i; article stating that I had received "feelers" from several
sources in private industry, inasmuch as I would be eligible- 

,3 for retirement sometime next year. I told Mr. Ostrow that any
5? "feelers" I had received over the years had been brought

5.to the Director's attention and were a matter of record.

a
a, 1.


3.391%!


He asked if I had received such an offer from the"
{mng? Pepsi-Cola Company. I told him I had, approximately 3% to 4 years?;
f??f?f ago, and had prepared a memorandum to the Director 
. .3, concerning the fact that I was turning down such an offer. Mr;
j?f Ostrow replied that he would include my statements in his article.;

a?

.. _1
5.9., 3: 
?:1ng
. 

.-


if;
ngg?gg? He stated also that a number of other names of officials"'
in the Bureau would be mentioned as possible successors. I 
uj}?pg reiterated that it was somewhat ridiculous to be writing such 
ljtfig an article and that I would hope, once and for all, that Such
?vat?fg articles would cease. I stated, frankly, I am getting a little

    

 

 

and tired ,of my name being mentioned in any gonnecticz 
.q;k
2 Rec-94. .5
"lie (Enclosure0&3: ti and 99.
F67.NQT ECOBDED 
:nrui ..LW Pug
10 JA 19 1970 4' we it?
A 
.jg? were: 

 

 

   

 

 

7 i

as long as the Director wanted me to. -

?h
I ,4

Hr.'Tolson



Mr. Ostrow brought up the?New York Times article of
Sunday, 12/28/69, and asked if I had any comment concerning
this article. I told him I had none whatsoever and, frankly,
the FBI would not comment on any of Wicher's work because of
his usual notorious inaccuracies. 

Mr. Ostrow asked if he could quote me on that. I said
not only could he quote me, but also he should feel free to
quote the Director on it.

Mr. Ostrow inquired as to the number of children I had
and was advised I had seven and contribute partially to the

two grandchildren at the present time. I stated my
was in the military service. He told me it must be
0

a pre ugh job financially to support such a crew. I agreed
with this,.but stated we have been able to get along well over
the years and have no apologies to make to anyone.

I stated that the security of the FBI position and the
general all?around good reputation it afforded had been several
of the things which had caused me to remain on the job this long
and basically represented the reasons why I intended remaining

He expressed appreciation and then hung up.

Mr. Bishop submitted a memorandum on 12/17/69gconcerning,g
an earlier contact by Hr. Ostrow regarding his desire to write

E,a story on the possible retirement of the Director (copy attachedACTION . 92:?
. For record purposes.v// M: "a 

 
 



,b6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Callahan
Conrad
Fel? 
Gale
1 Roses
Sullivan 
Tavel
Trotter 
Tele? Boom
Holmes 

Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

is

January 29, 1970

PERSONAL

Dear DeLoach:

Today you are celebrating
your Twenty?shah Anniversary in the
Federal Bureau of Investigation and I
want to congratulate you on this occasion.
You should be very proud of your many
contributions to the success of the Bureau
and I want you to know that I deeply
appreciate your able assistance through
the years.

 

 

 

 

Sincerely,

l. EDGAR HBWER
Mr. Cartha eLoach 6?71 i,
Federal Bureau of Investigation weamhg?m 

Washington, D. C.

 

 

is 29 1970

 

 

AnniVersary - Thursday, January 29

(3)

?53 "vita 

MAIL Boos/1C] TELETYPB 

 

TIME 




SENT FROM D20.

[-39 '70

 

 



 

 

Felt

 

Sullivan 

aging-'5 tie ism

i Tove!
i Soycts

 

A MAILED 21,
FE 3 1970
COMM-FBI

 

 

{in

Tolson
DeLocc-h 
Walters 

Mob;
Bishop
Casper 
Callahan
Conrad

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gale
Bo sen

 




 

 

 

Tele}.
Hoime
Candy

February 8, 1970



PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear DeLoach:

The especially successful results attained
incident to the investigation involvingl b6
and others, the subjects of a Labor-Management 1370
Reporting and Disclosure Act case, are indeed gratify-
ing and, in recognition of your valuable contributions
thereto, I want to commend you and advise that i have
approved an incentive award for you. This $200. 00
award will be represented by a check to be forwarded
to you at a later date.

 

 



Our splendid reputation as the world's fore-
most investigative agency has been tremendously
enhanced because of this vitally important matter which
engendered such intense national interest. I want you to
know of my deep appreciation for the guidance and direc?

 

 

tion that you afforded to it.
Sincerely, ??043.Edgar Hooves mm, 

 

6' 5r"
1 Payroll Distribution (Sent Direct) 6 mind} We

 

 

 

 

1 - Mrs. (Sent Direct) mi
RHC:jmp Award #819-70
Based on dams-Callahan memo 2/ 2/7 0 re YABMUR, Recom-

me ndation for Incentive Awardsand Commendations.




5515?
.x?irpi



MM ROOMEZI TELETYPEUNITC:

 

 

CAPTHA D.DELOACH

v<a

February 4, 197

Honorable John Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear Boss:

Thank you for your letter 0
this morning relative to the Yablonski
case. The comments contained therein
certainly made me feel good. The incen-
tive award will come in handy to defray
a few obligations.

Aside from the soul?satisfying
thrill of being part of a team that makes
such an accomplishment, I enjoy most the
communication I have with you in such

major cases. It is a relationship that
I will always cherish.

I?m very grateful for your
35 thoughtfulness.

 

 
  

 


1\

 

Mr.

.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Tele. Room
Miss Holmes 
Miss Candy 

TolsonL

rs 

Bishop 
Casper i
Callahan 

Conrad 

Gale 

Rosen 
Sullivan 
Tavel 
Soyars 

 

 

 
  




 

 

 

 

 

A 

IROBER

   

 

'7775 NANH-QE AVENUE
- . 50x I55Q
LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA 92037

LETTS JONES
er?esmEN?r 

Maggi? 3 

 

  
  

 

ms 19] 3" 

EM 3313 W3 W3 3 i

. WW WEE hala?a. . A

 
  

 

mg was 43:31:93 (A
Q-v?gwmaimma Ema Emma af 1cm WEE. 

I . '2
r. Ca
Mr.Ca1iahan 




'Mr ?1711? 

_Tele. Room- a ..
.Mi gs Holmes- .-

  
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
    
   

  

3:1

-- 

?per. 

 

'Mr. Comad .
Ir 

?Mr. 
lVIr    
 
 


(a omoun tom no. no solo-loo 
MAY "62 lomou 0150::
.4 DeLoach

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 
my?, .
Memorandum

:20er

To MR . TOLSON DATE: 3/12/70 Sitin?
Sulilvan 
cc Mr. DeLoach 
FROM . .?l?loach Mr . Llohr geie. Room 

 



AMERICAN LEGION MATTERS
Attempts of Los Angeles Times
to embarrass FBI personnel

a call at approximately 5 3/12/70,

from I who is a persona, friend of mine at American b6

Legion Headquarters, me that the

Los Angeles Times ha- niq- a ;011 stance call from its

Washington bureau to 315mm}, an

in an attempt to dig up termed ?gar ge" in an

effort to embarrass me persona y. stated he thought
had handled the matter properly; however, he thought

he should let me know about the situation right away so that

I could get in touch believed necessary.

 

  
   
 
 

 

I talked tol I who is a former National
Adj wait of the American Legion. I told me that at
roximately 3 p.m. today he received a call from one
of the Washin ton . bureau of the Los Angeles Times.
according fol told'him he understood 1 had
great influence in the American Legion and that I had been
responsible for of his job as National
Adjutant. this and stated it was not true.
(As a member of the National Commander's Advisory Committee;

 

M3

 

I was one of thirteen individuals who voted to replace
with the current Adjutant,  linasmuch as
is a more efficient individual and   was not doing a goOd
30b.) 

I the Los Angeles Times re resentative, neat told
I Ihe understood that, while  : pwas National Adjutant,
I had incurred a bill of approximately $900, as a resul 
trip overseas, and had later refused to pay this bill. .
told that his facts were incorrect, inasmuch as he recalled

this matter and I had completely paid this bill_ 
676,5? 72?~g3_
.. 0
10 mm 181970:22 ?3310} g5: 569' 
Aamm?ww? 18?" 47 

WK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Mr. Tolson

The truth of the matter is that the Director approved
my taking a trip with National Commander Eldon James, a
prominent lawyer from Hampton, Virginia, in May of 1966. In
my memorandum to the Director requesting approval for this
trip, I pointed out that the Legion would pay my ekpenses,
inasmuch as I was serving as National Chairman of Public
Relations during the trip; however, I would personally pay
my wife?s expenses out of my own pocket.

The bill for my wife's expenses amounted to approxi-
mately $933. The Legion had approved my paying this bill off
in small amounts each month. I faithfully paid every month
on this bill until approximately $300 was left, at which time
the entire balance was paid in full. I have cancelled checks
in my possession to prove complete payment of this bill.
There was never any dissension whatsoever or failure to 
pay a installment.

I asked if the Los Angeles Times reporter had b6
asked him any additional questions. He replied in the negative
but stated he had been led to believe that the Los Angeles Times
was carrying on a series of articles about the Director and the
{men around himthen volunteered that he had received a call
in December, 1968, from an individual who asked him the same 
questions. He stated this individual had osed/as a newspaper
reporter and had given him the name of
the time that he had gottenl Iname
cm a former Spedial Agent of the FBI whose name was Lee R.
upennington. he knew Pennington well and that

 

 

}Pennington had volunteered considerable information to him.

On the occasion of the call today, 3/12/70,
(the Los Angeles Times reporter) he had talked
with two former Bureau employees 
Pennington) and had also talked with a third former employee
who disliked me because I had kept him from advancing and had
been tough on him in the FBI.

 

This memorandum is written strictly for record purposes,
inasmuch as it appears the Los Angeles Times, through the actions

I



 

 

Mr. Tolson

NO 

of Ed 'uthman, Bobby Kennedy?s former press agent, who is now
Nationaf??ditor of the Los Angeles Times, is definitely-
continuing its vendetta and campaign of harassment and slander
not only against the Director, but also any of the Director's
assistants it can attack.

ACTRION -
As indicated above.

wee -




  

?ao

?52;

4392

4/5
;>c7 ?7
3

 

 

 

Nb

.
-omomt tom no. lo sow-loo
we: lemon 
os?i?otuFROM

SUBJECT:

1 .

1

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ?235'

ch:

Memorandum - I neg

 

no on 
Conrad
Felt

 

 

 

 

 

 

MR. TOLSON DATE, 3/17/70 gm?
osen
Sullivan
cc Mr. DeLoach 3f;
Co Mr. MOhr Tege. Room

Holmes
Candy

 

 

ATTEMPTS 0F LOS ANGELES TIMES
TO EMBARRASS FBI PERSONNEL

Reference is made to my memorandum of 3 12 70
reflecting that the Los Angeles Times (Reporterl b6
who wrote the highly biased and distorted series regarding
the FBI's investigation of a Klan case in Mississippi)
had called Bismarck, North Dakota to question a former
American Legion official relative to what he alleged was
my failure to pay a $930.70 obligation owed the Legion in
1966.

The allegation, as usual, was false, as indicated
in referenced memorandum. This false allegation was
apparently turned over to the Los Angeles Times by former
Agentl  (dismissed with preju ce), who in
turn had rece'ived the information from 

On the 3/12/70 memorandum the Director no d, "Remove
Pennington from all mailing lists. 

For record purposes, there is attached a signed
affidavit executed by the Assistant Executive Director and
the Fiscal Supervisor, American Legion Headquarters,
Indianapolis, Indiana, certifying that this bill was paid
in full. I possess the cancelled checks to back up this
affidavit.

ACTION:
That this memorandum and its attachment be made a
partfof Bureau files.


 

Enclosure

comes}: (3) 1*
3? 3330i


67- 5 3 5?2; 

REerm Seattle 1 
10 MAR 181976:

 

 

 

 

    



$l .
Jim ?MT-he . 1 ,u - ..
Awerican

eg??n NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS P. 0. BOX 1055 it INDIANAPOLIS. INDIANA 46206 

March 13, 1970 I

For God and Country \1

 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCMERN:

Mr. C. D. DeLoach was billed June 15, 1966 for Mrs. D?lToach's travel to Europe
in the amount of. $930 .70. He paid this in installments as follows:

 

 

 

 

Regs m1:
1966
.Aug. 5 30.70
19 50.00
29 25.00
Sept. 15 30.00
27 20.00
Nov. 8 30.00 
Dec. 1 20.00 i?
1967 
Jan. 6 25.00 -
Feb. 6 20.00
13 50.00
Adar. 6 20.00
Apr. 10 20.00
l?ay 8 20.00
June 8 20.00
July 14 15.00
.Aug. 7 20.00
28 30.00
Sept. 12 20.00
Oct. 12 20.00
Nov. 13 300.00
Dec. 15 
27 125.00
930.70

I hereby certify that the above was taken from the records of the Finance Division
of The American Legion at National Headquarters, 700 North Street,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204.

42/ {12%

c. HUJJL
Assistant Executive Director

 

  
 

JAMES E. SMITH
Fiscal Supervisor

 

   

. Ym?f? 

 



(Rev. 8-16-63) . .

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

REPORT OF PERFORMANCE RATING

Name of Employee; CARTHA D. LOACH

Where Assigned:

 

(Division) (Section, Unit)

Of?cial Position Title and Grade: 

Rating Period: from APRIL 1. 1969 to MARCH 31, 1970

 

I
ADJECTIVE RATING: OUTSTANDING 5
Outstanding, Excellent, Satisfactory. Unsatisfactory

 

 

Rated by: Associate Director 4/1/70
Signature Title Date 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ReVIewed by: Signature Title Date
Rating Approved by: Wireder 4/ 1/ 70
nature Title Date 
:12; If 9/
. 3mm 
TYPE OF 1 3 I970 
Official ??A?Hmmistrative 
[XAnnuaI 60?Day
90-Day
Transfer
Separation frOm Service

Special

I,
If

APRB 197i)

 

 

   
    
   
  

. Tolson 
?z . DeLoa 
r? 
., CARTHAD.DELOACH r.Bishopr

. -
April 3, 1970 r. 2

 

Mr. Felt-
Mr. 3,
Mr. 5
Mr. Sullivan_.: 
Mr. 
?Mr. Soyars 
Tele. Room 
Miss 
Miss'Gandy



 

 

 

 

 

Honorable J. Edgar (Hoover

Director .. 
Federal Bureau of Investigation My?fw

Washington, D. C.
Dear Boss:

Thanks for the Outstanding efficiency
report. I appreciate very much the fact that you feel
my services warranted such consideration. I would

tb? the first to admit, however, that there are times
?when I feel that my over-all supervisiOn of investiga?
tive activities, particularly in the slow?moving major

cases, warrants anything but outstanding notice. The
marvelous teamwork and coordination always seem to
,pull us through however.

I wish to also thank, you for the many

'opportunities given me during the past year to talk
personally with you concerning the many problems
that we face from an investigative standpoint.

 

Your instructions and guidance not only
give tremendous encouragement but always prove that
you are never too busy to offer advice and counsel.

 

Sincerely,



Deke oach

 

s: 317.28 43,717?
Harem
9 APR 1979

 

simmered 3in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


OPIIONAI new no. I0 3010406 i 
an In: a :3 
Guamif.? .0


   

 

 

. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT . v?i'??flwa
i" - 1 
Memorandum 

Conrad?
. Fell

TO DIRECTOR . one: April 8, 1970 gg?n_

?3 Avon


mom . CLYDE TOLSON 

 

 

Tole: Boom
Holmes

Candy
A i b6
SUBJECT: 

3 #411 Q: aw?W
?at a 

There is attached hereto a pink memorandum which yo ,Ep'rep'ar?d

1

early in November, 1969, which states as follows: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

am completely dissatisfied at manner in whichI:I prepared
memo to A. G. re President?s concern over our intelligence that I want
Liaison with White House in all matters to be handled by Haynes in

Domestic Int. Division. 
?ow/i: A 3/55 up

There are also attached a copy of a memorandum from Jones to
Bishop dated November 5, 1969, and a copy of a memorandum to the
?Attorney General which was prepared by Mr. November 6, 1969.
You made a hand-written note on the Jones to Bishop memorandum, on 1
a 2 as followsZ7. xii/.1 4 ??01591 5/ 3 451*]
"Certainly the memo to A. G. was all too short and. inadequate 970
but I didn't have time to redictategit. It is a shame we couldn't make 
a better presentation Emma
A copy of this memorandumzshould be placed in the personnelw 1 1 ?970

5 file of Mr. and in the appropriate file at the Seat of Government.

 

 

 

 



 



it: ?a
9:3 
s69 



{As}

29??


swam??

 

 

 

8

     
   

'Director April 2, 1970
Mr. Tolson

JOHN P. MOHR
Assistant to the Director - Administrative

CARTHA D. DE LOACH
Assistant to the Director - Investigative

OUTSTANDING ANNUAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS

There are attached for approval the annual performance
reports for Messrs. Mohr and DeLoach in which their services have
been rated Outstanding for the period April 1, 1969, to March 31,
1970. I have signed these ratings as the Rating Official.

In the event you approve these ratings, I respectfully
request that you sign both the original and the copy of each as the
Approving Official.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

That you, as Approving Official, sign the original and the
copy of each of the attached Outstanding performance ratings and that
Mr. Mohr and Mr. DeLoach each be furnished the original of his
rating.

RECORDEDQO

 


xv? scone
MEN ?5-53 d,
Enclosures
LDl-Izjab

3)
Personnel File of Cartha D. @Loach
\i

 

 

 

 

6 9

April 27, 1970
PERSONAL

 

Mr. Carine. D. Leach
Federal Bureau. of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear Mr. DeLoech:

As a. result of the failure of supervisory persom
eel in the Special Investigative Division to make e?proyer
determination, in the listing of certain cases subject to reim-
bursement by the Eeyartment, a. misunderstanding ?eveIOped
causing embarrassment?to the Bureau. This certainly could
have been avoided had the reapensible personnel been more
diligent and hat! there been proper coordination 

Divisions involved. @439 67You shared an the everall emsgon f2. 
ter and I am holding you reepensible fo the derehgtiens
attributable to your subordinates. You will be eXpected to set
up the necessary administrative safeguards to insure each
delinquencies do not recur.

Very truly yours, 
mama?; a 

 

 

 

 

 

J. Edge: 309%?
APR 2 81970 
John Edgar Heever g,
r? comm-FBI Director 

Tolscn
DeLoach
Walters
Moh: 
Bishop
Casper
Callahan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conrad
Fell

 

1 Movemeaj) IN
223%
(4) 
Gale

Rm Based on. memo Mohr to Mr. PM:gt?
Sullivan23.65% We

 

 

 

 

 

 

Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

 
   
  

TO

FROM

 

 

 

MR. TOLSON



SUBJECT:

tit 1W learnt

 

QIYIONALIOM MED STA res GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

5OIO-IOO

1 - Mr. DeLoach

  
 

 
  

Tolson 
DeLoc


Bisho 
Caspe
Callch
Conrad
Felt
Gale



 

 

4'5"

 

 

om: 4/30/70

ch

vel



ele. Room

Holmes
5311

Candy
On a memorandum dated 4/29/70 concerning the Inter-
departmental Informatibn Unit (IDIU), the Director noted, "In view of
absence of DeLoach, Sullivan, Rosen Gale during this most critical
period I am designating Casper to act as Assistant to the Director in
charge of these Divisions. 

 

 

C. D. DE LOACH

 

 

 

INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION UNIT (IDIU)
INFORMATION CONCERNING

an?"

The Director approved my attending meetings of the
National Executive Committee, The American Legion, in Indianapolis,
Indiana, for one and one? ?half ays beginning Tuesday, May 5,1970.
Mr. Rosen, whose leave 13.3 approved, was not to take his two dayso
of leave until my return. Mr. Sullivan will be back in the office as of
Monday, May 9,1910?v The Director approved his attending meetings
of NATO securityragencies during this week. Mr. Gale's annual leave 5
ends as of Friday, May 1,1970. Consequently, it can be seen thatiI 
requested one and one- -half days official absence only with thee knowledge
that these men would be here at FBI Headquarters. Mr. Gaje is the only

one absent at this time on annual leavehave never deserted my post at any time when needed. 1'
To the contrary; give up ample leave each year simply because I ?feel
that my responsibilities demand my presence in the office. I work every
Saturday and many Sundays. It is most unusual for me to get a good
night's sleep because of telephone calls from the office. My home life
with a large family has been sacrificed on many occasions. In a number
of instanc?es'l have handled important assignments for the Director when
my children were in the hospital??-or my wife was ill. 

In brief, my entire FBI career has been one of nel?gating
everything but my official duties to a second place position. My job
comes first. During major cases, Martin Luther King assassi?
nation, et a1. my overtime has been astronomical and?many- nights I have

slept on the couch in my office a? 
. new E: 

5 5.3 wg?gn?dlgya . . "if

b6
a b7C



CDD: amr
(2) 

 

 

 

 

C. D. DeLoach to Mr. Tolson
Re: Interdepartmental Information Unit (IDIU)

I regret that the Director felt that the men under my super-
vision, and I, had abandoned our duties at a critical time. My trip to
Indianapolis has been cancelled. Those matters which required my
presence will be handled by telephone. I will be here in the office.

Finally, I have no desire to accomplish anything in the
Bureau except continuation of a good job in the assignment currently
being handled. I'm very grateful for the many commendations received
and for outstanding efficiency reports during the past eleven years. My
devotion and loyalty have been established during twenty-eight years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

as

 

 

3? . /MrHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES . . 
Egg WASHINGTON, o. c. . Mr- 
3' Mr. Conrail 
Mr. Felt:= 
TWELFTH DISTRICT Mr. Gale 
OHIO April 29. 1970 - Mr. Rnsen 

Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Tavel 
Mr. 803mm.-.?
Tale. 
. Miss 
Miss 
I

3

Dear Mr. Hoover: i I
a 
Cartha "Deke" each was your personal

representative in Columbus. hio last Saturday,
April 25th, speaking at?the ranklin University
commencement exercises. 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

hp

rare-x



Ei? 53?6"

He did a most creditable job, not only
as your personal representative. but for the
. Bureau as a whole. During the course of his
very fine remarks he referred to you in a most
commendatory fashion. aha enhanced your image.
as well as that of the Bureau, before the Central.
Ohio community.




As a Member of Congress, I am sensitive
about public officials from Washington making
appearances in my district, and I must say
Deputy Director DeLoachf made a most favorable
impression. and I will be happy to have him .e

-appear there at any tim as your representative.j

ff? 4 ?ll gym/?? 3
0K ?20 -. 
51214 1<mnog i! 14197P5 MAY 5 1970 g/juxl.

urn??M

TED 
REC Liam in) .

UNRECORDED COPY FILED 11x

62/

  


33mm .w 
?Wu?lawn?,
5.:

19m

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l.
A: I. g? 

Honorab J. Edgar Hoom
Page Two

April 29, 1970

His remarks were.
most appropriate during

a

. warmly received and
I these times when we

 

are attempting to restc

make our streets safe again.
permitting him to be yd

"my town".

?re law and order and
Thank you for
ur representative in

 

Sincerely,



 

. .1 ?Le.

0.1.113 WK

Samuel L. Devine, M. C.
oewo]

Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation

 

Department of Justice
washington. D. c.

20530

 

?31


a ??g-sag.

gl?sr 343?

 

 

 

 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT-

}i 0 MAY228 gm Wage/121+ in was and

 

omomu. tom no. lo solo-loo
MAY "62 r?
GSA cm. :19. no. 27 1. - Olson
DeLoach 

UNITED GOVERNMENT Walters

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mohr
.DeLo Bishop
Memorandum 1? a9 
Conrad
Fell
MR. TOLSON DATE: 4/30/70 32:2,.
. . 
Tavel
C. D. LOACH iggfsiioom

Holmes
Candy

 

 

INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION UNIT (IDIU)
INFORMATION CONCERNING

 

The Director kindly indicated there was no need to
cancel the one and one?half day trip to Indianapolis. I will, of
course, abide by instructiOns, however, my plans for Indianapolis
were already totally cancelled prior to the time the Director' 5
notation was received back in my office. Instructions have already
been given fer another ranking Legion member to handle my respon-
sibilities. There will\be no embarrassment. What needed to be
accomplished, Legion?wise, will still be accomplished.

I will be in the office not only throughout the weekend
as usual, but also all of next week. If the Director wishes me to
brief Mr. Casper, or anyone else, this will of course be done.

I regret that this matter has arisen. I could never,
under any circumstances, shirk my responsibilities.

an

 

CDD: amrLr/

(2) GyJ?v? M4 I. 

 

?1

was?

an, MA 5 1970



 

 

 

    
      
  

-


Staqda?rd Form988

Revise April 1968 

Genera! 

- [met-agency (30mm. on Medical Records

?21145 

   

REPORT OF MEDICAL EXAMINATION

as?

 

 

I. NAME

Deloagh. Cartha Dekle

Z. GRADE AND COMPONENT 0R POSITION

Asst. to Director

3. mgr?

3?29-15

   
 

 

(Number. mm o: RFD, day or town. swan and ZIP Code)

5. PURPOSE OF EXAMINATION

Annual



 

5. DATE OF EXAMINATION

 

7. SEX

3. RACE

3 I

9. TOTAL YEARS GOVERNMENT SERVICE

I0. AGENCY

 







 

 

. MILITARY

lcmuAN

 

1

II. ORGANIIATION UNIT

i

 

I2. DATE OF BIRTH I3. PLACE OF BIRTH

 

7-7-20

Claxton, Georgia

NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS OF NEXT OI: KIN

 

I5. EXAMINING FACILITY OR EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS .

NNMC

I7. RATING OR SPECIALTY

CLINICAL EVALUATION

 

 

 

 

I5. OTHER INFORMATION

 

TIME IN THIS CAPACITY (Total)

LAST SIX MONTHS

NOTES. (Describe ever abnormality in detail. Enter pertinent item number before each

ts it necessary.)

I face
m- #39 scar .
I8. HEAD. FACE. AND SCALP
I9. NOSE
20. SINUSES

 

ZI. MOUTH AND THROAT

 

.. U?fd' nt?canahV?IAIdlln?
?22? EARS GENERAL Milt]: undc'r item: 700m! 7"

 

 

23. DRUMS (Perforation)
- (V at a 
2* ?3.3535. 50 

 

25. OPHTHALMOSCOPIC

 

26. PUPILS (Equality and reaction)

 

(Auxmkd? parah'ti move-
27. OCULAR MOTILITY an?. 

 

28. LUNGS AND CHEST (Include breasts)

 

29. HEART (Thrust. size, sounds)

 

30. VASCULAR SYSTEM (I'an'cosimt. etc.)

 

31. ABDOMEN AND (Include hernia)

 

("anemic-db ?uvial)

32? ANUS AND RECTUM (mutate. I: am"

 

33. ENDOCRINE SYSTEM

 

3L G-U SYSTEM

 

35. UPPER ?f

 

 

36. 
(B ?pt! I)
37. LOWER 

 

33. SPINE. OTHER MUSCULOSKELETAL

 

39. IDENTIFYING BODY mans. SCARS. TATTOOS

 

(0. SKIN. LYM RHATICS

 

NEUROLOGIC (Equlhbn'un lute under mm 72)

 

 

 

 

 



 

mm W716

 

?3 . 

I. 07 A 64I970 332?;



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESULTS 15 
Has?Gus RESULTS 7
11+4? ?mm 137 NEH
53 ucm? 4 5 {cf}
x103 102 CE
6 8 we 7?00 2
59 usury. 7 
7 4'w
1 DANDY. a 3 A18
32 mm?Lean
.1 .199.?
5 mmosw 25 $601?
I 
mnmx??L-?c .6 T..Bj_liru

 



AZ. IC (Specify any 

l.

 

. (Female: arch?) how done)

 

 

 

DVAGINAL Damn!

 

. 6.3 Uric Ac


(Continue mm 

Creatinine

bin
id.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U. DENTAL (Place appropriate symbols. :50er in examples. abat'twbr brTo-w of upper and lower tutb.) DENTAL
i 5 Fl 4 
a Runnable II a Missing I 1%;ch Exam Type 3
01 ?ah "51:57: {nth dentin: ?11 dentures Class carles noted
uto'm?av mamas j" 
45. URINALYSIS: A. SPECIFIC GRAVITY 1 . 023 46. CHEST X-RAY (Place. date. ?lm number and tend!)
B. ALBUMIN Neg D. MICROSCOPIC I 12 52 5?70 Neg
c. SUGAR Neg Ess?Neg 31060 -
47. SEROLOGY (Specify tut um! and um") 48. 49. BLoob TYPE AND RH 50. OTHER TESTS
I FACTOR
Neg gag-?il? I -
IUIIQAYI ?g 33.77%) g/?6 88 no
- A - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4? 
.3 I'm MEASUREMENTS AND OTHER FINDINGS 
51. HEIGHT 52. 53. HAIR 54. COLOR EVEs ss. BUILD: 56. TEMPERATURE
72% I I 185 Blue SLENDER MEDIUM HEAVV [j OBESE
57. BLOOD PRESSURE (Ann at heart (out) 7 58. PULSE (Arm at heart had)
A- 575.128 3. 5Y5. c. svs. A. SITTING a. AFTER c. 2 MIN. AFTER 0. RECUMBENT E. gm? STANOING
SITTING RECUM- STANDING . .
DIAS. 80 BENT DIAS. (3 min.) DIAS. 84
59. DISTANT VISION 1 . so. NEAR VISION
RIGHT 20] 60 CORRSphere CX J1 0033, 1?02 0/20 BY
_50 CORR.T020120 BY 00 S. _.25 ex 15 J5 av
52. HETEROPHORIA (Specify diuanuPRISM DIV. PRISM GONV. PC PD
CT 9
63. ACCOMMODATION 64. COLOR VISION (Tm um! and mutt) Gs. DEPTH PERCEPTION 
(Tn: used and um)
RIGHT LEFT Fransworth 9/9 CORRECTEO
66. FIELD I 67. NIGHT VISION :dand non 68. RED LENS TEST Normal 70. NEARING Au OIOMETER . 72 
. 2 h, (Text: and and um)
154500 4000 -
RIGHT wv [l5 SV \115 333 ?lmig?g .3323 ?96 Ions 95210., -10 T5 45; 80 11090 - 
Law 10590. 
1 I

   
   
  
    
 
 
    
  
  
 
  
  
 
     

73. NOTES (Continued) ANO SIGNIFICANT OR INTERVAL HISTORY EM: {$?En. 7 3 I ?n 5
?Mills?: 
4 - r. 96
a! 
hum! u: ?um"Pi-:2
i m. HERVE. 
It" 3:6381., 3x,
(Uu adduional them Ila-man) 

 

74. SUMMARY OF DEFECTS AND DIAGNOSES (List diagram: wmI item Rumba")

#71 Moderate high-frequency hearing'loss.

 

75. REGOMMENOATIONS-FURTHER SPECIALIST EXAMINATIONS INDICATED (Specifi) 76. A. 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tl. EXAMINEE (Check)

A. IS FOR 3. PHYSICAL 
a. IS NOT FOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18. IF NOT LIST OErEde BY ITEM NUMBER A 
I
79. OR PRINTED NAME or PHYSICIAN SIGNATURE b6
I Inc USNR
Go. 11950 OR PRINTED NAME OF PHYSICIAN SIGNATURE 
81. TYPED 0R PRINTED NAME OF DENTIST OR PHYSICIAN (Indicate wA icA) SIGNATURE 
az. TVREO, OR or OFFICER OR APPROVING AUTHORITY SIGNATURE OF AT-
TACHED SHEETS
9.2 ?l
U. GOVERNMENT PRINTIE: 
. 
- - ?Ea

   
 

. .3. ?53!
0? - 53%

is .

     
    



 

 

- I

 

 

 

1 Fn??moatr?v. sense) 6

 

.- 

Attachment?to Standard Form 63, Report of Medical Examinatimi
For Information and Guidance of Medical Examiner

5

Name of Examinee Deloach, Cartha Dekle
(Type or print) Last First Middle

The following portions of the attached examination report form need not be completedand 49; required for all Special Agent and FBI National Academy applicants but not for
any other applicant unless the examining physician deems one, two, three or all four of the
examinations necessary. 45, 46 and 47 are required in examination of any current employee.

48. Not required unless examinee is over 35 years of age or examination indicates such is desirable.

71. Audiometer examinations should be afforded Whenever possible for all Special Agent applicants
and Special Agents. Applicants for the Special Agent position will not be accepted if the hearing
loss exceeds a 15 decibel average in either ear?in the conversational speech range (500, 1000,
2000 cycles).

For All Examinees, Whether Clerical or Special Agent Applicants or Employees:

The medical examiner should answer the following question:

Examinee XX is is mot qualified for strenuous physical exertion.

To be Answered in the Base of All Male Employees and Male Applicants:

1. Does examinee have any defects restricting or prohibiting his participation in defensive tactics and
dangerous assignments which might entail the practical use of firearms?

 

No Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.

 

2. Does examinee have any defects prohibiting safe operation of motor vehicles?

No Yes If ?yes? please specify defects.

 

 

3. For safe driving of motor vehicles, Civil Service Commission requires distant vision must test at
least 20the other, corrected or uncorrected. Should examinee wear cor-
rective glasses while operating a motor vehicle? Yes No
If recommendation is based on a factor other than above standard, indicate basis

 

 

 

 


A ?i 

1. A - I 

 





 

 

Desirable Weight Ranges for Males

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Height Small Frame Medium Frame Large Frame
5?152
5?157
57? 123 137. 134 148 143 - 162
5?146 _142 - 156 151- 170
510175
5?11158 154 -_171 164 - 185
61190
6?195
6?200
6?4? 169 - 180 178'- 196 188 - 210
6?Examinee?s frame is small medium 1g) large

5. Considering above weight table, the examinee?s frame, and other individual physical characteristics,
I consider his present weight @{Satisfactory Excessive De?cient

6. Under proper medical supervision, employee should lose 

gain pounds

Remarks:

 

 

 

b6

 

 

 

?ignature of Why/l Examiner

21 April 4919
Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- (fr 1 -, - 



 

gru-?W

12:13": 

anewUNITED .3 - . 
Memorandum -WerMR. TOLSON - DATE: Apr?I24, 1970 ?olcj

. . - a 4? . Surlifvan' 

. - Tovcl . ?r
J. p. MOHR .. 1 $113"an 

A: i i . Holm'cs 
.. . Candy 
DEPARTMENTAL APPLICANT air/f2?


Refeigence' is made to the memorandum from Mr. Dd?oach and me
to you under date of 4/24/70 the third recommendation of which recommended that
a separate memorandum be sent through containing recommendations for disciplinary
action in connection with the above matter. 

In the attached memorandum from Mr. Cleveland to Mr. Gale dated
4/24/70 with regard to that Division's responsibilities in connection with this matter .
it is indicated that Division should have made a determination on 2/17/70 as tor
whether they should or should not be counting the Pardon Attorney-type cases as
Departmental Applicant Type cases. For their failure to do so Mr. Gale recommends
censure for himself and Section Chief William V. Cleveland and Mr. DeLoach concurs
in this recommendationThe Administrative Division has not maintained statistics with rega?rd ..
to the handling of this type of case, i. e. DAPLI as this is done in the Special
.?Investigative Division. This is the first year in which the issue of reimbursement
'r 55}: for such matters in excess of the number estimated has been raised. 1 .
., 
The Administrative Division prepared and forwarded to the Assistant
Attorney General for Administration by memorandum of 4/15/70 a voucher covering
reimbursement in the total amount of $284, 480 for 68 professional and 332 noni 
professional investigations. These 400 cases represented in this billing were in
excess of the 3570 cases for which provision had previously been made in our budget
request for the fiscal year 1970. The -voucher was prepared on the basis of a listi?g
as of 400 cases furnished by the Special Investigative Division. Included in this 11an
were 28 investigations conducted for the Pardon Attorney under the caption "application
for pardon after completion of sentence. The significance of the inclusion Of thesgzl
cases in the listing furnished was not readily apparent to those responsible fprithe 3
- .. preparation of the voucher, i. e. Special Agent Supervisor Daniel J. Green and 1 
Assistant Director N. P. Callahan and they did not challenge th in usion of?tlieso?d
cases in the listing. 67- 
nu REG-148 i, on: 12": MAY I1970
Had Callahan and Green5k who ?ngerle? andlin this matter? questioned
the inclusion of the 28 cases referred to fromt Par on Attorney before executing
the voucher the misunderstanding which haSuoccurred might have been avoided tend it.? :1
is regretted by them that the significance of these items was not recognized ?at the: 
time but this in no way relieves them of their responsibility in this matt'er. .

(If: ?rm-h

I 

 

0

?1.13311

   

 

 

1.. 111' 4 I: 1
gig/mt (3) MAY 201 1970 '1'001135 $1.3m? 730quoI?u?vb u?q?nzlm 



 

 

 

o'momu tom Ho. :0 solo-too A 

an m: comoa 

GSA GIN. no. no. :7 Olson

UNITED STATES CORERNMENT at 
ohro

"Memorandum 



30 MR. TOLSON 6/1/70 
a same?

cc Mr. DeLoach 
FROM C. D. DeLoach Mr. Mohr nmamm
Mr. Tavel 

 

 

 

 

INQUIRY CONCERNING TELEPHONE

CALL FROM DIRECTOR 5/31/70 

Reference is made to Tavel to Mohr memorandum
dated 6/1/70, entitled as above.

The Director' 3 questions regarding Inspector .
Sizoo being away from the city, and the handling of a teletype,
are being answered in a separate memorandum.

This memorandum is being written simply for the
purpose of stating that in my own case I did not tell the

switchboard I was going to play olf at Kenwood Country Club.
The switchboard was advised E?at I 
Country Club fOr dinner. Golf was no men ione . ave not

played golf for a considerabl length of time.) I was available
and cOuld have been reached thout a moment's hesitation.

   
 
 
 

<,For informatio

v/W err-W36? 791/? 5229?

 

 

5 JUN 5 153m ,1





 

(4)

n' 7 33%

8 Jumonm


 

 

 

3-496 5-25-70)

RETIREMENT INFORMATION
2:23am agrees: . ears-11m?:

The ?Application for Retirement? will be forwarded by the Bureau to the Civil Service Commission (CSC) for approval.

The enclosed ?Application for Retirement" should be executed (or changed as indicated below) and prompily returned to the

.Bureau for forwarding to the Civil Service Commission (CSG) for approval. The information sheet attached to the application
I: is for your records and you should detach it before sending in the application.

REDEPOSIT 

Making either a deposit or redeposit is optional. Such amounts are paid directly by you to CSC: therefore, it is possible. that
you have already made the depOSit or redeposit indicated below without the Bureau's knowledge, having dealt directly with 080.
If so, you may ignore this matter now. If not, after a review of the approximate annuity figures shown below, should you decide to
make a deposit or redeposit, you should request Bureau to forward Standard Form 2803 to you. Return this form to the Bureau.

Not applicable.

:3 The deposrt you may owe is: a payment to the retirement fund to cover a period of service during which no retirement deductions
were_Withheld' from salary. Credit is given for service not covered by deductions; however, if the deposit is not paid, your
annuity Will be reducedleach year by 10% of the amount due as deposit. The amount you'may owe is approximately Sp 

{j The redepOSit you may owe is a payment to the retirement fund to cover a period of service for Which retirement deductions
were Withheld from your salary but later refunded to you following your separation from civilian employment. No credit is
allowed in the computation of annuity for the period of service covered by the refund unless redeposit is made. The amount
you may owe is approximately 

ANNUITY

Annuities are computed on full months of service. The estimated annuity below is based on young] Bureau service, including
year, #months, days of accrued sick leave, other civilian Government service and/or military service
kn. tons, tot ling 8, #months, day 080 makes the official computations and rmines whether
prior serVice is credit?a ?f advising yo direct the exac amount of your annuity. The figures below are only estimates. and they do
do not take account of deduction for health insurance coverage. You should receive the first annuity check about 2 months after
separating from the Bureau?s rolls.

 

 

 

 

 

TYPES or ANNUITY With Without With Without . With 099092?
Married applicanis only . Deposit Deposit Redeposit Redepm?lit 8? Redeposn
Reduced Type of Annuity With benefit
?is to Widow or Widower swa? a 5 5
Annuity Without Survivor Benefit 3 - . 
is nmorrleda qipllcants only (Including WM 1' Divorced)
Annuity without Suryivor Benefit . 3 3
Reduced Annuity With Bene?t to
Person having an Insurable Interest 3 3 3 
Survivor Annuity (55% of all or the
portion of your annuity specified) 5 3

 

plus annuity for each eligible child.
SEPARATION FROM ROLLS

Since you will cease active duty [3 ceased active duty on Wyour annuity will commence
immediatelit?following the cease active duty date or? expiration okhr?i??'?c?h?ed annual leave on
earned through ML. =Item B4 on app ihation changed to should be Wellies of business

. . If annual leave was or will be used by you subsequent?) this datewill
change and the Bureau should be imrhediately advised. .
If retirementis for disability, separation takes effect after the approval of CSC is received by the Bureau or'after the expira-

tion of any=accrued sick leave, whichever occurs later. Under Internal Revenue SerVice regulations, some Sick pay and
disability income is not taxable; thus, you may be able to exclude from Federal income tax liability all or a part_of the payments
you receive for sick leave used prior to the date your annuity commenced, as well as for annuity received as a disability
annuitant. Any such exemption would terminate when you reach normal retirement age. Thereafter, this annuity would be Federal
income tax-free until you had drawn as annuity an amount equal to the retirement deductions from your salary while you were
working. 080 will advise you of this amount. . 
If retirement is not for disability, the ?sick pay? exclusion is not permiSSible. Once you have received in annurty as much as
9* was deducted from your salary for retirement purposes, you are subiect to Federal Income Tax on the rest. advrse how
much was deducted. Only if you were incapacitated and were granted extended sick and/or annual leave for Sick leave exceeding
thirty calendar days prior to separation ~for?retirement might you qualify for a ?sick_pay' exeluswn for the leave period.
Questions you may have as an annuitant regarding your income tax liability or priVileges can be answered by the Internal
Revenue Service. 
You should send 080 over your signature any change in address, setting-out your CSA (retirement) numbe .
[:39 You will receive a lump-sum payment for your accumulated annual leave in the approximate amount of its?W .
A deduction for Federal income tax has been made from this estimate.

 

 

 

FEDERAL GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
Records show you elected Optional Insurance of $10,000 and have Regular Insurance of 

Records show you declined Optional Insurance but are covered by Regular Insurance of swag g: It} 

Records show you waivedlbfoth Regular and Optional Insurance.

on may con inue your group i e_ insurance coverage following retirement or convert it to an indiv' a w?

being required to undergo a phySical examination. Conversion to an individual life insurance polihi'uziadefgsitlisttars uistiiliiut
premium for a person_of your age and class of risk. If you decide to convert, the Bureau should be immediately advised. Otherwise
SF-56, ?Agency Certification of Insurance Status," will be forwarded to CSC and a copy sent to you. If you elect to continue 
Regular Insurance coverage, such protection will continue premium free until you reach age 65. At that time coverage will be
reduced 75% (at 2% per month) by the time you reach age 68 years and 2 months. The remaining 25% is also premium free for the
remainder of life. Optional Insurance of $10,000, if continued after retirement, will be at full premium cost until you reach age 65
Thereafter, it is for the remainder of life and commencing at age 65 it will be reduced 75% at the same rate as Regular I
Insurance. The premium cost of Optional Insurance varies as to age, beginning at $2.82 for persons under age 35 and
ranging _to $41.17 for persons age 60 or oVer. Optional Insurance may be continued after retirement if you continue to
pay for it_until age 65 prOVided you keep Regular Insurance. If you retain the Optional Insurance, 080 will deduct the cost from
your annuity. You must have had Optional Insurance for all of your service during which it was available or for 12 years imme-
diately before your retirement. Optional Insurance may be converted to an individual policy if you are not eligible to continue
it or, if you do not Wish Optional Insurance to be continued, you may waive coverage at any time by notifying 080 and still keep
your Regular Insurance. Followmg retirement, double indemnity benefits concerning accidental death and dismemberment no
longer exist for either Regular or Optional Insurance.
Note: If the annuity of an insured retired employee is terminated under any applicable law or regulation, his regular and/or optional
life insurance coverage stops on the date of such termination, with no conversion rights thereafter. - 

DESIGNATION OF BENEFICIARY, STANDARD FORM 54, FEDERAL GROUP LIFE INSURANCE

Designation filed: .

No. Bene?ciary will be in order of precedence used by United States Government, (1) widow or widower, (2) children,
(3) parents, etc.

Yes; bene?ciary designated as - 
This designation is being forwarded to 080 and it will remain valid unless changed or canceled. Contact 080 for any change
desired following retirement. .

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
Records show you elected not to enroll.
Records show you enrolled in the following plan:
Government-wide Service Benefit Plan (Blue Cross - Blue Shield)?
Govemment-wide Indemnity Benefit Plan (Aetna Life Insuiance COmpanyl
[3 Comprehensive Medical Plan
Special Agents Mutual Benefit Association (SAMBA)
Nor . The life insurance you have under this plan Will continue in force until 1:10 or 7-10 coinciding with or next following the date
of your retirement: If you desire to continue the protection beyond this time,you may do so without a physical examination. You
may elect to continue up to age 70 at group rates 50% of your SAMBA Life Insurance. _If you presently carry $3,000 you may continue

 

$1,500 at a cost of $3.25 semiannually. If you presently carry a .
Present Coverage Amount You Can Continue Semionouai Cost

.500 $12.25
10.000 5,000 $.00
12,000 6,000 25.75
. 15,000 7,500 33.50
20.000 10.000 48.00
30,000 15,000 75.00

The 50% of your SAMBA Life Insurance that cannot be continued with SAMBA may be converted to a regular policy with Prudential.
At age 70, your coverage will terminate and you may then convert the amount of life insurance carried with SAMBA to a regular
policy with The Prudential Insurance Company of ?America.

Your desire in respect to Life Insurance at retirement should be communicated in writing to SAMBA, Snite 750, 1325 
Street. Northwest, Washington, D. C. 21005: .If you have Dependents Group Life Insurance this will continue until the next semi-
annual premium is due (1-10 or 7-10), with a 31-day grace period. You may continue $1,000 coverage on your wife at a cost of 25
semiannually until you reach age 70. The $1,000 that cannot be continued with SAMBA may be converted to a regular policy with
The Prudential Insurance Company of America without a medical examination. The premium will be the same as if your spouse
applied for an individual policy at that time. You may make the necessary conversion arrangement through the nearest Prudential
Office. The life insurance of your children cannot be converted.

Unless you cancel your, present enrollment, you will remain under your health benefit plan after retirement, and your enrollment will
be transferred to CSC. The costof your share of the plan will be deducted from your annuity by CSC. 

Enrollment of ari employee who dies while he is enrolled ?for self and family? continues for his family if at least one family member
is entitled to an annuity as the survivor. If the survivor annuitant is the only eligible family member, the retirement system 
automatically change the enrollment to ?self only."

The original of Standard Form 2810, ?Notice of Change in Health Benefits Enrollment,? will be forwarded to you by the Bureau at a
. later date.

SPECIAL ACCIDENT AND TRAVEL INSURANCE .
If you are a member or SATI upon retirement, you cannot continue the Long Term Disability, PenSion Supplement and the_In-Hospital
Income Plan. You may continue the Accidental Death, Dismemberment and Permanent Total Disability Plan and the Accident
Medical Expense Plan at the same rates and amounts to age 60. You may also continue the coverage on your spouse to age 60 and
your children full-time student.) Upon attainment of age 00 you may only continue the Acmdental
Death and Dismemberment Plan but not the Permanent Total Disability portion to a maXimum of $25,000 onbyou and your spouse to
age 75. The cost will be 19? per month per thousand. The Accident Medical Expense Plan cannot be continued after age 60. If
you retire due to disability, you should contact Wright and Company, 1001 Connecticut Avenue, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20036.

ENCLOSURE .

Standard Form 2801. ?Application for Retirement? 
.3 Standard Form 8, ?Notice to Federal Employee About Unemployment Compensation?
{:33 Pamphlet, ?Your Retirement System.? .
Standard Form 2801-13. ?Physician?s Statement,? for disability retirement 

0- i9 (Rev. 11-3-69)


2

 



 

 

$28.5 Aid? to Retire?


?Carma 13.4, 3256225312 thin}.

rdnk?d 333.253.3222Z :20 3. . Edgar.._
{Hoover dir?irgo?r' th? F?'ci?rai


  

  

35mm: ~?of plans
31:16 r?iire?? July :25? orifh?is 56:32
?2 Birthday spokesman
said; thatr?r DefLoach who
yams 53:22:: In ?21921 ezicyi?eS
{ears a ap?zc mar re 12' 4
financial reaMaW'Mw

Wa?s?iw um?:

 

9

?In?


a

 

 

Sullivan

 

'E?avei
Soy ors
Tele. Rdom
Holmes
Gdn?dy

 

 

 

 

The Washington Post
Times Herald

The Washington Daily News 
The Evening Star (Washington) 7'
The Sun'day Star (Washington) .
Daily News (New York)
Sunday News (New York)

New York Post
The New York Times 
The Sun (Baltimore)
The Daily World
The New Loader A
The Wall Sire?t-Joumnl
The National Observer
People?s Worm
Examiner (Washington)

JUN 71970

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Date

 

 

 

 

a? mun-?

 

 
 
 
  

1.100

 

 Conrad
1 Felt

 

6n

Tolson
DeLooch
Walters
Molu
Bishop
Casper 

Callahan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gale
Boson -
Sullivan 
Tove! c? 

 

 

 

Soyorsm

Tele. Boom
Holmes 


 

Jim 3

June 5, 1970
PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha Leach
Federal Bursa investigation
Washington, D. C.

Dear DeLoach:

I have your letter of June 4, 1970,? con~
cerning your retirement from the FBI, which we (118-!
cussed yesterday. I Want in this way to reiterate my
regret at your pending departure from our organization.

Your in many posts of
considerable antherity and responsibility are known
throughout the Bureau. I appreciate most sincerely all
the help you have given me over the years, and know the

depth of the devotion to duty which has characterized your

performance.

It is
to maintain a close interest in FBI affairs. I hone that
Mrs. DeLoach and you will find the years ahead to be
abundantly happy and rewarding.

(82
1 - Mis 

1 V0uc?1er~Sta' is:
1-- Miss

Sincerely, 
it HOMER

ical Section (Sent Direct)
(Last physical on 4--21--70)

 

 

?f

 

 

 

 

gratifying to note that you will continue

 

 

 

Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Tele. Room
Miss Holmes
Miss Candy

To] son
DeLoach
Walters
Mohr
Bishop
0 asper
Callahan
Conrad
Felt
Gale
R0 sen
Sullivan
Tavel
Soy arts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Mr. Jones-?Mr. DeLoach? cease active dutyi date is 7~20~70.

Place on ecial COrreSpondents' List. . 5i
Mrs.

 

NOTE: Assistant to the Director DeLoach will be quali?ed as of '7 ~20~70

for retirement under the liberalized SA plan.

 

SENT FROM D. 0.

TIME 

13 @111le


MAIL 

 

 

 

 

1/

 

 

 

 

 


I



June 4, 1970,

 

 

Mr. Rosen
Mr. Sullivan
Honorable John Edgar Keover . MLmel
Director 2 Mr. Soyars
Federal Bureau of Investigation' Tdefmmn

Mis?s Holmes

Washington . . Miss Gandy

Dear Mr. Hoover:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for seeing me this afternoon. QZ h?b?g?

In accordance with our conversation, I herewith
submit my request for retirement, effective (business
permitting) on July 20,1970.

This has not been an easy decision. No
active career covering over tWenty?eight years can
be brought to a close without agonizing deliberation.
Yet in my own by considerable
thought and the faith.and confi?
dence of my wife and children, the decision can hope-
fully be a wise one for the future. YOur thoughtful
understanding of my situation certainly made things
much easier.

I am grateful for the many commendations,
incentive awards and outstanding efficiency reports
you have afforded me. All of them, throughout the.
years, have been carefully preserved and will, again
and again, be looked at in the years to come. The'
recent commendations you have given me for super-
vising a number of major cases have been particularly

 

. a f?
gra ifying R?g??a a. A
No one, particularly t?b he?have.?haredm? 

these great experiences, actually evgr=lea" 65 this 
organization. In their hearts theyzstii ihN to
enjoy the fortunes of success, angugsspainsnhenqthe
going is rough. This will be true in my case. Your
leadership and the training given me over the years
are obviously the reasons why a good business oppor-
tunity has been given to me.

Thank you for understanding my reason for
requesting retirement and for indicating your approval
of the same.

Sincerely

 
 

wer::7 70.7 {70 3%

.5

 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:


?w

T. E. Bishog?N Eff



FORM NO. 10 SOIO-I06

MAY IDITION

on am. NO. 27 
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

Memorandum I. 

Callahan 

 

 

Conmd
. Felt
Mr. DeLoach?? DATE: 6- 5- 7 

 

Sullivun 

 

 

HOIMES 
(Sandy 

DAVE NORDEN . 
WASHINGTON BUREAU 

NEWSPAPER .

INQUIRY RE: MR. RETIREMENT

On the morning of 6 5- 70, Bishop received a telephone call

from the above captioned individual who advised that he had received a
"tip" from anumamed Senator' 9 office to the effect that Mr. DeLoach has
"resigned?? from the Bureau effective sometime in July. Norden asked 
for confirmation of this information. He was advised that a check would
be made. Nerden called back about an hour later and advised Bishop
that he had now been informed that members of the local Washington

ress had information to the effect that Mr. DeLoach had retired. After
checking with you, Bishop advised Norden that you (Mr. DeLoach) had
submitted your request for retirement from the FBI effective July 20,1970.

It was pointed out to Norden that this would be a "retirement? and not a
?resignation. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDATION: REC-139 Search: 5?15" 5/ 537 7
None. For information. 4 JUN 101970 

1 - Mr. DeLoach ?w

1 - Mr. Jones

1 - Mr. Bishop

TEBzhak (4)

 



 

 

 

  
     

a
?1 n?dfl? 

      

g;

   


s?mmg a:
?is

stunning-5n


n?y may?:

I

I

This is a deep disappointment?-
happiness for you that you are going onito other challeng s. 
:fm have no idea of your new assignment wat"-Pepsa. Cola; ibut if it
concerns human relations and; touches' in; sing: way on the problemsi?g? 

at

rs mind?.
?9 "e

g,

lucky indeed. 1:5" . . 

'0

r?s?u: 5%

Your understanding want?.5?-



   
 
     


-pfag lug-1Tut! 

ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE ..
. a 1 I. i M.- 
iB'na': r?fl" . 2? . n'c: l. (I

   

  

 


1'737.111.! .if.ingee-n:

n?uy?
has
Federal BureauS ostnvestigatiou ?g
. 1:3:
Washington D. 3. .n 3 4'3355friends we have had for more? than twenty- years in the Bureau 
7:5: will be leaving his important post?v? i?n' government. 

SI 

n-

p,



f?that we have handled in ADI. these L:xnsiny? years, Pepsi Cole is ?thf': ?ii-g3,
1-. .or' 8 a 

u?
I?_1r.



x?



 

a a

n-

ilour most reliable sources ofistrength. . I ensure you will be
hearing from Dave Brody7"bhi 111 13:spee or :al of us; 4133138.?th ar:- spe .. ,9 .335?faji 'rvir" . w. . inf?? fin-X: 331-5" 
h?r?h? ?(Vt as?: '3 I 
4? 
With every best wish andirwith the certainty that-your new31"} 17? fall?s-9? . . $17 Var sh?, i --
.ole willinot ?mean ithe-oend- oi our; friendship, 5; :2m . 33?53le :?n?nv A: 77%: fi??fi?i? yr "ii-Ii -- 1.ria?aids-was? 
wm?v?vW-H?WS? 
,rp an?? 

?mt-?I 6.1% ?on is 7- 3
Human 
. ?sysadmnold; -F rster?.
1? i 
. 5- '14 
:AF-?i?v?eh 845,51?
of? v" leg-ave?:
"P?s?st? 
- I on], 
gayest? 
.31} (4.: it 
- if}: i0), F7 ?Raff" .
Pag?ii ".33 HlLlu?un' r; . nix
run-5." a? 1 
{as-?ix s33?- .4.- ?353.3.141,? I .Ig, ?54: Mg jag?31-55: .3 . :9 :1 its: 373"- ?v35
.6 En hi 4- hiszit-?74? 5.12.3: ?a firs-AwJr: ILin .
"3 ?new; ?us3";33? 4 :tEth'p-Lug-qol 
?1 7 ?'97 'M?z?l 'Enul?eon-:3 N. We
walk" r; 
un?- .1
a ?i Lu 
.Vk
awn-w. 
Tux 11
o. . 6.
(1-7156: 7


 

 

 

 

 

Itj'is equalled only by our

 

.4 . 
and; from others. in and so, while if?? . . .1

 

 
  
       
        
    
      

 

    
  
  
 
   
  
     
        
  

CAIN-I ADORIEII 

I
I ?axncigua-?oen?man?z:


a
an;
a.



4:40;?

 

 






n? 
77? a; c?-wvzziwa 
t' 1 7' a 7:
gaf'?i?z?l? 
a?m(I), 
0
fiftif??f.?lfbluw 3, .
a. inf? 
2 "o'ot' I II it4'.313. 

. - i
2?55? vl'. a F.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I .00--.: .
155?
1c FOR '11113 ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED P13013113 . .
mooI-WASHINGTON ?11:1" . 95.3133- .E'T?la;- ?1;.sz non-?I" 
i 9? a" 1 BUILDING :422 5mm?. s?e' - ?3 :13: 3' 
?jrfre.h;h
?f 1" .. 1' i ?1"?3691 3:313. .31'11?3'41 112193." '3234?uni. 9 .
.3 . 2:12yp?gt. . . -r . -Q3Cif
."3331:?? 2:13;: 
. wt. Zh6'13. 31.9.3.1 gr 
'l I I-Mr. Cartha D. eLoach . t. H. Eeqp.rww . Assistant to the Director-I.?i . Federal Bureau of Investigation 1 ?3 . 
i?-j?i 3? .. Ninth and Avenue. N. 
a; .3 . WashingtonDear Dekeletter to Mr. Kendall- states, I have mixed
. feelings about your departure from the FBI. Although ?31?h
- the Bureau is always receptive to those seeking help 2 
1 on matters within its Jurisdiction. it is 
to know that the ersdn to whom one talks has a ?133??
I .Jh$ "11 ?U?r
.- 1 1 record of friendly concern as well as official '35: - e4;-
a 
.. effectiveness. The unassuming? manner in which you 
3 I .3
. have operated- in your impIortant- office' through the at
1 years has set an example fthat many good men will: I 3., 1.'vw.
want to _follow7.Best of luck_and much SatisfaCtion from your new I 
duties1.33.3Hhhn 2: n= 9 .v 
3.??lph6:?.4124; @118?.qu M1 tChe ?gDTre ctor '.an?3?11Inww ?l -
I .1: . . 3.1.2: .22~;Nw 11' A .F- 
a . :15: I ?u A i
@113 
a . I- I 51?v?j I . tiagrggi?ij?1 ?21:12bye? I. It 15:} I I I 

 

 

 

 

  

 

     
 
  

    

 

   

 

   

 

 
     
  

 

 

  
   

 

 

 

aim-14h.

In

i" ra?wwnv 2? sr

lbw-E 13- h. mm: s: :5


?sup-5 as



a

1?1?

 

in? 

is-

5 MW Wrasse,

mgr-tam arms-mm .5.

a:

?Em: .A 1?

swarm-mains

- 0?55-45?5-9c 


1

as,

.m was ?any??ma?a.? a?uw w?

:5:DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE mans BrownWASHINGTON. as. 20530 .5 
. ?5 15'1?! 15,.5.~55, km 5 . w, ??June 9, 1970 ., 
?1.1 1' ?Ill? EH I . it? :f
?hr? WA 55-15.33 33$31.3??wa 1?;51Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach 5, 
. ?i 1511* 151 ll
Assistant to the?Director 3 1 Wait :Federal Bureau of Invest1gationwWashin ton C, 20530 Dear Dekei ?.L'Jnihi read of your ret1rement With a very personal pain. Not: 55,555only 18 the Federal Government losing the serv1ces of a 5 
., truly great American, but someone for'whom I have the 4,355 ., .
a 
greatest personal respect and admirationwant to thank you for your sensitivity and cordiality 5 5 If: .
a "k
5.1? 5-?toward me over the past year. I cannot, adequately express
. you how supportive it was to me in this very difficult 5, 5
. 1
5 Job. I ,can only say that it is men like!you who reinforce .5
I I
persons like myself who feel strongly that, in' spite of .

its imperfection, this is a. great society more ?t an wort 
.r ?1 5.: .
- ?ghting to preservehope I will have an opportunity to convey my gratitude 5 ,5
. ,9 W. :3 .1151person before your departure..? 11,4? 3,5if}: 1 "v 
. 4.575555 ?wt??5555155oJ-?agr? 5' ?51? 1 55 m' 
1.5 fylf" 93?5:153. 31 a, I 9? a .5.
?14:qu a" ?1135"; 5? J: ., 5 
i 55:5 515.25.?? ,5 77"55-{1,151 1? 13":a' . A 1'3'
5551 i5.
3555?? i~ 55:55:15?5? 51.57.? 5 "5 a 1'1
1? .Prv?f?r: is "F?u .5 ?111% a331, 5 i .I a 
5'15?; 5535553531555. 533?: 5:531 1 - 5
?s 255 . .55: 51w?13? ?a "Ewart" h?lf?Eufhr?. .41 :15. i 
a a: 1152at? 11/ tiff?? If?. .u 6 on?
4: ?wt: we?ll a: ,Zs?mhk?; 1* (fa/R 
. 1., i 5:15,: ?5m533,135.53 3:35, 3., 55:51.53? remiss?,1. ?5 5555 -- 
5 4 1 ?Hal $11.11*; waf-hv: VIP: 191 I: I: 11-, 53? 
:1 ??ab \?tjt h"  Ev\ .1 t, a??f?T-asi"if: . far?? .5, 5 5:14;; - .
52- gm? . 1:35 .3311; ??3717" 35.1.15,,1 
Y5 3:5 25 ?55513-5525 55*: 5* 3,55: 55,155.5549 3: 
?r I .1 fl: *Erir?; ?21; .31?3?1541?5-5 ll? 1 tdlf?~t?3im??f?fa a
5 50 5.555.555 5.: 5'25 25,5555 5 I
. I ?Hut?31 "hfw? In? in Ti?; 3 i?if?aqtg {153?s n?inq?, . 7 7 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  
  
    
   



 

.- 
.- . TolsonY4~
. - r. DeLnac 

If

Mr. Rem 
Mr. Mohr 
Mr. Htxh?p 

Mr. Cameron..?
Mr. 
Ms. mm! 
1?55?: Ft}: 
My, Gale 
Mr. 
Mn Emu teem 
Mr. Tawi 
Sc? are 
Tole; Rectum
Miss 
Miss 

 



 

June 9: 1970

f' 
Mr. Cartha D. D?Loach
Federal Bureau of Investigation
washington, D. C.
Dear Deke:

The local press carried a.notice over the last weekend of your

intention to retire next month.

 

I read this notice with considerable regret. Possibly you do
not remember. but several years ago (at the time EdAMason?was

a special agent in charge at Cincinnati) you, I. Ed Mason. and_
one or two of my colleagues had lunch together. The impression
you made on us was deep and long lasting. Your dedication to
the cause of the FBI was easily apparent.,,

lThe loss to the Bureau by your retirement will be great. 
iknow that you have given considerable thought to your deCiSion,
ibut as a concerned citizen I hope that you will reconsider.

My colleagues join me in sending kindest regards and beet.wishes.

Sincerely.?

Arthur Buhr
Chairman-of the-Board

cc: J. Edgar Ho?uer 





 


44
1. 
If

(I, 


 

 

 

 

 

 

omomu you No. Io sow-loo
MAY In: tomow
GSA GEN. RIO. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

 

Memorandum

T0 MR. TOLSON EmmE 6/5/70 
cc Mr. DeLoach
FROM C. D. DeLoach Mr. Bishop

NEWSPAPER PUBLICITY REGARDING
PENDIN or
C. LOACH?.Assistant to the Director

 

I have not talked to any outsiders, particularly .

?newspaper people, regarding my request for retirement. a
Nevertheless, the word seems to be getting around. .?he .
Evening Star called me this morning and asked if I had
\requested retirement and, if so, what I planned to do in
the future. I simply responded by stating that I was leavingJ
for financial reasons, after being in the FBI for 28% years.

I praised the Director and indicated appreciation for his

leadership. I made no comment concerning the I was

joining. fine 3? M,

II

 



I was pressed for further details and adviSedith?t
I frankly could give no further facts at this timen Ie?as:
advised that this made no difference, inasmuch as theywhad?f
information in their morgue; furthermore, I was anersonals
friend of many of the reporters at the Evening Staralso have received inquiries from the Atlanta
Journal, which stated they had picked up this information on
the Hill; To be specific, they stated some Senator's office
them this information and inasmuch as I was a
native of Georgia they planned to write an article. I gave
?them the?same information as furnished the Evening Star, and
stated ?g further details were availableThe Los Angeles Times 5 called me andm%ghave no?giiga

returned the call. 61139 W3 7e? 3*

As I mentioned to the ?irector yeS%gI9a3?3133?iggG
not want publicity concerning this matter and h?ye Hon 0 ing _4
to?stir up such requests myself.

a? a; 
ACTION - 
For information11131ng I no mm



 

 

 

 

 

?1 as I 

-- (20? db 70,
9 7?30 ~70 WV
MM (344/ 3? M49544 
23301933 0(a) sust-

WW ago 
. 961:4) {a
June' 17, 3.976 

Box-iambic: angina E. Ruddeck
Directs:

Bureau of Retirement, Intutance
and Btcupational Health

Civil Service Cmissiaa
Washington, D. C. 291315

 

Bear Ht. Ruddock:

.

Em: cased. it an Apylicatitn fat Retirement?fgxecuted by
Caz-the. Battle @9633), an Assistant to the Director of this
Bureau, when 1-: indicated that he desirat to retire Jnly 31, 3.976. 
There are also emitted a? pxeliminazy Standard Form Number 2866
for ntndisability retirement, :3 Register of Separations and
Transfers, a cap? of DeLoach?s Homrable Bischargt from the
United States titty, and a copy at his Eatice of Separation from
the United States ?aval Service.

{3120145. 67- 53 $192.?
Ming his service: with 321%, team If 

participated in and supertisad the 

of laws cf the United Staten}. and has 
hazardous nature. His services have bean ?ntirely satisfactory
and he will have met the requirements necessary ta retire under
t?e pmvisions of gettion 8336(c) of Title 5, United States Code.

 

 

In accot?tnce with the action cf the Attorney General
delegating autharity ta me ta make apptapriate recommendations
in connection with applications for retirement from emgloyees
of the: Federal Bureau. of Investigation, I hereby teccmmend that

l-i?r. DeLoach?s treatment lye approved. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sm? use ?313? Wurs? 1 - Mr Row 6221 13

Waltexs . 

?m 1 4- Kiss: 4746306
Bishop

af?rm, jl/ 1 Mrs. 3

g3?" g2 . U) John Edgar Hoover .1 Mr. Jones; 4254

3215:? P?ljw Bixccter 1 Movement, 5224

SulILVun (8) 

3:335 . Enclasmes 

 



hie-Room if $013: Active duty to cease Julyezf} 1970;
?gy?o?$gi?ii le! retirement effective July 31: 1970.

 

 

i, . 
. a? IN). )7 
GOVERNMENT -
Memorandum

MR. DATE: 6/12/70

 

cc Mr. DeLoach

Soyms

 

 

 

 

 

 

FROM Mr. Mohr 
. Cal 121118.11 2:35

FROM
MORNING 

 

)1 received a call at?4 p. m. this afternoon from
Joe Ledlie, of the Savannah Worning News, Savannah,
Geoigia. -This is the area in which I was born and reared.
Ledlie told me his paper had received a tip from
a local source that I was being separated from the FBI

I because of my southern background. He asked if I could

?i i; talk to him, off the record, and give him the answer to
this. i .

if I told Ledlie there was no need to talk off the

record; that he could place my answer squarely on the front

page if he so desired. I then told/him his tip was absolutely
erroneous, asinine, and without any foundation whatsoever in

?fact. I stated the Director has always insisted upon merit~ 
and that no action, as long as I had known the Director 0r

had been employed by the FBI had been based upon race, creed,

or color. 

I also told Ledlie,_for his information, that he might
like to know I had received a number of personal letters in
connection with my retirement, and among them were letters
from the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, the National
Association for the Advancement of Colored People, and the
Community Relations Service of the Department of Justice,
extending gratitude for cooperation and friendship over a
long period of time. Copies of the letters in question are

attached. E11115

ACTION -

 

For record purposes.

mac. 53,}

Enclosures I 
CDD: (5) 



 

BEARS. L?irr

 

FD-ZB 16: (Rev. 7-9-62)




an,
i



RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

7/1/70

I certify that I have Whe following Government property for official use:

returned

Bureau Monographs: Labor Racketeering, Section

Labor Racketeering, Section
Labor Racketeering, Section

Labor Racketeering, Section 4, 1962 

Bank Robbery, 1963 F?h

Who's Who of National Leaders, Communist Party, USA,
1963 0?5

 

MARK 0E MUTILATE IT IN

READ

 

The Government property which you hereby acknowleclge
is, chargedi to you and you are responsible for taking care
of it and returning it when its use has been completed.

 

 

 

. ?rm,
53:19.70 
i

saw 

 

yvrsa-?Ekwq

J,

1, 1960 E-6
2, 1960 
3, 1961 F-6

f?b??g

C.

(Signature)

 

(Typed name) I


 

 

 

V4 m. . 

omoml mm no. 10 . 5010-106
. MAY "62 (omen
on Gun. no. no. 27 Tolson

 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 331:3? 7
Memorandum 
$01111?!
e!
T0 Mr. DATE- 6:17?70 Gale

 

 

Rosen
Sullivan 

Tove!
Soyors
FROM Tele. Room
2 Holmes 
Gandy 

SUBJECT: DELOACH 

 

 

 

 

 
   

SULLIVAN AND BRENNAN PROMOTED
JULY, 1970, ISSUE



i Attached are a write?up and photographs regarding
the retirement of Mr. DeLoach, the designation of Mr. W. C.
?llivan as Assistant to the Director, and the appointment of
Mr. manna; as the Assistant Director in charge of the
Domestic Intelligence Division. We plan to publish this material
in the July issue of "The Investigator, the proof copy of which is
currently being reviewed for approval.

I.


 

RECOMMENDATION:
. Kr: I
That the att?a?ched write-up be approved and expeditiously
returned to the Crime Research Section for further processing.

Eno?suxfs 1%

1 - Mr. D??foach ik 
1 - W4 Bis??gp .
1 - Mr?SMlimn Mk0

 

1 Mug-C. Brennan 
1 qu?VI. VA. Jones 
1?7
MM: mh es 
(7) Raoul. 
MM 313311911"? gm? wa? 71?:ng

 

  

.1 glib/-
an I 92 av-

"1.?th I 
CRIME $33

6 1131.: 1a,? Mm?
Lt}- 1 1970
Erin? REdem 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sumECT:



?Inspector Donahoe to sit in on the meeting as a witness.

 

 
  

N0. I0
MAY l'61 (ONION
GSA GIN. RIG. NO. 21

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT


sow-loo .

lson 

0
Add: I
Walters
Mohr



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Memorandum 
giggled?
e!

HR. TOLSON DATE: 7/2/70 ?fe

0 cc mach

C. D.LDeLoach Mr. Bishop me. Room
63:33:;

HAL 

Re Times

rCaptioned individual came to my office 7/1/70 and

asked to see me. He identified himself as a "fellow Georgian, 
from Macon, Georgia, and stated he was a reporter. Upon seeing
him he additionally stated he was with the New York Times and
that he wanted to discuss vague rumors" -he had
heard in goesip sessions with associates. At this point I asked

Mr. Rugaber stated that I was considered to be contro-
versial among his associates because I was close to the Director-~-
that the Director was considered to be conservative and
constantly talking about the dangers of communism. I asked
Rugaber what was wrong with such a philosophy and if this was
all he had to complain about. He replied that he had a number
of other minor allegations which concerned me personally. I
stated that, with reference to his "staunch conservative" charge,
while there was nothing wrong, he should know that the Director
in my opinion had always been strictly a moderate, and that I
likewise had followed and believed in his 
to what the columnists Evans and Nbvak had printed in their

 

column.

Rugaber stated he that as it may, my representation
of the Director had caused me to have personal enemies on the
outside. I replied that everyone who tries to do their Job
satisfactorily cannot possibly please every single person, and
that frankly in some instances an individuals stature was
determined by who called him an 

Rugaber asked if my wife had owned one percent in a
business office building in Arlington, Virginia in which the
FBI had once rented space. I told him that Fairfax County .
records would reflect that my wife did possess a minor one percent

1150.139 ?67-4 42; :37may;

 

 

 

w!

A

1?

it 

Mr. Tolson

ownership in one building; that, however, the FBI had never
occupied space in this building. Rugaber stated he had.checked

1Genera1 Services Administration records that afternoon and had

found this to be true, there had never been any FBI
occupancy. I told him, knowing that he undoubtedly had the
information anyhow, that the return on this investment paid
$83.34 per month, and that I was using this to supplement my
pay check in paying heavy college expenses for my children.
Rugaber stated I should forget his question; that there was

 

I

Lnothing wrong with this. -

Rugaber next stated he understood that I had been a
member of the Board of Directors of a small savings and loan
bank for a brief period of time. I stated this was true;
however, my membership had been quite brief and that I had
resigned simply because I did not have the time to attend
meetings once each month. He asked if there had been any
defalcations or embezzlement?m while I had been on the Board.
I replied in the.negative, stating that absolutely nothing had
come up and that the Board was composed of some of the most
prominent members of the business community, including Herbert
Blunck and Wayne Parrish.

The next allegation was typical of the preceding two
vague questions. Rugaber asked if I knew Victor Frenkil, the
contractor of the FBI Academy. He was told that I knew him
as a result of making a speech in Baltimore, karyland,
some years ago. Rugaber was told that I had not seen Frenkil
for approximately two years and that he was no personal friend
of mine. He was additionally told that Frenkil had never
asked'me for any favors and that I had never been of assistance
to him in any manner. Rugaber stated this answer "shot down"

 

Lthe latest"rumor'he had heard.

Rugaber stated he had one more hit of gossip he wanted
to ask me about. He added that I had probably gathered by this
time that all of these allegations were based upon an old
anonymous letter which several reporters had told him he should





 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tolson

disregard, inasmuch as it had obviously been written by a
disgruntled ex-agent who had either been fired, or else felt
he had been mistreated while in the FBI. I told Rugaber the
Director and I had both been well aware of a concerted and
prolonged "smear attack" by a well known newspaper, but that
apparently this paper had hit a dead end and had given up in
its attempts. Rugaber admitted that the allegations were
vague and, in view of my answers, apparently had no basis

in fact. He claimed that he wasn't interested in any "smear?
and that he would be stupid to write an article based upon
false allegations.

Rugaber then asked me his final question. He
inquired if I had a wealthy friend in Miami Beach, Florida,
who had been of financial assistance to my family and to me
personally. I asked him whom he meant.? He named Mr. Maurice
Gusman. I told him that the record was quite clear with
respect to Mr. Gusman. I stated that Mr. Gusman was a banker
with an unblemished reputation, whom I had known for twenty-
seven years. I stated Mr. Gusman had been quite close to me
and my family; had stayed in my home on numerous occasions,
yet the fact remained there had never been any business
transactions between us which had not been a matter of record
and which had always been completely satisfied in every respect.

Rugaber quite apologetically stated he had no further
questions and that he appreciated my forthrightness. He stated
he was completely satisfied and that he was sorry he had taken
so much time. He added that "he guessed no one could attain
high rank within the FBI without someone shooting at him."

Before leaving he stated he wanted to ask one final
question, "Would I ever consider returning to Government
service?" I told him that my immediate aim was to wind up my
affairs in my present job in good order, and that afterwards
I wanted to do the best Job possible in my new assignment;
therefore his question was moot. I added that once I got started
in my new job I doubted seriously that circumstances, financial
or otherwise, would allow a return to Government service.

Rugaber then left.

ACTION a
For record purposes.
3-

 

 

 

la (Rev. 8-11-64)

RQCEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT 
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Date 

I certify that I have received returned the following Government property for official use:

D. C. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #3129 ?10
expires 6-30-71 f?gby/

 

 

 

 

 

 

RETURNED
D. 0. OFFICIAL PARKING PERMIT #3405 (out 9-2-70 V7) FIL
expires 6-30?70 3/ 
AD Very truly yours,
The Government property which you hereb acknowledge
is char ed to you and you are responsible or taking care 8 
of it if when its use has been completed. (Signature) 
RSYNOE {?ng gauge?; chum?on IT IN ?lL 
7 (Typed name) 0' OACH
i ., 4370 

a) Mr.

efw

a lawman?Mann 

mew?w

 

 

 

Tolson
DeLoaoh
Wallets
Mohr
Bishop
?tCospe:
Callahan 
Conrad

 

 

 

 

   
 
 
 
 
   

 

 

 

Felt 

Gale
Ra sen

 

 

Sullivan 
i (-

?Eovel .
Soyazs 1; ?m

 

 

 

July 1, 1970
BY LIAISON

 

We shingion, Di: 


Dear Mr. Vice President:_

 

 

 

Thank you for your kind letter of June 26th.
It was certainly thoughtful of you to write and comment as
you did concerning the efforts of Mr. DeLoach and I am
indeed pleased to learn the} my selection of Mr. Sullivan
merits your approbation. :I'nhey share my deep gratitude
for your generous remarks regarding their work.

Sincerely yours,



11 - Mr. DeLoach - Enclosure
1 Mr. Sullivan - Enclosure

NOTE: Vice President Agnew is on the Special Correspondents List.

5

REK:sls(5) - 7W 
Vida/L) 1 .1 
536/??
Yd; "7:13
else-i ?3 

MAIL noouCIj TELETYPE 
at?? A - 5?4

IT

 

 

 




 

 

 

M: -
THE VICE 1332??! 

  

WASHINGTON Mr- 
June 26, 1970 culli 

. avel 
BY LIAISON . Soyars..__._
le. 
Miss 
Miss 

 

 

 

The Honorable J. Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Department of Justice
Washington, D. C.

 

 

 

Dear Mr. Hoover:

We have learned with regret that Cartha
eLoach is resigning from the Bureau after many
Mvoted service to our country, most re-
cently as Assistant to the Director. Please express
my appreciation to Mr. DeLoach for the fine support
and c00peration which he has extended to my office
over the past seventeen months.
Your selection of William Sullivan as ?7
[your new assistant seems an excellent choice. His

af?x/long years of experience in upholding the law of the



l? 'o serve you and the Bureau Well in his

?3 i . .
important new p051t10n.
9n.
n! mg?; I

Sincerely,

?c
Li
4rd




 

 

 

 

 

 

7 - 

..J

f/xw/

Pauli: 
j?omv Asiecm?rzs


FFIOM THE 

MUTE. Thompson?? guru President

Wilmington Police Department

0, Box 1810 - . .
Wilmington, North Carolina

   
  
   
  
   
   
  

 

   
     
   
   

writ: . m. 

 

Mr. Edge;- Hoover?, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Justice Building
Washington, D. C.

 

  

 

 


A

SJ ammMr. Tolsan. ?4
Mr. 

Mr. Walters
M. Mohr7z
Bisho ., 1


 

. Casper
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. Felt
Mr. Gale
Mr. Rosen
Mr. Sullivan
Mr. Tavel.
Mr. Soyars
July 14., 1970 7 Tale. Room

'Miss 
Miss >Gandy

 

i

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(DePoacha Associate Director 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
United States Department of Justice

Washington, D. G. 2?
Dear Mr. DeLoach: 

 

 

 

. 
The North Carolina Chapter, F.B.I. National Academy Associates, 
join together'in wishing you well as you bring a brilliant career to 
a close with the?Federal Bureau of Investigation on July 20, 1970. 2 
As this date is also your birthday, {we feel it appropriate to 1&5 
send you a product from our great state of North Carolina. Please t3 0
accept this "Old Fashion Country Ham" as a token of our appreciation 1'
for a job well done. - a 
We wish you success and happiness as you assume your new position. - 
May God continue to bless you and your family. if? - 
SincerelyThompson, Jr.
President

 

 

1 A I 9? 
CEr/JUL122 197: *4 xi

55 (Rev. 3-31-64) 

RECEIPT FOR GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

7/30 /70

I certify that I have received returned the following Government property for official use:

Datgeturned
with Case, #2138 - to be mounted and presented to r. Loach
L/?w 70Commission Card with Case #11 ?441
#9 7Q Manual of Rules Regulations #9
7:6/7P4Manual of Instructions 5815

7?777Agents Brief Case 

7?ay703tpper Brief Case (?555
?Colt Official Police Revolver #636579
7/6/70

Hip Holster
Handbook #987

    
  

"xvdapter
I??70/Defense Plans Manual #128
Inspecgors Manual #255
7/76/70inspectors Manual (Field) #816
t/SuperviSOrs Manual #139
Identification Card lh153
7/6/7998mith-Corone Par-table Typewriter 
Cal. Detective Special Revolver ##57370
IMHolster and Adapter for above
7/m370~4Pbsition Classification Manual #72
.L/7G?Foreign Operations Policy Manual 

72/57 7g-5th Floor Master Key Vii

 

6 M?Parking Permit Space #93, USDJ Garage

7 I-NKD. C. OffiCial Parking Permit 3&65 
7Winspectors Manual, Foreign Offices #5
~The CP Line July 1963 to Dec. 1963 Copy 6h A (H 
of Central Research Section Mbnographs" Copy 33 7
mMonograph-"The Communist Party Line 1/62-6/62" cp. 1u1 (62 lhl) 2
Monograph-"Labor Racketeering? Section 1 thru eBank Robbery monograph, 63PM
Who' Who of National Leaders,.CPUSA copy 5

 
  
 
 
 
 

 

   
  

exemption certifica te V4zavib-f?f?7'



READ

The Government property which you hereby acknowledge
is charged to you and y0u are responsible for taking care

 

 

 

 

 

of if and returning it when its use has been completed. . . 7 . .
(Slgnature) .
DO NOT .MARK oR OR MUHLATEITIN 
ANYWA 
Cartha Dekle De Leach

L9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

2c4n~17


5?52 January, 1969.

Dear z?jj??z2 

I understand that your assistant Mr. Gartha D. DeLoach
will have completed twenty five years service with your Bureau
at the end of January.

I wish to commend and congratulate Mr. DeLoach for
his long service and dedication to his work in the Federal
Bureau of Investigation.

It is men of quality and I am sure Mr. DeLoach has
these attributes, who devote their life to their work and
become a pillar of your world famous Bureau.

Would you be good enough to pass on to Mr. DeLoach
my sincere congratulations on reaching his 25th anniversary
of service under your comand.
as.

a,

With my best wishes, :i?ggi.

Kind regards,




4 

 

 

 

 

. u)
The Honorable J. Edgar Hoover, K.B.E., . 
Director,
Federal Bureau of Investigation,

WASHINGTON. 25 

1
comj?emme 3?39 9 

 

gm 1,3? $7l5?5?5

b7D

<4

 

 

-..-.. 25;; 

P:



 

 

OFFICE OF DIRECTOR



FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

MR.
um-reo STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

January 27, 1969 MR. CALLAHAN

The attached letter regarding

Mr. DeLoach's 25th Anniversary MR. 1'

in the Bureau ent to the
Director ironI I

age/?aw Qt?w #49

MR. 70 .74.
LOACH

MB. 

 

MR. CONRAD
MR. FELT
MR. GALE

 


a: 

MR. 

I


ROOM

?5 

 

 

MRS. METCALF

 

   

MISS GANOY 

?ui


nm 

   

 

 
 

59379 - 
FM (761969 5

 



 

b7D

 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET
l210789-0

Total Deleted Page(s) 2 4
Page 275 b6;

Page 276 b6;

Page 277 b6;

Page 305 Referral/Consult;



Deleted Page(s) 
No Duplication Fee 
For this Page 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agent Cover Sheet for File4-356 (Rev. 12-20-67in?v": 
Name 1. H, w- 1 - 
CARTHA DEKLE Date Grade Salary
EOD Clerk 7'
8/31/42 HUT 6F 8331717513 12/17/67 ME 23, 000
EOD Special Agent 
12/14/42 2/23/69 36?,?000
7/31/70 YRS .
17' A m'rvp mu 1- WITCH
Social Security Number m? mu? '5 ?n un?m?vu?
259-09?7925
Office Date
TO THE DIRECTOR 12/31/65
7/31 /7u
RETTREMEWWL VRS. INVEEIG. TIVE
EWNCE)

PERMANENT BRIEFS AND SECURITY REVIEWS
Perm. Brief Security Rev. Date Name of Bricfcr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- - 41' ?gs-w 1
. 

4-356 (Rev. 10-15-56) - . 
. Jr 

ASSIGNMENT HISTORY 0? . Date PERMANENT BRIEFS

 

 

 

CARTHA DEKLE DELQACH 7? 2 ~59 ADDED FDH/dar'

 

 

 

 

 

ENTERED 0N DUTY AT D.C. l?wf?a?? 111;" ([3606
ON DECEMBER 14, 19112 3--2-65 fdded 8; Sec. Chk. L. Teg
VIM
0m? Date {72 Added 8c 360470 .13. Tag

 

 

INSPECTOR RECORDS 
COMMUNICATIONS #2 MAN 3~15~54

INSPECTOR IN CHARGE

 

 

 

 

CRIME RECORDS DIV. 1-28~59
DESIGN AS DIR. 4?7-59

 

 

 

 

TO THE DIRECTOR 12-31-65

 

 

 

 

 

CAP-9 .EHTRAHCE SALARY $32005
SALARY CHANGES 

 

 

 

?1

Date Grade Scliary

 

 

10-26-5527GS-15 $10,800

 

 

 

 

4-25-54 03?15 $113050
3-13-55 GS-15 $11,800

 

 

10?23-55 03?15 $12,150
4?21-52 05-15 $12,420
3 1-12?58 68-15 $13,670
7 7?13?55 03-16 $14,190
?7-13-59 03-17 $15,375
7-10?60 03?17 $16,530
7-13-60 03?18 $18,500
662/? 902000

. ?n 
AAII)

1 74:42 5-4? 560
?2533721?
'u2L?iiss? 2.0 ?26, 006 

. if? NG 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

   
 

 

  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

wa?g??
A ?a 
i1 ?1 \s
111111.434 1 (F151. 
. 1 mg ?1 .1 ?I?m ?9 ?3ng a/?E?f 1- whhR153 ?71%%199 1121) 1111:-1 
kg - 4-4
:E?Slc MENT HISTORY or: CARTHA DEKLE DmmiiCH
71/1 9: 
711% idf/?i?fgw ,r
ERTERED ON DUTY AT C. 1 1942

  

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 11?? 
WMgae/?yegIdi/?t?
I, 7 #1152, 114;? 63OFFICE UL 3195535 gi?1AR?1 
'1 ?1.90 5
School 1 12"i??42 ?1.11; $3 fig)! g?e? - 
5 . SALARY
Norfolk 3?30- 3 (9 35% 
1 6..
Cleveland 8- 1-131. 1-1 641% 7 7/ $3500
Resident Agent 11-2?44 LEAVE met-?How PAY
a Akron 2-15-44 7?1?45 1 CAP-10
.: 7-2?45 
vm WITHOLHETPAV 11-9-44 4-1-46 RETURNED T0
11- 
RETURNED T0 DUTY 4W 7 46 1?
'9 7'14?46 
{Cleveland 2?3 __417 A 
Resident Agent. 7-11-48 0531.12
Akron, 5-15-46 3.3.43 GAE-12
- - 744-47 1-23-49 19:
1 ?15 Dinszon Fa. . 1 1 10-30-149 
*1 1 10?111-51 2-5?50 63-12
896% mug 9-17"50 
ng?ilsgong gr: Inspection 12 '19 ?11 11-26150 Gs-13
Mr. Tolson's Office 10-19-53 w? hzg5-51 Gs'lh
ngEgords 8c Communicati :51 5 
man to Mr. Natcho 33-1? -, (121165333? @3111),

m4? 
1948 EXCELLENP 
i k) i
w;
1 11 ?153;
1.: WW1,
1 1 1 :1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{P.F. - 25
NAME CARTHA DEKLE DELOACH .

8?31-42 ENTERED 0N DUTY Permanent DATE EFFICIENCY RATING
3-31-42 Fingerprint Classifier
1.
8-31~42 WHERE ASSIGNED Identification
ENTRANCE GRADE ENTRANCE SALARY
$1440
SALARY CHANGES
TESTS
DATE STENOGRAPHIG TYPING TELETYPE DATE GRADE SALARY

 

 

Entrance

 


17'

 

 

 

 

 


Hm


 

 

 

300- CID i

  

0/5
5?33 $3 

[0x 

?nu-nu .

 

ASSISTA DIRECTOR C.D. DE LOACH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 
   

 

Cw?rka 02 K/e.

. -


99? 

   



  

 

 

I
?36? you '40- I0

SE3.

'3 I solo-we
MAY "62 tomeoNrrED STATES GOVERNMENT
Memorandum

TO :Mr. Callahan

FROM :Ht N. Bassett

DEKLE DE LOACH

Former Assistant to the Director

veteran
(Retired 7/31/70)

Entered on Duty

Appointed Special Agent
Reported to Field
Military Leave

Retired

Last Salary (no grade)
Last Salary Change

Age 

Place of Birth

Marital Status
Education

Member of Bar

Language Ability

Last Performance Rating

Office of Preference since'5/67

  

 

. Felt
. Mohr 
. Rosen
. Bates
. Bishop

 

 

 

 

. Callahan 
. Campbell 
. Casper 
. Cleveland 
. Conrad 

DATE: 6/20/72

 

 

   

 
 
 


a

 

 

Sfucler?l I 
8/31/h2 - Fingerprint 
Classifier

7/31/70

$36,000

2/23/69 Basic Increase
51 Born 7/20/1929
Claxton, Georgia
Married - 7 Children
Bachelor of Arts Degree
Attended Law School
None 

None

OUTSTANDING (3/31770)
FBI Headquarters

 

Firearms Ability Qualified
Outstanding Endorsers None
Relatives in Bureau None
Offices of Assignment:
assigned \Norfolk
8/l/h3 reported Cleveland
2/16/h4 Resident Agent Akron, Ohio
11/2/?4 Military Leave
n/l/NG Returned to Duty Cleveland
5/13/h6 Resident Agent Akron, Ohio
7/1u/u7 reported Security Division
12/10/51 Inspector Training Inspection Division
10/19/ 3 Inspector Mr. Tolson's Office
3/15/5 Man Office of Assistant to the
Director (Records 
Division)
1/28/59 Inspector in Charge Crime Records Division
n/7/59 Assistant Director Crime Records Division
12/31/65 Assistant to the Director
7/31/70 retired f3 
LLD/pdf (2) a 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cartha Dekle DeLoach
4-10?67

 

 



z. 

?5

k?
?W-r ?Ivav?



 

 

 



At the conclusion of his training school, Mr. Clegg advised he presented a good youthful .,
appearance, talked with a southern accent, was a little slow in absorbing the course mat-4
erial at the outset of thercourse, but later had absorbed the material in a satisfactory
manner, he was sincere, conscientious, reliable, very enthusiastic, and he definitely needed
contacts to round him out and with a little more than average supervision he should develop
into a good Agent. 

On 3-30-43, he was assigned to the Norfolk Division. 7
His SAG advised he presented a neat appearance, was very personable, was above average in
aggressiveness and resourcefulness, accomplished a good volume, was very interested in his
work, and for an Agent of his experience exhibited a good knowledge of the Bureau's juris?
?diction and functions. He was a good dictator, made good contacts. possessed energy and
force, and should develop into a better than average Special Agent.

011 8-1-43, he was transferred to the Cleveland Division.

Effective 1-16?44, he was reallocated to Grade $3500 per annum. On 2-16-44, he; was
designated Resident Agent at Akron, Ohio. 
His SACs advised he was industrious, interested in his work}, learned quickly, profited by
his mistakes, possessed judgment and initiative, presented a neat appearance, performed an
above-average volume, presented an aggressive, forceful manner, had confidence in himself,
handled firearms well, and was temperamentally suited for dangerous assignments, had oper-
ated very capably on physical surveillances, was considered a capable witness and his con-
tacts with law enforcement officers and business men had been good. He accepted willingly.
and discharged responsibility with less than average supervision, was considered a good
dictator, he had spent five months on technical surveillances and had performed in a very
efficient fashion and he was progressing satisfactorily.

0n 4~l3~44, due to his age the Bureau advised they could no longer request further occu-
pational deferment; 11.111st at which time he applied for a commission in the Navy. On
8?21?44, he was advised the Bureau could not assist him in obtaining his commission. He

5

was placed oniilitamjeave without pay on 11-2-44. .3 1 i 12.,

01 his cease duty efficiency rating SAC Fletcher rated him VERY GOOD and advised he present-
ed a good personal appearance, had exhibited the proper amount of initiative, resourceful-
ness, force and aggressiveness, exercised good judgment, was rated a very good dictator,
the only criticism was that We due to his southern accent.
He was considered a capable witness, handled fire in a proficient manner, operated on .
physical surveillances in a very good manner, his reports were well organized and logical

and cmtained less than average amount of error, and he organized and initiated investi-
gations, accepted and discharged responsibility with practically no supervision.
I I I ?Iu

He reinrnedJoMy at the_0l_eyeland Division Military Leave without pay on 
during which time he progressed in $3500 per annum in Grade GAE-10, to $4080
in? Grade due to a basic increase,in_pay effective 7?1-45 and ar promotion under the
provisions of the Uniform Promotion Act effective 7-2-45. -

On 5?13-46, he was designated Resident Agent at Akron, Ohio.



 

 

 

 

 

In April-May, 1946, he attended "In-Service lIraining.

0n 6-18-46. SAC O'Connor rated him EMBLEM and advised he had displayed a very fine attitude,
being definitely interested, resourceful, ambitious, conscientious and aggressive, he exercised
very good judgment, was extremely cooperative, he had above average proficiency in the use

i of firearms, his reports reflected good working knowledge of the Manuals and policies of the

1 Bureau, his paper work required a minimum amount of supervision, and reflected above-average

volume of production. He could get along extremely well with police officers and businessmen

1 and had their confidence and cooperation. Due to the basic increase in pay effective 7-1-46,

9 his salary was increased to $4651.20 per annum in Grade GAE-10, and on 7-14-46, he was

reallocated to Grade per annum.

During an Inspection of the Cleveland Office in November, 1946, Inspector McKee advised he

made a good appearance, impressed one as being intelligent, interested and alive, azri his

prospects for development were very good.

1 On 12-16-46, his SAC was advised he was an approved Bureau ?speake

I

On 1-24-47 SAC Richardson rated him EXCELIEM and said he had an excellent attitude, was
aggressive and ambitious, very cooperative, was an excellent investigator, his reports 
quired a minimum amount of supervision, reflected careful thought and skill in preparation,
he did an above?average volume, he was very effective in his contacts, his performance of
his own work definitely indicated he had latent supervisory ability.

0n 2-3-47 he was reallocated to Grade GAE-12, $5905.20 per annum.

   
 
 
  
    
  
 
   
   
  
   
 
 
 
 
 
  

0n 93-27-4th a letter from the Dire ctor, he was come nied for the excelle at mrfomed
by him. in connection with the Ear gradit? 11gb case involving one Harry David Bechtel.

On 3-31-17 sec Richardsonrated him veg: coon and said that the 'oome'nts contained in the
Special efficiency rating of 1-24-47 still held true and in addition he was considered a 
competent Bureau witness, and had performed satisfactorily on physical surveillances.

 

b6

 

-28- Agent Deloach while driving a Bureau car was involved in an accident with one I
about two miles east of Welli o'ton Ohio; The accident resulted in damage to the Bureau
car estimated at $230 and damage to car consisted of a bent tail pipe only. An attempt
was made to collect the cost of the Bureau car from the third person. However, subsequently,
the Department informed the Bureau that it was their opinion that Agent Deloach was guilty
3 of contributory negligence in the captioned accident, and therefore, a suit against thet third\
party was not warranted, and this case should be considered as closed.

0n 744-47 SAC Richardson rated him EXCELLENT and said he was one of the very best police
contacts in the area. It was noted that the Akron Police Department had exhibited the most
cooperative spirit during re?ent months and the Chief of Police had nominated five of his
police officers for attendance at the FBI National Academy, one was to be in attendance at the
next session and three had already graduated, this fine record was attributable in a large
measure to the work of Agent Beloach. He was untiring in his efforts to do a good job and the
results, as a whole, reflected an above?average performance, his reports were carefully
prepared, reflecting good organization and skillful investigation; he did an above-average
volume of work and was diligent in meeting office and Bureau deadlines. 1.?Jhile he had had no
opportunity to demonstrate supervisory ability, the administration of his cases by him re?
flected that he possessed latent ability. With the enthusiasm for the work possessed by

him, it was felt that he would continue to develop.

On 7444- 57.1m- mg traneW?si at of Goverme .
I On 11-22-47 Hr. Keav rated hmmcEmeg 

 

  

was a very conscientious and thorough 

 

tabAgent; he _had taken hold of his work well and had made excellent progress as a Supervisor.
His paper work had been very satisfactory and he had organized his work well. His out-
standing characteristic was his excellent attitude; he showed an intense interest in the
Bureau's work and made a serious approach to it and he produced an excellent volume of work.
He presented an excellent appearance, always dressed neatly and it was thought that he
would make a very favorable impression on persons outside the Bureau. He had a very a
pleasant personality, showed enthusiasm at all times and cooperated well. It was thought
he had considerable supervisory ability.

During an mspection of the Security Division in February, 19118, the Inspector (G. L.
Carroll) said that he made a good appearance, handled himself well during an interview

and had a pleasant personality. He appeared interested in the Bureau's work and indicated
that in the future he would like to be considered for training as a Firearms Instructor and
a Police Instructor. He appeared to be intelligent and conscientious; his prospects for
the future appeared to be good and his rating in dictation ability by the stenographers

was Very Good. .

On~ 3131/118 Hr. Keay rated him EXCELLENT and said he was a conscientious, sincere, and
capable Agent. He showed commendable initiative and intense interest and had demonstrated
that he was ambitious to- progress in the Bureau. His paper work had been very satisfactory
and he was an excellent dictator. He was rated excellent on his field work during the

year and he had indicated that he had both administrative and executive ability. He made
an excellent appearance and made a favorable inmression on persons outside the Bureau; he
was enthusiastic, had a pleasant personality, and got along well with other personnel.

In March, 191:8 Hr. Keay submitted 
WWO be prospects for long range development as Special

Agents in Charge or Assistant Special Agents in Charge.

On a special efficiency report in March, 191:8, Hr. Wall rated him EXCELLENT and said his

work had been exceptionally good in every respect; he was conscientious, loyal and had an
excellent attitude. He made a fine personal appearance, was friendly and cooperative and

was well liked by his fellow employees.

011 7/1l/h8, his salary was increased to $6235.20 per annum due to an increase in basic
pay, and on 8/8 /h8 he was afforded a UPA promotion to 361171;. 60 per annum.

By memorandum dated 11/2h/h8, initialled by Mr. Ladd, Mr. Keay recommended that this agent
be reallocated to grade It was pointed out that, although he would not normally
be eligible for reallocation, he was handling liaison work with the Central Intelligence
Agency and the Navy Department, and the other liaison agents were in grade 13. He was
considered for reallocation on 11/30/118; however, it was recommended that no further action
be taken at that time inasmuch as he had not been a Special Agent for ten years, had been
assigned to administrative supervisory duties only since July, 19147, and had received a
rating of only VERY GOOD on his 1911? annual efficiency report.

0n 1/ 23/119 he received a meritorious increase to $67111 per annum in Grade for his
outstanding liaison work.

He attended an In-Service Training Course at the Seat of Government from February 7 to
February 18,191.59, during which time he was afforded training in inspection procedures,
and it was believed that he was well qualified to assist on inspections. 

I

 

 

 

 

 

   

.-

On 3/31/h9 Mr. Keay'rated and said he had innctioned as a Liaison Agent hand-
ling our relations udth the Navy Department and the Central Intelligence Agency during the
past year. He had been outstandingly successful in his liaison work, had shown commendable
interest in his work, had demonstrated proper initiative, and had been alert to the best
interests of the Bureau. 
the_highest officials oi the agencies he hand;gd, he had acquired an excellent knowledge
of the Bureau's policies and his paper work had been satisfactory. He had indicated adminis-
trative and executive ability. He made a favorable impression and had an enthusiastic and
pleasant personality; 

 
 

During an Inspection of the Security Division in June, l9h9, Inspector Gurnea said he 
presented an excellent, businesslike appearance and had an above average personality. He
expressed himself very well and conducted an above average interview. He impressed the
Inspector as being very familiar with the Bureau's liaison problems and obviously protected
the Bureau's interests when contacting other agencies. He . 
ever for CIA he Loontagts gpccessful 1n deveIOping
. Summarily, the Inspector was rather impressed w1th
this *upervisor, and it was believed he was ASAC material and capable of continuing +0

advance himself in the Bureau's service. g: per OGA

 
    



 

 

 

 

By memorandum dated T/lh/h9, Mr. Keay advised of a request issued to the Bureau

 

 

 

By letter commended for Jhe during the
repent National AcademM Retra1n1ng 5e331on in organizing and conducting the teur3~for wives
egg guests to the Naval Academy and the Naval Gun Factory.

-nvm

 

AS'the result of a basic salary increase effective 10/30/h9, his ealary was increased to
$6800 per annum in Grade 03?12.

On 2/5/50 he received a Uniform Promotion to $7000 per annum in Grade GSan.



On 3/31/50 Mr. Keay rated him EXCELLENT and stated during the past year he had been assigned
as a Liaison Agent. He handled relations with the Navy Department  b3 per OGA



 

 

 

 



   

133 per OGA

I as well as doing other miscellaneous liaison
tasks. In September, l9h9, he assisted in making arrangements to handle the
entertainment of wives and visitors in cannection with the National Academy
Retraining Session. He was highly praised for his handling of this situation
and it was commented that he paid close attention to details and had a deep
sense of responsibility; He was the type of Liaison Agent who displayed a
great deal of initiative was constantly proposing new ideas and was very
alert to situations involving the interests of the Bureau, He had been
successful in maintaining friendship-with the highest officials of the
agencies with which he had worked on a liaison basis. 'He had made excellent
progress in the knowledge of Bureau policies and was a valuable liaison man.
He indicated he was desirous of progressing in the Bureau's service, was
available for transfer wherever his-services were needed, and undoubtedly 
could handle any of the Bureau's assignments. He made a good appearance at
all times, had a.rather enthusiastic, pleasant personality and as noted by 
the comments above he made a good impression on persons outside the Bureau.
He had administrative and executive ability. 

By letter dated 5-9?50, Alva J. Russell

 

 

Prosecuting Attorney for Summit

 

 

County 011 asymmetrie?an to the .Bweau?rmiiannarehaa-
Sinn_g_u Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution (Burglaryjt? b6 1
Prosecuting Attorney Russell indicated that he desired to give special bVCi

 

 

recognition to in thel 
case. One of these was EgentMgeggagh, however, SAC Abbaticchio advised the
Bureau on of the Cleveland Office reflected that the
only_work done by Agent DeLoach was to take the original complaint.

0n 7?18?50 Mr. Keay advised he was presently assigned to the Liaison Unit

of the Correlatioaniaison Section and conducted liaison with the Office

of Naval Intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency; He had received
ratings of Excellent for the past three years, was in good physical condition
and was available for transfer wherever his services were needed. He re- 
ceived'a meritorious increase in pay on 1-3-h9 for the excellent results
obtained through his liaison. He had been commended on several occasions

and Mr. Keay recommended that he be promoted to Grade GS-13 because of his
three years as a supervisor and because of his excellent performance.

9-?17- 50 

By memorandum dated 10-18229 the a
ver C. D, Liaison Agent assignEd'

. to IA, when.he saW'him withmgeneral

Smith and Mr. Ci?immi?gw?irector said H.L verses?

mun-x Vii?um"

handled himselfwin a most mature manner. He was well in?

formed on the various problems which had arisen in the past. General Smith
seemed to like Mr. DeLoach and it was apparent that Mr. DeLoach had
established a most cordial relationship. .

 

 

 

By letter dated 10/27/50 he was commended for the excellent manner in which i
he handled the recent inquiry received from General W. B. Smith of the Gene
tral Intelligence Agency relative to the interrogation of aliens domestically
by that agency.

During an inspection of the Security Division in November, 1950, Inspector
Harbolsaid he was intelligent and was ambitious to progress in the Bureau's
service. It was believed he was definitely above average and could handle the-
position of ASAC in a small office.1

On 11/26/50 he received a meritorious increase to $7800 per annum in 
in view of outstanding services performed by him in connection with his con-
tacts with other Governmental agencies and coverage of confidential security
matters of particular interest to the Bureau.

November, hours 8 minutes;
an_mpecember, 1 hour ?g minutes. 

On 3/31/51 Inspector Keay rated him SATISFACTORY and said during the past year
he had been assigned in.a liaison capacity with the Central Intelligence Agen~
cy, Navy Department, and the Marine Corps, and he was a well seasoned Agent

in this type of work. He was one of the better liaison representatives in the
Bureau and he had been unusually successful in becoming close to the top offi-
cials of the other governmental agencies. He had been commended highly by of-
ficials with whom he was in contact and his assignment at the Central Intelli~
gence Agency was meet difficult because of the number o? basically unfriendly
individuals Who worked there. He had outstanding initiative, made excellent
suggestions, had an outstanding knowledge of Bureau policies and procedures,
and had administrative and executive ability. He was definitely in the upper
third of the Satisfactory rating. 0n h/lS/Sl he was reallocated to Grade
GS-lh, $8800 per annum.

 

On h/26/Sl Mr. Ladd submitted his name for consideration on a long-range basis
for development.

By letter dated 5/29/51 he was commended for the arrangements made by him re-
lative to the use of Naval medical facilities in several of the field divi-
sions in connection with physical examinations for the Bureau's agent person-
nel on a courtesy basis.

0n uro ean ?atita9be5100n, -
WWent ?Germany.

By letter dated 6gg64?lah? agmcommended fonmthe excellent,mapnenminnwhichmhe
cgrried out his assignment relative to the 

Euro ope. 11111 MW
On 7/8/51 he received a basic salary increase to $9600 per annum in GS?lh.

By letter dated lQAlQASluheswasnadgisedithat hgmwasmpeinghdesignatedgan Inr
sp_ptor effective lO/lh/Sl, with no change in grade or salary.

 

 

 

 

1



 

 

By letter dated 11-8-51 he was commended the excellent fashion in which
he assisted in the preparation of the Central Intelligence Agency brief.

0n 12-?-51 Inspector Kegygrated him SATISEAOTDRY and said he was an aggres-
sive, alert, ambitious, and dependable Supervisor.? He had administrative
and executive ability and an excellent all?round knowledge of Bureau
procedures. 

On lg-lO-Sl he was trans?erred to the Traininaland Inspection Division as
an Ins ector. 

'On his namgmfanmcansjderation on a longurange
basis_for_development.

 

0n 2-10-52 Inspector Mason rated him SATISEAUTORY and said since his
arrival in the Training and Inspection Division, he had been engaged full
time in stat of Government surveys, recheck inspections at the Bureau and
had performed a*considerable?amount of travel in connection with special
inquiries, operating under specific orders of the Director. a

de?inite gar had 
?sati?lnatany. 

During an Inspection of the Training and Inspection Division in February,
1952, Inspector: Harbo said he was above average in appearance and personality.
He displayed tact, enthusiasm and ambition during the interview.

By memorandum dated 3-15-52 the SAC at 
many?geruwfavorable comments talks given by 
luniciE?l Group ofwthe
?ou Carolina Law En?orcement ?The
audience was composed of municipal executives and police executives?from
principal cities throughout South Carolina. 

a greatmdegl to enhance the Buggau?smpublic?relations
. ?an MW

in thatyagea.

 

 

 

0n rated him SATISFACTORY and said during a portion
of the rating period he was assigned to Liaisoniduties with the Central
Intelligence agency and discharged his responsibilities in a highly satis?
factory way. He was unusually successful in becoming close to top officials
in the Government agencies he handled and was, therefore, in a position to
dominate the situation in connection with problems arising._ As an
Inspector, his work had been very well handled. yr. DeLoach's output had
been characterized by unusually prompt handling. When hemwasmgivenaan
tackled it and ursued itrgnaciously,until??he ob?

. nW? . . 
Jective was attaine3"aQ? gogmal is cin was agghadZEEQQ?s or er ace
. I all respects
the services af DeLoach had been highly satisfactory. \Heawas ambitious
possessed of talent Eggcg would 
the qualitiEs?needed for success as an executive
and he was a distinct asset to the Training and Inspection Division. 

 

 

 

 

 

Hisudail avera'e eventim naEehnudny?ul952mwas?3mhours 6 ?minutes and
Ma

%adwvised :hatdtgis Agegzm arrived
,in the midstyo?t the completed Buffalo inspection? an ai se 
o?gthe tw Wew had recently been completed.
withuthe admi iawratuveudatailsma?wth
Ens ection reviewed memoranda and case write?upsnsubmijwtedsby??gents or
Aides and did a Wgood an active interest in the Security work

to aidm him in future inspections. 
at the gr resent time!to _start out on his own in smaller a?fices.

during the month of

1952 Ins or DeLoach erroneously neglected to record overtime
nonethnee.eceasibns. In_then 

additional oveLtime_neaonded, he averaged da ay during
the month of March, 1952.

On 7?10?52 the Director saw?lns ector DeLoach and said he was leaving to
ins eat the New Orleans and??obile 5 fives and this would be Eis Zirg?

ins ection=on his own. The Direc or outlined,to him the genera Jectives
in_soections and the need_ or thoroughness and fairness; ?Ue?oab??a 
informed the Director" a with the

necessity his travel and he wanted the Director to know he would be
available for assignment to any place at any time.

By letter dated Bud-52 he was advisedythe Bureauwwas_very much displeased
at the manner in? ti renor ine.ua i ies in' we"s ari?? of
overtime by some b? the Agents i e~Qf ice.. The in?ormation which
he [urnis elephone indicate ese
ineguali ies to the attention 0; the ents involved. The SAC had advis 
that he had done so, and it appeared t%at he didmn?t oascertain the full
~facts?with' respect"to this situation during the inspection. Information
furnished by him by telephdne, therefore, was incomplete and inaccurate.
It obtain from the SAC in?ormation
wo er iscusSed inequa i?ies i??bver'ime with the Agents
invo entsn ice concerning over_ime. ?paramvunt?tm=??
portance the . nspector be accura in a 1 reports submitted to the
Bureau. lhe Bureau was embarrassed by his failure to ascertain all the
7 facts and report them?fully to the Bureau in his preliminary?report made

by telephone and it was mandatory that these fundamental and elementary
requirements be met at all times in the future.

 

 
 

    

 
 
    

 
 
   

    
 
   

   
  

 
 
      

 
 
  

.His ovggtime Apr August, 1952, was 5 hears dBAminutesf
On 10-12-52 he received a Uniform Promotion to $9800 per annum in 68?14.
On lag-26852 he was reallocated to Grade 03?145, #10, 800 per annum.?

 

 

 

 

1

By letter dated 12/29/52 he was his tive on-the-spot
supervision af the location and apprehension af and
another subject af an Interstate Transportation 0 Stolen Meter Vezicle

case.

 

 

oncerned over the fact that he spent last week end in washington without
prior Bureau authority and while Special Agents assigned to him were in
[Boston without the supervision oj?an Inspector. The Bureau was fully
aware that it was necessary fer him to take a train.from Savannah to
washington on Friday, February 27th, inasmuch as there were no available
air accommodations, and the Bureau understood that he did not plan in
advance to remain over in washington. However, he stayed in washington
from 9:30 Saturday, February 28th, until 4:50 a.m.,.Honday,.uarch
2; 1953, without the Bureau's being aware of his location and presuming
that he was in Boston. Although he had secured permission to proceed to
Georgia, he had no authority to spend two days in thhington under the
ctdcumstances. 

?Fy letter dated 3/5/33 he was advised that the Bureau was very much
0

 

By letter dated 3/9/53 he was his,fine anatheuspot supervision
af the apprehension I. 0. Fugitive and subject oJ?a b6
Unlawful Flight to Avoid Confinement - Armed Robbery case. b7C

 

During the Inspection cf the Training and Inspection Division in March,

1953, um. during the past several months he had been engaged
exclusively in?field inspection assignments, each of which had been

handled adequately and he had done a thorough, conscientious job. He had
shown a great deal cf initiative in taking the leadership oj?dangerous
assignments which had arisen during the course oJ?his field inspections.

He had learned quickly as an Inspector, he showed above average intelligence,
and in all respects his services were entirely satisfactory. 

By letter dated 3/22/53 he was the splendid work which he
did in identifying a.female clerical employee oj?the Chicago Q?fice who
admitted having advised an unauthorized individual that certain informa-
tion was contained in the files cf the Chicago Office.

\On 3/31/53 Assistant Director clegg rated him SATISFACTORY and said his

services had been quite satisfactory, he had progressed immensely and he
had demonstrated his capability to handle some cf the more involved
and complex inspections. Em had already inspected some af the larger
a?fices such as Boston and Cleveland and he had handled several complex
special inquiries involving personnel situations or unusual departures from,
Bureau regulations. He had the ability to report his work clearly and
concisely and his paper work was generally very well prepared. His work
appeared to be accurate, comprehensive and thorough. He had progressed in
a highly satisfactory faShion as a field inspector and it was believed that
despite the already rapid progress noticed in the past, he would continue
to progress even more and would become mqre valuable to the Bureau in
the.future. He was an excellent dictator.

 

le_ll;

 

 

 

   

His daily average overtime.for.uarch, 1953 was 6 hours 1 minute. His daily
average overtime.for April, 1953 was 2 hours 25 minutes.

By letter dated 5/29/53 he was oeusvnep in connection with an inquiry made
by him concerning allegations cf improper activities on the part of 
af the Atlanta Division during their investigation af an Interstate b7c
Transportation of Stolen Property Act case in whichl I
was a suspect, it had been noted that a memorandum submitted by him covering
the results af his inquiry was inadequate in that there were certain
deficiencies in the presentation and previous questions were not completely
resolved by him. Consequently, it was necessary.for the Bureau to have
additional inquiries made in order to secure.full details as to the search
why the agents requestedl lpermission to

search the suspect's home when Bureau instructions stated that a wife

can not grant such authority.for her husband, why the social security card
was taken,from why his handwriting specimens were not sent to the
,Laboratory and what was meant by a statement in his memorandum to the

e?fect that a police sergeant had been instructed by?a police detective to
give the Bureau Agents all assistance in the case including ?taking him
upstairs if necessary." It was also necessary to subsequently ascertain
executed a waiver of search for the premises and
whether the suspect had been asked to execute such a waiver as well as
several other unanswered questions which became apparent when the facts

were reviewed at the Bureau. These omissions on his part caused an
unnecessary delay in the,final handling of this matter and also necessitated .
additional work which should have been completed by him.

 

 

By memorandum dated 6/8/53 from ur. Clegg to ur. Tolson, he advised that
following the Detroit inspection, Inspector DeLoach recommended a letter of
work performed in Detroit by Inspector's
Aide of the Chicago Division. DeLoach dictated 15
Inspector's aides personnel write-ups on Sunday 5/17753, in Birmingham
Alabama. They were transcribed by Birmingham stenographer Tuesday, 5/39/53.
At this time a letter of commendation was attached to the personnel write-
up however, the letter of commendation was left undated. .Hr.
leson noted on the yellow copy of the letter of commendation, ?Why the
delay in handling this?" DeLoach dictated on the Detroit inspection all day
Saturday and Sunday May 16 and 173 1953. There were 26 case write-ups to
dictate upon, in addition to the synopns memorandum to.Hr. Tolson and the
letter concerning the inspection to the Special Agent in Charge. Letters
qr censure and letters af commendation were left undated so that the date
could be placed thereon when they were forwarded from the Bureau to the

designated employees. In view of the necessity of di tatin a 34- a 
report regarding the mishandling of?a case entitled 4 I
Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property? in Atlanta, and in view of
the necessity of investigating an anonymous letter incident in the
Birmingham Division, DeLoach did not finish dictation of the Detroit
inspection until wednesday, 5/27/53. The Detroit report was completely

correlated and mailed to the Bureau as of the night of Thursday, 5/28/53.

 

 

 

 

 

.the Special Agent in Charge. In connection with these facilities he reported

 

 

 

   

Mr. Clegg had issued instructions to all Inspectors that they should not
report inspection work on a piecemeal basis. The complete results, for
purposes of proper coordination must be sent into the Bureau all at one time.
There was therefore a necessity for delaying the forwarding of the Detroit
inspection until all matters had been completed. No administrative action
was taken against Mr. DeLoach in connection with this delay in view qf the
circumstances. -

By letter dated 7-9-53 he was CENSURED in connection with the inspection of
the Birmingham Q?fice. He included in the administrative data under the 
caption of f?ant Informants a reference to those facilities deemed vital by

a failure to indicate the identity of the interested agency and the agency
having security responsibility. Inasmuch as these facilities were declared
vital by the Special Agent in Charge, it was not possible or practical to
endeavor to show the responsible agency. As he knew, these plants were
selected by the Special Agent in Charge on the basis of potential value of
the plants in connection with any possible future national emergency. It
was essential that Inspectors befmeticulously.accurate in presenting their
findings, in offering constructive criticism, and in issuing instructions to
Special Agents in Charge. It was realized that this error was primarily
attributable to a special Agent who assisted him on the inspection; however,
inasmuch as he was in charge af the inspection he must bear the reSponsibility
of any errors resulting. 

By letter dated 7-29?53 he was COMMENDED inasmuch as he devoted three hours'
of his time on sunday prior to changing trains for a quick check of certain
matters in the New Orleans Q?fice. Ihe Director stated in his note that he
was very glad to have Inspector DeLoach?s views concerning the administration
of the New Orleans Division and further that he hoped that he would be con-
stantly alert to provide the Director with his frank observations concerning 
any and all phases of the Bureau?s work whenever occasions presented them-
se ves.

On August 31, 1953, the Director saw him, at which time Mr. DeLoach stated he
had a personal problem which he wanted to advise the Director 0J3 although he
was not making any specific request. He stated that as an Inspector he had
been on the road for extended periods of time and that his wife had been in
ill health, having lost considerable weight; and his latest child, who was

1? months old, practically did not know him because of his long absences from
the city. He was hopeful that if there was any work to which he might be as-
signed that would keep him at one place for a while he might be considered for
it. lhe Director inquiredi as to whether he wished to be considered the
position of SAG in one of the field a?fices because if he did the Director
-would endeavor to make the assignment upon the next vacancy. The Director
pointed out, however, that this would necessitate his moving from washington

 

. the Georgia Peace Q?ficers Association. It was evident that ur. DeLoach was

 

   

to whatever field office in which there might be a vacancy. .ur. DeLoach said
he had bought a home in thhington and he would suffer a financial loss if he
endeavored to sell it at that time. The Director told him that, consequently,
the Director assumed he did not? wish:u?sr an assignment to the field as an

8A0 at that time but that his problem would be kept in.mtd and if there were
any special assignments at Whehington to which he might be detailed that would
enable him to be in this area for some little while, his case would be given
careful consideration. His attitude was excellent and he was merely endeavor-
ing to set forth a personal problem which was confronting him.

On 10-19-53 he was transferred to ur. Tolson?s Q?fice and on his transfer re-
port em. Mbson rated him and remarked that during the rating
period he had served as Inspector in charge af various inspections af?field
divisions and he had inspected several of the larger field divisions; he also
conducted an inspection of the Records and Communications Division. He assist
ed in the training af a new Inspector. He conducted several inquiries involv?
ing rather delicate investigations and handled such with dispatch, a?fective-
ness and a?ficiency. In a summary af his career in the Training and Inspec-
tion Division, it was commented, among other things, that he very rapidly and
with vigor assumed his responsibilities and embarked upon a period af reorient
ation as to field techniques and operations, many of which had never previous-
ly come to his personal attention. He discharged his assignments with intel-
ligence, good judgment and vigor. The mistakes he had made in judgment had
been relatively minor in that they did not seriously jeopardize his very favor
able performance. He made an above average personal appearance, had an excel-
lent personality and in all respects fulfilled each of those points expected
by the public of an FBI representative. He was available special and
general assignment, although he preferred duty in Washington, D. 0. He was
equipped mentally, physically and through experience to handle personally mat~
ters of great delicacy involving the Bureau?s relations within or without the
organization. He was competent, capable, conscientious and as an Inspector
had contributed greatly to the success of the Inspection Programvduring his
service in that Division.

By letter dated 10-23?53 he was common!) and the Director stated that he felt
that Mr. DeLoach represented the Bureau most creditably at the convention of

aware of the importance of full cooperation between the Bureau and state and
local law enforcement agencies, and he discharged his responsibilities admira?
bly in further promoting jnendly relations with these groups and also in em-
plaining the Bureau's position in regard to certain investigative matters
under its jurisdiction.

0n 1243-53 ur. rated him SATISFACTORY and pointed out that he had taken
over the work formerly handled by Mr. Trotter and also assisted yr. Trotter in
the handling of the review of memoranda and correspondence from the investiga-

 

 

 

 

   

tive divisions. He had entered upon his new duties with enthusiasm and thus
far had handled his work in an excellent manner. He had demonstrated a con-
siderable amount of initiative in the handling af his work and in his'review
of memoranda and mail had exhibited excellent insight into the Bureau 3 work
and his judgment had been very sound. He was regarded as an excellent emplomw

By letter dated 1-29-54 he was awarded his Ten-Year service Award Key.

On his 1954 annual report.Mr. Bohr rated him SATLSEAOTORY and said he
handled all af the various duties in.Mr. Tolson's q?fice in an above average
manner. He showed an excellent aptitude handling all of the various
,problems that came up in connection with his work, was enthusiastic, ener-
getic and industrious. Based on the work in that q?fice, as well as his
previous work in the Training and Inspection Division he was entitled to a
rating of excellent. He had had considerable ability along executive and
administrative lines. He was extremely loyal to the Director and the Bureau
and it was felt he had excellent potentialities for further advancing in

the Bureau?s service.

On 3-15-54 he was transferred to the Records and Communications Division as
#2 Man to MT. Nichols. 



?On 4-25-54 he received a Unijbrm Promotion to $11,050 in Grade 

By letter dated 9?9-54 he was the excellent?fashion in which
he discharged his assignment during the convention cf the American Legion.

Memorandum?from Nichols to ur. Tolson dated 9?8-54 which by

.ur. DeLoach set?forth certain information in regard to the inquiry as to
just what was being done regarding contacting organizations holding con-
ventions in D. 0. to take FBI toursP, This memo set.forth steps which had
been taken in this regard and stated that itiwas not.felt we were su?fering
.from a public relations standpoint.from.failure to contact convention com-
mittees relative to our tours; that if desired we-wb?ld, of course, issue
blanket invitations to all groups. NW. Tolson noted, "we certainly should
have contacted this particular group." (fefertingtto 
Society of Clinical Pathologists). The Director noted, ?No one suggested that
we issue any "blanket anvxtattanseh?? All I have asked is to have intelli-
gents selective invitations issued. If Nichols a?fice canft or want do this
then transfer the project to Harbo's Q?fice.?

It a Memorandum dated 9?24-54 to.Hr. Tolson, NW. Nichols advised that he had
reviewed the tour situation, particularly with reference to inviting conven-
tion delegates and he had gone over with.?essrs. DeLoach and.McGuire the
memorandum of 9-8-54, which the Director mentioned to Mr. Nichols last 
Lyonday. 0ertainly.Mr. DeLoach was not too selective in his use of language.

a

After talking to him,.ur..Nichols stated he was certain that he did
..

 

 

 

(L:

   

not intend to convey the impression which was conveyed. He fully recognizes.
the necessity qf the use oj?proper phraseology. It was.Mr. Nichols personal
Opinion that his phraseology was thoughtless and did not in any way reflect
his real attitude, which he considered excellent. 

By letter dated 10-15-54 he was CENSURED inasmuch as it had come to the

 

j.attention qf?the Bureau ?mit_he_reviewed_gnd_gafroved transmittal a
letter dated 10-1-54, to Des.uoines, Iowa, acknow?b6
ledging receipt of certain material had furnished the Bureau

 

with his letter qf 9~24-54. He had a se in this
communication he missed the complete significance qf letter af
9?24-54, and that the reply to him was obviously in error. ?It was funda-
mental that the Bureau always welcomed data?furnished to it by citizens

and acknowledgments qf communications with which information was furnished

the Bureau should be completely responsive.

 

During an inspection of the Records and communications Division in.chember,
1954 Inspector Brown stated he was aggressive, decisive, and energetic.? He
had dejinite ideas and had no hesitancy in empressing himself. Given an
assignment, he went directly toward his objective. Inspector Brown consider-
ed him qualified for his present position, and capable af,further advance? .
ment.

. 

By letter dated 1?29-55 the Director congratulated him on his Eleventh anni-
versary with the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for february, 1955 was 2 hours 21 minutes.
0n 3-13-55 he received a Basic Increase to $11,880 per annum in GSL15.

0n 3-31-55.ur. Nichols rated said he had an excellent
background and had had a variety of experience. He was a growing man who
had taken hold qf his responsibilities with dispatch exhibiting judgment and
initiative. BE possessed the ability to get things done. lhere was no
reason why he should not continue to develop having the capability of assum-
ing additional responsibility.~ He was available for special and general
assignment.

His daily average overtime March, 1955 was 2 hours 53 minutes.

By letter dated 4~8~55 Honorable Daniel A. Reed, House of Representatives,
washington, D. 0. expressed appreciation to Inspector DeLoach his kinda
ness in arranging tours for the senior classes of Nunda Central School and
Frewsburg Central School on 4-11 and 13, respectively. lhis was acknowledged



 

 

 

   

on 4-l2b55. It is noted numerous other letters have been received from
persons outside the Bureau expressing kind words regarding yr. DeLoach?s
performance.

b6
b7C

By letter dated 5-18-55 he was CENSURED his inadequate supe 's'on 
the handling and preparation oJ?a special memorandum regarding

He was specifically instructed on the evening of 5?10-55 that this
memorandum was to be submitted by 9:00 a.m. on 5-11-55. He was most dere~
lict in the performance qf his duties in failing to see to it that this
memorandum was submitted by the deadline.

His daily average overtime for April, 1955 was 2 hours 15 minutes.

His daily average overtime.for May, 1955 was 3 hours 13 minutes.



1 By letter dated 6?22-55 he was QQMMEMDED for the competent manner in which
i he performed in connection with the recent Qperation Alert.



His daily average overtime June, 1955 was 3 hours 20 minutes, and 
July, 1955 was 3 hours 38 minutes.

By letter dated 8?2-55 he was the very splendid manner in
which he discharged his duties in connection with the recent convention qf
the Department oJ?the District qf Calumbia, lhe American Legion.

By letter dated 8-25?55 he was QONERATUZAZED on his recent installation
1 as Commander qf the FBI American Legion Post Number 56. The Director was
pmud of the record oj'the Bureau Post, and he (the Director) was sure that
i it would achieve further honors in the ensuing year under his competent
guidance. .

His daily average overtime?for.August, 1955 was 2 hours 49 minutes.

By letter dated 9-21-55 he was his splendid services as a
member of the Economy Streamlining Committee.

His daily average overtime for September, 1955 was 2 hours 55 minutes.

By letter dated 10-19-55 he was 00 MENDED for his most capable representa-
tion cf the Bureau at the recently conclu ed American Legion convention
in.Miami.

On 10-23-55 he received a uniform Promotion to #123150 per annum in GS-ls.

His daily average overtime.for October, 1955 was 3 hours 8 minutes.

 

 

 

 

   

By letter dated 11-14355 he was QEHSHRED inasmuch as since 5-11-55, he had
failed on a number of occasions to detect nonsubstantive errors in offi-
cial correspondence reviewed and approved by him.

His daily average overtime for November, 1955 was 2 hours 28 minutes.

By letter dated 12-13-55 he was aQyQRATULATED?for?firing a perfect score
on the Practical Pistol Course at Quantico, Virginia, on 12-3-55? On
12-29-55 he was awarded a Possible Club Medal.

By letter dated 12-15?55 he was his substantial contribu~
tions to the project of mechaniaing the Bureau's payroll operations.

On 12-22-55 the National Commander of the American Legion, J. Addington
Vagner, advised this employee that he had been appointed as a General
Member of the National Distinguished Guests Committee of the American
Legion. In a memorandum to Mr. Tolson dated 12-29-55, Mr. Nichols noted
that this Committee picked the speakers and guests to appear at the annual
Legion convention which consisted of between 40 and 50 members. It was
practically unheard qf?for an individual member of the Legion to be appoint-
ed to two National Committees in one year although Mr. DeLoach had pre-
viously been appointed as Vice Chairman of the Subversive Activities Com,
mittee of the Legion. Mr. Nichols thought that this reflected very favor-
ably upon the caliber qf Mr. DeLoach's liaison with the Legion. The
?irector 

His daily average overtime for December, 1955 was 2 hours 13 minutes.

By letter dated 1-4-56 he was CENSURED for his inadeq?ate_handlina_niia
request for a tour of the Bureau on 12-23?55, for one b6
and his family and it was evident that he exercise poor judg?
ment in this matter. .At the time he decided that would be
restricted to viewing exhibits only, he should have insured that he was in
possession of all the facts relating to this matter. As a result a? his
ailure to determine the extent of instructions issued previously,
his family were left waiting on the fourth floor for some
FBI representative to join them and no such contact was made. By letter
dated 1?5-56 Mr. DeLoach expressed regret for the above criticism.

 

By letter dated 1-12?56 he was COMMEMDED for the impressive statistics
regarding the number of visitors and tours handled at the Bureau during
1955. It was gratifying to know of the tremendous interest which outsiders
had displayed in the uwrk and facilities of the and their many expres-
sions of appreciation following their visits reflected most oreditably

upon his supervision of this program.

 

 



 

 




   

By letter dated 1-29-56 the Director congratulated him on his twelfth
anniversary with the FBI.

Hie daily average overtime for January, 1956 was 2 hours 31 minutes.

His daily?average overtime for February, 1956, 2 hours 34 minutes.

On 3-31?56 Mr. Nichols rated him SATISFACTORY and added he was energetic
and had an excellent background, made a good representative of the Bureau,
was industrious and conscientious. His liaison with the American Legon
had been outstanding which had necessitated his spending a great deal of
time on evenings, weekends and holidays in handling Legion activities.

He was considered capable of assuming additional responsibility and he
should continue to improve.

His daily average overtime for March, 1956, 2 hours 36 minutes and April,
2 hours 43 minutes.

During an inspection of the Records and Communications Division in April,
1956, Inspector J. E. Edwards advised that he manifested very good judgment
and discretion, and as a result, was a better than average contact
representative for the Bureau. He was an able administrator and considered
capable of assuming additional responsibili?es.

His daily average overtime for May, 1956, 2 hours 11 minutes and June,
2 hours 48 minutes.

By letter dated 7?23?56 he was COMMENDED for his outstanding leadership
in the affairs in the FBI American Legion Post Number 56, which he had
evidenced during his tenure as Post Commander.

His daily average overtime for July, 1956, 3 hours 31 minutes; August,
2 hours 48 minutes.

behalf of the RBI in connection with the American Legion National Convention
at Los Angeles.

?By letter dated 9-13-56 he was COMMENDED for his outstanding efforts on

His daily average overtime for September, 1956, 2 hours 37 minutes;a?dtober,
2 hours 43 minutes; November, 2 hours 35 minutes and December, 2 hours 39
minutes.

By letter dated 1?29?57 the Director congratulated him on his Thirteenth
Anniversary with the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for January, 1957, 2 hours 58 minutes and
February, 2 hours 52 minutes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I

 

 

On 3?31-57 Mr. Nichols rated him EXCELLENT and added that he was
exceedingly conscientious and industrious and was always seeking ways and
means to further the Bureau's interests to'be of assistance. His overall
knowledge of the work of the Bureau's operating procedures and policy was
outstanding. He had tremendous enthusiasm and used good judgment and
inmiative. His liaison with the American Legion had been outstanding and
he had devoted considerable his personal time as well as funds in
carrying out those programs. He was capable of assuming additional
responsibilities and should continue to develop. During the rating period,
numerous Legion officials and others with whom he had come in contact had
commended his services.

His daily average overtime for March, 1957, 2 hours 41 minutes.
0n 4-21-57 he received a uniform promotion to $12,420 per annum in 08-15.

His daily average overtime for April, 1957, 2 hours 42 minutes; May,
2 hours 31 minutes; June, 2 hours 33 minutes.

By letter dated 7?30-57the Director congratulated him on his election as
Commander of the Department of District of Columbia, The American Legion,
during the convention held July, 25 through July, 27% 1957. It is noted
that in his capacity as Commander he heads approximately 21,000 legion?
na res.

His daily average overtime for July, 1957, 3 hours 23 minutes and August,
3 hours 25 minutes.

By letter dated 9-20?57 the Director expressed appreciation to him for
the excellent arrangements he made in connection with the Director's
appearance before the National Convention of the American Legion in
Atlantic City.

His daily average overtime for September was 3 hours 32 minutes; and
October, 2 hours 42 minutes. 

By letter dated 11?21-57 he was CENSURED for a number of nonsubstantive
errors which had been detected in official correspondence reviewed and
approved by him. 

His daily average overtime for November was 2 hours 18 minutes.

By letter dated 12-23?57 he was COMMENDED for his effective over?all
supervision of the various assignments of Bureau personnel and the
tremendous assistance rendered by him to those responsible for the
production of the Bureau's portion of the'Wide Wide werld" television
program. - 19 -

 

 

 

 





 

 

   

His daily average overtime for December was 3 hours 50mminutes.

0n 1-12-58 he received a Basic Increase to $13,670 per annum in Grade 15.
By letter dated 1-29?58 the Director congratulated him on the occasion
of his Fourteenth Anniversary with the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

By memorandum dated 1?31-58 the Director advised that he saw this agent

on 1?28?58 when he called to discuss a personal matter with the Dhector.
He advised that he had beeg?contacted by Governor Graig of Indiana,

former Secretary of Defense Louis Johnson, and several other prominent
persons who had been quite active and prominent in America? Legion affairs
for some years. These gentlemen were concerned that the Legion might fall
more and more into the hands of individuals who may not have the best
interests of the Legion at hear. They also inquired whether he would be
willing to consider being advanced by them as a candidate for the National
Commandership of the American Legion. He observed that he would have to
resign from the Bureau for at least two years if he acceded to this.re?
quest. He also observed that the National Commander of the American
Legion received a salary of $44,000 a year.3_The Director advised him

that this was a matter for his personal decision but that it seemed to

him that Deloach should face reality and realize that even though his
candidacy might be successful, the Director doubted very much whether
politics could be excluded from Americah Legion affairs any more than

they could be excluded from the affairs of other organizations of all
types. DeLoach indicated that he intended to turn down the offer which

.had been extended to him but that hi??gnted the Director to know of it.


The Director obserVed that he thong as a wise decisi?n for he certainly

had a good future in the Bureau.

i

His da' avera ti f0 Ja a 1958 wa hours 13 inute

0n 1-1 3%8 he ngasic I??i?gge to $13,6F62per annumi?n 
0n 2-19-58 he was COMMENDED for his highly exemplary attitude for re?
porting for work on 2-18-58 notwithstanding the extremely hazardous
travel conditions as a result of a snow storm.

His daily average overtime for February was 2 hours 17 minutes. 
On 3-31?58 Mr. Nease rated him EXCELLENT and said he was a most willing
worker, possessed initiative and much enthusiasm. He approached all
assignments in a most conscientious manner and was always alert to ways of
furthering the Bureau's interest. He did an exceptionally fine job in

his liaison work with The American Legion, devoting much of his personal 41
time and funds to this endeavor. He functioned in an above?average manner
in making and maintaining contacts of value to the Bureau. He made many .
speeches in a highly efficient manner judging from comments received

from persons outside the Bureau. His over-all performance was considered
excellent.

 

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for march, 1958, was 2 hours 20 minutes.

By letter dated 4?14-58 he was COMMENDED for his excellent supervision of
the preparation of the series of tapes which were used on the previous
Saturday's "Monitor" radio program.

His daily average overtime for April, 1958, 3 hours 1 minute; May, 3 hours
15 minutes; June, 1958, 2 hours 28 minutes.

0n 6-11-58 Mr. Nease advised his memorandum 6?10-58 reflected a call from
SAC Powers, New Yerk on Friday, 6-6?58 during which he told DeLoach he re?
cevied an inquiry from Mary Cadwallader, Life Magazine, who desired the num?
ber of investigative employees in the FBI. She said this week's issue of
Life would contain an editorial re the charges leveled by Cyrus S. Eaton
against the FBI and other investigative agendas. The Director noted, "Was
this called to mypattention?" DeLoach did not prepare a memorandum which he
should have done. Over the week-end attempted to procure further informa?
tion; however, no information was available. A memorandum was prepared on
6~10-58 regarding this call from SAC Powers, and at this time the call was
received from Mrs. Coleman, Railroad Retirement Board and it was deemed
advisable to consolidate the two memoranda. Mr. Nease noted DeLoach had
been severely taken to task for this and it was recommended this memorandum
be made a matter of record. Mr. Tolson noted, "Matters of this nature must
be reported. 

By letter dated 7-1?58 he received a grade promotion to 68?16, $14,190 per
annum, effective 7?13?58. By letter dated 7-1?58 he expressed appreciation
to the Director for this promotion.

By letter dated 7-29?58 he was COMMENDED for the highly exemplary manner in
which he had represented the Bureau during his tenure as Departmental Com-
mander of the District of Columbia Americah Legion. He was congratulated on
the two awards he received. In a letter to the Director dated 7?29?58 he
expressed appreciation for allowing him to fill this position and to carry
out the duties in connection therewith.

By letter dated 7-30-58 he was CENSURED for failure to detect a number of
errors in official correspondence which he reviewed and approved.

His daily average overtime for anguly, 1958, was hours 9 minutes and for
?angusher, 1958, was 3 hours :3 minutes.

By letter dated 8?28?58 he was his excellent work in coordina?
ting the research project in connection with the Director's address before
the Judicial Administration Section of the American Bar Association.

By letter dated 9~5~58 the Director congratulated him upon his election as
a National Vice Commander of the America? Legion for the coming year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By letter dated 9-19-58 Mr. DeLoach expressed appreciation to the Director
for the message he prepared and which was read at the Testimonial Dinner
given in his (DeLoach's) honor at the National Press Club on 9-18-58 by the
American Legion.

His daily average overtime for September, 1958, was 3 hours 35 minutes and
for October, 1958, was 4 hours 16 minutes.

During the October, 1958, and Communications Division inspection
Inspector Malone stated DeLoach made a good appearance, was an excellent
speaker and was doing a good job in his present assignment. He had an
excellent attitude and inspection findings reflected no weaknesses in mattena
under his supervision. He was completely available for and interested in
administrative advancement. The Inspector recommended he be continued in
his present assignment.

By letter dated 11-26?58 he was COMMENDED for his excellent narration of
the two five-minute programs concerning the increase in bank robberies which
were broadcasted on "Monitor" on Sunday, 11-23?58.

His daily average overtime for Nbvember, 1958, 5 hours 3 minutes; December,
3 hours 1 minute; January, 1959, 2 hours 45 minutes.

0n 1-28?59 he was designated Inspector in Charge of the newly established
Crime Records Division. Functions of this new division included those pre-
sently handled by the Records and Communications Division excluding the
Records Branch, Reading Room and Communications Section.

By letter dated 1?29?59 the Director congratulated him on his Fifteenth
Anniversary with the FBI.

His daily average overtime for February, 1959, was 4 hours 27 minutes and for
march, 1959, was 4 hours 47 minutes.

On his 1959 annual performance report Mr. Tolson rated By
letter dated 5- 4-59 he received a CASH AWARD in the amount of $500 in recog-
nition of his Outstanding performance rating covering his services from
4-1-58 to 3?31?59. He expressed appreciation for this award.

On 4~7?59 he was designated Assistant Director in charge of the Crime
Records Division.

In a memorandum to Messrs. Tolson,DeLoach, Holloman, and Miss Gandy dated
5-20?59 the Director expressed his extreme; displeasure at the manner in which
the proposed remarks for his use in the television interview with Senator
Smathers had been handled. In this connection Mr. DeLoach's Office delayed
in the preparation of these remarks. No further action was taken.

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for April, 1959, was 4 hours 45 minutes and for
May, 1959, was 4 hours 56 minutes.

in answer to the Director's inquiry,he was advised by memorandum dated
5-19-59 that Mr. DeLoach would be eligible for promotion to Grade 
on 7~l3~59. The Director noted, "See that promotion is granted then. 

His daily average overtime for June, 1959, was 4 hours 27 minutes. 

Effective 7-13-59, he was promoted to $15,375 per annum in Grade He
expressed appreciation for this promotion.

His daily average overtime for July, 1959, was 4 hours 11 minutes; August,
5 hours 13 minutes.

By letter dat? 9-1-59, he was COMMENDED for the outstanding work he did
during the past year as a National Vice Commander of the American Legion.
In the same letter he was also CONGRATULATED on being appointed Chairman
of the National Public Relations Commission and being elected President
of the Past National Vice Commanders for the ensuing year.

His daily average overtime for September, 1959, was 4 hours 34 minutes;
October, 3 hours 46 minutes; November, 3 hours 22 minutes.

By letter dated 12-11-59, he was CENSUR or an error which appeared
in an outgoing piece of correspondence.

His daily average overtime for December, 1959, was 3 hours; January, 1960,
4 hours 39 minutes.

By letter dated l?6~60, he was CENSURED for the atrocious handling in
the past by the Crime Records a matter pertaining to the
American Bar Association. A conflicting instruction was issued and an
undesirable situation arose which hould have been avoided by the use of
greater alertness and initiative. 

By letter dated 1-29-60, the Director CONGRATULATED him on his Sixteenth
Anniversary with the FBI. He expressed appreciation for the Director?s
good wishes.

By letter dated 1-29-60, he was CENSURED over the delays in the handling
of correspondence by his division.

During an inspection of the Crime Records Division in January?February,
1960, Inspector Desmond commented that Mr. DeLoach was extremely aggres?
sive, loyal, ambitious and a particularly hard worker. He was an ex-
cellent speaker and a quick thinker. He appeared to have an overwhelming
desire to excel in all reSpects. He made a good contact man and at all
times was alert to further the?Bureau's interests.

 

 

 

 

 

By letter dated 2?8-60, he was COMMENDED for the highly effective manner
in which he represented the Bureau on 1-28-60, when he spoke at the
annual banquet of the Greenwood, Mississippi, Chamber of Commerce.

By letter dated 2-17-60, he was advised of the findings of the recent
inspection and was CENSURED because of the defeatist attitude displayed
by him in checking thegyniform Crime Reports Mailing List.

His daily average overtime for February, 1960, was 3 hours 50 minutes.

By letter dated 3-3-60, he was COMMENDED and through him, the personnel
in the Crime Records Division, for the outstanding attitude displayed

in reporting for duty on that date despite the extremely adverse weather
conditions in the area.

By letter dated 3-11-60, he was CENSURED for the delay which occurred
on 3?10-60, in providing a tour leader for a group of State Attorneys
General.

On 3-31-60, Mr. Mohr rated him OUTSTANDING.

His daily average overtime for March, 1960, was 4 hours 33 minutes.

By letter dated 4-5?60, he was COMMENDED for the outstanding manner in
which he conducted himself on 4-1-60, at a meeting of the Committee on

Cooperation with Federal Agencies and Legislation of the National Council
of Juvenile Court Judges.

By letter dated 4-19?60, the Director expressed appreciation to Mr.
DeLoach for his valued assistance during the Director's visit to Chicago.

By letter dated 4-21-60, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$430.00 which represented this award less withholding tax for his services

,for the period from 4-1-59, to 3-31-60, which merited an Outstanding

performance rating. He subsequently expressed appreciation for this award.

His daily average overtime for April, 1960, was 4 hours 38 minutes; May,
4 hours 13 minutes; June, 4 hours.

Effective 7-10-60, he received a Basic Increase to $16,530 per annum in
Grade 

Effective 7-13?60, he was promoted to $18,600 per annum in Grade GS-18.
By letter dated 7-18-60, the Director expressed appreciation to Mr.
DeLoach for the excellent arrangements he made in connection with the
presentation this morning by Mr. Dowd, President of the FBI National
Academy Associates.

His daily average overtime for July, 1960, was 4 hours 52 minutes.

 

 

 

 

 

I
"b
.

 

By letter dated 8-11?60, he was COMMENDED for his over-all direction
of a recent operation of vital f?p?rfa?EE?to the security of the
country.

His daily average overtime for August, 1960, was 4 hours 26 minutes.

By letter dated 9?8-60, he was COMMENDED and through him, the Agents
of the Crime Records Division who so capably conducted the tours of
the FBI for members and guests of the American Bar Association during
its annual meeting.

By letter dated 9-15-60, he was CENSURED due to a recent failure of his
division to properly coordinate Its operations with the result that a
proposed outgoing letter was submitted for the Director's approval

which would have been most embarrassing if it had been sent. The letter
expressed the Director's regret at not.having been able to personally

meet Mr. Iduring his attendance at the American Bar b6
Association Convention when, as a matter of fact, the Director did see
on that occasion.

His daily average overtime for September, 1960, was 4 hours 37 minutes.

 

 

 

By letter dated 10-11-60, he was COMMEHQED for his valuable services in
connection with the 67th Annual Conference of the International
Association of Chiefs of Police.

By letter dated 10-20?60, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$300.00 for his exceptional performance In connection with the Annual
Convention of The American Legion recently held in Miami, Florida.

His daily average overtime for October, 1960, was 5 hours 54 minutes;
November, 3 hours 56 minutes.

By letter dated 12-12-60, he was COMMENDED for the outstanding attitude
displayed by him in reporting for duty on that date despite the extremely
hazardous travel conditions in the area.

His daily average overtime for December, 1960, was 3 hours 20 minutes.

By letter dated 1-27-61, the Director CONGRATULATED him on his Seventeenth
Anniversary with the FBI, occuring on 1?29-61.

His daily average overtime for January, 1961, was 3 hours 30 minutes;
February, 3/hours 46 minutes.

During an inspection of the Crime Records Didsion in February?march, 1961,
Inspector R. K. Moore stated that Mr. DeLoach was an aggressive, loyal and
hard-working official, an excellent speaker and had the ability to think
quickly on his feet in highly sensitive situations. He was a natural
leader and commanded the respect of employees working for him. He was an

 

 

 

 

 

excellent contact man and had the ability to capitalize upon any given
situation to further the Bureau' interests among his widespread and
highly diverse contacts.

0n 3-31-61, Mr. Mohr rated him OUTSTANDING.
His daily average overtime for March, 1961, was 3 hours 34 minutes.

By letter dated 4-20-61, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD -in the amount of
$500.00 in recognition of the Outstanding Performance Rating covering
his services from 4-1-60, to 3?31-61. He expressed appreciation for
this rating and award.

By letter dated 4?27?61, he was CENSURED for the lack of discrimination
on the part of his division in handling certain literature which was
furnished to an individual of the Mississippi State College for Women.

His daily average overtime for April, 1961, was 3 hours 42 minutes.

By letter dated 5-18?61, he was CENSURED in connection with the 1961

Annual Performance Rating Reporf"3fmSA1 Iwhich was re- b6
duced from Excellent to Satisfactory inasmuch as   was the
recipient of five letters of censure during the rating period.

 

His daily averagnovertime for May, 1961, was 4 hours 26 minutes; June,
4 hours 23 minutes; July, 3 hours 8 minutes.

By letter dated 8?31-61, he expressed his appreciation to the Director
for presenting him with the life membership card in The American Legion
in behalf of the FBI Post 56.

i da A 1961 wa 3 ho rs 5 mi utes-
gegtem e; age?g ggertw efor ugust, 
By letter dated 9-20?61, he was COMMENDED for the superior fashion in
which he represented the Bureau at the American Legion Connention which
was held in Denver, Colorado.

By letter dated 10-16-61, he was COMMENDED, and through him, the members
of his working committee, the Keymen and all of the individuals for
their generous and enthusiastic support of the United Givers Fund campaign.

 

His daily average overtime for Odnber, 1961, was 3 hours 49 minutes;
November, 4 hours 3 minutes.

By letter dated 12-8-61, he was COMMENDED for his valued assistance in
connection with the arrangements made for the Criss Award Dinner.

By letter dated 12-28-61, he was COMMENDED, and through him, the personnel
of the Crime Records Division whd??E?HIEH?the press releases in connection
with the Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property case involving the
theft of medium transformer plans from the General Electric Corporation.

   

 

 

 


1v.
I

 

His daily average overtime for December, 1961, was 3 hours 21 minutes.?

By letter dated 1-29-62, the Director CONGRATULATED him on his
Eighteenth Anniversary in the FBI.

His dailyeaverage overtime for January, 1962, was 4 hours 27 minutes. 

By letter dated 2-5-62, he was COMMENDED for his outstanding performance

relative to the investigation of the Interstate Transportation in Aid

of Racketeering?Gambling case involving and others. b6
b7C

His daily average overtime for February, 1962, was 4 hours 5 minutes. 3

 

0n 3?31-62, Mr. Mohr rated him OUTSTANDING,
His daily average overtime for March, 1962, was 3 hours 10 minutes.

By letter dated 4-20-62, he was CENSURED for an error in a piece of
outgoing correspondence which was approved by him.

By letter dated 4-25-62, he received an INCguzlxg AWARD in the amount

of $500100 in recognition of his Outstanding Performance Rating

covering his services from 4-1-61, to 3-31-62. He expressed appreciation
for this rating and award. 

Hisciaily average overtime for April, 1962, was 2 hours 47 minutes; may,
3 hours 21 minutes.

By letter dated 5?8-62, he was COMMENDED, and through him, three Agents
in his Division for the excellent manner in which they performed at the
recent Command Level Administrative School for the Metropolitan Police

Department.

During an inspection of the Crime Records Division in May-June, 1962,
Inspector J. K. Ponder stated he was dedicated, aggressive, and alert
to his responsibilities. He was excellent on contacts, provided strong
leadership for his Division, an?had respect and confidence of employees.
He seized every opportunity to promote Bureau's interests.

His daily average overtime for June, 1962, was 2 hours 59 minutes;
July, 3 hours 21 minutes.

By letter dated 8-15-62, he was COMMENDED for the excellent personal
guidance he afforded the "Know Your segment of the NBC "Monitor"
program. Many favorable comments were received regarding his able
direction and cooperation in making this program possible and his per-
formance had been greatly responsible for its success.

 

 

 

 

 

By letter dated 8-28-62, he was COMMENDED for his superior performance
in connectidh with the location 5T"fwd"c?ildren who were missing from

their homes a lieved to have been kidnaped. b6
and . - b7C

His daily average overtime for August, 1962, was 3 hours 6 minutes;
September, 3 hours 43 minutes.

 

 

 

By letter dated 10-2?62, he was COMMENDED for his outstanding supervision
of the preparation of the press'reIeases concerning the apprehension of
Nelson Cornelious Drummond, subject of an Espionage case.

Effective 10-14-62, he received a Basic Increase to $20, 000 per annum in
Grade GS-18.

By letter dated 10-15-62, he his outstanding performance
in taking care of the Bureau's interests at the Annual Convention of

The American Legion which was held in Las Vegas, Nevada. In recognition.
thereof, he was given an INCENTIVE in the amount of $300.00.

By letter dated 10-24-62, the Director advised him that it was a pleasure
to meet him in his (Director' 5 office and as a memento of his visit

he was furnished a copy of a photograph which was made at that time and
which was autographed by the Director.

By letter dated 10-26-62, he was CENSURED inasmuch as it was necessary
to correct a number of letters w?ic werE?being directed to various
newspapers throughout the country in connection with an article which
appeared in those newspapers regarding former employee Jack Levine.
These letters contained an erroneous statement which could have resulted
in extreme embarrassment to the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for October, 1962, was 4 hours 1 minute.

By letter dated 11-20962, he was COMMENDED for the exceptional fashion
in which he handled releases to the news media in connection with the

Cuban Sabotage matter involvingl and others.b6
b7C

 

 

His daily average overtime for NOvember, 1962, was 3 hours 34 minutes;
December, 3 hours 24 minutes.

By letter dated 1-6-63, he was COMMENDED for his splendid work in connection
with the "Know Your and "National Alert" segments of the NBC'Monitor"
pisgram.

By letter dated 1-29-63, the Director CONGRATULATED him on the occasion
of his Nineteenth Anniversary in the FBI.

-23-

 

 

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for January, 1963, was 2 hours 32 minutes.

By letter dated 2-13-63, he was CENSURED for the unsatisfactory hand-
ling by his Division of a 1etter"?Trec?e3 to Mr. Henry R. Luce in
reply to his invitation to the Director.

His daily average overtime for February; 1963, was 3 hours 25 minutes.
0n 3?31-63, Mr. Mohr rated him OUTSTANDING.
His daily average overtime for March, 1963, was 3 hours 10 minutes.

By letter dated 4-9u63, he received an the amount of
$500.00 in recognition of his services for the period 4-1?62, to 3-31-63,
which earned for him an Outstanding Performance Rating.

During an inspection of the Crime Records Division in April, 1963,

Mr. Gale commented that Mr. DeLoach made an excellent personal appearance
and was extremely effective at public relations. He had a tremendous
number of valuable sources and contacts among newspapers, Government
leaders and in private industry which he utilized to maximum advantage

in promoting the best interests of the Bureau. He was extremely loyal

to the Director and was always alert to safeguard the welfare of the
Bureaua He was a very capable administrator who had done a fine job

in handling the Crime Records Division and was well qualified to con-
tinue in his capacity.

By letter dated 4-25-63, he was COMMENDED, and through him, the clerical
tour leaders in his division who assisted in such an effective fashion
in handling tours for the extremely heavy influx of visitors to the
Bureau during the 1963 Easter Season. 

His daily average overtime for April, 1963, was 2 hours 51 minutes;
May, 2 hours 58 minutes.

By letter dated 6?24?63, he was given an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount
of $300.00 in recognition of the outstandf?E?TEEHTE??T??which be dis-
charged his numerous responsibilities in supervising the preparation

and handling of releases to the news media relative to the investigation
of the Civil Rights case involving the murder of Medgar Evers.

His daily average overtime for June, 1963, was 3 hours 45 minutes; July,
3 hours 28 minutes.

By letter dated 7-3-63, he was COMMENQEQ for his superior work in directing
the preparation and distribution of releases to the news media in con?
nection with the Espionage-Conspiracy case involvingl b6

others. b7C

 

-29-

 

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for August, 1963, was 3 hours 25 minutes.

By letter dated 9-lln63, he was COMMquggafor the manner in which he
represented theFBI on the special program entitled, "Crimea-Spiraling
Tragedy" which was presented over NBC Radio on Sunday.

By letter dated 9?12-63, he was COMME for his fine work in connection
with the documentary film entitled, which was produced by Warner
Brothers Studios.

By letter dated 9-17?63, he was COMMENDED for being reappointed National
Chairman of the American Legion Public Relations Commission and being af-
forded the "Man of the Year" award. It was also pleasing to note the
numberr? favorable resolutions passed concerning matters of interest to
the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for September, 1963, was 3 hours 1 minute;

October, 3 hours 3 minutes. :38

By letter dated 11?1?63, he was COMMENDED and through him, the personnel

in the Crime Records Division, for splendid manner in which the

releases to the news media concerning the Espionage case involving 
and others were handled. 

 

By letter dated 11?18?63, he was COMMENDED for the excellent arrangements
made by him in connection with t?gm?f?3??8?'s appearance before the
Seventh National Convention of the Catholic Ybuth Organization in New
York on 11?16?63, at which time the Director received the Pro Deo et
Juventute Medal.

His daily average overtime for November, 1963, was 5 hours 1 minute.

By memorandum dated 12~4-63, he was COMMENDED for volunteering to work on
11?25-63. in connection with the emergency occasioned by the assassina~
tion of the President.

By letter dated 12~17?63, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$300.00 for his outstanding pe?brmance i?ft?e?6ver??ll??irection of the
preparation of releases to the news media relating to the Kidnaping case
involvingl land others. . . b6
b7C

 

His daily average overtime for December, 1963, was 3 hours 56 minutes.

By letter dated 1-14-64, he was the innumerable services he
performed incident to the tragicmdgat?fbf SA Fred K. Mergan.

0n 1-29-64, the Director personally presented him with the Bureau's Twenty-
Year Service Award Key and congratulatory letter. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In a wire to the Director dated 1-29?64, President Johnson requested that
his best wishes and congratulations be extended to Mr. DeLoach on the
occasion of his Twentieth Anniversary in the Bureau. The President's
communication was acknowledged on 1-29?64.

His daily average overtime for January, 1964, was 3 hours 6 minutes;
February, 4 hours 1 minute.

0n 3-31-64, his services were rated OUTSTANDING.
His daily average overtime for March, 1964, was 3 hours.

By letter dated 4?9?64, he was COMMEHDQQ for the exemplary manner in which
he handled the discussion on the television program, "Passport" which was
telecast over on 4-4?64.

By letter dated 4-10-64, employees of the Crime Records Division were
COMMENDED, through him, for their competent and effective handling of the
exceedingly large number of Bureau tours during the past Easter Season.

By letter dated 4-14-64, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$500100 in recognition of his 1964 Annual Performance Rating. By letter
dated 4?17-64, he expressed appreciation for this rating and award.

His daily average overtime for April, 1964, was 2 hours 57 minutes; may,
3 hours 52 minutes; June, 2 hours 56 minutes.

Effective 7-5?64, he received a Basic Increase to $24,500 per annum in
Grade 

By letter dated 7-13?64, he was given an in the amount of
$300.00 in recognition of the outstanding manner in which he handled his
particular responsibilities relative to the opening of our new office in
Jackson, Mississippi.

In a memorandum dated 7?16?64, the Director stated that while talking to
the President he stated he wanted the Director to congratulate Mr. DeLoach
for the unusually good job he was doing at the White House.

His daily average overtime for July, 1964, was 3 hours 19 minutes.

By letter dated 8?12?64, he was his most effective handling
of the liaison with high?level officials in connection with two important
Civil Rights cases.

His daily average overtime for August, 1964, was 4 hous 27 minutes.

By letter dated 9?1-64, he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$300.00 in recognition of the manner in?w?ic? He handled the special squad

at Atlantic City. (RE: Special;??; slantic City, New Jersey,

  

 

 

 

 

 

Democratic National Convention.) By letter dated 9-8-64, he expressed his
appreciation for this award. 

His daily average overtime for September, 1964, was 4 hours 16 minutes.

By memorandum dated 10-29u64, he advised that the Director of the U. S.
Board of Parole, Dick Chappell, had called him and advised he had been
requestedib recommend an individual for the Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury Position, U. S. Secret Service, and wanted to know if he would
be interested in the position. Mr. DeLoach thanked him for his consider-
ation and advised him he had no desire to leave the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for October, 1964, was 3 hours 55 minutes;
November, 4 hours 30 minutes.

By letter dated 11?18?64, he was COMMEEQED for the superior manner in which
he handled his numerous responsibilities the past several years incident

to the preparation and broadcase of material for the NBC radio program,
"Monitor%

In accordance with the Director's instructions that Mr. DeLoach be given
a $500.00 meritorious award he was appropriately advised by letter dated
11-30?6 . is was in connection with Mr. DeLoach's superb performance

in making the necessary arrangements for the Director's visit to Chicago

and for his outstanding work in recent past in other matters of importance
to the Bureau. He subsequently expressed appreciation for this Award.

During an inspection of the Crime Records Division in NovembereDecember,
1964, Mr. Felt stated that Mr. DeLoach made an excellent personal appear?
ance and was an extremehyeffective public relations man who currently
maintained personal liaison with the President for the Director. He had

a tremendous number of valuable sources in both Government and in private
industry, as well as among the news media, which he utilized to maximum
advantage in promoting the best interests of the Bureau. He was extremely
loyal to the Director and was continually alert to safeguard the welfare
of the Bureau. He was a highly talented public speaker, an impressive rep-
resentative of the Director and a very capable administrator, who in spite
of outside commitments, had a tight rein on his subordinates and had done
a fine job of running the Crime Records Division. The various functions
of the Division were rated as follows:

PHYSICAL CONDITION AND MAINTENANCE VERY GOOD
SPECIFIC DIVISION OPERATIONS EXCELLENT
ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS VERY GOOD
PERSONNEL MATTERS VERY GOOD
CONTACTS EXCELLENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

By letter dated 12711-64, he was COMMENDED for the continued superior man-

ner in which he discharged his numerous responsibilities in connection

with the  lease. b6
b7C

 

His daily average overtime for December, 1964, was 3 hours 49 minutes.

By letter dated 1-29-65, the Director CONGRATULATED him on his Twenty-
first Anniversary in the Bureau.

His daily average overtime for January, 1965, was 3 hours 5 minutes.

By letter dated 2-15-65, employees of the Crime Records Division were
COMMENDED, through him, for their contributions to the handling of a
recent expedite'special project. (RE: Special Name Check Project for
the White House.)

His daily average overtime for February, 1965, 2 hours 43 minutes; March,
2 hours 58 minutes.

By letter dated 3-5-65 personn?llofit?e Crime Research Section who
assisted in the preparation of the training document entitled "Prevention
and Control of Mobs and Riots", were COMMENDED, through him.

On 3?31?65 he was rated OUTSTANDING.

 

By letter dated 4?7?65 he received an the amount?
of $500.00 in recognition of his continued superior performance for

the period 4?1?64 to 3-31-65 which merited him an Outstanding annual
performance report. By letter dated 4?8?65 he thanked the Director.

By letter dated 4?29?65 the personnel of his division who so capably
discharged their duties in conducting tours of our facilities during
the past Easter Season, were COMMENDED, through him.

His daily average overtime for April, 1965, 2 hours 27 minutes; May,
2 hours 44 minutes.

By letter dated 5?5?65 he was the outstanding job he did
in directing and participating in the Bureau's portion of the "Early
Bird" telecast last Sunday.

By letter dated 5?19-65 he thanked the Director for spending time
this morning with Brother Bernardine and the St. John's Cadets, including
his son.

 

By letter dated 5?19?65 the Director wrote his son,  . L95
to thank him for dropping by his office and enclosed a photograph which
was made at that time.

 

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for June, 1965, 2 hours 21 minutes; July,
2 hours 28 minutes; August, 3 hours 14 minutes.

By letter dated Ib6
and were COMMENDED, through him, for their

performance in connection with a special project. (RE: White House Request)

 

 

By letter dated 9?1-65 he was COMMENDEQ for the superb way in which he
handled his innumerable duties re ative to the National Convention of
The American Legion held in Portland, Oregon.

His daily average overtime for September, 1965, 2 hours 42 minutes;
October, 3 hours 40 minutes.

On 10-10?65 he received a Basic Salary Increase to $25,382 per annum

By letter dated 10?20-65 the Director expressed his APPRECIATION to
him for the part he played last night in the presentation to him (Director)
of the Grand Cross of the Scottish Rite.

By letter dated 11-23?65 he was COMMENDED for the splendid manner in
which he had handled his myriad responsibilities relative to the

preparation of releases to the news media i the Transportation
of Stolen Motor Vehicle?Ring Case involving and others. b6

 

 

 

b7C

 

By letter dated ll~29-65, he was advised of his designation as Assistant
to the Director with an increase in salary to $26,000 per annum (no grade)n
effective 12-31-65.

His daily average overtime for November, 1965, was 2 hours 50 minutes;
December, 3 hours 10 minutes.

The Director saw him on 12-7u65, when he called to express his appreci~
ation for his designation as Assistant to the Director. The Director
discussed with him generally the duties of his new position.

DURING AN INSPECTION OF THE CRIME RECORDS DIVISION IN DECEMBER, 1965,
INSPECTOR R. C. HALSTEAD commented that he made an exceptionally fine
personal appearance, possessed an engaging personality and had an outstand-
ing ability to handle public relations. He had been very effective in
maintaining personal liaison with the White House and had extenSive
valuable sources in Congress, the Executive Branch, private industry and
news media. He was a dedicated career employee who was intensely loyal

to the Director. He had exceptional leadership qualities and made an
outstanding impression as a Bureau official. He was highly qualified to

 

 

 

 

serve in his new assignment as Assistant to the Director. The various
functions of the Division were rated as follows:

Physical Condition and Maintenance very Good
Specific Division Operations Excellent
Administrative Operations Very Good
Personnel Matters very Good
contacts Excellent.

He was subsequently advised of the results of this inspection and following
a review of these results he was to refer them to Mr. Wick for careful study
and review by him and to take corrective action. .

On 1-28-66 the Director congratulated him on his 22nd Anniversary in the FBI

By letter dated 1?31?66 he was COMMENDED for reporting for duty on that date
despite adverse weather and travel condition in the area.

His daily average overtime for January, 1966, 3' 10"; February, 2' 35".

On 3131-66 he was rated OUTSTANDING.

His daily average overtime for March, 1966, 2' 42"; April, 2' 29".

On 4-7-66 he received an Incentive Award in the amount of $500 in recogni-
tioa of his outstanding service during the past rating period.

His daily average overtime for mimay, 1966, 3' June, 3' July, 2' 49"
August, 2' 31"; September, 2' 32"; October, 2' 15"; Nbvember, 3' 35";
December, 3' 29"; January, 1967, 3' 20". 

On 1-27-67 the Director congratulated him on his 23rd Anniversary in the FBI.
His daily average overtime for February, 1967, 2' 18"; March, 2' 27".
On 3-31-67 he was rated OUTSTANDING.

On 4-10?67 he received an Incentive Award in the amount of $500 in recognitie
tion of his outstanding service during the paSt rating period.

His daily average overtime for April, 1967, 2' 45"; May, 2' 15"; June, 3'21".
July, 2' 19"; August, 2' 25"; September, 2' 14".

By letter dated 9-6-67 he was COMMENDED for the splendid job he did at
The American Legion National Convention, Boston, Massachusetts.

By letter dated 10-12-67 the Director expressed appreciation to him for the
beautiful plaques from The American Legion which were presented to him.

His daily average overtime for October, 1967, 2' Nevember, 2' 13".

  
 

 

On 12-17?67 he received a Basic 139 ease to $28,000 per annum (no grade)

 

His daily average overtime for December, 1967, 1' 46"; January, 1968, 2' 31".

?01: 3-31?68 he was rated OUTSTANDING.

 

On 1?29-68 the Director congratulated him on his 24th Anniversary in the FBI.

By letter dated 2?26?68 apprecition was expressed for his letter.concerning
the Director's appearance before the House Subcommittee on Appropriations.

His daily average overtime for February, 2'24"; March, 

By letter dated 2 68 he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$500 in recognition of his sexceptional services. He expressed
appreciation for this award in a letter to the Director.

His daily average overtime for April, 3'25?; May, 1'53"; June, 4'15".

By letter dated 6-10968 he was COMMENDED for his overall-supervision
of the James Earl Ray case.

By letter dated 7-19?68 he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$300 for his exemplary services in connection with the return of James
Earl Ray to the United States. He expressed appreciation forihis in a
letter to Mr. Hoover. 

His daily average overtime for July, August, 2'13"; September, 2?44".

By letter dated 9-3-68 he was COMMENDED in recogition afhis superb

overall supervision from the Seat of Government relative to the investigation

of the Kidnaping case involving  b6
b7C

His daily average overtime for October, 1'54"; November, 1'57"; December,

2 52".

 

 

By letter dated 12?26-68 he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of
$300 in recognition of his outstanding performance in connection with
the investigation of the Kidnaping case involvingl I

 

On 1-29?69 he received his Twenty-Five-Year Service Award Key. This was
personally presented by Mr. Hoover.

His daily average overtime for January, 1969, February, 1'52":
On 2?23?69 he received a Basic Increase to $36;000 per annum.

On 3~31-69 he was rated OUTSTANDING.

 

 

 

 

 

 

His daily average overtime for March, 2'41"; April, 1'40"; May, 1'58;
June, 1'30"; July, August, 2'19"; September, 1'47"; October, 1'56";
Nbvember, 1'33"; December, 1'43".

By letter dated 1-29?70 he received congratulations on his Twenty?Sixth
Anniversary in the Bureau from Mr. Hoover.

His daily average overtime for January, 1970, 

By letter dated 2-3-70 he received an INCENTIVE AWARD in the amount of

$200 in recognition of his valuable contributions to the investigations
involving Claude Edward Vealey and others, the subjects of a Labor-Management
Reporting and Disclosure Act case. He expressed appreciation in a letter

to Mr. Hoover.

0n 3?31-70 he was rated OUTSTANDING.
His daily average overtime for March, 1'55" April, 1'48".

By letter dated 4?27?70 he was CENSURED as the result of the failure of
supervisory personnel in the Special Investigative Division to make a proper
determination in the listing of certain cases subject to reimbursement

by the Department, a misunderstanding developed causing embarrassment to

the Bureau. He shared in me overall supervision of this matter.

His daily average overtime for May, 1'37"; 

On 6?4u70 he submitted his application for retirement to become effective
By letter dated 6-5-70 his retirement was acknowledged. He
was placed on the Special Correspondents' List.

By letter dated 8-25?70, Mr. Hoover expressed appreciation for his letter
of 8?18-70.

By letter dated 4?20?71 Mr. Hoover expressed appreciation for his letter
and for a copy ofthe PepsiCo annual report.

to him
By letter dated 10-28-71 Mr. Hoover forwarded/a copy of the remarks he
made Friday evening, October 22nd before the dinner meeting of the
Washington Chapter of the Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI.

By letter dated 2-7-72 Mr. Hoover expressed appreciation for his letter
of 1-31-72.

By letter dated 3?14?72 appreciation was expressed for the copies of the
correspondence he had with Ovid Demaris.

 

 

 

3-624 


I

 

I

OFFICE OF PREFERENCE

DELOACH CARTHA DEKLE

NAME


f??1


SOC. SEC. N0.

 

DATE

A IST. PREFERENCE

2ND. PREFERENCE

3RD. PREFERENCE

 

8? 1-62

NONE

 

(Ly?mg

804

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



LED-285 (Rev. 3-22-62)

 

 

 

 

 

FBI PERSONNEL STATUS FORM 
To: DIRECTOR. DATE 2/1/70
w: :93; to nus 
MY STATUS WITH REspEcng?-rHE ITEMS BELOW IS AS FOLLOWS: . a.
(A) NAME: I (B) A cyn- ICI SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
CARTHA n. 9/30 25 259-439?7925

(D) MARITAL STATUS: SINGLE MARRIED DIVORCED SEPARATED ?s WIDOIFI WIDOWER

I AGE 41?336

 

 

o? 3
,Ain $53"



 

SPOUSE: NAME (maiden iffemale)
1033,3511 '41??43 $835

'1
RESIDENCE ADDRESS IF IT YOURS
VI 0 cf 
PLACE oF ETNI a 0" 

(E) NAMES OF YOUR IMMEDIATE RELATIVES: (if deceased, so state) (use 3
RELATIONSHIP (Ifknown) RESIDENCE (City and State) (Ifknown)

 

3T6

 

 

emental sheet if necessary)

 

 

1. STEPCHILDREN, THEIR SPOUSES

ll

{if ngwn) ngp'ty 

2; (I'ncLuding foster parejrgt?s, stepparents,
etc): BROTHERS. Rs?a THEIR SPOUSES

1., qt;





RESIDENCE (City and State) (if known)

AGE
RELATIONSHIP (I- known

3- YOUR PARENTS. BROTHERS a. SISTERS
ther 79 ti on

Mrs. Ella Owens
Wm. Owens father dec sad

if

"3631)..
F533 3 19F 5*

i .11; A

 

 

Ifi?
'5

(F) NAMES OF ALL RELATIVES INCLUDING THOSE BY MARRIAGE NOW OR PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED BY THE FBI:
NAME EXACT RELATIONSHIP PRESENT EMPLOYEE FORMER EMPLOYEE

   
             

In; 3?17 I A i ILI 7 

(G) NAMES OF EL-ATIVE INCLUDING THOSE BY MA Node GOVERNMENT SERV 
NAME RELATIONSH I NM NT WHERE EMPLOYED

      
 
  
  
 
  
 
 

a. :1 on? I. (Ir-r5 I- 

(H) ORGANIZATIONS: ALL EMPLOYEES list all or anizations to which you presently belong - do not abbreviate. ONLY SPECIAL
AGENTS list former members ip in Boy Scouts (indicating exact rank attained) and affiliation with fraternal,
honorary or professional groups while in college. NON-AGENTS need not list former memberships at any time.

FORMER
(A ents
nly)

  
  
  
   

PRESENT

mployees)

    
 

NAME CITY AND STATE

             
   

Soon (I) CURRENT ARE You ATTENDING COLLEGE. OR ANY OTHER TYPE
?or; YES INDICATE NAME OF INSTITUTION AND suagECTs IN wwgu, ENROLLEDI'll I 5" ?Jan I . 



a 1


 

 

u) PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED IN CASE OF EMERGENCY:

 

Wife b6

NAME RELATIONSHIP

 

 

 

 

 

ADDRESS 
. weWk; 

Assistan ?0 The Director



 

 

 

 

(Title)

9

 

 

 

 

Education
Dates Degree
Name of School Location. From To (Give descriptive title, BS in Civil Eng.)
College
Gordon Military Coll. Barnesville ,Ga. Prealaw
South George. St. College . Douglas, Ga. Bgeglaw

Stetson University College of Law DeLand, Fla.

?1

Agent Vocation Record
FD-287G (Rev. 6-27-60(Please type or print) 
Name (As it appears on Bureau rolls)

Date
. Assistant Director Cartha D. (?lleLoach Au st 15 1960
Check one: so SAA E3 ?Date of Birth 7720720? BOD 87 42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AME. Wtory

vii

 

Graduate School 

 

Major
Minor

 

 

 

Miscellaneous or Special Schools

(Include Vocational and Radio Schools)

 

 

 


?u

 

List all college courses studied in mathematics. engineering and sciences. including chemistry, physics, biology, radio. communica-
tions, etc., regardless whether degree obtained. (Use supplemental sheet if necessary.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Course fHours Course Hours Course iHours Course Hours
BARS:
Federal Year State Year CPA (Stats) Year
Other
. . Foreign Language and Dialects . . 
(Evaluate your proficiency in each phase as Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, or Unsatisfactory.) 
Name of Language Read Write Speak Understand Translate
French Source of Proficiency -

      
  
 

   
     

   

    
     

       
      

  

est Taken
0




i

It?

NO. Yrs. ur'

Studied

3

Foreign
Assignment

Bureau
School

Native
Tongue

      
 

 

              
   
   
     
     

      

  

Name of Language Academic es

 

  

French

   
          

4? 

     

0 

 

 
 

it you can handle any foreign language or languages ?uently with little or no hesitation. and without use of a dictionary speciiy same.

 

if you have had any TRAINING or EXPERIENCE in the writing field including newspaper reporting, writing tor a periodical, and
creative writing of any kind, set forth as follows:

Training I No. of
College Courses Hours Experience

Extensive experience in writing dur mg .Bureau career

- i no
67-N0Lil?s ?mono

4.

Er q, 

 

Period oi Experience 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- - -
1,

a?

Previous Employment

 

 

 

 

Type oi work and in what capacity Proficiency I lberiod of Experience
Coaching Freshman Football - 1 Yr.
S. ,Navy-Phys. Instruction Welfare ;P1:ogram 
Teaching??iz participahng in all athletics Yrs. .

 

 

 

Vocations and Avocations 
(Give detailed information regarding any special knowledge, abilities, talents, hobbies,tr trades, etc., you possess, including

 

 

 

 

athletics.)

Vocation or Avocation Professional Amateur Proficiency Period of EXperience
Athletics-Boxing Team . H.S. Coll. 8: Navy
Woodwork .

Reading -

 

 

 

 

 

it you feel your experience in any oi your previous employments, vocations or avocations is so that you could use it as
a cover in an undercover assignment, identity same. .

 

 

Foreign Travel

List all torsion countries you have traveled in in what capacity, and eriod there.

England, France, Canada, Italy, Mexico, ermany, Spain, all Territorial
- 0111c1ai pusmess

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

L- . Military Training
5 .. 2 i
Active duty: Branch . . Dates of ServiceUCt. 1944 may 1946 Ron ?7 A 2 
Specialized Military Training EnSIgn
Are you interested in Foreign Assignment? l: Yes El No Location desired
Typing ability Have you passed Bureau test? Yes No
Shorthand ability Have you passed Bureau test? Yes No
Name of Shorthand system you use 

 

 

Practical Experience in Radio
(State degree of proficiency and length of time spent)
Amateur Radio Licenses Held

I I

Commercial Radio Operator

 

 

Radio, Television or Sound Repairman or Technician

 

EXperimenter or other 
international Morse Code: Transmit Receive 
Technical Knowledge of any Electronic Devices

 

 

Miscellaneous

 

List any other information. qualificatiOns and accomplishments.

.

4 "if! ?pl~.pn' \if,~)wast-eFW?I?IE - a. -- A sun?a. 1. 
1 3:44. . . V. r3WMJM ERAL BUREAU or 
a. STATES DEPARTMENT FOR EMPLOYMENT 
a - 


FEDERAL BUREAU or INVESTIGATION, $171ng 63"- 0 35" ?7
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT or JUSTICE, 7- 
1 WASHINGTON, D. C. .0?8 
Sir: 1 Special Agent (Law Trained) :g
I hereby make application for employment in 

the osition indicated by check mark, in the 333$; 
Federal BUreau of Investigation, United States' Messenger 
Department of Justice, and for your use in this g*
connection submit the following information: 

Clerk 
(This application slim be typewritten if possible) (Indicate by check)
1. Nam. in full (please print) DeLoach Car-the ?ak-1e

 

 

(Fa-111,7 nale) (aiven none) (Middle nale)

(la?emale applicants trust furnish maiden mane
2. a1 8:11.. Clear-ton. Georgia. 
i3. Mill and telegraphic address Phone No. -20
4. (?8153. date Jule-20.192 ight lee 11?; Height 6 
5. Pl? of birth. 11113951" Georgia- Evans ?anrc-iri/

  
   

 

(o Present address. If foreign born, is he a citizen?
(ea Date and place of naturalizatiorL 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

    
       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

- )1 
7. (a Mother?s Mother?s 
Present If foreign born, is she a 

Date and place of naturalization.
Brothers . Hone . 1 
(Conplete nalee, 11 recent addresses)
1 Mi?i??fifm
9. Sthers None . 
Si (Include norried names, I?facnt addreases)
j,
111le 
10. If ?you were not born in Lhited States,ho W?Q?aei? .
11. Are  you a citizen of the United Statesnaturalized, date and place of natur?liyzation. 
?r 660946? 
13. Are you single, married, widowed, separa edggor divor?eg?er 
"h la?ciled 
14. Maiden name of wife (5) Wife' 8 5151111539 43334 If 
a ?7 @5561! mi {5,11%
address A 
Date and place ofwhalguralizatiom . 
I tSpeciry exact title? or position sought as Laboratory Technician}; 
Positions of Special gent (Lav Trained), Special Agent (Accountant). thm? Human-W,
Laboratory Technicl uni and Messenger?: for male; applicantsr?omyt it?sj?ll" ?w :1
it?; t, unsung tux upshot enema which will be Iohe?d ?frequent; 7331'"; 
w: chaff air. I .
I 3: ?Iii n7 km it} 1

   

 

(01(3) (County) (State?)? 
6. a5 Father 5 name {Eartha (1 - Dal. naoh Father? 5 b1 1a .

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

(9 
. 
15. nane
Presentaddress-
Date and place of naturalization.
Father-in-law??ha?m- - 
Present address If foreign born, is he a 
Date and place of naturalization. . 1
Mother-in-law?s nane 3 
Present aldress 
Date and place of naturalization
Brothers-in?law



Husband?s 
If foreign born, is he a 
. 



 

 

 

16.

 

 

 

17o

 

 

.neles, and present addresses)

1
a.

18.

'WConplete

Essa-1M 


19. Sisters-in?law

(colplete tie-es, and present. addresses)

20. If your husbmd (or wife) is employed, state where employed.
21. Nmber of children, if any 3 

22. Are you entirely dependent on your salary?
23. To what extent are you finamially indebted to others and 'to vim?

5






 

Alarm .

=h4
I



24. Education: (Please print.) . 





 

I 


Conan Putnam.
Dmons 
Dronns 
Browse 1?


[/zmerf?dr

NAME AND LOCATION or soaoor. rnom? To?-

1

 

Elementary ?laxton-.Hi ?113.. - $0110.03. a. .- . .1926,? .


n-i-uiui-bu- 

1955..-- ?19317.2(

?lm? 
Junior Follege
"194.0"? 

3" - 
Asmglargton Hi School
Glaxton ?Gwen.?

?1?th 530-5

South Georgia. Selle:

Stetson Univr: rs ity, .
onB..?D [gr?0C3
Elmo" rah?mn

?3 J, 
cl- L. 
may/cc ?5 
of F??a?ra?cx



    
   
  
   
  
 

  


College or technical-..

"-31 

rot-In Luge-u.
ham 0! 
nuklu. "all", with;

    
  

 

 

 



-



At present time lack on

 

 


?y nine





lanai-

.




Statson?niv .
for com-

 

fao aths

 

 

:3 
. 1

Applicants tor Laboratory 'rechnlotan positions should 115; in Eel-Q11 selenti?c courses pur- .

    
 

a. salad? 351.11g??! 1 eel-1'49 n?ceegnrroend'xlve title 91:: any? Mes
251:)? @1131: If: f. 

g;

+L?w fj\? i? ob

 

-

.

hesi I: cred.
ea e55 ester-.64; 39?: GP



a
1% 
I



 

 

 

 

 

 
 

- MNM 1. 1 1 yum1.t?u? an? 1 54w- - I 1 
comuu'. ,ara ho have ~111101.111 we the or more years. Please print

   
        

       

      

     

 

Bill: Of
Yuma

     

    
  
   

 

BUSINESS ADDRESS. 



NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS

U080 District Atty?:

. 1? 2 ers 0111be Geor 

        

Give residence addresses and dates ?of residence for the past ten years. -

-- .
- 

   

  

  

ist the names of any relative now in the Government ervice, with the degree of ?relat'



35.
and where enployed:

Jr

.1 

?gnu?MM ma
1.

1

4? 

a x/am/xs 1? Jig/me
36.W1at is the lowest entrance salary you will accept. Lav/vow?! (Flea-15c m?
37. Are you in a position to accept probationary enployment at any. time, Without previous notice?f

and, if notice is required, how rruch? j?j. 7170 05715 i
38. In the event of appointment will you be willing to proceed to Washington, D. C. upon 10 days?
notice and at your 01m expense? 3 
39. If appointed are you willing and prepared to accept assignment or transfer to any part of

United States where services are reqaired, for either temporary or permanent 

aph not larger than 3 by 454 inches. Write your name plainly on back
not more. than 30 days prior to date of application. 1
considered complete if such photograph not furnished)

3 I

I

Respectfully, i? 1

[0?19
?1 . (Signature 0! applicant a mu?! 

1. a 
Non: .-If the applicant desires to make any further remarks or statements,
$ncerrning his quali?cations or in answer to any question contzuned' 1n the applies- 1
n, the same should be made on a separate sheet qf paper, numbering the remarksaccordance with the, onglnal questions.

Federal Bureau 

w, 

  

. 31the icant 's 
ore 852311. e, . {3
?city (or town) of. icdmf}
,and State (or Territor ?ghts ?9:officer) 
,1'31131?3 ?11711111 1311-1111.: 121,: .
?1 .1

(orr1ci'ail' Tide) ?9

 

 

 

   
 
     
   
 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ifwoven-vi-Ivv- Qua-rm? ?15-743: . w-I? v-I-v-w 

25,. Give names of societies, and other similar organizations of which you are a menber: 




- j? 

. 26. Have you been adnitted to the Bar, if so specify . 

urn .1

27. Describe any physical defects, including extent of defective vision, if any, with and without

glasses (Smellen)- Luann. 1. 



28. Health record for the past 3 years (give number of days and nature of serious illness): 

391:er in-everydeteilrm - 
?:34 a c. - g. 


?tn-F31: h- - - 

29.= Experience: (Please print .

I

AL

i, i r. or nmrLonn mama}: AND gnom? gm!?

KIND or wonfirm-a
a "fa-f- Clerk - 1934 1937 Wad? 
i GeorgiaMai-{53
Name gm v/
.1515th . 
lNeme . i .7 
$Address . . 
1 3.: 1 3?
Name . .. 
Address 5
1 
iName
{Address

. iName
?1 rAddress . .
- . It
iName .
?l?ddress . .
a .
A . . 
a 393.;Spec1fy any arrests (include traffic -1..-

31. Specify any arrests of inmediate family ?anc- 
32. Have you ever been a defendant in any court 
:ji?wc?lf' 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

NO. '0
MAY I962 
GSA ?lth ?04 N0. 27

UNITED STATES GA

MR. TOLSON

C. D. ?ZLOach

FORWARDING ADDRESS



Memoran um

Tolson
DeLoach

Callahan

Conrad
Felt

DATE 7/20/70 4511/; gain?w
Towel

Soyozs

Tele. Room

Holmes

Gan dy





4

 

For record purposes, this is to advise

that my forwarding address, after 7/23/70, will be



531193443333
home ?Perhins Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830

office - Vice President Corporate Affairs

PepsiCo, Incorporated
Pepsi World Wide Headquarters
Purchase, New York 10577



- 
.v 

Wipe


?w?i?151m.
mums.?

 

 

 

  
   

 

 

Sullivan 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

a? 3%

mm {Ia?Rev. December 1961
Sonic- 
Chap 295

 

NOTIFICATION or PERSONNEL ACTION 5

 

AGENCY USE)

 

1. NAME (CAPS) 



DE LOACH, CARTHA DEKLE (BIB. 

2. (FOR AGENCY USE)

3. BIRTH DATE
(Mm. Day. Yul)

 

 

 

7.20.20 
I 5r VETERAN PREFERENCE 6. TENURE GROUP 7. SERVICE COMPT DATE 
I-NO PT. DISAB. 5-10 PT. OTHER
I 2 I 2-5 PT. PT. COMP. 
9. FEGLI I0. RETIREMENT II. (FOR CSC USE)
I-COVEREO (hauler only?duh?! 0pm.!) [.45 5-OTHER
1 I 3-wuvao Iucovcnzo gm. I on.) 1 

 

 

4, SOCIAL SECURITY NO.


and

 

I2: CODE NATURE OF ACTION

l3. EFFECTIVE DATE

MI CIVIL SERVICE OR OTHER LEGAL AUTHORITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

,7 I (20 YEARS (Moi?gr Yur)
IRVESTIGATIWM EXPERIENCE) 7-31?70 .
IS. FROM: POSITION TITLE AND NUMBER I6. I7. (3) i3: 18? SALARY
g, Assisfant to the Director . Level
030 5 A $36,00043a
l9. NAME AND LOCATION OF EHPLOYING OFFICE .
Office of the Assistant to the Director
Jaahington 30- 0- 
20.1'0: POSITION TITLE AND NUMBER . ZI. PAY PLAN AND 23. SALARY 

OCCUPATION CODE

 

22r GRADE STEP
OR OR

LEVEL RATE

 

 

 

24. NAME AND LOCATION OF EHPLOYING OFFICE

 

 

25. DUTY STATION (CKf-aunly-Shlt)



26. LOCATION CODE

 

 

27. APPROPRIATION

 

S. 8: E., FBI

28. POSITION OCCUPIED
SERVICE

2 I Z-EXCEPTED

SERVICE

 

29. APPORTION E0 POSITION

. FRO M:



 

2-WAIVED-Z

T0:

I?_l

STATE

 

 

30' REMARKS: A. to COMPLETION or I

 

 

 

 

Reason:
industry .
Forwarding Address:

T1 11!! 011?!

YEAR PROBATIONART (OR TRIAL) PERIOD COMMENCING
B. SERVICE COUNTING TOWARD CAREER (OR PERMANENT) TENURE 
SHOW REASONS BELOW. AS REQUIRED CHECK IF APPLICABLE:

 

 

C. DURING
PROBATION

I:

At his request, he voluntarily retired in View of Section 8336(0) 5
of the Civil Service Retirement Act.
Annuity payments to commence $21-70,
Employee retired to accept an executive position in

Perkins Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
Paid hereon for the period 7-2640 thru ob 7~31~70. Lump sum
to cover 341 hours commencing bob S-la?7O and ending after 5 hour

9-30-70, one holiday included.
Tum 

 

mi:
I

pa

 

I

31, DATE OWPOINTHEWPAFFIDAWT (Aumwo?zy) JS- Ali?I?- 

12 AUG 1?

8w

A

 

 

32, OFFICE MAINTAINING PERSONNEL 

?mm

 

 

{um out?m?i?olion) AND TITLE

1 



 

 

4. PERSONNEL FOLDER COPY

i? Director;
38.CODE EMPLOYING DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY 7
I EOE DU 5 U0 INVESTIGATION .
. DJ 02  Comte? Semi; 3'5 ?7-70
I
5 PART
50433-01



 

I
I
i

  
 
  
  
   
    
  
 
   
  
  

 



 

STANDARD FORM 56
FEBRUARY I968

us. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
FPM 

SIS-I08


es
1 
v:

 

AGENCY CERTIFICATION STATUS
Federal Employees Group Insurance Program 

 

I. NAME (Lou)

(First)

(Middle)

DE LOACH, DEKLE

 

DATE OF BIRTH (Moan coy. Year)

7-20-20

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

259' 09 I 7925

 

 

. ?w

3. CHECK THE REASON FOR TERMINATING INSURANCE

IOI- I SEPARATED ?2 OTHER (specify)
MONTHS
. HAD EMPLOYEE AT TIME or ml 
(bI' DEATH APPLIED TOR CIVIL 
- SERVICE sums
was NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX CONCERNING SF 54. DESIGNATION 0F BENEFICIARY
A CURRENT SF 54 IS ON FILE IN
I (C). I THE OFFICIAL PERSONNEL
FOLDER (OR EOUIVALENTI

NOTE: IF EMPLOYEE (A) DIED OR (8) IS RETIRING OR RECEIVING FEDERAL COMPENSATION UNDER CONDITIONS ENTITLING HIM TO RETAIN
HIS LIFE INSURANCE. ATTACH CURRENT SF 54. IF ANY, TO ORIGINAL SF 56 AND CHECK 80X 4 (0) ON ORIGINAL AND ALL COPIES OF SF 56:
IF NO CURRENT SF 54 IS ON FILE. CHECK 80X 4 IN ALL OTHER CASES. SHOW WHETHER OR NOT CURRENT SF 54 IS ON FILE BY CHECKING
ATTON (OE SF 54 IS ONE THAT HAS NOT BEEN CANCELED BY EMPLOYEE OR AUTOMATICALLY BY TRANSFER 0R PRIOR TERMIN-

 

 

 

A CURRENT SF 54 IS
NOT ON FILE WITH THIS
AGENCY

CURRENT
54 ATTACHED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. DATE OF EVENT CHECKED IN 8. DATE OF NOTICE OF CONVER-
SION PRIVILEGE (SF 55) TO 

PLOYEE (MONTH, DAY, YEAR)

6. ANNUAL BASIC PAY RATE (NOT AMOUNT 7. 019 EMPLOYEE HAVE OPTION
ITEM 3 (MONTH. DAY. YEAR) 05 d??lRAgC?y 0N BRIT INP 0N DATE IN ITEM YES. GIVE RECEIPT DATE OF ELECTION OF
ETC. RATE. OPTIONAL INSURANCE (SF I76 or INT-T):
9 

7-?31-70 5 ANNUM

INSURANCE
YES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. I CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM. AND CORRECTLY REFLECTS. OFFICIAL RECORDS AND THAT THE EMPLOYEE
NAMED WAS COVERED BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES GROUP LIFE INSURANCE ON THE DATE SHOWN IN ITEM 5.

?z??VW/w??ww

 

 

7?31?70
(Personal sTgnoture of authorized agency official) (Date)
p, Callahan Assistant Director
(Typed name 0! authorized agency official) (Title)

Washington, D. C. 20535

(Moilfng address. including ZIP Code of agency)

Federal Bureau of Investigation

(Nome oI agency)

 

 

 

 

SEE OTHER SIDE
FOR
INSTRUCTIONS TO EMFLOYING AGENCY

 

 

ng,,

Mi 

.31

9 
SFonbk/oaf?

SF 
mm 

9?30 com spay/o -

:23? 531990? v?o 

7/ 1%

2.311%
,7 .

PART 3 -- FILE corr?a x; 

 

 

 

 

 

?rm . - . 
COMPLETION OF CERTIFICATION

I. This Certification must be completed in triplicate whenever an employee's insurance -terminates for:
a. Death.
b. Retirement on an immediate annuity with or more years?E creditable service, of which at least 5 years civilian
.service.? or on account of disability. (.An immediate annuity is one which begins to accrue not later than I momh alter
the date the insurance would normally cease.) In a disability retirement case, do not complete SF 56 until a ?nding
of disability has been officially made and the employee?s separation is in order.
c. Completion of Hi months in a non-pay status or separation, and the employee is receiving benefits under the Federal
Employees' Compensation law, and held unable to return to duty.
d. Any other reason, if the employee desires to convert his life insurance, except under the following CIrSUmstanCes
(I) EmpIOyee waived or declined known that. within 3 calendar days after the date the insurance terminated, the employee will
return to Government service in the same or another position in which he will be eligible to reacqutre
Federal Employees Group Life Insurance:
(3) More than 75 days have elapsed from the date Insurance terminated unless speci?c rectuest is made therefor
by the Civil Service Commission or the Olfice of Federal Employees? Group Life Insurance.
insurance terminated on account of death, indicate in item 3(a) whether the employee had filed an Application for Retirement
- (SF 2801) with the Civil Service Commission. 
3. In item 8 give date of Notice of Conversion Privilege (SF 55). except that if this form (SF 56) is issued in lieu at
SF 55. give current date. In case of death. leave this item blank
4. It is important whenever a duplicate SF 56 is issued to replace one which has been lost, that it be clearly marked

DISPOSITION OF CERTIFICATION
LDeath of employee?
0. Send duplicate of SF 56 immediately to the Office of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance.
I). Keep the original (preferably in the Official Personnel Folder or its equivalent) tor attachment to a claim for
death benefits (Form FEI6) when received.
c. If no claim is received. send original SF 56, upon request. to the Office of Federal Employees? Group Life
insurance.
d. If the deceased employee has a current Designation of Beneficiary (SF 54) on tile. the SF 54 must be attached.
to the original SF 56 when it is sent to the OfIiCe of Federal Employees? Group Life insurance.

2. Retirement of employee?

a. If the employee is applying for an immediate annuity with 12 or more years? creditable service (of which at least 5
years are civilian service) or for disability, attach the original SF 56 and current Designation at Beneficiary (SF-
54), it any. to the Application for Retirement and give duplicate of SF 56 to the employee, (NOTE: In a disability
retirement case where the retirement application has already been sent to the Civil Servim Commission, attach
the original SF 56 (and SF 54. if any) to the Individual Retirement Record (SF 2806), 

b. ill the employee wants to continue only. his regular insuranCe, have him complete a SF i76 declining his Optional
insurance. If he wants to convert only his optional insurancet prepare a statement (see below). in duplicate, for

. him to sign. attach both copies of the statement to the original SF 56, and submit with application for retirement
as instructed in 20 above.
Illustrative Statement
wont to. continue my regular insurance after retirement but would likeadditional intermotion on converting my optional
insurance."

 

(Employee's signature) (Address?printer type) (Date)
6- If the employeeapraters to convert both his regular and optional insurance to an individual policy, give him the original
and duplicate copy of the SF 56. Retain SF 54. if any.
3. If employee' Is receiving compensation benefits-
Betore completing item 7 contact the local Bureau of Employees Compensation Office, if necessary. to confirm whether
the employee still has optional insuranCe.



O.

b..Hovo the employee complete appropriate box on reverse side of the original SF 56. Send original SF 56 and current
Designation OI Beneficiary (SF 54). if any. to the U. S. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, BUREAU OF RETIREMENT

AND INSURANCE. WASHINGTON, D. (2.. 20415, and give duplicate copy of SF 56 to the employee.
If the employee prefers to convert his group insurance to an individual policy, give him- the original and dupliCate copy
of the SF 56. Retain SF 54, it anv.

 

4. All other cases? .
Upon request. give the employee the original and duplicate copy of the SF 56 or mail them 30 him.

5. In all cases-
Retain tile copy of the SF 564p the employee' 5 Ollicial Personnel folder or its ouivolent. 
PROMPT CERTIFICATION REQUI .
The time' In which an emptoyee may Convert his group life insurance to an Individual polity is limited. ?this 
must be Completed and delivered or mailed to him 



 

 

 

Egg?

NAME MIDDLE NAME

MO.

LOACH CARTHA DEKLE

 

 

 

(RECORD EACH NAME 
STRIKE our PREVIOUS NAME)

SERVICE HISTORY

EFFECTIVE

DATE SASE PAY

4
Se tion
3 God

Standard Form 2806 

want 1M

DAY

SOC. SEC. NO.
YR.

2 2
DO nor us:

REMARKS

H-nm fFl'Hllf'E nt?rv?rucuw 

RETIREMENT

DAIE OF BIRTH

AGENCY PAYROLL OFFICE

FBI

2? Justice

CALENDAR YEAR
SALARY
IONS

6

YEAR

orw rd

0"

on

1? GPO 
I

PAYROLL OFFICE NO.

1 



Was in on

FISCAL RECORD


TOTAL SALARY
DE IONS





Fade 1 Eu 0 Invest?

I


Lion

ccoun 0 un ea_

     

a

0.5. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

Ilu 

 

OT RECON

SEP @1970

v.
t?

2a

we:
I

4L

an.?

 

 

 

 

 

2-451" NAME FIRST NAME NAME DATE OF BIRTH
. . Mom?? DAY IYEAR AGENCY PAY ROLL OFFICE
. 1 CARTHA DEKLE I usti 

 

 

 

(RECORD EACH NAME OUT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED NAME)

SERVICE HISTORY FISCAL RECORD

CALENDAR YEAR ACCUMULATIVE
YEAR SALARY TOTAL SALARY
DEDUCT IONS DEDUCTI IONS

(7)

 

I

-1 ..

Eifcctive 7/10

I 51:7?)

563'

om: 4"

alive nails- vaun? ?l . ?Hi-.1
-





 

smnaamFormNo.2soc . oro 16-5452? INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT RECORD

 

Form prescribed by Comp. Gem, U. 8., November 4. 1949 (Amended January 14,1955) . (CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM)
i?g-I?I?n?i 

 

 

 

 

I . 
NOIDELOACH . CARTHA 

(FIRST

 
   
 
   
 
 

  

JUN 3 

-

vasc-


~92-

    

 



9?1

10-2

      
      
       
    
  
    
  
 
  
           
   
  

.nscAL YEAR .
DEDUCTIONS AND
SERVICE CREDIT
coxmmumns

  
   

TONTINE

DATE DEDUCTIONS

   
  

  

2,135..
BS: ?nrr?vod



  

NET FISCAL YEAR

  
     
   

   

DATE OF BIRTH 

DAY

    

MONTH YEAR

    

  

sex RACE
AGE

   
      
    

DEPARIMENTS



    
    
 
  
 

psnucmns AND BALANCE:
nor use ms FORWARD TOTAL CREDITED
commaunous comm: To EMPLOYEE

 


4

CS 1

naconn Stmc: common ram. zeoc-rn. m: -

 

     

?n

DESIGNATION OFFICE

  
    
    
     
 
  
   
      

 
   
 

DATE OF ORIGINAL APPOINTMENT
REMARKS

 

  
 
 
 

 

  

 

   

Tontine Added

  

D. 3. 

12-31-47 
Gross Deductions 12-31-4

 
  
   
 
    
    

        
 
    

4

16-183

,1





 

in!? 

 

 

 

FBI 

3 DATE OF BIRTH VOTING RESIDENCE
.MONTH DAY YEAR STATE mo cone. COUNTY CITY or: TOWN

DELOACH DEKLE - I
.
(sunumc) (rmsT NAME) . (SECOND mm.) sax Izi MILITARY SERVICE .NO
i 4 I REFIREMENT AGE MILITARY PENSION OR WAR RISK COMPENSATION YES NO

 



I 

 

SALARY SERVICE

REFERENCE OF ACTION POSITION AND GRADE EFFECTIVE - DEPARTMENT OR ESTABLISHMENT
DATE OFFICIAL STATION
PAY LESS BASIC MOS. DAYS yns_

I .v - ALLOWA CES PAY 

oved 7 3
Ant

 

 

 

 

 

 

I common SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL homes DEGREES. IF ANY
NUMBER or was) 1 '2SPECIAL QUALIFICATIONS . 1? I 
. . -I. 16-183
 

 

APPLICATION FOR REIIREDNT

CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
(USE ONLY IF SEPARATED ON OR AFTER OCTOBER II, I962)

STANDARD FORM NO. 2801
April 1963 
FPM SUPPLEMENT 831-1

6 GAO 5000
MOI-TOO

 

 

 

To avoid delay?I . Read information carefully; 2. Complete application in full; 3. Typewrite or print in ink

 

 

A. PERSONAL INFORMATION
I. NAME (but) (First) (.Itiddlr) 2. DATE or BIRTH 3. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
MR 1 (Month) ?Day) (Ymr)
De?Loach, Cartha Dekle 7 - 0 - 20 259-09-7925

 

 

4. ADDRESS .N'uIirber and um: (Cir am! Slate) Code) 5. LIST All OTHER NAMES You HAVE USED
25308
ewe,

1109 Moi-ningside Lane, AlexandriaCITIIEN OF THE UNITED STATES OF 

YES

6. IB) IF OF WHAT COUNTRY ARE YOU GIVE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: 1 A
OR NAME HER (OR HIS) BIRIH DATE DAT: or PLACCE OF MAR PERFORMED BY
I Mont Dd car it am farr5593: RTE PEACE

 

 

 

 

 

 

. 4 - 22 -45 h?aec?umokIUPRR-m

 

B. CIVILIAN SERVICE I

 

I. DEPARTMENT OR AOENCY IN WHICH PRESENTLY OR EMPLOYED. INCLUDING 2. LOCATION or EMPLOYMENT (City and State)
BUREAU OR DIVISION 

FBI Washington. D. 

 

 

3. TITLE OF POSITION 4. DATE OF FINAL SEPARATION (Momb) (Day) (Year) 5. OF YEARS as
Assistant to the Director YOU HAVE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES GROUP 1le 7. ARE YOU ENROLLED IN A PLAN UNDER THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS
Cl NO

 

 

 

I. COMPLETE THE SCHEDULE BELOW IF You HAVE PERFORMED ACTIVE DUTY THAT TERMINATED UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS IN ANY OP THE FOLLOWING SERVICES:
(A) ARMY, NAVY, MARINE CORPS, AIR FORCE. OR COAST GUARD OF THE UNITED OR (B) REGULAR CORPS OR RESERVE CORPS or THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
325R JUNE 30, OR (C) AS A COMMISSIONED OFFICER OF THE COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY AFTER JUNE 30, INT. IF AVAILABLE, ATTACH A COPY OF YOUR

I HARGE CERTIFICATE. - 

 

ORGANIZATION AT DISCHARGE
(Din. Reg!" 60.. Pk.)

DATE OF ENTRANCE
ON Amy; DUTY

DATE OF SEPARATION
FROM ACME DUTY

LAST GRADE

BRANCH OF SERVICE OR RANK

SERIAL NUMBER

 

5p? ml: sr'S(?

q50-o3?63 b/T3/+b classf?ns??a??kn, air/P4.

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

2. (A) ARE YOU A MILITARY RE-
SERVIST (EITHER ACTIVE

OR 
Um Mg

2. (C) IF WERE YOU RETIRED FROM A RESERVE COMPO-

2. (B) ARE YOU IN RECEIPT OF OR HAVE YOU EVER APPLIED FOR
NENT UNDER CHAPTER 67. TITLE U.S.C. (FORMERLY

MILITARY RETIRED (RETIRED PAY DOES NOT INCLUDE V.A. 
PENSION OR TITLE PUBLIC 

Um ?g I Um Um

 

 

 

 

D. DISABILITY INFORMATION

 

I. WHEN DID YOU BECOME TOTALLY (Mamb. year)

Only applicants for total disability retirement will com-
plete Part D. 

 

 

2. BRIEFLY DESCRIBE YOUR DISABILITIES. STATE WHEN INCURRED, AND HOW THEY INTERFERE WITH PERFORMANCE OF THE DUTIES OF YOUR POSITION. ADDI-
TIONAL COMMENTS ON PLAIN SHEET OF PAPER IF NECESSARY.)

?imam-Quid!? n.



 

 

E. OTHER CLAIM INFORMATION .

 

MIA) HAVE YOU EVER RECEIVED OR MADE APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATIO
UNDER THE FEDERAL COMPENSATION 

YES

NO

I. I8) IF STATE THE NUMBER OF YOUR COMPENSATION CLAIM AND THE
PERIOD FOR WHICH YOU RECEIVED COMPENSATION

 

CLAIM NUMBER FROM (Month) (Day) (Year) TO (MombHDayN I'nrr)

 

 

 

2. (A) HAVE YOU PREVIOUSLY FILED ANY APPLICATION UNDER THE CIVIL SERVICE
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, INCLUDING APPLICATION FOR RETIREMENT, REFUND,
DEPOSIT OR REDEPOSIT, OR VOLUNTARY 

YES

NO

 

2. (B) IF INDICATE THE TYPEIS) OF APPLICATION

 

AND GIVE THE CLAIM NUMBERIS) IF KNOWN CLAIM NUMBERLS)

 

RETIREMENT DEPOSIT OR REDEPOSIT
REFUND VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS 

 

 

3. (A) DO YOU HAVE LIFE INSURANCE THROUGH A FORMER EMPLOYEE BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION FOR WHICH PAY
NO

PREMIUMS TO THE CIVIL SERVICE 
7; 4

it 

3. IB) IF GIVE YOUR ACCOUNT NO.

YES 

 

 

 

4. (A) HAVE YOU EVER BEEN EMPLOYED UNDER A drgz? A ENT SYSTEM FOR

I FEDERAL COU BIA EMPLOY ES
.1 SEP @1970 M0

L5 DYE

 

 

4. (B) IF GIVE THE NAME OF THE OTHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM



 

(OVER) 3

 

 

 

- 

km .

.1ij-

 

 



 



 



CONSIDER THE MATTER 

VIVOR BENEFIT, BE SURE TO GIVE . OTHER INFORMATION CALLED FOR.

0 CHANGE WILL BE PERMITTED AFTER AN ANNUITY HA

BY SIGNING YOUR INITIALS IN THE APPROPRIATE BOX BELOW, THE TYPE OF ANNWOU WANT TO RECEIVE. AND

GRANTED. IF YOU WANT AN ANNUITY WITH A SUR-

 

F. TYPES OF ANNUITY: MARRIED APPLICANTS ONLY 

 

 

INITIALS



 

ANNUITY WITH SURVIVOR BENEFIT TO
WIDOW OR WIDOWER

 

 

 

If you are married, you will receive this type .of annuity un-
less you choose the annuity in F. 2.

'I?h?e annuity payable to you during your lifetime will be re-

 

 

SPECIFY THE PORTION OF YOUR ANNUITY YOU WANT USED AS THE BASE
FOR YOUR (OR SURVIVOR ANNUITY.

 

If you wont on your onnulty used as the hose For Ibo survivor
bene?t, write the word "all" In the box below. IF you want
only port of your onnulty used as the has. for the survivor
benefit, write the yearly amount m: annuity you wont used.

 

 

 

 

THE ANNUITY WILL BE 55% OF ALL OR WHAT-

 

 

 

duced by 2V2A- of any amount up to $3.600 a year. used as
the base for the survivor bene?t, plus of any amount
over 53.600 so usrd.

If you retire for total disability before age. 60 and get a guar-
anteed minimum disability annuity. you may use all or any
part of your ?earned" annuity as the base for the survivor
bene?t. You cannot use any extra annuity which may be
payable to make up the guaranteed minimum annuity.



_If your Wife (or. husband) should die before you.- no change

. tn type of annutty Will be permitted. your?annuuy will not
be Increased, nor may you name any other person as 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ALL YOU SPECIFY As THE The survivor?s annuity will begin upon ydu; death and end
when she (or he) dies or rcmarries. 
ANNUITY WITHOUT SURVIVOR BENEFIT "You choose this type, Your wife (or husband) cannoI be Paid
asurvivor annuity a ter your death.
2. (I do not desrre my wife (or husband) to receive a . . .
survivor annuity bene?t after my death.) This type provules annutty payments to you only.
G. TYPES OF ANNUITY: UNMARRIED APPLICANTS ONLY (Including Widowed and Divorced) I
a 
ANNUITY WITHOUT SURVIVOR BENEFIT If on are not married. you will receive this type of annuity
. un ess you choose the annuny In 2 I
1' 0 This type provides annuity payments to you only. 
INITIALS ANNUITY WITH SURVIVOR BENEFIT T0 0 This. type is available to all retiring unmarried employees ?who
2 NAMED PERSON HAVING AN INSURABLE . . am we readmitt-
INTEREST - It provides a reduced annuity to you and a survivor annuity

 

 

 

.to the person named as havmg an insurable interest.

 

SPECIFY THE NAME, RELATIONSHIP AND DATE OF BIRTH OF THE PERSON YOU WISH
TO RECEIVE THE SURVIVOR ANNUITY

The survivor?s annuity will begin upon? your death and end
when she (or he) dies. .

 

NAME Of PERSON (First. middle. In?)

The survivor?s annuity will be 55% of the reduced annuity
you receive.

 

RELATIONSHIP DATE OF BIRTH (Mm, dd), yr.)

 

IF you choose this type: lyou will have to under 9 _a medical
examination which th be arranged by the ml Sethcc
Commisswn at no cost to you.

 

 

SEE UNMARRIED EMPLOYEES UNDER INFORMATION REGARDING SURVIVOR
ANNUITIES ON THE ATTACHED INFORMATION SHEET FOR EXPLANATION OF REDUC-
TION IN YOUR ANNUITY.

If the erson named as having an insurable interest should
die beibrc you, no change in type of annuity will be per-
mitted.your annuity will _not be increased. nor may you name
any other person 'as survnvor.

 

 

 

H. CERTIFICATION OF APPLICANT

 

 

 

intentional false statement in this applica-
tion or willful misrepresentation relative thereto is a Violatton
of the law punishab by a ?ne of not more than $10,000 or
of not more than 5 years, or both (18 U.S.C.

 

 

I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are

true to, the best of my knowl ge and belief.
?a?vy?aa 


or "pucmn

    



 

I. FOR USE OF EMPLOYING AGENCY (See FPM Supplement 831-} For instructions.)

 

 

CHECK APPROPRIATE BOX:

Mauy? F. Row



WITH REGISTER OF SEPARATIONS AND SF 2807, NO.

INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT RECORD, SF 2806, AND REGISTER OF SEPARATIONS AND TRANSFERS, SF 2807, ARE ATTACHED.
INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT RECORD, SF 2806, WAS SENT TO U.S. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION ON

(DATE)

 



We

(SIGNATURE)

9?7
(DATEI

I

Federal Bureau of Investigatibn

Officer

(OFFICIAL ..

(DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY)

OFFENSES EARRING ANNUITY PAYMENTS: Public Law 87?299 prohibits payment of annuity to persons who have committed speci-

?ed oIl?enses involvingl
formation to the Civn

the national security of the United States.- Emplo . . 
Service Commission?s Bureau of and nsurance tn any case when law applies.

ing agencies are responsible for submitting all pcrtincnt_in-

 



 





A H?siswwm?Tr?-thwwi-s-

u.

r- a. 1n- -

 

mrnpu omce no.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ustums nasr NAME MIDDLE NAME DATE or 3mm
1 DAY
CARTHA DEKLE
A 
(RECORD EACH NAME 
- smxe put PREVIOUS NAME) a}
SERVICE 

"?532? ACIION use my
a (I an - 
A 


 

Sundud Form 2806
February I966 2806-104




 

SOC. SEC. NO.
AGENCY PAYROLI. OFFICE

YR.
Wash to

DO NOT USE

 



FISCAL RECORD

YEAR ACCUMULATIVE

REMARKS YEAR 
DEDUCTIONS DEDUCTIONS

?4

6

as as? ,k

47?63 
.
and 2810 Sent to 56, 2806,

9 WI of?

i 0.5. CWIL SERVICE MMISSION
LEM. SUPHEMENT t-



UAL RETIREM RD
(CIVIL SERVICE SYSIEM)

 
 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
BUREAU RETIREMENT AND INSURANCE
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20415
June 29, 1970 
GSA 1 23? 95A

Us 34;. Deperhnent of Justice
Federay Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. G. 20535

Attention: Personnel Section in
I. Roonf [+513



- . - a 
as?" we!? tw4m,!zgralt . -1rvREQUEST FOR INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT RECORD (STANDARD FORM 2806)

NAME (Last) (First) (Middle) DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAK SECURITY NO.

 

 



 

Whigghoach, Cartha D. 7-20?20 259309-7925 kw

OTHER NAMES UNDER .WHICH EMPLOYED POSITION 


Tera; Assistant to the Director

SERVICE CLAIMED IN CONNECTION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR

 

 

 

DEPOSIT on
ECANNUITY DEATH BENEFITS REFUND REDEPOSIT If

 

PERIODS OF SERVICE FOR WHICH A 2806 IS REQUESTED

 

LOCATION

 

BEGINNING DATE ENDING DATE DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY

 

741?70 FBI Washington, D. c.

 

 

 

Mai???can! u?

 

 

 

 

- a. . 3
REMARKS. mr?fa' ms; 

The S?omission has approved the retirement of Bertha De Leach under
Sectlona8336 5 USC. Please forward the claimant's retirement record WI
card (Form 2806) as soon as possible after date of final separationPrelmmary 2806 renewed. {same-M if?

lD/afz" 
rem? 5437s a . 



 

372%;90' 

Please attach this form to the 2806 forwarded. If Form 2806 is not submitted, please check one
of the boxes on the reverse side of this form and furnish information as required.

Jack Goldberg 
chxef, Claims va1510n 3m 41-6?
2 ?924

 
   
  

,0.5. OFFICE: 1969?3

AUGUST I967

 

 

United States Civil Service Commission
Bureau of Retirement and Insurance
Claims Division

Washington, D.C. 20415



1? K.- 

The requested information is furnished below as indicated?by checked box:

Form 2805 covering service claimed forwarded to the Civil Service Commission.

a


4
do

 

DATE FORM 2806 FORWARDED

4 .

REGISTER OF SEPARATIONS NO.

I

 

 

 

NAME AND tar-crabs: ?ne-m SHOWN of; FORM zsoe

 

 

No record of employment in this department or agency.

CI Form 2806 cannot be forwarded. Employee on furlough until

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(dual I I

Employee not subject to the Civil Service Retirement System:
FROM TO
REASON FOR SEPARATION
Remarks 
I ?r . p? .ba(AUTHORIZID 
Inna} drum?J I 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series 
If);

I



. ??u?m?w?lh?h (Ilsgl?lj/ s. NAVAL PERSONNEL SEPARATION c?mna

?Clam 
_1__3th March 1945 

9/72?] mx/z {am/v 2/55/49 (1%J/mz mag/a
3



it"
ISICaz-13011Captain,U U.S. Nairy
- -, -. 2 - Commanding
'

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Authority for discharge a,

51 ?2 
mum-1m DATA TRANSCRIBED FROM NOTICE. OF semm?bu. 13. ??33
i 5-3. it: u?
Serial or file number 950'05'69 09- 253.3
i3 :1 a
?f Date and Place of birth 30 July 1930 Club?, Ga' :31: 
(Date) (Place) $1 3 
g? 1;

Date of entry into active service 15 October 1944 . :23 -. .2

s- s: 

Highest rank or rating held 3P?F1alis?'8 9138-" ggzua=

. . . 

Service (Vessels and stations served on) . r" E?i??i

.USNTC, Great Lakes, Iliinois ?53?
NAS Norman, Oklahoma (Duty) 223:5

u: 



2 ?3 5;



 

 

 

Remarks .

Point System

Victory Medal, World war- 

American Area Ribbon

 



 



i

F. A. (jg) . 

other entries previously made hereon now covered ?53?

I

by Notice .0

pf. 
I
a

1? Separation.

i

 

 

on.



SEPARATION FROM U. S. NAVAL SERVICE 18 
.3. Nwrcao-oss (RKV. 0-45) . 

i I

I. sum. nu: no. t. mu: (unit) (Mi-53?) a. nut Imcmu'foa I. run: or unnuou 
I

RANK mo a. nnumnrr hon unluno maroon 
5 PSC-Norman Oklahoma
950 0:5 69 -- i

A H, Carths. Delcle . . - 1:

 

 

n'"MM-non 1
v35 USNR 3 .3 - Honorable Discharge . 
201 Main St . 1. Abonns rnou wmcu mu. a: sou-1m

201 w. Main St. - . .

Claxton, Evans 00., Ga. Claxton, Evans 00lo. Mann-M. "nus u. u.o. (no on no) u. out. mo rue: or 0mm l.
Marri od Yes 7-20-20 Claxton, Evans 00 . Ga. 
S: 3 IKRVICI BOARD OF RIOIITMTION ll. ADDRESS AT 0' ENTRY INTO 3KRVICI 1 .
s? .o 1312158. Akron, Ohio Box 165 R0 . Akron, Ohio .
"u Din". OF ENTRY DY IN ION) . If. DATE OF ENTRY INTO IERVICI II. NIT IIRVICE PAY. 
h} i?ryr v.1? .. mg 
10-13-44 S'inos. iday . . 5
- mun?. "?3"an ?um'nmm u. me: or mm mm acnv: ?mac: a;
?l on?: out 10?15?44 DAT: Akron, Chi I . 
:21 a. cuauncnlons. Hm. rrc. If. ?mm: mm . ..
See Rating D?soription Booklet A53 320331? (3)30: - . - 1'
for Specialist Second 3903320 
?6 Cla 3 name: (vnuu Ann "Anon: unveu on) . If 
a. name: Icnoou coumro vant- USNTC Great Lake 8 Ill 0 -. 3' 
SerSohool Gomd. NTC HAS Norman Oklahoma Duty) 1: i
ii Bainpridge Md. 8 . .
[y
I PREMIUM IS NOT PAID WHEN DUI OR WITHIN THIRTY-ONE DAY. THCRIAFTER. INSURANCE WILL UPSE- CHECK. 0K CHOIR, .
. IMPORTANT: $7315? 7595mm; or. Tug u. rouwann 'ro coLLtc'roa' a 3515mm I 
-EPFECTIVH MONTH OF 17- MO. PRIMIUM AMOUNT OF PREMIUM DUI SI. INTINTION 0F VITIRAN To CONTINUI INI. 'h .h
nuovnSN'r4uc0N-rmumcu our: 4.46 no" non-m 6. 70 Y6 n.
:3 PAYMENT UPON TRAVEL 0R INITIAL OF DISDUHSINO 
<4 Incwono TOTAL 
5 75162 54.195

 

 

 

 

1cm)

8. RIMARKI Point System worldj'gar II a. slam-run (av pentagon or coumuom .
Victory Medal Ameri can Campaign . - .
Medal 

    

(so -

 

. FRANK-E. IGOUCH a;
Lieu-t. '1 n? . 
?2 of Law S?h??l Ass?t.?Peraonnel Officer. 

. 

I 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

?u NAM: AND ADORIIS OF EMMTII ?a OF 1.. MAIN CIVILIAN AND 0.0.1.. 
35 Federal Bureau of Investigation mom 8-42 Lawyer and Agent 
:m Washington, D. c. - . of Fed. Bur. 'of Invog. x;
I 3 1'0 10-44 - H. 
3 3-. "cannot (uu? nu. LOCALITY. um emu?. nu) PRIFIHINCI Iron ADDITIONAL or 51::
2 Secure old job - Undecided :1
. a I Hal.
u. won-non?. on TMDI ooums (NATURI mo ?mm or, coon-mos-two: can. (no. uuccuo- a. Dunno acumen count rm.? counxuo . . 4 .. . . I. 1 3m: 
ORAMJ 8 I H. t. 4 I GILLmom- mou u. pr?gom munouu'oounuo count-rm a . ., I. - 1'21(?23??nun?It; I I 
New} . - - . - 
$2.234qu - - -
0 ?l .1. . 
,4 15;; {635.M11: or "mum - Us} Tommq.UI JOU: IJJLG t'jf'ip?OJ ?Inc-T Ii px?u QGLAICG  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

U0. 8 Naval Re: I . .
serve 
La <53, 13 onovaIble .13 .
utt?n_ issued ischarge Button. and .
. . Ono rable- 
'11 - - erV1*Lu1'31#311 .. .Il-Oq'Iosl'01031135 . . 
i 5 t: ?my ?Hi"amw J. 35! m: 111153354: my" ?011111133 {31 .J. 1:53;: a 2:011:131? :u 3" '1 931811313? 3? ?1611013va fit. 0? I 5, 
.1 11 If?. ?In"la 37:34:46 at0111?Him :13 so 31331: . ?Jm313,133)" I I. 03.1'3 03J?s-l J'I'1n?; ?gal-U . I. ?3}001?? 'n
3 1 11?3") ?Imam.- I "f 1 
:1 ?4 '17. 11buggy3?91); fig: . I. {0 -. vumuouu 1?431,307,; I y? 0 ?0.353111.1-1. {3 Gan 1' n' aural/1.3M 
i" "Midi? 19:33? 1 Huron .1, 1 b" "tag 1? ?4 1.13509ILTIAXAG $13.32. . i' - .
4 33-112. 0 3 ?tm 2.32353.?- ?852.. 2011003": . - 3. 1.34.4.5.51- ?i \i ?f any,? or'91. 31?1'1'7; a" 3 9 I653. 06"" 3- W941
?Ltal?g . Iuar? 
"'6th ?hmArargr . 0301'?: A I If 1* . it: 41;? 
?vmom - ."Mm? a 613} 503Main)? u. . 5:37111.. . "Eff-h- (Bk mmrcuod 94,, 1' .
. .53: m?ur mum-'11 ?no.1 6""qu 3'00. 00 vuw?acw; . 3 :1 ?ifRIO- I i? . 3 Jig-:13 Wu - l' lig?lli?:fa\ - r- 1. ??10m3011r$ . ENC . :22.
1 3-: a . u. Wain!? ma Vt?
gal??E"?P? 25:6.533.mgu'm" 12' '91. Oh M?smj?"; if"! 
?1 .. "2339"? 1: 73:91.:26" M's. 'f?isrlint$.I-UTU I 1.1- If?II-qt}. 86 I ?1?qu . :15'e'l 
c- 0:300: 'Q'omq . . (VJ-ll If . A u: 35014:15:; . Ili?r r= (3317823?2:
1 2 ?04?kl-Mtg I I 5? '215'1- .3 <39Hm' 3.1. I 0130 . .. . .1.112535?: 11:12} 'rnu- 1, . . .331Vanna 31an. ?an. - a 13";.p?l 3 . 3.23.4213 law? .0 
1 . . I
night1:1, I W12"(in '4 a r? . Tonya 0-3.Icg? - 
uh 1w: ?65? mm: 
.. .Ellzu .. - 1 4:13?. 1" . 4 0 . ugm. ?l?ic?[$1135 "0 5'"if? 19.3.1.409": 
I: - a I 1
CLERK sUFlsc r\.dk\ bout? . A6 I. ?Ous )0 a: 'l;m 
9 COUNTY GE. i .13' tn": ?3 I3 3" 3 I:
.11? ORGIA :3 . 'x Mvu. 01-mn-I-n?Mm" .. 
?In that [hm instI-Umcnt W515 5: 015- EL: A311 Of?'Anihall van-- a 
?y 1? 0 .19M MN \Ir 1 ?315:; 50?3"! 1'4 fasyc "{locordcd Book . 3Fan 
ff? 19.9.4.2 .- "103mm: .2650'50?113.0 . . ?l
'l/jAJ 41/? m_ . can ?h'k't'umh . :vh1?35; ?31 . II, n- 1. ?uk?I?gs??g? 11'3??
. . ?1 . 1?1? I {11:30 A .. v. 
?? 

August 25, 1970



if

Mr. Cartha D. kDel'..oach -

Vice President - Corporate. Affairs
PepsiCo, Incorporated

Pepsi World Wide Headquarters
Purchase, New York 1057?

Dear DeLoach:

Thank you for your kind letter which
was received on August 18th. I certainly appreciate
your expression of best wishes and hepe you will have
every possible success in your future endeavors.

Sincerely,

Edgar Hoever

1 New York - Enclosure 

?1

3 NOTE. Former Assistant to the Director DeLoach retired

1%

 

i 7/20/70 and is on the Special Correspondents List? Adclress
1:1 per mailing list.

Tolson 

 

 

 

 

   
 
 

Bringing cu fg? a .1 4,12
Callahan i 
1w 1 111111.111 1! ,1 - 
1233m?? 1310025810: 3 - 1

gamers 

r1332? ?ooz?m 

 

 

 

1 Holmes 1'

I a
1" 110/
Candy MAIL Roomljj renames UNITE: 

 

 
 
  

Mr Tolsong
. t] a 

 
   

 

  
 

Mr. 
PWWYORK10577 ML 
- Mr. Casper
. AuguSt 12: 19 0 Mr. Conrad.-.?
Mr. 
Mr. 1
Mr. 
. Mr. Tavel 
The Honorable J. Edgar Hoover Mr- 
Director Mr' swam 
Tele. Room
Federal Bureau of Investigation Miss Holm
Muss Gand

 

Washington, D. C.

 

 

Dear Boss: 

Please forgive my rudeness at not writing sooner to thank you for your
many kindnesses on July 20, 1970, the date of my departure. The
gold cuff links, the gold buttons for a sport coat, and particularly the
mounted gold badge, which I treasured and carried for so many years,
were all deeply appreciated and will be coveted forever.

Barbara, the children and I have moved into a new home in Greenwich,
Connecticut and, of course,?' are finding plenty of work to do before
becoming settled particularly yard work.

I

I reported to work as of Monday, August 3, 1970, and have since been

in the "learning stage. My new associates are high type friendly people
who take pride in their work and company. The parent company,
PepsiCo, Inc. with whom I am affiliated, is a fast growing outfit whose
successes have become phenomenal.

Your words of advice and encouragement on the day I left were gratefully
received. I will continue to you and the FBI whenever the
Opportunity presents itself. In the meantime, let me wish you the best

of health and continued success.
3561135 I 3 
617?5} a; 5 it MTV 9

 

 

 

 

 

One final thing, as a retiring employee, I've had'th? MS usual requests for
interviews and feature stories from ?The Baltimore Sign, 
?Meet the Press, et al, but have indicated uniavailab1'
to become involved in such matters.

1?



ity. I do not wanit.

Sincerely,

 



Deke DeLoach



unsung-W

3 1970

1
MW

 

 



3? 




 

,13? 4?

NOV 2 1970

i PURCHASE. NEWYORK10577 

wax. .
9


October 28, 1970

Mr. Tolson 

 

   
   
 

 

Mr? Sull'va
I 

13/
1349;167er


Mr. 
Mr. Casper
Mr. 1
Mr. Felt.
Mr. Gale
Mr. Rosen
Mr. Tavel,
Mr. Walters
Mr. Sayers.-.)
Tele. 
Miss Holmes.
Miss Gandy,

 

 

 

Honorable Edward M. Kennedy
United States Senate 1
Washington, D. G. 20510 

My dear Senator:

I have your letter of October 6 1970

?gin which you request my participation relative to the

Epreparation of a documentary on the life of the late

General; Robert Kennedy.

While I would like to be of assistance, I 
11 must of? necessity indicate that any contacts I had 1 
with Mr. Kennedy came about through my official 9 .
:employment with the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 

EConsecmern?.ly.. those experiences are part of the ?les
of the FBI and therefore, not available to me in 
retirement status. I therefore could be of little or
in this regard.



fella

.Na?s?l?

er?
$2524

Searchc?

 

Sincerely,

     

19 NOV '19 1979

 

 

 

 

c. 
1910
- Honorable Edgar Hoover 921 5
Federal Bureau of Investigation. mm 14?
Washington, D. C. ?20535 
r? 1? .. 
DeLoach *1 i
1 
LEDSILQ 

 

?l A3
w- I 










?i?lbw nu?? {of

   
 
 

{if 


 

59W

 

 

RD M. KENNEDY . .. w. 2.. x.


?PJCnifeb ${afes ?cnafe

WASHINGTON. D.c. 20510
October 6, 1970

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach

Vice President, Corporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.

Pepsi Worldwide Headquarters
Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

As you may know, an oral history program
on the life of Robert F. Kennedy has been estab?
lished and is being administered by a special staff
of the John F. Kennedy Library. The program is
developing a valuable source of information for
historians, political scientists, biographers and
other scholars interested in Robert Kennedy's
career and in the events in which he played a part.

We are, of course, interested in thorough?
ly documenting Bob's role as Attorney General. We
would consider your participation of great value,
and hope that we can count on your cooperation.

The coordinator of the program is James
A. Oesterle.? He or a member of his staff will
follow up on this request to provide you with more
information and to arrange for the interview. I
know they will be happy to answer any questions
you may have about the interviewing process.

I would appreciate hearing from you as

to whether or not you are willing to be interviewed
for the program. Thank you for your cooperation;

Sincerely, 

EDWARD KENNEDY

 

  
 

 

 



14333. REC. 


a
"b

REC 49;. November 12, 1970

was

Mr. Cartha De oach

Vice President eCorporate Affairs
- ePeEsiCoyw Incarcerated 

Purchase New York 10577

?mum?l??

Dear DeLoach:

 

 

I received your letter on November 9th and
Mr. Tolson and I certainly appreciate your kind sentiments.

 

It was good of you to furnish me the informa-
tion concerning your conversation with Mr. Seton and I ?shall
make this data a matter of record.

Sincerely,
3? Edgar Hoover

A ?is

NOTE: Retired Assistant to the Director DeLoach non 8/31/42 and

Bufiles contain nothing unfavorable concerning Donald M. Kendall who
is a firm supporter of the Bureau and the Director. A1 Seton is not
1 identifiable in Bufiles.

(3)

I
"rink!

9* 
i We? ?u


. {1352?

Sullivan 

 

?i
3.41% MAILEQ 
rennan. OJ). .. . :x 5r
(MIL-ban .1 2 1970 l?g 

a {in 
-_Ln

3d {25.31: . 

?if w: \N?x 3:2: ..-

Mu 
.x

 

 















Moll! 


1

i I #s






ceased active duty 7/31/70. He is on the Special Correspondents List.

{it 4 
?alhh . ?r '3 
@8?3 
32:13:? W, m. noon TELETYPE 

?ev 

.m



., A



 



-- was;

 

e-e-r?Mikvee?i-Y?



 

 

 

(2..



I







CARTHA O. 

VICE PRESIDENX,
CORPORATE 

Honorable I. Edgar Hoover

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C.

20535

Dear Mr. Hoover:

I firm in New

i

9
PEDSECQ

PURCHASE. N.Y. 10577
TEL. (914) 250- 0027

 

 

 

 

November 4, 19 70

l/

CONFIDENTIAL





Mr. Tg?onT?C/p


are/@965;
(it, ?npa?CD

Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. 
rMr. 
Mr. TaVl 
Mr. 
Mr. 5: 
Tale. Room.--
.Miss 

 

 

Mr. AiXSe?ton, who operates a newly established public relations
York City, called by my office at 11:00 a.m. today. Mr. Seton

has been previously employed by the American Broadcasting Company in
New York City, and most recently was an executive with the Deegan-Raymond 
public relations firm in New York City. In connection with the latter firm, he 
was assigned the public relations account with the United Mine Workers (UMW) f?

[in Washington, D..C. As a result, he came to know Tony Boyle, President,
UMW quite well.' When Mr. Boyle and the UMW decided not to renew their

5

l?

f?siderable business with the National Alliance of Businessmen (NAB) in

Washington, D. C. He traveled with Paufrka??er, a former vice president of 1 lg; 


While with the Deegan-Raymond firm, Mr. Seton also did con?

:contract with the Deegan-Raymond firm, Mr. Seton decided to leave the Deegan?
I'Raymond firm and set up a business of his own. He was promised the public
relations account by Mr. Boyle.

my company, PepsiCo, Inc. who was temporarily assigned as President of

the NAB. As you may recall, Donald MXKe??daIl, President and Chief Executive

Officer, PepsiCo, Inc. was Chairman of the Board of the NAB for one. year,

men 3 <3 5

March, 1969, to March, 1970.

Mr. Seton's declared purpose for visiting me was to return equipment,
such as a typewriter, radio, etc. which was purchased through PepsiCo, Inc. 
for his usage when handling public relations for the NAB. While in my office, he
asked me if I could discuss the Yablonski case.
that he would now have the public relations account for the UMW and he desired
to raise the image of this organization as much as possible in the United States. 
He specifically inquired as to whether or not I felt the American public believed 

He very pointedly indicated

\that the top hierarchy with UMW was responsible for the Yablonski murders .

1 - Mr. Alex Rosen



In":



um

ii-EO

6 NOV 18 


Eflbw

.. 

I

 

i
i
l" i
M, 
39-3?:

Miss Galridyml

unu-uc-ummu?u-g.

 

 

+1 -





 
  

raw!" 

lo?"

q,




i

 

 



. n.
iw?nr?v? 


PEPSICO INC.

I told Mn. Seton that I felt certain he, could find the answers to
these questions through evidence given out not only during the Federal
arraignment of the Yablonski subjects but additionally from state court
records in I stated that I was.in no position to be of assist-
ance to him inasmuch as such information that I possessed was of a confi-
dential nature as a result of my previous FBI employment. I did tell him
that I thought he had a most difficult task to perform if he planned to raise
the image of the UMW.

I

"iv?22:? 

The above facts are being made available simply for record
purposes. 

I trust that all is well with you and Mr. Tolson, and I do hope
I that you will let me know any time I can be of assistance.

Sincerely 

. . DeLoach



We -

 

H?t?me ?mm?wee ki?

WW

 

 



FIELD .5ARMS TRAINING 11"ij

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPECIAL AGENT ?2 LOAGH, a. 5. $25319
. QUALIFIED
?Mixdiu . rat/L
0144404? I Ira-M 
.1 1mm gm 
It

 

 

 

 

 

- my??
M. W. Hap? 25?3?. 5.
CR WA-?wcgm?im 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 






 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.a'rnl?' 7,5337!

 

 

 

. Oi. 555552555554 - 
?07 5 SEP 151579 31 

4

November 17, 11470 

r7 -
?17 stats 7! QR I
11; D. @2Loach i
Vice President - Corporate Affair
a 3 PepsiCo, Incorporated
116?" Pepsi World Wide Headquarters
Purchase, New York 10577

Dear DeLoach:

You will recall that Southeastern University, which
is located in Washington, D. .C. is a four-year resident college
accredited by the accrediting commission for business schools as

senior college of business. We continue to enjoy a close friendly
working relationship with this school which always has had a con? i
servative administration. 

The J. Edgar Hoover Foundation first issued a
scholarship grant to Southeastern in 1988 in the amount of 500. 
This was subsequently raised to 060 in 1969, and 500 in 
19%. .. it is suggested that the Board of Directors of the Foundation i
give consideration to increasing its scholarship grant to Southeastern

 

 

 

 

 

 

I
in 1971. 1'
- i . 4
must). as Sincerely, 
NOV 17,1970 Edzar Ham 5
5* cons-Fe; . 7 
I
1 Mr. Sullivan 1- Mr. Callahn W4 
Mr. Mohr 1- Mr. Caspar}
{\ii 1- )S?f?l - Mr. Bishop

van?, 
3% See Adams to Mr? Callahan memorandum dated 11/16/70,
:captioned "Southeastern University, J. Edgar Hoover Foundation Scholarship
333:3?" Grants, in which the Director instructed that it be suggested to Mr. DeLoach

the scholarship grant to Southeastern University berincreased in 1971

Fell

1 1 1
him?W8 DEC ?37 me, 
.1?er tub} 7 XEROX 
Swansea ome?m'EDY DEL 1 39?, 
it (10) . ?1 
Zaiifwj?: MAIL noon/1:] TELETYPE 

 

 

 

 


'my? car: I art-??lo-I05 
. 23.22:. 32:11.. .. . - . 
UNITED STATES nggmun

 

 

 

 

5 .- :91. in
If . . 
~Memomndum .
. 323%? 
- Fell. 
To CALLAHAN DATE: November 16, 13"? ,gzi?g, 
. Tavcl 
.I Walters 
FROM . B. ADAM fg 6y} W0 
gil?i?'f
UNIVERSITY . 
. [$ij
SCHOLARSHIP GRANTS

 



Mr. Tolson has inquired as to the manner of selecting recipients of the=
J. Edgar Hoover Foundation Scholarship Grants. To be eligible for consideration,
an individual must be an FBI employee, have completed one year of FBI service
and one year of study at Southeastern University with a quality point index of 50
or higher. Applicants must furnish a statement of need for financial assistance
and an autobiographical sketch outlining college and high school extracurricular
activities, militaryexperience, organizational affiliations, and hobbies. Theii
Scholarship Committee makes the selections, however, in each instance, 
Dr. John P. Maurer, President of the University, informally checks with me to
insure the FBI employees selected are in good standing with the Bureau, appear
to be career-minded, and are working towards the Special Agent position or ther
aresponsible assignments. Dr. Maurer wants to insure that any employee??
selected will be a credit to the FBI as well as Southeastern University. 
Southeastern University is a local night school accredited by the accreditin
commission for business schools as a senior college of business. It is a four- .
year resident college with an enrollment of over 500. A number of FBI employees
have attended Southeastern at night over the years since it is conveniently located
in the down town YMCA Building with an Alexandria Branch at the Francis C.
Hammond High School. Another factor is that tuition is lower than that of the

..

 

 

 

   

 

 

major colleges in this area. There are approximately 250 Special Agents on the
rolls today who have graduated from Southeastern as well as approximately 50
lclerical employees. With Bureau approval, I serve on the Board of Trustees
having been asked to serve in that position in view of the close ties existing
between Southeastern and the FBI. This school has always had a conservative)
administration and faculty oriented bu iness community. 3 r,
lay/45:4 ?mi-32 1/ ?re"
The .J1 . Edgar Hoover Foundation made its firs ?scholarship grant to
lSoutheastern in 1968 in the amount of $1500. This was raised to $3000 in 1969,
and $3500 in 1970. my 
6?0 i 
. ?all.
ACTION: 13 NOV 2519?: Meg
:5 3/ gal/Maw 3.13% iww-u?w 
None? information only? a grime a. 
- .1 .S?i L?xnno
oorv MADE FOR ma. TOLSONN. 9? . .
non-u. . 'th-nI-II 't - LC 1 
JBA:mfs (2) it} .3 ,p . 
Mg. ha- gen. 

 

4 4.- u, . or: 

 

 

 

 

 

omouu 10m no. lo . solo-loo .

mu no: tomou To! 1:1

GSA cm. are. no. 27 I hen-?
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Memorandum
Conrad
Felt
T0 Mr Bisho?yl?/ DATE 11/18/70 321:?
. Tavel
a 1:12;:
FROM M, yo 3 Tele. Room
. ?1 7? 1:11:
SUBJECT: FORMER ASSISTA 0 THE
DIRECTOR C. . LOACH

ATTENDANCE AT 
PRAYER SERVICE
SUNDAY, 11/22/70-

We have received a list of individuals the White House
is planning to invite to a Prayer Service at the White House on 11/22/70.
Included on this list is former Assistant to the Director C. D. DeLoach,
who is being invited in his capacity as Chairman of the National Public
Relations Commission of The American Legion.

RECOMMENDATION: . 1? i? 

For information.

   

Hui? 

2,7197
1 - Mr. Sullivan 8 

1 - M. A. Jones 
. 11 NOV 241970

1.

JCF Tip (5)

Wm" 

/3 

 

 

 

STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION

BUREAU OF RETIREMENT, OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CWQJ)

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20415

 

 

. 113-727-370 FILE Re?a?fgmt
. - GSA 1 23? 95h
NAME
11.8. Dept of Justice Car-the DQ103011

 

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, 13 20535
?rth; PersOnnel Section 7.20-20

.,
- com h513 ss# 259 09 7925

In an application for benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System, the above-
named individual lists service as follows:

DATE or BIRTH (Month, Day. Year)

 

 

 

 

DEPARTMENT on AGENCY INCLUDING PERIODS OF SERVICE

 

LOCATIONOFEMPLOYMENT
BUREAU. BRANCH. ORDIVISION WHERE . -
EMPLOYED (Guy and State) TITLE OF BEGINNING DATE ENDING DATE

 

3,8, Dept Agriculture I?vans County, Ga Farm Surveyor Surmers of?1937, 1938, i339

 

Navy Deland, Fl Time Material 8-11-42 8-285-112
. Checker

 

 

 

 

 

 

For use in connection with this application, you are requested to furnish on the
reverse of this form a complete record of the service as reflected in the files of
your office.

If the employee was on leave of absence without pay during any of the service show

the number of days at each rate of pay during which he was absent. If the employee
rendered service on-a "when actually employed" basis, show the number of days actually
employed at each rate of pay:(

In the event you cannot furnish us with the record of the service listed because your
records are lost, destroyed, or incomplete, please furnish the name and symbol number
of the disbursing officer and any other data which you believe will aid in making a

payroll search in the General Accounting Office.

Jack Goldberg
Chief, Claims Division

 

IF THE OFFICIAL PERSONNEL FOLDER
HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED T0 FEDERAL
RECORDS OENTER IN ST. LOUIS, PLEASE
FORWARD THIS REQUEST To THAT OFFICE.



United States Civil Service Commission

 
  

 

 

 

PLEASE CERTIFY ON
THE REVERSE SIDE

. . OF THIS FORM AND
Bureau of Retirement, Insurance and Occupational Health RETURN TO THIs

r?Wawio ?ack/W OFFICE.
80EC 4 I 413? . 3 

BR 46-36
FEBRUARY 1969 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FULL NAME OF FORMER EMPLOYEE

Cartha D. DeLoach

 

DATE OF BIRTH DATE

 

7?20-20 12-3-70

 

 

SERVICE HISTORY 

RATE OF (per
NATURE 0" POSITION annum. per diem.
ACTION per hour, etc.)

REPORT OF LEAVE WITHOUT PAY
. T0 N0. DAYS

EFFECTIVE DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY, INCLUDING BUREAU,
DATE BRANCH OR DIVISION WHERE EMPLOYED

 

REPORT OF A SERVICE
T0 N0. DAYS

  

DATA (IF AVAILABLE) 

 

 

AGGREGATE BASIC EARNINGS FOR PERIODS DU RING WHICH
RETIREMENT DEDUCTIONS WERE NOT WITHHELD UNDER
ANY RETIREMENT SYSTEM

CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM DEDUCTIONS. IF ANY

 

PERIODS OF SERVICE

 

AGGREGATE

BEGINNING ENDING BASIC pAy
DATE DATE

PERIODS OF SERVICE

 

GROSS-
BEGINNING ENDING RETIREMENT
DATE DATE DEDUCTIONS

 

3-:

 

 

II

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE INFORMATION CHECKED BELOW PERTAINS TO DEDUCTIONS WITHHELD UNDER A RETIREMENT SYSTEM OTHER
THAN CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT. (CHECK AND COMPLETE APPROPRIATE ITEMSI

 

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE WAS SUBJECT TO RETIREMENT SYSTEM.
DEDUCTIONS WERE NOT REFUNDED.
DEDUCTIONS WERE REFUNDED. 
DEDUCTIONSIREFUNDEO COVER SERVICE FROM To . AND THE AMOUNT WAS
PAID 
REMARKS: CERTIFICATION: THE STATEMENTS CONTAINED ON THIS

Our records show no official
documentation of service with
the Navy Dapartment or the
Agriculture Department.

 

FORM ARE BASED ON THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THIS
OFFICE AND ARE CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWL-
EDGE AND LIEF.


. SIGNATURE
lee . Row

 
     
  

Ma

 
 
    

I 

   

 

OFFICIAL TIT 

Federal Bureau of Investigation
DEPARTMENT OR AGENCY

 

 

GPO 870.745

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A and?owOmcuu you no Io 59.9??
an no: (omen ?131:ch 5
1 677207? 72 um . .1 ?1133? ?it: 9 1
i (?anu MR. SULLIVA mui-1awm
Ruwn 1.111.915
anl .. a as .s
cc Mr. Sullivan new.? .1
4: PRORI 3 S. B. Donahoe Mr. Brennan a?f?lhmm
I Mr. Branigan 
sumacn a?bs
Internal Security - 051 b7c

I

Mr. C. D1 ggLoach,, former Assistant to the Director,
called from Purchase, New York, where he is now Vice President

0L Pent-5.190 .
3/ DeLoach advised he wanted to inform us regarding the F1 
1? actions of above? subject in-case they had not previously come 

to our attention. He_usaid DoanEndall, 
had received a letter a political writer for 
?Izvestia, the largest evening newspaper in the Soviet Union.
Kendall had ?met? him while visiting in Moscow with then

- Vice President Nixon, some years ago.

 



 

in would be in the 
United States from December 15 to 20, 1970, and sought an inter? fa
view 'with 'Ke?dall, H?;was tgnbe accompanied, if interview 
waswgranted Washington representative
He said?he was seeking interviews with ot

 

 

      
  

Ls

prominent Americans. via k:
DeLoach said he did not yet know if Kendall wo 1d 5

grant the:: Bureau to k?Bw in se 
we had any specific interest in the interview.mil?thanke 
him and told him the?Bureau would not want to inject itself 
into the interview. 3
Bureau files characterized 

fgreign intelligence agencies as a KGB officer and 
i?_?also reported to be a suspected Soviet intelligence agent. 5;
State Department has advised is coming here to 
study internal problems in the U. S. and how they are being 

resolved. He is said to be a more balanced reporter than most
Soviet writers. On this trip he hopes to obtain interviews

with Gegrge Rpmney, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development;
Herbert Klein of the White House staff, Governor Rockefeller

of New Ydrk; and mayors Lindsay, Daley and Aliotniipfi?emeork
City, Chicago, and San Francisco, respectivel E6 2/3" ;7

ACTI /"3319:
Q?7f\y record purposes. - 13_'
Bil: 11-3in {33303 

$1119?. 113?le



   

 

   

 

 

 

 

?lm?Q new

 

 

Mr. Tolson.{/ 1

Mr. Sullivan-
. 33/311111
r. BronnanCD-E
Mr. 

Mr. 

puncHAsc. NM 1057-: Mr. Conrad 
253? 3027 Air. I??:lt 
Mr. Gale 

Mr. 
Mr 'l?avel 
cmma o. November 25 3 19 70111:: Walters

we: 1 .,
AFFAIRS 1 Tele 811:2: 

Miss Hoimcsm
Miss ?Gandy



 

 

 

 

 

 

Honorable Edgar Hoover

Director 3
1/ . Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Boss:

I have your letter of November 17,1970,
written to me in my capacity as Secretary to the Board
iof Directors, The J. Edgar Hoover Foundation, which
3' suggests that the Board give consideration to increas- 
ing a scholarship grant to Southeastern University in
19 7 1 . 

You may rest assured that your suggestion
will be placed high on the agenda for the next meeting
of the Board of Directors . The Board has been most

'enthusiastic in the past relative to grants to South-

eastern University and has been particularly gratified
over the personal response received not only from the
President of the University but from the students who
received the scholarship assistance.

It was kind of you to bring this to my
[attention. REG-1970

Sincerely 

 

Imm? - 

1r 1? a "v1? 333-? rc-vrw" 35?7?3 nun 1.532.412"? :vat-f?RK-iUral

v?
:41.





141?-



 

 

 

 

f0?30

MO

   

OFFICE-2 YR

My

 

 

FIELD HMS AND SGIEHTIFIG TRAINING 
OF SPECIAL AGENI 19. 

- P. 0.


1i

RADIO

?MAGNUM
MO PIST
PRACTICE
F. P.

LAT.

M. P. P.


 

67? 61%? 

 

 

?v.31 I. 5.3Fla-197
1 . . a . 
DUPLICATE PROPERTY RECORD

 



(This record'is to be kept up-tO-date and should be paintained
in the field personnel file of the special agent.)

 

I

zu-m? nus-e.

Badge 2138 with case
Commission Card with case, ?029

FBI Handbook 3&9 w"
Tax Exemption Identification Card 
Agents Brief Case I

Zipper Brief Case' vX

G.T.R. Identification Card h?7h9

 

 

 

FIREARMS:

Official Police Revolver 636579
Official Police Hip Holster 
Grip Adapter 

 

 

 

1 Ammo VED FROM mm D,
. PERSONNEL FILE
. 67 - NOT RECORDED




 

 

 

 

 

 



I. If OPIIONAI 101? Io 50m 10:. . .
MAV no: lemon .
on am no no Tnlmu 
?g
Agate}.

rin? 

Memorandum 

I 

TO Mr. Sullivan 1/ 26/ '7 1 

Raspn 

Tavcl 


. . 5? 
mom T. E, ?Eton??

Holmes 
Candy 

SUBJECT: FORMER AS NT TO THE DIRECTOR 

CARTHA DE LOACH (RETIRED) A, 

- 
ii In accordance with Mr. Tolson' instructions, BishOp .

telephonically advised Mr. DeLoach of a question received by the Bureau
from Jack?Nelson, reporter for the "Los Angeles Times, and the reply

whicWaS?giVeho tB'Nelson to the question. The question and answer are
as follows:

5. We are informed that Cartha DeLoach, former assistant
to the Director of the FBI, gave assistance on scripts for
the show. Was he paid either by the producer or by the
FBI Recreation AssOciation fund? Who replaced him in that
role after he retired from the FBI this past summer?

ANSWER: Former Assistant to the Director DeLoach retired
from the FBI in July, 1970. He was, in fact, responsible a
for reviewing scripts for "The television series--which

responsibility now is handled by Assistant. Director Thomas E.
Bishop.

To the knowledge, Mr. DeLoach received no payments
of any kind from the producer of the television series.

Mr. DeLoach did not receive any payments from the FBI
Recreation Association in connection with ?The show.

Mr. DeLoach stated that he had not been contacted. by Nelson
concerning this matter, that the reply furnished to Nelson by the Bureau
. was entirely accurate, and that Mr. DeLoach received no payments of any
kind from either the producer of the FBI television show or the FBI Recrea-
tion Association in connection with the show.-
m. '3 3 I 

Mr. DeLoach thanked Bishop for Biggfyili? him of the// a ove
matter and stated he would, of course, immediately advise the Bureau of

any contact Nelson might make with him concerning a 
the FBI or the Director.

 

  

XEROX 
RECOMMENDATION: F521: 8 if??
or information. .
1 @Mr. S?lliva n?g? -- Mr. Mohr 1- Mr. Callahan . -.
1- T. E. 

 

 

 

 

          
           

   
  

.

mewp-umwluw


I 3?53; 9 25 ?rvisl 35* .
I, "Au ?35} if?! Myra-W run-wmw 
?3m .3 219'43'553?3131:11) CLARK 23.52:, :22: IV 730:1 re?t?? $7013 be;
I, I. Rama; Ream . . 
- . a ?ew 0000*me Roaming.
?ngyerw?u, 
. MARIA 1?81!de to Sty? it: better?
V5 for imam I 3013:??
gia?i 33!? 000590031 mama-V
. 2:33: 1 ?23: .
. 90:: IA: V: V100
01ml. ??ght ,?gi with, $5,431,: magi ., a
3; wasm Akron10:: 311i? $01228 . Hm much 193$ch
,{be a 2:3:
:v . may.? 
I, 3 2M A?'mngfaszhe'cag??
4.: ?1 
30:0,?
2 '3 
Them 0% swim 02101311053,
a I ?zshould step?aside for 0530011;
z? 
I Iaa?e?where againithi?nkii 
E: ii? entirely ?pq?his h?aiih Ra?; 2: 
EA at, carry?e?utt?emalibat 
-, I 1 03a jot the $0116: $1,53- 31,?
Iii; 11f} to?the Premier}; Rafi ?93C?f3vghm?. .
It, GARTHA new if}? V, 1,1010: :03: ERA mm Ag; {at RR
gigigijmirin 
I ?:Itiiz?ep grids 000;; 3,11 1., 
#ij lie iRI?em 35%? 30100330 0,0 035 
Lemeneec?perwm? a?w??n 13}? IE (10203 I .
I 
,m . ?Vf-xc Isamfacm oh?siRr?Vh?isImuniER
W?Fve VII 3:3: i; :33
eg?waa?n? (imam: 41.51,: 12:33:26?? 
., IIRyV-=almut 32;,fm
Remnsg?en?t gfat?300015}: iikem pom} 0121? i?at when -
,0 13 .39?v?r? ERII?aehAsie??ed ?31:1? II 305943110 ?8350? ?03330 
31!} wk jobgm Rica gregi?ent 1.00% I, .. ??33 303%: A charge Bi; E?nnv?stiga:
335%,? 90??ng V'weV'agtwmeR 10mm: atiiberty a
?ikquesnman?m?wer inte?i? ??iiga 
A 11000.,? V'Vg?gigf? ,Vf- 
{in ?z?ka gibw ?mw?a ?umuisa, .1 
32,33 3 .234%,,ng warn-n, 
I




"Wt?gfww??
. Mr"

     

 

 

 

  
  
 
 
  
 

         
    

       

 
 
   
  

   
  
 
   

  
    
  

        

    

 

 

     

  

      
      

  

   

   

"x



MA

 
 
    
    
    
 
   
   
  

Almikosmw,
sir. 
3112, 
Iain 803mg mg.
Tale. 
Miss 
Aims 

  
 
 
  
 

      
  
    
   
 
    
        
     
  
         
    
 
   
   
  
     
   
 

 

   
   

 

  

  
 

 
   

 

 
  

 
 
    
 

    

V:


. I I
4 
a

'27; 053 

  

 

  
   

  

 
 
  
 

     
     
 
   

 

 

  

 
   
 

  
  
 

   

    
 

 

     

     
        
 
  

        

 

 

 

 

RN AcoRis
JOURNAL, 
AKRQN, OHIO

JANUARY 1%?197 

. . . 4 I D, ?l 1 3 
.wxw?su L. . 6 J. E4:

?mam1, 7:14?g??f?f?E?W35 33?1?} ?66216; 
me??a ,5 J. .1 6 616666 66 660%. 66 6 
315.2?: iinAttIIt-naycxieaemi 3136634136 6161211325; 
16.3146 ?dive" 6665;; i661? 165i?; 
. w" ;;iagents**66616696616613: from the? . 
6: ?65666661136638?? 93? ?711959 666 atnothzn 6666611666 
04?: 6466665666 With ?Jinan; JhaciJground it): if 46%;;13 66544431666?1??63?0?5 ?6941733669 9998143339133? . 003386116 :61?283 Joyainw?m} promote 6661301166666 6661666126 ?3:6 
6666 6:6? 

6656 Hi?? 366666 ?epartxnemw??remmen. 76116? fi?fvtearJdawnJour rule?i??filawv? W531: .J I

36??

?5

I ?Enniinu??
:69

       
 
 
 

     

     

      

   
 



m5?

      
 

     

?it?

     
 




an JI JI

 
  
   
  
  
   

  
  
   

Ami:
1? 55333666036645.

?ingzwere 66666;? th??i Ef?gy Ji?ai c?argc? .
estgig vemports. 6 63666 4? 1 
I 4 635,6 masxiecai? 1.26146 56366613666664? 664636 my 666105? 166g ?6 6119 East survey I
4 i666 6666;366:1566 th?e?: matier were?? iris, lighoweth?eJFBi?aaents i ti 6 as]: 51?3?} if?.
I I - 26 I Jam 5253:? ?szerent colleges 666 6616?; $36? ?ii-5 SDSM ?ti?
(JJ, s36r51txesJJ6'JI?here is; I '66 at: ?is: ?15% 06-.
(Tftw??ztsiice ?ammnent Ironclad-f - ?Tng?y mthin? the ?a?evg?? 5111;058:183 ?6666
666 thatatherhootmgq ?were 11626664? 4? 6396?? Of the background??i 6616 61616626 essaryJandmot in?. 61666;. ?It; "?62366 126:}; 6y 6666m6666'66r6 66616? 4
vista Ghzati?officials :66: If mas? 3? ;6?ituation.JJA 21111!th organizatmn Jim,
u; yJ?c fishy-1mack:

   

gigi?f'k

 



 
  
   
  
     
  
   
 
 
 
   
      
 
  
  
   

66?

 

 

    

 

 

it


 

 

        

   
   
  

 
  
 
 
  

 

  

L6 66 666 62666666 666662166066 I
. ?if: 666;: 66:: 3J6 4 -,er:6 whoyractzce mvotum 
?Can 55653 111309 the} 331? Zilve??ga'm slim manprlack F61 agents 13:86:65th 3m? 6666;526:116 practic?h Idilinng :3 
homziniitts histoncal persiiec?va? 3:313:66213 :5 ?61664} mpr?paggna i
J. 3313??th9 18.115866 961665011 366? 66 Ema, 521% J: um .
$263 ?rried 61:6ng minis oimanpowerJJ (gene/can 3813*? that? 1 611516.66 6663 $66 that happenmgixmur soczety miss; sgiisJiJJ J66 iblaz?IEagentzhas6666mtumcd do 66,36? 66653663 {663616666666666 I
3' if; 666,6 ?1666;212:1116 FBIJ It 's?fjust if? 36:66:66? 

     

   

,1 6.66316? W6Jhave 6 number 6fv 6mg; ?aw Jexte 63166 a; a ?31,438; 

. 9 Bra?" 61346363 fi?t?qg? tars Th9?e>alfg GQIHQJIWHO 6136
566.6 mi? 61666;: ere 31493 '3 piesen 6:6ng 16666 thesis??i yruba?hlg?hasa ?666 2: 4r
663?im6 36166 116.46? 666?; engagmi in? 6.113%;

6 6;er 

Kr 7? a; 
2,626116266 :61 smgle 6666}





an

6 I 

  
   

a
l?
v?s?



1.. Q3 :cW Eggs: :gi?nZ-l
63616: I 6663* imam 6361166,: nimg?z?afruthrega ding 
63266 6666661216666.J16i66k6666666. 6?66 662;; gig?J?; 
6 ?4 666%? :6 666665? 661

6 361666;} S61646716611 61666616666665ch 

6.:
3795,?? 1:

6
'9

66'

  

6636f666 eve!? 66661666 s?zglg 66564666 $61639? manta; 6

      

M3: 1;
wwd; 

?i?l?hats alaughabfte RIMS-soon): 66$
11616 6661* 6616? 6666166 616236 6162': - -
136316 files; stmetly 



Aw-

   

4}

   
  

(:wa

it."

??0166 263?, 661166 511121661616 ?66336 
?33531 ?Sim TEE working 66 {6266666666 $95616!ch 66:66: authomzatiamfm? 662:6
66?3? 666?: 1633? :33; knwwotgtha; 16? lahongas han666?66wn I636 6126 JJ

6216 higgesi mmnsibihty 63?. 66 666666 6: =36 35? 323559: ?In $366 13% 666532666 1316;611:113. 1266 6666336

5; s6 :5 61366665663? 266666 616' 666: 6?6 Maw 
?46? 6? 6? 3 ?96 611631 16900661636 forthateg
4?41? ?Grady?? law?s ?veg-6833'? '6 6166616 ?Egroyeng?aa?za 61336:? ..

.3941, 
$936666: {gammy ca?6?f



 

 

    
  
    
     
  
  
   

 

 
 
 

 

 

I Jsi-EYaIJIEIJamIinsaJrenmd ?trains, 

?in $153732?? j'

when ?tmiisJ abpotentiai 

six-vs: 5605??:

(32666661166666,116666966366? the 51111131361666? {6336662131 66666 is 111366an 

  

INIWWM

56695 :10 1616..Kank?tgtg?166666366326 $36663? as 666 662 (36636666 owihwparf 
666wa prmtuced 66% 6662616 72662 r6626},J666 if?: ?666sz ?6&6 66:66:? 66166 66621666??

6:116 0961' 3639 66666666 $26 636? 
366? 6; ?66 J. 66966666666666
6666: 5636 6666; 666 6633 2166267166

666616 639266?? :66 JJ 
Jas?w 01636?sz 24.66%? 



 

3?principle 666i 636:} 63,6666) 666116212ng: 666461246 investigate Individuals forJ
Iantheanng 61666666?

936 authnriti'o; 5,616 660626;! 66566636- ,36 66664666366 @613 Wow??
mnslaemugszitaxmmjipg 1666621352"

 

 

  

hf? 

66166666tmssihirop66f?e66m6~ 
18130226. 1616 62363611216 ?dicalws. 3; .

awg??vq?'dt

M?i? z?i?mto? Kiwi-WV:

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 
      

 
 

  
 
   

 


22:33 32:2? 2 2.2222222? 22:2 2r.
2:4. 314411552114 your 2012;522:212 16?31 erg: can":-
?i a
2? .
5' :4 Ethis gpnniry?

.2352. v2 2
2122::



4r-

iramework e552" .2201: vioiatmg the ch:
11 shhertiee 4041 indterduais And wife
therejave been 
and {041 course .we areehumen'ian? 2?
444 4 - eg?iw theyehave
pen im'inedrateiwaee 

333%:2: 

?hv force: 143$ 12:21" ?emocratic4-i'



 

    
    
   
      
     
  
     

?aii-n-n 

 

.
1 M. ..
amuse-rem:






.2-

   

.2-



preselve tome by any 2"
?112315222122: 4. 
We impassable. There ..
are too..mahy checks and balane
qxi the And the manutethe? .8324 '47:



ww~




 

 

. .3252!
t' 

. 

?3V5111d on {eel the semenwey,



 

 

    
    
     
 
 




. 


{ge' 



6.

    



?xer: very carefuil and that the 161313 4:

f: tzeuldatrzc?y .5153! but qt the p04!
1225541 1231211 if the FBI. isailowe?te"


.5 w,

9..

 

.,


men, then ate? memes mveshgetwns .
fire: amused for. pahhcal .4. 
blackmait and for many reasons";

 

 

"551133341395

amnimstmioeem. see 51; 'm
Ef?e? Tgot fa be?very.egrefui aetef.
. t??Ee he used @133? the
.FBL?Eed?he empartmem? e: Jusuee?
'z?i'zi carmng? out? of ju?iczat and. Rim 2..
lative resmnexb?t?es. 2 
'46 .MW

 

 

4 fimtherefere .3544 1

witc'fshouldr'bewaypomte? so": titty;

 

   

  
 
 
 
    
     
  

 

 

 

 

.13 
2312.321229W9?3?w?? 22": 4. .2 W7
2: .4 themthen the?? 2051: ?feet. the
$.33 ?eueceemr Le Heevemhoutd he 533m 
.3 4 one ma?a the ?2 
1, EM .46. -
45612120219 ?tithe 
121:5 has left, within the? 132.1; a
'3 ive? 01:24:21.2 eaterwee 3111212423223
5 feign?444 prdeeduree amt {2110:3254 dedi *1
-ceted :?te thepmcetiures. 2.22% parhcw $444444 
itariyr the motcetten: ?of Evil?; heather).
?1 and the sanctity eft414i4e files. 2.222.225.2222

 
  
 

  

there Merge where 3'95;

:44

the te? 43ers FBI power meander}? 22?1? 

 
 
 
  

pended When youe?heve a erge 

M?~r?4

chum h?e?eo?mef :yqug saute; have, more

  

51.1ng qt: 13:25.01 sueemsmn?amts'
4 ueihc?tent organize
3.1" time {there Ehav :bee? manyrece

 

 
 
 
    
 
 
  
   
   

more or 5234 34.4.4.
and this 51101116 neyerhappen' $541.63.?

 

 



~34: 


can the evemgeitndividual

'30 it {11391112302211 3.11.3; smtegevem
meme 22:22:24 the recmnegtg 11? 52%; ..

121$ whee efti? 4
salar asethm?: 

 

 

wiehi? ?ergamzatmn, .352 1h 

misconduct? more in}; . 4.

?endatwns ?that: the FBI 

 


3.2.3444

  

 
 
  
  

    
 
  
   
  
  
 
    

 

 

   
  
  
   
  
  



1'

 

 

n4



 

"u ?4722226252226;
.

It?

 

 

 /7 m?i

VFW 4


a;
OF 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

February 25 1971

  
  




I

44*)

Reference is made to the Director 
and former Assistant to the Director

MR. DAL BEY

C. D. DeLoach on page 4 of the pm
attached. MR. 
MR. ROSEN 
MR. TAVEL 
MR. WALTERS
MR. SOYARS

 

MR. JONES
TELE- ROOM 
.: MISS 

  
 
 

MRS. METCAL 

a MISS GAN
..
I ?53? .3

  

i 

 

77777

ss ?P's 
7 MAR 161977 a

 

 

 

 

    

BERNARD P. GALLAGHER

3%9 9Wm??%f JM.

0 230' PARK AVENUE 1
. NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10017 I

 

 

 

 

1 [s b) 
ga/?zg?m 33mm i 

A CONFIDENTIAL LETTER TO CHIEF EXECUTIVES

A

230 PARK AVENUE, NEW YORK 10017 212 MU 5-6100

New York. February 2k, 1971.
Volume VII. Number 8.
(In Two Sections)

Dear Sir:

 

COMPANY PRESIDENTS HAVE STAKE IN GOVERNMENT REVENUE CRISIS. Estimated bil-
1 lion spending increase planned by state, local governments this year. Nixon's $229
1 billion fiscal 1972?73 budget cells for $16.5 billion additional Federal expenditures.
Corporate chief executives must convince'Nixon Administration U.S. unable to a?ford
"guns and butter" economy. Press for cutbacks in national defense budget, government
payrolls. Urge end to unions' tax?exempt status. Private sector unable to sustain
public sector at current rate of expansion. Increased taxes mean less jobs, depressed
profits. Corporations, individuals now generate two?thirds of total $285-billion
Federal, state, local government revenues. No longer able to shoulder political pro?
grams promoted by "free loaders" like N.Y. Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, N.Y.C. Mayor
"Hollywood John" Lindsay, Pittsburgh Mayor Peter Flaherty, San Francisco Mayor Joseph
Alioto, Boston Mayor Kevin White.

EconOmy in government sole alternative to national bankruptcy. {Current revenue crisis
must force end to public sector's "free load" thinking. Future tax increases must
come from privileged sectors of U.S. economy. tax-exempt foundations; indus-
triesrwith government subsidies (oil, minerals, agriculture); tax-free organizations.
Shift of public sector's financial burdens from state, local levels to Federal govern-
ment no solution. Federal government now accounts for over three-fifths of

1 total revenue collections. Vs. 50% prior to World War II. 

1; JESSE WERNER MAKES CRITICAL BEUNDER. In prOposal to acquire Cadence Indus-
1. tries' Perfect Photo division. Dissident stockholders to use acquisition agreement as
evidence of GAE chief executive's questionable business judgment. $15 million (plus
liabilities) high price to pay for business worth estimated $5 million. Jesse duped
by Perfect Photo's 1970 turnaround after serious loss in 1969. Acquisition 
rate" film processing labs won't help GAF's need?to develoP quality image in battle
against Kodak. - 




1 STOCK LOAN CRUCIAL IN GEISMAR SUIT AGAINST REEVES. Reeves Telecom chairman Haz-

ard,Reeves holds notes for $310,000 from former president Dick Geismar for personal

sale of 20,000 Telecom shares at $18 a share (stock now 3 Geismar's complaint

demands return of notes plus $50,000 downpayment. $9?million-plus suit claims $318,750
9 severance pay, $350,000 compensation for worthless stock options (30,000 at $23.125 a

share), $8 million for libel. Look for Dick to drop charges of libel, loss of options

in return for cancellation of stock purchase, payment of severance.

CIGARET COMPANIES EYE POTENTIAL IN LEGALIZED MARIJUANA. National marijuana
lobby makes progress toward legalization. Cigaret manufacturers make money accid-
entally from periphery businesses. Brown Williamson's roll-your-own Laredo
brand, American Brands' La Croix Wheat Straw, Riz La Croix cigaret papers. Industry
can -rpect help from 18-year-old voters if legalization put to test in national ref-

 

1971. The Gallagher Presidents' Report Inc. All rights reg? rv'ed. Material may not be reproduced in any form without written permisslon.

 

 

 

 

 

. 


.k 
??71

I
(sf-pg . 

a 1?
a a ?an. .1
Fin-? 

OPPORTUNITY. Division general manager for New York Stock Exchange-listed compa-
ny Operations executive with consumer marketing experience preferred. Annual divi-
sion volume $8 million. a-Salary: $35,000 plus options. . . Director new product
development.for diversi'fied multi?million dollar public company headquartered in
N. Y. C. Exec_utive responsible fer creation, development of new products in consumer
field. Salary: $h0, 000 plus equity participation. . . . Write to Bernard P. Gallagher,
230 Park Avenue, New Ybrk, N. Y. lOOl7. In confidence.


FINKELSTEIN ON SPOT. Struthers Wells Corp. chairman privately
persuades N. Y. C. Mayor ?HollyWood John?.Lindsay to abandon Republican party. Declare
as Democrat. Jerry not in position to endorse Lindsay'programs publicly due to 
as head of N. 0. Democrats.: .National Democratic party chairman Larry Brien non-
committal. Lindsay uses threat of party label change in strategy against admi?
nistration. Finkelstein more loyal to party'members than to Struthers Wells stockhold?
ers. Hired former LBJ press secretary George Reedy to head .Struthers Wells opera-
tion (George now with Woodrow Wilson InternatiOnal Center fer Scholars). Listens to .
acquisition offers from former JFK appointments secretary Ken 0' Donnell (Ken owns 
management consultant business in Boston).

 

WOMEN EXECUTIVES PRIME CANDIDATES FOR CORPORATE DIRECTORSHIPS. Particularly in

1 consumer companies like General Electric, Procter Gamble, Colgate? ?Palmolive. Mi-

nority stockholders expected to pressure corporate chief executives for female repre-
sentation at board level in upcoming annual meetings. Women own over 50% of stock in
i public corporations. Heuston Post chairman Oveta Culp Hobby director of General

Foods, Mutual of New Ybrk. Amohg women executives qualified to-serve as corporate
directors of public companies: Beech Air Craft president Olive Beech, Dell Publishing
president Helen.Meyer, Maidenform president Beatrice Coleman, Trenton Trust Co. chair-
P1 man Mary'Roebling, columnist Sylvia Porter, WashingtongPost president Kay Graham.

GEORGE DILLON ON BORROWED TIME. Air Reduction president reports 10% drop
in net income from continuing operations in past year. Takes $10. 5 million on
discontinued operations. 1970 net income down 6l% to 8 million on $h36?million
sales. Southern Natural Gas Co. nmjor stockholder (owns 3&5, 200 shares of ll. 3 mil-
?lion outstanding). Represented on Airco board by Southern Natural Gas president John .
Shaw Jr. Airco Temescal division president Hugh Smith holds th- the shares vs.
Dillon's ll, 000 shares. Airco ri.pe for acquisition. Company leading manufacturer of 1
industrial gases, ferroalloys. Ohio Medical Products division makes anesthetic agents,
medical gases, respirators for hospital use. Current market price Airco ?stock 23 l/h.
Near book value $22 per share. "h
. . Look for Nixon to appoint PepsiCo vep.C.D. ?Deke? Deloache to succeed

FBI chief Hoover. Deloache Hoover's former chief of staff. Offered PepsiCo job by
Nixon crony'& PepsiCo chairman "Frostbite Don" Kendall. . . . Earthquake to depress
real estate values in Los Angeles area. Result in slowdown of California population's?
growth rate. . . . Nixon lawyer lawyer. Runs country like law firm. Voters un-

certain whether they are plaintiffs or defendants. . . . As predicted (GPR Feb. 10,

1971), Chase Manhattan_president Herb Patterson announces new bank subsidiary in sub-
urb. Garden City, L. 1., location to be pposed by Long Island Trust Co. chairman
Fred Hainfeld in Albany, Washington. .

very truly yours,

The Gallagher Presidents' Report, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

35213

Tolson
Sullivan
Mohr 
Bishop
Brennan, 
Callahan

 

 

 

 

Casper 
Conrad
Dalbey a

 

 

Felt 
Gale

R0803 

 

Tavel 
Walters
Soyars 
Tole. Room 
Holmes 

Candy

 

 

April 20, 1971

?i

Mr. Cartha D. ??DeLoach
Vice President is,Corporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Incorporated
Pepsi World Wide Headquarters 
Purchase, New York 10577
Dear DeLoach:

Thank. you for your letter of April 12th
enclosing a cepy of the PepsiCo annual report. It was

mast tho?ghtful of you to send it to me? and I appreciate

having the opportunity to read it. I baselnot yet had the

chance to examine it carefully; however, it appears

that you have achieved your intent.



 

simian 12 Sincerely, .
APR231971 
FBI 

 

 

 

Mr. De?oadh is on the Special Correspondents List and is a former
Assistant to the Director who resigned 7/31/?217.
5 . by *g?w
?Epm ?gitE?VE

MAIL Room: TELETYPE 

 

 

 

Mr. Tolson

9 . Mr. Sullivan
- 5 Mr
so -.
ll r. rennan, 0.1). .
PSI Mr. Callahan 
Mr. Casper
Mr. Conrad 

 

 

 

 

 

PURCHASE. N.Y. 10677
TEL. <914> 2 5:3 - 3027 Mr. Dalbey
Mr. Felt,
Mr. Gale
. Mr. Ro?sen
CARTHA D. April 12 I 19 7 1 

vac: 
convonne AFFAIRS So
yars

Tele. Room?
Miss Holmes
Mis's Candy .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*i

mat?.

 

 

 

 

 

 

?rm 

Honorable I. Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 20535

Dear Mr . Hoover:

Although I'm certain you are deluged with mail from
friends and supporters at this particular time, I did
want to send you a copy of the PepsiCo annual report.

This was my first attempt in putting out a report of this
nature in private industry. Quite naturally, I hoped to
produce something different from what had been dis semi?
nated in prior years . The end result represents the
values that accrue to any city, San Francisco in this
instance, where our products and services are offered.


I'm rather proud of this report and hope you enjoy me?! 
looking at it. ff
55% 

3353 APR so 1971

 

   

Enclosure

ACK

7'34?qu
Umbra

 

 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT: FORMER ASSEESFT TO THE DIRECTOR

 

 

POM N0. 5010-I06
MAY I961 
GSA GIN. NO. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

Memorandum

Mr. Mohr DATE 5/13/71

 

Walters

T. E. Bishop Sovars

Tole. Room

Holmes

Candy

CARTHA CACH- 1 -

Mr. DeLoach called Bishop at 6: 15 p. m. 5/12/71, to advise
that he had been contacted by Richard Berlin of the Hearst Corporation on
5/12/71, who stated that he would like very much to have DeLoach sit down
with one of the top writers of the Hearst Corporation for an in- -depth discussion
Of the wiretap situation. He indicated that he' was interested in finding out all
that was possible concerning Bureau policy on wiretapping and electronic
surveillance and that the interest of the Hearst Corporation was based on the
recent criticism of the FBI, the Attorney General and the Department of
Justice over wiretapping and electrOnic surveillance procedures. Mr. Berlin
indicated that, following the discussion with Mr. DeLoach, an article would
be prepared to be carried 1n Hearst newspapers throughout the country.

DeLoach indicated that he was not too enthusiastic about doing
this, stating that he had been away from the FBI for almost a year and there
poSsibly could have been some changes in our procedures since his departure.
BishOp mentioned to DeLoach the fact that there had been requests from
Capitol Hill for various and sundry Congressional committees to look into the
matter of wiretaps and electronic surveillance, although it is not yet known if
any of these committees will hold hearings. DeLoach stated he felt, in View
of this, it would not be appropriate for him to discuss this matter with one
of Hearst's writers for an article because, he stated, the possibility exists
that he himself could be subpoenaed before one of these committees. Therefore,
he advised, he will inform Mr. Berlin that he does not think it would be
appropriate for him to discuss this matter with a Hearst writer. Bishop told
him that it was up to him, but DeLoach stated that he felt it would -be best if

he did not discuss this topic.
RECOMMENDATION: 

None. For information.

1 - Mr. Mohr 

1 Mr. Sullivan
1 - Mr. Bishop @9145 
1 - Mr. M. A. Jones

139m;

- (Ina-1A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1971f.

. MEMORANDUM FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL .
. ?3,123.2st

Lest evening iormer'Presicient Lyndon called me by
long distance from his ranch home. He stated that he had just finished reading
the article appearing in Newsweek for May 10, 195?1, concerning fife and con-
taicisg an alleged statement by former ?resident Johnson. Hel'ete??d he was
outraged at this statement attributed to him and which appearsfon pyge 32
of the May 10th issue of Newsweek reading as follows: "One insider 534353 that
.. 1.1126922 Johnson asked him (Hoover) to quit in favor of his then iaeyraide';
(3.1.2.23. Beloech,? but when Hoover resisted, LBJ gave up and shruggedmto
friends: 'i?d rather have the s. 0.73. inside the tent out ther?iutside
the tent?p-uing in. The former Presi?ent stated that this is e?zfsgesolute lie; ii





?Ruu?l

?on 5'

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

5 that he had never had any thought at any time while he itiase?esicient?of re~ 
placing me with Mr. Bea-Leach nor anyone else and that he?edm?de r20 such 
statement as attributed to him to anyonetoid tee former-Precedent teat I Knew what he said was true, but . . e,
that he must realize that Newsweek is?ofimed by Mrs. Graham, Iwho 2" 
Washisgton Post and has the television outlet for CBS, all three? of which media
?4 have been consistently atteckingme for some years and that not oni?fr?did I not 
beiieve the statement attributed to former ?resident Johnson in the-current f3?,
1 article in Newsweek, but there were 1332131? other statements containedin that
article which clearly indicate that it was a hatchet job and that he, former 
President Johnson, should not be coccerne? about the statement attributed to 
him because i knew when I read it that it was a lie. . 3:11:55Mrs. Lyndon Johnson aiso talked to me from the ranch last night (:35
.enc?i ressed similar feelings toward me as the former President had in . x. 
i I gasp 
5 making he celi. j? m; . (out, 
Olson 7h]: (if! 1: vib?kgfgi :30 .3. arm": 
#4 r" .5 9' -. sesne?tggJazz. 3. teem titties .e MAY 28 1971 
:cnnan?33f ?5 23'
(80;:@919 3-H John Beams . SENT 33323133,.? 
. Gale 5 ?e TIME 
. Director I
pg] ?mm 51 ?3 9] 
Wall 5 2: i
?g?m The D?uW?tto?nk?'menera 1 - BY ,g
. 001?97?
. it. 

i


a 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

 

omen.? tom no. lo . sow-ms . 

m: 

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT gig
len . C.D. 

Memorandum



Conrad
Dalbey

5/14/71 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Mohr - Gale

Rosen 

Tavel

Walters

. . Sayers
B18110 Tele. Room 
Holmes 

1 Candy
CARTHA D. LOACH
RETIRED ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR

 

 

 

 

Mr. DeLoach called Bishop on the morning of

5/14/71, and stated that the Jack Anderson column about the
authorship by Mr. Hoover of 3 books has been brought to his
attention. He stated that he realizes that this column is completely
false. He stated that to his personal knowledge, no mOney whatsoever
was received by Mr. Hoover from either Study of Communism?
or Edgar Hoover 0n Communism, and that all the proceeds .
of these 2 beek?s went to the FBI Recreation Association. DeLoach
stated he handled the details concerning these 2 books and knows
this for a fact and would be willing to write a letter to Anderson
concerning this matter or, if necessary, to testify to this at any
court proceedings or before any Congressional committee.

Mr. DeLoach stated that he has no information
concerning the disposition of the proceeds from ?Masters of Deceit"
because this book was written prior to his being in an assignment
where he would know this, although he does have certain information
in his poSsession concerning the disposition of the movie rights
to this book.

  

Mr. DeLoach was thanked for calling and he was
RECOMMENDATION:

advised that his call-would be brought to Mr. Hoover' attention. 
2545??
For information. 1

I'll/W3
1 - Mr. Mohr 

 

1 Mr.? BishOp
1 - MissGandy
1 - Mr. M.A.Jones

sz
(5) 22,5 197??
on 

 

 

 

1 02-"an Form "one

 

4'

a gig"?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Tolsonuym
Mr. Sullivancsarmnm . . ?1
$4 STATES GOvr RNMENT m. 0?5:
. d1; C) Mr. 
1 Mr. Casper..
?emor?an trim 2% Mr. 
$11 1 
TO Director, FBI ,Dxmm 6/9/71 
Attn: Crime Records Division Mr, 
.1 1? - Mr. Tavrcl ..
1 . Mr. 
. 1 Mr. Beaver
. . 4 Tole. 
SUBJECT: CARTHA DE (TH Miss 4
Miss 
I 
Former Assistant Director CARTHA D. DE LOACH now resides
in Greenwich, Cbnn., and is active in numerous affairs b7D
throughout the stete.? His business address is on the 
*New York-Connecticut line and is PEPSICO, Purchase, New?_
York 10577; telephone (914) 253?3027. His residence is
Perkins Road, Greenwich, Conn.06832; telephone 661-1578151,1?

1; mo 

1E gunmen??

 

 

 

 



Bureau,

. 
New Haven

(iikw
th? Zuahxfti.QZVL 197; 
13 
11} 
11%6? 88381 - 1
1? Il??m gamma-1971 1/51 In}: flBay Regularly w; #96 Payroll Savings Plan

 

 

?1 a 

omowu '0er no. no solo-m -
MAY um tourney 
our": 110.130. :7 . 1 

UNIT ED STA YES GOVERNMENT Sullivan 

 

 

 

 

 


Memorandum 1 . 

. . (?Conrad
"to Mr. Bishop/\a . June 14 1971 ,1 22:51.?

   
 

Gale
Roscn 
Tavcl
Walters
Soyars
Beaver
Tclo. Room
Holmes

 

 

 

 

 

   
  

 

011031094

. 1011111 

. By letter dated 6/ 9/ 71 (attached) SAC New Haven recoimmended
captioned individual, former Assistant to the Director, be approved as an
vsAC Contact cf the New Haven'Office. SAC concluded his letter stating
1 "The items through are thoroughly known to the Bureau and recorded
there and are not being set out. As to Item I recommend he be designated
an SAC Contact of the New Haven Office. With regard to this last paragraph
the Director asked "What is he talking about?"

 

 

 

Part 2, Section 6,0f the Manual of Instructions specifically sets
out the procedure to be followed for a Field Office requesting an individual
be approved as an SAC Contact. The information concerning the individual
is set forth in a letter to the Bureau and if approved one c0py of the letter
1. is returned to the Fieid Office stamped "Approved. According to the
Manual of Instructions the incoming letter from the Field must set out

specifically information concerning the individual under alpliabetical headings
as follows:

b. Services this contact can provide 
. Past relations with field office 0
1 - Thumbnail sketch of known history

Results of Identification Division check

f. Derogatory information

g. Recommendation of SAC

Description of prOposed SAC Contact

The above are the alphabetical headings referred to by

SAC New Haven about which the Director made inquiry. The SAC apparently

- feels that the Items A through am not necessary to set forth in the case of
?11-w- DeLoach, and with regard to Item he recommends he be de io?natedgas
an SAC Contact of the New Haven Office. 737

1 ?i-U'Ai
nclosure 1 1 .1

1 - Mr. Mohr #335959 736?? ?1 3 I 
1 - Mr. Bishop *1 . (RECOMME 1111110373111st 1971 

   

 

 

 

I
a .

M.A. Jones to BiShOp Memo
D. DE LOACH
SAC 

RECOMMENDATIONS:

New Haven Office.

 

(1) That Mr. DeLoach be approved as an SAC Contact of the

(2) That this memorandum and attachment be returned to the
Crime Records Pivision for final processing.?

. ma



 

 

Tolson
Felt
Rosen 
Main
Bishop
Miller. E.S.
Callahan 

 

 

 

 

 

Casper 
Conrad
Dalbey 
Cleveiand 
Ponder

Bates 

Tavel
Walters

Soyars 
Telet Room 

Holmes
Candy

 

 

 

 

 

were i i

October 28, 1971

Dear Deke:
I thought you might be interested
in seeing a copy of the remarks I made Friday
evening, October 22nd, before the dinner meeting
of the Washington Chapter of the Society of Former
Special Agents of the FBI.
Sincerely,
J. E. H.
Enclosure
Mr. Cartha D. Quiz
Vice President - Corporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.

Pepsi World Wide Headquarters .
Purchase, New York 10577 [?57 MM- . ?ww- ?We 57]
7 I

xix

 

anheredms _r J.

?9 TEST so) 

?i?kw??Y :J?nNm?m I:



 

SENT FROM D. 0.
TIME 
DATE 

BY gaze

JEH: edm (3)

 

 

 

MAIL ROOMEJ TELETYPE UNITE:

 

 

 

 

f\ 2% 1:7 4 4 c: git/a Nb W225 PM
Qa?kwq?i b1: Jr 3

Mr. Robert Edgar Stowers
4880 Merlendale Drive, Northwest
Atlanta, Georgia 30327

Dear Mr. Stowers:
Your letter of November 6th, with enclosure, 
has been received and I want to assure you I have no present
thought of retiring. It is my desire to remain in my position
as long as I can be of service to our Nation.

It was thoughtful of you to write and I am most
grateful for your continuing support of my activities.

5 5 Sincerely yours,
J. Edgar Hoover,

NOTE: Prior cordial correspondence with Mr. Stowers.
(3) 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1:5 1.
i 550?! 5 
- w?

32:30:. - MAILED. 20 406 ?55

in, . 197? . - 5 5555 4?

Callahan
Casper
#5
Da 0 ?mm'mh? 
Clevcfand i 
Ponder 535/
53:2: 8 

 

Walton
Soyara

. Room
llolnca
Candy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MAIL ROOMCJ TELETYPE 

 

 

?a
u? ?43/ .1. 
. illcr. E. S. 

 



. 9/0? r59? 1g 1 

 

Mr Callahan
Atlanta, Ga. Mr. Casper

NOV. 6, 1971 Mr. Conrad
Mr. Dalbey

Dear Mr. Hoover: Mr. Cleveland
. Mr. Ponder

. . Mr. Bates
I have, on a number of occas16ns, had a cord1al Mr. 

exchange of correspondence with you. Mr. Walters
Mr. Soyars

I have not in the past told you much about my background. T018- Room
Iwill say solely for the purpose of identifying myself a little ??93 "01m?
more clearly that I worked for the federal government more Miss candy
than 40 years following service in the Navy during World War 
-I am a member of the Georgia Bar; being an attorney qualified me for--
legal positions and I retired from the government service as a Chief
Member of the Board of Veterans Appeals; I have been a member of
The American Legion more than 50 years; I have been a member of?
the Elks 49 years; a member of the Masons 44 years; I am a member.
of the Veterans of World War I belong to Sigma Delta Kappa Legal
Fraternity; other organizations of which I am or have been a member
are federal employee and retired employee associations; Veterans of
Foreign Wars; State Bar of Georgia, etc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nfoldt

You, no doubt, have seen the attached column. I concur in all the
good things said about you. However, the time of your departure should

be left to your own good judgement in which I have the greatest
confidence.

With all good wishes, I remain

Sincerely,



Jobert Edgww 

4880 Merlendale Drive, N. W. 

7/ Atlanta, Ga. 30327
mac/?" 11-41NOV 161971



1 0 r. 
I unl?

\chL SURE. - 


1r}; REC mil.?

 

 

. 
., 
?1



.9 
Ewes 00/

 

men Open 1
I: or Hoover? .

. WASHINGTON A year or so ago,
the conservative right wing went into
full flap over Mr. Justice Douglas. The
obj ct was to ?it
impeach the gen-

?tleman and,if

    
  
   
 

 

 
  
 

viewed solely' on
its merits, the ob-
ject was splendidfew con- C. ?is:
servative tacti- '3 ram? dig? 
cians, wiser than my; I
their eager broth- diff. .33
ers, privately of- ?35?
fered some sage 3 
. advice: Lay off. i . in. axed

The advice proved unavailing, but: .
the pomt was sound. Whatever else.
may be said of him, Bill Douglasisa"
fighter. He would never quit under
fire. The same advice might be offered
today to professional critics of J.
Edgar Hoover. The F.B.I. director.
ought to retire. If he were left alone'
for a while, he might do precisely that. 
But Hoover is tough; he is stubborn; .
he is proud; and he will die with his}
boots on before he lets it be said that:
the likes of Ramsey Clark hounded,
him out of his office.

Surely these elementary observa-,
tions must have been pressed upon the
scholars, lawyers, bleeding~hearts and
weepeasies who convened at Prince,
ton last weekend. Considering the re-.
spectable setting and sponsorship, one?
might have supposed that this ?con-g
ference on the would exhibit at;
least the surface aspects of objectiVity.
Not so. This was a hanging jury. The
conferees proposed to_ hustle old man
Hoover to the gallows; they suceeded

 

only in confounding themselves.

The Princeton consistory, according
to Duane Lockhard, chairman of the
university?s department of polities,
was sponsored chiefly by an ?anony-
mous New York couple,? who put up
$20,000. The left-lib Field and New
World Foundations threw in $5,000
apiece. A $30,000 kitty emits a loud
meow, and 55 cats came clawing. .

In the van were members of the'
self-anointed "Committee for Public
Justice,? a marshmallow concoction
cooked up a year ago by former Attor-j
11130 General Clark, eghosts bacigbongi

compar un avora 
warm macaroni. . ?ff: 

annual; I



 

the committee?s ex-
ecutive council were a ragtag? band of
professional lloover haters ?-Rohcrt
Sherrill of the Nation magazine,
Fred J. Cook, 1. F. Stone and Walter
Pincus. Other participants and paper?
readers included a platoon of profes-
sors, attorneys, and disgruntled for-
mer agents of the F.B.I. This wasa
hatchet job, done by experts. The
?anonymous couple,? hiding in am-
bush, doubtless got their dirty mon-
ey?s worth. But will they get the old
man? No, Hoover will not budge.

And this is a pity. There is no man
in public life, since the death of Harry
Byrd, whom I have held in greater ad-
miration than J. Edgar Hoover. He is
the incorruptible head of an incorrupti-
bureau. To glance through his last
annual report, released just a few
weeks ago, is to share his pride in
those "high standards of professional
excellence and personal integrity? that,

,he has exemplified all these years. 

Yet there comes a time, all the-
same, when the swiftest runner out-
runs his fame, when there is nothing
more to be gained and only luster to be
lost. Hoover, at 76, has reached this
point in his great career. He has won?
every accolade worth winning, inciud-
ing the enmity of the Princeton jack-
als. He has given his bureau every last
ounce of dedication, leadership and in-

fspiration. In the F.B.I., he?has forged

a superlative instrument for responsi-
ble law enforcement.'What else re-?
mains? .
These have not been happy times
.lately for the director. Recent months
have "produced a spate of resignations
and forced transfers that have hinted-
of sagging morale within the bureau.
Cartha D. DeLoach, once his No.
3 man, left in June of last year after
28 years with the bureau. The depar-'
ture ?last month of William C. Sullivan?
.has caused acute dismay among

-- friends of the F.B.I., for Sullivan, av

30-year veteran, was highly regarded. ..
It has been a painful thing to be forced 

.. to take sides. 

- The director understandably will
disdain the voices of the liberal left.
?But he should know of the increasing
concern on the conservative right. We
want him to go, when he goes,with
trumpets _and iaurels. He is risking the?
1' m? 

6- 45%3? 3
murmurs

 

 

 

 

 

4?



 

:The Attorney General February 7, 1972

Director, FBI




MR. CARTHA D. QESLOACH

VICE PRESIDENT, CORPORATE AFFAIRS
PEPSI CO, INC.

PURCHASE, NEW YORK

Enclosed is a copy of a letter received from Mr. DeLoaCh
which is most complimentary of the efforts of personnel of this Bureau
in connection with recent aircraft hijacking matters.

1 - The Deputy Attorney General - Enclosure

#T9=a


1 - Mr. M. A. Jones (detachedi?f ?wig :1 1'11 cr- a

f. . ?75/ if: 1'
- Nummri?m
.6, ., Sinclair} PM 
.p it? 2 FEB 1912

{In

 

 

 

 

 

2;

?w [i Muff/1% 1

 

 

?Mr. Tolson 
Mr. Felt

I Mr. Rosen
Mr. Mohr

Mr. Bishop
Mr. Miller. 3.3. 

Mr. Callahan 
'Mr. Casper
lit. Com-ad
Jr. Dalbcy 
Cleveland 
l' Ponder 

g. Bates

Waikart 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. Walters 

Soyars
a. Room

 

 

 

3 Holmes 
5 Candy 
i

 

we: I 


4:05
5"
FEMS law - "Mm
l7 7 Wm" RSS- 2%
MAIL ROOM TELETYPE .. 

 

 

 

 

 

February 7, 1972

  
    
 

Mr. Cartha De?Loach

Vice President,??orporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.

'Purchase, New York 10577

Dear DeLoach:

 

It was typically though?ui of you to write on
January 31st and express your support of the Bureau's
handling of the recent aircraft hijackings in New York. I
am indeed appreciative of your comments and want you to
lmow communications such as yours mean a great deal to me.
You may be sure my associates share my gratitude for your

comialimentary remarks.

 

Sincerely,
use
1 - New York - Enclosure I I I (BE
33:33?! 7 A NOTE: Mr. DeLoach is on the Special Correspondents List and

former Assistant to the Director. By memorandum same date,

it. 3321!;ng copy referred to the Attorney General.

 

 

 

Callahan W*?r?w A 
CnSper- 2'
wilmadw JCW. CS (4) 1 mm ?air; "0 ?n Re?ll/l
hey 4? .9 ll
. eland h? 9% 
1' 
?54

 

5.4: a; -i \l 
4?

- 

Eta:


9
f7 ROOM TELETYPE UNIT 

6

 a" 3

pEPs?Qg 5%

  

 

 

  
   
   
   
 
   
 

 

?if
?3qu

 

mg 

 

 

 

 

 

. 
N.Y. 10577 Mr. Casper
253?3027 Mr.Conmd._

Mr. Dalbey

 

Mr. Clevelan

January 31. 1972 Mr. 
AFFAIRS MT. 
Mr. Sayers?
?l'eio. Room?

Miss 
Miss Gandy

 

Honorable I. Edgar Hoover
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535 .. a 
Dear Boss:

I felt a tremendous surge of pride as I heard the news
about the FBI's handling of the two recent "skyjackings"
in the New York area. Many of my associates in the
business world made very fine comments about this
activity.

Iohn Malone obviously handled the direction of the Agent a
personnel and the press in a skillful fashion. He and

all of the Agents involved in these matters acted in a

courageous efficient manner that reflected the highest

credit upon you and the FBI as a whole. Both of those

cases represented positive investigative and public

relations efforts of the highest order.

I wanted to congratulate you and ?the-Btgg?tgiy?
outstanding work. 1% ?a .

c- 
RE Sincerely5 FEB 151912,


wk? 24 . Cartha 43..oach 

ccw,w . . 
:?mmumm. ASE.

 

    

 

 

was)

 

 

 



omoun tom no. lo . SOIO-IOI 
3:11:13 13:11.. .. 
UNITED STATES (1 VERNMENT .. .. .. .. 1:

emo 70:72 am

hog?1 
. . nm) WM
TO Mr. Felt DATE: 2/18/72 



111.? f' .S 
Cleveland

1 
1? 111011 (T. E. Bishop 
1 1. 

JAMES RIDDLE HOFFA, AL .5 21-11:
JURY TTER 1? ..

. ifa 
te afternoon of February 18th, CBS ews,

Washington MD. C. ., contacted my office and spoke to 1315111151? 
.. . gieferred to a ?story concerning Willia Yioeb, well- known newspaperman


 

 

  

in New Hampshire, and former Assistant to the Director DeLoach concerning

he question of wiretapping by the Department of Justice in the Hoffa matter.
1 1., said that it had been reported that some type of a money offer had
been made to DeLoach for the Director if information would be supplied
indicating that the Department of Justice under Attorney General Kennedy was
involved in wiretapping in the Hoffa case. He said that he was familiar with
the fact that affidavits by Loeb and DeLoach had been filed in U. S. District
Court, Chattanooga, Tennessee, in early 1967. asked for any 1
comments the FBI might desire to make concerning this matter. He was 
advised that the FBI would have no comment.

I

?Gailbraith of CBS News contacted my office and said that it was his under-
standing that former Assistant to the Director DeLoach had written two
memoranda to Mr. Hoover concerning the reported offer of William Loeb

of money in exchange for information concerning wiretapping. Gailbraith .
said that he wanted to make a specific request for copies of these two
memoranda. He said that it was his understanding these memoranda were
included in the files of the FBI. Gailbraith was advised that no information
and/ or memoranda would be furnished to him from the FBI's files, and that

he was to clearly understand that this was not to be taken to infer that we

1% C"Subsequently, late on the afternoon of February 
do or do not have memoranda as requested b6 l?im. '42? 3 7 5:13:22?

1

mm 
ACTION 3:13 
as FEB 24 1972 
None. For in ormation. 

 

 

1 $11
\a 159%? 1?
61/ ?EbeEi-E) . 331-1133311213? Q33
1 . 
1 1 Mg. MAPA.1J - .. 
- . 1'5
JFBzasg 
(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

PIS-350 (Rev. 7-16-63)

(Mount Clipping In Space Below)

1 Mr. 

 

M1. Miller, 

 

syn! Cullaha
Mi. Caspor__._._
fir/y} I M1. Conrad

 

it

 

1

Legion Io iiear


The annual salute to thea 
loan Legion takes place 8is
year at a noon luncheon March
22 at the Lord Baltimore htel

Dan Burkhart America Le-
a intent, Departme of4
Mary nd announced the ?gag;
the D. Leach, former ssist-
Wgan Hoover, the FBI
director, 1 will speak Mr. De
Leach is now vice president {or
corporate affairs for PEPSICO

Mr. De Loach started with the
1n 1942;1eit1n 1944 for duty
with the United States Navy and
Ireturned to the in 1916, ua?s
signed to headquarters

In 1951,; he was elevgted to
position of inspector and in 1959
hamed an assistant director. 

?Gains Proniotion 

In 1955;119; became an assist-
[ant to Mr. Hoover and super:
vised all investigative and crime

{records operations of the 

until July, 1970 

He has been an aetiVe. mom
he: of the American Logionjior
many years; serving as depart-
nient commander and national
vice commando? and is' noiv
chairman of the .Nationai?Puhii?
Relations Commission. 1

He was named manfoi the

year in the Legion by the stateL

commanders society at the Le-
gion?s national convention in
1953 1 

In 1964 he received the annual
president?s award of the Na-
tional Association of State DirecJ
tors of veteran Affairs for dis-
tinguished public service.

 

meqvwi.? I

 



11W

?ise-t?e
1.11111 29 1972

Why;

M1. 
M1. 
M1. 
Mr. Bates.? i
Wotkazt.__.. 1
Mr. Wallets_._._ i
Mr. 
ROOM 
Miss 
Min Candy I 


 



 

 

 

 

(indicate page, name 0! 

newspaper, city and state. 

THF SUNPAPERS 

PAGE 0 3
BALTIMORE, MARYLAND



Duto: 3 3 ?'72
Edition: EVENING
Author:

Editor:

Title:

Character:

or
Classification:
Office: BA

Boinq Investigated

 

 



we.

1" 
.. Egg";

 

4"

 



 

 

 

 

-i
gas

J3



Mn Tolson 
Mr. Felt 7 
Mr. Rosen 

Mr. Moll:
Mr. Bishop
Mr. Miller. E-S. 
Mr. Callahan 
Mr. Casper
Conrad 
Mr. Dalbey 
Mr. Cleveland 
Mt. Ponder 
Mr. Bates
Mr. Waikart 
Mr. Walters 
Mr. Soyars 
Tele. Room
Miss Holmes 
Miss Candy 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fl? ,3

March 14, 1972

Mr. Cartha Ema-each
Perkins Road 
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830
Dear DeLoach:

On March 7th I received the copies of the
correspondence you had with Ovid Demaris. Your thought-
fulness in forwarding them to me is indeed appreciated.

Sincerely,
es.

NOTE: Mr. DeLoach is a former Assistant to the Director who retired
on 7/31/70; he is on the Special Correspondents List. The Director and
Mr. Tolson have previously declined requests for interview by Demaris.

 

 

(3)

MAILED 23 
MAR 14.1972 I 


 

 

{)ng
534?r?m??l?a. s? 
dim 

MAIL ROOM TELET

 

 

 

 

March 2 197(/va 17:} on?: L) 3 
Mr. Ovid Demaris
855 Hope Avenue
Santa Barbara. California 93105

 

Dear Mr. pemario: 

I have your letter of February 24, 1972. requesting an intendew
for the purpose of discus sing on oral biography you are doing
on the Honorable Edgar Hoover.

While I agree that Mr. Hoover's background is worthy of great
attention by the American public, it has always been my under
standing that Mr. Hoover has no interest in such a project.
Along with thie fact. my present travel and office schedule is
simply not conducive to conduct of a intewiew.

-wa

 

I regret my inability to cooperate but trust that you will under-?
stand the situation.

    
 

.-.

Sincerely yours 
[IENcmsuRg [Zn?Vi 

D. Def?'ach

b/Blino copy: Mr. Hoover (Enc.)

CDD:amr

 

.A

a


I
t.


4?

 

Mr. 
Mr. 
Mr. Comadm .
Mr. 

Mr. Clovevlank
Mr. Ponder



  

 

1/ {53,3


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.

?nuair, 3.. all?" kg ., framing OVID DEMARIS
ass HOPE AVENUE
SANTA BARBARA. CALIFORNIA 93105

February 24, 1972

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
1109 Morningside Lane .
Alexandria, Virginia

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

I am currently interviewing persons acquainted
with Mr. J. Edgar Hoover for an oral biography
of his life andttimes to be published by Farrar,

Straus Giroux in 1974, the year of his 
anniversary as FBI director.

In terms of research, this is an enormously
ambitious undertaking, one involving a complexity
of data, but one that is uniquely suited to the
new technique of oral history which aims to
preserve the history of the recent past by
collecting the thoughts and reminiscences of
those who helped shape that history. Please

be assured that this will be a de?initive study,
with the only bias being toward excellence.

All interviews will be transcribed and donated

in bound volumes to the national archives for

later use by historians. Naturally all restrictions
of a confidential nature will be honored with a

time seal.

I hOpe you will consent to an interview, at a
time and place of your choosing, which can be
arranged by mail or telephone-~please call
collect: (805) 687?5806. Thank you.

Sincerely yours,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
    
  
  
  

I mu I 

Memorandum 1/1; r??i?ftZ:

Mi? ?3 
r1": Mus.

IIONA N0 Io IMO-dot
I) @1 <1
UNI 1?11 S'Iwrx-zs Gov RNMIJN 

I .1le 

 

 

T0 TOLSON . DATE: 4- 24- 72 mix?7;
1 
FROM M. FELT I agar?mm
?nu-m

SUBJECT: EDWARD ,1 513:3??
FORMER SPECIAL AGENT x. 

?7

Mr. Morgan called me at home on Sunday with the request that
the following information be relayed to the Director. Morgan advised that
he was leaving shortly for Dallas.

Morgan stated that he had conferred with Congressman -
I concerning the tax evasion ?05
and perjury charges which have been brought against the Congressman. By
previous memorandum it was pointed out that a member of the firm of
Welch and Morgan, one Charles McNelis, was to defend :1 Morgan
1 advised that he toldl that his law firm would have absolutely nothing
to do wit defense unless the attacks on the Director and the
Bureau by are stOpped.  : agreed but according to
Morgan he insisted he has oof of some of the allegations he has made
which proof involves Carth DeLoach, Roy Cohn, Louis .quchols, and
Lewis S. Rosenstiel, orm Morgan tol
he was not interes ed in this and ns 3?
remain unchanged. 

 

     

 

 

 

 

  

 

RECOMMENDATION: I-JE

 

 

None. For informat 

 

72"

 

7315' . . 
Mar 261972 .

 

I . 
.

 

 

 

 

Hales

FROM P. Walters
. yarn

omouu no. I0 1010- 106 1

MAY lemon STATES GOVERNMENT ?f [mm
.4167

Memorandum 

\gi?ffim

To 1, MR.. TOLSON mm 3/23/72 

Cleveland 
Ponder

 

 

 

1. 

Ilolmca

.JEROME J. 

i Inspector
Unifo1m Crime Reporting Section
(Retirement Pending)

 

 

 



Mr. Cartha DXQoach, with PepsiCo, called me this morning
and advised that he had am that Jerry Daunt had submitted his applica-
tion for retirement and lie had always regarded Daunt as a valuable man.
Since he had a vacancy for an assistant in his office, he has discussed the
matter with Daunt since his retirement request and Daunt has indicated a
willingness to go with PepsiCo. Mr. DeLoach said he needs somebody to
appear before regulatory agencies inIWashington and to appear before state
legislative bodies which are considering legislation detrimental to the best
interests of PepsiCo. He feels that Daunt is well qualified to handle such
an assignment.

I told Mr. DeLoach very fran ly that I thought Mr. Daunt had
(treated the Bureau shabbily in the manner in which he had submitted his re?
tirement request, that the request 1n itself was very perfunctory and that he
knew we were in the process of setting up a new division and the least he
could have done was to stay and help get the division well on the road to

success before applying for retirement. 1/ 

Mr. DeLoach said he was Sorry to hear that and he ,was not aware
of this fact before he talked to Daunt and he had already mad??a fi 
commitment.

Mr. DeLoach reiterated that he is 100% on the side of the Director
and the FBI and any time he can be of service or assistance that all we have
to dois call upon him.

The foregoing is submitted for record purposes.

. 
1 - Mr. Bishop 
1 - Mr. Callahan 1972 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3' l? anFat
$2222: zgmomo. I0 . {k solo-loo .. Mr. Mohr
as: am. no. no. 27 Mr. Rosen
UNITED STATES RNMENT Mr- Bates
. Mr. Bishop
Memorand . Mr. Callahan 
.. Mr. Campbell 
. Mr. Casper
. Mr. Cleveland 
TO Mr. Callahan DATE: 6?20.372 Mr. Conrad 
f? . Mr. Dalbey
Mr. Marshall 
A 
FROM H. N. 1 
Mr. Soyars
34;) Mr. Walters
CARTHA DEKLE ll) LOACH $31??le
Former Assistant to the Director A233
. 
Veteran . MaHmwm
EOD 8-31-42 Fingerprint Classifier; . Mm.Mwmm
Appointed SA 12?11mm; Military Leave 11?244 to 4-1446; 

 

 

Retired 7?31-70

The following is a brief summary of Mr. DeLoach's record
for the use of Mr. Gray.

Mr. DeLoach entered on duty as a Fingerprint Classifier
on 8?31-42; was appointed a ecial Agent on 12-14?42 and was
on Military Leave from ll-2-4? to During his Bureau
tenure he was assigned to two field offices as well as
several divisions at FBI Headquarters. At the time of his
retirement on 7~31-70 he was serving as Assistant to the
Director at $36,000 per annum.

During his Bureau career he was COMMENDED on numerous
occasions and received many INCENTIVE AWARDS. He was last
CENSURED on ?-27?70. On his last performance rating dated
3?31-70 he was rated OUTSTANDING. He is on the Special
Correspondents' List. He has continually corresponded with
the Bureau on a favorable basis since his retirement.

 

His file is Vice President Corporate Affairs,
Ff?sl PepsiCo, Incorporated, Purchase, New York.

?61 fl? if? .4 i
367' 6%Efi
lg ?i .

. Numbered .1-
33?? 1 JUN 2.5 197,25

'15le ..

:wnuv

 





?wing?Jaw;

 

 

 

 

?1

a.

 

5/ I 8 1972 F?s Tr: 111?

.L .I 1? 

13891 I S) 
Hr. A novel]
M1nronnuLic1 and. 1
spnco A"mtninizrntion ., 
?ontor 
1 Houston, .?oxas 77?58 .

11A: 

111?1 '11: Jini?\ Lax! 

Ehish just a hrio1. note tell you how
very n11cn I your kind cor rents on the
o? mv dc. to servo an Actinq Director
at tr" rncornl Euronn o? Investigation. I an anoply
1ratv?1l to you for your thoughtfulness in writing.

I an auto Golan DeLoacn and Don Hanning

"1o111nq you in Acapulco. It would be nice #1
if so could .1nc].ndc a stay at tho Brisas Hotel; . fig
an p?rf of the FBI physical fitness program. ?If 
with my host rishoa nn? warm respect, 7 
A 
Sincerely, 1 . #1
MAILED. 20, saga 1, 1 . ?"131?

JUN-191972 

I

1 I 22 

45 -. 1'1- 
FBI 
11


Housizon Enclosure
1 Mr. Bishop Enclosure

Personal Attention: Bring to the attention of 
mun. Donald G. Banning. 

1 Personnel File of Donald G. Hanning Enclosure

?own 

 

 

Halon ?1 I:

NOTE: Mr. Cartha D. mach is ?'former Assistant to 
Canrbollm the Director of the FB . 5' . 
(HumDallwy 

11mm. 12,3. 

Ponder w? .
's?mnra my. 
1 7?

Walton 

 

 

3' i 
1 . 
\uitiirlum11.1111"; 11? 00111113 ~19 . 1
?In. MMLR LETYPE UNIT '1 
i I

 

 


me 

 

I. ?1 

 

REPLY TO
ATTN OF:

Mr. it: I
Mr. .?J?ohr 

I 
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (232??

i 1
MANNED SPACECRAFT CENTER 

Housrou. 77058 M, 


Mr. Cleveland 
Mr. Conmd 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Mr. Dolbey
TA 2 Mr. Miller. as. 
197 Mr. Ponder
MAY 5 0 m. Soym
Waika?. 
Mr. Walters 
. . 
Honorable L. Patrick Gray, 
Acting Director Mr. 
. . . 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 1 i1?; 
Washington, D. C. 20535 . t,
Dear Pat: 
Just a note of congratulations from one Navy man to another. I 3:3

know now that the FBI will be in shipshape and will have smooth
sailing. The President's Physical Fitness Council has always
been pleased with the FBI's physical fitness program. You are
one of the few agencies that has an active program.

I have enjoyed meeting several of your personnel over the last

few years; among them are Deke DeLoach and Don Hanning. I

met both while vacationing in Acapulco at the Las Brisas Hotel.

You will have to give that a try sometime; it's great. Don has a
kept me supplied with good speech material for my talks to

young people. I also had the pleasure of talking at the FBI

Communion Breakfast last December.

Best of luck in your new job. i .,



Sincerely,

 

REC-2Q is?? (30/1
?rr? 
wI
Co suIltant to the President . 2 1972
hysical Fitness and Sports 17 JUN 1

if
00 
. 

 

PERS. 1:20. UNIT

A 

 

 

?no

 

wru?u?u- 
-

- 
.mxuh.

a?
3"

 

 



A, ?Aline-1-



:03?.va 

- mm

*g?p awn-u-

 

 

REPORTS

Personae; 1.31m?) 04 5.153..?

Personae: . 1.. i. 


qu?u-w-lr" 
.4. I A?c ?Liz?'n/

6 'z .2

 



 

 

 

a

Standard oForm 520 I
Item!- b.1195 I

I Promulgated

By Bureau 0! the Budget
Circular 

 

CLINICAL RECORD I ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD

Pngwous ECG

[3 YES NO

 

CLINICAL IM PRESSION

MEDICATION



EMERGENCY BEDSIDE
ROUTINE CI AMBULANT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGE SEX EXCE HEIGHT WEIGHT B. SIGNATURE or PHYSICIAN DATE
AXIS DEVIATION (ORS) RATES
SINUS REITELL WW, . JOHNNTAL 
INTERVALS WAVES 
-12 ?Raw 21,421 NORMAL

 

 

QRS COM PLEXES

SEGMENT

VISO-CPIRDIETTE

WAVES

 

 

SUMMARY. SERIAL CHANGES. AND IMPLICATIONS:

CONCLUSION NORMAL ECG.



 

 

 

(Continue on rgvorse)
no. SIGNATUREU 5 TITLE DATE
ECG 15262 DR. R. SIKES LT MC USNR h?20-53
LAST NAME REGISTER NO. WARD NO.
DELOACH . CARTHA. FBI ST. CLINICL

 

 

USNH H-

(NAME OF HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)

5 GOVERNMENT 0 915m Its?562094 2

 

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Standard Form 520
(Attach tracings to S. F, 507)

a- JI

 

qxawgwa' Mn

 

 

 

 

#09
4r 
Manda Form 520 
mm. ab. :95: 

1:331 
.

Chants: .9452 
PREVIOUS ECG

REcoan ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD mm Na

MEDSGATIOIQ

 

E3 E3 gamma
[3 Ron-rma meant?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

new: sex mes. Harem was": 9? p. mama-um; a? WARD PHYSICIAN mm;
3 5 LE 6* 1.80 Dr. Aspen 6~1~5 5
mas naum?nou (was) RATES
Normal sinus Left ammc. van-r. 85
:mnmis WAVES
. mm .s 08 car 33

41?

mars COMPLEXES
Hatching of waves in II, AVE, ?21. Hatching of vmve in 

SEGMENT WAVES

 

 

UNIPOLAR LEADS {83mm}

 

Pnecoaomn LEADS (Spedf?



 

SUMMARY. SERIAL. CHANGES. AND IMPLICATIONS:



normal limits.

(Continue on swarm)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

N0. TITLE rams 
$66 #315262 1 mm 031m 6-2~f55
variant-s mm NAME Rzersran NO. want) no.
Sartha F. B. 16 at 0 Clinic
215? . ?Mi 251? 3? 2:33:23:
{runs 5a? saw-man (32 $1453: mwzcaz. "mm mm mwmwa tach :0 s. F. 52;}

 

 





 

3, 

1, 1'37; ?33'1"





b6

 

 

 

 

 

 

       

                    

    
   
          

     

 
      

      

  
 
  
     

  
  

            
    

 

  

  

. . 5:.?Ifany. .I .. . I WE. ?rm. ?Ixr F. I .. I . scnaw thaw?; ??incWr ?33. 3,13.th (Ruhr? ..
I I . 15.7311. ..
w? .Ivs?.f3uu ?Iteb?i .. inw?uh?. . . I. 3. .. .Ims hurry541%. . 9 . Er 3.3:..va .11.. 
. 2.371.39??. 3. . w) in.? v.3. a . 0.6. it . pa$w 5 . I I 1.931. . . .. v..I.. fig . .m
(xi. iiw?a?ixnyg. nub.? {ammo .
$.12.?le a. ?.mi . 2
. .. ?sfazv wssw?x

is. .

v: . 
irfu . . . ..
uni 3 .

   

.
1% .. .(sfd. I. .wlr

             

in 

  

                            

  

  

   

   

 

 

        
                 

                    
       

 

 

 
    
 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
      

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

   

      

  
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
                                   

                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                
          

 

             

   

 

w? .w
4 y. W: 1.3. 
)5 ?4 4 off. 
i in . S. 
v.3. It. 431%?? .Wv?wam
. .mN?lf-t?3.3..
grihnvuc
3


virtue? .wlA I
. . AJhu .
.. . .. I W. . .3 21?. .
.w?bnhg?it . 
bear Vun 15.4?xt?ihh.I3.3m?. 2. I. $.th 4mm). N: kw) Pkm+ . .v L. .. CamI . .. A. .w
V??n?wa it?; 2.3"..huesxuauhnm.m a. ?has . . . ..
. graham. h. . . 3m
5.1.!ng 
. ?up: as. .. Manamav


333.:
.9 .
1215.. 
. 3 .. ?9.ij hi9me Rwaw 1 Kw? .3.
wink. ?xh?un A
.. 2?..121
. .354.3
?tts .bIlukI tinVan3.3.. . . .
. waving v??g{rung wauq?. ma;me s. .3 Wu .4. 4
:13" EwauuM?muswi .4 11?.
. . .33.: .
I33 maxi .3 3.. .3. . AuRi1.. 3.533353w
. 1vQIquu .. I 
awizi?3.1. Anny.4292 I.1.3.2333Gal..- .1 . 4 I. 2129.935. 3:X..- .. .. .. 3.2311.. ?Imam.Mtlush. . .. . . .. ?23w? . 1.. .1 a . .33.. T, 2.390.?
.3. .. 3.wwao?f wm. .53. .W #m .11 
Jae15H.miftu 0.3 I, 8.4rm?no??013.13Ni?. WWHW. Sums?an. .. a . .n
yrxanz .09.. $2 3W a . . .23 ..I(193.5733! .4 .ww Ia Ir .. 51m. an? va -. Nita .?in.25.. I r? VWWQ .2 14.2? .42.. . H:
. .mwsaw3.333.333. 3.13.2.3. ?u 3.. .3333 Erik. ?$lfl?f?f?f? quJGdv.4r! .73fw?h. 3333.vim. .0.
m. .. ?Xmauwd.93.. . . .va?3.2mmIVAKQQ . Exits-t uo?k..w. .3 v.13.32333.. 9.33232th2
. 331.3?3.9515?. .U Chum 
..nnm
H3.4333.1. twain.3115..

w. .n a a. 3 ?rmwaw .fannexturnwe. n. \s I . . ?4%!on .Awmf?n 
3.. ?mm; 1.?t?xv?9? #??iqu?usu?EJ(man: I 3.?. 

 



1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3? 4, f? if i 

smam?u Form. 653:) 1+ 3
RM. Feb. 1951

33 Burg-39111110! the Bad 

Giza MMA g6

mwzous ace.
811mm. REBBRB Emc?raocmnmempmc I13 a No
MEDICATION
C3 gamma? {3 93:35:08
momma: mauwrt

me: sax name: we?: w?cm a. P. stsm'ruaa or WARD mmmated 6/2/ 
mar-mm mas (ans) mm

mail. Sinus Left mm? 92
XWRVALE 1? WAVES

am ?1'3 .98 OT .36
ans 

Roma}. 
ammun- 1' waves

arm}, 3, .. 

 

 

 



it

2553:2803? menge

an

.5

smaoan fW?/i??wy h?vaot?K was 

Rama]. Limits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{Continua on reverse)
H0. 53% ?rm 3mm
ace 15262,, Lt. 3:0 can 6/2/53
ms}: mmsusrmm' 1mm NAME mamma NO. WARD NO.
331?hm? ?32" I) 3t 01.1an
ascraecanmoammc 225cm:
:35 3 ?3a 3 "533$; .. ?mndammxm 820

9" <3 3333 {in .
(MM a 933195" 1 155:. a. museum mum: 1W (Attach traumas to 8. 507)

 



mww??wmw??mw. $35,333:?
. 

mm 

?w 
Mn 



an?;



wmwv?.m

TWw-r



 



 

.3 m?m??mms a ?(was a 3. 

r5-

-

 

b6

 

 



., 

 

 

 

amna?m Form 520 {e s: 1?
Rev. Angus: 19? 
3? Promulgated
By Bureau 01 me nudge:

Circuiar 15-432

pnavaous ECG
CLINICAL RECERD ELECTaocmmoeaApmc RECORD gm No

cumcm. mmassaou 

{3 EMERGENCY ?3 macssma
ROUTINE mauwir

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGE sax RACE Haas: I B. P. mama-um; oar wmo PHYSICIAN om:
$5 120 . 91*. 3011113 on 5 -1 $46wa 995
AXIS tuna} RATES
Emma}. Sinus Tam; AU Rm- VENT-75
INTERVALS WAVES
pm .313, (3118.08 0336 
ems 
res??r sasmem? ?r WAVES 



..

meW
LEADS (S

   



 
 

Shraaogm VISGCARQIEWE 2?

4

l.
A:
3w

  

wav-

jazz



  

..


-mp-
a

  

in ?AM-am: Mvvm;
$5
j!

I
.x

 

SUMMARY. SERIAL
"4 -) i'r
Emmi 133:3??
i






9.

Smmum WSO Cam;

(Continue on reverse)

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO. . 1111.5 ?nma
ECG 3.596? 3333?: 5.219956
IDENTIFICATION (For p43 or w: ?on Mattias diva: Namauhst?, ?rst. REGISTER NO. WARD No;
middla: grade: dd to; lacspiml or modica! facility) .
Seawall, Gm?tha to Elana
1331333 1mm Bethasda, hide azcoan
Form 590

(Attach tracings to S. F. 507)

$5 0mm . 5951.. mam it} 542:? 

 

 

MW Wit-x: 

  
   
      
    
        
     
 
  
    
 

?hue- .x

{xi-Uri

 



?m?f"??3fWW:



sm?mwwm am? 

 

 

 

a ?mndam Farm 526
Rev. August 1535:
m!
By Human at 3w Bu 32c!
Emmy? Aw :32

canuan Receaa 

RECORD



W'k?

PREVIOUS ECG

 

 

CLINICAL 

MEDICATIGN I
a [3 smeaemcv 32:25:95
i {3 ROUTINE E3 AMBULANY

 

 

ma? 4-043-

 

.Mu

DATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sax RACE 3mm venom a, or wnao PHYSICIAH 
16 *72 1183 imp. Johnston . 12 57@n107
mus (OHS) i RATES
319222: 31W?inua -3500 3 VENL 9?
WAVES
Miktgw. .08 -32
mas COMPLEXES
laxgxigd ?wm?-uhw 
SEGMENT WAVES


. .9. 
anM?,WmM

LEADS 

nww?-M- .4 HM r10 

PRECORDIAL LEADS (Specify)

mm:

 

45m"

SUMMARY, $15813?. 

 
 

.-
a; .3: ?lg: mamas:
Mm?: ?915%; - km?, .4

.p mug;

 

.quwxr

MM ,U?muv??

"whim-

Ms??j?a am

 

. 
i

,r
..

      
   
  

 

SANSORN 

      
      

mm -w ?ma? ?5 sum

??04
mm, mm n- 
?\nwrs?gw 4n- 
W- .. unm-

 

  

 

 

 

 

1 . 1?35 1:111 21 nermal I imits
(Continue on reverse)

no. *7 .., @1111. DATE

ace. 15962 3 CPR 1331?? 5m1?~?7
(For typed or written ontrfasfh?vo: Nama?viast ?rst. REGISTER No. WARD NO.

grade; data; hospimo median! facility) CL
A 

BE CE SETH BI ascent:

'f MD.

a mm:- wawwna 3mm 9 3453?s at

Form 629
(Attach tracings to S. 

mange?:51 ?vmw my;
.




i

3

b6

 

 

 

 

{Standard Form 529

Re?. August 1951

Pm meals mi
Bureau 0: the Budget
Circa! at Ana:

 

CUMCAL 

CLINICAL. 

mawous ECG

C3 YES .

MEDICATION

[?rm

[3 momma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nourme: Cl mauwzr

AGE sax 32mg mom was?: a. P. slsNA-ruaa or want) cm:

25'? 7 '72 183 DR. 5/1 /5831115
AXIS gamma-Ion (c3115) ?mas

Normal a1 nus aumc. vmr. 80
INTERVALS WAVES
.its-1- SEGMENT 5 waves

 

 
   
   

 

UNEPOLAR ex'mamrrv LEADS 


-

LEADS 

  
   

x. 4 w; r- 5?




 
     
  

SUM MARY. CHANGES.

     
    

 

 

 

 

 

my.?

1. 31,32,315 pa 
2. within n?rmzal limit?. 
5. $0 significnnt change since 5/15/57.
(??y??rsox
no. mama?rung 111an DATE
ace 15262 I I no Hem shat/58
?mm 5 ?Emmc?wm" $333" 
. Stafg clinic

 

 

 

DE LOACH. CA. WAAD FBI

mm 115 hi 335.33:ng ELsctaocmmoammc assent)

Standard Form 5:30
{Attach tunings to 3. F. 507)
amt: who-399M: is? 559994:



 

 




 

944? ?a a:

b6

 

 

 





Standard Earn: my 1
Rev. August. ?954
I?mmuigawi
{Jay Burma oi the Budge:

Chm!? Ana-:32
mavaouzs 

CURECAL RECORE ELEcmocmmaammac $253039 :1 

CLINICAI. IMPRESSIGN ON

 

EMERGENCY {3 summer:
nourmz E3 magma"

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGE A sax RACE HEKGHT mam is. P. mam-rung or: WARD mm:
38 as 72 183% Dr. Johnston 5454 @1100
mus (ems) {amass
Nam}. sinus aumc. van-r. 82
9 WAVES
Pr: .13 was .08 m?
cm 
ns-T szamznr . 
UNIPOLAR 123712129417? Lenses; 

 
    
    
     
 
      

mzcoamm. Lamas (Specify)



  

  

. .s

SUM MARY. SERIAL CHANGES.

 

4* {wag ~Wu1>m~ 

1. Right ventric
3. Within normal If .V 4 
3. No significant changes smce 5-43?58.

  

  

mg A 44-? wh? 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.
Won ?mm reverse)
s??umuma m? .- i'n'rm 9mg
ace 15262 Lt . ac USN 5-16-59
{For typed or written ontn'es give: ?rst, REGISTER NO. WARD NO.
midday, grade: data; (hospital! at m?dle?l Imam) 3% 81



FBI ascoaa

3 3 3 9' esda, Mao ?tand?m mm 520

(Attach (mung: ?98. 593')

:3 3 ?q Baf??f?il ?Sier-wf} ?vfr?ji?i mi.? 533;; 5 

a?

 



)0me

mgsvagw mm";

?tm?' 

iv? 



lb

wry



x"

5?




3w Emhdard Farm 520 

Rev. Augus! ?954

a? 
5900? Of ?w 341696? COPY 10/30/61? US: 3 Git-537$?

VCircula: A-32
PREVIOU5 ECG
0

CLINICAL RECORD i RECORD YES ONO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLINICAL IMPRESSION 
E3 EMERGENCY Bangles
ROUTINE E3 imam:
AGE - sax RACE Hill?s!? Imam a. P. or wane PHYSICIAN . cum:
41 6 185 1 0/17/6161). 10: 50
DEVIATION (QRS) RATES
Normal sinus ~50 Mime? VENT, 80
INTERVALS WAVES
. 14 . 08 GT Normnl
cans compmxas 
Normal . ?2
SEGMENT -r wnvas
Normal 
g?Ans (Specify) . A . . .39

 

maconpml. LEADS (Spam/l

 

SUMMARY. SERIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Left axis deviation
2.. Otherwise within normal limits
3. No significant change since 5/25/60

(Continue on reverse)

 

 

 

 

 

 

NO. SIGNATURE - one
ECG 15262 LT USN 10 /19/ 61
IDENTIFICATION (For typed or wn't?oa ontn'aa gm: Na'maw-Iagl, ?rst. REGISTER no. WARD no.
middfo; trade,- data: hospital or medical tummy)
St. C1.
DELOACH, CARTHA D. FBI nacoao
USNH NNMC BETHSEDA, MD. Siundurd form 520
520-403
(Aim mags :05. r. 5071

I. I
all 

     
     

 




.. 5314gar.ayRitz??w?vi?n-XF

   
  

 

  

    
    

  
  

     
     
   
 
   
   
  
 
         

   
 

   

  

a.

w. 



w?

:25?



?2 #3 

*1 J5 $431+9253bf? ?mum; 5 

9s? 3. :fku . 
. wad-jag 3? 
?"335 rm}
5? 2 573??tiulv 3'51"
pa?

  

 

?a a
,s


 

   

 
 
 

 

 

 

Eu? ?3 .
Standard Evrm 520
Rev. August 1954
Pram uga! ted
By Emma: 01 we image:

Circa! at Aw

cumcm RECORD macmocmmoemmc 32mm:

PREVIOUS ECG

E3 YES (3 NO

 

CLINICAL 

MEDICATION

 

 

[3 maacsucv aaosma
Ci nourma meow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGE SEX HACE WilGl?? B. SIGNATURE OF PHYSICIAN DATE

39 6* 1 185:? among on request 30W 5~25~60/0930
AXIS DEVIATIOR (0R8) RATES

Sinus ~30 AURIC. VENT. 80
WAVE5

in? 0.12 ans 0.08 m? Normal

 

 

(IRS 

 

#1sz SEGMENT

WAVEE



?nu-I - a. ?fmh??i??d

 

UNIPOLAR EXTREMITY LEADS 

1. Left Axis

2. ?themse, 
39 HO Significant whivv I'Wu?'mflf? ?4 1? 

PRECORDIAL LEADS (Specify)

SUMMARY. SERIAL CHANGES. A



 



(Continue on reverse)

     
     
    
 
  

 

NO.

564:; 15 262

RQENTIFICATION (For pet! or wn

361301383, cA?f?A D. 135313153111?. ?nah-mu 


Ra?m

nan-u

mama-mid?

 

5 55"? #5
dm grade; data: hoap?al or medical facihty)

 



 

 

DATE
i LT 2&0 USN 5-2560
v0: Namawlaat, ?at, Ramsnm N9. WARD N0.
astaff {13.5 and an


.4: mums? um ?newV?Iv?ml?an-tl

 

Maw?4

mm

b6

 

 

 

 





a ?a

(Standard Farm 5202
?1 Rev. August 1m
Promuluuhd 
11y Bureau o! ?w nudge!
Circuits: Ans?

CLINICAL RECORD I ELECTROCARDIOGRAPNC Rascal)

PREVIOUS ECG



. ?own-f

 

 

cumcm. manucmsow

 

 

 

 

 

 

EMERGENCY Became

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ROUTINE mauum
A 9-- minu-?a?I?v?
55X RACE HEIGHT WEIGHT 9? V. SIGNATURE OF WARD 
(it? If 72 3 183 11/15/62:? 1030
AXIS oavwnou (ans) narzs?
mama}. 8111113 .. W. ?i0, numc. 
amenwas WAVES
PR .11; M35 .03 nomam m? w. 
was comrL?xzs 1-w- -- 7
53. 32 33 pattern 
Ins?T woman-r waves 3 
normal mama]. 

 

 

 

UNSPOLAR EXYREMITY LEADS (Spam)

 

 

gnu-mun-

 

LEADS (Specify)

SUMMARY. SERIAL CHAN623. AND 
Left; ands deiviaten
2. 82 S3 pattern
3. 1?50 change since 10/17/61



(Continue on revenge)

Aww?apm wuss-huh!- .Wmmum?uian-mn . -.. .. .

"ages. 15262 Jimmy: 3:53:35;

4 .th ?Ml. nun-?DH
1?prer written 1mm?! diva: Namo Inst. ?rst, REGISTI. NO.
middfo; ,tmdt'.? dd?; im?piml mmh?cnl facility)

s. NAVAL Hbsm:
DEFY.
new: .xrwsA AND

?was. a

 

 



sa?ma m3:
3% We?;

omcr ML 0 me}: MM 4:

 

up Wu.

tutu-Irinuo-nv I: a I an: a-

gun? ?0 a 

. 1 out:
11/15/6
N0.

TCL

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD.

Mammal Farm {:29
{Attach tract-uh (u S. 507)



"I'm 

ywn' v1. 

2

 

w-mwm 

136

 

 






365;;

?3

we
3:



3! .


?m?uva-

4


 

?nix #:ka 
$433mung

34:. :i

 

-r-n 

 

 

  



 

 

2 

3.,

 

 

 
 
  

453:1 2. .I

 

I 1 gli?gg?gpigzL?bv-ng?;
14"?wa1'2"
?yr: can 2 ??unk-b nauform 520% 42., ?11(August 1954 . . I
,ureau of this Budge! if .. 2.. . I
Crrcular A-32 . mmnua omcc ammo"
I
us ECG
CLINICAL RECORD I ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC necono No .
CLINICAL IMPRESSIQIG 2 MEDICATION ?w 2 2
2 ?h
T. EMERGENCY aaosnoe .
I Es ?am?'ma 
#7 sax WRACE I 2 B. P. HYSICIAN a
AXIS DEVIATION (ans) RATES 
. AURIC. VENT. . .. i.
INTERVALS I WAVES 5
PR J, gas or 1
ans COMPLEXES 
I ?44
4L4. L?s-inane? 2w ?um .uma? an. mu- 1 .m .9: Lat-.6 a: ?mu: ?Hm 
ns-?r SEGMENT WAvus i
i x!
I I a 
Iii-an; - 1-.- wary 
cx-rncurrv LEADS (SpermPRECORDIAL LEADS (Sma'fvSUMMARY. SERIAL CHANGES. AND IMPLICATIONS(Continue on reverseTITLE WARD NO. .

Ramp-last. ?rst.
. rm die,- (rade; date: hoayitator medicalfacility)
{DELanw cm: TIM DE/ar;



ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC 

 

2.0

Standard Form 520

 

 

 

 

 

 

i . 520'!? 2
?557- 7?0 j'a(Aired. 5. 5072.2315233 - ?awwgh? lqu-m, ?2 ??n-3W 

 

 

 

 

sq





W:



 

?obwnwu?if bl .utF?rW 
. hi; . 
. .k??dnhr
1r . .p
id [Elma s?M
.Iixt. 3.0.1!
4 4.31, 

I

(Mioth freeing! Id 5. 507)

De 
F51

$3 In?

a. .vft
?Zr. 1

7.: 

fr.

[af?ict 

middle: dude} dale: Manual a: Medical faculty)

iiAns'N'r's (frai- iyped?

or in?ict: 0?1th dive! Namo-l?af ?ul.

 





,w
960,290 (a

 

No.

is 

,7

 

 

Le 

(comm no on rare?ed)




 

77/!
Standard Form 520
520-10!

 

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC ntconn

NO:

lel?La?t

 

bA'rE

 

a.
9





- I

?tutu?MK. t-

In:-

S.


. A

SUMMARY. Beulah CHANGES. ANU 

i:

$71-$90" 5-
hot; ~l

nzc?nmAL LnAb? [.9ch

us:

 

 

m-F

uumotkn Ear?E?iw-v Labs (swam

mum-



res?1- 



bits brim-Lexus





 

 

f==1?m 

 

 

 

?r WAVES

 



INTENVALH





61-1



umzrr 

 

AGE

 

3


max

 

 

(mt;

?Acz I 

 

Raisin mam

.219 AW

B: P.

 



 

 



mug bawn?'lou (ans)

(753;!

Slam-rum or WMD PHYSICIAN
I

 

AUHICA

 



9-) ~69? - 2

times

IMbnEs?ioN

CLINICAL RECORD

 

ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD
Mablc?lo?

 



 

 

DATE

GHEUTINE WWI

 

El EMERGENCY became

 

I

1?

 

PREVIOUS Izcd
as



 

. mung? 7..if? C?nu?ra. 1%

?it: an!

at ?its? (fp1'7? .
Sluudurd ram 520
RH Augull W51
0mm of 1M Uudgil
Cumin~4u494. .

 

0.3. aoumutm manna bmu 21m o?mw

 

 

 

1 Hap 4 IQ: $41

tithillaci. Juli]!

 

I?ll! n-
I s! I: 
luk?
1 
5 1 
W. Fla
?mmlw?lklliq-IA quna
., 31.3.11. 3.
1 flirt,
. hille?tirair
.. .fan;

a 
f\ .. .w?l?u 
7 4w 
..
1 a,

u?fd 
?in: r-
Cr.nn.r. irarf 1

NEWESMIW ramp 1
mull I. a 
1 ?x 4m 110M . fir. I . 
. .
?3.13 V: 
me? . up H.
.1. up:
Null.? I: .,
Ox ..
fwwaw 1 .5
i: it". .1 Fabian. <se~ i
7? . wrfi-:_ x. e.
.. 11:95.. 5 i 
- . 1 

IFddn 1?un "Wu 
.l.1 fitwalk 
Au. 1min?: A
Pb: I 
L'ru In?ll.?
:1 v1) ?gut HaH5114
?'wH. 1.1 

 

1 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rev. Feb. 1951
Promulgated
By 1?chth of the Budget


?99 
Stmdathormdl: I 

 

CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET

 

 

REQUEST

DATE OF REQUEST




444%?
71%? 

Doc-rows E: APPRO PLACE OF CONSULTATION [j EMERGENCY
>2 UBEDSIDE Don CALL ROUTINE

 
 
   

 

REASON FOR REQUEST (Complaij. 



   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONSULTATION REPORT
[7 7? I I
- I vg?u?v



 

 

1? I .l (Continued on reverse side)

DATE JEENTI ON NO. ORGANIZATION

1 b6
74:55: A
NA REGISTER NO. WARD NOCONSULTATION SHEET
StandardForm 513

(NAME or HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u. 3. ?Nikki?! manna omc: 16?5611? 1?

 

 

 

 

51:80 0? 9

Standard Form

 

 

 

 

Pramulgated Augustl
By Bureau of the Budget
OkwlarA?32 ,5 
I .,
CLINICAL RECORD I CONSULTATION SHEET
FROM: (Requesting ward nit) DATE OF REQUEST 
a? Q- 5' 2/

 



REASON FOR REQUEST (Comptam: and ?ndings)





 

PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS
PLACE OF CONSULTATION [j Rom-mg
nEnsmE [3 ON CALL [3 EMERGENCY

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURE

 

CON ULTATION REPORT

giaZn I
?zz/51224724 @464)
Mt?z/cwf 99 

 

(Continue on raverse side)
IDENTIFICATION No. ORGANIZATION


(I Zf?c. yge/S?Z?,
NANIE 


CONSULTATION SHEET
Standard Form 513

(NAME OF HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)
II. 3. covnnuun' ornct 10-56119?2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Standard Form 513 .
Promulgated August 1943
By Bureau of the Budget

Ckcular 

CLINICAL RECORD

'?nga 

I


DATE OF NEOUEST

 

 



 

FROM: (Requesting wardorunu)
.. 2 7 2/

 

 

REASON FOR REQUEWMKI ?nding?

 

PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

ROUTINE

PLACE OF CONSULTATION
{j EMERGENCY

 

SIGNATURE

 

APPROVED
BEDSIDE ON can.

 

 

 

CONSULTATION REPORT



AA A

JW?jigf

 

  

j/I [KContInued 
I I IDENTIFICATION NO. ORGANIZATION
b6



 

 

REGISTER NO. WARD NO.

 

 

 

 

 

PA LAST 
is: It c.

I ST NAME
CH 2 Fr .3 a 29/
CONSULTATION SHEET

Standard Form 518

 

(NAME OF HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)
ll- 3- PRINTING OFFICE



 

16-56119'1

00 ,7 .0 
at .7
??tandardFormb?lB . if" 2 .

 

?Gamma I. 2. :00
CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET

 

 

DATE OF REQUEST

To: FRO M: (Requesting main! or unit)
@Lmimf {0 

 

 

 

I a
Ham/J Mag 1132??- (39??ng 
PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

63M #202372]?

APPROVED PLACE OF CONSULTATION ROUTINE

mama ON CALL [3 EMERGENCY

 

 

 

 

 

max?? MD @77-

Io?uwo?xm
Wumw 035m AIM mm LM

*mme muni? 


mm mm 4525

magmm?g

(Continue on? rve as: 'ed 
ID NTIFICATION NO. OR IZATI 
mam g) ow be
-- IDDLE NAME REGISTER NOmam 

(NAME OF HOSPITAL. OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)

 

qmummw AND @11- 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

u. 3. ?annual! "mum: onlc: 16.561194



 

 

 

 

 

 


29mm Mam?? ?10 0:0 (Jet?sRoQagi

2, 0:151 amid WAQ
mm 

 

 



 

 

. . . 
?mndamrorm 513 . . .

 

 

 

E?sa?mm??g?
a: 
CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET
TD: 3 1 FROM: (Requesting ward or unit) REQUEST,
?xbb 9.ng

 

 

 

 

REQUEST Us] .7
3W9?wg? .369. {Xi/x79 .
12?. (t I {Iggy/?? f2; w%%1?f?m

e; ?442me /Me??a3@?ere Jae @f?j

  

 





5 A

U?toe e4, f<me3wag 
Doe'ro '5 r? APPROVI-ED PLACE 6F Rom-mg
lg} 21.. I M4?f? . El anew: on CALI. mzRoch

CONSULTATION 


 

 

 

 



 

2g 4 (If
1 

Urology Clinic

22 October 1951 

Rectal examinatinn reveals the grostate to 'be grade 5. size 5116. consistency with
no suspicious fixation or nodulerity. Just lateral to the base on the right is
a. rounded, movable mass which is non tender and. well encapsulated. which probably
represents a cystit seminal vesicle. The left seminal vesicle is palpable though
neigher indurated nor tender. The left vesicle is enlarged. 3 x. 

Impressions: 1) Normal prostate
2) Cystic seminal Vesicles, bilateral. most marked. on the right.

Recommend:- CRe-check in 3 months.

 

 

 

 

 

I, A (Continue on reverse side)
SI A TLE DATE IDENTIFICATION NO. ORGANIZATION
LT MC USN b6
LAST DLE NAME es. REGISTER NO. WARD NO.
?bagel. (94% a Q?l.

 

 

 

I 
WAINIQ I cousumnou SHEET 2, 

 

Standard 513 it 6?
(NAMEOF HOSPITAL on OTHER memo?. FACILITY) :3

u. s. continual! nmme cruel 16.561194



 

 

 

?1 i

. 
auraFormsla . 6 

 

 

 

.
Okcular 
CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET
T0: FROM: (1249mm ward or unit) DATE or REQUEST

 

 

97,] 7 

REASON FOR REQUEST (Complaints and ?nding") 
2W7 5 5?6? ?3?4




 

      

 

5H:
5


OVISIONAI. DIAGNOSIS

 

 

 

 

 

Dog-O WM APPROVED PLACE OF CONSULTATION [j Rob-rm:
. . . I .-- papaya? Don cAu. EMERGENCY
REPORT 








 

nga?az?a?S?XIHHbeam57/994743; w??W?v 5?4 

-

 

 

 

 

  

?q 3; (GonQ?inuddmn .revgrse 31'in)
1 DATE NO. ORGANIZATION
. .. 

   

'E-i-?i?sT - A

   

 

 

4' h? REGIST RNO. WARD NO.
1 55/ 4/21,; 

 

 

 

I . v. a. CONSULTATION SHEET
44* *1 ?if; smndaraFormala
. 

(HAL): or HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL 
u. s. savanna! "muse omc: 16-5611?!

 

A MWii irw?ZJ

 

 

 

A 1, 

A ELL .. 3%zxmA

A A?gg
\Nx4\\r4 ax: ?Ax
A14 4V ggxka Ro?gxfx?xU/xx
Ax? GWEN 

.Awawx?qur?xN?wlA A A


nxx? 33x:
A, ML ?94m! ENiw
Ermxx? 

AA. A


.. {no
39?? i Em

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

         
    

 
    
      

  
       
 

 
 

        
  
 

    
   
   
 

    

  

            
   
  

    
    
   
 

     

  
      
       
     
       
  

   
 
    
   
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. I
Standard Form 89

CIRCULAR A-2E REPORT OF MEDICAL HISTORY
894?? THIS INFORMATION Is EOR USE ONLY AND WILL NOT BE RELEASED To PERSONS 
MST NAME-MIDDLE NAME AND COMPONENTOR POSITION 
CARTHA DEK LEI DIrector a
4. HOME ADDRESS (Number, street or RFD. city or town, zone and State) RPOSE OF EXAMINATION 6. ME (IF EXAMINATION
107 Morningside Drive Alexandria, Va. Annual . 5/25/60
. 9. TOTAL YRS. GOVT. SERVICE 10. DEPARTMENT. AGENCY.OR SERVICE II. ORGANIZATION UNIT
Male - Whlte MIUTARY I CIVIUAN
y" BIRTH 433mm OF BIRTH 14. NAME. RELATIONSHIP. AND ADDRESS OF NEXT OF KIN
1/0/20 diff 0, 44:
I5. FACILITY OR EXAMINER. AND ADDRESS I6. OTHER INFORMATION
If
17. STATEMENT OF PRESENT HEALTH IN OWN WORDS. (Follow by desaipn'on ofpast history, if complaint exists}
l/e?y 400 6/
AMILY HISTORY ANY BLOOD RELA . (Parent, .
RELATION AGE STATE OF HEALTH IF DEAD. CAUSE or DEATH DEA YES No (Check each item) RELATIOMS)
FATHER .5- ,eg. HAD TUBERCULOSIS
MOTHER a VHAD STRRILIS
SPOUSE HAD DIABETES 6
HAD CANCER
BROTHERS HAD KIDNEY TROUBLE
AND RAD HEARTTROUBLE
SISTERS HAD STOMACH TROUBLE
HAD RHEUMATISM (AHMED)
CHILDREN
EPILEPSY (Fits)
OOMMITTED SUICIDE
BEEN INSANE
VALVE You EVER HAD OR HAVE YOU Now (Place check qt left ofeach item)

(YES No (Check each from) YES NO (Check each Item) YES No each item) YES No A (Check each item)
Mgc?gl?' FEVER. ERVSIBELAS TUMOR. GROWTH. CYST. CANCER OR LOCKED KNEE
VZTUBERCULOSIS BUPIURE TROUBLE
FEVER . APPENDICITIS I
OR PAINFUL JOINTS MA ?$41425 OR RECTAL DISEASE ARRALYSIS (Inc. i?fa?lilt) .

MUM PS OF BREATH EREOUENT OR PAINFUL URINATION OR FITS
WHOOPING COUGN OR PRESSURE IN CHEST STONE OR BLOOD IN WEAR. TRAIN. SEA. OR AIR SICKNESS
OR SEVERE HEADACHE I COUGH . OR ALBUMIN IN URINE TROUBLE SLEEPING
OR SPELLS VCRALPITATION OR ROUNDING HEART ginLs MPEBEOUENT OR TERRIFYING NIGHTMARES
OR LOW BLOOD PRESSURE DISEASE VIEEPRESSION OR EXCESSWE WORRY
NOSE OR THROAT TROUBLE IN YOUR LEGS RECENT GAIN OR LOSS WEIGHT yi'ioss OF MEMORY OR AMNESIA
RUNNING EARS INDIGESTION OR RHEUMATISM if BED WETTING
OR FREQUENT COLDS LIVER OR INTESIINAL TROUBLE v?yNE. JOINT. OR OTHER DEFORMITY TROUBLE OE SORT
OR GUM TROUBLE TROODIEOR CALI. STONES DRUG OR NARCOTIC HABIT
SINUSITIS V?Igss OEARM. LEG. FINGER. OR TOE (ETCESSWE DRINKING HABIT
HAY FEVER y?g?gg?gm? 1? SERUM- DRUG OR V?mm 03 gm vi HOMOSEXUAL TEN DENCIES
MAVE x911 EVER (Check each Item) 22. FEMALES ONLY: A. YOU EVER- B. COM PLETE THE FOLLOWING:

I GLASSES VFETTEMRTED SUICIDE I BEEN PREGNANT AGE AT ONSET OF MENSTRUATION
AN ARTIFICIAL. EYE A SLEEP WALKER HAD A VAGINAL DISCHARGE INTERVAL BETWEN PERIODS
HEARING AIDS RSI-H TREATED FOR A DISORDER DURATION OF PERIODS
EROTTERED OR Vi UGHED UP BLOOD HAD PAINFUL MENSTRUATION DATE OF LAST PERIOD 

A BRACE OR BACK SUPPORT ?g?g??gfg?m 0" HAD IRREGULAR MENSTRUATION QUANTITY: DNORMAL 
23. How MANT JOBS HAVE You HAD IN THE 24. WHAT IS THE LONGEST PERIOD YOU 25. WHAT Is YOUR USUAI. OCCUPATIONI 26. ARE YOU (Check one)
PAST THREE TEARSI HELD ANT or THESEJOBSL - YES IT

2
0
5..

 
   

CHECK EACH ITEM YES 0K NU.

 

HAVE YOU BEEN UNABLE TO HOLD A JOB BECAUSE OF:
A. SENSITIVITY TO CHEM ICALS. DUST. SUN LIGHT. ETCE

 

INABILITY TO MOTIONS 

 

 

C. INABILITY TO ASSUME CERTAIN POSITIONS

 

0. OTHER MEDICAL REASONS (ltyes, give reasons)

 

HAVE you EVER WORKED RADIOACTIVE sue.
ounce:

 

. DID YOU HAVE DIFFICULTY WITH SCHOOL STUDIES

OR (Ilyes, give details)

 

. HAVEYOU EVER BEEN REFUSED EM PLOYM ENT BECAUSE

OF YOUR (Ilyes, state reason and gzve
details)

 



. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN DENIED LIEE 

(It'yes, state reason and gave details)

 

32

HAVE YOU HAILOR HAVE YOU BEEN AQVISED TO HAVE:
ANY (11' yes, thumbs and give
age at whach occurred) 

 

33



HAVE You EVER BEEN A PATIENT (commr'tted or
voluntary) IN A MENTAL HOSPITAL OR 
(lfyes. Specu?y when, where. why, and
name of doctor, and complete address of
hospital or chmc)

 

?34



HAVE you EVER HAD ANY ILLNESS on INJURY omen
mm mesa ALREADY (If)yes. specify

when, where. and grvo details

 

35.

HAVE YOU CONSULTED OR BEEN TREATED BY CLINICS.
PHYSICIANS. HEALERS. OR OTHER PRACTITIONERS
WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS: yes, give com-
plete adqress of doctor. hospital. clinic.
and detmls)

 



36. HAVE YOU TREATED YOURSELF FOR ILLNESSES OTHER

THAN MINOR COLDSI (If yes, which illnesses)

 



37. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN REJECTED FOR MILITARY

SERVICE BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL MENTAL. OR OTHER
(If yes, give date and reason {or
rejection

 

V,

33. HAVE YOU EVERIBEEN FROM MILITARY

SERVICE BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL. MENTAL OR OTHER
(If yes, gwe da te, reason, and
type of dIscharge: whether honorable.
other than honorable, {or un?tness or un-
suitabllity)

 



 

 

39 HAVE YOU EVERIRECEIVED. IS THERE PENDING. HAVE

YOU APPLIED FOR. DR DO YOU INTEND TO APPLY FOR
PENSION OR COMPENSATION FOR EXISTING DISABIL-
(It'yes. speedy what kind. granted by
whom, and what amount, when. why)

 

 

I CERTIFY

I AUTHORIZE ANY OF THE HOSPITALS. OR CLINICS MENTIONED ABOVE TO FURNISH THE

0F PROCESSING MY APPLICATION FOR THIS EMPLOYMENT OR SERVICE.
TYPED 0R PRINTED NAME OF EXAMINEE

THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE FOREGOING INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY ME AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND-COMPLET

 

To THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. -
VERNMENT A COMPLETE TRANSCRIPT OF MY MEDICAL RECORD FOR PURPOSES

5&me

 

40. PHYSICIAN 5 SUMMARY AND ELABORATION or ALL PERTINENT DATA (Physician shall wmment on all poeitircanswer: In itcm?sthru s9TYPED on PRINTED NAME or PHYSICIAN on EXAMINER . DATE SIGNATURE I ?mgb?irmnzo OVERNMENT anrmc?ornca: 0 - 5130?



 

 

U. S. NAVAL HOSPITAL

NATIONAL NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER
BETH ESDA 14. MARYLAND REPLY nuts: 10

 

DE Leann. CARTHA DEKLE CIV nun NON 

11-12?56 Admitted this date with diagnosis of: HERNIA, 
INDIRECT, mnsnuclsm, left (5602)

11-21-56 Diagnosis changed this date by reason of concurrent to:
HERNIA, INQUINAL, DIREGT, left (5600)

ll?lS~56 Hernioplasty, left (302)

SUMMARY: This 36 year old white male was admitted for repair of a
left hernia.

The patient noted about 5 months ago a lump in the left inguinal
area, which has produced mild aching pain since then. He was seen
here and a hernia diagnosed and surgery advised.

Past history was non contributory.
Physical examination revealed a left inguinal hernia which was

freely reducible. The remainder of the physical examination was with
in normal linits.

Laboratory studies were within normal limits.
Course in heapital: On 11?15?56 a left inguinal direct hernia

was repaired. Post operatirely the patient did well and was discharged
to out patient care on 11-21?56.

 

b6

 

 

 

LT MC USN 0
APPROVED:



R. B.EROWN
CAPT MB USN
CHIEF OF SURGERX

 

 

Rev. Felt). 1951
Prom gated

.smga??i 3.309. 6 4

Bureau otthe Bud 
rclH'Ia. 3e

 

CLINICAL RECORD CONSULTATION SHEET

 

 

REQU EST

 

 

 

1'0: [14% mj?wu? Luigi?; DATE/canny

 

FOR REQUEST (Complaints and ?nding? MM 
MM
PM 5% 

Wgad?m



 

PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

p. a. 

 

 

 

 

 

WW APPROVED PLACE OF 
7 7 ?can.
14" 

CONSULTATION REPORT





A 4 (Confiqued' on reverse side)

EM cane?
OUTINE

 

 

 

 

 

1 277m IDENTIFICATION NO. ORGANIZATION



?b6

 

 

 

3&24?472

 

PA SLAST LE NAM REGISTER NO.
A aya? (a 


 

(NAME. OF HOSPITAL OR OTHER MEDICAL FACILITY)
u. I. covnnux'r nnmuc omc: 16-56119-4 

I
CONSULTATION SHEET
Standard Hum 513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Check one) PATIENTS MST NAME-FIRST NAME REGISTER NO. WARD BIO.
DE LOACH, GARTH A D. FBI STAFF CL.
?mi? REQUESTED BY DATE OF REQUEST
Ameuu'romr DB. . I I . 12-13? 53
EXAMINATION REQUESTED I AGE IDENTIFICATION NO.

CHEST 33 .

 

 

 

 

PERTINENT CLINICAL HISTORY. OPERATIONS. PHYSICAL FINDINGS. PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

i. REPORT

0

11377? 53

FILM NO.



DATE OF REPOR

chest Re-examination of the chest reveals no change sin?e the last exanination

with no evdence of active pathology in the heart or lungs.



a

 

IE MCUSN

 

 

b6

 

SIGNATURE: (SPECIFY LOCATION OF LABORATORY IF NOT PART OF FACIUTY)

 

 

MEDICAL FACILITY) GPO 

ww? ?4 -LHLLAI

Standard Form 519A (Rev.Feb.1951)
Promulgstodcliy 1311:0311: of the Dude?

RADIDGRAPHIG REPORTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Check 01%) LAST NAME-FIRST NAME REGISTER N0. WARD NO.
. Winterg- cram D. r31 STAFF c.
32mg? REQUESTED BY oAfE or REQUEST
AMBULATORY EXAMINATION REQUESTED AGE SEX IDENTIFICATION H0.
STEREO CHEST 53 M,

 

PERTINENT CLINICAL HISTORY. OPERATIONS. PHYSICAL FINDINGS. MID PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS

11377- 53

mmocmmc REPORT FILM DATE OF ?Em? 10?2 2-53

Re-egcamination of the chest by means of stereo views and comparison with the

prenous films reveals the density to be located in the right base and somewhat
anterior-1y. This appears to lie in the major lobar septum between the middle and

lower lobes and may represent an area of pleural thickening. The possibility

of a lesion still must be considered and a repeat X?ray in approximately
1cine monthti?gr comparison with all the previ us films would in this particular case

a wax-ran .

I ?og; LT MCUSN b5

SIGNATURE: (SPECH-T LOCATION OF LABORATORY IF NOT PART OF REWNG FACILITY)

 

 

Standard Form 519A (Rev. Feb. 1951)
Promulnud by Bureau of the Budget
Circular A42

(NAME OF HOSPITALOR 0mm umxmraclun) I opo ee?ze?moo-A 1? RADIOIIRAPHIB REPORTS 

-7 A: 1 7 .,

 

 

I

 

1
3
LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME REGISTER N0. WARD 

(Eartha Dekle Staff Clinic

AGE SEX (Chad: one)

BEDSIDE. WHEELCHAIR. BED
OR ST BET CHER PATIENT AMBULATORY

REQUESTED 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REQUESTED BY DATE OF REQUEST

 

 

(Above space for mechanical imprinting, {fused} 
PERTXNENT CLINICAL HISTORY. OPERATIONS. PHYSICAL Fmomss. mo PROVISIONAL nmsuosxs

 

 

FILM no. 2882?.?56 lam 0? 
RADIOGRAPHIC REPORT

5/18/56 CHEST: Repeat studies of the chest show again heavy markings towards both
Bases but apparently within the upper limits of normal. The cardiac outline is also

normal . SEW hob

MEI M9 

SIGNATURE: (Smelly location of laboratory 5] not part of requesting facility)
Standard Form 519A (Rev. Aux-1951)

Promulntod by Bureau of the Buds?
are ?9?1ka mm," A42 m, 

(me 0? 303mm. omen MEDICAL mum RADIOS RAPHIG REPORT

 

 

b6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PATIENTS LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAM - REGISTER N0. WARD N0:

Staff Clinic

 

 

 

DE LOACH, Gartha D. AGE sax (Check am)
ssosme. WHEELCHAIR. BED
on STRETCHER PATIENT AMBULATORY

 

 

EXAMINATION REQUESTED

 

REQUESTED BY DATE OF REQUEST

 

 

 

 

 

(Above space for mechanical Imprinting, if used) 
CLINICAL HISTORY. PHYSICAL FINDINGS. AND PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS .
mu N0. 2882-66 ism: OF REPORT

 

RADIOGRAPHIC REPORT

2/6/56 CHEST: There is a slight increased density superimposed on the anterior portion
4470f the heart on the left lateral view. 0n the RA View this presents as 
increased markings showing the heart. There are some slight increased markings in
the left 5th anterior interspace also. These findings are minimal and equivocal.
The impression is that of accentuated markings in the lingula.
0n the lateral View, we get the impression that there is slight narrowing of the
main stem bronchus on the left. waever, this may be an artefact. 
views. GLL/hcb b6

pen MC USN

SIGNATURE: (Specify location oflaboralorg if not. part of requesting facility)
Standard Form 519A (Rev. Aug. 1954)

Pro ulntod. by Bureau of the Bucket
oro Circular (Rom)

RADIOGRAPHIG REPORT

 

 

 

 

 

 

(NAME OF HoerL on 0mm MEDICAL rACtun')

 

 



 

PATIENTS LAST NAME-MIDDLE NAME REGISTER N0, . WARD 

Staff Clinic

AGE sax (Check one)
3505105. WHEELCHAIR. BED

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DE LOAGE. CARTHA. DEKLE 34 STRETCHER PATIENT AMBULATORY
EXAMINATION REQUESTED
REQUESTED BY DATE OF REQUEST
(Alum space for mechanical imprinting, used) Dr . I I 
PERTINEHT CLINICAL HISTORY. OPERATIONS. PHYSICAL FINDINGS. AND PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS
FILM N0. 2816-55 OF REPORT
- -- - - A- -
2-28-55 .
Cheat: the 1 fields are clear, the heart is normal in size and. configurationSGWEI (Specify location of laboratory if not part of 
I Standard Form 51% (Rev. Aux. 1954)
apo oo?Ie?moe-et 

 

(mm: or HOSPHAL on omen name?. rmum I RADIOGRAPW -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(Check one) NAME-FIRST NAME REGISTER N0. WARD 
BEDSIDE. WHEEL
CHAIR. OR DELOACH, Gartha. Dekle F.B.I. Rm 1 
CI Baa-153$? REQUESTED BY DATE REQUEST
[j AMBULATORY Dr I. 4.5.54
EXAMINATION REQUESTED AGE SEX H0.
. I chest PA 34 Hal 9
PERTINENT CLINICAL HISTORY. OPERATIONS. PHYSICAL FINDINGS. AND PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS
4518-54.- 
REPORT FILM N0. DATE OF REPORT 13?13?511

   

1ww-um-rs-w:macaw-wmm Examination of the chest reveals that the
lemon prOViously described in the right loner lung field is not present

at this time. The heart and lungs are now considered to be within normal limits.



 

 

 

LT MCU SN b6

 

 

SIGNATURE: (SPSCIFY LOCATION OF MBORATORY IF NOT PART OF REQUESTING Helm)

. - 7 Sundae Form sum (Rev. Feb. 1951)
NMIG BETHESDA, MARYLAID 

(NAMEOF HOSPITALOR OTHER MEDICAL mum) apo ?lo-hm? RADIOGRAPHIB REPORTS

 

 

 

 
  


PREVIOUS ECG 
N00

.M .

.1 3. 9,
. rC] EMERGENCY neosnoe
WUTINE BULANT

SIGNATURE OF WARD PHYSICIAN DATE

wasi-1-741 . - a
QRS councxg g. I 
71: 

SEGMENT i 



UNIPOLAR EXTREMITY LEADS (Specify) 

mmumt 41?41

JEALINICAL RECORD 1 ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC REC

CLINICAL IM PRESSION
RACE WEIGHT

2 (50C. 70?? DEVIATION (0R5)
5/2. A 5 

 



MEDICATION

 

PRECORDIAL LEADS (Sptcify)

i.
SUMMARY. ?nmnicmnon?at/f4.?
i 35:true?on reverseECG rim; 9-33 {#451106
PATIENTSIDENTIFICATION i g? r. If Wl?miilaslt??;cap: a me 1m acuy FF 
:De ELECTROCARDIUGRAPHIC RECORD
Standard Form 520
(Attach tracmda to S. 507   

 

Ix Luann." Haunt?

223 

 

huntlug-ilk,
. w. 
?(manna .. AM . .

 

..
u.



 

4.114141.) 115.76.! vi. 

Qa?th 



3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

an

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    
 



5-.

 

. In.

1 ?fl" 777 is" 7 ~r~?4n
'i 11

I: PREVIOUS ECG

f; 5 RECORD . 7.:77 MEDICATION

1 I

. In {j EMERGENCY asosma

AGE sax EDI/ace: I HEIGIIT was?: a I SIGNATURE or WARD PHYSICIAN one
3! i It .

.i .7514; I 
:54? mus DEVIATION (0R5) 5 RATES -
I 9 . 7 7 AGRICI VENT.,

INTERVALS WAVES 
I - PR was or
ons commexcs

R5-T SEGMENT i 1- WAVES 
CK .I thx?gdv) ?7 
Li
I
.

i

maimow-?M . r,
PRECORDIAL 1?5?
- 1?
.M


 

 

 

 

SUMMARY. SERIAL CHANSFS. AND IMPLICATIONS:

{W?umx .a g: L??w?i?l?tI?z;

 

 

 

.-


. 782?: (W- 
I?ylao CHANGE anew-?? 7 
- mucus c. 731- 
7 77777777 77 7 7% ?Iconunuo on reverse) LT. (MC) ILSJL 7
?a mm? ?m 1307 EQBIEQE7

I 
l'nthnu :2 [I?m-In :ru AI n. I Ir?. ?1me ui?lfoa'l ?Inn-g7

Hush": gut-u.- Ilnln, lump-In!



5 
1 jg? (In: I.

4? 
i

1?5 JAIN 
?r/z/?zc



.II II. 5w. ..
Q?m?lu'n?z'vm?" 

 

 

 

 

 

 


m. Nan-a hut. REGISTER NO. WARD no. 2
famh'ty) I f?
I 7,/7 


ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC RECORD 5&2;

Standard Form 520 5-33

MED-404 7&2:

- I.

(?Foch houngs to SI 597v4.47 Isa
a...I. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
  

 

  
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mum" $?51 Pie?w?!

3w II. 0' ?gdgo} .r Ge},
Cantu Aow?2 
1 IRE RBIOGRAPHIC RECORD 
Mr?! .A 
. MEDICATION Vi .
9
3 . aqua-w

I - Hubun?us 941nm?:

I angina-58x RACI?12? ?awc Jul .4 
1 AXIS (ans) 1 mmINTIMVAL 3 1 l' WAVES
. inn-as?? I WAVES
.. 7 
i? L, i" mi??nwd? an? -- 
Qumran" EXTREMITY LEADS {Spam'quq .yn . yum-I ?u I .. ad nut. H?Cte?u-s-Qabuml-dl?amaconom. LcAos .

{:73 .- 7* w: 
anyslats?..- gun-5g: . Man-5 v.7? -. a?w m-m?uw gaunt-nun -4. ar- A . I I
if. sans/II. CHANGES. AND WPMCA-rlonsWITHIN NURFIIAL .
.E1:14 .
:4"er ff'lrkg: f} *3 . .
1 ?lg'g'li' . C0 Illit?e on rovarse) .. a? 7 4pm? in; vuln- 
v?r'z' ?a . -. 4hr? a i. a
51%. 7" -mo. SIGNATUF :Tnu: 
. . a 
a "k ECG 1&(F9: type at Ivn'uvmp n'os dive Nam-n but HFGISTKR M). WANG Ho.
1.. I ,1 gift middle; grads: dale; or mulu'zvl In?ll?) Jacki.? . 
a? >13u?1 

)8 06' a ?7th nrcmocnamocuwmc niconn
3m:? :1qu Form 5?Mun? rum:
A55 I 1?ma??hrs-.5112.? . .. 
'7 I. - f?lu ?1234 

 

 

 

wmerItan?utd form :20
I934
Bureau ol Ibo Budget

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Circular 
I 7 mav us ca
CLINICAL Inseam) I meow mm
cummwuracsaiou ?mama-non i 
?5?5 Dansaomcv Bantams
WWanwm Wm
AGE sax lnacs "mam  mam lam ?mum?r a} mu 
I??ll- '73f2 
mus pawwmmuna) mus 
AU?lcv yam".
pwmma
PR am: at
am 
woman-i- 1' 
Luna {swam
(if


 

 

 

WHIALWMMEB. MD IMPUGATIOMI

Mew arm/9m 


A. ?/Jo (Co??o?wvmm

7m 95"
if?? 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.
W??brh Lli?isi ?355535517: 9

 

QQLQAQH, 
.9534. @c?j?aa??f '6 12mm?

-. (m as. r. son


.mw?cha?aamu madam?) 

b6

 

 

urn-I?





?ht-Ami I:

a
,4



 

  

    
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



.
nap?Hrs M-?bV?v? 

 




s,


ems.

 

 

    

 

 

4 m: 2:



 



A

3?

 

 

 

April 26, 1968

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Assistant to the Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. 0.

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

In reviewing the results of your recent physical
examination, there are two minor abnormalities I wish
to call to your attention. First, you have a moderate
hearing loss for high tones, bilaterally. As long as
this is not causing you difficulties, I do not think
anything further need be done. Secondly, you have a
moderate elevation of your serum cholesterol (293 mg%,
upper limits of normal is 250 mg%o. I advise that you
attempt to follow a diet, low in saturated fat, and am
enclosing a booklet describing such a diet.

There were no other significant abnormalities
noted.

I am enclosing a copy of the physical examination
report for your personal records.

Sincerely,

Capt. MC USN

 

b6

 

 

  

REPORT OF MEDICAL HISTORY .
U.S. Civil Service Employees and Applicant"

15 information is for of?cial and medically-con?dential use only and will not bi

  
  
 

 

 

I. W-IIDDH 

04 



 

2. OF I 
[45.57.- 70 

{ti ed persons.

Budget Bureau
Approved 50-R0390

    

3. icon mum mm:

 

4. HOME muss (Number, um: or RFD. city or town, Stale, and ZIP Code)

 

3. toms: or mummy:

?you?. At.

6. ONE OF 

74?76

 

 

Ilsa

GOYMIIDIT SERVICE

9. 

 

 



Milli!?

lo. ?5quon uim

 

[?52

I (mun

 

 

II. 0? 

7.2.0-10

IZ. PLACE Of 

 

Qumran . 6501961?

 

Ill/ll 

33. MINING noun 0! EXAMINER, (Including ZIP Cod!)

 

u. smman or mum's mm: no armaments usto ?a?ow by dexnloxion afpgu binary, ifcomplaim m?m)

 

Is. now: (Please check a: left of nub item):

It. um vou PM (Please :bnla a: of cat!) item):-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ns 0 (Clmn? each item) as no (Check cad: mm)
m: on coma mus nun/mm moat we no Intercoms
1/ [Lin mm IOIH ms ?ow or noon 
A ammo AID mu mun 0: room common
1/ on 5mm mlwuu 
V??n A Inc: on no: sonon A
n. um you EVER nun 0: mt you ION (Please at hf: of curb item): 
YES up now (Cluck nub item) YES so by! non cad: Em?) YES NO ooWK? (Clmk cacb item)
7 1/ mu, animus . Asnuu mini! em 0: or was?!
. 1/ oamrutm V, SHOHIESS or mm: 1/ umms o: mumsu
mum: ma . mu oz PIESSUIE cuss: tout. mm, o: omen wommr
:3 mum on mum j, mass
W7 gum uumnou on mums mu IOSS or nu, 1:6. mm, o: 
1/ ,f (mo: Moms I men on tow noon mssun 7 
moon: on my: mucus I, cams IN YOUR LEGS itcunbn no: im
mums on mums mus moum momsnon "mm oi tome ms
noun: 7 root noun:
m, most. on man noun: 2/ om moon noun: 0: w? mnius
mums ms manque "(Imus (Inc. infantile)
mm [055 ?umgf" semmom cows I norm BONES . m, mm, 59., oz 
some room on sun noun: rum, atom, ?51,0: cum 1/ mom nouni: memo A
1/ smusms mum o; IIGHIMMES
1/ nu ma ,mmomns o: wom
nun ms 0: mm mass 1035 or 0: mm:
4/1} sxul olsuses mom: on mm: manna: umous noun: or son
1/ ,x ?ooun Imam smut on noon mm :7 we on moon: mm
mamas sum 0: mum Ill m: acissm mm mm
some (Night sweats) tons rmoos o: uncomousuess

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It now own ms um mu tun Inn:

 

l9. Will! IS KIIOD YOU

20. WI IS ?airmen!

 

 

us you (Cluck onemom
FORM 58
Do Not. Transmit Enclosed Naterial MAY I968

With ?fficial Pers onnel amour.

.5

2

0.5. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSIQN
PPM CHAPTER 293
5058-IOI

 

 

 

 

111501 no 11111 1111 (mm: 115 nus: s: nun ammo II 1111151111 on mm
1111; you 11111 111mm 011161119110: 11111 umlE 
211010 11011111181401: 1 
5915111111110 vacuums DUSI sumom in.
1/ . 1115111111 10111110151 (6mm [1111110159 
(mm msmous . 311?; reasons2/3311: mu 1111 won? mm woman 5111111111 
11:: . 2111! 1011111 1111 DENIED un susumm (If :11. 
3 i/ ?ate reason and give details) 
1
Wm 1110,01 1m: 11:11 111111010 11111. 1 1
. cannons: (If yes, describe and give 
1 age at wbicb occurredmm" 1111 0111091111: W/u 
(Ifyes, specify when, wherename of doctor and complete address 913:1501111111!) 1 

 

27. HAVE IOU EVER HID OI OTHEI nuts
,1 most (If es, specify when.
where. and give detaiis')

YOU OI IEEH HEATED 
PHYSIEIAHS. OI OEHER WIIHIH
M31 3 YEARS EOI OEHEIE EHAH MIIOI 
(If yes. give complete address of doctor,
hospital, clinic, and details)

 

 

(21' HAVE YOU EVER IEEH- EOI SERVICE
IEUUSE OE IEHHI. OI OEHEI 
(If yes, give date and reason for rejec-
tion)

 

30. HAVE YOU EVER IEEI DISEHAIGED EIOH SERVICE
BECAUSE OF HEHIAE, OR OTHER (If 7
,yes. give date, reason, and type of dis- 4
cbarge: wbetber honorable, other than
honorable, for nn?tness or unsuitability)

 

13E. HAVE YOU EVER I3 RIDING. OI 
YOU AHMED EOI PENSION OI (OHPEHSAEIOH E01 EXISE- 
IIG (If yes, specify what kind. 
granted by 10150111. and what amount,
when, wby)



1/


 

 

 

 

I (111111 I HAVE REVIEWED DIE EOIEGOIHG SUMIED ME AND THAT IS TRUE DID (OHHETE 10 Eli DESI OE MY KHOWEEOGE 

1

I All? OE THE DOCIOIS. HOSEIIALS, OI MEHIIOHED AIOVE IO EUIHISH THE GOYEIHMEII A EOHHETE 11mm! OE HY MEDICAL RECORD EDI PURPOSES Of EDI IHIS OI

SEEVIEE. 

 

OI WE 0E EXMIHEE 

 

 

IOIE: HAND 0000! OI If mum MARK IE OPENED IY MEDIUE 

32. 1111111111; SUHHAIT MID 11110111101 or All 111mm om. (Physician 1111:? comment on all' positive answers 1'11 110111 15 through 31,, Physician may develop by

1nter11ew any additional medical bsstory [1e deems important, and record any sigm?cant ?ndings bere.)

    



4

 

"pm mm 0! 
[mi MC.

 

3151111111 



out ?1 '1
2/ '79 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

NUMBER OF 
SHEEIS

b6

 

 

 

INT OFFICE 0.39105"

 

 

 

 





?3335- Lcomputers. ., 
BE ris?haf casetn?broke is; 
3,33. :3 iafwr day?on gd?typ
at 53:13:91: hom? ?making breakfastt
pancakestfor thatchildren whemrthe 
3,353 ??(gngbassy irg"; LorfdonLcaIied?tRay

if; ?t?tt Onemofwbeloach? 1:1

2:3 Vgg?ghgiw??: ?t kldnapmgiui

E13

.3.






?51Egg?l?w geeks ag?q: DeLoachtIunahed? 13nes,~gwmg ardersrami 

 
  

33:3:

fNavai3gAcadgm graduate tamifiga' 35am 5:We hadtiearnxa??met mur?arw

?1 I 
housg (kinking hear??i?magh heaVy 
if Hi DELOACH ?ii-13?? waihad ifa??iz; iitidi- sexism? -day3t 

ww?mwum




gym/W?;

1?53;

9 3 
- jK? 03333;; MK .: ?is?ts; of: prints fo?r: identity big; thegonerg

1. .

k. 

fgxit 

martian cases,"the Midst i; 



{Were seeretane

?WAn?ihourW yitixvt?emachuleaves 3% Ae?Qh myseigl? 3.:
xegretiingmhee ?It; anngd with an?! 13mm

cliff hi5); :g 4?15; w?jufg?i bagta

    

{f3m6133??casesxasithe% prwafegbusiness {1qu in centast may



 

?171: {Kwa 

 

322.8563 rigs-9,5" W2:

 
  

fwi?z L. Famck?ray. mg}. new??l making (1361510113 junta? 1321a agents.

ML Thett??tsearc fangthe: slayersiigpy
dr?gmnt andmdual ?4315;; tha bglj?b nskit 
anoghei?ti. Heaven?it ?workersileader am?? his wifagtandtg
t?ach??-?Vgafd. ;;5e??rigg?g gag-3y? agjwdaughier, zs?onetnffiusafavomgs WW

re?gmym. sincere fa": mafia breakmg,

       

   

 
  

  
   

mast: g??rs miside??abt?sz?knygeXpected galley uptthe 

ah'aunced ubhcl 1:338; i 0 ca ans?mandiound 
13* -, yfgy-t ?g {3 $5353; tl?rhentFBI scuba tiwers foun? (mac:

?the weaponstm deep water under a; it
?it? andigNavy; dzvers faumi

gg/?f, "Si 35?33
another ,ng
gr; L: gm ., wig, 



icha a'ii?ges thetnew director ?as {rapt

 
     
 
 
 
 
   
    
  
 
  
 
    
 
 
   
  
   
  
 
 
   
 
  
 
 

#5
"fg?x?g" $3,564 

1241


   
  

?Ntf?l

 

SitESItheW-assa?sginat1bn 10f Dr. Marian ,1
inthex ??BeLoach" said b?gam
- ?ning rangegi over ?ares-t
{1133210315 and contmentsmafterga 
?isearch 290 m?lxoa

 


4

 

 

Hefner: attrx?egbyA??amesn Bari Raga;
,3 5?Prints ski! thav?i tcgbe checked
?manually,?it hei .
(Agate we dwersetwjbe comparecitbyx



   

 

   
  
 

 
 

 
  
 

fsucceedeg?onyeg?; Miss tMackIe, the? 
in

  
  

 

  

4 Vi; @323?!th ?i?is?t?i?ifit-l g: ,3?ng bti?rzedzahit n3 
soma which he; a? at: cg?: 
?t if; ff}? gimme 21? 

?mitt

. 33$ 3,
itit ?tits g; cof?n, tsomewhereuui agividet?reatwt

'as? agentshand zh?yi} "did ?fih? 
especxaliyg innit? espwnaget??andt Wt

   
  
  
 
 

has} 

?fg?edug; 53?? wt: 
When an agen?t fmaliy fegecwd?tthe 

 

 

   
  
  
   

 

   

?Aften 33?, wasuavertitthey

?tt?i?ii?t? women. st??m {imit 
theiarduons stressesiu? 
asdying far?murs in mcoideditcir.?themataddediw his} 

:WJ?n'f

balding a gun, watching a: suspect. 115i anui?n?ghdve

 

       
   
 

"'ng 
a
4:133}:

been hefier;



 



bus? mt?t?t?t?itei?b?m ihig metcaf?n FBI 
lilg 


Wagr?nes nab 333:1" 



 
  

th??ni
1'

"in
GIVES ii}: L,}}eLcach 

 

  



 



Jack Elanakig nlsifderma??; ?gig tWt-ttpa?t 435%
coifimkxti?aping jaf Barbara afan?wtr merggs?u, crigis 
Mackletw?utfwin mach 

that Strategas :ttiagum his ath?jf?itgay?hec?g it?s ?hm 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

?6m: 33m; casest-

?We knew the} bananas twwid last}; 
geniygsatlongzmakecp hembreathmg ?'th t'

a
i

Mame-8? W: 19:15??

)4 my

7.4% .

mam"? m3??

?2


4
urn-Ilia?; .MM
. ?1 

 

 

 

 

. -
Mr. Felt 1.,

?1 . Mr/? 7
Mr 5.1.7:
5 . . Mr. 

Mr. Caxiipbellm
\fr. CleveIazid 

 

If 
?bF?D-350?I?ov. 7-16-63m_~x

a

 

   
    
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     
   

 

 

 

 
   

 

  
 
 
  

 

     
 

 

 

 

  

gt . . (Mount CIIppIng in Space . 51%? 5% Comm! 

Mr. Marshal!
5? Mr. Miller, 
. '3 5 Mr. Ponder
?3 Mr. Soyars
1 3; Mr. Walters . 
351.0522: had 5555551 turf. 5005555 2155 I, g?l?if??
255515531552 25530 was president In ~55: 5,5,55,55,55,? :1 
. 3.55:1: ?.?Migcharge at? carporate affairs {55121315a 3?5, :5 5553; defy,? 1; '5
.4 Exempt-aspect ,ma?sf?gfe?sm (Indicate mm}. $155. Neenan .
*2 Imzng and publxc?refaimn" ?5 Li ,?f?j?si?g?m Iistene 5 6? W1 ..
,{fj?yinii {Ii?e morn-Ia! Mung. caurzeoas manner,? -.-. 
?65 5,555.5 Banach 5688135551?!Eexplainedxat 1 .2 

Ibecume thmi?v?m 6,155,650: 5505523553., Iengzh Eiiat I had??ecided It} ?53509? 3
Carthal?abekle "bake? ?De?0a.ch..r offered {orseveral ng
35511:; as theCFBI?s N63 2 1051123555 311% ,-mye; old, friehd Ebonaid Mi? Kendail 
,chargezg o?frallwfi?BI Investigative/E? the board 50f? 9595100? 
5133? $3033 421? 5?31: $0015.; 1361: skyears, but he goE 
years. ?35505, 5 ms: ngi; a Is 6y: 
5511;121:555 attracuveg? 311$? ?na?ysg? g?cegr?g?mr

auburn-haired wxfe and tyres: of; {hag ti:

5
{31?3311. HQOVER. ?335,311; you ever?gdemde;
*iQtIx? 931,?? his?? han?? DeioachI-?in I?ave tIie; be.sure an ad CRUINDO SENTINEL
personaily everywover with: mewfigst he~5axd 1, Orlando Flerida
51551930215343. ?zi?mang; :tiigEfE; that: that?sfwhat vae been . Page" 153 
88m}..aaent5 and 63369} 0511210315,; doing for-71 womours; 
2516.5 absolute domamon? 0151:: 115535?; graphed?, 
.3113 men and thexrgfam?ies. I ha?dEt t0: 35.? Lthought you yth? 01:55:12,121:~ ,5
gig}! a?iid gamer him?origail?decismns" .51th weuidn?t l?av?ex hegsaid..He:gI
forwsiis. weeks>- wouldn?t
?El?g?e 535a; acdi?l 55.55. vspeak ?0 3.501116 my mail bu
ipubzic.?conixaence.m .5155: F85 should~* 15555355 hecame friendWagam-WW.

55 .5 5, 3.1136. Much} together in: New~~Y0rk
ryf: nix; 0111' sources (If, i formatznm, wgek before he-dxed?on May 2.5?513;

wouId. drptup, ,te?b? ?Any Fatima What}?
embarrassed 1m}: 5? 55;} 5?

I?m-?1w nu me



     

   

   
 
 

 

 
 
  
 

    

 

 

any?

I

    

    
  

(5:26?

 

 

7/5/72

:f . ,Editi 
.351 . Aim: Darathy I?Ia?lee
3% i 
I,gi:dgme thucha' 5&3. ?5155 arrest?? 1,50le
mxgl?: punished probaiiog?rw Tit} 
5535:5105: fringe benefzts?Ioer 3* game? 5 1 - ?w
:33; 

   
    
     

   

a


     
     
      
 

 

   

. 

. ?52551?: ..~.~dechned name the - Character:
:Imiwsamogt: 51531055 . .. . . . . . or- . .
$6513 . 7' .2 
5,.Ge0rgxa native, and"; ., Classificuuon: 
?gg?dgaiewf 3%st s. Ir: timersiiy, . 5.5 A Office: 1 am pa
55:05:56 $115478! 10.4942 Iii. I959 was:: 54;? f, 
$531119, lingfor 5 E, 5 . 851m: InVesuqated

555115 tog} spetm Haovar?s 5..

65.551595 .5 .5 .: it? .1

55? 5:5? fpleasaFFmannex-ed,xhanti~ :3th 

  

 
  
  

3'
m??n {0,2 ?2 35105511 515253;; 555 ., \x .
tellg?EEofm tug: ham: manute? 5 



If WEI .. I
?3,531197?.
55.5

0?

175/2! 4'2. I

 

 



zq-ua .

 

 

 

 

 

 

Form& No. 2 Man 1
Homer ?3 I rem I?d-mods Cases 

DOROTHY MADLEE Two weeks ago DeLoach lunchedi with open lines, giving orders and I 1
?111111.151." t- \with L. Patrick Gray, the new FBI making decisions for all the agents. 
1 director. The search for the. slayers of 

1 Fea" respect and a genius MI ?Hes a different individual -?he Yablonski. mine

timing and relations were the ?w?WiH not: be another De- \vorkers leau?r and his wife and

keys to the late .1. Edgar Hoover' sfi'LOach said describing Gray as ?daughter, is one ofhis favorites

.power. says the man who 00"? have. ;"religious, sincere, a disciplined ?You make? your own breaks." he

become the FBI dt?rectorLs successorJ? Naval Academy graduate and a said. ?We had. learned the murder-

wigaggIhfggI?s ?38k; maaebggci} family man." . ers had first sat outside Yablonski' 

1 I I: DELOAC will at house drinking beer. Although heavy e. .
charge or all FBI invest1gat1ve comment on any epraicted polIcy snow had fallen and several days .5 

operations untiirh?e resigned two changes the new director has not had passed the agents dug up the



   
  
 
  
 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

years ago. is visiting Walt Disney ans? (If 1n 1 sintact 
World this week wiIh his attractive :?announced publicly, he '3 in favor or 'I?hen Fig? sc?idd?ivg'irggufd meat I 
. auburn- h8if?d Wife and three or their .1 gear? 3+ 1 .. I the weaPOns if] deep water under a I 
seven children. - bridge, ?and Navy divers found .
neoveabheld the FBI in ., gamm- 
the palm of his hand ?DeLoach OF THE cases 
said. ?He passed personally every .1. 11 . ,was the assassination of Dr. Martin 
1? disciplinary case?- among the then .11. ??117 .1 .Luther King." DeLoach said, begin- I i
8. 000 agents and 000 employes. 1 I ning a story that ranged over three .,
"He held absolute dominion over nations and two continents. after a 
. \his men and their families. I had to search among the? 3 200 million i
call and brief him on all decisions I sets of prints for identity of the one ?i
made in major cases. 'left on a rifl? byt?games Earl Ray. i
?He was acutebf aware that if\ "Prints; Still have to: _be Cheeked
. public confidence in the FBI should manually,? he said. "The patterns -
dry up, our sources of information-J1 are too diverse be compared by
. . would dry up, too. Any action, that qumputers?. 1. .. 
1. . embarrassed him or the service was That case broke on: a homely 3 .
a cardinal sin." a DteLgach, elite; ?daysbon ?lthyinfraction, or an c?pancakesdor the when the . 
judgment such as a false arrest. t. .. I
1.1? . 1 U. S. embassy in London called. Ray 
might be punished by probation ?he ?1 1 $3353ppre ended. .
without fringe benefits or pay raises. Q: .5, 63," ?i?he of DeLoach?s most chal
0 r? h. 3! 
officer.?a iran fer to a doghouse CAEZIIghgili?fceedgg?gH . VII longing cases was the kidnaplng of 1
DeLoach declined to name the I . . ?orid; giirl 13:80 ?If E. a I
a Georgia native and .addition of women agents. WE KNEW SHE WAS buried in a I I
. .. coffin, somewhere in a Wide area. .
graduate of Stetson University, We sometimes used secretaries th batte i 3 would last .
mined the FBI 1n 1942 In 1959 he was .as agents and they did fine worltr .5 I at 11 f, b. thi
named assistant director, in line for 1 especially in espionage and ex. fInd ermi- airy-emf: ?:15
the top Spot in the event of Hoover? tor t1on 08593:" he said. 1 failed? 1 -
death or retirement. "After the case was over. they Whpleasant-mannered hand- "were secretaries again. Mr. Hoovers en an agen ma ec L. 
. some man of 52_ DeLoach smiles as felt women were not equipped for? and the girl was found alive, . I a?
?he tells of a two 'hour, 47 minute the arduous physicalstr?sses?such -DeLoach said her first words were a I i"
conferenCE in Hoovers office in 1 as lying for hours in a cold ditch abonus added to his delight. _i 
July, 1970 . hoAdinlg a glwiuyagl?gng hi "It couldn't"have been airetter . 
our 8 030 V83 3. 6 each if I?d written it myse he . 1
rgfei?zacgg?agsde?iggd 11:: listener regrettihg he probably is ?152m. "It ended with ande knew i
t? 9' much busy to write about his when they opened the coffin an FBI I

charge of corporate affairs for themassive Pepsico Corp. .p hangmg cases. 1 agent would be standmg there. 

. . . 13-1113; GIVES agents the credit fori DeLoach said he does not find.
HOOVER listened in his solving such famous cases as the' private business dull in contest with

normal aloof, courteous manner," 3.301; Yablonski murder and the past adventures.
a-?E?fioa ?ggidnaping of Barbara Jane *1 ?There still is a crisis ev 
longs ?Ne ldec a But 1n each DeLoach was minute." he grinned. ?And 
pos non hoffered 5 ?1the stx?ategist, sitting in his office paycheck is better.? .
my old friend ona M. Kendall, ,3 .-. 
cha r?man?oi?the?board?bi Pepsico. 

 

 

1 ?lt took Don six years, but he got
his man.? I aid. ?Mn-Hoover . .
?7 see?n?aimnauy ?to accept *my deci-w *4 ?Mm - 9.5sion. Then, as I was leaving, he".
spoke.

'Well. Deke, if you ever decide 
to leave the FBI. be sure and talk it . . f, . 
over with me first,? he said. .. . . .

that's what I?ve been .
doing for two hours and 47 min-:1 Int-31.135. 1 .
utes. I replied. 

I thought you were the one man -
who wouldn?t leave me.? he sald.He1
pouted for six weeks wouldn't
speak to me or route my mail but
later we became friends again. We

ha 1 nc together dew vr 
wee ore he on Mag? 2.

I.

 

 

     

 

 

 

1/ August 18, 1972

PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha DQLoach

Vice President, Corporate Affairs
PE PSICO, Inc.

Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:
I have been carrying your letter with me for quite a

few days and just want you to know that I appreciate very
much your writing to me. .

 

This is a magnificent organization of men and women,
and I am just delighted to know that I will have your support
in the days that lie ahead.

With regard to Don Whitehead's request for mom ra~
tion on a biography of Mr. Hoover, it is my understanding
that Clyde Tolson felt only that Mr. Hoover's estate should
be settled before papers from the estate could be made
available to Mr. Whitehead, and consequently, that no
work on a biography should be done now. I am informed
that Mr. Whitehead had agreed to hold the project in
abeyance pending action on the estate. If positions have
changed, I am not aware of it. I believe, as you do, that
a good, up-to ?date biography of Mr. Hoover WOuld be of
value to America in presenting a true picture of one of
its greatest citizens.

Fe" 
Baker (3)

Bates
Bishop

 

 

 

 

 

Callahan 

glovehandm SENT FROM D. 0.
onra 
TIME 452411323?
put-'? I
Mina . DATE ,Me? 
Miller. 33. 

Ponder
Soyars
Walters
Tele. Room 

622 seesaw} 55

Mr. .. - .
Ms. llerwig ..
Mrs. Neonagi?wgJWOM TELETYPE UNIT 

,igm

 

BY 1775? 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 





Your kind gift of golf balls will be appreciated, if I
ever get an opportunity to play. I'm afraid Dick Kleindienst
will still have an edge, as he gets so much more practice

than I do.

MAIL ROOM 

Sincerely,

242? 

TELETYPE UNIT 

 

 



 

 

 

g, . A t' Mr. Fell 

c. j; t, r. ones
4 ?l Mr. Eishop

Mr. Callahan

*1
. 3
1 Mr. Campbell 

Mr. Cleveland 

PS I (O Mr. Cont-ad

Mr. Dc}: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PURCHASE, N.Y. 1057?? Mr. 3933,51?
72.1.. (914) 253- 3027 Mr. Marshall
Mr. I-?iizzcr. 2.8. 
Mr. Ponder .
Mr. Sayers
CARTHA Iuly 17 I 1972 Mr. 

 

VICE ensue-Eur.

CORPORME Armns . 7919- 300m
Mr. Kinley 
Mr. 
Ms. Horwig 

Mrs. Noenqn

 

 

 

 

Honorable L. Patrick Gray
Acting Director

Federal Bureau of GInvestigation
Washington, 20535

DearPat: /0 Kierww

I have wanted to drop you a note since our discussion on
June 21 1972 and the delightful dinner that evening with Dick and
I Marnie Kleindienst and our wives.

First, let me reiterate my statement made to you personally.
I will be very happy to support you in any manner that I can. You
obviously have an uphill struggle. I would have supported you
regardless of whether or not we had personally conferred. The future
of the FBI demands that all of those whose lives have been a part of
the organization now either put up or shut up. The many fine people
in the FBI deserve every bit of help they can receive.

I was quite disappointed to receive a note from Don Whitehead
indicating that Clyde? Tolson felt that cooperation should not be extended
in the preparation of a book regarding Mr. Hoover's career. I feel very
strongly that the true factual story should be available on all high

school and college library shelves. Otherwise, students of the present 6?
?3 

and future will have very little to choose from except outd ted materia 
or: the poisonous creations of the Turners, CooksTeg- 
i.
With reference to the latter "*TWWo?t?e?mdnvo 1"
recently by a reporter in Orlando, Florida, who was famil M1 ?11 FIWJ
the bad utterances about the FBI, but apparently knew-nogh-ing-?g Ld"?i?bo cu 
the organization. I wasted approximately two hours of valuable vacation
time trying to straighten her out, only to find seVeral days later that the

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 





 



 

 

 


. 



Honorable L. Patrick Gray

very distortions I had tried to explain were picked up and used out of
context by the Associated Press. I hope that by this time you have seen
the entire article. It was some better. I mention this, not in any manner
of an apology, but rather to prevent any incident which might have a
bearing on our future friendship and relations . I would not want this

to happen.

You will receive, in the near future, a box of one dozen Surlyn
long-distance golf balls. This is a new product just going on the market.
Our Wilson Division guarantees ten yards further distance than any ball
on the market. They are also cut-resistant. I have sent Dick Kleindienst
some, consequently, would hate for him to have an edge on you in future
matches.

While law enforcement has nothing to do with my present respon-
sibilities, I still enjoy having association with the profession. The
Westchester County District Attorney's Office will have a meeting on
organized crime at the facilities of our world headquarters in the near
future. For the third time, a six?week police school will be held here
early next year. Permission for all of these events is granted only with
the understanding that the FBI either supervises or is a part of such pro-

ceedings. I always clear such matters with Iohn Malone or Charlie Weeks .

Please call me any time I can be of assistance. I am always
available to be of service to you and/or the FBI.

Sincerely 

affix

Gartha . DeLoach

 

 

 



 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

 

. STATES Gog ERNMENT

'Memorandum

Mr. L. Patrick Gray, 111

omomn tom noSOIO-IDO

Felt
Bates
Bishop
Callahan 
Campbell
Cleveland
Conrad
Dalbey
Jenkins
Marshall 
Miller. E.S. 
Ponder

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DATE: 8/9/72
I 

 

 

 

Soyars 6

Walters

 

 

Special Assistant

 

 

Tele. Room 
Mr. Kinley
Mr. 
Ms. Hex-wig 
Mrs. Neenan 


77* 
LETTER FROM CARTHA 



 

You asked that you be supplied the facts on Mr. Tolson's
refusal to cooperate on a biography of Mr. Hoover, and on Mr. DeLoach's
statement to the press, both mentioned in Mr. DeLoach's letter of 7/17/72.

1. According to the attached memoranda, Mr. Tolson originally
was favorably disposed toward cooperating with Mr. Whitehead on a biography,
but changed his mind, indicating that he questioned the propriety of cooperating
while Mr. Hoover's estate was still open. Our memoranda do not indicate
that Mr. Tolson?s decision is final, but only that he had doubts about the

timing. It may be that there has been a more recent decision by Mr. Tolson
of which we are not aware.

2. Attached is a c0py of the UPI item about Mr. DeLoach's
comments on the Bureau. We do not have a copy of the complete story
he refers to in the letter.

3. Attached is a dr?ft? a reply to Mr. DeLoach's letter.
It does not mention the UPI story, as your guidance is required as to the
proper reSponse.

D??j

Enclosures

BLH:wmc wane,

 

 

 

 

(2)
1 


f: 








 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Bishop - 7 May 8, 1972
M. A. Jones

DON 
PROPOSED BIOGRAPHY
EDGAR.HOOVER

Don Whitehead, author of "The FBI Story" and of "Attack'
on Terror: The FBI Against the Ku Klux Klan in hississippi,?
telephoned today from his home in Tennessee to express his
interest in writing a biography of the late Director J. Edgar
Hoover. Mr. Whitehead said that he would not consider under?
taking such a book without the approval; that, as was

'the case with his previous two books concerning the FBI, he

would?want the biography to be absolutely authentic?wwhich
would be possible only if the Bureau lent its cooperation in
providing him background data concerning important incidents
and events from Mr. Hoover's 48?year tenure as Director, as
well as furnishing him the identities of persons close to

Mr. Hoover over the years whom he should interview. Mr. White?
head expressed the opinion that if an authentic biography of
Mr. Hoover is to be written, it should be started while back-
ground data concerning him still is accessible and while 
numerous persons familiar with various phases of his life
remain alive and available for interview.

?Mr. Whitehead is, of course, extremely well known
as a friend and supporter of the FBI. His book "The FBI

Story,? published in 1956, wasaa long-time best seller and,

in 1959, was made into a movie. Mr. Whitehead was a war
correspondent in North Africa and Europe during World War II
and was awarded the Medal of Freedom in 1945 for his European
combat reporting. He has won two Pulitzer Prizes?~the first
for his reporting on theiKorean War.in 1950, and the second
for his coverage of President-elect Eisenhower?s journey to
Korea?in 1952.

RECOMMENDATION:

That consideration be given to the Bureau's extending
its cooperation to Mr. Whitehead in a biography on J. Edgar Hoover;
and that this memorandum be returned to the Crime Records Division
so that Mr. Whitehead can be appropriately advised.

I .

MI . {?1011}: I M: a:
1 My. Bishop . g; ?xf?
1 M. A. Jones .in gafij/g (f . 2

.adss' 
:dsm (7) 1

 

 

MrLBishop . 5/23/72
M. A. Jones

DON WHITE-319KB
BIOGRAPHY
035? J. EDGAR HOOVER

3 .
By memorandum dated May 8, 1972, and cautioned as chore, I
advised you that Don Whitehead, author of "The FBI Story, hail telephoned from
his home in toeXprese his interest in writing a. hicgrep?lzy of the late 
. Director Hoover. My memoreocium recommended-~aod it was approved-4113i: 
consideration be given to the Bureau? 3 extending its c?oeemti?on to Mr. Whitehead
in this biography. 

RECENT DEVELOPMENT:

A Mr. Whitehead arrived at the Bureau last Thursday, May 18, to
'ciiecues preliminary plane for researching and writing this biography. Among
the 33oreeo officials with whom he conferred were Io: eesre. T. Biehoo and
J. P.i~.iohr.1o addition, erreugomecto were made for Mr. Hotelier-1d to see
retired Associate Director Clyde Tolsoo, who had expressed a favorable attitude
toward ?heir. Whitelieed?s proposal to author lair. Eoover' a biography when he
(Mr. Tolson) was contacted regarding this project earlier this month.

Boring Mr. Whiteheed'e visit with him on May 18, for. Toleon
etated that no executor of lair. Hoover? an estate, he etr ongly queetiooed tiie
propriety of his cooperating in any manner in a biography concerning . Hoover
prior to the time the late Director?s will had been orobeted anti proceeds of his
estate distributecl. Mr. Toleoo noted Emt many months undoubtecily will elapse
before these matters have been resolved; and doring thip period, he felt it
woeld he improoer for him to answer questions or otherwise fora mh?nforthotioo
orally to . 2r. Whiteheadwnor could he make available to Mr. Whitehead any
papers which helix-?r. Toleon) felt-?mlongeci to the estate.

Following his interview with Mr. Toleon, Mr. Whitehead expressed
the View that it would be best to hold in eboyen?e riorl: on for. Hoover?s biography in
the hope that persona papers from the late Bin-actor?s estate will become available
at a future date and that more active cooperatioo of Mr. Tolsoo may then be obtained.

1 - Mr. Molar
i - Mr. Bishop
1 M. A. Jones CONTRIUEWOVER

Gli?Gwee (7)

 

 

 

 - 



 

 

 

 

11-32;: I A. Jones to Mr. 12.252205.) Memo
RE: DON AD PRQPOSED OF J. EDGM EOGVER

12%. Whitehead left Washington on Friday, May 19th, He
telephoned from his home in Tennessee on Suncsay nig 32% to reiterate his
conviction that work an 3322'. ?mver?s biography should iempemriiy be held
in abeyz: nee. ?e expreased his ceatinuing interest in authoring mis biography

at a future aate.
RE 

For infoi'mation. Mr. Whitehead's interest in writing; this
bicgraphy shauid be kept in mind after fmal legal 2370 E: on Mr. Hoover's
-state has been completed.

 

 

 

 



II?qwc

 


3" J- wz 

b??d?l "if 

I . .s'x .r 
Girls Stat Oleeys Prosuwnen
The California Girls State mock legislature has approved ..
a "bill" legalizing prostitution. 

Gov. Sandra Dorsey, 17, of Sacramento, signed the meas-
ure in the closing session yesterday of the week-tong session.
The meeting was attended by 540 high school jumors from

throughout the state. . . . 
The proposal calls for legalized prostitution with licensmg
and medical supervision. . .
other bills approved by the girls were ones abolishing the
winner-take-all primary system, requiring ?ethnic studies in
secondary schools and allowing women to use Miss, Mrs. or Ms.
on legal documents?UPI

Weaver?s Doghouse

i A former FBI executive says J. Edoar Hoover? the late 
,dlrector, disciplined FBI agents who em arrassed tum or the
service by transierrin ?thcm to so-callod ?doghouse? of?ces
or placing them on pro ation. .

iloover held ?absolute dominion over his men and their
families," passing personally on every case
mong 8.000 FBI agents and 216.000 employes, Cartha D.
.(Dekc) DeLoaeh, a former special assistant to Hoover, said,
con?rming what. Hoover's critics have contended.

Agents brought on Hoover?s wrath, DcLoaeh said, thrpu 
sucr actions as making a false arrest; or 

judgment. Those placed on probation also. faced suspension of?
tring??'iie?heiits and pay raises, Deboach?said. .
Delnach, who retired from the kill two years ago, de- 

WM

 

lined to name the cities FBI agents considered "doghouse
lattices.? He said llooveubeiievcd thatf?any that
em?ir?ras?sed him or?the service was a cardinal Sin." 
.l







3% 

Yoblonskr Suspect nger? .

Annette Gilly, who has pleaded guilty to murder in the
Yablonski family slayings, may have to he moved for security
easons from the farm where she is staying. 
The Pittsburgh Fest-Gazette says special prosecutor Iticlf- 

ard Sprague has confirmed that news reports of Mrs. Gilly?s
whereabouts have caused the federal government lobe con-
cerned for her safety. 
Mrs. Gilly is being kept under guard on a Fayette County
farm in southwestern at a cost to the federal
government that would amount to about $200,000 a year. Mrs. 
Gilly has turned state?s evidence in the December 1969

. ,stavinas of United Mine Workers insurgent Joseph A. Yabion-

-

siti?i??jriio and daughter. A

p.

     

1

 

    

 

film

 


6i?7

fit-eleKETICS

FRANCISCAN COMMUNICATIONS CENTER

1229 S. SANTEE STREET, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90015 (213} 748?2191

FBI PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Dear Sirs:

I wonder if you would kindly forward
the enclosed to Mr. D. ??e?oach.
We are old friends; I don't like to
be out of touch with him. Many

thanks.




Rev se Thomas Nolan

January 16, 1973

a
. a. -- La
?swn.? 


:7'ecordings - television 

 

 

 

radio 
?1

 

 

 

 

NOIanz Reverend Joseph (LD) 3/28/70
205 7,C?liiff Avenue . 

Wi 1nthr0p, Massachusetts 02152

Dear Father Nolar}:

.5 

 

 

iiwa?? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

:f 
,vr, 

 

 

 

 

March 8, 1973

 

Mr. Cartha D.;DeLoach
Perkins Road 1:
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830



Dear 

It occurrea to me that you may wish to have the
enclosed c0pies of my prepared testimony before the Judi-
ciary Committee of the United States Senate.?

 

I send these to you because you devoted so many
years of your life to making the FBI the institution that
it is in our country.

With my best wishes an? warm reg d5 ,1 .3: 39
f} Lair?? :jm/ i" 7 i5%?
. . ,2 m! 

  

 

 

~i Sincerely,
MAILEQE I L. Patg?iglw?ray ?9 a) 121973
MARB 1973 1.. Patrick Gray, ?1.11.11. A 
Acting Director

 

Enclosures (2)
kg LPG's Statement before Committee on the Judiciary, S. Senate,
WashingtonStatement before Committee on the Judiciary, U. S. Senate,
Washington, D. C., 3- 6- 73.?

 

5&Futm NOTE: DeLoach is a former Assistant to the Director. Address,

mailing fiat.
g. Callahan 
. - 
MrMarshall 
Miller. Es. 
Sayers 5' 
Thompson .. 
Walters 

um?. Tim-*9 

,2 girl/$7 M?g; '9?!th Egg/4? gk
sf 

Neenan MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT 

i 
he

 

5.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

OHIONAX N0. ?0 ?a 50'0?405
leOH 
on at? no ho 7

1/ UNITED STATES stem-mam .w a

. 1c}! mm

33:. Bake:

?2 Memorandum 22:27

Mr. 

 

Mr.

To :Mr. 25, 1973 

 

I Mr. ?Sm-551:1" 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


f7 Mr. Gebhardt 
3- Long/4a :17? 1 1 Mr- Long 
3 ff; 3 Mr. Nuzum :1?020. Room
i? ,r . Mr. Eardley h??w
HEARINGS ,2 I - 
:ki! but,? 1? 
. . Wf MLConmy
Mr. Scott Parr, Investigator, Majority 
Committee for the Senate Committee Investigating manwm_i_l

Presidential Campaign Matters, Called to inquire if he/could
be furnished?the telephone num .or Messrs. . MarkiFelt,

'3 William C. Sullivan, and Garth agh. Mr. Parr was calle
?bph at"EEIepbohe numBEr 225- -0531, ary responded to the
y? ?3 Senate' Committee on Presidential Campaign and Mr. Parr was

i placed on the line. Mr. Parr was advised that the telephone

     
  

number?of Mr. Felt was 573?3216, the telephone number for .
Mr. Sullivan could be possibly Obtained through the Justice 
i??Department, and the telephone number for Mr. DeLoach could 
possibly lbezdetermined through Pepsico at New York City.

a

Mr. Parr advised that he? has talked to Mr. DeLoach
and would be subsequently calling Mr. Felt.

Mr. Parr expressed his appreciation for the information
and remarked that he would want to talk to them and it is not
anticipated that any subpoenas would be issued at this time for
their testimony before Senator Sam Ervin' 5 Senate Select Commi tee;

ACTION: 5?1
For information. Jig. -.
- /a :s (Qt/b;
REL:ige JUN 281973
9 

 

 

 

  
  
 

 

FD-350 (Rev. 7-16-63)

41

(Mount Clipping in Space Below)

7.19m"an. . 

1 1.,1 5 r. . *4
1 ?human-.1121payments went; tavA
13182354? 3:14:12?? *t 3?1: .A A .1
And, he?said; Americans 331%

falling preytto a Weakness of;
to whichwart;
531?:



Q)

Slim



WE







444444


5: gion? aPublic Relations Coin-i

?eta-w 11,. .1
.A 1

n?ssioh}fwas in? Binghamton moral fibre
:A}today?t9 tell Legionnaires and tached" three names, all of
their 111 from throughout New 1 he in 111 a bl sy-.

igYork State to ?stand up; and? nonymons; perm1ssweness,
Abe counted . . . again 112;. the theory of Arelatmsmu
?t Situational 

He arrived at the1Veteransr" A. A 
31111111011111 Arena in downtown 2 ?What do we mean by- this/2i

Bingba?mton A replete with Well, what I?fn talking about

sli?riif?s cruiser escort and is the logic that who people?

honor escort?1 prepared to tell use in thinking that; they can}

i the Legionnaires that the do dahything it th??thihl: it to

American economy and Amer- be all right. There is disregard?

icai1 honor and integrity, are in :ior?aw and; ordergit DeLoac 


peri16h? shape} 5, said: :9 A . A .t
Banach}, who ?iorgoes Cara ?We must observe law an
thafor-the nickname ?Deke,? order. This 15? no Standard 11
is vice president. for carporate conduct for the United States
affairs? Of PepsiCo Ina,a to maintain it we wish to;
Pepsi?s worldwide headquar? mamtama free society! A 
tors; 1n Purchasea 5 ?w

ASKED thearesult of

no to the soft drink - 
EAf?rm fag: the FBI where; he situational ethics is if_ that pol-j
1

Q:
- 

'_ll

1.5.

   
 
  

1 Hal

   
   
  

wasasnstant to the late J. Ed? icy 15 carried to its ultimate

E- endhaDeLoach rephed ?Arie.
cjy x115; 

A
1 a: A ..1

gai?rH?over, tormendlrector 
the Bureau113% said he cornL

Wma?lbnw?l

  
  

AT .103: 111; said gave
111 ?1 certain amount of in-
sigh? into national policy and
Aper :ahce, and has

atin recent archers; 011i:
ban-rm

entSE" overseas haveA
been: has 119141113: whilel

    
 
    
  

our "11111Aggy-A

Mr. Felt ..

Mt. Baker
MI. 
Ml. Cioveland 
Mr. Conrad

Mr. 
M8- Jenkins ..

Mn Marshall

MI- Miilor. 2.3. 
MI. 

MT. ThemPSOnh
Mr. warm

Tole. Room

Mr. Klntey Mr. Mint: 1'
Mrs. Neenan

 

 

 

 

 

(Indicate pag arne of 
newspaper, city and state.



i


11
1

Press

3
1-:

ginghainton, NY

Date: 7/20/73 
Edition:

Author:

Editor:

Title:

i

Character:
66- 3
Albany

Being Investigated

Classification:
Submitting Office:

 

z!



 



?rhea/m, mg;

 

 

 

 

951 ~11

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  

FBI has been saddled with .
is situation. -

?But, we have very strong

peOple in the bureau. They;

i will continue to ?iuhction, .fe-f 
i gardless of :who the?new direcl-
tor 1s,? DeLoach saidzf :i-j?g

4-, . 

that will carry the. bureau

.1 through any crises it may= -f_ace 1 
was instilled by Hoover, who

1 said did; an hexc?llent- job '01? 

encouragmg the right spirit of-

law enforcement 1n his: people: .

He said? Hoover? ?res ametia
11 cutous infattentim Ea deta1ls .of 
the law, .and insisted on hav-.:

       

~DeL0Aggi,
15,1. {nentr'on' Watefgate or the

recently revealed bugging of.
'1_pre51dentlal conference's gand- .
.telephone conversatlons in: his; 
gal-Speech} tend declined tomake ?5

1

my general 111 any; use of 

 
 
 

 

141.135 - 1 - he: 25%
1? :4 ?.tHoover DeLoach :said; 1. 
Regarding the position of would never have thought or
(th. FBI in the :scandals that making uSe of an unauthofized 
g1 havernpped the": :federal goy-,; or illegal itvuetap, and he in? .
yernmentrm trecent months stilled the same concern 
DeLoaCh said he does not feel . the letter? of ?the Flaw in the 3'
911111 the' mega 6f. the FBI has thousands-tot empIOyes of the

a, 111 any-,5 
gtbeqn tarmshed ?113.1-: 

5911413: m??g"73? .
w?I think it?s ?unfortunate that 

?ing the; approval of: the attor?m-a 

. '93 3 ?7

. Ww??gu

HE SAID THE STRENGTH . 1

1




.. 

Li


Us.

r?k-l

 

 

.3-

Memorandum . 
. 1. Cam. --
1 ?1 Con. lav. 
TO THE DIRECTOR ?3 pm. August 1, 197 3 

1 Laboratory.?
FROM N. r. CALLAHAN W334i: gf'r 
KM: LTmlInzag 
or MANAGER or $33,333:?
saw??rms: COLA BUENOS AIRES ARQENEINA ?2227.?
31?, 1973 Toluphon; Rm. 
Di rule: 50 'y 
[fa/[H 
F01 mer Assistant to the Director C. D. ?Deke' ach.telephonica11y

61? x34 oc/x/z? 

 

1: Q, 1 a 
31111115 . ouV/

.but was not familiar at all with its customs, Aprocedures and/ the like. .
1 er of the

.11.
muck? row 110.10 sow-10a

Ant. 01m

 

 

 

 

contacted the W1 itei at 10: 45 AM this date to ad vise that he was departing this
afte1noon for A1 gentina in connection with the captioned kidnapping. DeLoach
fui ther advised that a demand of a million dollar ransom has been made of Pepsi
Cola in Argentina and the demand was recorded and cautioned that no notification
to police or other authorities should be given. 
ha

DeLoach further advised that PEPSICO in Purchase, New York
made no press release on this matter up to this point and did not know if and
when this would be done. DeLoach further pointed out that PEPSICO has rox?hly
a $43, 000, 000 operation in Buenos A11 es and they, of course, are anxious
secure the 1eturn of the manager safely by payment of the million ransom.

The purpose of DeLoach's call was to ascertain if it would be all
right for him to contact our Legal Attache John J. Wachter, whom he knows, upon
his arrival in Buenos Aires for the purpose of seeking guidance with respect to
the habits of the country in the event it might be of assistance to him in connection
with his visit but definitely not to involve the Bureau in this matter in Argentina
indicating he was aware of the delicate nature of the situation in that country,7

1 is!?
I have discussed t? 113 matter with Assistant Dir/actor Mi
Intelligence Division and comur with him that we permit DeLoach to make contact
with Wachter merely on a courtesy basis to steer him to the proper State Department
officials with whom he should work 111 connection with this matter in Argentina
and under no circumstances for Wachter to become involved matternhimseli.

RECOMMENDATION 23 AUG 2 1973

 

?2,312

It is recommended that approval be granted for DeLoacTh?to ohtatzt

1 Mr. Millers
NPC @3391 161973

 

?z,0 "3 
17 '31
. up.

 

A,

Q. 
axf' . fa? . . .

Memo to the Director 
Re: Kidnapping of Manager of PEPSICO Company - Buenos Aires, Argentina

Wachter with the above precautions and that Wachter be advised by the Intelligence
Division of the forthcoming contact by DeLoach upon his arrival in Buenos Aires
and to alert State Department officials of DeLoach?s impending visit and assurance
of our non -involvement in this matter.

      

?1

\l

 

 

Assoc. Djr. 

Asst. Dim
Admin. 
Comp. Sysr. 
Files 8- Com. 
Gen. Inv. 
Idem.
Inspection 
Intell-
La?borutory 
Plan. 8- Evul. 
Spec. lnv. 

 

 

Cong. Sew. 

Can. 8. Cm.
Research 

Plus; 

Telephone 
2.,


 

Director SecJ

 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
   
 
 
   
 
 
 

Legal Coun. A

mm~%%fawps vim 


If?;

VJ

August 7, 1973 a; I,

5}

Mr. Cartha D. 

Vice President, Corporate Affairs
Peps iCo Inc. 
Purchase, New Yerk 10577

Dear Deke:

Thank you for your kind letter of July 27th.
Your message supporting my remarks concerning our late
Director is most encouraging and I want you to know that
felt strongly that this slur on a great.American should
not go unrefuted. 

I appreciate your giving me your thoughts on my
appointment of Nick Callahan as Associate Director and I

ifeel that he is an outstanding individual and will do a
great deal to strengthen the leadership of the Bureau.

With warm regards,_

Sincerely; .: ?p 

 

 

 

 



MAILED 3?
Time - 1973
NOTEE Mr. D??oaoh is a former Assistant to the Director who

EOD 8/31/42 and retired 7/31/70. He is on the Special Cor-
respondents List. 



 

RCD:nmi (3) a
?aw





1  3 :94?

 

b6

 

 

(9?7?me m?

Mg? 2::i?fsiifft- i

Admin.

 

 

 

Comp. Syst. 

1 &Com
PEPSICO - ?7

Gen. huh 

 

QURCHASE, MN. 10577 Ident.
TEL. (914) 253 - 30?27 Inspection

Infell.
Laboratory

Plan. Eval. 
GARTHA o. Spec. Inv.
VICE Pg??ofr?rims 
CORPO July 27 I 1973 . Training
Legal Coon.
Cong. Serv. g/
Corr. 
Research

5 Press 
Mr. Clarence M. Kelley ?1 qummem.__
Director . Director Sec'y 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535 7? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Clarence:

I noted with some great degree of satisfaction your forth-
right statement on July 26, 1973, defending Mr. Hoover's
administration of the FBI during his later years. I feel
rather personal about the matter inasmuch as a slap at

Mr. Hoover can also be taken as criticism of those of us
who stood with him at that time.

In my almost twenty-nine years of service I cannot recall

a single instance of an FBI representative deliberately
shirking his duty in an investigation. It is preposterous
to think that Mr. Hoover would have failed his trust because
of friendship or petty desire.

Please also accept my congratulations on your appointment
of Nick Callahan as Associate Director. Nick is a rock of
loyalty and fine dedication. He is a "team man" with an

excellent image. ??0439

~W5f7
[From reports of ex~agents and the 

are?looking up for the Bureau. You ppg?gB?iyhgreNt? T?g7m? .1,
control in fine shape, and everyone feels bdgte?Ugsl 

I

0 With best wishes, 

 

 

 

Sincerely,

4?56"

Cartha D. DeLoach

 

   

 

 

 

tom-Io: . .
i 

 

it. 33.11:: 
UNi'l'l-il) daniNMEN'r . 
Memorandum 
'ro The Director 1mm: 8/13/73 .. .
. 1 ?g Lobevolerym
J- 33- Herington 30:15::
Trafnln m?
I Legal Cogvn. 

Cong. 50H. 

SUBJECT: WATERGATE 65?7?? 

I, cameo?
?mm?ww-?w A 
aft ~eJ WEE f) nlephon. 
This morning at approximately 10 a. m. former 

to the Director Deke DeLoach_ca11ed me and said that he had been contacted

by Dan Thomasson of Scripps-Howard here in Washington, who said that he
was part of a three-man investigating team made up of himself, a representa-
tive from the "Chicago Tribune" and a representative of Hearst Publications.?
DeLoach said they wanted to talkie him about the alleged use of the FBI for
political purposes by the Johnson Administration. DeLoach said that although}
he hesitated to do so, he scheduled an appointment with them for 2 p. m. this it

    

 
  
 

 
 

afternoon. At 4:15 p. m. DeLoach called me again and said tha had talked);
to the three representatives in his office for about 25 minutes. 5 id he .
did not recall the names of the representatives of the "Chicag iygie" n?

Hearst Publications.

  

- . 
DeLoach said they began the conversation by claimi} that the}?
(1 knew that former Assistant to the Director William C. Sullivan had given

John Dean memoranda he had typed himself alleging FBI political assistance .
to the Johnson Administration and that these memoranda had been turned .
over to the Ervin Committee. The reporters claimed that they had not sai?Ns
copies of the memoranda. DeLoach said that although they made this 1
.disclaimer their line of questioning tended to indicate they knew what wa?\ 
in the memoranda and he did_not know whether they had obtained this inJEor-I 1
mation from Sullivan, Dean orpossibly former SA Harold P. Leinbaugh Q5: 3.
who now works in the White House or from some other source. 9?



The reporters wanted to know if DeLoach had headed up a task
force of FBI representatives at the Democratic National Convention in 1963
and he told them that he had gone to the Convention and that his purpose there
was to assist in connection with Presidential security, working in conjunction 
with the Secret Service. .In response to questioning he told them we had not
usurped the work of the Seceretservice but had been an adjunct to them 1-Mr. Gd?hardt 3/ ?3

1 - Mr. Miller . . ,3 i" by

1 - Mr. Herington m? nae-n69? Q-i

2T3H:asg .. AUG 1 r- ?14 5.
. . 01973 .
XEROX 

 

 

r: Aileen snags, 00/ We.

 

 

?us?v



.. 



Mum.

 

 

 

 

PT, 

.., 



a. ?vw? In Iii-Jr: 3n;

furnishing security-type information, and in response to another question
denied that any wiretapping or bugging had been used. They asked him why

he had a private line from the White House and told them quite frankly that
the President had tried to call him one evening and his daughter had been on.
the line for 18 1/2 minutes and the President ordered a private line be put

- in at once, which was done. He told them that his contacts with the President

were as an official- of the FBI who had the liaison responsibility with the
White House and that most of his conversations with President ,Johnson
involved civil disturbances, the progress of investigations regarding White
House appointments and other official matters. He told them that he was not
a social acquaintance of President Johnson, had not been invited to his
daughters' weddings, and that his relationship was in connection with official
business. He denied that any request had ever been made for assistance for
political! purposes and told them that if such a request had been made,

Mr. Hoover and he also would have resigned.

They asked his affiliation with Nixon, Ehrlichman and Haldeman
and he replied that he had met Ehrlichman once but had never met Haldeman
He told as far as he knew Nixon had never requested the FBI to do
any FBI/spying? They asked him if Sullivan had taken the wiretap records
of the 17 individuals that ended up in the? Ehrlichman safe from the Director's
safe and DeLoach replied that he didn't know where Sullivan had obtained the .

records fromu DeLoach told them that he knew nothing whatsoever about the
17 wiretaps. . 

They asked him specifically if he could comment on Sullivan's

allegations claiming President Johnson had used the FBI for political purposes,

and he told them that the allegations were not true.

They asked him about his work for Nixon's last Presidential
campaign and he told them of several activities he was involved in. 

DeLoach noted that Scripps-Howard, Hearst Publications and
the "Chicago Tribune" have all been strong Nixon supporters. He did not
know how they got put on to this line of questioning but he felt the purpose
of their inquiries was to try to take some of the heat off the Nixon Administra-
tion by alleging other Administrations had also used the FBI politically.

RECOMMENDATION

For information. 
it 

 

*He raised funds for Republican National Committee by selling advertising and
served on 2 or 3 committees to organize businessmen for Nixon. 

 

 

 

i
a 


 


The Deputy Attorney General October 2 1973
1 - Mr. ?Callahan?

Director, FBI 1 - Mr. Miller

- 1 - Mr. Mintz

CARTHA D. D- LOACH . ?55.53

sfss?ii?e?r eff). ..
COMMITTEE ON t? .
ACTIVITIES 

. ?rant-m

 

?Wilma. .

Mr. Cartha D. Delmach advised this Bureau that he has
received a subpoena calling for his appearance before the Select
Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities at 4:00 p. m. on
October 3, 197 3. Mr. DeLoach advised that he is aware of Attorney
General Orders which require the prior approval of the Attorney
General or his delegate for former employees to testify concerning
material contained in the files or the Lepartment of Justice or 
information relating to such material.

1

I understand that you have been designated by the Attorney 
General to handle the details concerning this matter. We request 
that you recommend to the Attorney General that Mr. be
instructed pursuant to Attorney General Order 501-7 3 that in
responding to the subpoena he should not provide testimony concerning
electronic surveillance matters because such matters relate to the
national security interest. We recommend that Mr. DeLoach be .
authorized to testify in executive session concerning such other. matters
as may be within the jurisdiction of the Select Committee on Presidential
Campaign Activities. In that regard we recommend that an appropriate
attorney be designated to appear with Mr. DeLoach, not to act as his
counsel but to represent the igierests of the United States.



we
REC-3 r32; . . :17 jg
The FBI has not advised Mr. DeLoach concerning a 

  
 

A limitations which should be imposed on his testimony. We request
that such discussions with Mr. DeLoach concerning these matters

33:27.: as may appear to be necessary be conducted by an attorney'of the?

- Department of Justice representing the Attorney General. ?i 5 1973

Emit}. 14 0b .

:iipfclionr/ NOTE PAGE 2 

yam; \1'9 3? Wad
a. ?11an: JAMszd Czar!) [/15 VJ

 

Logal Conn.
i Tglophonc Rm. 


LDquarSoc'r?H MAIL ROOMCZI UNITE: . 1/

 

Spec. lnv. 1 )0 DP ?l
Trolnln 133m ?/7417 3%

 

-.
A



-.



 

 




a



The Attorney General
NOTE: 

Mr. DeLoach was subpoenaed to appear before the
Select Committee and requested advice as to what information he 
could furnish and whether he should have counsel from the Department
of Justice. 

On the evening of October 1, 1973, Mintz met with Assistant
Attorney General Dixon, Gary Boise, Associate Deputy Attorney
General, Leon Ulman, of the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department,
and Harland Leathers and Irving Goldbloom of the Civil Division of the
Department, concerning the questions of providing Mr. DeLoach
with counsel and whether executive privilege should be claimed concerning
his testimony. It was determined that the FBI should?make recommendations
to the Deputy Attorney General who would then make recommendations
to the Attorney General concerning handling bf this matter. On the morning
of October 2, 1973, Mints discussed this matter with Assistant Director
Miller and Supervisor Thomas J. Smith of the Intelligence Division
aid it was determined that we should recommend Mr. DeLoach's
testimony be limited oxiy by prohibiting testimony concerning electronic
surveillance matters. Following discussion with Mr. Callahan
and Director Kelley on October 2, 1973, Mints discussed this matter with
Gary Baise, Associate Deputy Attorney General, who agreed to our
proposal and requested this letter be prepared immediately.

Raise advised that the Attorney General had designated the
Deputy Attorney General to handle this matter when it was discus'sed at a
conference at 9:00 a. m. on October 2, 1973. Bates advised that there is
a conference scheduled at 4:00 p. m. on October 2, 1973, at which time the
Deputy Amrney General must furnish his report and recommendations
to the Attorney General. 

 

 



   

 

  

Laboratory 
Plan. 8. Evel. .
Spec. lnv. 
Training 

Legol Coon. 

Telephone 

A.

Director Sec'y 

     
 

4 a

Dir 
halo. 

pomp. Syst. 

Exf. Altair 3

Flles G. 

Gen. lnv. .

   
 

r-

TL ROOM VTELETYPE UNIT 

December 20, 1973

Mr. Cartha DinneLoach

Vice President - Corporate Affairs
Pepsico

Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

I appreciate your letter of December 7, 1973, and the
comments made concerning your appearance before the Watergate
Committee. I do hope that this satisfactorily explained to the
group and that you do not have to return for any additional testi-
many.

I would like to take this additional Opportunity to wish
to you and your family a splendid Holiday Season.

Sincerely,


14:? 

 

 

 

 



A 7

 

 

 

 

111:: . WM "Assoc. Dir. 

Asst. Din:
Admin. 
I Comp. Syst. 
pEpSl(-O I Ext. Affairs 
I Files Com. 

Gen. Inv.

PURCHASE. N.Y. 10577 Ident' 

Laboratorv
Plan. Eval. 
CARTHA o. Spec. Inv. .
we: PRESIDENI . . 
CORPORATE armns iramlng .
Legal Conn. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TEL. (914) 263- 3027

 

Inspection 
Illte?ld unn-

 

 

 

December 7, 1973

Mr. Clarence M. Kelley W90
Director -
Federal Bureau of Investigation . . 

U. S. Department of Justice

.
Washington, D. c. 20535 (:m?tb 7). 9/8 (L

Dear Clarence:

 

 

 
 

I am long overdue in writing a letter to you regarding several matters.

First, my three hour testimony before the Watergate Committee. Senator
Howard Baker (R-Tenn. vice-chairman of the committee, and former
special agent Don Sanders, now minority counsel, and a stenotypist were
all that were present. The testimony was under oath and in executive
session. The questioning was largely based upon ?ve rambling memo-
randa furnished by former employee W. C. Sullivan to the White House
allegedly at the request of Counsel John Dean. There was some semblance
of truth to Sullivan's claims. . . enough to give rise to legitimate questions.
For the most part, however, the allegations were obviously self-serving
for Sullivan?s insatiable desires at the time. I still am at a loss to under-
stand how personal ambition can cause a person to try and wreak such 

harm on an organization he swore to uphold and protect for swag.?egrs.jw 5%
My: .

REG-143 a7. :5 24 a
Senator Baker was most thorough, cou?E?T??T?and politehis job. Following the advice and instructio?ns of the th'eii Doputmxg
Attorney General Ruckelshaus, I attempted to answen every?uestion with
blunt honesty. Regulation #1622 was utilized only once, then pertaining
to the usage of an electronic surveillance as authorized by theilate former
Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy. As you might anticipate, I could
not confirm Sullivan's allegations that the FBI had been used as a'political.
tool' by several administrations. To the contrary, the official color of
every activity and the insistence that White House orders emanate from
the President personally, not subordinates, was brought out. As you
may readily understand, I am not at liberty to deal in specifics inasmuch
as the testimony was: in executive session. Otherwise, I would report to you

in full detail.



   

  

 

 

 

 

 

-2- .




Senator Baker, at the conclusion of the session, expressed appreciation
and stated for the record that I had served as a forthright, excellent,
witness. He added commendatory remarks for twenty -eight years of
FBI service, and afterwards advised that no further testimony would

be needed.

I mention this matter simply to bring my own personal appreciation to.
your attention. Both you and Nick Callahan most called this
matter to the attention of the Attorney General's office. Bill Ruckelshaus
gave me very good advice and counsel. The Bureau stood back of me.

Secondly, the matter of a Pepsi? Cola employee being kidnapped in
Argentina. In your absence, I discussed this matter with Nick
Callahan telephonically. As a result, Legal Attache John Wachter,
strictly consistent with the prescribed responsibilities of his office,
rendered invaluable advice and counsel. Available facts have deter-
mined a possibility of the alleged victim's involvement. As a result,
my company has refused to pay any ransom. Chairman Kendall and
I are most grateful for the FBI's excellent assistance.

Thirdly, while perhaps presumptuous, I want to congratulate you upon
the superb choices you have made in putting together a team at FBI
Headquarters. Callahan, Miller, Jenkins, Frank, Jamieson, Adams,
and Quinn, among others, are all top notch men of great loyalty and
capability. You have obviously brought stability and hope to a fine
group. Although ?outside, I can't help but feel most happy about

the Bureau's continued prestige and higher stock with the American
public. You're certainly off to a fine start.

I would like to reiterate my offer to be of assistance to you personally
or to the RBI at any time.

.Best wishes and kind regards,

Sincerely,

?32,

Cartha D. DeLoach

 

 

 

 

 

in:



FROM .. 

sumECT:

 

win "0.10 

MAY nu tm'nou
YES 
Memorandum
MM. CALLAHAM:

R1333. 
0

. x? 
CARL STERN I
Ase $21.15? 

I

'11

2: The purpose of this memorand
former Assistant to the Director C. D. DeLoach, now Vice President
in .Charge of Corporate Affairs for Pepsico, Inc., Purchase, New
York, telephoned to advise that Stern has been in telephonic
contact with- him regarding material released to Stern on the

program.





12/21/73



U?nu?a ?luv-- lmg.? re nee;- I.-

Em1is to advise that

hamsman who might perchance contact him.

i '0

DeLoach has been sent a copy of the news release made
ingconnection with this matter for his information.

RECOMMENDATION 


l.1j_.
.
I

 

'For information.


I
II - 
I.

?Mr. Callahan 
.Mr. Miller 
1 Mr. Wannall

Mr. Mintz
?f'Mr.

Franck

 

.. .. x5 
2;;242352 

no JAN 18 1974
#511355





.u

in;


a



In
Alice. 

DeLoach indicated that he advised Stern that he would
haVe no comment concerning this matter to Stern or any other



 




.3
Am. DIM
Admin. 
?5 II.
Elf/Mfg? V-
File: JJAmfr- 
Gen. 
Mani. 
lnupocilon 
Into". 
Laboratory 
Plan. Emil-
Spec. lnv.
Twining 
Legal Coon. 
Telephone Rm. 
Dlredo! Sec'y 

 

 





   







.

.,
I

4
I 

UMAECORDMQ CORY FILED

5/5; 1-3

 

 

 

  

Mr. R. R1 Franck 

Mr. R. Gebhardt

Mr. W. R: Wannall 

- Smith 

January 3, lg74
.- l\




Special Prosecution Force
U. S. Department of Justice


- Mr. J. R. Hagy 
DirectorimFBI BY 
9/ 
\1

causes; FORMER ASSISTANT
To THE DIRECTOR, FBI 
swarms-Ion CONCERNING 





Reference is made to your memerandum dated.December is,
1973, requested your office be furnished Mr. DeLoach's
last known address. 

For your information, Mr. DeLoach resides on Perkins
Road, GreenWich, Connecticut 06830, telephone number 203-661~
1578.. His employment is that of Vice President, Corporate -
Relations, PepSico, Incorporated, Purchase, New York, telephone
number 914-253w3027JR?zmeb/jcp {Elf; \?Lg?ii
NOTE: ?gv 

Incoming request from Watergate Special Prosecution
Force (WSPF) indicates that office desires to interview
Mr. DeLoach in connection with certain wiretaps and asks that
the FBI provide his last known address. Relative to this
request, Frank Martin, WSPF, has advised that the wiretaps in
question are the seventeen National Security Council taps,
g/x whose records were surreptitiously taken from the FBI by former
%2 assistant to the Director, William C. Sullivan and which were
located in May, 1973, in storage at The White House. Mr. DeLoach
is believed to have played a part in arranging for the installation
several of these wiretaps. Residence and employment data per
MmDm: 1 Inspector George T. Quinn, ExternalwAffairs DiViSion.

Admidtm?r? 9? 1"
2 Comp. Syst. 
En. 

.f .I.
Files 8? CORI- A ..-- we?l?hce?: i 
Gen. ?g ?mixInspection 
1him". 1 a *5.ng NIAILED 3 4 
Laboroto r: 7 .n

i f??y 

Plan. Evol. I 
Space In.? A 1 JAN 19 74
-.. 
Lego! Coun. 
TeIephone Rn. 
5irecfof Sec.273 .5322 
sq we .. we: 2
MAIL 309M TELETYPE Q8 a ?5 we

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 


-113a (Rev. 3-21?73) 
i ?iW 

Intelligence Division

 

IN FORMATIVE NOTE 

0m 12/26/73

Attached is request from Watergate
Special Prosecution Force (WSPF) for last?
known address of former Assistant to the
Director Cartha "Deke" DeLoach. Request
indicates WSPF desires to interview
Mr. DeLoach in connection with "certain
wiretaps."

Relative to this request, Frank
Martin, WSPF, has advised the wiretaps
involved are the 17 National Security
Council taps, whose records were surrep-
titiously turned over to former Assistant
Attorney General Robert Mardian by former
Assistant to the Director William C.
Sullivan. These records were thought to
have been destroyed but were subsequently
located in May, 1973, in storage at The
White House. Mr. DeLoach is believed to
have played a part in arranging for the
installation of several of these wiretaps.

If you agree, Mr. DeLoach's last-
known address will be obtained and
furnished to WSPF.

31k 1?53;
i uf??3\

again,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a - Assoc. Dir. 
Mix. a, Asst. Difa
PROSECUTION FORCE DEPARTMENT Sam's
1 amp. ysi.
emor?ndum
Files 8: Com. 
1' Gen. Inv.
. Idem. 
T0 -Mr. ClarenceM ley Decemb m? -
Director 
Federal Bure nvestigation Lao
i? will; Plan. 8  Eval. 
:Henry jpo gun-#3 Spec. lnv. 
Deputy Special Prosecutor 
1 Watergate Special Prosecution Force l?m?Cwm
Telephone Rm. 
i SUBJECT Investigative Request - Former Bureau Employee _Ca mm.? sec-y 

 

 

 

 

1 -x-u7? 1

1 In connection with our investigation of certain wiretapsi rme?1
we will want to interview former Assistant to the Director
cartha DeLoachJ WOuld th?hBureau please provide thiS'office

with DeLoach?s?last known address so that we may contact him.

137? j?g g: It,

191% 18l974? 0)

 

 

a,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
   

a
we.?

h; 5/ 313/

 

 

 

TO

FROM

SUBJECT:

omoNAl no. lo

MAY IDINON



05.! OIN no. NO 2?

UNI IED GOVERNMENT

li??eznu97127mahur7z



FRANCE

a. HEIM

MM

ALTERCATION
U. S. CAPITOL BUILDING

D. c.

A

1


m-Y! -1


.




I

appear at
2/13/74; however, he, Mr.
view would concern.

3.
5


MAY 34

'1

I974

On 2/7/74,
American _Legion, confidentially advised that he had been interviewi

SOIO-IOI

BETWEEN ANTIWAR DEMONSTRATORS
AND MIAMI-BASED CUBANS

DATE:

2/11/74

 

 

. ?ner?g:



Comp. Sysi. F,


023). AD 
Asst. Din:
Admin.

Ext. Al in

 

lnspociidn 7?4


Laboratory

Plan. 8. Evai. ..

Spoc. Irw.
Training
Legal Caun.

To lephonc Rm. 

Director Soc'y 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

by Nathaniel Ackerman of the Watergate Special Prosecutor's Force,

1425 -K



?8

Street, N.

that Mr. Ackerman made routine inquiries

W., Washington, D. C.

concerning The American Legion? 3 relationship with the White House
including the appearances of Presidents at Legion functions and
Legion resolutions su orting positions of various Administrations;

however,

in 

opinion, the primary purpose of the interview

was to determine whether The American Legion had hired buses to

bring Legionnaires to Washington, D. C. to counteract any demonstra?

tors at the U. S. Capitol Building during Mr. Hoover' funeral.
Mr. advised Mr. Ackerman that The American Legion had not
brought any Legionnaires to the Capitol during the funeral and he
also checked with neighboring departments and determined~that

too had not sent any Legionnaires to Washington for the quEr

he had learned that former
Assistant to the Director C. D. DeLoach has also been requested by

RECOMMENDATION:

 

- Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
- Mr.



For recordmpurposes.

Franck
Gebhardt

Wannall 

Heim

Tame
2 mm
. 

 

 

(.3. .1 3/

 

:53 19 1974

at
34.1.3. rift: 1. 21:13": ?51

. Ackerman's, office, on Wednesday,
had no idea as to what the inter?

4W

 

i?v

b7C



 

 

 

 

April 26, 1974

Mr. Cartha D. 9L ach
Vice President

Corgorate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.

Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

I was ple 0 learn from your letter of

April 19th that Jo alone's appearance before the annual
seminar scheduled I he Westchester County Association
was well received. Your personal endorsement of his work
is, of course, held in high regard and is a source of
great encouragement to me. Thank you for your expression
of support with resgect to the Bureau' 3 success in several
recent kidnaping cases.

With warmest personal regards,

 

 

 

 

wmusozo Sincerely yours, 

AP meme Kelley.
$m Clarence M. Kelley
1 Director

1 New York Enclosure

Attention ADIC . i

Assoc. Dlr. 
Dep. AD Adm. 
Dep? AD lnv. 

?Auhmm NOTE: Correspondent was a former Assistant to the Director

 

who retired 7 70 and is on the mailing list to receive
the LEE, UCR and Annual Report.

Ext. Affairs 
Flles 8- Com. I.

 

    

RCD .mkS (?5424) f? .
Inspection i we ?hr
414M XEROX 

Plan. 3- Evo. 1: 1 I i .

Spec. lnv. U6 . MAY $1 1974

Z, i- 

Legal Coun. 
Telephone Rm.

 

 

 

 

     
 





Assoc. Dir. 4 a



Dig-Al} 

Asst. Din: 

(0 Admin. .. 

Comp. Syat. 1"

Ext. Affairs 1

Files Com.
Gen. Inv. ..
Ident. 
Inspection
Intell. .. 
Laboratory 
Plan. Eval. 

Hammers 0 Apri119. 1974 spa rm. 
CORPORATE Armns a Training 
Legal Conn. 

. can-ma in, . .

Telephone
Mr. Clarence Kelley

 

 

 

 

 

 

PURCHASE, MN. 10577
TEL. (914) 253- 3027

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

QC Director
0?3 Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535


,k \3 Dear Clarence: 

Yesterday I had the privilege of introducing Assistant Director Jo alone
to a large gathering of security officers, former Agents, and rate
heads at the; annual seminar scheduled by the Westchester County Associa?
tion in Tarrytown, New York? My purpbsefor being there was simply in
the category of being a member of the board of directors of the Westchester 
County Association. 

John spoke to approximately 200 of the above maimed individuals and did an
outstanding job. I am certain that the Bureau gained in reputation and
prestige as a result of John's appearance.

 



 

It. gives me a very warm feeling indeed to participate in such matters and 
to see the constant respect enjoyed by the FBI as a result of appearances

as the one made by John on this occasion.

)1 also wanted to take this opportunity to congratulate you and the Bureau on - 5'
your recent successes in kidnapping "cases. I am certain that the one in

San Francisco will be handled in the same manner as the successful!? I
clusion you have shown in recent cases. 67- 5 8 i 8 {94% i

 

 

- Se chat N?ml?a :d ?t 
With best wishes and kind regards, REC 148 a; 338 MAY :13 23974 ?1 

 

 

Sincerely,

. 

C. D. DeLoach

 
  

   
 
 



.. (IL I
7 ?93,9 

. .33"



 

 

 



Callahan
Mr. J. A. Mintz
Mr. O. T. Jacobson

4 - Mr. W. R. Wannall
The Attorney'General . June 20? 1974

.39.


a

Director, FBI

0
%95 A. pff?bt/ A
mass Grams-TED FOR 4 5
agar wares gogss BY THE FBI 
answers 1 Y, FEBRUARY, 197l? ., 

On June 14, 1974, the Deputy Attorney General advised
Associate Director Nicholas P. Callahan that he had received infor-
mation from horton Halperin's attorney that he, the attorney, had
noticed, in reviewing documents pertaining to the electronic
surveillance on Halperin, that FBI logs indicated Halperin's tele?
phone had been overheard on May 9, 10, and ll, 1969, whereas the
Attorney General's approval for the electronic surveillance was
dated May 12, 1969. The Deputy Attorney General requested
clarification on this matter. 



Interviews of present and past FBI employees who may 

3 be knowledgeable concerning this matter have been conducted. 
Attached are interview forms on the following individuals:

Hr. John P. Mohr, former Assistant to the Director; Miss Helen

Gandy, former Executive Assistant to the Director; Mr. William

C. Sullivan, former Assistant Director and Assistant to the

Director; Mr. Cartha D. De ach, former Assistant to the

Director; Superv sor Court an . Jones, Washington Field Office,

Supervisor James J. Gaffney, Washington Field Office, 

Mr. Ernest H. Belter, retired FBI Agent; Mrs. b5
Administrative Assistant to the Director; Miss

Administrative Assistant to the Director: and miss

Administrative Assistant in the\pffice of the Director.



'2

Our files contain a memorand for the Attorney General
dated May 12, 1959, captioned ?Colone1.Alexander M. Haig

 

 

Surveillance Request." This memorandum stated
De . AD Adm. ..
06:. AD Inv. 1
mm 
Admin. 8)
Com . 5 sf. 


 

Exl. Mlairs 
3:23:51: . . 
Irritation?? . 5 

Info".

Dot." ??3114? a? 1?1

 

Plon- Eval. 

a: 

1 1,
$33.22;? JUQL. 

Direclor Soc'y MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT :1 U.

spec. lnv. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



The Attorney General

Haig came to the FBI on May 10, 1969, {Other information in our
files indicates Haig talked to Mr. William C. Sullivan regarding
the matter.) and stated a request was being made "on

the highest authority" which involved a matter of most grave

and serious consequence to our national security. The memorandum 
indicated Haig requested telephone surveillance be placed

on Danie1.Ira Davidson, Morton H. Halperin, Colonel Robert
Pursley, and Helmet Sonnenfeldt. Approval for these electronic
surveillances was obtained from Attorney General John Mitchell
on May 12, 1969, and his signature and the date appear on page
two of the memorandum.

we have no correspondence in our files showing any
instructions to our Washington Field Office to place an electronic
surveillance on Halperin on May 9, 1969, May 12, 1969, or any
other date. As indicated in the attached interview of Mr. William

C. Sullivan on June 15, 1974, he advised he had not instruct~

edlthe Field Office to institute an electronic
surveillance-on dalperin on May 9, 1969, either on his own
authority or anyone else?s. He was shown EBI logs showing an
electronic surveillance on Halperin for the dates of May 9, 10,
and 11, 1969. He stated he could furnish no information which
would shed any light on how the coverage oanalperin could have
been in.effect for the above dates when the Attorney General's
authority was not obtained until May 12, 1969. He stated his
normal procedure was to telephonically contact Supervisor
Courtland J. Jones of our washington Field Office and to
instruct him to initiate coverage. He stated he assumed

this procedure was followed when he was advised the

Attorney General had approved the coverage on May 12, 1969. He
indicated that, although he probably had seen the logs on Halperin
dated May 9, 10, and 11, 1969, he could not state on what date
or dates he may have seen them. He acknowledged his handwriting-
appears on the May 10, 1969, log. He advised that in reviewing
mail, he frequently read the contents thereof without paying
particular attention to the dates.

As indicated in the attached interview of Supervisor
Courtland J. Jenes of our Washington Field Office, he advised
that, to the best of his recollection, he received a~telephone
call from William C. Sullivan who related he was calling Jones
because the Bureau wanted some special coverage conducted on

 

 

 

 

 

Nomo? ?on?mm? . an . ruhem?The Attorney General .



the "highest authority." He stated Mr. Sullivan furnished him

the names of several individuals on whom this coverage should

be instituted, but Jones cannot recall the identities of these
individuals. Jones is unable to recall the date or day of the
week on which the call was received, but believes it was 
received sometime during the afternoon. He stated he presently
has no written record regarding the above conversation with

Mr. Sullivan. ?He advised that Mr. Sullivan?s instructions were
reliyedto Supervisor Ernest H. Belter of the Washington Field

Off oe.

As indicated in the attached interview of Ernest H.
Belter, now retired, Belter advised that, while he has no
clear recollection as to the specific time or date, sometime
probably in the Spring of 1969 he was instructed by Supervisor
Courtland J. Jones to effect electronic surveillances on Morton
Helperin, a man named Sonnenfeldt, and a man named Davidson.
He believes there was a fourth Person named, but does not at this
time recall the identity of the individual. He stated that,
while he is unable to specifically recall the date or time
he received his instructions from Supervisor Jones, he believes
this initial request could well have been on a Friday, but
reiterated he has no record to substantiate his belief. He
does know that, after receiving the instruction from Sunervisor
Jones, he initiated the necessary action to effect a contact
with the phone company. It is Mr. Belter's recollection that
on the same afternoon positive information was received on
the Halyerin line.

Our records indicate that Mr. Hoover had dinner with
President Richard Nixon and Attorney General John Mitchell on
April 25, 1969, at Camp David, naryland. Our records further
indicate that Dr. Henry Kissinger met with Mr. Hoover at FBI
Headquarters on the afternoon of May 5, 1969. As indicated in
the attached interview of Mr. williem C. Sullivan on June 18,
1974, he recalls being shown a memorandum by Hr. Hoover pertaining
to a Camp David meeting, date unrecalled by Mr. Sullivan.
According to Mr. Sullivan, the memorandun indicated that at
the Camp David meeting President Nixon was disturbed about
White House leaks of information and indicated something had to
be done about it. According to Sullivan, the memorandum indicated
Mr. Hoover told Fresident Nixon he would do something

 

 

 

Claudrr




i . 
3i.
4- mus?5

x.


The Attorney General

about the White House leaks, but Mr. Sullivan indicated there
was no reference in the memorandum to possible utilization of
electronic surveillances. Mr. Sullivan stated that in thiS'
meeting with Hoover, Mr. Hoover did not ask him to dc"
anything regarding the White House leaks.

Mr. Sullivan recalled seeing a memorandum regarding

{o who-nae? in.- f? attire-rel 'u mug-a .- Aa; a, a. 4 ?an?r 4 maw?Wd?m - ?fawn-?- - eh0-2-55?

I1

a meeting between Dr. Kissinger and Mr. Hoover in early May, 1969,

but he could not recall whether the memorandum he saw had to do
with the May 5, 1969, meeting. He recalled that the memorandum
indicated Dr. Kissinger made a request oi Mr. Hoover

that certain wiretaps be put on to counteract White House leaks
of information. Mr. Sullivan did not recall the names of any
individuals mentioned. It is Mr. Sullivan's recollection that
the memorandum showed that Mr. Hoover had told Dr. Kissinger
that the FBI could initiate the wiretaps requested and that
it,would be done. Mr. Sullivan stated he has no recollection
of having received any request from Mr. Hoover for any necessary
action based on information set forth in :he memorandum.

As indicated in the attached interviews of Mr. John

 

 

P. Mohr, Miss 1en Gand yrs. I Missl
and Hissl I these individuals were unable to
furnish any information regarding the memoranda referred to by

Mr. Sullivan regarding the Camp David meeting and Dr Kissinger's
meeting with Mr. Hoover on May 5, 1969. Mrs.  I

I Iwere the employees who handled all of
Mr. Hoover' dictation.

 

 

CURRENT FBI AHALYSIQ

Essentially, it appears that two basic questions
should be answered concerning the 17 wiretaps placed between?
May, 1969, and February, 1971, in connection with leaks of
highly sensitive national security information from< the White
House. The best way to resolve the questions would be to
produce unassaiiable documentary evidence.. However, an
exhaustive search of FBI records has been made, and the
documents needed to provide the solution cannot be located.

 

 

 

 

 

 

'1 -
I 
. a

The Attorney General

Therefore, since the best evidence, complete
documentation, cannot be located, we feel that a professional
analysis of the available facts is the next best way of helping
to resolve the issues. .Our analysis does not cover the basic
issue of whether the wiretaps were properly and legally placed,
based on the constitutional powers of the President and the
state of the law at the time. Our previous legal analysis
has fully convinced us that the wiretaps were legal:

Our professional analysis then is concerned with the
issue of who actually initiated the wiretaps; that is, who
actually suggested, requested, or ordered the installation and
use of the wiretaps; and (2) the issue of why the Norton Halperin
wiretap was evidently installed on May 9, 1969, whereas the Attorney
General authorization was not effective prior to May 12, 1969.

First, and foremost, all available FBI records available
for analysis and review are the records recovered from the
White House May 12, 1973, after they had been turned over to
former Assistant Attorney General Robert C. hardian by former
Assistant to the Birector William C. Sullivan in the Summer of
1971. The FBI has no record of what records were turned over
to Mr. hardian by Mr. Sullivan; therefore, we have no way of
knowing whether we did, in fact, retrieve all of the records
originally turned over to Mr. Mardian. This is mentioned,
not in any sense as an accusation that some of these records may
have been removed prior to their return to FBI control, but only
as one of the many unknown factors in trying to arrive at a
logical conclusiozi as to the facts. 1

All of those records retrieved from the White House
have been carefu'lly reviewed, and it is not possible to
establish with any degree of certainty the role Dr. Kissinger
played in the initiation of the wiretaps. The initial document
recording the request by the White House for the wiretaps states
~that the request was made personally by then Colonel Alexander M.
Haig of Dr. Kissinger' Office, and Colonel Haig stated this request
was being made on ?the highest authority." This immediately

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Attorney General

suggests that the President, not Dr. Kissinger, was the
initiator or the request. . 

One memorandum, a personal memorandum from Mr.
Sullivan to Mr. Hoover, dated May 20, 1969, records that
Dr. Kissinger reviewed logs of the first four wiretaps in
Sullivan's office and told Sullivan that he (Kissinger) wanted
the coverage to continue for a while longer on the first four
names, to which would be added new ones. This memorandum also
recorded that Dr. Kissinger stated "It is clear that I don't
have anybody in my office that I can trust except Colonel Haig."

w- we understand that Dr. Kissinger has indicated he
attended a meeting between the President, Attorney General, and
J. Edgar Hoover on May 9, 1969, or previous to that time, con?
cerning the very serious matter of leaks of_nationa1 security
information from the White House. Supposedly, the matter of
wiretans was discussed at that meeting, perhaps with Mr. Hoover
suggesting this technique as one means or discovering the source
of the leaks. we know that no such meeting occurred on May 9,
1969, since the President and Dr. Kissinger were in Key Biscayne,

Florida, on that data while Mr. Hoover was in Washington.

A review of Hr. Hoover?s appointment book and logs
of his teleohone calls and personal meetings in his office (copies
attached?heretoi reveals that Mr. Hoover had dinner with the
President and the attorney General at Camp David on April 25, 1969.
There is no information available to indicate Dr. Kissinger
was present, although he may well have been.

Mr. Foover?s daily log reveals the President
telephoned him at his home at 6:55 May 2, 1969. Subsequently,
at 12:05 May 5, 1969, Colonel Haig of Dr. Kissingor's Office
called and left a message, since the Director was out at the time.
At 1:12 p.mn Colonel Haig called the Director's telephone room
and confirmed an appointment for Dr. Kissinger. At 3:55 p.m. and
4:10 Dr. Kissinger?s Office called to advise that



arr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Attorney General

Dr. Kissinger would be a little late. At 4:27 p.m. Dr.
Kissinger met with Mr. Hoover, and at 4:43 p.m. hr. Hoover
attempted to reach Assistant Director William C. Sullivan.

The events surrounding the meeting at Camp David on
April 25, 1969, and Dr. Kissinger?s visit to Mr. Hoover's office
on May 5, 1969, following a telephone call from the President
on May 2, 1969, tend to support the theory that Mr. Hoover had
possibly discussed the very serious matter of White House leaks
with the President, the Attorney General, and Dr. Kissinger.
Such being the case, the matter of wiretaps being a valuable
tool in the investigative effort to pinpoint the source of
the leaks logically would have come up. We know that the then
Attorney General John N. Mitchell had been somewhat critical
of the restrictive attitude of former Attorney General Ramsey
Clark concerning the use of wiretaps. We feel, therefore, that
Mr. Mitchell would have certainly been amenable to the suggestion
for use of wiretaps.

. Mr. Hoover's attitude respecting the use of wiretaps
has traditionally been a negative one. .FBI records are replete
with evidence of his repugnance for use of wiretaps, and it is,
therefore, highly unlikely that he would have initiated a
suggestion for their use in this case. We think, however, if the
President and the Attorney General had voiced an Opinion that
wiretaps were in order, Mr. Hoover would not have opposed them
in any way. In absence of any documentary evidence, however,
the FBI cannot supply facts concerning the conversations

,that might have taken place where Mr. Hoover took part concern~
ing the suggestion, proposal, or recommendation that wiretaps
be used.

With respect to specific documentation regarding
Mr. Hoover?s meeting with the President and Mr. Mitchell at
Camp David on April 25, 1969, and his subsequent meeting with
Dr. Kissinger on May 5, 1969, an effort was made to determine if
Mr. Hoover had made any record of these meetings. Mr. Hoover's
personal Executive Assistant of many years, Miss Helen W. Gandy,
felt in her own mind that Mr. Hoover would have dictated a
record of those two meetings since he always carefully recorded
important meetings and discussions. She does not now recall that
he did prepare such records. Upon interview, as related above,
secretarial personnel could not recall preparing memoranda
relating to these two meetings. 

 

 

 


mus-- a A -b.-.uI-nn-g ?Avior-vault nth-?- Ehe Attorney General

Since Mr. W. C. Sullivan played a key role in this
matter, he has been interviewed at length concerning his recol~
lection of the sequence of events and the facts surrounding the
use of wiretaps in this case. Results of his interviews are
attached.

Mr. Sullivan advised that he did not instruct
the Washington Field Office to initiate electronic surveillance
coverage on Halperin on May 9, 1969, either on his own
authority or anyone else's. He stated his normal procedure
was to telephonically contact a specific supervisor in the
Washington Field Office and instruct him to initiate coverage
after specific authorization had been obtained.

However, logs of the wiretap on Morton H. Halperin
reveal the first call monitored was at 6:20 May 9, 1969.
This fact then raises the second important question; 
i1when was the wireta? (at least on Halperin) actually requested,
and who authorised it?"

Washington Field Office personnel were interviewed at
length, and pertinent Agents were unable to recall sufficient facts
to resolve the question. The coordinating supervisor, who does
recall having been instructed by W. C. Sullivan to have the
first wiretaps installed, cannot now recall the date or the
identities of those wiretapped. He thought Mr. Sullivan furnished
him the names of several individuals on whom coverage was to
be instituted but could not recall identities of those individuals.
As a matter of?record, however, the other three wiretaps
(besides Halperin) were not monitored prior to May 13, l969, even
if they were installed prior thereto. a

The Special Agent who handled the technical work couid
recall only that the request came possibly on a Friday and that
he worked late that evening to insure that the correct line was
being monitored so that he would not have to come in the next
day. He does not recall the day of the month, but May 9, 1969,
was on Friday. 

While it is recorded that the first wiretap, the
Helperin wiretap, was initiated on May 9, 1969, the question as
to who ordered (or roguested) it is still unresolved. We do
know, however, that on Hay 9, 1969, a series of telephonic

.- 8 .-

 

 

$4

The Attorney General

discussions took place between Mr. Hoover and Dr. Kissinger
concerning the seriousness of the leaks, and specifically

about a leak appearing in a New York Times article by

William Beecher on May Dr. Kissinger declared that

this particular leak was extraordinarily damaging and used

secret information. Dr. Kissinger asked that the FBI use whatever
resources were needed to find out who was responsible.

Mr. Hoover posed the groblem to his executive staff
and through appropriate contacts information was developed
concerning three possible suspects in connection with the leaks.
These suspects were (Horton) Halnerin, (Lawrence?) Eagleburger,
and Ivan Selin. All three were connected with the National
Security Counci3., and all three were acquainted with William
Beecher, author of The New York Times article referred to by?
Dr. Kissinger.

I

 

Halperin and Selin had reportedly gone to school,
possibly at the same time as Beecher, at Harvard University.
Beecherireportedly had a roommate at Harvard undergraduate
school who was then (in May, 1969) a staff member of the National
Security Council. -This information was telephoned to Dr. Kissinger
by Mr. Hoover at about 5:05 May 9, 1969. Insofar as
Mr. Hoover and the FBI were concerned at that point, Halperin,
Eagleburger, and Selin were all good possibilities as suspects
in the leaks. However, and this is a most significant point,
only Halperin was targeted for a wiretap. We cannot conceive
of Mr. Hoover or anyone else in the FBI making a unilateral
decision to wiretap Helperin to the e; :clusion of the other two
logical suspects.

This leads to a somewhat logical conclusion that
during the discussion between Mr. Hoover and Dr. Kissinger
beginning at 5:05 Dr. Kissinger made the decision to
wiretap Halperin but not the other two. If such were the case,
Mr. Hoover would have immediately instructed (probably Wu C.
Sullivan) to institute the wiretap on Halperin, and this would
account for the Washington Field Office Agent?s recollection
of staying late to have the wiretap installed and working so
he would not have to come in on Saturday, possibly May 10, 1969.

 

 

a?u?K

 

 

 

in: g. .

.

I

we?:

(3-

The Attorney General

The Director's daily log does not show that hr.
Hoover made a call to Sullivan following the 5:05 p.m. call
to Dr. Kissinger. However, if Mr. Hoover used his direct line a
to Sullivan, such call would probably not have been logged. . :2

?t ?n-zniwl a:

earl

The records retrieved from the White House reveal that
on May 10, 1969, Mr. Sullivan tried to contact Mr. hoover at
his home and, being unsuccessful, left a message with Miss Gandy
for Mr. Hoover. Sullivan related that Colonel haig had visited
him on the morning of May 10, 1969, and made certain requests
concerning a colonel at the Pentagon. Sullivan said that he
did not want to move on this until he had gotten Mr. Hoover?s 
approval, and "they" did not want anything in writing.

 

 




This record supports the theory that as of May 10,
1969, not all of the original four wiretap requests had been
previously requested since it would appear that the colonel
in the Pentagon referred to above was probably Colonel Robert I
Parsley, one of the four initially wiretapped in this case.

We can offer no explanation as to the reason why
the memorandum to the Attorney General dated May 12, 1969,
in which the first four wiretaps were requested and approved?
did not set forth the fact that one of the wiretaps had already
been initiated on May 9, 1969. If the theory is correct that
Dr. Kissinger made the request for the wiretap during the
conversation at 5:05 p.m. on May 9, 1969, it would have been
logical under the circumstances to state in the memorandum that
the request had been made for the wiretap on Helperin on
May 9, 1969, and that, because of the urgency and source of the
request, it had been initiated on the basis of expected authoriw
ration by the Attorney General on the following workday (Mdnday,
May 12, 1969).



 

It can he speculated also that when the request was
made late in the day (Friday) May 9, 1969, Sullivan had no
reasonable expectation that the installation could he made
prior to May 12, 1969,-sinoe it would be difficult to get
the installation made on the evening 05.nay 9, 1969, or during
the weekend. This does not account for failure of the May 12,
1969, memorandum to state that the Helperin request was made

i 10 

not? 

 

3d 
.

The Attorney General

May 9, 1969, instead of May 18, 1969, as set forth. dowever,

in the haste to get the memorandum to the Attorney General, a

shortcut in the administrative language could have occurred.
In other words, in the preparation of the memorandum, it would
have been much simpler to set forth that all of the wiretaps
were requested by Colonel Haig on May 10, 1969, than to go
into the more complicated details of one being requested

May 9, 1969, by Kissinger and the others on May 10, 1969,

by Colonel Haig.

The only other gossihility is that Colonel Haig and

W. C. Sullivan independently worked out the details early on

May 9, 1969, and Sullivan bygassed Mr. Hoover on the Halperin
request on May 9, 1969, ordering it without advance clearance
from either Mr. Hoover or the Attorney General.

.In any of these considerations, it must be remembered
that, according to Sullivan' 5 first memorandum on the subject
dated Hay 11, 1969, he wrote that Colonel Haig had stressed
that the.matter was so sensitive that it demanded handling on a
need?to~know basis, with no record being maintained. He said

in fact, that if possible it would be desirable to have the matter

handled without going to the Department of Justice; although
Sulliuan was told that the Attorney General was aware in general
terms of the main elements of the security problem.

Here we have a request for a reversal of our normal
operating procedures relating to wiretaps. Ordinarily, the FBI
initiates the request for the wiretap. It is the FBI seeking
authority under constitutional power of the President to install
the wiretap, and the Attorney General, acting for the President,
grants or denies that authority.

But in the case of the wiretaps in question, these
were being requested from authority higher than the Attorney
General; being requested in the name and office of the
Presidency, which is the.source of authority.

11 i

 

 

 

 

 

 

A a 
i 14- . r? 
?hm-mic-O war ?was ts? 1. Mia-4? 

a: ?7m 7m 5?er wing-7NThe Attorney General

*It can, therefore, be stated that these wiretaps for
and on behalf of the White House required no additional authori~
zation or approval of the Attorney General. Therefore, the
various memoranda to the Attorney General were merely a device
to insure that the FBI was not acting unilaterally. Can the
President instruct the Director of the FBI to install a national
security wiretap without consulting the Attorney General?

Our answer was that we believed he had the'authority and we
acted on that belief. 

Many of the nagging questions could undoubtedly be
answered, at least in part, if records could be located of
Mr. Hoover's visit to Camp David, his telephone conversation
with the President on May 2, 1969, and his meeting.with Dr.
Kissinger on May 5, 1969. We have not located these records.
However, as noted in the attached report of interviews of Mr.
Sullivan, he recalls reading memoranda relating to a Camp
David meeting probably on April 25, 1969, and a meeting with.
Dr. Kissinger probably'on May 5, 1969. 

Mr. sullivan recalls that subsequent to Mr. Hoover's
meeting with the President at Camp David on April 25, 1969,
Mr. Hoover showed him a memorandum he prepared concerning the
meeting-and told Sullivan that this mandrandum would never
leave his (Hoover?s) office. According to Sullivan, this
memorandum dealt with three main topics: (1) Then Deputy
Attorney General Richard Kleindienst was pressing hr. Hoover
to testify before Congress on the electronic surveillance
activities in general. . Hoover was very much opposed.
(2) The matter of the White House leaks was discussed, and the
FBI was urged to do something about the problem. Mr. Hoover
promised that the F31 would do something. (3) Criticism of
Mr. Hoover was discussed, although Mr. Sullivan does not recall
the nature of the criticism;

Sullivan also recalls that after Mr. Hoover's meeting
with Dr. Kissinger on May 5, 1969, he saw a memorandum concern?
ing the meetinj with Dr. Kissinger. Sullivan said this
memorandum recorded the fact that Dr. Kissinger had requested
Mr. Hoover to utilize certain wiretaps in an effort to stop
the leaks. However, Sullivan could not recall the names of any

individuals mentioned. 



12 

t?

 

 

I: 1- .
a, #0 mwn? some -- .u ?e - Art-rt? 4 ?sf?u ?2??an 

 

 

The Attorney General

Unfo:tunately, Mr. Hoover's daily log does not show
that hr. Sullivan was in Mr. Hoover's office anytime between
April 25, 1969, and May 31, 1969. However, in light of Mr.
Sullivan's statement, the possibility should be considered that
the daily log is not infallible. 

Sullivan's recollection of the subject matter of the
two demoranda described above is somewhat supportive of Dr.
Kissinger's reported recollection of discussions prior to May 9,
1969, concerning the use of wiretaps in efforts to stop the
leaks. 

All of the evidence we have developed points to the fact
that there was active collaboration between White House and FBI
officials, including the President, Dr. Kissinger and then
Colonel ?aig, Hoover, Mr. Sullivan, and other FBI representa~
tives in the attempt to identify and plug the leaks of extremely
sensitive national security information. The White House
obviously realised that in order to detect these leaks, which
were coming free the very highest levels in the White House,
extraordinary measures were necessary to prevent our investigative
efforts from being exposed and neutralined. This factor,
which in itseli'was a major problem, had to be considered
along with the politically explosive?factor of public reaction
and Opinion if the use of wiretaps against White House personnel
and others were to be exposed.

By the same token, Mr. Hoover's reluctance to use
wiretaps and his longstanding policy of requiring prior Attorney
General authorization before wiretaps were used, may have been
an annoyance to those in the White House who felt they were 
an important investigative tool. Couple this with W. C.
Sullivan's personal philosophy that Mr. Hoover?s wiretap policy
was too restrictive and add the ingredient of the White House
supporting his philosophy, rather than the restrictive
Hoover policy, and the problems of misunderstanding and adminis~
trative mishandling are created. This entire analysis is
dependent on the simple premise that the wiretaps were legal
and proper and that whether Kissinger or the President or
J. Edgar Hoovrr initiated them is irrelevant so long as the
President approved of their use and/or was aware in advance
of their proposed use and authorized them. we believe that
Presidential approval-was granted in advance, regardless of how
it may have been expressed or given. 

Enclosures 18
- The Deputy Attorney General





 

 

 

"FEDERAI. BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

. Dale of transcriuifn m8 [974

Mr. Caz-ma B. DeLoach, 96 Perkins Road, who is a former
Assistant to the Director of the Federal Bureau of Invectigation, was interviewed
by Ioepeetor Jamee J. Dean, Jr. and Iasyectoz: Gerald D. Coaktey regarding
his recouectioe of the circumstances surrounding (ice iaittattoe of electronic
surveiltaace (ELSUR) coverage on Matteo. Helperio to May, 1969. The identities
of Inspectors Dunn and Coaltley as members of the Inapectioe Division, FBI.
Headquarters, were made moose to Mr. DeLoachlat the outset of: the interview.

A cup}: of a memorandum from W. O. Sullivan to Mr. C. D. DeLoaoh
dated May 11, 1969, 8.12.13 captioned "Colonel Alexan?er M. Eaig, Technical
Servemaece Request, together with a copy of a memoraaoum for the Attoreey
General dated May 12, 1969, cautioned "Colonel Alexander M. Eaig, Technical
Eminence were shoot: to Mr. DeLoaeh, The May 2969,
memorandum indicates! that on May 10, 1989, Colonel ?aig, who was assigned
to the stair of Dr. A. Kissinger, had come to the Bureau and ceaceeted
that a. telephone surveillance be placed on four iadiuideaha including Morton
Balearic.

He stated he has no recolleetioa of having Laetied instructions to the
Washington Field Of?ce of the FBI to initiate ELSUR coverage ea Morton Helperin
or any other: individual. He stated that in his cagacity as Assistant to the
Director of: the FBI, he had occasion to review correspondence (Seating with
electronic 'eerveitlance coverage. He stated that if he received any correSpoadeuce
indicating that an ELSIJR had beet: approved by the Attorney General, he would
route the mail back. to the FBI Headwaters moisten which had initiated the
soonest. 

Mr. DeLoaeh was shown 9623188 of: 3:331? toga dated May 9, It}, and a,
$968, which eel: forth of tee ELSUR coverage ea Morton Helperm. He
stated that he had out seen these tags or: any other tugs pertaining to the ELSUR
cove cage ca Helperm.

He stated he was aware of the concern: expressed by the White House
over {cake based on memoranda prepared by Mr. Hoover; however, he atatect
that the results of the ELSUR coverage based on the mute House request

 

 

Inlecviewed ??34.111946 19124 ol?memm1ec?c?t?Eih 
hepectore James J. Dunn, Jr. and I
bv?Geoatd-Dy?Coakleylarmg Due ?awed??ImmJQie?

Ihls documenl (Onloins neither recommendation: nor conclusions of the FBI. It Is the property of the FBI and Is Iooned Io your ogency;
II and BI: conlentg are no! to be distributed outside you! 

 

i. 

 

 

 

 


?Ci
.

in:

were handled directly by Mr. W?uam C. Sullivan, L163 Assistant ?izector of the
FEE, based Specific Instructions of Mr. Hoover

a:

?f

13.

 

 

i!


?1 . p.

. T?Callahan
- Mr. J. A. Mints
Mr. O. T. Jacobson
tar. W. R. Hal-{nail

The Attorney General June 24, 1974_




Director, FBI
fw

If, a.

172WIRBTAPS CPERATED.EQR.



BETWEEN AND FEBRUARY, 1971 
2) 46M

Reference is made to the conference in the Deputy
Attorney General's Office on June 21, 1974, between Associate
Director Nicholas P. Callahan, Deputy Associate Director
E. S. Miller, Assistant Director 0. T. Jacobson, Inspector'
Thomas J, Smith, Mr. Lawrence Silberman, the Deputy Attorney.
General and . James Wilaerotter, Associate Deputy Attorney.
~Genera1, concerning captioned matter. Earlier, on June 14,.
1974, the Deputy At orney General a?vised Mr .Callahan .
that he had received information from.?orton Halperin.'s attorney
that he, the attorney, had noticed in reviewing accuments .
pertaining to the electronic surveillance on Halperin,
that FBI logs indicated Halperin?s telephone had been .
overheard on May 9, 10, and ll, 1969, whereas the Attorney 
General?s approval for the electronic surveillance was dated.
May 12, 1969. The Deputy Attorney General requested Fatna
clarification on this matter.

  

 

 

 

A ?anal" a?
.

Pursuant to the Deyuty Attorney General?s request
on June 21, 1974, the following is a summary of information
relating to the matter. Copies of pertinent FD 302?s and
other pertinent documentation are attached hereto. The
Deputy Attorney General advised that a cony of this summary
and attachments will he made available to the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee and.to Mr. Carlyle Maw, Legal Adviser} 
Department or State, under the same conditions other material
has been furnished these rec is w'
Pitt 40.?

Assoc. Dir. 
Interviews of present and past FBI employees who may

039- AD lnv. 

 

Anhmm knowledgeable concerning this mattzr have been conducted.

fem Attached are interview forms on the following individuals: 
in?i? Mr. Jehn P. Mohr, former Assistant to the Director, Miss Helen [Oi
merchi: Gandy, former Executive Assistant to the Director: Mr. William. eh:

 

Director; Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach, former Assistant tes?he

?poc?on

former Assistant Director and Assistant to the 



Jl
\ry? 2.


53"? clh/f $531145: 13:93.4 qt?{ ahw? Ju:?m19::w sci/f 
5" 7 

MAIL ROOM TELETYPE uni 'r 

n- 

 

 

 

 

in

pa? -- a? m? Paw-w wu-nrn?? mun. A an? r\ 11 5 m~a~ P?i?wwm' Aim-w? 54.9.. wqThe Attorney General

11/



 

Directary Sugarviaorl Washington Field Office,
aupervisorl I Washingten Field Offica, $31; be
Mr. Ernest a. Salter, xetixe? F31 Agent; ?rs?l 
Administrativc Agaistant to the Directof; ?isal 
Adminiatrative Assistant to the Directox; and Hissl 
Adminiatrativa Agsistant in the Office ofrtha rector.?

Our files ean?ain a mamoranaum fag ?ne Attorney Ganerak
dated May 12, 1959, uapticne? ?Colonel Alexan?er H. ?aig, 
Techniaal Survaillance Requeat.? ?Thia mamgran?um stated,

Haig came to the FBI on any 19, 1969, {Uther informatian in our
files indicatem ?aig talked to . William C. Sullivan ragar?ing
the matter.) and atate? a requast was being ma?a ?on

tha highest authosity? which a matter of mast grave'
aha serious cansequenae to our national security. The memorandum
indicatea Haig xequestaa teleghone gurvaillance be placed? 
an Daniel Ira waviasan, ?ertan H. Halparing Colonel ?obert 
Parsley, an? ?mlmut Sonnenfel?t. approval far ?he$e electronic
suzvaillanaea was obtained ?rnm.httorney Genaral John Hitchell'
an ?ay?lz, lgsa, an? his signature and the aate apyear on gage
two :35 the memorahaum.

we hava nG-cozraspondanca in our filas gnawing any
instructians to cur waghington yield.0??i?a to ?laca an alectrania
suxvaillance an Halperin on ?ay 9, 1969, ?ay 12, 1969, or any
other aate. An in?icatea in the attached intexview of Mr. Willi:m
C. Sullivan on June 15, 1974, he advise? ha ha? not instruct?
ed the Eiala affice to institute an alactronic
surveillance on Ealparin on May 9, 1959, either an hia awn
authority at anyone elae?a. He was FBI logs gnawing an
electranim $urveillance on Balperin for the dates of may 9, 19,
and 11, 1969. ?e stata? he caul? furnish n0 infarmation which
would shed any light on how the covmxage on Halpcrin coul? haxu
been in affect far'the &hover?ata3 when the Attornay $2nara1?3
authority was not obtained until May 12, 1969. ?e state? his
nogmal prnca?uxc was to?telephoaically contact ?uyervisor
Iof our Hashington Fial? O?fice and to
inatruct him ta initiate coverage. ?e statea he aasugea
thia procedure was fallawed when he was a?vise? tha .
ht?orney General had caverage ou.?ay 12, 1969. He
in?icatad that, althaagh he prabably ha? seen tha on Halyerin
aatem Ray 9, 10, and 11, 1969, he coul? not state an what ?a?e
or ?atea he may have seen them. ?e acknowledged his han?wziting
apgeara an the ?ay 10, 1969, lag. Ha advised that in reviswing
mail, he frequently read the contenta thereo? without paying
particular attantien ta the ?ates.

in! 2 a.


Is

 

 

 

?bur

 

 

1.51.. Gnu.

unwvurrsc'n: -


?1

The Attorney General 

As indicated in the attached interview of Supervisor
I let our Washington Field Office, he advised b6'
that, to the best of his recollection,?he received,e teleohone
call from William C. Sullivan who related he was calling
because the Bureau wanted some special coverage conducted on
the "highest authority." He stated Sullivan furnished him"
the names of severel individuals on whom this coverage should
be instituted but cannot recall the identities of these
individuals. i his unable to recall the date or day of the
week on which the call was received, but believes it was 
received sometime during the afternoon. He stated he presently
has no written record regarding the above conversation with .
Mr. Sullivan. 1e advised that Mr. Sullivan?s instructions were
relayed to Supervieor Ernest H. Belter of the washington Field
Office. -

 

 

 

 

 

As indicated in the attached interview or Ernest H.
Beltor. new retires, Beltcr advised that, while he hoe no .
clear recollection as to the eoecific time or date, sometime-
probebly in the Spring or 1969 he was instructed by Supervieor.
I he effect electronic surveillancee on Morton b6
Heleerin. a man named Sonnenieldt, and a man named Davideon.t
He believes there was a fourth person named, but does not at this
time recall the identity of the individual. He stated that,
whileghe is unable to specifically recall the date or time
he received hie instructions from Supervisor he believes
this initial request could well have been on 'rieey, but
reiterated he has no record to euhetentiatc his belief. He 
does know that, after receiving the instruction??rom Supervisor
he initiated the necessary ?ction to effect a contact
W't the phone comneny. It is Mr. Belter?s recollection that?
on the Same e?ternoon positive information was received on
the Helperin line. 

 

 

In the attached interview of Mr. William C. Sullivan
on June 18, 1974, he recalls being ohown?e memorandum by 
Hr. J. Edgar ?cover pertaining to a Camp David meetinga
Mr. Sullivan does not recall the date thie occurred. According
to Sullivan, the memorandum indicated thet.at the Camp
David meeting President Rixon was disturbed about
White House leaks of information and indicated something had
to be done about it.? According to Sullivan, the memorandum
indicated Mr. Hoover told President Nixon he would do something

on 3 at

 


ea a1?. 91? 

 

 

The Attorney General

about the White House leaks, but Mr. Sullivan indicated there
was no reference in the memorandum to possible utilization of
electronic surveillanccs. Mr. Sullivan stated that in?this
meeting with Mr. Hoover, Mr. Hoover did not ask him to do
anything regarding the White House leaks. .
Concerning the meeting at Camp David referred to by
Mr. Sullivan, Hr. Hoover's appointment book contains an

entry showing that Mr.?Hoover had dinner with the President
and The Attorney General at Camp David on Friday, April 25,
1969. The apoointment book contains no other clarifying
information. A.copy of the pertinent page of the appointment
book is attacied hereto. 2 7

Mr. Sullivan also recalled, during his interview on?
June 18, 19%? having seen a memorandum regarding a meeting
between Dr. Kissinger and Mr. Hoover in early May, 1969.
He recalled that the memorandum indicated Dr. Kissinger made
a request of Hr. Hoover that certain wiretaps be put on to
counteract White House leaks of information. Mr. Sullivan did
not recall the names of any individuals mentioned. It is
or. Sullivan's recollection that the memorandum showed that
Mr. Hoover had told Dr. Kissinger that the FBI could initiate
the.wireteps requested and that it would be done. Mr. Sullivan
stated he has no recollection of having received any request
from hr. Hoover for any necessary action based on information
set forth in the memorandum.

Concerning the meeting between Mr. Hoover and Dr.
Kissinger in early May, 1969, Hoover=s daily logs of
telephone calls and personal meetings contain an entry showing
that Dr. Kissinger met Mr. Hoover in Mr. Hoover's office at
4:27 may 5, 1969. No other such meetings were recorded
during early Hey, 1969. The daily logs also show that the
President telephoned Mr. Hoover at his home at 6:55 May 2,
1969. The logs Show contacts between Dr. Kissinger?s office
and Mr. HooVer's of?ice during the day May 5, l969, in? 'g
connection with an appointment for Dr. Kissinger. The legs
also record chat immediately following-the meeting between
Mr. Hoover and Dr. Kissinger at 4:27 May 5, 1969,
Mr. Hoover attempted unsuccessfully to telephone Assistant
Director W. O. Sullivan at 4:43 p.m.

 

 

I In"

 

 



w. '15

{In

The Attorney General

As indicated in the attached interv? es of Mr. John b?
P. Mohr, Miss Helen Gandv. Mrc-  i 

and Miss these individuals were
unable to furnis: any information regarding the memoranda 
referred to by Mr. Sullivan regarding the?Camp David meeting
and Dr. Kis nger?s meetirg with Mr. Hoover on May 5, 1969.
Mrs. Miss and Miss were the employees
who handled all of Mr. Hoover's dictation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

An exhaustive search was made of all FBI records in
an effort to locate the two memoranda referred to by Mr.
Sullivan concerning the Camp David meeting and the meeting
between hr. Hoover and Dr. Kissinger in early May, 1969.
however, no trace of these documents could be found. Documents
such as these, if related to the use of wiretaps concerning
the White House leaks at that point in time should have been
filed along with similar documents, etch as the five memoranda
prepared by Mr. Hoover on May 9, 1969, concerning his exchange
of telephone conversations with Dr. Kissinger on that date.
The May 9, 1969, memoranda were among those turned over to
Mr. Sullivan's care by . Hoover and which were subsequently
turned over by Mr. Sullivan to Mr. Robert C. Hardian, former
Assistant Attorney General, in the Summer of 1971.

. The May 9, 1969, memoranda, with other related
documents, were recovered by the FBI from the White House
May 12, 1973, where they had been in the custody of Mr. John
D. Ehrlichman. The two-memorande referred to by Mr. Sullivan,
concerning the Camp David meeting and the early May, 1969,
meeting between Mr. Hoover and Dr. Kissinger, were not among
the documents recovered and inventoried on May 12, 1973. 
The FBI has no inventory or record of documents turned over
to Mr. Sullivan by Mr. Hoover, nor do we have an inventory
or record of documents turned over to Mr. Mardian by Mr. Sullivan.

With respect to the date and time of installation of
the first four wiretaps installed in connection with this case,
the only available records'we could check which could establish
this are the logs of the wiretaps. These show that the wire?
tap on Morton H. Halperin-conld not have been installed later
than 6:20 May 9, 1969. The wiretap on Ira Davidson
could not have been installed later than May 13, 1969,
although the time of day is not known.?The first recorded time?

5 a

 

 

 

 

. The Attorney General .



of day is 9:30 May 14, 1969. The wiretap on Robert

Parsley could not have been installed later than 6:05 
May 13, 1969. The wiretan on Helmet Sonnenfeldt could not
have been installed later than May 13, l969, although the time
of day is not known. The first recorded time of day is 11:01
alm? on May 14, 1969.

a 

A thorough review has been made of all pertinent

FBI records and interviews have been conducted of current and
former FBI personnel who would have been knowledgeable concern~
ing the matten. However, no information has been locatea 
which would explain the fact that the wiretap was installed

on Morton H. Helperin on May 9, 1969, whereas the recora

states it.was not authotized until May 12, 1969.

The memorandum of Mr. Hoover dated ?ay 9, 1969, at
5:05 p.me, revealed that Mr. Hoover gave Dr. Kissinger the names
of (Mo:ton} Helperin, (Lawrence) Eagleburger, and Ivan Selin.
Mr. Hoover indicated that, baeea on contacts the FBI had made,
lenke'to William Beecher no reported in his article in the
u?ew ?955 Timon on May 9, 1969, could hove come one probably
?ia come from a staff member of the National Security Council.?
Mn..Hoover told Dr; Kieeinger that Beecher, while at under~
graduate school at Harvard Univereity, reocrtedly had a roommate
who was then staff member of the National Security Council.

Hr. Hoover told Dr. Kissinger that Helperin,
Eagleburger and Selin were all acquainted with Beecher.
Wiretapo were never installed on either Eaglebnrger or Selin.
This particular memorandum in the only document closely
relatea to the time the Halperin wiretap began to log conveneem
tione at 6:?6 May 9, 1969e It does not, however,
?iocnee in any?way the matter of?witetapeq

The Director?s daily log of telephone calls and
personal meetings does not Show that . Hoover mace a call
to Mr. Sullivan following the 5:05 p.m. telephone call on
May 9, 1969. However, if Mr. Hoover used his direct line
to Mr? Sullivan, such call woul? probably not have been

Ogge 

 

 



 

The Attorney General

The Director's daily loge of telephone calls and
personal meetings do not show that Mr. Sullivan was in Mr.
Hoover's o?fice any time between April 25, 1969, and May 31,
1969. However, in light of Mr. Sullivan?s statement concerning
having seen memoranda relating to Mr. Boover'e Camp David
meeting and hie meeting with Dr. Kissinger in early May, 1969,
the daily logs should not be considered infallible.

Encloeures'w 18

- The Deputy Attorney Genexal

Huff?

 

 

 

TO

I
I

FROM.

SUBJECI 17 WIRETAPS OPERATED FOR THE WHITE HOUSE 5v?- 


1% gEnclosures? JUL 3 1 1374


.4 
(mm-1  1m :95
who to lath-m 
Am in: lemon GOVERNMENT 

?0 Ad". 

emomndu 

Admln.

Comp. Synl. 

 

Ext. A?ohl 
MR. CALLAHAN July 18, 1974 5. Con. ..

Gen. lav.

II 
.H. N. ?1980? . . ?gs- 5:339ng
.. Lobe ovary 

Plan. 8. Evol. 

 

Training 

BY THE FBI BETWEEN MAY, 1969, AND FEBRUARY, 1971 

Tolophonc Rm. ..

Interviews of certain present and former Bureau loy {w conducted
by Inspection Staff personnel regarding the knowledge these per ennel have of the
circumstances surrounding the placing of electronic surveillance coverage on .
Morton Halperin. Authority for this coverage was secured from the Attorney
General on 5/12/69 whereas a log from our Washington Field Office (WFO) indicated
such coverage was initiated on 5/9/69.

Pertinent information deve10ped from these interviews along with pertinent
cgpie/s?of were furnished to the Attorney General by memorandum dated
6 24 74.

Attached are the originals of the FD-3025 involved together with copies
thereof. These pertain to interviews of the following individuals: 

Ernest H. Belter, retired Special Agent, WFO 0,9
Cartha D. @ach, former Assistant to the Director it [51059191. 
Supervisor WFO 5 e51 

Miss Helen Gand former Executive Assistant to Mr. Hoover
Supervisor I WFO
I Administrative Assistant to the Director

Administrative Assistant to the Director
3 John P. Mohr, former Assistant to the Director .
.3,  Administrative Assistant in the Office

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.. in E, gii. 9. of the :Director 

- #4131, William Sullivan, former Assistant to the Director
WW9 . uni/If REG. 3 2 Will
1 attaghe gs a copy of a memorandum from Supervisor]
WFO ?to SAC, WFO, which was forwarded to the Bureau by attached airtel 6/ 18/74

#:3919115 miiyemor?ndlim sets forth information regarding telephone calls made to

isupeansoi: by William c. Sullivan in which Sullivan inquired-regarding cir-

cumstanc??s surrounding the placing of electronic surveillance cove?2g%7%n Halperin.
18 JUL
RECOMMENDATION: That the attached documents be forwarded to the Intelligen 

Division for appropriate filing.

 

i - Mr. Wannall 1- Mr. Gebhardt
(42
ar-

 

 

 

November 19, 1974
f" ?13,
Mr. Cartha D.:DeLoach
Vice President?i- Corporate Affairs
Pepsico, Inc.

Anderson Hill Road
Purchase, New York 1057'?

Dear Delta: 4

Nick Callahan brought over the 
you sent and I just wanted to drop you this note to thank
you. It was a most generous and kind mought and I appre~
oiate this very much. Needless to say, it was most welcome

and will be enjoyed. 345013333 95 - 4.)

Good luck and good health alway?' 9 5:613:11 25: 11374

 

Sincerely,

[sf CwapocU

CMKzedm (3)

Dop. AD lnv. .-

Asst. Din: 
Admin. 
Comp. Sysl. 
Ext. Affaits 

Files 8. Com. 
Gen. Inv.
Idem.
Inspecllon 
Into".
Laboramry 
Plan. 8. Eval. 

  
 
   
      


Nov 20 3974

:22: (aim-

\w

  

SENZI FROM 13 a: 

mm 
DAT 51' 

 

 

 

Spec. Inv. 

.2312: @1191! 2 91 19215,

Telephone Rm. 
MAIL ROOM -PE UNIT 

 

 

 

 

. g! -- 7 . 
1 one 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dep. -A.D -Inv If
Asst. Din: 
A 
a a
m" 1 Files om. 
PURCHASE. N.Y. 10577 Gen. Inv.
253-3027 Ident. .1
Inspection

 

 

 

Intel]. 5. 
Laboratory 
Plan. Eval. -

 

CARTHA D. 

 

VICE easement. Spec. Inv.
conponue Armas Training 
November 1974 Legal Coun.

 

Telephone Rm. 
Director Sec?y 

 

The Honorable Clarence M. Kelley
i Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation
1. Ninth Street and Avenue
Washington, D. C. 20535


Dear Clarence:

 

I wanted you to know that Barbara and thoroughly
enjoyed the program and dinner on the ni
November 6, 1974, in Washington, D. C. It as
a thrill to see you and a number of other old
We are both very grateful to have been include.

   

 

 

4 
Irepeat again my offer to be of ass1s?2anee?530?/er .4
the RBI at any time. I always find it gu?ew eno oyabe 

 

 

 

to be of any poSsible assistance to the FBI 0113 ?f 2 1974
its representatives. '1
With kindest regards, 


. .53-
Slncerely, 
me: use

(I. DeLoach 2101414974

. 
?bre net'sie ?wife a

 

 



 

Jr
j; 

OPNONAI IOIM I0 5010-106 6

MAY I962 

03A GIN. N0. 27

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT i?M?

 

 

 

 
 
   
 

Dep. AD Mm
Memorandum .3: .139
Admin.
'10 . THE DIRECTOR DATE. January 24, 1975 
:2:le 
FROM N. P. 
Laboralory
Plan. 8. Evul. .q
SUBJECT: FORMER ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR 
CARTHA ?gist

/Jiw 
1, Director 5 
9?4ij L, . 

Mr. DeLoach called the writer this rning a to report the
fact that he had received a call from J. Bromley Smith who was Foreign Affairs
Advisor during the John on Administration. Smith advised DeLoach that he had
received a call from Re and Kessler told him
that DeLoach's testimon in executive session before the Watergate Committee
had been leaked to the Washington Post. Kessler indicated that the testimony included
the fact that President Johnson had used the FBI for personal intelligence reasonsm
He indicated that President Johnson had instructed the FBI and DeLoach had carried
out the errands and responsibility to find out if Vice President Agnew had called

while he was making a campaign trip in 1968 Clare Chenault in Washington concerning

 

the South Vietnese situation on the war. Kessler told Smith that the FBI had put a

surveillance on Chenault and put a wiretap on as a result of Agnew' call. He, DeLoach

thinks Kessler is lying indicating that in DeLoach's testimony it reflected the name

of if. Bromley Smith and DeLoach said he did not mention Bromley Smith in the

testimony. DeLoach didn't recall whether the Bureau's files reflect this that the

1 President did call either Mr. Hoover or DeLoach that the National Security Agency

i had received a call that the Ambassador of the United States in Vietnam that Chenault

i had called him and urged him to keep the South Vietnese from going to the peace

. talks until after the election of Nixon and Humphrey. She told him it would be a
feather in Nixon' cap if the South Vietnese did not go to Paris peace talks untisir after

. the election. Actually Kessler' entire pitch was that President Johnson was using

,1 the FBI for personal intelligence and DeLoach did not think there was a leak in his

testimony before the Watergate Committee because the only people there were the

Republican Minority Elonrisel, Senator Baker and the stenotypist and he dictated the

complete details of this because he checked with Ruckelshaus and he approved DeLoach

appearing. DeLoach indicated in his testimony he did not indicate that Agnew called

Mrs. Chenault from Albuquerque since the facts as he rec?lled them was that

I. Agnew did not make any calls; his personal staff made the calls, none of them to Mrs.

Chenault, some to New York. No wiretaps placed on Agnew or Nixon just the toll

7? calls from Albuquerque back to Washington. Miss Gandy files may or may not

 

i
A

 

reflect this information. ."Jwrii' .. ?7 -. ?5
MALI DeLoach said he did not intend to answer WNW from Kessler andgg



\Elf stopped 378n?the street by a reporter he would say no co Mat. Hev?indrca?i??jlns 'g

Ksecretary advised him that Kessler had called him at 10 AM. *DeLoach 
essler had called Bromley Smith early this morning and Smith refused to make 3839:

I:

i

omment sa it was a classified matter he refused to comment. .13. 2E5
C:gt 1- .Adams 1? Mr. Jenkins

 

 

 

 

January 6, 1975

.
I (.- 



N:


 

 

 

ET AL 
I 1?Mr. 

ET AL VICTIMS .
INTERCEPTION or 
DESTRUCTION or JUSTICE

Reference is made to tele hone conversation on
January 6. 1975, to Attorney I Criminal

Division, Department of Justice: bf Special Agent 

 

 

this Bureau. Mr. had telephonically requestsd
?rm, on January 6 1975 to be advised concerninq the current address
of Mr. Cartha D. @Loach, former Assistant to the Director of
this Bureau. Mr. advised that Mr. DeLoach may be called

5 to testify before the Federal Grand Jury, Dallas, Texas, con-

cerning captioned matter.

*1 This is to confirm that the following is the current

Ki address of Mr. Cartha D. neLoach.

I
Home address: Perkins Road

Greenwich, Connecticut. 06830
Business address: Vice-President
PESICO
Pepsi World Wide Headquarters
Purchas s, ?New York, 10577

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Business telephone?H(3W4 29/ j. 27" 
urn/f. 
This will aig?u eggff on Januarin,

1975 between SA and in on
Dop.ADlnv._ 
Aul. Din: was" .1
s17? JCKAlia rs?
This document. contains nei .her
Gomlnv. . recommendations nor conclusions
the FBI. It is the 0001. 
?lpocl on__ a
JAN 9 $975 the and is 10? and to ?mun 
A 1k- its i: 84"" zh?u ?50
Lo 01 Coui. 1 .4. -
?gimuvgifJ *1 ibutod Ohb; ice your agency. 31~ 

 

 

 

"new Soc'y MAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT 

#4 .- wen-119,75 a 
[244Mr. was advised that during the interview with

Mr. Wi Prison at Austin, Togas, on December 30,1974,

Mr. Wilson advised EHEEW records consisting of stenographic

pads containing list of incoming telephone calls and appoint--~
ment calendars kept for the period during which Wilson was
Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, are in the hands
of his attorney,  Federal Bar Buildigg 
1819 Street, Washingtonthrough Mr.

 

that this Bureau obtain the
stenographio pads containing the above records from 
This is being done. 



a.

com, This the in which 1/15/70 
a private investigator was arrestgd in Richar son, Eeggs,

 

in possession of wiretapping paraphernalha. Investigation re- 
vealed that -was employed by Clyd?imiisOn and Associates,

a private investigative firm, and that sehveral investigators

were involved in numerous wiretaps in Dailas, Texas. Indictments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

were returned againstl mm?: lin May, 1971,
and against] bid?January, 1972. In July and August,
l972,l lafter maintaining silence

 

regarding the wiretapping years, testi?ied before the
Federal Grand Jurvl I

 

 

 

 

Which is the matter under investigation in ?ne 
aspects of this case. In the event DeLoach is subpoenaed

'in this matter, his testimony would concern a telephone call

made to DeLoach by Senator James Eastland on 2/3/70 regarding
this case, which telephone call is the-subject of a memorandum,
C. D. DeLoach to Mr. Tolson, contained in the file of this

case and dated 2/3/70.

Original and one copy of above LHM furnished to the
Criminal DiVision, attention Mr.  [via form 
same date. 

 

 

 



 

cb3



?b6

b6
b7C

 

b6

b7C

 

 

. 


June 24, 1975
Mr. Cartha .
Vice President - Corporate Affairs
Pepsico

  
   
   
   
 
 
  
 
 

Assoc. Din. 
Dep. AD Adm. ..
Dep. AD Inv. 

Asst. Dm:
Adm 5+
Rome 
Com. 
.lnv 
Idem. 
Inspecl'u?on 
lulu".
Laboratory 
Plan. 8. 
Spec. 
TI mm in
Legal CounMAIL ROOM TELETYPE UNIT are :1915 0 -569-920

Tole phone Rm. a

Purchase, New York 10577

 

Dear Deke:

Thank you for your nice letter of June 12, 1975.
You were most kind to comment so graciously regarding my
remarks before the Pittsburgh Chapter of the Former Special
Agents of the FBI.

It is true that we all are spending considerable time
and energy on the past, but, hopefully, when all is said and
done, the Bureau will have weathered it all in good shape and
we will have the confidence of the public. Then we can more 
forward and continue in the fine tradition of the Bureau. 

?Warn

3

Best of luck and good health always. 1;
Sincereljr, we
I 5 I :5

 
  
 

CMKzedm (3)

COPY made 
01? Gem-es
and Tours section . 

 





 

 

 

 

44

 


Co

 

 
     
    
  
    
   
   

I Assoc. Dir. 
-

. I, 
I . Asst. Din: 

Admin. ?2

 

 

 

 

Comp. Syst. 
Ext. Affairs 

PEPSICO Files Com 
. Gen. Inv. 

N.Y. 10577 Ident. I
TEL. (914) 263-f302'7 Inspection 

 

Intell. .
Laboratory 
Plan. Eva]. 

OARTHA D. June 12, 1975 Spec. Inv.

wca Training
coupon?: AFFAIRS

 

 

 

Mr. Clarence M. Kelley

Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation . . 
9th Street 8: Avenue, N. W. 
Washington, D. C. 20535 

Dear Clarence:

I have had an opportunity to review a copy of your remarks made before the
Pittsburgh Chapter of the Former Special Agents of the FBI on June 10, 1975.


-W
. 

I wanted to applaud your excellent and courageous statements, particularly
those on pages five and eleven. Your reference to condemnation of the FBI
for activities and techniques of years ago--as.in theCounter Intelligence
Program, without consideringbasic objeCtives to halt violence and protect

the innocent--was certainly most timely and a statemen?t?th t?s 

utilized in defense of the Bureau by every ex-Agent; 67- 

Although my past is continually risingEgpl?g??i 

today I have been subpoenaed to give a deposition at ithe A erican 'Vif Lib-

erties Union offices in a case involving Morton Halperin-vsr-Henry" ssmger

I find that a brief recital of the facts, germane to the case involved, usually

6 clarifies an issue without further difficulty. While I hope that the American 
public will eventually cause the current era of ?condemnation? to cease and

desist and let all of us get on with our, work, I nevertheless wanted to take
a moment to write and express gratitude for your fine comments in Pittsburgh.

With kindest re ards,

5/ m, .
M4 ,1 Cartha \?ucngsunn? Sincerely,

 

 

 

 



STATES DEPARTMENT 99JUSTICE

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

 

Q.C. *20535 . 



FOR RELEASE
7 EDST
TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 1975

THE FBI -- IT STILL STANDS FOR

FIDELITY, BRAVERY AND INTEGRITY
AN ADDRESS BY

DIRECTOR
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

BEFORE THE
PITTSBURGH CHAPTER OF THE
FORMER SPECIAL AGENTS OF THE
BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

PITTSBURGH, 

JUNE 10 1975

BEE v?u? in Am ,3 I
HOLDS 

 

 

I am privileged to be your guest this evening,
and I truly appreciate your kind invitation.

I feel I am among friends and kindred spirits.

There are people here in whose lives the FBI
has played a vitally important role, as it has in mine.

You know the FBI.

You know that it has foibles and 
just as any big, robust organization has. But you know
also that when these foibles and arelswept
aside, the indiSputable truth remains that the FBI in which

you served has for decades excelled as an investigative agency.

 

 

 

 

 

4

You know that Fidelity, Bravery and Integrity
are not merely words on the FBI seal. You knowxfrom
personal experience that the FBI in which you served in
fact practiced those principles.

And though the FBI occasionally is being chewed
up in the public forum these days, I'm here to tell you
the FBI still practices the principles of Fidelity, Bravery
and Integrity.

Those principles are the enduring bedrock
?upon which the FBI has been built, by peOple such as you.
And no tempests of ill-founded criticism, no matter how
viciously they may rage, can destroy that tradition.

Skepticism and cynicism seem to be in vogue today
where government is concerned. And perhaps the skeptics
and cynics would scoff at the mention of Fidelity, Bravery
and Integrity in the same breath with a government agency 
particularly an agency charged with intelligence responsibility.

And in this climate of suspicion of government,
the FBI is under the most intense scrutiny it has ever
experienced;

No less than nine Congressional committees and
subcommittees have expressed keen interest recently in the

FBI's operations. 3



 

 

 

we?


. 1

Last month we received an average of 57 requests
each work day fer records from FBI files under the Freedom
of Information Act alone.

Now aside from the problems of trying to preserve
the confidentiality of our files in order to function
effectively as a law enforcement agency, I have no
apprehensions about this surge of interest in the FBI's
Operations.

We fully intend to open all the doors it is
possible to open to facilitate legitimate inquiry into
our agency's work.

The FBI has always served the people, and the
people have a right to know what confident that when all the questions
are resolved, when all the resounding rhetoric has echoed
its last, and the facts are made known, the FBI will emerge
exactly as you and I know it an agency that does
in fact practice the principles of Fidelity, Bravery and
Integrity.

That may sound sentimental or naive; but I.
don't believe sentimentality or naivety has biased my
judgment.

But what about these idealistic words, Fidelity,
Bravery and Integrity? Well this is how I perceive their

relevancy to the FBI's role in our society today.

 

 

 


I . 


I maintain that the FBI practices fidelity to
the law -- laws governing its operations, laws it is
charged with enforcing.

You know from your own experience that from
the moment a new FBI Agent enters training, the Agent
is taught to adhere not only to the letter, but to the
spirit, of the law. You know, also, there were
administrative penalties for failure to do so, inadvertently
or not.

An example that comes to mind is our insistence
on advising suspects of their rights long before the Miranda
Decision -- a practice for which the late Supreme Court
Justice Warren commended us.

Fidelity, as translated into terms of tradition,
means also fidelity to our country, the people we serve,
fidelity to humanitarian principles.

Some say we show fidelity to the wrong laws,

that we support our country when our country is wrong.
They say the FBI's fidelity is not to all the people,
that it favors a select few.

They say our interpretation of fidelity to humanity
and humanitarian principles is boiler plate and bureaucratic,

oblivious to the urgent wants and views of the people.

 

 

 


Iquit-


. If

Well, perhaps fidelity cannot always be clearly
defined and assessed to everyonels satisfaction?

But I say our fidelity should be judged, insofar
as this can be accomplished, by applying the permanent
benchmarks of laws and court interpretations of them.

It is patently unfair to judge us by faddish
standards, transitory trends and the changing seasons of
fashionable opinions.

Honest and fair judgments of our fidelity must
be based on solid, enduring truths and timeless principles.

We happily submit to judgments on that basis,
and are Optimistic of the outcome.

But to condemn the FBI for activities and
techniques of years ago as in the counterintelligence
programs 1- without considering our basic objectives 
to halt violence and to protect the innocent is to
condemn us without a fair hearing of all the factors,
without a showing that our intent was wrong.

If there is a malicious or Machiavellian motive
behind any investigative policy of the FBI, I certainly
am not aware of it.

I do not believe our Bureau in the past, present
or future has, or will, violate its commitment to fidelity

as good, honest people interpret it.

 

 

 

 






Surely, we may err. Surely, on occasion our
performance may not seem up to standard. Never; however,
shall we compromise fidelity to escape criticism or avoid
?confrontation. Never shall we defer to an easier course
because the hard but proper one is fraught with public
relations problems.

And I sincerely believe that the history of this
organization, examined objectively and honestly, supports
characterization of the FBI as an agency devoted to true
fidelity.

The second word in our FBI acronym -- Bravery --
needs no apology. 

Never in my career have I heard the bravery of our
Agents challenged. Even when we have come under withering
fire from our critics there have been no justifiable slurs
on the bravery of the men and women of the FBI. It has been
demonstrated time and time again, well documented and firmly
established.

From 1966 through 1974, FBI Agents have found
themselves fighting for their lives and, in some cases
the lives of innocent bystanders, in 147 gun battles.

Twenty Agents were wounded and five were killed.
1 Last year 143 FBI Agents were assaulted while
performing official duties. _The year before, 173 were

assaulted.

 

 

 

a 

Permit me to turn now to the principle of Integrity.

Integrity means many things. 

But to me integrity means, above all else,
honesty honesty beyond mere truthfulness.

We in the FBI could answer the many inquiries we
have received recently literally and truthfully, but not
necessarily be completely honest. The point ishave not hedged. We've engaged in no games of
semantics and literal interpretation. 

For example, in our responses to inquiries regarding
the FBI's counterintelligence programs, we have given more
than was asked, knowing that we were exposing our chests for
our critics' harpoons.

Sure enough, the harpoons rained down upon us.

Nevertheless, in accordance with the principles
of integrity, we have honestly and fully answered all
questions as they have arisen, and we have provided more
than was demanded.

Another aspect of integrity, as it relates to
the FBI, is dedication in long an FBI tradition and a
potent force in the Bureau today.

One of the vitally important things the FBI

has done magnificently through the years is to recruit

outstanding personnel.

 

 

 

 

 

5.
. II

The FBI would never have.achieved excellence
in fulfilling its myriad responsibilities without dedicated,
intellectually qualified people people with conscience"
and character, people who understand and subscribe to the
highest ethics and morality.

In the final analysis, it is the Agent who knocks
on doors, interviews peOple and reviews endless records,
the Agent who chases down and places the handcuffs on the
kidnaper and bank robber, who has given substance to the
FBI's tradition of excellence.

And though the Agent remains anonymous as far
as the public is concerned, though the Agent rarely receives
public accolades, it is the dedicated Agent who enables the
FBI to excel. 

We know that integrity must be demonstrated. We
can proclaim our integrity from the rooftops, but unless
we manifest integrity in our performance, we are as sounding
brass or a tinkling cymbal.

Fully realizing the need to assure that our performance
remains top flight, we have in the past several months
engaged in many studies of our operations and have made
some beneficial changes.

In our management-by?objectives program, we

establish priorities for each fiscal year. In the 1976

 

aw-

 

9 . 

fiscal year, for example, we are targeting organized crime
to reduce its impact on the American peOple. We are also
going to hammer away at white?collar crimes. 

We are beefing up our efforts in fulfilling
various other investigative responsibilities and providing
cooperative services to other law enforcement agencies:

We have revamped our executive advancement policies
as a result of extensive study and refinement of our
careeridevelopment program.-

The new system is designed-to provide clearcut
career avenues for exceptionally able and competent employees
so they may advance to supervisory positions.

As you well know, the FBIvis first and foremost
an investigative agency. Studies are underway to evaluate
the effectiveness of our investigations. These studies
focus on ways to streamline and make more effective our
investigative efforts in areas such as major cases. The
team concept is one of the things we are examining.

The Atlanta and Philadelphia offices are serving as pilot
offices in this study.

Also, we are taking a good look at the possibility
of providing computer service to field offices to help
fill their investigative and computer needs. This would

be accomplished through decentralized computer centers.

 

 

 

 

.

9

. .


Although in the final analysis, sustained integrity
in any organization must come from within the people who
make it function, the value of a just disciplinary and
inSpection system has been well demonstrated. Such a
system continues in the FBI.

The vital nature of the FBI's responsibilities
does not permit us to make any assumptions regarding integrity.
And I feel we must keep our agency wieldy.

And one of the key responsibilities of leadership
is to.perpetuate and stimulate integrity. From integrity
flows many beneficial things.

Let me cite an example.

During my twelve?year sabbatical with the Kansas City
Police Department I found a coterie of fine people. I
continuously reminded them of my pride in their integrity
and performance, and it was gratifying to see their own
pride-burgeon.

Their pride seemed to act as a catalyst. Pride
was demonstrated in their work. Among other things, they
more readily accepted change. I don't mean change for the
sake of change, nor change that compromises principle;
but change for the betterment of the organization, change
to make us more facile, more capable of overcoming problems

rather than building around them.



 

W-

 

. . i

In closing let me emphasize that.the FBI continues
to serve the American people with Fidelity, Bravery and
Integrity, always our hallmarks.

Some scoff. Some vilify. But fair-minded people
will agree that the FBI has served this_nation well and
continues to do so.

I want you to know that as Director I am proud
of my associates. I consider them loyal to the
traditions of efficiency and profeSsionalism you and others
like you established years ago.

We may be maligned, misunderstood and occasionally
victimized by grandstanders and demagogues. And though we
may never be universally loved, no one can dispute the
FBI's achievements as an investigative agency. These
achievements were made possible by legions of men and
women people like you who exemplified Fidelity,
Bravery and Integrity.

And I am confident that, as former Agents and
friends, you share my pride in the FBI of today. Your
support in the past is most appreciated. And I'm certain
our performance in the future will be such that you will
not hesitate to continue to support us.

Thank you.

-11-

 

 

 

J. B. Adams

1 ?t 0 a A. I'iintz
1 H. R.?wanna11
MI: 0 ?3 Grega?:

Tim; ffntomey 43mm}. Eecember 18, 1975,
1 Mr. 5. F. Phillips

 

Enacta'ar, 32m

3' 9* SEWE asamr?m
{?323 (33:33

Kin. Eartha if}. Kafm?ch, fame): Issaistmt in: the
aimetor, wag ?apgse? by am? Wished infamatim the
an 25 and 1975. He was zepreaemte? 33y
gamma}. cam?el ?mm mesa interviews. ?e 313$ a?viaa?:
ibis Bataan mat his Busy 1222591131 sche?ule preclu?es 133.3
?nishing as the ?etaizs 133E ?the ia?emiem, either is:
written as: anal farm, In This mama, he ?that 31::
has Emmi {352123321221 the musi?cra?bla ?mm?s 321mm 02:: his
?time by the: $98 resulting frank 21m interviews as wall as
his agapearame at public Mums cf me $33. Kalaaeh 9:31;? 
havever, velwta?ily fwmiah this Emma; this: falimzm
ghaarvatiem 23:50:32: the intervieva which magi}? imam be:
9f interest ts; mu. 

whack desc?bg? the; intewiaw cf him an

lfcvembaa 25:, 1975, as .3 53mm: ?123me gracea?i?g.? team}.
{if ?ight S?aff geraamal @1338 am seawater pa?ticiyatec?i
in time guestieninz sf him. 3653:3922 gafhicularly fam?
Stafi? Elemberl Its: be ?Extremely vieiws?? in

his: {mi ?emach salsa inset: the 1:92:23 $231333th
em . ?wmaiatmy? in dascrih manner. ?5.23 an
examyla, mam-2&2 a?visec?; that ?eld him that: the: Li}
disclase?, ?by my af refereace, tha (am-131m existence 
a pa?timlar 5mm Eeigach *ta J. Siam,
mgther frames: 3233 afficiaig tam: ?eslaa?h We
SEQ baa been trying; 5:9 9212:3111 a. capy ef the memrawm ?rm:
the. FBI hm: thaw the $93.31 hat?: beea ma?a tn imam it:
although exhau?tive effa?ta hm} been m?tz ?an finc'? it.


67? (Personnel File Former Assistant to the ?irectoz'
Eartha; fBeLoach)
7 a .
410m 21 19734 .

 

 

SEE NQTE PAQE 2



b6 .
b7C

 

 

  

 





Slim ?tterm}: ?Mam!

that: allege? that; ?en??uaah hm Wing: mg mer
with him an 113.5 ratirenazai: ma ties?mye? it. - ribiauzmatiea
le? 35:5 a heate?mc%amem whack and which
finally mama 131%. @3131:th that ha had an facts
1:23 wgpom such am allega?ian. A 

A .2123 315% are aware, was mmally Wish the {{2th
mammn?a wegertmg. the remake as iatmlem 235' 1:235:th
m? farm: 3?33): mlayma. Hammer, bawusa Emmet: was

amass: ta mm @113? amongst we are imamg 9w acivim
ta 3m: in ?lms; in?ame ts: Ellis 

 

 

1 - The: 233%}! ?t?amay?eneml 
?atma?tiem 33'. ambiaea, 
533362131 f0:
Eateliigenw Qanz?imtivm

Norm . i
Debach? qomnents Were given telephonically to
Supervisor S. P. Phillips of the Senstudy 75 Project.

136
2370

 

 

 

 

 


. :va

Mr. .1. B. Adams 5 11/12/75
Legal Counsel

SENATE SELECT COMMTTEE

At 11:15 a.m. on November 12, 1975, Cartha DeLoach,
former Assistant to the Director, telephonicailv advised me that he

 

 

 

was interviewed under oath lot the b5
Senate Select Committee on plat/ember 11, 1975. He advised that he 
was representdd I an attorney in the Washington law

 

firm of Edward Morgan. The testimony was recorded by a etenographer
and principally dealt with general guidelines Mr. DeLoach used in briefing
various Attorneys General concerning FBI work. They also inquired
concerning the Cmnterintelligence Program in that they asked him if he
had ever briefed Ramsey Clark regarding the Counterinteliigeace Pregram.
Mr. DeLoach described that portion of the interview as a 'political tug of
war" in whichl:l attem ted to have him say that Ramsey Clark had
not been briefed, and attempted to have him say that Ramsey

. Clark had been briefs .

Mr. BeLoach said that he testified that he had briefed Ramsey
Clark. regarding the Countermteliigence Program and else briefed Clark
regarding wiretaps and micrOphones at Clark?s specific request. Mr. DeLoach
was asked whether he had written a memerandum regarding that briefing, 
but he could not recall specifically whether the memorandum Was prepared.
He did say that it was the practice for a memorandum to be prepared recounting
conversations with Departurent officials. The Committee representatives 
then advised Mr DeLoach that they had asked for such documentation from
the Bureau,- but a memorandum indicating DeLoach had briefed Ramsey Clark
regarding the Counterintelligence Program was not received among the
documents furnis by the Boreas. Mr. DeLoach requested me to advise
the Bureau that i ew if ch a memorandum can be located, it should be
forwarded to the Commi'f?; 

 

Personnel file Ca DeLoach
1 - Mr. Wannall 
1 - Mr. Cregar
1 - Mr. Hotis (Atm: 
1 - Mr. Mintz
JAMmifd CONTINUED - OVER

7
Kim-31k

'31:: wt??
93? 

59.1
5 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0 ?o
{i

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

Mr. DeLoach was asked whether anyone from the Bureau had
alerted him to the possibility that he would be asked concerning briefing
Ramsey Clark and whether anyone had suggested to him what his response
should be. He denied that such was the case, but did say that he had
received a telephone call from Assistant Director Wannail asking him
the question whether DeLoach had briefed any Attorneys General regarding
the Cmnterintelligence Program.

Mr. DeLoach was requested by the Committee to return. on
Tuesday, November 18, 1975, at 2:30 p.m, for additional interview at which
time the subject will be the Southern Christian Leadership Conference and
Martin Luther King. 

Mr. DeLoach said that a Mr. of the Committee 's be
staff described a memorandum which he claimed that Delmach had prepared 1070
regarding Jack Anderson and the Warren Commission. Mr. DeLoach said
that he could not recall Such ai?memorandum.

Mr. DeLoach requested that the Bureau make available a
Bureau representative for consultation at 2:30 p. m. on November 18, 1975.
Mr. DeLoach said he madethis request because he was uncertain as to the
scope of the testimeny he might be asked to give regarding Martin Luther
King. In response to his question, I told Mr. DeLoach that informatim
concerning certain confidential sources involved in the originatiOn oil?ie
investigation of Martin Luther King has not been discussed with the
Committee staff, but limited discussion has been had with Chairman Frank
Clurch. I told Mr. DeLoach that inquiries concerning the informants involved
in the basic information in that case should not be answered due to the
sensitivity of the information.

RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That the Intelligence Division determine whether there is

a memorandum describing a briefing of Ramsey Clark by Mr. DeLoach
concerning the Counterintelligence Program.

- 2. CONTINUED - OVER

 

 

 

 

I'm

Memorandum to Mr. Adams
Re: Senate Select Committee

RECOMMENDATIONS (CONT 

2. That the abor e-described memorandum be made available
to the Committee with such excisions as may be necessary.

3. In response to the Specific request of Mr. DeLoach, a 
Bureau representative familiar with the King matter should be available for
consultation at the time of Mr. DeLoaeh's testimony on November, 18, 1975.

 

 

 





4
. 

1 Mr. Mints
Mr. wannall
1 Mr. Cregar

Mr. J. B. Adams 1 ll 5
- Mr.
M2-

Legal Counsel

 



 

SENSTUDY 75

 

On ll/T/75,I oi the Senate Select Committee b6
requested that former Assistant to 'he Director John P. Mohr ans b7C
former Assistant to the Director Bertha DeLoachwbe.made arailable
for Staff interview concerning their briefings of various Attorneys
General concerning Bureau operations.

 

 

SAC James 0. Ingram of the New York Office was.instructea 
to inform DeLoach of the Senate Select Committee's request and the
fact.that that Committee would contact him in the near future for
purposes of arranging an interview with him. Unsuccessful attempts
?were mace on 11/7/75 to Contact Mr. Mohr by the Legal Counsel
Division to apprise him of the Senate Select Committee's request.
Mr..Mohr subsequently contacted Assistant Director John A. Mints
of this Division concerning this matter.

Mr. DeLoach telephonically contacted  of
this Division on 11/10/75 and advised him he had been not; ad of
the Senate Select Committee's request that he he interyie?ed ana?
informea SA Ithat he had retaine? Attorney of
the firm.We;oh and Morgan to represent him. .Mr. DeLoach stated that

would contact the Committee to arrange for?interview of
. eLoachr

 

 

 

 

Mr. Mohr and Mr. DeLoaoh were previously released from
their employment agreement for purposes of this interview; (See'
Legal Counsel to Mr. Adams memo dated 11/10/75 captioned ?Senate
Select Committee.") 

RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

7 
(lrw Personnel File earths DeLoaoh
1 Personnel File - John P. Mohr

 

 

 

?31
i



Wanna-mm 1mm 1 "5w 

Assoc. Dir. 
Dep. AD Adm. 
Dep. AD lnv. 

Asst. Din:

Admin.
Comp. 573'. 
EM. Affairs 1.7,
His: 3. Cor-l.

 

Gen. 
Mani. 
Inspectioru .. 
lulu". 
Loborovory 
Plan. a VI: . ..

 

spas-lug}; Pam?;

Train-n9 
Legal Coon. 
Yolgphono Rm. 
Diucloc Soc'y 

?0 
- :f 
1 a- Division 6 
AIRTEL 1 Mr.  I ha
A . . 1.. b7c
1/23/76

local authorities.

MAIL ROOM UNIT [3 cm 1975 0 -589-92(;

 

 

To; SAC, New York
Legat, Tel Aviv?

3e 
1 ?34 .-
From: Director, FBI I

?3le 
13 - ISRAEL .
nxronrzor 1

If?? .1

1 Information has been received from a former Bureau
official that Pearson, President, PepsiCo, Inc., will lead a
group of appr01 imately 40 to 50 Food Chain executives, with
wives, to Israel for one week beginning 3/27/76 as guests of
the Israeli Government. Pearson, shortly after-sending letters
to individuals connected with the trip, received two calls on
the same date, the second of which consisted of a twice
repeated threat to "kill Pearson' family" if he went on the
trip. Details or this threat were reportedly furnished the
New York Office. 

SAC, New York, insure that information concerning the
threat to kill searson' family has been made available to



Legat, Tel Aviv, notify approPriate Israeli
authorities in order that they will be aware of this:smatter.

an? 

.1 Foreign Liaison Unit (Route throng for Review) ?334?, figs?
Jg gr 1

THGmed" .- .13- 

(8) py? 'h 

NOTE: 
723cm?: Eli?s-?3: 32?!

The above information is from a lettermdatedH1716%76
directed to Assista-nthirector ?annall.by former Bureau .
official Cartha 34:99 oac?nt.a mmhe.above is in keeping with our
responsibilities 0 ?notifying both local authoritieslinl a:
new York and appropriat?EIsraeli authorities in View of threats

 

against subject? 5 family. 9:9: 
pw?j?eltq?dcn 
A
41 4 Ii EC 
JAN 933.1975/ 3 ?a .
gnaw 

 

  

113?:




 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

1? .
rev 
PURCHAS N.Y. 10577
TEL.- (914) 203- 3027

slig?gg. cetoAcu ..


consents :?ims January 16, 1976
Mr. Raymond Wannal ?af?

gpAssmtarnt?Ui?recfor? 
Domestic Intelligence Division
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535

.r 19 1133/
I

Dear ?Mooshe',':

Nick Callahan called me on Monday, January 12, 1976, and Iindicat?d at
(It's tough

the time that I planned to call you regarding an Israeli matterthat famili rsupervisory chore!)
7-11. .2. at? awe 
wit-r? f? 
PepsiCo,

c. and one of my two Bosses, will

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1?3. ?3 1 

5. pk} . lead a group of approximately forty to fifty Food Chain heads, with wives,

[3113/ to Israel for one week beginning March 27, 1976. The Israeli Government

5 will play host to this group with tours, accommodations, et cetera. The

3 group will, however, pay their own transportation. Andy Pearson was invited
by Milton Perlmutter, Super Markets General Corporation, to organize and

coordinate this trip. 1. 
,1 To get to the point~-Andy recently sent out 
if: to the above?mentioned invitees in connection with this *tripT?Shb?rtly?the?rei? 
after two calls were received on the same date, obviously-?frommthe?sa?mevman,
. emanating from the New York area. The second call consisted of a twice

repeated threat to ?kill Pearson's family,? if he oes on the trip. Full de?b

tails were, of course, furnishedl in view of the 3pdssib1e



violation of the extortion statutes. 3 WC
pg116 REC 30? #51311 Earl/4

I would appreciate notification being discreetly given to Hal Rubenstein 1n Tel
Aviv concerning Andy pending trip and the stated threats. I would hope that

 

any intelligence concerning threats, or any information of 
1s W1

 

 

 

given to Andy through direct contact with Hal. Andy and h' will
reside at a prominent hotel while in Israel, the name of whichQ-i3 - 2 ?sh
you as soon as I have this information@1131). 111-10. 33159313195
. 33' ii 

 

Raymond Wang - . 


Hal will find the Pearsons to be a most delightful couple. And is a combi?
nation of regular fellow, humanitarian, and computer. I I is a b6
vivacious, attractive redhead who could make~even an .old man like you turn



.Another subject--I hope that Church and company have wound down the Hear-

ings and that you, Jim, Nick and Clarence, can go on to the business of the
Bureau. It was obviously a tough situation, definitely unfair, and lacking in
overall perspective. Needless to state, I did not enjoy my three sessions,
but hope that at least someanswers placed matters on the right track.

Best wishes in the New Year. Iam always available to help you or any of
the old crowd. 

Sincerely,



c. D. DeLoach

 

 



 

cAamA o. 

ANMRS

rno; 
?115.13. Dita. 


A?l?i?L Im'w??E

 



PURCHASE. N.Y. 10677
TEL. (916) 2 53 - 3?27

Comp. 
Ext. Afiatrs 
Fiies .1: Com. 
Gen. inv. 
Idem. 
Inei?ectim i.
Intuit ..
Lab watery 
Plan. (I: rivals. 
Spec. Inv. 
Training 

.1 Legal Ccun.

., .

?5 Ecuphone .1i
5 Ictt? A $33

?atmi'?l?u? 

ICE PHSSIDEHK

January 30, 1976

Whit: 


 

The Honorable Clarence M. Kelley
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation 
Washington, D. C. 20335 

Dear Clarence:

?as
?a

Me?oae? Karma .0 {13?
1 Understand you have already acce an invitation to/ be the

guest of the Missouri group at The America ion' banquet

for members of Congress on March 2, 1976. I would like to

take this means of extending you another'very cordial invitation
closely related to that affair.

For many years, it has been my custom to host a small cocktail-
buffet gathering for some of the people attending the Legion's
Mid-Winter Conference in Washington, D. C. My guests have

usually consisted of a select group of Legion officials and some' ?f


Bureau people. All of the past affairs have proved to be congenial/?X
and thoroughly enjoyable.

- 

This year, Ihave asked Jim Adams, Nick Callahan, and afew off?
the men from the External Affairs Division to join me in Suite D-

 

 

700 of the Sheraton Park Hotel at 7 p. m. Monday, March 1st. 3 
I would be delighted if you could be With us for a complet?y W:
informal evening of relaxation bolstered by plenty of good food 

.
and drink. . 

L. . - 

a. ?nun-M9: mam-11m
I. an -- if] :3
Ej?f . I =3 MAR 1976

hi 
9?1 . . MWMW
ll; 5' .j
a if?
(at, 1
.

 

PE 
new 2 21976 E1111, 

 

7a ~1th WIT . 4

I

a


 

?1

 

 

 

i 
I
/un1235:3513;
The Honorable Clarence Kelley .

Ihope your schedule will permit you to be with us and I look for?
ward to hearing from you at your convenience.

With myrbest wishes and highest personal esteem,

Sincerely,



C. D. DeLoach

 

 

4* 

 

 

 

 

Assoc. Dir. 
Dep. AD Adm. 
Don. M) lnv. ..

Assl. Dim
Admin. 
Comp. Sysi. 
Ext. Affairs 
Files 8- Com. 
Gen. Inv. 
Idem. 
Insp-oelfon 
lnfell.

Lanralory 

 

Legal Conn. 
Pluml?. Evul. 
Spec. Inv.

Training 4 



Dire'gor?: TELETYPE UNITED

  

 

Febmary 4, 1975 h? 

I

3313?. Carthal). L138 Ch ?5 W. 

ice ?resident
{Sammie Affairs
lie?yaw

3 ??wt?sn? 

'Z?ayzhase, New 365??

Bear Shaka:

Twinks am much for your letter a? Eanmry 38, 3.976,
mating me to the gathering on March 133:. am yieased to
acceyi and 3.003; forward to seeing you and syendmg a. mask

?hug?u 4"

en?oyable evening.

Best regards. . .
Siacerelygait/LCM 





3. - Teleghone Room (with copy of incoininv 95



663A WM 
.1. 1' 53120;; 23. o. i
w, fan) 5
I 

GPO 1975 - 594420

 

 

 

ant-om: to?. 3

1"
MAT I952 1911319Assoc 

ounce stairs GOVERNMENT 

Dep. AD 

71ch omnc?am 

Comp. Sysl. 

 

ELI Affairs 

DATE: marC-h 

Gen. lnv.
. . Idem.

Inspection?..-
CALLAHAN . 

21m: TZ

 

 

     
 

 

?f Plan. 5. 
SUBJECT: AWE SELECT COMMITTEE REQUEST . 'Srpec.lnv.__
reams A SISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR . 
D. DE OACH FOR FURTHER TESTIMONY W37 Madge?.?
Petr-5935111 DY SSASSINATION 
.. 1 pi], a 

On the afternoon of 3/ 17/ '76 Cartha D. DeLoach, former Assistant
to the Director and now an official with Pepsico, telephonically advised the writer
that he had received a telephone call in the last day or two from one b6
a staff member of the Senate Select Committee on Irtelligence. The purpose of his 137?
call to DeLoe was to inform him that Senators Schweiker of and
?Gary Hart of Ceierado and some of the staff members of the Senate Select Committee
were desirous cs ?taking testimony from Mr DeLoach for up to two days with regard
5 to the assassination of President Kennedy. further stated that they had
some memoranda 1a which Mr. DeLoach was mentioned and it was in connection/ea?
with these memoranda they desired his testimony.
. DeLoach stated he informed Mr. I:Ithat he had made four trips
to the Committee at their re uest 1n connection with the Martin Luther King matter
at the conclusion of whichIJ:I indicated they would have no further need
for him, DeLoach, and despite this he has appeared on two other separate occasions
at the Committee 5 request. He further informedl:  that in view of the heavy
work schedule and the disruption caused on prior occasions to his work that he was
going to refer the matter to his Attorney as he, .(DeLoach did not feel he should appear
unless subpoenaed to do so. . ,1 5:6 
pr"- r1175
DeLoach stated he contacted his ?tte?i?iiey, former Ingge?gor Ed Morgan,
here in Was-watch who communicated with: and pointedmut tmhat
he would advise his client that in view of his past cooperation on his part and the
disruption sad created 1n his very heavy work schedule not to appear unless 
subpoenaed is no so. Morgan, according to DeLoach, further stated that the
request was reaching the point of harassment, however, if a subpoena were forth?
coming oi? course he would consult with his client with regard to it.

 

 

 

 

DeLoach also advised that after the above conversation that Morgan
had withl:  according to Morganl:  backed down from his demand for

i. - ?9112f
cf 11 Mei-mSGallagher ism!? 


?19Saving Bond: Regularly 012 the Paymll Saving:

 

  

 

 

Memo to Mr. Mintz
Re: Senate Select Committee Request of Former
Assists-.11 to the Director Cartha D. DeLoach

DeLoach?s appearance and informed Morgan that he, had just recently 106'
come with the Committee and was not aware of DeLoach's prior appearances. MC
DeLoach was wondering just how long] had been with the staff and he was
informed from the writer's recollection he had been with them since last summer.
This was cem?immed with the Legal Counsel Division.

 

DeLo ach stated that he was merely calling the writer to inform him
of the most rece? wt contact by the Committee staff and the action he is taking


41

in "s ewith for the Bureau's information.

 

 

i-

a.

   





March 25, 1976

Mr. Cartha D. (leach

Vice President, Corporate Affairs
Pepsico Inc.
Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

I have received both your letter of March 23, 1976,
and the two boxes of cigars from Mr. Thank you b6
for your good offices in my behalf. . 137?

It is always a pleasure to see you and I particularly
enjoyed the evening spent with you while you were in Washington

 

recently.
Sincerely,
3/ 
(3 Director's handwritten note: haven't tried the
.53 clubs yet but I am anxious. Perhaps I can get out
in April. 
Assoc. Dir.
Dep. AD Adm. 
Dop. AD Inv. 

Asst. Dim
Admin. 

Comp. Syst. 

 

 

 

Ext. Affairs 

FilesS- 3.

Gen. Inv. a?

. neenu:~
Inspection 
Into".

Laboratory 

Legal Coun. 

Plan. &Eval._
Spec. lnv.

Training
0&4 7
01'6??mewa TELETYPE UNIT Gpousts . 591-120
(Q 

 

A

1? Yahw'tfory
CARTHA 0. .. 
VICE ratsmeu: March 23, 1975 Ccun. 
CORPORAIE 331;?! Eva]
Rec. Mgmt.
szc. Inv.
Twining

in an 

?4 
I
. 'wmw 
fr 3

Assoc. Dir. .


4 Asst. Din:

PEPSICO man. ..
me. Comp. Syst- 

PURCHASE, N.Y. 10577 Affairs
253-3027 Gen. Inv. 

 

 

 

 

 

Ident. 
Inspection
in?ll. - 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teiep?nsnc Rm. 
Snc?y. 


 

 



Mr. Clarence M. Kelley
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Clarence:

During the recent American Legion National Executive meet?
ings in Washington, D. C. on the night that I had the pleasure
of having you, Nick Callahan, Iim Adams, and others with me

I be
?of Las Brisas, Acapulco, Mexico, offered you one WC
of his fine cigars. He apparently was of the opinion that you
enjoyed the cigar inasmuch as he has forwarded four boxes to

me with instructions that two of the boxes be given to you.
These have been mailed to you today under separate cover. 5*

 

1

Mr. an outstanding Legionnaire and a dedicated 
patriot. He has an excellent background and I know of no derog-
atory information whatsoever concerning him.

I hope you enjoy the cigars. With kindest regards,

Sincere?gp?m?? 67", 9 3 

Numimndu 53

475/,& I 10 JUL 2 1976
WW t.
. De OaCh

 

 

 

 

 

- Mr. V??lahan
MIC. J. B. Elms
Mr. D. H. where

(Attn: be 
b7C 






 

I

2 Mr}. J. A. Milltz
S. F. Phillips (Phillips

I


Mr. w. Leavitt' I 5/10/76

 

 

 

75

PURPOSE: To advise of latest effort by'Senate Select
Committee (530) Staff to interview Cartha Deloach and 
abandonment of interview. 7

DETAILS: Memorandum from Mr. N. P. Callahan to Mr. Mints

3/ 18/ 76 recited information former Assistant to the Director
DeLoach furnished Mr. Callahan concerning efforts of SEC .
Staff Memberl Ito have DeLoach appear in
Washington, D. C., for additional testimony; and that DeLoach,
through his attorney, was resisting such appearance.

Deioach t?ele honed the writer at 9:00 5/ 10/ 76,
made reference to thebattempt to get Debach back
to Washington, D. 6., for testimony on the President Kennedy
assassination, and furnished the following information updating
3 the situation. 0n 5/ 6/ 76 contacted Deiaach's attorney,
and asked if DeLoach would agree to a Staff
interview, not under oath, in Delnach's office in New York City
on 5/ 1.0/76. I:Iagreed to this with understanding the
interview would last no longer than one hour. 0n the evening
cf 5/9/76, calledl:  and said. that, because .
time is so short, they were cancelling the interview and would
mt again pursue the matter of getting either testimony or
information through from DeLoaeh. DeLoach also
added that, whenl:l made the first contact 5/6/76, it
was indicated by him that, if Deloach did not agree, h? might
be subpoenaed by Senator SchweikerNone. For information.

0

 

 

6773 IQCI?ersonnel File Cart!


m?oacm
6?4 (10)

 

 

 

 

 

July so, 1976



Mr. Cartha D. oach

Vice President, Corporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.

Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

I am, in red?pt of your letter of July let concerning
MILI I. together with your enclosures, and
ap reciate Wur' bringing this matter to my attention.

Your remarks in behalf been noted and
have instructed our Savannah Office to contact him for the purpose of
i cussing the qualifications and application procedure for the Special
A ent (Accountant) position. You can be certain that his application
1 1 receive every consideration in line with his overall qualifications
1 . arid our needs.

1?
a

MAILED 6
JUL 3 01975

 

 

We

 

With my best wishes,

 

 

   

 

b6

i
4 
ilk/f Sincerely 1113,18?d 
v.5? - ?k
83b Clarence A 
4 Clarence M. Kelley
1 Director

Assoc. 
Dep. AD Adm.
Dop. AD kWh?1:-

Asst. Din:

Adm. 
Ext. Affairs,__.
Fin. 8. Pets. 
Gen. 
Idem.
Inspection 
Into".
Laboratory?
Legol 
?on. 8- Enh?
Roc. Mgnl. 
Spec. In.?
Training??

Tel

 

 

 

 

enemas. 

SAC, Savannah

 

ReBulet dated 7/30/76, captionedl

 

8.,
i?
A/g/Em SEE NOTE NEXT PAGE ?353
I 
I A 

 
 



TELETYPE UNIT 

(Aunt

J, soup?slim). 

I

.5 1,11%

1"

I



 

 

 

 

Mr. Cartha D. Deyach
In re: b5

 

 

 

 

NOTE: Applicant, age 22, desires to be considered for the position
based on a BBA degree in Accounting to be received in 8/76. The Savannah
Office was instructed to handle in accordanceswith existing instructions

re the processing of SA applicants by Bulet dated 7/30/76.

 

 

 

 3

. n: ?4 . . As?soc. Dir.
I . .3 Dell-w 

 

 

 


Asst. Din:
. Adm. Serv. 
PEPSICO Ex ??35
Fin .- .rs.

 

 

 

 

 

PURCHASE, N.Y. 10577
253?3027 . ?fe?gnm?
. Inspection -
Int 1. 
boratory
32212:..2iffim? Jul 21: 19 
conponnc AFFAI 3 Plan. Eval. 
r753 Rec. Mgmt. 
Spec. Inv.
?3 Training
Telephone Rm. 
Mr. Clarence Kelley Direct?): Sec'y .
Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Washington, D. c. 20535 \9 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Clarence:

The enclosed letter from Claxton, b6
Georgia, indicates an interest in applying for the
position of Special Agent, FBI. 

While Ihave met Mr. I: on only three different
occasions, I have known his mother and father for
over 25 years. They are one of the finest families
in Claxton. His father has been president and general
manager of the local Coca-Cola bottling company for
over ten years. His father and I both are members

of the Board of Directors of the Glaxton Bank. His
family is well liked, are outstanding?people, and 1

know of no derogatory information whatsoe er (Sigf 

cernin them. 2 iv" 3
67" a 

The applicant also enjg an 

the Claxton area. ?If?'g?l?ll be selen fromirtfhe?lalifag?eclg??6 

letter, he had an tetanding hig'llusehookrecordrb'oth

academically and athletically. He will graduate with

a B. B. A. in accounting from the University of Georgia

in August, 1976. He is a member of the Student Coun-

cil and was awarded the University of Georgia Certifi?

cate of Merit.

ENGLOSURE

 

 

 

 

 

[35:51ch

Mr. Clarence Kelley

In the, event you consider this applicant not eligible at
the present time for the position of Special Agent, it is
my understanding that he would be willing to report to
the Seat of Government to, work in a clerical capacity
and work in that category until he can be accepted into
Special Agents Class.

I would deeply appreciate any consideration that can be
given to this applicant.

With kindest regards 
Sincerely,



Gartha D. DeLoach



 

 

 

I . V- . Assoc. Dir. 
Ff Dep. AD .,

Dep. AD i

- Asst. Din:

Adm. Sew. I
pEpSl? 0 Ext. Affairs 

Fin. 

PURCHAS NY. 10577 Gen. Inv. 
253-3027 Ident. 
Intell. 
Legal Conn.

Plan. Insp.
OAHTHA Rec- 
we: patslo'sut S. Saw. 
conponne armns Spec. 111V. 

March 7, 1977 Training I

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Honorable Clarence M. Kelley
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

Washington, D. G. 20535

I



Dear Clarence:

Recently it became necessary for me to make an emergency
trip to San Juan, Puerto Rico to handle a very sensitive mat-
ter for my company. It involved a very large embezzlement
which was apparently initiated by the president of one of our

subsidiaries. . 
REC-1311 53>;
From the outset, we have had the Wiolehearted 
of the FBI in an ongoing investigation of this situat?nlgmun~
ingmy brief visit to your San Juan assisted i1 
eve ?v wav bv.two your men, Special Agent b6
and 0 me, both epitomized the b?st of
the Bureau in the manner in which they handled various
aspects of the case while I was there, and I wanted to
take this means of bringing their performance to your .
personal attention. a? 

I sincerely appreciate the help exte ded FWE 
the FBI and especially the efforts on our?behalf_made_by

Messrs. I I



kiwi!

  

 

Wg}:
Jr?

 

 

 


r.

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With best wishes, a
Sincerely,

wam?d? 01:11r

 

APR 11 1977

C. D. @oach

W2

 
  

 

 

jh? I 3 
..
..

 

March 11, 1977 


i 
Mr. Cartha "De; ach
Vice President
Corporate Affairs

Pepsico, Inc.
Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

It was most thoughtful of you to write
regarding your recent experiences with our people in
Puerto Rico. We all enjoy seeing you and you can
be sure your treatment is not unique. You're-a good
guy and lately we have not seen too many of that type.

 

 

Sincerely,
.- b6
figgk
l?l 335:31?? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 

 

Assoc. Dir.

oep. AD (3)

 

 

 

Dap. AD 
Assl. Digs.
Adm. Sew. 
Ext. 
Fin. 8. Pets.
Gen. Inv.
Idem.
Inspection 
Intell.
Laboratory 
Legal BY
Plan. 8- Evol. 

c. 

 

 

 

 
  
  
  

-7
- A 
RLgogMEg? TELETYPE UNITCJ

 





opnomu. FORM no. 10 
Juur 197.3 tome" -
GSA (41 cm) 101.?.6 

1) AD 

ch.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT DMZ

Ah Sol-v 

Memorandum 

 

 

Fin. 3. 
To MR. Mc ERMOTT DATE: 6-3 -7'7
FROM R. E. ng .
Toch'. 

SUBJECT: CARTHA ACH guy'w?zm-
FORMER ASSISTANT TO THE DIRECTOR 


On 6?2 ~77 Mr. DeLoach called to advise me that he is going to be interviewed
by Civil Rights Division, Department of Justice, concerning
surreptitious entries. The interview is to take place in WashingtonMonday, 6 -6- '77. Mr. DeLoach further advised that it is possible that he will also be
testify before the grand jury. MC

Mr. DeLoach advised that he just wanted to make this a matter of record
with the Bureau.

RECOMMENDATION:

in? #57) f, . 71/;
For information. 18:2,] fin"; Arie? Zp?
. 
i 9% JUN 11.49197?



 

 

 

RELsalami. jig)? ?5 3401113: Bond: Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan ?bow

WW 7. 

 

 

 

't "it. 
a, . 14
a ognoim. FORM no. 10 
3 i . JULY 1973 EDITION I
GSA FPMR 101.?.6 
MENT .

UNITED STATES GOV 

Dep. AD Inv. 
As". Dim

Memorandum gap:

T0 1 The Director DATE: 6?10-77 reg-m?

Legal
Flo-1.8; 
FROM maul 
Legal Cou 
Tech. 

Training
?Elm 
Diana? 3 Soc'y 

PURPOSE: 
To record information furnished by 

SYNOPSIS AND 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At 11:25 a.m. on June 10, 1977, Cartha DeLoach, former Assistant
to the. Director, telephonically advised me that he was in Washington, D. C. 
on June 6, 1977, to meet withl Iof the Department b6
of Justice for an interview. Mr. DeLoach said that he was interviewed for MC
approximately two hours and then at 1:30 p. m. on the same date he appeared
before the Federal Grand Jury in Washington. During his interview and durin
his Grand Jury testimony, 
"break-ins," ?suicide taps, and ?mikes. He said he stated that he had no
recollection he had done so during his tenure as Assistant to the Director and
he did not know of any such approvals given by anyone else during that time.
He was asked for his opinion as to whether Mr. Hoover had obtained authority
. for surreptitious entries and he replied that he believed that Mr. Hoover would
have obtained authority from the Congress, from the Attorney General, the
National Security Council, and from the President of the United States. He
suggested that they check the hearings before the ApprOpriations Committees
where Mr. Hoover testified and, at times, would testify off the record. He said
he did not accompany Mr. Hoover to the White House or to the testimony but that
he did ha 1 i . and ral from time to-ti
ve th Mr Ho ve he: will? Page 

 

 
  



 

:52
Mr. DeLoach said that he offered the opinioh that the :9 
through the years for such activities may have been the bagis :35; the heretof-
Agents who engaged in such activities that their acti?ni.1ere ?lawfu?l'f?j [said
that William Rogers authorized the FBI .to install 
Deputy Attorney General and that Nicholas Katzenbach authorized the FBI to
install such devices without prior authority any time he was unavailable and he

woulda ove 1-Mr.Mintz 
JAM:bpr ..

2.)

8% CONTINUED - OVER . 
JUL 3 . Saving: Bond: Regularly on the Payroll Saving: Plan K. -

     

 

 

Memo Legal Counsel to the Director
Re: Cartha DeLoach

In his appearance before the Grand Jury, he said he was asked whether
he personally installed any wiretaps, microphones, or had opened mail which he
answered in the negative. He said that throughout his testimony he constantly
referred to the fact that the Agents, acting without guidance from the Congress,
were acting on "probable cause" and he repeatedly stated his belief that

the Bureau and his own good name.
RECOMMENDATION:

For information.

3:33;} 
Brim. 

Fi?. 
Idem.?
1m?
Deg. AD Laboratory?

 

 

Mr. Hoover had sought higher authority for such activities in order to protect

Legai a

Plan. 8: ins

nae. 
Spec. 
Tech. 



Public Alia. 

 

 

 

.0 4:

August 29, 1977

- Mr. Boynton

Mr. Monahan (Fehl)
Mr. Mintz

Mr. Powers


I

Mr. Cartha 

96 Perkins Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830

 

.Dear Deke:

In response to your recent Freedom of Information?
Privacy Acts request, enclosed is a cepy of a memorandum
from you to Mr. Mohr dated December 2, 1964, and captioned,
?Martin Luther King; Appointment With Director; 3: 35 P. M.,
12?1- 64. You will note that no deletions or excisions
have been made from this document, thereby constituting a
total grant of your request. 

  

With warmest personal regards,

 



 

 

 

 

 

5 19$: I377
Mans Sincerely yoursz 3n
AUG 3 0 1977 Elarence Ke?eg
Clarence M. Kelley 
Director

 

 

., 1 my?. 
Enclosure 6 SE 
i 

NOTE: See C. P. Monroe to Mr. Boynton memorandum dEted 8-18-77,

Am"; Dir. _captioned, . . DE REQUEST FOR COPY OF DECEMBER, 1.9 64 
Dep. AD Adm. .MEMORANDUM . 

Dep. AD Inv. 

 

 

 

 

Assf. DIM
Adm. Sen. . Adm. Legal 
Cdm' bag (5) crim. Plan. a 
n. Pm!? Der/ Fin. Pars.._ Rec. Mgnl'
:dml?l. cc. Spec. 
1:11;qu .. up. AB A Tech. 
Legal 1 r, nap. AD Laboratory 
Plan. &Insp._ 1? Public hits. 

Rec. Mgr". ?n

Spec. {3

Tech. 

SE .- 1 
2:33:22}: 3 212- 3 

Dhumfs&6y_ MAH.ROOM TELETYPEIHHT C3 3 .
5 '1 

  

l?

 

 

1141' ?imp 

tl? 
1 

September 19", 1977

   

Mr. Cartha D:
Vice President
Corporate Affairs
Pepsico, Inc.

1 35.3nrchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:
I am in receipt of your letter of August-245th; together with
'your enclosures concerning Mr.  

In reviewing application for the Special Agent 5
position, I find that he does not possess the necessary three years'_ 
complex and/ or investigative experience to be considered for the 1 
Special Agent position at this time, and I have directed a letter to him 
under today?s date which explains the various requirements to be met 
?in order to qualify for Special Agentappreciate your bringing the matter to my attention.

1: We; 

If _Isz

1 With best regards,

   

 

 

  
     

Sincerely o; 1
67-? . 1 i
(5) . :Clarence . Kelley. 5.23 121:1?! 
I
or 0) MAILED 1? REC1143 
Clarence 1? . Kelley
jet/W?; 1 91977? Director - 1%
Assoc. Dir. FBI 2
029. AD 

011.10.11.1? SAC, Columbia (Enclosures?4)
SAC, Savannah (Enclosures?4)

Chm. lnv. 
Fin. 81Pers.

I Iage   app1ied for he position based upon BS and MS

 

 

 

??degrees in Criminal Justice; however, he does not possess the necessary 3

 
   

 

 



1-111 c.11._years' experience to qualify at this? time, i 
Plan. FEW 
Rec. Mgni. P: i; 

590:. Director -- g: 1 X?s-15m 
Tech. ASSDS- Dir.

Tnhin 2 I:

a (957 agar-AD Adm 

gigging"..- . - Hep. AD Laboraimy? Tni 115' 
Director?s sit-31.. wmcnoou TELETYPE UNIT ??59 

#1111 no.1

1

i

i.

b6


A,

 

 

1
-fad10577
(014) 253- 3027

 

 

 


okaaomu AugUSt 26, 1977

we: Pressman: I I
comment AFFAIRS 

 
    

 

 

  

 

 


1s . Mr. Clarence M. Kelley 5
Director fl
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535
Dear Clarence:
3 Please find enclosed a letter dated August 16, 1977, from 
i 553 . lot The Claxton Bank, Claxton, Georgia. Claxton 
.is my home town. I have bee the Board of Directors of this
small bank for many years. writes to me because he knows

 

of my previous FBI employment.

 

In the enclosure, I Irecommends onel I
While I do not know Mr.  persona?f I note that/he is a
graduate of the University 0 uth Carolina, Columbia, South 
Carolina, having received a B. S. Degree in Criminal Justice
and also a Masters Degree majoring in that category. I also
note that he was on the Dean's List and that he received his
degree cum laude.

 

 

 

Althou I do not know Mr. I am aware of the fact that
is a very fine banker whose reputation is above re-

proach. I am certain that, because of his great respect for the

FBI, he would not have recommended someone unless this person

deserves consideration. WW7. 73D -.
I would personally appreciate any attention that could be paid to 9.,

Mr. application. . 
.

With kindest regards, 
4:2 Sincerely,

a}
9 - 3111/}: 65m:
aw; i C. D. DeLoach
. i -
1.

Enclosures

 

00: Mr.

 

 

 

 

Public as.

Telephone P..-
Dxe star's Sc:

mu um.

pop. AD
Dcp- RE) .
Asst. 
5:131. 50:1
Cdemu
Pin. 5 l?c:

Intel}.
Lahcrcur,

Plan. 62 
Res. lifj'nt.
3.17..
Lech. 
1m ri: 

 

.



b6

 

 

21
?i 1?1:

   

 

 

 

 

NAL FORM NO. 10 :5
Egg?l'n?l?g?l?gg 10! II. a alt/xi
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 3:3; 1: 
Ant. DIM
Memorandum 
Crlm. lnv.
{1h Fin. 5. 
'3 l\ ldenl.
T0 Mr. Boy DATE: 8-18?77 
Laborao 
Legal ('30er 
Plan. 8. 
FROM C. P. Monroem maMwM??. 
,1 Spoc. A
Tech. Sons.?

SUBJECT: PuBllc Am. on. .

 

SOIO- IIO

Telephone Rm. 
Dlrecbr?s Sec'yu.

REQUEST FOR COPY OF
DECEMBER, 1964, MEMORANDUM

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this memorandum is to advise that former
Assistant to the Director C. D. DeLoach has requested a copy of
memorandum he wrote on December 2, 1964, and to recommend that
the attached c0py of that memorandum be furnished to him.

 

 

mp A 19442
meered..11l, 
Former Assistant to the Director C. D. 

 

 

telephonically requested a copy of a memorandum?w?ich?hg?wndte
on December 2, 1964, reporting a meeting 
between the then-Director Hoover and Martin Luther King-?which
meeting was also attended by Walter Fauntroy, and
Ralph Abernathy. (The memorandum is serial 634 or Bufile
100- 106670. Mr. DeLoach pointed out that ei ensive reference
to this memorandum (including a number of direct quotations from
it) is made on pages 164- 167 of Book of the Final Report of
the Senate Select Intelligence Committee (published in 1976);
and the Committee' report clearly indicates that at least two
o??u?gwitnesses before the Committee (Ralph Aberna ysan
had full access to his December 2,1964,me?oranm
?1 SEP 13 1873

Review of the attached copy of Mr. DeLoach' Decem? 
her 2, 1974, memorandum reflects that it is stric -y-an53536??tu3
of Martin Luther King?s visit with Mr. Hoover and that it does
not allude to information which Bufiles contain concerning
Dr. King or the other participants in the meeting. Furthermore,
as noted above, the meeting between Dr. King and Mr. Hoover was
not of a confidential nature--it was attended by four other persons
(including Mr. DeLoach) any of whom was free to tell outsiders what
had transpired; and Dr. King met with representatives of the press
immediately after his session with Mr. Hoover. Furthermore,
Mr. Hoover later discussed his meeting with Dr. King with news media.

Enclosure 

Mr. Boynton
Mr. Fehl
- Mr. Mintz

 

b6
b7C

 

 

SEE ADDENDUM1QF FOIPA, AGE 
11230.93.

   
 

CONTINUED - OVE
U. 3. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Saving: Plan

 

 

Monroe to Boynton memo
RE: C. D. DE LOACH

RECOMMENDAT-I 0N 

That the attached Xerox copy of Mr. DeLoach's
December 2, 1964, memorandum reporting the meeting between
Dr. King and Mr. Hoover be made available to Mr. DeLoach?wand

that, upon approval, this memorandum be returned to the Research?
Section.

 

 

 

 

 

APPROVED: 1?3?333?: Adm. Serv. Legal 
Grim. Hut. 3: lnsp. 

Fin. 2. I'm. 3.1m?.

Assoc. Dir. Manhw 356*. 

Dep. AD Adm. Emu. Teak. Sewsm

Dep. AD Training
Public Ms. DH 

 

 

 

?1 A
MM . a



Memorandum to Mr. Boynton

Re: C. D. DeLoach;
Request for copy of
December, l964, Memorandum

ADDENDUM OF FOIPA BRANCH, RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION
AHMsgag?' 8-26?77

Attached hereto is a proposed letter from the
Director to Mr. DeLoach alo with a copy of the memorandum
requested as it is proposed disclosed to him. It is
noted that no administrative markings have been excised
from the enclosed document pursuant to the current policy
of the FOIPA and guidelines issued by the Department of
Justice. Inasmuch as this disclosure amounts to less
than 30 pages, there is no charge for duplication pursuant
to existing Federal regulations.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

1. That the previous recommendation of the
Public Affairs Office as set forth in C. P. Monroe to
Mr. Boynton memorandum be dismggarded.

Imam dz: Legal scram
Grim. Finn. 6: 
E1 HM Fin. a Farm.? Baa. Man?
a. my 5342:. 
if!? I 



19' 

Ia?un?



2. That the attached letter, with enclosure, be
approved and forwarded to Mr. DeLoach.
an. Lozal Baumw?



Bi! - Fm. a 
996! s; I'm
9% A Tc? Sen-5?
33.

  

AD 

WEE-3 R115. 

 

 

 

 

 

April 17, 1978

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
Vice President, Corporate
Affairs

PepsiCo, Inc.
Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

I certainly appreciate your warm message of con-
gratulations on my appointment as Director, as well as your
kind offer of assistance. I have learned a great deal about
the Bureau during my short time here and I find each day
interesting and challenging. I hope I will conduct the
affairs of the FBI in a manner worthy of your support.

 

In reply to your request, it is a pleasure to
advise that Deputy Assistant Director James 0. Ingram is
available to speak to your employees on the subject of ter?
rorism on May 16th in Purchase. You may contact him directly
at FBI Headquarters, telephone number (202) 324- 4262, to
- ork out the specific details.

   

Sincerely yours,

ii. Web
William H. waggier

 

 

 

 

   

 

Director
New York - Enclosure
2 - Mr. Moore - Enclosures (2) 
23353511" Personal Attention: Bring to the te?? mm 019.3
Deputy Assistant Director James .aIngnamI
?xL?g; Speech Desk Enclosure 
Crim. Inv. 
5135mm. Mr. DeLoach is a former Assistg?ntl ito?vthg .?Dir?irtor
[?gmq who EOD 8-13- 42 and retired 7- 3l?70. 
1.91 cm handle Speech per CID- I ?63 MAY 111.1978.
Plan. 8. IMP 3 3
La amoun.M
$333593"? NB: rill APPROVED: 3A3: Eewh? 
TroiningT_ 3 R00. Mann-wa 81335
?is; Tech. 

 

Public Aiis. . - Vi] 

Telephone MAY Dir if". - Training

Diremt' 5 Sec' "?1733?; R0 AD gem boratOfy Public AW Fat/00.:

ii 

 

 

. Asso 
warms-x


. Dep. AD lnv._
.. .. Asst. Din: ..

lgti?fl?? 5

Laboratory

- . 

 

 

 

 

PURCHASE. MN. 10677 Legal Coun.

TEL. (914) 2:53- 3027 Plan.&lnsp.
Rec. Mgnt.
Tech. Servs. . 
Trainingw 

Public Affs. Off.

CARTHA D. OBLOACH
we: 9353mm. 
CORPORATE rector ec 



 

 

I 

 

 

 

March 31, 1978

The Honorable William H. Webster 
Direcror C7 

Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building

Washington, D. C. 20535 DQLOOLCK

. Dear Judge Webster:

I Permit me to take this means of extending you my warmest congratulations 
on your assumption of the position of Director of the FBI. You have some 
very heavy responsibilities Which I am certain you will handle expertly and
this will benefit our country greatly. I want to ass?re you that I am, always
ready to be of assistance to you if you should need me now or in the future.
You need only call on me.

I am a former Assistant to the Director who retired in 1970 to become Vice
President of Corporate Affairs of PepsiCo, Inc. Our company is a multi-
national organization which operates in approximately 140 countries. In this
particular respect, we have an abiding concern regarding terrorism both
domestically and abroad. The cor curate duties of our top executives ne-
cessitates their continual travel in?l? 31% of many potentially dangerous
ioountries.

223717" .. 
Because of the great interest we have in the protecti'o? at be via? :28

 

 

 

I would like to respectfully ask that you give for 
Ingram, Deputy Assistant Director of the Criminal In es tivge D1461 ion, to1
visit our World Headquarters at Purchase, New 
ducting" one of his seminars on the protection of the business executive. I
understand his presentation is an excellent one and we would be most grateful
jif you will agree to let him share his expertise With our people. If agreeable
with you, we would like to have Mr. Ingram visit us on May 15 Maybe-19.76? . .
will be speaking to between 200 and 300 exec ive personnel. .
i ii)? 54238 
Wu 
MAY 111978

 

 



 

     

 

 

?d (a msom
??ing {Mi r" Pertf?eci Unit A
i x. 13??:er 

 

 

 

 

- PEPSIQ ?n

The Honorable William H. Webster

Any consideration you feel you can accord this request will be greatly 
appreciated.

With best wishes,

Sincerely,

C. D. DeLoach 

 

 

 

a 
5":an . .

Assistant: 35.20::th 
Ammistmtiva Serums Bivisian "3,15,75

1. Ek. Bamatt
Legal mange}. 1 .. My, mum:

mesa 3mm? 1 gr? Fame?

(225m) 

PERPGSE: The ymesa of this ?emrm?m is 1:4) a?visa that:
Kw: 531% Rated amplayaes have hem raleasa? frat: their
emgloment agreeamts . i

g?T?lL?: To date, staff attorneys: cf the EZSGA hava ccn?uctad
amer of inmrviews of? Special Agents; and fame: ngeial
Eigemts in cannectian with the: emittee's investigaticn mm
the assassinaticn :35 Ex. Kazan Luther King, Jr. ?z??itional
requests far agent: inwrviws have: been 3:113:31:th by lemma;?
to tha Attemey {Samara}. 33mm 6.1 Raiaart Bialmy, Chief? Counsel
and Birecter, 585311.; ?Emacs. agemts, their effiaas ?335 
at: gag; Emma: a?drasg, and the dam and? intervimz request are
as- we. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a? 2mg? 95;:
92: mm mom: REQUEST
Kichm'd 33.1.o?g FBIKQ 4/38/73
MQSIESS
{Ema}
necl??zpfm (23.) cmmamm ?v mam.

3. a Femame}. file 65 Richarel E. Lang 1
1 1? Peraanaal file. cf E?war? J. Exc?cmugh
3. .. Eemaanal film af mug? L. Marcin?ala 
1 -- i?ersennel file 9.35 31mm? L. Ezzcamam, 32:.
?7 .. Persannel file: cf James R. ?fm?y .
- PQraomml ?119 of 
. -: Permimei ?3.16: 3f Gdi?ft?ney Evans;
1. I?egramma}. file :25 ?nkerz?ri?i. ?ick.
1 -- Feraamel file an? Free?i J. Baugamlne:
1 - ?ermnnel file cf Joseph 42. Siam:
1 - Z?arsamel file cf Sham-lea B. Brennan
1 a Personnel file. ?95 (Imam Elana
.. Fersennel file afl? b6
1 Parsmmel file?. 9f Paul" In Car:

67- OT RECORDED
L3 JUL E31978

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

m: mum HimmW
an mummy151-1?
?111 11m

1.11m um m, miss-am VimWin-nu . ms 

11:11-11:11, 
m?

1&me 
aim.) 

   

   

1111?? my 
1133:

anagram u' 313.3173

Am mum
99! 391?! . . 1
?1th Wm

379 3731 1 1 -
532min:

 

 

i I

 

MEMORANDUM TO THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION
RE: HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS (HSCA)

The above agents will be telephonically advised
by the Legal Liaison and Congressional Affairs Unit, Legal
Counsel Division, and Congressional Inquiry Unit, Records
?Management Division, of the interest of the Committee and,
prior to interview, Legal Counsel representatives will
provide these agents with a briefing as to the scope and
limitations of the interview.



(1) ?That the Legal Counsel Division.make appropriate
notigication to current employees regarding this matter.

(2) VThat the Congressional Inquiry unit, Records
Management Division? make appropriate notification to former
employees regarding this matter.

 

 

 

 

6. on

 
 

 

 

I, 

- . June 5, 1978

.33. 
1?
Mr. Cartha D. oach
Vice Preside t, Corporate Affairs
PepsiCo, Inc.
. Purchase, New York 10577 
Dear Mr. DeLoach:
Thank you for your letter of May 23rd regarding
the address mace by Deputy Assistant Direc tor James 0.
Ingram. I am pleased his remarks were so well received
and know he will be most grateful for your kind comments
concerning his performance. You may be sure he enjoyed
being with you an? is as appreciative as I am of your
courtesy in writing.

?53/ 3 Sincerely yoursWdham? yiehstej
5
535 3 William H. Webster
M- Director
New York Enclosure
6? 1 Mr. Moore Enclosure
;mV Personal.Attention: Bring to the attention of Deputy
A?wbh yr)? Assistant Director ames 0. ?n9 :35 .
67~ 519127 (James ram Enclosure 

I
Mr. DeLoach is a former Assiepaqt to- tbe Director
who eon 8/13/42 and retired 7/31/70 '7 r- {If} 33!
(5) . 1

v5 ?H-r-r ?Jz- tr 1.1. 
Hear. I /kmsj atCoun.
Cutaway . APPROVCD: 3295232. P1351. alnsp- 
. Rec.M;mt.. .. WM

Director .

Plan. ldent. Tee-h V)
Peel?" 417/ gisgc?g'ri. 5.17 35.3 :ilntel. Training: 
55"" PuincArfE. Off. 
Idl??gm

$25533: .33.: 

Direclon' Sec' 5 5! ROOM

 





 

 




(I
if?
A
I



PURCHASE, v. ?3577
(and) 2:53- 3027'

 

 

 

pau- ur tel-MM113': 
a sermon 
was tan: a? 3:73.
Gonna-e ?was 3 
a 19W
May 23, 1978 
The Honorable William H. Webster
Director 
Federal Bureau of Investigation
1. Edgar Hoover Building 
Washington, D. C. 20535 .

 
     

Dear Judge Webster:

I thought you would like to know that on Thursday, May 18, 1978,
Deputy Assistant Director James 0. Ingram made an excellent

talk on terrorism to an attentive and very interested, standing-

af - room?only group at our World Headquarters. Those in attendance3231"? 

I ll

I

.

.u


included a number of executives from neighboring corporations to g; 
whom we had extended an invitation, as well as a number of rank? . 

ing FBI officials from the New York, New Rochelle and New Haven 
Offices. . 

It- was a pleasure to have Mr. Ingram with us, and I thank you sin- .
cerely for your kindness in permitting him to make this talk to our
people. His remarks were very informative and timely, and they .
provoked an unusually large number of questions from the audience.
I believe he was well pleased with his reception and I know we were 
delighted to have him as our gUest.

Again, I am most appreciative of your courtesy in making this pre?

Mal-h-

 

 

 

sentation possibleWith highest esteem, 3?3 3K.
1 6 JUN '13 1378 ,t m.
3 m-W 


0. ?tit

- C.D.\Del..oach 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. J. 7
A . Exec. AD-lnv.
.e Exec. 
Exec. antes
1 3.7 .. Asst Bin:
1 Adm.?
trim. Inv. 
It! I.
- Inteu. 
Laboratory 
PURCHASE. 10577 Lega'Com?L?
TEL. (914) 2 63 - 3027
Plan lnsp.
7 Pcc. 7
302' Tania? 
annexes? Prim -
conPonAu AFFAIRS MarCh 1980 Telephone:
Director?s 32641

The Honorable William H. Webster
Director .
Federal Bureau of Investigw


 

935 Avenue,

Washington, D. c. 20535 
g? $7.wa 3L1 OMB Wide

Dear B111:

I PepsiCo and the Pepsi-Cola Bottlers Association have created a new series
of political education seminars for Pepsi-Cola Bottlers. These seminars
are held in Washington, D. C. and involve approximately 25 Bottlers. The
curriculum consists of political lectures, films, work sessions and

discussions of key soft drink issues. Two Senators and four Congressmen
are lecturing to this group. In addition, the program includes actual visits
to Capitol Hill for personal discussions with Senators and Representatives.
Dick Lesher, President of the S. Chamber of Commerce, will appear

 

before them.

Our next seminar is being scheduled for April 22-24 at the Madison Hotel.
I am no doubt being very presumptuous, but I would deeply appreciate it if

you could spend 15 or so minutes with the participants of this seminar, the
Pepsi-Cola Bottlers Association Board of Directors, on April 22nd at any
time convenient to you. I will bring them to your ff?e

location satisfactory to you. . 
l?tgu?z?"

?ft
if.

 

 
  

(?11911. 




    
 
 

      

Searched? Numbered 

The PCBA Board is made up of outstanding, wealth indivmga 7 7
different communities across the nation. Many of these men are well known
civic leaders who are keenly aware of the importance of po 1t1ca
{All participants would find meeting with you a valuable learning experience,

?as did the Bottlers you were most gracious to see at our first seminar in ?x

 

tau-1?

 

,October, 1979. 
hope we will have the pleasure of meeting with yW lkofprward to 

3:



hearing from you.

 

Sincerely,

I ,1

 

Copy made for Tale. Rn. (?my

)3/13/t7" ?7111.? C. D. DeLoach 



3.531.511.1sz 1:11:11 . Egg/1W We; anatomy
A 

,7

 

 

   

 

 

L,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5/ 
.2 if, 
D6
spoil 23, 1981

75?
Mr. earths D. DsLosoh
Vice President
Affairs
Pspsioo Ind.
sPurchass, New York 105?? 
Dear Bake:

I read.w re your letter of April 1,
1981, concerning an applicant for employ?
ment as a Special 'wi I.

Your continued interest in the and efforts to
keep us apprised of those individuals possessing good potsns
tial for the Special Agent position are greatly appreciated.

Please be assured that when hiring fOr the Special
Agent position resumes, Mr. will be given ovary con~
Sidsration consistent with his test scores and educational and
employment background.

With best wishes,

Sincerely,
{1 William H. Webster

$3 5 William H. Webster

33 rm: Director

$2 
LW . so so @935
EnExec Au In,"

   

Ctim. ..
[Jeni

lnlell. 
Laboratory 
Lego! Coun. 

 

Exec AIS 
Asst. Din} . . .
Adm. i Mr . .

 

Enclosure (Copy of\Incoming)

f3

. (s
Mls?

Incoming)

 

 

 

JGF:csb ?55)

EnclosureVCCopy of Inooming)(Detaohed)




mews; .u 

ZWETE no th&hss 
I. Directo?d/Jwg Rot. Mgnt.
Tech; SunTrains 
1: PuBlic Ans. on. .. he! Exec a? 3
Telephone Run. a EXEC. AL Cf 3mg. 
Direclor'; Sea, 41 ROOM A, memo, LES worm public A?rum-? 
- 7 - . 

 

 

b6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. If, 
33Per Division applied Egg?; 
the spe?iag?. Agent pg .it: Lon under Exec. AD 
ithe Modified Program: ever, his Ass: 
Cognitive Functions Test was not Adm shew
high enough to qualify him for an Crim'lnv I 
interview. \2 - I .. 
14m me. this".
i pu RCHASE. N. vi lie?Lew?r 
in TEL. (out) 263:?53027 
i Planalnsp. 
Rec Mani. 
CARTHA D. Teen sews 
April 1,1981 . Training 
0H. 01 Cong. 
08? &Pub!5c 
Teiephone Rm. 
Directors Sec'y 

 



 

 

Judge William H. Webster
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington, D. C. 20535

 

 

Dear Bill:
Mrs. I lie an Administrative Assistant to one b6
of our executives at PepsiCo, Inc. Her husband,

 

is currently an applicant for the position
10f Special Agent in the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

I has recently received an Honorable Discharge
rom the U. 3. Marine Corps. He attained the rank of
Captain while in military service and his most recent
assignment was that of Inspector? Instructor, Staff,

Fort Schuyler, Bronx, New York. He also had quite
extensive experience as Communication S-2 (intelligence)
while in the Marine Corps. He served in the Marines for
six years. All of his ?tness reports re?ect that he was
rated in an excellent fashion.

 

 

 

 

 

Prior to entering the Marine Corps, Mr. I: served
brie?y as a lice of?cer with the Westchester County Parkway
Police. Mint] has an excellent reputation? and is
regarded highly in the community. He makes an excellent
appearance, has a pleasing personality and, obviously due to
his Marine Corps training, appears to be we" discinlined

 

 

 

?and amenable to instructions. REC-144 61$; 702?? 5w

 

 

 

Wm 
f? 1

1329/3" . 
4900:. 5

 

 

[3533519

 

Judge William Webster

Mr. I:Ihas a Masters Degree in Educational
Curriculum Instruction. He graduated from Widener
University, Chester; in 1974. Mrs.

as referred to above, is a well respected employee of ours.
She has an excellent reputation and above average ef?ciency.

While I realize there is a "freeze" on hiring applicants at
the present time, I, nevertheless, wanted to bring this
young man to your attention so that his interest in the FBI
could be established for the record.

 

With kindest regards,

Sincerely,

    

C. D. DeLoach

1)

b6

1

 

 

.4. a 


PU RCHASE, N. Y. 10677

 

 

TEL. (914) 253-3027

CARTHA D. 
VICE PRESIDENT
CORPORATE AFFAIRS
June 14, 19 82

ASE 

Mr. William H. Webster
Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Washington; D. C. 20535

Dear Bill:

family represents the Schweppes bottling interest in the b6
United States. I am in the Knights of Malta withl 
and also serve on a board with them}.



I:Ihas a son,  l"who is 28 years of age and
currently serving in the "special? problems unit" of the Los Angeles
Police Department. I:Imakes an excellent appearance -- neat, trim.
and athletic looking in nature. He received a B. A. degree from
Baldwin~ Wallace College in 1976. His grades were above average.
He was immediately employed by the Bergen County, New Jersey
Police Department and was assigned to Tena?y where he remained
approximately 4 1/2 years. He left there of his own volition in 1980
and became employed by the Los Angeles Police Department.

At the LAPD, I:Ihas received at least a dozen commendations
and has received specialized training, including criminal investigation
and juvenile courses. He has never received any disciplinary action.

He is reportedly an excellent marksman, a quali?ed judo instructor,

and has additionally received training in Special weapons and repelling.
He has consistently been among the top ?ve police officers in his
division in performing necessary overtime. He has a working
knowledge of the Spanish language.

 

m" My".

Asaamhaa 
AUG 101982 3 AUG 4: 1982?

Memes ?7 
hjc?lo 0%
MIMIC WWI -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

. {a
1:35:25ng ?9

Mr. William H. Webster

I mentioned these facts inasmuch asEIfather and uncle have indicated
to me on several occasions the fact that he has previously applied to
the FBI for consideration as a Special Agent when and if a vacancy
occurs. While I have met this young man only once, I did have the
opportunity to converse with him for several hours and was quite
impressed with his appearance and abilities.

I would appreciate it if this letter could be made a part ofl:l ?le
at FBI Headquarters. I feel that he has potentialities of, becoming
an excellent Special Agent. He appears to be the clean?cut type of
individual that the Bureau constantly seeks.
With best wishes and kind regards.

Sincerely,



C. D. DeLoach

 

 

 

 

Eu: Ab Adm.?
Exoc AD luv-?

 

i .3
  Lr-i -1 a


Jane 19, 1931





mama I naa?o??oaca

?Tha following pertains to th? former employment 
in the Federal Bureau of Investigation of oaptionod indivi?ual.

Date of entry on duty: August 3i, 1942

EDD title, grade
and salary: Student Fingerprint Classifier, Grade GAE 2,
$1440 per annum

Dara appointed Special Agent: Bacamber 14, 1942 (military
loava without gay from
November 2, 19 a, to April 1,
1946) 

Duties performed as Special Agent .
following period of training: Investigative and supervisory
duties, and the duties o? an
Enagactor. Diraotor,
Asa start to the Director

Date of aoparation: July 31, 197%
Reason for Leaving: ?Rotirad

Title, salary and grade at -
time of separation: to the Director, Level 5,
$369000 per annum 

His services more satisfactory and nothing was known
which would reflect unfavorably on his oharaotor or integrity ?aring
the porio? of his employment with this Bureau.

Memorandum prepared for the transmittal to CIA b6

Exec AD Mr

Asst. DIM
Adm. Sons. 
Crlm. lnv.
Mont.
Into".
Labogoiory 
Logo] 
Plan. 8. lnsp. 

 

 

 

Roe. Manh?

Toch. Sun. 


?om-among.



loph'bm 

 



b7C
,3/45?
5? - 9 
67-338728 (a jar? 
60?4" (Y "Ma 

a 1'6) .554,
scaftwxw??g?
Tins-document contams nor conclusions of the FBI. It :3 the property of the I,
and ts loaned to your agency: it and its gantents are not to be distributed outside your agency. This reply
:3 [as t.0( she I FBI investigative files. To check arrest records, request must be submitted irEqd??'? my? I ton. are necessary for pastime check.




 

 

 

 

4- 22b Rev: (13-17259) 

SEAR A:
Mfg/z 1/ ?54,

Searche?
I wateyil? umber

Prod:

FILE NUMBER SERIAL



 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

1.

July 19 1982

0

Mr. Cartha D. De;gaqh_,
Vice President

Corporate Affairs
Pepsico Inc.

Purchase, New York 10577

Dear Deke:

Thankuyou for your June 14th letter recommending
Pwho?has applied for the Special Agent

 

 

b6
position with the Bureau. I appreciate your thoughtfulness
in advising us of your high regard for his qualifications,
and it will be a pleasure to see that your communication is
made a part of his record.
warmest regards, 
13? I w;
Searched .. Humbert 
3.11 3 4: 1982?
W. h. 
1 William H. Webster
1, 33 Director
a
a a, NOTE: Salutation per prior correspondence. I I
2? r4  has applied for the Special Agent position and is a police
2 ES officer with the Los Angeles Police Department, Los Angeles,
I -5 California. (Bufile 67 820097). mg
Em?, CAM: (5 1&3) 
Exec ADlnv. 
15x?. ,0 
Asst. A025: Es 
Adm. 
?Imewm. unmmw
3:2" Crirn. lnv. Legal figm-
Gig-Subliccngifs. 1
Lab. Exec.AD~Ad . Ident, Hedi-.5691. .
tyc'?fnzun?? I ExacADJnv. Inspection Tasha-me 
Pu-BlleAifs. - 41113023 52:91:. AD-LES lntell. 
12/; g? AUG 101932
fv ?5
PER :??Jrr 6W


 

 

 

 

 
 
  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A

 

   

July 2i, 1982

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach
96 Perkins Road
Greenwich, Connecticut 06830

Dear Deke:

IIK .I a nclosing a letter addressed to you which
I I has asked me to forward to you. As you will b6

 

note he is With Public Issues Research.
With best regards,

Sincerely,

 

Roger S. Young
Assistant Director in Charge
Office of Congressional

and Public Affairs

 

 

Enclosure

NOTE: First?name salutation per Mr. Young's Office. address
per mailing list. Mr. DeLoach is a former Assistant Director.

$352231 11:22:: 

JUL 2 6 1982
FBI 

 

f. MAILED 2 

 

 

I (3)

En: AD Adm. g: -
Exec AD Inv. 

Exoc AD LES

AubDlm day . 
Adm. Sorvs.

 

 

   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
  
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cllm. Inv. 
.67-9wl51156b7
$317?? Soazohod ?6 
i Coon. JUL 30 1982
Off. Cong. 8. AL A
s. 



WW erp gen? 

UQI Me ode .1
I. Fine: ?Gil-24: 7 

 

 



U.S. Department 01 Justice ?5

 

 

Federal Bureau of Investigauox.

 

Washingron. D. C, 20535

August 14, 1981

Society of Former Special Agents of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Inc.

2754 Graybar Building

420 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10170 :1 ?63? i 
Gentlemen: ?r 

=The Socialist Workers Party (SWP), its youth group,
and several of its members filed suit for damages and injunc-
tive relief in 1973. Damages were sought from three Special
Agents, the FBI, and others. It is a pleasure to notify you
that the individual liability of the three Special Agents -
I Arthur Greene, and John Malone was resolved
when the claims against them were dismissed at the beginning .
of the trial.

The trial began in early April and the presentation
of evidence concluded at the end of June. A decision is not
expected until the end of this year and you will be notified
when it is received.

Judge Webster was required to remove himself from
any involvement in the case as Director because he was a
member of a three-judge panel which had ruled on an earlier
appeal in the same case. The litigation became my responsi-
bility, and, with necessary assistance from several Divisions,
a task force was formed in September, 1980, which included
one former Special Agent.

 

John P. Thomas, who retired from the Intelligence
Division a few months before the task force was formed, became
a key member of it. His knowledge of Bureau policy, practices,
and personnel was invaluable to the rest of the Bureau team

db

34 \pv PM 39"
67-33011 RECORDED

4. SEP 3 1981 

 

 

 



 

 

b6



 

?gl nil

Society of Former Special Agents of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Inc.

and to the other Government attorneys. Many of you recall
John as a dedicated and tireless employee. Retirement did
not change him. The FBI is certainly indebted to him for his

efforts.

Many other former Special Agents were involved in
trial preparation, including:

 

b6

 

 

 

Leo E. Conroy
I
Loa
Arthur J. Greene
Declan J. Hughes
William K. Lambie
I
John F. Malone
lNorman H. McCabe

Thomas J. McNiff

 

 

 

 

Donald E. Roney


lJoseph A. Sizoo

W. Raymond Wannall
Thornton M. Wood
J. Walter Yeagley

As the plaintiffs' case progressed into and through
its second month, it became obvious that several of the FBI's
witnesses were no longer required. The time and effort of
those willing and prepared to serve is nevertheless appreciated.

 

 

 

1? sung,

tax 9
. A

Society of Former Special Agents of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Inc.

Joseph Sizoo, Norman McCabe and Arthur Greene
testified primarily about surreptitious entries. 0n the
day they testified, a veteran court observer told one of
the FBI attorneys: "You should have kept them till last:
they're awfully good witnesses.? He was equally complimen-
tary after the testimony of all the former Special Agents.

Ray Wannall testified as a former Assistant Direc-
tor of the Intelligence Division about the Bureau's authority
and use of various investigative techniques, particularly
COINTELPRO. In his concluding statement, the trial judge
specifically mentioned the COINTELPRO presentation as one
which was: ?developed in really a very sophisticated way
with a great sense of the nuances, the subtleties that are
involved in these very complicated legal matters.? Ray
Wannall spent a great deal of time on behalf of the?FBI both
on and off the witness stand and deserves special recognition.

 

I  was called as a witness by the SWP.
Although it was more than fifteen years served
as Case Agent for the investigation, his memory was so keen
and the reasonableness of his actions so apparent that his
testimony served more to buttress our case than to weaken it,
even though he was testifying as plaintiffs' witness.
agreed to return during the Government's case and was equa 
effective.

b6
b7C

 

The testimony ofl lalso went a long way
toward establishing the propriety which has always characterized
the manner in which we have handled informants.

This letter would be incomplete without mention of
a "non-Bureau" witness. Former Attorney General Herbert
Brownell testified unequivocally that officials outside the
FBI were aware of surreptitious entries during his years as
Attorney General and that they were authorized.

 

 



Society of Former Special Agents of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Inc.

The testimony of those involved in events being
litigated is required for the successful defense of this
type of civil action. Most of the events being questioned
in the SWP and similar civil actions happened several years
ago and it undoubtedly will be necessary to again call upon
your membership for assistance. With your continued coopera?
tion, the likelihood that the FBI will prevail is greatly
increased. The men and women of the FBI recognize and
appreciate the efforts of the members of your organization
who helped in this lawsuit.

Sincerely yours,

 
  
 

A. Mintz Kj

istant Director - Legal Counsel

 

 

 

 

 


0
i 71 p,
is?
x.
October 4, 1982
013mm: SOURCE

Mr. Cartha 


Vice President

Corporate Affairs

Pepsico Inc.

Purchase, New York 10577 

 



Dear Deke: .

Your thoughtful note of September let, enclosing
a copy of the August-II 1982, Report," has been received.
My colleagues and I have been very pleased by the response
received'in connection with ABC's failure to provide a bal?
anced analysis in its program regarding Mr. Hoover?s tenure
with the Bureau. We deeply appreciate the support and concern
of those who have attempted to set the record straight. Thank
you for making this material available to me.

With every good wish, 

 

 





Sincerely,

.- William H. Webster.

O)

3 William H. Webster

2 ?5 . Director





33 NOTE: Salutation per prior correspondence. Judge Webster
twrote Mr. DeLoach on 6-30-82, thankingwhim for furnishing
him a copy of his letter to Leonard Goldenson, President

 

of ABC, taking issue with its program regarding Mr. Hoover.
CAM: (3)

 

Exec AD Adm. 
Exec AD Imr. Wm
Exec AD LES APPROVEDN: Adm' Sew. I 
Aul. Din: Grim. "up 
Adm. Serve. leector Rem mmz?iSBZv

Cllm. Inv. AD "Tech,~5erils 

 

 

Public AMI. 
??an Rec. Mgnt. 

1982

Telephone Rm. 
Director's Sec'y MAIL ROOM . 


?w 

 

 





I)

If

.e

 




lnsp.__ Exec.AL?1nV Training was near; mm
am". Ollolconn. 
Lab. exec. ADLES Laboratory? mm 1' .
Legal Coon. 9
Off. Cong. 8-
3? 3 $94107"

 

 

 

5 n- we A . *?wm?wrc

0 

la So r" 
9: 11ch - i 3 lg) 

Not knowing if you have access to 

I Report, I am enclosing a c0py of the latest

 

issue which was sent to me by a subscriber.

 

I think you will find the report interesting
1 reading . 57" 5?53 72??



10 001? 281982

 

 

 

 

 

Deke DeLoach

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2
146K 9/21/82
360Debo?hw he Honorable William H. Webster a 
i. k? term"
i a DlreCtor Investigation ,3 
EPSICQ LFederal Bureau 0 3-533:
TH ?33? Washington?n ?20535 if}

 

 

 

Y. 10577





0;

2/7 33273 3?3735 
lU

     

 

 

 

asts.?



 

Puhished by ACCURACY IN MEDIA, INC.
1341 Street, N.W., Suite 312

Washington, D.C. 20005 0 Telephone: 202-783-4406

in . 


  
    
 

ABC SMEARS J. EDGAR HOOVER

The FBI and its leadership is not and should not be
exempt from critical examination by the media. any
more than any other government agency. However. any
government agency or official that is subject to such
scrutiny is ?entitled to have the facts presented
accurately and fairly.

The smear-style journalism which has been so
thoroughly exposed in the case of the CBS News attack
on Gen. William C. Westmoreland has also been at work
on I. Edgar Hoover and the FBI. We have shown in
previous issues how eagerly the media picked up and
amplified the false charge that the FBI had smeared the
late lean Seberg and ruined her life. We have shown how
CBS News persisted in disseminating that smear as late
as November 1981, over a year after it had been
presented with the evidence developed by AIM that
showed that the story was false. At the July 15 meeting
between the top officials of AIM and CBS. Robert
Chandler and Roger Colloff, both vice presidents of CBS
News, insisted that CBS News had done nothing wrong
in ignoring that evidence.

This propensity to smear the FBI was again
demonstrated on ]une 3. 1982. when ABC News aired a
one-hour ?Close-Up" on J. Edgar Hoover. the man whose
name was synonymous with the FBI until his death ten
years ago. -

Those who grew up thinking of I. Edgar Hoover and his
?G-Men" as heroes who were defending decent citizens
against criminals and the country against subversion
had some difficulty recognizing the description of
Hoover that Marshall Frady painted at the outset. ?Who
was this man,? asked Frady, ?who came to command
such reverence, such dread?? Frady told his audience
that 1. Edgar Hoover?s ambition ?was to control
American society itself.? ?In the end.? he said, ?it's a
story of how a secret police power came to grow within
democratic institutions. And it remains of the highest
importance to ask, how did it happen??

What followed was a collection of anecdotal criticisms
of Hoover and the FBI by a few individuals who
harbored grudges against him. The tone and quality of
this appraisal is illustrated by Frady's incredible raising
of the qUestion of whether Hoover was a homosexual.

@7233? 7?31s??g?

a

Early in the program he said: ?Hoover stayed with his
mother until he was 43. when she died. He never
married.. .He spent almost all his time with Associate
Director Clyde Tolson. But the rumors Hoover was a
homosexual are discounted by friends and even
enemies." Why then. did ABC bring it up? They were
obviously reaching. since Hoover spent 50? years in
public life, in a field where temptations are ever-
present. and no breath of scandal ever touched his
personal life. An honest portrait of the man Would have
emphasized that point. ABC News chose the low road of
bringing up a rumor that was disconnted even by the
nian's enemies.

Was Hoover a Bigot?

"During most of his reign it (the FBI) remained virtually
all white. all male. all Christian." Frady declared ejarly in
the program. implying that I. Edgar Hoover was a bigot
and discriminated against minorities. Frady omits facts
which show the man in an entirely different light. He
failed, to mention that 1. Edgar Hoover had been
vigorously opposed to the relocation of all persons of
Japanese descent from the West Coast in 1942. an action
pressed by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Earl Warren.

Nor did Frady mention that in 1959 the B?nai B'rith
effectively buried the anti-]ewish charge against
Hoover. Philip Klutznick, the president of B?nai B'rith
gave Hoover and the FBI high marks for their ?deep
concern? and for their assistance in ??'educing the threat
of continued bigot-inspired violence.?

The charge that Hoover was guilty of racism is equally
erroneous. In fact. when Hoover was first made
Assistant Director of the FBI during the administration
of President Warren G. Harding. he immediately turned
his attention to the terrorist activities of the Ku Klux
Klan. something his predecessors had carefully avoided.

In one early case, in Louisiana, two men, Watt Daniels
and T.F. Richards, had been kidnapped by the Klan
because they had been alleged to be witnesses to a 
beating. Released with a warning to remain silent, they
nevertheless told friends that they recognized the
kidnape 5 week later, as they returned from a

 

 

 

. 


 

.
I 

baseball game and a barbecue, thev were seized by
armed men wearing white hoods. 'as the last time
they were seen. Working with local thorities. a group

- of Bureau of Investigation' agents selected for their

trustworthiness by Hoover began an investigation.
Eventually, Imperial Kleagle Edward Y. Clarke was
indicted. Under Hoover's orders, the Bureau moved into
Georgia, uncovering the then common practice of
?selling? Negro prisoners on road gangs to local farmers.
Conviction of one farmer who had killed 12 Negroes in
order to hide the evidence broke the back of that
practice.

In 1944. long before the growth of the civil rights
movement. Hoover had directed the FBI to investigate
the death of Robert Hall. a 30 year old Negro who had
been beaten by the sheriff and his deputies in Newton.
Georgia. Working against the hostility of the
community and the local police. the FBI built up a case
which showed that Hall had been beaten to death in
violation of a Federal law which prohibits anyone
?acting under the color law" to deprive any person

willfully of his rights. privileges and immunities under 

the Constitution. The sheriff and two deputies were
indicted on ?evidence provided by the FBI and convicted.

Referring to the Hall case. Hoover said: ?We can have the
Constitution, the best laws in the land, and the most
honest reviews by the courts?but unless the law
enforcement profession is steeped in the democratic
tradition, maintains the highest in ethics, and makes its
work a career of honor, civil liberties will continu ally?
and without end?be violated.? It is incredible that a
man such as I. Edgar Hoover, who led the battle against
the racism and bigotry of the Ku Klux Klan, a host of
nee-Nazi groups in the years before and during World
War II?and who opposed the relocation of Japanese-
Americans which was supported by such current heroes
of the media as Franklin Roosevelt and Earl Warren?
can be portrayed as a ?bigot.?

Hoover did insist that the same high standards he set for
FBI employees be applied to all regardless of race. sex or
political connections. Once when he was pressed by
Attorney General Ramsey Clark to lower entrance
requirements as part of an affirmative action program.
Hoover said. won'tvappoint a man to the FBI because
his uncle is a powerful senator. And I won?t appoint a
Negro just because he's a Negro. There are Negroes now
in the FBI and they got their jobs like everyone else?by
careful examination of their qualifications. the same
examination that any other applicant receives. There
has been no case of a Negro who was qualified being
turned down. There never will be. But I do not intend at
this time or any other time to bring into the FBI any man.
regardless of his race or creed. if he does not measure up
to the FBI's standards." To ABC News that seems to add
up to prejudice and bigotry.

Why the FBI Bugged King

The program's main effort to show Hoover's racial
prejudice relates to the case of the Rev. Martin Luther
King. In. and the FBI's decision to tap his telephone.
Former Attorney General Clark states on the program:
?At a subjective level at least. Mr. Hoover had deep
racial prejudices. In his role in the investigation of

r?
I K.

Martin Luther Ki speaks volumes. Here was the non-
violent prophet cial changes?what more could a
country ask for. you know?and subjected to the most
vicious sort of investigation. In large part because the
man deeply offended Mr. Hoover at a personal level."

Frady declares. "Though the wiretaps and bugs
produced 'no direct evidence of any Communist
influence on King. they did provide Hoover with a
different possibility?lo sabotage King personally. The
tapes from that FBI surveillance indicated a highly
active sex life by King

What Frady did not tell the viewer was that the FBI had
legitimate cause for concern about Dr. King's
association with known Communists. The story begins
on Ianuary 8, 1962, when Hoover sent a letter to
Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy stating that the
Bureau had learned that Stanley D. Levison, a member
of the Communist Party. USA. was a close friend of
King. A reliable informant, Hoover said, had reported on
Ianuary 4 that Isadore Wofsy, a high-ranking
Communist leader, had said that Levison had written a
major speech that, King delivered to the AFL-CIO
convention in Miami Beach on December 11, 1961. By
March 1958, it had been known that Levison was
reviewing the book manuscript and helped in the
drafting and publication of King?s book. Stride Toward
Freedom. Levison took charge of administering
contributions flowing to the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference (SCLC). King also trusted
Levison's judgment regarding SCLC employees. By the
fall of 1961, Levison had brought onto the staff jack
O?Dell, also a known Communist, to assist with SCLC
administrative work in New York.

In his important book on this subject, The FBI and
Martin Luther King. In. From Solo to Memphis. David
Garrow says. ?The true source of FBI information about
Levison was an operation that had been one of the most
carefully guarded secrets in FBI history. The operation
began in the early 19505 and lasted until 1981. Its code
name is ?Solo.? '5010' stands not for one person. but for a
team of two brothers whose accomplishments over 28
years of activity may well make them the most
successful double agents in U.S. history. jack and
Morris Childs. for 25 years. would be working for the
FBI .. .They came to be the crucial link by which Soviet
funds approximating one million dollars a year were
channeled secretly to the American Communist Party.

?As such the brothers not only came to know the most

confidential details of the Soviet Union-Communist
Party. USA connection but also have substantial entree
with those in Moscow who supplied the cash. jack
Childs had regular contact with Levison in the 1953-55
period. ?He gave the FBI an account of Levison's
activities . . . According to some FBI agents. jack Childs
told the FBI that Levison reportedly had been an
important secret financial benefactor of the Commonist
Party since perhaps 1945 or 1946. Levison was reputed
to have played a central role in establishing businesses
whose real purpose was to earn or perhaps launder
money needed by the Communist Party."

Beginning in 1953 or early 1954. lack Childs told the FBI
that Levison was assisting Communist Party financial

 

 

 

ti; g.

57 chiefs William Weiner, Lem Kling and

Isadore Wofsy in acquiring a anaging the
.Commpnist Party's secret monies. In February, 1954.
Jack Childs told the FBI that Levison was now the
interim chief administrator of the party?s most secret
funds, and was Child's nominal boss. Professor Garrow
declares that, ?All available evidence indicates that
Levison had been closely involved in Communist Party
financial activities between 1952 and 1955 
reports from Childs to the FBI .. .were in all likelihood
quite accurate.?

Garrow points out in his book that there was no
evidence after 1955 that Levison remained active in the
Communist Party. While he does not personally believe
that Levison went underground and was acting as a
Soviet agent in his cultivation of King. he recognizes
that this was a possibility. It was a possibility that the
FBI took seriously. The ABC program mentioned
Levison and the information the Childs brothers had
supplied about him but they used Garrow on the
program todiscount this. Garrow said that the FBI had
only a hypothesis that Levison still had communist ties
in 1962 and misled Robert Kennedy in not telling him
this. While Garrow does not feel that ABC
misrepresented his views. he acknowledged to AIM that
the FBI could not have prudently ignored the possibility
that Levison in 1962 was a covert communist agent. He
agreed that Kennedy Would doubtless have approved
the taps on King knowing that it was a possibility but
not a proVen fact that Levison was still a communist.
ABC implied that the real reason for surveillance of
King was Hoover?s alleged racial prejudice. Garrow said
in his book: ?The truth of the matter is that the origins of
the King investigation lay in an honestly held FBI belief
that Stanley Levison was a conscious and active agent
of the Soviet Union."

Kennedy Cautions King

After reading Hoover's January 8, 1962 letter. Attorney
General Robert Kennedy asked his administrative
assistant. Joh_n,SeigenthaIer, to meet with King to warn
him. King replied that he did not question the motives of
those who sought to assist him. Another FBI report went
to Kennedy on February 14. pointing out that Jack
O'Dell, the young man whom LeVison had hired for
SCLC's New York office. had a long record of
Communist Party ties.

On April 30, Levison was subpoenaed by the US.
Senate Internal Security Subcommittee, where he was
represented by radical attorney William Kunstler.
Committee counsel Sourwine declared, ?The
received information that you have
been a party to and are aware of certain financial
dealings of the Communist Party." Levison took the
Fifth Amendment. Senator James Eastland asked, ?Isn't
it true that you are a Spy for the Communist apparatus
in this country? Isn?t it true that you have gotten funds
from the Soviet Union and given them to the Communist
Party, Levison again took the Fifth Amendment.

When King was asked about O'Dell. he denied that
O'Dell had been acting as SCLC executive director. This
response. according to Professor Garrow, contained
?much overstatement and some inaccuracy." Then. King

i-

said that he had a epted Q'Dell's resignation. Professor
Garrow notes tiwi?he'resignation was more fiction
than fact. as King's own message and appointnient
books for late 1962 and the first half of 1963 reflect."

Despite warnings from the highest levels of the Kenrfedy
Administration, King maintained his close contacts
with the two identified Communists?Levison and
O'Dell. King would not see FBI of?cials to discuss the
matter. In late January, at Attorney General Robert
Kennedy?s suggestion, his deputy, Burke Marshall, once
more suggested to King that continued association with
Levison and O?Dell was unwise. In mid-March, Robert
Kennedy was informed that Levison and O'Dell were
writing an article under King?s name for ?The Nation?
magazine. On June 22, Marshall once again Spoke to
King urging that his relationship with Levison and
O'Dell should be ended. President John F. Kennedy
himself met with King. He asked King, ?You?ve read
about Profumo in the papers?? King said he had.
Kennedy went on, ?That was an example of friendship
and loyalty carried too far. Macmillan is likely to lose
his government because he has been loyal to his friend.
You must take care not to lose your cause for the same
reason.? President Kennedy then named Levison and
O'Dell. ?They?re Communists,? he said, ?You've got to
get rid of them.?

King Ignores Kennedy Advice

King told the President that he agreed with him about
O'Dell. but he said he would need proof that Levison
was a communist. something the President could not
provide without exposing the FBl's source. Within a
week it was revealed in the press that although King had
said that O'Dell had not been with his organization?the
Southern Christian Leadership Conference?since
December 1. 1962. O'Dell was still on the SCLC payroll.
This story discussed O'Dell?s communist ties and an
allegation that he was a secret member of the national
committee of the Communist Party.

The Justice Department contacted King, who
even while denying that any ties with O?Dell 'had
continued, sent a letter to O?Dell. telling him that his
?temporary resignation? was being made permanent.
King still refused to break with Levison, however. He
and Levison worked out a solution. They would in the

future communicate only through a third party. They .

selected for that role another Levison protegee, Clarence
B. Jones.

Three weeks ?after King made O'Dell's ?temporary
resignation" permanent. his New York office confirmed
to the UPI that O'Dell was still the administrator of that
office. In Atlanta. King hastily called a press conference
to deny that he was still employing O'Dell. whereupon
the New York office reversed itself and told
the press that O'Dell was no longer with them. However.
King's contacts with both O'Dell and Levison continued.
It was against this background that on October 10,1963,
the FBI obtained Robert Kennedy's agreement that taps
should be placed on King?s phones.

Robert Kennedy was as suspicious of King as was J.
Edgar Hoover. He said: ?The reason that President

Kennedy and I and the Department of Justice were so -

 

1T

 

 

. fl ?e 
11? about I?m sure he felt. I mean. I
never'really .had any conversations with him over the

period other than what he should be gin connection
with the Communists. We never ed to get very
close to him just becsdse of these contacts and
connections that he had, which we felt were damaging
to the civil rights movement and because we were so
intimately involved in the struggle for civil rights. it also
damaged us. It damaged what we were trying to do.?

Deputy Attorney General Burke Marshal said in an
interview in 1970: ?The reason that he [Kennedy]

approved the tap [on King] . . . is that after the third time .

or the fourth time. or whatever it was. when the
President had talked to him and I'd talked to him and
Bob Kennedy had talked to him and I talked to him again

which was injune of1963. right after the legislation was
introduced and tried to impress upon him the
seriousness of this there was a report in that 
(Levison and King) were back in touch with each other
as if nothing had happened. And that's what decided
him to do it. that there didn't seem to be any other course
of action then."

Did Levison and O'Dell radicalize Martin Luther King?
Here the evidence is strong. King told his staff in 1967:
?For the last twelve years we have been in a reform
movement . . . But after Selma and the Voting Rights bill
(in 1965] we moved into a new era, which must be an era
of revolution. I think we must see the great distinction
here between a reform movement and a revolutionary
movement." The latter would ?raise certain basic
questions about the whole society means a
revolution of values and of other things whole
structure of American life must be changed.? In 1968,
King declared. ?We are engaged in the class struggle
America is much sicker than I realized when I
first began working in 1955."

Whatever the merits of Martin Luther King, the fact
remains that the FBI taps on King were instituted for
valid and legitimate national security?reasons?and
were fully supported by President john F. Kennedy
himself. For ABC to imply a personal motive of bigotry
on the part of]. Edgar Hoover in this connection is to fly
in the face of all available evidence and to engage in
nothing short of character assassination.

COIN TELPRO 

When it comes?to a discussion of the FBI's
program?the secret counter-
intelligence program directed against subversive and
extremist elements and agents of hostile foreign
powers?Mr. Frady again presents a largely one-sided
report. He shows former Attorney General Ramsey
Clark saying that this program involved ?deliberate
activities of disruption. interference with the lives and
rights of people in the United States."

The program, considered controversial by many in
retrospect. lasted from 1956 to 1971 and, covering
different periods of time, targeted the Communist Party.
the Ku Klux Klan; the domestic Nazi groups and
other racist organizations; Black extremist groups; the
Trotskyite Socialist Worker?s Part y; and the radical core

of the New Left. It dealt. in additionfwith certain
espionage operations and hostile foreign-based
intelligence serv Writing in Policy Review-(Fall.
1981), David . it notes that. ?It was an acti?ist
program which involved not only the gathering of
intelligence. but also infiltration plus a variety of
strategems aimed at the disruption and exposurerof
targeted organizations and the ?neutralization' of
targeted individuals?~that is. rendering them politically
ineffective.?

Critics in 1982 forget the atmosphere of growing
political and racial violence which rocked the country at
that time.

The FBI was reacting not to differences of political
opinion. as Mr. Frady implies. but to growing violence.
During the 19605 there were over 300 arsons or
attempted arsons. 14 destructive bombings. 9 persons
killed. and almost 600 injured on America's college
campuses alone. In the 1968-69 school year. damage on
college campuses exceeded 33 million and in the nest
year mounted to over $9.5 million. FBI Director Clarence
Kelly. in 1973. noted that. ?In this atmosphere of
lawlessness in the cities. mobs overturned vehicles. set
fires. and damaged public and private property. There
were threats to sabotage power plants. to disrupt
transportation and communication facilities.
Intelligence sources informed the FBI of plans that were
discussed _to poison public water supplies. At this time
of national crisis. the Government would have been
derelict in its duty had it not taken measures to protect
the fabric of oursociety . . . Because ofthe violent actions
of the leadership ofthe'N-ew Left. FBI officials concluded
that some additional effort must be made to neutralize
and disrUpt this revolutionary movement. This effort
was called the ?Co?unterintelligence Program?New
Left.?

A Cruel Caricature

Edgar Hoover. in his many years as head of the FBI.
made many mistakes?as any human being would. Yet.
the ABC program discussed only Mr. Hoover?s alleged
errors and it was wrong about many of them. In some
areas. where honorable and thoughtful men and women
can sincerely disagree, the program's host. Marshall
Frady. makes it clear that. in his view, there is only one
proper conclusion, one which is hostile to 1. Edgar
Hoover. 

ABC News has given its viewers not a portrait of j.
Edgar Hoover and the FBI. but a cruel caricature.

What You Can Do

We will list in the Note from the Editor's Cuff companies
that sponsored this inaccurate and one-sided program.
We urge you to write to them to tell them how you feel
about their having paid for this kind of journalism.

 

AIM REPORT is published twice by Accuracy In
Media. inc.. 1341 Street.N.W.. Washington. D.C. 20005.and
is free to AIM members. Dues and contributions are tax
deductible. The AIM Report is mailed 3rd class to those whose
contribution is at least $15 a year and class to those
contributing $30 a year or more. Non-members subscriptions
are $35 [1st class mail).

 

 

 

1 1 AIM Report?
NOTES FROM THE CUFF 
239 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

August-II 1982

ON JUNE 3, 1982, TEN YEARS AFTER J. EDGAR HOOVER DIED, ABC NEWS DID A PROFILE OR
the man who headed the FBI for nearly 50 years. Hoover and the FBI came in for a
great deal of criticism after Hoover died. A lot of that criticism was unfair and
ill-founded. ABC had an opportunity to correct the errors and set the record straight.

Instead, it chose to pass up that opportunity and pile on new false charges and innuendo.

THERE WERE AT LEAST TWO MAJOR FALSEHOODS ABOUT HOOVER AND THE FBI THAT HAVE BEEN
exposed in recent years. One of them is the charge that in 1972 the FBI planted a
smear of the actress Jean Seberg in the press, causing her untold grief and suffering.
-.Accuracy in Media exposed the-falsityuof that charge in 1980, but despite our best
efforts, the correction never overtook the lie. The ABC program on Hoover would have
been an excellent occasion to tell the story straight onbnationwide television. It
is interesting that the Seberg case was not even mentioned. I understand that this
was because the people that put the program together were warned that if they brought
up the Seberg matter they would be obliged to take account of the evidence eXOnerating
the FBI which AIM had put into the public record. I have no doubt that they would have
hit Hoover with the Seberg case if they could have used it to make him look bad. They
couldn't do that, thanks to the work we did on this case, and so they chose to avoid it.

THE OTHER MAJOR FALSEHOOD IS THAT THE FBI SURVEILLANCE OE MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.
was motivated by Hoover's alleged racism. We discuss this at length in this AIM Report.
ABC could have made a fascinating documentary or segment based on David J. Garrow's
book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., From "Solo" to Memphis. This was published
last year in hardback, and it will soon be available in paperback. Read what we say
about it in this Report. The ABC program on Hoover used an interview with David Garrow,
but it fell far short of telling the story in a comprehensible way. Garrow was brought
on immediately after former Attorney General Ramsey Clark was shown suggesting that
King's phones were tapped because of racial prejudice on the part of Hoover. Garrow then
explains that the taps were put on King because of allegations that one of his close
advisers had Communist ties. Without mentioning that these ties were to the top leaders
of the Communist Party and that there was no evidence that the individual had broken
with the Communists, Garrow is shown turning the argument around. He said the Bureau
had no direct evidence that the adviser still maintained those ties. Therefore,?he arr
gued, ?Mr. Hoover did not tell the Kennedy brothers the whole truth, and what he told
them was, in its essence, very misleading." Garrow told me that this was an accurate
representation of what he told ABC News, but he conceded that the FBI would haVe been
negligent if it had not assumed, on the basis of the evidence available, that King's
adviser remained dedicated to the Communist cause. Garrow's story deserved a more
complete presentation. Instead, ABC left the impression that Ramsey Clark was right.
That is not the impression conveyed by Garrow's excellent book.

ONE OF THE SERIOUS CHARGES MADE BY ABC WAS THAT J. EDGAR HOOVER HAD MISHANDLED THE
case of the eight Nazi saboteurs who landed here in 1942. They charged that Hoover had
rushed to publicize the case; damaging the chances of capturing their contacts. They
even said that the saboteurs were not caught by the FBI. A comment prepared by the
Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI points out that President Roosevelt had
instructed Hoover to announce the arrests as soon as the saboteurs were caught in order
to discourage further actions of that type. The FBI arrested all eight within two weeks
of their landing.

.-

 

 

 

?LgABC SHOWED DON EDWARDS SAYING: H00 WOULD GO TO THE 
tions Committee every yea and for every dolla pent on the FBI, the PETS
got back $1715 or whatever the figure might be. And the subcommittee starthd
to wonder about these so we asked the General Accounting Office to audit
those the General Accounting Office found out that the statistics
really didn't hold water." The GAO report Edwards was referring to was'an analysis of
the data for the fiscal year ending July 1976, four years after J. Edgar Hoover's death.

ABC NEWS STARTED OFF CHARGING THAT AMBITION WAS CONTROL AMERICAN
society itself." They ignored the evidence that refuted this. In the early days of
the Nixon administration a plan was devised to get around existing restraints on
the collection of domestic intelligence. It was called the Huston Plan. It was scuttled
when Hoover opposed it, saying that the FBI would not undertake any investigative step
bordering on unconstitutional or illegal action without the prior approval of the
Attorney General in each individual instance. ABC did not mention that. Ironically,
ABC made considerable use of a taped interview that they obtained from the estate of
a former Assistant Director of the FBI, William Sullivan, was a principal author
of the Huston Plan. Sullivan?s hatred of Hoover is said to have stemmed from Hoover's

'r-torpedoing the Huston Plan. Sullivan, who authored many ofnthe abusesu.uu
for which the FBI has been criticized,was presented as a "good guy" by ABC to attack
the "bad guy," J. Edgar Hoover.

WHEN ABC PERSONNEL SOUGHT THE HELP OF THE SOCIETY OF FORMER SPECIAL AGENTS TN
m?king the program on Hoover, they assured them that the program would be aniobjective
and balanced evaluation of Hoover's leadership of the FBI. Interviewing the president
of the society, Mr. Joseph Sizoo, ABC's Patricia was interested only in critical
comments on Hoover or cases of conflict with him. explained that she already had
a surplus of fav0rable references to Mr. Hoover. If she had such comments, she didn't
use them. We counted 21 interviews in the program, including the Sullivan tapes. Only
three of them, occupying a total of 11 lines in the ABC transcript, were favorable to
J. Edgar Hoover. W. Richard Glavin, a former Assistant Director of the FBI whose inter-
view was not used by ABC, wrote to thank ABC for not associating him with the program.
He said: "The program had one purpose only, to the image of a great and deditated
and'viciously smearing a public servant, for no useful purpose,
who can no longer defend himself, reaches the depth of degradation in media news coverage."

We urge you to write to the sponsors of this program to let them know what you
think of their association with it. The following are the addresses of the sponsors.

General Foods Corp. Corp. Best Western International
Ferguson, L. A. Iacocca, Jerry Gill, 

77 Middlebrook Farm Rd. 12000 Townsend Dr. P. O. Box 10203

Wilton, CT 06897 Highland Park, MI 48231 Phoenix, AZ 85064 (hotels)

Canon USA 2 Exxon MEM Co., Inc.

F. Mitarai, C. C. Garvin, Jr., Stephen H. Mayer, 

One Canon Plaza .1251 Ave. of the Americas Northvale, NJ 07647

Lake Success, N. Y. 11040 New York, N. Y. 10020 (English Leather cologne)

(camera, office equip.)

WE COMMEND RALSTON PURINA CO. FOR ITS POSITIVE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINTS ABOUT ITS
sponsoring "People Like Us." They have told CBS that they will not sponsor news shows
in the future unless they receive in advance "an adequate synopsis of the production, 
including the overall tenor of the program as well as the subject matter to be covered.
Mention this in letters to sponsors who say they can do nothing about news programs.

WOULD YOU LIKE A SPONSOR-FINDER LIST THAT GIVES YOU THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF THE
companies that produce the products frequently advertised on We will send you ?ne .
FREE. Just send us a self-addressed, stamped #10 envelope. Mark it "Sponsor List. .

 

 

 

 



 

 

us

 

 

 

 





. 
MI 0 Car: 

Vice "frees. seat

. . "fa
5: hing-fairs;

?F??si?o Ina.i
Purchase, New fork 10577

Dear Deke,

 







Thanks very

November 4th.

people.were abl
of security are
can fully unders
in a foreign son

I also want
PepsiCo clock radio.

superb relationship we
already put it on disPl

Please don
we can be of any help.

RSY:nls
(4)

1 Mr. Young/J
1 - Mr. Baker

?x?j NOTE 


49:.

a

3

Av

Mr. 

Young

Do-

a?
?1 ?ti

 
 

NOvember 12, 1982

much for your letter of

I was glad to hear that our Mexico Citv
to be of assistance to you.
difficult enough in this country so I

tend your concern when incidents occur
ntry 

to thank you very much for the
It is a handsome reminder of a
have with PepsiCo and I have

ay (and to work) in my office.

't hesitate to give us a call if

Sincerely,

@533

Roger S. Young 
Assistant Director in Charge
Office of Congressional

and Public Affairs



n1
_1

aph forWarg?g to Assistant Director
SmalliGeneral Electric clock radio

with the PepsiCo logo. It is estimated that

the value of the radio is $15.00 and it is

being retained in Mr. Young's office as a
permanent furnishing.

 

 

 

Problens

gt


calf: 

 

 

  

- 

manic-??
PUBCHASE, N. Y. 10577

 

 

 

Warn. 1914) ?253?3027

 

?Wtw?a sunny?: 

CARTHA D. 
VICE paesmem' .
CORPORATE AFFAIRS UTE-519E 509$le

y? November 4, 1982

Mr. Ro un

Assistant Director

Federal Bureau of Investigation
7116 J. Edgar Hoover Building
Washington, D. C. 20535

Dear Roger: 

Please permit me to take this means of telling you how
grateful I am for your very kind assistance in handling
the matter of the abduction and robbery of one of
PepsiCo' executives in Mexico City on October 25.

The Bureau?strepresentatives in thelAmerican Embassym??

there,  land cooperated

full and most willingly with our/Ebrporate investigator,
providing him with invaluable assistance. I

am writing to these men to express my personal apprecia? 

tion for their help but I also wanted to thank you for ?y

your part in arranging for the assistance of the Legal ,f

Attaches . @6459 [M?Hlf'r?

Please let me know whenever I can return the ?yoummb?i?edm
may be assured I will be very glad to be 20f rviqegi?DE0151982

 

 

 

 
 
   

b6

 

 

 

needed. 
I
With best regards, 36 
Sincerely, =umnm ?.mmg mg

 

 

. 
an ..
. . eLoach Off. Q?g? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

,June 12, 1985-? . or

9

Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach

50 Gull Point Road .

Hilton Head Island . .
South Carolina 29928 1

Dear Deke:

Thank you for your letten.of May 24, 1985, and

enclosure, on behalf ofl b6

 

From a review of his resume,  lappears 
to be a talented young man. Unfortunately, he is beyond the
maximum age limit established by the Attorney General for
entry on duty as an Agent, and we at the Bureau do not have
the authority to waive this age requirement. We do, on very
infrequent occasions, request exceptions to the age limet from
the Department of Justice; however, such requests are only
sought under certain conditions. is
impressive, the circumstances in Mr. case simply do
not meet the establishedmcriteria for requesting an age waiver.

 

Although I am.unable to respond favorably concerning
prospects of becoming an Agent, I certainly
appreciate your taking time from your busy schedule to bring
his interest in FBI employment to my attention.

From the comments in your?letter, it sounds like
retirement really agrees with you. 



Best wishes. .

?mm

.sincerely,

. . 31
. IO JUN 1985
231:.? W. 20 - g/M

 

Exec 1985 J-Iilliam

Crlm. lnv. 4? 

[dorm 

Insp. 

- Mr. Sharp (Enc.)

1- Mr. Blum

3n?. Bigflg?-

RI::b lc (46

?453.1% 2 91985

Tralni?b 4? 1?


Dir-clef: 5067?. MAIL ROOM .

Talc phone Rm. 



 

 

 

September 26, 1966

Mr. C. D?DeLoach

Federal Bureau of Investigation
Do Co I

.. Dear DeLoach:

 

Thank you very much for your
invitation to attend the stag dinner which you
i are giving on September 28th for Mr. John

Davis, the new American Legion National
Commander. 

Although I should like to be

3 with you on this occasion I must regretfully
decline, but I do want to take this means

of extending my best wishes for a most
enjoyable dimer party. 

  

With kind regards,

Sincerely,

J. E. H.

 

 



 

     

.., .. SENT 97%

'll



BY 
- 3E TELETYPE UNIT 



1
A . r? TIME 
?/memesoe Mis?re .
3 2?

 

 

fl



4 
if?"
.r 
. 3 

:x

1
(?how we 
1v . 


1


 

 

 

A .

-

    

 

   

I H,
3 Mr. T018 
9 5- Damn,
41A D.IDE y? 
15:. 
Mr. 

Mr. 
Hr. 
Hr. 
Mr. Gale.
Hr. Rosem

September 26, 196313 SulliVan-u'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. John Edgar Hoover 
Director (99 A 
Federal Bureau of Investigation 
Washington, D. C. he

'i 
Dear Boss: r,

I plan to give a small, stag dinner
party on Wednesday night, September 28th, at
Billy Martin' Carriage House (the Cognac Room),

for the new Am rican ngign National Commander;
Jo av- It would certainly give me a gr??t
ea I pleasure if you and Mr. Tolson could

attend. hf? Angf??


There will eeapproximately ten people
at the dinner, incl ding Senators Karl Hundt
and George Murphy. Davis has been extremely
cooperative and helpful to us for many years
and, as National Commander, he will be of con-
siderable assistance. -

fir/w 

Hiram"

I know how difficult it is for you to
attend social functions; however, we would all
feelbvery honored if you could find it possible
to be there. 

inSincerely,

a 5 BY SRD



 

 

 

 

Twining
Telephone Rm. 
Director's Sec'y MAIL ROM

April 2, 1986

 

 

 

 

 

This is in response to 1our telephone conversation
march 25, 1986 with FBI Historian Enclosed, as
.you requested, is a copy of the inventory of the J. Edgar Hoover
Foundation items prepared Librarian, Freedoms
Foundation, valley Forge, Enclosed also is a list
of missing items compiled 1979.. The third
enclosure is a list of items the FBI would likeqto borrow from

the Foundation for historical exhibitions or to complement items
in our records. 

 

For further information, please contact Special Agent
Milt Ahlerich, Chief of Public Affairs Section, 324-5354, or
Dr. 324-5335 or 324-5611.

Sincerely,

?"Hilliam M. Baker
Assistant Director,
Office of Congressional

1C

      
 
  

Enclosures (3)

'Mr. W. Baker
Mr. Ahlerich
Mr.
Mr.
Dr.

66-19308 

NOTE: Iformer AD, Crime
E'Aoum Records Division. With former SA (385-4717), He is 
the transfer of J.vEdgar Hoover Foundation memorabilia

suioLs_m;from Freedoms Foundation, valley Forge, to the

 

 

 



 

 

Cartha DeLoach indicated in a-communicaticn to Dr.
.Lg May 29, 1984, that the Foundation would be to len 1 ems
the FBI for historical purposes. The name and address 

by Egg? 1-

Lab. 
(gigs?) 3? IME
Public Mfswe,

Auhmm custody of George washington University Law School, washingEon,-

Rec. Mani. 
Tech. Serve?fwwF1341, . -19?80)
Memorandum - -. . 

a. J,

   

 

To Dir ctor, FBI - Date 9/6 /8 9

ATT.: Research-Correspondence/ Tours Section

FEW MUMB IA Public Affairs Olii ce



subled CORRESPONDENCE MATTERS
RECOMMENDATION FOR LETTER FROM DIRECTOR

This form may be utilized where applicable in conjunction with Bureau letter
to Albany, and all offices d?t?ed 11-7-73 captioned ?Correspondence Matters.??
Name . Rank (if applicable)
a? CarthawD, "Deke" DeLoach 
:mm Mr .mm?uu-?dvm . 
Residence Address (include Zip Code?):
50 Gull Point Road, Hilton Head Island, SC 29928
Name of Agency 1 Name of Head of Agency

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

- Address of Agency (include Zip Code)

 

I 
BASIS FOR RECOMMENDATION: (Amplify under ?Remarks.')

 

Promotion (Indicate from to i l.
Serious illness (Indicate where confined; if hospital, how long confinement will be. 
Death (Indicate next of kin, widow, if any, and children, if any.)

 

Death .m family (Indicate relations hip.)

Editorial or feature article (Indicate whether complimentary or derogatory; also
indicate editor, or newspaperman, to be written to,
with address and Zip Code.)

Appreciation for assistance in Bureau case. Identify case by caption
?Remarks.?

 

 
   

searchedm-um ?um

1.53.4101 19.19.83



Other

 

 
   

REMARKS: (Set forth below a clear, concise, justification for recommenda
specific, omit generalities. If applicable, include Bureau fllri-?T?:

 

This recommendation is for assistance rendered in
investigation entitled 1 aka; Et Al; b6
DRUG MATTER, 00: COLUMBIA, File Number a b7c
highly successful Columbia Division case which thus far has
resulted in the seizure of over a half ton of cocaine, the
arrest of nine subjects including several from Colombia,
South America, seizure of over $662,000 in cash, a half
.million dollar residence, and several boats and cars.

- Bureau

3 - Columbia 13738)
WEN/elh

lei?dai?? erseH? ng (918??

Q?M?ig??m?i aw? . "at,

. #3012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ff 
37%:f . 
Mg: n. I 



Mr. who retired from the FBI as Assistant to
the Director in the early 1970s, brought the original information
in this matter to the attention of the FBI. A boat captain
friend of Mr. mentioned to him that a person on Hilton
Head Island had made several approaches to him which appeared to
be an invitation to participate in bringing drugs into the United
States. Mr. immediately contacted the Senior Resident
Agent in Beaufort, South Carolina, and arranged a meeting with
the subsequent Cooperating Witness (CW). As a respected leader
in his community he offered encouragement to the CW (and his
wife) to participate fully in the ensuing major investigation.

His support continued in many other ways including discreetly

placing us in contact with a cooperative realtor to arrange
property rentals, opening the bank, of which he is chairman of
the board, after hours for the counting and storage of large sums
of money, and hosting a "Job Well Done? function on the day of
the initial arrests for all participants for the FBI and other
local and Federal law enforcement agencies.

 

 

This case only typifies Mr. continuing
support and interest in the welfare of the FBI and exemplifies
"Once an agent, always an agent," -

 

 

 

 

OCT [1 51989

PERSONAL

Mr. Cartha ach
50 Gull P01nt Road
Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29928

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

my associates in Columbia have advised me of the role
you played in bringing about a successful drug investigation in

your area, and they join me in thanking you for your valuable
assistance.

5

 

You encouraged a-friend of yours who had been
approached to transport drugs into the United States on his boat
to cooperate fully with the FBI in the ensuing major investi;
gation. As the case progressed, you continued to offer your
support in many other ways, including discreetly placing our
Agents in contact with a cooperative realtor to arrange property
rentals and arranging to open the bank after hours where you are
chairman of the board for the purpose of counting and storing
large sums of money to be used during this operation. Then on
the day of the initial arrests in the case, you generously hosted
a "Job Well Done" function for all in the FBI and other local and
Federal law enforcement agencies who participated in this

important investigation. I know this meant a great deal to our
4 Agents, and we very much appreciate your continued interest in
the FBI's effective pursuit of its mandated responsibilities.
liAccomplishments to date include the seizure of over a half ton of
m?cocaine, over $662,000 in cash, a half-million?dollar residence
several boats and cars, and the arrest of nine subjects,
including several from Colombia, South America. 67?th

In light of the above you have 93; deep ankg. 
a "Job Well Done." I %?$cl?1m 

I

mil in? L235

k. 
.

  

 

Sincerely yore-

William 8. Sessions

William S. Sessions

Adm Sens. 2f; 
AD Ad a szm? Env. nan?M . Uni I3-
- Columbia ?5an on a! LE. 4
.o - 6/89. mam-m In? M- 
Assl.Dlr.: {53:35. 
Adm: SONS. I. "fhcgatop cc} an: I 
67-338728 (Carthg D, eLoach - 

 

 

   
  
     
 

amt??"?li This letter was requested by the Columbia, and

Drug Section,,CID, concurs. Mr. DE LOACH is a former
sistant to the Director who EOD 8/31/42 and retired 7/31/70. 
contain othing to preclude this letter. 





Off. Unison 

lnl. Ans.

1 Telephone Rm. 

 

A 

 
      
  
 
 
  
 

 

 
  
  

b6

 

 

%3
cw

co
v-l

C:


Exec AD Adm.
Exec AD lnv. 
Exec AD LESM
Mel. on:
Adm. Sens. 
Crlm. lnv. 
ldenl. 
Insp' 
lntell. 
Lib 
Legal Coun. 
Oll. 60:19.8:

Public Alls. 
Rec. Mgnl. 
Tech. Sam. 
Training 
OH. Llelson 

Int. Am. 
Telephone Rm. 
Dlreclor' 3 Sec? 1 

 

may 17, 1989

7 .J


I

[3&311? i1] 1
Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach 
J. Edgar Hoover Foundation 
so Gull Point Road 4

Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29928
Dear Hr. DeLoach:

The selection process for the recipients of the
J. Edgar Hoover Scholarship Awards for this year was carried
out on April 13th, and I am very proud to say that I believe 1
this group to be one of the finest.

The FBI appreciates your continued interest in this
endeavor, and I want you to know of my personal 1
gratitude for your exceptional cooperation. The Foundation,
under your fine leadership, performs a valuable service, and we
look forward to extending any help we can which will assist you
in carrying out your mission.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

 

Milt Ahlerich :w
Assistant Director 1
Office of Public Af airs_ 1;
a . 5 
Charlotte 419131. 
- Mrs. 7861, TL 213) ?ivbs

NOTE: Letter requested by the Special Productions Unit! 3
there is nothing to preclude. Bufiles reveal previous cordial 
correspondence with retired Assistant to the Director DeLoadh 1
(CAD 7/31/702T-

 

Ma/

BEGWZS

    

 

 

 

OIL Llalsont:

 

 

WiEstweg

?54?
.-


3

Mr. Cartha ?<:ZeLoach

Chairman of the Boar

Atlantic Savings Bank

The Village at wexford

Post Office Box 5930

2 Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29938

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

I received your letter of September 8th and am sorry you were
unable'to be with us to celebrate the?zsth Anniversary of the 
Washington" radio series. It was an enormous success, and I think you
would have particularly enjoyed renewing old acquaintances from the
days of the Crime Records Division. I do, however, understand 
perfectly the demands on one's time, but I hope there will be other
opportunities for you to visit us at FBI Headquarters.

.. John Otto relayed to me what a pleasure it Was for him to be
With you and the other representatives of the J. Edgar Hoover
Foundation who attended the opening ceremonies of the new J. Edgar_
Hoover Room at the Masonic Temple here.in Washington. The Foundation
can take pride in this further tribute to a great American.

MAILED 33
26 19%

Thank you for your hospitable invitation to visit Hilton .
Head. It would be most relaxing, I am sure, and I hope I can find time
to take you up on your offer at some later date.

With best regards,

APPROVED: A Servs. Of! ofCong.


Sincerely yours,

 

 

 

 

 

idem. oitia. [William 
Dimmer 'nszasczior. a intl 8' SESSIONS
23.53:? mfg. Inachul?gmt. William S. SeSSions 
. r2 cry cc em. 
Exec. _.._.__cha1Coun. Training 167-
Exoc AD 4.. .. 1-1.. I ping-5H7!" A:
1 4?35?? 9? AN 23 1990
Em AD - - Enclosure 
Assl.Dir.:
Adm. Sens.

 

 

 

 

  
 
    





 

CARTHA D. DE LOACH is a former Bureau official who EOD 8/31/42
:?M?-w-and retired 7/31/70. The 25th Anniversary celebration of the 
radio series was held 9/19/89 at FBIHQ and was attended by

 

 

number ofrpast and present Bureau officials, according to Mr. 
OPA. ..

   

Public Alls.
(5) 



 

Telephone Rm. 

b6


Director's Sec?y MILROOA 
.. . i A i

 

 

 

Dcp. Dir.



Off of Gen

Counsel

Asst. Dir;
Admin Sew

CrimJnv.
CH5
Finance

 

 

Info. Res.
lnsp.
lnv. Sew.
Lab.

 

National Sec.

OPR
Off. of Publm

61. Cong. Affs. 

Training

 


Director's Ol?cc 

July 22, 2002

Mr. Robert Stewart

Chief

South Carolina Law Enforcement Division
P. O: Box 21398

Columbia, South Carolina 29221-1398

Dear Chief Stewart:

This letter is on behalf of Cartha Dekle DeLoach, dob
7/20/20, SSAN 259- 09- 7925, who has applied for a license to carry
a concealed weapon.

This is to confirm that Cartha Dekle (C.D.) DeLoach
was employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 3/31/42
until 7/31/70. Mr. DeLoach served in a law enforcement capacity
in the position of Special Agent from 12/14/42 until his
retirement on 7/31/70. Mr. DeLoach's retirement was voluntary
and he retired in good standing with our organization. .

Sincerely yours,

eri A. Farrar
ssistant Director
Administrative Services

Division
-HQ- 338728 .- 5 7G
?"SAF:mkr ..
12v

fix"
a 0L . 
5
032? m0]

 

 

 

 

9 15% 7'3"

Mr. D. DeLoach OCT 1 41992- 

 

Chairman of the Board and . 
Chief Executive Officer js? . 

The J. Edgar Hoover Foundation 

50 Gulf Point Road

Hilton Head Island, South Carolina 29928

Dear Mr. DeLoach:

SAC Duffin has told me of the generous donation of The
J. Edgar Hoover Foundation to the FBI Survivors Fund. I want you
to know of my personal gratitude for your kindness to the Bureau
employees in Florida who lost their homes to Hurricane Andrew.

You can be sure that this benevolent contribution is
most welcome and will be put to good use by those you and the
other members of the Foundation have sought to help through your
generosity. I know they and my other colleagues in South Florida
share my appreciation for your kindness and would want to join me
in thanking you.

It is good to know that the Bureau has the Foundation's
continuing support. I hope you will not hesitate to let us know
if we can ever be of assistance to you.

With warmest regards and best wishes,

Sincerely yours,

we!
33?: 
?33 s? ?a
. 
3% William S. Sessions
Director






#31 - Columbia

 

1 - Miami
Personal Attention SAC.
1 - Mr.

 

 

 


-338728 (Cartha D. DeLoach)

NOTE: This letter is based on a note dated 9/28/92 from
OPCS, to Director Sessions. Mr. DE LOACH
?gzh--sand RICHARD S. WOODS, Legal Counsel of THE J. EDGAR HOOVER
wrote to SAC Andrew J. Duffin of the Miami Office on
enclosing a check for 000 as a contribution for the
cwumui.Agents in Homestead, Florida, whose homes were destroyed by
m?~w??H1urricane Andrew. SAC Duffin responded by letter dated 9/22/92.

1. n.v . .
Eg?g? ?files conta1n prior cordial correspondence D.

 

 

    

 
  
  

 

LOACH, a former Assistant to the Director.

LegalCoun. . 

imws 51:3 majh (7) APPR 5'1: Ad be 15- mtaboraiory of Liaison
Con ?Ans on__ . cm" Wiesel Coun- .2. Int. MB.
OH 91550 . Ddedor .1 much. Saws. m0". of 

:0 Den. Par .i .4- m'a Pubh'c ms. 41%
0:213:30? M39 Am A H1 Amne- 2 {m (may run on ?m .. 

S. .

AFD?wii ,llmte'h- 11 1,111?? .31 EEO 

 

ol Public M13. 
relephone Rm. 

Oirector's 

 

 

b6



i

 

 

ECT- 432?1992 FREE 5. TE -I- 

 

. 


5 gin?55.84555 .5. UeparxmenIt .55 JuSIich

Federal BurcauI {3511? caugaum

   

Mr?am: 3cm - -

 

. i
.5555555555 55555 SWIM 559'" Gimme 5 ?5 - MHDNEHE War IMAM Harm Mica: Heath. Fiona?! 331"}? 

 

MTEEJ Edgar Hoover Foundation .. - . .. . ..
'55 555-5 5 5?55 5555 5 .,
South Carolina E9928 ., 

   

.l

5?
1 -.

OE E5 fhE Miami FBI WEE woufd like 50?. WE VEFV $WEEIE EE Euly IE. 1- . 

-




.
L??v?v?mu-Y 

 
    
  
 
 
 
  
 
 

 

I . Eymg EMEE IS 5
I ngEi?iy by E5 EE

{ta-EM?? 

 

 

i
3

- gym?

3 I lg sayingmEmbEr Ef- yEEr 55- 
Miami you 6171?]! to 

 

"55,550 573 9:80wa - 
:5 -- 1?74 

 
 

1' 


. u?

 

 

   

3 c? - . - a

33"1992 13?31 - 

 
 

   

   


33-3 1'
A 3 33 
3
THE ERCAR HOOVER FOUNDATION 
o. QELGACH f?rkmg?ci?mJW?'WMWW -soGuEf-aamn?aq. HWHMIM scumcEEtrEHEze .-
Emma. E33333 Etumr?s. WW. ammSAMUELL EEVEE 12'0meer . .
mumw. 322m 1333$Gtemmo?w Ema-3335335 - ?3 .
MAME 9'ng 133WRM. Wmaw?mjim 
Hwicqam??i'mm?ch 99:737.
wwf?m? ..
3 3?3. ..
1 3 EEptember 17 43.3%
1 l" [517-FedErE1 BE33E3 E3 Invest3gat3on - . . 3 . i
16320 NU 

 

 

 

 

3E33EE A3153 :Fibrida ?a 333 by 3
.?-need FEE 3E :3
aQO?t E3 E3ECG 33EE E673E3 your EE tE 3E EE- 3

offer EE3 EE and .EE 3E3E check EETEE . 
3E your agents. gj' .

     

. 31351E77 11C 
'3gigjii3 

 
  

S. 


     

3 3 
EEc1osure 

 

cf,

gE: 3A11 D1rectors 

 

 

 


A: 
. I

OFEICB OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS

MAR 18 2004
. 2001

 

 

 

 

 

:i a
7176 7230
Wainstein - 7230
7210
7230 
7230.
7162 7270
7366
72
Ban. 7142 7150
AD. 7110 7226
BAD. 7116
Dep. BAD. 11703
7369 r262

 

 

 

7110 . 7252
125 I 7262
7 7901 Admin. Un 0

Press Ottice

 

cars. wv c3: __Conauqiey Relations
OT __Pugitlve Pub11c1cy
A50. 6012 __zxecut1vo Writing
IRD. 9939 ~_On11ne/Pr1nt Media
Counterlnielligence. 4012

czn. 5012

LAB. 3090 4~

00c, 7427

Inapeqz1on, 7825 __101?3 303?

Security. 7128 __Ha11:oom. 18327
Elnance. 6032

AD.?ounterterrorism? 5829

AD Cyber. 3023

AD Records Mgmt. 11703

AD Invesgigatlve Tech. or
SAC CZRG. QT

SAC Internaticnal Operations.

I I I

FOR YOUR INFORMATION
PLEASE CALL ME
PLEASE SEE ME
INITIAL

I 

INQUIRY

'"Norz AND RETURN
RECORD AND RETURN noon

I

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

136

 
   
 
  
    
  
  
  
 
  

 

 

 or PUBLIC AFFAIRSMAR 2 6 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

'1 2070?
__D;chron, 717's 723,0
Wainstein 
249
7230
723,0
7152 7270
7366
A F2
BAD. 7142 PBSD
. AD. 7110 7223
5 am. 7116' 
am. 11703
7859 I I 72'62
7110 7262

 

Actin AD 7125

CJIS. WV C-3
Training, or
ASDI ?912

1RD, i?39
Counterlntelligence. 4012
?10. 5012

LAB. 3690?

OGC. 7427
Inspection, 7825
Securlxy. 7128
Elnanc ?032



  
   



ber. 3823

chords Mgmt. 11703
Tech, or

__sac 9:36. or

__SAQ_Internacional Operatio?s, 74?3

FOR YOUR INFORMATION
PLEASE CALL ME 
PLEASE SEE ME

INITIAL

222 mourn?
ACTION

NOTE AND RETURN
RECORD 

I

1

Admin. Unit

7-

__Press oftice
__Comnun1ty Relations
_?Fug?;1ye Publicigy
__Execut1ve Writing
Media

_1014?3 
__Ma?1room? 13327

ROOM



 

 

 

 

 

ROOM

343

b6

 

 

18 March 2004:
f-

 

 

 

 

Re} CARTHA D. DE LOACH
FORMER ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR
REQUEST FOR BUREAU SPEAKER

This afternoon I received a telephone call from former
Associate to the Director, Mr. Cartha D. DeLoach. Mr.
DeLoach advised me that on Wednesday, 28 April 2004, 10
AM, a delegation of Civic and business leaders, including
the mayor, from Hilton Head-Island, S.C., would be in?
Washington and have expressed a desire to visit FBIHQ.
Specifically, they have asked to meet with Bureau experts
who could brief them regarding the modern FBI, and FBI
counter terrorism efforts. Mr. DeLoach indicated to me that
this group has between 45 minutes to 1-hour for this
purpose.

I told Mr. DeLoach that I would pass this along and
that I was very optimistic that we could help him in this
instance. -

For your information: Mr. DeLoach, who was the third
ranking official in the FBI at the time of his 1970
retirement, and a protege of former President Lyndon
Johnson, has consistently assisted the FBI in retirement.
Some years back he played a major role in assisting FBI
Columbia take down one of the largest drug Operations in
South Carolina history. Further, he has steadfastly
assisted OPA for many, many years by_making numerous
televised appearances on behalf of the FBI when asked to do
so.

SAC Columbia
Mr.

Mr.

 

PHI-4H
I

 

 

 

 

 

b6

b6

 

 

 


i.
.

1.

In recognition of Mr. DeLoachQs past (and current)
support of the FBI, your schedule permitting, I would like
to request that you meet with this group to discuss today's
FBI. I know it would mean a great deal to Mr. DeLoach, and
would doubtless assist FBI Columbia. He has assured me
that these individuals are prominent both in their 
community and in the State of South Carolina.

With your permission I will also arrange for a speaker
?rom CTD, who could brief them on the counter
terrorism.

Thank you, for your consideration.

Respectfully,

 

b6