U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Legal Counsel
Washington, D. C. 20530

January 16, 2018
Charlie Savage
The New York Times
savage@nytimes.com
Re:

FOIA No. FYl 7-070; N.Y. Times, et al. v. DOJ, No. 17 Civ. 1946 (S.D.N.Y.)

Dear Mr. Savage:
This letter partially responds to your January 28, 2017 Freedom oflnformation Act
("FOIA") request to the Office of Legal Counsel ("OLC"), seeking "all e-mails, memos, and
other documents related to[:] 1. Office of Legal Counsel review of proposed Trump
administration executive orders for form and legality, including during the transition period[;]
and 2. Office of Legal Counsel review of other proposed Trump White House matters, including
during the transition period," through January 28, 2017. As you know, the request is also the
subject of the above-captioned litigation, and the request has been narrowed in certain ways
pursuant to agreement through counsel.
Since the last partial response, we have processed 372 pages ofresponsive records. We
have enclosed 46 pages with material redacted as exempt from disclosure pursuant to FOIA
Exemption Five, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b )(5), and pursuant to FOIA Exemption Six, 5 U.S.C.
§ 552(b)(6). For your information, Exemption Five exempts material protected by the attorneyclient, deliberative process, and presidential communications privileges, as well as the attorney
work product doctrine and other privileges. Exemption Six exempts material the disclosure of
which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. We have withheld
the remaining 326 pages in full pursuant to Exemption Five, and in part pursuant to Exemption
Six. We have determined that none of the withheld material is appropriate for discretionary
release. We are continuing to process responsive records.
For your information, Congress excluded three discrete categories oflaw enforcement
and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA. See 5 U.S.C. § 552(c). This
response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA. This is a
standard notification that is given to all our requesters and should not be taken as an indication
that excluded records do, or do not, exist.
You may contact Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Tinio, at 212-637-2774, for any
further assistance and to discuss any aspect of your request. Additionally, you may contact the
Office of Government Information Services ("OGIS") at the National Archives and Records
Administration to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they offer. The contact information
for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and
Records Administration, Room 2510, 8601 Adelphi Road, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001,

 e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at
202-741-5769.
Although your request is the subject of ongoing litigation, and administrative appeals are
not ordinarily acted upon in such situations, I am required by statute and regulation to inform
you of your right to file an administrative appeal. You may administratively appeal by writing to
the Director, Office of Information Policy ("OIP"), United States Department of Justice, Suite
11050, 1425 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20530-0001, or you may submit an
appeal through OIP's FOIAonline portal by creating an account on the following web site:
https://foiaonline.regulations.gov/foia/action/public/home. Your appeal must be postmarked or
electronically transmitted within 90 days of the date of my response to your request. If you
submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom
of Information Act Appeal."
Sincerely,

/4//!~
Paul P. Colborn
Special Counsel
Enclosures

cc:

Rebecca S. Tinio
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
Benjamin H. Torrance
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York

2

 Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Thursday, December 1 5, 201 6 10:16 PM

(b) (6)

To:

(OLC}

Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC)

Cc:

Subject:

{12-11-2016)

Thanks, .
RH

(b) (6)

On Dec 15, 2016, at 9:59 PM,

(b) (5)

This

(OLC) <

(b) (6)

o wrote:

and adds some conforming language.

From: Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC}
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 7:15 PM
To: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Cc:
Subject: Re:

+ rh 230

(12-11-2016).

pm

That would be good.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 15, 2016, at 6:51 PM, Hart, Rosemary (OLC) <

(b) (6)

. w rot e:

(b) (5)

From: Koffsky, Daniel L{Ole)
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:33 PM
To: Hart, Rosemary {Ole}<
(b) (6)
~
(ml'iE
(D)
(6)
Cc:
(b) (6)
(b) (5)
Subject: RE.
ll-2016)i(b)
' (o)

11

I o

(b) (5)
(b) (5)

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
t Th d
D
b 15 2016 6 25 PM

S

duplicate
Document ID: 0.7.13767.48104

(12-

(003)

duplicate

 

 

Document ID: $61481 U4

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:51 PM
(b) (6)

To:

Subject:

(OLC}
(b) (5)

Re:

(12-13-16) +illlli1+ rh

Sounds good.
(b) (6)

On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:48 PM,
That's helpful, thanks. I'll finish

!

(OLC} o

(b) (6)

> wrote:

upMJeJII before turningtothetmJII EO.

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 10:06 PM
To:
Subject: Re:

(OLC)
(12-13-16) +111i1+ rh

I need to do t hem both. I thought I would work on the EOs the first t wo hours and then switch to
ODll:)] until we send them out.
I am only sending Steve the ones from Batch 1. So not thelO>IEJI one.

On Dec 15, 2016, at 9:52 PM,

(b) (6)

{OLC} o

(b) (6)

(b) (5)

will look through the m all tomorrow .
I know you're trying to

(b) (5)

and EOs back to Steve tomorrow.

Which is your priority?
from: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:30 PM
(OLC}
(12- 13-16) +111i1+ rh

Just a few addit ional edits, and an attempt at a response to your question.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.48090

wrote:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 6:56 AM

To:

(b) (6)

Cc:

Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC)

Subject:

Re:
- - {003) + rh 230 pm

Yes, let's talk about that

(OLC}
(b) (5)

(b) (5)

On Dec 16, 2016, at 6:48 AM,

I

(12-11-2016)

today.
(OLC) o

(b) (6)

(b) (6)

> wrote:

(b)(5)

(b) (6)

Attorney-Adviser
Office of Legal Counsel
(b) (6)

On Dec 15, 2016, at 9:59 PM,
wrote:

Document ID: 0.7.13767.48074

(b) (6)

(OLC} o

(b) (6)

>

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 1 0:04 AM
(b ) (6 )

To:

Subject:

RE:

i

(b) (5)

(OLC}

(12-13-16)

+illlli1+ rh

OK - Just remembered that you are doing[IDlli f irst. I will continue working on the EOs and talk to you
about them when you have a break.
(b) (6)
(Ole)
Sent: Thursda , December 15. 201610:49 PM

From :

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47720

From:

MQ>lmJl1

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 10:48 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Subject:
Attachments:

(b)(5)

orders
(b) (5)

olc.docx;
(12-11-2016) + olc.docx

(12-11-2016) +
(b) (5)

(b) (5)
Rosemary: I'm attaching the
I orders in a cleaned up
redline form that would be ready for transmittal if everything looks good to you. You may want to take a
quick look at the comment bubbles on
that I've added to implement our discussions
yesterday (see new comment on page 1 and revised comment about '
:" on page 2).
(b) (5)
You may also want to look at the comment I added to the
I order regarding t he
(b) (5)

Thanks!

Document

ID: 0.7.13767.57676

- .(O_L
_c)_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
(O LC)

(b) (6)

From:

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 11:04 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary {Ol e)

Subject:

RE:

(b) ( 5)

-

(003) + rh 230 pm

-

(003) + rh 230

(b) ( 5)

Attachments:

This strengthens the

I

(b) (5)

I

(12-11-2016)

(12-11-2016)

+llli 10pm + rh 9 am +111i111am.docx

comment.

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)
Sent: Fri day, December 16, 201610:05 AM
To:
(Ole} o
(b) (6)
Subject: RE:
(b)(5)
pm

>
(12-11-2016)-

1{003) + rh 230

(12-11-2016}-

1{003) + rh 230

No-that's OK. Just come when you have a break.
(b) (6 )
From:
{OlC)
Sent: Fri day, December 16, 201610:04 AM
To: Hart, Rosemary (Ole) o
(b) (6 )
Subject: RE:
(b) ( 5)
pm

Sorry- I've been in t he SCIF working onru>M I can come to you in 2 minutes.
From: Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent: Fri day, December 16, 201610:03 AM
(b) (6)
To:
{OlC} o
(b) ( 5)
Subject: RE:
pm

(12-11-2016)-

1{003) + rh 230

Ar e you around? I came by your office a couple of times but missed you. I wanted to follow up on a couple
of your documents.
From :
(b) (6 )
{Ole)
Sent: Fri day, December 16, 2016 9:42 AM
(b) (6 )
To: Hart, Rosemary (Ole) o
Subject: RE:
(b) ( 5)
pm
I think you' re right-

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47697

Koffsky , Daniel L (Ole} ,

(b) (5)

(b)(6)
(12-11-2016)-

>
1(003) + rh 230

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 9:20 AM
To:

(OLC); Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC)

Subject: RE:

( 12-11-2016}(b)(5)

I tweaked t he comment

Also,

(b)(6)
From:
(OLC)
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 6:48 AM

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47697

(b) (5)

1(003} + rh 230 pm

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

From:

MWUII

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 11:24 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary {O l e)

Subject:

RE:
+ olc 12 16 2016

(b) (5)
(b) (5)

Attachments:

I

I

(12-11-2016)

{12-11-2016) +

ale 12 16 2016.docx

Thank you for catching that! All of your additions look good to me, and I've deleted the highlighting in the
attached redline.

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Sent: Friday, December 16, 201611:16 AM
,
(b) (6)
(b)(5)
Subject:

To:-UUmii1

Ill: This looks gre at.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57573

(12-11-2016) + olc 1216 2016

(b) (5)

- .(O_L
_c_
) ------------------(b) (6)

From:

!

(OLC)

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 11:29 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

Subject:

RE:

Attachments:

This revises t he comment

(b ) (5 )

(12-13-16) +i11111+ rh

(b) (5)

. (12-13-16) +i11111+ rh +i111111130am.docx

(b ) ( 5 )

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)

Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 6:30 PM
(b) (6 )
To:
o(OLC} o
Subject:
(12-13-16}

+. +

>

rh

Just a few additional edits, and an attempt at a response to your question.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47674

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 11:46 AM

To:

emxae

Subject:

(b) (5)

Attachments:

(b)(S)

Here is

theM$IE>II EO, wittll's edits.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57568

(12-13-16) + OLC (12 16 2016)
. (12-13-16) + OLC (12 16 2016).docx

No rush on this, as this is in Batch 2.

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.....

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Friday, December 16, 2016 11:49 AM

Attachments:

Use this one. I adjusted

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57564

(b) (5)

(12-13-16) + OLC (12 16 2016)

(b) (5)

(12-13-16) + OLC (12 16 2016).docx

(b) (5)

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 11:50 AM

To:

Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC}

Cc:

(b ) (6 )

Subject:

: (OLC}

(b) (5 )

RE:
+ OLC 1 2 16 2016

I

(12-11-2016)

That makes sense. Thanks-this looks good.
From: Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC}
Sent: Friday, December 16, 201611:48 AM
(b)(6 )
To: Hart, Rosemary (OLC) o
(b) (6 )
Cc:
: (OLC) o
(b)
(5)
Subject: RE:

(b) (5 )

>
(12-11-2016) + OLC 1216 2016
i.

See below.

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC}

Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 11:31 AM
(b)(6 )
To: Koffsky, Daniel L {Ole) o
(b) (6 )
(b ) (6)
Cc:
: (OLC) o
(b
)
(5)
Subject:
Dan: Here is the final that.

and I propose sending. The comment on

(b ) (5)

Do you think this is OK?

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47549

>
{12-11-2016) + OLC 1216 2016

(b) (5 )

, now reads:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.,,..

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}
Friday, December 16, 2016 12:20 PM
(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) +

OLC 12 16 2016
(b) (5)

Att achments:

OLC 12 16 2016.docx

This is thellQDJI EO.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57308

I

(12-11-2016) +

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.,,..

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}
Friday, December 16, 2016 12:22 PM
(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) +

OLC 12 16 2016
(b) (5)

Att achments:

OLC 12 16 2016.docx

IDJEDI again, with

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57305

(b) (5)

slightly revised.

I

(12-11-2016) +

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.,,..

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Friday, December 16, 2016 1:06 PM
(b) (5)

{12-11-2016} +

(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) +

OLC 12 16 2016
Att achments:

OLC 12 16 2016.docx

I promise - no more tinkering!

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57290

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.,,..

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}
Friday, December 16, 2016 1:17 PM
(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) +

(b)(5)

. (12-11-2016) +

olc 12 16 2016
Att achments:

olc 12 16 2016.docx

I found a typo in one of my comments, so I fixed that. Also, made title all caps.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57285

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 1:18 PM

To:

-WIUII

Subject:

(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16 2016

Attachments:

(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16

2016.docx

Another f inal.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57283

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 2:09 PM

To:

MWUII

Subject:

(b) (5)

Attachments:

(b)(S)

(12-11-2016) +111+ rh
1(12-11-2016) +111+ rh.docx

Good edits! This one was a bit messy. I've tried to respond to your questions and have added some
additional edits.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57257

- .(O_L
_c_
) ------------------(b) (6)

From:

i

(OLC)

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 2:18 PM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

Subject:

RE:

(b) (5)
(b) (5)

Attachments:

+
.
+
+11111 +ill

: (12-11-2016)
: (12-11-2016)

rh

+ rh

217pm.docx

From: Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:17 PM
To:
o{OLC)
(b) (5)
Subject: RE:

(b) (6)
, {12-11-2016}

+.1
+ rh

That would be great. Thanks!
(b) (6)
From:
I (OLC}
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:16 PM
(b)(6)
To: Hart, Rosemary (OLC} o
(b) (5)
Subject: RE:

, (12-11-2016}
(b) (5)

Yes, but I'm conforming the comment about

+.1

, so give me a minute.

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC}
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 2:16 PM

To:
Subject: FW:

o (OLC} o
(b) (5)

(b) (6)

+ rh

>
(12-11-2016)

4. 1

+ rh

This is the last version I recall. Correct?
From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 8:49 PM
(b) (6)
To:
{OLC} o
(b) (5)
Subject:

>
(12-11-2016}

+Ill + rh

. : I liked all your edits and questions. In the attached redline, I have responded to your question by
(b) (5)
providing an outward-facing comment and have added some additional edits.

Happy to discuss.
Thanks,
Rosemary

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47531

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)

.,...

Friday, December 16, 2016 2:27 PM

Subject:

(b ) ( 5 )

: (12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16 2016

Attachments:

(b ) ( 5 )

; {12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16

2016.docx

Another f inal.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57247

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

.....

Friday, December 16, 2016 2:45 PM
Hart, Rosemary {O le)
(b) (5)
(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) + olc
1

{12-11-2016) + olc.docx

Rosemary: A near-final version of this redline for your review. The yellow highlighting denotes where I
added text.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57180

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.....

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Friday, December 16, 2016 2:50 PM

Attachments:

Those look good. Thanks!

Document ID: 0.7.13767.57155

(b) (5)
(b) (5)

(12-11-2016) + olc
1

(12-11-2016) + olc.docx

From:

MWoWM

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 4:04 PM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Subject:

RE: Executive Orders for OLC Review (Part 1)

Attachments:

(b ) (5 )

2016..... docx;
(.... docx;
{12-11-20.... docx;
(12-11-20.... docx;
11-2016) + OLC 12 16 2 .... docx;
(12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16 .... docx

(12-11-2016) + olc 12 16
(b) (5)
(b ) (5 )
(b) (5)
(b) ( 5)

(12-

(b) (5)

Rosemary: I' m attaching cleaned up redlines for the six EOs in the first batch. I looked at thelll PM and
didn't think that any formatting changes, so I think all of this is ready for transmittal. Thanks[

From: Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 10:00 AM

Document ID: 0.7.13767.5711 7

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

From:

MUWM1

Sent:

Friday, December 16, 2016 4:18 PM

To :

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Subject:

RE:

: (12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16

(b) (5)

2016
: (12-11-2016) + OLC 12 16

(b) (5)

Attachments:

2016.docx

You're right! I've made that change in this version {as well as added underlining under the "sec. X" parts
throughout to match the other orders).

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Sent: Friday, December 16, 20164:09 PM

To:MG>Ja1,
Subject:

(b) (6 )
(b) (5)

Reading through this one,

Document ID: 0.7.13767.56823

(12-11-2016} + OLC U 16 2016
(b) (5)

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 9:48 AM

Cc:

Subject:
Attachments:

tml(I:

.,.,.
(b) (6)

To:

FW: Draft executive order,
(b) ( 5 )

Another one for review.

Thanks,

Rosemary

Document ID: 0.7.13767.35820

(OLC}
(b) (5)

(12-18-2016).docx; ATT00001.htm

(b) (5)

___---------------------------------,

From:

waue

Sent:

Monday, December 1 9, 2016 9:58 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary {Ole)

Subject:

RE:

lllllfDmllll E0

Yes, will do. Thanks!
From: Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:57 AM

To:oG>J-1,

(b) (6 )

Subject: FW:

Ill: Could you please review this one?
RH

Document ID: 0.7.13767.56319

Just looking through this quickly,

(b ) (5 )

- .(O_L
_c_
) ------------------From:

(b) (6)

!

(OLC)

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 10:16 AM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

Cc:

MWIWM

Subject:

RE: Another EO

Sure.
From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 201610:14AM
To:iiiiiiiiiiiiiiieiiiiiiii

Cc:E I -1.

i { 0 LC}
(b) (6)

(b) (6)

>

>

Subject: Another EO

ii: Could you please review the attached draft?
possible.
Thanks,
Rosemary

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47188

I would like to send comments back this week if at all

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 11:07 AM

To:

Koffsky, Daniel L (OLC); llllll:>DIIII

Subject:

RE: Draft executive order,

(b)(5)

Let's meet in 5 minutes. I'll print out the latest order.
From: Koffsky, Daniel L ( Ol e)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 201611:06 AM
To: Hart, Rosemary {Ole) o
(b) (6)
(b) (5)
Subject: RE: Draft executive order,

o

(b) (6)

I can accommodate any time today.
From: Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 11:05 AM
To:EJW1i1<
>; Koffsky, Daniel L ( OLC) o
(b) (5)
Subject: RE: Draft executive order,

(b)(6 )

I have a call from 2-3 but am otherwise flexible.
Dan: What works for you?
Rosemary
From:ae>UJl1
Sent: Monday, December 19, 201610:19 AM
(b) (6)
To: Hart, Rosemary {Ole) o
Koffsky, Daniel L {Ole} ,
(b) (5)
Subject: RE: Draft executive order,

(b)(6)

I have a 10:30 call but am ot herwise free today.
From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 10:16 AM
To: Koffsky, Daniel L {OLC) o
(b)(6)
Subject: FW: Draft executive order,
(b) (5)
We should discuss when convenient.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.50646

o

(b)(6)

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

 

duplicate

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 12:23 PM
(b) (6)

To:

Subject:

i

(OLC}

RE: Draft executive order,

(b) (5)

I can find it and send it.
(b) (6)
From :
: {Ole)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 201612:22 PM
(b)(6)
To: Hart, Rosemary {Ole) o
(b) (5)
Subject: RE: Draft executive order,

I can easily tra~
- -.~

-

, but you also mentioned
Do you by any chance have that handy?

O ffic e o f Lega l Counse l

(b) (6)

From : Hart, Rosemary {Ole)
Sent : Monday, December 19, 201612:15 PM
(b)(6)
To:
! (Ole) o
>
(b) (5)
Subject: FW: Draft executive order,
Here is the electronic version. Thanks!
Rosemary

Document ID: 0.7.13767.42004

(b) (5)

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 12:32 PM

To:

-

Subject:

Em aiii ng -

(OLC}

llllltDll:Jllll.pdf

Here is the memo I was thinking of -

(b) (5)

-.

Document ID: 0.7.13767.42003

(b) (5)

From:

IIIIIIDIDII

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 2:32 PM

To:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Subject:

RE: EOs for OLC

Attachments:

(b) (5)

Rosemary: Attaching a red line of thettillll EO. Thanks!

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 20161:15 PM

Document ID: 0.7.13767.55854

(12-14-2016) + a

.docx

 

 

duplicate

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}

Sent:

Monday, December 19, 2016 3 :18 PM

To:

Subject:

(b)(6 )

(OLC}

RE: Another EO

I had not thought of that. We usually wait until they are final and we know they are going forward. But if
you have time, and just hang onto the paperwork, it could save time later if a bunch of them go forward. It's
really up to you and your workload.
Thanks,
Rosemary
From:
(b) (6)
(Ole)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 3:07 PM
To: Hart, Rosemary (Ol e) o
(b) (6)
Subject: RE: Another EO
Here are my comments.
Are we supposed to be preparing F&L memos for these EOs as we go as well?

From: Hart, Rosemary {OLC)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 201610:14AM

Document ID: 0.7.13767.47152

Sent:

-mmo

To:

Hart, Rosemary {O le)

Subje ct:

RE:

From:

Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:56 PM

lllllfDmllll E0
(b) (5 )

Att achments:

{12-18-2016) + ii11.docx

-.
-

Rosemary: Here's a draft redline.

Thanks,

From: Hart, Rosemary (OLC)
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 9:57 AM

Document ID: 0.7.13767.55385

(b) (5 )

duplicate

 

Document ID: 

Sent:

-mmo

To:

Hart, Rosemary {O le)

Subject:

RE:

From:

Wednesday, December 21, 2016 10:42 AM
(b ) (5 )
(b ) (5 )

Attachments:

2016).docx

(b ) (5)

This looks great, Rosemary.

sentence now reads:
(b ) ( 5 )

The Order has all of our internal comments removed and should be ready for transmittal.
Thanks!

From: Hart, Rosemary (Ole)
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 9:57 AM
To:

o=
Subject:

This looks good! I added a few technical edits, plus

let me know what you think.
Rosemary

Document ID: 0.7.13767.55360

+. +

(12-14-2016)
rh
; {12-14-2016) + olc (12-21i

(12-14-2016)

+. I+ rh
(b) (5)

Hart, Rosemary (OLC)

From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

.,,..

Hart, Rosemary (OLC}
Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:31 AM

(b) (5)

, (12-14-2016) + olc {12-21-

(b)(5)

, (12-14-2016) + ale (12-21-

2016)
Att achments:

2016).docx

(b) (5)
. Let me know if you are OK with this change.

Thnx,
RH

Document ID: 0.7.13767.55357