P E N N L E Y PA R K S O U T H D E V E L O P M E N T R E VIS ED AM EN D ED PR ELI M I NARY L AN D D E VELO PM ENT PL AN PIT TS B U RG H , PEN N SY LVAN IA F ebruary 5 th , 201 8 PROJECT TE AM OWNER: CIVIL ENGINEER: LG R E A LT Y A DV IS O R S TH E G ATE W AY E N G I N E E R S , I N C . 5 3 5 SMITHFIELD S TREE T 4 0 0 HO LIDAY DR SUITE 9 0 0 SUITE 3 0 0, PIT TSBURGH, PA 1 52 2 2 PIT TSBURGH, PA 1 52 20 A RC H ITEC T: TR A FFI C CO NSU LTA NT: M V+A DAV I D E W O OS TE R A N D A S S O C I ATE S , I N C 1 20 0 G S TREE T, NW 2 E A S T CR A F TO N AV ENUE SUITE 2 5 0 PIT TSBURGH, PA 1 520 5 WA SHINGTON, D C 20 0 0 5 L A N D US E CO U NS E L : G O LD B E RG , K A M I N & G A R V I N 18 0 6 FRICK BUILDING 437 GR A NT S TREE T PIT TSBURGH, PA 15219 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. BACKGROUND & EXISTING CONDITIONS 8 3. REGULATING PLANS 24 4. STREETS DESIGN 32 5. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND UTILITIES 38 6. DEVELOPMENT BLOCKS 40 7. DESIGN GUIDELINES 54 8. SITE AMENITIES 61 9. OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPE STANDARDS 64 10. ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS 74 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Pennley Park South, Inc., (“PPS”) has retained LG Realty Advisors, Inc., MV+A Architects, Gateway Engineers, Inc., David E. Wooster and Associates, Inc., and Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin, LLP (collectively the “Project Team”) to develop this Revised Amended Preliminary Land Development Plan (the “RAPLDP”) for the properties located in the 8th Ward of the City of Pittsburgh known as 5600 Penn Avenue, 5704 Penn Avenue, and Enright Park (collectively the “Properties”). The Properties consist of approximately 9.29 contiguous acres and are located in the heart of Pittsburgh’s East Liberty Neighborhood. On May 10, 2017, the Honorable Joseph M. James appointed William Pietragallo, II as the Court Appointed Mediator in the Litigation. Over the next five (5) months, the Developer, City, and Neighborhood Groups met numerous times to work through the outstanding issues related to the redevelopment of the Properties. The Parties agreed that everything would be on the table for discussion purposes. After more than 1,000 collective hours of work, the Parties reached a consensus and arrived at a settlement of the Litigation. This settlement is embodied in the Consent Order of Court (the “Consent Order”), which was executed by the Honorable Joseph M. James on October 27, 2017. This RAPLDP is the direct result of, and consistent with, the terms of the Consent Order. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 5, 2015, PPS and the City submitted an Application to the Zoning Administrator requesting that the Properties be rezoned to “AP”. In addition, PPS and the City submitted a joint Preliminary Land Development Plan (the “Original PLDP”). On October 27, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval to City Council of the rezoning request with conditions. On April 19, 2016, after holding the requisite public hearings and meetings, Pittsburgh City Council approved the rezoning request with conditions and the Original PLDP. On April 22, 2016, Mayor William Peduto signed Ordinance No. 33 of 2016 into law. On August 2, 2016, PPS submitted its Amended Preliminary Development Plan (“APLDP”) to the City of Pittsburgh. The City spent several months reviewing the same and making comments. PPS revised the APLDP to address these comments. On December 13, 2016 and January 10, 2017, the Planning Commission held Public Hearings on the APLDP. On January 10, 2017, the Planning Commission voted to deny the APLDP. PPS filed an appeal of this decision to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County on January 17, 2017. Various stakeholders intervened in PPS’ appeal, and filed their own appeals to the Planning Commission’s actions and/or inactions. The City also filed a separate appeal relating to the Planning Commission’s approvals. In total, there were six (6) active cases (collectively referred to as the “Litigation”) in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania that dealt with this development. I NTRO DU C TI O N A N D PU R P OS E PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 1 COMMUNITY COMMITMENT AND OBJECTIVES Consistent with the Consent Order, the RAPLDP accomplishes a number of very important objectives: 1. Enright Park. A. Enright Park is reconfigured to allow better bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular access from the surrounding neighborhoods. B. Enright Park now has a direct connection to Penn Avenue and Garland Park by virtue of the newly established South St. Clair Street. C. The reconfigured Enright Park is larger than the existing Enright Park and will have better functionality. D. Up to $1,000,000.00 of renovation dollars, generated by the development of the Properties (as further described herein), will be invested in Enright Park to develop enhanced amenities under the direction of the City of Pittsburgh and Neighborhood Groups. 2. Community Benefits. A. The Properties are part of the elTRID Phase II Implementation Plan (the “TRID”). PPS has committed that its TRID Funding Plan (the “TFP”), which will be prepared in conjunction with both the City and the parties to the Litigation, shall include the following: 1. The TRID increment generated from the TFP shall be segregated into three accounts: the PPS Improvement Account (the “PPIA”), the Enright Park Improvement Account (the “EPIA”), and the East End Housing Regeneration Account (the “Housing Account”). 2. Fifty Percent (50%) of the total TRID increment generated from the TFP shall be deposited in the PPIA (the “PPS Share”) and will be used for (a) construction, repair, and/or replacement of Eva Street, Penn Avenue, South Negley Avenue, and/or South St. Clair Street, including, but not limited to, all of the infrastructure, lighting, sidewalks, traffic control, and utilities associated therewith; (b) the construction, maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of all utilities which service the Properties, including, but not limited to, the stormwater management system servicing the Properties and other green infrastructure; (c) site development expenses associated with physically preparing the Properties for development including, but not limited to, the rough grading of the reconfigured Enright Park; (d) any subsurface construction and improvements on the Properties necessary to develop the Properties to accomplish the items set forth herein; and (e) any I NTRO DU C TI O N COMMUNIT Y COMMITMENT A ND OB JEC TI V ES approved soft costs consistent with the TRID enabling legislation. 3. The remaining Fifty Percent (50%) of the TRID increment generated from the TFP (the “Public Share”) shall be deposited according to the following schedule: A. Up to One-Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) shall be deposited in the EPIA for improvements to the reconfigured Enright Park; and B. The remaining funds, which will be in excess of One-Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for each phase of the development, shall be deposited in the Housing Account which will fund a New Housing Program (the “Housing Program”). The Housing Program shall fund, in part, the acquisition and development of mixed income housing within a one (1) mile radius of the Properties. See Figure 1 Below. B. PPS has also made the following community commitments as part of its development of the Properties: 1. PPS has committed to incorporate sustainable and environmentally appropriate materials and systems within its development. 2. PPS has committed to utilize commercially reasonable efforts to meet or exceed the Urban Redevelopment Authority’s M/WBE participation standards for the development of the Properties. 3. Development Objectives. This RAPLDP not only achieves the goals set forth above, but it also achieves very specific Development Objectives: A. PPS has configured the Properties to allow for the construction of world class retail and Class “A” signature office space. B. PPS has developed the RAPLDP to accommodate a true urban mixed-use development that is contextually appropriate for the neighborhood. C. The RAPLDP has sufficient onsite bicycle storage and vehicular parking for efficient customer and employee parking for both the retail and office uses. D. The improvements contemplated by the RAPLDP will generate hundreds of new jobs for the City, and will result in millions of dollars, on an annual basis, in new real estate tax revenue and other taxes for the taxing bodies. Garland Park Residences (TCB) Figure 1: Housing Replacement Breakdown PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 2 AP MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The City of Pittsburgh has set specific goals for development within the AP Zoning District. The City Zoning Code (the “Code”) provides: “The AP Mixed Use Planned United Development District is designed to permit and encourage the mixture of residential uses and commercial uses that is not possible in other zoning districts, but which is very common in many areas of the City. As in other planned unit development districts, the regulations established hereunder permit a variety of structure types and greater flexibility in the overall design of the site than is possible in either residential or commercial districts.” 1. Uses. PPS has extensively reviewed the Code, as it applies to the RAPLDP, to make a determination of compatibility with regards to the proposed uses for the Property. PPS proposes that the following uses will be permitted as of right: (a) All uses permitted in the RP district, as set forth in Sec. 909.02.D.2; (b) Bank or Financial Institution (Limited) (c) Bank or Financial Institution (General) (d) Club (Limited) (e) Club (General) (f) Cultural Service (Limited) (g) Cultural Service (General) (h) Educational Classroom Space (Limited) (i) Educational Classroom Space (General) (j) Hotel/Motel (Limited) (k) Hotel/Motel (General) (l) Laboratory/Research Service (Limited) (m) Laboratory/Research Service (General) (n) Medical Office/Clinic (Limited) (o) Medical Office/Clinic (General) (p) Grocery Store (Limited) (q) Grocery Store (General) (r) Office (Limited) (s) Office (General) (t) Parking Structure (Limited) (u) Parking Structure (General) (v) Retail Sales and Services (Limited); I NTRO DU C TI O N A P MI X ED USE PL A NNED UNIT DE V ELOPMENT DIS TRIC T (w) (x) (y) (z) (aa) (bb) (cc) (dd) (ee) (ff) (gg) Retail Sales and Services (General); Restaurant, Fast-Food (Limited); Restaurant, Fast-Food (General); Indoor Recreation and Entertainment (Limited); Indoor Recreation and Entertainment (General); Outdoor Recreation and Entertainment (Limited) Outdoor Recreation and Entertainment (General) Restaurant (Limited); Restaurant (General); Vehicle/Equipment Sales (Limited); and Vehicle/Equipment Sales (General). 2. Development Intensity. Section 909.02.C.2 of the Code provides that the maximum floor area ratio for a PUD shall not exceed the higher of: (1) the floor area ratio associated with the zoning classification of the PUD district prior to its rezoning; or (2) the average floor area ratio of the zoning classification of land that is adjacent to or across a street or way from the PUD. The Floor Area Ratio for the current development is 1.74. The apartment buildings, retail and offices that were located on the site contained 538,726 square feet of gross floor area. The site is comprised of 9.29 acres, totaling 404,672 square feet. The proposed development will maintain an FAR of 1.74 or less, which would result in a total maximum allowable square footage for the entire site of 705,129 square feet. 3. Height. Section 909.02.C.2 (d) provides the appropriate methodology for determining the height of the structures to be erected. Section 909.02.C.2.(d) provides: (d)  Height Structures within a PUD district shall not exceed the height of structures on adjacent lots or the maximum height allowed in the adjacent zoning districts, whichever is less. This height restriction shall apply for a distance into the subject (PUD) site that is equal to the required setback for each adjacent site. Beyond this distance, maximum structure height shall be regulated by the PUD Height Formula of this section. At points on the subject site where the setback requirements of more than one (1) adjacent district may apply, the more restrictive of the setback standards shall apply to the subject site. hp = ha + ha/25 × x2/20 where: ha =  height of existing adjacent structure or maximum height permitted in adjacent district, whichever is less x =  horizontal distance into the subject site measured from the point at which the curved plane begins hp =  maximum allowed height of structures in the proposed PUD at any horizontal distance “x” Where the proposed PUD is adjacent to a zoning district with unlimited height restrictions, or where the PUD is adjacent to another PUD, “ha” shall equal the actual height of the nearest principal structure on such adjacent zoning lot or thirty-five (35) feet, whichever is greater. PPS has worked with the City to develop the Height Chart depicted on Page 42 of the RAPLDP, which serves as the base restrictions on the development. The RAPLDP is in conformance with these requirements. 4. Setbacks. In accordance with Section 925.06.B of the Code, the Property will utilize Contextual Front Setbacks along South Negley Avenue and Penn Avenue in order to allow for a zero setback and Build to Property Line for these frontages. In accordance with Section 909.02.C.2(e) of the Code, the Property will have a zero foot setback along South St. Clair Street, South Euclid Avenue and Eva Street. PPS will have the right to build to the property line. 5. Open Space. Code Sections 909.02.F.3 and 909.02.E.3(b) require the Applicant to have twenty percent (20%) Open Space as part of its development. Applying this percentage to the Properties, the Applicant would be required to have 1.858 acres of Open Space. However, under Ordinance No. 33 of 2016 (the “Ordinance”) and Section 5.2 of the Court Order, the Applicant agreed to provide at least 2.28 acres of Open Space in the configuration as shown on Exhibit “A” of the Court Order. The Applicant has complied with the Ordinance and the Consent Order and therefore, the Open Space provided PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 3 in the RAPLDP is compliant. 6. Projected Use Mix. As with any project of the scale that is proposed by the RAPLDP, the final plans and tenant mix have not been finalized at this preliminary stage. However, in accordance with the discussions that occurred during the mediation process, PPS estimates that Phase 1 of the Development will contain approximately 50,500 square feet of retail uses and 125,000 to 200,000 square feet of non-retail uses. Phase 1 is also estimated to contain structured parking with a range of 400 to 500 parking spaces. PPS estimates that Phase 2 of the Development will contain between 50,000 and 150,000 square feet of retail uses and 100,000 to 250,000 square feet of non-retail uses. Phase 2 is also estimated to contain structured parking with a range of 500 to 925 parking spaces. 7. Public Realm and Open Space Plan. The Public Realm and Open Space Plans are contained on Page 31 of the RAPLDP. Pursuant to the terms of the Consent Order, the specific “Open Space” plans for Enright Park are being developed by others. 8. Build-to and Massing Thresholds. The proposed “Build-to” and Massing Plans are contained on Page 26 of the RAPLDP. 9. Environmental and Stormwater Management Plan. PPS, consistent with its prior submissions, will meet or exceed the City’s Stormwater Management requirements. However, in accordance with Paragraph 2 of the Consent Order, PPS’ failure to complete its Stormwater Management Plan as of the date of submission of the RAPLDP is not an appropriate ground to declare the RAPLDP incomplete. PPS will submit its Stormwater Management Plan to the City prior to submission of its FLDP. 10. Affordable Housing / Socio Economic Impact. Consistent with the terms of the Consent Order, PPS is the first, and only, developer to agree to pledge fifty percent (50%) of the TRID Increment that it generates from its Development to the improvement of Enright Park and the development of the East End Housing Regeneration Account. This pledge will allow for up to $1,000,000.00 to be invested into Enright Park, and at least $2,000,000.00, in aggregate, to help fund the “GAP” on the development of approximately 251 Affordable Units to be located within a one (1) mile radius of the Development (See Figure 1 on Page 2 of the RAPLDP). The aforementioned notwithstanding, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (“URA”) has projected that PPS’s total pledge, upon completion of all phases of the Development, will amount to approximately $6,000,000.00 of direct investment towards Enright Park and the East End Housing Regeneration Account, which is well in excess of the $3,000,000.00 specified previously. active recreational opportunities. In addition to its significant and first-of-a-kind direct investment towards the construction of Affordable Housing in the East End, the Development will also generate hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in ad valorem real estate taxes. In its current configuration, as vacant, the Development parcel has an assessed value of $1,136,900.00, which translates into less than $30,000.00 in annual real estate taxes. Upon completion of all phases of the Development, the URA has projected a taxable assessed value estimated to be in excess of $85,000,000.00. Even after accounting for the TRID Increment, the URA estimates that the as-complete Development will contribute in excess of $500,000.00 in annual real estate taxes. Furthermore, the Development will also generate hundreds of new jobs both during the construction phase and post-completion with the addition of new retailers and office tenants. 12. Landscaping Plan. PPS has supplied a list of approved plants and species that it intends to utilize as part of the Development. PPS has also supplied specifications for “typical” street trees and plantings. The improvements to Enright Park, including the landscaping contained therein, will ultimately be determined by others. The final design of the landscaping will ultimately be determined at FLDP based upon the approval of the RAPLDP. The positive impacts this Development will have on the surrounding neighborhoods, through the combination of (i) Millions of dollars towards development of Affordable Housing, (ii) The improvement of Enright Park, (iii) Hundreds of thousands of dollars annually in real estate tax revenue, and (iv) Hundreds of jobs, is extraordinarily significant. Second, pursuant to Paragraph 5.4 of the Consent Order and Exhibit C of the Consent Order, PPS has agreed to perform, at its own expense, various work to prepare the new Enright Park for these improvements. These items were agreed upon as part of the Consent Order and therefore PPS is compliant with its obligations under the City’s Ordinance to provide Tree Replacement. 13. Construction Management and Phasing Plan. PPS intends to construct the Development in two phases. Phase 1, which will be the improvement of Block A, will occur first. In addition to the actual structures erected on Block A, PPS will also construct Eva Street and the new South St. Clair Street, along with their required utility and Stormwater management, as part of its Phase 1 Improvements. Phase 2 of the Development will be the improvement of Block B. The improvements to Block B are currently planned to commence within 12 - 24 months after construction begins on Phase 1. During the construction of Phase 1, PPS will stage its construction on Phase 2. A full construction management Plan and Phasing Plan will be provided at FLDP. 11. Tree Replacement Analysis. Pursuant to the Consent Order, the Parties already agreed to their “Alternative Means” of compliance with the City’s Tree Replacement Ordinance under the Section 915.02.D. of the Code. First, PPS has pledged up to $1,000,000.00 for direct investment into Enright Park. This investment, as directed by the City and the Community Stakeholders, will not only allow for plantings, but will also allow for enhancements that will make Enright Park appropriate for both passive and I NTRO DU C TI O N A P MI X ED USE PL A NNED UNIT DE V ELOPMENT DIS TRIC T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 4 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE PPS’ RAPLDP is now before the Planning Commission for review and approval. Pursuant to Section 922.11.B.3 of the City Zoning Code, the Planning Commission shall recommend approval if the Planning Commission determines that the proposal meets the following criteria: (a)  That the proposed district shall create an efficient, functional and attractive urban area which incorporates a high level of amenities; (b)  That the proposed district shall protect and preserve the natural environment; (c)  That the proposed district shall create a favorable environmental, social and economic impact on the City; (d)  That the establishment, maintenance, location and operation of the proposed district shall not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; (e)  That the proposed district shall not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes permitted, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within adjacent zoning districts; (f)  That the establishment of the proposed district shall not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of property for uses permitted in the adjacent districts; (g)  That adequate utilities, access road, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or shall be provided; (h)  That adequate measures have been or shall be taken to provide ingress and egress designated so as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets; and (i)  That the proposed development complies with plans and policy documents adopted from time to time by the City. I NTRO DU C TI O N S TATEMENT OF COMPLI A NCE This RAPLDP meets all of these requirements: 1. The Proposed RAPLDP creates an efficient, functional and attractive urban area which incorporates a high level of amenities. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. As presented, this RAPLDP incorporates public amenities such as (a) a reconfigured and redeveloped Enright Park; (b) pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to Enright Park, the development, and the surrounding neighborhoods; (c) pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle connectivity to the surrounding streets and neighborhoods; (d) the reestablishment of portions of Eva Street and South St. Clair Street in accordance with the original street grid; (e) enhanced streetscape; and (f) the creation of a dedicated fund of up to $1,000,000.00 to fund the renovation of Enright Park and to pay for enhanced amenities to be located therein. In addition, the Project Team’s design has focused on developing a unique sense of place for shopping, working, and recreation. There are also numerous private amenities such as rooftop gardens and common spaces which will service the development. 2. The proposed district protects and preserves the natural environment. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The RAPLDP protects and preserves the natural environment in multiple ways. The Applicant has taken significant steps to reconfigure its site plan in order to save several mature trees inside Enright Park, which were previously scheduled to be removed under the prior APLDP. In circumstances where trees must be removed in order to facilitate the development, PPS has agreed to replace the trees in accordance with the City’s Tree Protection, Preservation and Replacement Ordinance by utilizing the alternative compliance provisions of the Code and making up to $1,000,000.00 of its TRID Increment to improving the newly configured Enright Park in accordance with Paragraphs 6.1, 6.1.1, 6.1.3 and 6.1.7 of the Consent Order. In addition, the Project Team has designed enhanced streetscape along the streets, which will complement the recent landscaping enhancements that have been developed throughout East Liberty. In addition, this RAPLDP, for the first time in 60 years, has been designed to facilitate access and connectively between Enright Park and the surrounding neighborhoods, as well as Garland Park thereby allowing the residents and citizens to have greater accessibility to these public assets. 3. The proposed district shall create a favorable environmental, social and economic impact on the City. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The RAPLDP creates a favorable environmental impact by reconfiguring Enright Park to facilitate its connectivity to the surrounding neighborhoods. The RAPLDP, and Consent Order, also establish a dedicated fund of up to $1,000,000.00 to allow for the enhancement and improvement of Enright Park. In addition, PPS has designed its development to exceed all of the City’s stormwater management requirements, which will also reduce the environmental impact of the development and surrounding properties on the City’s aging sewer infrastructure. PPS has set the standard for positive social impact with the commitments that it made in the Consent Order. Specifically, PPS is the first, and only, developer to dedicate fifty percent (50%) of its tax abatement from the TRID to enhancing Enright Park and to fund affordable housing projects within a one (1) mile radius of the development. PPS worked very closely with the City and the parties to the Litigation throughout the Mediation Process to make sure that the dedicated dollars generated as part of the development achieve the maximum positive social impact. PPS project will have a very favorable economic impact on the City. The project will cost approximately $150,000,000 and will have an extremely positive impact on ad valorem taxes. In addition, the retail and office components of the development will provide hundreds of jobs for the economy. These new assets will also generate additional City taxes as well as economic benefits for East Liberty, Friendship, and Garfield. 4. The establishment, maintenance, location and operation of the proposed district is not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The RAPLDP actually enhances the public health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of the community. As provided above, PPS has made significant community commitments in the Consent Order, all of which are accretive to the community. In addition, the previously existing buildings were well beyond PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 5 their useful life, and the removal and redevelopment of the Properties with new first class retail and office uses is also beneficial to the City. 5. The proposed district shall not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes permitted, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within adjacent zoning districts. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. PPS’ significant investment, in both the development and Enright Park, will enhance the use and enjoyment of properties within the vicinity, and will cause the surrounding property values within the adjacent zoning districts to increase. Moreover, the dedicated funds generated by the TFP will help to improve Enright Park and to build affordable housing within one (1) mile of the development, all of which will improve the property values within the adjacent zoning districts. 6. The establishment of the proposed district shall not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of property for uses permitted in the adjacent districts. I NTRO DU C TI O N S TATEMENT OF COMPLI A NCE The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The RAPLDP, including the reestablishment of certain portions of the street grid, while protecting and preserving Enright Park, will promote the orderly development and improvement of property for their permitted uses in the adjacent districts. 7. Adequate utilities, access road, drainage and other necessary facilities have been or shall be provided. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The Project Team has designed the site to meet these requirements. In addition, the creation of additional streets and partial restoration of the street grid improves the established existing conditions. Moreover, pursuant to the terms of the Consent Order, PPS has agreed to use its portion of the TRID monies to make many infrastructure improvements which will benefit the public as well as PPS. 8. Adequate measures have been or shall be taken to provide ingress and egress designated so as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. The plan will be developed in accordance with an approved traffic study. In addition, (a) the removal of the speed lane at the intersections of Penn Avenue and South Euclid Avenue; (b) the establishment of parking and pedestrian access on Penn Avenue (c) the establishment of new bicycle, pedestrian, and vehicle connections by virtue of the reestablished South St. Clair Street and the reestablished Eva Street; and (d) the fortifying of Enright Park, will all work, in a harmonious and compatible fashion, to meet these goals. 9. The proposed development complies with plans and policy documents adopted from time to time by the City. The RAPLDP s in compliance with this requirement. First, RAPLDP is in accordance with Ordinance No. 2016-033, which was adopted by Pittsburgh City Council 7-0 and signed by the Mayor on April 22, 2016. Second, the RAPLDP is consistent with the applicable portions of the East Liberty Plan previously developed by East Liberty Development Corporation and various other community organizations. Third, the RAPLDP is the product of over 1,000 collective hours of work between the City, PPS, and various Neighborhood Groups. The fact that the City was a party to the Mediation and approved the Consent Order further establishes that this RAPLDP is in compliance with this requirement. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 6 PUBLIC PROCESS The RAPLDP is the product of more than 1,000 collective hours of work between the City, PPS, and the Neighborhood Groups. As part of the Consent Order, the Parties agreed to the following enhanced Public Process: 1. Within ten (10) days of City Planning’s determination that the RAPLDP is complete, PPS, the City and the Intervenors (the “Neighborhood Groups”) shall schedule the first of two (2) Public Meetings, facilitated by City, to review the RAPLDP and to seek public input on the same. The Parties shall respond to the issues raised at the first meeting at the second meeting, which shall be held no less than seven (7) days before the scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The Public meetings shall include the following minimum components: A. A principal of PPS shall attend the Public Meetings; B. PPS will have its design consultants in attendance at the Public Meetings; C The City shall have representatives from the Planning Department in attendance at the Public Meetings; D. The City will post the RAPLDP and any follow up submissions to the City Planning Department’s website; E. PPS shall provide Counsel with electronic copies of any submissions for Counsel to distribute to its clients; F. Public comment will be taken on the entire RAPLDP; G. The City will be responsible for advertising each Public Meeting through its standard public information process. Intervenors shall also share the timing and place of the Public Meetings with their constituents. In addition to the Public Meetings, there will be a Briefing and Public Hearing before Planning Commission prior to the Planning Commission taking action. Additionally, the Consent Order envisions that City Council will take a number of legislative actions, each of which will take place at a Public Meeting after the requisite advertising and public participation. I NTRO DU C TI O N INTRODUC TION PUBLIC PRO CES S PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 7 19 6 5 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE 1951 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE EAST LIBERTY HISTORY The following excerpt is from East Liberty Community Plan, 2010 The rise and fall of East Liberty is a familiar story in Pittsburgh. In its “golden era” in the 1940s and 1950s, East Liberty exemplified a vibrant commercial center and a tight-knit residential community. Pittsburgh’s “second downtown” declined rapidly in the 1960s after an ambitious urban renewal program designed to remake East Liberty so that it could compete with the new suburban markets and shopping malls. Boasting movie houses, department stores, a roller skating rink, and many retail shops, East Liberty was a booming regional business district until 1958. At that time, faced with the first commercial vacancy in decades, increasing vehicular congestion, lack of parking, and competition from the suburbs, East Liberty’s business leaders began to call for change. While founded on the desire to maintain East Liberty’s strength, that change became one of the nation’s largest urban renewal projects, and ultimately brought about the demise of the once vibrant community. 19 9 4 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE 1970 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE Attempting to mimic suburban development, these well-intentioned local and regional leaders deconstructed the tightly knit urban fabric to make way for large one-story retail buildings and wide access roads. Neighborhood streets and entire blocks of houses and commercial property were demolished and replaced by a highway-sized ring road called Penn Circle and vast parking lots around the commercial core. The central streets of the business district were converted into a pedestrian mall. More than 1,000 rental apartment units were built to anchor each end of the business district, replacing a long tradition of neighborhood home ownership. Bulldozers outpaced new construction, leaving a net loss of one million square feet of real estate. Spanning ten years, the disruption from construction and dislocation hastened the decline in both the commercial and the residential communities. The new traffic patterns effectively took people around and away from the business district. Retail life in the heart of the community was choked off by its inaccessibility. No longer able to attract enough customers, businesses closed or moved. Entire families relocated to adjacent neighborhoods or suburbs. The new government-subsidized housing became a nuisance as it fell into disrepair over time. Most of the new suburban-style development around Penn Circle failed, leaving a moat of vacant buildings and empty expanses of cracked pavement. Once it was apparent the project was a failure, the rest of Pittsburgh seemed to forget about the neighborhood, and East Liberty quietly survived with a few remaining local businesses and dedicated longtime residents. Community leadership was fragmented, unable to agree on a strategy to reverse the decline. While there was always the potential for recovery, failure to come together as a community made it impossible to attract private investment and public redevelopment dollars. (East Liberty Community Plan 2010, 6-7) B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS NEIGHB ORHO OD A ND SITE HIS TOR Y PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 9 198 4 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE EAST LIBERTY HISTORY CONTINUED The neighborhood continued to struggle through the 80s and 90s. In the late 1990s A Vision for East Liberty, a community plan, was developed, which set the stage for the next generation of revitalization. New housing was built and public housing towers such as Liberty Park and East Mall were demolished. Commercial development began to return as well with Home Depot opening in 1999 and Whole Foods Market arriving in 2002. More national chains followed in addition to an influx of new locally-owned businesses. (East Liberty Community Plan 2010, 7-8) In 2010, the East Liberty Community Plan was developed to further guide growth in the neighborhood. PENN PLAZA APARTMENTS Built in 1968, the Penn Plaza Apartments served East Liberty residents for nearly 50 years. The apartment buildings, which were well past their useful life, were demolished in stages between 2016 – 2017. The site, currently vacant, hopes to be redeveloped into a vibrant mixed use development that will continue the exciting redevelopment in the neighborhood. New connections through the existing superblock and improvements to the surrounding road network will help repair some of the damaging urban design decisions of the past. 198 4 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE 1970 B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS NEIGHB ORHO OD A ND SITE HIS TOR Y 1970 PIT TS BURG H P OS T- G A Z E T TE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 10 Stati on St Broa St clid Ave ld St alty inifie N Be . Cla N St Kirkw NW ood S t Broa d St Ave Ave Enrig h Parkl t et gley S Ne Stra Coral S t ld St inifie Ave SW St alty S Highland t er S ay ir St ay air W Eucl Ave z St S St . Cla dship Topa Stam ar W Frien Amb Ravo ux W ay S Eu clid Ave t Eva S S Be S Fa fford irmo Ave unt St Penn N Eu Garla nd Parkl et ir St N Ne gley A ve d St ve vd m au Bl A tre n Ce y wa B t as K ML E Jr. s Bu 0' 125' 250 0' 125' 250 500' 1 inch equals 250 feet 1/250"=1'-0" B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS E X IS TING SITE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 11 1 1 2 3 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING E A S T 2 3 NOR TH S T CL A IR S TREE T LOOK ING SOUTH B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF SITE NOR TH S T CL A IR S TREE T LOOK ING E A S T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 12 4 4 5 6 SOUTH EUCLID AV E LOOK ING SOUTH 5 6 SOUTH EUCLID AV E LOOK ING NOR TH W E S T B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF SITE SOUTH EUCLID AV E LOOK ING SOUTH W E S T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 13 7 9 8 7 ENRIG HT PA RK LE T 8 9 ENRIG HT PA RK LE T B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF SITE ENRIG HT PA RK LE T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 14 10 12 10 11 TOPA Z S TREE T LOOK ING E A S T 11 12 SOUTH S T. CL A IR LOOK ING NOR TH B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF SITE SOUTH NEG LE Y AV E . LOOK ING NOR TH PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 15 1 3 2 1 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING W E S T 2 3 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING W E S T B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING W E S T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 16 4 4 5 6 SOUTH NEG LE Y AV E LOOK ING NOR TH 5 6 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING W E S T B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T NOR TH S T CL A IR S TREE T LOOK ING NOR TH PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 17 7 7 8 9 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING E A S T 8 9 PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING E A S T B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T PENN AV ENUE LOOK ING E A S T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 18 10 10 11 12 11 SOUTH EUCLID AV E . LOOK ING SOUTH 12 SOUTH EUCLID AV E . LOOK ING NOR TH B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T SOUTH EUCLID AV E . LOOK ING NOR TH PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 19 13 15 14 13 SOUTH EUCLID AV E . @ FRIENDS HIP AV E . 14 15 SOUTH S T CL A IR S TREE T LOOK ING NOR TH ENRIG HT COMMUNIT Y G A RDEN B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 20 16 17 16 18 S TA M A R WAY LOOK ING NOR TH 17 18 A MB ER S TREE T LOOK ING SOUTH A MB ER S TREE T LOOK ING NOR TH B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 21 19 21 20 19 R AVOUX WAY LOOK ING NOR TH 20 21 SOUTH NEG LE Y AV E . LOOK ING NOR TH SOUTH NEG LE Y AV E . LOOK ING NOR TH B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS V ISUA L CH A R AC TER OF CONTE X T PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 22 SITE ANALYSIS Acti ve U Acti ve U rban rban When studying the existing site, it is clear that the current uses and design create a breakdown of the urban edge and vibrant mixed use activity that occurs to the east and to the west on Penn Avenue. In both of those locations, mixed use buildings built to the sidewalk create an exciting urban realm that is lost adjacent to the site. In addition, the design of Penn Avenue itself changes adjacent to the site. There is a lack of on street parking, two travel lanes in each direction, and a wide median. This width coupled with the speed turn lanes at the intersection of Penn Avenue and South Euclid create very high speed traffic and little feeling of pedestrian safety and comfort along the sidewalks. Edg Edg e e BRE AKD OW NO F UR SUP BAN ERB x x Acti K x xxx xxx E LOC xxx LIMI The block itself is a giant superblock which further reduces the pedestrian scale and walkability along Penn Avenue. The giant block also reduces connectivity through the site to adjacent neighborhoods. EDG ve U Acti ve U rban rban Edg Edg e e The site features an existing park, Enright Parklet. However, a fence surrounds the park on three sides, allowing access only at its south side. As a result, it is impossible to pass through the site in the north-south direction or the east-west direction. ACC TED ESS xxx x B AC KG RO U N D A N D E X IS TI N G CO N D ITI O NS SITE A N A LYSIS PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 23 REGULATING PLANS LEG E ND CURRENT PROPERTY LINE (INCLUDING EXISTING ENRIGHT PARKLET) BOUNDARY OF EXISTING ENRIGHT PARKLET PE N N AV E N U E S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E FUTURE PROPERTY LINE (AFTER SPEED LANE REMOVAL) S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. PROPOSED EVA STREET ROW S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E EXISTING EVA STREET ROW E VA S T R E E T R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS CONCEPT M A S TERPL A N / SITEPL A N E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY ENRIGHT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 25 BUILD TO LINES Proposed build to extents are called out. These build to lines pertain to the first level adjacent to the sidewalk. Upper levels are allowed and are encouraged to step back from the build to line for architectural massing purposes. However, portions of upper levels should meet the build to lines for the purpose of defining a strong architectural edge to adjacent public space, as well as placing eyes on adjacent public spaces. At the street level we propose that the building be allowed to step back from the build to line for architectural massing purposes in limited locations as long as the intent of a defined public edge is maintained. Build to Property Line B LO C K A 2 4’ M I N I M U M H E I G HT S E E PAG E 42 FO R B U I LD I N G H E I G HT S S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E 3 76’-7 ” 2 5 8’- 3” 15’ minimum setback from back of curb S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. 15’ minimum setback from back of curb B LO C K B 2 4’ M I N I M U M H E I G HT S E E PAG E 42 FO R B U I LD I N G H E I G HT S 3 76’-7 ” Build to Property Line 4 8 5’-7 ” 4 0 ’- 0 ” 10’ E V A S T R E E T E VA R I G H T O F W AY STREET 3 2’- 0 ” 10’ minimum setback from back of curb 10’ minimum setback from back of curb 3 2’- 0 ” 925.07.A When measured in feet, building height refers to the vertical distance between the average finished grade along the wall facing the front street yard at the base of the building and: 1) the highest point of the coping of a flat roof; 2) the deck line of a mansard roof; or 3) the average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. In the case of fences or walls, other than retaining walls, height shall be measured on the side with the least vertical exposure above finished grade to the top of the fence or wall. Build to Property Line Build to Property Line S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E At Least 70% of the building frontages shall fall within 2’ of prescribed build to lines. Within the 70% frontage, additional setback is allowed at building entrances to allow for enhanced and prominent entry spaces. PE N N AV E N U E 5’ M I N . I N T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B A C K 5’ M I N . I N T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B A C K S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T E U C L A I R W AY 2 5’ M I N . E X T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B A C K S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY E N R I G HT PA R K A R E A : +/- 8 , 42 5 S F (0. 1 9 AC R E S) M I N I M U M 0.0 8 ACR E S B LO C K C E N R I G HT PA R K A R E A : +/- 9 5, 8 3 6 S F (2 . 2 AC R E S) 2 0 0 ’-1 1” 5 2 9 ’- 9 ” 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS S TREE TS , BLO CK S , A ND BUILDING HEIGHTS PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 26 LEG E ND CONTEXTUAL SETBACK REFERENCE BUILDINGS FOR CONTEXTUAL SETBACK R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS CONTE X TUA L SE TB ACK S S O U T H E U C L I D AV E N U E Build to Property Line Build to Property Line S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. S TA M A R WAY TO PA Z S T R E E T E U C L A I R WAY E VA S T R E E T AMBER STREET Regardless of the minimum front setback requirements imposed by the zoning district standards of this Code, applicants shall be allowed to use the Contextual Front Setback. The Contextual Front Setback shall apply only to primary uses and structures. A Contextual Front Setback for any lot with street frontage may fall at any point between the (zoning district) required front setback and the front setback that exists on a lot that is adjacent and oriented on the same side of the street as the subject lot or that of a build-to line established by at least fifty (50) percent of the primary structures within the same block as the subject property on the same side of the street as demonstrated by the applicant with plot plans, surveys, maps, and other evidence determined to be acceptable by the Zoning Administrator. This provision shall not be interpreted as requiring a greater front setback than imposed by the underlying zoning district, and it shall not be interpreted as allowing setbacks to be reduced to a level that results in right-of-way widths dropping below established minimums. R AVO U X WAY 925.06.B Contextual Front Setbacks Build to Property Line S O U T H N E G L E Y AV E N U E In accordance with Section 925.06.B of the Code, the Property will utilize Contextual Front Setbacks along South Negley Avenue and Penn Avenue in order to allow for a zero setback and Build to Property Line for these frontages. In accordance with Section 909.02.C.2(e) of the Code, the Property will have a zero foot setback along South St. Clair Street, South Euclid Avenue and Eva Street. PPS will have the right to build to the property line, although PPS anticipates that there may be some deviations from this requirement in order to facilitate access and best in class architecture. P E N N AV E N U E 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 27 LEG END PEDESTRIAN ACCESS S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. The plan calls for new connections in the northsouth direction as well as the east-west direction to address the issues described above. PE N N AV E N U E S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E Previously pedestrian connections through the site in the north-south direction, as well as the east-west direction, were not possible. This cut off connectivity to Garland Parklet and Penn Avenue to residents to the south, and Enright Parklet to residents to the north. It also made it difficult for pedestrians to circulate across the site, increasing travel times to various destinations. E VA S T R E E T R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS PEDES TRI A N CIRCUL ATION E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY ENRIGHT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 28 LEG END BICYCLE CIRCULATION Previously bicycle connections through the site in the north-south direction, as well as the eastwest direction, were not possible. PE N N AV E N U E S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E The plan calls for new connections in the north-south direction as well as the east-west direction to increase bicycle options and the bicycle network in the neighborhood. E VA S T R E E T R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS BIC YCLE CIRCUL ATION E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY ENRIGHT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 29 LEG END VEHICULAR CIRCULATION ONE WAY TRAFFIC * S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E * S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. The site today creates a large “superblock” that decreases the feeling of walkability in the area. New vehicular connection through the site breaks down the scale of the site and helps serve the site for service and parking needs. * * POSSIBLE LOADING AREA - PHASE II EXACT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E * POSSIBLE LOADING AREA - PHASE I EXACT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED PE N N AV E N U E * * E VA S T R E E T R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS V EHICUL A R CIRCUL ATION E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY ENRIGHT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 30 LEG E ND CURRENT PROPERTY LINE 309,147 SF BOUNDARY OF EXISTING ENRIGHT PARKLET 99,363 SF ENRIGHT PARK - PUBLIC 2 ELEVATED COURTYARDS - PRIVATE NOT INCLUDED IN OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS 2 2 S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E 1 2 2 2 S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. FUTURE PROPERTY LINE (AFTER SPEED LANE REMOVAL) 2,146 SF S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E EXISTING EVA STREET ROW 10,978 SF PE N N AV E N U E Note: The conceptual design of courtyards is shown for graphic purposes only. E VA S T R E E T 1 C A LCUL ATIO NS TOTAL SITE AREA: 421,634 SF 1 ENRIGHT PA R K E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY R AV O U X W AY PROV IDED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: 10 0,957 SF AMBER STREET 20% REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 84,326 SF 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. R EG U L ATI N G PL A NS OPEN SPACE PL A N PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 31 STREETS DESIGN S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. PE N N AV E N U E E VA S T R E E T 0' Build To Line & Property Line 40' 80' 40' 80' 1 inch equals 80 feet 160' 20’ 24’ 12’ 24’ 20’ Sidewalk / Streetscape Existing Two Lane Eastbound Vehicular Traffic Existing Median / Turn Lane Existing Two Lane Westbound Vehicular Traffic Existing Sidewalk / Streetscape 100’ 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 20' Varies 0' 8' 16' 0' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16' Existing Penn Avenue R.O.W. PARTIAL PLAN S TR E E T D E S I G N PENN AV ENUE SECTION - PENN AVENUE 1 inch equals 16 feet 1/16"=1'-0" Note: The conceptual design is shown for graphic purposes only. Existing Dimensions are Approximate PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 33 S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E PE N N AV E N U E E VA S T R E E T Varies 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 1 inch equals 80 feet 160' Sidewalk / Streetscape 55’ (varies) 7’-6” Existing Two Way Vehicular Traffic One Southbound lane; One Northbound Lane + Two Turn Lanes; bike lanes in both directions 20' Sidewalk / Streetscape 0' & Build To Line Property Line 0' 80’ 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 17’-6” (varies) 8' 16' 32' 8' 16' 32' 0' 4' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16' Existing South Negley Ave. R.O.W. PARTIAL PLAN S TR E E T D E S I G N S OUTH NEGLE Y AV ENUE SECTION - SOUTH NEGLEY AVENUE 1 inch equals 16 feet 1/16"=1'-0" Note: The conceptual design is shown for graphic purposes only. Existing Dimensions are Approximate PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 34 PE N N AV E N U E E VA S T R E E T 0' ENRIGHT PA R K 40' 80' 40' 80' 160' 0' 8' 16' 0' 8' 16' 8' 16' Enright Park (By others) 24’ Note: Sidewalk/walking path design to be 32' incorporated into the park by others Two Way Vehicular Traffic 32' 1 inch equals 80 feet 8’ 10’ min. Build To Line Parallel Sidewalk / Parking Streetscape 32’ EVA STREET R.O.W. (Private) 1/80"=1'-0" 0' PARTIAL PLAN S TR E E T D E S I G N E VA S TREE T 20' 0' 1 inch equals 16 feet 1/16"=1'-0" 4' SECTION - EVA STREET 0' 4' 8' 16' Note: The conceptual design is shown for graphic purposes only. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 35 S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. P E N N AV E N U E 10’ maximum canopy encroachment into sidewalk 9’ and above Build To Line 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 1 inch equals 80 feet 1/80"=1'-0" 0' PARTIAL PLAN S TR E E T D E S I G N S OUTH S T. CL A IR S TREE T 20' 160' 10’ 10’ 9’ 9’ 15’ min. 8’ 24’ 8’ 15’ min. Sidewalk / Streetscape Parallel Parking Two Way Vehicular Traffic with Shared Bike Access Parallel Parking Sidewalk / Streetscape 10’ maximum canopy encroachment into sidewalk 9’ and above Build To Line 0' 8' 16' 32' 0' 8' 16' 32' 40’ SOUTH ST. CLAIR STREET R.O.W. (Private) SECTION - SOUTH ST. CLAIR STREET 0' 4' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16' 1 inch equals 16 feet 1/16"=1'-0" Note: The conceptual design is shown for graphic purposes only PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 36 S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E P E N N AV E N U E Build To Line & Property Line 11’ 36’ 12’ Sidewalk / Existing One Way Vehicular Traffic Streetscape Three Southbound Lanes Note: City is proposing to make Existing 11’ Varies Parallel Sidewalk / Parking / Streetscape Travel Lane 0' 8' 16' 32' 0' 8' 16' 32' South Euclid Avenue a Two Way Traffic Road; 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 160' Street section T.B.D. 1 inch equals 80 feet 70’ 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 20' 0' 4' 8' 16' 0' 4' 8' 16' Existing South Euclid Ave. R.O.W. PARTIAL PLAN S TR E E T D E S I G N S OUTH EUCLID AV ENUE SECTION - SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE 1 inch equals 16 feet 1/16"=1'-0" Note: The conceptual design is shown for graphic purposes only. Existing Dimensions are Approximate PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 37 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT UTILITIES N OTE: G ATE WAY ENG INEERS W ILL B E SUB MIT TING A FULL S TORM WATER REP OR T BY SERPA R ATE COV ER TO THE CIT Y FOR RE V IE W S TO R M W ATE R M A N AG E M E NT & U TI LITI E S PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 39 D E V ELO P M ENT B LO C KS , B U I LD I N G L O C AT I O N S , A N D M A S S I N G C O N T R O L S INTRODUCTION The new street connections developed to increase connectivity create 3 blocks when previously the site contained a single superblock that limited feelings of pedestrian walkability. Blocks A and B allow for a range of development options. Block C represents Enright Park where the development of buildings is not allowed. RP R3-M PE N N AV E N U E S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. B LO C K B AP S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E R3-M S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E LNC B LO C K A E VA S T R E E T LNC R3-M S O U T H S T. S O U T H S T. C LL A A II R R SS T. T. C S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY TO PA Z S T R E E T E U C L A I R W AY B LO C K C E N R I G HT PA R K E N R I G HT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S INTRODUC TION PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 41 Incline Plane next to R3-M Permitted Height where contextual setback used Permitted Height abutting R3-M with 5 foot interior sideyard setback 0 Feet into site 40 10 Feet into site 48 20 Feet into site 72 30 Feet into site 112 35 Feet into site 138 40 Feet into site 168 40 42 58 90 112 138 20 Feet into site 81 30 Feet into site 126 35 Feet into site 155.25 40 Feet into site 189 20 Feet into site 100.80 30 Feet into site 156.80 35 Feet into site 193.20 40 Feet into site 235.20 Incline Plane next to LNC Permitted Height 0 Feet into site 45 feet 10 Feet into site 54 Incline Plane next to East Liberty Place South & New Pennley Place Permitted Height D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S PERMIT TED HEIGHT 0 Feet into site 56 10 Feet into site 67.20 PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 42 A 925.07.A When measured in feet, building height refers to the vertical distance between the average finished grade along the wall facing the front street yard at the base of the building and: 1) the highest point of the coping of a flat roof; 2) the deck line of a mansard roof; or 3) the average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. In the case of fences or walls, other than retaining walls, height shall be measured on the side with the least vertical exposure above finished grade to the top of the fence or wall. A SEE PAGE 42 FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHTS BUILDING BEYOND 25’ MIN. EXTERIOR SIDEYARD SETBACK MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT 24’ R3-M TOPAZ ST. ENRIGHT PARK (BY OTHERS) EVA ST. Section A D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S SITE SEC TIONS R3-M PENN AVE. NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 43 B 925.07.A When measured in feet, building height refers to the vertical distance between the average finished grade along the wall facing the front street yard at the base of the building and: 1) the highest point of the coping of a flat roof; 2) the deck line of a mansard roof; or 3) the average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. In the case of fences or walls, other than retaining walls, height shall be measured on the side with the least vertical exposure above finished grade to the top of the fence or wall. B SEE PAGE 42 FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHTS BUILDING BEYOND 5’ MIN. INTERIOR SIDEYARD SETBACK BUILDING BEYOND RP MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT 24’ R3-M EVA ENRIGHT ST. PARK (BY OTHERS) Section B D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S SITE SEC TIONS PENN AVE. NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 44 C 925.07.A When measured in feet, building height refers to the vertical distance between the average finished grade along the wall facing the front street yard at the base of the building and: 1) the highest point of the coping of a flat roof; 2) the deck line of a mansard roof; or 3) the average height level between the eaves and ridge line of a gable, hip or gambrel roof. In the case of fences or walls, other than retaining walls, height shall be measured on the side with the least vertical exposure above finished grade to the top of the fence or wall. C SEE PAGE 42 FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHTS SEE PAGE 42 FOR MAXIMUM HEIGHTS BUILDING BEYOND LNC MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT 24’ SOUTH NEGLEY AVE. Section C D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S SITE SEC TIONS 56’ MIN. BUILDING HEIGHT 24’ SOUTH ST. CLAIR ST. AP SOUTH EUCLID AVE. NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 45 BLOCK A Allowable Uses: As referenced on Page 3 PE N N AV E N U E Envelope Limitations: Maximum Height: See Page 42 Build to property lines on north and east frontages. Build to north of new Eva Street right of way on south frontage, with 10’ minimum setback from back of curb. To the west, there is a 10’ setback from back of curb. Build to Property Line 4 8’- 0” E VA S T R E E T 3 2’- 0” 10’ 10’ minimum setback from back of curb S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E B LOCK A 2 4’ MINIMUM H E IG HT S E E PAG E 42 FO R M A X IMUM H E IG HTS Build to Property Line 376’- 7 ” Frontage: Block A includes PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES on Penn Avenue and South St. Clair. It includes SECONDARY FRONTAGES on South Euclid Avenue and Eva Street. See Page 55 for more information on street frontages. 15’ minimum setback from back of curb S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. 2 5 8’-3” PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGE 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 160' 1 inch equals 80 feet SECONDARY FRONTAGE 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 20' NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK A PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 46 NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK A PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 47 BLOCK B Allowable Uses: As referenced on Page 3 PE N N AV E N U E Envelope Limitations: Maximum Height: See Page 42 Build to property lines on north and west frontages. Build to north of new Eva Street right of way on south frontage, with 10’ minimum setback from back of curb. East Frontage, 10’ setback from back of curb. 15’ minimum setback from back of curb B LOCK B 2 4’ MINIMUM HE IG HT S E E PAG E 42 FO R M A X IMUM HE IG HTS 376’- 7 ” Build to Property Line 4 8 5’-7” S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E Frontage: Block A includes PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES on Penn Avenue and South St. Clair. It includes SECONDARY FRONTAGES on Eva Street and South Negley Avenue. See Page 55 for more information on street frontages. Build to Property Line 4 8’- 0” 3 2’- 0” 10’ minimum setback from back of curb E VA S T R E E T E VA R I G H T O F W AY STREET PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGE 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 160' 1 inch equals 80 feet SECONDARY FRONTAGE 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 20' NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK B PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 48 NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK B PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 49 BLOCK C No built structures are allowed on Block C. Enright Park shall remain publicly owned and equivalent in size and function of the existing Enright Park. There will be no commercial uses fronting on the park below Eva Street. All adjacent uses to the park shall be buffered with landscaping and screening. Although the park will be designed and constructed by others, the developer shall assist in programming and in developing enhanced amenities for the reconfigured Enright park. E VA S T R E E T S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E 3 2’- 0” See Page 65 for more information on proposed Enright Park character. 5’ M I N . I N T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B AC K 52 9’- 9” E NRIG HT PA RK A RE A : +/- 8 , 4 55 S F (0. 19 ACRE S) B LOCK C E NRIG HT PA RK A RE A : +/- 95, 8 36 S F (2 . 2 ACRE S) 2 0 0’-11” 5’ M I N . I N T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B AC K S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T E U C L A I R W AY 2 5’ M I N . E X T E R I O R S I D E YA R D S E T B AC K S TA M A R W AY A M B E R S T R E E Tv M I N I M U M 0.0 8 ACR E S 0' 40' 80' 40' 80' 160' 1 inch equals 80 feet 1/80"=1'-0" 0' 20' NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK C PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 50 NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S B LO CK C PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 51 March 21 8:00 am March 21 12:00 pm March 21 4:00 pm June 21 8:00 am June 21 12:00 pm June 21 4:00 pm NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S SH A DE & SH A D OW S TUDIES PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 52 September 21 8:00 am September 21 12:00 pm September 21 4:00 pm December 21 8:00 am December 21 12:00 pm December 21 4:00 pm NOTE: The conceptual design shown is for graphic purposes only. D E V E LO PM E NT B LO C K S , B U I LD I N G LO C ATI O NS , A N D M A S S I N G CO NTRO L S SH A DE & SH A D OW S TUDIES PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 53 DESIGN GUIDELINES INTRODUCTION - FRONTAGES The development blocks are able to accommodate buildings that approach streets with differing characteristics. The following design guidelines will provide general guidelines, as well as guidance on how the variety of uses that may be contained within the buildings should relate to the various frontages found throughout the site. S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. S O U T H E U C LI D AV E N U E SECONDARY FRONTAGE Frontages along South Negley Avenue, Eva Street, and South Euclid Avenue take on a less active, quieter, and secondary character as a result of the existing character and land uses on these streets. In addition, these frontages serve as service and support streets for the more active frontages. S O U T H N EG LE Y AV E N U E PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGE Frontages along Penn Avenue and South St. Clair Street are intended to have the most activity and prominence as a result of the existing character of Penn Avenue, and the intention of creating an active north-south link between Enright Parklet and Garland Parket. PE N N AV E N U E E VA S T R E E T E N R I G H T PA R K D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S INTRODUC TION - FRONTAGES E U C L A I R W AY S O U T H S T. C L A I R S T. TO PA Z S T R E E T S TA M A R W AY AMBER STREET R AV O U X W AY ENRIGHT PA R K 0' 25' 50' 100' 0' 25' 50' 100' 200' 1 inch equals 100 feet 1/1000"=1'-0" PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 55 RETAIL FRONT OF HOUSE TRANSPARENCY PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES: 65% min. at street level between 3’ and 8’ from the retail floor. 25% min. at upper levels INTRODUCTION Retail Front of House refers to public entrances and active frontages of retail uses. SECONDARY FRONTAGES: 40% min. at street level between 3’ and 8’ from the retail floor. 25% min. at upper levels FRONTAGES All retail spaces must include at least one frontage that is considered Retail Front of House. Retail Front of House Frontages are allowed on PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES and SECONDARY FRONTAGES. Retail Front of House can be located at the street level as well as upper levels as long as clear and architecturally expressed pedestrian connections from the street level to upper level retail is provided. MASSING AND ARTICULATION Retail Front Of House should maintain a constant street wall at all allowed frontages, but deviations from the build to line at street intersections are encouraged to create an interesting and active public realm. Entrances to retail should be easily identifiable from the street. Retail architecture should represent the base of the greater building and its extents should be delineated from architecture above through a cornice or similar horizontal expression, or a change in material treatment that allows the retail base to MATERIALS The intent for the site is to provide a high quality, vibrant, and interesting urban environment express its own identity. For approximately every 50’ of horizontal facade length, the that respects the existing context while still allowing for contemporary design. In general, facade should be broken down vertically. This can include, a change in plane, a material higher quality materials should be used at PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. Acceptable change, an attached or recessed element that creates a vertical form on the facade, or any other technique that helps to avoid uninterrupted, blank horizontal facades. materials at all allowed frontages include: Brick Masonry Stone or cast stone Precast concrete Cement fiber board (Only on upper stories) Glass (Opaque, tinted, smoked or reflective glass may be used for accent/spandrel elements only) Naturally durable wood Metal storefront and metal panels Stucco Glass Block - Glazed tile or brick EIFS (above 12’ from ground) Additional materials with approval STOREFRONTS Transparency in and out of storefronts is required for retail to prosper, for a vibrant street life, and to maintain eyes on the street. Storefront design shall balance the needs of the tenant’s individual expression with the overall aesthetic quality and sense of place. 1. R etail Front Of House frontages must include visible and accessible entries from the street. 2. Doors should be compatible with, and complementary to the overall storefront design. 3. Doors should have a high percentage of glass to increase visibility into the stores interior and out to the street. Clear Glass and maximum visibility are encouraged. 4. Overhangs, canopies, awnings and/or door recesses are encouraged to provide a feeling of protection when entering or exiting a storefront. Overhangs and canopies also create visual interest to the facades. Colorful canopies and awnings are allowed and encouraged. Unacceptable materials at all frontages include: Vinyl siding 5. Restaurants are encouraged to have additional doors to connect to outdoor seating areas. 6. Fully operable / removable openings are encouraged to enhance interaction between the interior and exterior street experience. Primary material pallets should include light colors and natural earth-tones, however accent paque, tinted, smoked or reflective glass may be used for accent/spandrel elements colors or darker shades are allowed to compliment more neutral colors in order to create a 7. O only. vibrant and exciting place that compliments the colorful character of the existing buildings in 8. Careful consideration to retail signage is required. East Liberty. D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S RE TA IL F RONT OF HOUSE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 56 RETAIL BACK OF HOUSE INTRODUCTION Retail spaces naturally have primary front of house zones and back of house zones where visibility and transparency is less desirable or appropriate. It is often unavoidable for these spaces to abut exterior frontages. FRONTAGES Retail Back of House uses are discouraged on PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. They are only allowed when individual retail spaces front on more than one PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGE zones. In such a case, a maximum of 60% of the second frontage located on a PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGE street can be considered Retail Back of House. Retail Back of House uses, when necessary, are encouraged to be located on SECONDARY FRONTAGES. MATERIALS Acceptable materials at all allowed frontages include: Brick Masonry Stone or cast stone Precast concrete Cement fiber board (Only on upper stories) Glass Naturally durable wood Metal storefront and metal panels Stucco Glass Block - Glazed tile or brick EIFS (above 12’ from ground) Additional materials with approval In general, higher quality materials should be used at PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. Primary material palettes should include light colors and natural earthtones, however accent colors or darker shades are allowed to compliment more neutral colors in order to create a vibrant and exciting place that compliments the colorful character of the existing buildings in East Liberty. TRANSPARENCY PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES: minimum 10% of the horizontal length of the building facade SECONDARY FRONTAGES: minimum 5% of the horizontal length of the building facade Although transparency is often not appropriate for Retail Back of House, if on a PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES, 10% minimum transparency is required. The Applicant is agreeable to adding a minimum of 5% transparency along the SECONDARY FRONTAGES. This can be in the form of clerestory glazing. At all frontages, spandrel glass, window graphics, show windows or building articulation in the scale of windows can be an effective strategy to provide the character of windows and transparency while allowing for functional Retail Back of House space. MASSING AND ARTICULATION Retail Back of House often requires long stretches of blank walls. Great effort should be made to reduce the negative visual impact of long blank walls. For approximately every 50’ of horizontal facade length, the facade should be broken down vertically. This can include, a change in plane, a material change, an attached or recessed element that creates a vertical form on the facade, or any other technique that helps to avoid uninterrupted, blank horizontal facades. FACADE DESIGN Both blocks of the project front on four distinct streets. The building facades will address the hierarchy of the streets with appropriate design while mitigating the back of house programming. In addition to transparency and articulation described above, facades will include a level of design appropriate to the public space they face. Unacceptable materials at all frontages include: Vinyl siding D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S RE TA IL B ACK OF HOUSE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 57 OFFICE INTRODUCTION Office space can be an interesting addition to mixed use buildings, and provides more opportunities for residents to work in their own neighborhood. Upper level office can have the added benefit of creating more building mass to define public space as well as provide a captive consumer helping activate retail uses in the neighborhood. FRONTAGES Office is allowed on PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. Primary material palettes should include light colors and natural earth-tones, however accent colors or darker shades are allowed to compliment more neutral colors in order to create a vibrant and exciting place that compliments the colorful character of the existing buildings in East Liberty. TRANSPARENCY PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES: 60% min. at street level between 3’ and 8’. 25% min. at upper levels SECONDARY FRONTAGES: 60% minimum at street level between 3’ and 8’. 25% min. at upper levels UPPER LEVEL OFFICE EAST LIBERTY Office is allowed on SECONDARY FRONTAGES. On frontages that allow Office, it can be located at the street level as well as upper levels as long as clear and architecturally expressed visual connection from the street level to upper level Office is provided. MATERIALS The intent for the site is to provide a high quality, vibrant, and interesting urban environment that respects the existing context while still allowing for contemporary design. Acceptable materials at all allowed frontages include: Brick Masonry Stone or cast stone Precast concrete Cement fiber board (Only on upper stories) Glass (Opaque, tinted, smoked or reflective glass may be used for accent/spandrel elements only) Naturally durable wood Metal storefront and metal panels Stucco Glass Block - Glazed tile or brick EIFS (above 12’ from ground) Additional materials with approval In general, higher quality materials should be used at PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. Unacceptable materials at all frontages include: Vinyl siding Dark tinted or mirrored glass D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S OF F ICE Street level glazing should be treated similar to retail Retail Front of House, and should utilize similar storefront guidelines. Glazing on upper level retail space often takes on a more monumental character than residential glazing, a result of the difference in scale between individual residential units and office tenants. MASSING AND ARTICULATION At the street level Office should be treated similar to Retail Front of House Uses. At upper levels office space should be located at the building edge to maximize its visibility and viability. The office lobby should be made clearly visible to street level pedestrians. Upper level office can be made to read as an extension of the lower retail, or can take on its own identity and prominence. Buildings should strive for a feeling of authenticity. Therefore, a singular building does not need to arbitrarily appear as if it were built piecemeal over time. However, buildings should strive to create a human scale. This can be achieved in numerous ways. Some examples include, a strong reading of base middle and top, human scaled fenestration, and human scaled facade elements such as awnings, recessed openings, porches, balconies, etc. For approximately every 200’ of horizontal facade length, the facade should be broken down vertically. This can include, a change in plane, a material change, an attached or recessed element that creates a vertical form on the facade, or any other technique that helps to avoid uninterrupted, blank horizontal facades. UPPER LEVEL OFFICE EAST LIBERTY UPPER LEVEL OFFICE EAST LIBERTY PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 58 STRUCTURED PARKING compliments the colorful character of the existing buildings in East Liberty. INTRODUCTION Surface parking is not proposed for this project. As a result, structured parking is necessary to serve the needs of the mixed use development. TRANSPARENCY Transparency in Structured Parking can be direct openings and does not need to include glass. Care should be taken to screen views to the headlights of interior cars from the exterior of the parking structure. FRONTAGES Exposed Structured Parking is discouraged from PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES. If required, it should be seamlessly integrated into the surrounding building architecture. Structured Parking is encouraged on SECONDARY FRONTAGES. it should be sensitive to the surrounding building architecture. MATERIALS Acceptable materials at all allowed frontages include: Brick Masonry Stone or cast stone Precast concrete Poured in place concrete Cement fiber board (Only on upper stories) Glass (Opaque, tinted, smoked or reflective glass may be used for accent/ spandrel elements only) Naturally durable wood Metal storefront and metal panels Stucco Glass Block - Glazed tile or brick EIFS (above 12’ from ground) Additional materials with approval PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES: 65% minimum at exposed lower levels between 3’ and 8’. Exposed Lower levels shall provide screening over openings for security and aesthetics. 25% Minimum at upper levels. SECONDARY FRONTAGES: 40% minimum at exposed lower levels between 3’ and 8’. Exposed Lower levels shall provide screening over openings for security and aesthetics. 25% Minimum at upper levels. MASSING AND ARTICULATION As a result of the functional requirements for Structured Parking, strong massing and articulation moves are often difficult. In general, Structured Parking should have architectural treatment and quality of the surrounding uses and is encouraged to blend into the surrounding architecture. Creating openings with consistent scale to surrounding architecture can help facilitate this. A continuity of material across Structured Parking and its surrounding uses is an effective strategy as well. In some instances sculptural or graphic use of material or natural screens can turn Structured Parking into a visually interesting addition to the building rather than an eye sore. Unacceptable materials at all frontages include: Vinyl siding Dark Tinted or Mirrored Glass Primary material palettes should include light colors and natural earthtones. However, accent colors or darker shades are allowed to compliment more neutral colors in order to create a vibrant and exciting place that D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S S TRUC TURED PA RK ING PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 59 SERVICE INTRODUCTION All buildings require loading and other building services. At Pennley Park South, all loading and service is to be located and treated in such a way to minimize its impact on public space. FRONTAGES Service uses are discouraged from PRIMARY ACTIVE FRONTAGES and are prohibited on Penn Avenue. If required, Service doors must be provided and should be of high aesthetic quality. In addition, care should be taken to minimize the impact on the streetscape. For example, similar materials used on the sidewalk should carry across Service entries to avoid interrupting the sidewalk experience. Service uses are encouraged to be located on SECONDARY FRONTAGES when possible. Care should still be taken to minimize the impact on the streetscape. SCREENING Service and loading areas shall be located in the interior of blocks or enclosed within the building, and should be screened from the public realm view by wall, fencing, and/or landscaping. Landscaped screening should include evergreen plant material equal to or greater in height than the object screened. When enclosed within the building, surrounding walls shall be of consistent quality of surrounding building walls. Rooftop equipment taller than 4 feet above the roof parapet should be visually screened from street level via architectural treatments that are harmonious with the design of the building. D E S I G N G U I D E LI N E S SER V ICE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 60 SITE LIGHTING PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC STREETS Any changes to existing lighting will conform to the city of Pittsburgh standards as outlined in the Pittsburgh Lighting Code. This calls for traditional post top acorn for pedestrian scale lighting and taller drop acorn lighting on arms. PRIVATE STREETS AND PLAZAS Private streets, parks and plazas will be identified by a more contemporary but timeless pallet of light fixtures. Fixtures should be made of durable heavy guage materials that will not degrade in visual or structural quality over time. In addition to creating safe lighting levels for nighttime use, an array of fixture types should be used for visual character and wayfinding. This includes but is not limited to paver lights, lit bollards, and landscape lighting. Photos (right) represent examples of fixtures that would be suitable under these guidelines. City Standard Drop Acorn City Standard Post top acorn Existing Light Fixture Photo Credits: Top Left, Top Right, Middle Left - Landscape Forms, www.landscapeforms.com; S ITE A M E N ITI E S SITE LIGHTING Middle Right, Bottom - Forms+Surfaces, www.forms-surfaces.com PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 62 SITE FURNISHINGS PRIVATE STREETS PLAZAS AND PRIVATE SPACES Site furnishings inform the function of a space, contribute to cleanliness, and enhance use and liveliness. These furnishings should be constructed and finished with durable methods and coatings to ensure a resilient product that will not degrade with time. Furnishings will be identified by two broad design groups: STREET STANDARDS Standard street furnishings should be consistent throughout the development and of a timeless design that still responds to the architectural aesthetic. These furnishings should be used judiciously and support an active street life. It is also important for furnishings along streets to be arranged so as to not to impede or cause safety concerns to pedestrian traffic. Photos (right) represent examples of furnishings that would be suitable under these guidelines. PRIVATE SPACES AND PLAZAS Private spaces and Plazas should take a more eclectic approach to site furnishings, responding to both the design of the landscape aesthetic as well as function. Moveable furnishings throughout these spaces are encouraged. Photos (right) represent examples of furnishings that would be suitable under these guidelines. Photo Credit: Above images - Forms+Surfaces, www.forms-surfaces.com PAVING STANDARDS Broom Finished Concrete Exposed Aggregate Concrete Photo Credits: Top Left, Center - IDmetalco, idmetalco.com; Top Right - IronSmith, www.ironsmith.cc; Bottom Left, Lower Right, Bottom Right, Bottom Center - Landscape Forms, www.landscapeforms.com S ITE A M E N ITI E S SITE F URNISHINGS PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 63 OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPE STANDARDS E NRIG HT PA RK (DE S IG NED BY OTHERS) AC TI V E FLE XIBLE SPACE M A INTA IN WH AT IS THERE NOW SOME PA S SI V E A RE A UNPRO GR A MMED L AWN M ATURE SH A DE TREE COV ER PL AYGROUND A ND WATER FE ATURE DO GS/PE TS A PL ACE WHERE PEOPLE COME TOGE THER CIT Y OWNERSHIP MINIMUM OF 1 FULL B A SK E TB A LL COURT ONE PA RTI A L B A SK E TB A LL /SPORTS COURT O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS OPEN SPACE CH A R AC TER PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 65 ELEVATED COURTYARDS MIX OF HARDSCAPE AND SOFTSCAPE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADDITIONAL AMENITIES GARDENS TREES PLAY AND EXERCISE SPACES SEATING AREAS PROVIDE ATTRACTIVE VIEWS FROM BUILDING INTERIOR O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS OPEN SPACE CH A R AC TER PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 66 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN - PENN AVENUE Minimum standards for landscape design are provided. Additional detail and concepts will be provided at FLDP level. B LO C K B O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS L A NDS C A PE PL A N 0' 5' 10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 inch equals 10 feet PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 67 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN - SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE Minimum standards for landscape design are provided. Additional detail and concepts will be provided at FLDP level. B LO C K A 0' 5' 10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 inch equals 10 feet O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS L A NDS C A PE PL A N PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 68 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN - SOUTH NEGLEY AVENUE Minimum standards for landscape design are provided. Additional detail and concepts will be provided at FLDP level. B LO C K B 0' 5' 10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 inch equals 10 feet O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS L A NDS C A PE PL A N PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 69 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN - SOUTH ST. CLAIR STREET Minimum standards for landscape design are provided. Additional detail and concepts will be provided at FLDP level. 0' 5' 10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 inch equals 10 feet O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS L A NDS C A PE PL A N PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 70 TYPICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN - EVA STREET Minimum standards for landscape design are provided. Additional detail and concepts will be provided at FLDP level. B LO C K B E N R I G H T PA R K (B Y OT H E R S) O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS L A NDS C A PE PL A N 0' 5' 10' 0' 5' 10' 20' 1 inch equals 10 feet PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 71 LANDSCAPING NATIVE PLANTS Plants native to the Pittsburgh region should be prioritized in the landscape for their hardiness, disease resistance and adaptational advantages. They continually prove themselves to have the highest survival rate, lowest maintenance, and least threat of invasive growth. This page offers a suggested list of native plants that may be considered. Specific plant selections should take into account tolerance to urban conditions, nursery availability, beauty and seasonal interest. This list is not inclusive, but should serve as a guide and starting point for plant selection. ORNAMENTAL PLANTS In some cases, ornamental plants are acceptable and desirable. These plants are non-native but are well adapted to the Pittsburgh climate and have a proven record of success in the landscape. They must be noninvasive and exhibit unique desirable characteristics not able to be found in a native plant species. When selecting an ornamental plant, consideration should also be give to maintenance, disease susceptibility, and potential wildlife value particularly to fauna such as birds and butterflies. PUBLIC STREET TREES The City of Pittsburgh Forestry Division has a list of recommended street tree species. In addition, the City has been working with Tree Pittsburgh to refine and improve standards for tree selection, tree planting and urban canopy health. Specific tree selections should take into account tolerance to urban conditions, the presence of overhead utilities, tree form and shape, scale of the street and sidewalk, nursery availability, beauty and fall color. SCIENTIFIC NAME CANOPY TREES Acer rubrum Acer saccharum Carya ovata Fagus grandifolia Larix laricina Nyssa Sylvatica Prunus serotina Qercus alba Quercus rubra Tilia americana Ulmus americana 'Princeton' UNDERSTORY TREES Amelanchier canadensis Betula lenta Betula Nigra Cornus florida Hamamelis virginiana Malus coronaria Ostrya virginiana DECIDUOUS SHRUBS Aronia melanocarpa Cornus racemose Cornus sericea Ilex verticillata Sambucus canadensis Viburnum lentago EVERGREEN SHRUBS Gaultheria hispidula Juniperus communis Taxus canadensis COMMON NAME Red Maple Sugar Maple Shagbark Hickory American Beech American Larch Black Tupelo Black Cherry White Oak Red Oak Basswood Princeton American Elm Shadblow Serviceberry Black Birch River Birch Flowering Dogwood Witchhazel Sweet Crabapple American Hophornbeam Black Chokeberry Grey Dogwood Red-osier Dogwood Winterberry (1male:3female) American Elder Nannyberry SCIENTIFIC NAME GRASSES Andropogon gerardii Eragrostis spectabilis Panicum Virgatum Schizachyrium scoparium Sorghastrum nutans Spartina pectinata Tridens flavus GROUNDCOVER Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (6"-12") Asarum canadense Dennstaedtia punctiloba (12"-18") Juniperus horizontalis Phlox divaricata (8”-18”) Sedum ternatum ‘Larinem Park’ Tiarella cordifolia (6”-12”) PERENNIALS Anemone canadensis Anemone quinquefolia Aquilegia canadensis Aster novae-anglieae Cypripedium reginae Heliopsis helianthoides Iris versicolor Rudbeckia Hirta COMMON NAME Big Bluestem Purple Lovegrass Switch Grass Little Bluestem Yellow Indian Grass Prairie Cordgrass Tall Redtop Bearberry Wild Ginger Hay-scented Fern Bar Harbor Juniper Canadian Phox Stonecrop Foamflower Roundleaf Thimbleweed Wood Anemone Wild Columbine New England Aster Showy Lady’s Slipper Sweet Ox-eye Blue Flag Iris Sweet Black-Eyed Susan Creeping Snowberry Common Juniper Canada Yew SCREENING All services areas and mechanicals should be screened through architectural or evergreen plant material equal to or greater in height than the object screened. O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS PL A NT PA LE T TE PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 72 (in) 12 18 36 24 30 24 24 24 18 18 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 424 TREE PROTECTION, PRESERVATION, & REPLACEMENT Based on Chapter 915: - Environmental Performance Standards, the following sections of code apply: 915.02.C Tree and Vegetative Surveys The Zoning Administrator shall require a tree survey for development applications on any site greater than one-quarter (¼) acre (ten thousand eight hundred ninety (10,890) square feet). 915.02.D Tree Protection and Replacement The Zoning Administrator shall require the protection and preservation of trees with a diameter of twelve (12) inches or more, measured at a point four (4) feet above grade. If said trees are removed during site preparation or development, they shall be replaced, at a minimum, equal to the combined total diameter of removed trees. Diameter measurements shall be taken at a point four (4) feet above grade. Trees to be preserved (Trees in ROW that can't be preserved will be replaced to city standards) Trees to be removed and replaced (see below) Tree Replacement Analysis Replacement Options Tree Caliper (inches) Tree ID Caliper (Inches) 2.5" ID 170 Trees 1 12 30 3" 142 Trees 17 4" 106 Trees 28 2 13 24 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 24 15 24 16 18 17 18 18 28 19 28 20 28 21 12 22 28 Total Caliper (inches) 494 Replacement Options 2.5” Caliper Trees 198 Trees 3” Caliper Trees 165 Trees 4” Caliper Trees 124 Trees 5 4 3 13 12 14 17 19 10 2 9 8 7 1 18 15 11 6 16 20 21 22 17 21 20 24 15 12 18 36 24 O PE N S PAC E A N D L A N DS C A PE S TA N DA R DS TREE REPL ACEMENT Pennley Park South, Inc. has addressed its “alternative means” of compliance for the Tree Replacement Plan by committing up to $1,000,000.00 of its TRID Increment to improving the newly configured Enright Park as set forth in Paragraphs 6.1, 6.1.1, 6.1.3, and 6.1.7 of the Consent Order. PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 73 IONAL ANALYSIS ACCE S SIB ILIT Y A ND UNI V ERS A L DE SIG N SUMM A RY This project will follow all required laws regarding accessibility and will follow universal design strategies to accommodate all users, including children, the elderly, people with disabilities, those who are blind, deaf and hard of hearing and those without disabilities. Some of these strategies include equitable use for all users without segregating or stigmatizing any users, simple and intuitive use of the building for all, perceptible information provided to all users, low physical effort required to utilize the building and its components, and appropriate size and space to access and utilize the building and its components. A D D ITI O N A L A N A LYS IS ACCES SIBILIT Y A ND UNI V ERS A L DESIGN SUMM A R Y PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 75 EN V IRONMENTA L INNOVATION A ND SUS TA IN A B ILIT Y SUMM A RY WATER & ENERG Y EFFICIENC Y SUS TA IN A B LE SITE S The proposed plan on this site is an important contributor to social and environmental sustainability. The site is previously developed which reduces the impact on undeveloped greenfield sites. It is in close proximity to public transportation options, reducing the need for cars. It is also in close proximity to the highly dense residential, retail, and office uses, which places less demand for vehicular travel and allows more people to walk or bike to surrounding amenities. In addition, bicycle facilities will be provided on site. The site will not include surface parking lots, and electric charging stations will be provided in structured parking lots to accommodate electric vehicles with smaller carbon footprints. The site will also preserve, and increase access to existing open space, allowing recreation and exercise facilities for neighborhood residents. During construction, measures will be taken to reduce construction activity pollution. Care will be taken to limit light pollution, and the urban heat island effect. S TORM WATER M A N AG EMENT In re-developing this site, stormwater management requirements of Chapter 906.07 and 1003 of the City of Pittsburgh Code of Ordinances and Chapter 102 of the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection shall be met or exceeded. Three underground storm water management facilities shall be designed to help control peak discharge rates from the developed site to less than the calculated peak rates from the site in its current condition. Additionally, infiltration systems shall be incorporated into the facility designs to allow the 2-year volume increase to be stored on site, in multiple water quality BMP’s. Additional BMP’s, in the form of Stormceptor Manholes, shall be constructed in order to provide water quality treatment prior to connecting the public storm sewer system. The project plans to be developed with special attention to water and energy efficiency, both with attention to a reduction in potable water use for exterior irrigation and interior use. Water meters will be installed so water usage can be analyzed to identify opportunities for additional water savings, and to identify spikes in water usage. Indoor water usage will be reduced through the utilization of water efficient fixtures, and energy efficient lighting and appliances will help energy performance. INDOOR EN V IRONMENTA L QUA LIT Y & M ATERI A L S Great care will be placed on indoor environmental quality, an important factor in sustainability and personal health. The project will be constructed with low emitting materials, and care will be taken to control environmental tobacco smoke and other harmful emissions. Care will be placed on maximizing thermal comfort, daylighting and quality views, and access to fresh air through operable windows. Care will be paid to acoustic performance, an important factor in personal health and comfort. The project will also accommodate the storage and collection of recyclable materials. In addition, viable materials from the demolition of the existing structures will be recycled. A D D ITI O N A L A N A LYS IS EN V IRONMENTA L INNOVATION A ND SUS TA IN A BILIT Y SUMM A R Y PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 76 NOTE: The conceptual design and conceptual signage shown is for graphic purposes only and will comply with code. A D D ITI O N A L V I E W S PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 77 NOTE: The conceptual design and conceptual signage shown is for graphic purposes only and will comply with code. A D D ITI O N A L V I E W S PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 78 NOTE: The conceptual design and conceptual signage shown is for graphic purposes only and will comply with code. A D D ITI O N A L V I E W S PE N N LE Y PA R K S O U TH PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA REVISED AMENDED PRELIMINARY LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN - FEBRUARY 5, 2018 79