Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL NO. 17-201-2 v. Violations: 18 U.S.C. 371 and 1001(a) RICHARD W. GATES 111, Case: 1:17?cr?201 Assigned To Judge Jackson Am Be Assign. Date:2/23/2018 ?nan Description: SUPERSEDING >1 A Case Related to: 17-cr?201 (ABJ) mm (A) Defendant. it- SUPERSEDING CRIMINAL INFORMATION The Special Counsel informs the Court: 1. RICHARD W. GATES (GATES) served for years as a political consultant and lobbyist. Between at least 2006 and 2015, GATES and Paul J. Manafort, Jr. (Manafort) acted as unregistered agents of the Government of Ukraine, the Party of Regions (a Ukrainian political party whose leader Victor Yanukovych was President from 2010 to 2014), Yanukovych, and the Opposition Bloc (a successor to the Party of Regions that formed in 2014 when Yanukovych fled to Russia). Manafort and GATES generated tens of millions of dollars in income as a result 0ftheir Ukraine work. In order to hide Ukraine payments from United States authorities, from approximately 2006 through at least 2016, Manafort and GATES laundered the money through scores of United States and foreign corporations, partnerships, and bank accounts. 2. In furtherance of the scheme, Manafort and GATES funneled millions of dollars in payments into foreign nominee companies and bank accounts, opened by them and their accomplices in nominee names and in various foreign countries, including Cyprus, Saint Vincent 1 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 2 of 25 the Grenadines (Grenadines), and the Seychelles. Manafort and GATES hid the existence of the foreign companies and bank accounts, falsely and repeatedly reporting to their tax preparers and to the United States that they had no foreign bank accounts. 3. In furtherance ofthe scheme, Manafort and GATES concealed from the United States their work as agents of, and millions ofdollars in payments from, Ukraine and its political parties and leaders. Because Manafort and GATES, among other things, directed a campaign to lobby United States officials on behalf of the Government of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine, and Ukrainian political parties, they were required by law to report to the United States their work and fees. Manafort and GATES did not do so. Instead, when the Department of Justice sent inquiries to Manafort and GATES in 2016 about their activities, Manafort and GATES responded with a series of false and misleading statements. 4. In furtherance of the scheme, Manafort used his hidden overseas wealth to enjoy a lavish lifestyle in the United States, without paying taxes on that income. Manafort, without reporting the income to his tax preparer or the United States, spent millions of dollars on luxury goods and services for himself and his extended family through payments wired from offshore nominee accounts to United States vendors. Manafort also used these offshore accounts to purchase multi? million dollar properties in the United States. Manafort then borrowed millions ofdollars in loans using these properties as collateral, thereby obtaining cash in the United States without reporting and paying taxes on the income. In order to increase the amount ofmoney he could access in the United States, Manafort defrauded the institutions that loaned money on these properties so that they would lend him more money at more favorable rates than he would otherwise be able to obtain. Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 3 of 25 5. GATES aided Manafort in obtaining money from these offshore accounts, which he was instrumental in opening. Like Manafort, GATES used money from these offshore accounts to pay for his personal expenses, including his mortgage, children?s tuition, and interior decorating of his Virginia residence. 6. In total, more than $75,000,000 ?owed through the offshore accounts. Manafort laundered more than $18,000,000, which was used by him to buy property, goods, and services in the United States, income that he concealed from the United States Treasury, the Department of Justice, and others. GATES transferred more than $3,000,000 from the offshore accounts to other accounts that he controlled. Relevant Individuals And Entities 7. Manafort was a United States citizen. He resided in homes in Virginia, Florida, and Long Island, New York. 8. GATES was a United States citizen. He resided in Virginia. 9. In 2005, Manafort and another partner created Davis Manafort Partners, Inc. (DMP) to engage principally in political consulting. DMP had staff in the United States, Ukraine, and Russia. In 201 1, Manafort created DMP International, LLC (DMI) to engage in work for foreign clients, in particular political consulting, lobbying, and public relations for the Government of Ukraine. the Party ofRegions, and members ofthe Party ofRegions. DMI was a partnership soiely owned by Manafort and his spouse. GATES worked for both DMP and DM1 and served as Manafort?s right?hand man. 10. The Party of Regions was a pro-Russia political party in Ukraine. Beginning in approximately 2006, it retained Manafort, through DMP and then DMI, to advance its interests in 3 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 4 of 25 Ukraine, including the election of its slate of candidates. In 2010, its candidate for President, Yanukovych, was elected President of Ukraine. In 2014, Yanukovych ?ed Ukraine for Russia in the wake of popular protests of widespread governmental corruption. Yanukovych, the Party of Regions, and the Government of Ukraine were Manafort, DMP, and DM1 clients. 1 1. The European Centre for a Modern Ukraine (the Centre) was created in or about 2012 in Belgium as a mouthpiece for Yanukovych and the Party of Regions. The Centre was used by Manafort, GATES, and others in order to lobby and conduct a public relations campaign in the United States and Europe on behalf of the existing Ukraine regime. The Centre effectively ceased to operate upon the downfall of Yanukovych in 2014. 12. Manafort and GATES owned or controlled the following entities, which were used in the scheme (the Manafort-GATES entities): Domestic Entities Entity Name iDate Created Incorporation Location Bade LLC (RG) January 2012 Delaware August 2008 Virginia Daisy Manafort, LLC (PM) March 201 1 Florida Davis Manafort International LLC March 2007 Delaware (PM) March 2005 Virginia DMP (PM) March 201 1 Florida October 1999 Delaware Davis Manafort, Inc. (PM) m, November 1999 Virginia DMI (PM) June 2011 Delaware 4 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 5 of 25 Incorporation Location Entity Name lDate Created March 2012 Florida Global Sites LLC (PM, RG) lJuly 2008 Delaware Jemina LLC (RG) July 2008 Delaware Jesand Investment Corporation (PM) April 2002 Virginia esand Investments Corporation (PM) March 201 1 Florida April 2006 Virginia John Hannah, LLC (PM) March 201 1 Florida Jupiter Holdings Management, LLC January 2011 Delaware (RG) Lilred, LLC (PM) 201 1 Florida LOAV Ltd. (PM) April 1992 Delaware MC Brooklyn Holdings, LLC (PM) November 2012 New York January 2012 Florida MC Soho Holdings, LLC (PM) April 2012 New York LLC (also known as iJuly 2008 Delaware LLC) (PM, RG) Cypriot Entities Entity Name Date Created Incorporation Location Actinet Trading Limited (PM, RG) May 2009 Cyprus Black Sea View Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus Bletilla Ventures Limited (PM, RG) October 2010 Cyprus Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 6 of 25 Entity Name Date Created Incorporation Location Cavenari Investments Limited (RG) December 2007 Cyprus Global Highway Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus Leviathan Advisers Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus LOAV Advisors Limited (PM, RG) August 2007 Cyprus Lucicle Consultants Limited (PM, RG) December 2008 Cyprus Marziola Holdings Limited (PM) March 2012 Cyprus Olivenia Trading Limited (PM, RG) March 2012 Cyprus Peranova Holdings Limited (PM, RG) June 2007 Cyprus Serangon Holdings Limited (PM, RG) January 2008 Cyprus Other Foreign Entities Entity Name Date Created Incorporation Location Global Endeavour Inc. (also known as Unknown Grenadines Global Endeavor Inc.) (PM) Ieunet Ltd. (PM) August 20i 1 Grenadines Pompolo Limited (RG) April 2013 United Kingdom 13. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was a bureau in the United States Department of the Treasury responsible for administering the tax laws of the United States and collecting taxes owed to the Treasury. The Scheme Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 7 of 25 14. Between in or around 2008 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere, Manafort and GATES devised and intended to devise, and executed and attempted to execute, a scheme and arti?ce to defraud, and to obtain money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises from the United States, banks, and other financial institutions. As part of the scheme, Manafort and GATES repeatedly provided false information to ?nancial bookkeepers, tax accountants, and legal counsel, among others. Manafort And Wiring Of Money From Offshore Accounts Into The United States 15. In order to use the money in the offshore nominee accounts of the Manafort?GATES entities without paying taxes on it, Manafort and GATES caused millions of dollars in wire transfers from these accounts to be made for goods, services, and real estate. They did not report these transfers as income to DMP, DMI, or Manafort. 16. From 2008 to 2014, Manafort caused the following wires, totaling over $12,000,000, to be sent to the vendors listed below for personal items. Manafort did not pay taxes on this income, which was used to make the purchases. Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction Vendor A 6/10/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $107,000 (Home 6/25/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $23,500 Improvement 7/7/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $20,000 Company in the 8/5/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $59,000 Hamptons, New 9/2/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $272,000 York) 10/6/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $109,000 10/24/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $107,800 1 1/20/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $77,400 12/22/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $100,000 1/14/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $9,250 7 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 8 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction 1/29/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $97,670 2/25/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $108,100 4/16/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $94,394 5/7/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $54,000 5/ 12/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $9,550 6/1/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $86,650 6/18/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $34,400 7/31/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $106,000 8/28/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $37,000 9/23/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $203,500 10/26/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $38,800 11/18/2009 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $130,906 3/8/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $124,000 5/1 1/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $25,000 7/8/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $28,000 7/23/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $26,500 8/12/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $138,900 9/2/2010 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $31,500 10/6/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $67,600 10/14/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $107,600 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $31,500 12/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $46,160 2/7/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $36,500 3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $26,800 4/4/20] 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $195,000 5/3/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $95,000 5/ 16/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $6,500 5/31/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $70,000 6/27/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $39,900 7/27/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $95,000 10/24/201 1 Glebai Highway Limited Cyprus $22,000 10/25/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $9,300 11/15/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $74,000 11/23/2011 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,300 I 1/29/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $6,100 12/12/2011 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $17,800 8 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 9 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction 1/ 17/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $29,800 1/20/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $42,600 2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,300 2/23/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $75,000 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $22,300 3/28/2012 Peranova Holdings Limited Cyprus $37,500 4/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $50,000 5/15/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $79,000 6/5/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $45,000 6/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $11,860 7/9/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,800 7/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $88,000 8/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $48,800 9/27/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $100,000 1 1/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $298,000 12/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $55,000 1/29/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $149,000 3/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $375,000 8/29/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $200,000 1 1/ 13/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $75,000 1 1/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $80,000 12/6/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $130,000 12/12/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $90,000 4/22/2014 Unknown Unknown $56,293 8/18/2014 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $34,660 Vendor A Total $5,434,793 Vendor 3/22/201 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000 (Home 3/28/201 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $25,000 Automation, 4/27/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $12,000 Lighting and 5/16/2011 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $25,000 Home . 1 1/15/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $17,006 Entena?mm 1 1/23/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $11,000 $32223? 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $6,200 10/31/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $290,000 12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $160,600 1/15/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $194,000 9 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 10 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction 1/24/2013 Lueiele Consultants Limited Cyprus $6,300 2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $51,600 2/26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $260,000 7/15/2013 Pompolo Limited Uimed $175,575 Kingdom 11/5/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $73,000 Vendor Total $1,319,281 Vendor 10/7/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $15,750 (Antique Rug 3/17/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $46,200 $101?: in 4/ 16/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $7,400 Alexandria, 4/27/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $65,000 V'rgm?a) 5/7/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $210,000 7/15/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $200,000 3/31/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $140,000 6/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $250,000 Vendor Total $934,350 Vendor 1) (Related to 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $100,000 Vendor C) Vendor Total $100,000 Vendor 1 1/7/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $32,000 (Men?s Clothing 2/5/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $22,750 Store in New 4/27/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $13,500 York) 10/26/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $32,500 3/30/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $15,000 5/1 1/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $39,000 6/28/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $5,000 8/12/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $32,500 1 1/17/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $1 1,500 2/7/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $24,000 3/22/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $43,600 3/28/2011 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $12,000 4/27/201 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus 3,000 6/30/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $24,500 9/26/20] 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000 1 1/2/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $26,700 10 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 11 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction 12/12/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $46,000 2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $2,800 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $16,000 3/14/2012 Lueicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $8,000 4/18/2012 Luciele Consultants Limited Cyprus $48,550 5/15/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,000 6/19/2012 Luciele Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,600 8/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $15,500 1 1/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,900 12/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,500 1/15/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $37,000 2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,000 2/26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $39,000 9/3/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $81,500 10/15/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $53,000 1 1/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $13,200 4/24/2014 Global Endeavour Inc. Unknown $26,680 9/1 1/2014 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $58,435 Vendor Total $849,215 Vendor 4/27/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $34,000 (Landscaper in 5/12/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $45,700 the Hamptons, 6/1/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,500 New York) 6/18/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $29,000 9/21/2009 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,800 5/1 1/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $44,000 6/28/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $50,000 7/23/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $19,000 9/2/2010 Yiakera Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,000 10/6/2010 Giebal Highway Limited Cyprus $57,700 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $26,000 12/16/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $20,000 3/22/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $50,000 5/3/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $40,000 6/1/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $44,000 7/27/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $27,000 8/16/201 1 Leviathan Advisers Limited Cyprus $13,450 11 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 12 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction 9/19/2011 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $12,000 10/24/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $42,000 1 1/2/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $37,350 Vendor Total $655,500 Vendor 9/2/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $165,000 (Antique Dealer 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $165,000 in New York) 2/28/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $190,600 3/14/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $75,000 2/26/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $28,310 Vendor Total $623,910 Vendor 6/25/2008 LOAV Advisors Limited Cyprus $52,000 (Clothing Store in 12/ 16/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $49,000 Beverly Hills, 12/22/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,260 California) 8/12/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $76,400 5/1 1/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $85,000 11/17/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $128,280 5/31/20] 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $64,000 1 1/15/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $48,000 12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $7,500 Vendor Total $520,440 Vendor I (Investment 9/3/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $500,000 Company) Vendor I Total $500,000 Vendor 1 l/15/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $8,000 (Contractor in 12/5/201 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $1 1,237 Florida) 12/21/201 1 Black Sea View Limited Cyprus $20,000 2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $51,000 5/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $68,000 6/19/2012 Lueicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $60,000 7/18/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $32,250 9/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $1 12,000 11/30/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $39,700 1/9/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $25,600 2/28/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $4,700 Vendor Total $432,487 12 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 13 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction Vendor 12/5/201 1 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus 15 (Landscaper in 3/1/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $50,000 the Hamptons, 6/6/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $47,800 New York) 6/25/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $17,900 6/27/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $18,900 2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $3,300 7/15/2013 Pompolo Limited Uf?m $13,325 Kingdom 11/26/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $9,400 - Vendor Total $164,740 Vendor 4/12/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $83,525 (Payments 5/2/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $12,525 Relating to three Range Rovers) 6/29/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $67,655 Vendor Total $163,705 Vendor 1 1/20/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $45,000 (Contractor in 12/7/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,000 Virginia) 12/17/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $21,000 1/17/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $18,750 1/29/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $9,400 2/12/2013 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $10,500 Vendor Total $125,650 Vendor 1/29/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,000 (Audit), Video, 3/17/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $21,725 and Control 4/ 16/2009 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $24,650 System Home 12/2/2009 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $10,000 Integration and 3/8/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $20,300 [?Stalla?m?? 4/23/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $8,500 Company in the Hamptons, New . . . . York) 7/29/2010 Lev1athan Adv1sors L1m1ted Cyprus $17,650 Vendor Total $112,825 Vendor 0 (Purchase of 10/5/2012 Lucicie Consultants Limited Cyprus $62,750 Mercedes Benz) 13 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 14 of 25 Payee Transaction Originating Account Country of Amount of Date Holder Origination Transaction Vendor 0 Total $62,750 Vendor (Purchase of 12/30/2008 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $47,000 Range Rover) Vendor Total $47,000 Vendor 9/2/2010 Yiakora Ventures Limited Cyprus $10,000 (Property 10/6/2010 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $10,000 Management 10/18/2010 Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $10,000 Company in 2/8/20] 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $13,500 South Carolina) 2/9/2012 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $2,500 Vendor Total $46,000 Vendor 2/9/201 1 Global Highway Limited Cyprus $17,900 (Art Gallery in . . Florida) 2/14/2013 Lucrcle Consultants L1mtted Cyprus $14,000 Vendor Total $31,900 Vendor 9/26/20] Leviathan Advisors Limited Cyprus $5,000 (Housekeeping in 9/19/2012 Lucicle Consultants Limited Cyprus $5,000 New York) 10/9/2013 Global Endeavour Inc. Grenadines $10,000 Vendor Total $20,000 17. In 2012, Manafort caused the following wires to be sent to the entities listed below to purchase the real estate also listed below. Manafort did not report the money used to make these purchases on his 2012 tax return. Property Originating Country of Purchased Payee Date Account Origin Amount Howard Street DMP Peranova Ho] din Condominium International 2/1/2012 Limited Cyprus $1,500,000 (New York) LLC . Attorney Actinet Trading Union Street Account Of 1 1/29/2012 Limited Cyprus $1,800,000 Brownstone, [Real Estate Actinet Trading 0 (New York) Attorney] l/29/20]- Limited Cyprus $1,200,000 l4 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 15 of 25 Property Originating Country of Purchased Payee Date Account Origin Amount Arlington . House RealEState 8/31/2012 consultants Cyprus $1,900,000 . . . Trust Limited (Virginia) Manafort And Hiding Of Ukraine Lobbying And Public Relations Work 18. It is illegal to act as an agent ofa foreign principal engaged in certain United States in?uence activities without registering the af?liation. Speci?cally, a person who engages in lobbying or public relations work in the United States (hereafter collectively referred to as lobbying) for a foreign principal such as the Government of Ukraine or the Party of Regions is required to provide a detailed written registration statement to the United States Department of Justice. The filing, made under oath, must disclose the name ofthe foreign principal, the ?nancial payments to the lobbyist, and the measures undertaken for the foreign principal, among other information. A person required to make such a ?ling must further make in all lobbying material a ?conspicuous statement? that the materials are distributed on behalf of the foreign principal, among other things. The ?ling thus permits public awareness and evaluation of the activities of a lobbyist who acts as an agent ofa foreign power or foreign political party in the United States. 19. In furtherance of the scheme, from 2006 until 2014, both dates being approximate and inclusive, Manafort and GATES engaged in a multi?million dollar lobbying campaign in the United States at the direction of Yanukovych, the Party of Regions, and the Government of Ukraine. Manafort and GATES did so without registering and providing the disclosures required by law. 20. As part ofthe scheme, in February 20l2, Manafort and GATES solicited two Washington, 15 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 16 of 25 DC, ?rms (Company A and Company B) to lobby in the United States on behalfonanukovych, the Party of Regions, and the Government of Ukraine. For instance, GATES wrote to Company A that it would be ?representing the Government of Ukraine in [Washington,] 21. Manafort repeatedly communicated in person and in writing with Yanukovych, and GATES passed on directions to Company A and Company B. For instance, Manafort wrote Yanukovych a memorandum dated April 8, 2012, in which he provided Yanukovych an update on the lobbying firms? activities ?since the inception of the project a few weeks ago. It is my intention to provide you with a weekly update moving forward.? Toward the end of that ?rst year, in November 2012, GATES wrote to Company A and Company that the ?rms needed to prepare an assessment of their past and prospective lobbying efforts so the ?President? could be briefed by ?Paul? ?on what Ukraine has done well and what it can do better as we move into 2013.? 22. At the direction of Manafort and GATES, Company A and Company engaged in extensive lobbying. Among other things, they lobbied multiple Members of Congress and their staffs about Ukraine sanctions, the validity of Ukraine elections, and the prOpriety of Yanukovych?s imprisoning his presidential rival, Yulia Tymoshenko (who had served as Ukraine President prior to Yanukovych). Manafort and GATES also lobbied in connection with the roll out of a report concerning the Tymoshenko trial commissioned by the Government of Ukraine. Manafort and GATES used one oftheir offshore accounts to funnel $4 million to pay secretly for the report. 23. To minimize public disclosure oftheir lobbying campaign, Manafort and GATES arranged for the Centre to be the nominal client of Company A and Company B, even though in fact the Centre was under the ultimate direction ofthe Government of Ukraine, Yanukovych, and the Party of Regions. For instance, Manafort and GATES selected Company A and Company B, and only 16 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 17 of 25 therea?er did the Centre sign contracts with the lobbying ?rms without ever meeting either company. Company A and Company were paid for their services not by their nominal client, the Centre, but solely through off-shore accounts associated with the Manafort-GATES entities, namely Bletilla Ventures Limited (in Cyprus) and Jeunet Ltd. and Global Endeavour Inc. (in Grenadines). In total, Company A and Company were paid more than $2 million from these accounts between 2012 and 2014. 24. To conceal the scheme, Manafort and GATES developed a false and misleading cover story that would distance themselves and the Government of Ukraine, Yanukovych, and the Party of Regions from the Centre, Company A, and Company B. For instance, in the wake of extensive press reports on Manafort and his connections with Ukraine, on August 16, 2016, GATES communicated false talking points to Company in writing, including: 0 Q: ?Can you describe your initial contact with [Company and the lobbying goals he discussed with them?? A: ?We provided an introduction between the [Centre] and [Company B/Company in 2012. The [Centre] was seeking to retain representation in Washington, DC to support the mission of the 0 A: ?Our [Manafort and task was to assist the [Centre] find representation in Washington, but at no time did our firm or members provide any direct lobbying support.? a A: ?The structure of the arrangement between the [Centre] and [Company A and Company was worked out by the two parties.? 0 Q: ?Can you say where the funding from for [sic] the [Centre] came from? (this amounted to well over a million dollars between 2012 and 2014).? A: ?This is a l7 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 18 of 25 question better asked of the [Centre] who contracted with the two firms.? 0 Q: ?Can you describe the lobbying work speci?cally undertaken by [Company on behalf of the Party of Regions/the [Centre]?? A: ?This is a question better asked to Company and/or the [Centre] as the agreement was between the parties. Our firm did not play a role in the structure, nor were we registered lobbyists.? Company through a principal replied to GATES the same day that ?there?s a lot ofemail traffic that has you much more involved than this suggests[.] We will not disclose that but heaven knows what former employees of[Company or [Company might say.? 25. In September 2016, after numerous recent press reports concerning Manafort, the Department of Justice informed Manafort, GATES, and DM1 that it sought to determine whether they had acted as agents of a foreign principal under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (PARA), without registering. In November 2016 and February 2017, Manafort, GATES, and DM1 caused false and misleading letters to be submitted to the Department ofJustice, which mirrored the false cover story set out above. The letters, both of which were approved by Manafort and GATES before they were submitted, represented, among other things, that: - ?efforts on behalfofthe Party of Regions? ?did not include meetings or outreach within the 0 Manafort and GATES did not ?recall meeting with or conducting outreach to US. government officials or US. media outlets on behalf ofthe [Centre], nor do they recall being party to, arranging, or facilitating any such communications. Rather, it is the recollection and understanding of Messrs. Gates and Manafort that such communications would have been facilitated and 18 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 19 of 25 conducted by the [Centre?s] U.S. consultants, as directed by the [Centre]. . . 0 Manafort and GATES had merely served as a means of introduction of Company A and Company to the Centre and provided the Centre with a list of?potential U.S.-based consultants?including [Company and [Company the [Centre?s] reference and further consideration.? - DMI ?does not retain communications beyond thirty days? and as a result of this policy, a ?search has returned no responsive documents.? The November 2016 letter attached a one-page, undated document that purported to be a ?Email Retention Policy.? 26. In fact, Manafort and GATES had: selected Company A and Company engaged in weekly scheduled calls and frequent emails with Company A and Company to provide them directions as to Speci?c lobbying steps that should be taken; sought and received detailed oral and written reports from these ?rms on the lobbying work they had performed; communicated with Yanukovych to brief him on their lobbying efforts; both congratulated and reprimanded Company A and Company on their lobbying work; communicated directly with United States of?cials in connection with this work; and paid the lobbying ?rms over $2 million from offshore accounts they controlled, among other things. In addition, court-authorized searches of Manafort and DMI email accounts and Manafort?s Virginia residence in July 2017 revealed numerous documents, including documents related to lobbying, which were more than thirty-days old at the time ofthe November 2016 letter to the Department ofJustice. Manafort And Hiding OfForeign Bank Accounts And False Filings 27. United States citizens who have authority over certain foreign bank accounts -- whether or 19 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 20 of 25 not the accounts are set up in the names of nominees who act for their principals -- have reporting obligations to the United States. 28. First, the Bank Secrecy Act and its implementing regulations require United States citizens to report to the United States Treasury any ?nancial interest in, or signatory authority over, any bank account or other ?nancial account held in foreign countries, for every calendar year in which the aggregate balance of all such foreign accounts exceeds $10,000 at any point during the year. This is commonly known as a foreign bank account report or The Bank Secrecy Act requires these reports because they have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings. The United States Treasury?s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is the custodian for FBAR ?lings, and provides access to its FBAR database to law enforcement entities, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The reports ?led by individuals and businesses are used by law enforcement to identify, detect, and deter money laundering that furthers criminal enterprise activity, tax evasion, and other unlawful activities. 29. Second, United States citizens also are obligated to report information to the IRS regarding foreign bank accounts. For instance, in 2010 Form 1040, Schedule had a ?Yes? or ?No? box to record an answer to the question: ?At any time during [the calendar year], did you have an interest in or a signature or other authority over a ?nancial account in a foreign country, such as a bank account, securities account, or other ?nancial account?" If the answer was ?Yes,? then the form required the taxpayer to enter the name ofthe foreign country in which the ?nancial account was located. 30. For each year in or about and between 2008 through at least 20l4, Manafort had authority 20 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 21 of 25 over foreign accounts that required an FBAR report. Speci?cally, Manafort was required to report to the United States Treasury each foreign bank account held by the foreign Manafort-GATES entities noted above in paragraph 12 that bear the initials PM. No FBAR reports were made by Manafort for these accounts. 31. For each year in or about and between 2008 through at least 2013, GATES had authority over foreign accounts that required an BAR report. Speci?cally, GATES was required to report to the United States Treasury each foreign bank account held by the foreign Manafort-GATES entities noted above in paragraph 12 that bear the initials RG, as well as three other accounts in the United Kingdom. No FBAR reports were made by GATES for these accounts. 32. Furthermore, in each of Manafort?s tax ?lings for 2008 through 2014, Manafort represented falsely that he did not have authority over any foreign bank accounts. Manafort and GATES had repeatedly and falsely represented in writing to Manafort?s tax preparer that Manafort had no authority over foreign bank accounts, knowing that such false representations would result in false Manafort tax ?lings. For instance, on October 4, 201 1, Manafort?s tax preparer asked Manafort in writing: ?At any time during 2010, did you [or your wife or children] have an interest in or a signature or other authority over a financial account in a foreign country, such as a bank account, securities account or other financial account?? On the same day, Manafort falsely responded Manafort responded the same way as recently as October 3, 2016, when Manafort?s tax preparer again emailed the question in connection with the preparation of Manafort?s tax retums: ?Foreign bank accounts etc?? Manafort responded on or about the same day: Manafort And Fraud To Increase Access To Offshore Money 33. After Manafort used his offshore accounts to purchase real estate in the United States, he 21 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 22 of 25 took out mortgages on the properties thereby allowing Manafort to have the bene?ts of liquid income without paying taxes on it. Further, Manafort defrauded the banks that loaned him the money so that he could withdraw more money at a cheaper rate than he otherwise would have been permitted. 34. In 2012, Manafort, through a corporate vehicle called Soho Holdings, owned by him and his family, bought a condominium on Howard Street in the Soho neighborhood in Manhattan, New York. He paid approximately $2,850,000. All the money used to purchase the condominium came from Manafort entities in Cyprus. Manafort used the property from at least January 2015 through 2016 as an income-generating rental property, charging thousands ofdollars a week on Airbnb, among other places. In his tax returns, Manafort took advantage of the beneficial tax consequences of owning this rental property. 35. In late 2015 through early 2016, Manafort applied for a mortgage on the condominium. Because the bank would permit a greater loan amount if the property were owner-occupied, Manafort falsely represented to the bank and its agents that it was a secondary home used as such by his daughter and son?in-law and was not a property held as a rental property. For instance, on January 26, 2016, Manafort wrote to his son-in?law to advise him that when the bank appraiser came to assess the condominium his son-in-law should "[r]emember, he believes that you and [Manafort's daughter] are living there.? Based on a request from Manafort, GATES caused a document to be created which listed the Howard Street property as the second home ofManafort?s daughter and son?in-law, when GATES knew this fact to be false. As a result of his false representations, in March 2016 the bank provided Manafort a loan for approximately $3,185,000. 36. Also in 2012, Manafort through a corporate vehicle called Brooklyn Holdings, 22 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 23 of 25 similarly owned by him and his family bought a brownstone on Union Street in the Carroll Gardens section of Brooklyn, New York. He paid approximately $3,000,000 in cash for the property. All of that money came from a Manafort entity in Cyprus. After purchase of the property, Manafort began renovations to transform it from a multi-family dwelling into a single family home. In late 2015 through early 2016, Manafort sought to borrow cash against the property. The institution Manafort went to for the loan provided greater loan amounts for ?construction loans? -- that is, loans that required the loan amounts to be used to pay solely for construction of the property and thus increase the value of the property serving as the loan?s collateral. The institution would thus loan money against the expected completed value ofthe property, which in the case of the Union Street property was estimated to be $8,000,000. In early 2016, Manafort was able to obtain a loan of approximately $5,000,000, after promising the bank that approximately $1,400,000 of the loan would be used solely for construction of the Union Street property. However, Manafort never intended to limit use of the proceeds to construction as required by the loan contracts. In December 2015, before the loan was made, Manafort wrote his tax preparer, among others, that the construction loan ?will allow me to pay back the [another Manafort apartment] mortgage in full. . . Further, when the construction loan closed, Manafort used hundreds of thousands of dollars from the construction loan to make a down payment on another property in California. COUNT ONE Conspiracy Against The United States 37. From in or about and between 2006 and 2017, both dates being approximate and inclusive, in the District ofColumbia and elsewhere, the defendant RICHARD W. GATES together with 23 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 24 of 25 others, knowingly and intentionally conspired to defraud the United States by impeding, impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful governmental functions of a government agency, namely the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury, and to commit offenses against the United States, to wit, the violations of law charged in Counts Three through Six and Ten through Twelve of the Indictment returned in this matter on October 27, 2017 (Indictment). 38. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect its illegal object, GATES, together with others, committed the overt acts noted in Count Eleven of the Indictment and the overt acts, among others, in the District of Columbia and elsewhere as set forth in paragraphs 9, 16, 17, 20-25, 32, and 34- 36, which are incorporated herein. COUNT TWO False Statement 39. On or about February 1, 2018, in the District of Columbia, the defendant RICHARD W. GATES did willfully and knowingly make a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, to wit, the defendant falsely stated and represented to the Special Counsel?s Office, including Special Agents ofthe Federal Bureau oflnvestigation: that after a March I9, 2013 meeting in Washington, DC. attended by Manafort, a senior Company A lobbyist, and a Member of Congress (the Meeting), he was told by Manafort and a senior Company A lobbyist that there were no discussions of Ukraine at the Meeting; when, in fact, as he then and there well knew: 24 Case Document 195 Filed 02/02/18 Page 25 of 25 (ii) Manafort and the senior Company A lobbyist had not made the above statements to him; Manafort and the senior Company A lobbyists had told him that the meeting went well; (0) GATES had participated with Manafort in preparing a report that memorialized for Ukraine leadership the pertinent Ukraine discussions that Manafort represented had taken place at the meeting; and Manafort told GATES in 2016 that Manafort told his FARA lawyer that there had been no discussion of Ukraine at the Meeting. (18 U.S.C. ?1001(a)) ROBERT S. MUELLER Special Counsel By: Andrew Weissmann Greg D. Andres Kyle R. Freeny Brian M. Richardson Senior/Assistant Special Counsel 25