Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 3 of 15 PageID: 7 L THEODORE CAMPBELL MAY I 9 2017 I.DJ 022511981 Law Offices of Theodore Campbell 1050 George Street Suite 3-0 New Brunswick, NJ 08901 732-828-4393 Attorney for Plaintiff MEMONE CRYST1AN MONMOUTH VICINAGE CIVIL DESIGN 254 SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY SIMMEE CRYSTIAN MONMOUTH COUNTY LAW DIVISION Plaintiffs vs. RED BANK BOROUGH, STANLEY SICKELS, ART MURPHY, EUGENIA POULOUS, TAMILA BUMBACK, AND JOHN DOES 1-10 DOCKET NO: CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Defendants Plaintiff, Memone Crystian and Simmee Crystian reside in the Borough of Red Bank, County of Monmouth, State of New Jersey: FIRST COUNT (Parties) 1) The plaintiff, Memone Crystian, was hired and appointed as Director of the Parks and Recreation for the Borough of Red Bank on April 27, 2010.. 2) Plaintiff has been married to Simmee Crystian for sixteen years. 1 610/ LOO® N0SMI u3’l VHVBHVB ytT09tZZt'L XVd 8S : ST L Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 4 of 15 PageID: 8 3) The Defendant, Red Bank Borough is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, located at 90 Monmouth St., Red Bank, New Jersey. 4) At all times hereinafter-mentioned Parks and Recreation is a Department within the Borough of Red Bank. 5) At all times hereinafter-mentioned Stanley Sickels is the Borough Administrator. 6 ) At all times hereinafter-mentioned Art Murphy is an elected councilman for the Borough of Red Bank. 6 a) At all times hereinafter-mentioned Eugenia Portions is the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) far the Borough of Red Bank. 6 b) At all times hereinafter-mentioned Tamila Bumback is an employee of the Borough of Red Bank, FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 7) Memone Crystian, Plaintiff herein became employed by the Borough of Red Bank on or about April of 2010 to the positon of Director of Parks and Recreation. As Director, plaintiff reported directly to Stanley Sickels (Borough Administrator). 8 ) Plaintiff terminated her employment with the Borough on or about May 22,2015 after years of being subjected to a hostile work environment generated by her supervisors, the named'defendants herein. 9) Crystian was selected for the position of Director by-way of an interview process conducted by the Parks and Recreation Council Committee. This Committee consisted of the three council members; namely, Juanita Lewis as Chair, Councilwoman Sharon Lee and Councilman Art Murphy. 10) Plaintiff was informed during and after her selection by the Council Councilman Murphy was strongly opposed to her selection and sought to alter or adopt a new process whereby the full Council could review the qualifications of the candidates prior to selection. However, Murphy was overruled by committee members. Committee that 2 6 10/8000 N’osx'i vavaava St'T09t,oZCi XYd 8S -ST 'TOZ/OT/TT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 5 of 15 PageID: 9 11) Plaintiff believes and avers that defendants, Sickels, Murphy and other defendants engaged in calculated negative actions and conduct toward her throughout her tenure to create stress, anxiety and her ultimate failure thus prompting Crystlan’s constructive termination. 12) Plaintiff believes their actions were motivated by her race and gender as an African American female. Plaintiff has been told by others who either were employed or are currently employed (including volunteers) by the Borough that both Sickels and Murphy have either made or entertained bias racist comments, some of which were directed at plaintiff. 13) For example, defendant Sickels, upon coming to a meeting at one of the Fire Department buildings in fee Borough, prior to plaintiff’s employment, reportedly stated; “I just had a meeting with them niggers at DPW”, Department of Public Works. When questioned about the comment by one of those present, Sickels then attempted to recant. 14) Defendants Murphy and Sickels reportedly stated in the presence of another council member at a local eatery “give her a bucket of fried chicken and;make her happy”, referring to plaintiff. That statement was made in the spring of 2015. 15) Additionally, some of defendant Murphy’s relatives associated with the Borough have stated publicly that Art Murphy repeatedly voiced a desire to terminate plaintiffs employment. Sean Murphy, the brother of Art and a member of the Parks and Recreation Community Council Committee stated to others, “I can't believe they hired that black bitch to the Parks and Recreation Director”. 16) Examples of the negative treatment directed at plaintiff from the beginning and throughout her tenure are exemplified in the following paragraphs. 17) Art Murphy, who sat on the Parks and Recreation Counsel Committee for several years during plaintiffs tenure, failed to attend any of the Committee meetings and Advisory Committee meetings (70 in number) except two; but yet defendant Murphy told citizens of the Red Bank Community throughout her tenure that he (Murphy) is seeking to get rid of Crystian. (18) After Crystian was selected as Director by the Township (Borough) Council and she (Crystian) began negotiating the terms of her employment and 3 6T0 600® s.'os\i-Hin vavaave St’TOfH’ZZC' YVd BS : ST iTOS 01 IT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 6 of 15 PageID: 10 salary with Stanley Sickels, Crystian requested the same starting anmial salary as that of her predecessor. Sickels refused, indicating that as a new Director she would have to work-up to a higher salary while stating; “we don’t do that we tend to start at a salary rate lower than the person in the position before yon”. Crystian was also told a college degree is required to fill the position. (19) The two agreed on $65,000 as the starting annual salary. When Crystian first spoke with Human Resources about the salary, Crystian was told Sickels stated it was $63,500 and $1,500 toward the medical expense. Crystian stated that was not the agreed amount and refused to accept that unilateral change by Sickels. Sickels ultimately relented and $65,000 was her starting salary. It is noteworthy that Crystian’s replacement as Acting Director, Tamila Bumback began receiving the same annual salary’ ($71,000) as Crystian when Crystian quit her position. Also, Bumback did not have a college degree. (19a) It is noteworthy that Bumback received a higher salary upon being hired than that of her predecessor. In fact Sickels was reluctant to pay the rate Bumback received until plaintiff informed him she is Caucasian. (20) Sickels later boasted to the local newspaper that “We got her at a bargain price; the position was budgeted for $75,000 so we got her for $10,000 less, (21) Crystian was not allowed to participate in the state pension program as a public employee. The only Director for the Borough and fill! time employee of the Borough, to which that distinction applied. Indeed when the Administrators for the New Jersey Division of Pensions and Benefits decided Crystian and Eva Biyiano, Human Resource Manager should be allowed to participate in the program the year of 2014 the Borough Administrator by-way of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), Eugenia Poulous, decided to appeal that decision seeking a reversal. (22) It is noteworthy that the Borough Administrator did not appeal the Division of Pensions decision to allow Human Resource Manager’s, Eva Biviano participation in the pension, which occurred at the same time. Biviano is Caucasian. (23) Crystian was out on medical leave from her position as Director during the year(s) 2012 for six (6) weeks and 2014 for approximately four (4) months. Crystian was not allowed to use her significantly accumulated flextime (one hour leave time for one hour of overtime) during her medical 4 tilO, OTO® Nominal vavttHva t'H0 9 Ksez. xvj eu:si i t o z oi Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 7 of 15 PageID: 11 leaves, although she had 2 2 weeks of flex time during her first medical leave in 2012, (24) Sickels, sent Crystian an e-mail when she attempted to use her flex time announcing a new policy; that as a non-union employee she could onlyuse the accumulated flex time within a week of accumulating it, this new policy was not in the HR handbook and was the first time plaintiff was made aware of it Plaintiff believes she was the first employee subjected to this alleged policy change. (25) For example, Crystian* s secretary, Tamila Bumback, was allowed to use comp time (same as flex time for union employees) when she (Tamila) was out on medical leave in 2014. (26) Additionally, Sickels told plaintiff at their initial meeting after her appo mtment/hire as Director, that he was looking for someone to work 14-15 hour days and not have to worry about taking care of children. Therefore, plaintiff was expected to work nights, holidays, weekend and often worked 60 hours or more each week, (27) However, that policy did not apply to Tamila Bumback who assumed the position of Acting Director during plaintiff’s medical leave the 4-5 months of 2014. Bumback told plaintiff in conversations during her leave that Sickels allowed her to leave at 5:00 p.m. Tamila Bumback is Caucasian. It is also noteworthy that Bumback received a 5% increase in pay during the same period which was the first time a secretary in the Borough received an increase in pay while substituting for her supervisor on leave, according to Sickels. (28) Throughout Crystian’s tenure, administrative funds were withheld from the Packs and Recreation Department, although budgeted for use. (29) For example, Crystian’s predecessor and successor had for use at least one fairly new recreation van for activities along with an assigned personal vehicle for business use in the Borough and across Monmouth County, Crystian was required to use the same IS passenger van used by her predecessor, which had become old and in need of constant repair, for both activities and business throughout the Borough and the County. Indeed, plaintiffs successor has been provided with three (3) recreation vans and a SUV Durango for Parks and Recreation business use. 5 G10/TT0® NOSMIAtHH VHVHHV8 IJH091’ Z Z Z L \rYU 00 :91 ilOZ/OT/TT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 8 of 15 PageID: 12 (30) Another example of harassment involves Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Eugenia Poulous, who reported directly to defendant Sickejs.. Poulous repeatedly and consistently reported to the Boroughs Council during Poulous’s tenure 2013-2015, also to the Mayor and Parks and Recreation Council Committee that the Parks and Recreation budget was vastly overrun which was false, Sickels would then follow with memos instructing plaintiff to cease certain planned activities. Plaintiff would also get questions and comments from Council members about the budget. (31) Plaintiff would then have to respond to all the appropriate parties and demonstrate that her analysis for planned activities were all within the budget (32) In feet plaintiff had a stellar four year audit history as the Director. Nevertheless in the spring of 2015, Sickels with Poulous as Liaison between the Borough and Auditor initiated a grueling extensive audit that consumed several days, unlike the prior audits toe Department had undergone during plaintiff s tenure. (33) The Auditor told Crystian that she did very well and that he had informed the Administration that she cleared up the problems created by her predecessor. The Auditor was referring to a prior extensive audit conducted in 2009* prior to plaintiffs employment which was tertoed a special audit and the basis upon which Sickels terminated the previous Director, according to information learned by the plaintiff. (34) It is noteworthy that Sickels never provided Crystian with the results of that intense special audit conducted in 2009 with its critical analysis and constructive criticism to assist Crystian in preparing for the intense audit she had to undergo as Director in 2015, an audit that Sickels apparently initiated. (35) Crystian also complained during her tenure that her Department was understaffed; but her complaints and requests for assistance were ignored. Crystian had to utilize volunteers to conduct Parks and Recreation business and activities. (36) Sickels would have multiple excuses for his failure to hire a full staff for plaintiffs Department. (37) It is noteworthy that former Acting Director, Tamila Bumback, was given a foil paid staff upon taking over for plaintiff in May of 2015. 6 6I0/ZT0® x'osxiuhi vaveava £f'T09f’SSC' xva 00:91 L [02/0 l/ TT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 9 of 15 PageID: 13 Thereafter, the plaintiff’s successor was also provided with a full paid staff upon being appointed Director, in 2016. (38) As a general proposition, plaintiff faced opposition from Sickels, Murphy and some other Council members when she attempted to initiate programs for the benefit of Red Bank’s youth and adult communities. Sickels would often discourage activities and programs for ethnic minorities. (39) Sickels and Murphy seemed more concerned about the youths from neighboring towns and their ability to use Red Bank facilities. (40) So it came as no surprise to plaintiff when Sickels made the obscene cutthroat gesture while glaring at plaintiff during Juanita Lewis’s re-election event. Lewis loss her bid for re-election, but Sickels while embracing Juanita Lewis after Lewis’s apparent loss looked at plaintiff and ran his fingers across his throat as if to say your days are numbered as Director, now that your support is no longer on the Council. (41) In January df 2:017 newly elected Coimcilwoman, Linda Schwabenbaur, was appointed to chair the Parks and Recreation Council Committee and, as such, she became plaintiff’s supervisor. (42) In the spring of 2017, in a meeting between the two, Schwabenbaur told plaintiff that Sickels asked her to terminate plaintiff but she did not have documented grounds to.do so. (43) Plaintiff recalls the conversation occurred before she (plaintiff) had any substantive meetings with Schwabenbaur. (44) Plaintiff also recalls being told by Tamila Bumback, something similar when she (plaintiff) was out on medical leave. (45) Apparently Sickels and Murphy had expressed to Bumback their desire to get rid of Crystian while Crystian was away on medical leave. Bumback told Crystian when Crystian returned from medical leave of the conversations and stated she was tired of being in the middle. Plaintiff perceives Bumback’s demeanor toward her began to change after that conversation. (46) Plaintiff believes all of the defendants actions enumerated above were intended to harass alarm and force her out as Director. Plaintiff believes her race and gender were motivating factors for those actions. 7 e lomo® K0SNTU31 VHYHHYH SH09t’33CZ. X \ d 10 = 91 L I'OZ'OT IT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 10 of 15 PageID: 14 (47) As a result of the actions of the named defendants, plaintiff has suffered emotional, physical, and psychological harm, and interference with employment, which forced her to terminate her employment with the Borough of Red Bank. (48) The above described conduct of the defendants constitutes unlawful discrimination against the plaintiff within the meaning of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10-5-1 et.seq. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment on this count against any and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits^ punitive damages, together with interest, attorney Tees, cost of suit, and any further relief the court deems equitable and just. SECOND COUNT (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) 1. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the previous counts of the complaint and incorporate same herein by reference. 2. The conduct of the Defendants constitutes the intentional infliction of emotional distress against the plaintiff, Mem one Crystian WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment on this count against airy and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits, punitive damages, together with interest, attorney foes, cost of suit, and any further relief the court deems equitable and just. THIRD COUNT (PER QUOD Claim) 1. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the second count of the complaint and incorporate same herein by reference. 2. At all relevant times herein Simmee Crystian was the husband of Plaintiff Memone Crystian. 3. As a proximate result of the above described conduct and actions of the Defendants, Simmee Crystian has suffered loss of society and consortium as well as personal emotional anxiety. 8 GTO fr ro® K0SS.TM.T7 VHVHHVH SNOQ t ’ Z Z U XY'd S0 : 9T iTOS/OT/TT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 11 of 15 PageID: 15 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment on this count against any and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits, punitive damages, together with interest, attorney fees, cost of suit, and any further relief the court deems equitable and just FOURTH COUNT (Constructive Discharge) 1. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the previous counts of the complaint and incorporate same herein by reference. 2. The conduct of the Defendants toward the plaintiff Memone Crystian, constitutes a pattern of harassment extending over a period of time which forced her to terminate her employment, 3. Defendants actions against plaintiff Edelstein were discriminatory and in response to his efforts tp process his rightful claims to workmen’s compensation ultimately terniinating his employment as an Edison fireman in violation of NJ.SA. 3:15-39.1 et.scq. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment on this count against any and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits, punitive damages, together with interest, attorney fees, cost of suit, and any fhrther relief the court deems equitable and just FIFTH COUNT (Aider and Abettor) 1. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the previous counts of the complaint same herein by reference. and incorporate 2. The named defendants aided each other in the harassment and creation of a hostile work environment for plaintiff.. 3. The conduct of Defendants violated plaintiffs rights under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJ.S A. 10:5-1 et. seq.). WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment on this count against any and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits, 9 6ro 9X0® noskih31 vavaava mogrzzci xvj zo:gx iioz ot/tt Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 12 of 15 PageID: 16 punitive damages, together with interest, attorney fees, cost of suit, and any further relief the court deems equitable and just. (Violation of Civil a Act of 1866) 1. Plaintiffs repeat the allegations of the previous counts of the complaint and incorporate same herein by reference. 2. The conduct of the defendants violates plaintiff’s tights under the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 USCA 1981). Defendant Borough of Red Bank is an employer within the meaning of 42 USCA Sec. 1981 and 1983., 3. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands j udgment on this count against any and all Defendants for compensatory damages, including lost wages, benefits, punitive damages, together with interest, attorney fees, cost of suit, and any further relief the court deems equitable and just. JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs hereby demand trial by jury to all issues in this case. Pursuant to Rule 4;25*4, Theodore Campbell is hereby designated as trial counsel for Plaintiffs tn-the within matter. 10 eio'sio© kosm.uH'1 vaveave S H 0 9 t 2 S C £ \'VS C 0 : 9 T £ T 0 i 5 / 0 I / I I Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 13 of 15 PageID: 17 RULE 4:5-4 Certification I hereby certify that the subject matter of the within complaint is not subject matter of any other lawsuit, arbitration proceeding or contemplated lawsuit or arbitration proceeding of which I am aware. 3q Dated: 5-19-17 Aftp n BIO 2 ,1 0 ® mosni \\3 i vHvaava eno9 t’2 3 C2 xva eo:9 i 2102 ot/tt Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 14 of 15 PageID: 18 ■Appendix XH-Bl Civil Case Information Statement PayMentIt^pe:, Chs/ckno.. Use for Initial Law Division Civil Part pleadings (nbf motions) under Rule 4:5-1 Pleading will be reiocted for filing, under Rule 1:5-6(c), H information above the black bar Is not completed or attorney's signature is not affixed ODD 8 Amount; Overpayment; Batchnumber. TELEPHONE NUMBER ATTORNEY/PROSE NAME (732) 828-4383 Theodore Campbell AA QfV Ais-O U \ DOCKET NUMBER (when available) FIRM NAME (IfappU cable) I aw OHIces of Theodore Campbell DOCUMENT TYPE OFFICE ADDRESS 1050 George Street Suite 3-0 NAME OF PARTY (eg, John Caption Doe, Plaintiff) Red Bank Borough.Stanley SIckels, Art Murphy, Eugenia Poulous, Tamila Bumbaek and John Does 1-10. Memon© Crystian; Plaintiff & jammed Crystian CASE TYPE NUMBER HURRICANE RELATED? (See reverse side for Wing) SANDY □ YES IS THIS A PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE CASE? □ YES ■ NO 610 IF YOU HAVE CHECKED "YES.’ SEE N.J.S.A. 2A;53 A -27 AND APPLICABLE REGARDING YOURlOBUGATlON TO FILE AN AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT. D Yen □ Yea NAME OF DEFENDANT'S PRIMARY INSURANCE COMPANY fif known) □ THE mptmiMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM CANNOT BE IN TW^ATIONSHIPr -- F*- r-r‘-»V> JH.X- - KWPLoTCK/ewFLpree □ P&ttUN. □ ■ RECURRENT RELATIONSHIP? YB3 □ No ED INTO EVIDENCE. ‘ 1 ^ ■ ■■ ■■ FHiero/filiiaHBOR Acla^ATCDDISpiftW0NHe eCWJRT TCi ANY SP?°'Ai-CA£li .■.no.. WILL AM INTERPRETER BE NEEDiaj? tetfdcted from ajf documents IT vca, PLEASE IQENTWrTHe REQUESTED ACCOMM ■ If yes, for what language? ■No' fleothave documents now submitted tb the court, and will be With Ru/e i;3a.r(b). 7 Bftacfiva 10/01/2C16, CN 10617 t>ro s v o @ gg^ CHARACTERISTICSTi-tAT MAY WARRANT- INCfOiSjAL MANAGEMENT OR " Do YOU mYWRaj6NTNSSiOAHYQISrB*,trrACCOWMOCWnOM3? 1 certify that confidential personal I □ OTHER (ejqprleln) Business DOES THE STATUTE GOVERNING'THIS CASE PROVIDE irOR PAYMENT OF FEES BYTHE LOSING PAPrPtf? ______■___. ___ __ ________.___ . ________ P . O YK none □ Unknown □ No j CASEqHARACTTRlSXTC^<5S'pfi^O^S;bEfD^ ^^'GIF'^^^ ^^^WtE:r«kMECHA:fl'5Nl;',~''''’ Irvn da rjTtcc /fr A.PI ioOSVJt fbAOTma ~ ~QOPAfJXIES HAVE A-CURRENT, PASTOR ATTORNEY BSQNATUHE. CASE LAW No DO YOU ANTICIPATE ADOING ANY PARTIES (arising out of aame transaction or occurrence)? n yee • NO IF YES, LIST DOCKET NUMBERS RELAT ED CASES PENDING? !& YE8 □ NO JURY DEMAND New Brunswick, N J. 08801 page i orz MosNiuai vavaava St lOBt'ZZSi YVH to: 91 /T0Z OT/TT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-1 Filed 11/21/17 Page 15 of 15 PageID: 19 CIVIL CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT □a DU DUD Use for initial pleadings; (not motions) under Rule 4:5-1 CASE TYPES (Choose one and enter number of-case type in appropriate-space on the reverse side.) Track 1 — 150 days’ discovery '151 175 302 399 502 505 506 510 511 51? 599 80T 802 ' NAME CHANGE FORFEITURE TENANCY REAL PROPERTY (other than Tanancy, Contract, Condemnation, Complex BOOK ACCOUNT OTHERONSURANCECLAIM;(INCLUDING DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ACTIONS) PIP COVERAGE ■ UM or U.IM CLAIM ACTIGNiQN NEGOTIABLE.INSTRUMENT LEM.nNt.AW ' CONTR/TCT/COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION SUMMARY ACTION OPEN PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (SUMMARY ACTION) Track It — 300 Commercial or Construction) days' discovery . . 305 CONSTRUCT ON 609 EMPLOYMENT (other titan CEPA or LAD) ■ '802 ASSAUUPAND BATTERY . 603 AUTO NEGLIGENCE A PERSONAL INJURY 605 PERSONAL INJURY" 010 AUTO NEGLIGENCE - PROPERTY DAMAGE '699 TORT - OTHER ■ 450 days’dlscovery Track'll! 005 CIVIL RIGHTS 301 CONDEMNATION ■ 604 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE 606 PRODUCT LIABILITY 607 PROFESSIONAL MALPRACTICE 608 TOXIC T'ORT f-00 DEFAMATION ■616 Wl'liS.I'tPBLOWhR TCONSC'ENT'OUS EMPLOYEE PROTECTION ACT (CEPA) CASES 617 INVERSE CO'NDBMtfATtCN 616 LAW AGAINST. DISCRIMINATION (LAD) CASES j Track IV —— Activa Case Manag&ment by Individual Judge / 4^0 days' discovery 156 ENVIRONMLNnAUENV.RCNttENTA- COVERAGE LITIGATION. 303 MT. LAUREL 500 COMPLEX COMMERCIAL 701 ACTIONS IN’ LIEU OF PREROGATIVE WRITS Mass Tort (TrackdV) 240 REDUX/PHEN-FEN (formerty 'DIET DRUG') 248 CIBA GEIGY 264 PPA 601 ASBESTOS 619 VIOXX 999 OTHER (Briefly dascriba nature of action). If you boliovo this cose requires a track otherthan that provided above, ptaasa Indicate the reason on Side 1, In the space under "Casa Characterisecs." Please check off each applicable category: □ Verbal Threshold □ Putative Class Action On Hie 59 ’ KWI»«i iliflctiVe 47 WI5 RIO 6100 NosKiuHi vavaava Sl-1091’ Z Z Z L XYd f-O : 91 L T0S OT IT Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 20 CIVIL COVER SHEET JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and sen ice of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided bv local rules of court This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS MEMONE CRYSTIAN Borough of Red Bank, Stanley Sickels, Art Murphy, Eugenia Poulous, and Tamila Bumback SIMMEE CRYSTIAN (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Monmouth County of Residence of First Listed Defendant Monmouth__________ (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known) Theodore Campbell, Law Offices of Theodore Campbell, 1050 George Street, Suite 3-0 New Brunswick, NJ 08901 732-828-4393 II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an "X" in One Box Only) Bruce W. Padula, Esq.- Cleary Giacobbe Alfieri Jacobs, LLC 955 State Route 34, Suite 200 Matawan, New Jersey 07747 (732) 583-7474 III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an "X" in One Box for Plaintiff (For Diversity Cases Only) 3 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff 8 3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party) n2 □4 U.S. Government Defendant __ Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) and One Box for Defendant) PTF DEF Citizen of This State □1 □1 Incorporated or Principal Place of Business In This State PTF □4 DEF □4 Citizen of Another State □2 □2 Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State □5 □5 Citizen or Subject of a Foreiun Country □3 □3 Foreign Nation □6 □6 IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an “A in One Pox Only) CONTRACT TORTS □ 110 Insurance □ 120 Marine □ 130 Miller Act □ 140 Negotiable Instrument □ 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment □ 151 Medicare Act □ 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excludes Veterans) □ 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran’s Benefits □ 160 Stockholders' Suits □ 190 Other Contract □ 195 Contract Product Liability □ 196 Franchise 1 REAL PROPERTY □ 210 Land Condemnation □ 220 Foreclosure □ 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment □ 240 Torts to Land □ 245 fort Product Liability □ 290 All Other Real Property PERSONAL INJURY □ 310 Airplane □ 315 Airplane Product Liability □ 320 Assault. Libel & Slander O 330 Federal Employers' Liability □ 340 Marine D 345 Marine Product Liability □ 350 Motor Vehicle □ 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability □ 360 Other Personal Injury □ 362 Personal Injury Medical Malpractice FORFEITURE/PENALTY PERSONAL INJURY □ 365 Personal Injury Product Liability □ 367 Health Care/ Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability □ 368 Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability PERSONAL PROPERTY □ 370 Other Fraud □ 371 Truth in Lending □ 380 Other Personal Property Damage □ 385 Property Damage Product Liability CIVIL RIGHTS PRISONER PETITIONS 5? 440 Other Civil Rights □ 441 Voting □ 442 Employment □ 443 Housing/ Accommodations □ 445 Amer. w/Disabilities Employment □ 446 Atner. w/Disabilities Other □ 448 Education Habeas Corpus: □ 463 .Alien Detainee □ 510 Motions to Vacate Sentence □ 530 General □ 535 Death Penalty Other: □ 540 Mandamus & Other Cl 550 Civil Rights □ 555 Prison Condition □ 560 Civil Detainee Conditions of Confinement □ 625 Ding Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881 3 690 Other BANKRUPTCY □ 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 H 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157 PROPERTY RIGHTS □ 820 Copyrights □ 830 Patent □ 840 Trademark LABOR SOCIAL SECURITY □ 710 Fair Labor Standards Act □ 720 Labor/Management Relations □ 740 Railway Labor Act □ 751 Family and Medical Leave Act □ 790 Other Labor Litigation Cl 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act □ 861 HIA (1395ff) □ 862 Black Lung (923) □ 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) 3 864 SSID Title XVI □ 865 RSI (405(g)) FEDERAL TAX SUITS □ 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant) □ 871 IRS—Third Party 26 USC 7609 OTHER STATUTES □ 375 False Claims Act □ 400 State Reapportionment □ 410 Antitrust □ 430 Banks and Banking 3 450 Commerce □ 460 Deportation □ 470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations □ 480 Consumer Credit □ 490 Cable/Sat TV □ 850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange □ 890 Other Statutoiy Actions □ 891 Agricultural Acts □ 893 Environmental Matters 3 895 Freedom of Information Act □ 896 Arbitration 3 899 Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision □ 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes IMMIGRATION C) 462 Naturalization Application □ 465 Other Immigration Actions V. ORIGIN (Place an "X" in One Box Only) ai Original Proceeding X 2 Removed from State Court □3 Remanded from Appellate Court □ 4 Reinstated or Reopened □ 5 Transferred from Another District (specify) n 6 Multidistrict Litigation Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity). VI. CAUSE OF ACTION 42 U.S.C 1981 and 1983 Brief description of cause: Plaintiff claims her civil rights were violated by Defendants' alleged constructive discharge of her employment VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY □ DATE CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE 23, F.R Cv.P DEMAND $ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: (See instructions): JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD /s/ Bruce W. Padula 11/21/2017 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIPT # AMOUNT APPLYING IFP JUDGE MAG. JUDGE >3 Yes □ No 1 Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-2 Filed 11/21/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID: 21 JS 44 Reverse (Rev. 12/12) INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS COMPLETING CIVIL COVER SHEET FORM JS 44 Authority For Civil Cover Sheet The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows: I. (a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and then the official, giving both name and title. (b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.) (c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting in this section "(see attachment)". II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.O.P.. which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X" in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below. United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here. United Slates defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box. Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331. where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty' of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked. Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity cases.) III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this section for each principal party. IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If the nature of suit cannot be determined, be sure the cause of action, in Section VI below, is sufficient to enable the deputy clerk or the statistical clerk(s) in the Administrative Office to determine the nature of suit. If the cause fits more than one nature of suit, select the most definitive. V. Origin. Place an "X" in one of the six boxes. Original Proceedings. (1) Cases which originate in the United States district courts. Removed from State Court. (2) Proceedings initiated in state courts may be removed to the district courts under Title 28 U.S.C., Section 1441. When the petition for removal is granted, check this box. Remanded from Appellate Court. (3) Check this box for cases remanded to the district court for further action. Use the date of remand as the filing date. Reinstated or Reopened. (4) Check this box for cases reinstated or reopened in the district court. Use the reopening date as the filing date. Transferred from Another District. (5) For cases transferred under Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a). Do not use this for within district transfers or multidistrict litigation transfers. Multidistrict Litigation. (6) Check this box when a multidistrict case is transferred into the district under authority of Title 28 U.S.C. Section 1407. When this box is checked, do not check (5) above. VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23. F.R.Cv.P. Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction. Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded. VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases. Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet. Case 3:17-cv-11914-BRM-DEA Document 1-3 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 1 PageID: 22 CLEARY GIACOBBE ALFIERI JACOBS LLC BRUCE W. PADULA, Partner bpadula@cgajlaw.com Reply to: Matawan Office November 21, 2017 Via Electronic Filing William T. Walsh, Clerk United States District Court Clarkson S. Fisher U.S. Courthouse 402 East State Street, Room 2020 Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Re: Memone Crystian, et al. v. Borough of Red Bank, et al. Docket Number: MON-L-1982-17 Dear Mr. Walsh: With respect to the above-referenced matter, enclosed please find a Notice of Removal with Certification of Service, Civil Cover Sheet and Disclosure Statement in the above-captioned matter. I have also provided the appropriate credit card payment in the amount of $400.00 representing payment for the filing of these documents. Thank you for your courtesies. Very truly yours, Bruce W. Padula 955 State Route 34 Suite 200 Matawan, NJ 07747 Tel 732 583-7474 Fax 732 290-0753 169 Ramapo Valley Road Upper Level 105 Oakland, NJ 07436 Tel 973 845-6700 Fax 201 644-7601 www.cgajlaw.com