U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Homeland Security Privacy Office, Mail Stop 0655 February 28, 2018 SENT VIA EMAIL TO: foia@americanoversight.org Austin R. Evers Executive Director 1030 15th Street, NW Suite B255 Washington, DC 20005 Re: 2017-HQFO-00564 (17-cv-01187) CBP-2017-041455 Dear Mr. Evers: This is the final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), dated March 21, 2017, and received by this office on March 21, 2017. You are seeking all records concerning the schedule or schedules for the initiation, construction, and or completion of a wall, fence, or other physical barrier on the U.S.–Mexico border; any preliminary or final analysis regarding the scheduling or timing of the initiation, construction, or completion of such a wall, fence, or physical barrier; all correspondence sent or received by political appointees within the agency or individuals appointed to or acting in presidential appointment with Senate confirmation (PAS) positions within the agency concerning the schedule for the initiation, construction, or completion of such a wall, fence, or physical barrier. A search of Office of Policy (PLCY) for documents responsive to your request produced a total of 132 pages. Of those pages, I have determined that 3 pages of the records are released in their entirety, 14 pages are partially released, and 115 pages are withheld in their entirety pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. § 552 (b)(5), and (b)(6). FOIA Exemption 5 protects from disclosure those inter- or intra-agency documents that are normally privileged in the civil discovery context. The three most frequently invoked privileges are the deliberative process privilege, the attorney work-product privilege, and the attorney-client privilege. After carefully reviewing the responsive documents, I determined that portions of the responsive documents qualify for protection under the Deliberative Process Privilege. The deliberative process privilege protects the integrity of the deliberative or decision-making processes within the agency by exempting from mandatory disclosure opinions, conclusions, and recommendations included within inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters. The release of this internal information would discourage the expression of candid opinions and inhibit the free and frank exchange of information among agency personnel. FOIA Exemption 6 exempts from disclosure personnel or medical files and similar files the release of which would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This requires a balancing of the public’s right to disclosure against the individual’s right to privacy. The privacy interests of the individuals in the records you have requested outweigh any minimal public interest in disclosure of the information. Any private interest you may have in that information does not factor into the aforementioned balancing test. You have a right to appeal the above withholding determination. Should you wish to do so, you must send your appeal and a copy of this letter, within 90 days of the date of this letter, to: Privacy Office, Attn: FOIA Appeals, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane, SW, Mail Stop 0655, Washington, D.C. 20528-0655, following the procedures outlined in the DHS FOIA regulations at 6 C.F.R. Part 5 § 5.8. Your envelope and letter should be marked “FOIA Appeal.” Copies of the FOIA and DHS FOIA regulations are available at www.dhs.gov/foia. Your request was sent to the U. S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) on April 4, 2017. You may contact the CBP FOIA Office at 202-325-0150 for the status of your request and refer to case number CBP-2017-041455. If you need any further assistance or would like to discuss any aspect of your request, please contact the analyst below who processed your request and refer to 2017-HQFO-00564. You may send an e-mail to foia@hq.dhs.gov, call 202-343-1743 or toll free 1-866-431-0486, or you may contact our FOIA Public Liaison in the same manner. Additionally, you have a right to right to seek dispute resolution services from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) which mediates disputes between FOIA requesters and Federal agencies as a nonexclusive alternative to litigation. If you are requesting access to your own records (which is considered a Privacy Act request), you should know that OGIS does not have the authority to handle requests made under the Privacy Act of 1974. You may contact OGIS as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Sincerely, Kevin L. Tyrrell Director FOIA Appeals and Litigation Enclosure(s): 132 pages From: Sent : To : Cc: Subject: Attachments : 14 Apr 2017 20:24:29 +0000 P,)<6) ~ OCC) EO 13767 90-Day progress report for review EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report PLCYDRAFT(DHS combined) .docx Hi As mentioned on the phone, OGC requested that you review and clear on this report as it mentions several in-progress/drafted policy statements, policy guidance documents, and regulations. Please feel free to make any edits directly in this document and I will incorporated them in the clean draf t . I also reached out to OGC to see who was currently reviewing the FAM changes but am still waiting to hear back. I'll let you know when I get a POC. - Best, DHS-17-0040-A-000001 Page 002 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000002 Page 003 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000003 Page 004 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000004 Page 005 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000005 Page 006 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000006 Page 007 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000007 Page 008 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000008 Page 009 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000009 Page 010 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000010 Page 011 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000011 Page 012 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000012 Page 013 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000013 Page 014 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000014 Page 015 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000015 Page 016 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000016 Page 017 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000017 Page 018 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000018 From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: 14 Apr 2017 15:39:31 +0000 EO Border Report 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CBP 04.13.1....doc, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CRCL).doc, 1139124 E0 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (MGMT 04.13 doc, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (OGC).docx, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (USCIS).doc, 1139124-E0 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (I&A).doc, 1139124-E0 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (ICE).doc, 1139124-E0 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (OLA).doc, EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report PLCY DRAFT (DHS combined).docx, Si Action Memo Template (4.18.17).doc Here you are. DHS-17-0040-A-000019 Page 020 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000020 Page 021 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000021 Page 022 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000022 Page 023 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000023 Page 024 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000024 Document Clearance Comment Form Title or Description of Document: 90-Day Report to the President on E.O. 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Efforts (WF 1139124) For Internal DHS Use: Lead Action Officer Name and Component: Date: Comments provided by: INSTRUCTIONS: The reference column is where you will type the document paragraph, sentence, etc. you are commenting on. The Comment columns are where you will type your comment. Please note that RED FLAG comments are critical suggestions that must be incorporated for DHS to concur with the document. 2 DHS-17-0040-A-000025 Page 026 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000026 Page 027 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000027 Page 028 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000028 Page 029 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000029 Document Clearance Comment Form Title or Description of Document: 90-Day Report to the President on E.O. 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Efforts (WF 1139124) For Internal DHS Use: Lead Action Officer Name and Component: Date: 4/10/17 Comments provided by: USCIS INSTRUCTIONS: The reference column is where you will type the document paragraph, sentence, etc. you are commenting on. The Comment columns are where you will type your comment. Please note that RED FLAG comments are critical suggestions that must be incorporated for DHS to concur with the document. # 23. # Reference NON -SUBSTANTIVE / GRAMMATICAL COMMENTS 24. 25. 26. 3 DHS-17-0040-A-000030 Page 031 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000031 Page 032 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000032 Page 033 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000033 Page 034 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000034 Page 035 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000035 Page 036 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000036 Page 037 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000037 Page 038 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000038 Page 039 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000039 Page 040 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000040 Page 041 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000041 Page 042 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000042 Page 043 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000043 Page 044 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000044 Page 045 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000045 Page 046 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000046 Page 047 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000047 Page 048 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000048 Page 049 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000049 Page 050 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000050 Page 051 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000051 Page 052 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000052 Page 053 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000053 Page 054 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000054 (b)(6) From: 13 Apr 2017 15:14:29 -0400 Sent: To: FW: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WF 1139124 - E0 13767 (Border Subject: Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance Attachments: 1139124 - E0 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CBP 04.13.17).doc From (b)(6) Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 3:12 PM (b)(6) To: Cc: (b)(6) Subject: RE: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WE 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance Hi CBP's comments attached. We received them about 1/2 hour ago. Component MGMT OLA S&T NPPD USCIS OHA OPS OPE OGC CRCL Cleared By Cleared on Date 04/05/201 7 Attach men Comments MGMT clears without comment. 04/06/201 OLA Clears with Edits 7 04/07/201 no comments 7 04/07/201 NPPD clears without comment 7 Yes No No 04/10/201 USCIS clears with comments 7 04/10/201 7 04/06/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 No comments Without comment per step note below. Without comment per step note below. No No clears with comments attached Yes CRCL comments are attached. Cleared Yes DHS-17-0040-A-000055 (b)(6) (b)(6) 04/07/201 7 04/11/201 7 04/13/201 7 04/13/201 7 l&A ICE CPA CBP l&A clears with comments attached. ICE clears with comments. Yes CPA clears with no comments or edits. With comments per step note below. No Yes From: (b)(6) Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:44 PM To: )(6) Cc: I ) Subject: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WF 1139124 - E0 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance (b)(6) MGMT's comments are attached. Cleared By Component (b)(6) MGMT OLA S&T NPPD 4.1 Cleared on Date Attach men Comments 04/13/201 MGMT clears with edits. 7 Yes 04/06/201 OLA Clears with Edits 7 04/07/201 no comments 7 04/07/201 NPPD clears without comment 7 Yes No No USCIS 04/10/201 USCIS clears with comments 7 No OHA 04/10/201 No comments 7 No DHS-17-0040-A-000056 04/06/201 Without comment per step note No 7 below. 04/10/201 Without comment per step note No 7 below. 04/10/201 clears with comments attached Yes 7 CRCL comments are attached. 04/10/201 Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica Yes 7 Venture. 04/07/201 I&A clears with comments 7 attached. 04/11/201 ICE clears with comments. Yes 7 04/13/201 OPA clears with no comments or No 7 edits. OPS OPE OGC CRCL l&A ICE OPA RESPONSE OF NO EQUITIES: DNDO, TSA, FEMA, CISOMB From: Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:39 PM To: Cc: Subject: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/11: WE 1139124 - 60 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance HM See updated clearance table below. I previously provided the I&A comments in my prior email, and now I&A has indicated who cleared. CBP remains delinquent and I've asked ESEC to send reminder. Also, MGMT anticipates having comments around 2pm today although they initially cleared without comment. I'll share upon receipt. Finally, ICE has cleared with attached comments. Component MGMT Cleared By Cleared on Date Attachmen Comments t 04/05/201 MGMT clears without comment. 7 DHS-17-0040-A-000057 1:q1111i,1 OLA S&T NPPD USCIS OHA OPS OPE OGC CRCL l&A ICE 04/06/201 OLA Clears with Edits 7 04/07/201 no comments 7 04/07/201 NPPD clears without comment 7 Yes No No 04/10/201 USCIS clears with comments 7 04/10/201 7 04/06/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 No comments Without comment per step note below. Without comment per step note below. clears with comments attached No No Yes CRCL comments are attached. 04/10/201 Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica Yes 7 Venture. 04/07/201 l&A clears with comments 7 attached. 04/11/201 ICE clears with comments. Yes 7 RESPONSE OF NO EQUITIES: DNDO, TSA, FEMA, CISOMB From , l Sent: Wednesday, Apr.112, 2017 12:10 PM To Subject: RE: COMPONENT COMMENTS: WF 1139124 - E0 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance Any word back form l&A? Also noticed CBP and ICE are not included in the list below. They saw this right? DHS-17-0040-A-000058 (b)(6) b)(6) Frorr Sent Monday, April 10, 2017 7:08 PM To:1(130(6) Cc: (b)(6) Subject: COMPONENT COMMENTS: WE 1139124 - E0 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance 41 Hi Thus far, these are the clearances received, with matrices attached: Component MGMT OLA S&T NPPD USCIS OHA OPS OPE OGC CRCL Cleared By Cleared on Date Attach men Comments 04/05/201 MGMT clears without comment. 7 04/06/201 OLA Clears with Edits 7 04/07/201 no comments 7 04/07/201 NPPD clears without comment 7 04/10/201 USCIS clears with comments 7 04/10/201 7 04/06/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 No comments No Yes No No Yes No Without comment per step note below. Without comment per step note below. clears with comments attached No No Yes CRCL comments are attached. 04/10/201 Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica Yes 7 Venture. RESPONSE OF NO EQUITIES: DNDO, TSA, FEMA, CISOMB NOTE: l&A provided comments, but did not indicate who cleared. I will share once l&A responds to my request to clarify. DHS-17-0040-A-000059 Page 061 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000061 Page 062 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000062 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: 30 Mar 2017 16:23:12 -0400 Plcy Exec Sec Immigration Policy RE: [updated mats] OMB passback - 51 testimony - Border Security 51 Testimony Bordeer Security - OMB Passback 3.30.17 (IMM PLCY edits).docx PLCY ES, Our edits/comments attached. From: Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 2:40 PM To Cc: Subject: [updated mats] OMB passback - Si testimony - Border Security All: Please use the attached updated doc, incorporating additional edits just received from DPC and State. These have been combined with the comments sent earlier. Thanks! From: Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:51 PM To: Cc: Subject: [URGENT - due 4:30pm today] OMB passback - Si testimony - Border Security TPSP/LE PLCY, BIT/IMM, Americas: We request your urgent attention in responding to the attached OMB passback for the Secretary's upcoming testimony ASAP AND BY 4:30 PM TODAY, 3/30, TO PLCY EXEC SEC. ALL OMB comments under the sections "The President's Executive Orders", "Interagency and International Cooperation", and the conclusion MUST be responded to in the comment bubble by PLCY. Even if you concur with the comment, please note that you concur or accept the edits DHS-17-0040-A-000063 made. Any additional language should be made in track changes. (CBP will handle addressing comments made under the "Border Security and Immigration" section.) PLCY Exec Sec recommends that BIT/IMM take the lead on OMB comments under "The President's Executive Orders" and BIT/Americas take the lead for "Interagency and International Cooperation". We recommend that BIT/Americas and IMM work w/ LE PLCY to address any of its equities throughout. PLCY Exec Sec will consolidate responses. If you require assistance from any other DHS Component to adjudicate the passback, please reach out to that Component at a DCOS or higher level for immediate response. Thank you, DHS-17-0040-A-000064 Page 065 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000065 Page 066 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000066 Page 067 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000067 Page 068 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000068 Page 069 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000069 Page 070 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000070 Page 071 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000071 Page 072 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000072 Page 073 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000073 Page 074 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000074 Page 075 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000075 Page 076 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000076 Page 077 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000077 Page 078 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000078 From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: on behalf of Plcy Exec Sec 20 Apr 2017 16:19:58 -0400 Plcy Exec Sec; Immigration Policy RE: 90 Day Progress Reports for EO 13767 and EO 13768 (WF 1139124/1139126) Attachments: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report DHS Combined_CLEAN (PLCY 04.18.17)_GHP edit.docx FYI — attached are Bdits on this Report as well. More edits will likely come in from DNS FO. Thanks! From On Behalf Of Plcy Exec Sec Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 8:27 PM To Cc: Subject: RE: 90 Day Progress Reports for EO 13767 and EO 13768 (WF 1139124/1139126) All: I have transmitted both EO reports to ESEC. In addition, I've sent requests to ICE, PRIV, CBP, and MGMT/CHCO to provide updated information in a few instances. As that info comes in, I will work with ESEC to ensure it is properly incorporated. From: Sent: No,,IFI )17, 2017 5:50 PM To: DHS-17-0040-A-000079 Cc: Subject: 90 Day Progress Reports for EO 13767 and EO 13768 All, Attached are the draft 90 day progress reports for EO 13767 (Border Security) and EO 13768 (Public Safety), as well as corresponding 51 action memos. The reports have been reviewed by both the EO Task Force Working Group Leads (see Dimple's email below) and cleared through the formal ESEC process. Pending your review and approval, PLCY Exec Sec will send the reports to the DHS Front Office for final clearance. Per the E0s, 51 must submit the final reports to POTUS by April 25th. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Many thanks, From: Shah, Dimple Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:00 AM To Cc: Subject: Executive Order Implementation Status Reports- Input Needed EO Working Group Leads: Attached you will find draft 90-day progress reports for EO 13767 (Border Security) and EO 13768 (Public Safety in the Interior). Each report requires working group input, marked accordingly. in my Immigration Policy shop will take lead in working with your staffs to receive your input and clear the reports. Please work with your teams and provide a summary of the progress made to date per the instructions below. For your situational awareness, we plan to follow the below timeline: 3/22 — Request and being collecting section-by-section updates 3/29 — Working group updates due by COB to Policy WG vi 3/31 — Draft 90-day progress reports circulated for clearance 4/18 — Cleared 90-day progress reports due to ESEC 4/25 — Final 90-day progress reports due to POTUS Please reach out .t if you have questions. DHS-17-0040-A-000080 Thanks, Dimple Page 082 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000082 Page 083 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000083 Page 084 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000084 Page 085 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000085 Page 086 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000086 Page 087 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000087 Page 088 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000088 Page 089 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000089 Page 090 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000090 Page 091 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000091 Page 092 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000092 Page 093 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000093 Page 094 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000094 Page 095 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000095 Page 096 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000096 Page 097 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000097 From: Sent: 17 Apr 2017 21:49:43 +0000 To: Cc: Plcy Exec Sec Subject: 90 Day Progress Reports for EO 13767 and EO 13768 Attachments: EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report DHS Combined_CLEAN (4.17.17).docx, EO 13767 - Si Action Memo Template (4.17.17).doc, EO 13768 - 90 Day Progress Report DHS Combined_CLEAN (4.17.17).docx, EO 13768 - Si Action Memo Template (4.17.17).doc All, Attached are the draft 90 day progress reports for EO 13767 (Border Security) and EO 13768 (Public Safety), as well as corresponding Si action memos. The reports have been reviewed by both the EO Task Force Working Group Leads (see Dimple's email below) and cleared through the formal ESEC process. Pending your review and approval, PLCY Exec Sec will send the reports to the DHS Front Office for final clearance. Per the E0s, Si must submit the final reports to POTUS by April 25th. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Many thanks, From: Shah, Dimple Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 10:00 AM To: Cc Subject: Executive Order Implementation Status Reports- Input Needed EO Working Group Leads: Attached you will find draft 90-day progress reports for EO 13767 (Border Security) and EO 13768 (Public Safety in the Interior). Each report requires working group input, marked accordingly. Eric Johnson in my Immigration Policy shop will take lead in working with your staffs to receive your input and clear the reports. Please work with your teams and provide a summary of the progress made to date per the instructions below. For your situational awareness, we plan to follow the below timeline: 3/22 — Request and being collecting section-by-section updates DHS-17-0040-A-000098 3/29 — Working group updates due by COB to Policy WG via 3/31 — Draft 90-day progress reports circulated for clearance 4/18 — Cleared 90-day progress reports due to ESEC 4/25 — Final 90-day progress reports due to POTUS Please reach out tc if you have questions. Thanks, Dimple DHS-17-0040-A-000099 Page 100 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000100 Page 101 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000101 Page 102 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000102 Page 103 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000103 Page 104 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000104 Page 105 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000105 Page 106 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000106 Page 107 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000107 Page 108 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000108 Page 109 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000109 Page 110 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000110 Page 111 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000111 Page 112 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000112 Page 113 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000113 Page 114 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000114 Page 115 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000115 Page 116 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000116 Page 117 o132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000117 Page 118 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000118 Page 119 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000119 Page 120 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000120 Page 121 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000121 Page 122 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000122 Page 123 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000123 Page 124 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000124 Page 125 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000125 Page 126 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000126 Page 127 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000127 Page 128 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000128 Page 129 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000129 Page 130 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000130 Page 131 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000131 Page 132 of 132 Withheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act DHS-17-0040-A-000132 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Homeland Security June 6, 2018 American Oversight Attn: Cerissa Cafasso 1030 15th Street NW, Suite B255 Washington, DC 20005 Re: 17-cv-01187 (2017-HQFO-00564) American Oversight v. DHS Interim Release Dear Ms. Cafasso: This is an interim response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), dated March 21, 2017. For this month's production DHS reviewed 1 document consisting of 132 pages of which 3 pages are released in full, 14 pages are released in part pursuant to FOIA exemption 6, and 115 are withheld in full pursuant to FOIA exemption 5. The 132 pages for release are bates stamped DHS-001-564-000001 to DHS-001-564-000132. Sincerely, Kevin L. Tyrrell Director FOIA Appeals and Litigation Enclosure A ff ICA PVERSIGHT From: Se nt: l(b)(6) 14 Apr 2017 20:24:29 +0000 6 f1'>< > ~ OCC} To: Cc: Subje ct: Attachments : Kb)(6) I EO 13767 90-Day progress report for review EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report PLCYDRAFT(DHS combined) .docx Hi~ As mentioned on the phone, OGC requested that you review and clear on this report as it mentions several in-progress/drafted policy statements, policy guidance documents, and regulations. Please feel free to make any edits directly in this document and I will incorporated them in the clean draf t . I also reached out to OGC to see who was currently reviewing the FAM changes but am still waiting to hear back. I'll let you know when I get a POC. Best, l(b)(6) I b)(6) /\MERll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000001 Page 1 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000001 Page 002 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000002 DHS-17-0040-D-000002 Page 003 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000003 DHS-17-0040-D-000003 Page 004 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Priv acy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000004 DHS-17-0040-D-000004 Page 005 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000005 DHS-17-0040-D-000005 Page 006 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000006 DHS-17-0040-D-000006 Pag e 007 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000007 DHS-17-0040-D-000007 Pag e 008 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000008 DHS-17-0040-D-000008 Page 009 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000009 DHS-17-0040-D-000009 Pag e 0 10 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000010 DHS-17-0040-D-000010 Pag e 0 11 01132 Withhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000011 DHS-17-0040-D-000011 Page 012 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000012 DHS-17-0040-D-000012 Page 013 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000013 DHS-17-0040-D-000013 Page 014 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000014 DHS-17-0040-D-000014 Page 015 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000015 DHS-17-0040-D-000015 Page 016 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000016 DHS-17-0040-D-000016 Pag e 0 17 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000017 DHS-17-0040-D-000017 Pag e 0 18 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000018 DHS-17-0040-D-000018 From: Se nt: To: ~ f-b-)(6_>______ 14 Apr 2017 15:39:31 +0000 f b)(6) I Subject: Attachment s: EO Border Report 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CBP 04.13.1.. ..doc, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90 -Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CRCL).doc, 1139124 EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (MGMT 04 .13 .....doc, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (OGC).docx, 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (USCIS).doc, 1139124-EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (l&A).doc, 1139124-EO 13767 Sec 15 90 -Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (ICE).doc, 1139124-EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (OLA).doc, EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report PLCYDRAFT (DHS combined) .docx, Sl Action Memo Template (4.18. 17).doc Here you are. b)(6) /\MERICAi\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000019 Page 19 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000019 Page 020 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000020 DHS-17-0040-D-000020 Page 02 1 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000021 DHS-17-0040-D-000021 Page 022 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000022 DHS-17-0040-D-000022 Page 023 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000023 DHS-17-0040-D-000023 Page 024 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000024 DHS-17-0040-D-000024 Document Clearance Comment Form Title or Description of Document : 90-Day Report to the President on E.O. 13767 : Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Efforts (WF 1139124) For Internal DHS Use : Lead Action Officer Name and Component : I Date: Comments provided by : INSTRUCTI ONS: /\MERICAi\ pVERSIGHT Th e r e f e r e nce co l umn i s whe r e you will ty pe t h e d ocument paragraph , sentence , etc . you are comment i ng on . Th e Comme nt co l u mns ar e whe r e you will ty pe you r c omment . Pl ease note t hat RED FLAG commen t s a r e c riti ca l sugges ti ons tha t must be incorporate d f or DHS to concur with t he d ocum e nt . 2 DHS-001-564000025 Page 25 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000025 Page 026 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000026 DHS-17-0040-D-000026 Page 027 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000027 DHS-17-0040-D-000027 Page 028 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000028 DHS-17-0040-D-000028 Page 029 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000029 DHS-17-0040-D-000029 Document Clearance Comment Form Title or Description of Document: 90-Day Report to the President on E.O. 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Efforts (WF 1139124) For Internal DHS Use: Lead Action Officer Name and Component : I Date: 4/10/17 Comments provided by: USCIS INSTRUCTIONS: Th e r e f e r e nce co l umn i s whe r e you will ty pe paragraph , sentence , etc . you are commenting Th e Comme nt co l umns ar e whe r e you will ty pe Pl ease note t hat RED FLAG commen t s a r e c riti that must be incorporate d for DHS to concur t h e d ocument on . you r c omment . ca l sugges ti ons with the docum e nt . # 23. # Reference NON-SUBSTANTIVE/ GRAMMATICAL COMMENTS 24. 25. 26 . /\MERICAi\ pVERSIGHT 3 DHS-001-564000030 Page 30 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000030 Pag e 03 1 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000031 DHS-17-0040-D-000031 Page 032 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000032 DHS-17-0040-D-000032 Pag e 033 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000033 DHS-17-0040-D-000033 Page 034 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000034 DHS-17-0040-D-000034 Pag e 035 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000035 DHS-17-0040-D-000035 Pag e 036 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000036 DHS-17-0040-D-000036 Pag e 037 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000037 DHS-17-0040-D-000037 Pag e 038 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000038 DHS-17-0040-D-000038 Page 039 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000039 DHS-17-0040-D-000039 Page 040 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000040 DHS-17-0040-D-000040 Page 04 1 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000041 DHS-17-0040-D-000041 Page 042 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000042 DHS-17-0040-D-000042 Page 043 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000043 DHS-17-0040-D-000043 Page 044 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000044 DHS-17-0040-D-000044 Page 045 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000045 DHS-17-0040-D-000045 Page 046 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000046 DHS-17-0040-D-000046 Page 047 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000047 DHS-17-0040-D-000047 Page 048 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000048 DHS-17-0040-D-000048 Page 049 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000049 DHS-17-0040-D-000049 Page 050 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000050 DHS-17-0040-D-000050 Page 05 1 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000051 DHS-17-0040-D-000051 Page 052 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000052 DHS-17-0040-D-000052 Page 053 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000053 DHS-17-0040-D-000053 Page 054 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000054 DHS-17-0040-D-000054 6 From: ~rb_)( _) ----~ Sent: 13 Apr 2017 15:14:29 -0400 To: l(b)(6) Subject: FW: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance Attachments: 1139124 - EO 13767 Sec 15 90-Day Report Comments Matrix DHS (CBP 04.13.17).doc I From~fb_ )(6_) ----~ Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 3:12 PM ro:l(b)(6) I Cc:j (b)(6) Subject: RE: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance ~ Hi L__j CBP' s comment s attached. We received them about 1/2 hour ago. Component Cleared By (b)(6) MGMT OLA S&T NPPD USCIS OHA OPS OPE OGC CRCL /\MERICAi\ pVERSIGHT Cleared on Date 04/05/201 7 04/06/201 7 04/07/201 7 04/07/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/06/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 04/10/201 7 Attachmen t Comments MGMT clears without comment. OLA Clears with Edits Yes no comments No NPPD clears without comment No USCIS clears with comments No comments Without comment per step note below. Without comment per step note below. No No clears with comments attached Yes CRC L comments are attached. Cleared b~b)(6) (es DHS-001-564000055 Page 55 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000055 rb )(6) b)(6) 04/07/201 7 04/11/201 7 04/ 13/201 7 04/13/201 7 l&A IC E OPA CBP l&A clears with com ments attached . ICE clears with comments. Yes OPA clears with no comments or edits. With comments per step note below. No Yes (b)(6) From :,_ fb_ l(5_l ___ ___, Se nt : Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:44 PM To: ~b)(6) Cc:fb l(6) Subject: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/12: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance LJ MGMT' s comments are attached. Compo nent Cleared By (b)(6) MGMT Cleared on Date Atta chmen t Com ments 04/ 13/201 MGMT clears with edits. 7 Yes 04/06/201 7 04/07/201 7 04/07/201 7 OLA Clears with Edits Yes no comments No NPPD clea rs wit hout com ment No USC IS 04/10/201 7 USC IS clears with com ments No OHA 04/10/201 7 No comments No OLA S&T NPPD /\MERll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000056 Page 56 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000056 (b)(6) 04/06/201 Without comment per step note 7 below. 04/10/201 Without comment per step note 7 below. 04/10/201 clears with comments attached 7 CRCL co mments are attached. 04/10/201 Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica 7 Venture. 04/07/201 l&A clears with comments 7 attached. 04/11/201 ICE clears with comments. 7 04/13/201 OPA clears with no comments or 7 edits. OPS OPE OGC CRCL l&A ICE OPA No No Yes Yes Yes No RESPONSE OF NO EQUITIES: ONDO, TSA, FEMA, CISOMB (b)(6) 5 From: l< ..... b_)<.,.. ) -.,---,,---,-..,...,..-----,--...,......-----' Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:39 PM j To: ~b)(6) Cc: ~b)(6) ! Subject: COMPONENT COMMENTS as of COB 4/11: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance H~ See updated clearance table below. I previou prior email, and now I&A has indicated who asked ESEC to send reminder. Also, MGMT today although they initially cleared without ICE ha s cleared with attached comment s. Component Cleared By D b)(6) MGMT /\MERll Al\ pVERSIGHT sly provided the I&A comment s in my cleared. CBP remains delinquent and I've anticipates having comments around 2pm comment. I'll share upon receipt. Finally , Cleared on Date 04/05/201 7 Attachmen t Comments MGMT clears without comment. DHS-001-564000057 Page 57 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000057 (b)(6) 04/06/201 7 04/07/201 7 04/07/201 7 OLA S&T NPPD 04/10/201 7 USCIS OLA Clears with Edits Yes no comments No NPPD clears without comment No USCIS clears with comments 04/10/201 No comments 7 04/06/201 Without comment per step note 7 below. 04/10/201 Without comment per step note 7 below. 04/10/201 clears with comments attached 7 CRC L comments are attached. 04/10/201 Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica 7 Venture. 04/07/201 l&A clears with comments 7 attached. 04/11/201 ICE clears with comments . 7 OHA OPS OPE OGC CRC L l&A ICE No No Yes Yes Yes RESPONSE OF NO EQUITIES: ONDO, TSA, FEMA , CISOMB b)(6) ___ l(b)(6) From~.__ ___, Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 12:10 PM ToFb )(6) Subject: RE: COMPONENT COMMENTS: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Securit y) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance l(b)(6) Any word back form l&A? Also noticed CBP and ICE are not included in the list below. They saw this right? /\MEf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000058 Page 58 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000058 ~ Fro rrj~ (b_l<5_l ____________ ~ Se nt: Monday , Apr il 10, 2017 7:08 PM To:Kb)(6) Cc:fb)(6) SubJect: COMPONENT COMMENTS: WF 1139124 - EO 13767 (Border Security) 90 Day Progress Reports for Clearance I I Hi l(b)(6) Thus far, these are the clearances received , with matrices attached: Component C leared By (b)(6) MGMT OLA S&T NPPD USCIS OHA OPS OPE OGC CRC L C leared on Date 4/05/201 4/06/201 4/07/201 4/07/201 4/10/201 4/10/201 Attachmen t Comments MGMT clears without comment. No OLA Clears with Edits Yes no comments No NPPD clears without comment No USCIS clears with comments Yes No comments No 4/06/201 Without comment per step note below. 4/10/201 Without comment per step note below. 4/10/201 clears with comments attached 4/10/201 No No Yes CRC L comments are attached. Cleared by Acting Officer Veronica Yes Venture. RESPONS E OF NO EQUITIES: ONDO , TSA, FEMA, CISOMB NOTE: l&A provided comments, but did not indicate who cleared. I will share once l&A responds to my request to clarify. /\MERll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000059 Page 59 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000059 DHS-001-564000060 Page 60 N132 DHS-17-0040-D-000060 Page 06 1 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000061 DHS-17-0040-D-000061 Page 062 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000062 DHS-17-0040-D-000062 From: Se nt: To: Cc: Subje ct: Attachments : l(b)(6) 30 Mar 2017 16:23:12 -0400 Plcy Exec Sec Immigration Policy RE: [updated mats] 0MB passback - S1 testimony- Border Security Sl Testimony Bordeer Security- 0MB Passback 3.30.17 (IMM PLCYedits).docx PLCYES, Our edits/comments attached. l(b)(6) 5 From: .... ~b_l<_l____________ Se nt: Thursday, March 30, 2017 2:40 PM __. TT''I l(b)(6) f b)(6) Cc: o)(6) Subject: [updated mats] 0MB passback - Sl testimony - Border Security All: Please use the attached updated doc, incorporating additional edits just received from DPCand State. These have been combined with the comments sent earlier. Thanks! From: .... rb_)(_6l_____________ Se nt: Thursday, March 30, 2017 1:51 PM To : f b)(6) __. Cc :f b)(6) Subject: [URGENT- due 4:30pm today] 0MB passback - Sl test imony - Border Security TPSP/LEPLCY,BIT/ IMM, Americas: We request your urgent attention in responding to the attached 0MB passback for the Secretary's upcoming test imony ASAP AND BY 4:30 PM TODAY, 3/30, TO PLCYEXECSEC. ALL0MB comments under the sections "The President's Executive Orders", "lnteragency and International Cooperation", and the conclusion MUST be responded to in the comment bubble by PLCY. Even if you concur w ith the comment, please note that you concur or accept t he edits /\MEf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000063 Page 63 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000063 made. Any additional language should be made in track changes. (CBPwill handle addressing comments made under the "Border Security and Immigration" section.) PLCYExec Sec recommends that BIT/IMM take the lead on 0MB comments under "The President's Executive Orders" and BIT/Americas take t he lead for "lnteragency and International Cooperation". We recommend that BIT/Americas and IMM work w/ LE PLCYto address any of its equities throughout. PLCYExec Sec w ill consolidate responses. If you require assistance from any other DHSComponent to adjudicate the passback, please reach out to that Component at a DCOSor higher level for immediate response. Thank you, b)(6) /\MERll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000064 Page 64 of 132 DHS-17-0040-D-000064 Page 065 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000065 DHS-17-0040-D-000065 Page 066 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000066 DHS-17-0040-D-000066 Pag e 067 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000067 DHS-17-0040-D-000067 Pag e 068 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000068 DHS-17-0040-D-000068 Page 069 of 132 W ithheld pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000069 DHS-17-0040-D-000069 Pag e 070 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000070 DHS-17-0040-D-000070 Pag e 07 1 01132 Withhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000071 DHS-17-0040-D-000071 Page 072 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to exemption (b)(5) of the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000072 DHS-17-0040-D-000072 Pag e 073 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000073 DHS-17-0040-D-000073 Pag e 074 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000074 DHS-17-0040-D-000074 Pag e 075 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000075 DHS-17-0040-D-000075 Pag e 076 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000076 DHS-17-0040-D-000076 Pag e 077 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000077 DHS-17-0040-D-000077 Pag e 078 of 132 W ithhel d pursuant to ex empti on (b)(5) of the Fr eedom of Inf ormation and Privacy Act /\Mlf ll Al\ pVERSIGHT DHS-001-564000078 DHS-17-0040-D-000078 fb)(B) Ion behalf of Plcy Exec Sec From: 20 Apr 2017 16:19:58 -0400 Sent: l(b)(6) To: Cc: Plcy Exec Sec;lmmigration Policy Subject: RE: 90 Day Progress Reports for EO 13767 and EO 13768 (WF 1139124/1139126) Attachments : WF 1139124 - EO 13767 - 90 Day Progress Report OHSCombined_CLEAN (PLCY 04.18.17)_GHP edit.docx I ~ 5 FYI- attached are ~l Page 1 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000130 DHS-17-0040-B-000130 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document (b) (6) USACE Real Estate Lead USBP POC Role (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) USBP Field Contact (San Diego Sector Mission Support Director) USBP Field Contact (El Paso Sector Opperations Officer) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) USBP Headquarters, Tactical Infrastructure Director Business Partner Requirement: Name (b) (6) [This section should be developed by the Business Partner. It should detail the Mission Need and Operational Requirement being met by this project. If replacing a station or asset, indicate the requirement for the replacement, not the original requirement for the original asset. If project is requirement is born out of an FCA rather than a Business Partner requirement, reference the FCA by title and the year instead of reaching out to the Business Partner. It is acceptable to have some overlap in the Business Partner Requirement, The Project Description, and justification sections] Project Description/Objective: The project consists of the demolishing replacement of the existing legacy vehicular fence, constructing with a new pedestrian and the installation of (b) (7)(E) for the future (b) (7)(E) deployment of . The existing all (b) (7)(E) weater road shall remain and all new site work shall be constructed to ensure proper drainage and alignment with the existing roadway. The removal of the existing vehicular fence shall start (b) (7)(E) location and at shall be provided for at each international (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) X miles on center. The installation of the (b) (7)(E) shall begin at the (b) (7)(E) The project will be a design-build construction project under a MATOC at USACE. The design and completed construction will be done in accordance with the most current CBP Tactical Infrastructure (TI) Design Standards. The primary objective of this project is fence replacement and (b) (7)(E) installation. Secondatry objectives, should available funding support, include the creation of aBased on this acquisition strategy, the USACE shall include a (b) (7)(E) The fence replacement and (b) (7)(E) installation can be done within the existing (b) (5) . The additional (b) (7)(E) will require additional land acquisition along the entire(b) (7)(E) length. These items will be included in the RFP as separate optional contract line items in the RFP. Details of these project features include: Lighting: Should funding support, (b) (7)(E) located within the approximate but restrictions may dictate the location. The lights lighting characteristics (b) (7)(E) (quality and quantity) will be designed and constructed in accordance with the lighting design standards developed and confirmed as part of the (b) (7)(E) lighting retrofit project recently completed in (b) (7)(E) Fixtures that can accommodate a (b) (7)(E) may be used if deemed appropriate. If funding is available, The the lights will be made fully functional as part of this project. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Commented [RS1]: (b) (7)(E) Commented [RS2]: Need to verify...I thought they were using a (b) (7)(E) -- -------o--- Page 2 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000131 DHS-17-0040-B-000131 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document Vegetation Clearing and Grading: Should funding support, All all vegetation in the (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) shall match the contours of the existing all weather road. (b) (7)(E) will be cleared and existing grading ---------- . (b) (7)(E) will be (b) (7)(E) completed by USBP and provided to BPAM. Analysis will be required to ensure does (b) (7)(E) not occur. All technology will be provided by USBP, . iInsfrastrutcure will be constructed and funded by BPAM dependent on available funding. Project Justification: [Provide background information detailing the following things: Mission Capability Gap, Strategic Objective Met, Safety Env & Security, Amount of Space, Space Type & Configuration, Quality of Space, & Life Cycle Cost Reduction. It is acceptable to have some overlap in the Business Partner Requirement, The Project Description, and justification sections] Under Executive Order (EO) 13767, CBP is directed to "...secure the southern border of the United States through the immediate construction of a physical wall on the southern border, monitored and supported by adequate personnel so as to prevent illegal immigration, drug and human trafficking, and acts of terrorism." Diagrams/Exhibits/Conceptual Designs: [CBP Design standard or industry standards, site adapt information, specs, floor plan references and architectural renderings if available. Be specific and provide as much detail as available. May also include pictures (with captions) of existing site conditions if applicable to design (e.g., existing fence to be replaced, dilapidated condition of existing dock), and for TI, perhaps a picture of a project utilizing a similar structure, if available. If the project is not using a design standard, provide an explanation as to why.] Page 3 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000132 DHS-17-0040-B-000132 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document The project will be executed utilizing a design-build approach. All design work will be done in accordance with the most current CBP Tactical Infrastructure (TI) Design Standards. (b) (5) Figure #1: Project Location Map Page 4 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000133 DHS-17-0040-B-000133 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document (b) (7)(E) Figure #2: Pedestrian Fence Start Location (b) (7)(E) Figure #3: Existing (b) (7)(E) " Vehicle Fence Page 5 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000134 DHS-17-0040-B-000134 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document (b) (7)(E) Figure #4: Existing "(b) (7)(E) " Vehicle Fence Real Estate Acquisitions [Describe the project's plan for acquiring RE, plans for doing market surveys (for new facilities land purchases), needed permits, easements, LSEs, or ROEs. Include market survey sites, top preferred site, alternative site and any other sites and photos. This is a high-level summary. Reach out to PMO Real Estate SME for assistance in compiling this section.] Environmental (b) (5) (b) (6) Commented [JFP3]: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) WOULD YOU PLEASE FILL THIS IN? WE NEED TO LOOK INTO ACQ. (b) (7)(E) BAND ON LAND NORTH OF THE BORDER. . The BPAM Environmental Branch will coordinate with the appropriate stakeholders (e.g. DOI, USFWS, state, and local agencies) in conjunction with the overall CBP outreach program to identify sensitive areas or areas of concern within the project area and recommended mitigation. Surveys for cultural, biological, and natural resources will be conducted to identify potential impacts and best management practices (BMPs) to be implemented during construction. An Environmental Stewardship Plan (ESP) covering a specific fence segment or the sector will be prepared. The Environmental Branch will provide oversight of BMP implementation during construction. Following construction, a survey of final site disturbance will be completed to determine actual environmental impacts Page 6 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000135 DHS-17-0040-B-000135 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document and any needed mitigation. Mitigation and restoration efforts will be conducted as separate environmental projects for eah fence segment. I_______________________________________________ Miscellaneous: Approvals, Permitting, Interrelated Projects, Etc. (b) (6) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Commented [JFP4] o----PLEASE CONFIRM THIS IS [~-CORRECT AND EDIT AS YOU DEEM FIT. [Describe any additional required approvals from Federal, State and local agencies/governments (e.g. DOT, DOD, IBWC, CalTrans, etc.) that may need to be acquired for the project. This may include easements. List any interrelated project dependencies on other projects including projects such as Tactical Infrastructure, SBInet towers, OFO/LPOE, or projects within other agencies or private construction. The Acquisition Directive refers to this as "Interoperability." If there are risks associated with obtaining these permits (e.g, delay or non-approval), be sure to include those as risks in the risk register.] Border Patrol has a number of technology programs ((b) (7)(E) , etc.) that shall be coordinated with this effort. Maintenance and repair of the roadway within the project boundary shall be the responsibility of the contractor during construction, this shall be coordinated with the CTMR POC. IBWC approval will be required before construction can commence. Cost and Schedule Breakdown Structure See Attachment A, Cost Estimate Workbook Schedule of Deliverables: Key Deliverables/ Milestones Cost Est. Project Management $XX FY17 Start Date (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) FY18 FY19 End Date st 1 nd 2 rd 3 th 4 st 1 nd 2 rd 3 th 4 st 1 nd 2 3rd 4th (b) (5) Real Estate $XX Environmental $XX Design $XX Construction $XX (b) (7)(E) Construction Oversight Other Costs: Mitigation Servicing Agency Total: $XX (b) (7)(E) $XX $XX Total: $XX (b) (7)(E) Q1 Oct - Dec; Q2 Jan - Mar; Q3 Apr - Jun; Q4 Jul - Sep Initial Total Cost Estimate: [List key deliverables/milestones to be executed and their anticipated start date, duration and end date. Designate cost in the "Cost Est.".. In order to determine cost estimates, a Cost Estimation form should be completed and submitted with this document incorporated as attachment A. Ensure all technology, furniture, and executing agency costs are included, as necessary. For the FM&E Costs column, if the costs are being handled by the BPAM PMO and not by the Servicing Agency, Page 7 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000136 DHS-17-0040-B-000136 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document enter "Yes". For example, if Env is being handled in-house, indicate "Yes" in the FME Column. Other Costs" Include disposal, OIT, voice/data, etc. These other costs are in many cases FM&E costs. Do not include Servicing Agency Labor in this section for any of the other key deliverables (for example, labor in support of Real Estate should be rolled up under Real Estate) .In the totals section of the chart, total all non-FME costs to get "Servicing Agency Total." This will match the Servicing Agency Cost Estimate. Incorporate all costs (including FM&E costs, to get the overall total. Under the schedule section, place an X in any quarter where that activity is taking place. If environmental monitoring is included during the entirety of construction, the monitoring in the environmental schedule line should mimick the construction schedule line ] $ Total Project Cost 1:8] BSFIT o1:8]O&M D&D oo O&S PC&I (b)(b)(3) (7)(E) FY17 (Design/Planning) 1:8] BSFIT O&M 1:8] D&D O&S PC&I FY18 (Construction / Real Estate Acq.) 1:8] BSFIT O&M 1:8] D&D O&S PC&I Design and Planning (USACE): $X CBP Costs: $X Real Estate Acquisition: $X Construction: $X Construction Oversight: $X o oo -- o oo Cost Assumption(s): ? Cost estimate is based upon ROM (b)(3) /mile x(b) (7)(E) = (b)(3) ? All estimates should be considered rough order of magnitude, -50/+100 as defined by the Project Management Body of Knowledge ? Primary fence replacement design assumes an (b) (7)(E) ? Cost per mile estimates for primary fence replacement construction includes construction and supply chain, planning/oversight, environmental ? Cost per mile does not account for site conditions not experienced during the construction of PF225, though impacts from unencountered site conditioin ? Estimates for "recurring costs" reflect average maintenance costs per mile of fence. Assumes the maintenance and repair costs ? Labor estimates include federal employee and contract support for project management and associated disciplines required to ramp up to construction ? Assumes the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security issues a waiver of applicable environmental and land management l ? Outyear costs are calculated in 2016 dollars. ? Cost per mile for real estate is assumed to be (b)(b)(3) (7)(E) in order acquire access and staging areas Real Estate Assumptions ? Construction Assumptions ? The approved contractor will work with 4 crews and each crew will construct (b) (7)(E) Design Assumptions ? The TI design guidelines shall be followed Options Assumptions - - Page 8 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000137 DHS-17-0040-B-000137 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document ? A more refined cost estimate incluing all options will be determined during the Design Build RFP documentation. Potential Project Risks/Mitigations: Total Initial Risk Estimate $X See Attachment B, Risk Register Interrelated Projects [List any interrelated project dependencies on other projects including projects such as Military Deployment Constraints, Facilities, towers, or projects within other agencies or private construction. The Acquisition Directive refers to this as "Interoperability."] I I# 001 Interrelated Projects (b) (7)(E) Priamary Fence Replacement Project 002 Disposal Plan The existing vehicular fence within the project boundary will be removed and disposed of following CBP protocols. Attachments Attachment # A B Attachment Name Cost Estimate Workbook Risk Register Page 9 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000138 DHS-17-0040-B-000138 Border Patrol Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure & Air and Marine PMO Wall Program - Project Requirements Document CONCURRENCE & APPROVAL: Business Partner Mission Needs Concurrence: XXXXX, XXXX Date US Border Patrol, XXXXX Approval: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Date (b) (6) Chief US Border Patrol, Law Enforcement and Operations Directorate APPROVAL: Financial (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b) (6) Director, Business Operations Division (A) Date BPAM PMO APPROVAL: Constructability (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) , Branch Chief, Tactical Infrastructure Date (b) (6) USACE, ECSO Concurrence: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Date (b) (6) , Chief Engineer BPAM PMO APPROVAL: Real Estate & Environmental (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Date (b) (6) , Branch Chief BPAM PMO, Environmental and Real Estate Branch PROJECT APPROVAL (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Date (b) (6) , Program Manager BPAM PMO, Wall Program - Page 10 of 10 FM&E No. TBD Template Version 8 (06/23/2016) For Official Use Only (FOUO) Created: MM/DD/YYYY Last Updated: MM/DD/YYYY BW8 FOIA CBP 000139 DHS-17-0040-B-000139 Activity ID Activity Name Start Fence-PQ Pre-Qual Fence Schedule Fence-PQ.01000 Planning Phase Fence-PQ PLAN1000 Planning Funds Received PLAN1020 PRD Complete PLAN1010 Kick-off Meeting RE1100 RE1120 RE1110 RE1130 RE1140 RE1150 RE1160 RE1170 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Remaining Predecessors Duration (b) (5) (b) (5) Fence-PQ.90000 Real Estate Fence-PQ Finish 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) PLAN1000, PLAN1010 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) PLAN1000 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) (b) (5) 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) ENV1000 ENV1020 ENV1005 ENV1030 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) 2017 A M J Jul A S O N D 2018 J F M A M J Jul A S O N D 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1100 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1100 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1130 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1120 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1150, RE1110, RE1130 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) RE1160, RE1140 (b) (5) 7 - Day Workweek 7 - Day Workweek Fence-PQ.95000 Environmental Fence-PQ ENV1010 Calendar 7 - Day Workweek ) - (b) (5) PLAN1020 7 - Day Workweek ENV1010 7 - Day Workweek ENV1000 7 - Day Workweek ENV1020 7 - Day Workweek Fence-PQ.40000 Design & Procurement Fence-PQ Fence-PQ.40000.01 A/E Solicitation & Award Fence-PQ.40 AE-S1000 A/E SOW Complete PLAN1000 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1010 A/E RFP Complete AE-S1000 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1020 A/E Proposal Preparation AE-S1010 7 - Day Workweek AE-S1030 Pre-Award Activities AE-S1020 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1040 ROE-S Required AE-S1030 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1050 Award A/E Base AE-S1040, AE-S1030 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1035 Funds Receipt AE-S1060 Award A/E Option 1 & 2 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-S1035, AE-S1050 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) Fence-PQ.40000.02 A/E Contract Option Fence-PQ.40 AE-C1000 Draft RFP Prep 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1010 Draft Submittal Review AE-C1000 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1020 Pre-Final RFP Prep AE-C1010 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1030 Pre-Final Submittal Review AE-C1020 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1040 Final RFP Prep AE-C1030 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1050 Final RFP Review AE-C1040 7 - Day Workweek AE-C1055 SRB Comment/Review/Resolutions AE-C1050 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-C1057 Pre-Qualification List Approved (Tied to P20 in Pre-Qual Schedule) P20 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AE-C1060 RTA AE-C1055, AE-C1057 7 - Day Workweek Fence-PQ.40000.03 DB Solicitation & SSEB Fence-PQ.40 DB-S1000 Solicitation Reviews AE-C1060 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1010 Construction Funds Required DB-S1000, AE-S1035 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1015 Advertise DB-S1010 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1020 Advertisement Period DB-S1015 7 - Day Workweek DB-S1030 Technical SSEB DB-S1020 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1040 Cost SSEB DB-S1020 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1050 Prepare Initial SSEB Board Reports DB-S1040, DB-S1030, DB-S1040 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) BW8 FOIA CBP 000140 DHS-17-0040-B-000140 Activity ID Activity Name DB-S1060 DB-S1070 Conduct Discussions (if required) Submit Best and Final Offers DB-S1080 Prepare Final SSEB Report based on discussions/final revised proposals Fence-PQ.40000.04 Award Prep & Award Fence-PQ.40 Start Finish Remaining Predecessors Duration (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Calendar DB-S1050 DB-S1060 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DB-S1070 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) (b) (5) RE1010 RE Certification for DBB features AP1000 SSAC Report DB-S1080 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1010 SWF CT/Legal Review AP1000 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1020 Resolve Comments/Finalize Documents AP1010 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1030 Complete Contract Package (Upload to PCF, etc.) AP1020 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1040 PARC Pre-Award Peer Review AP1030 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1050 PARC Peer Review Comment Resolution Meeting and Revise Documents AP1040 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1060 Receive PARC Concurrence to Award/Congressional Notification AP1050 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) AP1070 Award C-Type Contract AP1060, RE1010 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) Fence-PQ.60000 Construction Fence-PQ Fence-PQ.60000.01 DB Features of Contract Fence-PQ.60 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) 2017 A M J Jul A S O N D 7 - Day Workweek DES1000 Design Kick-Off AP1070 DES1010 60% Design DES1000 7 - Day Workweek DES1020 60% Submittal Review DES1010 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DES1030 90% Design DES1020 7 - Day Workweek DES1040 90% Submittal Review DES1030 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) DES1050 100% Design DES1040 7 - Day Workweek DES1060 100% Backcheck DES1050 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) CON1000 Design Acceptance/Pre-Con RE1170, DES1060, RE1160 7 - Day Workweek CON1010 Mobilization CON1000 7 - Day Workweek CON1020 Construction Start CON1010, ENV1005 7 - Day Workweek CON1100 Construction Duration CON1020 7 - Day Workweek CON1110 Construction Completion CON1100 7 - Day Workweek 2018 J F M A M J Jul A S O N D (b) (5) 7 - Day Workweek BW8 FOIA CBP 000141 DHS-17-0040-B-000141 ID 1 0 2 3 4 Task Mode ,,. ~ ;; ~ ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete Site Visit 6 Design Proposals submitted 7 Technical and Price Evaluation 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 18 Identify Funds 19 Create PR 20 Identify if existing contract can be used Issue RFP/TO 21 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Tue 4/4/17 Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary E October B M E November B M E December B M (b) (5)(b)(b) (5) (5) 5 17 Start o o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000142 DHS-17-0040-B-000142 E Janua B ID 22 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Response due for SWPPP 23 ~ Response evaluation 24 ~ SSA report (if needed) 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 ~ SWPPP filed 30 ~ SWPPP Installation 31 ~ 32 ~ 33 ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M (b) (5) E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP CTIMR add road and drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatb Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Tue 4/4/17 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000143 DHS-17-0040-B-000143 E Janua B ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M (b) (5) E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M (b) (5) pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Coordinate planning trip with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with Sector Identify location for pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple groups required Determine duration of visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Tue 4/4/17 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000144 DHS-17-0040-B-000144 E Janua B ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/questions to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answers Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M (b) (5) E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M (b) (5) Site Security Determine process for routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for checks Determine funding and rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to support Determine location of access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs identify off-site parking options Negotiate offsite parking access/price if needed Write-up parking operations and security checkpoint for distribution Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Tue 4/4/17 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000145 DHS-17-0040-B-000145 E Janua B ID 79 0 Task Mode Task Name ~ Temporary facilities 80 ~ 81 ~ 82 ~ 83 ~ 84 ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ Duration Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month requirement) Issue RFP/TO Predecessors March B M E April B M 89 Develop Testing Protocol 90 Develop Test Plan 91 Develop Test Schedule 92 Procure Test Tools 93 Determine Test Team 94 Develop Team Training Plan 95 Conduct Team Training 96 Conduct Tests 97 Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Tue 4/4/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o E October B M E November B M E December B M (b) (5) evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 88 99 Finish (b) (5) Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 98 Start o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000146 DHS-17-0040-B-000146 E Janua B ID 1 0 2 3 4 Task Mode ,,. ~ ;; ~ ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued 1 day Site Visit 6 Design Proposals submitted 7 Technical and Price Evaluation 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Predecessors Identify Funds 19 Create PR 20 Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 4/6/17 March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M 1 day December B M E January B M E February M B M E Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 Task Milestone E (b) (5) 18 21 Finish Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 5 17 Start o o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000147 DHS-17-0040-B-000147 ID 22 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Response due for SWPPP 23 ~ Response evaluation 24 ~ SSA report (if needed) 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 ~ SWPPP filed 30 ~ SWPPP Installation 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February M B M E (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE 1 day and BP CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 37 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 4/6/17 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000148 DHS-17-0040-B-000148 ID 42 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 43 44 46 pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 -;. 55 -;. 56 -;. 57 -;. 58 -;. 59 -;. 60 -;. 61 -;. Mon 3/20/17 May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS -.. Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary o November B M E December B M E January B M E February M B M E M Task Milestone E (b) (5) Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 4/6/17 E Mon 3/20/17 Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? April B M E (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 45 March B M Manual Progress o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000149 DHS-17-0040-B-000149 ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/question to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking access/price if needed Write-up parking operations and security checkpoint for distribution Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 75FS+1 day January B M E February M B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 70 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary December B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Task o November B M E (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Milestone E 59 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 4/6/17 March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000150 DHS-17-0040-B-000150 ID 79 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Temporary facilities 80 ~ 81 ~ 82 ~ 83 ~ 84 ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ 88 ~ Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 89 ~ Develop Testing Protocol 90 ~ Develop Test Plan 91 ~ Develop Test Schedule 92 ~ Procure Test Tools 93 ~ Determine Test Team 94 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 95 ~ Conduct Team Training 96 ~ Conduct Tests 97 ~ 98 ~ 99 ~ Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Start Finish March April May June July August September October Tue 4/4/17 January February Wed 4/5/17 81 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary December Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 80 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract Milestone November (b) (5) Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 4/6/17 Predecessors o Manual Progress o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000151 DHS-17-0040-B-000151 M ID 1 0 2 Task Mode ,,. ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued 1 day 4 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 5 ~ Site Visit 6 ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 3 ;; ~ 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 17 Start Finish Predecessors April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 19 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 20 Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO December B M E January B M (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 Task Milestone E (b) (5) Identify Funds Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 18 21 March B M o o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000152 DHS-17-0040-B-000152 E Febru B ID 22 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Response due for SWPPP 23 ~ Response evaluation 24 ~ SSA report (if needed) 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 SWPPP filed 30 SWPPP Installation 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE 1 day and BP CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 37 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000153 DHS-17-0040-B-000153 E Febru B ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS -M Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E December B M E January B M Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS Project Summary o E (b) (5) (b) (5) Task Milestone October B M (b) (5) Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? March B M Manual Progress o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000154 DHS-17-0040-B-000154 E Febru B ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/question to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking access/price if needed Write-up parking operations and security checkpoint for distribution Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 75FS+1 day December B M E January B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 70 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Task o E (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Milestone October B M 59 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000155 DHS-17-0040-B-000155 E Febru B ID 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 Task Mode Task Name Duration March B M E April B M Develop Testing Protocol 90 Develop Test Plan 91 Develop Test Schedule 92 Procure Test Tools 93 Determine Test Team 94 Develop Team Training Pla 95 Conduct Team Training 96 Conduct Tests 97 Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M Tue 4/4/17 December B M E January B M (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Wed 4/5/17 81 Task Milestone E Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 80 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 89 99 Predecessors (b) (5) Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 88 98 Finish Temporary facilities Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 87 Start o o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000156 DHS-17-0040-B-000156 E Febru B ID 1 0 2 Task Mode ,,. ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued 1 day 4 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 5 ~ Site Visit 6 ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 3 ;; ~ 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 17 Start Finish Predecessors April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 19 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 20 Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO December B M E January B M (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 Task Milestone E (b) (5) Identify Funds Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 18 21 March B M o o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000157 DHS-17-0040-B-000157 E Febru B ID 22 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Response due for SWPPP 23 ~ Response evaluation 24 ~ SSA report (if needed) 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 ~ SWPPP filed 30 ~ SWPPP Installation 31 ~ 32 ~ 33 ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE 1 day and BP CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 37 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000158 DHS-17-0040-B-000158 E Febru B ID 42 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 43 44 Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 45 46 pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 -;. 55 -;. 56 -;. 57 -;. 58 -;. 59 -;. 60 -;. 61 -;. Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 April May June July August September Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS -M Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary December January M Project Summary o November (b) (5) (b) (5) Task Milestone October (b) (5) Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? March Manual Progress o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000159 DHS-17-0040-B-000159 Febru ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/question to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking access/price if needed Write-up parking operations and security checkpoint for distribution Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 75FS+1 day December B M E January B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 70 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Task o E (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Milestone October B M 59 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000160 DHS-17-0040-B-000160 E Febru B ID 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 Task Mode Task Name Duration March B M E April B M Develop Testing Protocol 90 Develop Test Plan 91 Develop Test Schedule 92 Procure Test Tools 93 Determine Test Team 94 Develop Team Training Pla 95 Conduct Team Training 96 Conduct Tests 97 Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M Tue 4/4/17 December B M E January B M (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Wed 4/5/17 81 Task Milestone E Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 80 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 89 99 Predecessors (b) (5) Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 88 98 Finish Temporary facilities Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 87 Start o o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000161 DHS-17-0040-B-000161 E Febru B ID 1 0 2 Task Mode ,,. ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued 1 day 4 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 5 ~ Site Visit 6 ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 3 ;; ~ 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 17 Start Finish Predecessors April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 19 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 20 Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO December B M E January B M (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 Task Milestone E (b) (5) Identify Funds Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 18 21 March B M o o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000162 DHS-17-0040-B-000162 E Febru B ID 22 Task Mode Task Name Duration Response evaluation 24 SSA report (if needed) 25 Issue CN (if needed) 26 Award 27 SWPPP created 28 SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 SWPPP filed 30 SWPPP Installation 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 Finish Predecessors Response due for SWPPP 23 31 Start March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE 1 day and BP CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 37 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000163 DHS-17-0040-B-000163 E Febru B ID 42 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 43 44 Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 45 46 pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 -;. 55 -;. 56 -;. 57 -;. 58 -;. 59 -;. 60 -;. 61 -;. Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS December B M E January B M M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS -M Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E l Project Summary o E (b) (5) (b) (5) Task Milestone October B M (b) (5) Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? March B M Manual Progress o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000164 DHS-17-0040-B-000164 E Febru B ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/question to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking access/price if needed Write-up parking operations and security checkpoint for distribution Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 75FS+1 day December B M E January B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 70 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Task o E (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Milestone October B M 59 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000165 DHS-17-0040-B-000165 E Febru B ID 79 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Temporary facilities 80 ~ 81 ~ 82 ~ 83 ~ 84 ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ 88 ~ 89 ~ Develop Testing Protocol 90 ~ Develop Test Plan 91 ~ Develop Test Schedule 92 ~ Procure Test Tools 93 ~ Determine Test Team 94 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 95 ~ Conduct Team Training 96 ~ Conduct Tests 97 ~ 98 ~ 99 ~ Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO Start Finish March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B (b) (5) M E August B M E September B M E Tue 4/4/17 Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Task o E Wed 4/5/17 81 Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing Milestone October B M Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 80 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 4/7/17 Predecessors Manual Progress o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000166 DHS-17-0040-B-000166 E Febru B ID 1 0 2 Task Mode ,,. ~ Task Name Duration RFPs issued 1 day 4 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 5 ~ Site Visit 6 ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 3 ;; ~ 8 Environmental waive issued 9 SSA Decision 10 Contract document 11 Legal review 12 Congressional Notification 13 Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Period 16 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 17 Start Finish Predecessors April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E 10 days Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 19 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 20 Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO 1 day November B M E December B M E January B M T Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 17 Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary E Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 Task Milestone October B M (b) (5) Identify Funds Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 4/26/17 E Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 18 21 March B M o Manual Progress o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000167 DHS-17-0040-B-000167 E Febru B ID 22 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration ~ Response due for SWPPP 23 ~ Response evaluation 24 ~ SSA report (if needed) 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 ~ SWPPP filed 30 ~ SWPPP Installation 31 ~ 32 ~ 33 ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE 1 day and BP CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 37 l I Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 4/26/17 (b) (5) Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000168 DHS-17-0040-B-000168 E Febru B ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 15 days Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M 5 days 2 days 1 day? December B M E January B M Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/14/17 46 Tue 4/18/17 49 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E (b) (5) Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Milestone E 1 Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 4/26/17 E (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver March B M o o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000169 DHS-17-0040-B-000169 E Febru B ID 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/question to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Site Security 13 days? Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 75FS+1 day December B M E January B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 70 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 72 72 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 68SS Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/19/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/12/17 76 76 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E Mon 4/3/17 Wed 4/19/17 identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking 10 days access/price if needed Write-up parking 5 days operations and security checkpoint for distribution o E (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 58SS Milestone October B M 59 Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 5 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 4/26/17 March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000170 DHS-17-0040-B-000170 E Febru B ID 79 0 Task Mode Task Name ~ Temporary facilities 80 ~ 81 ~ 82 ~ 83 ~ 84 ~ 85 ~ 86 Duration Start Finish Predecessors Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month requirement) Issue RFP/TO 10 days 1 day Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 80 2 days Tue 4/4/17 0 days Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 82FS+3 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 83FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 84 89 Develop Testing Protocol 20 days Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/14/17 90 Develop Test Plan 5 days Mon 4/17/17 Fri 4/21/17 89 91 Develop Test Schedule 92 Procure Test Tools 93 Determine Test Team 94 Develop Team Training Pla 95 Conduct Team Training 96 Conduct Tests 97 Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes 99 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 4/26/17 April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M December B M E January B M (b) (5) (b) (5) Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E 4/10 Task Milestone E Wed 4/5/17 81 88 98 E (b) (5) Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 87 March B M o o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000171 DHS-17-0040-B-000171 E Febru B ID 1 2 0 v v v Task Mode ,,. ,,. Task Name Duration Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 1 day Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 ~ 5 ~ Site Visit 6 ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio ~ Environmental waive issued 1 day 9 ~ SSA Decision 10 ~ Contract document 11 ~ Legal review 12 ~ Congressional Notification 13 ~ Contract awards 14 ~ Kickoff Meeting ~ Construction Period ~ SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 8 15 ;g 6' 16 17 v ~ 18 v ~ 19 v 20 21 Predecessors 1 day 4 ~ Finish RFPs issued Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 3 Start 20 days March B M E April B M May B M June B M E E M E August B M September B M E E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M I (b) (5) Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days Identify Funds 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 ~ Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 v ~ v ~ Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO 1 day T Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 19 T Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 17 I Task Project Summary I I ' Manual Task ...I Start-only [ Deadline J Progress Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Milestone o Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Summary July B I 10 days Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 E I . Inactive Summary I Manual Summary ' . External Milestone J ... Manual Progress o Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000172 DHS-17-0040-B-000172 E Febru B ID 22 0 v v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 21 ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 22 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 25 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 26 ~ Award 27 ~ SWPPP created 28 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 29 ~ SWPPP filed 30 ~ SWPPP Installation 31 ~ 32 ~ 33 ~ 23 24 34 v ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 39 ~ 40 41 Tue 5/2/17 March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M r 23 (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver 1 day Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 34 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 40 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000173 DHS-17-0040-B-000173 E Febru B ID 42 0 Task Mode 44 45 46 47 49 50 51 ~ 52 ~ 53 ~ 54 ~ 55 ~ 56 ~ 59 60 61 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 48 58 Duration Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 43 57 Task Name pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver 15 days 30 days Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 1 day Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 50,49 5 days Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 5/1/17 2 days 1 day? 0 days Fri 4/14/17 49 Tue 4/18/17 52 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 5/1/17 8 Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 5/1 (b) (5) Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Coordinate planning trip with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with Sector o 2 days 1 day Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 34SS Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Milestone Summary o Manual Progress o Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000174 DHS-17-0040-B-000174 E Febru B ID 62 0 Task Mode 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 72 ~ 73 ~ 74 V ~ 75 V ~ 77 78 79 Duration Start Finish Predecessors Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 61SS Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/questions to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answers Tue 4/4/17 Site Security 71 76 Task Name 13 days? April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E Tue 4/4/17 December B M E January B M Mon 4/3/17 Wed 4/19/17 -.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 71SS ~l Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 71SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 73 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 61SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 * 75 75 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 71SS Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E (b) (5) Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 78FS+1 day o E 62 identify off-site parking options Milestone October B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 61SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 61SS Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 E Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 61SS Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 5 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day 1 day? March B M Manual Progress o Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000175 DHS-17-0040-B-000175 E Febru B ID 80 0 Task Mode 81 82 ~ 83 ../ ~ 84 ../ ~ 85 ../ ~ 86 ../ ~ 87 ~ 88 ~ 89 ~ 90 ~ Task Name Duration Negotiate offsite parking 10 days access/price if needed Write-up parking 5 days operations and security checkpoint for distribution Temporary facilities Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month requirement) Issue RFP/TO 10 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract Start Finish Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/19/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/12/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M December B M E January B M (b) (5) 1 day Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 83 2 days Tue 4/4/17 0 days Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 85FS+3 days 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 86FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 87 Wed 4/5/17 84 92 Develop Testing Protocol 20 days Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/14/17 93 Develop Test Plan 5 days Mon 4/17/17 Fri 4/21/17 92 94 Develop Test Schedule 95 Procure Test Tools 96 Determine Test Team 97 Develop Team Training Plan5 days 98 Conduct Team Training 99 Conduct Tests 100 Gather results and write report 4/10 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Mon 4/24/17 Fri 4/28/17 93 Task Project Summary Manual Task Start-only Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Manual Progress Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary November B M E 79 91 Milestone E 79 Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 March B M o o Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000176 DHS-17-0040-B-000176 E Febru B ID 101 102 103 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M I I E April B M I I Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Update Design Standards based on Test Results Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/8/17 I E May B M I I I E June B M I I I E July B I IM I E August B M I I I E September B M E I I I Project Summary Manual Task Start-only [ Deadline Split Inactive Task Duration-only Finish-only J Progress Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Rollup External Tasks Inactive Summary Manual Summary External Milestone Summary I I E November B M E I I I December B M E I I I January B M I I I (b) (5) Task Milestone October B M I o Manual Progress o Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000177 DHS-17-0040-B-000177 E Febru B I I ID 0 Task Mode ,,. ,,. 3 v v v ~ 4 mg 5 6 1 Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors RFPs issued 1 day Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 1 day Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete mg ~ Site Visit m ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 8 ~ SSA Decision 9 ~ Contract document 10 ~ Legal review 11 ~ Congressional Notification 12 ~ Contract awards 13 ~ Kickoff Meeting 14 b#J ~ 15 ~ 2 16 v ~ 17 v ~ 18 v 19 v 20 21 v 20 days March B M E April B M E May B M June B M E E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M I (b) (5) Construction Period SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 10 days Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days Identify Funds 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 ~ Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 ~ Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 18 ~ Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO 1 day ~ Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 20 r Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 16 I Task Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Milestone Milestone o Inactive Summary Summary I I Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary I I Duration-only External Tasks I Start-only I I External Milestone o Deadline ... Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split 1111111111111111111111111 Progress Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000178 DHS-17-0040-B-000178 ID 22 0 v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 21 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 22 24 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 23 25 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 24 26 ~ SWPPP created 27 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 28 ~ SWPPP filed 29 ~ SWPPP Installation 30 ~ 31 ~ 32 ~ 23 33 v ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 39 40 41 ~ March B M 1 day Complete work on GSA sit for access CTIMR add road and drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Create turnaround moving 1 day jersey barriers as required E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 39 Thu 6/15/17 Thu 6/15/17 38 I Task Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 April B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver E Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Milestone Milestone o Inactive Summary Summary I 7 Project Summary I I l Manual Task Duration-only Start-only I J External Tasks --. Deadline o Manual Progress ... Critical [ Finish-only - External Milestone Critical Split 1111111111111111111111111 Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000179 DHS-17-0040-B-000179 ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 15 days 30 days 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 49,48 (b) (5) 1 day? Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) 2 days 1 day Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 33SS Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E Fri 4/28/17 1 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 April B M 1 Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with Sector E (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000180 DHS-17-0040-B-000180 ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 0 v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M April B M E Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/questions to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answers Tue 4/4/17 Site Security 13 days? Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from Via de Amistad?) Coordinate checkpoint 5 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Evaluate parking needs 1 day Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 Tue 4/4/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Wed 4/19/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 r 72 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 74 74 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o September B M E r 61 Task Milestone E Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000181 DHS-17-0040-B-000181 ID 78 0 Task Mode 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ~ v v v v 86 87 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ Task Name Duration identify off-site parking 1 day? options Negotiate offsite parking 10 days access/price if needed Write-up parking 5 days operations and security checkpoint for distribution Temporary facilities Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month requirement) Issue RFP/TO 10 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 88 ~ 89 ~ 90 ~ Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 91 ~ Develop Testing Protocol 92 ~ Develop Test Plan 93 ~ Develop Test Schedule 94 ~ Procure Test Tools 95 ~ Determine Test Team 96 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 97 ~ Conduct Team Training Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M Wed 4/5/17 Wed 4/5/17 77FS+1 day Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/19/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 4/12/17 78 78 (b) (5) 1 day Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 82 2 days Tue 4/4/17 0 days Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 84FS+3 days 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 85FS+5 days l Wed 4/5/17 83 J. 4/10 ....,, (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000182 DHS-17-0040-B-000182 ID 98 99 100 101 102 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Conduct Tests Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Update Design Standards based on Test Results Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Wed 5/10/17 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E (b) (5) May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M (b) (5) Task Milestone E Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000183 DHS-17-0040-B-000183 ID 0 Task Mode ,,. ,,. 3 v v v ~ 4 mg 5 6 1 Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors RFPs issued 1 day Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 1 day Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete mg ~ Site Visit m ~ Design Proposals submitted 7 ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio 8 ~ SSA Decision 9 ~ Contract document 10 ~ Legal review 11 ~ Congressional Notification 12 ~ Contract awards 13 ~ Kickoff Meeting 14 b#J ~ 15 ~ 2 16 v ~ 17 v ~ 18 v 19 v 21 v April B M E May B M June B M E E July B M August B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M I Construction Period SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days Identify Funds 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 ~ Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 ~ Identify if existing contract 1 day can be used Issue RFP/TO 1 day Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 18 Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 20 ~ E (b) (5) 10 days .. 20 20 days March B M r Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 16 I Task Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Milestone Milestone o Inactive Summary Summary Project Summary I Start-only ' ' Manual Task Finish-only ' ' Duration-only External Tasks I I External Milestone o Deadline ... Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split 1111111111111111111111111 Progress Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000184 DHS-17-0040-B-000184 ID 22 0 v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 21 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 22 24 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 23 25 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 24 26 ~ SWPPP created 10 days Thu 5/11/17 Wed 5/24/17 25 27 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 28 ~ SWPPP filed 29 ~ SWPPP Installation 30 ~ 31 ~ 32 ~ 23 33 v ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 39 40 41 E April B M E 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days 30 days Tue 4/4/17 Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Mon 5/15/17 E June B M E July B M August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 39 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E 33 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 May B M (b) (5) SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000185 DHS-17-0040-B-000185 ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 15 days 30 days 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 49,48 (b) (5) 1 day? Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) 2 days 1 day Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 33SS Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E Fri 4/28/17 1 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 April B M 1 Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Coordinate planning trip with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with Sector E (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000186 DHS-17-0040-B-000186 ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 0 v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M April B M E Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit 1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for bidding vendors Capture any open discussion items/questions to be addressed via Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answers Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 May B M E June B M E July B M August B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 r 72 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 74 74 (b) (5) Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o September B M E (b) (5) Task Milestone E r 61 Site Security Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and rfp 1 day requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 5 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security checkpoint for distribution E Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000187 DHS-17-0040-B-000187 ID Task Mode 78 79 80 81 82 Duration v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 84 ~ 10 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 87 88 Develop Testing Protocol 89 Develop Test Plan 90 Develop Test Schedule 91 Procure Test Tools 92 Determine Test Team 93 Develop Team Training Pla 94 Conduct Team Training 95 Conduct Tests 96 Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes 97 98 Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 May B M E June B M E July B M 1 day Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 79 2 days Tue 4/4/17 0 days Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 81FS+3 days 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 82FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 83 Wed 4/5/17 80 August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M E February B M l o 4/10 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E (b) (5) Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month requirement) Issue RFP/TO Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 86 Start Temporary facilities 83 85 Task Name o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000188 DHS-17-0040-B-000188 ID 99 Task Mode Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors March April May June July August (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) Update Design Standards based on Test Results Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 5/11/17 Start Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o October November December January February (b) (7)(E) Task Milestone September Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000189 DHS-17-0040-B-000189 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 18 19 20 21 .~ 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 Manual Task Duration-only Project Summary o Summary E May B M E June B M E July B M E Page 1 r, Progress Critical Split Deadline L.J External Tasks Finish-only External Milestone Critical .. Milestone Split Task Start-only Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 20 Response due for SWPPP 5 days Inactive Summary Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 16 1 day April B M Manual Summary Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 18 1 day Identify if existing contract can be used Issue RFP/TO o- Inactive Milestone Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 1 day Create PR E August B M E September B M E October B M Manual Progress (b) (5) ~ Manual Summary Rollup Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 day Identify Funds SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Construction Period Kickoff Meeting Contract awards Congressional Notification Legal review Contract document SSA Decision Technical and Price Evaluatio - Inactive Task Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days II 8 10 days ~ Design Proposals submitted March B M - 7 ~ 6 Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days 2 days ~ Site Visit ~ 5 Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day 1 day OI~ 4 20 days r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1r r 3 Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 1 day Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete ~ 2 Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 Predecessors 1 day RFPs issued ~ 1 Finish Start Duration Task Name Task Mode l Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 ID ~ o E November B M E January B M DHS-17-0040-B-000190 BW8 FOIA CBP 000190 December B M E E Febru B ID 22 0 v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 21 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 22 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 23 25 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 24 26 ~ SWPPP created 27 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPA 28 ~ SWPPP filed 29 ~ SWPPP Installation 30 ~ 31 ~ 32 ~ 23 24 33 34 v v ~ ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 v ~ ~ SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access 215 days Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver E April B M May B M E June B M E July B E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M - 1 day 30 days Tue 4/4/17 Mon 5/15/17 T 33 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 39 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Critical Summary Manual Task Finish-only Critical Split Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Progress Milestone M r Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 E (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Wed 1/31/18 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs March B M o Manual Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000191 DHS-17-0040-B-000191 E Febru B ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction 30 days for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE 1 day green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 49,48 (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) (b) (5) Original waiver and CATEX reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 33SS Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000192 DHS-17-0040-B-000192 E Febru B ID 61 62 63 64 0 v v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ 65 v ~ 66 v ~ 67 68 69 v 72 ~ ~ 73 v ~ 74 v ~ 75 76 77 Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be Provide answers to procurement on open Procurement post answer Tue 4/4/17 Site Security 70 71 Task Name 36 days Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and 1 day rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 5 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security 5 days checkpoint for Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 Tue 4/4/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 65SS (b) (5) Mon 4/3/17 Mon 5/22/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS -.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS ~l Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 72 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/17/17 Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 * 74 74 76FS+20 days Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o E 61 Task Milestone August B M Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000193 DHS-17-0040-B-000193 E Febru B ID 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 0 Task Mode ~ v v v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ 88 v Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E Temporary facilities Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 0 days Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 79 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 82FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 83 Tue 4/4/17 Wed 4/5/17 80 E June B M E (b) (5) July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M J. 4/10 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 81FS+3 days t ~ Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing (b) (5) ~ Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 89 ~ Develop Test Plan 90 ~ Develop Test Schedule 91 ~ Procure Test Tools 92 ~ Determine Test Team 93 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 94 ~ Conduct Team Training 95 ~ Conduct Tests 96 ~ 97 ~ 98 ~ Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Mon 3/20/17 Fri 5/12/17 (b) (5) Task Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 May B M Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Deadline ... Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Milestone o Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split 1111111111111111111111111 Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000194 DHS-17-0040-B-000194 E Febru B ID 99 Task Mode Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors (b) (7)(E) Update Design Standards based on Test Results Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Mon 5/22/17 Start March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B (b) (5) M E Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (7)(E) Task Milestone August B M Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000195 DHS-17-0040-B-000195 E Febru B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 18 19 20 21 .~ 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 Manual Task Duration-only Project Summary o Summary E May B M E June B M E July B M E Page 1 r, Progress Critical Split Deadline L.J External Tasks Finish-only External Milestone Critical .. Milestone Split Task Start-only Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 20 Response due for SWPPP 5 days Inactive Summary Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 16 1 day April B M Manual Summary Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 18 1 day Identify if existing contract can be used Issue RFP/TO o- Inactive Milestone Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 1 day Create PR E August B M E September B M E October B M Manual Progress (b) (5) ~ Manual Summary Rollup Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 day Identify Funds SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Construction Period Kickoff Meeting Contract awards Congressional Notification Legal review Contract document SSA Decision Technical and Price Evaluatio - Inactive Task Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days II 8 10 days ~ Design Proposals submitted March B M - 7 ~ 6 Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days 2 days ~ Site Visit ~ 5 Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day 1 day OI~ 4 20 days r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1r r 3 Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 1 day Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete ~ 2 Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 Predecessors 1 day RFPs issued ~ 1 Finish Start Duration Task Name Task Mode l Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 ID ~ o E November B M E January B M DHS-17-0040-B-000196 BW8 FOIA CBP 000196 December B M E E Febru B ID 22 0 v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 21 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 22 24 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 23 25 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 24 26 ~ SWPPP created 10 days Thu 5/11/17 Wed 5/24/17 25 27 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 2 days Thu 5/25/17 Fri 5/26/17 26 28 ~ SWPPP filed Tue 5/30/17 Tue 5/30/17 27 29 ~ SWPPP Installation 30 ~ 31 ~ 32 ~ 23 33 v ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 v ~ ~ 1 day March B M May E B ..., E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M ..., ..., l 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 39 1 (b) (5) Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M (b) (5) Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 M ..., . SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver April B M E o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000197 DHS-17-0040-B-000197 E Febru B ID 42 0 Task Mode 44 45 46 Start Finish Predecessors March B M 48 49 50 a;, 51 m; a;, 52 a;, 53 a;, 54 ;; 55 RI a;, 56 a;, 57 a;, 58 a;, v a;, a;, a;, pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction 30 days for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE 1 day green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Original waiver and CATEX 5 days reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Mon 5/22/17 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit 46 days? Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector E May B M June B M E E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 49,48 (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Fri 5/26/17 (b) (5) Mon 3/27/17Tue 5/30/17 Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 33SS .~ I Task Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 April B M E (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 47 60 Duration Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers 43 59 Task Name Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Manual Summary Split l lllllllllllllllllllllllll Inactive Milestone Milestone o Inactive Summary Summary I I Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary I I Duration-only External Tasks I Start-only I I External Milestone o Deadline ... Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split 1111111111111111111111111 Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000198 DHS-17-0040-B-000198 E Febru B ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 0 v v v v v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 68 ~ 69 ~ 70 v ~ 71 v ~ 72 73 74 75 76 77 ~ v v ~ ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be Provide answers to 5 days procurement on open Procurement post answers1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 E E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 65SS Mon Fri 5/26/17 66 5/22/17 Tue 5/30/17 Tue 5/30/17 67 (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and 1 day rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 60 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security 5 days checkpoint for Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS -.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS ~l Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 72 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 6/27/17 74 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/17/17 Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 * 74 76FS+20 days Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M 61 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 May B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000199 DHS-17-0040-B-000199 E Febru B ID 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 0 Task Mode ~ v v v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ 88 v Task Name Duration Temporary facilities 193 days Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 0 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract Start Finish Predecessors Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Thu 12/21/17 Fri 3/31/17 1 Tue 4/4/17 Wed 4/5/17 80 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 82FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 83 E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M 4/10 Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Fri 5/12/17 89 ~ Develop Test Plan Mon 5/15/17 Tue 7/11/17 88 90 ~ Develop Test Schedule 91 ~ Procure Test Tools 92 ~ Determine Test Team 93 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 94 ~ Conduct Team Training 95 ~ Conduct Tests 98 April B M Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 81FS+3 days Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 97 E Mon 4/3/17 79 ~ 96 March B M 40 days (b) (5) Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000200 DHS-17-0040-B-000200 E Febru B ID 99 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M I E April B M I I I E (b) (7)(E) Update Design Standards based on Test Results Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/1/17 I May B M I I I E June B M I I I E July B I (b) (5) IM I E Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o I I E September B M E I I I October B M I I I E November B M E I I I December B M E I I I January B M I I I (b) (7)(E) Task Milestone August B M I Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000201 DHS-17-0040-B-000201 E Febru B I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 18 19 20 21 .~ 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 Manual Task Duration-only Project Summary o Summary E May B M E June B M E July B M E Page 1 r, Progress Critical Split Deadline u External Tasks Finish-only External Milestone Critical .. Milestone Split Task Start-only Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 20 Response due for SWPPP 5 days Inactive Summary Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 16 1 day April B M Manual Summary Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 18 1 day Identify if existing contract can be used Issue RFP/TO o- Inactive Milestone Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 1 day Create PR E August B M E September B M E October B M Manual Progress (b) (5) ~ Manual Summary Rollup Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 day Identify Funds SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Construction Period Kickoff Meeting Contract awards Congressional Notification Legal review Contract document SSA Decision Technical and Price Evaluatio - Inactive Task Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days II 8 10 days ~ Design Proposals submitted March B M - 7 ~ 6 Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days 2 days ~ Site Visit ~ 5 Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day 1 day OI~ 4 20 days r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 1r r 3 Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 1 day Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete ~ 2 Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 Predecessors 1 day RFPs issued ~ 1 Finish Start Duration Task Name Task Mode l Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 ID ~ o E November B M E January B M DHS-17-0040-B-000202 BW8 FOIA CBP 000202 December B M E E Febru B ID 22 0 v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 21 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 22 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 23 25 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 24 26 ~ SWPPP created 10 days Thu 5/11/17 Wed 5/24/17 25 27 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 2 days Thu 5/25/17 Fri 5/26/17 26 28 ~ SWPPP filed Tue 5/30/17 Tue 5/30/17 27 29 ~ SWPPP Installation 30 ~ 31 ~ 32 ~ 23 24 33 v ~ 34 ~ 35 ~ 36 ~ 37 38 39 40 41 v ~ ~ 1 day March B M May B M E June B M E July B E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M - 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 33 Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 39 (b) (5) Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Critical Summary Manual Task Finish-only Critical Split Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Progress Milestone M (b) (5) Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 E r SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver April B M E o Manual Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000203 DHS-17-0040-B-000203 E Febru B ID 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction 30 days for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE 1 day green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Original waiver and CATEX 5 days reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Mon 5/22/17 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit 52 days? Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Fri 4/7/17 E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 49,48 (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Fri 5/26/17 (b) (5) Mon 3/27/17Wed 6/7/17 Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 33SS Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000204 DHS-17-0040-B-000204 E Febru B ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 0 v v v v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 67 v ~ 68 mg ~ 69 ~ 70 v ~ 71 v ~ 72 73 74 75 76 77 ~ v v ~ ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit1 day? Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS * Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS M Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be Provide answers to 5 days procurement on open Procurement post answers1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 E E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 65SS Mon Fri 5/26/17 66 5/22/17 Wed 6/7/17 Wed 6/7/17 (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and 1 day rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 60 days with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security 5 days checkpoint for Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS -.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS ~l Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 70SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 72 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 60SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 6/27/17 74 Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/17/17 Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 * 74 76FS+20 days Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M 61 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 May B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000205 DHS-17-0040-B-000205 E Febru B ID 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 0 Task Mode ~ v v v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 85 ~ 86 ~ 87 ~ 88 v Task Name Duration Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 0 days Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 79 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 82FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 83 March B M E April B M Tue 4/4/17 E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Wed 4/5/17 80 4/10 Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 81FS+3 days Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing (b) (5) 89 ~ Develop Test Plan 90 ~ Develop Test Schedule 91 ~ Procure Test Tools 92 ~ Determine Test Team 93 ~ Develop Team Training Pla 94 ~ Conduct Team Training 95 ~ Conduct Tests 98 Predecessors (b) (5) Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 97 Finish Temporary facilities ~ 96 Start Mon 3/20/17 Fri 5/12/17 (b) (5) Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000206 DHS-17-0040-B-000206 E Febru B ID 99 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors March April May June July August (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) Update Design Standards Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 Start Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o October November December January (b) (7)(E) Task Milestone September Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000207 DHS-17-0040-B-000207 Febru ID 0 Task Mode 5 v v v v v 6 !Im -.;. 7 -.;. 1 2 3 4 Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors :# RFPs issued 1 day Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 :# 1 day 20 days Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 -.;. Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 1 day Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day -.;. Site Visit 2 days Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days -.;. Design Proposals submitted SSA Decision 9 Contract document 10 Legal review 11 Congressional Notification 12 13 Source Selection Announcement Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Media Event 16 Construction Period 17 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 10 days Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days 19 Identify Funds 1 day Mon 3/20/17Mon 3/20/17 20 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17Mon 3/20/171 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 March B M E April B M Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Technical and Price Evaluatio 8 18 Start o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000208 DHS-17-0040-B-000208 E Februa B ID 21 0 v v v v v Task Mode -;. Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors -;. Identify if existing contract can be used Issue RFP/TO -;. Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/1722 -;. Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 23 -;. SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 24 26 -;. Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 25 27 -;. Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17Wed 5/10/1726 28 -;. SWPPP created 10 days Thu 5/11/17 Wed 5/24/1727 29 -;. SWPPP reviewed by BPAM2 days Thu 5/25/17 Fri 5/26/17 28 30 -;. SWPPP filed Tue 5/30/17 Tue 5/30/17 29 31 -;. SWPPP Installation 32 -;. 33 -;. 22 23 24 25 34 35 36 37 38 39 1 day Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 20 1 day Mon 4/17/17Mon 4/17/1718 1 day March B M May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M 'L I- 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 35 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E (b) (5) Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work plan Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 April B M 1 SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver E o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000209 DHS-17-0040-B-000209 E Februa B ID 40 41 42 43 0 v v v Task Mode -.;. -.;. -.;. 44 -.;. 45 -.;. 46 -.;. 47 48 Duration Have CTIMR repair all drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Verify turn radius for Flatbed 4 hrs Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 35 r Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 41 Create turnaround moving jersey barriers as required Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers (b) (5) Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 49 50 51 52 53 Task Name -.;. m -.;. 54 -.;. 55 -.;. 56 m 57 !ml -.;. -.;. pursue updated license with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify extent of survey areas Environmental waiver 15 days 30 days 1 day Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 T Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 51,50 (b) (5) 1 day? Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Original waiver and CATEX 5 days reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Mon 5/22/17 o Fri 5/26/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000210 DHS-17-0040-B-000210 E Februa B ID 58 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration -;. CATEX updated as needed 59 -;. 60 -;. Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit 61 v -;. 62 v -;. 63 v -;. 64 v -;. 65 v -;. 66 v -;. 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 Start Finish Predecessors March April May Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 35SS _.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS ~ Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS ~ Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS ..~ Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site visit and egress Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be addressed via to Provide answers 5 days procurement on open items Procurement post answers1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 63 September October November December January Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 67SS Mon Fri 5/26/17 68 5/22/17 Wed 6/7/17 Wed 6/7/17 (b) (5) 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS 1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 74 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August ., Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 July (b) (5) Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day? groups required Determine duration of visit1 day? Determine process for routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for checks Determine funding and rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to support June o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000211 DHS-17-0040-B-000211 Februa ID 76 0 Task Mode 77 78 79 v 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 -;, -;, v v v v v v -;, -;, -;, -;, -;, -;, 87 -;, 88 -;, 89 -;, 90 v Task Name Duration Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Determine process for 10 days scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security 5 days checkpoint for distribution at site visit Temporary facilities Determine requirements (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if purchase card can be used SOW (6 month Create requirement) Issue RFP/TO 10 days evaluate and finalize selection Award contract Start Finish Predecessors March B M April B M E E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/17/17 76 Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 78FS+20 days (b) (5) 1 day Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 81 2 days Tue 4/4/17 Wed 4/5/17 82 0 days Mon 4/10/17Mon 4/10/1783FS+3 days 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 84FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17Wed 4/19/1785 l 4/10 t ., (b) (5) -;, Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 91 -;, Develop Test Plan 92 -;, Develop Test Schedule 93 -;, Procure Test Tools 94 -;, Determine Test Team Mon 3/20/17Fri 5/12/17 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone May B M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 E o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000212 DHS-17-0040-B-000212 E Februa B ID 95 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration -;. Develop Team Training Pl 96 -;. Conduct Team Training 97 -;. Conduct Tests 98 -;. 99 -;. 100 -;. 101 -;. Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Update Design Standards Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/8/17 Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M May B M E June B M E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone E o External Milestone Manual Progress Deadline [ J Critical Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000213 DHS-17-0040-B-000213 E Februa B ID Task Mode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 v v v v m ,,. ,,. Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors RFPs issued 1 day Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 1 day 20 days Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 ~ Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete 1 day Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day ~ Site Visit 2 days Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days ~ Design Proposals submitted 20 days ~ Technical and Price Evaluatio ~ 8 SSA Decision 9 Contract document 10 Legal review 11 Congressional Notification 12 13 Source Selection Announcement Contract awards 14 Kickoff Meeting 15 Construction Media Event 16 Construction Period 17 SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW 18 Start E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M I (b) (5) 10 days Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days Identify Funds 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 20 Create PR 1 day Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 21 Identify if existing contract can be used 1 day Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 20 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M Mon 5/15/17 Mon 6/12/17 4 19 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000214 DHS-17-0040-B-000214 E Febru B ID 22 0 v v v v Task Mode Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M E May B M June B M E ~ Issue RFP/TO ~ Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 22 ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 23 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 24 26 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 25 27 ~ Award 1 day Wed 5/10/17 Wed 5/10/17 26 r 28 ~ SWPPP created 10 days Thu 5/11/17 Wed 5/24/17 27 29 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 2 days Thu 5/25/17 Fri 5/26/17 28 -i 30 ~ SWPPP filed Tue 5/30/17 Tue 5/30/17 29 31 ~ SWPPP Installation 32 ~ 33 ~ 34 ~ 23 24 25 35 v ~ 36 ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 39 40 41 v v ~ ~ 1 day Start 1 day M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M ..., I- t 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 35 Thu 6/1/17 Wed 6/14/17 39FS+40 days Tue 4/4/17 35 Tue 4/4/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M (b) (5) Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all 10 days drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 July B Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 18 SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver E o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000215 DHS-17-0040-B-000215 E Febru B ID Task Mode 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 51 52 ~ Ill ~ 54 ~ 55 ~ 56 m ~ 57 ml ~ 58 59 Duration Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Tue 4/4/17 Create turnaround 1 day moving jersey barriers as Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers Thu 6/15/17 Thu 6/15/17 40 March B M April B M E May B M June B M E E July B M E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction 30 days for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE 1 day green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to survey site Survey completed and marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day? extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Original waiver and CATEX 5 days reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed 40 days Mon 5/22/17 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit 52 days E 41 Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 49 53 Task Name Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 51,50 (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Fri 5/26/17 Tue 5/30/17 Tue 7/25/17 57 (b) (5) ==L _:~ :_J_____________ ======== l==~ I== ~~~~~~~ ~==== ----; .60 Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 Mon 3/27/17Wed 6/7/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Milestone Summary Project Summary Inactive Summary o I Start-only ' ' Manual Task Finish-only ' ' Duration-only External Tasks External Milestone I I Manual Progress Deadline Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000216 DHS-17-0040-B-000216 E Febru B ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 0 v v v v v v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 69 v ~ 70 m; ~ 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ~ v ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day groups required Determine duration of visit1 day Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 35SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS _.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS _.. Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be Provide answers to 5 days procurement on open Procurement post answers1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 E E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 67SS Mon Fri 5/26/17 68 5/22/17 Wed 6/7/17 Wed 6/7/17 (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and 1 day rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint 60 days with local PD Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS ~1 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 74 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 6/27/17 76 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M 63 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 May B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000217 DHS-17-0040-B-000217 E Febru B ID Task Mode 78 79 v 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ~ ~ v v v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 87 ~ 88 ~ 89 Task Name Duration Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security checkpoint for Temporary facilities Start Finish 10 days Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/17/17 5 days Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 Predecessors March B M E April B M May B M E June B M E July B E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M 78FS+20 days (b) (5) Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 81 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 84FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 85 Tue 4/4/17 Wed 4/5/17 82 l Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 83FS+3 days 4/10 t ~ Install facilities NLT 2 days before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing (b) (5) 90 Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 91 Develop Test Plan 92 Develop Test Schedule 93 Procure Test Tools 94 Determine Test Team 95 Develop Team Training Pl 96 Conduct Team Training 97 Conduct Tests Mon 3/20/17 Fri 5/12/17 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Critical Summary Manual Task Finish-only Critical Split Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Progress Milestone M 76 Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 0 days Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 E o o Manual Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000218 DHS-17-0040-B-000218 E Febru B ID 98 99 100 101 102 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Update Design Standards Design Standards Review Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Thu 6/15/17 Start Finish Predecessors (b) (7)(E) March April May June July August Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o October November December January (b)(5) (7)(E) (b) Task Milestone September Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000219 DHS-17-0040-B-000219 Febru ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ 19 20 21 .~ 18 17 16 15 14 ~ 13 12 11 10 9 8 r r r r r r r 1r r Duration-only Project Summary May B M E June B M E July B M E r, Progress Critical Split Deadline Critical External Milestone L.J External Tasks Page 1 Start-only Inactive Summary Finish-only Manual Summary Inactive Milestone Manual Task o Summary E .. Milestone Split Manual Summary Rollup Tue 3/21/17 Tue 3/21/17 20 1 day April B M Inactive Task Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 1 day o- Task Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 1 day ~ Identify if existing contract can be used Mon 4/3/17 Fri 4/14/17 1FS+10 days 10 days E August B M E September B M E October B M Manual Progress (b) (5) - Create PR Identify Funds SWPPP Development, Installation, Removal Develop SOW Construction Period Construction Media Event Kickoff Meeting Source Selection Announcement Contract awards Congressional Notification Legal review Contract document SSA Decision Technical and Price Evaluati Mon 5/15/17 Mon 6/12/17 4 March B M - 7 ~ Design Proposals submitted 20 days ~ 6 Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 4FS+3 days 2 days Site Visit ~ 5 Fri 5/12/17 Fri 5/12/17 3FS+1 day 1 day OI~ 4 20 days r r r r r r r r r 3 Mon Mon 3/20/17 3/20/17 Thu 4/6/17 Wed 5/3/17 1 1 day Funding reprogramming complete First response evaluation period Down select complete ~ 2 Fri 3/17/17 Fri 3/17/17 Predecessors 1 day RFPs issued ~ 1 Finish Start Duration Task Name Task Mode l Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 ID ~ o E November B M E January B M DHS-17-0040-B-000220 BW8 FOIA CBP 000220 December B M E E Febru B ID 22 0 v Task Mode Task Name Duration Finish Predecessors ~ Issue RFP/TO ~ Response due for SWPPP 5 days Tue 4/18/17 Mon 4/24/17 22 ~ Response evaluation 5 days Tue 4/25/17 Mon 5/1/17 23 ~ SSA report (if needed) 1 day Tue 5/2/17 Tue 5/2/17 24 ~ Issue CN (if needed) 5 days Wed 5/3/17 Tue 5/9/17 25 ~ Award 1 day Fri 6/9/17 26 28 ~ SWPPP created 29 ~ SWPPP reviewed by BPAM 30 ~ SWPPP filed 31 ~ SWPPP Installation 32 ~ 33 ~ 34 ~ 23 24 25 v v v 26 27 35 m v ~ 36 ~ 37 ~ 38 ~ 39 40 41 v v ~ ~ 1 day Start April B M E May B M E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Fri 6/9/17 ..., I- T 1 day Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 1FS+10 days (b) (5) Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 35 Thu 6/1/17 Wed 6/14/17 39FS+40 days Tue 4/4/17 35 Tue 4/4/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M (b) (5) Complete work on GSA site for access CTIMR add road and 1 day drainage repair into work Have CTIMR repair all 10 days drainage and roads from access point to beyond eastern end Identify turnaround 4 hrs location for vehicles Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 E Mon 4/17/17 Mon 4/17/17 18 SWPPP Maintenance during construction SWPPP Removal at end of prototype removal Worksite Access Confirm routing with RE and BP GSA Permit for site access/work CATEX or Waiver March B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000221 DHS-17-0040-B-000221 E Febru B ID Task Mode 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 51 52 ~ Ill ~ 54 ~ 55 ~ 56 m ~ 57 ml ~ 58 Duration Start Finish Tue 4/4/17 Predecessors Verify turn radius for Flatbe4 hrs Tue 4/4/17 Create turnaround 1 day moving jersey barriers as Mark ingress and egress routes for deliveries Maintain roads during construction (CTIMR) Remove signs at end of construction and prototype removal Restore jersey barriers Thu 6/15/17 Thu 6/15/17 40 March B M E April B M E May B M June B M E E July B M E August B M pursue updated license 15 days with CALTRANS Complete RE transaction 30 days for access on eastern half of access road USACE/CBP RE confirm RE 1 day green on site area CBP Hire survey crew to 5 days survey site Survey completed and 2 days marked CBP Personnel verify 1 day extent of survey areas Environmental waiver Mon 3/20/17 Mon 3/20/17 Original waiver and CATEX 5 days reviewed for applicablity (failing waiver) CATEX updated as needed Mon 5/22/17 60 Memorandum for Record issues on CATEX update Site Visit 52 days September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M (b) (5) Fri 4/7/17 1 Fri 4/28/17 1 Mon 5/1/17 Mon 5/1/17 51,50 Mon 6/12/17 Mon 6/19/17 Mon 3/20/17 Fri 6/16/17 50 Tue 6/20/17 53 Mon 3/20/17 (b) (5) Fri 5/26/17 (b) (5) ==1~.,~ 't-J__________________ ======= l===~ I=== -= -= ~~~~~~===== ---;59 E 41 Restore road to pre-prototype condition Real Estate Clearance 49 53 Task Name Mon 3/27/17Wed 6/7/17 o Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Milestone Inactive Summary o I Start-only Summary I I Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary I I Duration-only External Tasks External Milestone I I Manual Progress Deadline Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000222 DHS-17-0040-B-000222 E Febru B ID 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 0 v v v v v v v v Task Mode ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 69 v ~ 70 m; ~ 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ~ v ~ Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March B M E April B M Coordinate planning trip 2 days with OBP and Sector Plan site visit days with 1 day Sector Identify location for 1 day pre-visit meeting Determine if multiple 1 day groups required Determine duration of visit1 day Mon Tue 3/28/17 1FS+5 days 3/27/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 35SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS M Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS _.. Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS _.. Choreograph actual site 1 day visit from parking area discussion through site Conduct site visits for 2 days bidding vendors Capture any open 2 days discussion items/questions to be Provide answers to 5 days procurement on open Procurement post answers1 day Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 E E June B M E July B M E E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 5SS Thu 5/18/17 Fri 5/19/17 67SS Mon Fri 5/26/17 68 5/22/17 Wed 6/7/17 Wed 6/7/17 (b) (5) Determine process for 1 day routing names to BP for background check (similar to USACE) Determine POC for BP for 1 day checks Determine funding and 1 day rfp requirements for site security (access control) Plan PR as required to 1 day support Determine location of 1 day access checkpoint (at turn from (b) (7)(E) ?) Coordinate checkpoint with local PD Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS ~1 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 72SS Tue 4/4/17 Tue 4/4/17 74 I Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 62SS (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Milestone August B M 63 Site Security Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 May B M o Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000223 DHS-17-0040-B-000223 E Febru B ID Task Mode 78 79 v 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ~ ~ v v v v v v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 87 ~ 88 ~ 89 Task Name Duration Determine process for scheduling contractor deliveries Write-up security checkpoint for Temporary facilities Start Finish 10 days Tue 4/4/17 Mon 4/17/17 5 days Tue 5/16/17 Mon 5/22/17 Predecessors E April B M E May B M E June B M E July B E August B M E September B M E October B M E November B M E December B M E January B M 78FS+20 days (b) (5) Mon Fri 3/31/17 1 3/20/17 Mon 4/3/17 Mon 4/3/17 81 evaluate and finalize selection Award contract 1 day Tue 4/18/17 Tue 4/18/17 84FS+5 days 1 day Wed 4/19/17 Wed 4/19/17 85 Install facilities NLT 2 days 1 day before start Notify for removal when complete Prototype Testing 90 Develop Testing Protocol 40 days 91 Develop Test Plan 92 Develop Test Schedule 93 Procure Test Tools 94 Determine Test Team 95 Develop Team Training Pla 96 Conduct Team Training 97 Conduct Tests Tue 4/4/17 Wed 4/5/17 82 l Mon 4/10/17 Mon 4/10/17 83FS+3 days Fri 8/4/17 Fri 8/4/17 4/10 t ~ 14SS-2 days (b) (5) Mon 3/20/17 Fri 5/12/17 (b) (5) Task Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline Inactive Summary Start-only Critical Summary Manual Task Finish-only Critical Split Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks Progress Milestone M 76 Determine requirements 10 days (toilets and wash-stations) Create PR or determine if 1 day purchase card can be used Create SOW (6 month 2 days requirement) Issue RFP/TO 0 days Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 March B M o Manual Progress Page 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000224 DHS-17-0040-B-000224 E Febru B ID 98 99 100 101 102 0 Task Mode Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors March I Gather results and write report Notify vendors to remove mockups and prototypes Vendors remove mockups and prototypes Update Design Standards Design Standards Review Project: Prototype Detailed Sch Date: Fri 6/23/17 (b) (7)(E) I April I I May I I I I June I I I July I I August I Inactive Task Manual Summary Rollup External Milestone o Split Inactive Milestone Manual Summary Deadline ... Inactive Summary Start-only Summary Manual Task Finish-only Project Summary Duration-only External Tasks o October November December January (b)(5) (7)(E) (b) Task Milestone September Manual Progress Critical [ J Critical Split Progress Page 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000225 DHS-17-0040-B-000225 Febru Rapid Response Contract Timeline Jan-17 Feb-17 Environmental (b) (5) Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Procure Env and Survey Contracts Outreach (public and land managers) Environmental Surveys Biological & Cultural Report Environmental Stewardship Plan Rapid Response Contract Board of Directors Review and Acceptance Draft Construction RFP Pre-Final & Final RFP Prep/Review* RFP Advertise through Award Design Analysis and Submittal Reviews Construction Period *Includes legal review, comment review, and engineering review. Please Note: This schedule is draft. Baseline schedule will be developed as a part of the project development team's project requirement document. USACE and CBP are researching additional construction strategies to reduce durations and result in earlier construction start Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000226 DHS-17-0040-B-000226 Rapid Response Contract Timeline (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Jan-17 Feb-17 Environmental Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Procure Env and Survey Contracts Outreach (public and land managers) Environmental Surveys Biological & Cultural Report Environmental Stewardship Plan Rapid Response Contract Board of Directors Review and Acceptance Draft Construction RFP Pre-Final & Final RFP Prep/Review* RFP Advertise through Award Design Analysis and Submittal Reviews Construction Period *Includes legal review, comment review, and engineering review. Please Note: This schedule is draft. Baseline schedule will be developed as a part of the project development team's project requirement document. USACE and CBP are researching additional construction strategies to reduce durations and result in earlier construction start Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000227 DHS-17-0040-B-000227 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 Environmental May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 (b) (5) (b) (5) Procure Env and Survey Contracts Outreach (public and land managers) Environmental Surveys Biological & Cultural Report Environmental Stewardship Plan Real Estate Site Visit & Tract Ownership Research Right of Entry (ROE) Declaration of Taking Devel. & Review DOJ Files Action & Obtain ROE-S Metes & Bounds Survey & Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Offer to Sell - Private Landowner Declaration of Taking (CBP/USACE/DOJ) Aug-17 Sep-17 Average Timeline (days) Example Phase 1 Project (b) (5) (b) (5) Design and Acquisition A/E RFP Development & Award Draft Construction RFP & Survey Pre-Final & Final RFP Prep/Review* RFP Advertise through Award Complete Design (60,90,100%) (b) (5) *Includes legal review, comment review, and engineering review. Please Note: This schedule is draft. Baseline schedule will be developed as a part of the project development team's project requirement document. USACE and CBP are researching additional construction strategies to reduce durations and result in earlier construction start Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000228 DHS-17-0040-B-000228 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Activity ENV (b) (5) Envorinmental Funds Received Procurement of ESP & Survey Contracts Public Outreach Coordination with Land Managers Environmental Surveys Draft Biological & Cultural Report Draft ESP Review Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Final Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Review Draft ESP Issue Comments Issue Final ESP Environmental Clearance Start Finish (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000229 DHS-17-0040-B-000229 Duration Predecessor 30 1 30 3 7 3 14 12 From RE, 4 30 6 30 6 7 8 7 9 7 10 7 11 12 Functional Area Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental BW8 FOIA CBP 000230 DHS-17-0040-B-000230 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Activity USBP Phase I Requirements Defined BPAM GIS Validation of Requirements Project Team On-site Reconnaisance Real Estate Planning Funds Received Tract Ownership Validation Data Approach for ROE & Exploration Condemn for ROE Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) File Action (DOJ) Court Awards Possession for Survey ROE-S Obtained or Exercise Eminent Domain For Survey Metes & Bounds Survey (Aliquot) Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Real Estate Acquisition Funds Received Negotiate w/ Land Owner Secure Offer to Sell Exercise Eminent Domain Closing on Offer to Sell Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) Deposit Estimate of Just Compensation w/Court and File Action Court Awards Possession Real Estate Certified Start (b) (5) (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000231 DHS-17-0040-B-000231 Finish Duration Predecessor (b) (5) (b) (5) Functional Area Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate BW8 FOIA CBP 000232 DHS-17-0040-B-000232 Assumptions Agency Acceptance of (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000233 DHS-17-OO40-B-000233 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Activity PRD Received Draft A/E RFP A/E RFP Review Final A/E RFP A/E IGE Funds Receipt for Design Solicit A/E A/E Proposal Prep Proposal Received Proposal Review & Acceptance Award Package Assembly Award Package Review A/E Award Kickoff Draft RFP Prep & Survey Draft RFP Submittal Draft RFP Review Comment Review Conference Pre-Final RFP Prep Pre-Final RFP Submittal Pre-Final RFP Review Comment Review Conference Final RFP Prep Final RFP Submittal Final RFP Review Funds Received for Construction Legal Review Advertise milestone Advertise period SSEB SSEB Report SSA Report Prepare Award CBP CN D/B Construction Award Receipt of Bonds Design Kickoff/NTP 60% Design 60% Design Review 60% Design Comment Resolution 90% Design 90% Design Review 90% Design Comment Resolution 100% Design 100% Design Review & Backcheck 100% Design Acceptance Start Finish Duration (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000234 DHS-17-0040-B-000234 47 Pre-Construction Meeting 48 Mobilization 49 Construction Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000235 DHS-17-0040-B-000235 Predecessor - 3 3 FF (b) (5) 5 & 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 & 12(RE) FF - 19 20 21 22 23 24 (b) (5) 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Functional Area Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Assumption LPTA (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000236 DHS-17-0040-B-000236 46 Design & Acq 47 Design & Acq 48 & 25 From RE Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000237 DHS-17-0040-B-000237 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Activity ENV (b) (5) Envorinmental Funds Received Procurement of ESP & Survey Contracts Public Outreach Coordination with Land Managers Environmental Surveys Draft Biological & Cultural Report Draft ESP Review Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Final Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Review Draft ESP Issue Comments Issue Final ESP Environmental Clearance Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000238 DHS-17-0040-B-000238 Finish Duration Predecessor (b) (5) 1 3 6 6 9 Functional Area Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental BW8 FOIA CBP 000239 DHS-17-0040-B-000239 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Activity ENV (b) (5) Envorinmental Funds Received Procurement of ESP & Survey Contracts Public Outreach Coordination with Land Managers Environmental Surveys Draft Biological & Cultural Report Draft ESP Review Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Final Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Review Draft ESP Issue Comments Issue Final ESP Environmental Clearance Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000240 DHS-17-0040-B-000240 Finish Duration Predecessor (b) (5) Functional Area Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental BW8 FOIA CBP 000241 DHS-17-0040-B-000241 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Activity USBP Phase I Requirements Defined BPAM GIS Validation of Requirements Project Team On-site Reconnaisance Real Estate Planning Funds Received Tract Ownership Validation Data Approach for ROE & Exploration Condemn for ROE Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) File Action (DOJ) Court Awards Possession for Survey ROE-S Obtained or Exercise Eminent Domain For Survey Metes & Bounds Survey Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Real Estate Acquisition Funds Received Negotiate w/ Land Owner Secure Offer to Sell Exercise Eminent Domain Closing on Offer to Sell Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) Deposit Estimate of Just Compensation w/Court and File Action Court Awards Possession Real Estate Certified Start (b) (5) (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000242 DHS-17-0040-B-000242 Finish Duration Predecessor (b) (5) Functional Area Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000243 DHS-17-0040-B-000243 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Activity PRD Received Draft A/E RFP A/E RFP Review Final A/E RFP A/E IGE Funds Receipt for Design Solicit A/E A/E Proposal Prep Proposal Received Proposal Review & Acceptance Award Package Assembly Award Package Review A/E Award Kickoff Draft RFP Prep & Survey Draft RFP Submittal Draft RFP Review Comment Review Conference Pre-Final RFP Prep Pre-Final RFP Submittal Pre-Final RFP Review Comment Review Conference Final RFP Prep Final RFP Submittal Final RFP Review Funds Received for Construction Legal Review Advertise milestone Advertise period SSEB SSEB Report Discussions Revised Proposals SSEB Report SSA Report Prepare Award CBP CN D/B Construction Award Receipt of Bonds Design Kickoff/NTP 60% Design 60% Design Review 60% Design Comment Resolution 90% Design 90% Design Review 90% Design Comment Resolution Start Finish Duration (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000244 DHS-17-0040-B-000244 47 48 49 50 51 52 100% Design 100% Design Review & Backcheck 100% Design Acceptance Pre-Construction Meeting Mobilization Construction Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000245 DHS-17-0040-B-000245 Predecessor - 3 ff (b) (5) 5 & 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 15 16 17 18 & 12(RE) FF - 19 20 21 22 23 24 (b) (5) 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Functional Area Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000246 DHS-17-0040-B-000246 46 47 48 49 50 51 & 25 From RE Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000247 DHS-17-0040-B-000247 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Environmental Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 (b) (5) (b) (5) Procure Env and Survey Contracts Outreach (public and land managers) Environmental Surveys Biological & Cultural Report Environmental Stewardship Plan Real Estate Site Visit & Tract Ownership Research Right of Entry (ROE) Declaration of Taking Devel. & Review DOJ Files Action & Obtain ROE-S Metes & Bounds Survey & Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Offer to Sell - Private Landowner Declaration of Taking (CBP/USACE/DOJ) Aug-17 Sep-17 Average Timeline (days) Example Phase 1 Project (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Design and Acquisition A/E RFP Development & Award Draft Construction RFP & Survey Pre-Final & Final RFP Prep/Review* RFP Advertise through Award Complete Design (60,90,100%) *Includes legal review, comment review, and engineering review. Please Note: This schedule is draft. Baseline schedule will be developed as a part of the project development team's project requirement document. USACE and CBP are researching additional construction strategies to reduce durations and result in earlier construction start Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000248 DHS-17-0040-B-000248 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Activity ENV (b) (5) Envorinmental Funds Received Procurement of ESP & Survey Contracts Public Outreach Coordination with Land Managers Environmental Surveys Draft Biological & Cultural Report Draft ESP Review Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Final Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Review Draft ESP Issue Comments Issue Final ESP Environmental Clearance Start Finish (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000249 DHS-17-0040-B-000249 Duration Predecessor 30 1 30 3 7 3 14 12 From RE, 4 30 6 30 6 7 8 7 9 7 10 7 11 12 Functional Area Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental BW8 FOIA CBP 000250 DHS-17-0040-B-000250 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Activity USBP Phase I Requirements Defined BPAM GIS Validation of Requirements Project Team On-site Reconnaisance Real Estate Planning Funds Received Tract Ownership Validation Data Approach for ROE & Exploration Condemn for ROE Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) File Action (DOJ) Court Awards Possession for Survey ROE-S Obtained or Exercise Eminent Domain For Survey Metes & Bounds Survey (Aliquot) Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Real Estate Acquisition Funds Received Negotiate w/ Land Owner Secure Offer to Sell Exercise Eminent Domain Closing on Offer to Sell Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) Deposit Estimate of Just Compensation w/Court and File Action Court Awards Possession Real Estate Certified Start -- (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) - (b) (5) (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000251 DHS-17-0040-B-000251 Finish Duration (b) (5) Predecessor 1 1 1 - 3(FF (b) (5) 14 5 7,8 10 5 5 5 6 9 10 11 11 5 15 SS W/13 30 13 14(FF- (b) (5) 14 14,15,16 17 30 5 10 - FF FF 18 19 21 (b) (5) (b) (5) 24 Functional Area Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate BW8 FOIA CBP 000252 DHS-17-0040-B-000252 Assumptions Agency Acceptance of (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000253 DHS-17-OO40-B-000253 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Activity PRD Received Draft A/E RFP A/E RFP Review Final A/E RFP A/E IGE Funds Receipt for Design Solicit A/E A/E Proposal Prep Proposal Received Proposal Review & Acceptance Award Package Assembly Award Package Review A/E Award Kickoff Draft RFP Prep & Survey Draft RFP Submittal Draft RFP Review Comment Review Conference Pre-Final RFP Prep Pre-Final RFP Submittal Pre-Final RFP Review Comment Review Conference Final RFP Prep Final RFP Submittal Final RFP Review Funds Received for Construction Legal Review Advertise milestone Advertise period SSEB SSEB Report SSA Report Prepare Award CBP CN D/B Construction Award Receipt of Bonds Design Kickoff/NTP 60% Design 60% Design Review 60% Design Comment Resolution 90% Design 90% Design Review 90% Design Comment Resolution 100% Design 100% Design Review & Backcheck 100% Design Acceptance Start Finish Duration (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000254 DHS-17-0040-B-000254 47 Pre-Construction Meeting 48 Mobilization 49 Construction Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000255 DHS-17-0040-B-000255 Predecessor - 3 3 FF (b) (5) 5 & 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 & 12(RE) F - 19 20 21 22 23 24 (b) (5) 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Functional Area Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Assumption LPTA (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000256 DHS-17-0040-B-000256 46 Design & Acq 47 Design & Acq 48 & 25 From RE Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000257 DHS-17-0040-B-000257 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Activity ENV (b) (5) Envorinmental Funds Received Procurement of ESP & Survey Contracts Public Outreach Coordination with Land Managers Environmental Surveys Draft Biological & Cultural Report Draft ESP Review Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Final Draft Biological & Cultural Reports Review Draft ESP Issue Comments Issue Final ESP Environmental Clearance Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000258 DHS-17-0040-B-000258 Finish Duration Predecessor Functional Area Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000259 DHS-17-0040-B-000259 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Activity USBP Phase I Requirements Defined BPAM GIS Validation of Requirements Project Team On-site Reconnaisance Real Estate Planning Funds Received Tract Ownership Validation Data Approach for ROE & Exploration Condemn for ROE Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) File Action (DOJ) Court Awards Possession for Survey ROE-S Obtained or Exercise Eminent Domain For Survey Metes & Bounds Survey Valuation Acquire Title Insurance Real Estate Acquisition Funds Received Negotiate w/ Land Owner Secure Offer to Sell Exercise Eminent Domain Closing on Offer to Sell Assemble DT Package DT Package Reviews (USACE/CBP/DOJ) Deposit Estimate of Just Compensation w/Court and File Action Court Awards Possession Real Estate Certified Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000260 DHS-17-0040-B-000260 Finish Duration Predecessor (b) (5) (b) (5) Functional Area Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Proj Initiation Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate BW8 FOIA CBP 000261 DHS-17-0040-B-000261 # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Activity PRD Received Draft A/E RFP A/E RFP Review Final A/E RFP A/E IGE Funds Receipt for Design Solicit A/E A/E Proposal Prep Proposal Received Proposal Review & Acceptance Award Package Assembly Award Package Review A/E Award Kickoff Draft RFP Prep & Survey Draft RFP Submittal Draft RFP Review Comment Review Conference Pre-Final RFP Prep Pre-Final RFP Submittal Pre-Final RFP Review Comment Review Conference Final RFP Prep Final RFP Submittal Final RFP Review Funds Received for Construction Legal Review Advertise milestone Advertise period SSEB SSEB Report Discussions Revised Proposals SSEB Report SSA Report Prepare Award CBP CN D/B Construction Award Receipt of Bonds Design Kickoff/NTP 60% Design 60% Design Review 60% Design Comment Resolution 90% Design 90% Design Review 90% Design Comment Resolution Start Finish Duration (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000262 DHS-17-0040-B-000262 47 48 49 50 51 52 100% Design 100% Design Review & Backcheck 100% Design Acceptance Pre-Construction Meeting Mobilization Construction Start (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000263 DHS-17-0040-B-000263 Predecessor 3 (b) (5) ff 5 & 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 15 16 17 18 & 12(RE) FF - (b) (5) 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Functional Area Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000264 DHS-17-0040-B-000264 46 47 48 49 50 51 & 25 From RE Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq Design & Acq BW8 FOIA CBP 000265 DHS-17-0040-B-000265 Building The Wall April 7, 2017 (b) (7)(E) Timelines Homeland Security PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000266 DHS-17-0040-B-000266 (b) (7)(E) Wall - Optimistic Schedule 4/11/2017 7/15/2017 5/15/2017 9/15/2017 10/15/2017 (b) (5) (b) (5) 4/1/2017 ? All dates are notional (b) (7)(E) ? First wall segment approximately (b) (7)(E) miles ? Schedule is forward leaning o (b) (5) o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000267 DHS-17-0040-B-000267 2 (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Wall - Segment Optimistic Schedule (b) (5) 2/15/2018 ? All dates are notional - (b) (5) ? Assumes funding availability for (b) (7)(E) segment award ? Schedule is forward leaning o (b) (5) o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000268 DHS-17-0040-B-000268 3 Homegland Securlty BW8 FOIA CBP 000269 DHS-17-OO40-B-000269 Activity ID Activity Name (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Planning Funds Received Kick-off Meeting PLAN1020 PRD Complete (b) (5) ESPs - (b) (5) ENV1020 ESP Contract ENV1030 ESP Complete ROE-SE AE-S1000 A/E SOW Complete AE-S1010 A/E RFP Complete AE-S1020 A/E Proposal Received AE-S1030 Pre-Award Activities AE-S1040 ROE-S Required AE-S1050 Award (b) (7)(E) Draft RFP Prep AE-C1010 Draft Submittal Review AE-C1020 Pre-Final RFP Prep AE-C1030 Pre-Final Submittal Review AE-C1040 Final RFP Prep AE-C1050 Final RFP Review AE-C1060 RTA 05 DB Solicitation & SSEB DB-S1000 Solicitation Reviews DB-S1010 Construction Funds Required DB-S1020 Advertisement Period DB-S1030 SSEB DB-S1040 SSEB Report Prepared DB-S1050 Prepare & Approve Decision Doc (b) (7)(E) 06 Award Prep & Award AP1000 Pre-Award Activities AP1010 Congressional Notification AP1020 Award (b) (7)(E) 07 DBB Contract CON1030 Bonding and Submittals CON1040 Pre-Con/NTP CON1050 Mobilization CON1060 Construction Start (b) (7)(E) 08 DB Contract DES1000 Design Kick-Off DES1010 60% Design DES1020 60% Submittal Review DES1030 90% Design DES1040 90% Submittal Review DES1050 100% Design (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) 04 A/E Contract AE-C1000 (b) (7)(E) 07-Apr-17 03 A/E Solicitation & Award AE-S1045 2017 ar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep (b) (5) 02 Environmental ENV1010 (b) (7)(E) Remaining Predecessors Duration 01 Planning Phase PLAN1010 ENV1000 Finish RGV Sector Schedule PLAN1000 (b) (7)(E) Start 0d Planning Funds Received (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000270 DHS-17-0040-B-000270 Activity ID Activity Name DES1060 100% Backcheck RE1000 RE Certification Required CON1000 Design Acceptance/Pre-Con CON1010 Mobilization CON1020 Construction Start Start Finish Remaining Predecessors Duration 2017 ar Apr May Jun Jul 2018 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000271 DHS-17-0040-B-000271 Activity ID Activity Name (b) (7)(E) HYBRID HYB (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Start Wall with (b) (7)(E)(b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Finish Remaining Duration (b) (7)(E) 187d 10-Apr-17 0d Planning Funds Received PLAN1010 Kick-off Meeting PLAN1020 PRD Complete - (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.02 Environmental HYB ENV1010 (b) (5) ESPs (b) (5) ENV1020 ESP Contract ENV1030 ESP Complete ENV1000 (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.04 A/E Solicitation & Award HYB AE-S1000 A/E SOW Complete AE-S1010 A/E RFP Complete AE-S1020 A/E Proposal Preparation AE-S1030 Pre-Award Activities AE-S1040 ROE-S Required AE-S1050 Award (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.05 A/E Contract HYB AE-C1000 Draft RFP Prep AE-C1010 Draft Submittal Review AE-C1020 Pre-Final RFP Prep AE-C1030 Pre-Final Submittal Review AE-C1040 Final RFP Prep AE-C1050 Final RFP Review AE-C1060 RTA (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.06 DB Solicitation & SSEB HYB DB-S1000 Solicitation Reviews DB-S1010 Construction Funds Required DB-S1020 Advertisement Period DB-S1030 SSEB DB-S1040 SSEB Report Prepared DB-S1050 Prepare & Approve Decision Doc (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.07 Award Prep & Award HYB AP1000 Pre-Award Activities AP1010 Congressional Notification RE1010 RE Certification for DBB features AP1020 Award (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.08 DBB Features of Contract HYB CON1030 Bonding and Submittals CON1040 Pre-Con/NTP CON1050 Mobilization CON1060 Construction Start - (b) (7)(E) HYBRID.09 HYB DB Features of Contract DES1000 Design Kick-Off DES1010 60% Design DES1020 60% Submittal Review DES1030 90% Design DES1040 90% Submittal Review DES1050 100% Design 2017 r Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018 Jan Feb Mar Apr (b) (5) HYBRID.01 Planning Phase HYB PLAN1000 Calendar (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) 5 - Day Workweek (w/ Holidays) Planning Funds Received (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000272 DHS-17-0040-B-000272 Activity ID Activity Name DES1060 100% Backcheck RE1000 RE Certification Required CON1000 Design Acceptance/Pre-Con CON1010 Mobilization CON1020 Construction Start Start Finish Remaining Duration Calendar 2017 2018 Apr (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000273 DHS-17-0040-B-000273 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 (b) (5) Planning & Coordination Project Plan Complete IBWC Coordination Meeting (b) (5) Stakeholder Outreach (b) (5) Environmental (b) (5) Environmental Contract (b) (5) Real Estate Land Owner Research (public tax records) Title Research Acquisition Design & Engineering (b) (5) (b) (5) A/E Solicitation Geotechnical & Survey Work Construction RFP Development (b) (5) Construction Solicitation (Review, Solicit., Proposals) Source Selection through Award Construction (b) (5) Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000274 DHS-17-0040-B-000274 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Planning & Coordination Project Plan Complete IBWC Coordination Meeting Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 (b) (5) (b) (5) Stakeholder Outreach Environmental (b) (5) (b) (5) Environmental Contract (b) (5) Real Estate Land Owner Research (public tax records) Title Research Acquisition (b) (5) Design & Engineering (b) (5) A/E Solicitation Geotechnical & Survey Work Construction RFP Development Construction Solicitation (Review, Solicit., Proposals) Source Selection through Award Construction (b) (5) (b) (5) Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000275 DHS-17-0040-B-000275 - (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) - Project -001 Schedule Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Planning & Coordination Project Plan Complete IBWC Coordination Meeting Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) Stakeholder Outreach (b) (5) (b) (5) Environmental (b) (5) Environmental Contract Real Estate Title Research Acquisition (b) (5) Design & Engineering (b) (5) A/E Solicitation Geotechnical & Survey Work Construction RFP Development Construction Solicitation (Review, Solicit., Proposals) Source Selection through Award Construction (b) (5) (b) (5) Assumptions: (b) (5) BW8 FOIA CBP 000276 DHS-17-0040-B-000276 BW8 FOIA CBP 000277 DHS-17-0040-B-000277 Wall Acquisition Executive Steering Committee (ESC) May 3, 2017 Homeland Security PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000278 DHS-17-0040-B-000278 Agenda ? Wall Acquisition ESC Overview ? (b) (7)(E) Border Wall System Overview ? Status of the ADM for ADE-1 ? Status & Schedule for ADE-2A/B documentation ? Prototype Schedule ? RFI Status & Schedule Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000279 DHS-17-0040-B-000279 2 2 Wall Acquisition ESC ? Purpose of the Wall ESC: The ESC provides a recurring, formalized opportunity for the Chief Acquisition Executive (CAE) and appropriate DHS and CBP leadership and technical experts to engage in appropriate oversight of the proposed Wall investment, in accordance with Department policies and procedures, to ensure sound management, review, support and oversight of Wall-related activities. ? Facilitator/Owner: i, Chief Acquisition Executive (Wall Acquisition ESC Facilitator) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) , Wall Program Manager (b) (6) ? Frequency: Monthly (to be reevaluated as program matures) ? Attendees: CBP, CRSO, S&T, Policy, DOT&E, OCPO, JRC, CFO, CTO, PARM Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000280 DHS-17-0040-B-000280 3 Executive Order ? Fulfill the President's mandate to "secure the nation's southern border through the immediate construction of a physical wall, monitored and supported by adequate personnel so as to prevent illegal immigration, drug and human trafficking and acts of terrorism." NEW MEXICO II UNITED S TATES (b) (7)(E) j r ? Obtain and maintain complete operational control of the southern border through infrastructure investment, enforcement resources, technology and enhanced operational tactics and strategy ? Plan, design and construct a physical wall using materials and technology along approximately 1,200 miles of the United States border with Mexico Homeland Security Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000281 DHS-17-0040-B-000281 4 Southwest Border Operational Requirements USBP Capabilities 1. Domain Awareness (technology/intelligence) 2. Impedance and Denial (wall) 3. Mobility and Access (roads) 4. Mission Readiness (agents/equipment) Requirement for impedance and denial has increased - Evolution of threat - More demanding definition of operational control Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLYJune 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000282 DHS-17-0040-B-000282 5 Analysis of Border Wall Alternatives 1----1 Prototype I I I I I L____ Existing Toolkit I+ I I I '---~-----.. Analysis of Operational Factors (b) (7)(E) _________ ,/ V -- Optimal Wall Solution for Each Segment of Border Range of Wall Options Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000283 DHS-17-0040-B-000283 6 I&D Summary: SWB Chief Patrol Agents' Requests for Total Miles of Barrier The table below summarizes the TOTAL Barrier Requests from the SWB CPAs. The complete submittal from the CPAs is currently ongoing additional analysis. Types of Barrier ? Primary Fence ? Secondary Fence ? Replace (Primary or Secondary) ? Vehicle to Primary Sector RGV LRT DRT EPT BBT TCA YUM ELC SDC Total Total Miles for All Barrier Types Vehicle-to- Primary Secondary Replacement Primary (b) (7)(E) Presenter's Name PRE Total June 17, 2003 7 BW8 FOIA CBP 000284 DHS-17-0040-B-000284 Acquisition Status o CBP is following the DHS Acquisition process for each segment of the wall, to validate the need and cost of the project, and ensure fair and open competition. o On March 14, the Acquisition Review Board (ARB) reviewed the CBP Wall program. The purpose of the ARB was to assess the Wall program's Acquisition Decision Event 1 (ADE-1) readiness. o On April 14, the CBP Wall program was granted an ADE-1. The program was added to the Master Acquisition Oversight List (MAOL). Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000285 DHS-17-0040-B-000285 8 4 Initial Program Priorities ? Will slide Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000286 DHS-17-0040-B-000286 9 Prototype WALL PROTOTYPE (b) (5) APR 04 Concepts due from Vendors; Evaluation begins MAR 17 Solicitation to Industry I I JUL 18-25 Contract awarded; Construction JUN 06 begins AUG 22 Designs due Prototype from Construction selected complete Vendors I 1- . ACQUISITION CONSTRUCTION MARCH TO JULY JULY TO AUGUST INSERT DEF of PROTOTYPE and MB LANGUAGE Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000287 DHS-17-0040-B-000287 10 Prototype Schedule 3/17/2017 Solicitation to Industry 4/4/2017 Concept Papers Due 4/1/2017 5/8/2017 Down Select to up to 20 Vendors Notified 5/1/2017 5/30/ 2017 Design Proposals 7/12/2017 Due From Source Down Selected Selection Best Value Determination Vendors 6/1/2017 8/22/2017 Prototype Construction Completes 7/18/2017 Contracts Awarded / 7/1/2017 3/1/2017 8/31/2017 5/16 to 18/2017 Down Select Contractors Site Visits 7/25/2017 Prototype Construction Begins Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Dates subject to change BW8 FOIA CBP 000288 DHS-17-0040-B-000288 11 (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) WALL (b) (5) Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000289 DHS-17-0040-B-000289 12 (b) (7)(E) MID-MAY Contract for Design Awarded APR 13 USACE Wall IAA Awarded (b) (7)(E) WALL DESIGN APRIL TO JUNE FY17 (b) (5) (b) (5) FY18 - (b) (7)(E) ? Draft initial Project schedule in Primavera (April 25) ? Communication milestone chart (April 25) ? (b) (5) (May 4) (b) (5) ? (May 5) (b) (5) ? (May 15) (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) ? (3 projects) (May 25) (b) (5) ? (May 30) (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) ? Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000290 DHS-17-0040-B-000290 13 ADE-1& ADE-2A/B: Status & Schedule ? Currently, efforts are focused on the ADE-2A/B schedule completion. ? Kick off meeting scheduled for Tuesday, May 2 with CBP (OA and OFAM), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL), USACE/ERDC (Engineering Research and Development Center) to support the Wall AA. ? The purpose of this meeting is to define roles and responsibilities, and discuss the methodology and approach for AA completion. ? Pre kick off meeting regarding CBP cost estimate baseline and Independent Cost Estimate with DHS PARM, CAD, OA and BPAM PMO ? Provided CAD the LCCE for the current TI and the draft CEBD Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000291 DHS-17-0040-B-000291 14 5 Next Steps ? The scope of the Wall Program will continue to evolve over time ? CBP will continue to work closely with our DHS counterparts to continue to share information, including a Integrated Master Schedule that coalesces all aspects of the Wall Program Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000292 DHS-17-0040-B-000292 15 Homegland Securlty BW8 FOIA CBP 000293 DHS-17-OO40-B-000293 (b) (7)(E): Status & Schedule - DRAFT (b) (5) Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000294 DHS-17-0040-B-000294 17 6 Wall IPT Weekly Update May 11, 2017 Homeland Security PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000295 DHS-17-0040-B-000295 Agenda ? Outreach & Public Engagement o Dashboard o Freedom of Information Act ? Acquisition Management o Overall ? Procurement and Execution o FY17 Reprogramming Efforts o FY17 Enacted Budget o FY18 President's Budget Request ? Additional Items o Request for Information o Red Teams o Buy American Act Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000296 DHS-17-0040-B-000296 2 2 Outreach & Public Engagement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000297 DHS-17-0040-B-000297 3 Outreach & Public Engagement Dashboard Since We Started 5/11 - 5/19 5/19 - 5/26 ? 4/20 - International Boundary Water Commission (IBWC) Kick-Off Meeting ? 5/12 - Prototype Down Select Notifications ? ? (b) (5) ? 4/26 - U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Kick-Off Meeting ? 4/27 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) Kick-Off Meeting ? ? ? Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000298 DHS-17-0040-B-000298 4 4 Freedom of Information Act Requests NUMBER OF REQUESTS ORGANIZATION RECENTLY COMPLETED Total Recently Completed OPEN American Oversight Center for Biological Diversity CNN Pikes Peak Progressives Project on Government Oversight (POGO) ProPublica Reuters Sierra Club Texas Civil Rights Project The Center for Investigative Reporting The Desert Sun The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law Total Open APPEALS Sierra Club 0 7 2 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 26 1 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000299 DHS-17-0040-B-000299 5 5 Acquisition & Procurement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000300 DHS-17-0040-B-000300 6 Acquisition Management ? Executive Steering Committee (ESC): ? First ESC May 3 ? Next ESC June 1 ? Cost Estimating Baseline Decision (CEBD) and Life Cycle Cost Estimate (LCCE): ? ECD for LCCE and CEBD is August 1 ? Integrated Master Schedule: ? 80% draft document by Friday, May 12 ? IMS will continue to expand as additional individual project schedules are (b) (7)(E) developed (e.g. fence replacement, , etc.) ? Alternatives Analysis (AA): ? Component Acquisition Executive and Program to define guidance to Johns Hopkins University & USACE Engineer Research and Development Center Monday, May 15 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000301 DHS-17-0040-B-000301 7 Planning & Execution Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000302 DHS-17-0040-B-000302 8 FY17/18 Border Wall Planned Expenditures Planned Projects Planned Expenditures (b) (5), (b) (7)(E) Reprogramming | $20M (b) (5) Architecture/Engineering (New design standard, geo-tech, topography surveys) Planning Requirements (A/E, real estate, environmental) Wall Prototype Construction Enacted FY2017 | $341M Total Southwest Border: 1,954 mi Type Barrier Qty Cost 1 (b) (7)(E) Primary Barrier Replace Single (b) (7)(E) (b)(3) 2(b) (7)(E) rimary Barrier Replace Single New Single Type Barrier -- 3 (b) (7)(E) Proposed FY2018 | (b) (5) 4 5 6 * Planned expenditures are based upon Border Patrol operational requirements, constructability & OMB guidance. (b) (7)(E) Qty Cost (b) (5) (b) (5) 9 PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000303 DHS-17-0040-B-000303 FY 17 San Diego Sector Border Wall Prototype Project Description o o o Industry-tested approach to define the best solution when considering a new product or methodology Approximately twenty offerors (from each solicitation - concrete and "unspecified materials") will be selected for the down select pools Solicitation of cost/price and technical proposals will take place so that awards can be made for multiple prototype builds Funding/Cost o Funding is allocated from the FY17 $20M Reprogramming o Up to 8 prototypes at $500K each = $4M o Fencing and security, site preparation and equipment, testing and evaluation, and contingency planning = $1.4M Status Update o First phase of solicitation - 90% complete Schedule APR 04 Concepts due from Vendors; Evaluation begins MAR 17 Solicitation to Industry ACQUISITION MARCH TO JULY JUL 26 Contract awarded; Construction JUN 06 begins SEPT 01 Designs due Prototype from selected Construction Vendors complete o Down-select notifications anticipated May 12 o San Diego site visit scheduled May 18 & 19 CONSTRUCTION AUGUST 04 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000304 DHS-17-0040-B-000304 10 FY17 San Diego Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description o (b) (7)(E) pedestrian fence replacement located in San Diego's Border Infrastructure System o Funding/Cost - FY17 Enacted: $146M for(b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement o (b)(3) o Current landing mat fence will be replaced with Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) *Assumes funding received by June 1 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000305 DHS-17-0040-B-000305 11 FY17 TBD Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description o o Funding/Cost (b) (5) o o - FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o USBP identifying requirement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000306 DHS-17-0040-B-000306 12 FY17 El Paso Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description Funding/Cost o (b) (7)(E) pedestrian fence replacement (b) (7)(E) o o FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement o ~ - (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000307 DHS-17-0040-B-000307 13 FY17 El Paso Sector Vehicle Fence Replacement Project Description Funding/Cost o ~(b) (7)(E) vehicle fence replacement (b) (7)(E) o l - o FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) vehicle fence replacement o ~ (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000308 DHS-17-0040-B-000308 14 FY17 (b) (7)(E) Project Description (b) (7)(E) o Funding/Cost o Prior year funding on-hand at USACE: (b) (5) o FY17 Enacted: $49M (b)(3) o Cost estimate: o This includes: - (b)(3) for Construction (b)(3) for Real Estate - - Schedule o To be determined Status Update o Real estate planning underway o o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000309 DHS-17-0040-B-000309 15 FY18 Rio Grande Valley Sector New (b) (7)(E) Project Description o Funding/Cost (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) o $498M requested in President's Budget (b)(3) o o Reprogramming: (b)(3) Status Update o Real estate and environmental planning underway o o (b) (5) o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000310 DHS-17-0040-B-000310 16 FY18 Rio Grande Valley Sector New Border Barrier System Funding/Cost Project Description o o Construction of (b) (7)(E) of border barrier (b) (7)(E) system in the & (b) (7)(E) area of responsibility This border barrier system includes a combination of various types of infrastructure (b) (7)(E) such as wall, fence, and allweather roads o To be determined (b)(3) o o Includes construction planning,;~ (b) (7)(E) ; real estate, and; construction oversight and staffing Status Update Schedule o $784M requested in President's Budget o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000311 DHS-17-0040-B-000311 17 FY18 San Diego Sector Secondary Fence Replacement Project Description o (b) (7)(E) of new border barrier (replacing secondary fence) in the Border Infrastructure System o Funding/Cost o $251M requested in President's Budget o Readily executable due to Federallyowned land Rough Order of Magnitude: o Reprogramming: - (b)(3) (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o Pending completion of prototype Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000312 DHS-17-0040-B-000312 18 Additional Items Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000313 DHS-17-0040-B-000313 19 Request for Information ? DHS Science and Technology (S&T) completed review of Wall RFI responses ? Broken into topical categories ? "Owners" for topical categories will receive responses for their consideration and market research ? DHS S&T prepared to provide seed funding for some technology initiatives ? Follow-on meeting will ratify or adjust priorities ? OA will develop feedback to industry ? FedBizOps announcement Summary of RFI response categories ? Potential industry day/webinar Homeland Security o Consulting o Technology o Finance o Other o Conceptual Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Services o Duplicate June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000314 DHS-17-0040-B-000314 20 Red Teams ? Goal: Identify risks and mitigations for the wall system, to include real estate and environmental; outputs will be documented, stratified, and analyzed to develop recommendations to further refine CBP's border wall system strategy ? Tentatively scheduled for (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000315 DHS-17-0040-B-000315 21 Buy American Act ? OCC to provide update Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000316 DHS-17-0040-B-000316 22 Homegland Securlty BW8 FOIA CBP 000317 DHS-17-OO40-B-000317 Wall IPT Weekly Update May 11, 2017 Homeland Security PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000318 DHS-17-0040-B-000318 Agenda ? Outreach & Public Engagement o Dashboard o Freedom of Information Act ? Acquisition Management o Overall ? Procurement and Execution o FY17 Reprogramming Efforts o FY17 Enacted Budget o FY18 President's Budget Request ? Additional Items o Request for Information o Red Teams o Buy American Act Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000319 DHS-17-0040-B-000319 2 2 Outreach & Public Engagement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000320 DHS-17-0040-B-000320 3 Outreach & Public Engagement Dashboard Since We Started 5/11 - 5/19 5/19 - 5/26 ? 4/20 - International Boundary Water Commission (IBWC) Kick-Off Meeting ? 5/12 - Prototype Down Select Notifications ? (b) (5) ? ? 4/26 - U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) Kick-Off Meeting ? 4/27 - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (FWS) Kick-Off Meeting ? ? ? Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000321 DHS-17-0040-B-000321 4 4 Freedom of Information Act Requests NUMBER OF REQUESTS ORGANIZATION RECENTLY COMPLETED Total Recently Completed OPEN American Oversight Center for Biological Diversity CNN Pikes Peak Progressives Project on Government Oversight (POGO) ProPublica Reuters Sierra Club Texas Civil Rights Project The Center for Investigative Reporting The Desert Sun The University of Texas at Austin - School of Law Total Open APPEALS Sierra Club 0 7 2 4 1 4 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 26 1 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000322 DHS-17-0040-B-000322 5 5 Acquisition & Procurement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000323 DHS-17-0040-B-000323 6 Acquisition Management ? Executive Steering Committee (ESC): ? First ESC May 3 ? Next ESC June 1 ? Cost Estimating Baseline Decision (CEBD) and Life Cycle Cost Estimate (LCCE): ? ECD for LCCE and CEBD is August 1 ? Integrated Master Schedule: ? 80% draft document by Friday, May 12 ? IMS will continue to expand as additional individual project schedules are (b) (7)(E) developed (e.g. fence replacement, , etc.) ? Alternatives Analysis (AA): ? Component Acquisition Executive and Program to define guidance to Johns Hopkins University & USACE Engineer Research and Development Center Monday, May 15 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000324 DHS-17-0040-B-000324 7 Planning & Execution Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000325 DHS-17-0040-B-000325 8 FY17/18 Border Wall Planned Expenditures Planned Projects Planned Expenditures (b) (7)(E), (b) (5) Reprogramming | $20M Architecture/Engineering (b) (5) (New design standard, geo-tech, topography surveys) Planning Requirements (A/E, real estate, environmental) Wall Prototype Construction Enacted FY2017 | $341M (b) (7)(E) 1 2 Total Southwest Border: 1,954 mi 3 (b) (7)(E) Primary Barrier (b) (7)(E) Primary Barrier (b) (7)(E) Proposed FY2018 | (b) (5) 4 Rio Grande Valley - 5 Rio Grande Valley - Border Barrier System 6 San Diego Secondary Barrier * Planned expenditures are based upon Border Patrol operational requirements, constructability & OMB guidance. Type Barrier Qty Replace Single (b) (7)(E) Replace Single New Single Type Barrier Qty Cost (b)(3) Cost (b) (5) Planning for FY2019 & Beyond 9 PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000326 DHS-17-0040-B-000326 FY 17 San Diego Sector Border Wall Prototype Project Description o o o Industry-tested approach to define the best solution when considering a new product or methodology Approximately twenty offerors (from each solicitation - concrete and "unspecified materials") will be selected for the down select pools Solicitation of cost/price and technical proposals will take place so that awards can be made for multiple prototype builds Funding/Cost o Funding is allocated from the FY17 $20M Reprogramming o Up to 8 prototypes at $500K each = $4M o Fencing and security, site preparation and equipment, testing and evaluation, and contingency planning = $1.4M Status Update o First phase of solicitation - 90% complete Schedule APR 04 Concepts due from Vendors; Evaluation begins MAR 17 Solicitation to Industry ACQUISITION MARCH TO JULY JUL 26 Contract awarded; Construction JUN 06 begins SEPT 01 Designs due Prototype from selected Construction Vendors complete o Down-select notifications anticipated May 12 o San Diego site visit scheduled May 18 & 19 CONSTRUCTION AUGUST 04 Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000327 DHS-17-0040-B-000327 10 FY17 San Diego Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description o o Funding/Cost - ~(b) (7)(E) pedestrian fence replacement located in San Diego's Border Infrastructure System - FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement o (b)(3) o Current landing mat fence will be replaced with (b) (7)(E) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000328 DHS-17-0040-B-000328 11 FY17 TBD Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description o o Funding/Cost (b) (5) o o - FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o USBP identifying requirement Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000329 DHS-17-0040-B-000329 12 FY17 El Paso Sector Primary Pedestrian Fence Replacement Project Description Funding/Cost o (b) (7)(E) pedestrian fence replacement (b) (7)(E) o o - FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) primary pedestrian fence replacement (b)(3) o Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000330 DHS-17-0040-B-000330 13 FY17 El Paso Sector Vehicle Fence Replacement Project Description Funding/Cost o ~(b) (7)(E) vehicle fence replacement (b) (7)(E) o - o FY17 Enacted: $146M for (b) (7)(E) vehicle fence replacement o ~ (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o o o Real estate and environmental planning underway (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000331 DHS-17-0040-B-000331 14 FY17 (b) (7)(E) Project Description (b) (7)(E) o Funding/Cost o Prior year funding on-hand at USACE: (b) (5) o FY17 Enacted: $49M (b)(3) o Cost estimate: o This includes: - (b)(3) for Construction (b)(3) for Real Estate - - Schedule o To be determined Status Update o Real estate planning underway o o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000332 DHS-17-0040-B-000332 15 FY18 Rio Grande Valley Sector New (b) (7)(E) Project Description o Funding/Cost (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) o $498M requested in President's Budget o $ (b)(3) o Reprogramming: (b)(3) Status Update o Real estate and environmental planning underway o o (b) (5) o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000333 DHS-17-0040-B-000333 16 FY18 Rio Grande Valley Sector New Border Barrier System Funding/Cost Project Description o o Construction of (b) (7)(E) of border barrier (b) (7)(E) system in the )& (b) (7)(E) ) area of responsibility This border barrier system includes a combination of various types of infrastructure (b) (7)(E) such as wall, fence, and allweather roads o To be determined (b)(3) o o Includes construction (b) (7)(E) ; real estate, and; construction oversight and staffing Status Update Schedule o $784M requested in President's Budget o (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000334 DHS-17-0040-B-000334 17 FY18 San Diego Sector Secondary Fence Replacement Project Description o o - ~(b) (7)(E) of new border barrier (replacing secondary fence) in the Border Infrastructure System Funding/Cost o $251M requested in President's Budget o Readily executable due to Federallyowned land Rough Order of Magnitude: o Reprogramming: - (b)(3) (b)(3) Status Update Schedule* (b) (5) o Pending completion of prototype Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000335 DHS-17-0040-B-000335 18 Additional Items Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000336 DHS-17-0040-B-000336 19 Request for Information ? DHS Science and Technology (S&T) completed review of Wall RFI responses ? Broken into topical categories ? "Owners" for topical categories will receive responses for their consideration and market research ? DHS S&T prepared to provide seed funding for some technology initiatives ? Follow-on meeting will ratify or adjust priorities ? OA will develop feedback to industry ? FedBizOps announcement Summary of RFI response categories ? Potential industry day/webinar Homeland Security o Consulting o Technology o Finance o Other o Conceptual Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Services o Duplicate June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000337 DHS-17-0040-B-000337 20 Red Teams ? Goal: Identify risks and mitigations for the wall system, to include real estate and environmental; outputs will be documented, stratified, and analyzed to develop recommendations to further refine CBP's border wall system strategy ? Tentatively scheduled for (b) (5) Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000338 DHS-17-0040-B-000338 21 Buy American Act ? OCC to provide update Presenter's Name PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000339 DHS-17-0040-B-000339 22 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) ? The IMS is intended to display all schedule activities and dependencies as they pertain to the FY17 ongoing actions for the Border Barrier System. This includes requirements under Management Direction 102-01 (i.e. (b) (7)(E) Acquisition Decision Events), Border Barrier Prototype Project, and the (b) (5) Project. ? Upcoming Milestones: ? o Management Direction 102-0 - Alternatives Analysis: May 1 (b) (5) - Status Updates & Path Forward: o o o (b) (5) o Border Barrier Prototype Project - (b) (5) o Rio Grande Valley (RGV) o Project (b) (5) Presenter's Name June 17, 2003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000340 DHS-17-0040-B-000340 23 Homegland Securlty BW8 FOIA CBP 000341 DHS-17-OO40-B-000341 CBP Enterprise Services Office of Facilities and Asset Management Wall Pre-Phase 1 and Phase 1 Strategy PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Prepared for the CBP Wall IPT February 10, 2017 U.S. Customs and Border Protection BW8 FOIA CBP 000342 DHS-17-0040-B-000342 Warning! This document, along with any attachments, contains NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION exempt from release to the public by federal law. It may contain confidential, legally privileged, proprietary or deliberative process inter-agency/intraagency material. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying, or further distribution of this information to unauthorized individuals is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized disclosure or release of this information may result in loss of access to information, and civil and/or criminal fines and penalties. U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000343 DHS-17-0040-B-000343 Overview ? Current State ? Lessons Learned ? Wall Expedited Strategies ? Acquisition Options - Estimated ? Proposed PMO Staffing ? Funding Requirements Timeline ? Key Environmental Milestones ? Key Real Estate Milestones ? Risks ? Back Up U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000344 DHS-17-0040-B-000344 Current State Current State Miles (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Type Pedestrian Fence (PF) Vehicle Fence (VF) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) 1,954 Total Miles along the SW Border CBP has the know-how and technical expertise to execute wall construction o (b) (7)(E) - - (b) (7)(E) ? There is a total of miles of fencing on the southwest border (more than of the border). The majority of this fencing--more than (b) (7)(E) --was constructed by CBP between 2007 and 2008 in accordance with a very ambitious deadline established by Congress. ? Many of the team that were part of this program will join the Wall Program o Internal to CBP to include OFAM, Office of Chief Counsel, Office of Public Affairs, and Office of Acquisition o Interagency partners to include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Department of Justice (DOJ), Department of Interior (DOI) and Department of State's International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) - building on the expertise as well as the lessons learned U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000345 DHS-17-0040-B-000345 Lessons Learned ? Throughout the Pedestrian Fence (PF) 225, PF 70 and Vehicle Fence (VF) 300 Programs, CBP, USACE, DOJ, DOI and IBWC worked collaboratively to identify lessons learned to be applied to future programs ? Below are some of the sample lessons that will be leveraged in the execution of a Wall Program Discipline Lesson Learned Wall Program Application Acquisition Delay in RFI release delayed development of appropriate acquisition vehicles Immediate focus on RFI with USACE. RFI was released on 2/2/2017, this will expedite the acquisition planning process Acquisition Bulk steel buy will expedite delivery of required steel (b) (5) Delaying decision to invoke the Secretary's waiver under IIRIRA negatively impacts the construction schedule (b) (5) Environmental Real Estate (b) (5) (b) (5) DHS's delayed decision to pursue (b) (5) condemnation where necessary delayed progress U.S.Customs and PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Border Protection 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000346 DHS-17-0040-B-000346 Wall Expedited Strategies CONSTRUCTION (b) (5) 4/1 PLANNING 1/ 6/30 (b) (5) RAPID RESPONSE (b) (5) -(b) (5) (b) (5) .... - - (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) - Approx.(b) (7)(E) - Const. Start: - Const. End: (b) (5) o (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) - Approx. (b) (7)(E) - Const. Start: (b) (5) - Const. End: (b) (5) - UNFUNDED (b) (5) - (b)(3) Required by 3/1/17 - UNFUNDED - Overseen by CBP - Overseen by USACE (b) (b) (5) Required by 3/1/17 - (b)(3) (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (b) (5) - Total potential miles completed by 12/31: (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) 12/31 10/31 Total ROM estimated cost: (b) (7)(E) 8(A) 9/30 8/1 (5) PHASE IA (b) (5) l (b) (5) - Approx. (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) Const. Start: Const. End: (b) (5) UNFUNDED (b) (5) equired by 3/1/17 (b)(3) (b) (5) Risk: - Overseen by USACE - Approx. (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) - Const. Start: (b) (7)(E) ....,..approx. (b) (7)(E) ) - Const. End: (b) (5) only (b) (7)(E) - UNFUNDED (b) (5) Required by 5/1/17 - (b)(3) - Overseen by USACE PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 6 BW8 FOIA CBP 000347 DHS-17-0040-B-000347 Acquisition Options - Estimated ? CBP is leveraging multiple methods to pursue innovative acquisition solutions to expedite wall construction schedules including direct engagement with vendors, alternate service providers (e.g. NAVFAC, AFCEC), requests for information (RFIs), etc. ? Strategies to date include: Strategy Miles 8(a) (Small Business) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) Mod to NACO (b) (7)(E) Rapid Response (b) (7)(E) Expedited Acquisition Options New or Construction Real Estate Replacement Award Date New Wall, Replacing VF (b) (5) Complete Replacement Complete Replacement Complete Construction Starts Environmental (b) (5) (b) (5) Suite of Acquisition Options Phase IA MATOC (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) New Wall (b) (5) Phase IA Remainder New Wall TBD TBD Feb-17 TBD Phase 2 New and Replacement TBD TBD TBD TBD (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection 7 PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000348 DHS-17-0040-B-000348 Proposed PMO Staffing Proposed Wall Program Staffing* Entity OFAM Current Onboard Desired Onboard (b) (5) Total USBP OCC (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) Acquisition OPA USACE DOJ Total TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD ( b ) ( 5 ) (b) (5) TBD TBD ? Wall execution is a collaborative program with key personnel across the enterprise. CBP is confident that although additional staffing resources will be required as the operation grows, we are sufficiently staffed to initiate execution of this highpriority program. ? Subject matter experts at USACE are involved that have a deep understanding of the program and had involvement with prior fence programs *Includes all FTEs (government employees and contract staff) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 8 BW8 FOIA CBP 000349 DHS-17-0040-B-000349 Funding Requirements Timeline Amount (b) (5) Date Needed (b) (5) Purpose (b) (7)(E) -2 8(A) Option Rapid Response Phase IA TOTAL (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 9 BW8 FOIA CBP 000350 DHS-17-0040-B-000350 Key Environmental Milestones - Pre-Phase I and Phase I Activity Status Waiver Development & Issuance In progress Waiver Challenge Period Pending Procure Environmental Contracts In progress Outreach (public and land managers) Planning in progress Conduct Environmental Surveys Planning in progress Prepare draft Biological and Cultural Reports Planning in progress Finalize Biological and Cultural Reports Pending Prepare draft Environmental Stewardship Report Pending Finalize Environmental Stewardship Report Pending U.S. Customs and Border Protection Anticipated Start Anticipated Completion (b) (5) PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 10 BW8 FOIA CBP 000351 DHS-17-0040-B-000351 Key Real Estate Milestones - Pre-Phase I and Phase I Activity Pre-Phase 1 Fence Replacement Fence Swath o o (b) (5) Staging Area o (b) (5) Milestone o (b) (5) (b) (5) o Phase 1 New Construction (b) (5) Access Road (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) o (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection o (b) (5) PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 11 BW8 FOIA CBP 000352 DHS-17-0040-B-000352 Risks ? (b) (5) ? (b) (5) ? (b) (5) ? (b) (5) ? (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) ? Construction on the ? (b) (7)(E) (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12 BW8 FOIA CBP 000353 DHS-17-0040-B-000353 Questions? U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 13 BW8 FOIA CBP 000354 DHS-17-0040-B-000354 Back Up U.S. Customs and Border Protection PRE-DECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 14 BW8 FOIA CBP 000355 DHS-17-0040-B-000355 Example Phase 1A Project Schedule (b) (7)(E) -- Eim "ro 11' e n.till (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) De.aar?rtioo c,o ~.ki"; 10!:,..el s.-:!Re-~ ew DOJ 'ile!i M.ioo ~ o ~ j r..S:OE-.5 "' """' ~ l!laul'.d!: Su~ Ao:quir e Ol"'!er to fl. lla,!ioo t~ Ir: :.ir.?r: -,~ t e LDndcwn er Offlarolio rxilllcal; Bl'N SACE/001] ~ (b) (5) B:uildl,Qm tnc U,o q - - -,,., lnl o"'E" "Cf ll\,"roo nto rJ: l!loe.JPYe lop R?] P _ -.-..; fl. Ee,rulr011 ~ 1~ 11e lopme r:a;; O"'lt :J>:\io,rt FJ'P fl. Suro-.JPY -;l e I&. f<<: 'o RFP op,. .,;,,,..o r.,.-p thrOUE,h ........ rd .._ _rm,,, Dq ;i>-E>: Cs E [E!l..9J ,10Ctit) C On Feb 16, 2017, at 6:46 PM, (b) (6) < @omb.eop.gov< (b) (6) > > Thanks Kevin and team. Let me sync up with (b) (6) tomorrow's meeting. > > -----Original Message----> From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K [mailto > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 6:36 PM > To: EOP/OMB (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov< (b) (6) EOP/OMB @omb.eop.gov< (b) (6) > Cc: . EOP/OMB (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov (b) (6) (b) (6) . EOP/OMB (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov>> wrote: and (b) (6) and double check precisely what is needed for (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) -- - @omb eop gov>>; @omb.eop.gov>> @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) > Subject: RE: Wall Funding > > Adding C2; CFO; OFAM leads. > > (b) (6) > We are working quickly to come up with revised FY17 and FY18 costs based on the President's guidance. I can make the team available to discuss at 1000 tomorrow, but please understand that their initial estimates aren't even due to us until the end of the day, so they would be essentially giving guesstimates or ranges at this point. I know you need to have something for the meeting with the Director, though, so we want to support. I was told that (b) (6) and (b) (6) spoke today and (b) (6) conveyed the need for time. Thanks, > > KM > > -----Original Message----> From: . EOP/OMB @omb.eop.gov] (b) (6) (b) (6) > Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 6:27 PM > To (b) (6) . EOP/OMB @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) MCALEENAN, KEVIN K >> Cc: EOP/OMB (b) (6) < @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) - - DHS-17-0040-C-000001 BW8 FOIA CBP 000357 (b) (6) > Subject: RE: Wall Funding > > Following up on this -- any chance we can speak or meet tomorrow morning? As (b) (6) mentioned, we are meeting with the Director tomorrow mid-day. Having updated specs, even if notional, would be very helpful. > > Thanks, > > (b) (6) > > -----Original Message----> From: (b) (6) EOP/OMB > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:26 PM > To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K > < Cc: EOP/OMB (b) (6) EOP/OMB < @omb.eop.gov< @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) < @omb.eop.gov< @omb.eop.gov>> (b) (6) (b) (6) > Subject: RE: Wall Funding > > Thanks Kevin. Sounds good, just let us know the schedule. > > We'll hold time for late tomorrow afternoon; Friday morning will be more difficult since we expect to meet with our newly-sworn in Director, however before 10 may be possible. > > Thanks, > (b) (6) > Office of Management and Budget > (b) (6) > > > -----Original Message----> From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K [mailto (b) (6) > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:12 PM > To: (b) (6) EOP/OMB < (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/OMB < @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>> (b) (6) (b) (6) > Cc: EOP/OMB (b) (6) EOP/OMB < @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>>; (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov @omb.eop.gov>> (b) (6) (b) (6) > Subject: RE: Wall Funding > > Thank you. (b ) we have a meeting tomorrow with the Acting Deputy and I should have clarity on our path forward coming out of that. Perhaps we can meet late tomorrow or early Friday. Thanks, KM > > > > ________________________________ > > From: (b) (6) . EOP/OMB > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 6:21:39 PM > To: EOP/OMB; MCALEENAN, KEVIN K (b) (6) > Cc: . EOP/OMB; (b) (6) (b) (6) > Subject: RE: Wall Funding > > > Thanks (b) (6) --- - - DHS-17-0040-C-000002 BW8 FOIA CBP 000358 - > > Kevin, we're standing by for whatever makes most sense for next steps. (b) (6) and I are happy to come to you in the next few days to discuss CBP work to date, if that is convenient. > > Thanks, > (b) (6) > Office of Management and Budget > (b) (6) > > > -----Original Message----> From: . EOP/OMB (b) (6) > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 6:17 PM > > To: Cc: EOP/OMB (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov>; (b) (6) EOP/OMB (b) (6) (b) (6) < (b) (6) @omb.eop.gov> > Subject: Wall Funding > > Kevin> > Great meeting you today and appreciate your briefing. I wanted to start the process of getting your specifications on the wall so that we can continue to make budget decisions. I want to connect you with and (b) (6) (b) (6) on our team. Can you all connect? Thanks, > > (b) (6) > > -- - DHS-17-0040-C-000003 BW8 FOIA CBP 000359 From: To: Cc: DHS-OIG Office of Public Affairs (b) (6) Nielsen, Kirstjen; MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; SHERRI LEE; RICHARDSON, LYNN; GAO-OIG Liaison; Gottfried, Jordan; Maher, Joseph; Shuchart, Scott; Media Inquiry (b) (6) ; OIG"s DHS Liaison; DHS-OIG Office of Public Affairs; DHS-OIG Office of Legislative Affairs; (b) (6) (b) (6) Subject: Date: Attachments: OIG-17-70-SR "Lessons Learned from Prior Reports on CBP"s SBI and Acquisitions Related to Securing our Border " Monday, June 12, 2017 4:30:20 PM OIG-17-70-SR.pdf Good Afternoon, Attached is the final report, OIG-17-70-SR, "Lessons Learned from Prior Reports on CBP's SBI and Acquisitions Related to Securing our Border." *This is an advance copy that has not been made public by DHS OIG. Please do not distribute without OIG authorization. The projected date for delivery to Congress is June 13, 2017. The projected date for Web posting is June 14, 2017. Actual dates may differ please contact OIG to confirm. Thank you, Office of Public Affairs Office of Inspector General Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) Phone: www.oig.dhs.gov | Twitter: @DHSOIG DHS-17-0040-C-000004 BW8 FOIA CBP 000360 From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN To: Nielsen, Kirs_tjen; (6) Subject: FW: Border Wall Update (19-23 Jun) Date: Sunday, June 25, 2017 11:26:27 PM Kirstjen/W, Wanted to send a few more details on the Bordet wall update. KM From: gim- Sent: Sun ay, June 25, 2017 10:46:41 PM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Su nject: Borer Wall Update (19-23 Jun) Commissioner/Deputy, Bottom Line: Prototype procurement continues to progress, with the second evaluation hase undervva . Prototype Procurement: - Phaselk 0 Proposal review began June 14 and continues to progress. - Vendor oral presentations continue. The last presentation is currently scheduled for Thursday, June 29. - The Pricing and Evaluation Team delivered their draft report on pricing analysis today. I (5) FY17 Program Execution: - CBP awarded an architectural/engineering contract June 14 for 35% design of the (N5 of replacement wall to be constructed in San Diego, El Centro and El Paso Sectors. The 35% design will feed four design-build Requests for Proposals. 5 DHS-17-0040-C-000005 BW8 FOIA CBP 000361 (5) Acquisition Planning: - The Army Corps of Engineers continues to progress in the development of acquisition vehicles to allow for the execution of the FY 2017, 2018 and beyond replacement and new wall requirements. 0 Approximately 20 questions have been received from parties interested in the Pre-qualified Bidder?s list. The Army Corps, in collaboration with CBP, is developing answers to post to FedBizOps. The Pre-qualified Bidder?s list, the first large-scale vehicle to be used for replacement and new wall construction, remains on schedule for availability by late July 2017. Legal Challen oes: Partnering Outreach: - Border Patrol Enterprise Services finalized the border wall requirements analysis investment strategy. 0 On Wednesday, June 21, Border Patrol Enterprise Services briefed the DHS Under Secretary for Management, Chief Financial Officer and representatives from Program Analysis Evaluation. USM Fulghum suggested 0 On Friday, June 23, Border Patrol Enterprise Services briefed OMB General Government Practice Deputy (6) Homeland Security Branch Chief (6) and CBP Examiner (6) The tone was positive and overall OMB was supportive of the tool and its use to further explain our requirements and prioritization with the Appropriations Committees. - OPA continues working with DHS CPA and other partners to conduct a series of events to bring the public, via the media, up to date on the progress being made on the Wall. 0 (5) DHS-17-0040-C-000006 8W8 FOIA CBP 000362 (5) (5) - OPA continues to coordinate with DHS OPA, U.S. Border Patrol and the Offices of Congressional Affairs, Acquisition and Facilities and Asset Management to develop two additional events, detailed below. The interdisciplinary team will work with OPA to ensure these events ensure tranSoarenc without disru tin oerations or construction. - Congressional Engagement: 0 On Monday, June 19, USBP briefed the Roadmap and CGAP processes to HAC and SAC staff as a follow on to the June 15 series of briefings. The process discussion was very helpful to help staff understand the analysis underway that incorporates risk and threat considerations. 0 On Wednesday, June 21, Deputy Commissioner (5) oriefed Congressman Mark Amodei on the design and build process for the wall. The Congressman was interested in having a practical discussion on the process and was provided all relevant information. There were no oet-backs. VR, (6) (6) Executive Assistant Commissioner Enterprise Services US. Customs and Border Protection 6 DHS-17-0040-C-000007 8W8 FOIA CBP 000363 From: SZECD To: MCALEENAN KEVIN Subject: RE: Border Wall Update (24?28 Jul) Date: Sunday, July 30, 2017 10:15:25 PM Thank you. very informative. If you preparing this regularly I'd love to get a copy. Elaine Elaine C. Duke Deputy Secretary De?aitment of Homeland Sec1u'ity From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 8:37:27 PM To: Wolf, Chad; Fulghum, Chip; Hamilton, Gene Cc: Subject: FW: Bor er Wa Update (24-28 Jul) Madam Secretaly. A signi?cant amount of detail on the wall progress below. We can provide to you and/or Acting Deputy Secretary Fulghum and staff on a weekly basis at yom? preference. Thank you, KM From: Sent: Sun ay, Ju 30, 2017 8:19:31 PM To: MCALEENAN KEVIN Commissioner/Deputy: Bottom Line: The waiver for the San Diego border wall prototype and 14 miles of replacement wall was signed by the Secretary on 26 July (see attached) and is expected to publish in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 1 Aug. CBP filed its agency response tothe protest on 26 July. Prototype Procurement: Phasel: - As a result of Procurement?s internal compliance review, the four evaluated proposals that ranked low were sent unsuccessful offeror letters. Only one of these four vendors requested a debriefing. The fifth vendor that was evaluated DHS-17-0040-C-000008 BW8 FOIA CBP 000364 and invited into Phase II confirmed their intent to participate. Their proposal is due no later than August 17, 2017. - Notifications regarding the RFP protests were sent to appropriators on 26 Jul and to authorizers on 27 Jul. Phaselk - The Army Corps continues to make progress in developing the Pre-qualified Bidder?s List. Source selection began on time on Wednesday, July 12th and is now complete. USACE remains on track for mid-August availability. Legal Concerns: GAO Protests - Protests: In a decision dated July 20, the GAO o. .n uests for summary dismissal of both of the protests filed rotests: has until Monday, August 7, to file its response to the Agency Report. Waiver - On July 26, the Secretary signed the San Diego waiver. DHS OGC submitted the waiver to the Federal Register on July 28. The Federal Register will post the waiver on its website on Tuesday, August 1 at 8:45 am and will publish the waiver in the hard copy publication on Wednesday, August 2. The waiver will be legally effective upon publication. The waiver includes 38 environmental and natural resources laws. Embargoed notifications regarding the publication of the waiver will be sent to appropriate Congressional of?ces on July 31. Litigation DHS-17-0040-C-000009 BW8 FOIA CBP 000365 - Updates - FY2017 Fence Reolacement - FY 2018 New Construction 0 The 15% design meeting was held on Tuesday, July 25 for the- project in RGV. The project is still on schedule for Ready to Advertise (RTA) in mid-October Partnering Outreach: - Operation Unified Resolve is a multi-jurisdictional operation designed to ensure agencies execute integrated, flexible and coordinated measures to address protester threats and/or incidents in San Diego during the prototype construction of the border wall. On Thursday, July 27, BP held an executive update briefing with the San Diego and Chula Vista Police Departments, San Diego Sherriff, California Highway Patrol, San Diego County Fire, San Diego Fire Rescue as well as county officials. Public Affairs Congressional Affairs DHS-17-0040-C-000010 8W8 FOIA CBP 000366 (6) VR, (6) Executive Assistant Commissioner Enterprise Services US. Customs and Border Protection Off' 6 ()68 DHS-17-0040-C-00001 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000367 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K S2ECD; Wolf, Chad; Fulghum, Chip; Hamilton, Gene (b) (6) FW: Border Wall Update (24-28 Jul) Sunday, July 30, 2017 8:37:28 PM San Diego Waiver Fed Reg 20170728.pdf Madam Secretary, A significant amount of detail on the wall progress below. We can provide to you and/or Acting Deputy Secretary Fulghum and staff on a weekly basis at your preference. Thank you, KM (b) (6) From: Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2017 8:19:31 PM (b) (6) To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; Cc: (b) (6) Subject: Border Wall Update (24-28 Jul) Commissioner/Deputy: Bottom Line: The waiver for the San Diego border wall prototype and 14 miles of replacement wall was signed by the Secretary on 26 July (see attached) and is expected to publish in the Federal Register on Tuesday, 1 Aug. CBP filed its agency response to the (b)(3) protest on 26 July. Prototype Procurement: Phase I: - As a result of Procurement's internal compliance review, the four evaluated proposals that ranked low were sent unsuccessful offeror letters. Only one of these four vendors requested a debriefing. The fifth vendor that was evaluated and invited into Phase II confirmed their intent to participate. Their proposal is due no later than August 17, 2017. - Notifications regarding the RFP protests were sent to appropriators on 26 Jul and to authorizers on 27 Jul. Phase II: - (b) (5) Acquisition Planning: - Solar RFI is drafted, has been cleared by OMB, and is awaiting final C1 approval for release. CBP Procurement and the DHS Procurement Innovation Lab are discussing . (b) (5) DHS-17-0040-C-000012 BW8 FOIA CBP 000368 - The Army Corps continues to make progress in developing the Pre-quali?ed Bidder?s List. Source selection began on time on Wednesday, July 12th and is now complete. USACE remains on track for mid-August availability. Legal Concerns: GAO Protests - Protests: In a decision dated July 20, the GAO for summary dismissal of both of the protests filed by oranted re uests has until Monday, August 7, to file its response to the Agency Report. Waiver - On July 26, the Secretary signed the San Diego waiver. DHS OGC submitted the waiver to the Federal Register on July 28. The Federal Register will post the waiver on its website on Tuesday, August 1 at 8:45 am and will publish the waiver in the hard copy publication on Wednesday, August 2. The waiver will be legally effective upon publication. The waiver includes 38 environmental and natural resources laws. Embargoed notifications regarding the publication of the waiver will be sent to appropriate Congressional of?ces on July 31. Litigation - FOIA Uodates: Updates BW8 FOIA CBP 000369 - FY 2018 New Construction 0 The 15% design meeting was held on Tuesday, July 25 for the Partnering Outreach: - Operation Unified Resolve is a multi-jurisdictional operation designed to ensure agencies execute integrated, flexible and coordinated measures to address protester threats and/or incidents in San Diego during the prototype construction of the border wall. On Thursday, July 27, BP held an executive update briefing with the San Diego and Chula Vista Police Departments, San Diego Sherriff, California Highway Patrol, San Diego County Fire, San Diego Fire Rescue as well as county officials. Public Affairs Congressional Affairs (m (6) R, (6) Executive Assistant Commissioner Enterprise Services US. Customs and Border Protection Off' 6 DHS-17-0040-C-000014 BW8 FOIA CBP 000370 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: lb) (6) Subject: RE: Wall Funding Date: Friday, February 17, 2017 2:07:02 PM Thank you! I didn?t get that opponunity in the Original From: (6) (6) @OInbeolggov] Sent: Friday. Feblualy 17. 2017 2:03 PM To: MCALEENAN. KEVIN (6) Subject: Fwd: Wall Flulding (5) Of?ce of Management and Budget (5) Begin forwarded message: Fromz' (6) (6) @ombeopgm (6) Date: Febluary 17. 2017 at 2:01:14 PM EST To: KEVIN (6) Subject: Re: \Nall Flulding Thank you. (6) Of?ce of Management and Budget (6) On Feb 17. 2017. at 8:36 AM. MCALEENAN. KEVIN (6) mote: 10-4. Thanks DHS-17-0040-C-000015 8W8 FOIA CBP 000371 From: (0) (6) To: (6) . (6) (6) MCALEENAN KEVIN Cc: (6) (6) . EOPZWHO Subject: RE: Buy America Act Provisions for Border Wall Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:06:18 AM Thanks. Adding the Commissioner to this thread. We are really down to the wire now. Anything y'all can do to help advance this will be vely much appreciated. Semor Counselor to tl!e Secretary US. Department of Homeland Secru?ity I?ve asked USTR, and should hear back from them soon. From (6) Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:27 AM To: (6) (6) @who.eop.gov> (6) @who.eop.gov> Cc: (6) (6) @who.eop.gov>; (6) (6) @who.eop.gov> Subject: RE: Buy America Act Provisions for Border Wall And meant to add (6) (5) Senior Counselor to the Secretary U. Department of Homeland Security From: (6) Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:04 AM To: (6) (6) @who.eop.gov>; Cc: (6) (6) @who.eop.gov>; (6) (6) @who.eop.gov> Subject: RE: Buy America Act Provisions for Border Wall Good morning. everyone. DHS-17-0040-C-000016 BW8 FOIA CBP 000372 Any updates on the below? We're about two days away from a final deadline. Thanks again, (b) (6) Senior Counselor to the Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) From Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 10:42 AM To: . EOP/WHO' < @who.eop.gov>; (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO < (b) (6) @who.eop.gov> Cc: EOP/WHO' @who.eop.gov>; (b) (6) EOP/WHO' (b) (6) (b) (6) < (b) (6) @who.eop.gov> Subject: RE: Buy America Act Provisions for Border Wall Hi y'all, Our team is eager for some resolution here--we need a final answer by the 23rd. Please see below another summary that describes the situation: . . . . . . Construction of the Border Wall is a Presidential priority and time is of the essence To the maximum extent, we want walls to be constructed with American materials (concrete and steel) We are issuing requests for bids for the next segments of wall construction on or about August 31 (b) (5) DHS-17-0040-C-000017 BW8 FOIA CBP 000373 (b) (5) . Current status: (b) (5) CBP, through its partners at USACE, is nearly ready to issue Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the four FY17 fence replacement projects, each of which is likely to exceed $7.3 million in value. (b) (5) Decision request: (b) (5) Thanks! (b) (6) Senior Counselor to the Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) From: Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 1:24 PM To: . EOP/WHO' (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) Cc: KEVIN K MCALEENAN - (b) (6) - (b) (6) EOP/WHO < (b) (6) EOP/WHO' < (b) (6) @who eop.gov> Subject: FW: Buy America Act Provisions for Border Wall (b) (6) - ; @who.eop.gov> (b) (6) (b) (6) @who.eop.gov>; Good afternoon, (b) (6) Thanks for taking my call earlier. Below is the text of a message from CBP (Acting Commissioner McAleenan copied here) that captures the issue we discussed. We would like to arrange a call or meeting as soon as possible with you, Peter Navarro, and to (b) (6) bring an issue pertaining to the Buy American Act to resolution. Please note the highlighted DHS-17-0040-C-000018 BW8 FOIA CBP 000374 portions. The Buy American issue was first broached at the inception of the border wall/prototypes acquisition planning process in late February. (5) In early March, we spoke with Peter Navarro as well as the Acting US. Trade Representative (USTR), Stephen Vaughn, and laid out the Government?s options for reinstating the BAA for the border wall project. The three potential options discussed were as follows: (1) (2) (3) As a result of our discussions with Mr. Navarro and Mr. Vaughn, our office (5) As we understand it, USACE is putting the finishing touches on RFPs for El Paso vehicle fence replacement, San Diego primary fence replacement, El Paso primary fence replacement, and El Centro vehicle fence replacement. (5) DHS-17-0040-C-000019 8W8 FOIA CBP 000375 3 Please let us know ifyou would like to discuss further. or if we can facilitate any discussion on this. Thank you for your consideration. Senlor Counselor to the Secretary. U. S. Department of Homeland Security DHS-17-0040-C-000020 BW8 FOIA CBP 000376 From: Navarro Peter K. EOP WHO Cc: (6) MCALEENAN KEVIN (6) (6) - (6) -WHO Subject: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec"s of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:14:51 PM Attachments: mcaleenan (6) I spoke with. about this and am attaching documents that relate to a deadline for inclusion of Buy American provision in border wall bids. My office has been working a number of months now on this but we are at an impasse and a decision needs to be made forthwith. I am requesting an emergency meeting tomorrow morning at StaffSec?s office at 10 am. or 11 am. with representatives from CBP, USTR, DPC, OTM P, and WHLC. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Navarro Attachments (5) Various documents from CBP BW8 FOIA CBP 000377 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: Navarro Peter K. EOP WHO Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:34:52 AM As you requested, here are some highlights about the importance of a quick decision 011 the waiver Construction of the Border Wall is a Presidential priority and time is of the essence To the maximum extent. we want walls to be constructed with American materials (concrete and steel) We are issuing request sfor bids for the next segments of wall construction 011 or about August 31 For your information, I have pasted a more detailed narrative from(b) (6)as additional detail and background: Current status: The US. Trade Representative (USTR) has yet to act to reinstate the Buy American Act (BAA) for Government construction projects. such as the border wall. that exceed $7.3 million in value. As such, the Trade Agreements Act (TAA) currently governs any Government procurement for construction services valued above that threshold. BP, through its partners at USACE. is nearly ready to issue Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the four FY17 fence re lacernent ro'ects, each of which is like] to exceed $7.3 million in value. DHS-17-0040-C-000022 8W8 FOIA CBP 000378 Decision re nest: From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:28:56 AM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Would love updated bullets. Will push this issue aggressively this week? Was this issue ever brought to General Kelly?s attention? Is he read in? peter From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailto: (6) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:24 AM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Thanks Peter. We appreciate your ongoing support 011 that. Let me know if you need update bullets 011 where we stand. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesda Au ust 22, 2017 8:39:34 AM To: Cc: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: FW: Trade Enforcement update DHS-17-0040-C-000023 BW8 FOIA CBP 000379 USTR team, See yellow below. Kevin and CBP have been great allies. Peter From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailto: (6) Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:17 PM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Cc: (6) Subject: Trade Enforcement update Peter, I want to take this opportrmity to update you on the recent efforts rurdertaken by US. Customs and Border Protection (C BP) with respect to the application of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), speci?cally, the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) and the President's Executive Order on Trade Enforcement. EAPA outlined a process for the American industry to identify potential instances where goods have been imported into the Unites States through evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Working together with American industry on our initial cases has produced immediate results. Speci?cally, the Thailand and Malaysian wire hanger investigations outlined in our recent press release, which you can access via the included link below, highlight 110w BP is partnering with the sole American wire hanger manufactru?er to protect American jobs from this transshipment evasion. Bloomberg and others have ah?eady picked 11p the good news. This is not the only group of investigations we have rmderway, but it represents the ?st completed investigation and has led to the American manufactru'er ?ling eight more allegations of transshipment evasion that we are investigating and have enacted interim measru'es upon. This partnership prevents the further evasion of over $33 million in antidumping duties and will allow the American company to reinvest its resom'ces to expand production in the United States. I would like to hi 111i ht that it has been critical to our initial success to be able t- of production or in these recent cases, lack of production capability. That said, TFTEA legislation was an authorization without explicit appropriation, 1mless the trade enforcement trust funds are considered available, and as a result, in order to continue such enforcement efforts, BP continues to look for solutions to grow oru? (5), (5), (NB (5), (7)05) Thank you for your continued interest and support on this veiy important issue. Thank you, Kevin DHS-1 7-0040-C-000024 BW8 FOIA CBP 000380 From: (6) To: MMLEENAN KEVIN Subject: FW: Trade Enforcement update Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:23:32 AM Response to your date question. (6) (5) Notlce' FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY matenal covered by the Pm'acy Act of 1974 and should be \?1ewed only by personnel haVIng an offimal "need to know." If you are not the 111tended reelp1ent. be aware that any d1sclosu1?e d1smbut10n or use of the content of tlus mfomlatlon 1s prolublted If you have recen?ed connmuucanon 111 error. please 110t1f_\' me umned1ately by enlall and delete the ongmal message. From: (6) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:19 AM To: Cc: (6) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update V/r, 6) From: (6) DHS-17-0040-C-000025 8W8 FOIA CBP 000381 Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:10 AM To: (6) Cc: (6) Subject: FW: Trade Enforcement update AC, Commissioner asked for your assessment on Mr. Navarro's question on waiting to the 25th for a decision? He also asked for an update on the waiver. Last I left the issue, I saw traffic from our team to (6) at OMB. Any updates? (6) (6) Notice: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY th1s transmission contams matenal covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and should be \iewed only by personnel havmg an o?ic1al "need to know." If you are not the intended rec1p1ent be aware that any disclosure. copymg. distribution or use of the content of this mfomlation 1s prolublted. Ifyou have received t111s comnnuucatlon 111 enor, please notlfy me 1111111ed1ately by email and delete the original message From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:53:13 AM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Moving paper on this. Can we have until Aug 25 to make a decision? Aug 23 is pushing the From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [m Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:47 AM To: Navarro, Peter K. (5) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update For General Kelly, it was more an update and issue identi?cation, than a decision point at the time. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:34:34 AM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN DHS-17-0040-C-000026 BW8 FOIA CBP 000382 Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Roger that. Did the General express any opinion or was it just a situational awareness discussion? Just trying to get context before I push this. From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [m Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:33 AM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update It was raised mid-Spring to Gen. Kelly. but was still in work. Now it's urgent. Will forward momentarily. Thanks again for your help. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:28:56 AM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Would love updated bullets. Will push this issue aggressively this week? Was this issue ever brought to General Kelly's attention? Is he read in? peter From: MCALEENAN, [m Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:24 AM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Thanks Peter. . We appreciate yoru' ongoing support on that. Let me know if you need update bullets 011 where we stand. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesda Au ust 22, 2017 8:39:34 AM To: Cc: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: FW: Trade Enforcement update USTR team, See yellow below. Kevin and CBP have been great allies. Peter DHS-17-0040-C-000027 BW8 FOIA CBP 000383 From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [n (6) Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:17 PM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Cc: (6) Subject: Trade Enforcement update Peter. I want to take this opportrurity to update you on the recent efforts rurdertaken by US Customs and Border Protection (C BP) with respect to the application of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), speci?cally, the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) and the President's Executive Order on Trade Enforcement. EAPA outlined a process for the American industry to identify potential instances where goods have been imported into the Unites States through evasion of antidurnping and cormtervailing duty orders. Working together with American industry on our initial cases has produced irmnediate results. Speci?cally, the Thailand and Malaysian wire hanger investigations outlined in om' recent press release, which you can access via the included link below. highlight how BP is partnering with the sole American wire hanger manufactlu?er to protect American jobs ?'om this transshipment evasion. Bloomberg and others have ah'eady picked up the good news. This is not the only group of investigations we have underway. but it represents the fn'st completed investigation and has led to the American manufactru?er ?ling eight more allegations of transshipment evasion that we are investigating and have enacted interim measures upon. This partnership prevents the fluther evasion of over $33 million in antidlunping duties and will allow the American company to reinvest its resom?ces to expand production in the United States. I would like to hi 111i ht that it has been critical to our initial success to be able to- of production or in these recent cases, lack of production capability. That said, TFTEA legislation was an authorization without explicit appropriation, unless the trade enforcement trust funds are considered available, and as a result. in order to continue such enforcement efforts, BP continues to look for solutions to grow oru? . . (5). (5), (NE (D) (5): Thank you for yoru? continued interest and support on this very important issue. Thank you. Kevin DHS-17-0040-C-000028 BW8 FOIA CBP 000384 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: (6) EOP OMB Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:33:13 PM I will be at OAC in San Diego, mum and (6) andm should be there. Frankly, we just don't want anyone to surprised. 0111' number one 0 Jective is to avoid having the schedule slip. Buy American issue is second, but we get the politics and want to go in eyes open with fmgerprints from the relevant White House players. Crazy week--was on the border yesterday in AZ, called back to DC ., to ?y back down to AZ on Air Force One on the off chance we need to brief the President on the way to 001 plane though! Hope you are well. From: w. Sent: Tue ay, August 22, 2017 2:27:56 PM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec?s of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Yep. As usual, we See you or hear your voice tomorrow? From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailto: (6) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:27 PM To: (6) (6) @0mb.eop.gov> Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow resolve border wall issue Great question. actually asked if he could share our concerns with OMB. My response was, haven't you een working this since March? From: w. Sent: Tue ay, August 22, 2017 2:24:07 PM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec?s of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Yep. I?ll be there. Not sure why CBP left us out of this and then raised it as a fire on Friday From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [m Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:22 PM DHS-1 7-0040-C-000029 BW8 FOIA CBP 000385 To: EOP/OMB @omb.eop.gov> (b) (6) (b) (6) Subject: FW: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue FYSA (b) (6) From: EOP/WHO Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:39:18 PM (b) (6) (b) (6) To: Navarro, Peter K. EOP/WHO; EOP/WHO (b) (6) (b) (6) Cc: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; EOP/WHO; (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO; (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO; EOP/WHO; EOP/OMB Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue - I am happy convene a meeting tomorrow, if doing so could help the group reach consensus. Please let (b) (6) , copied here, know if you--or a proxy--can attend a meeting tomorrow on this topic in the Staff Secretary's office at either 10 or 11 am. We can set up a dial-in for those who may be traveling. As I understand it, there are several issues that would need to be resolved on a quick time frame to move forward, some of which would likely require Presidential involvement. Therefore, if we can convene a meeting, I would propose to organize the discussion around these 6 questions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (b) (5) Given possible budgetary implications of any decision, I've added OMB to this chain. Thanks, 1 1 (b) (6) From: Navarro, Peter K. EOP/WHO Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:14 PM @who.eop.gov>; To: (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO < (b) (6) @who.eop.gov>; (b) (6) EOP/WHO (b) (6) @who.eop.gov> DHS-17-0040-C-000030 BW8 FOIA CBP 000386 Cc: (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) @who.eop.gov>; ; MCALEENAN, KEVIN K . EOP/WHO (b) (6) EOP/WHO < (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) @who.eop.gov>; . EOP/WHO @who.eop.gov> (b) (6) Subject: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue (b) (6) I spoke with about this and am attaching documents that relate to a deadline for inclusion of Buy American provision in border wall bids. (b) (6) (b) My office has been working a number of months now on this but we are at an impasse and a decision needs to be made forthwith. I am requesting an emergency meeting tomorrow morning at StaffSec's office at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. with representatives from CBP, USTR, DPC, OTMP, and WHLC. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Navarro Attachments (b) (5) Various documents from CBP DHS-17-0040-C-000031 BW8 FOIA CBP 000387 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: (6). Subject: FW: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec"s of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Date: Tuesda Au ust 22 2017 12:23:49 PM mum imb? (5) mcaleenan Need (6) and(b) (6) 01- there. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesda Au-ust 22 2017 12:14:uject: Request or Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue (6) I spoke with. about this and am attaching documents that relate to a deadline for inclusion of Buy American provision in border wall bids. My office has been working a number of months now on this but we are at an impasse and a decision needs to be made forthwith. I am requesting an emergency meeting tomorrow morning at StaffSec?s office at 10 am. or 11 am. with representatives from CBP, USTR, DPC, OTM P, and WHLC. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Navarro Attachments (5) Various documents from CBP DHS-17-0040-C-000032 BW8 FOIA CBP 000388 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: (6) Subject: FW: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec"s of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:37:39 PM Attachments: mca eenan .Q Can you fowvard Peter the letter we sent to From: Navarro, Peter K. uject: Request or Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue (6) I spoke with. about this and am attaching documents that relate to a deadline for inclusion of Buy American provision in border wall bids. My office has been working a number of months now on this but we are at an impasse and a decision needs to be made forthwith. I am requesting an emergency meeting tomorrow morning at StaffSec?s office at 10 am. or 11 am. with representatives from CBP, USTR, DPC, OTM P, and WHLC. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Navarro Attachments (5) Various documents from CBP DHS-17-0040-C-000033 BW8 FOIA CBP 000389 From: MCALEENAN KEVIN To: Navarro Peter K. EOP WHO Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:35:04 AM As you requested. here are some highlights about the importance of a quick decision 011 the waiver Construction of the Border Wall is a Presidential priority and time is of the essence To the maximum extent. we want walls to be constructed with American materials (concrete and steel) We are issuing request sfor bids for the next segments of wall construction 011 or about August 31 For your information. I have pasted a more detailed narrative from (6) as additional detail and background: Current status: BP, through its partners at USACE. is nearly ready to issue Requests for Proposals (RFP) for the four FY17 fence re lacernent ro'ects, each of which is like] to exceed $7.3 million in value. DHS-17-0040-C-000034 BW8 FOIA CBP 000390 Decision re uest: From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:28:56 AM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Would love updated bullets. Will push this issue aggressively this week? Was this issue ever brought to General Kelly?s attention? Is he read in? peter From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailto (6) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 10:24 AM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Subject: RE: Trade Enforcement update Thanks Peter. . We appreciate your ongoing support 011 that. Let me know if you need update bullets 011 where we stand. From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Tuesda Au ust 22, 2017 8:39:34 AM c: Subject: FW: Trade Enforcement update DHS-17-0040-C-000035 8W8 FOIA CBP 000391 USTR team, See yellow below. Kevin and CBP have been great allies. Peter From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailt02 (6) Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 4:17 PM To: Navarro, Peter K. (6) Cc: (6) Subject: Trade Enforcement update Peter, I want to take this opportrmity to update you on the recent efforts rurdertaken by US. Customs and Border Protection (C BP) with respect to the application of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015 (TFTEA), speci?cally, the Enforce and Protect Act (EAPA) and the President's Executive Order on Trade Enforcement. EAPA outlined a process for the American industry to identify potential instances where goods have been imported into the Unites States through evasion of antidumping and countervailing duty orders. Working together with American industry on our initial cases has produced immediate results. Speci?cally, the Thailand and Malaysian wire hanger investigations outlined in our recent press release, which you can access via the included link below, highlight 110w BP is partnering with the sole American wire hanger manufactru?er to protect American jobs from this transshipment evasion. Bloomberg and others have ah?eady picked 11p the good news. This is not the only group of investigations we have rmderway, but it represents the ?st completed investigation and has led to the American manufactru'er ?ling eight more allegations of transshipment evasion that we are investigating and have enacted interim measru'es upon. This partnership prevents the further evasion of over $33 million in antidumping duties and will allow the American company to reinvest its resom'ces to expand production in the United States. I would like to hi 111i ht that it has been critical to our initial success to be able to- production or in these recent cases, lack of production capability. That said, TFTEA legislation was an authorization without explicit appropriation, 1mless the trade enforcement trust funds are considered available, and as a result, in order to continue such enforcement efforts BP continues to look for solutions to 'ow oru? investigative capability. 5, 7 Thank you for your continued interest and support on this veiy important issue. Thank you, Kevin DHS-17-0040-C-000036 BW8 FOIA CBP 000392 From: (6) . To: MCALEENAN KEVIN Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Date: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:34:58 PM Exciting times! I figured you were down there. Still need to catch up but I know things aren?t slowing From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [mailtoz (5) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:33 PM To: (6) (6) @omb.eop.gov> Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow resolve border wall issue Iwill be at COAC in San Diego, but (6) (6) and (5) should be there. Frankly, we just don't want anyone to be smprised. Our nlunber one objective is to avoid having the schedule slip. Buy American issue is second, but we get the politics and want to go in eyes open with fmgerprints ?'om the relevant White House players. Crazy week--was 011 the border yesterday in AZ, called back to DC ., to ?y back down to AZ on Air Force One on the off chance we need to brief the President 011 the way to 001 plane though! Hope you are well. me:m. Sent: ue ay, ugust 017 2:27:56 PM To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's of?ce tomorrow resolve border wall issue Yep. As usual, we See you or hear your voice tomorrow? From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN [m Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:27 PM To: (6) (6) (Bombeo . ov> Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow resolve border wall issue Great question. actually asked if he could share our concerns with OMB. My response was, haven't you een working this since March? From: gim- Sent: Tue ay, August 22, 2017 2:24:07 PM DHS-17-OO40-C-000037 BW8 FOIA CBP 000393 To: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue Yep. I'll be there. Not sure why CBP left us out of this and then raised it as a fire on Friday night... From: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K [mailto (b) (6) Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 2:22 PM To: EOP/OMB < @omb.eop.gov> (b) (6) (b) (6) Subject: FW: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue FYSA (b) (6) From: EOP/WHO Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 1:39:18 PM (b) (6) To: Navarro, Peter K. EOP/WHO; EOP/WHO (b) (6) (b) (6) Cc: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; EOP/WHO; (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO; (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO; EOP/WHO; EOP/OMB Subject: RE: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue - I am happy convene a meeting tomorrow, if doing so could help the group reach consensus. Please let (b) (6) , copied here, know if you--or a proxy--can attend a meeting tomorrow on this topic in the Staff Secretary's office at either 10 or 11 am. We can set up a dial-in for those who may be traveling. As I understand it, there are several issues that would need to be resolved on a quick time frame to move forward, some of which would likely require Presidential involvement. Therefore, if we can convene a meeting, I would propose to organize the discussion around these 6 questions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. (b) (5) Given possible budgetary implications of any decision, I've added OMB to this chain. DHS-17-0040-C-000038 BW8 FOIA CBP 000394 Thanks, 1(b) (6)1 From: Navarro, Peter K. EOP/WHO Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 12:14 PM To: (b) (6) EOP/WHO (b) (6) Cc: (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) EOP/WHO @who.eop.gov>; @who.eop.gov> MCALEENAN, KEVIN K (b) (6) EOP/WHO (b) (6) EOP/WHO (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) @who.eop.gov>; EOP/WHO l@who.eop.gov> (b) (6) Subject: Request for Emergency Meeting in Staff Sec's office tomorrow at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. to resolve border wall issue - (b) (6) I spoke with (b) (6) about this and am attaching documents that relate to a deadline for inclusion of Buy American provision in border wall bids. My office has been working a number of months now on this but we are at an impasse and a decision needs to be made forthwith. I am requesting an emergency meeting tomorrow morning at StaffSec's office at 10 a.m. or 11 a.m. with representatives from CBP, USTR, DPC, OTMP, and WHLC. Thanks for your consideration. Peter Navarro Attachments (b) (5) Various documents from CBP DHS-17-0040-C-000039 BW8 FOIA CBP 000395 From: (6) To: MCALEENAN KEVIN Subject: FW: Memorialization of Meeting on Border Wall Date: Fridail ?tember 01' 2017 9:10:01 PM Attachments: (6) reviewed for us. No issues. (6) er Wa All - FYI. Please let me know if we have any concerns or issues. (6) (6) . . . Executive Of?ce of Trade 1400 St. Washington. DC 20229 (6) ph From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Thursda Au-ust 31, 2017 10:51:51 PM To: Cc: Subject: Memoria ization 0 Meeting on Borer Wa Please see attached for the record. Peter Navarro DHS-17-0040-C-000040 BW8 FOIA CBP 000396 From: (6) To: MCALEENAN KEVIN Subject: FW: Memorialization of Meeting on Border Wall Date: Friday, September 2017 8:28:58 AM (5) max I have (6) and(b) (6) reviewing. Attachments: Notice: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY this transmission contains matenal covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and should be uewed only by personnel having an of?cial "need to know." If you are not the intended rec1pient be aware that any disclosure copying. distribution or use of the content of tlus mfomlation is prohibited. If you have received this conunuiucation 111 error. please notify me inunediately by email and delete the original message. From: (6) Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 8:19 PM To: Cc: (6) Subject: FW: Memorialization of Meeting on Border Wall All - FYI. Please let me know if we have any concems or issues. (6) (6) . . Executive Assmtant Of?ce of Trade 1400 St. Washington. DC 20229 (6) ph From: Navarro, Peter K. Sent: Thursda Au-ust 31, 2017 10:51:51 PM Please see attached for the record. DHS-17-0040-C-000041 BW8 FOIA CBP 000397 Peter Navarro DHS-17-OO40-C-000042 BW8 FOIA CBP 000398 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20229 U.S.Customs and Border Protection Sent via email to: foia@americanoversight.org August 29, 2018 CBP-2017-041455 Austin Evers American Oversight Washington, DC Dear Mr. Evers: As agreed to in American Oversight v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et at., Case No. 1:17-cv-01187-RDM (D.C.), this is the final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), on behalf of American Oversight, in which you are seeking records pertaining to the schedule for the initiation, construction, and/or completion of a wall, fence, or physical barrier on the U.S.-Mexico border. A search of CBP databases produced 522 pages of records responsive to your request. CBP has determined that 386 pages will be withheld in full pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. ? 552 (b)(5), information that is considered to be attorney client privilege, and that which is considered pre-decisional and deliberative, 104 pages are partially releasable, pursuant to Title 5 U.S.C. ? 552 (b)(5), (b)(6),(b)(7)(C) and (b)(7)(E), and 32 pages will be released in full. Uploaded to your FOIAonline account and attached to this email are 146 pages with certain information withheld as described below: FOIA Exemption (b)(5) exempts from disclosure information considered to be predecisional and deliberative, information that is attorney-client privilege, and inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency. FOIA Exemption (b)(6) exempts from disclosure personnel or medical files and similar files the release of which would cause a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This requires a balancing of the public's right to disclosure against the individual's right privacy. The types of documents and/or information that we have withheld may consist of birth certificates, naturalization certificates, driver license, social security numbers, home addresses, dates of birth, or various other documents and/or information belonging to a third party that are considered personal. The privacy interests of the individuals in the records you have requested outweigh any minimal public interest in disclosure of the information. Any private interest you may have in that information does not factor into the aforementioned balancing test. FOIA Exemption (b)(7)(C) protects records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes that could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This exemption takes particular note of the strong interests of individuals, whether they are suspects, witnesses, or investigators, in not being unwarrantably associated with alleged criminal activity. That interest extends to persons who are not only the subjects of the investigation, but those who may have their privacy invaded by having their identities and information about them revealed in connection with an investigation. Based upon the traditional recognition of strong privacy interest in law enforcement records, categorical withholding of information that identifies third parties in law enforcement records is ordinarily appropriate. FOIA Exemption (b)(7)(E) protects records compiled for law enforcement purposes, the release of which would disclose techniques and/or procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law. CBP has determined that disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law. This completes CBP's response to your request. If you have questions or concerns regarding this final response, you may contact Assistant United States Attorney W. Mark Nebeker at (202) 252-2536 or mark.nebeker@usdoj.gov. Please notate file number CBP-2017-041455 on any future correspondence to CBP related to this request. Sincerely, Jodi Drengson FOIA Analyst, FOIA Division Office of Diversity and Civil Rights From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: - (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) RE: DRAFT RFI Monday, January 30, 2017 7:47:15 AM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Thank you for your prompt and thorough comments regarding the proposed RFI. It's clear that ideas that haven't been previously considered will be difficult to come by. I look forward to discussing this further later in the week. I'll touch base as soon as I get a handle on (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) my calendar. Thanks again, - (b) (5) DHS-17-0040-E-000001 (b) (5) ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT This communication might contain communications between attorney and client, communications that are part of the agency deliberative process, or attorney work product, all of which are privileged and not subject to disclosure outside the agency or to the public. Please consult with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection before disclosing any information contained in this email. From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 4:46 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) b Subject: RE: DRAFT RFI - (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Thanks, I think it will be interesting to see what ideas might be out there. We've had trouble ourselves coming up with things that would incentivize other types of financing (we've had similar questions about infrastructure like towers, but we've not found other markets in some of our more remote areas!) Maybe some of these outside entities will perceive opportunities we haven't yet discerned--especially if we can get outside of some of the "traditional" sources (most of whom we've spoken to, including about some of the ideas here). DHS-17-0040-E-000006 For what it's worth, cost and schedule performance have not been issues in the past, once we got started--the actual construction generally turns out not to be so hard if we can get past the start up transients. So while it will be useful to get ideas about incentives, I'm not sure that'll be where we get the biggest bang for our buck from innovative thoughts. Still worth asking, of course. It might also be interesting to see if folks have any ideas about the other types of issues that can constrain us: how to mitigate concerns of local residents who object to the aesthetics of a barrier; how to handle environmental concerns; how to facilitate access to both sides of the fence in a secure way that minimizes loss of property value to private owners; how to provide for maintenance and repair that is timely and cost-effective... I'll think on this some more but I wanted to get back to you with some initial thoughts... See you next week, Mark From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:26 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: DRAFT RFI (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Mark, Part of my task with CBP is to explore alternative approaches to constructing the wall. Below is a rough draft seeking information. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. I'm in Seattle until Saturday but back in the office on Monday morning. I wanted to get together with you both right away but my first two days were taken up by meetings and in processing tasks. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Please take a quick look and I'll try to set up a short meeting early next week. Thanks, - DHS CBP seeks white papers from companies, not for profits, educational institutions, consortiums, and other entities with innovative ideas to design, finance and complete construction of physical infrastructure, known as the "wall", on the southwest land border of the United States. The infrastructure will add to the approximately 650 miles of that which was previously constructed, and will complete the physical barrier along the southwest land border. CBP is interested in ideas including, but not limited to: o Public private partnership models for financing, constructing and maintaining the wall o Multi or dual use functions for the wall and/or wall corridor o Financing of the wall construction within the limits of federal fiscal law o Business incentives that could be included in any contract or business deal to provide improved performance, shorter schedule, and/or lower cost. o Tools and methods to determine the best type of wall for each section of the southwest border. This would include the ability to tradeoff security capability, acquisition, life cycle cost, useful life and other factors. o Proposed business/contract terms and conditions that would optimize risk avoidance for DHS CBP and its business partners in providing strong security quickly, efficiently, and DHS-17-0040-E-000007 effectively. This would include, but is not limited to whether this endeavor should be a contract or grant, public private partnership or financial assistance program; necessary length of an agreement, benefits of one partner vs. many different partners on various areas of the border and major deviations from federal law or regulation necessary to make this innovation possible. o How to bring economic benefit and jobs to the regions (states, counties, cities, individuals) cooperating with DHS CBP on the wall project. White papers should be no longer than 5 pages. If known, the papers should identify the largest obstacles to accomplishing the idea and proposed methods of overcoming the obstacles. Alternatives within a proposed model are encouraged. DHS CBP may set up meetings (in person or telephonic) with respondents whose white papers contain ideas, in the opinion of DHS CBP, that have merit and value in further discussion. DHS CBP intends to hold these meetings within 30-60 days of the response date. A response to this market research is not required to participate in future acquisitions. Similarly, DHS CBP's decision not to continue communications regarding a white paper does not prohibit that respondent from participating in future acquisitions for this program. Respondents are encouraged to write their white papers in a manner that the content could be used by DHS CBP to assist in developing future requests for proposals. Nonproprietary responses are preferred but DHS CBP will also consider responses marked in total or in part proprietary. Please note however, that DHS CBP does not consider these responses unsolicited proposals nor does it intend to award a sole source contract from the responses to this market research notice. Therefore, nonproprietary responses are of the most value to DHS CBP as it proceeds forward with the wall. DHS-17-0040-E-000008 From: To: Subj ect : Attachment s : FW: Strategies for Addressing HAC/SAC Requirements Discussion 20M Reprogramming Wall Regs 03282017 v4 .xlsx All times listed are in the following time zone :(UTC-05 :00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) (b)(6).(b)(7)(C) BW8 FOIA CBP 000407 DHS-17-0040-E-000009 Item Number 1 2 3 4 HAC/SAC Reprogramming Requirements (as of 3/29/2017) Source: HAC or SAC Responsible Party Suspense Date (Internal) The results of the source selections for Border Wall System prototypes. HAC BPAM in coordination with OA Requirement Suspense Date (External)* Status Not Started (b) (5) USBP in coordination USBP to provide with BPAM ('Proposed laydowns of border infrastructure' is BPAM responsibility) Not Started TBD The current threat assessment along the Southwest Border and how it HAC relates to CBP's long term border security goals and proposed solutions. USBP USBP to provide Not Started TBD An independent cost estimate for any proposed solutions. BPAM TBD Not Started (b) (5) USBP USBP to provide Not Started TBD The evaluation results for the Border Wall System prototypes, including HAC the criteria for selecting one or more prototypes for the proposed initial Border Wall System segment. BPAM in coordination with USBP CBP's long-term goals and plan for border security between the ports of HAC entry along the Southwest border and one or more long-term, multi- layered solutions for achieving those goals and plans, informed by alternatives analyses and including proposed laydowns of border infrastructure. HAC Not Started (b) (5) 5 6 7 8 Assumptions Complete an analysis of alternatives to determine the most appropriate SAC and effective solutions for securing the border. Detailed cost-benefit analysis SAC BPAM in coordination TBD with USBP SAC USBP USBP to provide Study has to effectively measure the impact of the existing fencing along the border as recommended by GAO *External due date is based on one week clearance time through appropriate channels (b) (5) Not Started Not Started TBD DHS-17-0040-E-000010 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: BAA Memo Monday, March 06, 2017 2:34:18 PM (b) (5) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 2:18:37 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: Subject: FW: BAA Memo From (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 2:16 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: Subject: BAA Memo Here is a bootleg copy. 1111is sending it to C1 and C2 shortly. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Associate Chief Counsel - Trade and Finance Office of the Chief Counsel U.S. Customs and Border Protection (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT This communication might contain communications between attorney and client, communications that are part of the agency deliberative process, or attorney-work product, all of which are privileged and not subject to disclosure outside the agency or to the public. Please consult with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection before disclosing any information contained in this email. DHS-17-0040-E-000011 From: To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S; CALVO, KARL H.; FLANAGAN, PATRICK S; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FRIEL, MICHAEL J; KOLBE, KATHRYN; LOWRY, KIM M; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) PROVOST, CARLA (USBP) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) DCC10A-RMB-COMMISSIONER-CN-RM; Subject: Date: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) WALL IPT: Solicitation of Agenda Items Monday, March 27, 2017 9:37:12 AM All - In prep for the upcoming Wall IPT, scheduled for Wednesday, March 29 at 4 pm EST, we are soliciting agenda items. Please send (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) any items that you would like discussed during the meeting by noon EST Tuesday, March 28. If your agenda item(s) will require your office to present materials, please indicate that in your response as well. Based on last week's discussion, here are the agenda items that are already being considered for discussion. . HAC & SAC Reprogramming Requirements - Plan & Responsible Parties | OFAM & USBP . Source Selection Schedule | OFAM & OA . Other Messaging Sub-IPT Updates | OPA As a reminder, the following action items are currently being tracked as part of the Wall IPT discussion. Date Assigned Item Owner Status 2/23 Finalize operational requirements by 4/1 USBP In Progress 3/23 Schedule briefing with C1/C2 on completed requirements USBP Complete - Scheduled for 4/7 3/22 "The Plan" Narrative OFAM Completed; Draft being routed for final concurrence 3/23 Procurement Schedule (after prototype) OFAM In Progress - ECD 4/14 3/23 Determine the appropriate approach to the LCCE OC In Progress 3/23 Leverage one IPT per month to use as Acquisition Oversight body to include the Department OFAM In Progress - First Meeting week of 4/24 3/23 Red team potential legal challenges OCC Not Started Best, DHS-17-0040-E-000012 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Chief of Staff Office of Facilities and Asset Management Mobile: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) DHS-17-0040-E-000013 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S; CALVO, KARL H.; RE: FINAL SOWs :) Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:19:18 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Mr. Burkowski, I did not say oh well. What I said is that part of this effort is for us to be here to answer the contractors questions. Do you want me and my team to spend more time developing greater detail regarding a reinforced concrete wall? Because we ARE the SMEs in this arena. As I said in my previous email we are confident our current language for this prototype effort. Your call sir. - (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:14:25 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: CALVO, KARL H.; Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) I have been around this track a few times, so if you don't mind, I think it's prudent to anticipate the questions and he protests based on ambiguity. The fact that we know what we mean doesn't help when a judge agrees with someone else's interpretation. Normally, this would not be an issue because we wouldn't have two RFPs hat are hopefully mutually exclusive. What happens when one person thinks a concept belongs in the concrete RFP, but a different person thinks it belongs in he other one? And the right response is NOT to say "oh, well--let's just wait for questions." So I'm asking the question now. How about just giving me the answer? (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:03:32 PM To: BORKOWSKI, MARK S; Cc: CALVO, KARL H.; - (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) Mr. Burkowski, If you tell me you want a reinforced concrete wall I provide that to you based off of your DHS-17-0040-E-000014 requirements, plans, and specifications. Considering this is a DB effort the contractors will take our requirements and provide a design. If they have questions during the RFP process they will ask and we will provide answers to all of the prospective bidders. If we want CMU block we can specify that in our requirements, but we know we expect reinforced concrete. In other words, this is being over thought. This will not be perfect, that is part of the nature of a DB effort, but that is why will answer the contractors' questions. We could take the time and specific the PSI of the concrete, size of reinforcing bar, additives to the concrete, etc. I believe out current is sufficient for this effort. At this point it is about how much time do we want to add to the schedule. - Thanks, (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 4:36:59 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: Cc: CALVO, KARL H.; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) Thanks. I'd like the experts to think about this question as we finalize whatever this language should be: When we say "sold concrete," I think we all mean that the faces are solid and made of concrete. However, I think we also understand that this would include structures that are reinforced with materials other than concrete (like steel reinforcement) as well as structures that are "hollow" or have stringers on the inside. So, we would call a cinder block "solid concrete," even though it has a hollow inside (and, of course, as long as the solid face is pointed in the correct direction). I just want to ensure that everyone will recognize that as what we mean by "solid concrete." If you think there might be ambiguity, we may need to expand the definition of solid concrete to ensure we're perfectly clear. Or we may need to say something like "a concrete structure with solid facings," or something like that. What do you folks think? From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:48 PM To: BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) DHS-17-0040-E-000015 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: CALVO, KARL H. < (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) ALCON: We will be including the highlighted language below verbatim. Thank you, (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) 1111 From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 3:02 PM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: CALVO, KARL H. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) Thanks. I think we need some clear language in the Prototype Task part of the SOW to make clear that we are considering concepts that do not fit within the requirements of the concrete RFP. We will have to be explicit. We need words something along the lines of: "Prototypes constructed under this task order must offer designs that are alternatives to solid concrete walls. Alternatives may include, but are not limited to, designs that have differing materials or may not be entirely solid." If we DON'T do that, solid wall concepts can be proposed both here and in the other RFP. I don't think we want that. I also think we need to capture the idea of a requirement that prevents the passage of some appropriately sized package through the wall--perhaps in the "Objective" requirement section... (By the way, I made complementary comments on the concrete stuff--we need to be clear we want solid concrete designs there...) Thanks, Mark From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:44 PM DHS-17-0040-E-000016 To: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Cc: CALVO, KARL H. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) Im not sure about the whole RFP but here is the current version (with track changes) of the other than solid concrete SOW. PW: (b) (7)(E) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Business Operations OFAM / BPAM PMO (b)(6);(b)(7)(C)(o) m) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:22 PM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: CALVO, KARL H. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) Is the "other" RFP out for review? I haven't seen it--did I miss it somewhere? From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:20:17 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: Cc: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S; Subject: RE: FINAL SOWs :) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Thanks - o CALVO, KARL H.; (b)(6);(b)(7 - im working on incorporating everything (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Business Operations OFAM / BPAM PMO (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (o) (m) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) -----Original Message----From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 1:01 PM DHS-17-0040-E-000017 (b) (5) THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR SUBJECT TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT, ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT AND/OR DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGES. THIS COMMUNICATION MAY ALSO CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, AND IS NOT FOR RELEASE, REVIEW, RETRANSMISSION, DISSEMINATION OR USE BY ANYONE OTHER THAN THE INTENDED RECIPIENT. PLEASE NOTIFY THE SENDER IF THIS EMAIL HAS BEEN MISDIRECTED AND IMMEDIATELY DESTROY ALL ORIGINALS AND COPIES OF THE ORIGINAL. ANY DISCLOSURE OF THIS COMMUNICATION MUST BE APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION. -----Original Message----From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) . Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 9:09 AM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: FINAL SOWs :) Per your request - here are the final versions. Clause in last paragraph was updated which was the last change (for now) :) DHS-17-0040-E-000019 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b) (6) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b) (6) BORKOWSKI, MARK S; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 9 Mar 17 915 AM Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:39:07 AM (b) (5) - Pls see attached updated Source Selection strategy paper. Thank you. - (b) (6) - From: (b) (6) Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:30 AM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: (b) (6) Cc: Subject: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 9 Mar 17 915 AM Good morning CBP procurement team - We met with(b) (6) this morning (b) (5) (b) (5) Thanks - (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000022 From: To: Subject: Date: - BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Wall briefing package Monday, February 13, 2017 8:24:07 AM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) As you requested, I came up with a few questions on this briefing: 1. 2. 3. 4. (b) (5) 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. v/r, Mark Mark S. Borkowski Chief Acquisition Officer and Component Acquisition Executive Customs and Border Protection DHS-17-0040-E-000023 From: To: Subject: Date: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S RE: DRAFT RFI Monday, January 30, 2017 2:51:24 PM Mark, Thanks for your quick response. I'd like to come over to see you later in the week and discuss this further. I have meetings Thursday morning and a drug test Wednesday morning. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Otherwise, I'm flexible. Thanks again, - From: BORKOWSKI, MARK S Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 4:46:05 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: Subject: RE: DRAFT RFI - Thanks, I think it will be interesting to see what ideas might be out there. We've had trouble ourselves coming up with things that would incentivize other types of financing (we've had similar questions about infrastructure like towers, but we've not found other markets in some of our more remote areas!) Maybe some of these outside entities will perceive opportunities we haven't yet discerned--especially if we can get outside of some of the "traditional" sources (most of whom we've spoken to, including about some of the ideas here). (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) For what it's worth, cost and schedule performance have not been issues in the past, once we got started--the actual construction generally turns out not to be so hard if we can get past the start up transients. So while it will be useful to get ideas about incentives, I'm not sure that'll be where we get the biggest bang for our buck from innovative thoughts. Still worth asking, of course. It might also be interesting to see if folks have any ideas about the other types of issues that can constrain us: how to mitigate concerns of local residents who object to the aesthetics of a barrier; how to handle environmental concerns; how to facilitate access to both sides of the fence in a secure way that minimizes loss of property value to private owners; how to provide for maintenance and repair that is timely and cost-effective... I'll think on this some more but I wanted to get back to you with some initial thoughts... See you next week, Mark From (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:26 PM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: DRAFT RFI (b)(6);(b)(7)(C /Mark, Part of my task with CBP is to explore alternative approaches to constructing the wall. Below is a rough draft seeking information. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. I'm in Seattle until Saturday but back in the office on Monday morning. I wanted to get together with DHS-17-0040-E-000025 - you both right away but my first two days were taken up by meetings and in processing tasks. (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Please take a quick look and I'll try to set up a short meeting early next week. Thanks, DHS CBP seeks white papers from companies, not for profits, educational institutions, consortiums, and other entities with innovative ideas to design, finance and complete construction of physical infrastructure, known as the "wall", on the southwest land border of the United States. The infrastructure will add to the approximately 650 miles of that which was previously constructed, and will complete the physical barrier along the southwest land border. CBP is interested in ideas including, but not limited to: o Public private partnership models for financing, constructing and maintaining the wall o Multi or dual use functions for the wall and/or wall corridor o Financing of the wall construction within the limits of federal fiscal law o Business incentives that could be included in any contract or business deal to provide improved performance, shorter schedule, and/or lower cost. o Tools and methods to determine the best type of wall for each section of the southwest border. This would include the ability to tradeoff security capability, acquisition, life cycle cost, useful life and other factors. o Proposed business/contract terms and conditions that would optimize risk avoidance for DHS CBP and its business partners in providing strong security quickly, efficiently, and effectively. This would include, but is not limited to whether this endeavor should be a contract or grant, public private partnership or financial assistance program; necessary length of an agreement, benefits of one partner vs. many different partners on various areas of the border and major deviations from federal law or regulation necessary to make this innovation possible. o How to bring economic benefit and jobs to the regions (states, counties, cities, individuals) cooperating with DHS CBP on the wall project. White papers should be no longer than 5 pages. If known, the papers should identify the largest obstacles to accomplishing the idea and proposed methods of overcoming the obstacles. Alternatives within a proposed model are encouraged. DHS CBP may set up meetings (in person or telephonic) with respondents whose white papers contain ideas, in the opinion of DHS CBP, that have merit and value in further discussion. DHS CBP intends to hold these meetings within 30-60 days of the response date. A response to this market research is not required to participate in future acquisitions. Similarly, DHS CBP's decision not to continue communications regarding a white paper does not prohibit that respondent from participating in future acquisitions for this program. Respondents are encouraged to write their white papers in a manner that the content could be used by DHS CBP to assist in developing future requests for proposals. Nonproprietary responses are preferred but DHS CBP will also consider responses marked in total or in part proprietary. Please note however, that DHS CBP does not consider these responses unsolicited proposals nor does it intend to award a sole source contract from the responses to this market research notice. Therefore, nonproprietary responses are of the most value to DHS CBP as it proceeds forward with the wall. DHS-17-0040-E-000026 (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) BORKOWSKI, MARK S From: To: Subject: Date: - RE: DRAFT RFI Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:35:49 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Will do, (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Best, (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Chief Counsel U.S. Customs and Border Protection (b)(6);(b)(7)(C)(Office) (Mobile) (Fax) ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED/ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT This communication might contain communications between attorney and client, communications that are part of the agency deliberative process, or attorney work product, all of which are privileged and not subject to disclosure outside the agency or to the public. Please consult with the Office of Chief Counsel, U.S. Customs and Border Protection before disclosing any information contained in this email. From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 3:26 PM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: DRAFT RFI - (b)(6);(b)(7)(C /Mark, Part of my task with CBP is to explore alternative approaches to constructing the wall. Below is a rough draft seeking information. I'd appreciate your thoughts on this. I'm in Seattle until Saturday but back in the office on Monday morning. I wanted to get together with you both right away but my first two days were taken up by meetings and in processing tasks. Please take a quick look and I'll try to set up a short meeting early next week. Thanks, Harold DHS CBP seeks white papers from companies, not for profits, educational institutions, consortiums, and other entities with innovative ideas to design, finance and complete construction of physical infrastructure, known as the "wall", on the southwest land border of the United States. The infrastructure will add to the approximately 650 miles of that which was previously constructed, and will complete the physical barrier along the southwest land border. CBP is interested in ideas including, but not limited to: o Public private partnership models for financing, constructing and maintaining the wall o Multi or dual use functions for the wall and/or wall corridor o Financing of the wall construction within the limits of federal fiscal law o Business incentives that could be included in any contract or business deal to provide improved performance, shorter schedule, and/or lower cost. o Tools and methods to determine the best type of wall for each section of the southwest border. This would include the ability to tradeoff security capability, acquisition, life cycle DHS-17-0040-E-000032 cost, useful life and other factors. o Proposed business/contract terms and conditions that would optimize risk avoidance for DHS CBP and its business partners in providing strong security quickly, efficiently, and effectively. This would include, but is not limited to whether this endeavor should be a contract or grant, public private partnership or financial assistance program; necessary length of an agreement, benefits of one partner vs. many different partners on various areas of the border and major deviations from federal law or regulation necessary to make this innovation possible. o How to bring economic benefit and jobs to the regions (states, counties, cities, individuals) cooperating with DHS CBP on the wall project. White papers should be no longer than 5 pages. If known, the papers should identify the largest obstacles to accomplishing the idea and proposed methods of overcoming the obstacles. Alternatives within a proposed model are encouraged. DHS CBP may set up meetings (in person or telephonic) with respondents whose white papers contain ideas, in the opinion of DHS CBP, that have merit and value in further discussion. DHS CBP intends to hold these meetings within 30-60 days of the response date. A response to this market research is not required to participate in future acquisitions. Similarly, DHS CBP's decision not to continue communications regarding a white paper does not prohibit that respondent from participating in future acquisitions for this program. Respondents are encouraged to write their white papers in a manner that the content could be used by DHS CBP to assist in developing future requests for proposals. Nonproprietary responses are preferred but DHS CBP will also consider responses marked in total or in part proprietary. Please note however, that DHS CBP does not consider these responses unsolicited proposals nor does it intend to award a sole source contract from the responses to this market research notice. Therefore, nonproprietary responses are of the most value to DHS CBP as it proceeds forward with the wall. DHS-17-0040-E-000033 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 9 Mar 17 915 AM Thursday, March 09, 2017 10:18:23 AM (b) (5) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Acquisition Head of the Contracting Activity Location: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) National Place, Washington, DC Desk: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) - Cell: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Main: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) - From: (b) (6) Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 9:30 AM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: (b) (6) Subject: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 9 Mar 17 915 AM Good morning CBP procurement team - We met with(b) (6) this morning and (b) (5) (b) (5) (b) (5) . Thanks - (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000034 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b) (6) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 8 Mar 17 430 PM Wednesday, March 08, 2017 4:51:27 PM image001.png (b) (5) My folks put the attached together based on our discussions this morning and information received this afternoon. We used Mark's original write-up and tried to preserve many of his key concepts. I have not shared this with others at CBP because I wanted to give you first short at it. I would be happy to discuss early tomorrow morning (before they meet with the RFP development team) to help guide the discussions. I am trying to provide flexibility but guide the evaluation process to an informative, clear, and focused decision-making process. I welcome your thoughts/comments and suggestions. - Thank You! (b) (6) (b) (6) Chief Procurement Officer Management Directorate U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office: Voice: Cell: Email: (b) (6) - From: (b) (6) Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 4:30 PM To: (b) (6) Cc: (b) (6) Subject: Wall IDIQ with Innovative Prototype - CPO 8 Mar 17 430 PM Revised per discussion. DHS-17-0040-E-000035 DHS-17-OO40-E-000036 (b )(6) ;(b )(7 )(C ) From: To: Subj ect : Date : KOLBE,KATHRYN RE: RFI ResponsesEvaluation & Assimilation Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3 :28:54 PM That would be fine. From:KOLB E, KA THRYN Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3 :28 PM (b )(6 );(b )(7 )(C) CALVO, KARL H. (b )(6);(b )(7)(C ) BORKOWSKI, MARKS (b )(6 );(b )(7 )(C ) To: Cc: Subject: (b )(6 );(b )(7 )(C ) RE: RFI Responses Evaluation & Assimilation Do you mind coming by my office? ~~~:--. To: KOLBE ,KATHR YN 22, 2017 3:20:35 PM Subject: RE: RFI ResponsesEvaluation& Assimilation Kathryn, 1000 is fine. Location?IIII From:KOLB E, KA THRYN Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3 :19 PM Cc: Subject: RE: RFI Responses Evaluation & Assimilation - How about 10am tomon ow? Do you mind if Karl & Mark join , since we're hy ing to integrate this into the overall acquisition su-ategy? From: (b )(6 );(b )(7 )(C ) Sent: Wednesday,March 22, 2017 2:04:49 PM To: KOLBE ,KATHR YN Subject: RE: RFI ResponsesEvaluation& Assimilation Kathryn, The RFI was posted while I was away and the delive1ypoint was changed to a mailbox controlled by someone in the CPO office. On F1idayI was given access to the mailbox and found approximately75 responses. I was somewhat disappointed that most of the responses are less than helpful, e.g. "I would like to propose a wall made out of flowers. Maybe sunflowers. One that promotes peace, not fear" or, "Sentry guns t hat shoot at movements" or "I am a construction worker and construction business owner from Ohio, Mybusiness is strugglingand could use any work offered." Approximatelyhalf t he responses actually included a white paper or some attachment BW8 FOIA CBP 000435 DHS-17-0040-E-000037 d iscussing t he wa ll. My plan is to set up an IPT, of a size conducive to actua l collaborat ion, to refe r any worthwh ile informat ion gleaned from the RFI to management for a decision on the way ahead . My thoug ht is that t he IPT wou ld include two people from OFAM (Loren and an engineer) to comment on feasibility, two from t he Border Patrol (Chief Martin and o ne ot her) to evaluate compat ibility wit h ope ratio nal requ irements , someo ne from Acquisit ion and, possibility, someo ne from Science and Techno logy at the Department. If any of t he concepts subm itted are conside red to be wort hwh ile by management , they would be included in t he requ ireme nts process and included in t he basic wall design. It does not appea r t hat we are go ing to get anyth ing that could be incorporated into t he prototype - primarily because of schedule . Therefore, any prom ising concepts wou ld likely have to be included in any cont ract fo r actua l const ructio n of t he wa ll. My plan is to do a very quic k review of t he pape rs, brief th is proposa l to C2 regarding t he IPT and get th is started very soo n. Since at least th ree of t he proposed team members wor k fo r you , I'd like to include you in the process. I don't inte nd to bring th is up in t he Wall IPT meet ing tomo rrow but wou ld like to get t his ro lling early next wee k. I'm ope n from 1000 to 1600 tomorrow if you' d like to d iscuss. Thanks,"fWP! From: KOLBE, KATHRYN Sent: Wed nesday, Ma rch 22, 2017 9 :16 AM To: (b )(6);(b )(7)(C) Cc: BORKOWSKI, MARK S (b )(6);(b )(7)(C) Subject: RFI Responses Evalu at io n & Assimilatio n - Hope all is (b )(6);(b )(7)(C) I'd like to capture your thoughts regarding how you envisioned evaluat ion of the feedback/papers received from the RFI you drafted. I'd like to start the conversat ion about how we incorporate the responses into the overall wall strategy. On the Hill most of today, but can set up a meeting, if you'd like. VR , KK Kathryn L. Kolbe Executive Ass istant Commiss ioner Enterpr ise Services U.S . Customs and Border Protect ion ~=: ~ -- BW8 FOIA CB P 000436 DHS-17-0040-E-000038 From: To: Cc : Subj ect : Atta chment s: FW: Fence Waiver Discussion **Mtg. Confirmed** (b) (5) Any interest in part icipating? All times listed are in the following time zone :(UTC-05 :00) Eastern Time (US & Canada ) From : BORKOWSKI , MARKS Sent: Wednesday , Feb~ 20 17 9:28 :27 AM To: BORKOW SKI. MARK s. Cc Subject: Fence Waiver Discussion .. Mtg. Confirmed ** When : Wednesday , February 08, 20 17 2 :00 PM -3:00 PM . Where: Teleconference WIWl@IDI Date: Feb 1 Conference Line: Participan t Code: Meeting purpose: a: : I I.a. I t.-.1 I (b) (?)(E) Fence Waiver Discuss ion ** Background oo (b )(6),(b )(7)(C) From : Sent: Tuesday , January 31, 20 17 6:01 PM To: BORKOW SKI, MARKS Cc: Mr. Borkowski , 1 11 (b) (5 ) (b) (5 ) 7 '' '' "'" .. availab le to discuss . - Associate Chief Counsel - Trade and Finance Office of the Chief Counsel U.S. Customs and Border Protection 1M 1WXP31 ATTORNEY -CLIENT PRIVILEGED /ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT This communication migh t contain communicat ions between attorney and client, communications that are part of the agency de liberat ive process , or attomey-work product , all of which are privileged and not subject to disclosure outside the agency or to the public. Please consult with the Office of Chief Counsel , U .S. Customs and Border Protection befo re dis closing any information contained in this email. BW8 FOIA CBP 000437 DHS-17-0040-E-000039 (b )(6 );(b )(7)(C) From: To: Cc: FLANAGAN . PATRICK S Subj ect: RE: Executive Order Milestone POC and Due Date Date : Atta chments: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 3 :16: 14 PM EO Milestone POC 2017-0308 CBPEDITS.xlsx Please see attached and let us know if yo u have any questions. Thank you, ""'" (b )(6) ;(b )(7)(C) (A)Depu ty Chief of Staff - Policy U.S. Customs & Borde r Prot ection (b )(6) ;(b )(7)(C) From: (b) (6) Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4 :15 PM To: KOLBE,KATHRYN (b )(6) ;(b )(7)(C) (b )(6);(b )(7)(C) (b )(6);(b )(?)(C) Cc: Subject: Executive Order M ilesto ne POCand Due Date Dear Task Force Membe rs, As documented in the attac hed "EO Implementation Tracker," you r Component cont ri butes to a number of activities . Please note that we need to confi rm who exactl y your Compone nt's "Point of Contact" is for each act ivity and w hat t he cur rent due date is fo r t he complet io n of each acti vity . Please complete the highlighted columns in the attached "EO Mile stone POC" and return it to me and (b) (6) (cc'd) by 2pm tomorrow. Should you have any quest io ns, please contac t me at your conven ience . Thank you, BW8 FOIA CBP 000438 DHS-17-0040-E-000040 - (b) (6) (b) (6) EO Implementation Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) Tel: (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000041 A ExecutiveOrder B Section Name C Milestone 1 G D Target Completion Lead Working Group Matrixed Services l.eadOffice(s) SupprtiJJg WGs H POC NON-RESPONSIVE . BORDER SECURf!Y AND IMMIGRATION ENroRCEMENT Section 04: Obtain complete operational control of the Southern Border I (b )(6 );(b)( 7 )(C I .oo I I o : o 2().J?,/2017 Establish Integrated Project Team 2/2/20 17 Wall Construction CBP AC Karl Calvo 2/24/20 17: Marked as completed 2/2/20 17 Wall Construction CBP AC Karl Calvo 2/24/20 17: Marked as completed Wall Construction Communica tion/ Engagement o . o: CBP 1m1r1m11~ 1 .... . I : o . oo: , I I . 1 .,,., I : I :I . e o o , , ,: , : o . . ;;<~ .._ Enhance our messagingcampaign in Northern Triangle countries emphasizing that attempts to enter the United States illegallywill be unsuooessful in light of th President's Executi ve Orders : o 11 I . . , ,: : o.. I o , o : o o o. oo I! . .- ..... _,... - - ,..., ,, . .. o . . . I : 166 BORDER SECURf!Y AND 1Mi\11GRATION 170 ENroRCEMENT BORDER SECURf!Y AND 1Mi\1JGRATION 171 ENroRCEMENT Section 04a 04b 04-c,Construc t a physical wall on the Southern Bord Secti on 04a 04b 04-c,Construc t a Issue contrac t solicitation to construct tem porary physical wall on the Southern Borde detention facilities along SWB BW8 FOIA CBP 000440 DHS-17-0040-E-000042 3of 5 A C B ExecutiveOrder Section Name BORDER SECURf!Y AND IMivtlGRAllO N ENFORCEMENT Section 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Identify construction priorities physical wall on the Southern Borde Milestone 1 D Target Completion 2/14/2017 E Lead Working Group Wall Construction F H G Matrixed Services Lead Office(s) SupprtiJJg WGs CBP Updates POC AC Karl Calvo 172 BORDER SECURf!Y AND 1Mi\1JGRATIO N ENFORCEMENT Secti on 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Cap ital lnv,estment Plan (CIP) physical wall on the Southern Borde 6/30/2017 Wall Construction CBP 173 AC Karl Calvo 2/24/20 17 - CBP OFAM has identified all req . costs for the first phase of the wall construction; Phase I construction D!llfiillll n SOC and EPT) expected to cost approxima tdy ALC approval required to use BSm funding based on impa ct analysis o UUIOJI CB 2/24/20 17 - OCC review of BAA/ fence (b) (5) BORDER SECURf!Y AND IMivtlGRAllO N ENroRCEMENT Section 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Ensure rescnm:e procurement and hiring programs are . physical wall on the Southern Borde compliance with o Buy American o requirements Ongoing Wall Construction CBP MIW:111 174 BW8 FOIA CBP 00044 1 DHS-17-0040-E-000043 4of 5 From: To: (b) (6) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6) Cc: Subject: Attachments: KOLBE, KATHRYN; (b) (6) (b) (6) EO Implementation Task Force NON-RESPONSIVE EO High Priority 03.15.17.docx NON-RESPONSIVE NON-RESPONSIVE > <> NON-RESPONSIVE DHS-17-0040-E-000044 Executive Order Implementation - 03/15/17 Working Grou 111 1111 . Deliverable / ,1111.1 NON-RESPONSIVE P1iority Action s - Executive Orders EO 1: Border Security and Imm i ation En orcement Im rovements Wall CBP Wall Construction Metric s CBP Gain Operational Border (Sec 4abc) Control of the Southwest Borde1 . Border (Sec 4d) CBP Border Sec. & Int. Enfor. 287( g) Action s ICE Border (Sec 10) NON-RESPONSIVE I BW8 FOIA CB P 000443 DHS-17-0040-E-000045 From: To: Cc: (b) (6) - ALLES, RANDOLPH D; KOLBE, KATHRYN; Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Wall Construction: Milestones Wednesday, March 08, 2017 11:52:55 AM EO Milestones Wall Construction WG 2017-0308.xlsx Wall Construction Working Group, In preparation for tomorrow's Task Force meeting, please find attached a list of milestones associated with the Wall Construction Working Group. The most recent status updates are highlighted in red (in column J). We are currently collecting POC names for each of the milestones, as well as updated target completion dates, to assist with tracking and management in the future. We will share this information with you as soon as we have it ready. If possible, we would like to meet (via phone) to review the attached list. Please let us know a couple of days/times next week that work for you so we can coordinate schedules. The meeting shouldn't take more than hour. In the meantime, if you have any questions about the attached spreadsheet or the milestones contained within it, please do not hesitate to reach out to us. Very respectfully, (b) (6) Executive Order Implementation Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) Tel: (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000046 B Executive Order Section Name D G Lead Working Group Milestone POC Updates The currentcampaign running in .ca through May 2017 "Our Country Our Futureo does contain a message about the dangers of crossing the border without documentation which we belie,.., supports the intent of the EO Pleasefeelfree to view the campaign website and the materials at http: // www nuestrapatrianuestrofuturo org/ CBP OPA has discussed options with our vendor to immediately enhance messaging in light of EO CBP OPA has two options for further AND lMivtlGRAllON Section 04: Obtain complete ope,ational control of the Southern ENroRCEMENT Border BORDER SECURf!Y Enhance our messaging campaign in North ern Triangle countries emphasizing that attempts to enter the United States illegally will be unsuccessful in light of th President's Executive Orders 2/28{}JJ 17 \+VallConstruction Communication/ Engagement CBP consideration; o New branded campaign to launch in June 2017 ( or earlier if needed) - No additional funding required; CBP would work with vendor to script new radio message and would work with OHS OPA on messaging - would run in the Northern T ciangle Countries and would develop new digita ,.,-et,banners for social mclia websites New branded campaign to launch in late summer / early fall for 3-6 months - Additional funding would be required; Campaign materials would include additional options such as TV radio digital outdoor (posters) 2/24f}JJ17. nm1;Jl\9IO I@ CBP OPA has ongoing efforts with DOS on a more aggressive campaign strategy that began in December2016and will conclude in January 2017 CBP OPA will continue 166 to work with Elevationto discuss o tions tc BORDER SECU Rf!Y AND lMi\ UGRAllON 170 ENFORCEMENT BORDER SECURf!Y AND 1Mi\1JGRATIO N 171 ENFORCEMENT Sectio n04a 04b 04cConstructa Establish Int tedPro" tTeam physical wall on the Southern Borde egra !le<: Section 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Issue contrac t solicitation to construct temporary physical wall on the Southern Borde detention facilities along SWB 2/2/2017 Wall Construction CBP 2/24f}JJ17: Marked as completed 2/2/2017 Wall Construction CBP 2/24f}JJ17: Marked as completed BW8 FOIA CBP 000445 DHS-17-0040-E-000047 2of4 A Executive Order B Section Name D G Target Completion Milestone 1 Lead Working Group H Matrixed Services Lead Office(s) SupprtiJJg WGs POC Updates 3/7/2017 -Asm2/17/17 S2 was briefed on CBP proposals for four wall prototypes follow on effo will be to oonstruct 200 miles of wall once prototype oonstruction and area is selected BORDER SECURf!Y ANO IMMIGRATION Sectio n 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Identify tru o . . . cons coon pn ontt es physical wall on the Southern Borde 2/14/2017 Wall Construction CBP ENFORCEMENT 2/24/2017 - lllllo nstructionis in progress to rep!aceDDfillipn egacy "landing mat"; SOC/EPT il1DUil!),f fence in SOC/EPT; Other options include additional lllDlfilll and/ or ELC (Phase I); USBP will deliver validated requiremen ts for Southern Border(Phases 11,I,: lll) llilllllli n 172 BORDER SECURf!Y ANO IMivtlGRAllON ENFORCEMENT Section 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Ca . al ~ physical wall on the Southern Borde J)lt 1nvesu=nt Pia (CIP) n 3/7/2017 - C BP oontinues to request additional informatio n lrom OHS regarding the requirements for the Cap ital Investment Plan C BP oontin ues to request additional informatio n lrom OHS regarding the requirements for the Cap ital Investment Plan 6/30/2017 Wall Construction CBP 2/24/2017, CBP OFAM has identified all req . oosts for the 6rst phase of the wall construction; lillfllin Phase I oonstruction SOC and EPT) expected to oost approximatelyEJQII CB ALC app roval required to use BSAT funding based on impact analysis 173 3/7/2017,C BP is engaged in Working Gro up w/ EOIR ICE OPlA and ICE ERO to establish requirement which will drive financial implications for CBP BORDER SECURf!Y ANO !Mi\UGRATION ENFORCEMENT Sectio n 04a 04b 04c Construc t a Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are . physical wall on the Southern Borde compliance with oBuy Americano requirements Wall Construction CBP 174 BW8 FOIA CBP 000446 DHS-17-0040-E-000048 3of4 From: To: Cc: (b) (6) KOLBE, KATHRYN; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: Date: Attachments: Executive Order Milestone POC and Due Date Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:14:47 PM EO Implementation Tracker 3.7.2017 v12.docx EO Milestone POC 2017-0307v2 CBP.xlsx Dear Task Force Members, As documented in the attached "EO Implementation Tracker," your Component contributes to a number of activities. Please note that we need to confirm who exactly your Component's "Point of Contact" is for each activity and what the current due date is for the completion of each activity. Please complete the highlighted columns in the attached "EO Milestone POC" and return it to me (b) (6) and (cc'd) by 2pm tomorrow. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Thank you, - (b) (6) (b) (6) EO Implementation Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) Tel: (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000049 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATION (March 7, 2017) N Launch JTF-W and JTF-1j oint operat ion against TCOs, in conj unction with DOJ ICE N Intensify efforts to speed issuance of trave l documents to f acilitate removal efforts ICE Immed iate OHS OGC will also play a ro le as the Department's lead on all regulations . -----------+------I-----+---'--- Enhan ce our messaging campaign in Northern Tr iangle countr ies, emphas izing that attempts to enter the United States illegally will be unsuccessful in light of t he President's Executive Orders CBP POC: CBP Immed iate (b )(6);(b )(7)(C) ----=-------1-------------l The current campa ign runn ing in Central America t hroug h May 2017 , "Our Count ry, Our Futu re" does contain a message abo ut t he dange rs of crossing t he border w itho ut docume ntat ion, wh ich we be lieve supports t he inte nt of the EO. Please fee l free to view t he campa ign website and t he mater ials at http ://www. nuestrapatr ianuestrofuturo. orq/ . CBP OPA has discussed opt ions with ou r ve ndor to immed iate ly enhance messaging in light of EO. DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL 3 Document Key: JDone - On Track ~ Delayed/ Issues - Off Track BW8 FOIA CBP 000448 DHS-17-0040-E-000050 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATI ON (M arch 7, 2017) CBP OPA has two options for further consideratio n: - New branded campa ign to launch in June 2017 (or ear lier if needed) - No additio nal fu nding req uired; CBPwou ld work w ith vendor to script a new radio message and wou ld work w ith OHS OPA on messaging - wo uld run in t he Nort hern Triangle Countr ies and wou ld deve lop new digita l web ban ners for social media websi t es New branded campa ign t o launc h in late summe r / ear ly fall fo r 3-6 mo nths - Add itiona l fundi ng wo uld be req uired; Campaign mate rials wou ld include addit io nal options such as TV, radio, digita l, out door (posters) 2) Construct a physical wall on the Southern Border (Sect ion 4a, 4b, 4 c) J J J Establish Integ rat ed Proj ect Team Issue contract solicit ation to construct t emporary det ention faci lities alo ng SWB Identify construction prior ities CBP February 3, 2017 CBP February 3, 2017 CBP February 15,20 17 As of 2/17 /17 S2 was briefe d on CBP proposa ls for four wall prototypes fo llow o n effor t will be to construct DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL 4 Document Key: JD one - On Track ~ Delayed/ Issue s - Off Track BW8 FOIA CBP 000449 DHS-17-0040-E-000051 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATION (March 7, 2017) 200 miles of wa ll o nce prototype construction and area is selected. CBP OFAM has identified all required costs fo r the first phase of the wa ll construction; Phase I co nstruct ion 1ppp3!1n SOCand ~ cted to cost approximate ly CBP ALC approva l required to use BSFITfunding based on impact analysis. o ID:<> <> <> Please find attached the EO Executive Steering Committee Briefing Template Please find attached a revised agenda and EO Priority List. (b) DHS-17-0040-E-000056 o(b Executi ve Order Implementation - 03/15/17 Working Grou Ill Deliverable / ""'"""' EO Section - 11111.1 NON-RESPONSIVE Pendin g Policy Decisions Pri vacv Act o Resc. d 0 Policy OGC , PRIV t r p . At l' t' t us I (b) (5) 3/14 Interior (Sec 14) o Develop new policy tltat will govern information handli ng in the future (Due: No deadline identified) o 3/ 15/20 17 No status u dated rovided. I BW8 FOIA CBP 000455 DHS-17-0040-E-000057 NON-RESPONSIVE P1iority Action s - Executive OJ'ders EO 1: Border Sec urit rovements 0 Wall CBP 6/30 Border (Sec 4abc) 3/13 Border (Sec 4d) o Ensure resource p rocurement and hiring pro grams are in compli ance with BUY AMERI CAN requirements (Du e: N o deadline identified) o (3/7/2017) CBP is engaged in Working Group w/ EOIR, ICE OPLA, and ICE ERO to establish requirem ent which will drive financial implication s forCBP. Gain Operationa l Contl'ol of the Southwest Bol'de1. o Enhan ce our messaging campaign in N orthern Triangle countries o (3/7/2017) The cmTent campaign running in Central America through May 2017, "Ow-Country , Ow-Futw-e" does contain a message about the dangers of crossing the border without documenta tion, which we believe supports the intent of the EO . Wall CBP 2 BW8 FOIA CB P 000456 DHS-17-0040-E-000058 NON-RESPONSIVE Immigration Judges ? Develop long-term joint DHS-DOJ strategy, including long-term requirements, resources, personnel, and plan proceedings at POEs and along the Southern Bord o Border Sec. & Int. Enfor. ICE, OGC (b) (5) 3/19 Border (Sec 5c) ? Coordinate required number of IJs for short term surge with DOJ (Due: No deadline identified) o ICE and EOIR are engaged in continuing discussion regarding the 50 IJ surge. 235(c) Return to Territory ? Develop DHS implementation plan (CBP) o (b) (5) Policy CBP, PLCY, ICE ? Engage in discussions with Mexican and Canadian governments (PLCY) o (3/15/2017) No status update provided. ? Assess and implement repatriation actions (PLCY, ICE) o (3/14/2017) As of March 13, 2017, ICE Charter Operations removed 9,745 aliens a result of a planned removal surge operation. On March 8, 2017, ICE removed 8 Liberian nationals via charter flight including 2 FTC cases. ? Assess Port Court operational and resource needs (PLCY, ICE; Due: No deadline identified) o (3/7/2017) OFO's Enforcement Programs Division (EPD) met with Executive Office for Immigration Removal (EOIR) staff for a walk-through on their court hearings process, including attending 'live' proceedings. OFO-EPD, EOIR and ICE/OPLA visited various sites at El Paso, TX, to determine a location for piloting a virtual near border 'Port Court'. EPD will meet with OFO-APP leadership tomorrow to provide updates and determine a path forward and later draft a memo for briefing findings to OFO/CBP leadership. There were no updates to progress on discussion with the Mexican Government per EO on 235(b)(2)(c). Border (Sec 7) CBP has developed an off the shelf plan to establish Port Courts, following a series of site visits to assess the operational and resource needs in potential locations, CBP identified Tornillo as the preferred site for the first Port Court. However implementing the plan will require resolution of 235(b)(2)(c) which requires further engagement with GoM. 3 DHS-17-0040-E-000059 1) Wall Construction Identify construction prio1ities ______ Complete capital investment plan Com Iv with "Bu Alne1ican " re uire111ents _ __ NON-RESPONSIVE Document Key Done - On Track D Delayed / Issues - OffTrack UNCLASSIFIED//FOROFFICIALUSEONLY 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000458 DHS-17-0040-E-000060 Document Key Done - On Track D Dela ye d/ Issues - OffTrack UNCLASSIFIED//FOROFFICIALUSEONLY 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 000459 DHS-17-0040-E-000061 -= ' I . o EO ImplementationProgress I Actions Milestones 1) Wall Construction Components: CBP & MGMT (Wall Working Group) Sr. Staff: Randolph Alles o Identify constru ction prioriti es 2/ 14/ 17 o Complete capit al investm ent plan 6/30/ 17 o Comply with "Buy American" requirement s TBD Key Interdependencies / Issues: o o Budget Rollout plan Document Key Done D On Track UNCLASSIFIED//FOROFFICIALUSEONLY Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 3 BW8 FOIA CBP 000460 DHS-17-0040-E-000062 From: To: (b) (6) (b) (6) Burke, Jenny; Christensen, Gillian; Burriesci, Kelli; (b) (6) (b) (6) Clark, Alaina; (b) (6) (b) (6) Pejic, Gregory Shah, Dimple; Lapan, David; FLANAGAN, PATRICK S; McKeown, Michael; Wolf, Chad; Subject: Date: Attachments: (b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; KOLBE, KATHRYN; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) ; (b) (6) Johnson, Liz; ; Wolf, Chad Immigration EO Task Force: Reporting Tool Training Wednesday, March 08, 2017 3:48:33 PM EO Implementation Tracker 3.1.2017 v11.docx All, Please note that we have replaced the attached tracker with a new IT tool that to collect status updates on behalf of Working Group leads and monitor EO implementation. For anyone that currently uploads or is responsible for the status reports in the attached tracker, we are providing training on Monday, March 13, to explain how to use the tool. Starting next week: We will only use the new tool to report status for EO implementation. Therefore we will ask for a quick turnaround on the updates for key priorities following the training session. The new tool is very simple to use for updating status but it does require instruction. The 1 hour training will be provided at the NAC on Monday morning and at 7th and D on Monday afternoon. We will provide a "virtual meeting link" for those of you unable to attend the meeting in person. I will send out a meeting invite for each of the sessions. It is only necessary to attend one of the two training sessions. Should there be anyone from your office that may require the training and is not included on this invitation, please forward this invitation accordingly. Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Regards, - (b) (6) (b) (6) EO Implementation Department of Homeland Security DHS-17-0040-E-000063 - Tel: (b) (6) (b) (6) _____________________________________________ (b) (6) From: Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 11:00 AM To: Higgins, Jennifer; Metzler, Alan; MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; Scialabba, Lori L; Homan, Thomas; (b) (6) (b) (6) Zukunft, Paul F ADM; (b) (6) (b) (6) Maher, Joseph; ; Corbin, Susan; Clark, Alaina; (b) (6) Hamilton, ; Nielsen, Kirstjen; Burke, Jenny; (b) (6) (b) (6) Christensen, Gillian; ; Wuco, Frank; , David; Ray, -- (b) (6) FLANAGAN, PATRICK S; Chad; (b) (6) (b) (6) Exec Sec Subject: Immigration EO Task Force Johnson, Liz; (b) (6) Wolf, I&A All - <> Attached is the latest version of the immigration EO implementation tracker. Please provide progress updates by noon on Tuesday, 7 March. Thank you, (b) (6) Office of the Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000064 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL BORDERSECURITYAND IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT S1 Action Target Needed Status Actions Lead Completion (Y/N) 1) Obtain complete operational control of the Southern Border (Section 4) Working Group Key Progress/Issues Action POC: Debb ie Seguin N Increase the number of ICE specia l agents / ana lysts working in Northern Triangle to dismant le TCOs N Expand Border Enforcement Security Task Forces, targeting individ uals/ organizations that undermine border security ICE ICE February 25, 2017 Immediate ICE is working with its Special Agent in Charge offices to assess potentia l future BESTlocations and possib le expansion of existing BESTsby 20% over current staffing levels. DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL 2 Document Key: JDone - On Track ~ Delayed/Issues - Off Track BW8 FOIA CBP 000463 DHS-17-0040-E-000065 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATION (Fe bru ary 28 , 2017) N Launch JTF-W and JTF-1j oint operation against TCOs, in co nju nction with DOJ ICE N Intensify efforts to speed issuance of trave l documents to facilitate removal efforts ICE Enhance ou r messagi ng campaig n in Nort hern Triang le countries, emp hasizing t hat attempts to ent er t he United Stat es illegally w ill be unsuccessfu l in lig ht of the President's Executive Orders CBP Immediate Immediate The cur rent campaig n running in Cent ral America th roug h May 2017 , "Our Country, Our Fut ure" does co nt ain a message about the dangers of crossi ng the border wit hout documen t ation, whic h we be lieve supports the intent of t he EO. Please fee l free to view the campaig n websi t e and the mate rials at http ://www. nuestrapatr ianuestrofuturo. orq/ . CBP OPA has discussed options wi t h our ve ndor t o immediate ly enhance messaging in light of EO. DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL 3 Document Key: JD one - On Track ~ Delayed/ Issues - Off Track BW8 FOIA CBP 000464 DHS-17-0040-E-000066 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATION (Fe bru ary 28 , 2017) CBP OPA has two options for further consideratio n: - New branded campaign to launch in June 2017 (or ear lier if needed ) - No additio nal fu nding req uired; CBP wou ld wor k with vendor to script a new radi o message and wou ld wor k with OHS OPA on messaging - wo uld run in t he Nort hern Triangle Countries and would develop new digita l web ban ners for social media webs it es New branded campaign t o launc h in late summe r / ear ly fall fo r 3-6 mo nths - Additiona l fundi ng wo uld be req uired; Campaign mate rials wou ld include addit io nal options such as TV, radio , digital, out door (poste rs) 2) Construct a physical wall on the Southern Border (Sect ion 4a, 4b, 4 c) J J J Estab lish Integ rat ed Project Team Issue contract solicit ation to construct t emporary det ention faci lities alo ng SWB Identify construction priorities CBP February 3, 2017 CBP February 3, 2017 CBP February 15,20 17 As of 2/17 / 17 S2 was briefed on CBP proposals for four wa ll prototypes fo llow o n effor t w ill be to construct DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL 4 Document Key: JD one - On Track ~ Delayed/ Issue s - Off Track BW8 FOIA CBP 000465 DHS-17-0040-E-000067 DRAFT- PRE-DECISIONAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IMPLEMENTATION (February 28, 2017) 200 miles of wa ll once prototype construction and area is selected. CBP OFAM has identified all required o costs for the first phase of the wa ll construction; Phase I construction o ID:<> V/R (b) (6) DHS Executive Order Implementation Task Force DSEC NAC01-03-B Washington D.C. (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000070 (8 EO Implementation Progress Wall Consh~1ctio11 (slide?) - NON-RESPONSIVE NON-RESPONSIVE Done D On Track Delayed / Issues DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY - OffTrack BW8 FOIA CBP 000469 DHS-17-0040-E-000071 2 o (b) EO 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-E-000072 -= ' Wall Construction I . o I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o Est ablish int egrated plannin g team to constru ct a physical wall on th e SB 1/ 25/ 17 o Issue Request for Proposals 3/ 17/ 17 o Obt ain Acquisition Decision Event - 1 appr oval 3/ 20/ 17 o OGC to provide AS2 with th e letter from CBP Commissioner (A) McAleenan tha t was sent to U.S. Trade Represe nt ative (USTR) requestin g support for a waiver of the Buy American Act for th e pur chase of wall building material o OGC to provi de AS2 with an option / recommendation for moving th e issue forward by working directly withWH o Proposals due b ack to CBP (deadlin e extended from 3/ 29/ 17) 3/ 31/ 17 3/ 31/ 17 4/ 4/ 17 o Includ e mileston es for "repo1ting" requir ements in thi s tracker 4/ 5/ 17 o Complete prop osal review and down select 4/ 12/ 17 o Publish sign ed Secreta1y' s waiver of applicable environm ent al, land mana gement , and oth er laws 4/ 30/ 17 o Identi fy Southwest border barrier requirement s 4/ 30/ 17 o Award IDIQ contr acts and prototype task orders 6/ 14/ 17 o Begin conshu ction of wall pr ototypes Key Interdependencies / Issues: Reprogramming request Eminent Domain Phased Communications Plan Ensure resource procurement and hiling programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 7 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CB P 00047 1 DHS-17-0040-E-000073 -= ' I . o Wall Construction(Reprogramming) I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o CBP to validate th e following reprogr amming mileston es and dates 4/ 5/ 17 o Ensure equal consideration is given to curr entl y deployed and proven bord er security capabilities TBD o Ensure compliance with DHS Man agement Directive 10 2 includin g completing an an alysis of alternati ves to includ e a cost-b enefit analysis and effectiveness measur es of existin g fencing as recommend ed by GAO to determin e the most appr opriat e and cost effective solution TBD o Brief HAC-HLS on th e following as soon as possible TBD o Results of prot otype source selection o Prototyp e evaluat ion results including crit eria for selectin g one or mor e prot otypes for th e initial segment TBD o CBP's long-t erm goals and plan for bord er security b etween the port s of ently along th e SWB and one or more long-t erm, mu lti-layered solution s for achieving th ose goals and plans, inform ed by alternati ves analysis and includin g proposed laydowns of bord er infra stru cture TBD o The curr ent threat assessme nt along th e SWB and h ow it relates to CBP's long term bord er security goals and proposed solutions TBD o Ind epend ent cost estimate for any proposed solutions TBD Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 8 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000472 DHS-17-0040-E-000074 From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Wuco, Frank; Jones, Quinn (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) daily briefing Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:42:22 AM daily briefing 4-20-17.docx DHS-17-0040-E-000075 Memorandum Date: April 20, 2017 To: - Frank Wuco From: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Re: Daily Briefing Today, I am reporting for the CBP PA team. I. Accomplishments, events, results of the past 24 hours ? We attended the daily briefing with senior leadership. ? I spent time reviewing the excel spreadsheet listing the metrics requested from the components by the Metrics Working Group and then engaged the Border Patrol and Office of Field Operations to see their proposed feedback. ? We attended the EO task force call, which focused largely on metrics and how to measure implementation of the numerous EOs (related to the spreadsheet above). ? We had a wall implementation meeting which updated the team on numerous aspects of this project: o Regarding FY 2017, there is now talk that Congress may adopt a short-term CR to avoid shutdown when the current CR expires April 28th. That may delay our current schedule. o It appears that negotiations with OMB regarding the FY 2018 wall budget are almost complete. The intent is to give CBP funding for (b) (7)(E) of new border (b) (7)(E) barrier system in the (b) (7)(E) of steel bollard in (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) (although there is not enough money for access roads, cameras, etc.); and (b) (7)(E)of barrier replacement in (b) (7)(E) There are still some ongoing discussions about purchasing vehicles for the Border Patrol. o The Office of Facilities and Asset Management, working with the Intergovernmental Public Liaison, Office of Congressional Affairs, and Office of Public Affairs have created a coordinated schedule for outreach in the RGV Sector. ? Outreach with federal stakeholders, such as the Dept. of Interior, are taking place now. ? At the beginning of May (May 1-2), CBP will be reaching out to the Texas Governor and the Legislature to update them on the project. ? During that same time CBP will be engaging landowners, impacted landowners and stakeholders to discuss real estate and environmental issues. ? During the first week of May, CBP also plans to start title research (and will continue engagement) to accomplish its real estate needs. o Source selection work is ongoing and OFAM hopes to be finished by May 5. - -- DHS-17-0040-E-000076 II. o CBP is working on developing materials to respond to all the requests from House and Senate appropriators. One of these Congressional requests is for a border security strategy and CBP is already concerned that the strategy the Border Patrol provides to Congress is consistent with the report DHS is preparing pursuant to EO1--namely the border security report that includes a strategy to obtain operational control of the border. More coordination may be required here. Major anticipated events and actions over the next 24 hours ? S1 and AG Sessions are down on the border, El Paso today and San Diego tomorrow. ? (b)(6);(b)(7)(C)s in the San Diego Sector today to accompany/advise the Domestic Policy Council as they tour the border. (from IDA) to discuss ? I have a meeting at the NAC tomorrow with (b) (6) metrics and methodologies for how to measure operational control. Major anticipated events and actions over the next 48 hours ? C1 is in Mexico through the rest of the week. Unforeseen events that need WH visibility, including media approaches, potential leaks, unresolved organizational conflicts. (b III. IV. - DHS-17-0040-E-000077 From: To: Cc: Subj ect : (b)(6) ,(b )(7)(C) (b) (6) ~ I o ( DJ(bJ;l DJ(/ )(C) ;: ENDABROCl> Greetings. Attached is the latest version of the dashboard we discussed yesterday. This is still VERY draft and needs some additional work. We are continuing to make several updates today but would appreciate your feedback on the items within your component's/office's purview by noon tomorrow. For your own ease and to ensure version control, please send your suggested changes via email (no need to directly update the slides) to the following individuals: (b) (6) We really appreciate all of your work on this; once we have this locked down updates and tracking should be much easier for us all. - Thanks, (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000082 EO #1: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-E-000083 -= ' Wall Construction I . o I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP & MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o Establi sh Int egrated plannin g team to constru ct a physical wall on th e SB 1/ 25/ 17 o Issue Request for Proposals 3/ 17/ 17 o Obtain Acquisition Decision Event - 1 appr oval 3/ 20/ 17 o Proposals due b ack to DHS 3/ 31/ 17 o Resolve Trade agreement s vs. Buy American Act concern s for wall contr acts and task ord ers 3/ 31/ 17 o Publish sign ed Secreta1y' s waiver of applicable environm ent al, land man agement , and other laws 4/ 1/ 17 o Complete prop osal review and down select 4/ 21/ 17 o Identi fy South west border barri er requirement s 4/ 30/ 17 o Award IDIQ contr acts and prot otype task orders 5/ 30/ 17 o Begin conshuc tion of wall pr ototypes 6/ 15/ 17 Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 2 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000482 DHS-17-0040-E-000084 From: To: (b) (6) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) KOLBE, KATHRYN; (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Cc: Subject: Attachments: ; CALVO, (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6) KARL H.; " EO Implementation Task Force NON-RESPONSIVE EO Implementation Summary 2017-0322 Final1.pptx NON-RESPONSIVE <> DHS-17-0040-E-000085 EO #1: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-E-000086 -= ' Wall Construction I . o I Action s Mil es ton es EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP & MGMT Sr. Staff: Randolph Alles o Establish Integrated Project Team 2/ 2/ 17 o Identify initial fund ing source 2/ 2/ 17 o Identify construc tion priorities (plan to conshuc t 200 miles of wall once prototype conshuct ion is complete) 2/ 14/ 17 o Issue pre-solicitation notice 2/ 27/ 17 o Issue RFP for prototype 3/ 17/ 17 o Down select firms 6/ 15/ 17 o Complete capital investment plan 6/ 30 / 17 o Prototype construct ion complete 7/ 31/ 17 o S1 visit and decision 8/ 4/ 17 o Issue RFP for long-term construction 8/ 15/ 17 Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Do cum e nt Key Don e - On Tra ck D Delaye d/ Iss u es - OffTra ck 2 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000485 DHS-17-0040-E-000087 From: To: - (b) (6) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) KOLBE, KATHRYN; Cc: Subject: Attachments: (b) (6) (b) (6) ; CALVO, KARL H.; (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) EO Implementation Task Force NON-RESPONSIVE Draft-Predecisional EO Implementation Summary 2017-032917.pptx NON-RESPONSIVE <> Please find attached the agenda and EO Implementation Summary Report for today's meeting. DHS-17-0040-E-000088 (8 EO Implementation Progress Wall Construction I .- ...... I I '" .,,, :. I I o I I ,,- I I t o I I : .... .. I ... (slide 6) I t I .- o: - : . : I .. - I Ill :o. - 1 .. .. I '" .. ... NON-RESPONSIVE Document Key Done o DRAFT-PREDECISI On Track 17 Dela ye d/ Issues // FOROFFICIAL USEbm:r - OffTrack BW8 FOIA CBP 000487 DHS-17-0040-E-000089 2 EO 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-E-000090 -= ' Wall Construction I . o I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o Est ablish int egrated plannin g team to constru ct a physical wall on th e SB 1/ 25/ 17 o Issue Request for Proposals 3/ 17/ 17 o Obt ain Acquisition Decision Event - 1 appr oval 3/ 20/ 17 o Proposals due back to CBP 3/ 29/ 17 o OGC to provide AS2 with th e letter from CBP Commissioner (A) McAleenan tha t was sent to U.S. Trade Represe nt ative (USTR) requestin g support for a waiver of the Buy America Act for th e pur chase of wall building material o OGC to provi de AS2 with an option / recommendation for moving th e issue forward by working directly with WH 3/ 31/ 17 3/ 31/ 17 o Resolve tr ade agreement s vs. Buy American Act concern s for wall contr acts and task ord ers 3/ 31/ 17 o Complete prop osal review and down select 4/ 12/ 17 o Publish sign ed Secreta1y' s waiver of applicable environm ent al, land mana gement , and other laws 4/ 30 / 17 o Identi fy Southwest border barrier requirement s 4/ 30 / 17 o Award IDIQ contr acts and prototype task orders 6/ 14/ 17 o Begin conshuc tion of wall prototypes Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues 6 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CB P 000489 DHS-17-0040-E-000091 -= ' I . o Wall Construction(Reprogramming) I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o Ensure equal consideration is given to currentl y deployed and proven border security capabilities TBD o Ensure compliance with DHS Management Directive 102 including completing an an alysis of alternatives to include a cost-benefit analysis and effectiveness measure s of existing fencing as recommended by GAO to determine the most appropriate and cost effective solution TBD o Brief HAC-HLS on the following as soon as possible TBD o Results of prototype source selection o Prototyp e evaluation results including criteria for selecting one or more prototypes for the initial segment TBD o CBP's long-term goals and plan for border security between the ports of ently along the SWB and one or more long-term , multi-layered solution s for achieving tho se goals and plans , informed by altern atives analysis and including proposed laydowns of border infrastructure TBD o The current threat assessment along the SWB and how it relates to CBP's long term border security goals and proposed solutions TBD o Independ ent cost estim ate for any proposed solutions TBD Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key Done - On Track D Delayed / Issues - OffTrack 7 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000490 DHS-17-0040-E-000092 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: Border Bill Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:55:14 PM Building Americas Trust Act.pdf This is a draft, withheld (b)(5). The full bill is available here: https:// www.cornyn.senate.gov/content/issues/building-americas-trust-act. Please do not forward. - From: (b) (6) Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 7:43:33 AM To: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Subject: FW: Border Bill Voila! (b) (6) - (b) (6) From: Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 7:29:09 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: Border Bill (b) (6) See attached. Unless directed otherwise, I will be setting up a meeting in the next couple of days with the appropriate folks to discuss the way ahead. - From: (b) (6) Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 7:02 AM To: Cc: Subject: Border Bill o (b) (6) (b) (6) - -- could you pls email me a copy of the proposed Cornyn-McCaul border bill this am. Looking for a clean copy. I have the comments but not the original bill. Thanks. (b) (6) (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000093 From: To: Subject: Date: Attachments: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) FW: FOUO: Materials for 3:30 Meeting - Fence Way Forward Friday, January 27, 2017 11:16:03 AM Fence Way Forward Deck 01 27 2017FINAL2.pptx (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) From: Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 9:01:51 AM (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) To: CALVO, KARL H.; (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Cc: Subject: FOUO: Materials for 3:30 Meeting - Fence Way Forward All, Please see the attached deck for the 3:30 meeting today on the Fence Way Forward. This is For Official Use Only (FOUO) and therefore we will not be attaching it to the meeting invite. We will have limited copies in the room. Thanks, o (b)(6);(b)(7) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) Special Projects Analyst Strategic Analysis, Inc. Office of Facilities and Asset Management U.S. Customs and Border Protection Mobile: (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) (b)(6);(b)(7)(C) DHS-17-0040-E-000094 CBP Enterprise Services Office of Facilities and Asset Management Overview of the Fence: Way Forward Discussion 1 January 27, 2017 BW8 FOIA CBP 000493 DHS-17-0040-E-000095 Warning! This document, along with any attachments, contains NON-PUBLIC INFORMATION exempt from release to the public by federal law. It may contain confidential, legally privileged, proprietary or deliberative process inter-agency/intraagency material. You are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying, or further distribution of this information to unauthorized individuals is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized disclosure or release of this information may result in loss of access to information, and civil and/or criminal fines and penalties. U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 2 DHS-17-0040-E-000096 Overview o Section I: Background: Fence Program o Section II: USBP Initial Priority Requirements and Implementation Approach o Section III: Additional Key Considerations o Appendix A: Sector Level Maps U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 3 DHS-17-0040-E-000097 Section I: Background: Fence Program U.S. Customs and Border Protection 4 DHS-17-0040-E-000098 Background: Purpose of Fence Strategy o Purpose of the Fence - Fence (Tactical Infrastructure) is a material solution that provides persistent impedance. It includes: access roads for maintenance and patrol, lights, fence with sensors , low water crossings , debris removal , cane removal and vegetation control. o Other Material Solutions: is a material solution that rovides surveillance technolo y (i.e., - USBP staffing enhancements that make up the U.S. Border Patrol's (USBP) multi-layered approach to national security. These not only serve as forcemultipliers , but also greatly enhance agent safety. - All efforts are geared towards attaining maximum situational awareness and operational efficiency while creating a safer environment for USBP agents. 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000497 DHS-17-0040-E-000099 Background: Map of Existing Fence - -. City - .... w- BigBend(BBT) Del Rio(ORT) ElCentro(ELC) ElPaso(EPT) Laredo (LRT) RioGrande Valley(RGV) SanDiego(SOC) Tucson(TCA) Yuma(YUM) TOTAL - Ptdffr.;Jn Fence (RfjUCtmtn t) Ptdt'l#WI Ftta (PF225) Pedes:nan Fence (PF70) - Peo...,.nF..,.,. (~ ) Vehdofe nc, (VF300) = Vehde Fence (leg acy) 0 25 50 100 150 -=-==---= = =--- U.S.Customs and Border Protection 200 Miles PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 6 Please note that numbers may not add up due to rounding. Fence mileage is tracked to the thousandth decimal place. BW8 FOIA CBP 000498 DHS-17-0040-E-000100 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence o As a part of the Secure Fence Act, CBP was tasked with hundreds miles of "two layer" fencing along specific segments of the southwest border. o In December of 2007, Congress repealed the fencing requirements in the Secure Fence Act (SFA). Congress replaced the SFA fence requirements, with a more flexible statutory scheme--section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). o Section 102 of IIRIRA calls for "not less than 700 miles" of fence on the southwest border, including certain "priority miles" of fencing to be constructed by December 31, 2008. o At the same time, Section 102 of IIRIRA provides the Secretary with substantial discretion U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 7 DHS-17-0040-E-000101 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence o After assessing Border Patrol's operation needs, CBP constructed hundreds of miles of new fencing along the southwest border, including the "priority miles" called for under Section 102(b). o To date, CBP has deployed 654 miles of fencing along the southwest border, the majority of which were deployed between 2008 and 2009. o Given the Secretary's broad discretion under Section 102(b), this is consistent with the statutory requirement. - In 2011, the State of Arizona sought a judicial order mandating that CBP construct 700 miles of fence. However, the United States District Court dismissed the State's request, stating, "While the construction of the fencing and infrastructure improvements may be phrased in mandatory language, the IIRIRA and the Appropriations Acts leave the Secretary and the DHS with a great deal of discretion in deciding how, when and where to complete the construction." o Having completed hundreds of miles of new fence as of 2009, and given that Congress was not appropriating large sums for new fence construction, past Administrations and Secretaries focused on maintaining the (b) (7)(E) . existing fence and deploying other types of border infrastructure, e.g., o CBP continues to assess operational needs, and where Border Patrol identifies and operational need for fence, CBP has the statutory authority, assuming sufficient funding from Congress, to construct new fence. U.S. Customs and Border Protection 8 DHS-17-0040-E-000102 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence o Institutional Knowledge: - CBP's Border Patrol and Air and Marine Program Management Office (BPAM PMO), which is a part of CBP's Office of Facilities and Asset Management (OFAM), has individuals within its leadership ranks who possess critical institutional knowledge concerning the construction of border infrastructure, including border fencing. - Key individuals from the BPAM PMO have managed or overseen previous fence projects, including the Pedestrian Fence 70 (P70), Pedestrian Fence 225 (PF225) and Vehicle Fence 300 (VF300) initiatives, through which CBP constructed hundreds of miles of new fencing between 2007 and 2009. - Several senior managers in CBP (i.e., Office of Chief Counsel [OCC], Procurement), in addition to the BPAM PMO Director and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) personnel, and subject matter experts in areas such as engineering, design, real estate, environmental specialists, and analysts, who were a part of prior fence construction projects, including P70, PF225 and VF300, are still associated with the BPAM PMO and will be a part of any new fence program. U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 9 DHS-17-0040-E-000103 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence o Collaborative Inter-agency Partnerships: - OFAM/BPAM PMO senior leadership developed and continues to develop strong, collaborate, inter-agency partnerships with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Department of Justice (DOJ), International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC), and other federal, state, and local agencies. These partnerships enable and position the agency to execute CBP's USBP border infrastructure requirements. o Facilities and Tactical Infrastructure (FITT) Tracking Tool: - CBP and USACE developed a communication and project management tool, FITT, that serves as a communication tool between CBP and its executing agencies. - This tool allows the project team to plan and track project execution including schedule and budget, status and risks, and integrates real estate and environmental clearance requirements. - The system integrates project information, real estate and environmental clearance status, and the USBP asset inventory into a geospatial representation. - The tool's capabilities enable CBP to track detailed, immediate milestone progress for any fence construction requirements. U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 10 DHS-17-0040-E-000104 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence o Costs: - The foundation for CBP cost per mile for primary fence construction costs is based on average costs associated with the construction of PF225 fence. - Current estimates have been updated to include the cost of real estate acquisition and additional potential risks and costs associated with building a wall. (b) (5) . However, due - In 2008, the estimated cost for the wall in (b) (7)(E) was approximately to significant site adaptations resulting from building in a flood plain and to meet IBWC requirements, the estimated ROM costs have increased to (b) (5) . - These estimates do not account for future market fluctuations (e.g. increased fuel costs, labor, raw materials) that will increase cost to construct. - (b) (5) o Primary Pedestrian Fence: Approximate range is - Average of (b) (5) for real estate and environmental planning, construction and construction oversight - for mileage in all Sectors except Laredo & RGV - for mileage in Laredo & RGV - for environmental mitigation - for real estate acquisition - for staffing increases required to support the program (b) (5) (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 11 DHS-17-0040-E-000105 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence (b) (5) o Secondary Pedestrian Fence: Approximate range is $ - Average of (b) (5) for real estate and environmental planning, construction and construction oversight - also include (b) (5) for road between layers of fence (b) (5) for environmental mitigation - - (b) (5) for real estate acquisition - (b) (5) for staffing increases required to support the program (b) (5) o Vehicle Fence: Approximate range is - Average of (b) (5) for real estate and environmental planning, construction and construction oversight. - for environmental mitigation - r real estate acquisition - or staffing increases required to support the program (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 12 DHS-17-0040-E-000106 Background: A Foundation on Which to Build Fence (Roads) o CBP manages an inventory of over 5,100 miles of roads identified by the USBP or maintenance. - Roads are utilized for operational requirements including patrol and drag roads. Additionally, these roads provide access to tactical infrastructure including fence and boat ramps. o The average cost to construct new roads is currently estimated at (b) (5) - Estimate is a rough order of magnitude (-50/+100) and includes project planning and oversight, environmental planning and compliance, environmental mitigation, real estate planning and acquisition, staffing and human capital requirements, design, and construction. (b) (5) , per year. o The recurring average cost to maintain existing roads is - Estimates for "recurring costs" are rough order of magnitude (-50/+100) and reflect average maintenance costs per mile of road plus environmental compliance and staffing and human capital requirements. U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 13 DHS-17-0040-E-000107 Section II: USBP Initial Priority Requirements & Implementation Approach U.S. Customs and Border Protection 14 DHS-17-0040-E-000108 USBP InitialPriorityRequirements: Summary& Cost Estimates Focus is on: o EstimatP-c(@MB] have been identified as priority new pedestrian fence miles o o (San Die o El Paso and Rio Grande Valley). liliilllD have been identified as priority replacement Estimate pedestrian fence and vehicle fence t}Dledestrian fence (San Djf.EI Centro, Yuma, Tucson, and El Paso). Of theflQQ approximately[tDPI] of the fence replacement will be an upgrade from vehicle fence to mdestrian fence. An estimated in real estate oRGV and of roads that need to be maintained (estimated at along the SWB have also been identified as priorities. ! o) Requirement Type New Miles Acquisition/Initial Costs Jlflll 20 Vear Recurring Costs ROM (-50%/+100 %) Cost (Maintenance and Repair) Total End State Cost $ New Primary PF Replacement Primary PF $ And VF to PF $ $ Maintenance Total Costs U.S.Customs and Border Protection $ PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 15 BW8 FOIA CBP 000507 DHS-17-0040-E-000109 Wall with Levee o Definition of wall with levee: A joint structure tha-rises concrete wall and bollard infrastructure , measuring approximately o high to meet U.S. Border Patrol's (USBP) requirements , with the ratio of concrete to bollard fence fluctuating depending on height of levee. o Currently, CBP has bollards with levee (b) (?)(E) wall with levee and of wall with in Rio Grande Valley Sector. Rio Grande Valley - segmen - U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 16 BW8 FOIA CBP 000508 DHS-17-0040-E-000110 Potential Wall with Levee o Potential Wall with Levee: - We have identified sites, in the range of (b) (7)(E) , where we believe levee would support a wall. These miles are in: ? El Paso Sector ? Big Bend Sector ? Rio Grande Sector - Miles are subject to change, after real estate and other on-site investigations are completed. U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 17 DHS-17-0040-E-000111 USBP Initial Priority Requirements: Acquisition Strategy o CBP continues to work with USACE to establish Multiple Award Task Order Contracts (MATOC) and Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts to allow for an expedited contract award process for fence construction. o This acquisition strategy is dependent on ability to utilize BSFIT (O&M) funds recovered from completed fence replacement projects. o This money will fund the seed projects to establish the MATOC pools. Available ECSO Horizontal Capacity Pool SW Border Patrol Sectors Laredo, Del Rio, & Big Bend RGV Sector El Paso, Tucson & Yuma Sectors San Diego & El Centro Sectors Southwest Border East* Southwest Border West* Totals Beginning Set-Aside Total $ Awarded Contract Capacity Unrestricted $75,000,000 $30,095,148 SDVOSB $70,000,000 $15,219,270 8(a) 8(a) HUBZone Unrestricted Unrestricted *estimated Reserved Capacity Available Capacity $0 $32,500,000 (b) (5) Current Status of Procurement 44,904,852 Awarded 22,280,730 Awarded Phase 1 SSEB begins 1/17/17 Phase 1 RFP will issue on 1/27/17 Phase 1 RFP will issue on 1/27/17 Pending Pending , U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 18 DHS-17-0040-E-000112 Actua l 1/ 23/ 17 July Sept . January December CY CY 2017 2017 2018 2018 2020 2021 U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 19 BW8 FOIA CB P 000511 DHS-17-0040-E-000113 USBP InitialPriorityRequirements: EstimatedTimelineConsiderations o Environmental: o Real Estate: U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 20 BW8 FOIA CBP 0005 12 DHS-17-0040-E-000114 USBP Initial Priority Requirements: Estimated Timeline Considerations o Government Furnished Material (GFM) and Supply Chain: - - (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 21 DHS-17-0040-E-000115 USBP Initial Priority Requirements: Estimated Timeline Considerations o Additional staffing will be required in all program areas to meet the demands of fence construction while still maintaining current programs - - (b) (5) - U.S. Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 22 DHS-17-0040-E-000116 USBP Initial Priority Requirements: Next Steps o OFAM is prepared to authorize USACE to begin market research for potential requirements on January 23, 2017. - BPAM PMO is preparing an email to send for concurrence to authorize. o Continue to collaborate with USBP to refine needs and requirements. o Continue to coordinate with USACE on MATOC requirements. o Meeting was held on January 13, 2017 with Assistant Commissioner Borkowski to begin initial discussions regarding acquisition documentation to develop the Acquisition Decision Memorandum (ADM). Program Accountability and Risk Management (PARM) and Joint Requirements Council (JRC) were in attendance. o Workshop scheduled for January 25, 2017 with internal BPAM PMO subject matter experts to continue to examine USBP requirements and further refine subsequent schedules. A follow-up meeting will be scheduled for early February with USACE subject matter experts and other stakeholders to gain consensus on the path forward. o (b) (5) o Continued discussions around USBP unconstrained requirements are underway. U.S. Customs and Border Protection 23 DHS-17-0040-E-000117 Section III: Additional Key Considerations U.S. Customs and Border Protection 24 DHS-17-0040-E-000118 Additional Key Considerations o (b) (5) U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 25 DHS-17-0040-E-000119 Additional Key Considerations o o (b) (5) o U.S. Customs and Border Protection FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 26 DHS-17-0040-E-000120 AdditionalKey Considerations U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 27 BW8 FOIA CBP 0005 19 DHS-17-0040-E-000121 APPENDIX A: MAPS U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 28 BW8 FOIA CBP 000520 DHS-17-0040-E-000122 San Diego Sector --- U.S.Customs and Border Protection wun PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY --,11,lll1 29 BW8 FOIA CBP 00052 1 DHS-17-0040-E-000123 El Centro Sector U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 30 BW8 FOIA CBP 000522 DHS-17-0040-E-000124 Yuma Sector ProposedFence in Yuma Sector .._.n ._..,11.m1 U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 31 BW8 FOIA CBP 000523 DHS-17-0040-E-000125 TucsonSector -.- U.S.Customs and Border Protection a.cuni.-, PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 11,l011 32 BW8 FOIA CBP 000524 DHS-17-0040-E-000126 El Paso Sector __ _ ,,__ I ---,._. I-- ~ca.-,___ ,_ "_'=.---...-- MU77 "'".aJ U, JIU PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 33 BW8 FOIA CBP 000525 DHS-17-0040-E-000127 Big Bend Sector ProposedFencein Big Bend Sector MU77 ..,_,, U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 17. MlJ 34 BW8 FOIA CBP 000526 DHS-17-0040-E-000128 Del Rio Sector Proposed Fence in Del Rio Sector MU 71 ~1 U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY J,JM 7 35 BW8 FOIA CBP 000527 DHS-17-0040-E-000129 Laredo Sector ProposedFencein LaredoSector a.eJn U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY .,_..,11.1111 36 BW8 FOIA CBP 000528 DHS-17-0040-E-000130 Rio Grande Valley Sector Proposed Fence in Rio Grande Valley Sector U.S.Customs and Border Protection PREDECISIONAL/FOROFFICIALUSE ONLY 37 BW8 FOIA CBP 000529 DHS-17-0040-E-000131 From: To: Cc: FLANAGAN, PATRICK S MCALEENAN, KEVIN K; ALLES, RANDOLPH D; Subject: Date: Attachments: RE: Immigration EO Task Force Thursday, February 09, 2017 10:18:42 PM EO Implementation Tracker 2.8.2017 v6 cbp edits.docx (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Patrick, Please see attached incorporating updates / comments, also taking into account guidance found within implementation guidance. Some items we are already tracking internally, but will highlight at 0830 tomorrow with copies for everyone. NON-RESPONSIVE Thank you, - (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (A) Deputy Chief of Staff - Policy U.S. Customs & Border Protection (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) _____________________________________________ From: FLANAGAN, PATRICK S Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:57 PM To: (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Cc: MCALEENAN, KEVIN K (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) ; ALLES, RANDOLPH D DHS-17-0040-E-000132 (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Subject: FW: Immigration EO Task Force - (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Please review tracker for any equities associated with our IPTs. Request any edits by 5 p.m. C1 will review and forward an agency response. Thanks V/R Patrick - Patrick Flanagan (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Notice: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY - this transmission contains material covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 and should be viewed only by personnel having an official "need to know." If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify me immediately by email and delete the original message. _____________________________________________ From: Higgins, Jennifer Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 12:26 PM To: Metzler, Alan (b) (6) MCALEENAN, KEVIN K (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) ; Corbin, Susan (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) ; Clark, Alaina (b) (6) DHS-17-0040-E-000133 Hamilton, Gene (b) (6) Nielsen, Kirstjen Pejic, Gregory Short, Tracy (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) ; (b) (6) ; Feere, Jon (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) Shah, Dimple (b) (6) FLANAGAN, PATRICK S (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Johnson, Liz (b) (6) Wolf, Chad (b) (6) Cc: (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Subject: RE: Immigration EO Task Force Please find attached the latest version of the implementation tracker. This incorporates all of the feedback we've received to date. Please review closely and provide your updates to (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (cc:d) and to me by end of the day today. In particular, please take time to include the following: - - In the first column, whether S1 action/decision is necessary - In the second column, whether the current status (done/on track/delayed/etc) is captured correctly and if the action is delayed or off track, note the reasons/mitigation in the Key Progress/Issues column - In the Key Progress/Issues column, please be sure to flag if there is a resource/training/policy/legal - Don't worry about the last column. (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) and I will address that and ask that you confirm the content at a later date. Note that Monday's TF meeting will be canceled, so we'll want to be sure we have the latest updates from you when we meet on Friday. DHS-17-0040-E-000134 Thanks for your help and for all of your work on this! Best, - (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) << File: EO Implementation Tracker 2.8.2017 v6.docx >> DHS-17-0040-E-000135 From: To: (b) (6) (b) (6) Hamilton, Gene; Pejic, Gregory; Shah, Dimple; (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) ; Short, Tracy; Feere, Jon; (b) (6) Palmer, David; Johnson, Liz; Clark, Alaina; (b) (6) Chad; (b) (6) (b) (6) Cc: Carroll, Kevin T.; (b) (6) McDonald, Christina; arroll, Kevin; Subject: Attachments: Wolf, (b) (6) (b) (6) (b) (6) EO Implementation Task Force Meeting NON-RESPONSIVE EDITED-Predecisional EO Implementation Summary 2017-041217.pptx NON-RESPONSIVE <> NOTE: This will be the TF's single, regularly scheduled update meeting per week. Focus on near term due outs that are at risk of being late and/or require the attention of the TF and/or DHS. Physical attendance is not mandatory. If you are at the NAC at the time of the meeting, conference room attendance is encouraged. Otherwise, dial in. Let's roll through near-term (one week back and one week out) major concerns and moving parts, then get out. Intent is to be mindful of the group's combined time, avoid meeting fatigue, and direct energies more on immediate task completion and mission execution, than on HQ engagement in policy discussions. DHS-17-0040-E-000136 (8 EO Implementation Progress Wal1Consh~1ction (slide6J - NON-RESPONSIVE NON-RESPONSIVE Document 8/8/20 18 10:07 AM Key Done D On Track Dela y ed / Issues DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY - OffTrack BW8 FOIA CBP 000535 DHS-17-0040-E-000137 2 EO 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements 8/8/2018 10:07 AM DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-E-000138 -= ' Wall Construction I . o I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o Est ablish int egrated plannin g team to constru ct a physical wall on th e SB 1/ 25/ 17 o Issue Request for Proposals 3/ 17/ 17 o Obt ain Acquisition Decision Event - 1 appr oval 3/ 20/ 17 o OGC to provide AS2 with th e letter from CBP Commissioner (A) McAleenan tha t was sent to U.S. Trade Represe nt ative (USTR) requestin g support for a waiver of the Buy American Act for th e pur chase of wall building material o OGC to provi de AS2 with an option / recommendation for moving th e issue forward by working directly withWH o Proposals due b ack to CBP (deadlin e extended from 3/ 29/ 17) 3/ 31/ 17 3/ 31/ 17 4/ 4/ 17 o Includ e mileston es for "repo1ting" requir ements in thi s tracker 4/ 5/ 17 o Complete prop osal review and down select 4/ 12/ 17 o Publish sign ed Secreta1y' s waiver of applicable environm ent al, land mana gement , and oth er laws 4/ 30/ 17 o Identi fy Southwest border barrier requirement s 4/ 30/ 17 o Award IDIQ contr acts and prototype task orders 6/ 14/ 17 o Begin conshu ction of wall pr ototypes Key Interdependencies / Issues: Reprogramming request Eminent Domain Phased Communications Plan Ensure resource procurement and hiling programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key 8/ 8/ 2018 10:07 AM Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 6 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CB P 000537 DHS-17-0040-E-000139 -= ' I . o Wall Construction(Reprogramming) I Actions Milestones EO 13767, Section 4a 4b 4c WG: Wall Construction Components: CBP, MGMT Sr. Staff: Kathe1yn Kolbe o CBP to validate th e following reprogr amming mileston es and dates 4/ 5/ 17 o Ensure equal consideration is given to curr entl y deployed and proven bord er security capabilities TBD o Ensure compliance with DHS Man agement Directive 10 2 includin g completing an an alysis of alternati ves to includ e a cost-b enefit analysis and effectiveness measur es of existin g fencing as recommend ed by GAO to determin e the most appr opriat e and cost effective solution TBD o Brief HAC-HLS on th e following as soon as possible TBD o Results of prot otype source selection o Prototyp e evaluat ion results including crit eria for selectin g one or mor e prot otypes for th e initial segment TBD o CBP's long-t erm goals and plan for bord er security b etween the port s of ently along th e SWB and one or more long-t erm, mu lti-layered solution s for achieving th ose goals and plans, inform ed by alternati ves analysis and includin g proposed laydowns of bord er infra stru cture TBD o The curr ent threat assessme nt along th e SWB and h ow it relates to CBP's long term bord er security goals and proposed solutions TBD o Ind epend ent cost estimate for any proposed solutions TBD Key Interdependencies / Issues : o Reprogramming request o Eminent Domain o Phased Communications Plan o Ensure resource procurement and hiring programs are in compliance with "Buy Ame1ican" requirements. Document Key 8/8/20 18 10:07 AM Done - On Track D Dela y ed / Issues - OffTrack 7 DRAFT-PREDECISIONAL // FOROFFICIALUSEONLY BW8 FOIA CBP 000538 DHS-17-0040-E-000140 (b) (6) , (b) (7 )(C) o on behalf of (b) (6), (b ) (7)(C) From: To: Cc: Subj ect : Atta chment s: Call-In FW: Stakeholder Outreach FollowUp Draft WallEngagement Strategy Process.pptx (b) (7)(E) <> These are the three primary goals of our discussion at 10am. I. Improve definition of roles and responsibilities and the engagement process 2. Identify all inputs , responsib le part ies and deadlines for developing an integrated engagement schedule 3. Confirm immediate deliverab les, respons ible parties and deadlines for pending engagements (STAFF DELS and Townhall) BW8 FOIA CBP 000539 DHS-17-0040-E-000141 Wall Engagement Strategy Process: Formulation and Routing Circulate messagingtools Engagement schedule 1 BW8 FOIA CBP 000540 DHS-17-0040-E-000142 Wall Engagement Strategy Process: Key Activities and Milestones Line of Effort Location Acti vity / Mile stone RGV Tit le Search OCA, OPA, IPL soc soc soc RFPClosure No Action Down-Select OCA Award Not ifi catio n OCA N/A N/A OHSA Dat e rova l OCA CR Ends No Action OCA,O PA N/A Budget N/A N/A Outr each Action s FY18 Hearin House FY18Hearing (Senate) 23-May OCA OCA Acti vity / Mileston e Dat e Outr each Action s Prototypes Line of Effort soc RFPClosu re ~ Apr No Act ion Budget N/A CR Ends 28-A pr No Act ion Land Acquisitio n RGV N/A N/A N/A Budget Budget Budget Location Prototypes soc soc CGAP N/A Prototypes Tit le Search 5-May OCA, OPA, IPL FY18Budget Release 15-May OCA,O PA FY18 Hear ing (Senate) 23-May OCA FY18 Heari ng (House) 2~ May OCA Award Not ifi cat ion July TBD OCA Down-Se lect May TBD OCA OHSA Ma TBD OCA roval 2 BW8 FOIA CBP 00054 1 DHS-17-0040-E-000143 Wall Engagement Strategy Process: Key Stakeholders o National Media o LocaI Media o NGOs o Appropriations Committees o Governors o USACE o Mayors o Homeland Security Committees o Municipal Reps o DOI o DOJ o City Managers o IBWC o Local Law Enforcement o Private Entities o Border Members o State Legislatures o County Officials 3 BW8 FOIA CB P 000542 DHS-17-0040-E-000144 Wall Engagement Strategy Process: Messaging Tool kit o Public Affairs Guidance o Advanced Notifications o Advanced Notifications o Press Release o Leadership Meetings/Calls with Key Congressional Members o Calls to Key Stakeholders o Statement o Q&A o Press Calls o Leadership Interview o Leadership Op-ed o Committee Staff Briefings by SMEs o Site visits o Delegation Engagement 4 BW8 FOIA CBP 000543 DHS-17-0040-E-000145 Wall EngagementStrategyProcess: Key Considerations Messagingshould be... Examples: o o o o o Appropriators expect to know more and know first Aligned with outreach goals Jointly developed to ensure consistency Timed to reflect stakeholder hierarchy Scoped to satisfy stakeholder needs and expectations o Authorizers expect to know before media o Private landowners will know more than Congress is entitled regarding their private negotiations 5 BW8 FOIA CBP 000544 DHS-17-0040-E-000146 U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Homeland Security June 3, 2019 SENT VIA EMAIL TO: cerissa.cafasso@americanoversight.org Cerissa Cafasso Counsel American Oversight 1030 15th Street, NW, Suite B255 Washington, DC 20005 Re: 17-cv-01187 (2017-HQLI-00017) American Oversight v. DHS First Interim Release Dear Ms. Cafasso: This is our first interim response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), dated March 21, 2017. For this production, DHS reviewed 310 pages of which 75 pages are released in full, 129 pages are withheld in full, and 30 pages are withheld in part pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(5) and (b)(6). 76 pages are non-responsive. The 234 pages for release are bates stamped DHS-0011187-000001 to DHS-001-1187-000234. If you have any questions regarding this release, please contact Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Nebeker, Assistant United States Attorney, Civil Division, by email at Mark.Nebeker@usdoj.gov or phone at (202) 252-2536. Sincerely, Bradley E. White FOIA Program Specialist Enclosure: 234 pages - FOKOFFICIALUSE ONLY U.S.-MEXICO CEO DIALOGUE: BORDER OPTIMIZATION WORKING GROUP December 7, 2016 Overview: You will provide brief (5 minute) remarks on U.S.-Mexico trade facilitation efforts as part of the U.S.-Mexico CEO Dialogue Bord er Optimization Working Group from 9:00 a.m. to 9:45 a.m., with opening remarks by Mexican Foreign Minister Claudia Rui z Massieu from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., at the Four Seasons Hotel in Mexico City. The Dialogue is led by co-chairs Armando Gar za (Chairman , Alfa) and John G. Ric e Vice Chairman , General Electric). The Working Group is led by co-chairsl (b)(G) (Gamas Group) and j(b)(6) b)(G) I(FedEx Freight). (b_ )(6_l______ You will be joined by ,_l Administration Service. _,IChief of Mexico's Tax Background on the U.S.-Mexico CEO Dialogue: You participated in th e most rec ent meeting of the U.S.-Mexico CEO Dialogu e in Jun e 2016 at th e Organization of Am erican States in Washington , DC. Th e CEO Dialogu e was created in 2013 by the U.S. Chamber of Comm erce and the Consejo Coordinador Empresarial (CCE) to strengthen economic and commercial ties between the two countries. The CEO Dialogue is currently co -chaired by Armando Gar za (Chairman, Alfa) and John G. Rice (Vice Chairman, General Electric). The CEO Dialogue has a strong connection to the U.S.-Mexico CEO Dialogue, and often meet s at the same tim e. DHS repr esents th e U.S. Gov ernm ent in the CEO Dialogu e's Bord er Optimization Working Group. The working group is led by co-chairs~b)(6) l(Gamas Group) and l(b)(6) KFedEx Freight). Background on Relationship with Mexico: DHS has a robu st relationship with th e Government of Mex ico on trade facilitation and other issues. Participation in the CEO Dialogue is one of the many ways DHS bilaterally engage s privat e sector stak ehold ers in the United States and Mexico to discuss ongoing trade facilitation initiatives and solicit input on prioritie s. OHS Priorities for the Meeting: Vision for the Future. To date, we have addressed issues such as cargo preinspection, tru sted trad er programs , information sharing , and border infra structur e as separat e, discrete topic s. Going forward, we need to start to see-and build policy and regulatory fram ework s to support-th e connections betwee n bord er and communications 1 DHS-001-1187-000001 DHS-17-0040-F-000001 infrastructure development, pre-inspection and pre-clearance regimes, and programs like Air Cargo Advance d Screening (ACAS) program. Cargo Pre-Inspection. In line with the commitments of President Enrique Pefia Nieto's official working visit to Washington , DC in July 2016, CBP and Mexican Customs are interested in expanding air cargo pre-inspection in the Unit ed States and are preparing to publish criteria for such expansion. In addition to physical infrastructure requirements, information sharing between private sector partners and customs authorities in the Unite d States and Mexico will be critical to the continued success of cargo pre-inspection. You may wish to reiterate to the working group the innovativ e nature and continued evolution of cargo pre-inspection, nothing that DHS is interested in partnering with the private sector to ensure cargo pre-inspection efforts are meeting the expectat ions of all parties involved. Border Infrastructure Coordination. Based on priorities identified by the U.S.Mexico High Level Economic Dialogue, the Unite d States and Mexico have made significant strides in our bord er crossing infrastructure coordination efforts . In addition to the development ofbinational Bord er Crossing Infrastructure Principl es (see HLED Attachment E) which you may also discuss at the High Level Economic Dialogu e MidYear Review, the U.S. Border Crossing Infrastructure Prioriti zation Council directed the development of a reference guide to U.S . Government funding and financing options to support innovative approaches such as include public-private partnerships. While we should not openly discuss the U.S. Border Crossing Infrastructure Prioritization Council, you should note this effort, highlightin g that it is the first time such funding options are brought together in one plac e and will be a useful resource for stakeholders interested in investing in border infrastructur e proj ects. In the coming weeks this reference will be posted online. North American Trade Facilitation. With the ongoing U.S. presidential transition and its focus on trade issues broadly, and the U.S .-Mexico relationship and the future of the North American Free Trad e Agreement (NAFTA) more specifically, this meeting of the CEO Dialogu e is focused on ways to ensure forward momentum on trade facilitation efforts between the United States and Mexico. North America has emerged as a global economic and security powerhou se, with half a billion people, 25 percent of global GDP, and trilateral commerce at record levels over a trillion dollars. U.S. efforts and policies with Mexico and Canada are increasingly guided an " intermestic" lens: simultaneously international and domestic in focus and based on the assumption of shared respons ibility and joint management of common issues. Borders today are as much about flows of goods and people, and the systems that facilitate that, as they are about the jurisdictional boundary lines they cross. 2 DHS-001-1187-000002 DHS-17-0040-F-000002 With this new paradigm, it is critical the United States, Canada, and Mexico start to see- and build policy and regulatory frameworks to support - the connections between border and communications infra struc ture deve lopment , pre-inspection and preclearance regimes, and effo rts like the Air Cargo Advanced Screening (ACAS) program. You may wish to emphasiz e this new paradigm with th e working group member s and encourage them to think strategica lly in this area as they develop recommendations for 2017 and beyond. Issues the Working Group is Likely to Raise During the Meeting: SenseAware . Mr. tb )(6) jrnay seek increase d access to th e Nogales Port of Entry in support of SenseAware . PLCY and PSO , in coordination with CBP and SAT, arranged for FedEx and U.S . Chamber of Commerce teams to tour and "geo-fence" ports of entry along the U.S. -Mexico border, including McAllen/Reynosa; Laredo/Nuevo Laredo; El Paso /Ciudad Juarez; and Nogales. The FedEx/Chamber team successfully "geo -fenced" each port of entry, with the exception of Nogales, where CBP facilitated the "geo -fencing" of the primary inspection areas, but not the secondary inspection areas, citing security operations concerns. (b)( 5) Participants: DHS Alan Bersin CEO Dialogue !Chief, Mexico's Tax Administration Service Armando Gar za, Chairman, Alfa John G. Rice, Vice Chairman, General Electric l(b)(6) Own er, Gamas Group ~b)(6) I, CEO, FedEx Fr eight ~b)(6) I 3 DHS-001-1187-000003 DHS-17-0040-F-000003 Attachments: A. Agenda B. CEO Dialogue Working Group Recommendations C. Draft Border Infrastructure Innovative Funding and Finance Resource Guide D. Biographies Staff Responsible for Briefing Memo: Mexico, fb J(6) I l._ (b_J(6 _l___ __.l Regional Affairs Specialist- 4 FOR~LY DHS-001-1187-000004 DHS-17-0040-F-000004 Page 005 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000005 DHS-17-0040-F-000005 Page 006 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000006 DHS-17-0040-F-000006 Page 007 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000007 DHS-17-0040-F-000007 Page 008 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000008 DHS-17-0040-F-000008 Page 009 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000009 DHS-17-0040-F-000009 Page 010 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000010 DHS-17-0040-F-000010 Page 011 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000011 DHS-17-0040-F-000011 Page 012 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000012 DHS-17-0040-F-000012 Page 013 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000013 DHS-17-0040-F-000013 Page 014 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000014 DHS-17-0040-F-000014 Page 015 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000015 DHS-17-0040-F-000015 Page 016 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000016 DHS-17-0040-F-000016 Page 017 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000017 DHS-17-0040-F-000017 Page 018 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000018 DHS-17-0040-F-000018 Page 019 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000019 DHS-17-0040-F-000019 Secre tary U.S. Department of Homeland Security Washington, DC 20528 Homeland Security February 17, 2017 MEMORANDUM FOR: Kevin McAleenan Acting Commissioner U.S. Customs and Border Protection Thomas D. Homan Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Lori Scialabba Acting Director U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Joseph B. Maher Acting Genera l Counsel Dimple Shah Acting Assistant Secretary for International Affairs Chip Fulghum Acting Undersecreta ry for Management ~ '\\ ~ FROM: John Kelly Secretary SUBJECT: Implementing the Pre ? nt's Border Security and Immigrat ion Enforcement Improvements Policies This memorandum implements the Executive Order entitled "Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements ," issued by the President on January 25, 2017, which establishes the President ' s policy regarding effective border security and immigration enforcement through faithful execution of the laws of the United States. It implements new policies designed to stem illegal immigration and facilitate the detection , apprehension, detention , and removal of aliens who have no lawful basis to enter or remain in the United States. It constitutes guidance to all Department personnel , and supersedes all existing conflicting policy , directives , memoranda , and other guidance regarding this subject matter , except as otherwise expressly stated in this memorandum . DHS-001-1187-000020 DHS-17-0040-F-000020 www.dhs.gov A. Policies Regarding the Apprehension and Detention of Aliens Described in Section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The President has determined that the lawful detention of aliens arriving in the United States or otherwise described in section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) pending a final determ ination of whether to order them removed , including determining eligibility for imm igration relief , is the most efficient means by wh ich to enforce the immigration laws at our borders. Detention also prevents such aliens from committing crimes while at large in the United States, ensures that aliens will appear for their removal proceedings , and substantia lly increases the likelihood that aliens lawfully ordered removed will be removed. These policies are consistent with INA provisions that mandate detention of such aliens and allow me or my designee to exercise discretionary parole authority pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the INA only on a case-by-case basis , and only for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Policies that facilitate the release of removable aliens apprehended at and between the ports of entry, which allow them to abscond and fail to appear at their removal hearings, undermine the border security mission. Such policies , collectively referred to as "catchand-release," shall end. Accordingly , effective upon my determination of: (1) the establishment and deployment of a joint plan with the Department of Justice to surge the deployment of immigration judges and asylum officers to interview and adjudicate claims asserted by recent border entrants; and, (2) the establishment of appropriate processing and detention facilities , U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel should only release from detention an alien detained pursuant to section 235(b) of the INA, who was apprehended or encountered after illegally entering or attempting to illegally enter the United States, in the following situations on a case-by-case basis, to the extent consistent with applicable statutes and regulations: I. When removing the alien from the United States pursuant to statute or regulation ; 2. When the alien obtains an order granti ng relief or protection from removal or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determines that the individual is a U.S. citizen, national of the United States, or an alien who is a lawful permanent resident , refugee , asylee, holds temporary protected status, or holds a valid immigration status in the United States; 3. When an ICE Field Office Director , ICE Specia l Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Border Patrol Sector Chief, CBP Director of Field Operations , or CBP Air & Marine Operations Director consents to the alien 's withdrawal of an application for admiss ion, and the alien contemporaneously departs from the United States; 4. When required to do so by statute , or to comply with a binding sett lement agreement or order issued by a competent judicial or administrative authority ; 2 DHS-001-1187-000021 DHS-17-0040-F-000021 5. When an ICE Field Office Director, ICE Special Agent-in-Charge, U.S. Border Patro l Sector Chief , CBP Director of Field Operations , or CBP Air & Marine Operation s Directo r authorizes the alien' s parole pursuant to section 212(d)(5) of the INA with the written concurrence of the Deputy Director ofICE or the Deput y Comm issioner of CBP, except in exigent circumstances such as medical emergencies where seeking prior approval is not practicable. In those exceptional instance s, any such parole will be reported to the Deputy Director or Deput y Commissioner as expeditiously as possib le; or 6. When an arriving alien proce ssed under the expedited removal provisions of sect ion 23 5(b) has been found to have established a "credible fear" of persecution or torture by an asylum officer or an immigration judge , provided that such an alien affirmatively estab lishes to the satisfactio n of an ICE immigration officer his or her identity , that he or she presents neither a security risk nor a risk of absconding, and provided that he or she agrees to comply with any additional conditions of release imposed by ICE to ensure public safety and appearance at any removal hearings. To the extent current regulation s are inconsistent with this guidance, components will develop or revise regulations as appropr iate. As the Department works to expand detention capabilities , detention of all such individuals may not be immediately possib le, and detention resources should be prioritized based upon potential danger and risk of flight if an individual alien is not detained, and parole determinations will be made in accordance with current regulations and guidance. See 8 C.F.R. ?? 212 .5, 235 .3. This guidance does not prohibit the return of an alien who is arriving on land to the foreign territory contiguous to the United States from which the alien is arriving pending a removal proceeding under section 240 of the INA consistent with the direction of an ICE Field Office Director , ICE Special Agent-in-Charge , CBP Chief Patrol Agent, or CBP Director of Field Operations. B. Hiring More CBP Agents/Officers CBP has insufficient agents /officers to effectively detect, track , and apprehend all aliens illegally entering the United States. The United States needs additional agents and officers to ensure complete operational contro l of the border. Accordingly , the Commissioner of CBP shall-while ensuring consistency in training and standards-immediate ly begin the process of hiring 5,000 additional Border Patrol agents , as well as 500 Air & Marine Agents /Officers , and take all actions necessary to ensure that such agents /officers enter on duty and are assigned to appropriate duty station s, including providing for the attendant resources and additional personnel necessary to support such agents, as soon as practicable. Human Capital leadership in CBP and ICE, in coordination with the Unde r Secretary for Management , Chief Financial Officer , and Chief Human Capital Officer , shall develop hiring plans that balance growth and interagency attrition by integrat ing workforce shaping and career 3 DHS-001-1187-000022 DHS-17-0040-F-000022 paths for incumbents and new hires. C. Identifying and Quantifying Sources of Aid to Mexico The President has directed the heads of all execu tive departments to identify and quantify all sources of direct and indirect Federal aid or assistance to the Government of Mexico. According ly, the Under Secretary for Management shall identify all sources of direct or indirect aid and assistance , exclud ing inte lligence activities , from every depart mental component to the Government of Mexico on an annual basis, for the last five fiscal years, and quantify such aid or assistance. The Under Secretary for Managem ent shall submit a report to me reflecting historic levels of such aid or assistance provided annually w ithin 30 days of the date of this memorandum. D. Expansion of the 287(g) Program in the Border Region Section 287(g) of the INA authorizes me to enter into a written agreeme nt with a state or political subdivi sion thereof, for the purpose of authorizing qualified officers or employees of the state or subdivision to perform the functions of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation , apprehe nsion, or detention of aliens in the United States. This grant of authority, known as the 287(g) Program, has been a highly successfu l force multiplier that authorizes state or local law enforcement personnel to perform all law enforcement functions specified in section 287(a) of the INA, including the authority to investigate , identify, apprehend , arrest, detain , transport and conduct searches of an alien for the purposes of enforcing the immigration laws. From January 2006 through September 20 15, the 287(g) Program led to the identification of more than 402,000 removab le aliens , primarily through encounters at local jails. Empower ing state and local law enforcement agencies to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law is critical to an effective enforcement strategy. Aliens who engage in crimina l conduct are priorities for arrest and remova l and will often be encou ntered by state and local law enforce ment officers during the course of their routine duties. It is in the interest of the Department to partner with those state and local jurisdictions through 287(g) agreements to assist in the arrest and removal of criminal aliens. To maximize participation by state and local juri sdictions in the enforcement of federa l immigration law near the southern border, I am directing the Director ofICE and the Commissioner of CBP to engage immediate ly with all willing and qualified law enforcement jurisdictions that meet all program requirements for the purpose of entering into agree ments under 287(g) of the INA. The Commissioner of CBP and the Director of ICE should consider the operat ional functions and capabilitie s of the jurisd ictions willing to enter into 287(g) agreements and structure such agreements in a manner that employs the most effec tive enforcement model for that jurisdiction , includin g the jai l enforcement model , task force officer model, or joint jail enforcement-task force officer mode l. In furtherance of my direction herein , the Commiss ioner of CBP is authorized , in addition to the Director of ICE, to accept state services and take other actions as appropriate to carry out immigration enforcement pursuant to 287(g). 4 DHS-001-1187-000023 DHS-17-0040-F-000023 E. Commissioning a Comprehensive Study of Border Security The Under Secretary for Manageme nt, in consultation with the Commissioner of CBP, Joint Ta sk Force (Border), and Commandant of the Coast Guard, is directed to commission an immediate , comprehensive study of the security of the southern border (air, land and maritime) to identify vulnerabilities and prov ide recommendations to enhance border security. The study should include all aspects of the current border security environment, including the availabi lity of federal and state resources to develop and implement an effective border security strategy that will achieve complete operationa l control of the border. F. Border Wall Construct ion and Funding A wall along the southern border is necessary to deter and prevent the illegal entry of aliens and is a critical component of the President 's overall border security strategy. Congress has authori zed the construction of physical barriers and roads at the border to prevent illegal immigration in severa l statutory provisions , including section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immi grant Respons ibility Act of 1996, as amended, 8 U.S.C. ? 1103 note. Consistent with the President's Executive Order, the will of Congress and the need to secure the border in the national interest , CBP, in consultation with the appropriate executive departments and agencies , and nongovernme ntal entities having relevant expertise - and using materials originating in the United States to the maximum extent permitted by law- shall immediately begin planning , design, constructio n and maintenance of a wall, including the attenda nt lighting , technology (including sensors), as well as patrol and access roads , along the land border with Mexico in accordance with exist ing law, in the most appropriat e locations and utilizing appropri ate mater ials and technology to most effectively achieve operational control of the border. The Under Secretary for Management , in consulta tion with the Comm issioner of CBP shall immediate ly identify and allocate all sources of available fundin g for the plannin g, design , construction and maintenance of a wall, including the attendant lighting, techno logy (including senso rs), as well as patro l and access roads , and deve lop requirements for total ownership cost of this proj ect, includin g preparing Congressional budget requests for the current fiscal year (e.g., supplemental budget requests) and subseq uent fiscal years. G. Exp anding Expedited Removal Pursuant to Section 235(b)(l)(A)(iii)(I) of the INA It is in the national interest to detain and expedit iously remove from the United States aliens app rehended at the border , who have been ordered removed after consi deratio n and denial of their claims for relief or protec tion. Pursuant to section 235(b )(I )(A)(i) of the INA , if an immigration officer determine s that an arriv ing alien is inadmissible to the United States under section 2 12(a)(6)(C) or section 212(a)(7) of the INA , the officer shall, cons istent with all applicabl e laws , order the alien removed from the United States without further hearing or review , 5 DHS-001-1187-000024 DHS-17-0040-F-000024 unless the alien is an unaccompanied alien child as defined in 6 U.S.C . ? 279(g)(2) , indicates an intention to apply for asylum or a fear of persecution or torture or a fear of return to his or her country , or claims to have a valid immigration status within the United States or to be a citizen or national of the United States. Pursuant to section 235(b )(1 )(A)(iii)(I) of the INA and other provisions of law, l have been granted the authority to apply , by designation in my sole and unreviewable discretion, the expedited removal provisions in section 235(b)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) of the INA to aliens who have not been admitted or paroled into the United States , who are inadmissib le to the United States under section 212(a)(6)(C) or section 212(a)(7) of the INA, and who have not affirmatively shown, to the satisfaction of an immigration officer , that they have been continuously physically present in the United States for the two-year period immediately prior to the determination of their inadmissibility. To date , this authority has only been exercised to designate for application of expedited removal , aliens encountered within 100 air miles of the border and 14 days of entry , and aliens who arrived in the United States by sea other than at a port of entry. 1 The surge of illegal immigration at the southern border has overwhelmed federal agencies and resources and has created a significant national security vulnerability to the United States. Thousands of aliens apprehended at the border , placed in remo val proceedings , and released from custody have absconded and failed to appear at their removal hearings. Immigration courts are experiencing a historic backlog ofremoval cases , primarily proceedings under section 240 of the INA for individuals who are not currently detained. During October 2016 and November 2016 , there were 46 , 184 and 47 ,215 apprehensions, respectively , between ports of entry on our southern border. In comparison , during October 2015 and November 2015 there were 32,724 and 32,838 apprehensions, respectively , between ports of entry on our southern border. This increase of 10,000-15,000 apprehensions per month has significantly strained OHS resources. Furthermore , according to EOIR information provided to DHS, there are more than 534,000 cases currently pending on immigration court dockets nationwide - a record high. By contrast, according to some reports, there were nearly 168,000 cases pending at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2004 when section 235(b )( I )(A)(i) was last expanded. 2 This represents an increase of more than 200% in the number of cases pending completion. The average removal case for an alien who is not detained has been pending for more than two years before an immigration judge. 3 In some immigration courts, aliens who are not detained will not have their cases heard by an immigration judge for as long as five years. This unacceptable delay afford s removable aliens 1 Notic e D esignating Aliens Subj ect to Expedited Removal Under Section 235(b )( I )(a)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act , 67 Fed. Reg . 68924 (Nov. 13, 2002) ; Designating Aliens For Expedited Removal , 69 Fed. Reg. 48877 (Aug. 11, 2004) ; Eliminating Exception to Expedited Removal Authorit y for Cuban Nationals Encountered in the United States or Arriving by Sea , 82 Fed. Reg. 490 2 (Jan . 17, 2017 ). 2 Syracuse University , Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) Data Research; availabl e at http ://trac.syr.edu/phptools / imrnigration/court backlo g/. 3 Id. - 6 DHS-001-1187-000025 DHS-17-0040-F-000025 with no plausible claim for relief to remain unlawfully in the United States for many years . To ensure the prompt removal of aliens apprehended at or near the border, the Department will publish in the Federal Register a new Notice Designating Aliens Subject to Expedited Removal Under Section 235(b )( I )(a)(i ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. I direct the Commissioner of CBP and the Director of ICE to conform the use of expedited removal procedures to the designations made in this notice upon its publication. H. Implementi ng the Provisions of Section 235(b )(2)(C) of the IN A to Return Aliens to Contiguous Countr ies Section 235(b)(2)(C) of the INA authorizes the Department to return aliens arriving on land from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States, to the territory from which they arrived , pending a formal removal proceeding under section 240 of the INA. When aliens so apprehended do not pose a risk of a subsequent illegal entry or attempted illegal entry, returning them to the foreign contiguous territory from which they arrived , pending the outcome of removal proceedings saves the Department's detention and adjudicat ion resources for other priority aliens. Accordingly, subject to the requirements of section 1232, Title 8, United States Code , related to unaccompanied alien children and to the extent otherwise consistent with the law and U.S. international treaty obligations , CBP and ICE personnel shall, to the extent appropriate and reasonab ly practicable , return aliens described in section 235(b)(2)(A) of the INA, who are placed in removal proceedings under section 240 of the INA- and who, consistent with the guidance of an ICE Field Office Director , CBP Chief Patrol Agent, or CBP Director of Field Operations , pose no risk of recidivism-to the territory of the foreign contiguous country from which they arrived pending such removal proceedings . To facilitate the completion of removal proceedings for aliens so returned to the contiguous country , ICE Field Office Directors , ICE Special Agents-in-Charge , CBP Chief Patrol Agent , and CBP Directors of Field Operations shall make available facilities for such aliens to appear via video teleconference. The Director of ICE and the Commissioner of CBP shall consult with the Director of EOIR to establish a functional , interoperable video teleconference system to ensure maximum capability to conduct video teleconference removal hearings for those aliens so returned to the contiguous country . I. Enhan cing Asylum Referrals and Credible Fear Determinations Pursuant to Section 235(b)(l) of the INA With certain exceptions , any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters) , irrespective of such alien's status , may apply for asylum. For those aliens who are subject to expedited removal under section 235(b) of the INA, aliens who claim a fear ofretum must be 7 DHS-001-1187-000026 DHS-17-0040-F-000026 referred to an asylum officer to determine whether they have established a credible fear of 4 persecution or torture. To establish a credible fear of persecution , an alien must demonstrate that there is a "significant possibi lity" that the alien could establish eligibility for asylum, taking into account the credi bility of the statements made by the alien in support of the claim and such other facts as are known to the officer. 5 The Director of USC IS shall ensure that asylum officers conduct credible fear interviews in a manner that allows the interviewing officer to elicit all relevant information from the alien as is necessary to make a lega lly sufficient determination. In determining whether the alien has demonstrated a significan t possibility that the alien could establ ish elig ibility for asylum, or for withholding or deferra l of removal under the Convent ion Aga inst Torture, the asylum officer shall consider the statemen ts of the alien and determine the credibi lity of the alien ' s statements made in support of his or her claim and shall consider other facts known to the officer, as required by statute. 6 The asy lum officer sha ll make a positive credible fear finding only after the officer has considered all relevant evidence and determined , based on credible evidence , that the alien has a significant possibility of establ ishing eligibility for asylum, or for withholding or deferral of removal under the Convent ion Against Torture , based on established legal authority. 7 The Director ofUSCIS shall also increase the operational capacity of the Fraud Detection and National Security (FONS) Directorate and continue to strengthen the integration of its operatio ns to support the Field Operations , Refugee , Asylum , and Internat ional Operations , and Service Center Operations Directorate , to detect and prevent fraud in the asylum and benefits adjudicatio n processes , and in consultation with the USCIS Office of Policy and Strategy as operationally appropr iate. The Director of USC IS, the Commiss ioner of CBP, and the Director of ICE shall review fraud detection , deterrence, and prevention measures throughout their respective agencies and provide me with a conso lidated report within 90 days of the date of this memorandum regarding fraud vulnerabi lities in the asy lum and benefits adjud icat ion processes , and propose meas ures to enhance fraud detection , deterrence, and prevention in these processes. J. Allocation of Resources and Personnel to the Southern Border for Detention of Aliens and Adjudication of Claims The detention of aliens apprehended at the border is critical to the effective enforcement of the immigration laws. Aliens who are released from custody pending a determination of their removabi lity are highly likely to abscond and fail to attend their remova l hearings. Moreover, the screening of credib le fear claims by USCIS and adjudication of asylum claims by EOIR at 4 See INA ? 235(b) ( l)(A)- (B); 8 C.F.R. ?? 235.3, 208.30. See INA? 235(b) ( l)(B)(v) . 6 See id. 7 Id. 5 8 DHS-001-1187-000027 DHS-17-0040-F-000027 detention facilities located at or near the point of apprehension will facilitate an expedited resolution of those claims and result in lower detention and transportation costs. Accordingly, the Director of ICE and the Commissioner of CBP should take all necessary action and allocate all availab le resources to expand their detention capabilities and capacitie s at or near the border with Mexico to the greatest extent practicable. CBP shall focus these actions on expansion of "short-term detention " (defined as 72 hours or less under 6 U.S.C. ? 21 l(m)) capability, and ICE will focus these actions on expansion of all other detention capabilities. CBP and ICE should also explore options for joint temporary structures that meet appropr iate standards for detention given the length of stay in those facilities. In addition, to the greatest extent practicable, the Director of USCIS is directed to increase the number of asylum officers and FONS officers assigned to detent ion facilities located at or near the border with Mexico to properly and efficiently adjudicate credible fear and reasonable fear claims and to counter asylum-re lated fraud. K. Proper Use of Parole Authority Pursuant to Section 212( d)(S) of the INA The authority to parole aliens into the United States is set forth in section 212(d)(5) of the INA, which provides that the Secretary may, in his discretion and on a case-by-case basis, temporari ly paro le into the United States any alien who is an applicant for admission for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. Upon careful scrutiny, the statutory language appears to strongly counsel in favor of using the parole authority sparingly and only in individual cases where , after careful consideration of the circumstances, parole is necessary because of demonstrated urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. The practice of granting parole to certain aliens in pre-designated categories in order to create immigration programs not established by Congress, has contributed to a border security crisis, undermined the integrity of the immigration laws and the parole process , and created an incentive for additional illegal immigration. Therefore , the Director of USC IS, the Commissioner of CBP, and the Director of ICE shall ensure that , pending the issuance of final regulations clar ifying the appropriate use of the parole power , appropriate written policy guidance and training is provided to employees within those agenc ies exercising parole authority , including advance parole , so that such employees are familiar with the proper exercise of parole under section 2 12(d)(5) of the INA and exercise such parole authority only on a case-by-case basis , consistent with the law and written policy guidance. Notwithstanding any other provision of this memorandum , pending my further review and evaluation of the impact of operational changes to implement the Executive Order , and additional guidance on the issue by the Director ofICE , the ICE policy directive establishing standards and procedures for the parole of certain arriving aliens found to have a credible fear of persecution or 9 DHS-001-1187-000028 DHS-17-0040-F-000028 torture shall remain in full force and effect. 8 The ICE policy directive shall be implemented in a manner consistent with its plain language. In every case, the burden to establish that his or her release would neither pose a danger to the community, nor a risk of flight remains on the individual al ien, and ICE retains ultimate discretion whether it grants parole in a particular case . L. Proper Processing and Treatme nt of Unaccompanied Alien Minors Enco untered at the Border In accordance with section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reautho rization Act of2008 (codified in part at 8 U.S.C. ? 1232) and section 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. ? 279), unaccompan ied alien children are provided special protections to ensu re that they are properly processed and receive the appropriate care and placement when they are encountered by an immigration officer. An unaccompanied alien child, as defined in section 279(g)(2), Title 6, United States Code, is an alien who has no lawful immigrat ion status in the United State s, has not attained 18 years of age; and with respect to whom, ( l) there is no parent or legal guardian in the United States, or (2) no parent of lega l guardian in the United States is availab le to prov ide care and physical custody . Approximately 155,000 unaccompanied alien children have been apprehended at the southern border in the last three years. Most of these minors are from El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, many of whom travel overland to the southern border with the assistance of a smuggler who is paid several thousand dollars by one or both parents, who reside illegally in the United States. With limited excep tions, upon apprehension, CBP or ICE must promptly determine if a child meets the definition of an "unaccompanied alien chi ld" and, if so, the child must be transferred to the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) within 72 hours, absent exceptional circumstances. 9 The determination that the child is an "unaccom panied alien chi ld" entitles the child to special protectio ns, including placement in a suitable care facility, access to social services, removal proceedings before an immigration judge under section 240 of the INA, rather than expedited removal proceedings under section 235(b) of the INA, and initial adjudication of any asylum claim by USCIS. 10 Approximate ly 60% of minors initially determi ned to be "unacco mpanied alien children" are placed in the care of one or more parents illegally residing in the United States. However, by Depart ment policy and practice , such minors maintained their status as "unaccompanied alien children," notwithstanding that they may no longer meet the statutory definition once they have been placed by HHS in the custody of a parent in the United States who can care for the minor. Exploitation of that policy led to abuses by many of the parents and legal guardians of those 8 ICE Polic y No. 11002.1: Parole of Arriving Aliens Found to Have a Credible Fear of Persecutio n or Torture (Dec. 8, 2009). 9 See 8 U.S.C. ? 1232(b)(3). 10 See generally 8 U.S.C. ? 1232; INA ? 208(b)(3)(C) . 10 DHS-001-1187-000029 DHS-17-0040-F-000029 minors and has contributed to significant administrative delays in adjudications by immigration COUttsand users. To ensure identification of abuses and the processing of unaccompanied alien children consistent with the statutory framework and any applicable court order , the Director of USCIS, the Commissioner of CBP, and the Dire ctor of ICE are directed to develop uniform written guidance and training for all employees and contractors of those agencies regarding the proper processing of unaccompanied alien children , the timely and fair adjudication of their claims for relief from removal , and, if appropriate , their safe repatriation at the conclusion of removal proceedings. In developing such guidance and training , they shall establish standardized review procedures to confirm that alien children who are initially determined to be "unaccompanied alien child[ren]," as defined in section 279(g)(2) , Title 6, United States Code , continue to fall within the statutory definition when being considered for the legal protections afforded to such children as they go through the removal process. M. Accountability Measures to Protect Alien Children from Exploitation and Prevent Abuses of Our Immigration Laws Although the Department's personnel must process unaccompanied alien children pursuant to the requirements described above , we have an obligation to ensure that those who conspire to violate our immigration laws do not do so with impunity-particularly in light of the unique vulnerabilities of alien children who are smuggled or trafficked into the Unite d States. The parents and family members of these children , who are often illegally present in the United States , often pay smuggler s several thousand dollars to bring their children into thjs country. Tragically , many of these children fall vict im to robbery , extortion, kidnapping , sexual assault, and other crimes of violence by the smugglers and other criminal elements along the dangerous journe y through Mexico to the United States. Regardless of the desires for family reunification , or conditions in other countries , the smuggling or trafficking of alien children is intolerable. Accordingly , the Director ofJCE and the Commissioner of CBP shall ensure the proper enforcement of our immigration laws against those who-directly or indirectly - facilitate the smuggling or trafficking of alien children into the United States. Proper enforcement includes , but is not limited to, placing such individuals who are removable aliens into remo val proceeding s, or referring such individuals for criminal prosecution, as appropriate. N. Prioritizing Criminal Prosecutions for Immigration Offenses Committed at the Border The surge of illegal immigration at the southern border has produced a significant increase in organized criminal activity in the border region. Mexican drug cartels, Central American gangs, and other violent transnational criminal organizations have estab lished sophisticated criminal enterprises on both sides of the border. The large-scale movement of Central Americans , Mexicans, and other foreign nationals into the border area has significantl y strained federal 11 DHS-001-1187-000030 DHS-17-0040-F-000030 agencies and resources dedicated to border security. These criminal organ izations have monopolized the human trafficking, human smuggling , and drug trafficking trades in the border region. It is in the national interest of the United States to prevent criminals and criminal organizations from destabilizing border security through the proliferation of illicit transactions and vio lence perpetrated by criminal organizations. To counter this substantial and ongoing threat to the security of the southern borderincluding threats to our maritime border and the approaches-the Directors of the Joint Task Forces-West , -East, and -Investigations, as well as the ICE-led Border Enforcement Security Task Forces (BESTs) , are directed to plan and implement enhanced counternetwork operations directed at disrupting transnational criminal organizations, focused on those involved in human smuggling. The Department will support this work through the Office oflntell igence and Analysis , CBP's National Target ing Center , and the DHS Human Smuggling Cell. In addition, the task forces should include participants from other federal , state, and local agencies , and should target individuals and organizations whose crim inal conduct undermines border security or the integrity of the immigration system, including offenses related to alien smuggling or trafficking , drug trafficking, illegal entry and reentry, visa fraud, identity theft, unlawful possession or use of official documents , and acts of violence committed against persons or property at or near the border. In order to support the efforts of the BESTs and counter network operatio ns of the Joint Task Forces , the Director of ICE shall increase of the number of special agents and analysts in the Northern Triangle ICE Attache Offices and increase the number of vetted Transnational Criminal Investigative Unit international partners. This expansion ofICE ' s international footprint will focus both domestic and international effo1ts to dismantle transnational criminal organizations that are facilitating and profiting from the smuggling routes to the United States. 0. Public Reporting of Border Apprehensions Data The Department has an obligation to perform its mission in a transparent and forthright manner. The public is entitled to know, with a reasonable degree of detail, information pertain ing to the aliens unlawfully entering at our borders. Therefore , consistent with law, in an effort to promote transparency and renew confidence in the Department's border security mission, the Commissioner of CBP and the Director ofICE shall develop a standardized method for public reporting of statistical data regarding aliens apprehended at or near the border for violating the immigration law. The reporting method shall include uniform termino logy and shall utilize a format that is easily understandable by the public in a medium that can be readily accessed. At a minimum , in addition to statistical information currently being publicly reported regarding apprehended aliens , the following information must be included: the number of 12 DHS-001-1187-000031 DHS-17-0040-F-000031 convicted criminals and the nature of their offenses ; the preva lence of gang members and prior immigration violators; the custody status of aliens and, if relea sed, the reason for release and locatio n of that release; and the number of aliens ordered removed and those aliens physically removed. P. No Private Right of Action This document provides only internal OHS policy guidance, which may be modified , rescinded , or superseded at any time without notice . This guidance is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to create any right or benefit , substantive or procedural , enforceable at law by any party in any administrative , civil , or criminal matter. Likewise , no limitations are placed by this guidance on the otherwise lawful enforcement or litigation prerogatives of OHS. In implementing this guidance, I direct OHS Components to consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with all applicable laws , including the Administrative Procedure Act. 13 DHS-001-1187-000032 DHS-17-0040-F-000032 Page 033 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000033 DHS-17-0040-F-000033 Page 034 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000034 DHS-17-0040-F-000034 Page 035 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000035 DHS-17-0040-F-000035 Page 036 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000036 DHS-17-0040-F-000036 Page 037 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000037 DHS-17-0040-F-000037 Page 038 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000038 DHS-17-0040-F-000038 Page 039 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000039 DHS-17-0040-F-000039 Page 040 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000040 DHS-17-0040-F-000040 Page 041 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000041 DHS-17-0040-F-000041 Page 042 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000042 DHS-17-0040-F-000042 Page 043 Withhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000043 DHS-17-0040-F-000043 Page 044 W ithhe ld pursuant to exempt ion (b)(5) of the Freedom of Informat ion and Privacy Act DHS-001-1187-000044 DHS-17-0040-F-000044 From: (b)(6) To: Subject : FW: article: Build the Wall Date : 2017/02/16 10:59:24 Priority: Normal Type: Note Below and attached . From : Rosenblum, Marc Sent : Monday , December 5, 2016 9:37 AM To:l(b)(6) Cc: Kuepper, Andrew b)(6) b)(6) Subject: RE:article : Build the Wall ; Stodder, Seth ~~ (b~)(~6)~------~I : Thanks, b)(6) Definitely appreciate the careful read. (b)(5) (b)(5) Gathering feedback from a few other reviewers as well, inclu ding PA&E and CBP,and will discuss today with A/S Bersin. Marc Rosenblum r b)(6) From* b)(6) I Sent : Monday , December 5, 2016 8:46 AM To: Rosenblum, Mar c ! f~ .~; N. :is;l I !~ ~ ffi< I ,.2 ~ tf ! Expected Developments in the Threat f.:~ ;,::; I It is expected I that the threat will continue to grow for a number of reasons, including the following: \f. ir ,? i: N! ~, r, r= i~ lT ~ The border communities along the Mexico side of the border are continuing to grow in population, and if the Mexican economy does not drastically improve, the opportunity to hire persons willing to risk taking drugs across the border into the US will increase. f~ o ~ ,? :f~ The profits in the drug trade are very, very large and greed is a big motivator. Because of the huge profits and the need for technology to find markets, the latest technology can be expected to be available to the large smuggling operations. Demand for drugs will remain high unless the supply is interrupted. ~ It Heavy smuggling occurs on the land routes. Specific routes are :; identified for each of the sectors in the section, "Border Control (b) (7)(E) ~ Strategy b Sector," later in this volume. The' }~ # ij I 'I ~ft ;1 i;.~. ~ 1t '' o ,;EUR. ~~ f~ ---------- *' ' 2. Southwest Border Drug Control Strategy, Operation Alliance, El Paso, Texas, July 1990. i #i ~~ f.li Official, Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000033 Page6 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - OUO-7 (ALL) This study is focused on the land-based threat between the POEs. We do, however, recognize that smuggling also occurs through the POEs, by air, and by water. Border Control Strategy Our recommended strategy for improved border control is based on two tactics: ? the use of heavily patrolled multiple barriers to control the large number of aliens and drugs crossing in the urban areas of the border ? additional 24-hour, all-weather highway checkpoints to minimize the quantity of illegal aliens and drugs leaving the border region if they get into the country (Figure 1). Electronic technology, including sensors, will be an important element of a system to count the number of illegal crossings and, more importantly, to feed information into "intelligent" information control and display systems to alert agents to changes in border traffic patterns and to provide data to more effectively deploy interdiction resources. Some of the sensors requested by the sectors may have been planned for portions of the border where we are recommending the multiple barriers. If this is the case, additional analysis may result in a decrease in the number of sensors needed. A conclusion of this study is that the Southwest Border is being overrun, and the use of more sensors will only identify more targets that cannot be apprehended using current manpower or accommodated within existing facilities. Figure 1. All-Weather Checkpoint at Falfurrias,Texas Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000034 Page 7 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o f&Border 'fa! Control Concepts OUO-7 (ALL) ~: I The concept of control of the border can be more clearly defined j in terms of enforcement of existing laws that apply to the traffic ; at the border. If existing laws could be fully enforced, and if all inbound traffic could be thoroughly searched by US Customs and INS inspection teams, and, if citizenship could be positively i verified at the POEs, there would be no iJ].egal alien traffic or J smuggling of contraband, including drugs, into the US. In reality, the laws can only be enforced to the extent that resources are ~n= allocated to the mission. f I I 1;;:. ~ f~Our study of the operational environment of the Southwest Border has led to an observation that reveals a great deal about not only ~ the border but also about the nature of the problem. The single most important fact observed is that 66% of all illegal alien apprehensions occur in 4.7% of the border. That portion is totally I contained in two sectors, San Diego and El Paso. I I I ~ IThis observation, at first glance, appears to be related to control ,j of illegal aliens, as opposed to control of narcotics. The US Border j Patrol is ficonsistent o the main federal enforcement agency that has a presence along the entire border. Their primary mission :1is to apprehend illegal aliens, but they are also a primary agency for drug interdiction between POEs and are, in fact, a major i factor in drug interception. This very effective counternarcotics !iagency has a very large percentage of its resources dedicated to ~ the control of alien traffic in these two sectors. Because of the ~ huge numbers of aliens involved in this traffic, these two sectors ti also put a huge demand on the illegal alien transport and j detention activities and the logistics that go along with processing J large numbers of illegals. ! r.;o ~t it I" Control of Illegal Alien Traffic ii ~ I The central issue in the solution to the border control (b) (7)(E) Iii to j . After the illegal alien traffic is controlled :Jin these sectors, existing resources can be reallocated to control 1 f the drug traffic and ille al aliens in other sectors. Our (b) (7)(E) ~ recommendation is Hi: ?~ f'!:i t~ o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000035 Page8 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 o (b) (7)(E) o o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000036 Page9 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 ,. o (b) (7)(E) I I I "' iiffe- @ I I Ui I i :Rf I ~ w iI, I Ij!f ,%[ I I Jm 1ll I i I ~r- i I I I o Rf I I,, "i~ liit 1Ji!! YP, I i!1 'Ml I =,m i ~1 I I rr.;i- lli I :iffi' Th. ; !JPY= ~ ~ f If this approach is implemented, we believe that the total number of apprehensions will decrease because the number of attempted !i illegal entries will diminish. This will reduce the overload conditions that presently exist at the processing, detention, and I deportation facilities. Control of the border will then be demonstrably improved; the large numbers of illegal aliens that are overtaxing the present system will be reduced, and it will be I 1 o i I @ I I Official Use Only ~ OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000037 Page 10 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o !apossible to get an accurate count of total traffic to compare to I known apprehensions. But more importantly, a properly designed i and executed system could enable an actual reduction of forces I in the two most heavily staffed sectors. Some agents could then j be relocated to other sectors where the drug traffic is higher, and benefits would begin to accrue. ,Ithe counternarcotics M j Containment of Illegal Traffic "i! IGBP~ i There are many segments of the Southwest Border that cannot ,l be controlled at the line. The terrain and environmental features j! that favor illegal activity work against the ability of enforcement tiresources to respond at the point of intrusion. The alternative to Iicontrol in these regions is containment. ~-~ '"!! 1i J~ JThe goal. of organized illegal traffic is to reap profits from the ~ activity. If the alien and drug smugglers choose to cross where the border cannot be defended and thereby succeed in gaining ~ access to the US, they still must remove their contraband from J the border region in order to access inland profit centers. The l containment strategy must be aimed at preventing inland access. ;! llll .o OUO-7 ~ mt. "- j Full-time and all-weather highway checkpoints have served the purpose very well in the past. The continuous , presence of enforcement agents on selected highways and their ~}ability to identify and isolate violators .ficant threats to (b) (7)(E) ~ smu lin activities. I containment 'itll. fu"f j~ 1 "i fi 1? i!~ w, Tu il -~ "' ilii . .. There are a along the Rio Grande River and large I populations concentrated near the Texas cities of Del Rio and I Eagle Pass. !m " ~g ii!, ~ i o There are 154 linear miles (river frontage 205 miles) of border in the Del Rio sector. Those miles are composed of ~f I ~! ~ ~l !I iffi: iffi "' ~ i'fi 90.5 27 .5 25.5 5.5 5.0 miles miles miles miles miles of rolling brushland of reservoirs of farmland of urban flat of mountains. !!? JFigure 6 shows the distribution of these different types of terrain. % l1l Jj hl !fil- lii Figure 6. Distribution of Del Rio Sector Terrain Types "" I t 25.5 (16.6%) fl Farmland iii ,& ,,: ~ .,; 11\ I 90.5 (58.8%) Rolling Brushland 5.5 (3.6%) Urban Flat 27.5 (17.8%) o Reservoirs 5 (3.2%) Mountains Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000053 Page 26 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o ~IThreat Definition Ji' l
  • !! I I I o iffi I .iij J1i !!ill ~ i ~ I il!~ Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000062 Page 35 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) Threat Definition This sector has all of the threat types mentioned earlier in this (b) (7)(E) re ort, however, For the western 85 miles of this sector, Mexico Highway 2. parallels the international border and lies 5 to 8 miles to the south. This highway rovides relatively easy access to the border in this re .on. (b) (7)(E) The major routes for illegal aliens and drugs out of the region are those listed below, which can be monitored using the existing and recommended new checkpoints. Available Resources The El Paso sector currently has 590 agents and 80 nonagent support personnel assigned. The sector also possesses intrusion detection, communications, information control and display, and assessment equipment (some for day and some for night use) . Some of the obsolete equipment has recently been replaced. The new equipment recommended will augment and upgrade the sector's existing physical protection equipment inventory. More details are given in Volume 2. o Recommendations (b) (7)(E) ,:i. d I i I Existing f actual i features and patrol roads must be considered in the design. !~ o Figure 11 shows the major highways in the area. El Paso cur- ,1rently operates seven highway checkpoints: II &l Official Use Only ! OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000063 Page 36 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o EL PASO (b) (7)(E) CIUDAD o 45 N ~ KEY oooo -.-.- STATE BORDER I I I I I I I RAILROAD INTERNATIONAL BORDER MILES o CITY OR TOWN ? EXISTING CHECKPOINT I (b) (7)(E) I I I 0 10 20 II o Figure 11. Map of the El Paso Sector Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000064 Page 37 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I ? "' West of Las Cruces on westbound Interstate Highway 10 i~ I? '.ii~ .North of Las Cruces on northbound Interstate Highway 25 :!~, i} j I I ? North of Las Cruces on US Highway 185 at Radium Springs ? West of Alamogordo on eastbound US Highway 70 i j ? iill South of Alamogordo on US Highway 54 at Orogrande ~!. I ? J ~~g ? East of El Paso on US Highway 62/180 li~ West of Sierra Highway 10. Blanca Iii I (b) (7)(E) on eastbound Interstate OUO-7 ?1 ' I ' -~~ (ei.!r j ';J I ii I ili ti ~! o i1 I !I a iffi I? l}, o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000065 Page 38 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 o Io> (b) (7)(E) I ""' 11 ,i;; :ill ~ i I Additional encrypted radios are required l'llt Imation as well as updated infor- control and dis lay e uipment. j are required to replace j outdated units or provide more capabilities and to enhance I territorial I installation. i control near the border during and after barrier . I Other recommendations for the El Paso sector are given in the spreadsheet. The numbers and types of sensors and other support; ing electronic equipment listed for the El Paso sector were ij determined based on responses to questionnaires and surveys. The numbers and types of video cameras included reflect the I upgrade currently under way to restore the video surveillance "" ! capa b"li 1 ty. I I -~ !ii Bi I o !iff "" Ef @. ~. I ili! ~~ I q ,.. 11 I .fr iii ;_1,l: I .1 -;w I ]~ ,!!I j I'') i:,,i i,~ fil I I ~ ii ~ IM ti J!!! o !W, ~ ,] lW Et -t'* lj .. 1 o ,) ;fj , :ilil @ j n,~ I ii; im Official Use Only Sil OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000066 Page 39 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Tucson Sector The Tucson sector includes 16.5% (268.9 miles) of the Southwest Border but accounts for a large fraction of all illicit drugs seized on the border. Since January 1988, this sector accounted for 200,000 alien apprehensions, 350,000 pounds of marijuana, 20,000 pounds of cocaine, and $8.7 million in currency. In FY 1991 alone, the Tucson sector listed 60,500 illegal alien apprehensions (2,000 criminal aliens), 10,000 pounds of cocaine, 91,000 pounds of marijuana, $2.3 million in currency, and 1,250 vehicles seized. Operational Environment Terrain There are 268.9 linear miles of border within the Tucson sector. Those miles are composed of 122.9 69.6 45.0 20.4 7.0 4.0 - miles miles miles miles miles miles of mountains of flat desert of rolling brushland of canyons of urban flat of urban hilly. Figure 12 shows the distribution of the different types of terrain. Figure 12. Distributionof TucsonSector Terrain Types 45.0 (16.7%) Rolling Brush land 69.6 (25.9%) Desert 4.0 (1.5%) Urban Hilly 7.0 (2.6%) Urban Flat 20.4 (7.6%) Canyons 122.9 (45.7%) Mountains Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000067 Page40 OFFICIAL USE ONLY IThreat Definition o r~ :iAll of the types of threat mentioned earlier in this report exist in sector. The threats appear to be balanced among the types of threats mentioned, however, the drug threat is increasing (see JIthe Tucson Sector, Volume 2, for detailed information). I this I liii ;ig ijlf 3The sector includes six POEs located at Nogales, Mariposa West), Douglas, Naco, Sasabe, and Lukeville .. The '.l majority of the Tucson border is either mountainous or rugged i terrain characterized as north/south canyons. The total of these i two classifications can be considered natural barrier or traffic 0.channelizer. The remainder of the sparsely populated area is Ii composed of desert and brushland that represent only minimal barriers to illegal crossing. The remaining 11 miles are the heavily I populated hilly urban area at Nogales and flat urban area at Douglas and Naco. The locations of recommended checkpoints ] listed below cover the major routes for illegal aliens and drugs . I (Nogales I i .U' o .' OUO-7 (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000068 Page 41 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o TUCSON 85 (b) (7)(E) o KEY oooo MILES I D I 10 I 20 INTERNATIONAL BORDER STATE BORDER o CITY OR TOWN (b) (7)(E) * o PORT OF ENTRY Figure 13. Map of the Tucson Sector Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000069 Page 42 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 (ALL) o ,? (b) (7)(E) 1, I ill :!IT I~ ~,, 1? iWjf I . II I We estimate that 165 agents will be required to maintain fullof these checkpoints. I time operation II ~ Checkpoints (especially large ones) that impede the free flow of local traffic are unpopular with residents of the area. The checkpoints should be designed and operated to minimize this J inconvenience, yet still be able to detect smuggling operations. ~ I ' !iii The sector also possesses intrusion detection, communications, ' ii information control and display, and assessment equipment (some ff for day and some for night use). Some of the obsolete equipment o i has recently I will augment i s been replaced. The new equipment recommended and upgrade the sector's existing physical protection equipment inventory. More details are given in Volume 2. iii I Additional encrypted radios are required as well as u dated infor~ mation control and display equipment. fu1 are required to replace .ffloutdated units or provide more capabilities and to enhance i territorial control near the border during and after barrier I~installation. t~ -.J !iThe numbers and types of sensors and other supporting electronic I equipment listed on the spreadsheet for the Tucson sector were i determined. I based on responses to questionnaires and recent 1r surveys. Iill I .-{ l}. fil" I; o f~ fil ~~ .. '.JI ? ir,; !,1 ~~ I Official Use Only I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000070 Page 43 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I Yuma Sector M I i The Yuma sector includes 7.2% (118.2 miles) of the total JSouthwest Border and accounts for 6% (67,000 in 1987) of the total apprehensions of illegal aliens per year. Ei hty-nine percent ij of the apprehensions are made in the In the same zone, the Yuma sector personnel make 90% of their drug arrests. This is quite understandable I because nearly 80% of the sector is composed of rugged mountains, sand dunes, and flat desert, which includes the Luke Air Force Base bombing range. I I I . I I I I Operational "' . Environment II Terrain. I;: This sector has extremely hostile natural geographical features . .. ; There are 118.2 linear miles of border within the Yuma sector. I Those miles are composed of I 1!~ 1~ o II f, I I 51.6 28.5 22.8 11.7 3.6 miles miles miles miles miles of flat desert of mountains of farmland of sand dunes of rolling brushland. i,. Figure 14 shows the distribution of the different types of terrain. IBl f} I i Figure 14. Distribution of YumaSector i Terrain Types ffl 51.6 (43.7%) Desert .. I81: ii I[ jl?: F.t ~ I 11.7 (9.9%) Sand Dunes i;I ii .l ~1 j; ii o I:i 28.5 (24.2%) Mountains 22.8 (19.2%) Farmland 3.6 (3%) Rolling Brushland !si I{11 III Official Use Only . '.~ OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000071 Page44 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) I Threat Definition I i All of the types of threat "' mentioned earlier in this report exist in this sector. .1] j fI Illegal aliens (heavily migrant farm workers) constitute the major I,.threat in this sector but drug traffic is not insi ificant. The I ulated area of the sector follows the 'Iii I Iii! This zone is approximately 24 miles ,. in length (20% of the Yuma sector) and within it occurs approximately 90% of the drug arrests and 89% of the apprehen11s_ions.The locations of re~mmended ne~ and e~sting checkpoints J hsted below cover the maJor routes for illegal ahens and drugs. "'1"' I liill ;),'! ~ ] Available Resources ill iii I The Yuma sector currently has 184 agents and 36 nonagent I support personnel assigned. Additional encrypted radios are required as well as updated information control and display ~i! o lriequipment. are required to replace outdated units or provide 11 more capabilities and to enhance territorial control near the ~ border during and after barrier installation. ii o i I .1 .1 ~ ~ Recommendations . We recommend (b) (7)(E) I ~~ ~i im II i fi ~ J Figure 15 is a map showing the major highways and railroads in the sector. In addition, the existing highway checkpoints should be upgraded to full-time, all-weather operation: ii Ill-:o (b) (7)(E) l' 3/4 l!! 'I' I? ~\ I? fj @! ! We agree with the results of the Ironhorse II ~tudy as stated in the July 26, 1991, Ironhorse II memo, "El Centro demonstrated ff during Ironhorse that it can serve both our [the Yuma sector's] and their needs very effectively by I in their sector." I I o ~ i ,g; Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000072 Page45 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o YUMA (b) (7)(E) 78 o KEY oooo INTERNATIONALBORDER II RAILROAD I II I I o CITY OR TOWN 181 (b) (7)(E) --~ ....... N ~ ------ MILES 0 o 10 20 Figure 15. Map of the Yuma Sector Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000073 Page 46 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) f The numbers and types of sensors and other supporting electronic ~ equipment listed on the spreadsheet for the Yuma sector were J determined based on responses to questionnaires and surveys. ~1! .,,Many of the sensors requested will replace sensors that are old I and in need of replacement. All new sensor equipment should be I totally compatible with the old equipment unless the complete system is replaced or enough operable old equipment is available I for a separate system. I The Yuma sector has implemented a strategy of highway check; points and railway checks to control illegal alien and drug traffic i out of the Yuma area. Existing checkpoints are operated nearly full-time. To be totally effective they should also have all-weather I:~ capability. !f :'.:The Yuma Sector Technology Committee has developed a compre1hensive plan for an enhanced video surveillance system. This ~ system, when used in conjunction with other intrusion detection J systems, will result in the sector exertin a much eater de ee ii of control over the border itself. !!? i i, fi I ITT! \i ll! ~H?: o ~ Presently, video signals are monitored by agents at the Yuma station and sensors are monitored by radio operators at Sector Headquarters. I Consolidating these two systems will increase efficiency and yield f the immediate result of returnin five ents to field work. The I I j (b) (7)(E) I ,iif "&. II d ~ ~ r.f i Additional encrypted radios are required as well as u I mation control and dis la ~f e ui ment. ) are required to replace I outdated units or provide more capabilities and to enhance fl territorial control near the border durin and after barrier illinstallation. ~ ~ :if .sf .11 ~i Ii o ]i JJ Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000074 Page47 OFFICIAL USE ONLY El Centro Sector . The El Centro sector includes 4.3% (69.6 miles) of the total Southwest Border and accounts for 4.9% (55,000 in 1987) of the illegal alien apprehensions. The urban area consisting of Calexico on the US side and Mexicali on the Mexico side accounts for most of the illegal aliens as seems typical along the entire border. East and west of the urban centers of Calexico and Mexicali are mountains, desert, sand dunes, and farms. Operational Environment Terrain There are 69.6 miles of border within the El Centro sector. Those miles are composed of 29.4 18.0 16.8 3.0 2.4 - miles miles miles miles miles of flat desert of farmland of sand dunes of mountains of urban flat. Figure 16 shows the distribution Figure 16. Distribution of El Centro Sector Terrain Types of the different types of terrain. 29.4 (42.2%) Desert 16.8 (24.1 %) Sand Dunes 2.4 (3.4%) Urban Flat 3.0 (4.3) Mountains 18.0 (26.0%) Farmland Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000075 Page 48 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I]\ Threat Definition i All of the types of threat ;$.this ~ OUO-7 (ALL) mentioned earlier in this report exist in sector. iii ~ State Highway 98 and Mexico Highway 2 parallel the border west of Calexico/Mexicali and lie approximately 2 miles north and approximately 4 miles south, respectively. To the east the IIsame holds true, but Mexico Hi hwa 2 dro s further to the south (u to 10 miles). I J I hli I]I HI i~, 'Jh , I II Available Resources it 1The El Centro sector has 213 agents and 48 nonagent support i personnel. The sector also possesses intrusion detection, I communications, information control and display, and assessment I equipment (some for day and some for night use). Some of the I obsolete equipment has recently been replaced. The new equipiifi . ; ment recommended will augment and upgrade the sector's existing ; physical protection equipment inventory. More details are given ! in Volume 2. o l:fi: j ~ Recommendations !~ "' (b) ' (7)(E) :~ I:Ji m- t I l I There are two existing highway checkpoints northwest of I Westmorland on State Highway 86 and north of Niland on State I Highway 111 and a temporary traffic check operation that is !!!! J sometimes !/!I o erated on Interstate 8 west of Ocotillo. In addition, (b) (7)(E) '? ;m I ill i im 111 o !1 00 I io ~ ~ !ii. iiii Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000076 Page49 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o EL CENTRO (b) (7)(E) o N ~ KEY oooo INTERNATIONAL BORDER I I I II RAILROAD II o o o MILES CITY OR TOWN 0 10 20 EXISTING CHECKPOINT Figure 17. Map of the El Centro Sector Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000077 Page 50 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 o (b) (7)(E) I ~ii ~if jt , should be capable of full-time, I operation. all-weather fil fil I Additional encrypted radios are required as well as u f mation control and dis la e ui ment. ~ are required to replace ; outdated units or provide more capabilities and to enhance j"'' territorial control near the border during and after barrier I~installation. u ifu IIThe numbers and types of sensors and other supporting electronic ; equipment listed on the spreadsheet for the El Centro sector were determined based on responses to questionnaires and recent ll surveys. Many of the sensors requested will replace sensors that JIare old and in need of replacement. l (,% '{f ~! ~lij' :f~ Ef m o 1fil a '1!!1: I~ .;. o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000078 Page 51 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - San Diego Sector The San Diego sector includes 4.0% (65.7 miles) of the total Southwest Border but accounts for 45% (473,000 in 1990) of the illegal alien apprehensions per year. Ninety percent of the aliens are apprehended in the first 13 miles, 20% of the total length, east of the coast. There is drug-related drive-through traffic in the 5.5 miles of relatively rural area between the Tijuana Airport and the foothills of the San Ysidro mountains to the east of the Brownfield station. Operational Environment Terrain There are 65.7 linear miles of border within the San Diego sector. Those miles are composed of 37.5 9.9 7 .8 4.5 2.4 1.8 1.8 - miles miles miles miles miles miles miles of mountains of rolling brushland of urban hilly of canyons of farmland of flat desert of urban flat. Figure 18 shows the distribution of the different types of terrain. Figure 18. Distributionof San Diego Sector Terrain Types 9.9 (15%) Rolling Brushland 37.5 (57.3%) Mountains 2.4 (3.6%) Farmland 1.8 (2.7%) Desert 7.8 (11.8%) Urban Hilly 1.8 (2.7%) Urban Flat 4.5 (6.8%) Canyons . Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000079 Page 52 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I Threat Definition ~~ . ~ ~lIllegal and commuter aliens are the principal enforcement problem i!in this sector, however, all of the types of threat mentioned earlier in this report exist in this sector. It has been estimated that as many as 6,000 aliens attempt to enter the US illegally every I night in the 7.5 miles of border between the coast and the Tijuana Airport that is covered by the Imperial Beach and Chula Vista ~ stations (Figure 19). I I I I I The 13 miles of border east from the coast to the foothills of the :1San Ysidro Mountains are the most concentrated area of illegal !1ientry on the Southwest Border. Almost this entire length is i heavily urbanized on the Mexico side, with buildings and roads l running right up to the border. . &~ i The remaining east to the El Centro sector boundary the 37.5 miles of mountainous terrain that makes up I 57% of the San Diego sector. There are 4.5 miles of parallel north/ I includes ii south mountain canyons, 7.5 miles of rolling brushland, and .~1.8 miles of desert scattered along this length and two small I, populated areas at Tecate and Jacumba, which total about 5 miles. o ~ "'. IThe locations of the existing checkpoints, together with the recommended checkpoints listed below, cover the major routes J for illegal aliens and drugs. Because of the size of the greater "' San Di~go population, many illegal aliens and drugs do not leave -.,the region. li I ,~ & "' ~ iiAvailable I Resources ~ ii The San Diego sector has 820 agents and 115 nonagent support personnel assigned. The sector also possesses intrusion detection, } communications, information control and display, and assessment tiequipment (some for day and some for night use). Some of the ~jobsolete equipment has recently been replaced. The new equipment recommended will augment and upgrade the sector's Iiexisting physical protection equipment inventory. More details . i are given in Volume 2. i I IRecommendations OUO-7 '.fl liii 1~ _, .4 (b) (7)(E) I o 'iii i I will have to consider . The detailed design the areas where it may not be possible to iii J\ IiiGBP m!i! mr Official Use Only I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000080 Page 53 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o s.AN DIEGO (b) (7)(E) o N ~ KEY o o o o o MILES INTERNATIONAL BORDER 0 10 20 CITY OR TOWN PORT OF ENTRY o ? EXISTING CHECKPOINT Figure 19. Map of the San Diego Sector Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000081 Page 54 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 o I construct barriers. In those areas, a method is required of iii channeling any aliens that cross into an area where a Econcentration of agents can be in control. I ; Additional encrypted radios are required as well as u i~ mation control and dis lay equipment. I re required to replace ji outdated units or provide more capabilities and to enhance Js1 territorial control near the border during and after barrier I installation . .!! i Additional highway checkpoints are needed: (b) (7)(E) :11 :li Cij ~] q 11 @:1 m ra.; J! ~ . !Ii o /jThe $30 million expansion of the San Clemente highway check- I point is not included in the spreadsheet. I I The budget recommendations I in the spreadsheets. .. for the San Diego sector are given fr ;ff@ I !~ ~f f"fi ~ ~ij . ;_j ~ ,Ji I !!ii ill .Ff !iii M '26' lii ,I I :;;~ ?ii EURii- ~ t! f:l ief1 1Toi l-~ I o I :ii: 1, IT. ,!if ~! I 1! Official Use Only ~ OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000082 Page 55 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I At the end of this document we have included a set of spreadsheets Budget 11! that includes the categories of detection, assessment, Spreadsheet I communication, information control and display, barriers and checkpoints, and Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) for Description Ii highway each of the nine sectors. The numbers on the first spreadsheet I represent the funding needed for procurement and operation for !!1 year. We have also included a spreadsheet showing an estimate {\of the recurring costs. 11, ? I For each border . sector, a number of units is recommended and the estimated cost for the recommended number is given. In the I far right-hand column is the unit cost used. In some cases this "' I unit cost applies to a particular manufacturer. This is not meant i,to be a recommendation of that manufacturer but a typical cost i used only to arrive at a realistic estimate. A total estimated cost ,ifor each border sector is given at the bottom of each column. The bottom line gives the grand total for all sectors, a contingency I factor of 25%, and the recommended budget amount. Many items ;; that are hard to budget or that may be site-specific, such as cost ! of environmental impact statements, land acquisition, power line i~extensions, camera mounting details, etc., are intended to be ~~ covered by part of the contingency funding. Two different grand ~!totals are given. The first is based upon the optimal use of i" technologies and current staffing levels. The second grand total i increases the staffing levels and is based o.n a plan that allows additional personnel. It should be recognized that the first plan ~ will require reassignment of some personnel away from the line ;fflin order to fill the most critical positions. J I lill. o I mi I-The sensors recommended for each sector are ~onventional IR I- sensors. We have recommended both andIi sensors with the lanned for use around i and actual If the _,ensors communication channels are not overloaded it may be possible ; to use ensors at the ith only local OUO-7 annunciation. i I I ?iii lil sensors are harder to deploy than ensors; therefore, their usefulness is limited. A few of them are recommended here for tact~ew special applications may be fo~nd for I the sensors, but these are also more difficult ; to deploy. ii I :l o .. ~? iir.. I Our experience with classifyin~ I iI sensors has yielded many incorrect classifications in all except the most benign conditions. ~ Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000083 Page 56 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o ! Because they are a more expensive, more complicated, and higher item, a few should be carefully evaluated before I large numbers are purchased. OUO-7 i maintenance t"' I I making sensors usually require , them more difficult to deploy, more expensive, and more ll! in need of maintenance. Newer units ma be available with ,,. If the costs "' ~ are comparable and the is of im ortance (and will not be determin~ I that may be present), thesensors are recommended. I i Ii I l~theunattende The independent ~or th?se that do not. The ti1nstallmg the gverifying their integrity while deployed. ~ j Most of the recommended surveillance devices will replace obso1 lete units already in the field. In a few cases, they will allow increased capabilities. As discussed in Volume 3, many of the I closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras will be solid state. As o~ become less expensive, they should be~ j ~ary and permanent applications. An ~ ;known as _, has a goal of a production ~ost of $10,000 e8:ch. The INS Research and Develo me~ , ~ evaluating the .~ave been effectively used on helicopters in several of j the sectors. To our knowledge, these are still being maintained and are operational. As ad~ers for these types of operations are added, new may be required. i o mi ! I.. ~! I I i[r ~ IiiAs the illegal aliens move their routes for crossing into the more I remote areas, the ground-based f version wa I is now being replaced by surveillance latforms (an early which ~ I I The funds recommended for short-range (tactical) and long-range (sector-wide) _coverage are intended only to supplement the communications upgrades being performed by the Communications I Integration Working Group (CIWG). In some sectors, these funds may ~ot be need~d. ~e considered both private and commercial ii satelhte communications (SATCOM), however, have deferred the 1recommendations about SATCOM to the CIWG. Likewise, for cellular telephones in the areas with cellular coverage, this may II be an effective but expensive alternative means of communication. \? I f I o I om:: l!!( ~ 11! ii1ffi Official Use Only ~ OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000084 Page 57 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - The funding of information control and display equipment software is intended to upgrade existing capabilities. and Sandia National Laboratories is a pioneer in the development of unmanned ground and airborne vehicles and would welcome more practical applications for them; however, we believe more development work is required before we could recommend their use to OUO-7 the border patrol. In a few sectors in which additional barriers are recommended, we have recommended only a fractional welder operator. In those cases, the fractional welder will have to be supplied on contract or that person will have to have other duties within the Border Patrol. Because it is not known how often the barriers will be cut, we have estimated that one welder can keep them repaired. It is our hope that the rate of having new holes cut by illegal aliens will be low enough that this person can also assume other duties. The other items in the table are self-explanatory discussed in detail elsewhere in this study. - or have been Sources of Information The following sources of information were used to arrive at the recommendations: Official Use Only ? a 1989 report, Ten Steps to Securing America's Borders, issued by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) ? a 1990 survey, Survey of Border Patrol Surveillance Equipment, prepared by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, and Washington, DC, November 1990 ? a questionnaire prepared by Sandia National Laboratories, December 1991, in which all of the border sectors participated ? our own analysis of each sector based on actual visits to each sector, talks with headquarters and sector personnel, and studies of US Geological Survey (USGS) and other maps ? Additional references given in Volume 2. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000085 Page 58 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I Spreadsheet Background andAssumptions OUO-7 (ALL) 1~ 1t is necessary to understand the background and assumptions used to generate the spreadsheet entries and to justify the f,!numbers for budget purposes because I I there is reasonably good agreement among the three actual surveys about the total number of sensors in use '+ W.! m: a, ill! the agents in the field are better qualified to know where sensors need to be placed. liJ ITThis section lists this information as it applies to the various categories included in the spreadsheets . l!f. .:i: .~1 ffl ~,Sensors fill i There are several types of seismic sensors listed in the j spreadsheet. The differentiating features are listed below. I ~ Classifier o 11The classifier mode includes circuits to identify the intruder as ; vehicular or pedestrian. &. i;i; U! ill' J;Strategic ~r '~The main designation is for strate as those that !i~ I Rt ~ iI Tactical %i lo/, o I Under many of the sensor t 11sensors are for I I~ i~ ~ft i the I .0th~ deployment on the line is accompanied by agents who can observe, verify, and apprehend traffic crossing the sensors. ~ i I JPY. I"' ' I I o 1$ !fill i~ ~:i rut I ]ii i @ !,iii I Official Use Only I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000086 Page59 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Highway Checkpoints Highway checkpoints have been located to intercept all significant northbound routes by which drugs and aliens can be transported away from the border. Highway maps produced by Rand McNally and sectional aeronautical charts were used to select the locations. Two classes of checkpoint facilities, large and small, were considered to arrive at staff levels and physical facilities needed to support full-time, all-weather operations. The smaller facilities apply to checkpoints on two-lane highways at which all traffic is checked in one direction. The large facilities would be located on multi-lane and divided highways. Vehicle Barriers OUO-7 Vehicle barrier budget numbers are based oproperly anchored to stop all vehicles up to about Information Control and Display o The required software will perform the functions of the ComputerAssisted Display and Reporting Enhancement (CADRE) software but will make the information even more useful to the operators. It is expected that this may require the acquisition of some additional off-the-shelf software, some of which may provide video graphics display capability. Operational Spares Twelve to fifteen percent more sensors, communication links, and CCTV equipment should be ordered than the installation requires. Even with quality control, about one out of eight units shipped will be dead on arrival, and the excess e ui ment ordered will allow the installation to be com leted. . Essential items available only in limited numbers at a facility may require as fGBP much as 100% extra to ensure continuous operation. "' j W, !if. omi. i i- lii I o '~ i"' I I~r ; li~ ii Official Use Only I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000087 Page60 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I: I Personnel . f.i F,! I Console ~ Operators - m A single control system console operator can monitor up to - 'I CCTV monitors. I an additional If more monitors are added in a control station, control station and operator will be required. iJ ~;~ ~ Video Technicians -,I I ,IA single CCTV technician can effectively maintain a system of cameras and their associated transmission links and I monitors. Ifa system is expanded beyond this number, additional ~ technicians will be required. 1\- Q i Clerical Support !!, !. if A clerical person can support 10 individuals. We have accounted ffl for this and for the approximately 150 square feet required for II each new person. The 150 square feet is about one-half office <,! ;i space and one-half change-out, training, exercise, restroom, and I other facilities. These charges are included in our tables as loaded W salary. If, for example, an agent earns $35,000 per year, the loaded salary will be about $85,000 per year. o I li "' ffl Integrated Logistic Support ~'!?t iii I One of the spreadsheet items listed is ILS, which includes all of "' , those items required to install and keep equipment operational i throughout i i i i j its life: test and evaluation, installation, technical manuals, training, additional personnel required to operate and maintain the equipment, spare parts, human factors, quality assurance, reliability, and configuration control through drawings and documentation. . t Vehicles I "' fill!. J Accurate 5;,;; ~ I I estimates of vehicle ILS are best obtained from past records. In subsequent analyses, these data will be more carefully examined. However, some reasonable estimates for planning purposes are as follows: \~ An additional vehicle will be required for each two patrol agents added to a sector . o The cost of ownership for a two-wheel-drive vehicle driven mostly on hard surface roads is about $0.30 per mile based Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000088 Page 61 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - on 40,000 miles per year and depreciated to zero after 120,000 miles. This figure of $12,000 per year includes all gasoline, routine maintenance, repairs, oil and lubrication, tires, brakes, depreciation, and reserve for insurance. We have not included the cost for vehicles directly in the spreadsheets, but the cost can be considered to be part of the loaded salary. The cost of ownership for a four-wheel-drive vehicle driven over all types of terrain is about $0.40 per mile based on 40,000 miles per year and depreciated to zero after 120,000 miles. This figure includes all of the items listed above for the two-wheel-drive vehicle. Electronic Equipment About 15% of the purchase price of electronic equipment (sensors, assessment, and communication) should be allocated every year for parts and labor. About 50% of the purchase price of computer equipment should be allocated every year for an all-inclusive maintenance contract and for changes to the software. Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000089 Page62 o --(Claaaifiel) Rec.i.,..,, Por1able o :~~~,e!t~~~~~~~:;:~:I 160 1ll2 20 21 CCTV U TV. lnlenslft.o Video & SensorCable SubtoloI, A-ont 132,000 411,1120 19,900 11,345 OUO-7 a . Eo'~Jf:;.:::~:~e~.~=~ : " ;::,:,;1{!/11' Rciiill 1 100 82,500 50 41,250 llO 66,000 200 165,000 180 148,500 110 80,750 110 90,750 210 173,250 5825 S1kl0,ooo 312 81,120 568 147,680 432 112,320 760 197,600 528 137,280 180 41,600 304 711,040 272 70,720 1260 $1117,280 50 411,750 20 111,900 100 120 1111,400 55 $4,725 55 54,725 25 20 111,900 ,$9115 $<162,675 24 10,680 43 19,135 36 16,020 55 24,475 42 18,680 13 5,785 2:2 23 10,235 $4,15 $124,155 911,500 24,875 11,7110 10 16,750 25 41,875 5 8,375 5 8,375 35 58,625 15 25,125 5 11,375 5 8,375 5 8,375 21 8,400 24 9,600 43 17,200 36 14,400 55 22,000 42 16,800 13 5,200 22 8,800 23 9,200 10 14,950 0 0 5 7,475 5 7,475 10 14,1150 10 14,950 15 22,4:15 25 37,375 40 511,800 21 7,350 24 8,400 43 15,050 36 12,600 55 111,250 42 14,700 13 4,550 22 7,700 23 B,050 $350 1117,650 21 6,7ZI 24 7,680 43 13,760 36 11,520 55 17,600 42 13,440 13 4,160 22 7,040 23 7,360 $320 S89,280 180 179,100 100 119,500 100 119,500 80 79,600 100 Dll,500 200 190,000 175 174,125 150 149,250 150 149,250 $905 0 0 0 B 2,080 9 2,340 l260 $22,100 Sl,675 $184,250 $400 Si11,800 $1,485 $179,400 $1,228,1125 9 2,3<10 9 2,340 111 4,160 14 3,640 20 5,200 0 5 24,1175 1 4,1195 5 24,975 2 11,980 4 1.9,980 5 24,1175 2 9,9110 3 14,985 2 9,090 14,119$ $144,855 10 24,ll50 7 17,465 5 12,475 10 24,950 4 9,980 10 24,950 12 29,1140 5 12,475 5 12,475 $2,485 '169,860 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16,800 5 5,250 3 3,150 2 2,100 $1,050 $27,300 0 0 6 90,000 6 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $15,000 $180,000 1 4,995 1 4 19,980 2 9,090 2 1 4,995 S4,IID5 $74,925 4 11,960 10 20 511,900 5 14,975 4 11,980 10 28,850 $2,9115 1203,660 18 7,!i() 2,350 8 3,760 9 4,230 1470 $48,820 2 9,9110 1 5 14,1175 5 II Subtotal, Del:IICIOIII ~larllght o OFFICIAL USE ONLY 4,230 II 4,1195 14,975 4,230 1 5 16 14,975 7,520 14 $548,4211 $1130,IOII $121,816 4,911$ 6,560 20 4,911$ 29,950 11,41>> '817,905 $489,845 '411,411 '484,190 s1111,a:111 15 24,000 5 B,000 10 $182,220 16,000 5 8,000 $1,800 $120,000 15 24,000 0 0 10 18,000 3 4,800 12 7 59,500 15 127,500 2 17,000 1 8,500 12 102,000 12 102,000 7 59,500 6 51,000 3 25,500 SB,500 $552,500 20 115,1ZI 20 115,120 20 115,120 5 28,780 20 115,120 10 57,560 20 115,120 10 57,560 3 17,268 '5,758 1738,768 10 50,000 10 50,000 15 75,000 10 50,000 0 0 2 1a,ODO 15 75,000 20 100,000 2 10,000 $5,000 $420,000 10 3,000 40 12,000 10 3,000 10 3,000 10 3,000 10 3,000 10 3,000 20 6,000 10 3,000 10 560,000 2 112,000 7 392,000 7 382,000 3 168,000 8 448,000 10 560,000 10 580,000 II 504,000 $56,000 $3,IIIB,000 1 200,000 0 0 1 200,000 1 200,000 3 600,000 1 200,000 2 400,000 2 400,000 2 400,000 $200,000 $2,600,000 1000 15,000 -1000 15,000 1000 15000 1000 15,000 1000 15,000 1000 15,000 1000 15,000 1000 15,000 1000 15,000 $15 $135,000 Sl,GZl,820 '411,8211 '833,1:111 $702,080 111,200 5 9,11110 s1,1122,no OFFICIAL USE ONLY $U8,1611 $1,2:35,UO l1,2111S,AO S300 $39,000 '982,788 DHS-17-0040-H-000090 o o o OFFICIAL USE ONLY OUO-7 . VoiceComm,Shcrt Ra,,i,e 100 200,000 75 150,000 100 200,000 20 VoiceComm,LengRanee 1 150,000 0 0 1 150,000 1 SublOtal,Communication SIII0,000 S:110,000 --lnloConlnll& Ofsplay .C0,000 150,000 PII0,000 100 :200,000 75 150,000 100 200,000 100 200,000 33 68,000 $2,000 SMOB,000 0 0 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 150,000 1150,000 $1,050,000 s1eo,000 poo,ooo 1200,000 '3IIO,OCIO '311,000 '350,000 2 10,000 I 5,000 2 10,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 I 5,000 15,000 155,000 2 10,000 1 5,000 2 10,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 5,000 15,000 $55,000 Subtotal, Cntrt I Dllp 120,000 110,000 '20,000 ,10,000 110,000 ,10,000 ,10,000 ,10,000 110,000 1110,000 CheckpointShellar,Lari,e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 300,000 0 0 0 0 1,5 450,000 saoo,000 CheclqxintShelter,Small 1 200,000 1 200,000 8 1,600,000 5 1,000,000 8 1,600,000 9 1,800,000 0 0 3 600,000 2 400,000 $200,000 15 1,275,000 15 1,275,000 120 10,200,000 75 6,375,000 120 10,200,000 165 14,DG!S,000 15 1,275,000 45 3,825,000 75 6,375,000 192,000 80 240,000 0 0 18 72,000 18 72,000 $4,000 50 60,000 0 0 18 18,000 18 18,000 $1,000 1150,400 79200 2,376,000 1311118,6111,200 Ched" ~-------.--~-~~-~-~ '..~ Contact w/Suspects: Nov '90 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Drug-Related 164 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: 15,752.0 Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) 116.144 Heroin (oz) Other ---1. ___ _._ Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons ;g Assaults on BP ,:~1 Agents i:I...._______ ___ ...._ ___ L..- __ ---1. ___ ....j I I Page 32 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000156 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Contact w/Suspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Drug-Related Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w/Suspects: - Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Drug-Related Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (lb) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w/Suspects: Apr '91 May '91 Jun '91 Jul '91 Aug '91 - - - - - 55 47 41 32 64 5,452.0 3.071 2,899.0 126.93 1,567.0 1,004.19 687.0 6,471.74 2,773.0 21,667.7 4.814 - - Sept '91 Oct '91 0.05 - - - - - - - Nov '91 Dec '91 Jan '92 - - - - 86 97 102 108 138 4,705.0 1,074.6 10,253.0 12,864.1 16.0 9,753.0 2,115.236 17,975.0 145.7 - - - - 23,430.0 1,463.378 14.0 Feb'92 Mar'92 Apr'92 May'92 7 - Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen Drug-Related 109 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 6,512.0 Cocaine (oz) 319.241 Heroin (oz) 8.21 Other (lb) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents - - - - . - - Jun'92 - - - - 123 159 133 104 13,060.0 37.642 4.0 9,747.0 610.041 0.126 18,993.0 9,681.9 464.08 16,455.0 2,125.1 51.2 6 - - - - - - - - - - Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000157 Page 33 OFFICIAL USE ONLY !!l1 i I I I Contact w/Suspects: o Jul'92 ,. Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Drug-Related 121 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: MarfJuana(lb) 18,281.0 Cocaine (oz) 1,119.26 Heroin (oz) 11.5 Other iiil Number of Confrontations: WHhArmed Persons ~ Assaults on BP Agents - I I II I Sector - - Operations lW The McAllen Sector Headquarters is located in McAllen, Texas . . There is also a McAllen station, located at 4201 West Military ii Highway in McAllen, Texas. .1_~,-' 1 o Radio electronic maintenance is performed by three radio electronics technicians. Sector Headquarters was originally established at its present site in order to centralize it geographically in its area of responsibility. The sector includes the entire Rio Grande Valley where, for years, enforcement problems have been particularly critical and sensitive. It is a semi-tropical area devoted primarily to agriculture and allied industries. Employment opportunities exist throughout the area for unskilled and semi-skilled laborers. o Page 34 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000158 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY I'\The sparsely settled, hilly brush country in the western part of Hidalgo County and in Starr County make sign-cutting in these Ii sections lend themselves better to sign-cutting. !IAll of the brush has been removed along the areas more difficult, although the sandy areas in the northern riverbank in practically all of Hidalgo and Cameron Counties as a result of farming r:I, operations extending to the riverbank in most areas. This makes sign-cutting difficult because there is a considerable amount of foot traffic by farm workers and locals. I Iii I The sandy areas in Brooks, Kenedy, and Kleberg Counties are good for sign-cutting, except that they make travel by motor vehicle somewhat difficult. This necessitates the use of four-wheel-drive vehicles. !i the Cleared farmland extends only about 15 to 20 miles northward in Rio Grande Valley. This land is dry, arid, sandy ranchlands, which tend to discourage some of the aliens who would normally -, attempt to walk further north. t ~ ~ The Anzalduas Canal originates in Mexico about 12 miles north of i the Port of Hidalgo. It runs south a short distance from, and more ;i or less parallel to, the river to a point in Mexico immediately j, opposite Mercedes. Here, it is large and deep enough that it cannot normally be crossed except at the bridges. The few bridges tend to funnel aliens into general crossing areas. I I i The dense population areas adjacent to the border, especially in the .o Hidalgo and Brownsville vicinities, hampers sign-cutting and offers I illegal aliens ready opportunity to lose themselves in crowds of '.! people of similar racial characteristics. -I There are seven POEs into the sector: ' ? Falcon, across the Falcon Dam (open from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.) ,.. ? Hidalgo II Progreso Brownsville (all of which are 24-hour ports with bridges) Rio Grande City (with a bridge, open from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.) Official Use Only Los Ebanos (a ferry port, open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.). OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000159 Page 35 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) State Highway 649 originates at US Highway 83 about midway between Roma and Rio Grande City and runs northwa~ sector eventually terminating in Hebbronville on State which runs due north to San Antonio. In Starr County, there are several unpaved roads that originate in the Roma/Rio Grande City area Th o ds as th h anches and eventually connect with from Zapata to Hebbronville or with n Jim Hogg County outside this s and Hidalgo Counties, there is also an " " . . un aved avel road more or less and the International Border. o In Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, there are paved and unpaved roads running both north and south at 1-mile intervals throughout both counties. The entire riverfront area c int in the sector. There are two railroad lines within the sector. One is the _, which originates in Edinburg. It runs one freight train each Page 36 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000160 Official Use Only o OFFICIAL USE ONLY o day, 7 days per week, and an additional freight train 4 days per week. Additional freight train a run durin hea ve etable or , fruit shipping seasons. The through operates a line more or less parallel with the valley from Rio Grande City to Harlingen, where it joins the main line. The main line originates in Brownsville and proceeds northward, exiting the sector north of Kingsville. Generally, there is only one freight train each day, northward, except during heavy shipping seasons. There is no rail passenger service out of this sector. Brownsville, Harlingen, and McAllen have international airports of entry and are also served by commercial airlines. Harlingen has daily flights by American Airlines to and from Houston; and Southwest Airlines has six daily flights to and from Dallas Love Field. McAllen has six flights by Continental to and from Dallas and Houston. Charter planes are also available at the McAllen, Harlingen, and Brownsville Airports. o There are a number of private aircraft smuggling merchandise from McAllen and Brownsville clandestinely into Mexico and possibly some Central American countries. They appear to comply with all departure and entry regulations, except that their designated destination is usually fictitious and merchandise is usually landed at some point in Mexico. There is a large amount of aerial spraying and dusting. This is done from small fields and ranch strips located throughout the area. These numerous dusting planes also present hazards to the observation aircraft. All towns in the Rio Grande Valley are served by the Valley Transit Bus Company. Many of these routes are on a 30-minute schedule. These buses can and do stop at any point along the road to pick up or discharge passengers. The frequency of these schedules and the close proximity of some routes to the border makes it easy for aliens to secure transportation. Continental Trailways operates daily service out of the valley through Kingsville, Falfurrias, and Rio Grande City, where the buses are checked. o Official Use Only There is an overabundance of taxicabs in each of the towns and villages in Starr and Hidalgo Counties. These taxicabs belong to individuals and small companies and are not organized or policed in any manner. They have few central dispatch points and the drivers, many of them being aliens themselves, are extremely uncooperative. Local authorities allow Mexican taxicabs to enter through the POEs and to transport passengers as far as McAllen, OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000161 Page 37 OFFICIAL USE ONLY I Pharr, Mission, Weslaco, and Mercedes, Texas; and to pick up the I same passengers and return them to Mexico at a later date, if o I desired. Border Patrol agents have, on several occasions, discovered "' the drivers of these cabs in violations for which their local cards ' have been voided. There are companies (car rental, U-Haul trailer rental, and truck rental) in Mission, Harlingen, McAllen, Brownsville, and Weslaco. These rental companies are contacted regularly by INS AntiSmuggling Unit (ASU) officers as smugglers regularly move aliens by rental vehicles. In adjacent areas of Mexico, the only rail line from the interior of . Mexico first reaches the border at Camargo. This is the Mexican town adjacent to Rio Grande City. The rail line then closely paral' lels the Rio Grande River through Reynosa and Rio Bravo and terminates in Matamoros. There are two passenger trains daily to lll! the border area from the interior of Mexico. Freight train schedules are numerous and irregular, depending on the volume of traffic. II I ~),., Because of the number of freight trains arriving daily, many desti,:, tute aliens find it very easy to come to the Mexican border area for I an attempted ill_e~al_entry into the US. Fares on pa~senge~ trains ~ are very low, fac1litatmg the travel to the border by ahens with very illl little means. !Jll ,I' , o ,. Reynosa and Matamoros are both served by Aeronaves de Mexico i with one daily flight to and from Mexico City. I Buses arrive in Matamoros at a rate of approximately one each hour. These buses arrive from Monterey and Ciudad Victoria or '~ downriver from Reynosa. Local buses also run along the paved and l, unpaved roads paralleling the river on the Mexico side, extremely L close to the river throughout the entire area allowing aliens quick, easy, and cheap transportation to any point along the river. 1 ill' I Taxicabs in the adjacent area are numerous, and fares are cheap. transport persons to points outside the city areas for later surreptitious entry. I They regularly I ml Iii! Page 38 I I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000162 Official Use Only o OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Buses arrive in Reynosa from Monterey and Ciudad Victoria at a rate of approximately one each 30 minutes. These buses arrive from Monterey either directly on Mexico Highway 40 or through Ciudad Miguel Aleman, opposite the Port of Roma, and then travel downriver along the. road paralleling the river. This last route allows potential surreptitious entrants to disembark at any point along the river without coming into Reynosa. Many also travel downriver from Reynosa to the city of Rio Bravo, a distance of approximately 14 miles. There, they disembark and make their way a short distance to the river for illegal entry. The most important crop in relation to total farm income is cotton. The only laborers required are irrigators and tractor drivers. Planting is done by large six to eight row planters pulled by tractors, which requires little labor. The first heavy requirement for manual labor comes during the cotton chopping season, which begins about the third week in February. This requirement for labor is being reduced each year as farmers use herbicides for the control of weeds, and, as the mechanical planters become more effective, reducing the amount of thinning necessary. - Irrigated vegetables are raised throughout Starr, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties and account for the major manual labor requirements in the agricultural field. Much of this labor requirement in "stoop labor" involves weeding, transplanting, and harvesting the vegetables. This is a year-round operation because of the varying seasons of vegetables; however, the need for the greatest number of workers comes between March and June when onions, carrots, lettuce, beets, cabbage, spinach, bell peppers, tomatoes, okra, watermelons, cantaloupes, cucumbers, squash, peas, and beans are normally harvested. With the elimination of most of the labor required for cotton harvest, and because of this greater need for labor in April, May, and June, the heavy illegal entry period has shifted from July and August to April, May, and June. Official Use Only The citrus-raising industry requires some hand labor year-round in the form of irrigators and weeders. Many citrus fruit growers have found that chemical weed control is more economical and effective and are using this method instead of hand labor. The only operation that has not been mechanized in the industry is the picking. This must be done by hand and offers considerable employment starting the first of November and lasting through the middle of April. In the ranching areas of the sector, burning the thorns off the prickly pears in order to make it easier for cattle to eat is performed during winter months every year and year-round during extremely dry years when there is little grass. This is work that must be done in remote ranch areas, and it is a very undesirable type of work. For that reason, very few local residents wish to do it, and this offers job OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000163 Page 39 OFFICIAL USE ONLY opportunities for undocumented workers. One can expect this I-I round operation to continue indefinitely. There is work available yearbuilding fences, cleaning fence lines, cutting brush, etc. ~{ I In - '.I:::h::~:;::: ::::,:~::y ::::~~ l 1 o fJ I I j Ii Brooks and Jim Wells Counties, there is considerable dairy fo the Rio Grande Valley about 1921 because of insects and competition from foreign countries, has been reinstated. This crop was started in 1973 with the construction of a processing plant and an initial planting of approximately 28,000 acres. Planting and harvesting is mechanized and only irrigation of the crop offers employment opportunities. The tall, thickly standing crop offers ideal concealment for irrigation workers and aliens walking through the area. That area of the sector lying north of the Rio Grande Valley is principally devoted to ranching. These are large, privately owned and I operated ranches devoted to cattle raising. Labor demands are not i great in the ranching industry. The work is considered unattractive 1 by local labor and, consequently, ranchers willingly hire undocu1 mented workers, if available . o ,'; 1 I o Population in that area of the sector outside of the Rio Grande '" Valley is sparse with few towns or communities. In the Rio Grande Valley, there are many small towns and cities ranging in population from 100 to 70,000. The population of the Rio Grande Valley is approximately 424,600. - l Heavy manufacturing is limited to several firms in the Brownsville area. Light manufacturing firms prevail throughout the area, but are limited to the production of small items and food processing. The Brownsville-based shrimping fleet is the nation's largest with more than 600 trawlers. jj II i Agricultural work is seasonal and year-round work is unavailable for some of the agricultural labor force. During the summer months, many of these persons migrate north and east to secure employment. Tourism is actively promoted by the various Chambers of ; Commerce in the Rio Grande Valley. The area is increasingly attractive to winter tourists. Income to tourist-related industries in I1 the Rio Grande Valley is estimated at 100 million dollars per year. 1! This creates a demand for service personnel such as dishwashers, hotel workers, maids, and cooks. Most of these positions require j little training and are usually lower paid; therefore, they are filled i by a number of aliens with "visitor" documents. I '= i Page 40 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000164 Official Use Only - OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Intelligence The McAllen Sector Intelligence Section consists of a Supervisory Intelligence Agent (SIA), a Sector Intelligence Agent, an Intelligence Assistant, and a part-time student aide. The SIA is assigned to supervise the Intelligence Section and the Vehicle Seizures Section and normally reports to the Chief Patrol Agent or the Deputy Chief Patrol Agent, but is subject to supervision by any of the five Assistant Chief Patrol Agents. Both personally and through his subordinates, the SIA maintains liaison with local, state, and federal agencies; commissi9ns; departments; and agencies. The intelligence effort is supported through the use of one detailed agent as Acting Intelligence Agent and the input from collaterally assigned individual Station Intelligence Agents. A major intelligence source is derived from the direct input and cooperation of the patrol agents in charge of each station and the sector AntiSmuggling Unit. The reports sent in by these various groups constitute the foundation for the intelligence collection chain. The intelligence reports are reviewed and analyzed by the Intelligence Office personnel. The agents then prepare collated intelligence reports for dissemination to the appropriate offices. o an ervice -23 an G-623 end-ofmonth reports or forwarding to the Central Office and the Regional Office. These records are computerized, and the reports are computer generated. Government reports are maintained Subsection of the Intelligence Section. and filed in the Records In July 1990, McAllen Sector Intelligence laid the ground work for the Modem Analysis of Traditional Intelligence (MATI) Program. This program is strongly dependent on field sign-cutting intelligence and sophisticated Automated Data Processing (ADP) applications. The Intelligence Section created and maintains the cross-reference narcotics violator database. This database allows for the immediate retrieval and cross-referencing of information on individual narcotics smugglers apprehended by the sector. o Official Use Only Intelligence personnel are used to assist in the investigation and documentation of unusual situations and incidents. Video and still photography are used to photo-document armed encounter scenes, potential terrorists activities, and potential liability entanglements involving Service personnel. In addition, the video editing skills and forensic photographic skills of section personnel enhance the OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000165 Page41 OFFICIAL USE ONLY I I sector's ability to better complete its mission. The proactive investigation of leads derived from various sources results in the I acquisition and documentation of possible future apprehension information. This section has also acted as the storage and control point for various pieces of evidence involved in both criminal and administrative proceedings. II - I Air Operations I ~ The observation aircraft operate between dawn and dusk 7 days per week to provide aerial reconnaissance along the river and avenues I of entry into the US from the river. The aircraft are particularly I effective in assisting river units in trailing aliens during the early morning hours. Use of the aircraft accelerates work of the ground offices in effecting apprehension of illegal aliens traveling on foot to interior points. Observation aircraft work with farm and ranch ~ check units. In this activity, they locate groups of workers, direct ; ground units, and maintain surveillance of the area to prevent the escape of illegal aliens. I ,.. I I I I Screening and Prosecutions Aliens apprehended at the stations are usually processed by appreagents at those stations. Disposition is usually determined by the respective station's Patrol Agent in Charge (PAIC), and, at times, by apprehending agents on the basis of written instructions by the Chief Patrol Agent (CPA). 1bending f I I I The McAllen Screening and Prosecutions Office (responsible for the =ii Falfurrias, McAllen, Mercedes, and Rio Grande City stations) is I staffed by two supervisory Border Patrol agents, one clerk-typist, - j one detailed agent (sent on detail; not permanently assigned), and f one student aide . o. I I io; i The Brownsville Screening and Prosecutions Office (responsible for the Brownsville, Harlingen, Port Isabel, Kingsville, and Corpus Christi stations) is staffed by one Supervisory Prosecutions Agent, two Prosecutions Agents, one Warrant Screening Agent, and a student aide. ~ i1 The Screening and Prosecutions sections review all paperwork e forwarded for files opened by Border Patrol agents to ensure that they are in compliance with outstanding policy, instructions, and injunctions. Orders to Show Cause, Warrants of Arrest, OwnRecognizance Releases, and numerous other forms and documents are prepared by these screening and prosecutions sections for administrative as well as criminal cases. The sections are also Io responsible for the review of all cases forwarded for criminal prosecution to ensure that all the essential elements for the arrest J have been articulated and that the arrest was proper. In addition, l I I Page 42 I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000166 Official Use Only - OFFICIAL USE ONLY o they are responsible for the initial preparation and presentation in US Magistrate's Court of all felony and misdemeanor criminal cases. The US Government is represented by these sections in court for bond reduction, detention and discovery hearings, motions (pretrial), and jury selections. In addition, the units present cases to the grand jury for indictment. The sections ensure that the cases and people involved are transported to their final destinations within a prescribed time frame. The McAllen Office supervisors are the sector coordinators for the BORCAP. The section pr9vides technical assistance on complex BORCAP cases to all the sector stations. There are seven detention agents (one assigned to Falfurrias, three assigned to Brownsville, and three assigned to Headquarters) and one supervisory detention agent (assigned to Sector Headquarters) to do all transportation of aliens. The detention agents are assigned a schedule that provides for the most effective removal of aliens to the Port Isabel Detention Facility or for Voluntary Return (VR) at the nearest POE. o Aliens are detained at the Kleberg County Jail, Kingsville; the Brooks County Jail, Falfurrias; the Starr County Jail, Rio Grande City; and the Hidalgo County Jail, Edinburg, Texas . Presently, there are 10 criminal investigators, anti-smuggling (6 at McAllen and 4 at Brownsville) and 2 supervisory criminal investigators, anti-smuggling (1 at McAllen and 1 at Brownsville) assigned to the McAllen sector. Communications System The McAllen sector uses the Justice Teletype system with a direct circuit to Washington, DC. Through Washington, the circuit can be connected to any other point in the US that uses the Justice Teletype system. o Official,Use Only Sector Headquarters has .FM communications with the POE at Falcon, Roma, Rio Grande City, Los Ebanos, Hidalgo, and Progreso, as well as the District Director's Office in Harlingen, and the OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000167 Page43 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Service Processing Center at Port Isabel. This system uses car-to- o car, car-to-station, or station-to-station transmissions. The sector also has a series of transmitters, repeaters, and receivers to communicate the alarm signals from the unattended ground sensors in a separate network. Station Operations All of the regular sector activities of the Border Patrol mentioned in earlier sections of this volume are conducted in this sector. There are presently nine stations in the McAllen sector: Corpus Christi, Kingsville, Brownsville, Falfurrias, Rio. Grande City, McAllen, Mercedes, Harlingen, and Port Isabel. The last six listed are responsible for portions of the US/Mexico border. o Corpus Christi Station Linewatch function has been performed on Padre Island and the Intracoastal Waterway usually in conjunction with the US Coast Guard or the National Park Rangers at Padre Island. Corpus Christi also conducts boat patrol operations in the Intracoastal Waterway. Kingsville Station The Kingsville station is presently manned by 1 PAIC, 4 Senior Border Patrol Agents, 8 Senior Patrol Agents, and 22 Border Patrol agents, in . . e Kingsville station area comprises A total of th~s are located in the area of assignment, which consists ofsquare miles of flat coastal plains. This area has sparse patches of salt grass in the coastal region and live oak and mesquite thickets further inland. Kingsville has a population of approximately 28,800 o Page 44 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000168 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o o with the other two towns of Rivera and Sarita, whose population is 700 people. Kingsville is situated just north of the large farming areas of the lower Rio Grande Valle and south of the metro olitan and industrial regions. are the only vehicular routes going nort from the Va ey area. Kingsville is surrounded b semi-arid ranchland. If not for the Kin sville station Most of the illegal aliens encountered by this station are in transit, many by using vehicular transportation and some. are on foot through the ranchland, from brush thickets to water holes at night, and concealment in the brush thickets during the day. While the semi-arid terrain deters many, it also provides cover for the hardy ones who have a strong motive to attempt the trip on foot. There are five buses daily from the border area, which connect to all points in the US after proceeding north out of the station area. Thus, there is sufficient public transportation for any illegal alien who might escape apprehension in the border area and wish to go to northern parts of the country. Patrol, or sign-cutting, has a two-fold purpose: to apprehend aliens walking long distances through the brush in an attempt to reach interior points and to apprehend those who disembark from smuggler vehicles or public transportation a short distance south of the checkpoint, walk around it, and are picked up or reboard public transportation to continue their journey northward. Normally one or two agents working in separate, radio-controlled four.wheel-drive vehicles commence work at daylight, ~ o Official Use Only are encountered, apprehended . both units work the "trail'' As manpower is available, one or two agents perform the same assignments, around the clock. These agents make periodic checks OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000169 Page45 OFFICIAL USE ONLY (b) (7)(E) Traffic checkpoint is in operation checking northbound traffic 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, being discontinued only when rain or fog makes its continuance dangerous, or when lack of manpower makes continuance impossible. Because of recent court decisions, the traffic checkpoints h~ ~tationary ~which is located -Texas, on -and approximately 60 air miles and 64 land miles from the nearest border point. The house trailer is 10 x 52 feet, is air conditioned, and has all radio equipment and a telephone. The new checkpoint is still referr~ in court as being the Sarita Checkpoint and is referred to as by Service agents. It meets all safety and operational criteria of the Border Patrol Handbook. Signs meeting standards of the recently enacted highway safety code have been approved and installed by the Texas Highway Department. Electricity to operate lights and o radio is available as is a connection for telephone. Two mercury vapor lights are installed to light the area. A strip of shoulder has been paved by . 1- ff ranch. Normally, two agents are assigned to each of the three daily shifts. At times (on weekends, during heavy migratory labor movements, or on holidays), the volume of traffic requires three and sometimes four agents for parts of the two shifts between 8:00 a.m. and 12 midnight. The agents alternate in checking vehicles that stop at the checkpoint, and unless the occupants are persons known to the agents, they are advised of a reason for the check-''This is an Immigration Border Patrol Checkpoint"-and inquiry is made about the citizeno ship of all occupants of the vehicle. Should further interrogation be o necessary, the vehicle is pulled over to the side of the road where Page 46 .,, OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000170 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o the agent who originally commenced the check completes it while the other maintains the checkpoint. Aliens who are apprehended at the checkpoint are usually processed there, and a request is made to the Sector Headquarters for a detention guard to transport them. Otherwise, they are either placed in the Kleberg County Jail at Kingsville overnight or transported to Sector Headquarters by apprehending agents at the termination of their shift. To efficiently cover the traffic check, 15 agents (3 shifts of 5 agents each) should be assigned 7 days per week, 24 hours per day. Buses are checked at the checkpoint when it is in operation, or-at the terminal in Rivera or Kingsville when the check oint is down. When a backu . ent is available he usuall o One northbound freight train pass through the area daily and are chec ed y the agents assigned to patrol or by supervisory agents. The trains pass within sight of the checkpoint, so that checkpoint agents can give sufficient advance notice for checking. City patrol activities are carried out when information indicates the presence of illegal aliens in any of the three towns in the area. Less than 0.01 % of the major manpower of the station is devoted to this program. Air Operations Sector aircraft are available as needed. Liaison-Informant Development Because of the size of the Kingsville station area and the type of enforcement programs carried out, this function is more of an integral part of the regularly assigned activities rather than a distinct program to which agents can be assigned. o Official Use Only - The traffic check units encourage disclosures of any information that might be of interest to the general public and especially those who frequently travel the routes and are in position to note any OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000171 Page47 OFFICIAL USE ONLY unusual activity by others. This is especially helpful in cases where o illegal aliens are concealed in an auto or under equipment in trunks. Liaison is maintained with local law enforcement officials by all agents. Cooperation is solicited from major ranchers, foremen, ..cowboys, railroad section crews, and bus and truck drivers. All of these people are in an excellent position to observe actions of possible illegal aliens and movements of suspects who are passing through the area and solicit food and water. They are encouraged to furnish prompt reports of any such activities. Identification and Screening Most aliens apprehended at the checkpoints are screened and processed there, as are those apprehended in that vicinity by patrol units. Involved smuggling cases may now be processed at the checkpoint. The decision to grant voluntary departure or to hold for formal deportation hearing or prosecution is usually made by a station supervisor under criteria set by the CPA. Smuggling cases are discussed with a sector supervisor for a decision about disposition. Detention agents, from Sector Headquarters, usually make daily o pickup of aliens for movement to the Service Processing Center for a deportation hearing, for voluntary departure to the interior by bus lift, for prosecution, or to Hidalgo for local voluntary return. Special Programs and Activities Litigation accounts for 5% of the man-hours spent. Intrusion Detection The signals from these sensors are received at McAllen Sector Headquarters and relayed to sensor teams. Sensor signals are also monitored with a portable monitor when the checkpoint is in operation. Brownsville Station Linewatch is the most important single activity in the Brownsville station's operation. It is the first line of defense against the surreptitious entry and illicit smuggling activity. The greatest portion of the station's complement is directed to meet this threat and the greatest number of apprehensions result from its successful application. It is the most effective means of preventing the escape o of the surreptitious entrant into the interior of the US. During Page 48 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official, Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000172 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o normal operations, 23 agents are assigned to the day shift, 18 agents to the evening shift, and 3 agents to the midnight shift. A Senior Patrol Agent is always assigned with each of the shifts. ost signs of illegal alien traffic found during these hours are reported to the day shift and an all-out effort is made to overtake the suspect. The Service aircraft is used at this time to assist in placing the ground crews on proper roads and trails and in locating the suspect or putting him into hiding for a time sufficiently long so that the signcutting units are able to overtake and apprehend him . o Falfurrias Station The Falfurrias station is located at 904 East Rice Street 285) Falfurrias Texas. (b) (7)(E) which accounts en sector. Sign-cutting is done daily 7 days per week. Manpower permitting, two agents are assigned on duty each day, commencing work at daylight. Four-wheel-drive vehicles equipped with radios are used as trans ortation for these a ents. The start .ust south of continue working southward in thi encounter tracks of aliens or until the is reached. Should the tracks of aliens be encountered, both agents concentrate on following the trail until the aliens are apprehended. o Official Use Only On the west side of US Highway 281 both a power line and an underground gas pipeline more or less arallel the hi hwa at distances va .n from 2 to 10 miles . OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000173 Page 49 OFFICIAL USE ONLY are are locked, installed on the gates. Cooperation among the ranchers is normally good. It has improved because Border Patrol agents assisted Sheriff's officers in apprehending an illegal alien who had murdered a ranch worker. o Sector aircraft normally make an early morning reconnaissance of the area and assist in sign-cutting. The walkie-talkie radios are very valuable and useful in this work, because agents must walk at times for several miles through the sandy areas. For adequate control of brush walkers, six agents per day should be assigned to sign-cutting. Intrusion Detection Along the Rio Grande River, there is a narrow belt of flat valley land, a small amount of which is devoted to irrigated fanning from Falcon to Roma. From Roma, downriver to the eastern boundary, this flat valley increases in width somewhat to 4 to 5 miles and the majority of it is devoted to irrigated vegetable farming. During the past 3 to 5 years, several thousand acres of brushland in the western section of the county has been root-plowed and reclaimed for agricultural use. It is not irrigated, and cotton and grain sorghum is grown there. The remainder of Starr County is rough, rolling, low, hilly brush-covered, arid ranch country. There are no o streams, and water for the ranching operations comes from either wells or reservoirs created by damming up the many large dry Page 50 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000174 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o gulches lmown locally as "arroyos." Much of the area is caliche and shale and is covered with brush, wild olive trees, and prickly pear. The northern and northeastern parts are more sandy, and there is some dry land farming of cotton, grain, sorghum, and watermelons. There are small communities located along the entire area immeo diately adjacent to the river and along US Highway 83. The elevation at Falcon Dam is 323 feet above sea level, while that at the eastern boundary of the sector, La Grulla, on the Rio Grande River, is 14 feet above sea level. In adjacent Mexican areas along the river, there is a very narrow strip of flat valley farmland. The remainder is rolling, brushcovered, rocky hills. Two rivers, the Alamo and the San Juan, empty into the Rio Grande River, one near Roma and the other near Rio Grande City. At a distance of about 14 miles south of its junction with the Rio Grande River, the San Juan River has been dammed to form the Marte Gomez Lake, approximately the same size as Falcon Lake. The Rodeo Canal, a large gravity canal, carries irrigation water from this lake downriver, more or less paralleling the river at distances of 10 to 14 miles . o Topographical Enforcement Problems . Water is released at irregular intervals from Falcon Dam for irrigation and for generation of electricity at the Dam, causing the river level to fluctuate daily. o Official Use Only This fluctuation often washes out tracks of aliens who have crossed illegally. There being little farming activity along the river, and consequently few agricultural opportunities for illegal aliens, a majority of those who cross in this area either attempt to walk northward and eastward to reach interior points; or are part of an organized smuggling operation with an interior destination. The hilly, brush country with soil composed mostly of caliche and shale makes sign-cutting difficult in most areas. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000175 Page 51 OFFICIAL USE ONLY While the northern and northeastern sections of the County are o more sandy, sign-cutting is difficult there also due to the fact that the wind often blows out tracks in the loose sand. There being very few sources of water in the area, aliens who walk northward and eastward, follow routes from windmill to windmill because these mills can be seen from great distances and there is usually water available at each. This fact assists agents in sign-cutting operations. Transportation (b) (7)(E) In the extreme western portion of the county, an unpaved road known locally as the "Loma Blanca Road," originates at US Highway 83 about 5 miles west of Roma and runs northward through the area, terminating on State Road 649 in Jim Hogg County. State Road 649 . originates at US Highway 83 about halfway between Roma and Rio Grande City and runs northward through the area, terminating at State Highway 359 between Laredo and Hebbronville, Texas. ori~de City and runs northeast to a termination with 24 miles south of Falfurrias, . . T ~nt about 30 mile n intersects-with runs from that point northward to Hebbronville, Texas. Throughout the area are numerous dirt roads that run from ranch to ranch, which can be traveled by persons familiar with the area. Using these roads, it is possible to travel from the immediate border area into the Hebbronville/San Diego area, and from there, to any point inland. o The Missouri Pacific Railroad operates a rail line that carries unscheduled freight traffic from Rio Grande City to McAllen. There have been no problems in connection with this rail system. There is no air service into the area and though there are a few aerial applicator planes and other private aircraft using the Starr County Airport as well as several air strips on ranches in the area, no problem has been encountered in connection with them. The Continental Trailways Bus Company operates four daily schedules: two eastbound and two westbound buses through the area, stopping to pick up and let off passengers at a~ ~ese buses are periodically checked at but little problem of illegal aliens riding this line has o been encountered. Page 52 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000176 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o From the Port of Falcon and the Mexican town of Nuevo Guerrero, a paved road runs upriver to the towns of Parras and Nuevo Laredo, Mexico. From the Port of Roma and its adjacent town of Ciudad Miguel Aleman, a pav d road runs 90 miles south t onterre Mexi A aved r ad "Brechas" (or unpaved roads or trails) run southward at mile intervals to the Rodeo Canal. Buses operate locally on 30-minute schedules between Ciudad Miguel Aleman and Reynosa; and on one-hour schedules between Reynosa, Ciudad Miguel Aleman, and Monterrey. The only rail line from the interior of Mexico first reaches the border at Estacion Camargo, about 10 miles south of Rio Grande City. It then parallels the border downriver closely throughout the remainder of the area. Two passenger trains arrive daily from the interior, as do several unscheduled freight trains. Aliens regularly ride both. Programs and Activities o Linewatch Linewatch is extremely difficult in this area because there are many small settlements or ranches along both sides of the river, the inhabitants of which are relatives by either marriage or blood, and most of whom are either involved in alien or contraband smuggling or are sympathetic to it. They do not cooperate and often activel o ose Border Patrol erations b o Official. Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000177 Page 53 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Traffic Check Traffic leaving the border area within the Rio Grande City's area of responsibility is checked at a permanent checkpoint site. It has been recognized by Federal Judge Reynaldo Garza, of the Brownsville Division-Southern District of Texas, as a "functional equivalent of border search points," as set forth in the court's Almeida-Sanchez decision. o The checkpoint is operated in full compliance with the Fifth Circuit Court's Speed-Ranier decision. Agents do not conduct searches of car trunks, closed trucks, trailers, etc., without probable cause. They confine themselves to the inspection of the person's citizenship, or if an alien, his right to be in or remain in the US. Further investigation, such as search of the vehicle, is only undertaken where probable cause exists, or is developed, during the initial investigation. o The traffic checkpoint is maintained 16 hours per day, manpower permitting, except for periods when weather conditions make it unsafe. All northbound vehicles are stopped and checked as traffic only averages about 110 vehicles per a 24-hour period. No commercial bus traffic travels this route. Two agents, per shift, man the checkpoint and the hours of operation are varied to avoid a pattern, which could be determined in advance by potential smugglers or immigration law violators. Air Operations Border Patrol aircraft and pilots are dispatched from Headquarters in McAllen to the Rio Grande City area on a daily basis. These aircraft have proved to be an invaluable asset in coordinating o ground activities during linewatch and sign-cutting operations and Page 54 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000178 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o are also used effectively for aerial surveillance of smugglers' vehicles and other Border Patrol stations, as needed. Intrusion Detection . Agents periodically check these areas to determine if illegal entry has occurred. Communications o FM radio. There is an . There is an t at enables the base station or mobile units in the area to communicate with Sector Headquarters and car to car. This unit is installed on a Serviceowned tower located on leased land. Power is furnished by Central Power and Light Company. The Texas De artment of Public Safet also has a re eater on this tower . o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000179 Page 55 OFFICIAL USE ONLY ' This area contains approximately miles. The northern half of the county is sandy, flat country with a few rolling hills covered mostly by mesquite, chaparral brush, and prickly pear. The southern half is flat, irrigated land, sloping gently toward the Rio Grande River. It is irrigated to about 14 to 20 miles north of the Rio Grande River and to a point about 6 miles west of the city of Mission. From that point westward, the land is more hilly, with a caliche-type soil, covered with mesquite, ebony, wild olive, black brush, and prickly pear. The only water comes from irrigation canals pumped from the Rio Grande River or from a few wells. The majority of this area is classed as alluvial deposit and although there are 27 different soil types, the most predominant is heavy, sandy loam. , the area is rather hilly and has o numerous dry gulches called "arroyos," which carry heavy runoff water during rainy periods. This area is mostly devoted to ranching. The northern half of the area is devoted mostly to ranching, although some dry land farming is done. Through the center part of this area, there are numerous towns at a distance of from . h . . 1 bor er . From that point to. the western boundary, there are several small towns along a parallel line wi~ There is a heavy concentration of population along_, which runs through these towns. In the adjacent Mexican area, almost the entire area immediately adjacent to the river is irrigated farming area, flat, with very little vegetation. The city of Reynosa, which is immediately adjacent to the Hidalgo/McAllen area, is one of the largest cities in the entire Mexican area with a population of about 200,000. The topography of that area is very similar to that on the US side. In the extreme western section, the Mexican town of Miguel Aleman is adjacent to the US Port of Los Ebanos. Miguel Aleman is the first border stop near the river for the only rail line reaching the border from the interior of Mexico. Many aliens disembark at that o point. In addition, in the same general area, many of the residents Page 56 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000180 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o have, in the past, worked as ranch hands under the Contract Labor Program in the ranches northward from that area in Starr, Jim Hogg, and Brooks Counties. There is very little farming done on the US side in this same area. The terrain is generally rough and dry and is used almost entirely for ranching. All of these facts tend to cause aliens entering in this area to attempt to escape by walking north and east, rather than attempting to secure work locally. The sparsely settled, dry country makes sign-cutting somewhat difficult. The Anzalduas Dam, which is about 12 miles upriver from the Port of Hidalgo, backs up water almost to the Port of Los Ebanos, making crossing in that area more difficult. For that reason, crossing from about 5 miles below Los Ebanos to the Anzalduas Dam is very light and is done only occasionally by boat. o In the city of Reynosa, which is adjacent to the Port of Hidalgo, the "red light,, zone, in which the registered prostitutes are concentrated, is located about 1/2 mile upriver from the Port of Hidalgo at the ve ed e of the river. This fact causes inebriated aliens or The city of Reynosa has residences alo the riverbank for approximately 2 miles; and the . There are numerous buildings and population immediately adjacent to Reynosa and the US City of Hidalgo. The fact that these two populated areas are immediately adjacent to each other along an area that can be crossed at any point, causes this to be one of the heaviest crossing points in the entire station area. o Official Use Only along the entire . This large, concretelined canal carries enough water and is deep enough that it cannot be waded and persons who might try to swim it find that they cannot climb up the slanting, wet, concrete sides. For that reason, it is crossed onl~ges. Below Reynosa, for a distance of approximately ~ there are no bri Intelligence Program - All agents are charged with intelligence~gathering responsibilities. Two agents are designated as station intelligence agents and are charged with the responsibility of gathering, analyzing, coordinating, and disseminating all intelligence gathered by the station agents and sector intelligence agents. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000211 Page 87 OFFICIAL USE ONLY It The Texas-Mexico freight tr . is checked daily i~. cars. The amount of time allowed for normally has in excess of because of stringent schedule train check is from requirements. o Agents assigned to ELR/Sanctions, BORCAP, Intelligence, Drug ' ' Awareness, Prosecutions, Sensors, the Tri-County Task Force, . Explorer Post Advisors, and Special Operations will be drawn from the manpower pool. :1 Communications Although the Hebbronville station is limited in its area of res b 'lity, there are large portions that are . There needs to be a share the use of the and decreasing the operation/maintenance o costs. , , Fence Cutters I I . The more adventurous, without keys, simply cut fences and drive across country, circumventing checkpoints or areas where the Border Patrol normally maintains a Roving Patrol unit. With the proper sensor equipment, many of these major routes could be monitored. Page 88 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000212 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o connects It is only long, but is used re aliens and narcotics to circumvent the ~ther walked or driven t ~d picked up near the Traffic entering many routes. north arrives by ? o I I I There is currently a detection device on the highway which, while useful, is unreliable because of the large number of ranchettes on the highway and because local traffic sets it off. A low-light-level camera would be beneficial to maintain control of this highway. Traffi,c Check Facility With the addition of a proper awning, the present facility can be used as an all-weather checkpoint, allowing the inspection of vehicles 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Cotulla Station Responsibilities o Official Use Only ties include most of those listed earlier in this volume . OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000213 Page 89 OFFICIAL USE ONLY The Cotulla station is primarily engaged in the following activities: o train check, traffic observation, bus and freight check, and sign-cut operations. A breakdown of the manpower needs for each activity is as follows: ? Train check - -gents + Traffic observation (including bus and freight check) - Two agents per shift per day ? Sign-cut operations - -agents minimum per shift per day per shift per day. Freer Station R.esponsibilities The station is located in Freer, Texas, on Texas Highways 44, 65 miles east of Laredo and 85 miles west of o Corpus Christi. . . intersection of approximately Texas. The area is mostly open ranch and farmland and oil-field-related industries. The centers of population are Freer, Tilden, Three Rivers, George West, Mathis, Orange Grove, Alice, San Diego, and Benavides, Texas. The operations performed by the station are fixed and roving traffic check, sign-cutting and sensor response/maintenance, city patrol, transportation check, train check, liaison/intelligence with other agencies, ELR/Sanctions, BORCAP, drug awareness presentations, special operations, and details. o Page 90 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000214 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Dallas Station Responsibilities The Dallas station is responsible fi r all enfi counties in the state of exas . . The activities include most of those listed earlier in this volume. The Dallas station concentrates its enforcement efforts in three main areas: area control, the criminal alien program, and sanctions enforcement. All voluntary-return Mexican aliens are removed by way of a daily bus run between Dallas and Laredo. Dallas District Office detention officers meet Laredo sector detention officers in Austin, Texas, to shuttle the apprehended aliens back to Laredo for voluntary return. The Dallas station does not have any detention officers. assigned to the station. All deportation cases are handled by the Dallas District Office and are housed in contract jails or placed in service processing facilities. San Antonio Station o Responsibilities activities include most of those listed earlier in this volume. The San Antonio station has concentrated its efforts on aliens traveling to interior destinations and concentrations of indigent alien laborers. Employer Sanctions and the Criminal Alien Programs have been addressed when manpower and workload perm.it. San Antonio is a center for aliens who cross the border from Brownsville to El Paso, Texas, and who are continuing onward to points north or east. Transportation o Official Use Only Check - Bus In the past 3 years, San Antonio agents have apprehended 3,564 undocumented aliens traveling to interior destinations on buses. This is generally accomplished working one 8-hour shift. If two agents were assigned to each shift 7 days per week, apprehensions would obviously double or triple. Agents assigned to the bus station would also be available to perform interior enforcement duties in the downtown area when no buses are arriving or departing. By maintaining a presence 24 hours per day, the concentration of OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000215 Page 91 OFFICIAL USE ONLY illegal aliens in the downtown area could be controlled and, as an o additional benefit, petty crimes such as auto burglaries, purse snatching, assaults, and robberies by indigent aliens would be controlled. Transportation Check - Train During the past 3 years, San Antonio agents have apprehended 4,714 illegal aliens traveling on freight and passenger trains in San Antonio. This is accomplished with an average of three agents per day checking only those _trains arriving during daylight hours. Trains arrive and depart from San Antonio 24 hours per day, and to properly check each train will require a minimum of six agents per shift for three shifts each day. Two major rail lines serve San Antonio, the Southern Pacific and the Union Pacific, and each has numerous arrivals and departures each day. When not actively engaged in checking trains, agents would be free to work interior enforcement activities in the San Antonio area. Traffic Check - Observation ~c arteries leave San Antonio and go north and east, o In the past 3 years, 803 illegal aliens have been apprehended on these two highways. This figure is extremely low because of the station's limited resources to cover these highways. The majority of the time, only one one-agent unit is available for the activity in a 24-hour period and less than 2 working days per week are devoted to this program. However, two major narcotics seizures and two lesser ones have been realized during this period. Interior Enforcement The San Antonio station has three major metropolitan areas within its area of responsibility; San Antonio, Austin, and Houston. All of these cities have large populations of indigent alien laborers who are not being addressed by INS investigators. These concentrations create numerous problems for local law enforcement agencies and citizenry, and the Border Patrol Interior Enforcement Units are a major solution to this problem. The San Antonio station apprehended 5,598 illegal aliens in this activity during the past 3 years. These apprehensions were. primarily aliens who concentrate on street corners seeking day labor jobs until they can earn enough money to move on to interior destinations. Page 92 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000216 Official Use Only o OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Employer Sanctions During the past 3 years, the San Antonio station has produced over 200 Employer Sanctions cases. Border Patrol Criminal Alien Program The San Antonio station's BORCAP has been limited to five rural counties by agreements with the San Antonio District Office. This program has produced 63 criminal aliens and has been handled as a collateral duty by an agent_. With the additional counties-some of which are in the Houston District-it is unknown at this time whether an additional agent would be necessary. Most likely this will continue to be handled as a collateral duty by an agent. Alien Removal o The San Antonio station currently uses the San Antonio District's Detention and Deportation Unit to remove apprehended aliens. The District Unit only works the day shift and leaves alien removal to Border Patrol agents after hours, on holidays, and on weekends. This hampers current operations and would be unacceptable if proposed expansion of manpower is realized . Justification Border Patrol operations are 24~hour operations and the speedy removal of detainees is essential to a smooth operation. It is also fiscally more prudent to remove aliens rapidly than to encourage detention costs. Zapata Station Responsibilities -.-oc,T>n,Ti> 'ble for all enforcement activities in The The activities include most of those the listed earlier in this volume . o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000217 Page93 _______ J OFFICIAL USE ONLY that are used by alien and drug smugglers to gain entry into the US. Control of these highways can be achieved with the correct amount of personnel and equipment. I o o : o o t t I . II : o o that bound Mexico with areas as wide as 2 to 3 miles to the international markers. Recommendations General recommendations that are common to all of the sectors are given after the San Diego sector write-up. These general recommendations are then followed by sector-specific recommendations . o o Page 94 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000218 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Del Rio Sector Introduction The Del Rio sector includes 9.4% (154 linear miles) of the total Southwest Border. The Del Rio sector has averaged about 39,000 apprehensions per year for the last 2 year~. During FY 1990, 50 narcotics seizures occurred at a value of $100,400,000. FY 1991 seizures had already reached 70 at a value of $66,000,000 by July. Operational Environment Terrain . There are a few Mexican settlements along the Rio Grande River .and large populations concentrated near the Texas cities of Del Rio and Eagle Pass. There are 154 linear miles (river frontage 205 miles} of border in the Del Rio sector. Those miles are composed of o 90.5 27.5 25.5 5.5 5. 0 miles miles miles miles miles of rolling brushland of reservoir of farmland of urban flat of mountains. The Del Rio sector covers a wide varie and mountains to farms and ranches. oooo .~o,_,_,~,~-=....-.o= ....~.=.== sector is shown on the following page. Climate The average summer temperatures in the Del Rio sector are a low of 74?F and a high of95?F; however, temperatures as high as 100?F have been recorded. Winter temperatures are mild, with average lows of 46?F and highs of 64?F. The precipitation is 25 inches per year, with an average of 320 days of sunshine per year. There are no unusual storms such as high winds, flooding, sandstorms, or heavy snow that occur in this sector. High {?F) o Official Use Only LowrF} Rainy days J 67.3 43.5 1 F 71.3 47.4 3 M 72.2 52.5 4 A 78,6 60.7 8 M 87.5 67.4 4 OFFICIAL USE ONLY J J A s 98.6 76.8 1 92.2 73.2 7 93.8 88.2 69,5 0 82.0 56.9 8 3 73.2 2 N 73.2 51.9 2 DHS-17-0040-H-000219 D 64.6 40.2 1 Page 95 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o DEL RIO (b) (7)(E) o KEY o o I I fl I I I II INTERNATIONAL BORDER RAILROAD o CITY OR TOWN ? EXISTING CHECKPOINT PART-TIME CHECKPOINT TO BECOME FULL-TIME o Map of the Del Rio Sector Page 96 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000220 Of{i,cialUse Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o o Available Resources The Del Rio sector currently has 337 agents and 54 nonagent support personnel assigned. The sector also possesses intrusion detection, communications, information control and display, and assessment equipment (some for day and some for night use). Some of the obsolete equipment has recently been replaced. The new equipment recommended will augment and upgrade the sector's existing physical protection equipment inventory. Mention of most of this equipment is not included; however, in a few cases, specific sensor or camera locations_are discussed. Current on-duty force in the sector consists of 1 Chief Patrol Agent, 1 Deputy Chief Patrol Agent, 5 Assistant Chief Patrol Agents, I Supervisory Pilot, 5 Aircraft Pilots, 2 Supervisory Special Agents, I Supervisory Special Agent, 23 Special Agents, 1 Intelligence Agent, 1 Vehicle Seizure Officer, 6 Patrol Agents in Charge, 3 Assistant Patrol Agents in Charge, 3 Field Operations Supervisors, 35 Supervisory Border Patrol Agents, 70 Senior Border Patrol Agents, 231 Border Patrol Agents, 1 Administrative Officer, 24 Clerks, 4 Electronics Technicians, 12 Law Enforcement Communications Assistants, 10 Detention Enforcement Officers, 16 Automotive Mechanics, 4 Maintenance Mechanics, and 2 Aircraft Mechanics . Threat The principal movement of illegal aliens and/or contraband out of the Del Rio sector is by the three main north/south highways and both freight and passenger rail services: (b) (7)(E) I I I Sightings of Colombian aircraft landings in remote areas have also been reported . o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000221 Page 97 OFFICIAL USE ONLY I I Contact with Suspects - I The information presented in the tables below is the compilation of the Border Patrol agents' contact with illegal aliens and/or drug 1 Uafficl (b) (7)(E) + (b) (7)(E) ? o (b) (7)(E) (b) (7)(E) ? (b) (7)(E) I I I I I o Official Use Only ~eckpoints identified above, all but the one on-Nogales are relatively small operations. Having to staff five shifts to maintain full-time coverage at all of these stations would occupy nearly the entire staff assigned to the Tucson sector . On the other hand, the alternative would be to place fewer but larger checkpoints on the Interstates after the above routes have USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000283 Page 159 USE ONLY I joined '" II them. To intercept east/west and northbound traffic at the Interstate level and to cover smaller but significant highways that could be used for smuggling, at least six checkpoints, all larger than suggested above, would be required. ~ A W Because it is not possible to interdict the bulk of alien and drug smuggling traffic at the border itself, what will be required to gain control of illegal border traffic in this sector is an intercept strategy that passes all traffic out of the area through the scrutiny of experienced agents. Sensors and tracking at the border line will serve to alert the enforcing agencies to changes in traffic patterns, locations, and intensity. Patterns can also be observed in the sensor data which, in conjunction with real time intelligence, can be used to identify likely staging areas and mustering points and to direct operations against them. They will also provide a more confident count of total traffic with which to measure operational effectiveness. Recommendations General recommendations that are common to all of the sectors are given after the San Diego sector write-up. These general recommendations are then followed by sector-specific recommendations. Page 160 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000284 Official Use Only - USE ONLY o Yuma Sector Introduction The Yuma sector includes 7.2% (118.2 miles) of the total Southwest Border and accounts for 6% (67,000 in 1987 of the total a rehen. f "II I liens per year. In the 89% of the apprehensions are made. In the same zone, the Yuma sector personnel make 90% of their drug arrests. This is quite understandable because nearly 80% of the sector is composed of rugged mountains, sand dunes, and flat desert, which includes the Luke Air Force Base bombing range. Operational Environment Terrain This sector has extremely hostile natural geographical features. There are 118.2 linear miles of border within the Yuma sector. Those miles are composed of o 51.6 28.5 22.8 11.7 3.6 miles miles miles miles miles of flat desert of mountains of farmland of sand dunes of rolling brushland . The terrain within the Yuma sector is extremely hostile. Every year illegal aliens are found either dead or extremely dehydrated in the desert. The Border Patrol serves an important role along this stretch of border in deterring crossers who might otherwise come to harm in their attempts to cross the desert into the US. A map of this sector is shown on the following page. Climate The average temperatures in the Yuma sector are a low of 78?F and a high of 105?F; however, temperatures as high as 110?F have been recorded. Winter temperatures are mild with an average low of 46?F and high of 69?F. The precipitation is 3.1 inches per year, with an average of 345 days of sunshine per year. Flooding is possible in January and July and sandstorms are possible in June, July, and September . o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000285 Page 161 USE ONLY o YUMA (b) (7)(E) 78 o KEY oooo INTERNATIONAL BORDER l I II RAILROAD I I I o N ~ CITY OR TOWN MILES I 0 I 10 I 20 o Map of the Yuma Sector Page 162 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000286 Official. Use Only USE ONLY o J 69 High (?F) Low( 0 F) 44 Rainy days 2 F 74 46 1 M 79 51 1 A M 87 94 64 57 1 0 J 103 72 0 A 106 80 2 J 107 80 1 s 101 73 1 0 91 62 1 N D 78 51 1 69 44 2 Available Resources The Yuma sector currently has 184 agents and 36 nonagent support personnel assigned. The. sector has 183 sensors spread over 74 miles of the busiest corridors. There are four camera sites in the San Luis area. Other general physical security equipment is used in this sector. Threat o This zone is approximately 24 miles in length (20% of the Yuma sector) and within it occur approximately 90% of the drug arrests and 89% of the apprehensions. Contact with Suspects The information presented in the tables below is the compilation of the Border Patrol agents' contact with illegal aliens and/or drug traffickers and the amounts of drugs confiscated. Contactw/Suspects: Jan'90 Numberof Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests 2,629 Drug-RelatedArrests 14 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana(lb) 36.72 Cocaine (oz) 76.16 Heroin (oz} 0.01 Other (oz) 1 Numberof Confrontations: With Armed Persons 1 Assaults on BP Agents - Feb'90 Mar '90 Apr'90 May'90 2,441 30 3,324 26 3,150 23 3,740 18 215.1 3.6B 0.14 2.88 1395 0.16 0.001 21.12 0.21 3.20 0.02 2.56 131.07 0.32 0.02 0.16 5 - 1 - - - - o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000287 Page 163 USE ONLY I Contact w/Suspects: Jun'90 Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen Arrests 3,149 Drug-Related Arrests 17 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: 95.12 Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) 0.09 Other (oz) 2.72 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP 1 Agents Aug '90 Sept '90 Oct '90 3,453 22 3,373 8 3,080 19 2,873 23 205.8 0.16 0.58 2.24 - 0.03 0.16 0.14 0.48 0.8 84.02 3.36 0.02 3.52 - - 1 1 2 2 - Nov'90 Dec'90 Jan'91 Feb'91 Mar '91 - Contact w/Suspects: Jul '90 0.8 - 2 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests 1,869 Drug-Related Arrests 30 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 175.85 Cocaine (oz) 0.32 Heroin (oz) Other (oz) 80.61 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 2 Assaults on BP Agents 2,255 56 1,851 29 1,798 28 . 2,538 10 940.28 6.88 1.0 37.60 554.13 11,440.0 0.01 0.96 145.62 1.28 166.23 0.16 - - 3.20 0.64 - 2 1 4 2 3 2 - Contact w;suspects: Apr '91 May '91 Jun '91 Jul '91 Aug '91 3,039 15 2,543 16 2,716 25 2,330 23 11.06 0.16 17.6 0.32 0.02 0.32 0.09 0.32 2.38 0.96 0.01 0.16 0.06 0.64 35.04 1 1 3 2 1 - - - Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests 2,980 Drug-Related Arrests 22 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 172.01 Cocaine (oz) 0.16 1 Heroin (oz) Other (oz) 0.64 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents - - - - - Page 164 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000288 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Contact w/Suspects: Oct '91 Nov '91 Dec '91 Jan'92 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests 1,854 Drug-Related Arrests 13 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 0.08 Cocaine (oz) 1 Heroin (oz) 0.01 Other (oz) 2.72 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 1 Assaults on BP 1 Agents 1,508 12 1,302 20 2,339 50 2,155 38 1,019.57 0.32 0.04 1 317.1 49.28 1 1 136.08 0.32 0.01 432.16 128.45 0.96 0.29 512.96 1 2 2 - - - - Feb'92 Mar '92 Apr '92 May'92 Jun'92 2,822 19 2,304 44 2,482 61 2,035 31 166.36 1 0.01 0.8 382.39 0.48 0.14 0.8 72.64 42.24 0.09 296.48 604.34 0.32 1.15 0.8 - Contact w/Suspects: - Sept '91 Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen Arrests 1,841 Drug-Related Arrests 34 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 233.87 2,465.12 Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) 1 Other (oz) 0.32 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 1 Assaults on BP Agents - Contact w/Suspects: 1 1 2 - - - 3 Jul '92 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests 2,316 Drug-Related Arrests 29 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 44.51 Cocaine (oz) 832.0 Heroin (oz) 2.5 Other (oz) 16 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 3 Assaults on BP 1 Agents Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000289 Page 165 USE ONLY Sector Operations Yuma Sector Headquarters staff provides the overall leadership, direction, and support necessary to conduct sector operations. o The staff comprises one Chief Patrol Agent, one Deputy Chief Patrol Agent, four Assistant Chief Patrol Agents (one for each organizational area of responsibility), one Intelligence Agent, and one Vehicle Seizure Agent, for a total of eight agents. Air Operations The sector's Air Operations unit is a vital part of the overall operational effort. The fixed wing aircraft are flown daily with one pilot assigned to Iinewatch duties on the east side and another to linewatch duties on the west side. The pilots also assist in checking the freight yards and railroad sidings west of Yuma. A third pilot flies either the Cessna Skyline or the OH-6A rotary aircraft on the evening shift. This aircraft is used to assist ground units performing linewatch after dark, to enhance night operations in the freight yards, and to conduct aerial surveillance. Some of the activities the station is involved in are listed below. + Air Operati.ons: Three pilots per day are assigned to Air Opera- o tions, 365 days per year + Supervision: One of the five pilots will be the Air Operations Supervisor. Station Operations Yuma Station Yuma is a large border station with responsibility for ? miles of the international boundary. miles of the land border lies in and the state of California, followed by ? miles of river bounda another iles of land border in the state of Arizona. e terrai . The Southern Pacific Railroad maintains a major freight yard in Yuma coupled with on the outskirts of town. Yuma International Airport~eduled departures a day and the local bus terminal has 8 departures. AMTRAK stops in Yuma three times per week. Interstate 8 passes through town, and the station o Page 166 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000290 Official Use Only USE ONLY o (b) (7)(E) maintains a permanent, transportation check are major duties. Traffic and Tourism and agriculture are major industries and the Employer Sanctions Unit (ESU)/Employer Labor Relations (ELR) unit keeps track of over 4,000 businesses and agricultural enterprises. The BORCAP unit is responsible for the Yuma County Jail, city jails at San Luis and Somerton, and a 500-bed minimum security state prison located south of town. In addition to the above duties, one agent per shift is assigned to remain at the station as the alien processor and another is assigned to monitor the low-light-level television (LLLTV) system. On a five-shift per week basis, two agents are assigned to the local narcotics task force, one is assigned to prosecutions, and another is assigned to the Anti-Smuggling Unit (ASU). Two agents maintain the sensor system and two others are assigned to an interdiction unit that works specific information on narcotics or alien smuggling. o The demand reduction unit consists of two agents that make presentations at schools, at community events, and before civic groups. The unit has also been given assignments outside the sector on numerous occasions and has won a statewide award for their efforts. Some of the activities the station is involved in are listed below. ? Linewatch I Sign-Cut: For logistical purposes, the ? miles of boundary have been divided into ? overlapping areas. Three agents per shift are needed in five of these areas but only two agents in the sixth area. ? Traffic Check: A checkpoint located on an interstate requires four agents because of the volume of traffic and agent safety considerations. One of these agents is part of a canine unit. Transportation Check: Three agents are assigned to the freight yards and sidings and two others to the airport and bus terminals. Alien Processor, LLLTV Observer, and Interdiction Unit: One alien processor, one observer, and two interdiction agents are assigned per shift. ? o Official Use Only Other Agents: Six agents are assigned to ESU/ELR, six assigned to BORCAP, two assigned to demand reduction, one assigned to prosecutions, one assigned to ASU, two assigned to USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000291 Page 167 USE ONLY sensor maintenance, task force. ? and two assigned to the local narcotics o Supervisors: One supervisor per shift is assigned as duty supervisor at the station. A second is assigned the three east side linewatch areas, and a third is assigned the three west side linewatch areas. A fourth oversees traffic and transportation check units. Blythe Station Blythe is a backup station located approximately 70 miles north of Yuma. Before IRCA, Blythe was rimaril a traffic check and farm and ranch check station. The Blythe BORCAP unit has almost been overwhelmed because of the establishment of a 4,000-bed state prison just outside of Blythe. They are also responsible for a smaller minimum security facility located 40 miles west of Blythe. The ESU/ELR include Blythe Kingman, and roundtrip drive o unit stays on the move as their responsibilities and Needles, California; Parker, Lake Havasu, Bullhead City, Arizona; and Laughlin, Nevada. A to Kingman takes 5 hours. Some of the activities the station is involved in are listed below. ? Traffic Check: Three agents, three shifts per day, or nine agents, 365 days per year, are assigned to traffic check. ? Transportation Check: One agent per shift, three shifts per day, 365 days per year, is assigned to transportation check. ? BORCAP: Four agents are assigned to BORCAP. ? ESU I ELR: Four agents are assigned to ESU/ELR. ? Supervisors: One Supervisor, Border Patrol Agent oversees the BORCAP and ESU/ELR units. The Patrol Agent in Charge Page 168 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000292 Official Use Only o USE ONLY o (PAIC) and rema1n1ng Supervisors, supervise all other operations. Border Patrol Agents Wellton Station Wellton is a border station~ing approximately 30 miles east of Yuma and is responsible for ? miles of the international boundary. The desert area south ofWellton has one of the harshest climates in the US. The closest straight line walking distance from the Mexico border to a populated area in the US is over 30 miles. During the hottest months of summer, it is physically very difficult to carry enough water to sustain life while crossing this area. During the 2 years immediately preceding !RCA, Wellton agents and the sector's Desert Area Rescue Team saved 91 lives in this area. The most publicized of these rescues occurred in July 1987 when the entire nation watched as agents searched for a group of people south of Dateland, Arizona. Twenty-four of these individuals were found alive, although two of them subsequently died, and one was found dead upon arrival. ellton. To o Some of the activities the station is involved in are listed below. Traffic Check I Obse ? I I :t o I agents work at the checkpoint and two others in . Four agents per shift, three shifts per day, 365 days per year, are assigned to traffic check/observation. ? Sign-Cut: A minimum of two agents are assigned per shift, one shift per day, 365 days per year, to perform sign-cut. ? Supervision: One Patrol Agent in Charge and two first-line supervisors are assigned. Boulder City Station o Official Use Only This station was established in 1988 to supplement the office of the Las Vegas Officer in Charge after an operational survey found a need for it. . USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000293 Page 169 USE ONLY The survey of southern Nevada and northern Arizona law enforce- o ment agencies indicates that they encounter large groups of illegal aliens traveling through the area on the three major routes that run north from the Mexico border. There was also evidence that the local jails were holding numerous criminal aliens. The local investigations office was unable to respond to these needs because of a lack of manpower and other operational priorities. An operational plan proposed establishing a small station that could respond to local agencies throughout the four county area. The main objective was for these agents to develop alien smuggling and criminal alien cases. Unfortunately, the hiring freeze interrupted the process before it was finished. Nevertheless, the two agents who did enter on duty, working without an office or telephone, have proven the need for this station. When fully staffed, this station will have one supervisor and four journeymen or a total of five agents. Summary The personnel requirements listed above do not address antismuggling agent positions, detention officer positions, or nonofficer support positions. as t e nee arises, and patrol coverage of walking trails. This strategy is complemented by the use of sensors and cameras and could probably be enhanced by the addition of about 3.5 miles of multiple fence barrier design placed in the San Luis area. o Recommendations General recommendations that are common to all of the sectors are given after the San Diego sector write-up. These general recommendations are then followed by sector-specific recommendations . o Page 170 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000294 Official Use Only USE ONLY El Centro I Introduction Sector II The El Centro sector includes 4.3% (69.6 miles) of the total !!! Southwest Border and accounts for 4.9% (55,000 in 1987) of the I illegal alien apprehensions. The urban area consisting of Calexico II onthe theillegal US side and Mexicali on the Mexico side accounts for most of aliens as seems typical along the entire border. East and !;i west of the urban centers of Calexico and Mexicali are mountains, I desert, sand dunes, and farms. i Operational Environment I I Terrain Ill I i i I There are 69.6 miles of border within the El Centro sector. Those miles are composed of 29.4 18.0 16.8 3.0 2.4 I I fl! - i;,; I miles miles miles miles miles of flat desert of farmland of sand dunes of mountains of flat urban area. I A map of this sector is shown on the following page. ill I I Climate ~ I! The average summer low temperature in the El Centro sector is ! 78"F and the high is l06?F, however, temperatures as high as I 112"F have been recorded. Winter temperatures are mild, with an I average low of 44?F and high of 71"F. On average, 2.44 inches of I precipitation fall per year. There is no heavy snow that occurs in Ii!this sector. It is possible to have flash floods and sandstorms yearl!l round. The average winter temperature summer temperature is 92"F. is about 58"F and the I average High (?F) 70 Low (?F) 43 F 72 46 2 4 J Rainy days i I Available M 79 51 2 A 88 58 1 M 95 61 1 J J A s 0 105 72 1 108 80 2 106 80 3 103 72 91 4 2 63 N 80 51 2 D 71 43 .37 Resources i The El Centro sector has 213 agents and 48 nonagent support personnel, was authorized to have 360, and has requested 360. As of ~ 1990, they had 266 ground sensors, 147 processor transmitters, w 4 fixed repeaters, and 8 portable repeaters. Other general physical security equipment is used in this sector. I Offi,cialUse Only I ''':le I I USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000295 Page 171 USE ONLY o EL CENTRO (b) (7)(E) o N ~ KEY oooo INTERNATIONALBORDER I I I II RAILROAD I I MILES o CITY OR TOWN ? EXISTING CHECKPOINT 0 10 20 o Map of the El Centro Sector Page 172 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000296 Official Use Only USE ONLY o Threat The El Centro sector contains the Calexico Port of Entry (POE), which in 1990 admitted almost 30,000,000 persons of which about 22,000,000 were aliens. in 1989, the El Centro Border Patrol apprehended 27,524 persons, of which 149 were involved in known narcotics trafficking. There were 1,800 pounds of marijuana, 7,000 ounces of cocaine, and 60 ounces of heroin seized in 1989. In 1990, there were seven incidents involving a Border Patrol agent confronting armed persons. There were eight assaults on Border Patrol agents in 1990. Of the Border Patrol apprehensions, 14% occurred at inland checkpoints. Threat Along the Border (from west to east) o The border areas in the Imperial Valley are relatively flat and without much natural vegetation. The persons apprehended in this region are usually seeking employment in the agricultural areas or attempting to reach Los Angeles. While there is drug trafficking in this region as well, the persons attempting entry in this area are less likely to be armed. In the urban area of Calexico, the agents are sometimes subject to rock-throwing incidents from persons on the other side of the fence that separates the US and Mexico. The abandoned golf course near the border has become a major congregating area for aliens and is relatively dangerous. The truck crossing area near the old golf course is not open at night and the parked vans have become a major drug dealing area. The All-American Canal forms a barrier for the ille because the water is too swift for swimmers . o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000297 Page 173 USE ONLY II In addition, the sand dunes have become increasingly popular with sports enthusiasts, enabling the aliens to ''blend in" with them. o Threat Inland from the Border the El Centro sector conducts train inspections in the Indio area. However, the railroad companies have objected to the delays caused by such inspections. Contact with Suspects The information presented in the tables below is the compilation of the Border Patrol agents' contact with illegal aliens and/or drug traffickers and the amounts of drugs confiscated. Page 174 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000298 Oflicial. Use Only o USE ONLY - Contact wtsuspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (lb) Number of Confrontations; With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w{Suspects: - Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine {oz) Heroin {oz) Other (dosage units) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Jan'90 Feb'90 Mar'90 Apr'90 May '90 2,606 2,503 20 2,584 23 2,215 16 2,733 17 291 85 0.5 0.25 75 358 334 - 110 0.25 1 1 19 630 2,829 - 0.75 - - 1 - - 3 - - - - Jun'90 Jul '90 Aug'90 Sept'90 Oct '90 2,616 11 2,886 10 2,838 19 2,323 6 2,410 329 52 66 - 180 9 39 70 - 1 - - I - - 1 1 10 1 1,073 - Assaults on BP Agents 2 - Contact wtsuspects: Nov'90 Dec'90 Jan '91 Feb '91 Mar'91 2,163 1,931 24 2,957 33 2,185 2,798 24 30 192 10,080 5 732 176 29 379 0.5 276 - 800 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated; Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin(oz) Other (lb) Other (dosage units) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents 5 561 66 - - - - ' - - 2 1 - - 44 ' 1 1 1 - - - 3 1 1 - Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000299 Page 175 USE ONLY Contact w/Suspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (lb) (dosage units) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w/Suspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (lb) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w/Suspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Apr '91 May'91 Jun'91 Jul '91 Aug '91 2,734 22 3,012 24 2,691 10 2,550 21 2,682 24 206 816 119 5 1,152 1 - - 32 7 34 - 4 - - 47 26 301 - - 3 2 6 2 3 1 6 5 1 3 Sept '91 Oct '91 Nov '91 Dec '91 Jan'92 2,337 12 2,655 28 2,027 29 1,807 15 2,477 25 32 767 - 225 4,520 506 11,811 - 176 10,629 32 - - 64 2 - - - 28 4 1 - 2 1 - 5 2 Feb'92 Mar'92 Apr '92 May'92 Jun '92 2,165 11 2,810 29 2,608 46 2,924 23 2,357 37 2,633 13,254 901 39,197 1,053 672 574 27,183 - - - - 3,441 13,136 46 3 1 1 3 4 1 5 - - - - - - 6 - Page 176 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000300 Official Use Only USE ONLY o Contact wtsuspects: Number of Arrests: Illegal AJien Arrests Drug-Related Arrests Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other(oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Jul '92 2,756 22 1,431 38,781 1 - s. 1 Sector Operations The El Centro sector borders the San Diego sector to the west and covers about 26,000 square miles in southeastern California. Much of the sector is sparsely populated desert with the exception of the urban Riverside/San Bernardino area of the east Los . o The majority of the sector is within the Imperial Valley, a desert area below sea level irrigated by the All-American Canal with extensive agricultural areas. o Official Use Only at the eastern edge of the Imperial Valley in the sand dune region. The Yuma .,,,...,..-rn...o o El Centro sector, with an region . USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000301 Page 177 USE ONLY II the fence separating Calexico, California, and Mexicali, Baja C "fornia, or to remote desert areas adjacent to the eastern and western mountain ranges. The urban Calexico/Mexicali area is located in the middle of the sector's border and accounts for most of the illegal aliens apprehended. The number of apprehensions at El Centro has fluctuated over the past few years. This is partly attributed to the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) and partly to the natural terrain. The relatively low volume of legitimate traffic and the wide-open space would appear to have a deterrent effect on illegal border activity. Total apprehensions for the El Centro sector during FY 1989 were 27,524, down 33% from the 41,179 FY 1988 figure. The El Centro sector presently consists of headquarters personnel and stations located at Calexico, El Centro, Indio, and Riverside, California. The El Centro Sector Headquarters adjoins the El Centro station and the INS Service Processing Center at 1111 North Imperial Avenue. in El Centro, California. In 1990 approximately 30,000 aliens were apprehended in the El Centro sector. Calexico station personnel accounted for more than half of the sector's total. There are 53 persons assigned to the Sector Headquarters. e approximately , respectively. The nonurban areas of the sector are primarily at desert. In the region from Calexico to the Salton Sea, there is extensive irrigation with large agricultural plots. and ranch check, The sector duties include linewa~ traffic check, transportation check,~' intelligence, antismuggling, screening, prosecutions, vehicle seizures, air operations, training, Employer Labor Relations (ELR), drug awareness, and canine programs. Ten persons are assigned to the El Centro air operation. Station Operations Calexico Station The Calexico station area of operation consists of approximately 26 miles of international bound with the Mexican State of Ba. a California Norte. Page 178 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000302 Official Use Only o USE ONLY o of Calexico is immediately adjacent to the Baja California capital city of Mexicali, which has a population of just over one million. The primary function and responsibility of the Calexico station is linewatch. This operation is aided by the use of drag~ electronic sensors. Some transportation check and operations are conducted. A freight train check is performed daily on a train that enters the US from Mexico. The Calexico station is located within the Imperial Valley's fanning zone. The station also provides personnel for farm and ranch check operations. Last year, Calexico apprehended 17,385 illegal aliens. This represents 63% of the sector total. The majority of these apprehensions were made in linewatch operations. The station complex is located at the intersection of Andrade Avenue and Eighth Street in Calexico, California. This is a linewatch station, with 75 persons assigned. El Centro Station o The El Centro station area of operation is primarily located in the farmland of Imperial County. The area includes several incorporated small cities as well as small unincorporated farm towns. The primary function and responsibility of the El Centro station is the maintenance of two traffic che ooo..o.o llt I ..oo.I ~e vicinity of the Traffic check apprehensions accounted for 49% of the total station apprehensions for FY 1989. (b) (7)(E) o Official Use Only The station has International Boundary to patrol in desert and mountainous terrain. This area is monitored by drag roads and electronic sensors. Linewatch apprehensions accounted for 23% of the total station apprehensions for FY 1988. USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000303 Page 179 USE ONLY Additional station functions and responsibilities include farm and o ranch surveys, transportation check (airport, bus, and freight train), jail check, and city patrol. These activities accounted for 40% of the total station apprehensions for FY 1989. In FY 1991, the El Centro station apprehended 6,215 illegal aliens. This represents 23% of the sector total. There are 93 persons assigned to this station. Indio Station The Indio station comprises about -square miles, most of which is uninhabited desert wastelancI'ioc:ted in Riverside County. The Coachella Valley is within the station area and has about 60,000 acres in cultivation. The Valley also has a large tourist industry in the Palm Springs area. The primary function and responsibility of the Indio station is trans ortation check uses and frei ht trains . . T .s situation makes Indio an ideal train check station. Transportation check apprehensions accounted for 27% of the station's apprehensions for FY 1989. Large agribusiness operations are located within the station's area of responsibility. Crops consist of citrus, dates, grapes, and row crops. Farm and ranch check operations are performed during peak seasons on an intermittent basis. o The tourist activity in the Coachella Valley is responsible for attracting a large number of illegal aliens to work in restaurants, gardening services, etc. The combined activities of traffic check, city patrol, and jail check account for 73% of the station's apprehensions for FY 1989. In 1991, Indio station apprehended 985 illegal aliens. This repre. sen ts 3% of the sector total. The station complex is located at 45620 Commerce Street in the eastern portion of Indio, California. This is a linewatch station. There are 16 persons assigned to this station. Riverside Station The Riverside station area of operation includes parts of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. Much of the area of the three counties is mountains and high desert. The city of Riverside, located at the northwest end of Riverside County, is o easily accessible from the east, west, and south by the extensive Page 180 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000304 Official Use Only USE ONLY - .. I I , freeway systems of Southern California, a major airport at Ontario, California, and by three major railroads: Southern Pacific, Santa Fe, and Union Pacific. The Southern Pacific freight yards are located in the Colton/Bloomington, California area. The Santa Fe yards are located at San Bernardino and Barstow, California. Several trains arrive daily from the border area freight yards of San 1 .1 . Diego and Calexico, California; Yuma, Arizona; and El Paso, Texas. The primary function and responsibility of the Riverside station is i transportation check (air, bus, and freight train) with freight train check accounting for the majority of this activity. Transportation o check accounted for 19% of the station's FY 1989 apprehensions, "I with freight train check accounting for all of transportation check apprehensions. I Most illegal aliens, after traveling north from the border area, feel o they are safe from detection and apprehension in this area. l Therefore, they seek employment in the numerous citrus orchards, .. vineyards, light and heavy industry, and virtually every type of o business. Although Federal Court injunctions have severely hampered operations within these types of activities, farm and ranch ~; check, jail check, and city patrol apprehensions accounted for 81% .,, of the station's FY 1989 apprehensions. These restrictions have placed emphasis on the interception of illegal aliens before assimilation into the local metropolitan areas. i - 1 ... , I In FY 1991, the Riverside station apprehended 2,939 illegal aliens. I This accounted for 11% of the sector total. , There are 14 persons assigned to the Riverside station. I Recommendations ~, General recommendations that are common to all of the sectors are given after the San Diego sector write-up. These general reeom. mendations are then followed by sector-specific recommendations. I '' I Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000305 Page 181 USE ONLY This page intentionally left blank. II I I ' - %1 I Page 182 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000306 Official Use Only USE ONLY - San Diego Sector I Introduction I The San Diego sector includes 4.0% (65. 7 miles) of the total Southwest Border, but accounts for 45% (473,000 in 1990) of the illegal I alien apprehensions per year. Ninety percent of the aliens are ~. apprehended in the first 13 miles, 20% of the total length, east of t, the coast. There is drug-related drive-through traffic in 5.5 miles of 1~ relatively rural area between the Tijuana Airport and the foothills i of the San Ysidro mountains to the east of the Brownfield station . IoOperational I Terrain ., I Environment I There are 65. 7 linear miles of border within the San Diego sector. Those miles are composed of I i I ..i - l 1" 37.5 7.8 9.9 4.5 2.4 1.8 1.8 miles miles miles miles miles miles miles of mountains of urban hilly of rolling brushland of canyons of farmland of flat desert of urban flat. I A map of this sector is shown on the following page. , The sector has 37.5 miles of rugged mountains with the remaining ,; 28.2 miles divided among desert, canyons, farmland, and rolling brushland. The 13 miles running east from the coast to the foothills of the San Ysidro Mountains is the most concentrated area of illegal ~ entry on the Southwest Border. Almost this entire length is heavily i urbanized on the Mexico side, with buildings and roads running li! right up to the border. At the eastern end of this urbanized area is i} the General Aberlardo Rodriguez Airport, which serves Tijuana and CTampico. The border itself varies from very hilly for the first ;~ 3.5 miles inland from the coast to relatively flat except for the ~ "Soccer Field" area about a mile east of the San Ysidro Port of Entry I (POE). On the US side, from the coast 5 miles inland to the Tijuana : River flood control levee, the terrain is mostly rolling brushland and farmland. I I I Official Use Only Ia i ~ j::\ i USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000307 Page 183 USE ONLY o o N ~ KEY oooo MILES INTERNATIONALBORDER o CllYORTOWN o PORT OF ENTRY ? EXISTINGCHECKPOINT 0 10 20 o Map of the San Diego Sector Page 184 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000308 Official Use Only USE ONLY o Climate The average summer low temperature in the San Diego sector is 62?F and the average high is 72?F, however, temperatures as high as 94 ?F have been recorded. Winter temperatures are mild, with average lows of 49?F and highs of 67?F. The average precipitation is 12 inches per year. There is no heavy snow that occurs in this sector. The average temperature in the winter is about 58?F and in the summer is 67?F. High rf) Low (0 f) Rainydays F 69 J 68 47 53 7 s 72 63 J 73 63 72 2 1 0 M A M 65 55 6 73 60 4 J 63 A 74 64 1 s 0 N D 75 75 64 61 2 72 52 49 4 6 1 65 Available Resources The San Diego sector currently has 820 agents and 115 nonagent support personnel assigned. To assist them in their enforcement duties, they have 380 ground sensors supported by 263 transmit~ ters, 19 fixed and portable repeaters, and 20 night vision devices of various types. Other general physical security equipment is used in this sector . o Threat Illegal aliens are the principal enforcement problem in this sector. It has been estimated that as many as 6,000 aliens per night attempt to enter the US illegally in the 7 .5 miles of border between the coast and the Tijuana Airport that is covered by the Imperial Beach and Chula Vista stations. Most of this movement is individuals in a human wave that commences at nightfall. There may be drug smuggling embedded in this mass movement, but it is unlikely to be an important component of the traffic. There is drug-related drive-through vehicle traffic in the 5.5 miles of relatively rural area between the Tijuana Airport and the foothills of the San Ysidro mountains to the east of the Brownfield station. The current strategy is to spread out along the border in those areas where the human waves are concentrated and to apprehend as many of the aliens as can be handled by agents in vehicles and on horseback . o Official Use Only I # rural ar the next lll! I USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000309 Page 185 USE ONLY -The area o large number of aliens crossing to get into the cover afforded by San Diego has resulted in a traffic hazard serious enough to cause the closing of traffic lanes to allow the aliens to walk safely in the median. lil the area where closest to the border from about 0.5 to 1.5 miles west of the San Ysidro POE. This levee area is now brightly lighted by stadium lights at night. The installation of these lights has forced a significant portion of the border traffic to the west away from the lights. The terrain on the US side of the border into which the aliens are now movin includes the . A project is under way to replace the ineffective chain link border fence with a 10-foot-high opaque fence made of welded steel landing mat panels. The objective of the new fence is to force the traffic back to the open terrain of Otay Mesa where cover is relatively sparse so that sensors and night vision can be used much more effectively and pursuit is much o easier and more effective. We concur with this strategy, but recommend that the concept be extended. and hardened. Contact with Suspects The information presented. in the tables below is the compilation of the Border Patrol agents' contact with illegal aliens and/or drug traffickers and the amounts of drugs confiscated. Contact w/Suspects: Jan'90 Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen 41,751 Drug-Related 17 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana(lb) 56.0 Cocaine (oz) 7.23 Heroin (oz) 0.035 Other (oz) 9.37 Number of Confrontations: 12 With Armed Persons Assaults on BP 5 Agents Page 186 Feb'90 Mar'90 Apr'90 May '90 40,335 23 44,862 23 41,916 24 41,718 38 12.2 0.489 19.22 0.387 6.76 154.83 1,335.92 0.432 12.0 1.7 1,014.96 8.48 5.64 14.32 12 8 12 3 19 7 17 4 USE ONLY - 6.65 DHS-17-0040-H-000310 Official Use Only o USE ONLY Contact w/Suspects: Jun'90 Jul '90 Aug'90 Sept '90 Oct '90 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien Drug-Related Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine {oz) Heroin {oz) Other {oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents 34,046 26 42,601 43 52,091 42 45,249 47 35,050 54 1,111.2 49.76 12.35 56.0 410.86 36.16 0.42 29.25 5,889.88 20.16 6.0 136.24 12,375.4 - 3,512.9 5.92 0.28 6.27 7.82 17 8 13 10 11 Contact w/Suspects: Nov'90 Dec '90 Jan '91 Feb '91 Mar '91 33,687 41 32,736 39 41,573 15 43,121 36 56,245 52 681.98 5.92 40.6 2,872.56 0.48 22.4 1,604.40 0.13 6.01 712.62 355.10 109.32 635.90 10,507.74 33.34 Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen Drug-Related Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) Other (oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP Agents Contact w/Suspects: 33 11 . 51 11 - - 9 12 3 4 Apr'91 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien 56,495 Drug-Related 60 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana {lb) 1,614.45 Cocaine {oz) 5.36 Heroin (oz) Other (oz) 5.87 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 11 Assaults on BP 7 Agents - 7 4 Jun'91 Jul '91 Aug '91 55,016 38 50,028 46,953 33 47,925 46 764.17 40.53 256.08 30.02 6,364.29 5.60 0.88 1,007.34 0.11 50.40 0.46 1.99 64.74 4 11 6 6 5 14 5 10 May '91 USE ONLY - 4 10 - 5 9 - Official Use Only - I - 46 - - DHS-17-0040-H-000311 Page 187 USE ONLY Contact w/Suspects: Oct'91 Nov '91 Oec'91 Jan '92 34,517 56 37,723 64 33,354 44 61,212 67 5,623.01 39.98 1,894.71 24,296.64 59.575 1,709.51 0.42 4.62 8.266 0.01 2,620.78 0.736 0.133 11.696 5 4 7 10 4 4 5 6 Mar'92 Apr'92 May'92 Jun'92 56,932 71 53,210 78 55,305 53 46,629 70 5,358.12 8,081.54 0.09 126.37 2,756.66 2,090.18 0.331 1.877 2,354.20 8,304.14 18.67 0.693 3,599.87 24,688 100.01 0.302 7 10 6 9 5 9 4 14 Sept '91 Number of Arrests: 41,625 Illegal Alien Drug-Related 34 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 4,768.89 Cocaine (lb) 16.88 Heroin (oz) 114.95 Other (oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons Assaults on BP 17 Agents - - - Contact w/Suspects: Feb '92 Number of Arrests: Illegal Alien 50,499 Drug-Related 79 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 4,893.40 34,885.58 Cocaine (oz) Heroin (oz) 0.889 Other (oz) 1.26 Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 6 Assaults on BP 7 Agents ~ w/Suspects: . - - - Jul '92 Number of Arrests: Illegal Allen 44,274 Drug-Related 35 Illegal Drugs Confiscated: Marijuana (lb) 2,668.974 Cocaine (oz) 0.32 Heroin (oz) 11.375 0.292 Other (oz) Number of Confrontations: With Armed Persons 3 Assaults on BP 7 Agents I Page 188 ... USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000312 Official Use Only o USE ONLY - o.. A summary of narcotics seizures for the years 1987 through 1990 is ~ given below: I Narcotics Seizures Year II I I I.. 1987 II 1988 I 1989 Type Amount 12,133 lb Marijuana Cocaine Heroin Amphetamine 13,458,000 31,000 22,261,000 $ 4,907,000 6,474,000 8,000 Methamphetamine 256Ib 5,953,000 Steroids 203 units 50,000 32,000 Other $ 17,218 lb* Marijuana $ Heroin Methamphetamine Steroids 8,614,000 7oz 38,000 36Ib 301,000 45,000 4,588oz 859,000 Other 1990 17,424,000 29,293,000 2,290 lb Cocaine 48,160 lb* Marijuana Cocaine $ 39,150,000 $ 24,252,000 1,280,000 184Ib Heroin 43oz 136,000 Other 4221b 1,386,000 I $ 27,054,000 "Includes the harvest ot plants ... Sector I $ 2oz Heroin ..J i I 87,000 668Ib Cocaine I 'i 3,000 33oz 12,558 lb Marijuana 8,682,000 3oz 132,000 units Steroids I i $ 1,106 lb JJ i Value Operations The San Diego sector is one of nine sectors located along the 2,000 o miles between the US and Mexico and one of 21 Border Patrol seco11 tors nationwide. The San Diego sector has historically been the most active area of Border Patrol operations. During FY 1990, ,. 1,046,420 illegal aliens were apprehended along the US/Mexico i border, 45% of which (or 473,323) were apprehended by San Diego I Border Patrol Agents. !'!:' ;: iz The San Diego sector encompasses over 7,000 square miles, includportions of Orange and ! ing all of San Diego County and substantial !I Io Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000313 Page 189 USE ONLY Riverside Counties and shares 66 miles of international boundary with the Mexico state of Baja California. Tijuana, with a burgeoning population approaching 2,000,000 residents, and Tecate, a smaller city of 50,000, border the US in the sector's area of responsibility. A 9 Seven stations are strategically located throughout the sector to afford maximum enforcement effort. Seventy percent of the sector's enforcement personnel are deployed at four ''line" stations, engaged in immediate border responsibilities; 23% perform traffic and transportation check duties; and the remaining agents staff "backup" stations, performing city patrol and area control. Border Patrol operations within the sector are supported by garage, communications, electronics, and staging facilities. The Air Operations branch and a special operations function, which includes antismuggling, prosecutions, and intelligence units, provide an invaluable measure of support. The Air Operations branch employs four helicopters to provide coordination and illumination for ground activities. i I I Anti-smuggling and prosecution units are responsible for investigating and presenting for prosecution criminal violators of immigration laws, specifically the organized, commercial smuggling of aliens into the US. The sector intelligence unit is charged with developing and providing tactical and strategic information to the sector staff and field stations. The unit also supports the anti-smuggling program with data analysis. aI Operational A 9 Strategy I! I The illegal alien traffic in the metropolitan San Diego area is the major factor driving operations in the San Diego sector. The :! strategy outlined here is aimed at gaining control of this traffic. The Io" basis for the strategy is the design and fielding of a multiple fence I barrier system. The underlying concept is to delay the charge of the ? aliens and to confine them to a narrow isolation zone where pursuit and apprehension can be more effective. This physical barrier and it the resultant tight patrol strategy will also serve as a deterrent that will eventually reduce the attempted illegal entries to a much smaller number. ~ 1 I I -~ '"t Another important aspect of this concept is that control of the illegal aliens through this area must be gained in an orderly fashion. An abrupt change in effectiveness that results in greatly improved apprehension efficiency without a corresponding decrease in total attempted entries will totally saturate the deportation and detention facilities as well as the judicial capacity of the sector. A barrier system with accompanying tight line patrol can be advanced across the frontier at a rate that the staff and facilities can absorb Page 190 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000314 Official, Use Only . USE ONLY I until the main stream of traffic is effectively shut down. The eventual objective is to totally discourage the casual aliens, and 0 .: divert the determined aliens to open terrain or channels where they - can be controlled. I wl'.. I I When control of the illegal alien i ~ traffic is gained, the law enforcement resources of the Border Patrol can be re-allocated to gain control of alien and contraband smuggling. I Activities IAir Operations i Air operations is located 5 miles east of Sector Headquarters at the 11Brownfield Airport on Otay Mesa. It has an authorized duty force of 16 pilots and 4 aircraft mechanics. The San Diego sector pilots and !l! aircraft are highly effective in deterring and detecting the illegal i entry of aliens and contraband into the US and coordinating the arrests by ground units. i I 00 * I Anti.Smuggling Unit The anti-smuggling unit comprises an authorized force of 27 special located in offices in Spring Valley, Kearney Mesa, and ~1j Carlsbad. The special agents use a variety of techniques (such as ~Jsurveillance, informants, and smuggling ring infiltration) to develop cases that lead to the conviction of alien smugglers. o... ..! = ,i agents II /ljBorder Patrol Criminal Alien Program oI The Border Patrol Criminal Alien Removal Program (BORCAP) I identifies aliens who have been convicted of serious state and rt federal crimes and places them into the formal deportation process. I Criminal aliens are identified through apprehensions and liaison '' with other law enforcement agencies throughout the area. Canine Corps The sector has 10 canine units, deployed primarily at the traffic check stations. Each unit consists of a Border Patrol Agent and a Belgian Malinois dog. The sector canine units assist in detecting hidden narcotics and/or aliens, locating lost or abandoned articles involved in crime, and performing search and rescue missions. The canine units also play an active role in the sector's Drug Awareness Program. Drug Awareness Program The drug awareness program has 35 sector agents trained in giving drug demand/reduction presentations. The program provides Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000315 Page 191 USE ONLY j factual information on the hazards of drug use to parents, R community groups, and school-age children. The presentations use W agents in uniform, videos, and canine units. During FY 1990, over county schools were visited, reaching over 47,000 students. .1560 - Employer Sanctions . The employer sanctions program enforces the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which made it unlawful for employers to knowingly hire aliens who are in the country illegally. Employers who violate the Act are subject to civil fines. Since 1987, agents have made over 28,000 educational visits to employers. Over 290 employers have been fined and 306 warnings have been issued for violations. A total of over $2 million in fines have been levied, the largest being over $300,000. Ii .:.: 'o"The enforcement of the IRCA has brought about the proliferation of documents, which are used by aliens to illegally obtain Ir-: counterfeit employment. Sector agents identified over 7,500 counterfeit docu~---~ I ments used for employment in 1990. .o ij ii Horse Patrol I The sector has a complement of 10 horses to be used for the horse ij patrol program. The horse-mounted agents patrol in rough terrain ! where vehicle use is impractical. The unit is active in search and ~ rescue efforts throughout the area. ij - number of aliens apprehended by the Border Patrol in the San I The Diego sector alone has increased to slightly less than one-half million in 1990. Approximately 75% of that number is attributed to I . the "linewatch" stations of Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, Brownfield, and Campo. i Sector Support j Communications Center I The communications center operates and monitors the sector radio communications network 24 hours per day. It provides remote information access to the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), National Crime Information Center, and Department of Motor Vehicles computer databases and provides field agents information regarding intrusions detected by remote sensing devices. II 'ii! - I I Page 192 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000316 Official Use Only USE ONLY o Electronics The electronics support group maintains. all communications equipment, which includes over 650 mobile radios, 700 walkietalkies, and 21 base stations. It maintains the sector's sensor system, comprised of numerous intrusion devices strategically located along the border. This group is responsible for maintaining sector infrared and starlight night vision devices. Facilities Maintenance The facilities maintenance personnel offer a wide variety of services, including road maintenance, heavy equipment operation, building . construction and repair, and electrician and plumbing services. Information Systems. The information systems group provides technical support and training for several hundred sector computer users. The application areas include word processing, finance and accounting, and criminal case tracking. o Intelligence Program The intelligence program gathers, correlates, analyzes, and evaluates data received from diverse sources in order to provide staff and operational personnel with meaningful intelligence information. It is staffed by six intelligence agents who maintain liaison with localt state, and foreign agencies. Prosecution Program The prosecution program coordinates and provides guidance regarding all administrative and criminal casework. Prosecution cases prepared at the station level are submitted to the unit for review and presentation to the US Attorney. The group maintains close liaison with the US Attorney and provides case research and investigation for all Border Patrol trial cases. It is staffed by seven prosecution agents. Staging Facility o Official Use Only The primary function of the staging facility is to meet the transportation and temporary detention needs of the seven Border Patrol stations located within the sector. Sector staging is located within the headquarters complex~rt-term (72-hour) holding facility ~ousing -for 3 hours or less in addition to -for overnight detention. . USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000317 Page 193 USE ONLY Training Facility The training facility is responsible for training programs offered to sector personnel, in addition to all post-academy training of Border Patrol agent trainees. It is located in Spring Valley and is staffed by three training officers and a number of detailed agent/instructors. o Vehicle Maintenance Facility The vehicle maintenance facility is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the sector's vehicle fleet, which includes over 750 patrol, support, and heavy equipment-type vehicles. It is located within the Sector Headquarters complex. The garage includes 10 repair bays, a body and paint area, engine and transmission rebuilding, front-end alignment, and a tire shop. Vehicle Seizures Program The vehicle seizures program is located within the Sector Headquarters complex. The program is responsible for the processing and ultimate seizure action of vehicles confiscated by the seven stations in the sector for the transportation of illegal aliens. The unit is staffed by seven Border Patrol agents and seven clerical assistants. Seizures included 7,345 vehicles with a total value of $14,392,000 in FY 1990. Station Operations o Imperial Beach Station The Imperial Beach station is located 3 miles west of Sector Headquarters. The station has an authorized duty force of210 agents. The Imperial Beach station's area of responsibility encompasses both urban and rural areas of Imperial Beach, Coronado, and parts of San Die o. The station is res onsible for the border area for The primary station activities include linewatch, city patrol, employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. Chula Vista Station The Chula Vista station is located within the Sector Headquarters complex in San Ysidro. It has an authorized duty force of 218 agents. The Chula Vista station's area of responsibility encompasses a large urban area extending from the international border through San Page 194 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000318 Official Use Only o USE ONLY o Ysidro into San Diego. The station's immediate llllllliiliximately 1 mile extending to the _I I I o o I I ' _I The primary station activities include linewatch, city patrol, transportation check (AMTRAK, San Diego International Airport, and bus terminals), employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. Brownfield Station The Brownfield station is located 5 miles east of Sector Headquarters on Otay Mesa. It has an authorized duty force of 203 agents. The Brownfield station's area of responsibility encompasses mesa, rugged canyon, and mountainous terrain. The immediate border area begins 1 mile east of the San Ysidro POE and extends 8 miles east. The primary station activities include linewatch, sign-cut, city patrol, employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. o Campo Station The Campo station is located in Campo, 60 miles east of Sector Headquarters. It has an authorized duty force of 51 agents. This station has one substation, Boulevard Substation, located 20 miles east of Campo, which has an authorized force of 10 agents. The Campo station's area of responsibility encompasses a particularly rugged mountainous area extending 40 miles to the west from the Imperial County Line. The station activities include linewatch, sign-cut, employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. Traffic Check Stations San Clemente Traffic Check Station The San Clemente traffic check station is located on Interstate 5, 70 miles north of the border. It has an authorized duty force of 135 agents. o Official Use Only The San Clemente~f(b) (7)(E) responsibility includes the northwest comer ofand the southwestern portion of Orange County. Agents at this traffic check station perform traffic check operations on apprehending northbound USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000319 Page 195 USE ONLY illegal aliens. As many as 6,000 vehicles per hour pass through the station's inspectional lanes. o The station's activities include traffic check, city patrol, train check, employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. Temecula Traffic Check Station The Temec Temecula, traffic chec check operations on and 1,500 vehicles per hour pass through the station's checkpoint. Area Control/Backup Stations El Cajon Backup Station The El Cajon backup station is located in the city of El Cajon, 27 miles northeast of Sector Headquarters. It has an authorized duty force of 42 agents. o The station's area of responsibility includes over 2,000 square miles of urban, rural, and agricultural regions of greater San Diego. The station is responsible for intercepting aliens working in and passing through much of San Diego. The El Cajon station's activities include frequent support of linewatch stations, city and area control, transportation check, employer sanctions, and the criminal alien removal program. San Marcos Backup Station The San Marcos backup station is located 48 miles north of El Cajon. It has an authorized duty force of 14 agents. The San Marcos station was established in 1987 in response to increased alien activity in the north San Diego County area and lengthy response times from El Cajon. o Page 196 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000320 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Recommendations General recommendations that are common to all of the sectors are given in the following section. These general recommendations are then followed by sector-specific recommendations. - Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000321 Page 197 USE ONLY - II !I II I I This page intentionally left blank. - I I I I Page 198 I USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000322 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 (ALL) o General Recommendations Our recommended strategy for improved control of the border is based on two controlling tactics: ? Border Enforcement: ? Containment: additional 24-hour, all-weather checkpoints to. minimize the quantity of drugs and aliens leaving the border region if they get into the country. the use of heavily patrolled multiple barriers on the border to control the large number of illegal aliens in the urban areas of the border Border Enforcement We have suggested a particular type of multiple barrier and some associated cost figures. What is more important than the details of the barrier is its purpose. Any single barrier can be breached if the adversary has an infinite amount of time in which to attack it. Because there is no enforcement on the Mexico side of the barrier against attempted breaching, those desiring illegal entry into the US have unlimited time to accomplish the breach. With multiple barriers the time to breach those be ond the first barrier becomes finite . o o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000323 Page 199 USE ONLY OUO-7 (ALL) Some necessary actions must be taken for this strategy to work: ? o ? Depending upon the numbers and types of intruders and the area in which the barriers are located, the exact design of the barriers may be varied. Objections to the Barriers Some of the common objections to the barriers are listed below. "It makes the United States look like they are unfriendly to the Mexican people." The barriers are a way of limiting entry of criminal aliens and other illegal aliens. After control is gained, the US could o determine from a humanitarian point of view how many aliens could be supported and adsorbed by society and the economy and liberalize the immigration and entry to allow those who have gone through the proper channels to enter. Most people do not think that the banks are unfriendly because alarms, vaults, and barriers are used to limit access to their money. We believe that after control is gained and the intruders learn how hard it is to breach the border in the urban areas, much of the border crime that now occurs on both sides of the border will be eliminated. "If you are successful with the barriers, the intruders will go around the end of the barriers or find some other route in which to enter." We believe that the number of persons who will go around the ends of the barrier will be significantly reduced from those who now cross and are rapidly absorbed into the US urban areas. The reason for believing this is that many that now cross are going back and forth to work or to steal. Some are seeking to have their child born in the US, and some are entering because it is relatively easy and the penalty for trying is minimal. Additionally, there is minimal discomfort for trying. If going around the end means travel through difficult terrain with no o place to be absorbed if they are successful, this should serve as Page200 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000324 Official Use Only USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) an additional deterrent. The ends of the barrier could be located so the Border Patrol could have a significant advantage in that area. It is true that truly dedicated persons will attempt to find other routes. We have seen this in some of the shift in drug traffic from Florida to the Southwest Border when the sea and air control increased in Florida. We also have seen an increase in illegal activities on the ground with the advent of better control of the air on the Southwest Border. However, each time that such actions force the intruders to change tactics, the degree of control has increased. A fundamental principle of security is analogous to a chain in which each link represents a means of entry. One must continue to improve the individual links until they are equally strong. If the equally strong chain (balanced security) is broken, then a new level of security (strength of the broken link) must be established and the process repeated . o Containment Containment embraces the idea that even if drugs or illegal aliens successfully make it across the border into a region, they will be contained in that region. This requires more checkpoints and that they be operated as 24-hour, all-weather checkpoints. Objections to the Checkpoints "Checkpoints, just like Ports of Entry (POEs), are not perfect and some drugs and some aliens will get through the checkpoints." Yes, that is true, but using the chain analogy again, intelli~ gence, technology, and procedures can now be implemented to strengthen this link of the chain . o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000325 Page 201 USE ONLY OUO-7 (ALL) "Routes will be found in which there are no checkpoint~ intruders will find a way around the checkpoints." or o This is also true. It is th rea on the linewatch i -cu in andthe 1 will continue to be required; but again, each step strengthens the chain and makes the job of entering more and more difficult. Even the order for establishing the new recommended checkpoints or making existing checkpoints 24-hour, all-weather may have to be determined from experience. To gain that experience, temporary checkpoints may have to be established. Those that are not 24-hour, all-weather checkpoints will have to be observed during the hours of nonoperation to determine the priority in which each link must be strengthened. Priorities Other factors that affect the priorities are insufficient personnel to perform the already assigned tasks; inadequate office space, maintenance facilities, and detention facilities; and the lack of adequate vehicles to conduct present operations. We believe that there are critical lower limits, which, if violated, would severely limit the Border Patrol's present level of effectiveness. Therefore, every effort should be made to remain above these lower limits. They are diffi- o cult to ascertain because of the different points of view mentioned above, and because all of the present thinking is based on doing business the way it is now being done. If the number of intruders could really be decreased through the use of the barriers, the need for all of the operations required after an intruder is caught would proportionately decrease. Some of the vehicles that are now being used to travel many miles to remote crossing points could be used to patrol the barriers, and even though there may be more crossings in the remote areas, if the checkpoints are working properly, the majority of those successfully crossing into the region will be caught. A few prototype barrier locations will need to be established and data taken to absolutely determine how the Border Patrol in that particular sector or station will have to reorganize and restructure their operations. As the barriers and checkpoints are completed, the total number of agents required on the Southwest Border will increase. However, we also believe that as control is gained at the border and the major links of the chain are strengthened, the number of agents can be allowed to decrease through normal attrition to a number not significantly larger than what it is now. In the short term, in order to have sufficient personnel to staff the barrier patrols and the checkpoints, it may be necessary to decrease Page202 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000326 Official Use Only o USE ONLY OUO-7 o o linewatch and other personnel intensive activities. Because all of the barriers and checkpoints cannot be constructed simultaneously, new staff may be able to be added rapidly enough that this may not be necessary. In any given sector where decreased linewatch might be necessary, there would probably be a decrease in the amount of conventional detection and surveillance equipment. Obviously, more effective detection and surveillance equipment would help in this situation, but that is also true in the present situation, and it is expected that such equipment will start to be employed as soon as it becomes available. (The only real hope that improved detection equipment will become ayailable is the work being sponsored by INS Research and Development (R&D) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. (INS is now in the second year of a development cycle [concept, prototype, specifications, manufacturer different from prototype developer, manufacturing iterations] of a typical 4- to 5-year time to yield reasonable quantities of product. A significant portion of this time is due to the requirements of government contractual regulations.) Barriers and checkpoints are well-established, proven entities and can become effective as soon as they can be established. Items that must be considered in establishing the barriers are environmental impact statements; building structures that fully meet Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements; obtaining easements, ownership, or the authority to use the land for the barriers and checkpoints; and political objections to this strategy. These recommendations are based upon the things we saw as we visited the sectors, discussions with sector personnel, and questionnaires and surveys conducted by ourselves and others, but most of all by our determination about how a greater control of the Southwest Border can be gained. General background information for these recommendations can be found in Volume 1 and the introductory section of this volume. Sector-specific information can be found in the detailed write-up about each sector. Our study was not extensive enough to . cover detailed engineering design of the barriers, but the philosophy of what is recommended is included, and some rough recommendations are made. A detailed study will be required to produce an engineering design, and construction of small sections should be done for evaluation. In some areas, slightly more or less barrier may be required to accomplish its intended purpose. Likewise, in some areas, higher intensity lights may be required. In general, we recommend that the first priority is the lighted barriers in the urban areas. o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000327 Page 203 USE ONLY OUO-7 Because this is an urban area with residences nearby, this level of lighting, which is comparable to street and parking lot lights, was chosen to minimize any adverse reactions from residents on either side of the border. Page 204 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000328 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 o I It may also be necessary to condemn and clear property. We have not estimated the cost of such an action. ? o It is estimate that one full-time person with a mobile welder can keep the fences in most of the sectors repaired. However, until a determination has been made about how frequently the fence is cut, there should be a backup contract placed to assist the normal repair person in the event that the cutting is excessive. In some of the sectors with fewer miles of barriers and/or less aggressive persons desiring to enter the US, it may be expedient to have a part-time welder on contract to repair holes on roughly the time scale suggested for the full-time welders. Such situations are shown on the s readsheet as 0.5 welder o rators . o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000329 Page205. USE ONLY OUO-7 will cost about $1,240,000 per mile. JTF-6 has supplied material and labor for much of the landing mat fence constructed in the San Diego sector and for road building in Tucson and other sectors. If assistance continues to be available from JTF-6, the cost to the INS will be considerably less. Maintenance of the barrier is estimated to be about 5% per year of its installation cost. o Electricity and maintenance of the lights should be about $3,855 per mile per year for electricity and $5,300 per year per mile for relam in the li ht fixtures. This estimate is based on having a . It is estimated that the lights will bum an average of 10 hours each night and the cost of electricity is $0.10 per kilowatt hour. It is also estimated that the bulbs in the fixtures will have to be replaced once every 2 years. Because the lights can be serviced from a ladder from the back of a pickup, there should not be any special equipment required. The barrier and lighting system should last 30 or more years if it is maintained as recommended. With the proposed multiple barriers and lighting, the overall effectiveness of the Border Patrol should be increased in that much more of the border will be lighted and very difficult to penetrate. Effects caused by the barriers are that t e traffic may s ift to crossing areas between the barriers. In every case, this will mean that with fewer places for the illegal aliens to hide or be assimilated into the local population, they will be easier to apprehend. If the traffic becomes heavy enough in these areas, additional barriers may have to be constructed. There is political risk that there will be heavy opposition to the o barriers. A good public relations program, which emphasizes the fact that this is not an act of unfriendliness but an act of Page 206 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000330 Official Use On/.y USE ONLY OUO-7 o control in order to allow more deserving immigrants and fewer of the criminal aliens, drug traffickers, or other undesirable persons to enter the US, should help to mitigate this problem. We recommend that the second priority is the checkpoints. The checkpoint philosophy is that of producing containment so that even if drugs or illegal aliens successfully make it across the border into the US, they will be contained in that region. We recommend that checkpoints be operated on a 24-hour basis. o Large checkpoints are located on four lane highways and will require about 30 additional agents to provide six persons on duty at all times. The small checkpoints will be located on two lane roads and require a minimum of 15 additional agents to provide three persons on duty at all times. All of the checkpoints should be capable of 24-hour per day, 7-day per week, all-weather operation. They should all have at least one drug dog on duty at all times. The personnel required to staff the checkpoints should also be at this priority level. If funds for the checkpoints become available before the new personnel are available, existing personnel from linewatch, ranch check, city patrol, etc., should be used to staff the checkpoints . The land for these checkpoints is usually furnished by the federal, state, or local government that owns the highway. Often, these governments will .also provide some paving for . pull-off and inspection areas. The cost to establish a large . checkpoint is estimated to be $300,000 and $200,000 for a small checkpoint. The estimated maintenance and utilities costs are estimated to be 10% of the station's establishment.. cost per year for each checkpoint. We recommend that the third priority is the railroad inspection zones. A fenced and lighted railroad . o Official Use Only ocating the railroad checkpoint next to the highway checkpoint will allow multiple use of both facilities and personnel and will secure one flank of the highway checkpoint from bypassers. Not all of the sectors require railroad inspection zones . USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000331 Page 207 USE ONLY OUO-7 1~1 We ,......... ,,., ..m e fourth priority is the checkpoint sensors. ...... :'~and o makeup of the sets is: o We recommend that the fifth priority is to ensure that all of the sectors have adequate communications systems. The Border Patrol, in conjunction with the Communication Interoperability Working Group (CIWG), has plans to equip all of the Southwest Border with secure DES-XL radio equipment. This equipment has already been installed in El Paso, and the equipment has been procured for McAllen, Laredo, Del Rio, and Tucson. We understand that equipment is being planned for Marfa and San Diego in the near term, and for the other sectors on the Southwest Border in the longer term. We have recommended some short-range (portable) units for each of the sectors and about $150,000 per sector to supplement longrange communications equipment not provided by the new systems. Marfa has an older commu . . I ce soon as ossibl o Page 208 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000332 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 o and Laredo's system is in need of being upgraded to ensure reliable coverage. All sectors should verify that their communications systems are adequate before adding to the other physical security equipment. We hope that the new equipment will be such that the funds can be used for other recommended items. These communications systems are still being upgraded so some of the problems may have recently been corrected. Particular attention should be given to ensuring that agents have emergency comII?-unicationsfor their safety. We recommend that the sixth priority is to ensure that all of the sectors have adequate transportation. The transportation problem was not studied specifically as a physical security problem; however, we did observe that many of the vehicles had more than 100,000 miles on them. In those sectors where we are aware of specific transportation needs, they will be identified. The results of a vehicle survey completed in December 1991 are given in the table below. Personnel and Vehicle Data o Sector McAll?n Sector Penonne.. (12/31/92) Vehlclea Present VehlclN VehlclN (12/31/92) Required"" Surplua 378 201 237 -36 240 78 Laredo 318 318 Del Rio 304 185 244 Marfa 139 108 98 EIP?ao 855 425 Tuc?on 292 Yuma 225 EICemro San Diego Toblla .. Penannel tor Other New Checkpoint? Per? onnel New 15 85 Addltlonal Net Vehlclee New Required Vehlclee 57 93 15 100 15 o13 120 90 119 178 8 75 55 73 15 412 13 120 140 147 134 223 187 38 115 70 133 97 188 147 41 15 80 42 1 293 181 180 21 80 70 73 52 921 589 559 10 75 52 72 82 2,398 2,284 112 680 722 781 669 3.MO * These numbersare dynamic.The numbersused in the sector discussionsvary slightly from these becausethey were obtainedat a differenttime. - Based on the formula: vehicles needed = (1 + number of stations) + (numberof personnel x vehicle factor). The vehicle factor = 0.56525.This is a weighted number based upon two officers per vehicle, 33% in for repair, 5% deadlined,85% of fleet required (basedon 10% of the agents unavailablefor duty). o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000333 Page209 USE ONLY !1 The following factors and assumptions are used in developing a A I ' dynamic model to assign and monitor the number of vehicles at the sector level. ;;:;; Factors 1 Number of personnel o Assumption Two officers per vehicle. This is an historical ratio. I 2 Number of vehicles out of services for routine and emergency maintenance. The average number of vehicles is 33% based on the current age of the fleet. 3 Number of vehicles deadlined for excessive age or damage. 5% is the average number of deadlined vehicles. 4 Maximum portion of the fleet that is required to be available at any time. 85% of the total fleet is required (assuming 10",i of the agents are unavailable for duty). 5 Weighted vehicle factor. When Items 1, 2, 3, and 4 are considered, this factor becomes 0.56525 and is used for ease of calculation. ~ Formula: (1 + number of stations) + (number of personnel x vehicle factor) Example: I El Paso sector: (1 + 11) =12 + (655 x 0.56525) =382.238 vehicles - OUO-7 E .~ We recommend that the seventh priority is additional pero sonnel beyond those needed for the checkpoints. j Page210 I The Personnel and Vehicle Data table also includes personnel data. We have assumed that the total Border Patrol personnel count cannot exceed 6,000. With 4,349 on roll on December 31, 1991, we calculated that 83.7% of the Border Patrol personnel were assigned to the Southwest Border. Using that ratio, we determined that of the 1,651 persons that it would take to get the total personnel count up to 6,000, 1,382 persons could be assigned to the Southwest Border. With this number, all of the sectors except San Diego were able to be increased at least 20% over their December 1991 count plus the number recommended to staff the new checkpoints. With the lighted barriers in the San Diego sector and with the large number of personnel already there, it was felt that a smaller percentage was A sufficient for that sector. o USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000334 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 - We recommend that the eighth priority is to ensure that adequate vehicle and electronics maintenance is being conducted. Having equipment that is out of service because of inadequate maintenance is neither efficient nor economic. In some sectors, new vehicles have been unable to be used because personnel were not available to remove vital law-enforcement electronics from the old vehicles and reinstall it in the new vehicles. We have included funding in our recommendation for upgrading each sector's electronics maintenance, calibration, and testing capabilities. It may be necessary to have commercial contracts in place to handle the overload of the Border Patrol electronics and vehicle maintenance personnel. We recommend that the ninth priority is acquiring more conventional physical protection equipment. - Official Use Only Sensors, assessment, and information control and display equipment are important in every sector. In most sectors, we are already detecting more illegal aliens than can be apprehended and processed. If more of this type of equipment and more agents are supplied, the other parts of the system (e.g., transportation, detention, and deportation) become even more overloaded. Because of the important role of this equipment in the present operation of the sectors, we have recommended amounts of equipment close to the number presently employed. We realize that this is considerably less than each sector would desire, but we did not identify any new equipment that was significantly better than the models of equipment now in use. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) R&D has under development a new family of "smart" unattended ground sen. sors. These are now in the prototype stage and a specification is being developed so that commercial sources can be developed using government-owned designs. Likewise, the US Army's Center for Night Vision and Electro-Optics is developing a lowcost uncooled thermal imager that is projected to sell for $10,000 each in volume production, some of which INS R&D has acquired for testing. Other types of assessment equipment (CCTV cameras, recorders, storage media, etc.) are getting smaller and cheaper as time passes. Control and Display and Communications equipment are all being handled in a digital rather than the older analog format and are also experiencing rapid advances. For example, the use of satellite communications, voice privacy radios, and Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking systems is expanding. For these reasons, the amount of equipment recommended is closer to that now in use rather than that desired by the sectors. The equipment recommended will serve to replace any obsolete equipment now in use, nearly double that presently available (even USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000335 Page 211 USE ONLY OUO-7 though this may rapidly decrease to just using the new equipment as the older equipment fails). It will allow increased capability in the areas where this equipment is presently in use until new intrusion patterns develop and new needs are more firmly established as a result of the use of the recommended barriers and checkpoints ..... o In a few sectors, special situations may dictate that some of the equipment be given priority over other equipment. Air Operations was not considered in the prioritization process. A separate study on this subject has been conducted for INS and their results are not repeated in this report. Air Operations is a very useful function, but we did not study it in suffici d h to know what should be recommended. The use of devices has been very successful as has surveillance, sign-cutting, etc., accomplished during the daytime. We have concerns that even though the Air Operations function is very important, it may be in decline because of the stringent flight requirements, the fact that the pilots must be Border Patrol agents, and the dependence on surplus military aircraft in which parts are becoming harder and harder to obtain. After some accidents with the Huskys and the establishment of the 500-foot minimum fl in altitude, Most of that is now done by helicopters, which are much mo~ costly to operate. o Contingency In the sector recommendations that follow, the 25% contingency allocation is not shown. The contingency covers errors in estimating and items that are hard to budget or that may be site-specific, such as cost of environmental impact statements, land acquisition, power line extensions, camera mounting details, etc. The master spreadsheet in Volume 1 contains the contingency numbers. o Page 212 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000336 Official Use Only USE ONLY o OUO-7 McAllen Recommendations the other. This has resulted in a strip population along the border. The POEs at Hidalgo and Brownsville should have their lighted barrier extended to 2 miles on each side of the POE because of the heavier populations there. This amounts to 18 miles of barrier and lighting recommended for. this sector. It is anticipated that these barriers will cause some of the traffic to increase in the South Padre Island area and may. require an increase of Border Patrol personnel (the Coast Guard may also increase their help) in that area, perhaps to even later requiring a checkpoint at Port Isabel to monitor traffic leaving South Padre Island. There are no new checkpoints recommended in the McAllen sector. The sector currently operates three highway checkpoints. These should be full-time, all-weather checkpoints and will require additional personnel and facility modifications to be operational at all times: o ? (b) (7)(E) I I These three checkpoints, when operated full time and backed up by the Hebbronville checkpoints of the Laredo sector, effectively intercept all northbound traffic on major highway routes out of the border area. To expand operation of these checkpoints to full-time will require at least 15 additional agents and 6 drug dogs. Input from the sector indicates that this number may not be sufficient . . An inspection area should include fences on either side of the track and be long enough to allow the train to slow and stop for inspection and then start again while being wholly inside of the area. Sue~ .1 o din ns.will allow multiple use of both facilities and personnel and will secure one flank of the highway checkpoint from bypassers. I o Official Use Only I o ~ I ~ We recommend that all highway checkpoints use easily deployable tactical sensors that annunciate locally. Deployment of these USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000337 Page 213 USE ONLY OUO-7 The sensor procurement recommendations for this sector are detailed in the McAllen portion of the spreadsheet, which is included below. The rank ordering is the same as that given in the general recommendations. A study entitled, US Border Patrol Craft Feasibility Study, 1 recommends that two boats be provided for this sector: one 36-foot patrol boat for the Port Isabel station and one 36-foot patrol boat for the Corpus Christi station. If jurisdictional and cross-designation authority could be negotiated, our recommendation is that closer coordination should.be developed with the US Coast Guard, and the operations planned for these boats be delegated to them. o 1. Page 214 Resource Consultants, Inc., US Border Patrol Craft Feasibility Study, February 4, 1992. USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000338 Official Use Only o USE ONLY OUO-7 o 9,345 16,750 8,400 14,950 7,350 6,720 179,100 2,340 24,975 24,950 0 Q Receiver,Portable Tactical Subtotal, 0.eclars 5 9 15 o 9,990 14,975 4,230 $525,895 24,000 59,500 Subtotal, AAool'Mlll t,';; $5,000 $5,000 Subtotal, Cnlrl & Dlop CheckpaintShaltar,l...arge Checkpaint Shelter, Small CheckpaintPersonnel DrugDagg(Procuremen1) ' $300,000 $200,000 1,275,000 24,000 $85,000 $4,000 6,000 3,326,400 6,652,800 5,702,400 $1,000 I 110880 I 95040 0 102960 95040 0 2,574,000 4,752,000 1 25,000 85,000 15 6 6 I 95040 I $50 $25,000 $85,000 Test Equipment ILS, New Equipment 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $26,845,115 SeotorTotal I $60 $35 $25 $24,622,600 ILS, Old Equipment Official, Use Only $30 $70 Subtotal, Bllrrillrs,Elc. Subtotal, Support o $1,600 $8,500 $5,756 $5,000 $300 $56,000 $2,000 $150,000 lnb CanlrOI& D' WelderOperatar $470 I Vaice Camm,Shart Range Vaice Camm, Lan Range Subtotal, Communication VehicleBaniar Lighting Palral Raads MabileWelder $350 $320 $995 $260 $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 115,120 50,000 3,000 560,000 200,000 $200,000 $15 Video & SensorCable ' Unil Coat $825 $260 $995 $445 $1,675 $400 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000339 Page 215 USE ONLY Recurrina Costs McAllen Ext. Cast $285,377 15.0% $5,000 50.0% $20,000 10.0% 100% of Checkpont Personnel Cost and Dog Support $1,281,000 100.0% 5% of Barrier Cost for Mainlenance $1,021,680 5.0% $386,100 15.0% 100% of Welder Opera1or $85,000 100.0% 25% of Test Equipment for Calibration, Repair and Upgrading of Equipment $25,000 25.0% $200,000 100.0% 15% of all Detection Assessment and Communications Equipment 50% of Info Control - Unit Cost and Display Equipment 10% of the Construction Cost of Check Points for Maintenance & Utilities q m i ,mI M 15% of Lighting Cost for Maintenance & Electricity 100% of ILS Costs Total Recurring Cost for Each Secror - $3,309,157 i I N I d Page 216 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000340 Official Use Only USE ONLY I - McAllen Sector Analysis la!~The data given in the McAllen sector discussion of "Contact with Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall ~, .. trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, ~ 1991, and the first half of 1992. For this sector, the number of illegal alien arrests, number of drug arrests, confrontations with armed persons, and assaults on Border Patrol agents was not available on a monthly basis, but was available for each year. Therefore, the data for the year was divided by the number of months being ,.. represented. This makes the monthly plot not completely accurate, I so they are not included, but useful in computing the averages per month for the year and the presentation of the activities of the total Southwest Border given at the end of this section. Yearly (but not monthly) data was also available on confrontations with armed ill persons and assaults on Border Patrol agents. I... . I .i. i iI .1. The . analysis shows a decrease in overall illegal alien arrests and in the average amount of cocaine confiscated per month, but signifi,.. cant increases in the average number of drug-related arrests, and marijuana and heroin confiscated. The plots of cocaine and heroin ~..'.: .., show a few months with large activity mixed with many smaller I activity months. i - ~ iifu I 1@~ :'! Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000341 Page217 USE ONLY - McAllen Sector - 180 160 140. ~ 120 "O Q) 100 C'Cl 80 Q) a: 60 40 01 :, 20 Cl 0 C/l C/l Q) ~ ~ Jan '90 Feb '90 Mar '90 Apr '90 May Jun '90 '90 Jul '90 Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 Nov '90 Dec '90 McAllen Sector - 180 160 140 <( 120 "O Q) 100 C'Cl 80 Q) a: 60 01 40 :, 20 Cl 0 C/l C/l Q) ~ ~ - ~ Jan '91 Feb '91 Mar '91 Apr '91 May '91 Jun '91 Jul '91 Aug Sept '91 '91 Oct '91 Nov Aug Sept '92 '92 Oct '92 Nov '91 Dec '91 McAllen Sector - 180 160 140 <( 120 "O Q) 100 C'Cl 80 Q) a: 60 01 40 :, 20 Cl 0 C/l C/l Q) ~ ~ ~ Jan '92 Feb '92 Mar '92 Apr '92 May '92 Jun '92 Jul '92 '92 Dec '92 Page 218 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000342 Official Use Only USE ONLY - McAllen Sector Ill ..Q 30000 25000 ro :;. 20000 C: ,::, ro a> :::, ... 15000 =~ B ftl Ill 10000 :IE..: C: 0 u 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 McAllen Sector Ill ..0 ro :;. C: ,::, 30000 25000 20000 ... :l= B 15000 ro a> :::, ca Ill :E..:C: 10000 u 5000 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 McAllen Sector II) ..Q ca :;. 30000 26000 20000 ... :2' r1 16000 C: "Cl ca Q) ro 0 :::, :IE;;:: 10000 C: 0 u 6000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000343 Page 219 USE ONLY - McAllenSector 21000 -g ia (.) 16000 (I) ;:;::: C: 0 --N (.) -9, 11000 Q) C: -~ 6000 0 (.) 1000 Jan '90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Jul '90 Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 Nov Dec '90 '90 McAllenSector 21000 "O Q) N (I) 16000 ;:;::: c......._ 0 (.) (l) C: .a; - -N 0 8 (.) 11000 6000 1000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul '91 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 McAllenSector "O 21000 Q) t? ~ -~ C: 0 --N (.) 0 16000 11000 Cl) C: 6000 0 (.) 1000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Jul '92 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 220 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000344 Official Use Oaly USE ONLY McAllen Sector - "C (I) 400 m u(I) ~- 300 C: N 0 o- 0 200 C: .o ... (I) :I: 100 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Nov Dec '90 '90 McAllen Sector - "C (I) m u(I) ;;:: - C: 0 -N o..9. C: .o ... Cl) :c 450 / 400 350 300 250 200 150. 100 50 0 ,; Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Nov Dec '91 '91 McAllen Sector 450 400 m 350 u(I) 300 ;;:: 250 C: -N 0 0 .,9. 200 150 C: 100 (I) 50 :c 0 - "C Cl) .o ... Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000345 Page221 USE ONLY Laredo Recommendations Like the McAllen sector, the entire lower sectio o These border highways have resulted in strip population on both sides of the border. OUO-7 We recommend following the general recommendations for this sector with the exception that marine radars to detect traffic on Falcon Reservoir should be added as Priority 9 and the conventional physical protection equipment will then become Priority 10. The detailed recommendations for the conventional physical protection equipment are given in the Laredo portion of the spreadsheet, which is included below. The Laredo sector currently operates five highway checkpoints. These should be full-time, all-weather checkpoints and may require additional personnel and facility modifications to be operable at all times. One additional full-time, all-weather highway checkpoint is recommended: ? (b) (7)(E) This additional checkpoint will require a minimum of 15 new agents and 6 drug dogs. In a recent communication with the sector, they suggested that the new checkpoint not be implemented, but that the Hebbronville station could use the 15 people that we recommended for the ne eek oint. Their feelin was that the normal traffic on was minimal and would not justify the need for a 24-hour checkpoint operation. We defer to the sector's recommendations as long as the concept of containment is bein ful ed. A ossible solution would be to move '. ? (b) (7)(E) ? Page222 o o USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000346 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 - Locating the railroad checkpoints next to the highway checkpoints will allow multiple use of both facilities and personnel and will secure one flank of the highway checkpoint from bypassers. Apprehensions in this sector are on the increase. These increases normally indicate that more undocumented aliens are entering the US to work and take jobs. The personnel and equipment recommended in the general recommendations section and on the attached sheets are expected to solve much of this problem. - Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000347 Page223 USE ONLY OUO-7 o Unit 82,500 81,120 49,750 10,680 41,875 9,600 0 8,400 7,680 99,500 Casi $825 $260 $995 $445 $1,675 $400 $1,495 $350 $320 90,000 4,995 14,975 $995 $260 $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 4,230 $470 Subtotal, Dlllectors RegularLight CClV LL1V - Jnlensified $1,600 0 127,500 $8,500 115,120 $5,756 50,000 $5,000 12,000 $300 112,000 $56,000 0 $200,000 15,000 $15 o $431,.620 Subtotal, Cntr1& Diap CheckpointShelter,Large CheckpointShaltar,Small CheckpointPersonnel Drug Dogs(Procurement) ,, --------, I I 75 0 150,000 $2,000 0 $150,000 $150,000 5,000 $5,000 $5,000 0 $300,000 $200,000 $85,000 1,275,000 24,000 $4,000 6,000 $1,000 $30 2,217,600 $70 1,900,800 $60 0 $35 1,188,000 $25 1,584,000 $50 $25,000 0 $85,000 0 1 15 6 6 63360 31880 31880 VehicleBarrier Lighting PatrolRoads 0 47520 MobileWalder 0 0 WeidarOperator Subtotal, Barriers, Eto. Test Equipment ILS.New Equipment ILS,Old Equi rnent Subtotal,Support Sector Total 31680 200,000 $10,296,200 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $11,717,925 o Page 224 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000348 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Laredo Recurri"" Costs 15% of all Detection Assessment and Unit Ext. Cost $166,759 Cost 15.0% $2,500 50.0% $20,000 10.0% $1,281,000 100.0% 5% of Barrier Cost for Main1enance $380,160 5.0% 15% of Lighting Cost for Maintenance& Electricity $178,200 15.0% 100% of Welder OperalDr $0 100.0% 25% of Test Equipmentfor Calibration,Repairand Upgradingof Equipment $25,000 25.0% CommunicationsEquipment 50% of Info Control and Display Equipment 10"/4of the Construction Cost of Check Points for Maintenance& Utiities 100% of Cheekpont PersonnelCost and DogSupport 100% oflLS Costs Total RecurringCost for Each SeelDr $200,000 100.0% $2,253,619 - Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000349 Page 225 USE ONLY Laredo Sector Analysis I The data given in the Laredo sector discussion of "Contact with Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, 1991, and the first half of 1992. The activities of the total Southwest Border are given at the end of this section. - !ll The analysis shows significant increases in the average numbers of ;;, alien arrests per month, drug-related arrests, and marijuana and " cocaine confiscated. The plots of cocaine and heroin show a few months with large activity mixed with many smaller activity months. The data on confrontations with armed persons and assaults of Border Patrol agents are small averages, but the individual plots show decreases in these areas. I 1:ii I - i Page226 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000350 Official Use Only USE ONLY LaredoSector 12000 iii Cl Cl,) 111 ti 10000 ....... 8000 - Cl,) ~< Cl,) .0 C: Cl,) e= :::, C - Q) ~~2 f/) ~ 1 0 Jan Feb Mar 10 ooWW Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct WWo WW Nov Dec 10 10 LaredoSector 5 a. 4 t:O - C C/1 - Q) o C - Cl ~< < 3 2 f/) f/) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 LaredoSector ------------ Jan Official Use Only Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul USE ONLY Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec DHS-17-0040-H-000357 Page233 USE ONLY o Del Rio Recommendations Del Rio currently operates three full-time checkpoints: + (b) (7)(E) I I OUO-7 These checkpoints are operated full-time except in very bad weather. Modifications may be required to attain all-weather status. The part-time checkpoint that should be upgraded to fulltime, all-weather capability is + (b) (7)(E) To complete the control of highway routes out of the border region, seven additional full-time, all-weather highway checkpoints are recommended: + (b) (7)(E) o I I I I I I The existing temporary checkpoint southeast of Comst~(b) (7)(E) ~ndant if the recommended checkpoint o~ the Marfa sector is in operation. The net gain of eight full-time checkpoints will therefore require 120 additional agents and 48 drug dogs. ection zone is recommended west o checkpoint. Locating the railroad checkpoint next to the highway checkpoint will allow multiple use of both facilities and personnel and will secure one flank of the highway checkpoint from bypassers. (b) (7)(E) o Page 234 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000358 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 o ese s ou Priority 9 ollowe y the more conventional sensors The personnel and equipment recommended in the mendations section and on the attached Del Rio spreadsheet are all needed if the border is to be control. e 1nserte a:s for this sector. general recomportion of the brought under o o Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000359 Page235 USE ONLY OUO-7 Ext.Coat 41,250 147,680 19,900 19,135 8,375 17,200 7,475 15,050 13,760 99,500 RaceivBr,Portable 5 Tactical Subtotal, Dlltectora RegularLight CCTV LLTVo Intensified 16 2 J ,, t -------------- Video& Sensor Cable Sublollll, AHaument VolcaComm, Short Range $825 $260 $995 $445 $1,675 $400 $1,495 $350 $320 $995 $260 $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 $470 $548,425 10 r! [J l" 4,160 4,975 12,475 0 90,000 4,995 14,975 7,520 o Unit Coat 1000 100 Voice Comm, Lon Range Subtotal,Communication 16,000 $1,600 17,000 $8,500 115,120 $5,756 $5,000 75,000 3,000 $300 392,000 $56,000 200,000 $200,000 15000 $833,120 o $15 200,000 $2,000 150,000 $150,000 $350,000 10,000 $5,000 10,000 $5,000 $20,000 0 $300,000 CheckpointShelb&r, Small CheckpointPersonnel DrugDogs(Procuramant) D S rt(Food&\111) .~ . "' ----------- 8 120 48 48 580B0 42240 42240 VehlclaBarrier Lighting PalrOIRoads MobileWalder l, WelderOperator Subtotal,llamera,Elc, Test Equipment ILS, New Equipment ILS, Old Equipment SUblolal, Support Saclor Total Page236 0 50160 42240 1,600,000 $200,000 10,200,000 $85,000 192,000 $4,000 48,000 $1,000 1,742,400 $30 2,956,800 $70 $60 2,534,400 0 $35 1,254,000 $25 2,112,000 $50 25,000 $25,000 85,000 $85,000 $22,749,600 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $24,801,145 USE ONLY o DHS-17-0040-H-000360 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Unit Coat 15.0% Del Rio Re<:11rrlftft Co.+o 15%of all Detection Assessment and CommunicationsEquipment $259,732 ' $5,000 50.0% $160,000 10.0% $10,248,000 100.0% $467,280 5.0% $188,100 15.0% 100%of Welder Operator $85,000 100.0% 25% of T8$t Equipmentfor Calibration,Repairand Upgradingof Equipment $25,000 25.0% $200,000 100.0% 50% of Info Control and DisplayEquipment 10%of the ConSln.lction Cost of Check Poinllillor Maintenance& Utilities II Ext Cost 100%of Checkpont PersonnelCost and Dog Support 5% of BarrierCost forMain1tnance 15%of LighlingCost for Maintenance& Electricity 100%of ILS Costs Total RecurringCost for EachSector $11,838,112 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000361 Page 237 USE ONLY I Del Rio Sector Analysis The data given in the Del Rio sector discussion of "Contact with Bl Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall '" trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, ~ 1991, and the first half of 1992. The activities of the total Southwest s Border are given at the end of this section. - II i The analysis shows a nearly constant average number of illegal alien arrests and significant increases in drug-related arrests and _ marijuana and cocaine confiscated. The plots of cocaine and heroin show a few months with large activity mixed with many smaller activity months. The data on confrontations with armed persons and assaults of Border Patrol agents are small averages, but the individual plots show decreases or small changes in these areas. II I oI'.'! I - I Iii i r. I - ~j ' Page 238 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000362 Official. Use Only USE ONLY - Del Rio Sector 6000 II) Cl Ill -...... = ~ 0 200 C: ? 100 (.) Jan '91 Feb Mar '91 '91 Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 Jul '91 Aug Sept Oct '91 '91 '91 Nov Dec '91 '91 Aug Sept Oct '92 '92 '92 Nov Dec '92 '92 Marfa Sector I ~ 500 400 c: - 300 a>~ 200 0 (.) N 0 C: .1a g 100 (.) 0 Jan '92 Feb Mar '92 '92 Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 Jul '92 Page 254 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000378 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Marfa Sector - "O (I) 1'1:1 l,J II) .;::: C: 0 -N u.9. C: .5 ,_ GI :::c 40 / 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 / / Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Marfa Sector - "O (I) 1'1:1 l,J II) ;;;:: C: -N 0 u.9. C: .o ,_ (I) :::c 40,,, 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0,, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Marfa Sector Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000379 Page 255 USE ONLY OUO-7 El Paso Recommendations (b) (7)(E) . The actual design of the barrier system and the number of fences and patrol roads depend heavily on the existing conditions on the border. A large portion of the border that could benefit from barrier technology already includes concrete river embankments topped by fine mesh chain link fence and adjacent patrol roads. There are also multiple fences in place in the rail yards along the border, but the fences and patrol roads are not continuous or designed for delay and confineme ,,....,"",.,,,.... . (b) (7)(E) sed on Existing features and patrol roads must be considered in the actual design. o In correspondence with sector personnel, we learned that there is considerable opposition to the barriers by local residents on both sides of the border and also by sector personnel. Some of the reasons given for opposition from the sector personnel are the belief that the barriers will result in limited success and of much higher concern is the potential threat to agent and illegal alien safety. The concern is that if agents were trapped between the fences by large groups of illegal aliens, they might have to resort to the use of o deadly force in order to escape. Our recommendations still support the lighted multiple barriers as mentioned, however, the concerns expressed here may be valid and procedures for patrolling, the numbers of gates, and the possibility of patrolling outside the third barrier should all be considered. El Paso currently operates seven highway checkpoints: ? (b) (7)(E) ? I I I I I o Page 256 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000380 Official Use Only USE ONLY OUO-7 o Th s ch k . t h Id b I o d dt od t full t. I To complete the containment strategy, eight new full-time, allweather highway checkpoints should be established: + (b) (7)(E) I I I I o I I I Sector personnel expressed the concern that some of the roads mentioned for the new checkpoints were too lightly traveled to justify the manpower required to operate the checkpoints. They recommended that the present method of using sensors to monitor these lightly traveled roads be used. We believe that the potential for illegal alien and drug traffic is so high in this sector that the checkpoints should remain as the second priority. The personnel required to operate the checkpoints was perhaps part of the sector's concern, because they realized these could not be operated without an increase in personnel. The conventional physical protection equipment mentioned in the attached El Paso portion of the spreadsheet is important to this sector, but it should remain at the priority listed in the General Recommendations section . o Official. Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000381 Page257 USE ONLY OUO-7 Ext.CooI 165,000 197,600 119,400 24,475 58,625 22,000 14,950 19,250 17,600 99,500 Receiver,P11rtable Tactical Subtotal, Dlllactoiw 10 20 RegularLight CC1V LL1V- lnlensified 12 12 5,200 19,980 9,980 0 0 4,995 29,950 9,400 $817,905 19,200 102,000 115,120 0 ,< -------------- Video& Sensor Cable Subtotal,~ Voice Comm,Short Range Voice Comm, Long Range 1000 100 0 o Unit El Poa Coat $825 $260 $995 $445 $1,675 $400 $1,495 $350 $320 $995 $260 $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 $470 $1,600 $8,500 $5,756 $5,000 $300 $56,000 $200,000 $15 3,000 168,000 600,000 15,000 $1,022,320 $2,000 200,000 0 $150,000 o $5,000 $5,000 CheckpointShelter,Small CheckpointPersonnel DogSupport(Food & Vet) VehicleBarrier Lighting Palrol Roads MobileWelder WelderOperator 48 48 126720 95040 95040 0 110880 95040 .o $300,000 1,600,000 $200,000 10,200,000 $85,000 $4,000 192,000 $1,000 48,000 $30 3,801,600 $70 6,652,800 5,702,400 $60 $35 0 $25 2,n2,ooo $50 4,752,000 25,000 $25,000 85,000 $85,000 Subtotal, Barriera,Etc. $35,830,800 TestEquipment 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $38,181,025 ILS, New Equipment ILS, Old Equipment Subtotal, SUppolt Sector Total Page258 0 8 120 USE ONLY o DHS-17-0040-H-000382 Official Use Only USE ONLY - RecumnaCosts 15%of all Detection El Paao Ext. o:nst $306,034 Unit Cost 15.0"/o Assessmentand CammunieationsEquipment 50"/4of Info Control and Display Equipment $2,500 50.0% $160,000 10.0% $10,248,000 100.0% $1,045,440 5.0% $415,800 15.0% 100"/4of Welder Operator $85,000 100.0% 25% of Test Equipmentfor Calibration,Repairand Upgradingof Equipment $25,000 25.0% $200,000 100.0% 10% of Iha Construction Cost of CheekPoints for Maintenance& Utilities 100% of Checkpont PersonnelCost and DogSupport 5% of Barrier Cost for Maintenance 15% of Lighting Cost for Maintenance & Electricity 100% of ILS Costs Total RecurringCost for Each Sector $12,487,774 - Official Use Only i USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000383 Page 259 USE ONLY El Paso Sector Analysis The data given in the El Paso sector discussion of "Contact with Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, 1991, and the first half of 1992. The activities of the total Southwest Border are given at the end of this section. - The analysis shows a decrease in overall illegal alien arrests, in the average number of drug-related arrests, and in the average amount of cocaine and heroin confiscated per month, but significant increases in the amount of marijuana confiscated. The plots of cocaine and heroin show a few months with large activity mixed with many smaller activity months. There are a considerable number of confrontations with armed persons and assaults on Border Patrol agents in this sector. I I :1: I - ti! I ,I ~] Page 260 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000384 Official Use Only USE ONLY El Paso Sector 25000 iii Cl Ill -.... = Ill a., 0 <( a., .... - a., C: ..0 a., E= ::, <( z 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Nov Dec '90 '90 El Paso Sector 25000 iii Cl Ill -.. 20000 = :g.. 15000 Q) .... 0 <( Q) C: ..0 Q) E= ::, <( z 10000 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 El Paso Sector 25000 iii - .. 20000 a> c: 10000 e= ::, <( 5000 Cl Ill Q) = - .... Ill Q) ~ <( ..0 z Q) 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000385 Page261 USE ONLY El Paao Sector 220 200 180 160 "O Cll !ii f 140 Cll ., 120 a: f 100 0l ... :::><( 0 80 :gj 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Paso Sector 220 200 180 ] 160 'iii .,, 140 -Cl) tiCl) 120 a:. ... 100 0l ... 80 :::J <( 60 a 40 20 ... 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 El Paso Sector 220 200 180 "O Cl) 160 1ii .,, 140 120 a; a: ... 100 0l ... 80 :::J <( 60 a 40 20 = ... 0 Page 262 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 USE ONLY '92 '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000386 Official Use Only USE ONLY - El Paso Sector 9000o1 8000 7000 6000, 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Paso Sector 9000 8000 .D 7000 l'O ==c,:, 6000 ~ ~ 5000 :c B 4000 Ill II) ~;;: 3000 ? 2000 U 1000 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 El Paso Sector - 9000 8000 .Q 7000 l'O ==c "Cl 6000 l'O II) 5000 :) oIll "i: (J 4000 l'O II) 3000 ;::.E..:: C 2000 8 1000 II) 0 Official Use Only Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 USE ONLY '92 '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000387 Page 263 USE ONLY - El Paso Sector 100000 - "O Q) ~ en 80000 :;:::: C: ~ 0 (.) N 0 60000 ~ Q) C: .ca (.) 40000 20000 0 (.) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Paso Sector - "O 100000 Q) c a (.) en :;:::: C: ~ 0 (.) N 0 80000 - 60000 ~ Q) C: .ca (.) 0 40000 20000 (.) 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr '91 '91 '91 '91 May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 ~1 ~1 '91 '91 ~1 ~1 El Paso Sector / -B "O 100000. Q) 80000. en :;:::: C: 0 (.) ~ N 0 Q) C: .ca (.) 0 60000. ~ 40000. 20000 (.) 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 264 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000388 Official Use Only USE ONLY - El PasoSector E ~ 90 80 70 j,:, :~ 8s c: 40 30 ~ 20 10 .e 0 ------------ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Aug Sept Oct '91 '91 '91 Nov Dec '91 '91 El PasoSector E ~ - ,! c:,:, 0 0 o- 90 80 70 60 50 40 .E;; 30 Q) 20 10 e :C 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul '91 El PasoSector 90 80 70 'E0 N oS c: .e 60 50 40 30 Q) :c Official Use Only Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul .~ ti.~ - - - - - USE ONLY Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec - - - - DHS-17-0040-H-000389 Page 265 USE ONLY - El Paso Sector --~ .r= ~ Cll 0 C: Cll 0 ... ..; 8:. !!! "C C: G) eE ....... C: < 0 u 18 16 14 12 10 8 6. 4' 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Paso Sector - .L:. -~~ ~0 5: ... -~ rf ca ... "C C: G.) eE ....... C: < 0 u 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 . '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 - '91 El Paso Sector ... .L:. "i Ill C: o!2 - ~ C: Cll C: i... G.) Q. "Cl G) eE ....... < C: 0 u 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 266 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000390 Official Use Only USE ONLY - El Paso Sector 5 a.. m 4 ? GBPl ffi GBPl 3 ~~2 fJ) :2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Jul ~ Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ El Paso Sector 5 a. m - 4 ? GBPl ,A C ,:!$ (I) - Cl ~ <( 2 fJ) :2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 ~1 El Paso Sector .......... Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul .~. Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000391 Page 267 USE ONLY Tucson Recommendations The Tucson sector includes 16.5% of the Southwest Border, but accounts for a large fraction of illicit drugs seized on the border. From the western boundary to Nogales, the terrain alternates between desert and mountains and the eastern section is predominantly brush and ranchland with some desert. A small section just east of Nogales is mountains and border town areas. OUO-7 o (b) (7)(E) Ten full-time, all-weather highway checkpoints are recommended to enforce the containment strategy: ? (b) (7)(E) I I I I I I I I I o The conventional physical protection equipment is listed in the attached portion of the spreadsheet. We recommend that the priorities be those listed in the General Recommendations section . Page 268 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000392 Official Use Only o USE ONLY OUO-7 o o Tucaon Ext.Coat 148,500 137,280 54,725 18,690 25,125 16,800 14,950 14,700 13,-440 199,000 0 24,975 24,950 16,800 ' . Video & SanaorCable Subtotal, AuNMlllllt VoiceComm,Short Range VoiceComm,L Range 1000 75 i, (b) (7)(E) SubtaCal, Cnlrt I. Disp ChackpointShallar,Large CheckpointShe1'9r,Small Checkpoint Personnel DrugDogs(Procurement) Dog Suppa,t(Food & Vet) -------mm 9 165 60 60 mE:J VehicleBarrier ~ : lighting PaiolRoads MobileWelder WelderOperator Subtotal, Bllnlen, Eta. Test Equipment !LS,New Equipment ILS,Old Equipment Subtotal, SUppolt Sector Total o Official Use Only mm 105600 73920 73920 19,980 59,900 7,520 $797,335 24,000 102,000 57,560 10,000 3,000 -448,000 200,000 15,000 $859,580 150,000 150,000 $300,000 5,000 5,000 $10,000 300,000 1,800,000 14,025,000 240,000 60,000 2,217,600 5,174,400 4,435,200 3,696,000 1,848,000 3,696,000 25,000 85,000 Uni Coat $825 $260 $995 $445 $1,675 $400 $1,495 $350 $320 $995 $2SO $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 $470 $1,600 $8,500 $5,756 $5,000 $300 $56,000 $200,000 $15 $2,000 $150,000 $5,000 $5,000 $300,000 $200,000 $85,000 $4,000 $1,000 $30 $70 $60 $35 $25 $50 $25,000 $85,000 $37,602,200 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $39,869,095 i: USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000393 Page 269 USE ONLY - . RecurrinnCosts 15% of all Deteclion Assessmentand CommunicationsEquipment 50% of Info Control and Display Equipment I 10% of 1he Construction Cost of Check Points for Maintenance& UtiHties Tucson Unit Ext. Cost Coso $293,534 $2,500 15.0%1 50.0% $210,000 10.0%! $14,085,000 100.0% 5% of Barrier Cost for Mainl&nanc:e $960,960 5.0% 15% of lighting Cost for Maintenance& Elecbicity $277,200 15.0% 100% of Welder Opera1Dr $85,000 100.0% 25% of Test Equipmentfor Calibration,Repairand Upgradingof Equipment $25,000 25.0% $200,000 100.0% 100% of Checkpont PersonnelCost and Dog S141port 100% of llS Costs Total RecurringCost for Each Secwr $16,139,194 II Page 270 !I USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000394 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Tucson Sector Analysis The data given in the Tucson sector discussion of "Contact with Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, 1991, and the first half of 1992. The activities of the total Southwest Border are given at the end of this section. The analysis shows significant increases in the average numbers of alien arrests per month, drug-related arrests, and marijuana and heroin confiscated. The plots of cocaine and heroin show a few months with large activity mixed with many smaller activity months. The data on confrontations with armed persons and assaults of Border Patrol agents are small averages, but the individual plots show decreases in these areas. - Offiqial Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000395 Page27l USE ONLY Tucson Sector 110001 10000 9000 Cl U) Q.) t, 8000 Q.) 7000 0 ,._ ... 6000 ,._ <( 5000 Q.) C: 4000 ,.Q Q.) E :.:: 3000 :::, <( 2000 z 1000 ii> - 0 Tucson Sector 11000 10000 9000 Cl U) t, 8000 7000 ,._ 6000 5000 Q.) C: 4000 ,.Q E :.:: 3000. :::, <( 2000 z 1000 ... 8000 = U) Q.) 7000 ,._ 6000 5000 Q.) C: ,.Q Q.) 4000 E :.:: 3000 :::, <( 2000 z 1000 -~< 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 272 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000396 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Tucson Sector 120 100 "O Cl) .... (I) co .... 80 ti!.... 60 ... 40 - (I) Cl) C) ... :, <( Cl 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Jul Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 '90 Nov Dec '90 '90 Tucson Sector 120 100 "O Cl) - co .... (I) Cl) Cl) a: ... 80 :, <( 40 .... (I) - Cl ._ .... Cl 60 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Tucson Sector 120 100 "O Cl) .... 80 a: l!:! 60 ... 40 .... ~ Cl) (I) (I) Cl ,_ :, <( Cl 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000397 Page273 USE ONLY Tucson Sector 20000 (l'J .0 Ill ::;:. C "O Ill Q) :E'ij "' (l'J ,:E.;:: g 15000 10000 5000 u 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Tucson Sector 20000 en .0 "'::::. 15000 C "O "' Q) ::, ... 0 :2 ~ 1 000 "' (l'J :E .;:: 6 u 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Tucson Sector 20000 en ::9 15000 Ill C "O Ill Q) ::, ... 10000 :;: ~ Ill Cl'J :E t;::C 0 5000 u 0 Page274 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 USE ONLY '92 '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000398 Official Use Only USE ONLY Tucson Sector 7000 "N 6000 ..9. 5000 (I) "O .5 (!) 4000 l'O ... (.) l'O :il 3000u0 :;:: 2000 C: 0 u 1000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Tucson Sector - 7000 "N 6000 0 5000 (!) "O .E ~ 4000 l'O l'O (,) (.) 3000 r/) u0 :;:: 2000 C: 0 u 1000 0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Tucson Sector 7000 "N 6000 0 5000 (I) "O C: Q) 'iii ~ 4000 (.) (.) 3000 r/) u0 :;:: C: 2000 0 u 1000 - 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000399 Page 275 USE ONLY Tucson Sector -0 (I) .., I'll 0 ti) :.;:_ C: N 0 O uC: .5 ... I & Subtotal, Cntrt & Di? p 1111m 1111m 0 CheckpointShal1Br,Small CheckpointPersonnel 0 15 0 0 26400 26400 26400 10560 Drug Dogs (Procurement) Food V 1 I I I Lighting PalrolRoada MobileWelder WelderOparator Subtotal, Blni?ra, Eto. TaalEquipment ILS, Naw Equipment nt ILS,Old E ul Subtotal,Suppolt Sector Total $350 $320 $995 $260 $4,995 $2,495 $1,050 $15,000 $4,995 $2,995 $470 $1,600 $8,500 $5,756 $5,000 $300 560,000 $56,000 400,000 $200,000 15,000 $15 0 200,000 $2,000 150,000 $150,000 o $350,000 CheckpointShaltar,Large ooo $445 $1,675 $400 $1,495 1111111 Video& SensorC&bla Subtotal, ANN?mant Voice Comm,Short Ranga Voice Comm, Long Range D.... $995 1111111 Regular LightCCTV LLTVo Intensified Subtotal, o Unit Coat $825 $260 26400 26400 0.5 0.5 5,000 $5,000 5,000 $5,000 $10,000 0 $300,000 0 $200,000 1,275,000 $85,000 $4,000 0 0 $1,000 - 792,000 $30 1,848,000 $70 1,584,000 $60 369,600 $35 660,000 $25 1,320,000 $50 12,500 $25,000 42,500 $85,000 $7,1103,600 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $10,283,410 o Page 280 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000404 Official Use Only USE ONLY - I Ie I I Ij I fil :;,; I Recurrina Costs 15%ofall Detection Assessment and CommunicationsEquipment 50% of Info Control and DisplayEquipment Yuma Ext. Cost $310,472 Unit Cost 15.0% $2,500 50.0% $0 10.0% 10% of the Construction Cost of CheckPoints tor Maintenance& Utilities 100%of Checkpont PersonnelCost and DogSupport $1,275,000 100.0% $295,680 5.1)% 15% of UghtingCost for Maintenance& Eleclriclty $99,000 15.0% 100%of Welder Operafl>r $42,500 100.0% 25% of Test Equipmentfor Calibration,Repairand Upgradingof Equipment $25,000 25.0% $200,000 100.0% 5% of BarrierCost for Maintenance 100"/4of ILS Costs Cost Total Rec::urring for Each Secil>r $2,250,152 GBP! I '1 i~ I t.i i I "' I ~ I : ii! .. -~ t1 Official Use Only '" o i1 o j.. USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000405 Page 281 USE ONLY I Yuma Sector Analysis :; I ;;,;; ~ The data given in the Yuma sector discussion of "Contact with Suspects" is plotted on the following charts to show the overall trend of what has been happening in the sector for the years 1990, 1991, and the first half of 1992. The activities of the total Southwest ::: Border are given at the end of this section. - I'1The analysis ,1 I shows significant increases in the average numbers of alien arrests per month, drug-related arrests, and marijuana con- ~h~;:r~:! ~:l~~a;;fh ~=~:;!~;d~~h!;!~f;~f:1:c:~~! ~~~o~=:~i: activity mixed with many smaller activity months. The data ; on confrontations with armed persons and assaults of Border Patrol .I agents are small averages, but the individual plots show decreases or small changes in these a,eas. I /ill large I Page 282 USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000406 Official Use Only USE ONLY - Yuma Sector 4000 3600 3200 G) 'Iii 2800 G) 0,< 2400 2000 G) C: 1600 ..0 Cl) 1200 :::,< 800 z 400 0 ca Cl Ill -..... e= Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Yuma Sector - 4000 3500 ca CD Ill 3200 ~ 'Iii 2800 G) 2400 0 2000 Iii c:: 1600 ..0 Cl) 1200 =,< 800 z 400 0 -<.. e= Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Yuma Sector 4000 3600 Cl Ill 3200 ~ 1ii 2800 Cl) 2400 2000 Cl) c:: 1600 ..0 Cl) E :.:: 1200 =,< 800 z 400 m -~<.. 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000407 Page283 USE ONLY - Yuma Sector 70 Cl) 1ii 60 (J) 50 < "O 40 ... ... JPYJ CD 30 a: 20 Cl ::, 10 ... 0 0 Jan ogo Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 ogo ogo '90 '90 Jul '90 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 ogo '90 '90 '90 Yuma Sector 70. 60. i ~ "@ (ii CD a: 20 g> 10 c 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul '91 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Yuma Sector ;~ 7060 < 50 j 40 : 30 CC 20 ~ 0 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec U U .~ .~ U .~ U .~ U U U ~2 Page284 OFFICIAL USE ONLY USE ONLY Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000408 USE ONLY - Yuma Sector Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Yuma Sector - 1400 .., 1200 m; .Q C: i::, ... m Cl> ::::, :~~ !'Cl .., :E :.: C: u0 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Yuma Sector 1400 1200 N 0 1000 m C: i::, m Cl> 800 ::::, ..... .c: m (,) 600 Ill UI :E \;: c; 400 0 u 200 0 - Official Use Only Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 USE ONLY '92 '92 Nov Dec '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000409 Page285 USE ONLY - Yuma Sector N 2 a, "0 a, .-C.,,.... .,, 0 0 0 -= II) u C 0 u 12000,, 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 7 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Yuma Sector 12000 11000 N 100002 9000 a,,:, 8000 1000 co co 6000 g ~ 5000 U..:: 4000 C 3000 2000 1000 0 -=e 8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 - '91 Yuma Sector a, "0 .,,.... .= 0 0 Cl) .,, it Ut.:: C 8 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 286 OFFICIAL USE ONLY USE ONLY Offi,cial Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000410 USE ONLY Yuma Sector "O .... Ill Q) uII) t;::: - C N 0 0 o- C .5 ... Q) ::t: 40 / 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Yuma Sector "O .... Q) (II (J -.!!! - C 0 o- N O C: .5 ... Q) :::c: 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul Aug Sept Oct '91 '91 '91 '91 Nov Dec '91 '91 Yuma Sector "O .... Ill Q) (J II) :..::_ C 0 o.E 0 ... QJ ::t: N 0 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr '92 '92 '92 '92 May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Official, Use Only USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000411 Page287 USE ONLY o Yuma Sector 5 .c ~ 3: Cl) C: 0 C: Cl) 0 ,_ 4 Cl) .- 3 a, ai Q.. --c C: a, 2 _g E C: ,_ 0 c( 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec w w w w w w w w w w w w Yuma Sector - .c .Cl) 3: C: Cl) 0 c: en 0 ... 5 o ~~ --o C: Q) _g E C: ... o< 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Nov Dec '91 '91 Yuma Sector - .c .3: Cl) C: 5 Cl) C: 4 ? 0 !!? ~GBPf --o C: _g E C: ... Q) 3 2 o< 0 Page 288 . Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Aug Sept Oct ~ ~ ~ Nov Dec ~ ~ o OFFICIAL USE ONLY USE ONLY Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000412 USE ONLY - YumaSector 3 a.. en C 2000 ::, !::' ta ... u 1500 Ill II) :E ;;:: 1000 C 0 (.) 500 0 ... Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 El Centro Sector II) .Q Ill ::::, ... :c C "O Ill ::, Ill G> ~ Ul :E t;:: C 0 (.) 3600 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ~2 ~2 ~2 '92 ~2 ~2 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000421 Page297 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - El Centro Sector -N 0 (I) ,, .E (I) l'tl om 0 ~ U;.: C: 0 () 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 150001 10000 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Centro Sector 40000 N 35000 0 30000 (I) ,, .E (I) 25000 mu m 20000 0 ~ U.;:::: 15000 C 100001 0 () 5000' 0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 - '91 El Centro Sector 40000 N 35000 _g 30000 (I) ,, C: cu 25000 .-m .., m 20000 (.) (.) 0 Ill 15000 ().;:::: C 10000 0 () 5000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Page 298 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000422 OFFICIAL USE ONLY El Centro Sector "C .... Ill Cl) (.J 1/) :;::: C: - 0 uS N C: ... .5 Cl) ::i: 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 El Centro Sector "C .... Ill Cl) (.J 1/) :;::: C: - N 0 uS C: .5 ... Cl) ::i: 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 El Centro Sector "C .... CII Cl) (.J II) :;::: C: -N 0 uS .e C: Q) J: Official Use Only 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 OFFICIAL USE ONLY '92 '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000423 Page 299 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - El Centro Sector 6 -5 5 "? ig en o 4 c: en 0 .... -~l"O 3 +-' C: Q) _gE ?< (.) 2 Jan Feb Mar Apr '90 '90 '90 '90 May Jun '90 '90 Jul '90 Aug Sept Oct '90 '90 '90 Nov Dec '90 '90 El Centro Sector 6 .s:::. +-' en 5 "? C: en o 4 C: ~ -~~ +-' C: "O - 3 Cl) _g E C: .... 0 <( (.) 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 ~1 ~1 ~1 '91 '91 ~1 ~1 ~1 El Centro Sector 6 .s:::. +-' 5 "? en C: en o 4 c: en 0 .... -~l +-' C: "O 3 Cl) _g E C: .... 0 <( (.) 2 1 0 Page 300 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY '92 '92 '92 Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000424 - OFFICIAL USE ONLY - El Centro Sector 5 a.. 4 ClJ C: 2 ~ <( 2 ~ <( s ~ l'J) ti= -~ C: 0 -N (.) 0 Q) C: 0 (.) 140000. 120000. 100000. 80000. 60000. 40000. - 20000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 SouthwestBorder 140000 120000 100000. 80000. 40000 20000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Nov Dec '92 '92 Page318 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000442 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY Southwest Border 600 - ,:J Cl) 500 m 0 Ill ;;:::: C: 0 N u .3 400 300 C: 200 Cl) 100 .5 ,._ ::c 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Southwest Border 600 - ,:J Cl) 500 m 0 Ill ;;:::: C: 0 -N u .3 400 300 C: 200 Cl) 100 .5 ,._ ::c 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Southwest Border 600 - ,:J Cl) m 500 ;;:::: 400 0 Ill C: - 0 N u .3 C: 200 Cl) 100 .5 ,._ I Official Use Only 300 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 OFFICIAL USE ONLY '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000443 Page 319 OFFICIAL USE ONLY SouthwestBorder ,5 .-;: VI C: VI 0 C: f! ,g n:I 80 70 60 50 a. 'Eal 30 _g E C: ... 20 o Ill Cl. 40 30 'I: ... 20 o Ill a. 40 'cal 30 E 20 10 0 0 ,5 _g 5< Jan '92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Jul '92 Page320 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000444 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Southwest Border 35 30 ~ Ill 25 20 C t/l fl a5 15 0 ..... ~~ ti) ~ 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Jul '90 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '90 '90 '90 '90 '90 Southwest Border 35 30 ~ co 25 C t/l fl a520 ti) 10 o- ~~ ti) <( Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Jul '91 Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec '91 '91 '91 '91 '91 Southwest Border 35 30 0. co C t/l 25 o20 t/l C -- al<( ti) ti) <( (l) Cl 15 10. 5 0 Jan '92 Official Use Only Feb Mar Apr May Jun '92 '92 '92 '92 '92 Jul '92 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Aug Sept oct '92 '92 '92 Nov Dec '92 '92 DHS-17-0040-H-000445 Page 321 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - II I ::) ! I i II This page intentionally left blank. I I I I I I I III,,~ ~ Page322 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000446 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) National Recommendations One of the tasks for this study was to rank order projects for different levels of funding. Funding Level $0 Maintain present status and do the best that can be done. Funding Level $10 Million Construct the 2 large and 37 small checkpoints. This construction would cost an estimated $8,150,000. The remainder ($1,850,000) could be used for tactical sensors to be used at the checkpoints. If personnel cost had to come fro~e~commend that the two big checkpoints in -d ~, and five small checkpoints be built and staffed. (The five most critical small checkpoints would be negotiated.) Funding Level $25 Million Construct all the checkpoints (2~37 lighted barriers (15 miles) in the-sector. o small) and all of the Funding Level $50 Million Construct all of the items . ed for $25M and all of the lighted barriers (18 miles) in the ctor and as much of the lighted barrier as possible in the sector. These recommendations are not inconsistent with our general recommendations that the lighted barriers should be first priority. They are most effective whe~nuous section can be built as a completed barrier. In sector some of the lengths are 2 miles and some are the 4 miles allowing some portions to be completely built. Funding Level $250 Million Construct the full system recommendations . in the order mentioned in the o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000447 Page 323 OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY - I Appendix A Bibliography - Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000449 PageA-1 OFFICIAL USE ONLY This page intentionally left blank. II I !'I PageA-2 I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000450 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Appendix A Bibliography Arizona TBP, Three Statements of Work for contracts to develop a comprehensive computer-based real estate assessment program and long-range facility master plans for California, Texas, and New Mexico. BDM International, Inc., Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Satellite Technology Requirements, Capabilities, and Deficiencies Report (Appendix to Law Enforcement Satellite Technology Integrated Requirements Report), March 9, 1990, Revised May 11, 1990. BDM International, Inc., Satellite Technology Integrated Requirements Report (U), April 6, 1990, Revised May 31, 1990, draft. BDM International, Inc., Taggant Requirements and Capabilities Report (U), February 28, 1990. BDM International, Inc., Taggant Working Group Roles, Mission, Operation, and Organization, January 11, 1990. - CAS, Inc., Southwest Border Interagency Assessment, EP91052, April 5, 1991. Communications Cason, Cowell, and Kugler, A Strategy for the Employment of Technology on the Southwest Border, April 18, 1991. DCICNC Technology Group, Review (classified title), November 1990. and Recommendation Defense Communications Agency, Communication Study for the SW Border, no date. Defense Communications Agency, Technical and Architectural Support to the National Drug Enforcement Effort: Developmental Approach, December 22, 1989. Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, and Department of the Treasury, US Customs Service, Index to United States-Mexico Border Color Image Maps, 1988. Department of the Treasury, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Border Patrol Academy Immigration and Naturalization Service Eighteen Week Police Training Program, February 1992. DSB, DSB Summer Study (classified title), October 1987. Official Use Only El Paso Intelligence Center and 458 Military Intelligence Detachment (Strategic), Baja California Strategic Threat Assessment, June 1990. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000451 PageA-3 OFFICIAL USE ONLY I El Paso Intelligence Center, Assessment on the Effect of Counter- A ,.rl, Narcotics Operations on Cross-Border Smuggling, Special Report o .ii SR-10-90, August 15, 1990. ~ El Paso Intelligence Center, Cocaine Smuggling Across US-Mexico 1990. I Border, Message 241710ZSEP90, September tl El Paso Intelligence Center, Cocaine Smuggling Across US-Mexico 1990. I Border, Message 282230ZAUG90, August I El Paso Intelligence Center, Drug Smuggling Across the Southwest Border, A Threat Assessment, November 28, 1989. I I El Paso Intelligence Center, Drug Smuggling Into New Mexico Mexico Border: A Threat Assessment, April 1990. WtAcross the II El Paso Intelligence Center, Dryden to Eagle Pass, Texas, Threat Assessment, February 1990. El Paso Intelligence Center, Relevant documentation on Immi"' gration and Naturalization Service sensor capabilities and Mobile j Corridor threat analysis developed for Operation Alliance. ff. I El Paso Intelligence Center, Threat Assessment: Smuggling from Mexico Across the SW Border, Message 262345ZJAN91, GFAP-89111 1 8001, January 1991. - I El Paso Intelligence Center, Tucson Border Patrol Sector Threat 0, Assessment, December 21, 1989. I El Paso Master Plan, no date. 0 I Federation for American Immigration Reform, Ten Steps to B Securing America's Borders, January 1989. ii"" Frankel, H. D., G. A. VanHorn, and R. N. Carlile, Evaluation of the IllPorted Cable Sensor (PCCS), INS-RD-1001, Immigration and ; Naturalization Service Research and Development Office and the University of Arizona, December 1984. I I I Gilbert/Coupland I I Association/Architectural Research Consultants, Inc., Facilities Master Plan for the Imm~gration and Naturalization Service, El Paso Area, ATX00109, Pre-Final Report, July 28, 1992. Halevi, C.H., and R. N. Carlile, Exploration of Electromagnetic I, Fields and System Applications Relating to the Ported Coaxial I ., iI ;m Cable Sensor (PCCS), Volume 1: Electromagnetic Performance of the PCCS, Volume II: Investigation of the Feasibility of a Long Line ~, Intrusion Sensor System, INS-RD-1008, University of Arizona, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, July 1987. II PageA-4 I I!! OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000452 Official Use Only - OFFICIAL USE ONLY - I Henningson, Durham and Richardson, Inc., and Archos Corpo- 1ration, d ~ M ii,~ Long-Range Facility Master Plan, San Diego/El Centro, no ate. !!' J. F., Sharing the Secrets: The Dilemma of .... Counternarcotics Intelligence in the War on Drugs, University of !fil New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, February 1, 1991, draft. 'I- Holden-Rhodes, l;..... zllt Honeywell, Border Control Security Systems Handbook, June 15, 1980, draft. ;(if ~ I 11 Honeywell, Inc., Border Security Study, Volumes I, II, and III, June 1975. w:l I Hughes Aircraft Company, Supply Suppression Architecture Study, g Phase II Final Report, April 1991. I: Immigration and Naturalization Service Research and Development Office, Survey of Border Patrol Surveillance Equipment, November I 1990. I Immigration and Naturalization Service, 8 CFR 274, Revision of Regulations Regarding the Seizure and Forfeiture of Conveyances, . INS1061-88, published in the Federal Register, Vol. 53, No. 207, October 26, 1988. 'i..f.: - :Y) II Naturalization Immigration and Naturalization Service, Immigration and Service Six Year Detention Plan, FY 1991-1996, I Executive Summary, no date. I Immigration and Naturalization Service, Required ii CapabiUty for Unattended Ground Sensors, November II Operational 13, 1990. Institute for National Drug Abatement Research, INDAR Brochure, no date. II Institute for National Drug Abatement Research, Sensors Systems Test & Development Laboratory, Counter Narcotics Research and I Development Database, White Paper, no date. I Intelligence estimates on traffic flow patterns I Bo~~er including drug smugglers, illegal I legitrmate traffic. along the Southwest aliens, as well as I; ~oint Task Force Six, Relevant threat analysis developed by JTF-6, mprocess. I ';!j Lacombe, J., Thermal Infrared IDS, Presentation Outline, no date. I Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted, 1989. Iii ~ I i # Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000453 PageA-5 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Lupsha, P.A., Drug Lords and Narco-Corruption: the Players Change but the Game Continues, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, no date, draft. Memorandum of Record, Subject: Project Officer for OPN JT 18-90, Company B, 110th MI Battalion, 10th Mountain Division (LI), January 25, 1991. o Mitre Corp., Study of the Border, prepared for the Office of the President, no date. OUO-6 (b) (6) , Use of Remote Intrusion Detectors by t e Border Patrol in the Chula Vista Sector During the Period August 1970 to July 1971, SC-RR-72 0137, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, May 1972. National Research Council, STAR 21: Strategic Technologiesfor the Army of the Twenty-First Century, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1992. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Building a DrugFree Workforce, An ONDCP Guide for State Legislation, November 1990. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Classified documents used to define the threat in the National Drug Policy Seminar, October 30-November 3, 1989, United States Naval War College. o Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Comprehensive Plan for Use of Existing Federal Research and Development Facilities for Civilian Law Enforcement, November 15, 1989. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Deportation and Detention Optimization System, June 15, 1990. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), Modeling for Drug Interdiction, June 15, 1990. Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), National CounterDrug Enforcement Research and Development Strategy, August 1991. Office of National Drug Control Policy, Deportation and Detention Optimization System, June 15, 1990. On-Line Database Project Status Report, no date. Operation Alliance, Briefing Document, no date. Operation Alliance, Southwest Border Drug Control Strategy, July 1990. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000454 Official Use Only o OFFICIAL USE ONLY o I Operation Alliance, Southwest Border Law Enforcement Computer I Capabilities and Information I Intelligence Management and I Exchange, April 1991. Operational,Profile on Background Information from All Sectors, no date. i Peck, L., Acoustically Coupled Ground Motion Under Controlled Conditions- Trial Study, Special Report 92-10, April 1992. Quick Reference to Federal Forfeiture Procedures, current as of March 1991. Relevant documentation on current LEA operational methods and deployment capabilities. Resource Consultants, Inc., US Border Patrol Craft Feasibility Study, February 4, 1992. Reuter, P., G. Crawford, and J. Cave, Sealing the Borders - the Effects of Increased Military Participation in Drug Interdiction, RAND National Defense Research Institute, 1988. ( o b ) ( 6 ) Perimeter Sensors for Treaty Monitoring, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, July 1991. Texas A&M University,. Sensor System Test & Development Laboratory Planning Meeting, College Station, TX, June 26-27, 1991. The White House, National Drug Control Strategy, February 1991. Thornburg, Attorney General, Letter to 0MB Director Darman, November 29, 1990. Unedited Draft Technological Support Document (classified title), July 19, 1990. University of Texas at El Paso, Electrical Engineering Department, An Eva/,uation of the Initial Configuration of the Low Light Level Television System, INS-RD-1002, April 1, 1985. US Army, Army Counter-Narcotics AMIP Architecture Outline, in process. US Border Patrol and Sandia National Laboratories, The Laredo Operational Profile Sector Meeting of the US Border Patrol and the Sandia National Laboratory Cooperative Task Force, no date. o Official Use Only US Border Patrol, Border Patrol Handbook, April 1, 1985. US Border Patrol, US Border Patrol El Paso Sector, no date. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000455 PageA-7 OFFICIAL USE ONLY I US Border Patrol, US Border Patrol San Diego Sector Operational A .., I j,,Profile, no date. W US Border Patrol, US Border Patrol Yuma Sector Operational Profile, no date. I US Border Patrol/Joint Task Force Six, Operation 5-90, no date. II.... US Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Compilation of Selected Federal Forfeiture Statutes, current as of January 1991. US Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, , 1990 Statistical Yearbook of Immigration and Naturalization ~,. Service, no date. US Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Statistics Division, Commissioner's Fact Book, Summary of Recent Immigration Data, July 1991. US Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Annual Report of the Department of Justice Asset Forfeiture Program, 1990. US Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Annual I Report of the Department of Justice Forfeiture Program, 1991. a ,-.i US Department of Justice, The Attorney General's Guidelines on ', Seized and Forfeited Property, July 1990. II US Department of the NayY, Compendium of Reference Materials, Law Enforcement Physical Security Antitterrorism Low Intensity . Conf!,ictCrime Prevention, no date. j ' - Video Surveillance System, April 2, 1991. J: Weese, J. A., A Description of the Purposes and Services of the Institute for National Drug Abatement Research (INDAR), Texas Engineering Experiment Station, Texas A&M University report ~ prepared for the Joint Command Group and Operation Alliance, May 23, 1991. ; I j ..I, Weese, J. A., J. A. Morgan, and R.H. Benson, Sensor Systems Test & Development Laboratory (SSTD), May 1991. I Analysis Wortman, M.A., and R. E. Shannon, Interactive Modeling and of Intrusion Detection and Interdiction Systems, May 23, ;!If II 1991. ?:f I - ! ~!;it i "' ~ PageA-8 I OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000456 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY AppendixB Individuals Who Contributed to the Study Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000457 PageB-1 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - I This page intentionally left blank. PageB-2 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000458 Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY o Appendix B Individuals Who Contributed to the Study ONDCP (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) STEERING COMMITTEE (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) COBOR (Chairman) trategic Planning ntelligence , Administration nformation Resource Management ration Alliance (7)(C) ,JTF-6 , United States Customs Service (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) INS (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) irector R&D (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) o (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) , Director Facilities and Engineering BP/HQ (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) , Associate Chief Southern Regional Office (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) , Regional Electronics Officer BP Special Assignment (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) rn Regional Office Deputy CPA, Tucson o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000459 PageB-3 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o US Border Patrol Chief Patrol Agents and their Staff (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7) (C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (b) (b) (C) (b) (6), (7) (6), (b) (7)(C) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Sandia National Laboratories OUO-6 (ALL) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) Project proposal Project proposal Project proposal Project execution preparation Project execution preparation Modeling Map preparation Project execution preparation Project execution preparation Modeling and report and report and report o and report Thirty persons from throughout Sandia who participated in a brainstorming session. TechSource Consulting, Incorporated (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) K-Tech (b) (6), (b) (7)(C) o PageB-4 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000460 Offecial Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY - n o II AppendixC A Discussion of the Application of Regression Analysis to the Development I of a Model for a Systematic Analysis of ~ Southwest Border Security I - !! l II o II i ' i ?': 'l Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000461 Page C-J OFFICIAL USE ONLY - I o. I This page intentionally left blank. - Page C-2 OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000462 Official Use Only Official Use Only Systematic Analysis of the Southwest Border Volume 3 Prepared for the Immigration and Naturalization Service Funded by the Office of National Drug Control Policy Prepared by Advanced Systems Integration Department 9561 Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 OFFICIAL USE ONLY May be exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), exemption number and category 7. Law Enforcement. Department of Energy review required before public release. Name/Org.:Bruce D. Green / SNL-NM Date:July 7, 2015 Official Use Only January 1993 DHS-17-0040-H-000464 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Contents Acronyms Executive Summary Physical Security Systems Introd.uction...................................................................... Overview........................................................................ 1 2 Costs ............................................................................................. ,........................................... 5. Recommendations.......................................................... Integrated Logistic Support.......................................... Intrusion Detection Systems ........................................ Assessment Systems ..................................................... Communication.............................................................. Information Control and Display.................................. 5 5 7 9 12 13 Barriers............................................................................................................. 13 Bibliography................................................................... 14 Technology Description - Seismic Sensors .......................................... .................... Operational Environment ......................................... Threat......................................................................... Logistics and Operations Considerations ............... Magnetic Sensors ........................................................... Operational Environment ......................................... Threat......................................................................... Logistics and Operations Considerations ............... Passive Infrared Sensors ............................................... Operational Environment ......................................... Threat......................................................................... Logistics and Operations Considerations :.....:........ Active Infrared Sensors .................................................. Operational Environment ......................................... Threat......................................................................... Logistics and Operations Considerations ............... Break-wire Sensors......................................................... Operational Environment ......................................... 15 15 16 16 18 18 19 19 21 21 22 22 24 . 24 25 25 27 27 Threat.................................................................................. 27 28 30 30 31 31 Logistics and Operations Considerations ..o............ Video Motion Sensors ..................................................... Operational Environment ......................................... Threat......................................................................... Logistics and Operations Considerations ............... Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000465 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Contents (Continued) Catalog of Equipment Catalog ............................................................................ o...... 33. 37 39 41 43. 45 47 49 53 55 59 63 63 65 67 69 71 o. 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 101 103 105 105 105 105 105 105. OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000466 I OFFICIAL USE ONLY o 106 106 106 106 106 Contents (Continued) . 107 111. 113 Assessment Systems Sensor Imaging Remote Sensor Video Pack ............................................ 119 121 123 o 125 127 ITr Night Vision Goggles ...--.................................................. 129 Varo o Official Use Only Starligb.t Scope ... ................... ... ..... ..... .......... ......... .......... 131 Inframetrics Infrared Scanner and Telescope IRTV-445 L Long Range Infrared System ..................................... 133 USArmy Hand-Held Thermal Imager (AN/PAS-7)....................... 135 Texas Instruments Night Observation Device, Long Range (ANtrAS-6) .... Low-Cost Uncooled Sensor Prototype (LOCUSP).......... 137 139 Optic Electronic LH-83 MELIOS (AN/PVS-6) .......................................... 141 OFFICIAL USE ONLY ; . .~, :, "'. J. r.. 1-r. DHS-17-0040-H-000467 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Contents (Concluded) Communication Systems Harris RF-3200 Series High Frequency Transceivers ............ . 145 Motorola Systems Saber ........... .............. ........ ... ....... ............ ... ..... 149 QUALCOMM OmniTRACS Mobile Communications System ............. 155 o Display Systems Information Control and Display System...................... 161 Barrier Systems Multiple Fence Barrier System ............................ ......... 169 Fencing Systems ..................... ~.......:.................-....................... 171 o o OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official. Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000468 OFFICIAL USE ONLY Acronyms A Official Use Only AID Analog-to-Digital ABS Acrylonitrile/Butadiene/Styrene AC Alternating Current ACPA Assistant Chief Patrol Agent ADNET Anti-Drug Network ADP Automated Data Processing ADSID Air-Dropped Seismic Intrusion Detector AEW Airborne Early Warning AFB Air Force Base AGC Automatic Gain Control AI Artificial Intelligence AIA Acting Intelligence Agent AID Agency for International Development AIS Air Interdiction System AM Amplitude Modulation AOB Air Operations Branch (United States Customs Service) APAIC Assistant Patrol Agent in Charge ASARS Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System ASR Airport Surveillance Radar ASSA Anti-Smuggling Special Agent ASU Anti-Smuggling Unit ATC Air Traffic Control OFFICIAL USE ONLY Pagei DHS-17-0040-H-000469 OFFICIAL USE ONLY B ATF Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms AWACS Airborne Warning and Control System BAG Border Alliance Group BATF Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms BCD Binary Coded Decimal BLM Bureau of Land Management BMS Balanced Magnetic Switch BORCAP Border Patrol Criminal Alien Program BP Border Patrol BPA Border Patrol Agent BWSH Break Wire Sensor Head C c2 Command and Control cs Command, Control, and Communications Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence Official Use Only CADRE Computer-Assisted Display and Reporting Enhancement CB Citizens Band CCA Circuit Card Assembly CCD Charge-Coupled Device CCTV Closed Circuit Television CEO Canine Enforcement Officers CIA Central Intelligence Agency CINC Commander in Chief CINCFOR Commander in Chief, Forces Command OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000470 Page ii OFFICIAL USE ONLY - D Official Use Only CINCSOUTHCOM Commander in Chief, Southern Command CIWG Communications Interoperability Working Group CLASSIC Covert Local Area Sensor System for Intruder Classification CMOS Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor CN Counternarcotics CNC Counternarcotics Center COMM(s) Communication(s) COMSEC Communications Security CONUS Continental United States COPS Covert Observation Platform System (replacement for IIEV; presently known as TOPS) CPA Chief Patrol Agent csoc Consolidated Space Operations Center CW Continuous Wave CY Calendar Year DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DAVID Digital Automatic Video Intrusion Detection DB Database dB Decibels dBm Decibel to 1 milliwatt DC Direct Current DCA Defense Communications Agency OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000471 Page iii OFFICIAL USE ONLY E F Official Use Only DCPA Deputy Chief Patrol Agent DEA Drug Enforcement Administration DEMUX Demultiplex DF Direction Finder DI Drug Interdiction DIA Defense Intelligence Agency OLEA Drug and Law Enforcement Agency DMA Defense Mapping Agency DoD Department of Defense DoJ Department of Justice DOT Department of Transportation DSB Defense Science Board EIDS Eagle Intrusion Detection System ELR Employer Labor Relations EPIC El Paso Intelligence Center ESU Employer Sanctions Unit ETU Encoder Transmitter Unit FAA Federal Aviation Administration FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation FDA Food and Drug Administration FDIS Fraudulent Document Index System FH Frequency Hopping FLETC Federal Law Enforcement Training Center FLIR Forward-Looking Infrared (thermal imager) OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000472 Page iv OFFICIAL USE ONLY G H I Official Use Only FM Frequency Modulation FOV Field of View FRED Fast Response Erection Device (also known as IIEV) FY Fiscal Year GAO General Accounting Office GB Ground-Based GCS Ground Control Station GHz Gigahertz (billion) GPS Global Positioning System HF High Frequency HHS Department of Health and Human Services HIDAD High Density Array Development Program HUMINT Human Intelligence I/0 Input and Output I2CCD Double Intensified Charge Coupled Device ICCD Intensified Charge Coupled Device ICD Information Control and Display ICW Intercoastal Waterway ID Identification IEC/DOT/RTCM Industry Approved Test IEV Image Enhancement Vehicle II Image Intensifier IIEV Improved Image Enhancement Vehicle OFFICIAL USE ONLY Pagev DHS-17-0040-H-000473 OFFICIAL USE ONLY J K L Official Use Only ILS Integrated Logistics Support IMINT Image Intelligence INMARSAT International Maritime Satellite INS Immigration and Naturalization Service INSCAP Immigration and Naturalization Service Criminal Alien Program INSCOM United States Army Intelligence and Security Command INTELSAT International Telecom Satellite INTERPOL International Criminal Police IR Infrared IRCA Immigration Reform and Control Act (1986) IREMBASS Improved Remotely Monitored Battlefield Sensor System IRID Infrared Intrusion Detector IRS Internal Revenue Service IRST Infrared Search and Track JCS Joint Chiefs of Staff JTF Joint Task Force JTF-6 Joint Task Force Six KHz Kilohertz (thousand) LEA Law Enforcement Agency LED Light-Emitting Diode LINK Communications Network LLLTV Low-Light-Level Television LOCUSP Low-Cost Uncooled Sensor Prototype OFFICIAL USE ONLY Page vi DHS-17-0040-H-000474 OFFICIAL USE ONLY M - Official Use Only LORIS Long-Range Infrared System LOS Line of Sight LP Listening Post LPI Low Probability of Intercept LP1/D Low Probability of Intercept or Detect MAGID Magnetic Intrusion Detector MAP Mobile Aerostat Platform MATI. Modem Analysis of Traditional Intelligence MBBD Mini Break Beam Detector MBCN Mini Beacon MBWD Mini Break Wire Detector MCV Mobile Command Vehicle MGSH Magnetic Sensor Head MHHP Mini Hand-Held Plotter MHz Megahertz (million) MIDS Mini Intrusion Detection System MILSTAR Military Strategic and Tactical Relay System MINIMAGID Miniature Magnetic Intrusion Detector MLS Multi-Level Security MMGD Mini Magnetic Detector MOA Memorandum of Agreement MOE Measure of Effectiveness MOP Measure of Performance MOU Memorandum of Understanding OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000475 Page vii OFFICIAL USE ONLY N - Official Use Only MPDM Mini Portable Display Monitor MSE Mobile Subscriber Equipment MSID Mini Seismic Intrusion Detector MUX Multiplex MXMT Mini Transmitter NAS Naval Air Station NCIC National Crime Information Center NCNC National Center for Narcotics Control NDCS National Drug Control Strategy NDIC National Drug Intelligence Center NF Noise Factor NG National Guard NIDA National Institute on Drug Abuse NIIS National Immigrant Information System NNBIS National Narcotics Border Interdiction System NODLR Night Observation Device, Long Range NORAD North American Air Defense NPS National Park Service NSA National Security Agency NTIA National Telecommunications and Information Administration NTIC Naval Technical Intelligence Center NWS National Weather Service OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000476 Page viii OFFICIAL USE ONLY 0 - p Official Use Only OA Operation Alliance oc Operations Center OIC Officer In Charge OMD Omnidirectional Motion Detector ONDCP Office of National Drug Control Policy OP Observation Post OPFAC Operational Facility OPR Optical Pattern Recognition OPSEC Operations Security OTAR Over-the-Air Rekeying o 0TH Over the Horizon . OTM Other Than Mexican PA Patrol Agent PAIC Patrol Agent in Charge PC Personal Computer PD Probability of Detection PEP Peak Envelope Power PEWS Platoon Early Warning System PFA Probability of False Alarm PIRH Passive Infrared Head PL Pulse Length PLRS Position Location Reporting System PM Portable Monitor POE Port of Entry PRR Pulse Repetition Rate OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000477 Page i:K OFFICIAL USE ONLY Q R - s Offidal Use Only PSID Portable Seismic Intrusion Detector PVC Polyvinyl Chloride PVD Portable Video Display QA Quality Assurance RAC Regional Agent in Charge RAM Random Access Memory RCS Radar Cross Section REMBASS Remotely Monitored Battlefield Sensor System RF Radio Frequency RMSS Remotely Monitored Security System RPV Remotely Piloted Vehicle RSVP Remote Sensor Video Pack SADS Surveillance and Detection System SAR Synthetic Aperture Radar SASS Small Aerostat Surveillance System SATC Seismic/Acoustic Target Classifier SBPA Supervisory Border Patrol Agent SBTD Southwest Border Telecommunications Database SDC Strategic Defense Command SDLS Secure Data Link System SDR Signal Data Recorder SEIWG Security Equipment Integration Working Group SHF Super-High Frequency SIA Supervisory Intelligence Agent OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000478 Pagex OFFICIAL USE ONLY T - u Official Use Only SID Seismic Intrusion Detector SIGINT Signal Intelligence SINCGARS Single-Channel Ground and Air Radio System SNL Sandia National Laboratories SNR Signal-to-Noise Ratio SPA Senior Patrol Agent SSC Surveillance Support Center SSPA Station Senior Patrol Agent STC Seismic Target Classifier STU Secure Telephone Unit TAC Tactical Air Control Center TI Texas Instruments TNC A Type of Coaxial Connector TOPS Transportable Observation Platform System (formerly known as COPS; replaced the IIEV) TRANSEC Transmission Security TRITAC Tri-Service Tactical Communication System TRSS Tactical Remote Sensor System TV Television UAV Unmanned Air Vehicle UGS Unattended Ground Sensor UHF Ultra-High Frequency UI User Interface USA United States Army OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000479 Page xi OFFICIAL USE ONLY V Official Use Only USAF United States Air Force USAMICOM United States Army Missile Command USASC United States Army Signal Center USBP United States Border Patrol USCG United States Coast Guard uses United States Customs Service USFS United States Forest Service USIA United States Information Agency USMC United States Marine Corps USMS United States Marshalls Service USN United States Navy USPS United States Park Service UV Ultraviolet VEH Vehicle VHF Very High Frequency VHF-FM Very High Frequency-Frequency Modulation VIDS Visual Information Display System VR Voluntary Return (or Voluntary Departure) VSWR Voltage Standing Wave Ratio OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000480 Page xii OFFICIAL USE ONLY Executive Summary In September 1991 Sandia National Laboratories was tasked by the Office of National Drug Control Policy through the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Research and Development Program to conduct a systematic analysis of the security along the United States/Mexico Border (Figure ES-1) between Ports of Entry (POEs) and to recommend measures by which control of the border could be improved. The recommendations and conclusions in this report are those of the Sandia National Laboratories staff associated with this project. Figure ES-1. Southwest Border Between the United States and Mexico o Border Patrol Sector Headquarters The control of drug-related traffic across the US/Mexico Border involves the participation of some 41 agencies. These include federal agencies with charters and authority directed at drug and smuggling activities; federal agencies with only peripheral involvement, but wishing to share in both the budget and the asset forfeiture program; and state, county, and local law enforcement agencies directly concerned with illegal drug and smuggling activities in their jurisdictions. Most of these agencies participate in countemarcotics at a secondary level. The principal federal agencies with border control responsibilities are the following: Official Use Only ? INS/US Border Patrol ? Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) ? US Customs Service ? Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ? Operation Alliance OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000481 Page ES-1 OFFICIAL USE ONLY ? US Coast Guard ? Joint Task Force Six (JTF-6) ? El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC). Recent congressional actions have also provided funds to support the National Guard in these interdiction operations. As a result of this action, the National Guard has become increasingly active in supporting the other agencies at the border and at ''hot spots" within the US. As the enforcement arm of the INS, the US Border Patrol is charged with the responsibility to detect and interdict all crossings of the US borders except at designated PO Es. The law requires that persons must report to POEs for entry into the US, and the Border Patrol enforces this law. The Border Patrol, therefore, has the most concentrated presence along the entire length of the Southwest Border of all of the agencies listed. The primary statutory mission of the agency is the apprehension of illegal aliens, and the agents have arrest and search authority within 100 miles of the border to enforce citizenship and entry requirements. The Border Patrol has been granted collateral --authority to interdict drug traffic by the DEA because line patrol and highway checkpoints inevitably intercept drug smugglers as well as aliens. It is important to note that drug interdiction is a subset of the Border Patrol's activity and that the drug search and seizure authority is derived from the alien apprehension authority. Therefore, this study is heavily oriented toward the Border Patrol. Additional information about other agencies' responsibilities is given in Volume 2. - When this analysis was proposed, there was a belief that significant improvements in border control could be achieved by introducing new or improved technologies and that the application of these could lead to reduced manpower and significant control of the Southwest Border. During the first phase of the study, in which all of the Southwest sectors of the Border Patrol were visited, we realized that those beliefs were, in our opinion, incorrect. Our conclusions and recommendations about how to make significant improvements in border control are contained in Volume 1 of this study. A catalog of equipment that could be procured (Volume 3) has also been prepared. Additionally, to fulfill the contractual requirements of this study, we prepared Volume 2, which follows the outline of the original Sandia proposal and provides the detail for the budget suggested in Volume 1. Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000482 Page ES-2 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Our study consisted of characterizing the current border security environment, compiling a catalog of currently available or readily modifiable technologies, developing an implementation plan that provided optimal use of these technologies based on present staffing levels, and generating an implementation plan that allows a moderate increase in personnel. Even though this study is limited to the Southwest Border between POEs, we have approached the study from an integrated system point of view. Over a 3-month period, we visited all nine sectors of the Southwest Border where we analyzed the problem by questionnaire and discussions with field and headquarters personnel. In addition, time was spent flying over many of the border areas and driving along the border to examine the terrain surrounding the area, touring all of the facilities (including the electrical maintenance and vehicle maintenance facilities), observing the agents work in the field (including several apprehensions), and meeting with the agents to discuss the problems they face and the ways in which their work could be made easier. We also reviewed many of the available reports on this topic (see Bibliography, Volume 2). - AB of May 1, 1992, the portion of the El Paso sector east of a line through Comudas and Hilltop, Texas, became part of the Marfa sector. Also, the responsibilities and personnel count of some of the stations within a few sectors have changed. The conclusions of this report are not affected by these changes, but the text, maps, and spreadsheet within this report reflect the information that was available before May 1 when the sector visits were made. Most of the recommendations made in this report are not new; the basic problems have remained unchanged for years and have been individually studied by many qualified people with appropriate expertise. This report views the entire Southwest Border as a system and combines our observations with many of the previous recommendations in a systematic way. We make suggestions within the report regarding sensor procurement; those suggestions represent less than 15% of the total cost for implementing all of the recommendations. The sensors we suggest will simply augment existing capabilities but, more importantly, will serve to replace a dilapidated inventory. A conclusion of this study is that the Southwest Border is being overrun, and the use of more sensors will only identify more targets that can be neither apprehended using current manpower Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000483 Page ES-3 OFFICIAL USE ONLY nor accommodated within existing facilities. In some rural areas verification techniques (e.g., slow-scan closed circuit television [CCTV]) to reduce Border Patrol agents' responses to sensor alarms caused by legal activity have been effective. Additional research into making verification techniques consume less power, be easy to install, and be more covert are needed. OUO-7 (ALL) Our recommended strategy for improved control of the border is based on two tactics: ? Border Enforcement: the use of heavily patrolled multiple barriers on the border to control the large number of illegal aliens and drugs crossing in the urban areas of the border ? Containment: additional 24-hour highway checkpoints to minimize the number of illegal aliens and quantity of drugs leaving the border region if they get into the country. Gaining control of the situation in large urban areas is important not only for purposes of border law enforcement, but because the uncontrolled situation puts the illegal aliens and US residents living near the border very much at risk. The containment strategy, reinforced by efficient deployment of sensor and surveillance technology and effective use of intelligence resources, will reduce the risks that illegal aliens face when dealing with alien smuggling organizations and will enhance the safety of enforcement agents by providing them with needed tactical advantages and eventually reducing the volume of illegal trafficking. - An important fact observed is that 66% of all illegal alien apprehensions occur in 4. 7% of the border. That portion is totally contained in two sectors, San Diego and El Paso. Because of the huge numbers of illegal aliens involved, these two sectors also put a heavy demand on the alien transport and detention activities and the logistics that go along with the processing of large numbers of illegals. Many of these resources could be redirected to controlling drug and illegal alien traffic in other sectors if the illegal alien traffic in these sectors were controlled. The mat fence in the San Diego sector was nearly completed in late CY 1992; we expect that its existence may cause a shift in illegal alien activity to other sectors. The illegal aliens who attempt to cross rugged, uninhabited terrain (mountains, desert, etc.) will experience higher risks. Because many of these persons are expected to be uninformed, desperate, or criminal, the risk to Border Patrol agents may also be higher. Other urban areas on the border have similar problems, but to a much smaller extent. Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000484 Page ES-4 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o II ~ . . ;:. Tins 1s a am I technological solution that allows the immediate implementation of available technology to modify the situation at the border and \II: reduce the number of persons who will cross only if they can do i1so easily. The solution is to channel and direct a significantly I reduced level of traffic to places where the Border Patrol agents Iican adequately deal with it. We understand that the combination ;ij,of budget, procurement, and installation may not allow immediate li1 adaptation of the available technology, but all recommendations .~ should be implemented as soon as possible. r 7% {,;l: i is required to enforce the laws prohibiting illegal entry into the i~US is significantly increased discouragement that requires ~ the use of multiple tools and substantial time and tires the o .olators to the point hat they can be onsistently appreended or turned ack. o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000485 Page ES-5 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) o o Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000486 Page ES-6 OFFICIAL USE ONLY . Figure ES-3. Figure ES-4. O?icial Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) o it /!. '~ ~~ ifo 'ii;;. I )! J '!!' . ::~ i ,:!~ ~::1, It should also be noted that as illegal aliens find ~ ways to defeat the obstacles placed in their path, new technology will need to be developed. . '.'! ~l ' The conclusions reached ~ mi in our study are listed below: Tu :!! ij!J 7ii .... ~i o i}t o ~ The illegal alien traffic must first be brought under control in the urban areas of the Southwest Border, especially in _;t ----------- \11. Ten Steps to Securing America's Border, Federation ~I i~~ for American Immi- gration Reform, January 1989. ~l ~ fy1j :~ Official Use Only ti OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000488 Page ES-8 OFFICIAL USE ONLY o OUO-7 (ALL) I !~ ffi !I f !:mi 1 ~4 ~~ San Diego and El Paso, so that existing resources can be reallocated to control the drug and illegal alien traffic in other sectors. We believe that control must be gained as soon as possible and that it can be accomplished with existing technology for less-than 3% of the $11.7 billion National Drug Control budget for FY 1992. g "" I? Control of the illegal alien and drug traffic can be gained by ~ I ;:;k at it ~} :J :i::S 1 o !i:: '.1- ,@ o~ij ~11 ?~ :i !I ~~ ijl .i' ""' !ID "' ~ "' fill! ~~ i" ~~ ~f Iii '!!~ ill ] fr!! iii! t 'I The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 2 included provisions to increase the number of Border Patrol agents. Congress has ordered increases in Border Patrol personnel twice since then, but neglected to provide any additional funding. We believe that with presently authorized levels of Border Patrol personnel, in conjunction with the issues addressed above, control of the Southwest Border can be gained. The redistribution of personnel now required in the urban areas and the elimination of Border Patrol agents performing nonagent jobs (clerical, auto and facilities maintenance, transportation of deportees, etc.) will also increase enforcement effectiveness. It is very likely that future improvements in sensors and sensor fusion programs and other advanced enforcement technology will allow the number of Border Patrol personnel to decrease through normal attrition to some lower level after control is firmly gained. ""' rill ? ~1 "' "' ~a o There are an adequate number of organizations and structure available on the Southwest Border to produce an ?1EUR 1---------fi 2. Immigration 'iiif I Ill Official Use Only I Reform and Control Act ([RCA) of 1986, Public Law 99-603, November 6, 1986. OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000489 Page ES-9 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - effective security environment. The personnel and equipment of each of the individual organizations need to be better coordinated in order to better enforce the existing US laws. The integrated system can become more effective by strengthened policy and procedures, such as positive personnel identification of all apprehended illegal aliens, graded penalties for repeat offenders, adequate incarceration facilities for criminal aliens and those who refuse voluntary return, deep deportation, and fast judicial actions. ? - Because the Nation's drug control program is an integrated system, emphasis applied to one part of the system increases pressure on the other parts. For example, if the percentage of total illegal alien apprehensions increases without a corresponding decrease in total illegal traffic, then problems in the processing, transportation, detention, and deportation of illegal aliens are intensified. The approach of significantly reducing the number of illegal aliens entering the country will reduce pressure on all of the other parts of the system except the POEs themselves. Additional and more sophisticated technology must then be applied at the POE to assist in handling this increased pressure. It is imperative that control of the border be gained as soon as , possible because of the problems caused by the uncontrolled illegal alien and drug traffic in our border communities and large inland population centers. It is also clear that we must be concerned about the inhumane treatment of these illegal aliens by alien and drug smugglers who are determined to profit from the plight of the illegal aliens. If we stop the illegal alien traffic, crimes (such as rape, robbery, and murder) being committed against illegal aliens crossing the border will also stop. If the reason to assemble on the Mexico side is eliminated, the crimes being committed there should also decrease. The role of intelligence gathering, processing, and assessment will become even more important to help determine where to deploy Border Patrol assets as persons who are determined to cross the border are forced to make their attempts in more remote areas. A good public relations program is also recommended-one which emphasizes the fact that the barriers are not an act of unfriendliness, but an act of control in order to allow more deserving immigrants and fewer of the criminal aliens, drug traffickers, or other undesirable persons to enter the US. Official Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000490 Page ES-10 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Physical Security Systems Introduction In September 1991 Sandia National Laboratories was tasked by the Office of National Drug Control Policy through the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Research and Development Program to conduct a systematic analysis of the security along the US/Mexico Border between Ports of Entry (POEs) and to recommend measures by which control of the border could be OUO-7 improved. When this analysis was proposed, there was a belief that signifi- . cant improvements in border control could be achieved by introducing new or improved technologies and that the application of these could lead to reduced manpower and significant control of the Southwest Border. During the first phase of the study, in which all of the Southwest Border sectors were visited, we realized that these beliefs were, in our opinion, incorrect. Our recommended strategy for improving control of the border is based on two controlling tactics: - ? Border Enforcement: The use of heavily patrolled barriers on the border to control the large number of illegal aliens and drugs crossing in the urban areas of the border ? Containment: Additional 24-hour highway checkpoints to minimize the number of illegal aliens and quantity of drugs leaving the border region if they get into the country. Gaining control of the situation in large urban areas is important not only for purposes of border law enforcement, but because the uncontrolled situation puts the illegal aliens very much at risk. The containment strategy, reinforced by efficient deployment of sensors and surveillance technology and effective use of intelligence resources, will reduce the risks that illegal aliens face when dealing with alien smuggling organizations and will enhance the safety of enforcement agents by providing them with needed tactical advantages and eventually reducing the amount of illegal traffic. This volume is devoted to describing the technologies that exist and providing catalog-type information. A general description of physical security systems is given in the following section. Technology descriptions follow, and finally, we have included data sheets describing the technologies. Official, Use Only OFFICIAL USE ONLY DHS-17-0040-H-000491 Pagel OFFICIAL USE ONLY I Overview Physical .protection systems for industrial and high-risk facilities o are designed to provide protection against acts of sabotage and theft of special material or other items being protected. Four elements must react in a timely manner to form an effective physical protection system: ? Detection and assessment systems must expose and verify any intrusion attempt from outside or any malevolent act by insiders or outsiders. . ? Communications systems must bring all pertinent information to the point(s) where appropriate action may be taken. ? Delay systems must impede continued efforts to penetrate into, or exit from, the protected area. I. I Response systems (or forces) must counteract adversary activity and neutralize the threat. For border security, many of the concepts of a conventional physical security system do not apply. Instead of attempting to keep unauthorized persons out of a protected area, the goal is to . keep illegal aliens from crossing the border into the US. The o length of the Southwest Border is approximately 1,600 miles; therefore, using sensors along the entire length is not affordable or maintainable. Sensors are used to provide detection at specific activity locations along the border. A number o erent types of " intrusion etection equipment can be beneficial to the border control endeavor: + + Page2 Assessment is being able to tell what is happening in a. given area or to determine what caused a sensor to alarm. OFFICIAL USE ONLY Official Use Only DHS-17-0040-H-000492 OFFICIAL USE ONLY - Assessment devices include regular and low-light television cameras, intensified television cameras, and thermal imagers. Portable (tactical) devices include binoculars, night vision scopes, and hand-held thermal imagers. I I ? Communication equipment is used to send the sensor alarm signals to a central point and to allow communication between law enforcement personnel. ? Information control and display equipment is used to collect and display the alarms from the sensors and to display the . output from assessment devices. ? Barriers are useful to discourage illegal entry at certain points and to funnel the determined traffic into locations that are more advantageous to the law enforcement personnel. Included in the planning and analysis of any equipment to be installed is the development of the following: - ? a system philosophy, including techniques tolerate nuisance alarms ? a preliminary system design, including site survey and characterization techniques ? onsite and offsite experience and evaluation, including sensor test methods and acceptable performance criteria ? final system design ? construction and evaluation ? a program schedule ? cost considerations ? procurement procedures ? maintenance and operation of the system over its intended lifetime. to reduce or These steps will lead to an "operationally effective" system. The expression operationally effective is used to describe systems that have achieved a reasonable balance among optimization of system hardware and comprehension, acceptance, and efficient use of the system by the persons designated to operate the . system. . - I Official Use Only I DHS-17-0040-H-000493 Page3 Sensors cannot.operate by themselves; they are part of a total system that must be designed and maintained. Important o considerations that must be included in the design of a system are the following: + ? ? ? en testing a system, i~ is important that all subsystems be tested independently, followed by a full system test. Important environmental factors must be considered when designing, installing, and maintaining a system: . Page4 ? Wind - speed and temperature, cyclic behavior + Humidity - relative and range, effect on equipment ? Other Considerations (e.g., sand storms) - effect on equipment both corrosive and blocking openings o> Current and Tides (particularly near rivers or other bodies of water) - tidal variation, speed of current . + Precipitation - number of inches per month (time of year) for rain and snow + Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) - pot-shots by hunters, particularly near hunting regions