Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 1 of 304 No. 18-1173 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT SIERRA CLUB, WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION, INDIAN CREEK WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, APPALACHIAN VOICES, and CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK, Petitioners v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; and MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Army; TODD T. SEMONITE, in his official capacity as U.S. Army Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; PHILIP M. SECRIST, in his official capacity as District Commander of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, and MICHAEL E. HATTEN, in his official capacity as Chief, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District Respondents PETITIONERS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Derek O. Teaney Evan D. Johns Joseph M. Lovett APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN ADVOCATES, INC. Post Office Box 507 Lewisburg, West Virginia 24901 Telephone: (304) 793-9007 Facsimile: (304) 645-9008 E-Mail: dteaney@appalmad.org Counsel for Petitioners Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 2 of 304 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE: TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT..........................................................................7 STANDARD OF REVIEW.......................................................................................8 ARGUMENT.............................................................................................................9 I. Sierra Club is Likely to Succeed On The Merits Because MVP Cannot Satisfy the Conditions of NWP 12, Rendering The Corps’ Verification of The Pipeline Under NWP 12 Not In Accordance With Federal Law..................................................9 A. The Pipeline does not meet the express terms of NWP 12..........9 B. WVDEP lacks authority to modify either NWP 12 or its prior Certification of NWP 12..................................................10 C. Neither the Corps nor WVDEP can expand the applicability of NWP 12 without formal modification of the permit by the Corps after public notice and comment....................................14 II. Without Preliminary Relief, Sierra Club Will Suffer Irreparable Harm....................................................................................................16 III. Preliminary Relief Will Not Substantially Harm the Corps or MVP................................................................................................20 IV. The Public Interest Favors Preliminary Relief....................................21 i Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 3 of 304 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................... 22 ii Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 4 of 304 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES PAGE(S): CASES: AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Wilson, 589 F.3d 721 (4th Cir. 2009)...........................................................................9 Amoco Prod. Co. v. Vill. Of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531 (1987)......................................................................................19 Anglers of the AU Sable v. Forest Serv., 402 F.Supp.2d 826 (E.D. Mich. 2005)..........................................................20 Citizens for a Better Env’t—Calif. v. Union Oil Co. of Calif., 83 F.3d 1111 (9th Cir. 1996).........................................................................14 Crutchfield v. Hanover Cnty., 325 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2003)...........................................................................9 Dixon v. U.S., 381 U.S. 68 (1965)........................................................................................13 Fed. Leasing, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, 650 F.2d 495 (4th Cir. 1981).........................................................................20 Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770 (1987)........................................................................................9 Johnson v. Dep’t of Agric., 734 F.2d 774 (11th Cir. 1984).......................................................................21 Keating v. F.E.R.C., 927 F.2d 616 (D.C. Cir. 1991)................................................................11, 12 League of Wilderness Defs. v. Connaughton, 752 F.3d 755 (9th Cir. 2014).........................................................................21 iii Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 5 of 304 Long v. Robinson, 432 F.2d 977 (4th Cir. 1970)...........................................................................9 Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)........................................................................................8 Nat’l Audubon Soc’y v. Dep’t of Navy, 422 F.3d 174 (4th Cir. 2005).........................................................................19 Nat’l Parks Conservation Ass’n v. Babbitt, 241 F.3d 722 (9th Cir. 2001).........................................................................20 Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Burford, 676 F.Supp. 271 (D.D.C. 1985)....................................................................21 O.V.E.C. v. Bulen, 429 F.3d 493 (4th Cir. 2005)...........................................................................2 O.V.E.C. v. Bulen, 315 F.Supp.2d 821 (S.D.W.Va. 2004)..........................................................21 O.V.E.C. v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 528 F.Supp.2d 625 (S.D.W.Va. 2007)....................................................20, 21 PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cnty. v. Washington Dep’t of Ecology, 511 U.S. 700 (1994)........................................................................................5 Sierra Club v. Martin, 933 F.Supp. 1559 (N.D. Ga. 1996)...............................................................19 Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 803 F.3d 31 (D.C. Cir. 2015)......................................................................3, 4 Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 645 F.3d 978 (8th Cir. 2011).........................................................................21 Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 399 F.Supp.2d 1335 (M.D. Fla. 2005)..........................................................19 iv Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 6 of 304 Triska v. Dep’t of Health and Envtl. Control, 355 S.E.2d 531 (S.C. 1987)...........................................................................11 U.S. v. Bazile, 209 F.3d 1205 (10th Cir. 2000).....................................................................10 U.S. v. Malibu Beach, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 1301 (D.N.J. 1989).............................................................19, 20 U.S. v. Marathon Dev. Corp., 867 F.2d 96 (1st Cir. 1989).........................................................................4, 5 U.S. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., 191 F.3d 516 (4th Cir. 1999).........................................................................14 Wisc. Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 758 F.2d 669 (D.C. Cir. 1985)......................................................................20 FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS: Article III of the United States Constitution..............................................................8 FEDERAL STATUTES: 5 U.S.C. § 701-706....................................................................................................9 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).................................................................................................9 15 U.S.C. § 717f....................................................................................................1, 7 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(1).......................................................................................7, 8, 9 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(3)...............................................................................................6 33 U.S.C. § 403.........................................................................................................5 33 U.S.C. § 407.........................................................................................................4 33 U.S.C. § 1341..............................................................................................passim v Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 7 of 304 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1)..................................................................................5, 13, 15 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(3)............................................................................................12 33 U.S.C. § 1341(d).......................................................................................5, 10, 11 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a).............................................................................................2, 16 33 U.S.C. § 1344(e).............................................................................................1, 11 33 U.S.C. § 1344(e)(1)..............................................................................................2 FEDERAL REGULATIONS: 33 C.F.R. § 325.4(a)..... 33 C.F.R. § 325.4(a)(2)..............................................................................5, 6, 11, 12 33 C.F.R. § 330.1(b)................................................................................................15 33 C.F.R. § 330.1(d)................................................................................................15 33 C.F.R. § 330.2(g)................................................................................................15 33 C.F.R. § 330.2(h)..................................................................................................3 33 C.F.R. § 330.3(a)..................................................................................................3 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(a)..................................................................................................9 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(b)(1).............................................................................................3 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(c)(2)..................................................................................6, 10, 15 33 C.F.R. § 330.5(b)................................................................................................15 33 C.F.R. § 330.6(a)(2)..............................................................................................4 40 C.F.R. § 121.2(b)..........................................................................................12, 13 vi Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 8 of 304 STATE REGULATIONS: W. Va. C.S.R. § 47-5A-1 et seq..............................................................................12 W. Va. C.S.R. § 47-5A-5.........................................................................................13 FEDERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, 161 FERC ¶61,043, 2017 WL 4925425 (Oct. 13, 2017)................................2 FEDERAL REGISTER: Issuance and Reissuance of Nationwide Permits, 82 Fed. Reg. 1860 (Jan. 6, 2017)......................................................2, 3, 4, 11 vii Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 9 of 304 INTRODUCTION Petitioners Sierra Club, West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Indian Creek Watershed Association, Appalachian Voices, and Chesapeake Climate Action Network (hereinafter, collectively, “Sierra Club”) seek judicial review of the December 22, 2017 authorization by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) of the discharge of dredged and fill material into waters of the United States associated with the Mountain Valley Pipeline project (the “Pipeline”) under Nationwide Permit 12 (“NWP 12”)—a general permit issued under Section 404(e) of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. § 1344(e). Because discharges under that authorization and the attendant stream-trenching that will occur are likely to cause irreparable harm to Sierra Club and its members before a ruling on the merits, Sierra Club respectfully requests that this Court suspend the authorization pending judicial review. Counsel for Respondents and Respondent-Intervenor have been informed of Sierra Club’s intent to file this motion. They oppose the motion and intend to file responses in opposition within ten days. BACKGROUND On October 23, 2015, Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (“MVP”) applied to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (“NGA”), 15 U.S.C. § 717f, to construct and operate a 303.5-mile-long natural gas pipeline —1— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 10 of 304 stretching from Wetzel County, West Virginia, to Pittsylvania County, Virginia. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, 161 FERC ¶61,043 at PP1, 7, 2017 WL 4925425, at *1-2 (Oct. 13, 2017). Roughly 164 miles of the Pipeline and approximately 132 miles of access roads are located in the Corps’ Huntington District in West Virginia. Ex. 1 at 1. As it cuts through West Virginia’s forests and streams, the Pipeline and its access roads will require 594 crossings of waters of the United States in the Huntington District, resulting in the discharge of fill material into miles of streams and acres of wetlands. Id. at 1-2. The Corps permits dredge-and-fill projects under Section 404 in two ways. It can issue individual permits tailored to specific activities, 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a), or it can issue general, nationwide permits (“NWPs”) for defined sets of activities that are similar in nature and would cause only “minimal adverse environmental effects,” id. § 1344(e)(1). But even when categories of activities are “delineated in objective, measurable terms,” it is often difficult to determine ex ante that they will have only minimal impacts nationwide. O.V.E.C. v. Bulen, 429 F.3d 493, 501 (4th Cir. 2005). To overcome that difficulty, the Corps’ NWP program relies on “a three-tiered approach to ensure compliance” with the statutory requirements of the CWA. Issuance and Reissuance of Nationwide Permits, 82 Fed. Reg. 1860, 1985 (Jan. 6, 2017). First, the Corps develops general conditions applicable to all NWPs, as well as activity-specific thresholds and conditions for each permit. Id. at 1864. —2— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 11 of 304 The Corps’ regional offices may then add regional conditions, which further restrict the use of NWPs in their jurisdictions. Id. at 1861. Finally, district-level officers may review individual projects on a case-by-case basis and impose project-specific conditions necessary to ensure impacts are minimal. Id. at 1862.1 To facilitate this three-tiered approach, many NWPs require would-bepermittees submit their projects to the Corps for “verification”—a process “designed to ensure that the NWPs authorize only those categories of activities that have no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects.” Id. at 1985. After receiving a request for verification, the Corps first confirms “that the proposed activities comply with all applicable general conditions” of the permit before determining whether any project-specific “special conditions” are necessary to avoid more-than-minimal environmental impacts. Id. at 1862, 1971; 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(b)(1). Ultimately, the Corps can verify a project only if it “complies with the general permit’s conditions, will cause no more than minimal adverse effects on the environment, and will serve the public interest.” Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 1 The Corps’ general permitting regulations distinguish between an NWP’s “terms”—defined as the “limitations and provisions included in the description of the NWP itself”—and its “conditions”—any “additional provisions [that] place restrictions or limitations on all of the NWPs” or that the Corps imposes during the regional or project-specific review stage. 33 C.F.R. § 330.2(h). Both are prerequisites to verification under an NWP. Id. § 330.3(a). —3— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 12 of 304 803 F.3d 31, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2015). If, however, “an activity does not comply with the terms and conditions of an NWP,” the Corps must “notify the [applicant] and instruct him on the procedures to seek authorization under a[n appropriate] general permit or individual permit.” 33 C.F.R. § 330.6(a)(2). In January 2017, the Corps reissued its suite of 52 NWPs. See generally 82 Fed. Reg. 1860. One of those permits, NWP 12, permits discharges from utility crossings, including natural gas pipelines, “provided the activity does not result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters” at each discrete crossing. Id. at 1985. For projects, like the Pipeline, that require separate Corps approval under the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C. § 407, NWP 12 requires the prospective permittee to submit project-specific, pre-construction notification to the Corps for verification. 82 Fed. Reg. at 1986. Because NWP 12 authorizes discharges into protected waters, its reissuance triggered another important provision of the CWA. Section 401 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1341, provides that federal permits or licenses that result in discharges into waters of the United States cannot issue without “certification” by the affected state that the discharges will comply with all state water quality standards. The certification requirement “provides the states with a first line of defense against federally licensed or permitted activities that may have adverse effects on the state’s waters,” allowing them to determine whether those activities would frustrate —4— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 13 of 304 their efforts to attain and preserve water quality. U.S. v. Marathon Dev. Corp., 867 F.2d 96, 100 (1st Cir. 1989) (internal quotation marks omitted). A permit is effective only if the state concludes that the permitted activities will not violate applicable state water quality standards—or if the state waives its certification rights by inaction. 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1). However, a state can tailor its certification by imposing special conditions on certification, which become conditions of the federal permit as a matter of course. Id. § 1341(d); PUD No. 1 of Jefferson Cnty. v. Washington Dep’t of Ecology, 511 U.S. 700, 708 (1994). The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (“WVDEP”) took just that approach in response to NWP 12, certifying the permit on April 13, 2017, subject to several “special conditions” designed to protect water quality. Ex. 2 at 1, 10-11 (hereinafter, the “Certification”). Foremost among them was a requirement that “[p]ipelines equal to or greater than 36 inches in diameter” possess an individual, project-specific water quality certification. Id. at 10; Ex. 1 at 43; Ex. 3 at 20. The Certification imposes the same individual, project-specific water quality certification requirement on pipelines that cross rivers protected by Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 U.S.C. § 403.2 Ex. 2 at 10; Ex. 1 at 43; Ex. 3 at 20. The Corps accepted WVDEP’s conditions as “appropriate to the scope and degree of th[e] impacts” associated with pipeline projects and, consistent 2 Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act prohibits the obstruction of any navigable-in-fact waterbody unless authorized by the Corps. —5— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 14 of 304 with Section 401 and its own permitting regulations, incorporated them into NWP 12. See 33 C.F.R. §§ 330.4(c)(2), 325.4(a). Accordingly, NWP 12 in West Virginia, as issued by the Corps on May 17, 2017, includes an express condition that “Individual State Water Quality Certification is required for...[p]ipelines equal to or greater than 36 inches in diameter...[or] [p]ipelines crossing a Section 10 river[.]” Ex. 3 at 20 (emphasis added). MVP applied to WVDEP for an individual Section 401 certification of its use of NWP 12, and on March 23, 2017, WVDEP issued that certification. Ex. 4. After Sierra Club filed a timely petition for review in this Court of WVDEP’s individual certification, Ex. 5, WVDEP sought a voluntary remand and asked this Court to vacate that certification. Ex. 6. In its motion, WVDEP admitted that “the information used to issue the Section 401 Certification needs to be further evaluated and possibly enhanced” and that it “need[ed] to reconsider its antidegradation analysis in the Section 401 Certification[.]” Id. at 2. WVDEP further “commit[ed] to doing so as expeditiously as possible.” Id. On October 17, 2017, this Court granted WVDEP’s motion, vacated MVP’s individual Section 401 Certification, and remanded the matter to the agency under 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(3). Ex. 7. On remand, rather than reconsidering its antidegradation analysis per its commitment to this Court, WVDEP opted to abdicate its responsibilities under —6— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 15 of 304 Section 401 of the CWA and, on November 1, 2017, waived its authority to certify the Pipeline under Section 401. Ex. 8. As a result of that waiver, MVP does not possess an individual water quality certification under Section 401 of the CWA. On February 25, 2016, MVP requested that the Corps’ Huntington District verify that the 42-inch Pipeline’s 591 crossings of West Virginia’s streams and wetlands were eligible for coverage under NWP 12. Ex. 1 at 1-2. Three of the rivers that the Pipeline would cross—the Gauley River, the Greenbrier River, and the Elk River—are Section 10 rivers. Id. at 5. MVP updated its application on February 17, 2017, and submitted additional information on December 18, 2017. Id. at 1. On December 22, 2017, the Corps issued the verification challenged here, acknowledging the Pipeline’s size and impacts on Section 10 rivers, but nonetheless concluding that it “me[t] the criteria” for NWP 12, subject to several additional project-specific conditions not relevant to this action. Id. at 2, 4-7. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Section 19(d)(1) of the NGA, 15 U.S.C. § 717r(d)(1), places review of the Corps’ action in this Court’s jurisdiction: [T]he United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which a facility subject to...section 717f of this title is proposed to be constructed, expanded, or operated shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action for the review of an order or action of a Federal agency...acting pursuant to Federal law to issue...any permit, license, concurrence, or approval...required under Federal law [for that facility]. —7— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 16 of 304 Because the Pipeline is proposed to be built in West Virginia and Virginia, both of which lie within this Circuit, and because the Corps’ authorization of the Pipeline under NWP 12 is a “permit...required under Federal law,” jurisdiction exists under Section 19(d)(1). The Petitioners are non-profit organizations whose members reside, work, and recreate in the areas that will be affected by the Pipeline. As set out in the declarations of Sierra Club’s members, the construction and operation of the Pipeline will cause those members concrete, particularized, and imminent harm. See Ex. 9 (Declaration of Tammy Capaldo); Ex. 10 (Declaration of Maury Johnson); Ex. 11 (Declaration of Naomi Cohen). This Court can redress that harm by setting aside the Corps’ verification of the Pipeline under NWP 12. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992). Sierra Club, therefore, has Article III standing to seek judicial review. STANDARD OF REVIEW Sierra Club asks this Court to maintain the status quo by suspending the Corps’ verification of the Pipeline under NWP 12 pending resolution of the merits. A movant qualifies for such preliminary relief upon showing (1) that he will likely prevail on the merits of the appeal, (2) that he will suffer irreparable injury if the stay is denied, (3) that other parties —8— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 17 of 304 will not be substantially harmed by the stay, and (4) that the public interest will be served by granting the stay. Long v. Robinson, 432 F.2d 977, 979 (4th Cir. 1970). See also Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987). Because Section 19(d)(1) of the NGA does not specify a standard of review, the Court should apply the standard set forth in the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. See AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC v. Wilson, 589 F.3d 721, 727 (4th Cir. 2009) (applying APA standard to petition under Section 19(d)(1) of the NGA). See also Crutchfield v. Hanover Cnty., 325 F.3d 211, 216-17 (4th Cir. 2003) (applying APA standard in reviewing the Corps’ verification of a project under an NWP). Under that standard, the Court must set aside any agency action that is “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). ARGUMENT I. Sierra Club Is Likely To Succeed On The Merits Because MVP Cannot Satisfy The Conditions of NWP 12, Rendering The Corps’ Verification of The Pipeline Under NWP 12 Not In Accordance With Federal Law. A. The Pipeline does not meet the express terms of NWP 12. The Corps’ permitting regulations unambiguously require that, “for a valid authorization to occur,” a “prospective permittee must satisfy all terms and conditions of an NWP.” 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(a) (emphasis added). When a state agency places conditions on its water quality certification for an NWP, as WVDEP —9— Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 18 of 304 did in this case, those conditions become express conditions of the federal permit. 33 U.S.C. § 1341(d); 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(c)(2). As such, WVDEP’s requirement that pipelines greater than 36 inches in diameter or that cross Section 10 rivers possess an individual water quality certification is a condition of NWP 12 on equal footing with any other term or condition of that permit. The language of the condition in NWP 12 regarding individual water quality certifications is unambiguous: “Individual State Water Quality Certification is required for...[p]ipelines equal to or greater than 36 inches in diameter...[or] [p]ipelines crossing a Section 10 river[.]” Ex. 3 at 20 (emphasis added). The plain meaning of the term “required” is “‘demanded as necessary or essential[.]’” U.S. v. Bazile, 209 F.3d 1205, 1207 (10th Cir. 2000) (interpreting “required” in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines by quoting Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (1991)). Moreover, WVDEP did not include in its condition an option for a waiver of individual certification. That is, the condition does not read “Individual State Water Quality Certification or waiver thereof is required.” Because MVP did not obtain an individual water certification and does not possess one, its 42-inch pipeline that crosses three Section 10 waters cannot satisfy the plain language of the condition. B. WVDEP lacks authority to modify either NWP 12 or its prior Certification of NWP 12. WVDEP’s November 1, 2017 waiver of authority to issue an individual certification does not change that result. Once a state certifies a federal permit — 10 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 19 of 304 under Section 401, any conditions placed on that certification become enforceable conditions of the federal permit. 33 U.S.C. § 1341(d). In other words, “[w]hatever freedom the states may have to impose their own substantive policies in reaching initial certification decisions, the picture changes dramatically once that decision has been made and a federal agency has acted upon it.” Keating v. F.E.R.C., 927 F.2d 616, 623 (D.C. Cir. 1991). A state’s unilateral about-face simply cannot alter the terms and conditions of the federal permit. See Triska v. Dep’t of Health and Envtl. Control, 355 S.E.2d 531, 534 (S.C. 1987). And for good reason: state-imposed conditions protecting water quality often factor into the federal agency’s permitting analysis—as they did in this case. Although water quality certification is the province of the states, the Corps’ review at the regional- and project-level evaluation stages requires a determination that activities permitted under an NWP will result in only minimal impacts under Section 404(e) and are in the public interest. 82 Fed. Reg. at 1876, 1969, 2004. In reissuing NWP 12, the Corps explicitly recognized that regional conditions, including conditions “added to the NWPs as a result of water quality certifications...by states,” are an “important mechanism for ensuring compliance with” Section 404(e)’s minimal impacts requirement. Id. at 1876. Corps regulations similarly recognize that the public interest review “take[s] into account the existence of controls imposed under other federal, state, or local programs.” 33 — 11 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 20 of 304 C.F.R. § 325.4(a)(2). In other words, the Corps’ decision as to whether additional region- or project-specific conditions are necessary to ensure compliance with the CWA proceeds against the backdrop of any state-imposed conditions under Section 401. Allowing a state to alter that backdrop after the fact would undermine the integrity of the Corps’ review. Even assuming that a modification to WVDEP’s Certification could affect the terms of a federal permit, WVDEP lacked authority to make any such modification in this case. West Virginia regulations authorizing WVDEP to implement Section 401 do not empower the agency to modify previously issued certifications. W. Va. C.S.R. § 47-5A-1 et seq. Neither does federal law. Section 401 allows “a state to revoke a prior certification...but only pursuant to the terms of, and for the reasons indicated in, section 401(a)(3).” Keating, 927 F.2d at 622. None of the circumstances described in that section are present here.3 Furthermore, federal regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) interpreting Section 401 provide that a state’s certification may only be modified “in such manner as may be agreed upon by the 3 Section 401(a)(3) contemplates the revocation of a certification for a federal construction permit as a valid certification for a second federal permit for operation of the same facility within 60 days of notice of the second permit when there are “changes since the construction license or permit certification was issued in (A) the construction or operation of the facility, (B) the characteristics of the waters into which such discharge is made, (C) the water quality criteria applicable to such waters or (D) applicable effluent limitations or other requirements.” 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(3). — 12 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 21 of 304 certifying agency, the licensing or permitting agency, and the Regional Administrator” of the EPA. 40 C.F.R. § 121.2(b) (emphasis added). That regulation ensures that any post hoc changes to a federal permit have the concurrence of the federal licensing authority and EPA. Here, even if the actions by WVDEP and the Corps could be construed as an agreement to modify the April 13, 2017 Certification issued by WVDEP for NWP 12, there is no evidence that the Regional Administrator of EPA ever agreed to such a modification. Because the Regional Administrator’s agreement is a condition precedent to the modification of a certification, and because WVDEP is not authorized by state law to modify previously issued certifications, any effort by WVDEP to modify its Section 401 Certification for NWP 12 is a mere nullity. Dixon v. U.S., 381 U.S. 68, 74 (1965) (holding that an ultra vires administrative action is a mere nullity). Finally, WVDEP’s November 1, 2017 waiver of its individual Section 401 authority with respect to the Pipeline cannot be construed as a lawful modification to the long-effective Section 401 Certification for NWP 12 because it was not subject to the requisite public participation procedures. WVDEP’s April 13, 2017 Certification of NWP 12 was the subject of public notice and comment (Ex. 12)—a requirement imposed by Section 401 itself, 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1). Pursuant to that requirement, West Virginia has promulgated legislative rules requiring public notice and comment on Section 401 certifications. W. Va. C.S.R. § 47-5A-5. — 13 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 22 of 304 Because of the importance of those public participation provisions, WVDEP lacks the authority to unilaterally modify a previously issued and duly promulgated Section 401 certification without providing for public notice and comment. Cf. U.S. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc., 191 F.3d 516, 524, 526 (4th Cir. 1999) (upholding district court ruling that prior, valid CWA permit could not be modified by later state agency action that did not comply with procedural requirements); Citizens for a Better Env’t—Calif. v. Union Oil Co. of Calif., 83 F.3d 1111, 1120 (9th Cir. 1996) (same). Accordingly, even if WVDEP’s November 1, 2017 waiver of its Section 401 authority were to be construed as an attempt to modify the condition of NWP 12 requiring that pipelines greater than 36 inches in diameter or that cross Section 10 rivers possess an individual certification, such an effort would be ineffective as a matter of law. C. Neither the Corps nor WVDEP can expand the applicability of NWP 12 without formal modification of the permit by the Corps after public notice and comment. Even if WVDEP had the authority to modify its April 13, 2017 Certification of NWP 12 without EPA’s concurrence and had validly exercised that authority, WVDEP lacks the authority to unilaterally modify the terms and conditions of NWP 12. As a result of WVDEP’s April 13, 2017 certification of NWP 12, it is now a condition of NWP 12 itself that pipeline projects in West Virginia greater than 36 inches in diameter or that cross Section 10 rivers must possess an — 14 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 23 of 304 individual water quality certification from WVDEP. 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a); 33 C.F.R. § 330.4(c)(2). As such, that requirement—like any other term or condition of an NWP—can be modified only as the Corps’ general permitting regulations allow. Those regulations are unequivocal: once the Corps issues an NWP, its terms and conditions can be relaxed only by formal modification or wholesale reissuance—both of which require full notice and comment. 33 C.F.R. §§ 330.1(b); 330.5(b). Although the Corps retains some discretion in authorizing projects under an already-issued NWP, it can exercise that discretion “only to further condition or restrict the applicability of the NWP.” 33 C.F.R. § 330.1(d) (emphasis added). See also id. § 330.2(g) (Corps’ discretionary authority includes the ability to “add[] conditions” to an NWP authorization). That discretion is a one-way valve that only allows permits to become more stringent. By contrast, the rules plainly provide that “modifications to...existing NWPs” require “the Corps give[] notice and allow[] the public an opportunity to comment on and request a public hearing.” Id. §§ 330.1(b), 330.5(b). In short, on April 13, 2017, WVDEP certified NWP 12 under Section 401, subject to the condition that pipelines like MVP’s are required to have an individual water quality certification. Ex. 2. The Corps incorporated that requirement as a condition of NWP 12 in West Virginia. Ex. 3 at 20. Because — 15 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 24 of 304 WVDEP lacks the authority to modify a condition of a NWP after its issuance, its November 1, 2017 waiver can have no effect on the condition in NWP 12 that large-diameter pipelines and those crossing Section 10 rivers must have an individual Section 401 certification. Moreover, the Corps has not purported to reissue NWP 12 or subjected any proposed modification to public notice and comment. Consequently, the Corps’ verification of the Pipeline’s application to use NWP 12 cannot be construed as a valid modification of NWP 12. The Corps and MVP were thus bound by the terms and conditions of NWP as they existed when the Corps issued its regionally-conditioned NWP 12 on May 17, 2017. The ultimate result of WVDEP’s November 1, 2017 waiver is that MVP is ineligible to use NWP 12 in West Virginia, and, if it is to obtain a Section 404 permit for its discharges, it must obtain an individual permit under 33 U.S.C. § 1344(a). Because the Pipeline cannot satisfy the terms and conditions of NWP 12, the Corps verified the project in contravention of its own regulations and, consequently, federal law. Accordingly, Sierra Club is likely to succeed on the merits of its petition for review. II. Without Preliminary Relief, Sierra Club Will Suffer Irreparable Harm. As it snakes some 300-miles up and over the Appalachian Mountains, the Pipeline will inflict significant environmental damage to the forests, streams, and wetlands in its path. Most significant to Sierra Club’s claim here are the Pipeline’s — 16 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 25 of 304 impacts to aquatic resources at stream- and wetland-crossings in West Virginia. Those crossings will entail diverting water from the streams using one of three methods, digging a trench through the streambed up to eight-feet deep, placing the 42-inch-diameter pipe in the trench, and backfilling the trench. Ex. 13 at 2-42 to 246. Although it represents only one of the nearly 600 crossings at issue in this case, the Pipeline’s proposal to cross the Greenbrier River is a case study in the irreparable harm that will occur absent preliminary relief. Attached to this motion is a report by licensed geologist Dr. Pamela C. Dodds detailing the impacts of that crossing. Ex. 14. Dr. Dodds explains that, because bedrock is present at the Greenbrier crossing site, blasting is unavoidable. Id. at 4. Blasting at the crossing site has the potential to directly displace, injure, or even kill aquatic organisms. Id. In addition, blasting will further harm fisheries and other aquatic life by increasing turbidity in the Greenbrier or, as FERC recognized in its environmental review of the project, contaminating the water with chemical by-products. Id. at 4, 22. More troubling still, blasting will reduce groundwater recharge, likely altering the flow of groundwater to the wetlands and waterbodies along the Greenbrier River valley. Id. at 4. That, in turn, could alter the flow of the Greenbrier itself, especially in times of drought. Id. at 22. This is of particular concern because the Greenbrier and its tributaries are within the “Zone of Critical — 17 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 26 of 304 Concern” for the nearby Big Bend Public Service District, which supplies public water from an intake just downstream of the Pipeline crossing. Id. at 3. For Sierra Club and its members, those impacts will hit close to home. Attached to this motion are declarations from Sierra Club members detailing specific, irreparable harms that will result if construction proceeds as planned. For example, Sierra Club member Tammy Capaldo owns the property on which the Pipeline proposes to cross the Greenbrier River. Ex. 9 at ¶¶1, 3. As explained in her declaration, the Pipeline’s construction on her property, including the crossing of the Greenbrier and its water quality effects, would impact Ms. Capaldo’s aesthetic and recreational enjoyment of her property and may ultimately lead her to “abandon [her] dream” of living along the river she “hold[s] so dear.” Id. at ¶¶4, 18, 34. Moreover, Ms. Capaldo is a customer of the Big Bend Public Service District. Id. at ¶31. Maury Johnson—a member of the Sierra Club, the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, the Indian Creek Watershed Association, and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network—owns, operates, and resides on a 160-acre organic farm in Monroe County, West Virginia. Ex. 10 at ¶¶3, 6. As proposed, the Pipeline would cross three streams on his farm, all of which share a hydrologic connection with a domestic water well Mr. Johnson uses for cooking, cleaning, and watering livestock. Id. at ¶¶8-9. The three Pipeline crossings will release sediment and other — 18 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 27 of 304 pollutants into the aquifer that feeds his well or otherwise impact the flow of groundwater so as to render it “unusable.” Id. at ¶10. And like Ms. Capaldo, Mr. Johnson will suffer aesthetic and recreational injuries as Pipeline construction disturbs wildlife habitats, fishing holes, hiking trails, and even the location where Mr. Johnson was baptized as a young man. Id. at ¶¶12, 15-16, 19-20. The Supreme Court has recognized that environmental harms like those described above, “by [their] very nature, can seldom be adequately remedied by money damages and [are] often permanent or at least of long duration, i.e., irreparable.” Amoco Prod. Co. v. Vill. Of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 545 (1987). See also Nat’l Audubon Soc’y v. Dep’t of Navy, 422 F.3d 174, 201 (4th Cir. 2005) (same). The requirement that a movant suffer irreparable injury “does not focus on the significance of the injury,” but rather whether, “irrespective of its gravity, [it] is irreparable—that is, whether there is any adequate remedy at law.” Sierra Club v. Martin, 933 F.Supp. 1559, 1570–71 (N.D. Ga. 1996), rev’d on other grounds, 110 F.3d 1551 (11th Cir. 1997). Moreover, the “dredging and filling of wetlands that may occur while [a c]ourt decides [a] case cannot be undone.” Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 399 F.Supp.2d 1335, 1348 (M.D. Fla. 2005), order vac’d in part, 464 F.Supp.2d 1171 (M.D. Fla. 2006), aff’d, 508 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 2007). There simply “is no adequate remedy at law to compensate the public for the harm caused by the — 19 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 28 of 304 disposal of fill material into waters...or in wetlands.” U.S. v. Malibu Beach, Inc., 711 F.Supp. 1301, 1313 (D.N.J. 1989). In the words of Ms. Capaldo, the law “simply cannot put a price tag” on those resources. Ex. 9 at ¶33. III. Preliminary Relief Will Not Substantially Harm the Corps or MVP. In contrast to the real and permanent environmental harms discussed above, equitable relief would pose only minimal or temporary injury to the Corps and MVP. “Although the Corps has an identifiable interest in defending the validity of permits it has issued and the permitting process itself, the effect of an injunction on these interests seems rather inconsequential.” O.V.E.C. v. U.S.A.C.O.E. (O.V.E.C. II), 528 F.Supp.2d 625, 632 (S.D.W.Va. 2007). As for MVP, any “[l]oss of anticipated revenues generally does not constitute harm to others affected by injunctions in environmental cases.” Anglers of the AU Sable v. Forest Serv., 402 F.Supp.2d 826, 839 (E.D. Mich. 2005) (citing Nat’l Parks Conservation Ass’n v. Babbitt, 241 F.3d 722, 738 (9th Cir. 2001)). Monetary loss is relevant to the balance of harms only when it “threatens the very existence of the movant’s business.” Wisc. Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 758 F.2d 669, 674 (D.C. Cir. 1985). Accord Fed. Leasing, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, 650 F.2d 495, 500 (4th Cir. 1981). This is not such a case, as MVP has maintained that it will build the Pipeline even if construction is delayed until 2019. Ex. 15 at 179-80 (Tr. of Testimony of MVP’s Sr. V-P for Constr. & Eng’ing, Robert Cooper). — 20 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 29 of 304 In any case, temporary delays in construction, and any associated economic loss, cannot outweigh the permanent environmental damages that will occur absent preliminary relief because irreparable environmental injury outweighs economic harm in the balance of equities. League of Wilderness Defs. v. Connaughton, 752 F.3d 755, 765 (9th Cir. 2014); Sierra Club v. U.S.A.C.O.E., 645 F.3d 978, 996-97 (8th Cir. 2011). “Money can be earned, lost, and earned again;” but a wetland, once filled, “is gone” forever. O.V.E.C. II, 528 F.Supp.2d at 632. IV. The Public Interest Favors Preliminary Relief. Where environmental resources are threatened, “the balance of harms will usually favor the issuance of an injunction.” Amoco Prod. Co., 480 U.S. at 545. See also Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Burford, 676 F.Supp. 271, 279 (D.D.C. 1985). More specifically, the “public has an interest in the integrity of the waters of the United States and in seeing that administrative agencies act within their statutory authorizations and abide by their own regulations.” O.V.E.C. v. Bulen, 315 F.Supp.2d 821, 831 (S.D.W.Va. 2004). In fact, the CWA itself embodies the “balance Congress sought to establish between economic gain and environmental protection.” O.V.E.C. II, 528 F.Supp.2d at 633. Ensuring its mandates are thoroughly carried out is therefore always in the public interest. See, e.g., Johnson v. Dep’t of Agric., 734 F.2d 774, 788 (11th Cir. 1984) (“Congressional intent and statutory purpose can be taken as a statement of public interest.”). — 21 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 30 of 304 CONCLUSION Because Sierra Club is likely to prevail on the merits and the other factors all favor preliminary relief, Sierra Club respectfully requests that this Court maintain the status quo and suspend the Corp’s verification of NWP 21 for the Pipeline pending resolution of the merits of Sierra Club’s petition for review. Dated: February 23, 2018 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Derek O. Teaney Derek O. Teaney Evan D. Johns Joseph M. Lovett APPALACHIAN MOUNTAIN ADVOCATES, INC. Post Office Box 507 Lewisburg, West Virginia 24901 Telephone: (304) 793-9007 Facsimile: (304) 645-9008 E-Mail: dteaney@appalmad.org Counsel for Petitioners — 22 — Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 31 of 304 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Effective 12/01/2016 No. 18-1173 Caption: Sierra Club et al. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH TYPE-VOLUME LIMIT Type-Volume Limit, Typeface Requirements, and Type-Style Requirements Type-Volume Limit for Briefs: Appellant's Opening Brief, Appellee's Response Brief, and Appellant's Response/Reply Brief may not exceed 13,000 words or 1,300 lines. Appellee's Opening/Response Brief may not exceed 15,300 words or 1,500 lines. A Reply or Amicus Brief may not exceed 6,500 words or 650 lines. Amicus Brief in support of an Opening/Response Brief may not exceed 7,650 words. Amicus Brief filed during consideration of petition for rehearing may not exceed 2,600 words. Counsel may rely on the word or line count of the word processing program used to prepare the document. The word-processing program must be set to include headings, footnotes, and quotes in the count. Line count is used only with monospaced type. See Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(e), 29(a)(5), 32(a)(7)(B) & 32(f). Type-Volume Limit for Other Documents if Produced Using a Computer: Petition for permission to appeal and a motion or response thereto may not exceed 5,200 words. Reply to a motion may not exceed 2,600 words. Petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition or other extraordinary writ may not exceed 7,800 words. Petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc may not exceed 3,900 words. Fed. R. App. P. 5(c)(l), 21(d), 27(d)(2), 35(b)(2) & 40(b)(I). Typeface and Type Style Requirements: A proportionally spaced typeface (such as Times New Roman) must include serifs and must be 14-point or larger. A monospaced typeface (such as Courier New) must be 12-point or larger (at least IOn characters per inch). Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(5), 32(a)(6). This brief or other document complies with type-volume limits because, excluding the parts of the document exempted by Fed. R. App. R. 32(f) (cover page, disclosure statement, table of contents, table of citations, statement regarding oral argument, signature block, certificates of counsel, addendum, attachments): [{] this brief or other document contains _--=5..2..,1..:....8::;..8::...-_ [state number oj] words o this brief uses monospaced type and contains ______ [state number oj] lines This brief or other document complies with the typeface and type style requirements because: [Z] D this brief or other document has been prepared in a proportionally spaced typeface using Microsoft Word for Mac 2011 [identify word processing program] in Times New Roman, 14 point [identify font size and type style]; or this brief or other document has been prepared in a monospaced typeface using _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ [identify word processing program] in _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ [identify font size and type style]. (s) Derek O. Teaney Party Name Petitioners Dated: February 23, 2018 11114/2016 see Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 32 of 304 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that, on February 23, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit by using the appellate CM/ECF system. The participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and service will be accomplished by the appellate CM/ECF system. /s/ Derek O. Teaney Derek O. Teaney Appalachian Mountain Advocates, Inc. P.O. Box 507 Lewisburg, WV 24901 Telephone: (304) 793-9007 Facsimile: (304) 645-9008 Email: dteaney@appalmad.org Counsel for Petitioners Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 33 of 304 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF CORPS’ DECEMBER 22, 2017 VERIFICATION UNDER NWP 12 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 34 of 304 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HUNTINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 502 EIGHTH STREET HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25701-2070 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF December 22, 2017 Regulatory Division Energy Resource Branch LRH-2015-592-GBR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NO. 12 VERIFICATION Mr. Shawn Posey Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC 555 Southepointe Boulevard, Suite 200 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317 Dear Mr. Posey: I refer to the Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC’s request received on February 25, 2016 with an updated application received on February 17, 2017 and additional information received December 18, 2017 requesting a Department of the Army (DA) authorization to discharge dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States (U.S.) in association with the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) Project. The proposed project will involve the construction of a 304-mile 42-inch natural gas pipeline in Virginia and West Virginia. The MVP pipeline will cross the United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Pittsburgh, Norfolk and Huntington Districts regulatory boundaries. Approximately 164-miles of the proposed pipeline, approximately 132-miles of proposed access roads, and three (3) compressor stations are located within the Huntington District’s regulatory boundary in Monroe, Summers, Greenbrier, Nicholas, Webster, Braxton, Lewis, Harrison, and Wetzel Counties, West Virginia. The project has been assigned the following file number: LRH-2015-592-GBR. Please reference this number on all future correspondence related to this proposed project. The Corps’ authority to regulate waters of the United States is based on the definitions and limits of jurisdiction contained in 33 CFR 328 and 33 CFR 329. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Section 404) requires a DA permit be obtained prior to discharging dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (Section 10) requires a DA permit be obtained for any work in, on, over or under a navigable water. The proposed project, as described in your PCN and supplemental information, has been reviewed in accordance with Section 404 and Section 10. Based on your description of the proposed work, and other information available to us, it has been determined that this project will involve activities subject to the requirements of Section 404 and Section 10. In the submitted information, you have requested a DA authorization to temporarily discharge dredged and/or fill material into 10,087 linear feet (0.863 acre) of ephemeral streams, 12,021 linear feet (1.550 acres) of intermittent streams, 16,213 linear feet (8.824 acres) of EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 1 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 35 of 304 -2perennial stream, 15.299 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands, 0.43 acre of palustrine scrubshrub wetland and 2.558 acres of palustrine forested wetlands and the proposed permanent discharge of dredged and/or fill material into 803 linear feet (0.090 acre) of ephemeral stream, 1,018 linear feet (0.098 acre) of intermittent streams, 576 linear feet (0.0243 acre) of perennial stream, 0.639 acre of palustrine emergent wetland, 0.004 acre of palustrine scrub-shrub wetland and 0.012 acre of palustrine forested wetland. There are 591 single and complete crossings in the portion of the proposed project located within the Huntington District's regulatory boundary, as shown on the enclosed Table titled Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. Based on the provided information, it has been determined the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters ofthe U.S. at 591 separate and distant locations in conjunction with the utility line project meets the criteria for Nationwide Permit (NWP) #12 under the January 6, 2017 Federal Register, Issuance and Reissuance of NWPs (82 FR 1860) provided you comply with all terms and conditions of the enclosed material and the enclosed special conditions. A copy of this NWP can be found on our website at: http://www.Irh.usace.armv.millMissions/Re{!ulatory.aspx. A copy ofthis NWP and this letter should be supplied to your project engineer responsible for project activities and a copy kept at the site during project work. Please be aware this NWP verification does not obviate the requirement to obtain any state or local assent required by law for the activities. This verification is valid until the expiration date ofthe NWPs, unless the NWP authorization is modified, suspended, or revoked. The verification will remain valid if the NWP authorization is reissued without modification or the activity complies with any subsequent modification of the NWP authorization. All of the existing NWPs are scheduled to be modified, reissued, or revoked on March 18,2022. Prior to this date, it is not necessary to contact this office for re-verification of your project unless the plans for the proposed activity are modified. Furthermore, if you commence or under contract to commence this activity before March 18, 2022, you will have twelve (12) months from the date ofthe modification or revocation ofthe NWP to complete the activity under the present terms and conditions of this NWP. A copy of the NWP and this verification letter must be kept at the site during construction. Upon completion of the activities authorized by this NWP verification, the enclosed certification must be signed and returned to this office. If you have any questions concerning the above, please contact Christopher L. Carson at 304-399-5819, by mail at the above address, or by email at christopher .I.carson@usace.army .mil. Sincerely, 5PA GNA.T~~ ERESA.D.l ~~~~a~~.~~~~A~b.1229740519 DN: c=us, o==U,S. Government, ~~:~p~~~~~I~~~~lS:29740 519 2297 40519 D;;'~o~0171222100408 Teresa D. Spagna Chief, North Branch Enclosures cc: (next page) EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 2 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 36 of 304 -3cc: Mr. Matthew Hoover EQT Senior Environmental Coordinator 555 Southpointe Boulevard, Suite 200 Canonsburg, Pennsylvania 15317 Mr. Paul Friedman Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20426 Mr. Josh Shaffer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District 1000 Liberty Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222 Mr. Todd Miller Regulatory Project Manager U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Richmond Field Office 9100 Arboretum Parkway, Ste 235 Richmond, Virginia 23236 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 3 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 37 of 304 -4Nationwide Permit 12 Verification Special Conditions Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC MVP Project LRH-2015-592-GBR Page 1 of 4 1. This verification remains contingent upon the permittee’s submitted Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) information regarding the scope and/or impacts of the project as described in the enclosed Figure 1 titled Mountain Valley Pipeline Overview Map and the aquatic resources identified in the enclosed Table titled Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project. Should new information regarding the scope and/or impacts of the project become available that was not submitted to this office during our review of the proposal, the permittee must submit written information concerning proposed modification(s) to this office for review and evaluation, as soon as practicable. The permittee must complete wetland and stream investigations on all desktop evaluated aquatic resources, as identified in the enclosed Table titled Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, once access is granted. The permittee must submit to the Huntington District the information gathered during the field reconnaissance, including data forms, photographs, impact analysis and mitigation requirements, prior to the discharge of dredged and/or fill material in these desktop evaluated aquatic resources. If additional mitigation is necessary, the permittee must purchase the required mitigation credits prior to the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States. 2. The permittee is required to apply for and secure all necessary permits, certifications or other approvals from Federal, State and/or local regulatory agencies, prior to commencing the construction activity. These other Federal, State and/or local approvals and all conditions attached to or contained therein are hereby incorporated by reference as being special conditions of this verification. 3. Enclosed is a copy of Nationwide Permit 12, which will be kept at the site during construction. A copy of the nationwide permit verification, special conditions, and the submitted construction plans must be kept at the site during construction. The permittee will supply a copy of these documents to their project engineer responsible for construction activities. 4. Construction activities will be performed during low flow conditions to the greatest extent practicable. Additionally, appropriate site specific best management practices for sediment and erosion control will be fully implemented during construction activities. The permittee shall ensure stream and riparian upland buffers are adequately flagged and/or staked before construction activities to ensure these areas are not inadvertently impacted pre-, during- or post-construction and follow the Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures and the Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation Plan, and Maintenance Plan established by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission . EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 4 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 38 of 304 -5Nationwide Permit 12 Verification Special Conditions Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC MVP Project LRH-2015-592-GBR Page 2 of 4 5. Completion of stream and wetland crossings must adhere to dates established in standard conditions for West Virginia nationwide permits including restrictions during the spawning season for warm water streams (April to June) and trout waters (September 14 to March 31). 6. At each stream crossing, substrate in the channel is to be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. This native material must be reused in restoration of the stream channel and, upon final stream bed restoration, the stream must have similar substrate pattern, profile, dimension and embeddedness of the original stream channel. At each wetland crossing, the top 12 inches of soil are to be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. This native material must be reused in the restoration of the wetland. 7. The permittee will document pre- and post-construction activities through photographs, both upstream and downstream of each channel and each bank. A minimum of four (4) photographs per stream crossing will be taken. For the major streams, as defined by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, additional photographs of the streams’ banks will be taken for a minimum of six (6) photographs. For wetland crossings, the permittee will document prior to construction through photographs of the wetland with the Right of Way (ROW), the ROW as it enters the wetland, and the ROW as it exits the wetland. All photographs are to be geo-referenced and identified to correspond with aquatic feature names as described in the enclosed Table titled Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project, with a date of the photograph taken and GPS coordinates. Upon completion of construction and reclamation of each stream and wetland crossing, associated photographs must be taken in the same manner and locations as pre-impact existing conditions with narrative documentation that the area has been returned to pre-construction contours. The pre- and post-construction photographs associated with each stream and wetland crossing must be submitted to the Huntington District along with the enclosed “Activity Completion Certification.” 8. The permittee will submit post-construction reports upon completion of the activities at conducted with waters subject to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (Section 10) to document the restoration of the stream to pre-construction contours. Section 10 rivers within the Huntington District falling within the project boundary include the Gauley River, the Greenbrier River, and the Elk River. Post-construction reports will include in-stream habitat, bank characteristics, and GPS locations for boulders larger than 36-inches. The reports will include obtaining post-construction data consistent with methods used to document pre-construction conditions provided by the permittee for the above Section 10 stream crossing(s). The permittee will provide postconstruction documentation that the restored streams have similar substrate pattern, profile, dimension and embeddedness of the original stream channels. EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 5 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 39 of 304 -6- Nationwide Permit 12 Verification Special Conditions Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC MVP Project LRH-2015-592-GBR Page 3 of 4 9. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if , in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the United States Army Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. The permittee is solely responsible for insuring all activities are performed in compliance with all permit conditions. 10. The authorized work shall not interfere with the public’s right to free navigation on navigable waters of the United States. The permittee will provide a site-specific spill response plan and Aid to Navigation (ATON) to provide public information on construction, instream activities, and any potential user restrictions during construction. 11. The permittee will purchase stream and wetland mitigation credits from multiple federally-approved mitigation bank(s) as indicated on Table 1 below. The permittee will submit confirmation to the Corps, Huntington District (Permit Number LRH-2015-592GBR) of the purchase of the mitigation credits prior to the discharge of dredged and/or fill material into waters of the United States. Table 1 – Required Mitigation within the Huntington District’s Regulatory Boundary Required Purchase of Required Purchase of Wetlands Mitigation Stream Mitigation Bank Mitigation Bank Bank Credits Prior to Credits Prior to Discharge Discharge of Dredged of Dredged and/or Fill and/or Fill Material Material Kincheloe 0.3919 521 Mitigation Bank Foster Run N/A 362 Mitigation Bank Spanishburg 2.6558 675 Mitigation Bank Beverly Mitigation 0.5982 N/A Bank Total Mitigation 3.6459 1,558 Credits Required EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 6 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 40 of 304 -7- Nationwide Permit 12 Verification Special Conditions Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC MVP Project LRH-2015-592 Page 4 of 4 12. In the event any previously unknown historic or archaeological sites or human remains are uncovered while accomplishing the authorized activity, the permittee must cease all work in waters of the United States immediately and contact local, state and county law enforcement offices (only contact law enforcement on findings of human remains), the Corps at (304) 399-5210 and West Virginia State Historic Preservation Office at (304) 558-0220.The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will initiate the Federal, state and tribal coordination required to comply with the National Historic Preservation Act and the applicable state and local laws and regulations. Federally recognized tribes are afforded a government-to-government status as sovereign nations and consultations are required under Executive Order 13175 and 36 CFR Part 800. 13. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Biological Opinion for the Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC; Docket Number CP16-10-000; Project #05E2VA002016-F-0880 and #05E2WV00-2015-F-0046 (BO) and dated November 21, 2017 contains mandatory terms and conditions to implement the reasonable and prudent measures that are associated with “incidental take” that is also specified in the BO. The permittee’s authorization under this Corps nationwide permit verification is conditional upon their compliance with all of the mandatory terms and conditions associated with the incidental take of the BO, which terms and conditions are incorporated by reference as being special conditions of the Section 404 and Section 10 nationwide permit verification. Section 7 obligations under Endangered Species Act must be reconsidered if new information reveals impacts of the project that may affect federally listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, the proposed project is subsequently modified to include activities which were not considered during Section 7 consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or new species are listed or critical habitat designated that might be affected by the subject project. The USFWS is the appropriate authority to determine compliance with the terms and conditions of its BO, and with the Endangered Species Act. EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 7 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 41 of 304 Figure 1. MVP overview. EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 8 of 77 3 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 42 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Station Station Station Station Station Station Station Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Permanent Temporary Foster Run Foster Run Foster Run - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field - - - Field Temporary - Field 2-2 Permanent Foster Run Field 2-2 Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-3 2-3 Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 S-J63 S-ST13 S-ST13 S-ST14 S-ST14 S-ST10 S-ST10 RPW RPW RPW NRPW NRPW RPW RPW R4SB3 R4SB3 R4SB3 R6 R6 R4SB3 R4SB3 Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel 39.562824 39.562750 39.562545 39.562629 39.562580 39.562384 39.562262 -80.541691 -80.541814 -80.541549 -80.541666 -80.541378 -80.542424 -80.542374 1 Mobley Crossing S-J63, S-ST13, SST14, ST10 Total - - - 2 S-ST18 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 2 S-ST18 RPW R4SB3 2 3 3 RPW RPWWD R2UB1 PEM - - 4 5 S-ST18 Total S-A1a W-A1a S-A1a & W-A1a Total W-A2a S-A3a RPWWN RPW PEM R4SB3 Wetzel Wetzel 6 S-J66 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 6 6 7 8 9 10 S-J66 S-J66 Total W-A4a W-YZ8 S-A5a S-A6a RPW NRPWW NRPWW RPW RPW R4SB3 PEM PEM R4SB3 R2UB1 Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel 11 S-A115 RPW R2UB1 11 RPW R2UB1 - 12 S-A125 S-A115 & S-A125 Total W-IJ31 RPWWN PEM Wetzel 12 W-IJ31 RPWWN PEM Wetzel 12 W-IJ31 Total - - - - 0.0992 13 S-A116 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.505572 -80.525608 0.0015 13 S-A116 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.505571 -80.525615 13 S-A116 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.505489 -80.525655 13 S-A117 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.503142 -80.522977 13 S-A117 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.503135 -80.523044 0.0015 - 7 - 13 S-A117 RPW R4SB3 Wetzel 39.503132 -80.522918 0.0025 - 12 - - - - - 0.0070 0.0098 33 64 RPW RPW RPWWD RPWWD R4SB1 R4SB3 PFO PEM Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel 39.503288 39.502399 39.502389 39.502356 -80.532680 -80.523520 -80.523497 -80.523420 0.0276 0.0109 0.0497 0.0547† - 445 176 882† 802 - - - - - 0.0606 0.0547 1860 - - - - Field PEM Wetzel 39.491159 -80.520537 0.0066 - 107 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 3 11 13 14 15 15 15 15 16 S-A117 & A116 Total S-A124 S-A118 W-A27-PFO W-A27-PEM S-A118 & W-A27 Total W-A35 NRPWW 0.0069 - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 33 - 0.0018 0.0105 0.0047 0.0145 - 9 51 23 70 - - 0.0142 0.0297 69 144 39.561766 -80.540136 0.0026 - 12 - Wetzel 39.561753 -80.540125 Wetzel Wetzel 39.553946 39.553912 -80.545046 -80.544941 0.0026 0.0641 0.0038 0.0023 - 12 1034 18 11 - - - 0.0679 - 1052 - - - - Field 39.553508 39.551814 -80.545518 -80.545633 0.0732 0.0166 - 1181 267 - Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-3 2-4 39.546334 -80.544020 0.0057 - 28 - Temporary - Field 2-5 39.546030 39.544654 39.535721 39.534241 39.534023 -80.544314 -80.542771 -80.525972 -80.540995 -80.540889 0.0053 0.0110 0.0226 0.0104 0.0126 0.0376 - 85 113 364 50 203 606 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-5 2-5 2-10 2-9 2-9 Wetzel 39.506513 -80.526502 0.0207 - 100 - Temporary - Field 2-19 Wetzel 39.503477 -80.532902 0.0621 - 1003 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Station Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-17 - - - 0.0828 - 1103 - - - - Field 39.505764 -80.541781 0.0992 - 480 - 39.505612 -80.541681 ATWS Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road 0.0019 0.0036 - - - 0.0015 - 0.0023 0.0082 9 18 - - - 0.0082 480 - 7 0.0048 0.0050 7 - 11 40 40 31 33 Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-16 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-16 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-19 Permanent Foster Run Field 2-19 Temporary - Field 2-19 Permanent Foster Run Field 2-18 Temporary - Field 2-18 Temporary - Field 2-18 - - - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field Field EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 9 of 77 Page 1 of 30 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-17 2-18 2-18 2-18 2-21 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 43 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 17 S-A120 RPW R4SB4 Wetzel 39.489914 -80.522135 0.0011 17 S-A120 RPW R4SB4 Wetzel 39.489890 -80.522083 17 S-A120 RPW R4SB4 Wetzel 39.489866 -80.522029 0.0012 - 6 - 17 17 17 S-A120 S-A119 W-A34 S-A119, S-A120 & W-A34 Total RPW RPW RPWWD R4SB4 R4SB3 PEM Wetzel Wetzel Wetzel 39.489712 39.489589 39.489742 -80.520728 -80.520532 -80.520750 0.0149 0.0171 0.0833 - 241 276 1343 - - - - - 0.1176 0.0036 1872 15 17 - 0.0036 18 S-QR34 NRPW R6 Wetzel 39.489140 -80.520658 18 S-QR34 NRPW R6 Wetzel 39.489062 -80.520519 0.0004 - 18 S-QR34 Total - - - - 0.0004 19 W-A31 NRPWW PEM Wetzel 39.486706 -80.531774 0.0270 20 W-A28 NRPWW PEM Wetzel 39.486505 -80.537877 21 W-A30 RPWWN PEM Wetzel 39.486248 -80.534108 22 W-A29 NRPWW PEM Wetzel 39.485936 23 W-A33 NRPWW PEM Wetzel 39.484775 24 W-A32 NRPWW PEM Wetzel 39.484485 25 S-A114 NRPW R6 Wetzel 39.481424 26 S-J60 RPW R2RB2 Wetzel 39.474354 27 W-A26 RPWWD PEM Wetzel 28 S-J56 RPW R2UB1 28 S-J56 RPW 28 S-J56 - 0.0072 5 - - 15 24 2 - 0.0072 2 24 - 131 - 0.2609 - 1263 - 0.1546 - 748 - -80.536196 0.0129 - 63 - -80.526191 0.0294 - 142 - -80.528316 0.0713 - 345 - -80.518386 0.0042 - 20 - -80.511825 0.0243 - 392 - 39.473051 -80.524008 0.4412 - 2136 - Wetzel 39.464315 -80.502077 0.0173 - 279 - R2UB1 Wetzel 39.464105 -80.502318 0.0054 - 26 - RPW R2UB1 Wetzel 39.463899 -80.502594 RPWWD PEM Wetzel 39.463909 -80.502672 0.0011 - 5 - - - - - 0.0238 0.0095 310 46 0.0040 - 19 - 28 W-WX5 28 S-J56 &W-WX5 Total 29 W-WX4 RPWWD PEM Wetzel 39.463864 -80.502581 29 W-WX4 RPWWD PEM Wetzel 39.463844 -80.502622 29 W-WX4 Total - - - - - 0.0095 - 46 Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road/ATWS Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road - 30 S-J59 RPW R4SB Wetzel 39.462705 -80.504726 30 S-J59 RPW R4SB Wetzel 39.462684 -80.504736 0.0007 - 30 S-J59 Total - - - - 0.0007 31 W-K52 RPWWN PEM Doddridge 39.236762 -80.558524 0.0021 31 W-K52 RPWWN PEM Doddridge 39.236727 -80.558550 31 W-K52 Total - - - - 0.0021 0.0115 10 56 Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road - 32 S-K77 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.229029 -80.552534 0.0034 - 54 - Pipeline ROW 0.0040 - - 0.0055 0.0055 0.0005 19 - 27 27 2 3 - 0.0005 3 2 - 10 - 0.0115 - 56 Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Temporary - Field 2-21 Permanent Foster Run Field 2-21 Temporary - Field 2-21 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-21 2-21 2-21 - - Field Permanent Foster Run Field 2-21 Temporary - Field 2-21 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-23 Temporary - Field 2-24 Temporary - Field 2-24 Temporary - Field 2-24 Temporary - Field 2-23 Temporary - Field 2-23 Temporary - Field 2-26 Temporary - Field 2-28 Temporary - Field 2-27 Temporary - Field 2-30 Temporary - Field 2-30 Permanent Foster Run Field 2-30 Temporary - Field 2-30 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-30 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-30 - - Field Permanent Foster Run Field 2-30 Temporary - Field 2-30 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-32 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-32 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-38 32 S-K77 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.228942 -80.552437 0.0085 - 137 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-38 32 W-K45 RPWWD PEM Doddridge 39.228900 -80.552328 0.0401 - 648 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-38 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 10 of 77 Page 2 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 44 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 - - 0.0520 - 839 - - - - Field 39.227664 -80.551302 0.0080 - 39 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-38 -80.553179 0.0177 - 285 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 -80.552450 0.0165 - 267 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 -80.552035 0.0010 - 5 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 259 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 264 - - - - Field Water Type Cowardin Class1 - - S-K78 RPW R4SB5 Doddridge 34 S-K67 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.210269 35 S-K65 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.209813 36 S-K63 RPW R4SB5 Doddridge 39.209001 RPWWD PEM Doddridge 39.208990 -80.551957 0.0160 - - - - - 0.0170 - Crossing # Feature Name 32 S-K77 & W-K45 Total 33 County Latitude2 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 36 W-K41 36 S-K63 & W-K41 Total 37 W-K40 NRPWW PEM Doddridge 39.208395 -80.552038 0.0096 - 155 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 38 S-K54 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.207673 -80.552957 0.0127 - 204 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 39 S-K55 NRPW R6 Doddridge 39.207657 -80.552852 0.0018 - 9 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 40 S-K58 NRPW R6 Doddridge 39.205595 -80.553224 0.0045 - 72 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 41 S-K59 NRPW R6 Doddridge 39.204704 -80.553272 0.0044 - 70 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 42 S-K60 NRPW R6 Doddridge 39.203779 -80.553410 0.0090 - 144 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-41 43 S-A110/K62 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.201436 -80.553238 0.0063 - 30 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-42 43 S-A110/K62 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.201316 -80.553306 13 Permanent Access Road Permanent Foster Run Field 2-42 43 S-A110/K62 RPW R4SB3 Doddridge 39.201286 -80.553425 Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-42 43 S-A110/K62 Total - - - 44 S-A109 RPW R4SB4 Doddridge 39.201257 44 W-A23 RPWWD PEM Doddridge 39.201219 - 0.0040 - 0.0095 - 154 - - 0.0158 0.0040 184 13 - - - Field -80.553474 0.0046 - 22 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-42 -80.552848 0.2277 - 1102 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-42 0.2701 - 4358 44 W-A23 RPWWD PEM Doddridge 39.201188 -80.552996 44 W-A23 RPWWD PEM Doddridge 39.201157 -80.553264 44 S-A109 & W-A23 Total - - - - 0.5024 0.0579 5482 280 45 S-A111 RPW R2UB1 Doddridge 39.200749 -80.553190 0.0247 - 399 - - 0.0579 - - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-42 280 Permanent Access Road Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-42 - - - Field Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field Temporary - Field 2-49 Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field 2-51 2-51 2-51 Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW 46 W-B57 NRPWW PEM Lewis 39.111745 -80.587352 0.0336 - 163 - 47 47 47 W-K33-PSS W-K33-PEM S-J46 S-J46 & W-K33 Total S-J47b W-K34-PEM S-J47b & W-K34PEM Total RPWWD RPWWD RPW PSS PEM R2UB1 Lewis Lewis Lewis 39.095059 39.095056 39.094778 -80.585064 -80.584787 -80.584826 0.1544 0.0343 0.0024† - 12† 2490 553 - - - - - 0.1887 0.0024 3055 - - - - Field RPW RPWWD R4SB3 PEM Lewis Lewis 39.094003 39.093945 -80.585481 -80.585460 0.0067 0.0345 - 108 557 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 47 48 48 48 - - - - 0.0412 - 665 - 49 W-K39 NRPWW PEM Lewis 39.092655 -80.586749 0.0030 - 14 - 50 51 52 S-H172 W-H109 S-H170 NRPW NRPWW NRPW R6 PEM R6 Lewis Lewis Lewis 39.057704 39.053324 39.053159 -80.581416 -80.582020 -80.582083 0.0125 0.0027 0.0052 - 61 13 84 - Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW 2-51 2-51 - - Temporary - Field 2-51 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-56 2-57 2-57 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 11 of 77 Page 3 of 30 2-42 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 45 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 53 W-I22-PEM RPWWD PEM Lewis 39.052768 -80.582196 0.0386 53 W-I22-PEM RPWWD PEM Lewis 39.052760 -80.582147 53 53 53 RPW RPWWD RPWWD R2UB3 PEM PEM Lewis Lewis Lewis 39.052748 39.052728 39.052499 -80.582213 -80.583223 -80.580974 0.0062 0.0226 0.1395 - 99 109 675 - - - - 0.2069 0.0059 RPW NRPW RPWWD RPW RPW RPW R4 R6 PEM R4SB3 R4SB3 R4SB3 Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis 39.052420 39.019605 39.017820 39.017783 39.017738 39.017718 -80.581605 -80.597895 -80.596977 -80.596853 -80.597017 -80.597027 0.0076 0.0101 0.0104 0.0069 0.0011 0.0011 - - - - 57 58 S-I64 TTWV-W-201 W-I22-PEM-2 S-I64, W-I22 & TTWV-W-201 Total TTWV-S-217 S-KK3a W-KK6 S-KK5 S-KK5 S-KK5 S-KK5 & W-KK6 Total S-KK6 S-KK7 RPW RPW R4SB3 R2UB1 Lewis Lewis 39.017621 39.017519 -80.596939 -80.597010 59 W-L42 NRPWW PEM Lewis 39.011413 60 W-K28 NRPWW PEM Lewis 60 W-K28 NRPWW PEM Lewis 60 W-K28 Total - 61 W-L41 NRPWW 61 W-L41 NRPWW 61 62 63 64 W-L41 Total S-K45 S-K43 S-K38 NRPW RPW NRPW 65 W-L39 66 66 S-I63 S-I63 66 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Temporary - Field 2-57 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-57 - Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road/ATWS Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW ATWS ATWS Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Desktop Field 2-57 2-57 2-57 1505 28 - - - Field - 37 164 50 111 18 18 - ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Desktop Field Field Field Field Field 0.0195 - 197 - - - Field 0.0056 0.0132 - 90 213 - Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-62 2-62 -80.594436 0.0021 - 10 - Temporary - Field 2-63 39.009891 -80.597843 0.0088 - 43 39.009838 -80.598294 - - - 0.0088 PEM Lewis 39.005782 -80.595121 0.0048 PEM Lewis 39.005703 -80.595151 R6 R2UB1 R6 Lewis Lewis Lewis 39.002598 39.002045 38.992357 -80.595591 -80.596098 -80.592929 0.0048 0.0011 0.0164 0.0061 0.0111 - 23 6 264 99 54 - NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.986897 -80.601380 0.0071 - 34 - RPW RPW R2UB1 R2UB1 Lewis Lewis 38.970163 38.969369 -80.592886 -80.593138 0.0189 0.0294 - 92 474 - S-I63 RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.969290 -80.593203 0.0095 - 46 - 66 S-I63 RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.969239 -80.593244 0.0092 - 44 - 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 S-I63 Total W-I15 W-I16 W-I21 W-I20 W-I17 W-UU7 RPWWN NRPWW ISOLATE NRPWW ISOLATE NRPWW PEM PEM PEM PEM PEM PEM Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.968609 38.964758 38.964195 38.962362 38.962126 38.933646 -80.592042 -80.590881 -80.590961 -80.590607 -80.590741 -80.585074 0.0670 0.0631 0.0299 0.0584 0.0113 0.0017 0.0038 - 656 1018 483 283 55 8 19 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road ATWS Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW 73 W-H103 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.933290 -80.584765 0.0138 - 223 - 74 S-H160 RPW R2UB2 Lewis 38.933179 -80.584562 0.0409 - 660 - S-L76 RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.929761 -80.575251 0.0115 - 56 - S-H160 & S-L76 Total W-H102 S-H159 W-H104 - - - - 0.0524 - 716 - - - - Field RPWWN NRPW RPWWN PEM R6 PEM Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.933168 38.933155 38.933071 -80.584990 -80.585092 -80.585385 0.0129 0.0053 0.0203 - 62 26 98 - ATWS ATWS ATWS Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 53 54 55 56 56 56 56 56 74 74 75 76 77 - - - 0.0059 0.0091 622 - - 0.0091 43 - 23 0.0111 - 28 44 44 54 Temporary - Field 2-63 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-63 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-64 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-64 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field 2-62 2-64 2-66 Temporary - Field 2-68 Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-71 2-71 Temporary - Field 2-71 Temporary - Field 2-71 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-71 2-72 2-72 2-72 2-72 2-78 Pipeline ROW/ATWS Temporary - Field 2-78 Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Temporary - Field 2-78 Temporary - Field 2-80 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 12 of 77 Page 4 of 30 2-57 2-62 2-62 2-62 2-62 2-62 2-78 2-78 2-78 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 46 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 78 79 79 W-IJ39 W-H107 S-H158/H161 RPWWN RPWWD RPW PEM PEM R4SB5 Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.932381 38.932901 38.932002 -80.587400 -80.584200 -80.583184 0.0842 0.0284 0.0054 - 407 138 26 - 79 S-H158/H-616 & W-H107 Total - - - - 0.0338 - 164 - 80 W-H98 NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.925976 -80.578373 80 W-H98 NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.925868 -80.578367 0.0032 - 15 - 80 81 82 W-H98 Total S-H153 S-H152 RPW NRPW R3UB2 R6 Lewis Lewis 38.922846 38.922565 -80.579227 -80.579100 0.0032 0.0262 0.0011 0.0331 - 15 423 5 160 - 83 W-UU8 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.921791 -80.569178 0.1477 - 715 - RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.921541 -80.568772 0.0566 - 274 - - - - - 0.2043 - 989 - - 0.0331 - 160 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field - - - Field Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-79 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Temporary - Field 2-79 Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-81 2-81 Temporary - Field 2-84 Temporary - Field 2-84 - - - Field Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/ATWS Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-83 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Desktop Field 2-83 2-83 2-83 2-83 2-83 2-83 2-83 2-85 2-85 83 W-L36 W-UU8 & W-L36 Total 84 W-WX6 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.919959 -80.571769 0.0111 - 54 - 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 92 RPW NRPW RPWWN NRPW NRPW RPW NRPW NRPW RPWWD R3UB1 R6 PEM R6 R6 R4SB4 R6 R6 PEM Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.918986 38.918893 38.918766 38.918602 38.918489 38.916385 38.916132 38.914056 38.913939 -80.573838 -80.573461 -80.573564 -80.573256 -80.573480 -80.571676 -80.571681 -80.572045 -80.571910 0.0313 0.0026 0.0261 0.0198 0.0025 0.0193 0.0104 0.0076 0.0039 - 505 13 422 320 12 93 168 122 19 - - - - - 0.0115 - 141 - - - - Field RPW RPWWD RPW R2 PEM R4 Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.913440 38.913311 38.913235 -80.571839 -80.571953 -80.571939 0.0161 0.0934 0.0138 - 259 1507 222 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Desktop Field Desktop - - - - 0.1233 - 1988 - - - - Field 94 S-H145 S-H166 W-H108 S-H165 S-H167 S-H163 S-H144 TTWV-S-216 W-H96 TTWV-S-216 & W-H96 TTWV-S-208 W-H95 TTWV-S-209 TTWV-S-209, TTWV-S208 & WH95 Total W-VV9 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.904701 -80.563951 0.0534 - 259 - 94 S-VV13 RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.903930 -80.563537 0.0540 - 870 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road 93 93 93 93 94 S-VV13 RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.903318 -80.563794 0.0317 - 154 - 94 W-CD18 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.902751 -80.564644 0.0322 - 156 - 94 W-CD19 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.902618 -80.564694 0.0080 - 39 - 94 S-VV13d RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.902549 -80.564778 0.0210 - 102 - 94 S-VV13c RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.901736 -80.565501 0.0211 - 102 - 94 S-VV13b RPW R2UB1 Lewis 38.898431 -80.568250 0.0143 - 69 - 94 W-CD20 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.901264 -80.566126 0.0059 - 29 - 94 W-CD23 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.898699 -80.568306 0.0349 - 169 - 94 W-CD24 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.898648 -80.568238 0.0094 - 45 - 2-85 2-85 2-85 Temporary - Field 2-87 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-87 Temporary - Field 2-87 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 13 of 77 Page 5 of 30 2-78 2-78 2-78 Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary Access Road/ATWS 83 92 Figure Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 47 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name 94 S-VV13, W-VV9, W-CD18, WCD19, W-CD20, W-CD23, WCD24 Total 95 95 Water Type Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 - - - - 0.2859 - 1994 R4SB5 PEM Lewis Lewis 38.904135 38.904074 -80.563719 -80.563709 0.0388 0.0335 - - - - - 0.0723 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) - - - - Field 188 162 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary - Field Field - 350 - - - - Field Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure S-CD16 W-CD17 S-CD16 & WCD17 Total RPW RPWWD 96 W-CD16 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.903722 -80.563418 0.0249 - 401 - Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road/ ATWS Temporary - Field 2-87 97 97 97 S-VV12 W-VV8 S-VV11 RPW RPWWD NRPW R3UB1 PEM R6 Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.903575 38.903514 38.903610 -80.563308 -80.563258 -80.563186 0.0211 0.0708 0.0007 - 341 1143 3 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-87 2-87 2-87 97 S-VV12, S-VV11 & W-VV8 Total - - - - 0.0927 - 1487 - - - - Field Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-89 Temporary - Field 2-90 95 98 W-CD21 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.901049 -80.566582 0.0161 - 78 - 99 S-VV20 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.900233 -80.563491 0.0028 - 13 - 99 S-VV20 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.900178 -80.563184 0.0030 - 15 - 99 S-VV20 Total - - - - 0.0058 - 28 - 100 W-CD22 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.899690 -80.568061 0.0448 - 217 - 100 S-CD17 RPW R4SB5 Lewis 38.899594 -80.568144 0.0152 - 73 - 100 W-CD22 & SCD17 - - - - 0.0600 - 290 - 101 S-VV19 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.899505 -80.563925 0.0043 - 21 - 102 W-CD36 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.898177 -80.568287 0.0049 - 24 - 103 W-CD25 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.898021 -80.568159 0.0100 - 48 - 104 W-CD26 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.897805 -80.568155 0.0114 - 55 - 105 W-VV10 NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.897282 -80.567014 0.0091 - 44 - 106 S-VV16 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.896271 -80.566551 0.0202 - 98 - 106 W-CD27 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.895449 -80.566532 0.0025 - 12 - 106 S-VV16 & WCD27 Total - - - - 0.0227 - 110 - 107 S-CD20 RPW R4SB3 Lewis 38.893770 -80.565983 0.0607 - 294 - 107 W-CD28 RPWWD PEM Lewis 38.893740 -80.566012 0.0950 - 460 - 107 S-CD20 & WCD28 Total - - - - 0.1557 - 754 - 108 W-CD33 RPWWN PEM Lewis 38.893519 -80.566006 0.0120 - 58 - 109 110 111 W-UV17 S-UV11 W-ST16 RPWWN RPW RPWWN PFO R2UB1 PEM Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.893199 38.893014 38.892534 -80.556196 -80.556192 -80.556680 0.0523 0.0711 0.0055† - 27† 844 344 - 112 W-VV11 Isolate PEM Lewis 38.890612 -80.554981 - 0.0236 - 114 Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road - - Field Temporary - Field 2-90 2-90 Temporary - Field - - - Field Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Anode Bed Permanent Access Road Temporary - Field 2-90 Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field 2-91 2-91 2-91 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-91 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 14 of 77 Page 6 of 30 2-87 2-87 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 48 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 112 W-VV11 Isolate PEM Lewis 38.890576 -80.554852 0.0010 - 5 - 112 W-VV11 Total - - - - 0.0010 0.0236 5 114 113 S-VV22 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.890504 -80.550970 0.0006 - 3 - 113 S-VV22 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.890435 -80.550982 113 S-VV22 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.890411 -80.550986 0.0005 - 3 - 113 S-VV22 Total - - - - 0.0011 0.0018 6 6 114 W-VV12 NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.890309 -80.553784 0.0070 - 34 - 114 W-VV12 NRPWW PEM Lewis 38.890278 -80.553822 114 W-VV12 Total - - - - 115 S-VV21 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.890236 -80.553817 115 S-VV21 NRPW R6 Lewis 38.890221 -80.553817 0.0005 - 3 - 115 S-VV21 Total - - - - 0.0005 0.0007 3 2 116 S-L61 RPW R4SB3 Lewis 38.880040 -80.563579 0.0065 - 32 - 116 S-L61 RPW R4SB3 Lewis 38.879034 -80.564307 0.0069 - 34 - 116 117 118 118 118 S-L61 Total TTWV-S-132 S-VV9 W-VV4-PEM W-VV4-PFO S-VV9 & W-VV4 Total S-VV2 W-VV3-PEM W-VV3-PFO S-VV3 S-VV2 & W-VV3 Total RPW RPW RPWWD RPWWD R4 R3UB1 PEM PFO Lewis Lewis Lewis Lewis 38.864085 38.863254 38.863280 38.863238 -80.525859 -80.525763 -80.525705 -80.525813 0.0134 0.0078 0.0183 0.0082 - 0.0954† 66 38 296 133 462† - - - - - 0.0265 0.0954 891 - - RPW RPWWD RPWWD NRPW R5UB1 PEM PFO R6 Braxton Lewis Braxton Braxton 38.862730 38.862795 38.862691 38.862706 -80.525128 -80.525190 -80.525163 -80.525247 0.0412 0.0447 0.0032 0.0160† - 664 721 259† 16 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0891 0.0160 1660 - - 118 119 119 119 119 119 - 0.0070 - 0.0018 0.0207 0.0207 0.0007 - 34 - PEM Lewis 38.857677 -80.532592 0.0005 121 S-OP4 RPW R6 Braxton 38.843155 -80.517643 0.0004 121 S-OP4 RPW R6 Braxton 38.843150 -80.517662 121 S-OP4 RPW R6 Braxton 38.843121 -80.517772 0.0004 - 2 - 121 122 123 S-OP4 Total S-L51 S-J37 RPW RPW R2UB1 R4SB3 Braxton Braxton 38.839355 38.839133 -80.519693 -80.519716 0.0008 0.0472 0.0061 0.0014 - 4 761 98 5 - 124 W-L33 NRPWW PEM Braxton 38.828587 -80.525834 0.0205 - 99 - 125 126 S-L60 S-LL1 RPW RPW R2UB1 R2UB1 Braxton Braxton 38.824034 38.823595 -80.524988 -80.525342 0.0520 0.0607 - 838 980 - 127 W-IJ25 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.810321 -80.540558 0.0015 - 7 128 S-IJ28 RPW R3RB1 Braxton 38.810203 -80.550597 129 S-IJ31 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.810139 -80.540925 129 S-IJ31 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.810006 -80.540995 129 S-IJ31 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.809980 -80.541009 0.0022 2 2 NRPWW 0.0021 - 100 W-UU9 - 2 100 120 - - 6 0.0014 0.0052 0.0079 - - 10 11 5 17 39 - Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Figure Temporary - Field - - Field Temporary - Field 2-91 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-91 Temporary - Field 2-91 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-91 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-91 - - Field Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-91 Temporary - Field 2-91 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-94 Temporary - Field 2-94 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe Field Desktop Field Field Field 2-98 2-98 2-101 2-101 - - Field Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field Field - - Field Temporary - Field 2-99 2-91 2-101 2-101 2-101 2-101 Temporary - Field 2-104 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-104 Temporary - Field 2-104 Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-104 2-105 Temporary - Field 2-108 Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-108 2-108 Temporary - Field 2-111 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-111 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-111 Temporary - Field 2-111 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 15 of 77 Page 7 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 49 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 129 S-IJ31-Braid NRPW R6 Braxton 38.809757 -80.541302 0.0021 129 S-IJ31-Braid NRPW R6 Braxton 38.809680 -80.541408 129 S-IJ31/IJ31-Braid Total - - - - 0.0064 0.0094 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) 0.0037 0.0115 31 21 60 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.809628 -80.541520 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.809619 -80.541463 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.809608 -80.541406 0.0093 - 45 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.809102 -80.542914 0.0198 - 96 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808958 -80.543128 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808835 -80.543309 0.0093 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808636 -80.547362 0.0121 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808539 -80.547202 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808519 -80.547171 0.0180 - 87 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808316 -80.544286 0.0206 - 100 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808297 -80.546907 0.0120 - 58 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808242 -80.546896 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808197 -80.544673 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808190 -80.546886 0.0104 - 50 - 130 S-IJ27 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.808024 -80.545026 0.0144 - 70 - 130 S-IJ27 Total - - - - 0.1353 0.2048 655 992 131 S-IJ32 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.809467 -80.537419 0.0009 - 4 - 131 S-IJ32 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.809457 -80.537428 131 S-IJ32 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.809384 -80.537473 0.0010 - 5 - 131 S-IJ32 Total - - - - 0.0019 0.0030 9 10 132 W-IJ26 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.809174 -80.542584 132 W-IJ26 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.809149 -80.542548 0.0024 - 11 - 132 W-IJ26 Total - - - - 0.0024 0.0039 11 19 0.0003 - - - - - 133 S-IJ30 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.808309 -80.543963 134 W-EF9 RPWWN PFO Braxton 38.808212 -80.544270 135 S-QR30 RPW R3UB1 Braxton 38.807940 -80.535715 0.0274 0.0117 0.0538 46 - 130 - - 10 - - - 45 - 58 0.0223 0.0136 0.1034 0.0030 0.0039 - - - - 57 261 108 66 500 10 19 - 2 - 0.0201† 97† - - 442 - 136 W-EF10 ISOLATE PEM Braxton 38.805312 -80.537286 0.0729 - 353 - 137 138 S-JJ1 S-I60 RPW RPW R3UB2 R4SB4 Braxton Braxton 38.786930 38.781068 -80.530028 -80.524577 0.0265 0.0069 - 427 111 - 139 S-J70 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.780824 -80.527848 0.0277 - 134 - 139 S-J70 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.779616 -80.526217 0.0458 - 222 - Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Figure Temporary - Field 2-111 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-111 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-112 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-111 Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-111 Temporary - Field 2-111 - - Field Permanent Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-112 - - Field Temporary - Field Temporary Kincheloe Field 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-111 2-112 Temporary - Field 2-111 Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-115 2-117 Temporary - Field 2-117 Temporary - Field 2-117 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 16 of 77 Page 8 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 50 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 RPW R2UB1 - Braxton - 38.778955 - -80.525862 - 0.0530 0.1265 - W-I12 RPWWD PEM Braxton 38.779865 -80.524136 0.0002 W-K25 NRPWW PEM Braxton 38.775374 -80.526492 0.0549 W-KK4 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.768899 -80.514468 S-K34 W-K24 S-K33 S-K33 S-K34, S-K33 & W-K24 Total RPW RPWWD NRPW NRPW R4SB3 PSS R6 R6 Braxton Braxton Braxton Braxton 38.766123 38.766065 38.765714 38.765534 -80.520308 -80.520414 -80.520032 -80.519889 - - - 144 S-H122 RPW R4SB4 Braxton 38.762850 145 145 145 RPW RPW RPWWD R3UB2 R3UB2 PEM Braxton Braxton Braxton 38.761197 38.760426 38.760419 - - 146 147 148 S-H123 S-H123 W-H90 S-H123 & W-H90 Total S-H124 S-H125 S-H127 RPW RPW RPW R3UB2 R3UB2 R4SB3 Braxton Braxton Braxton 149 W-H93 RPWWD PEM Braxton 149 S-L50 RPW R6 149 S-L50 S-L50 & W-H93 Total RPW R6 150 W-H92 151 Crossing # Feature Name Water Type 139 139 S-J70 S-J70 Total 140 141 142 143 143 143 143 Type of Impact - 1 - - 886 - 0.0215 - 104 - 0.0086 0.0037 0.0119 0.0074† - 139 36† 60 192 - - 0.0243 0.0074 427 - -80.514650 0.0016 - 8 - -80.514887 -80.513624 -80.513602 0.0113 0.0113 0.0388 - 183 182 627 - - - 0.0614 - 992 - - - - Field 38.761100 38.760442 38.755029 -80.514934 -80.513764 -80.513692 0.0036 0.0004 0.0076 - 17 2 122 - Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-122 2-122 2-123 38.753968 -80.515672 0.0133 - 64 - Temporary - Field 2-123 Braxton 38.753948 -80.515649 0.0116 - 56 - Temporary - Field 2-123 Braxton 38.751904 -80.514702 0.0039 - 19 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road/ATWS ATWS/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-123 - - - - 0.0288 - 139 - - - - Field RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.753114 -80.512182 0.0113 - 55 - Temporary - Field 2-123 S-L49 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.751592 -80.514533 0.0253 - 122 - Temporary - Field 2-123 151 151 152 S-L49 S-L49 Total S-H132 RPW Braxton Braxton 38.751537 38.751499 -80.514789 -80.514919 0.0208 0.0461 0.3336 - 100 223 5383 - Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-123 RPW R2UB1 R2UB2 152 S-L47 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.744087 -80.509745 0.1622 - 785 - Temporary - Field 2-127 152 S-H132b-Braid NRPW R6 Braxton 38.743164 -80.527213 0.0047 - 23 - Temporary - Field 2-125 152 S-H132b RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.743033 -80.527236 0.2085 - 1009 - Temporary - Field 2-125 152 S-H132 & S-L47 Total - - - - 0.7091 - 7200 - - - Field 153 W-QR13 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.751445 -80.516905 0.0618 - 299 - Temporary - Field 2-123 154 W-H94 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.750690 -80.514837 0.0091 - 44 - Temporary - Field 2-123 155 W-QR12 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.749364 -80.522081 0.0881 - 426 - 156 157 158 S-H129 S-H131 S-H130 RPW NRPW NRPW R4SB5 R6 R6 Braxton Braxton Braxton 38.749321 38.749215 38.748751 -80.514337 -80.514370 -80.515247 0.0037 0.0030 0.0011 - 60 48 5 - 159 W-QR11 RPWWN PEM Braxton 38.747846 -80.521602 0.0559 - 271 - 160 S-L48 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.746690 -80.510952 0.0203 - 98 - 161 S-QR26 RPW R3UB1 Braxton 38.745016 -80.520304 0.0186 - 90 - 145 149 - Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Field Field 2-117 Temporary - Field 2-117 Temporary - Field 2-117 Temporary - Field 2-119 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field Field 2-121 2-121 2-121 2-121 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-121 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-122 2-122 2-122 2-123 Temporary - Field 2-124 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-126 2-126 2-126 Temporary - Field 2-124 Temporary - Field 2-126 Temporary - Field 2-125 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 17 of 77 Page 9 of 30 - Figure - Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type 854 1210 143 Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW ATWS Impact Duration (Discharge) Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 51 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 162 S-QR23 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.743946 -80.521742 0.0040 - 19 - 162 S-QR23 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.743737 -80.522117 0.0011 - 5 - 162 S-QR23 Total - - - - 0.0051 - 24 - 163 S-QR25 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.743848 -80.521838 0.0064 - 31 - 164 S-QR24 RPW R4SB5 Braxton 38.743495 -80.522793 0.0091 - 44 - 165 S-H117 RPW R2UB1 Braxton 38.731388 -80.505907 0.0195 - 94 - 165 165 166 167 167 167 RPW R2UB1 PEM R6 R4SB5 R4SB5 Braxton Braxton Braxton Braxton Braxton 38.731020 38.728893 38.723574 38.722646 38.722537 -80.506280 -80.506315 -80.502080 -80.505148 -80.505181 0.0283 0.0478 0.0065 0.0014 - 456 550 32 7 - 0.0031 0.0054 - 15 26 - - - - - 0.0045 0.0054 22 26 - - - Field 168 169 170 S-H117 S-H117 Total W-H89 S-AA12-EPH S-AA15 S-AA15 Harris Crossing S-AA15 & SS-L46 S-L44 S-I53 RPW RPW NRPW R3UB1 R3UB1 R6 Braxton Braxton Braxton 38.721880 38.716945 38.713940 -80.499258 -80.494589 -80.491855 0.0267 0.0185 0.0004 - 431 298 2 - Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-133 2-136 2-136 171 S-UV13 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.709858 -80.664829 0.0101 - 49 - Temporary - Field 2-468 172 S-UV14 NRPW R6 Braxton 38.709425 -80.664231 0.0179 - 86 - 173 W-I11b ISOLATE PEM Braxton 38.708869 -80.489369 0.0098 - 47 - 174 S-UV15 RPW R4SB3 Braxton 38.708821 -80.664122 0.0083 - 40 - 175 176 177 178 S-I57 S-A96/A103 S-A97 S-A99 RPW NRPW RPW NRPW R3UB1 R6 R4SB3 R6 Braxton Webster Webster Webster 38.697413 38.688706 38.688329 38.688120 -80.489560 -80.478590 -80.478406 -80.478371 0.0528 0.0114 0.0229 0.0039 - 852 185 370 19 - 179 S-A98 RPW R4SB4 Webster 38.687906 -80.478024 0.0629 - 1015 - 180 S-A101 NRPW R6 Webster 38.686679 -80.479058 0.0032 - 16 - 181 S-A102 NRPW R6 Webster 38.685865 -80.479868 0.0098 - 47 - 182 S-E83a RPW R4SB4 Webster 38.677346 -80.475023 0.0011 - 5 - 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 S-A100 S-E78/E82/R1 S-E76 S-KK1 S-KK2 S-KK3b S-KK4b S-E74 RPW RPW NRPW NRPW NRPW NRPW NRPW RPW R2UB1 R4SB3 R6 R6 R6 R6 R6 R3UB2 Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.676643 38.676223 38.674988 38.672719 38.672226 38.672110 38.671976 38.671971 -80.477940 -80.477663 -80.477360 -80.476227 -80.476315 -80.476515 -80.476825 -80.476990 0.1469 0.0094 0.0035 0.0005 0.0052 0.0069 0.0061 0.0062 - 2370 151 57 3 84 111 98 30 - 191 S-E72-Braid RPW R3RB2 Webster 38.667986 -80.478369 0.0030 - 14 - 191 S-E72 RPW R3RB2 Webster 38.667954 -80.478366 0.0041 - 20 - 191 192 S-E72 Total S-F40 RPW R2RB1 Webster 38.667943 -80.479023 0.0071 0.0499 - 34 805 - 193 S-S1 NRPW R6 Webster 38.667251 -80.480186 0.0020 - 9 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road 167 RPWWD NRPW RPW RPW 193 S-S1 NRPW R6 Webster 38.667020 -80.478624 0.0010 - 5 - 193 W-R2 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.667178 -80.480225 0.0620 - 300 - Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Station Station Station Impact Duration (Discharge) Figure Temporary - Field 2-125 Temporary - Field 2-125 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-125 Temporary - Field 2-125 Temporary - Field 2-131 Temporary Temporary Temporary Permanent Temporary Kincheloe - Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-131 2-131 2-132 2-113 2-113 Temporary - Field 2-468 Temporary - Field 2-137 Temporary - Field 2-468 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field 2-139 2-141 2-141 2-141 Temporary - Field 2-141 Temporary - Field 2-141 Temporary - Field 2-141 Temporary - Field 2-143 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-143 2-143 2-143 2-143 2-143 2-144 2-144 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-144 Temporary - Field Field 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-144 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 18 of 77 Page 10 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 52 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 W-KK3 S-S1, W-R2 &WKK3 Total RPWWD PEM Webster 38.667027 -80.478547 0.0222 - 357 - - - - 0.0872 - 671 194 W-R3 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.666869 -80.480889 0.0155 - 75 - 195 S-S2 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.666810 -80.481345 0.0037 - 18 - 196 S-S3 NRPW R6 Webster 38.665757 -80.482481 0.0036 - 17 - 197 W-F45 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.664402 -80.478856 0.0022 - 11 - 198 S-S4 NRPW R6 Webster 38.664389 -80.484709 0.0021 - 10 - 199 W-F46 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.664132 -80.479008 0.0039 - 19 - 200 W-R4 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.664021 -80.483434 0.0432 - 209 - 201 S-F43 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.663706 -80.478644 0.0232 - 375 - 202 S-R5 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.652757 -80.495715 0.0083 - 40 - 202 S-R5 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.652689 -80.495898 0.0059 - 28 - 202 203 S-R5 Total S-E67 RPW R2UB1 Webster 38.648021 -80.489704 0.0142 0.1803 - 68 2910 - 204 S-B62 RPW R2RB1 Webster 38.643910 -80.485213 0.0255 - 123 - 205 W-B44 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.633084 -80.486943 0.0056 - 27 - 206 W-B42 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.623424 -80.486240 0.0185 - 89 - 207 208 209 209 209 210 211 212 212 212 212 S-E68 S-E71 S-H111 S-H111 S-H111 Total S-H114 S-H112 S-H113 S-H113 S-H113 S-H113 Total TNW RPW RPW RPW R2UB1 R4SB3 R4SB3 R4SB3 R6 R4SB4 R3RB2 R3RB2 R3RB2 - Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster - 38.615060 38.614405 38.613367 38.613341 38.613259 38.613163 38.612982 38.612878 38.612874 - -80.506121 -80.506004 -80.504620 -80.504620 -80.504243 -80.504012 -80.503647 -80.503687 -80.503682 - 0.6425 0.0046 0.0138 0.0140 0.0278 0.0051 0.0032 0.0203 0.0026 0.0026 0.0255 - 10366 73 223 226 449 82 51 327 42 41 410 - 213 TTWV-S-214 RPW R4 Webster 38.611039 -80.550604 0.0585 - 283 - 214 215 216 217 W-H75 W-H79 W-H81 W-H82 RPWWN NRPWW ISOLATE ISOLATE PEM PEM PEM PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.607280 38.602069 38.599491 38.598415 -80.504722 -80.508493 -80.506376 -80.505238 0.0108 0.0077 0.0258 0.0128 - 174 125 125 62 - 218 W-T5 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.591863 -80.526411 0.0166 - 80 - 219 W-H86 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.591803 -80.508481 0.0013 - 6 - 220 W-H83 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.591372 -80.508904 0.0177 - 86 - Crossing # 193 193 NRPW RPW RPW RPW RPW Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field - - - - Field Temporary - Field 2-144 Temporary - Field 2-147 Temporary - Field 2-147 Temporary - Field 2-145 Temporary - Field 2-147 Temporary - Field 2-145 2-147 221 S-H110 NRPW R6 Webster 38.587200 -80.509634 0.0402 - 649 - 222 W-T4 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.586855 -80.518697 0.0403 - 195 - 223 224 224 224 W-H85 W-A20-PFO W-A20-PEM W-A20 NRPWW ISOLATE ISOLATE PEM PFO PEM - Webster Webster Webster - 38.586644 38.566923 38.566910 - -80.510350 -80.529968 -80.530098 - 0.0069 0.0117 0.0117 0.0725† 0.0725 33 1169† 57 1226 - 225 W-KK2 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.558192 -80.524167 0.0161 - 78 - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW ATWS/Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Figure 2-144 Temporary - Field Temporary - Field 2-145 Temporary - Field 2-149 Temporary - Field 2-149 Temporary - Field Field 2-151 Temporary - Field 2-160 Temporary - Field 2-159 Temporary - Field 2-158 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-163 2-163 2-163 2-163 Temporary - Desktop 2-176 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field 2-164 2-165 2-165 2-166 2-163 2-163 2-163 2-163 2-163 Temporary - Field 2-172 Temporary - Field 2-167 Temporary - Field 2-167 Temporary - Field 2-167 Temporary - Field 2-169 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Beverly - Field Field Field Field 2-167 2-178 2-178 Temporary - Field 2-184 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 19 of 77 Page 11 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 53 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 225 W-KK2 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.558182 -80.524141 225 W-KK2 Total - - - - 0.0161 0.0085 78 41 226 W-H69 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.557523 -80.525222 0.0078 - 38 - 226 W-H69 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.557502 -80.525163 226 W-H69 Total - - - - 0.0078 0.0060 38 29 227 W-H68 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.557425 -80.525181 0.0002 - 1 - 228 S-A83/A91 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.557293 -80.538966 0.0653 - 316 - 228 S-A83/A91 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.557237 -80.541093 0.0283 - 137 - 228 S-A83/A91 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.557064 -80.535592 0.0518 - 835 - 228 W-A19 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.557156 -80.538578 0.0265 - 128 - 228 S-A83/A91 & WA19 Total - - - - 0.1719 - 1416 229 W-H70 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.557097 -80.526293 229 W-H70 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.557075 -80.526280 0.0021 - 10 - 229 W-H70 Total - - - - 0.0021 0.0057 10 28 230 S-A89 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.556980 -80.537011 0.0063 - 30 - 231 S-A92 NRPW R6 Webster 38.556961 -80.536397 0.0411 - 199 - 231 231 S-A92 S-A92 Total NRPW R6 - Webster - 38.556658 - -80.535607 - 0.0175 0.0586 - 282 481 - 232 S-A88 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.556958 -80.537675 0.0142 - 69 - - - - 0.0085 0.0060 0.0057 - - - 41 29 28 233 S-A90 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.556951 -80.536556 0.0135 - 65 - 234 S-A86/A87 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.556948 -80.537406 0.0573 - 277 - 235 S-A93 NRPW R6 Webster 38.556823 -80.535751 0.0025 - 12 - 235 235 S-A93 S-A93 Total NRPW R6 - Webster - 38.556682 - -80.535572 - 0.0193 0.0218 - 312 324 - 236 W-H71 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.556481 -80.526853 0.0055 - 26 236 W-H71 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.556454 -80.526913 236 W-H71 Total - - - - 0.0055 237 W-H72 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.553783 -80.527760 238 W-O17 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.553578 -80.508257 239 W-H73 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.553085 -80.528148 239 W-H73 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.553074 -80.528114 0.0020 0.0020 239 W-H73 Total - - - - 240 W-H74 ISOLATE PEM Webster 38.552748 -80.533585 241 S-H108 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.549358 -80.539260 241 W-H67 RPWWD PFO Webster 38.549313 -80.539242 0.0012 - 0.0251 0.0205 0.0205 0.0064 0.0061 26 6 - - 10 0.0061 10 0.0115 99 99 31 29 29 56 - 405 0.0908† 1465† - 0.0908 1870 - - 241 S-H108 & W-H67 Total - - - - 0.0251 Type of Impact Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road - Impact Duration (Discharge) Figure Permanent Beverly Field - - Field Temporary - Field 2-184 Permanent Beverly Field 2-184 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-184 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 2-184 - - Field Permanent Beverly Field 2-184 Temporary - Field 2-184 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - - Field Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-181 Temporary - - Field Field 2-181 Temporary - Field 2-184 Permanent Beverly Field 2-184 - - Field Permanent Beverly Field 2-182 Temporary - Field 2-186 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-182 Temporary - Field 2-182 - - Field Permanent Beverly Field 2-182 Temporary - Field 2-182 Temporary Beverly Field 2-182 - - Field EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 20 of 77 Page 12 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 54 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 RPW RPWWD R3UB2 PFO Webster Webster 38.548824 38.548873 -80.539644 -80.539592 0.0083 - 0.2496† 135 4026† - - - - 0.0083 0.2496 4161 - - 243 S-H105 W-H66 S-H105 & W-H66 Total S-H107 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.548467 -80.540073 0.0003 - 5 - 243 S-H107 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.548463 -80.540050 243 243 244 244 244 244 245 246 246 S-H107 S-H107 Total W-H64-PEM W-H64-PSS W-H64-PEM-2 W-H64 Total S-H104 S-H103 W-H56 S-H103 & W-H56 Total RPW R4SB5 PEM PSS PEM R2UB1 R4SB3 PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.548378 38.548175 38.548099 38.548058 38.548121 38.545817 38.545807 -80.539980 -80.540709 -80.540896 -80.540847 -80.540431 -80.542972 -80.542983 Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - - Crossing # 242 242 242 246 RPWWD RPWWD RPWWD RPW RPW RPWWD 0.0031 0.0034 0.0276 - 0.0010 - - 3 0.0289 0.0565 0.0360 0.0034 0.0206 0.0010 0.0422† 0.0422 - 50 55 133 681† 466 1280 580 16 100 3 - 0.0240 - 116 - 247 W-O15 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.536021 -80.511990 0.0247 - 120 - 248 W-O13 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.533730 -80.513482 0.0278 - 135 - 248 W-O13 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.533655 -80.513682 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 W-O13 Total W-H58 W-H59-PEM W-KL8 W-H60 W-H61 W-H62 W-B39 ISOLATE NRPWW ISOLATE NRPWW ISOLATE ISOLATE NRPWW PEM PEM PEM PEM PEM PEM PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.523642 38.521027 38.519565 38.517850 38.517345 38.517147 38.508151 -80.546324 -80.546343 -80.545076 -80.544693 -80.545025 -80.545591 -80.559329 0.0278 0.0299 0.0074 0.0976 0.0869 0.0094 0.0335 0.0906 0.0405 - 135 145 36 472 1401 151 162 1462 196 - 256 W-B38 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.495397 -80.559910 0.0519 - 251 - - 0.0405 - 196 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Beverly Field Field 2-182 2-182 - - Field Temporary - Field Permanent Indian Creek Field 2-182 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Beverly - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-182 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-190 Temporary - Field 2-190 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-190 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-198 2-198 2-198 2-199 2-199 2-199 2-201 Temporary - Field 2-203 2-182 2-182 2-182 2-182 2-182 2-194 2-194 257 S-B48 NRPW R6 Webster 38.495356 -80.560429 0.0047 - 23 - 258 259 260 261 262 262 262 262 RPWWD RPW RPW NRPW RPW RPWWD NRPW NRPW PEM R2UB1 R4SB4 R6 R4SB3 PSS R6 R6 Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.494322 38.493956 38.493884 38.493819 38.493750 38.493757 38.493723 38.493645 -80.561155 -80.560990 -80.560969 -80.560919 -80.560898 -80.560962 -80.560843 -80.560892 0.0320 0.0561 0.0037 0.0033 0.0038 0.0020 0.0046 0.0108† - 517 904 59 53 61 174† 32 75 - - - - - 0.0104 0.0108 342 - - NRPW NRPW NRPW NRPW NRPW R6 R6 R6 R6 R6 Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.493532 38.493352 38.493394 38.493363 38.493227 -80.560792 -80.560574 -80.560786 -80.560657 -80.560529 0.0008 0.0000 0.0008 0.0122 0.0076 0.0007 - 13 0 13 196 122 12 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0083 - 134 - - - - Field 266 267 268 W-B31 S-B34 S-B35 S-B36 S-B37 W-B35 S-B38 S-B42 S-B37, S-B38, SB42 & W-B35 Total S-B39b S-B39b S-B39b Total S-B45 S-B39a/B46 S-B39a/B46 S-B39a/B46 Total S-B43 S-O4 S-O5 NRPW RPW NRPW R6 R2RB1 R6 Webster Webster Webster 38.492227 38.483002 38.482251 -80.560443 -80.556464 -80.555499 0.0036 0.0379 0.0035 - 17 612 56 - Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-203 2-206 2-206 269 W-A18 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.481237 -80.555783 0.2038 - 986 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-206 262 263 263 263 264 265 265 265 Temporary - Field 2-203 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Beverly - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 - - Field Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 21 of 77 Page 13 of 30 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 2-203 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 55 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 270 S-A79 RPW R2UB1 Webster 38.480782 -80.554682 0.1563 - 2521 - 271 S-A81 NRPW R6 Webster 38.481219 -80.554668 0.0037 - 18 - 272 S-A80 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.480687 -80.554061 0.0096 - 46 - 273 S-E58 RPW R2UB3 Webster 38.443669 -80.551989 0.0187 - 302 - 274 W-E28 RPWWD PSS Webster 38.443010 -80.551309 275 S-E55 NRPW R6 Webster 38.440270 -80.559955 0.0022 276 W-F18 NRPWW PEM Webster 38.438835 -80.577826 277 W-F19 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.438588 -80.577142 0.0084 40 - 35 0.0012 - 6 - 0.0085 - 41 - - 278 S-F22 RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.438157 -80.575929 0.1279 - 619 - 278 W-F20 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.437197 -80.575137 0.0168 - 81 - 278 S-F22 & W-F20 - - - - 0.1447 - 700 - 279 S-F25/F26 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.434116 -80.569027 0.0023 - 11 - 280 S-F32 RPW R4SB3 Webster 38.434034 -80.567225 0.0017 - 8 - 281 S-F33 NRPW R6 Webster 38.433946 -80.566631 0.0298 - 144 - 282 S-F31 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.433907 -80.567319 0.0088 - 42 - 283 S-F28 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.433103 -80.568130 0.0104 - 51 - 284 S-F27/F29 RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.432824 -80.567852 0.0313 - 152 - 285 286 287 287 287 W-F26 S-F35 S-F34 W-F29 W-F28 S-F34, W-F29 & W-F28 Total NRPWW RPW RPW RPWWD RPWWD PEM R3UB3 R3UB3 PEM PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.428623 38.424082 38.423988 38.424050 38.423890 -80.567054 -80.570710 -80.570680 -80.570711 -80.570659 0.0045 0.0006 0.0099 0.0054 0.0037 - 22 3 160 26 18 - - - - - 0.0190 - 204 - 287 Type of Impact Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Temporary - Field 2-206 Temporary - Field 2-206 2-206 Temporary - Field Temporary - Field 2-212 Permanent Beverly Field 2-212 Temporary - Field 2-213 Temporary - Field 2-216 Temporary - Field 2-216 Temporary - Field 2-216 Temporary - Field 2-216 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary - Field 2-215 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field 2-219 2-220 2-220 2-220 2-220 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary Beverly Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-220 Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 288 S-F36a RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.422056 -80.569457 0.0006 - 11 - 288 S-F36a RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.421474 -80.570012 0.0027 - 13 - 288 S-F36a RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.418662 -80.573898 0.0027 - 13 - 288 S-F36a RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.418122 -80.574566 0.0023 - 3 - 288 W-F40 RPWWD PSS Webster 38.421461 -80.570007 0.0188† 91† - 288 W-F37 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.420097 -80.572466 0.0007 - 4 - 288 W-F36 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.420084 -80.572603 0.0005 - 3 - 288 W-F32 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.418041 -80.575053 0.0002 - 1 - 288 W-F31 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.417806 -80.576227 0.0223 - 108 - 288 S-F36a, W-F40, W-F37, W-F36, WF32 & W-F31 Total - - - - 0.0320 0.0188 247 - - - - Field 289 S-F38 R3UB3 Webster 38.419895 -80.572765 0.0037 - 18 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field RPW - EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 22 of 77 Page 14 of 30 Figure 2-220 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 56 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 290 W-F33 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.418139 -80.574370 0.0005 - 2 - 291 S-F36b RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.417934 -80.576775 0.0300 - 145 - 291 S-F36b RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.417774 -80.576635 0.0359 - 580 - 291 S-F36b RPW R3UB1 Webster 38.417693 -80.576495 0.0074 - 36 - 291 S-F36b Total - - - - 0.0733 - 761 - 292 W-F42 RPWWN PEM Webster 38.417838 -80.575730 0.0065 - 31 - 293 S-F37 RPW R3UB3 Webster 38.417651 -80.576431 0.0018 - 9 - W-F41 RPWWD PEM Webster 38.417599 -80.576458 0.0002 - 1 - - - - - 0.0020 - 10 - - NRPW RPW RPW RPW RPWWD R6 R4SB3 R3UB3 R3UB3 PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.416587 38.408941 38.405871 38.405683 38.405713 -80.577890 -80.589063 -80.591069 -80.591116 -80.591171 0.0022 0.0038 0.0063 0.0237 0.0485 - 11 18 31 383 783 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0785 - 1197 - - RPW RPWWD R2UB3 PEM Webster Webster 38.399618 38.401209 -80.597332 -80.597852 0.0136 0.1733 - 220 839 - RPWWD PEM Webster 38.399940 -80.597527 0.2983 - 4812 - Pipeline ROW Anode Bed Pipeline ROW/Anode Bed Temporary - - - - 0.4852 - 5871 - - - RPW NRPW RPW RPWWD R4SB5 R6 R3UB1 PEM Webster Webster Webster Webster 38.400883 38.399733 38.370597 38.370595 -80.597787 -80.597536 -80.611921 -80.611923 0.0084 0.0024 0.0085 0.0389 - 41 12 138 627 - Anode Bed Anode Bed Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0474 - 765 - - - - Field RPW R4SB5 Webster 38.369110 -80.611761 0.0025 - 12 - Pipeline ROW Temporary Ancillary Site Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field Temporary - Field 2-471 Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF - Field Field Field 2-231 2-231 2-231 293 293 294 295 296 296 296 296 297 297 297 S-F37 & W-F41 Total S-C49 S-B33 S-B32-Braid S-B32 W-B30 S-B32 & W-B30 Total S-B29 W-EF29 W-B28 Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 Temporary - Field 2-221 - - Field Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field - - Field Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-224 2-224 - Field 2-224 - Field 2-221 2-223 2-223 2-223 2-223 301 S-B29, W-EF29 & W-B28 Total S-EF40 S-B30 S-E50 W-E21 S-E50 & W-E21 Total S-E52 302 W-IJ43 ISOLATE PEM Nicholas 38.368775 -80.822726 0.0144 - 70 - 303 303 303 RPWWD RPWWD RPW PEM PSS R3UB1 Webster Webster Webster 38.367359 38.367284 38.367280 -80.612334 -80.612248 -80.612317 0.0208 0.0075 0.0538† - 101 868† 122 - - - - - 0.0283 0.0538 1091 - - - - Field 304 305 306 307 308 309 309 W-E18-PEM W-E18-PSS S-E50 S-E50 & WE18Total S-E49 W-E16 W-E13 S-E46 W-F13 S-F21 S-F20 NRPW NRPWW RPWWN RPW RPWWN RPW RPW R6 PEM PFO R2UB1 PEM R3UB3 R3UB3 Nicholas Nicholas Webster Webster Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.365574 38.364427 38.364017 38.363374 38.356737 38.355859 38.355800 -80.613141 -80.614459 -80.616570 -80.617277 -80.631888 -80.633328 -80.633223 0.0020 0.0124 0.0594 0.0354 0.0016 0.0176 0.0107† - 33 200 52† 958 171 8 284 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Spanishburg - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-231 2-232 2-232 2-232 2-234 2-234 2-234 309 W-F12 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.356528 -80.632264 0.1068 - 1723 - Temporary - Field 2-234 309 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.355680 -80.633383 0.1542 - 2488 - Temporary - Field 2-234 - - - - 0.2803 - 4504 - - - - Field 310 W-F11 S-F20, S-F21, WF11 & W-F12 Total W-K23 Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.355273 -80.633811 0.0294 - 474 - - Field 2-234 W-K23 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.355237 -80.633777 Permanent ILF Field 2-234 310 W-K23 Total - - - - Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road - Temporary 310 - - Field 297 298 299 300 300 300 303 309 0.0294 0.0195 0.0195 474 95 95 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 23 of 77 Page 15 of 30 2-224 2-224 2-231 2-230 2-231 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 57 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # 311 312 312 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 318 318 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 W-K20 W-IJ51 S-IJ57 S-IJ57 & W-IJ51 Total W-IJ50 S-IJ59 S-IJ60 W-IJ55 S-IJ62 S-B28 W-B27 S-B28 & W-B27 Total RPWWD RPWWD RPW PEM PEM R3UB1 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.354644 38.352366 38.352362 -80.634586 -80.636369 -80.636401 0.0100 0.0410 0.0094 - 48 662 152 - - - - - 0.0504 - 814 - - - - Field RPWWN NRPW RPW RPWWN RPW RPW RPWWD PEM R6 R3RB1 PEM R4SB3 R2UB3 PEM Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.350787 38.348372 38.343699 38.343568 38.343547 38.340083 38.339713 -80.637226 -80.641152 -80.644721 -80.646491 -80.647035 -80.655413 -80.655364 0.0528 0.0096 0.0141 0.0218 0.0054 0.0315 0.0515 - 852 46 227 352 88 508 249 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field - - - - 0.0830 - 757 - 319 S-B26 RPW R4SB5 Nicholas 38.339012 -80.659609 0.0039 - 19 - 319 W-B26-PEM-1 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.339034 -80.659282 0.0273 - 132 - W-B26-PEM-2 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.338935 -80.659254 0.0060 - 29 - - - - - 0.0372 - 180 - - Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.337803 38.337774 38.332776 38.331763 38.308183 -80.658933 -80.658995 -80.669068 -80.670342 -80.675347 - RPWWN RPW RPW PSS PEM PEM R2UB1 R2RB2 0.1780 0.1780 0.0444 0.0625 0.1240 0.0987† 0.0987 - 1592† 2872 4464 716 1008 2000 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.1865 - 3008 - - RPW RPWWD R3UB3 PEM Nicholas Nicholas 38.329126 38.329122 -80.671211 -80.671098 0.0106 0.0037 - 172 18 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0143 - 190 - - - - Field NRPWW RPW NRPW RPW RPWWD PEM R3UB2 R6 R4SB5 PSS Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.327813 38.326001 38.325540 38.323815 38.323735 -80.670776 -80.670358 -80.670150 -80.670069 -80.670118 0.1300 0.0193 0.0069 0.0114 - 0.0891† 2098 311 112 184 1437† - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF Field Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0114 0.0891 1621 - - - - Field NRPW RPWWD RPW RPW R6 PFO R3RB2 R4SB2 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.321687 38.321643 38.321572 38.321548 -80.670952 -80.670901 -80.670958 -80.670969 0.0039 0.0089 0.0163 0.0972† - 19 1569† 144 263 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF - Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0292 0.0972 1995 - - - - Field RPW RPW RPW RPW RPW RPWWD R3UB1 R4SB3 R4SB3 R3UB1 R3UB2 PEM Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.317575 38.317217 38.317089 38.313275 38.313105 38.313104 -80.671553 -80.671495 -80.671565 -80.673645 -80.673751 -80.673749 0.0121 0.0113 0.0022 0.0135 0.0071 0.0087 0.0638 - 196 183 36 219 114 140 1030 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 319 319 320 320 320 321 322 322 322 323 323 323 324 325 326 327 327 327 328 328 328 328 328 329 330 330 330 331 332 332 332 S-B26 & W-B26 Total W-FF6-PSS W-FF6-PEM W-FF6 Total W-FF3 S-J32 S-A65 S-J32 & S-A65 Total S-A76 W-FF4 S-A76 & W-FF4 Total W-A17 S-A75 S-A74 S-A73 W-A15 S-A73 & W-A15 Total S-A72 W-A14 S-A71 S-A71-Braid S-A72, S-A71 & W-A14 Total S-A67 S-A69 S-A69 S-A69 Total S-H100 S-H99 W-H52 S-H99 & W-H52 Total RPWWN RPWWN - - - - 0.0725 - 1170 - 333 S-H96 RPW R4SB3 Nicholas 38.309759 -80.675706 0.0018 - 9 - 334 S-H95 NRPW R6 Nicholas 38.309738 -80.675733 0.0178 - 86 - - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road 2-234 2-234 2-234 2-235 2-236 2-237 2-237 2-237 2-239 2-240 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-240 Temporary - Field 2-240 Temporary - Field 2-240 - - Field Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF - Field Field Field Field Field Field - - Field Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-240 2-240 2-242 2-242 2-245 2-242 2-242 2-242 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-243 2-244 2-244 2-244 2-245 2-245 2-245 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-245 Temporary - Field 2-245 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 24 of 77 Page 16 of 30 Figure Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 58 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 335 W-H50 NRPWW PEM Nicholas 38.309707 -80.676585 0.0114 - 55 - 336 337 337 S-A64 W-N25 S-N15 S-N15 & W-N25 Total W-N24 S-N14 S-N14 S-N14 Total W-N22 S-I43 W-I7 S-I43 & W-I7 Total NRPW RPWWD RPW R6 PEM R4SB1 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.304538 38.302028 38.301571 -80.673827 -80.674533 -80.674776 0.0086 0.0104 0.0234 - 139 50 377 - - - - - 0.0338 - 427 - - - - Field RPWWN RPW RPW PEM R2UB2 R2UB2 PEM R4SB5 PFO Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.299148 38.297014 38.296646 38.296941 38.293473 38.293453 -80.675928 -80.676341 -80.676258 -80.676479 -80.677158 -80.677084 0.0031 0.0171 0.0030 0.0201 0.0030 0.0180 - 0.0391† 15 275 48 323 14 291 630† - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF Field Field Field Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0180 0.0391 921 - - - - Field 342 S-I44 RPW R2UB2 Nicholas 38.291332 -80.679265 0.0146 - 236 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 343 344 345 346 S-I45 S-I47 S-I48 S-J29 RPW RPW RPW TNW R3UB3 R4SB5 R3UB1 R2UB1 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.290061 38.284291 38.280116 38.274498 -80.680304 -80.685885 -80.687738 -80.691389 0.0140 0.0037 0.0199 2.1556 - 226 59 321 34776 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field 347 S-EF28 RPW R4SB2 Nicholas 38.268989 -80.680189 0.0088 - 43 - Temporary - Field 2-254 348 S-J26 RPW R3RB2 Nicholas 38.268317 -80.682864 0.0249 - 120 - Temporary - Field 2-254 348 S-J26 RPW R3RB2 Nicholas 38.268267 -80.68288 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-254 348 S-J26 RPW R3RB2 Nicholas 38.268218 -80.682896 Temporary - Field 2-254 348 S-MN9 RPW R3UB1 Nicholas 38.261759 -80.684644 Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road 2-249 & 2250 2-250 2-251 2-251 2-253 Temporary - Field 2-258 348 S-J26 & S-MN9 Total - - - - - - - Field 349 W-EF8 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.267034 -80.670429 Temporary - Field 350 S-MN8 RPW R3UB1 Nicholas 38.266362 Temporary - Field 2-257 351 351 S-J28 W-J8 S-J28 & W-J8 Total RPW RPWWD R4SB3 PFO Nicholas Nicholas 38.263235 38.263168 Temporary Temporary ILF Field Field 2-256 2-256 - - - 352 S-J25 NRPW R6 Nicholas 38.256724 352 352 353 353 353 S-J25 S-J25 Total S-J24 S-J24 S-J24 Total NRPW R6 R3UB1 R3UB1 - Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas - 38.256682 38.256302 38.256248 - 354 W-W5 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 355 W-W4 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 356 357 357 S-J23-EPH W-J7 S-J22 S-J22 & W-J7 Total S-N10 S-N10-Braid S-N10 Total NRPW RPWWD RPW R6 PFO R4SB5 337 338 339 339 339 340 341 341 341 351 357 358 358 358 RPWWN RPW RPWWD RPW RPW RPW RPW 0.0242 0.0207 - 100 - Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - 117 0.0264 - 128 - 0.0755 0.0207 365 100 0.0053 - 26 - -80.683559 0.0030 - 14 - -80.687908 -80.687930 0.0091 - 0.0533† 147 860† - - 0.0091 0.0533 1007 - -80.687047 0.0047 - 23 - -80.687348 -80.687350 -80.687358 - 0.0089 0.0136 0.0261 0.0261 0.0522 - 143 166 422 421 843 - 38.243285 -80.741101 0.0058 - 28 - 38.243122 -80.740672 0.0241 - 117 - Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.234331 38.233731 38.233718 -80.707513 -80.708250 -80.708268 0.0025 0.0058 0.0693† - 41 1119† 94 - - - - - 0.0058 0.0693 1212 - - R2UB3 R4SB5 - Nicholas Nicholas - 38.231025 38.230934 - -80.710633 -80.710804 - 0.0071 0.0069 0.0140 - 115 112 227 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Impact Duration (Discharge) Figure Temporary - Field 2-245 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-247 2-247 2-247 2-248 2-248 2-248 2-248 2-249 2-249 2-255 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-258 Temporary Temporary Temporary - - Field Field Field Field Field 2-258 Temporary - Field 2-275 Temporary - Field 2-275 Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF - Field Field Field 2-266 2-266 2-266 - - Field Temporary Temporary - - Field Field Field EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 25 of 77 Page 17 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type 2-258 2-258 2-267 2-267 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 59 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 NRPW RPW RPW R6 R4SB2 R4SB5 - Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas - 38.228924 38.226869 38.226851 - -80.713076 -80.715487 -80.715393 - 0.0074 0.0050 0.0041 0.0091 - 120 24 66 90 - W-U3 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.226324 -80.687293 0.0099 - 48 - W-N18 NRPWW PEM Nicholas 38.224246 -80.716448 0.0075 - 36 - S-L42 RPW R4SB3 Nicholas 38.221567 -80.718197 0.0075 - 37 - RPW RPW RPW RPW RPW RPWWD R2UB1 R3UB3 R2UB3 R2UB3 R2UB3 PEM Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.220793 38.205534 38.203887 38.203097 38.200338 38.203621 -80.717100 -80.718246 -80.719122 -80.719248 -80.717177 -80.719372 0.0349 0.0052 0.0079 0.0080 0.0072 0.0064 - 564 83 128 129 117 31 - - - - - 0.0295 - 405 - - - - Field RPW RPWWN NRPW RPW RPW RPW RPWWD RPW R4SB5 PEM R6 R4SB5 R4SB3 R4SB5 PEM R4SB5 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.203873 38.202610 38.196644 38.194221 38.194025 38.187582 38.179434 38.179384 -80.718989 -80.718505 -80.718856 -80.719357 -80.719298 -80.723025 -80.729511 -80.729497 0.0008 0.0029 0.0056 0.0089 0.0126 0.0133 0.0579 0.0143 - 4 14 27 143 204 214 934 231 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0722 - 1165 - - - - Field 374 375 376 377 378 S-L41 S-L38 S-L35 S-L35 S-L35 W-L28 S-L35 & W-L28 Total S-L37 W-L27 S-I37 S-I38 S-I39 S-I40 W-I11a S-I41 S-I41 & W-I11a Total S-I36 W-U7 W-I5 S-I31 S-N8a RPW RPWWN RPWWN NRPW RPW R2RB2 PEM PEM R6 R3UB3 Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.178889 38.178298 38.175595 38.163802 38.162363 -80.729790 -80.729744 -80.730736 -80.730743 -80.733602 0.0976 0.0666 0.0082 0.0033 0.0172 - 1575 322 133 54 277 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field 2-286 2-286 2-286 2-294 2-294 379 S-VV1 RPW R4SB3 Nicholas 38.161085 -80.734282 0.0041 - 20 - Temporary - Field 2-295 379 379 RPW RPWWD R4SB3 PEM Nicholas Nicholas 38.161064 38.161072 -80.735022 -80.735000 0.0073 0.0229 - 118 369 - Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-295 2-286 - - - - 0.0343 - 507 - - - - Field 380 S-VV1 W-VV2 S-VV1 & WVV2Total W-N16 Pipeline ROW ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW NRPWW PEM Nicholas 38.157063 -80.738304 0.0348 - 561 - Temporary - Field 2-295 381 W-H48 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.138565 -80.727192 0.0078 - 38 - Temporary - Field 2-299 382 W-H49 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.138550 -80.725571 0.0012 - 6 - Temporary - Field 2-299 383 W-H46 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.137490 -80.728993 0.0061 - 30 - Temporary - Field 2-299 383 S-H90 RPW R4SB5 Nicholas 38.137462 -80.729246 0.0006 - 3 - Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-298 383 S-H90 & WH46Total - - - - 0.0067 - 33 - - - - Field 384 W-H45-PFO RPWWD PFO Nicholas 38.137212 -80.729564 0.0211† 102† - Temporary ILF Field 384 W-H45-PEM RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.137146 -80.729716 - 56 - Temporary - Field 2-298 2-298 & 2299 Crossing # Feature Name Water Type 359 360 360 360 S-EE1 S-N13-Braid S-N13 S-N13 Total 361 362 363 364 365 366 366 366 366 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 373 373 379 384 S-H88 384 S-H88 & WH45Total 385 S-H80 385 W-H41 RPW 0.0115 Type of Impact Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Temporary Temporary Temporary - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type - Figure Field Field Field Field 2-267 2-268 2-268 Temporary - Field 2-263 Temporary - Field 2-268 Temporary - Field 2-268 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-268 2-281 2-281 2-281 2-281 2-281 2-281 2-281 2-282 2-282 2-282 2-283 2-286 2-286 2-298 R2RB2 Nicholas 38.136744 -80.730560 0.0697 - 1125 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field - - - - 0.0812 0.0211 1283 - - - - Field RPW R4SB5 Nicholas 38.128044 -80.733815 0.0009 - 4 - Temporary - Field 2-301 RPWWN PEM Nicholas 38.127873 -80.733868 0.0151 - 73 - Temporary - Field 2-301 Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 26 of 77 Page 18 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 60 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project - - - - 0.0160 - 77 - RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.127800 -80.734855 0.0067 - 33 - W-H40 RPWWD PEM Nicholas 38.127525 -80.734781 0.0043 - 21 - - - - - 0.0110 - 54 - - RPWWD RPW PEM R3UB2 Nicholas Nicholas 38.124326 38.124315 -80.735761 -80.735783 0.0590 0.0257 - 952 415 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0847 - 1367 - - - - Field RPWWN RPW RPW RPWWN RPW RPWWN RPW RPW RPWWD PEM R3UB2 R4SB5 PEM R4SB5 PSS R3UB1 R4SB5 PEM Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas Nicholas 38.124117 38.120580 38.120088 38.116376 38.116279 38.115834 38.115823 38.107549 38.107483 -80.736018 -80.736772 -80.737022 -80.735285 -80.735319 -80.731137 -80.730960 -80.726284 -80.726303 0.0177 0.0235 0.0023 0.0139 0.0060 0.0219 0.0038 0.0208 0.0031† - 285 379 11 67 96 15† 354 61 336 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/ATWS Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary ILF - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field Field - - - - 0.0246 - 397 - - - - Field S-H80 & WH41Total 386 387 387 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 395 395 Impact Duration (Discharge) W-H38 385 386 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 Feature Name 386 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Water Type Crossing # W-H38 & W-H40 Total W-H33 S-H71 S-H71 & W-H33 Total W-H35 S-H67 S-H66 W-H31 S-H64 W-V4 S-V3 S-EF41 W-EF31 S-EF41 & WEF31 Total County Latitude2 Longitude2 Type of Impact Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure - - Field Temporary - Field 2-301 Temporary - Field 2-301 - - Field Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-301 2-301 2-301 2-302 2-302 2-303 2-303 2-304 2-304 2-305 2-305 396 W-M15 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 38.068055 -80.718035 0.0027 - 13 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-311 397 W-M16 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 38.067873 -80.718034 0.0037 - 18 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-311 398 W-M17 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 38.067698 -80.718179 0.0042 - 20 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-311 399 W-M18 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 38.061194 -80.720732 0.0415 - 669 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-312 400 W-M20 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 38.060869 -80.723064 0.0031 - 15 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-312 0.0616 401 W-M23 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 38.060683 -80.722348 402 W-M22 NRPWW PSS Greenbrier 38.060661 -80.722616 403 W-QR4 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.057094 -80.729024 404 W-J6 RPWWD PFO Greenbrier 38.053361 -80.732198 0.0370 - - 994 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-312 0.0039† 19† - Pipeline ROW Temporary ILF Field 2-312 - 179 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-314 0.0744† 1,201† - Pipeline ROW Temporary ILF Field 2-315 Temporary - Field 2-323 Temporary - Field 2-322 Temporary - Field 2-328 Temporary - Field 2-328 Temporary - Field 2-326 Temporary - Field 2-327 Temporary - Field 2-327 Temporary - Field 2-326 Temporary - Field 2-326 Temporary - Field 2-326 Temporary - Field 2-326 405 S-J31 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 38.041774 -80.745842 0.0070 - 34 - 406 W-J9 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 38.039366 -80.747651 0.0179 - 86 - 407 W-KL37 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.033817 -80.731491 0.0126 - 61 - 407 W-KL38 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.033422 -80.732880 0.0098 - 47 - 407 W-IJ58-PEM-5 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.030548 -80.736023 0.0004 - 2 - 407 W-KL40 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.029060 -80.736807 0.0312 - 151 - 407 W-IJ61 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.026898 -80.738411 0.0214 - 103 - 407 W-IJ58-PEM-4 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.024068 -80.739750 0.0024 - 12 - 407 W-IJ58-PEM-2 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.022593 -80.741917 0.0031 - 15 - 407 W-IJ58-PEM-3 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.021808 -80.743351 0.0056 - 27 - 407 W-IJ58-PEM-1 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.021745 -80.744012 0.0015 - 7 - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 27 of 77 Page 19 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 61 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name 407 W-KL37, WKL38, W-IJ58, WKL40 & W-IJ61 Total 408 W-ST27 Water Type ISOLATE Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 - - - - 0.0880 - 425 PEM Greenbrier 38.029124 -80.742585 0.0075 - 36 409 W-J5 NRPWW PSS Greenbrier 38.028817 -80.743566 410 W-ST28 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 38.028800 -80.743155 0.0310 - Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) - - - - Field - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-321 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 0.0052† 25† - Pipeline ROW Temporary ILF Field 2-321 - 150 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-321 411 S-J19 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 38.028599 -80.743623 0.0044 - 71 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-321 412 W-IJ60 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 38.024335 -80.739643 0.0174 - 84 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-326 Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-324 Temporary - Field 2-325 Temporary - Field 2-326 Temporary - Field 2-325 Temporary - Field 2-329 413 S-J20 RPW R3UB3 Greenbrier 38.023801 -80.747266 0.0592 - 955 - 414 S-IJ66 RPW R4SB3 Greenbrier 38.022216 -80.746495 0.0116 - 56 - 415 W-IJ59 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 38.022031 -80.743027 0.0024 - 12 - 416 W-IJ57 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 38.021723 -80.745579 0.0017 - 8 - 417 S-I25 RPW R4SB3 Greenbrier 38.020430 -80.753194 0.0086 - 139 - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW 418 S-I26 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 38.019129 -80.755220 0.0090 - 145 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-329 419 S-I27 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 38.018031 -80.755999 0.0091 - 147 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-329 Temporary - Field 2-333 Temporary - Field 2-335 Temporary - Field 2-335 Permanent ILF Field 2-336 Temporary - Field 2-336 2-336 420 W-V6 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.993269 -80.756363 0.0422 - 204 - 421 W-M5 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.987898 -80.764724 0.0058 - 28 - 0.0192 - 93 422 W-M6 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.987344 -80.761908 423 W-QR2 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.983978 -80.756817 423 W-QR2 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.983212 -80.756099 0.2435 - 3929 - 423 S-I29 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.982531 -80.755275 0.0117 - 57 - ATWS Temporary - Field 423 S-I29 & W-QR2 Total - - - - 0.2552 0.0010 3986 5 - - - Field - 0.0010 - - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road 5 424 S-I28 RPW R2UB3 Greenbrier 37.982078 -80.755369 0.0861 - 1389 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-336 425 S-L26 RPW R3UB Greenbrier 37.981900 -80.755213 0.0079 - 127 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-336 425 S-L26 RPW R3UB Greenbrier 37.980598 -80.754872 0.0114 - 184 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-336 425 W-L16 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.980653 -80.754908 0.0247 - 398 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-336 425 S-L26 & W-L16 Total - - - - 0.0440 - 709 - - - - Field 426 W-PP7 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 37.966818 -80.738483 0.0255 - 124 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-339 427 S-EF38 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.963259 -80.733162 0.0028 - 46 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-339 428 S-L24 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.963068 -80.733141 0.0065 - 106 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-340 429 W-L20 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.962843 -80.732518 0.0172 - 83 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-340 430 W-L22 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.962713 -80.732241 0.0131 - 63 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-340 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 28 of 77 Page 20 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 62 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 431 W-L21 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.962682 -80.732475 0.0266 - 129 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-340 432 S-L27 RPW R4SB3 Greenbrier 37.960725 -80.732852 0.0035 - 56 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-340 433 S-L30 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.954276 -80.739708 0.0093 - 151 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-341 Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-341 433 W-L19 RPWWD PEM 433 S-L30 & W-L19 Total 434 Greenbrier - - S-L22 RPW R2UB1 Greenbrier 435 W-L13 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 436 W-L12 RPWWN PEM 437 S-L20 RPW R3UB3 437 W-L11 RPWWD 437 S-L20 & W-L11 Total 438 W-L8 439 W-L4 37.954250 -80.739757 0.1060 - 1711 - - - 0.1153 - 1861 - - - - Field 37.954035 -80.739868 0.0517 - 834 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-341 37.953825 -80.740037 0.0316 - 509 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-341 Greenbrier 37.953736 -80.739892 0.0075 - 36 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-341 Greenbrier 37.949579 -80.742646 0.0111 - 179 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-342 PEM Greenbrier 37.949563 -80.742715 0.0194 - 94 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-342 - - - - 0.0305 - 273 - - - - Field RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.939016 -80.745277 0.0001 - 0 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-344 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.938675 -80.746774 0.0404 - 196 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-344 Temporary - Field 2-344 440 S-L10 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.938606 -80.746051 0.0013 - 6 - Temporary Access Road 440 S-L10 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.938308 -80.747009 0.0071 - 115 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-344 Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-344 440 W-L2 440 S-L10 & W-L2 Total 441 W-L3 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.938326 -80.746878 0.0393 - 635 - - - - - 0.0477 - 756 - - - - Field - Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary - Field Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-344 Permanent ILF Field 2-345 Temporary - Field 2-345 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-345 Permanent ILF Field 2-345 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-345 Field RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.938569 -80.746480 0.0136 0.0018 - 66 - 9 442 S-L11 RPW R4SB4 Greenbrier 37.938229 -80.746912 443 W-L7 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.934077 -80.744896 443 W-L7 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.934074 -80.744879 0.0021 - 10 - 443 W-L7 Total - - - - 0.0021 0.0015 10 7 444 W-L6 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.933862 -80.745240 0.0223 - 108 - 444 W-L6 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.933720 -80.745329 444 S-L13 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.933655 -80.745327 444 S-L13 & W-L6 Total - - - - 445 W-EF28 NRPWW PFO Greenbrier 37.923033 -80.740465 446 S-EF39 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.922828 -80.740670 0.0202 447 S-I21 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.918228 -80.736774 0.0034 447 S-I21 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.918164 -80.736852 0.0089 447 S-I21 Total - - - - 0.0123 - 0.0223 - 0.0015 0.0188 0.0008 - - 7 91 3 Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road 2-344 0.0196 108 94 - - - 0.0095† 46† - Anode Bed Temporary ILF Field 2-347 - 98 - Anode Bed Temporary - Field 2-347 - 55 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-348 - 143 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-348 - 198 - - - - Field EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 29 of 77 Page 21 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 63 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 0.0043 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Temporary - Field 2-348 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-348 Temporary - Field 2-349 S-I22 RPW R4SB3 Greenbrier 37.918041 -80.736833 S-I23a RPW R4SB3 Greenbrier 37.917347 -80.738534 450 W-KL30 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.917261 -80.745506 0.0664 450 W-KL29-PEM RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.916791 -80.744943 0.1438 450 W-IJ47-PEM RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.916423 -80.743551 450 W-IJ47-PEM RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.916255 -80.743867 450 W-KL30, W-KL29 & W-IJ47 Total - - - - 0.2102 0.0633 1018 307 451 S-IJ54 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.917146 -80.742478 0.0010 - 5 - 451 S-IJ54 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.917125 -80.742425 451 S-IJ54 Total - - - - 0.0010 452 W-W11 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.911778 -80.729952 0.0016 452 W-W11 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.911778 -80.729952 452 S-W23 RPW R4SB Greenbrier 37.911730 -80.729941 0.0006 - 3 - 452 S-W23 & W-W11 Total - - - - 0.0022 0.0044 11 21 453 W-W10 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.911495 -80.727880 453 W-W10 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.911495 -80.727880 0.0050 - 24 - 453 W-W10 Total - - - - 0.0050 0.0439 24 212 454 S-W22 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.911127 -80.727485 454 S-W22 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.911104 -80.727487 0.0005 - 2 - 454 S-W22 Total - - - - 0.0005 0.0005 2 2 455 W-W9 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.910671 -80.728841 455 W-W9 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.910671 -80.728841 0.0089 - 43 - 455 W-W9 Total - - - - 0.0089 0.0087 43 42 Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Raod Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road/ATWS - 456 W-FF1 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.908821 -80.733706 0.0320 - 516 - Pipeline ROW - - - - - - - - 322 - 696 0.0113 0.0520 0.0036 - - 0.0036 5 - 8 0.0044 0.0439 0.0005 0.0087 - - - - - Pipeline ROW 448 0.0030 70 Impact Duration (Discharge) 449 - - Type of Impact 10 55 252 12 12 21 212 2 42 Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Temporary - Field 2-349 Permanent ILF Field 2-349 Permanent ILF Field 2-349 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-349 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-349 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-350 Permanent ILF Field 2-350 Temporary - Field 2-350 - - Field Permanent ILF Field 2-351 Temporary - Field 2-351 - - Field Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-351 Temporary - Field 2-351 - - Field Permanent ILF Field 2-351 Temporary - Field 2-351 - - Field Temporary - Field 2-352 457 W-W13 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.908489 -80.734405 0.0019 - 9 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-352 458 W-U8 NRPWW PEM Greenbrier 37.884175 -80.746490 0.0014 - 7 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-356 459 460 460 460 460 460 460 S-K30 W-EE6 W-EE7 S-A104 S-A104 S-QR4 S-QR4 RPW NRPWW NRPWW NRPW NRPW RPW RPW R4SB5 PEM PEM R6 R6 R4SB5 R4SB5 Fayette Fayette Fayette Fayette Fayette Fayette Fayette 37.870431 37.869071 37.868952 37.869012 37.868771 37.865963 37.865903 -80.754175 -80.759476 -80.759689 -80.757538 -80.757108 -80.762036 -80.761885 0.0003 - 1 - 0.0050 0.0026 0.0045 0.0395 0.0135 - 24 12 22 191 65 - Pipeline ROW Station Station Station Station Station Station Temporary Permanent Permanent Temporary Permanent Permanent Temporary ILF ILF Spanishburg Spanishburg - Field Field Field Field Field Field Field 2-358 2-358 2-358 2-358 2-358 2-359 2-359 460 Stallworth Crossing W-EE6, W-EE7, S-A104 & SQR4 Total - - - - 0.0261 0.0601 126 290 - - - Field 461 S-K27 R4SB5 Fayette 37.866124 -80.757723 0.0011 - 5 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field RPW 0.0211 - 102 - EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 30 of 77 Page 22 of 30 2-360 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 64 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) 462 S-K26 RPW R4SB5 Fayette 37.866124 -80.757808 0.0012 - 19 - 463 W-KL25 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.865552 -80.762049 0.1183 - 573 - 464 W-KL26 ISOLATE PEM Greenbrier 37.865505 -80.762470 0.0121 - 59 - Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Pipeline ROW Temporary Ancillary Site Temporary Ancillary Site Temporary Ancillary Site Temporary Ancillary Site Temporary - Field 2-360 Temporary - Field 2-359 Temporary - Field 2-359 Temporary - Field 2-359 Temporary - Field 2-359 465 W-KL22 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.865324 -80.761812 0.0694 - 336 - 466 W-KL23 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.864995 -80.761621 0.4982 - 2412 - 467 W-K7 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.863527 -80.757286 0.3206 - 5173 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 468 S-K17 RPW R3UB3 Greenbrier 37.863065 -80.757391 0.0432 - 698 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-359 468 W-IJ30 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.862357 -80.757476 0.3236 - 5221 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 468 S-K17 & W-IJ30 Total - - - - 0.3668 - 5919 - - - - Field 469 W-IJ28 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.862331 -80.758500 2.2955 - 11110 - Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary - Field 2-360 470 W-UV9 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.862309 -80.757756 0.4361 - 2111 - Pipeline ROW/ATWS Temporary - Field 2-360 471 W-UV11 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.861173 -80.757726 0.0285 - 138 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 472 W-UV10 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.861078 -80.757968 0.0092 - 45 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-360 472 W-UV10 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.861066 -80.757954 0.0035 - 17 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 472 W-UV10 Total - - - - 0.0127 - 62 - - - - Field 473 W-K9-PEM-1 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.860916 -80.757817 0.0354 - 572 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 473 S-K19 RPW R4SB5 Greenbrier 37.860940 -80.757825 0.0107 - 172 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-360 473 S-K19 & W-K9 Total - - - - 0.0461 - 744 - - - - Field 474 W-IJ38 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.860502 -80.759420 0.0638 - 309 - Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary - Field 2-360 475 W-IJ29 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.859892 -80.759247 0.0302 - 146 - ATWS Temporary - Field 2-360 476 W-K10 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.858743 -80.755724 0.0068 - 33 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-361 477 S-K21 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.858566 -80.755584 0.0189 - 304 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-361 478 S-K22 RPW R3UB1 Greenbrier 37.858315 -80.755546 0.0125 - 202 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-361 0.0024 479 W-K12 RPWWN PEM Greenbrier 37.857129 -80.755257 480 W-UV4 RPWWD PSS Greenbrier 37.854391 -80.755038 480 S-UV6 RPW R5RB Greenbrier 37.854386 -80.754981 0.0161 - 480 S-UV6 & W-UV4 Total - - - - 0.0161 0.0885 481 W-UV8 RPWWD PEM Greenbrier 37.851590 -80.752937 0.4913 - 481 S-UV2 RPW R5UB2 Greenbrier 37.851099 -80.752978 0.0324 481 S-UV2 & W-UV8 Total - - - - 0.5237 - - 12 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-361 0.0885† 1427† - Pipeline ROW Temporary ILF Field 2-361 260 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-361 1687 - - - - Field 7926 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-362 - 523 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 2-362 - 8449 - - - - Field Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field Temporary - Field 2-364 Temporary - Field 2-368 482 S-U22 RPW R4SB2 Greenbrier 37.839558 -80.748496 0.0221 - 356 - 483 S-FF1 NRPW R6 Greenbrier 37.837519 -80.751898 0.0029 - 14 - 484 S-EE4 RPW R4SB5 Summers 37.813881 -80.748817 0.0079 - 127 - Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 31 of 77 Page 23 of 30 2-364 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 65 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 RPWWD PEM Summers 37.813845 -80.748769 0.0453 - 730 - - - - 0.0532 - 857 RPW RPWWD RPW R4SB6 PEM R4SB6 Summers Summers Summers 37.807929 37.807878 37.807733 -80.746327 -80.746307 -80.746267 0.0118 0.0381 0.0023 - - - - - 0.0522 486 486 486 486 487 W-EE4 S-EE4 & W-EE4 Total S-M6 W-M2 S-M6 S-M6 & W-M2 Total S-J13 S-J13 S-J13 S-J13 Total S-M5 NRPW NRPW NRPW NRPW R6 R6 R6 R6 Summers Summers Summers Summers 37.797484 37.796572 37.795915 37.792243 -80.733605 -80.732397 -80.731850 -80.728802 0.0085 0.0088 0.0114 0.0287 0.0136 488 S-M4 NRPW R6 Summers 37.786834 -80.728719 489 S-J12 NRPW R6 Summers 37.784725 -80.733873 490 W-I10 NRPWW PEM Summers 37.783907 -80.718899 490 W-I10 NRPWW PEM Summers 37.783879 -80.718903 0.0190 - 92 - 490 491 492 493 494 W-I10 Total S-I13 S-I14 S-I15 S-I16 RPW RPW RPW RPW R4SB5 R4SB5 R4SB5 R4SB5 Summers Summers Summers Summers 37.782534 37.781099 37.779878 37.779381 -80.719085 -80.719318 -80.720470 -80.721388 0.0190 0.0296 0.0141 0.0180 0.0076 0.0550 - 92 478 227 290 123 266 - 495 TTWV-S-205 RPW R4 Summers 37.776921 -80.764974 0.0053 - 26 - Crossing # 484 484 485 485 485 485 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field - - - - Field 190 614 36 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field - 840 - - - - Field - 137 142 183 462 219 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field 2-371 2-371 2-371 0.0032 - 16 - Temporary - Field 2-373 0.0051 - 25 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary - Field 2-374 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-376 Temporary - Field 2-376 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field 2-376 2-376 2-379 2-379 Temporary - Desktop 2-384 - 0.0550 - 266 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 2-368 2-369 2-369 2-369 2-372 Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.776902 -80.763594 0.0007 - 3 - Temporary Access Road 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.776661 -80.761885 0.0265 - 128 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.776522 -80.761101 0.0348 - 168 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.776437 -80.760375 0.0086 - 42 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.776293 -80.767901 0.0217 - 105 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.775930 -80.757289 0.0021 - 10 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.775895 -80.757821 0.0503 - 243 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.775622 -80.756384 0.0148 - 72 - Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-W-55 RPWWD PFO Summers 37.775376 -80.755362 0.3435 - 1663 - Temporary Access Road Temporary ILF Desktop 2-383 Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 Temporary - Desktop 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.774948 -80.743137 0.0141 - 68 - Temporary Access Road 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.774722 -80.740492 0.0275 - 133 - Temporary Access Road EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 32 of 77 Page 24 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 66 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 496 TTWV-S-51 RPW R2 Summers 37.774625 -80.748093 0.0165 496 S-I12 RPW R4SB3 Summers 37.775891 -80.710797 496 S-I19 RPW R2UB1 Summers 37.772089 -80.732901 0.0265 - 428 - 496 TTWV-W-54 RPWWD PFO Summers 37.774952 -80.742788 0.1820 - 881 - 496 TTWV-S-51, SI12, S-I19, TTWVW-55 & TTWV-W54 Total - - 0.7696 0.0035 4024 11 497 TTWV-S-204 Summers 37.776568 -80.761285 0.0043 - 21 - 0.0124 RPW R4 498 TTWV-S-52 RPW R4 Summers 37.776305 -80.760156 498 TTWV-W-56 PFO RPWWD PFO Summers 37.775814 -80.75768 498 TTWV-W-56 PEM RPWWD PEM Summers 37.775722 -80.757056 - - - 0.0035 80 - 11 - 60 - 0.0015† 7† - 0.1401 - 678 - 0.1525 0.0015 745 - - 499 TTWV-S-52 & TTWV-W-56 Total S-I17 NRPW R6 Summers 37.775160 -80.728058 0.0045 - 72 - 500 TTWV-S-47 RPW R3 Summers 37.774865 -80.740009 0.0179 - 87 - 501 TTWV-S-206 NRPW R6 Summers 37.774806 -80.746459 0.0047 - 23 - 502 S-I10 RPW R4SB4 Summers 37.772437 -80.713781 503 S-I18 RPW R3UB1 Summers 37.772353 -80.732996 0.0110 498 - 0.0018 - - 53 9 - 504 S-I20 RPW R3UB1 Summers 37.771406 -80.733241 0.0212 - 342 - 505 S-J10 NRPW R6 Summers 37.748657 -80.755523 0.0009 - 4 - 506 S-L8 RPW R4RB1 Summers 37.748131 -80.755911 0.0001 - 1 - 507 S-J9 NRPW R6 Summers 37.746997 -80.756919 0.0014 - 7 - 508 S-L7 RPW R4SB3 Summers 37.746624 -80.757288 0.0008 - 4 - 509 TTWV-S-56 NRPW R6 Summers 37.740078 -80.752948 0.0009 - 4 - 509 TTWV-S-56 NRPW R6 Summers 37.740028 -80.752946 509 TTWV-S-56 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739978 -80.752943 509 TTWV-S-56 Total - - 510 TTWV-S-54 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739982 -80.752693 510 TTWV-S-54 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739944 -80.752724 510 TTWV-S-54 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739906 -80.752755 510 TTWV-S-54 Total - - 511 TTWV-S-57 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739755 -80.752133 511 TTWV-S-57 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739725 -80.752181 - 0.0032 - 16 0.0009 - 4 - 0.0018 0.0032 8 16 0.0009 - 4 - - 0.0029 - 14 0.0009 - 4 - 0.0018 0.0029 8 14 0.0011 - 5 - - 0.0037 - 18 Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) Temporary Access Road Temporary - Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-377 Temporary - Field 2-380 Temporary Spanishburg Desktop 2-382 Temporary - Desktop 2-383 Temporary - Desktop 2-383 Temporary Spanishburg Desktop 2-383 Temporary - Desktop 2-383 Temporary - Field 2-380 Temporary - Desktop 2-381 Temporary - Desktop 2-382 Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road †Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Desktop Figure 2-381, 2382, 2-383, 2-384 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-378 Temporary - Field 2-380 Temporary - Field 2-380 Temporary - Field 2-389 Temporary - Field 2-389 Temporary - Field 2-390 Temporary - Field 2-390 Temporary - Desktop 2-392 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-392 Temporary - Desktop 2-392 Temporary - Desktop 2-392 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-392 Temporary - Desktop 2-392 Temporary - Desktop 2-392 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-392 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 33 of 77 Page 25 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 67 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Crossing # Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 511 TTWV-S-57 NRPW R6 Summers 37.739696 -80.75223 0.0012 - 6 - 511 TTWV-S-57 Total - - 0.0023 0.0037 11 18 512 TTWV-S-202 RPW R4 Summers 37.739597 0.0016 - 8 - 512 TTWV-S-202 RPW R4 Summers 37.73954 -80.75432 512 TTWV-S-202 RPW R4 Summers 37.739483 -80.754315 0.0016 - 8 - 512 TTWV-S-202 Total - - 0.0032 0.0051 16 25 513 TTWV-S-60 NRPW R6 Summers 37.736275 -80.75974 0.0026 - 13 - 513 TTWV-S-60 NRPW R6 Summers 37.736223 -80.759806 513 TTWV-S-60 NRPW R6 Summers 37.736175 -80.759857 0.0014 - 7 - 513 TTWV-S-60 Total - - 0.0040 0.0048 20 23 514 TTWV-S-59 NRPW R6 Summers 37.736221 -80.760079 0.0019 - 9 - 514 TTWV-S-59 NRPW R6 Summers 37.73616 -80.760133 514 TTWV-S-59 NRPW R6 Summers 37.7361 -80.760181 514 TTWV-S-59 Total - - 515 516 517 518 518 Summers Summers Summers Summers Summers 37.704240 37.696788 37.694776 37.694507 37.692868 521 522 S-N5 S-K14 S-N3 S-N2 S-M3 S-N2 & S-M3 Total S-CD23 S-N4 W-EF40 S-N4 & W-EF40 Total S-KL29 TTWV-W-MM20 522 TTWV-W-MM20 518 519 520 520 520 522 S-I8 522 TTWV-W-MM20 & S-I8Total 523 -80.754326 - - 0.0051 0.0048 0.0055 - - - 25 23 27 0.0017 - 8 - 0.0036 0.0055 17 27 0.0040 0.0089 0.0164 0.0362 0.0183 - 65 143 265 584 295 - Impact Duration (Discharge) Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop Temporary - Desktop Permanent Spanishburg Desktop Temporary - Desktop Temporary - Desktop Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-393 Temporary - Desktop 2-393 Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure 2-392 2-392, 2393 2-392, 2393 2-392, 2393 2-393 Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary - Desktop 2-393 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-393 Temporary - Desktop 2-393 Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field 2-398 2-399 2-400 2-400 2-400 RPW NRPW NRPW RPW RPW R3UB3 R6 R6 R2UB1 R3UB1 - - - - 0.0545 - 879 - - - - Field NRPW NRPW RPWWD R6 R6 PEM Summers Summers Summers 37.694228 37.693961 37.693888 -80.736099 -80.735841 -80.735663 0.0181 0.0115 0.0568 - 88 186 916 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field - - - - 0.0683 - 1102 - - - - Field RPW RPWWD R2UB1 PFO Summers Summers 37.692932 37.681648 -80.733839 -80.730271 0.0863 0.1407 - 1392 2270 - Temporary Temporary ILF Field Desktop RPWWD PFO Summers 37.681037 -80.730074 0.2458 - 1190 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary ILF Desktop 2-403 Field 2-403 & 2404 TNW R2RB2 Summers - - S-EF53 RPW R4SB5 Summers 524 525 S-I9 W-EF36 RPW RPWWN R4SB5 PEM Summers Summers 526 S-K10 RPW R4SB5 526 S-K10 RPW R4SB5 526 S-K10 RPW 526 527 528 529 S-K10 Total S-L4 S-L2 W-K2-PEM RPW RPW RPWWD 37.680131 -80.744827 -80.739242 -80.736952 -80.736682 -80.734247 - Type of Impact -80.731502 0.0934 - 1507^ - - - 0.4799 - 4967 - 37.681323 -80.729672 0.0095 - 46 - 37.675977 37.675423 -80.732822 -80.732001 0.0195 0.0047 - 314 76 - Summers 37.675079 -80.734384 0.0013 - 6 Summers 37.675070 -80.734447 R4SB5 Summers 37.675058 -80.734522 0.0013 - 6 - R3UB1 R4SB3 PEM Summers Summers Summers 37.673213 37.671392 37.668130 -80.729772 -80.728311 -80.723493 0.0026 0.0176 0.0081 0.0140 0.0043 - 12 284 130 225 21 - - 0.0043 - 21 Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary - - - 2-400 2-403 Temporary - Field 2-403 Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-404 2-404 Temporary - Field 2-404 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-404 Temporary - Field 2-404 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field 2-404 2-406 2-407 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 34 of 77 Page 26 of 30 2-400 2-400 2-400 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 68 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Type of Impact Impact Duration (Discharge) - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field - - - - Field Temporary - Field 2-407 Feature Name Water Type Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 S-L1 S-L1 & W-K2 Total RPW R3UB1 Summers 37.668076 -80.723470 0.0104 - 168 - - - - 0.0244 - 393 S-K5 NRPW R6 Summers 37.667876 -80.726202 0.0028 - 14 - 530 S-K5 NRPW R6 Summers 37.665862 -80.725660 0.0003 - 1 - 530 531 532 533 533 S-K5 Total S-J5 S-J4 S-G47 W-G7 S-G47 & W-G7 Total RPW RPW NRPW NRPWW R2UB1 R4SB3 R6 PEM Summers Summers Summers Summers 37.666864 37.663926 37.654112 37.654106 -80.721794 -80.715460 -80.702579 -80.702592 0.0031 0.0471 0.0106 0.0037 0.0191 - 15 759 171 60 309 - - - - - 0.0228 - 369 - Crossing # 529 529 530 533 534 S-Q19 RPW R3UB3 Monroe 37.629373 -80.711725 535 536 537 S-G52 S-G49 S-G48 NRPW RPW RPW R6 R3RB1 R2RB2 Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.627537 37.627381 37.627308 -80.695593 -80.695679 -80.695759 0.0066 0.0397 0.0360 538 S-PP13 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.623457 -80.693530 539 S-H61a RPW R3RB1 Monroe 37.619090 539 S-H61a RPW R3RB1 Monroe 37.618454 539 S-H61 RPW R3RS2 Monroe 539 S-H61a RPW R3RB1 0.0028 9 - 106 640 580 0.0106 - 51 - -80.699994 0.0189 - 91 - -80.702473 0.0139 - 67 - 37.618426 -80.699138 0.0434 - 700 - Monroe 37.618410 -80.704037 0.0143 - 69 - - - - - 0.0905 - 927 - 0.1359 0.0090 - 2193 145 - - S-H61 & S-H61a Total W-OP1 S-OP1 RPWWD RPW PEM R2UB3 Monroe Monroe 37.600067 37.600003 -80.700400 -80.700509 540 W-CD37 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.598471 -80.699393 0.0176 - 85 - 540 S-OP1, W-OP1 &W-CD37 Total - - - - 0.1625 - 2423 - 541 W-CD40 RPWWN PEM Monroe 37.598069 -80.699728 0.0112 - 54 - 542 W-CD39 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.598051 -80.700150 0.0024 - 11 - 543 543 543 544 545 S-IJ65 S-IJ65 S-IJ65 Total S-IJ64 S-A63 NRPW NRPW NRPW RPW R6 R6 R6 R2UB1 Monroe Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.592083 37.591837 37.591822 37.560460 -80.705700 -80.705747 -80.705874 -80.710233 0.0013 0.0044 0.0057 0.0104 0.0203 - 6 21 27 168 327 545 S-A60 RPW R2UB1 Monroe 37.558698 -80.709966 0.0358 - 545 S-A63 & S-A60 Total - - - - 0.0561 - 539 540 540 0.2991 Field 2-407 - Field Field Field Field Field 2-407 2-408 2-410 2-410 - - - Field Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-420 Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field 2-418 2-418 2-418 Temporary - Field 2-418 Temporary - Field 2-422 Temporary - Field 2-422 Temporary - Field 2-422 Temporary - Field 2-422 - - - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-426 2-426 Temporary - Field 2-426 - - Field Temporary - Field - - Field 2-426 Field Field Field Field Field 2-427 2-427 578 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 905 - - - - Field Temporary - Field 2-432 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-432 Temporary - Field 2-432 Permanent Spanishburg Field 2-432 Temporary - Field 2-432 Temporary - Field 2-432 37.559410 -80.710082 546 W-A13 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.559332 -80.709734 546 S-A61 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.559351 -80.709683 546 S-A61 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.559334 -80.709736 546 S-A61 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.559328 -80.709792 0.0013 - 6 - 546 S-A61 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.559320 -80.710037 0.0131 - 211 - 0.0041 - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Monroe - Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary PEM - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary RPWWD 0.0012 4826 6 - 110 14 Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 35 of 77 Page 27 of 30 2-407 - W-A13 0.0228 Figure Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW 546 - - Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type 2-426 2-427 2-431 2-431 & 2432 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 69 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 - - 0.3147 0.0269 5049 124 37.556386 -80.708859 0.0009 - 4 - Cowardin Class1 - - TTWV-S-203 RPW R4 Monroe 547 TTWV-S-203 RPW R4 Monroe 37.556366 -80.708912 547 TTWV-S-203 RPW R4 Monroe 37.556345 -80.708966 Feature Name 546 S-A61 & W-A13 Total 547 County Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Longitude2 Water Type Crossing # Latitude2 - 0.0030 - 14 0.0009 - 4 - 0.0018 0.0030 8 14 -80.710853 -80.712099 -80.725577 0.1120 0.0004 0.0280 - 1807 2 135 - 37.540505 -80.723946 0.1613 - 781 - 37.540366 -80.723439 548 549 550 TTWV-S-203 Total S-D31 S-D29 TTWV-W-29 RPW RPW RPWWN R2UB3 R4SB3 PEM Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.554163 37.547394 37.540583 551 TTWV-W-21 RPWWD PEM Monroe 551 TTWV-W-21 RPWWD PEM Monroe 551 TTWV-W-21 Total - - - - 552 TTWV-S-102 RPW R4 Monroe 37.540254 -80.723104 553 TTWV-W-20 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.539873 -80.722782 553 TTWV-W-20 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.539856 -80.722691 - - - - 0.0878 0.0631 425 306 554 TTWV-W-20 Total S-D25 RPW R4SB3 Monroe 37.538768 -80.718855 0.0079 - 127 - 555 TTWV-S-101 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.538403 -80.719633 556 557 558 S-F18 S-Z5 S-Z4 RPW NRPW NRPW R3RB1 R6 R6 Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.536872 37.524333 37.524302 -80.716923 -80.711450 -80.711444 0.0612 0.0034 0.0043 559 TTWV-S-201 RPW R4 Monroe 37.520159 -80.707386 0.0050 559 TTWV-W-200 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.520155 -80.707392 559 559 S-MN2 TTWV-S-MN2 S-MN2, TTWV-SMN2, TTWV-S201 & TTWV-W200 Total RPW RPW R3RB1 R3RB1 Monroe Monroe 37.520028 37.519990 -80.707404 -80.707537 - - - 560 TTWV-S-109 RPW R3 Monroe 561 TTWV-S-108 RPW R2 561 TTWV-S-108 RPW TTWV-W-32 RPWWD 547 553 559 561 0.1613 0.0878 - 0.0342 0.0342 0.0018 0.0631 781 425 - 165 165 9 306 Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW ATWS Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Desktop 2-439 Field Desktop 2-439 2-439 - - Desktop Temporary - Desktop Temporary - Desktop 2-444 Temporary - Desktop 2-444 Temporary Spanishburg Desktop 2-444 Temporary Temporary - Desktop Desktop 2-446 2-447 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-447 Temporary - Desktop 2-447 R2 Monroe 37.500277 -80.691489 0.0286 - 461 - PFO Monroe 37.501271 -80.690426 0.3927 - 6335 - 0.4692 - 7568 - 0.0006 0.0005 - 3 2 - - 2-436 - - 247 Desktop Desktop - 772 - Spanishburg Temporary Temporary - 0.0511 Permanent Temporary 0.0479 -80.682924 2-436 2-439 -80.690263 37.492164 Desktop Desktop 37.501612 Monroe Spanishburg - Monroe PEM Permanent Temporary - NRPWW 2-436 2-435 2-438 2-438 55 TTWV-W-34 Desktop Field Field Field - 564 - - 0.0113 3 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary -80.690488 - 2-432 2-433 2-436 2-435 37.501647 0.0006 Field Field Desktop 2-435 - - - Field - -80.682884 Temporary Temporary Temporary Desktop 448 37.492285 2-432 Spanishburg - Monroe Desktop Permanent 0.0550 PEM - Desktop - NRPWW Temporary - - TTWV-W-34 2-432 - - 564 Desktop - 7 260 -80.688114 -80.683093 Spanishburg Temporary 157 37.498632 37.492867 Permanent - - Monroe Monroe 2-432 2-436 - R6 R4 Desktop 2-436 0.0014 0.0161 NRPW RPW Field - Desktop 0.0324 562 563 - Desktop 24 - Temporary - - - Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 36 of 77 Page 28 of 30 Figure Spanishburg - 8 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Temporary 988 56 69 0.0017 Impact Duration (Discharge) Permanent Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/Temporary Access Road/ATWS Temporary Access Road/ATWS Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW TTWV-S-108 & TTWV-W-32 Total TTWV-S-145 TTWV-S-146 561 - Type of Impact 2-446 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 70 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Impact Duration (Discharge) Water Type Cowardin Class1 - - - - 0.0511 0.0006 247 3 TTWV-S-147 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.490491 -80.684896 0.0006 - 3 - TTWV-S-112 TTWV-W-35 TTWV-S-111 TTWV-S-112, TTWV-W-35 & TTWV-S-111 Total RPW RPWWD RPW R4 PFO R4 Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.487727 37.487575 37.487499 -80.681853 -80.681867 -80.681885 0.0151 0.0118 0.2570† - 243 4146 191 - Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW - - - - 0.0269 0.2570 4580 - - 567 TTWV-W-9 RPWWD PFO Monroe 37.486843 -80.690214 0.0142 - 69 - 567 TTWV-W-9 RPWWD PFO Monroe 37.48678 -80.690297 567 TTWV-W-9 Total - - - - 0.0142 0.0120 69 58 - - - Desktop 568 TTWV-S-212 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.479224 -80.676747 0.0002 - 1 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Desktop 569 S-G44 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.474870 -80.676267 0.0079 - 128 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 570 W-MN1 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.473153 -80.675740 0.0342 - 553 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field 570 S-G43 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.473139 -80.675738 0.0095 - 154 - Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field S-G43 & W-MN1 Total S-G42 W-G6 - - - - 0.0437 - 707 - - - - Desktop RPW RPWWD R4SB3 PEM Monroe Monroe 37.472602 37.472534 -80.675456 -80.675718 0.0055 0.0684 - 88 1103 - Temporary Temporary - Field Field 2-451 2-451 571 W-G6 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.472502 -80.676002 0.0842 - 407 - Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Permanent Access Road Temporary - Field 2-451 571 S-G42 & W-G6 Total - - - - 0.1581 - 1598 - 572 TTWV-S-124 RPW R3 Monroe 37.465809 -80.660684 0.0015 - 7 - 572 TTWV-W-37 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.46571 -80.660611 0.0044 - 21 - 572 TTWV-S-124 & TTWV-W-37 Total - - - - 0.0059 - 28 - 573 TTWV-S-125 RPW R4 Monroe 37.465786 -80.661202 0.0137 - 66 - 573 TTWV-W-36 RPWWD PSS Monroe 37.465668 -80.662252 0.0058 - 28 - 573 TTWV-S-125 & TTWV-W-36 Total - - - - 0.0195 - 94 - Crossing # Feature Name 564 TTWV-W-34 Total 565 566 566 566 566 570 571 571 County Latitude2 Longitude2 574 TTWV-S-123 RPW R3 Monroe 37.464474 -80.665269 574 TTWV-S-123 RPW R3 Monroe 37.463796 -80.667350 574 TTWV-S-123 Total 575 TTWV-S-126 NRPW R6 Monroe 37.465202 576 TTWV-S-127 NRPW R6 Monroe 577 TTWV-S-122 NRPW R6 Monroe 578 579 580 581 582 TTWV-S-121 TTWV-S-120 TTWV-W-7 S-E43 S-E45 RPW RPW RPWWN NRPW NRPW R2 R4 PEM R6 R6 Monroe Monroe Monroe Monroe Monroe - 0.0120 0.0078 - - 58 38 - 0.0019 - 9 - 0.0097 - 47 - -80.663681 0.0049 - 24 - 37.464463 -80.665418 0.0022 - 10 - 37.464026 -80.666227 0.0020 - 10 - 37.462815 37.462794 37.458675 37.453834 37.453798 -80.669597 -80.670256 -80.664933 -80.664417 -80.664266 0.0172 0.0087 0.1518 0.0147 0.0069 - 278 141 2448 237 112 - Type of Impact - Temporary Access Road Permanent Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Figure - - Desktop Temporary - Desktop 2-447 Temporary Temporary Temporary Spanishburg - Desktop Desktop Desktop 2-449 2-449 2-449 - - Desktop Temporary Spanishburg Desktop 2-448 Permanent Spanishburg Desktop 2-448 2-450 2-450 & 2451 2-451 2-450 & 2451 - - Desktop Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary - Desktop 2-453 - - Desktop Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary Spanishburg Desktop 2-453 - - Desktop Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary - Desktop 2-453 Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Desktop Desktop Desktop Field Field 2-452 2-452 2-454 2-455 2-455 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 37 of 77 Page 29 of 30 Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 71 of 304 Aquatic Resource Crossing Table Mountain Valley Pipeline Project Amount of Amount of Permanent Permanent Temporary Impacts within Discharge Discharge Construction 4 4 Limits (acres)3 (cubic yards) (cubic yards) Cowardin Class1 County Latitude2 Longitude2 Temporary Impacts within Construction Limits (acres)3 NRPW R6 - Monroe - 37.453718 - -80.664097 - 0.0005 0.0074 - 8 120 - S-E40 RPW R2UB1 Monroe 37.451003 -80.667795 0.0117 - 57 - 583 S-E40 RPW R2UB1 Monroe 37.450757 -80.667719 0.0227 - 366 - 583 584 584 RPW RPWWD R4SB5 PEM Monroe Monroe 37.450692 37.450761 -80.667650 -80.667516 0.0344 0.0010 0.0041 - 423 5 20 - - - - - 0.0051 - 25 - RPWWN RPW RPW RPWWD RPW PEM R4SB5 R4SB5 PEM R2UB1 Monroe Monroe Monroe Monroe Monroe 37.427083 37.427033 37.426915 37.426734 37.426686 -80.694569 -80.694254 -80.694499 -80.694534 -80.694499 0.0113 0.0041 0.0143 0.2172 0.0125 - 55 66 231 3503 202 - - - - - 0.2481 - 4002 - 587 588 S-E40 Total S-E41 W-E12 S-E41 & W-E12 Total W-C14 S-C38 S-C38 W-C13 S-C39 S-C38, S-C39 & W-C13 Total S-C41 TTWV-S-131 RPW RPW R4SB3 R4 Monroe Monroe 37.426161 37.426069 -80.694592 -80.694762 0.0041 0.0465 - 66 225 - 589 W-C17 RPWWD PEM Monroe 37.425547 -80.693481 0.0306 - 148 - S-C40 RPW R3UB1 Monroe 37.425372 -80.693417 0.0053 - 26 - - - - - 0.0359 - 174 - RPW RPWWD R4 PEM Monroe Monroe 37.418765 37.418745 -80.694621 -80.694581 0.0311 0.1382 - 502 2229 - - - - - 0.1693 - 2731 - - Crossing # Feature Name Water Type 582 582 S-E45 S-E45 Total 583 584 585 586 586 586 586 586 589 589 590 590 590 S-C40 & W-C17 Total TTWV-S-200 TTWV-W-203 TTWV-S-200 & TTWV-W-203 Total Notes: 1 2 3 4 Type of Impact Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Impact Duration (Discharge) Mitigation (Bank Delineation and/or ILF) Type Figure Temporary - - Field Field 2-455 Temporary - Field Pipeline ROW Temporary - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field - - - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary Temporary - Field Field Field Field Field - - - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW Temporary Access Road Temporary Access Road Temporary Temporary - Field Desktop 2-461 2-461 Temporary - Field 2-461 Temporary - Field 2-461 - - - Field Pipeline ROW Pipeline ROW/ATWS Temporary Temporary - Desktop Desktop - - Field 2-455 & 2456 2-455 & 2456 2-456 2-456 2-461 2-461 2-461 2-461 2-461 2-462 2-462 - Field classification based on Cowardin et al. 1979. See wetland delineation report for more details. - in decimal degrees - Includes 1) temporary impacts to PEM wetlands in the temporary limit-of-disturbance, 2) permanent conversion impacts to PSS and PFO impacts in the temporary and permanent limit-of-disturbance, and 3) permanent impacts to PEM within permanent access road limit-of-disturbance, 4) temporary and permanent impacts to streams in the temporary and permanent limit-of-disturbance. - Includes 1) temporary fill associated with construction activities and timber mat crossings. PSS and PFO conversion impacts are categorized as having temporary fill impacts, to account for the placement of timber mats in these wetlands during construction activities, and 2) permanent fill associated with the construction of permanent access road and facilities. † - PFO and PSS wetlands that occur within the pipeline ROW, a temporary access road, or ATWS will incur impacts from temporary fill in addition to permenant impacts resulting from conversion to a PEM Cowardin Class. No impacts from permanent fill are anticipated at these locations. ^ - cubic yards of S-I8 impact updated to correct previously submitted incorrect value EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 38 of 77 Page 30 of 30 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 72 of 304 Permit Number: LRH-2015-592-GBR Name of Permittee: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (MVP) Date of Issuance: 22 December 2017 Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: Huntington District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 502 8th Street Huntington, West Virginia 25701-2070 Attn: RD-E Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an U. S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you are subject to permit suspension, modification, or revocation. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the said permit, and required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. Signature of Permittee _____________________________ Date ______________________ PM - CARSON EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 39 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 73 of 304 NATIONWIDE PERMITS FOR THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (CORPS) REGULATORY PROGRAM REISSUANCE AND ISSUANCE OF NATIONWIDE PERMITS WITH WVDEP WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION NWP 12 Utility Line Activities. Activities required for the construction, maintenance, repair, and removal of utility lines and associated facilities in waters of the United States, provided the activity does not result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States for each single and complete project. Utility lines: This NWP authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States and structures or work in navigable waters for crossings of those waters associated with the construction, maintenance, or repair of utility lines, including outfall and intake structures. There must be no change in pre-construction contours of waters of the United States. A “utility line” is defined as any pipe or pipeline for the transportation of any gaseous, liquid, liquescent, or slurry substance, for any purpose, and any cable, line, or wire for the transmission for any purpose of electrical energy, telephone, and telegraph messages, and internet, radio, and television communication. The term “utility line” does not include activities that drain a water of the United States, such as drainage tile or french drains, but it does apply to pipes conveying drainage from another area. Material resulting from trench excavation may be temporarily sidecast into waters of the United States for no more than three months, provided the material is not placed in such a manner that it is dispersed by currents or other forces. The district engineer may extend the period of temporary side casting for no more than a total of 180 days, where appropriate. In wetlands, the top 6 to 12 inches of the trench should normally be backfilled with topsoil from the trench. The trench cannot be constructed or backfilled in such a manner as to drain waters of the United States (e.g., backfilling with extensive gravel layers, creating a french drain effect). Any exposed slopes and stream banks must be stabilized immediately upon completion of the utility line crossing of each waterbody. Utility line substations: This NWP authorizes the construction, maintenance, or expansion of substation facilities associated with a power line or utility line in non-tidal waters of the United States, provided the activity, in combination with all other activities included in one single and complete project, does not result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States. This NWP does not authorize discharges into non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters of the United States to construct, maintain, or expand substation facilities. Foundations for overhead utility line towers, poles, and anchors: This NWP authorizes the construction or maintenance of foundations for overhead utility line towers, poles, and anchors in all waters of the United States, provided the foundations are the minimum size necessary and separate footings for each tower leg (rather than a larger single pad) are used where feasible. 1 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 40 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 74 of 304 Access roads: This NWP authorizes the construction of access roads for the construction and maintenance of utility lines, including overhead power lines and utility line substations, in nontidal waters of the United States, provided the activity, in combination with all other activities included in one single and complete project, does not cause the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of non-tidal waters of the United States. This NWP does not authorize discharges into non-tidal wetlands adjacent to tidal waters for access roads. Access roads must be the minimum width necessary (see Note 2, below). Access roads must be constructed so that the length of the road minimizes any adverse effects on waters of the United States and must be as near as possible to pre-construction contours and elevations (e.g., at grade corduroy roads or geotextile/gravel roads). Access roads constructed above pre-construction contours and elevations in waters of the United States must be properly bridged or culverted to maintain surface flows. This NWP may authorize utility lines in or affecting navigable waters of the United States even if there is no associated discharge of dredged or fill material (See 33 CFR part 322). Overhead utility lines constructed over section 10 waters and utility lines that are routed in or under section 10 waters without a discharge of dredged or fill material require a section 10 permit. This NWP authorizes, to the extent that Department of the Army authorization is required, temporary structures, fills, and work necessary for the remediation of inadvertent returns of drilling fluids to waters of the United States through sub-soil fissures or fractures that might occur during horizontal directional drilling activities conducted for the purpose of installing or replacing utility lines. These remediation activities must be done as soon as practicable, to restore the affected waterbody. District engineers may add special conditions to this NWP to require a remediation plan for addressing inadvertent returns of drilling fluids to waters of the United States during horizontal directional drilling activities conducted for the purpose of installing or replacing utility lines. This NWP also authorizes temporary structures, fills, and work, including the use of temporary mats, necessary to conduct the utility line activity. Appropriate measures must be taken to maintain normal downstream flows and minimize flooding to the maximum extent practicable, when temporary structures, work, and discharges, including cofferdams, are necessary for construction activities, access fills, or dewatering of construction sites. Temporary fills must consist of materials, and be placed in a manner, that will not be eroded by expected high flows. After construction, temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-construction elevations. The areas affected by temporary fills must be revegetated, as appropriate. Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the activity if any of the following criteria are met: (1) the activity involves mechanized land clearing in a forested wetland for the utility line right-of-way; (2) a section 10 permit is required; (3) the utility line in waters of the United States, excluding overhead lines, exceeds 500 feet; (4) the utility line is placed within a jurisdictional area (i.e., water of the United States), and it runs parallel to or along a stream bed that is within that jurisdictional area; (5) discharges that result in the loss of greater than 1/10-acre of waters of the United States; (6) permanent access roads are constructed above grade in waters of the United States for a distance of more than 500 feet; or (7) permanent access roads are constructed in 2 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 41 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 75 of 304 waters of the United States with impervious materials. (See general condition 32.) (Authorities: Sections 10 and 404) Note 1: Where the utility line is constructed or installed in navigable waters of the United States (i.e., section 10 waters) within the coastal United States, the Great Lakes, and United States territories, a copy of the NWP verification will be sent by the Corps to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service (NOS), for charting the utility line to protect navigation. Note 2: For utility line activities crossing a single waterbody more than one time at separate and distant locations, or multiple waterbodies at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. Utility line activities must comply with 33 CFR 330.6(d). Note 3: Utility lines consisting of aerial electric power transmission lines crossing navigable waters of the United States (which are defined at 33 CFR part 329) must comply with the applicable minimum clearances specified in 33 CFR 322.5(i). Note 4: Access roads used for both construction and maintenance may be authorized, provided they meet the terms and conditions of this NWP. Access roads used solely for construction of the utility line must be removed upon completion of the work, in accordance with the requirements for temporary fills. Note 5: Pipes or pipelines used to transport gaseous, liquid, liquescent, or slurry substances over navigable waters of the United States are considered to be bridges, not utility lines, and may require a permit from the U.S. Coast Guard pursuant to section 9 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. However, any discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States associated with such pipelines will require a section 404 permit (see NWP 15). Note 6: This NWP authorizes utility line maintenance and repair activities that do not qualify for the Clean Water Act section 404(f) exemption for maintenance of currently serviceable fills or fill structures. Note 7: For overhead utility lines authorized by this NWP, a copy of the PCN and NWP verification will be provided to the Department of Defense Siting Clearinghouse, which will evaluate potential effects on military activities. Note 8: For NWP 12 activities that require pre-construction notification, the PCN must include any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other separate and distant crossings that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require preconstruction notification (see paragraph (b) of general condition 32). The district engineer will evaluate the PCN in accordance with Section D, “District Engineer’s Decision.” The district engineer may require mitigation to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see general condition 23). 3 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 42 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 76 of 304 Corps NWP 12 Specific Regional Conditions: a. PCN in accordance with NWP General Condition 32 is required for all permanent conversion of scrub/shrub and forested wetlands and greater than 1/10 of an acre of temporary discharge of dredged or fill material into all wetlands. b. For all horizontal directional drilling activities requiring authorization from the Corps pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, the PCN must include a drilling mud clean-up plan as a contingency for an inadvertent return of drilling mud to the surface. c. The PCN must include a restoration plan showing how all temporary fills and structures will be removed and the area restored to pre-project conditions. d. Anti-seep collars or clay plugs must be utilized for trenching activities conducted in a perennial or intermittent stream or a wetland. e. Should an inadvertent return of drilling mud occur during a directional drilling activity, and the clean-up of drilling muds necessitates the use of NWP 12 the permittee must report to the Corps the location and circumstances of the clean-up after the work has been conducted unless a PCN is otherwise required. NWP 12 West Virginia 401 Water Quality Certification Special Conditions: A. Individual State Water Quality Certification is required for i. Pipelines equal to or greater than 36 inches in diameter; ii. Pipelines crossing a Section 10 river (unless the bore is greater than 100 feet below the stream bed on the Ohio River mainstem, or greater than 50 feet below the stream bed on all other Section 10 waters); iii. Pipelines transporting hazardous materials/substances as defined by the Toxic Substances Control Act; iv. Utility lines within wetlands that would use or consider the use of herbicides for right-of-way maintenance; v. Cumulative permanent impacts totaling greater than 200 linear feet, on one side, of any stream identified in Condition 18 A, B, and C herein; vi. Cumulative permanent impacts on any one perennial or intermittent stream totaling greater than 300 linear feet; vii. Pipelines carrying separated natural gas liquids, unless installed with an automated system which will indicate a sudden loss of pressure. B. Points of ingress and egress to streams for equipment shall be within the permitted area of disturbance. C. Individual stream crossings must be completed in a continuous, progressive manner and within 72 hours during seasonal normal or below normal stream flow conditions. Crossings on the Ohio River, Kanawha River, New River , Monongahela River, and the 4 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 43 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 77 of 304 Little Kanawha River, below the confluence with Hughes Rivers, are exempt from the 72hour requirements. All stream activities shall b e completed as rapidly as possible. D. Equipment tracking in wetlands will utilize protective mats when practical. Restoration of the disturbed areas will be completed within 72 hours of the completion of pipeline installation across the watercourse. E. Surface disturbance will not extend beyond the right-of-way limits and construction easements. Stream crossings will be conducted as close to a right angle to the watercourse as practical and the area of disturbance will be limited to reduce in stream activity. F. Dredging for backfill material is not allowed. G. Submarine pipeline stream crossings (including horizontal directional drilling) must be designed and constructed to prevent flotation and the possibility of leakage or rupture and the top of pipelines must be buried a minimum of three (3) feet below the stream bottom. H. Horizontal directional drilling for underwater crossings requires an Inadvertent Return Contingency Plan certified by a West Virginia Professional Engineer to be kept on site and made available upon request. I. Where it is apparent that small boats, inner tubes, swimmers, etc. could be using the stream in the work area, easily seen warning signs must be placed a minimum of 50 feet upstream and downstream of the stream crossings construction site to advise stream users of the potential danger. J. Prior written notification to West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management (WV DEP DWWM) is required when this permit is being used for vented low water crossings. K. Forty-five-day advance notification prior to withdrawal must be provided to WV DEP DWWM when this permit is being used for water withdrawal, allowing for a determination of whether the water withdrawal will have more than minimal impacts on aquatic resources, thus necessitating further review or an individual certification. Information to be provided is as follows: i. ii. iii. the maximum water withdrawal rate; designs to minimize impingement and entrainment of aquatic life, and a description of how the intake rate will affect streamflow, or be varied, during periods of seasonal low flow and/or drought. L. No structure authorized by this permit shall impede or prevent fish movement upstream or downstream. M. At each stream crossing, substrate in the channel is to be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. This native material must be reused in restoration of the stream channel and, upon final stream bed restoration, the stream must have similar substrate pattern, profile, dimension and embeddedness of the original stream 5 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 44 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 78 of 304 channel. At each wetland crossing, the top 12 inches of soil are to be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. This native material must be reused in restoration of the wetland. N. Waterbody banks are to be returned as close as practicable to preconstruction contours. Riparian areas shall be revegetated with native species of conservation grasses, legumes, and woody species (of low determinate growth), similar in density to adjacent undisturbed lands. Routine mowing or clearing adjacent to waterbodies shall be limited to allow a riparian strip at least 25 feet wide, as measured from the waterbody’s mean high water mark, to permanently revegetate with native plant species across the entire construction right-of-way. However, to facilitate periodic corrosion/leak surveys, a corridor centered on the pipeline and up to 10 feet wide may be cleared at a frequency necessary to maintain the 10-foot corridor in an herbaceous state. In addition, trees that are located within 15 feet of the pipeline that have roots that could compromise the integrity of the pipeline coating may be cut and removed from the permanent right-of-way. Seeding recommendations can be found in West Virginia Division of Natural Resources’ publication, “Enhancing Wildlife Habitat on Oil & Gas Infrastructure.” 1. Navigation. (a) No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation. (b) Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or otherwise, must be installed and maintained at the permittee's expense on authorized facilities in navigable waters of the United States. (c) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. All permanent and temporary crossings of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted, bridged, or otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic species. If a bottomless culvert cannot be used, then the crossing should be designed and constructed to minimize adverse effects to aquatic life movements. 3. Spawning Areas. Activities in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., through excavation, fill, or downstream smothering by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area are not authorized. 6 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 45 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 79 of 304 4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas. Activities in waters of the United States that serve as breeding areas for migratory birds must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. 5. Shellfish Beds. No activity may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWPs 4 and 48, or is a shellfish seeding or habitat restoration activity authorized by NWP 27. 6. Suitable Material. No activity may use unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.). Material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the Clean Water Act). 7. Water Supply Intakes. No activity may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake, except where the activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization. 8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the aquatic system due to accelerating the passage of water, and/or restricting its flow must be minimized to the maximum extent practicable. 9. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable, the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters must be maintained for each activity, including stream channelization, storm water management activities, and temporary and permanent road crossings, except as provided below. The activity must be constructed to withstand expected high flows. The activity must not restrict or impede the passage of normal or high flows, unless the primary purpose of the activity is to impound water or manage high flows. The activity may alter the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters if it benefits the aquatic environment (e.g., stream restoration or relocation activities). 10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. The activity must comply with applicable FEMAapproved state or local floodplain management requirements. 11. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands or mudflats must be placed on mats, or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance. 12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow, or during low tides. 13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, as appropriate. 7 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 46 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 80 of 304 14. Proper Maintenance. Any authorized structure or fill shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety and compliance with applicable NWP general conditions, as well as any activity-specific conditions added by the district engineer to an NWP authorization. 15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a single and complete project. The same NWP cannot be used more than once for the same single and complete project. 16. Wild and Scenic Rivers. (a) No NWP activity may occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, unless the appropriate Federal agency with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status. (b) If a proposed NWP activity will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the permittee must submit a preconstruction notification (see general condition 32). The district engineer will coordinate the PCN with the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river. The permittee shall not begin the NWP activity until notified by the district engineer that the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river has determined in writing that the proposed NWP activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status. (c) Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal land management agency responsible for the designated Wild and Scenic River or study river (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Information on these rivers is also available at: http://www.rivers.gov/. 17. Tribal Rights. No NWP activity may cause more than minimal adverse effects on tribal rights (including treaty rights), protected tribal resources, or tribal lands. 18. Endangered Species. (a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or which will directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify the critical habitat of such species. No activity is authorized under any NWP which “may affect” a listed species or critical habitat, unless ESA section 7 consultation addressing the effects of the proposed activity has been completed. Direct effects are the immediate effects on listed species and critical habitat caused by the NWP activity. Indirect effects are those effects on listed species and critical habitat that are caused by the NWP activity and are later in time, but still are reasonably certain to occur. (b) Federal agencies should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of the ESA. If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed activity, the Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate 8 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 47 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 81 of 304 compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation has not been submitted, additional ESA section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity and the respective federal agency would be responsible for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the ESA. (c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat, and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that might affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat, the pre-construction notification must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the proposed activity or that utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed activity. The district engineer will determine whether the proposed activity “may affect” or will have “no effect” to listed species and designated critical habitat and will notify the non-Federal applicant of the Corps’ determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete preconstruction notification. In cases where the non-Federal applicant has identified listed species or critical habitat that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, and has so notified the Corps, the applicant shall not begin work until the Corps has provided notification that the proposed activity will have “no effect” on listed species or critical habitat, or until ESA section 7 consultation has been completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. (d) As a result of formal or informal consultation with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add species-specific permit conditions to the NWPs. (e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not authorize the “take” of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization (e.g., an ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with “incidental take” provisions, etc.) from the FWS or the NMFS, the Endangered Species Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to take a listed species, where "take" means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The word “harm” in the definition of “take'' means an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering. (f) If the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit with an approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a group of projects that includes the proposed NWP activity, the non-federal applicant should provide a copy of that ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit with the PCN required by paragraph (c) of this general condition. The district engineer will coordinate with the agency that issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit to determine whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. If that coordination results in concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for the ESA 9 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 48 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 82 of 304 section 10(a)(1)(B) permit, the district engineer does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7 consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district engineer will notify the non-federal applicant within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit covers the proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA section 7 consultation is required. (g) Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS or their world wide web pages at http://www.fws.gov/ or http://www.fws.gov/ipac and http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/esa/ respectively. 19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. The permittee is responsible for ensuring their action complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permittee is responsible for contacting appropriate local office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine applicable measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds or eagles, including whether “incidental take” permits are necessary and available under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity. 20. Historic Properties. (a) In cases where the district engineer determines that the activity may have the potential to cause effects to properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, the activity is not authorized, until the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) have been satisfied. (b) Federal permittees should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed NWP activity, the Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation is not submitted, then additional consultation under section 106 may be necessary. The respective federal agency is responsible for fulfilling its obligation to comply with section 106. (c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to any historic properties listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including previously unidentified properties. For such activities, the preconstruction notification must state which historic properties might have the potential to be affected by the proposed NWP activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic properties or the potential for the presence of historic properties. Assistance regarding information on the location of, or potential for, the presence of historic properties can be sought from the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or designated tribal representative, as appropriate, and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). When reviewing pre-construction notifications, district engineers will comply with the current procedures for addressing the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The district engineer shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out appropriate identification efforts, which may include background research, consultation, oral 10 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 49 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 83 of 304 history interviews, sample field investigation, and field survey. Based on the information submitted in the PCN and these identification efforts, the district engineer shall determine whether the proposed NWP activity has the potential to cause effects on the historic properties. Section 106 consultation is not required when the district engineer determines that the activity does not have the potential to cause effects on historic properties (see 36 CFR 800.3(a)). Section 106 consultation is required when the district engineer determines that the activity has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. The district engineer will conduct consultation with consulting parties identified under 36 CFR 800.2(c) when he or she makes any of the following effect determinations for the purposes of section 106 of the NHPA: no historic properties affected, no adverse effect, or adverse effect. Where the non-Federal applicant has identified historic properties on which the activity might have the potential to cause effects and so notified the Corps, the non-Federal applicant shall not begin the activity until notified by the district engineer either that the activity has no potential to cause effects to historic properties or that NHPA section 106 consultation has been completed. (d) For non-federal permittees, the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether NHPA section 106 consultation is required. If NHPA section 106 consultation is required, the district engineer will notify the non-Federal applicant that he or she cannot begin the activity until section 106 consultation is completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps. (e) Prospective permittees should be aware that section 110k of the NHPA (54 U.S.C. 306113) prevents the Corps from granting a permit or other assistance to an applicant who, with intent to avoid the requirements of section 106 of the NHPA, has intentionally significantly adversely affected a historic property to which the permit would relate, or having legal power to prevent it, allowed such significant adverse effect to occur, unless the Corps, after consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), determines that circumstances justify granting such assistance despite the adverse effect created or permitted by the applicant. If circumstances justify granting the assistance, the Corps is required to notify the ACHP and provide documentation specifying the circumstances, the degree of damage to the integrity of any historic properties affected, and proposed mitigation. This documentation must include any views obtained from the applicant, SHPO/THPO, appropriate Indian tribes if the undertaking occurs on or affects historic properties on tribal lands or affects properties of interest to those tribes, and other parties known to have a legitimate interest in the impacts to the permitted activity on historic properties. 21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Artifacts. If you discover any previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify the district engineer of what you have found, and to the maximum extent practicable, avoid construction activities that may affect the remains and artifacts until the required coordination has been completed. The district engineer will initiate the Federal, Tribal, and state coordination required to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 11 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 50 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 84 of 304 22. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include, NOAA-managed marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district engineer may designate, after notice and opportunity for public comment, additional waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance, such as outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage sites. The district engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment. (a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are not authorized by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, and 52 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters. (b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 54, notification is required in accordance with general condition 32, for any activity proposed in the designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The district engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after it is determined that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal. 23. Mitigation. The district engineer will consider the following factors when determining appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal: (a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site). (b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating for resource losses) will be required to the extent necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. (c) Compensatory mitigation at a minimum one-for-one ratio will be required for all wetland losses that exceed 1/10-acre and require pre-construction notification, unless the district engineer determines in writing that either some other form of mitigation would be more environmentally appropriate or the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal, and provides an activity-specific waiver of this requirement. For wetland losses of 1/10-acre or less that require pre-construction notification, the district engineer may determine on a case-by-case basis that compensatory mitigation is required to ensure that the activity results in only minimal adverse environmental effects. (d) For losses of streams or other open waters that require pre-construction notification, the district engineer may require compensatory mitigation to ensure that the activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. Compensatory mitigation for losses of streams should be provided, if practicable, through stream rehabilitation, enhancement, or preservation, since streams are difficult-to-replace resources (see 33 CFR 332.3(e)(3)). 12 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 51 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 85 of 304 (e) Compensatory mitigation plans for NWP activities in or near streams or other open waters will normally include a requirement for the restoration or enhancement, maintenance, and legal protection (e.g., conservation easements) of riparian areas next to open waters. In some cases, the restoration or maintenance/protection of riparian areas may be the only compensatory mitigation required. Restored riparian areas should consist of native species. The width of the required riparian area will address documented water quality or aquatic habitat loss concerns. Normally, the riparian area will be 25 to 50 feet wide on each side of the stream, but the district engineer may require slightly wider riparian areas to address documented water quality or habitat loss concerns. If it is not possible to restore or maintain/protect a riparian area on both sides of a stream, or if the waterbody is a lake or coastal waters, then restoring or maintaining/protecting a riparian area along a single bank or shoreline may be sufficient. Where both wetlands and open waters exist on the project site, the district engineer will determine the appropriate compensatory mitigation (e.g., riparian areas and/or wetlands compensation) based on what is best for the aquatic environment on a watershed basis. In cases where riparian areas are determined to be the most appropriate form of minimization or compensatory mitigation, the district engineer may waive or reduce the requirement to provide wetland compensatory mitigation for wetland losses. (f) Compensatory mitigation projects provided to offset losses of aquatic resources must comply with the applicable provisions of 33 CFR part 332. (1) The prospective permittee is responsible for proposing an appropriate compensatory mitigation option if compensatory mitigation is necessary to ensure that the activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. For the NWPs, the preferred mechanism for providing compensatory mitigation is mitigation bank credits or in-lieu fee program credits (see 33 CFR 332.3(b)(2) and (3)). However, if an appropriate number and type of mitigation bank or in-lieu credits are not available at the time the PCN is submitted to the district engineer, the district engineer may approve the use of permittee-responsible mitigation. (2) The amount of compensatory mitigation required by the district engineer must be sufficient to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see 33 CFR 330.1(e)(3)). (See also 33 CFR 332.3(f)). (3) Since the likelihood of success is greater and the impacts to potentially valuable uplands are reduced, aquatic resource restoration should be the first compensatory mitigation option considered for permittee-responsible mitigation. (4) If permittee-responsible mitigation is the proposed option, the prospective permittee is responsible for submitting a mitigation plan. A conceptual or detailed mitigation plan may be used by the district engineer to make the decision on the NWP verification request, but a final mitigation plan that addresses the applicable requirements of 33 CFR 332.4(c)(2) through (14) must be approved by the district engineer before the permittee begins work in waters of the United States, unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation (see 33 CFR 332.3(k)(3)). 13 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 52 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 86 of 304 (5) If mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program credits are the proposed option, the mitigation plan only needs to address the baseline conditions at the impact site and the number of credits to be provided. (6) Compensatory mitigation requirements (e.g., resource type and amount to be provided as compensatory mitigation, site protection, ecological performance standards, monitoring requirements) may be addressed through conditions added to the NWP authorization, instead of components of a compensatory mitigation plan (see 33 CFR 332.4(c)(1)(ii)). (g) Compensatory mitigation will not be used to increase the acreage losses allowed by the acreage limits of the NWPs. For example, if an NWP has an acreage limit of 1/2-acre, it cannot be used to authorize any NWP activity resulting in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States, even if compensatory mitigation is provided that replaces or restores some of the lost waters. However, compensatory mitigation can and should be used, as necessary, to ensure that an NWP activity already meeting the established acreage limits also satisfies the no more than minimal impact requirement for the NWPs. (h) Permittees may propose the use of mitigation banks, in-lieu fee programs, or permitteeresponsible mitigation. When developing a compensatory mitigation proposal, the permittee must consider appropriate and practicable options consistent with the framework at 33 CFR 332.3(b). For activities resulting in the loss of marine or estuarine resources, permitteeresponsible mitigation may be environmentally preferable if there are no mitigation banks or inlieu fee programs in the area that have marine or estuarine credits available for sale or transfer to the permittee. For permittee-responsible mitigation, the special conditions of the NWP verification must clearly indicate the party or parties responsible for the implementation and performance of the compensatory mitigation project, and, if required, its long-term management. (i) Where certain functions and services of waters of the United States are permanently adversely affected by a regulated activity, such as discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States that will convert a forested or scrub-shrub wetland to a herbaceous wetland in a permanently maintained utility line right-of-way, mitigation may be required to reduce the adverse environmental effects of the activity to the no more than minimal level. 24. Safety of Impoundment Structures. To ensure that all impoundment structures are safely designed, the district engineer may require non-Federal applicants to demonstrate that the structures comply with established state dam safety criteria or have been designed by qualified persons. The district engineer may also require documentation that the design has been independently reviewed by similarly qualified persons, and appropriate modifications made to ensure safety. 25. Water Quality. Where States and authorized Tribes, or EPA where applicable, have not previously certified compliance of an NWP with CWA section 401, individual 401 Water Quality Certification must be obtained or waived (see 33 CFR 330.4(c)). The district engineer or State or Tribe may require additional water quality management measures to ensure that the authorized activity does not result in more than minimal degradation of water quality. 14 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 53 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 87 of 304 26. Coastal Zone Management. In coastal states where an NWP has not previously received a state coastal zone management consistency concurrence, an individual state coastal zone management consistency concurrence must be obtained, or a presumption of concurrence must occur (see 33 CFR 330.4(d)). The district engineer or a State may require additional measures to ensure that the authorized activity is consistent with state coastal zone management requirements. 27. Regional and Case-By-Case Conditions. The activity must comply with any regional conditions that may have been added by the Division Engineer (see 33 CFR 330.4(e)) and with any case specific conditions added by the Corps or by the state, Indian Tribe, or U.S. EPA in its section 401 Water Quality Certification, or by the state in its Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determination. 28. Use of Multiple Nationwide Permits. The use of more than one NWP for a single and complete project is prohibited, except when the acreage loss of waters of the United States authorized by the NWPs does not exceed the acreage limit of the NWP with the highest specified acreage limit. For example, if a road crossing over tidal waters is constructed under NWP 14, with associated bank stabilization authorized by NWP 13, the maximum acreage loss of waters of the United States for the total project cannot exceed 1/3-acre. 29. Transfer of Nationwide Permit Verifications. If the permittee sells the property associated with a nationwide permit verification, the permittee may transfer the nationwide permit verification to the new owner by submitting a letter to the appropriate Corps district office to validate the transfer. A copy of the nationwide permit verification must be attached to the letter, and the letter must contain the following statement and signature: “When the structures or work authorized by this nationwide permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this nationwide permit, including any special conditions, will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this nationwide permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below.” _____________________________________________ (Transferee) _____________________________________________ (Date) 30. Compliance Certification. Each permittee who receives an NWP verification letter from the Corps must provide a signed certification documenting completion of the authorized activity and implementation of any required compensatory mitigation. The success of any required permittee-responsible mitigation, including the achievement of ecological performance standards, will be addressed separately by the district engineer. The Corps will provide the 15 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 54 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 88 of 304 permittee the certification document with the NWP verification letter. The certification document will include: (a) A statement that the authorized activity was done in accordance with the NWP authorization, including any general, regional, or activity-specific conditions; (b) A statement that the implementation of any required compensatory mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions. If credits from a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program are used to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements, the certification must include the documentation required by 33 CFR 332.3(l)(3) to confirm that the permittee secured the appropriate number and resource type of credits; and (c) The signature of the permittee certifying the completion of the activity and mitigation. The completed certification document must be submitted to the district engineer within 30 days of completion of the authorized activity or the implementation of any required compensatory mitigation, whichever occurs later. 31. Activities Affecting Structures or Works Built by the United States. If an NWP activity also requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 because it will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) federally authorized Civil Works project (a “USACE project”), the prospective permittee must submit a pre-construction notification. See paragraph (b)(10) of general condition 32. An activity that requires section 408 permission is not authorized by NWP until the appropriate Corps office issues the section 408 permission to alter, occupy, or use the USACE project, and the district engineer issues a written NWP verification. 32. Pre-Construction Notification. (a) Timing. Where required by the terms of the NWP, the prospective permittee must notify the district engineer by submitting a pre-construction notification (PCN) as early as possible. The district engineer must determine if the PCN is complete within 30 calendar days of the date of receipt and, if the PCN is determined to be incomplete, notify the prospective permittee within that 30 day period to request the additional information necessary to make the PCN complete. The request must specify the information needed to make the PCN complete. As a general rule, district engineers will request additional information necessary to make the PCN complete only once. However, if the prospective permittee does not provide all of the requested information, then the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee that the PCN is still incomplete and the PCN review process will not commence until all of the requested information has been received by the district engineer. The prospective permittee shall not begin the activity until either: (1) He or she is notified in writing by the district engineer that the activity may proceed under the NWP with any special conditions imposed by the district or division engineer; or (2) 45 calendar days have passed from the district engineer’s receipt of the complete PCN and the prospective permittee has not received written notice from the district or division engineer. However, if the permittee was required to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 18 that 16 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 55 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 89 of 304 listed species or critical habitat might be affected or are in the vicinity of the activity, or to notify the Corps pursuant to general condition 20 that the activity might have the potential to cause effects to historic properties, the permittee cannot begin the activity until receiving written notification from the Corps that there is “no effect” on listed species or “no potential to cause effects” on historic properties, or that any consultation required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (see 33 CFR 330.4(f)) and/or section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)) has been completed. Also, work cannot begin under NWPs 21, 49, or 50 until the permittee has received written approval from the Corps. If the proposed activity requires a written waiver to exceed specified limits of an NWP, the permittee may not begin the activity until the district engineer issues the waiver. If the district or division engineer notifies the permittee in writing that an individual permit is required within 45 calendar days of receipt of a complete PCN, the permittee cannot begin the activity until an individual permit has been obtained. Subsequently, the permittee’s right to proceed under the NWP may be modified, suspended, or revoked only in accordance with the procedure set forth in 33 CFR 330.5(d)(2). (b) Contents of Pre-Construction Notification: The PCN must be in writing and include the following information: (1) Name, address and telephone numbers of the prospective permittee; (2) Location of the proposed activity; (3) Identify the specific NWP or NWP(s) the prospective permittee wants to use to authorize the proposed activity; (4) A description of the proposed activity; the activity’s purpose; direct and indirect adverse environmental effects the activity would cause, including the anticipated amount of loss of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters expected to result from the NWP activity, in acres, linear feet, or other appropriate unit of measure; a description of any proposed mitigation measures intended to reduce the adverse environmental effects caused by the proposed activity; and any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other separate and distant crossings for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require pre-construction notification. The description of the proposed activity and any proposed mitigation measures should be sufficiently detailed to allow the district engineer to determine that the adverse environmental effects of the activity will be no more than minimal and to determine the need for compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures. For single and complete linear projects, the PCN must include the quantity of anticipated losses of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters for each single and complete crossing of those wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters. Sketches should be provided when necessary to show that the activity complies with the terms of the NWP. (Sketches usually clarify the activity and when provided results in a quicker decision. Sketches should contain sufficient detail to provide an illustrative description of the proposed activity (e.g., a conceptual plan), but do not need to be detailed engineering plans); 17 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 56 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 90 of 304 (5) The PCN must include a delineation of wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters, such as lakes and ponds, and perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, on the project site. Wetland delineations must be prepared in accordance with the current method required by the Corps. The permittee may ask the Corps to delineate the special aquatic sites and other waters on the project site, but there may be a delay if the Corps does the delineation, especially if the project site is large or contains many wetlands, other special aquatic sites, and other waters. Furthermore, the 45 day period will not start until the delineation has been submitted to or completed by the Corps, as appropriate; (6) If the proposed activity will result in the loss of greater than 1/10-acre of wetlands and a PCN is required, the prospective permittee must submit a statement describing how the mitigation requirement will be satisfied, or explaining why the adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal and why compensatory mitigation should not be required. As an alternative, the prospective permittee may submit a conceptual or detailed mitigation plan. (7) For non-Federal permittees, if any listed species or designated critical habitat might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat, the PCN must include the name(s) of those endangered or threatened species that might be affected by the proposed activity or utilize the designated critical habitat that might be affected by the proposed activity. For NWP activities that require pre-construction notification, Federal permittees must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the Endangered Species Act; (8) For non-Federal permittees, if the NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to a historic property listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places, the PCN must state which historic property might have the potential to be affected by the proposed activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic property. For NWP activities that require pre-construction notification, Federal permittees must provide documentation demonstrating compliance with section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; (9) For an activity that will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the PCN must identify the Wild and Scenic River or the “study river” (see general condition 16); and (10) For an activity that requires permission from the Corps pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 408 because it will alter or temporarily or permanently occupy or use a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers federally authorized civil works project, the pre-construction notification must include a statement confirming that the project proponent has submitted a written request for section 408 permission from the Corps office having jurisdiction over that USACE project. (c) Form of Pre-Construction Notification: The standard individual permit application form (Form ENG 4345) may be used, but the completed application form must clearly indicate that it is an NWP PCN and must include all of the applicable information required in paragraphs (b)(1) through (10) of this general condition. A letter containing the required information may also be 18 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 57 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 91 of 304 used. Applicants may provide electronic files of PCNs and supporting materials if the district engineer has established tools and procedures for electronic submittals. (d) Agency Coordination: (1) The district engineer will consider any comments from Federal and state agencies concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs and the need for mitigation to reduce the activity’s adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal. (2) Agency coordination is required for: (i) all NWP activities that require pre-construction notification and result in the loss of greater than 1/2-acre of waters of the United States; (ii) NWP 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52 activities that require pre-construction notification and will result in the loss of greater than 300 linear feet of stream bed; (iii) NWP 13 activities in excess of 500 linear feet, fills greater than one cubic yard per running foot, or involve discharges of dredged or fill material into special aquatic sites; and (iv) NWP 54 activities in excess of 500 linear feet, or that extend into the waterbody more than 30 feet from the mean low water line in tidal waters or the ordinary high water mark in the Great Lakes. (3) When agency coordination is required, the district engineer will immediately provide (e.g., via e-mail, facsimile transmission, overnight mail, or other expeditious manner) a copy of the complete PCN to the appropriate Federal or state offices (FWS, state natural resource or water quality agency, EPA, and, if appropriate, the NMFS). With the exception of NWP 37, these agencies will have 10 calendar days from the date the material is transmitted to notify the district engineer via telephone, facsimile transmission, or e-mail that they intend to provide substantive, site-specific comments. The comments must explain why the agency believes the adverse environmental effects will be more than minimal. If so contacted by an agency, the district engineer will wait an additional 15 calendar days before making a decision on the preconstruction notification. The district engineer will fully consider agency comments received within the specified time frame concerning the proposed activity’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the NWPs, including the need for mitigation to ensure the net adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are no more than minimal. The district engineer will provide no response to the resource agency, except as provided below. The district engineer will indicate in the administrative record associated with each pre-construction notification that the resource agencies’ concerns were considered. For NWP 37, the emergency watershed protection and rehabilitation activity may proceed immediately in cases where there is an unacceptable hazard to life or a significant loss of property or economic hardship will occur. The district engineer will consider any comments received to decide whether the NWP 37 authorization should be modified, suspended, or revoked in accordance with the procedures at 33 CFR 330.5. (4) In cases of where the prospective permittee is not a Federal agency, the district engineer will provide a response to NMFS within 30 calendar days of receipt of any Essential Fish Habitat conservation recommendations, as required by section 305(b)(4)(B) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. (5) Applicants are encouraged to provide the Corps with either electronic files or multiple copies of pre-construction notifications to expedite agency coordination. 19 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 58 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 92 of 304 District Engineer’s Decision 1. In reviewing the PCN for the proposed activity, the district engineer will determine whether the activity authorized by the NWP will result in more than minimal individual or cumulative adverse environmental effects or may be contrary to the public interest. If a project proponent requests authorization by a specific NWP, the district engineer should issue the NWP verification for that activity if it meets the terms and conditions of that NWP, unless he or she determines, after considering mitigation, that the proposed activity will result in more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic environment and other aspects of the public interest and exercises discretionary authority to require an individual permit for the proposed activity. For a linear project, this determination will include an evaluation of the individual crossings of waters of the United States to determine whether they individually satisfy the terms and conditions of the NWP(s), as well as the cumulative effects caused by all of the crossings authorized by NWP. If an applicant requests a waiver of the 300 linear foot limit on impacts to streams or of an otherwise applicable limit, as provided for in NWPs 13, 21, 29, 36, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, 52, or 54, the district engineer will only grant the waiver upon a written determination that the NWP activity will result in only minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects. For those NWPs that have a waivable 300 linear foot limit for losses of intermittent and ephemeral stream bed and a 1/2-acre limit (i.e., NWPs 21, 29, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 50, 51, and 52), the loss of intermittent and ephemeral stream bed, plus any other losses of jurisdictional waters and wetlands, cannot exceed 1/2-acre. 2. When making minimal adverse environmental effects determinations the district engineer will consider the direct and indirect effects caused by the NWP activity. He or she will also consider the cumulative adverse environmental effects caused by activities authorized by NWP and whether those cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal. The district engineer will also consider site specific factors, such as the environmental setting in the vicinity of the NWP activity, the type of resource that will be affected by the NWP activity, the functions provided by the aquatic resources that will be affected by the NWP activity, the degree or magnitude to which the aquatic resources perform those functions, the extent that aquatic resource functions will be lost as a result of the NWP activity (e.g., partial or complete loss), the duration of the adverse effects (temporary or permanent), the importance of the aquatic resource functions to the region (e.g., watershed or ecoregion), and mitigation required by the district engineer. If an appropriate functional or condition assessment method is available and practicable to use, that assessment method may be used by the district engineer to assist in the minimal adverse environmental effects determination. The district engineer may add casespecific special conditions to the NWP authorization to address site-specific environmental concerns. 3. If the proposed activity requires a PCN and will result in a loss of greater than 1/10-acre of wetlands, the prospective permittee should submit a mitigation proposal with the PCN. Applicants may also propose compensatory mitigation for NWP activities with smaller impacts, or for impacts to other types of waters (e.g., streams). The district engineer will consider any proposed compensatory mitigation or other mitigation measures the applicant has included in the proposal in determining whether the net adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity 20 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 59 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 93 of 304 are no more than minimal. The compensatory mitigation proposal may be either conceptual or detailed. If the district engineer determines that the activity complies with the terms and conditions of the NWP and that the adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal, after considering mitigation, the district engineer will notify the permittee and include any activity-specific conditions in the NWP verification the district engineer deems necessary. Conditions for compensatory mitigation requirements must comply with the appropriate provisions at 33 CFR 332.3(k). The district engineer must approve the final mitigation plan before the permittee commences work in waters of the United States, unless the district engineer determines that prior approval of the final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation. If the prospective permittee elects to submit a compensatory mitigation plan with the PCN, the district engineer will expeditiously review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan. The district engineer must review the proposed compensatory mitigation plan within 45 calendar days of receiving a complete PCN and determine whether the proposed mitigation would ensure the NWP activity results in no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. If the net adverse environmental effects of the NWP activity (after consideration of the mitigation proposal) are determined by the district engineer to be no more than minimal, the district engineer will provide a timely written response to the applicant. The response will state that the NWP activity can proceed under the terms and conditions of the NWP, including any activity-specific conditions added to the NWP authorization by the district engineer. 4. If the district engineer determines that the adverse environmental effects of the proposed activity are more than minimal, then the district engineer will notify the applicant either: (a) that the activity does not qualify for authorization under the NWP and instruct the applicant on the procedures to seek authorization under an individual permit; (b) that the activity is authorized under the NWP subject to the applicant’s submission of a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal; or (c) that the activity is authorized under the NWP with specific modifications or conditions. Where the district engineer determines that mitigation is required to ensure no more than minimal adverse environmental effects, the activity will be authorized within the 45-day PCN period (unless additional time is required to comply with general conditions 18, 20, and/or 31, or to evaluate PCNs for activities authorized by NWPs 21, 49, and 50), with activity-specific conditions that state the mitigation requirements. The authorization will include the necessary conceptual or detailed mitigation plan or a requirement that the applicant submit a mitigation plan that would reduce the adverse environmental effects so that they are no more than minimal. When compensatory mitigation is required, no work in waters of the United States may occur until the district engineer has approved a specific mitigation plan or has determined that prior approval of a final mitigation plan is not practicable or not necessary to ensure timely completion of the required compensatory mitigation. Further Information 1. District Engineers have authority to determine if an activity complies with the terms and conditions of an NWP. 21 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 60 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 94 of 304 2. NWPs do not obviate the need to obtain other federal, state, or local permits, approvals, or authorizations required by law. 3. NWPs do not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. 4. NWPs do not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. 5. NWPs do not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project (see general condition 31). Nationwide Permits Regional General Conditions 1. Full Agency Pre-Construction Notification (PCN): To the extent possible, applicants are encouraged to submit a complete compact disc (CD) copy for any PCN package greater than 15 pages and/or includes maps, drawings, spreadsheets or other similar materials which are larger than 8.5 inches by 11 inches. All files saved on CDs should be in .pdf format. A hard copy of any oversized maps, drawings, spreadsheets etc. in the PCN package should be submitted and accompany the complete CD. An index or table of contents should be provided and correspond with each file saved on the CD and/or within the PCN hard copy. 2. United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS): Due to the potential presence of federally listed endangered and threatened (T&E) species or their habitats, including critical habitat, within the state of West Virginia, PCN in accordance with Nationwide Permit Condition 32 is required for any activity in the waterways listed in Appendix A. Sufficient information must be provided in the PCN to determine the proposed activity's compliance with NWP General Condition 18. Applicants are encouraged to contact the USFWS, West Virginia Field Office, Ecological Services by phone at (304) 636-6586 or by writing to 694 Beverly Pike, Elkins, West Virginia, 26241 prior to the submittal of a PCN. The USFWS can provide information to assist in complying with NWP General Condition 18 pertaining to endangered species and NWP General Condition 19 pertaining to migratory birds and bald and golden eagles. All relevant information obtained from the USFWS should be submitted with the PCN. The current list of waterways supporting federally listed T&E species in West Virginia is provided as Appendix A. Perspective applicants are encouraged to contact the USFWS West Virginia Field Office to obtain the most updated information regarding potential locations known to inhabit T&E species. 3. All regulated activities located in the waterways listed below require PCN in accordance with NWP General Condition 32:     New River; Bluestone River from the upstream boundary of Pipestem Park to Bluestone Reservoir; Meadow River from an area near the US 19 Bridge to its junction with the Gauley River; All streams within the Monongahela National Forest designated as National Wild 22 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 61 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173   Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 95 of 304 and Scenic Study Rivers; All streams and other bodies of water in State and National Forests and Recreation Areas (included are streams and bodies of water located within the Spruce Knob, Seneca Rocks and Gauley River National Recreation Areas); and Streams and their tributaries as contained within the boundaries of the designated National Wilderness Areas or the headwaters of such rivers and their tributaries; Cranberry River, Red Creek, Laurel Fork and Otter Creek. The Corps will consult with National Park Service and/or the United States Forest Service upon receipt of the PCN. 4. Due to the ecological significance of the following waterways, all regulated activities located in these waterways require PCN in accordance with NWP General Condition 32:      Greenbrier River from its confluence with Knapps Creek to its confluence with the New River; Anthony Creek from its headwaters to its confluence with the Greenbrier River; Cranberry River from its headwaters to its confluence with the Gauley River; Birch River from Cora Brown Bridge in Nicholas County to its confluence with the Elk River; and New River from its confluence with the Greenbrier River to its confluence with the Gauley River. 5. Historic Properties: Sufficient information must be provided in the PCN to determine the proposed activity's compliance with NWP General Condition 20. To ensure compliance with NWP General Condition 20, the following project information should be provided:  A detailed description of the project site in its current condition (i.e. prior to construction activities) including information on the terrain and topography of the site, the acreage of the site, the proximity of the site to major waterways, and any known disturbances within the site. Photographs and mapping are also needed which show the site conditions and all buildings or structures within the project site and on adjacent parcels.  A detailed description of past land uses in the project site. Photographs and maps supporting past land uses should be provided as available.  A detailed description of the construction activities proposed to take place on the site and a description of how the site will look after completion of the project compared to how it looked before the project.  Information regarding any past cultural resource studies or coordination pertinent to the project area, if available.  Any other data the applicant deems pertinent. 23 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 62 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 96 of 304 The applicant is encouraged to consult with professionals meeting the Professional Qualification Standards as set forth in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation (48 FR 44716) during this data gathering process. These professionals can assist with compiling the project information discussed above and should provide recommendations as to whether the proposal has the potential to affect historic properties and if further effort is needed to identify or assess potential effects to historic properties. These professionals can also compile preliminary review information to submit to the district engineer. A preliminary review encompasses a search radius of 2 miles from the project area, and consists of the following:  United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5’ series topographic maps;  West Virginia Division of Culture and history files including:  Historic Property Inventory (HPI) Form;  Archaeological Site Forms;  Cemetery Inventory Forms;  National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) nomination forms including Historic Districts; and  County atlases, histories and historic USGS 15’ series topographic map(s). As an alternative to submitting the information described above, the applicant may choose to request comments from the West Virginia Division of Culture and History (State Historic Preservation Office) and the District Engineer on specific requirements appropriate to the particular circumstances of the project. Be advised, undertaking identification efforts prior to consideration of the potential of the proposed activity to affect historic properties by the Corps is not without risk. It is possible that previous efforts could be determined insufficient or even potentially unnecessary once reviewed by the Corps and other consulting parties. Upon receipt and review of the information listed above, the Corps will evaluate the submittal. If the Corps determines the proposed activity has the potential to cause effects to a historic property, the Corps will seek consulting parties. In consultation with those parties, the Corps will scope appropriate historic property identification efforts and take into account the effect of the proposed activity on historic properties. Appendix A Aquatic Habitats Supporting Federally listed Endangered and Threatened Species, and Proposed Endangered Species in West Virginia There are seventeen federally listed endangered and threatened or proposed endangered species that are associated with specific aquatic habitats in West Virginia. These include ten endangered freshwater mussels - clubshell (Pleurobema clava), fanshell (Cyprogenia stegaria), James spinymussel (Pleurobema collina), northern riffleshell (Epioblasma torulosa rangiana), pink mucket pearlymussel (Lampsilis abrupta), rayed bean (Villosa fabilis), sheepnose (Plethobasus cyphyus), snuffbox (Epioblasma triquetra), spectaclecase (Cumberlandia monodonta), and tubercled-blossum pearlymussel (Epioblasma torulosa 24 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 63 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 97 of 304 torulosa); two endangered plants - Harperella (Ptilimnium nodosum) and northeastern bulrush (Scirpus ancistrochaetus); one threatened plant - Virginia spiraea (Spiraea virginiana); two threatened crustaceans – Madison Cave isopod (Antrolana lira) and Big Sandy crayfish (Cambarus callainus); one endangered crustacean –Guyandotte River crayfish (Cambarus veteranus); and one endangered fish - diamond darter (Crystallaria cincotta). Nine other listed species not associated with specific aquatic habitats also occur in West Virginia. Those species are not addressed here. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Huntington District 1. 2. Big Sandy Creek: Kanawha County: Snuffbox. Bluestone River: Mercer and Summers Counties (Bluestone Gorge to slackwater of Bluestone Reservoir): Virginia spiraea. 3. Cedar Creek: Braxton and Gilmer Counties: Snuffbox. 4. Clear Fork: Wyoming County: Guyandotte River crayfish 5. Cove Creek: Monroe County: James spinymussel. 6. Elk River: Braxton, Clay, and Kanawha Counties (Sutton Dam to slackwater below Coonskin Park), including the lower one-half mile reaches of its tributaries Birch River, Blue Creek, and Laurel Creek: Clubshell, pink mucket pearlymussel, northern riffleshell, rayed bean, and snuffbox. The Elk River also contains the diamond darter (endangered). Critical habitat for this species is from King Shoals to slackwater below Coonskin Park. 7. Gauley River: Fayette and Nicholas Counties (Summersville Dam to Swiss): Virginia spiraea. 8. Greenbrier River: Greenbrier and Pocahontas Counties: Virginia spiraea. 9. Henry Fork: Calhoun and Roane Counties: Snuffbox. 10. Hughes River: Ritchie and Wirt Counties, including the lower one-half mile reach of its tributary Goose Creek: Snuffbox. 11. Kanawha River: Fayette, Kanawha, Mason, and Putnam Counties: Fanshell, pink mucket pearlymussel, sheepnose, spectaclecase, and tubercled-blossum pearlymussel. 12. Leading Creek: Gilmer and Lewis Counties, including the lower one-half mile reach of its tributary Fink Creek: Snuffbox. 25 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 64 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 98 of 304 13. Little Kanawha River: Braxton, Calhoun, Gilmer, Wirt, and Wood Counties, including the lower one-half mile reaches of its tributaries Leading Creek (Calhoun County), Pine Creek, Sand Fork, Slate Creek, Straight Creek, Tanner Creek, Tucker Creek, and Walker Creek: Clubshell and snuffbox. 14. Marsh Fork River including Dingess Branch and Millers Camp Branch and associated palustrine emergent and scrub-shrub wetlands: Raleigh County: Virginia spiraea. 15. McElroy Creek: Doddridge and Tyler Counties: Snuffbox. 16. Meadow River: Fayette, Greenbrier, and Nicholas Counties: Virginia spiraea. 17. Meathouse Fork of Middle Island Creek: Doddridge County, including the lower onehalf mile reach of its tributary Toms Fork: Clubshell and snuffbox. 18. Middle Island Creek: Doddridge, Pleasants, and Tyler Counties, including the lower onehalf mile reaches of its tributaries Arnold Creek, Bluestone Creek, Buckeye Creek, Indian Creek, McKim Creek, Point Pleasant Creek, and Sancho Creek: Clubshell and snuffbox. 19. New River (Lower): Fayette County (Route 19 to Gauley Bridge): Virginia spiraea. 20. North Fork Hughes River: Ritchie and Wirt Counties, including the lower one-half mile reaches of its tributaries Addis Run, Bonds Creek, Devilhole Creek, and Gillespie Run: Snuffbox. 21. Ohio River: Cabell, Jackson, Mason Pleasants, Tyler, Wetzel, and Wood Counties: Fanshell, pink mucket pearlymussel, sheepnose, and snuffbox. 22. Pinnacle Creek: Wyoming County: Guyandotte River crayfish 23. Potts Creek and South Fork of Potts Creek: Monroe County: James spinymussel. 24. Reedy Creek: Roane and Wirt Counties: Snuffbox. 25. South Fork Hughes River: Doddridge, Ritchie, and Wirt Counties, including the lower one-half mile reaches of its tributaries Bone Creek, Indian Creek, Leatherbark Creek, Otterslide Creek, Slab Creek, and Spruce Creek: Clubshell and snuffbox. 26. Spring Creek: Roane and Wirt Counties: Snuffbox. 27. Steer Creek: Calhoun and Gilmer Counties: Snuffbox. 26 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 65 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 99 of 304 28. Sugar Creek: Pleasants County: Snuffbox. 29. Tug Fork River and tributaries including Dry Fork: McDowell and Mingo Counties: Big Sandy crayfish 30. West Fork Little Kanawha River: Calhoun, Roane, and Wirt Counties: Snuffbox. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District 1. Back Creek: Berkeley County: Harperella. 2. Cacapon River: Morgan County: Harperella. 3. Dunkard Creek: Monongalia County: Snuffbox. 4. Fish Creek: Marshall County: Snuffbox. 5. Fishing Creek: Wetzel County: Snuffbox. Note – the mouth of Fishing Creek at the Ohio River is regulated by the Huntington District. 6. Hackers Creek (of the West Fork River): Harrison and Lewis Counties: Clubshell and snuffbox. 7. Potomac River: Morgan County (from the mouth of the Cacapon River to the mouth of Sleepy Creek): Harperella. 8. Sleepy Creek: Morgan County: Harperella. 9. West Fork River: Harrison, Lewis, and Marion Counties: Snuffbox. 10. Streams, springs, and wetlands connected to the groundwater system including caves, areas near sinkholes, and other groundwater/surface interfaces, from the Potomac River west to Opequon Creek, especially in the Rippon and Leetown Areas, and the Evitts Run Watershed: Jefferson and Berkeley Counties: Madison Cave isopod. 11. Wetlands: Berkeley and Hardy Counties: Northeastern bulrush. *Note 1: Applicants must ensure they are referencing the latest version of Appendix by contacting the USFWS since federally-listed species are continuously listed, proposed for listing, and/or de-listed. *Note 2: Please also note that freshwater mussels which are not federally listed are protected and managed by the State of West Virginia, Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR). Nonlisted freshwater mussels may occur in the streams listed above as well as additional streams throughout the State. For information on the distribution of freshwater mussel species and 27 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 66 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 100 of 304 their protections contact the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources by phone at (304) 637-0245. Standard Conditions of State 401 Water Quality Certification Applicable to Nationwide Permits 1. Any permitted activity for which U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requires preconstruction notification (PCN) in accordance with Nationwide Permit General Condition 32 requires the same information to be sent by the applicant, prior to construction, to West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management (WV DEP DWWM). 2. The applicant must provide proof of compensatory mitigation (as outlined in Standard Condition 19 below) to WV DEP DWWM prior to construction for a project with permanent stream impacts greater than 300 linear feet or causing the loss of greater than 1/10 acre of wetlands. 3. Culverted crossings should be sized and installed in a manner to allow the passage of aquatic life and freely pass bankfull flows. Exceptions to this requirement would be when culvert placement is on bedrock, or when stream gradient is equal to or greater than 4%, or when bankfull elevation is greater than final surface elevation. 4. The permittee will investigate for the presence of water supply intakes or other activities within 1/2 mile downstream, which may be affected by suspended solids and turbidity increases caused by work in the watercourse. The permittee will give notice to operators of any such water supply intakes and such other water quality dependent activities as necessary before beginning work in the watercourse in sufficient time to allow preparation for any change in water quality. 5. Excavation, dredging or filling in the watercourse will be done only to the extent necessary to achieve the project's purpose, and at each wetland crossing the top 12 inches of topsoil shall be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. In addition, at each stream crossing, substrate in the channel is to be removed and stockpiled separately from other excavated material. This native material must be re-used in restoration of the wetland and/or stream bed. 6. Spoil materials from the watercourse or onshore operations, including sludge deposits, will not be dumped in the watercourse, or deposited in wetlands or other areas where the deposit may adversely affect the surface or ground waters of the state. 7. The permittee will employ measures to prevent or control spills from fuels, lubricants or any other materials used in connection with construction and restrict them from entering the watercourse. Storage areas for chemicals, explosives, lubricants, equipment fuels, etc., as well as equipment refueling areas, must include containment measures (e.g., liner systems, dikes, etc.) to ensure that spillage of any material will not contact surface or ground waters. Storage areas and refueling areas shall be a minimum distance of 100 feet from any surface 28 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 67 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 101 of 304 water body. All spills shall be promptly reported to the State Center for Pollution, Toxic Chemical and Oil Spills, 1-800-642-3074. 8. Upon completion of in-stream operations all disturbances below the ordinary high water mark will be properly stabilized within 24 hours to prevent soil erosion. Where possible, stabilization shall incorporate revegetation using bioengineering as an alternative to rip rap. If rip rap is utilized, it is to be of such weight and size that bank stress or slump conditions will not be created due to its placement. Fill is to be clean, nonhazardous and of such composition that it will not adversely affect the biological, chemical or physical properties of the receiving waters. Unsuitable materials include but are not limited to: copper chromium arsenate (CCA) and creosote treated lumber, car bodies, tires, large household appliances, construction debris, and asphalt. To reduce potential slope failure and/or erosion behind the material, fill containing concrete must be of such weight and size that promotes stability during expected high flows. Loose large slab placement of concrete sections from demolition projects greater than thirty-six inches in its longest dimension and tires are prohibited. Rebar or wire in concrete should not extend further than one (1) inch. All activities require the use of clean and coarse non-erodible materials with 15% or less of like fines that is properly sized to withstand expected high flows. 9. Runoff from any storage areas or spills will not be allowed to enter storm sewers without acceptable removal of solids, oils and toxic compounds. Discharges from retention/detention ponds must comply with permit requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit program of the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management. 10. Land disturbances, which are one (1) acre or greater in total area, must comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System or other state stormwater permit requirements as established by the WV DEP DWWM, if applicable. Any land disturbances are required to use Best Management Practices for Sediment and Erosion Control, as described in the latest West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection’s Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practice Manual, or similar documents prepared by the West Virginia Division of Highways. These handbooks are available from the respective agency offices. 11. Concrete will not be permitted to enter the watercourse unless contained by tightly sealed forms or cells. Concrete handling equipment shall not discharge waste washwater into wetlands or watercourses at any time without adequate wastewater treatment as approved by the WV DEP DWWM. 12. In stream work in designated warm water streams and their adjacent tributaries during the fish spawning season, April - June and trout waters and their adjacent tributaries during the trout water fish spawning season September 15 to March 31 requires a spawning season waiver from the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (WV DNR) Coordination Unit, at (304) 637-0245. For information about specific stream designations contact West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Water Quality Standards Section at (304) 926-0495. In-stream work may occur during the respective spawning season in ephemeral 29 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 68 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 102 of 304 waters without a waiver if all reasonable measures are taken to minimize turbidity and sedimentation downstream associated with the proposed project. 13. Removal of well-established riparian vegetation not directly associated with the project construction is prohibited. Disturbance and removal of vegetation from project construction area is to be avoided, where possible, and minimized when necessary. Removal of vegetation shall not be allowed where stream bank stability under normal flow conditions would be compromised. 14. Operation of equipment instream is to be minimized and accomplished during low flow periods when practical. Ingress and egress for equipment shall be within the work site. Location of ingress and egress outside the immediate work area requires prior approval of the WV DEP DWWM in concurrence with the WV DNR. 15. The permittee will comply with water quality standards as contained in the West Virginia Requirements Governing Water Quality Standards, Title 47 of Code of State Regulations, Series 2. 16. Stream activities permitted under the Nationwide Permit Program require that a West Virginia Public Lands Corporation Right of Entry be obtained. Application for Stream Activity should be made to the WV DNR, Office of Lands and Streams, at http://www.wvdnr.gov/REM/default.shtm or (304) 558-3225. In addition, any activity within the Federal Emergency Management Agency delineated 100-year floodplain requires approval from the appropriate Floodplain Manager. The following website provides a statewide listing of Floodplain Managers in West Virginia: http://www.dhsem.wv.gov/MitigationRecovery/Pages/Floodplain-Management.aspx www.dhsem.wv.gov/mitigation/floodplain/Pages/default.aspx 17. If applicable, the permittee must measure and report Large Quantity Water use pursuant to §22-26-1et seq of the West Virginia Code. 18. Prior notification describing the project location and impacts must be given to the WV DEP DWWM for use of any of the Nationwide Permits for all work in streams set forth in Sections A, B, and C below. A. Tier 3 Protection. West Virginia Code of State Regulations, Requirements Governing Water Quality Standards, Title 47, Series 2. Outstanding National Resource Waters: Outstanding National Resource Waters include, but are not limited to, all streams and rivers within the boundaries of Wilderness Areas designated by The Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. §1131 et seq.) within the State, all Federally designated rivers under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. §1271 et seq.; all streams and other bodies of water in state parks which are high quality waters or naturally reproducing trout streams; waters in national parks and forests which are high quality waters or naturally reproducing trout streams; waters designated under the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978, as amended; and pursuant to 30 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 69 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 103 of 304 subsection 7.1 of 60CSR5, those waters whose unique character, ecological or recreational value, or pristine nature constitutes a valuable national or state resource. The listing of Tier 3 streams is located at: http://www.dep.wv.gov/WWE/Programs/wqs/Documents/Tier%203%20I nfo/WVTier_3_Nov2013_web.xlt B. All naturally-reproducing trout streams. For information about specific streams contact WV DNR, Wildlife Resource Section, Trout Fisheries Program at 304-637-0245. C. West Virginia Natural Stream Preservation Act. The following streams or rivers are protected from activities that would impound, divert or flood the body of water: Greenbrier River from its confluence with Knapps Creek to its confluence with the New River, Anthony Creek from its headwaters to its confluence with the Greenbrier River, Cranberry River from its headwaters to its confluence with the Gauley River, Birch River from Cora Brown Bridge in Nicholas County to the confluence of the river with the Elk River, and New River from its confluence with the Greenbrier River to its confluence with the Gauley River. 19. Wetland and stream mitigation guidelines. The discharge of dredged or fill material into a stream or wetland is authorized based upon the following criteria: A. One-tenth to ½ acre of permanent impact to wetland(s) (including wetland type conversion) requires prior notification describing the project location and impacts and plan for mitigation to be submitted to the WV DEP DWWM along with the proposed plan for mitigation provided to the state for approval. B. The amount of fill in a wetland, wetland complex or wetland system without mitigation is not to cumulatively exceed 1/10 acre. C. West Virginia Stream Wetland Valuation Metric (SWVM) is the preferred method to assist with the determination of required mitigation. The metric is available at the Huntington and Pittsburgh ACOE web sites. In all instances, mitigation for all impacts incurred through use of these Nationwide Permits must first be directed to elimination of the impacts, then minimization of the impacts and lastly through compensatory mitigation. In many cases, the environmentally preferable compensatory mitigation may be provided through an approved mitigation bank or the West Virginia In-Lieu Fee Program. Permittee responsible compensatory mitigation may be performed using the methods of: restoration, enhancement, establishment and in certain circumstances preservation. In general, the required compensatory mitigation should be located in the same watershed as the impact site, and located where it is most likely to successfully replace lost functions and services as the impacted site. However, the use of mitigation banks or in-lieu fee for in-kind replacement is not restricted to the major watershed in which the impact has occurred until such time as mitigation banks or in-lieu projects are developed in each major watershed. 31 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 70 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 104 of 304 Wetlands. When permittee responsible in-kind replacement mitigation is used, it is to be accomplished at the following ratios until such time an approved functional assessment methodology is established for the state of West Virginia: Permanent impacts to open water wetlands are to be one (1) acre replaced for one (1) acre impacted. Permanent impacts to wet meadow/emergent wetlands are to be two (2) acres replaced for one (1) acre impacted. Permanent impacts to scrub-shrub and forested wetlands are to be three (3) acres replaced for one (1) acre impacted. In instances where compensatory in-kind mitigation is completed 12 months prior to the impact of the resource, the replacement ratio may be reduced to as low as one (1) acre created/restored to every one (1) acre impacted. NOTE: The ratio of created/restored wetlands to impacted wetlands not only ensures no net loss, but assures the adequate replacement of the impacted wetlands functions and values at the level existing prior to the impact. For many of the more complicated type wetlands, such as scrub-shrub and forested, the values and functions cannot readily be replaced through creation. Furthermore, not all wetland creation is successful. In certain instances, the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water and Waste Management may consider the acquisition of existing wetlands. Acquisition ratios are the following: 5 to 1 for open water wetlands 10 to 1 for wet meadow/emergent wetlands 15 to 1 for scrub-shrub and forested wetlands Under extenuating circumstances the director may accept lower ratios for high quality wetlands under significant threat of development. All wetlands acquired, using the acquisition method of mitigation, will either be deeded to the WV DNR Public Land Corporation for management by the Wildlife Resources Section or placed under a conservation easement and be protected from disturbance by the permittee or their designee. Third party oversight of the conservation easement by a non-profit conservation organization is preferred. Streams. Compensatory mitigation projects for permanent stream impacts should attempt to replace lost functions. Mitigation will be determined on a case-by-case basis based on the preand post- condition stream quality and complexity of the mitigation project preferably utilizing the SWVM worksheets. Compensatory mitigation may require protection through deed restrictions or conservation easements by the permittee or their designee. 32 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 71 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 105 of 304 20. Streams with Mussel populations. A. Should native freshwater mussels be encountered during the use of any Nationwide Permit, all activity is to cease immediately and the WV DNR Wildlife Resources Section, Wildlife Diversity Program is to be contacted (304-637-0245) to determine significance of the mussel population and the action to be taken. B. Work in streams known to have protected “no take” mussel populations or contain protected habitat of mussels on the Federal Endangered Species list must be approved by the WV DNR, Wildlife Diversity Program. Applicants wishing to conduct projects in such streams should contact the program at (304) 637-0245. The most current list of these waters and other mussel information can be found here: http://www.wvdnr.gov/Mussels/Main.shtm. C. Applicants should also consider utilizing WV DNR Wildlife Data Base Inquiry process. This resource is designed for the applicant as an informative preplanning tool. It allows the applicant to know, in advance, if they will be encountering any federally listed endangered species (ES), state species of concern and high quality fish and wildlife habitats such as trout streams, warm water fisheries, wetlands, karst and cave habitats. This inquiry can be obtained from the: Wildlife Data Base Coordinator, PO Box 67, Elkins West Virginia 26241. Information on what to submit to receive an inquiry should be directed to data base coordinator at 304-637-0245. 21. Isolated State Waters. In some cases, the ACOE may determine that an activity will not impact waters of the United States because the water is an isolated wetland or stream, and therefore does not require a 404 permit. However, under West Virginia Code §22-118(b)(3), a permit is needed to place a waste into any water of the State. Accordingly, any applicant proposing to impact an isolated water must contact WV DEP DWWM to obtain all necessary approvals for activities impacting any isolated State waters. H. Definitions Best management practices (BMPs): Policies, practices, procedures, or structures implemented to mitigate the adverse environmental effects on surface water quality resulting from development. BMPs are categorized as structural or non-structural. Compensatory mitigation: The restoration (re-establishment or rehabilitation), establishment (creation), enhancement, and/or in certain circumstances preservation of aquatic resources for the purposes of offsetting unavoidable adverse impacts which remain after all appropriate and practicable avoidance and minimization has been achieved. Currently serviceable: Useable as is or with some maintenance, but not so degraded as to essentially require reconstruction. Direct effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and occur at the same time and place. 33 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 72 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 106 of 304 Discharge: The term “discharge” means any discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Ecological reference: A model used to plan and design an aquatic habitat and riparian area restoration, enhancement, or establishment activity under NWP 27. An ecological reference may be based on the structure, functions, and dynamics of an aquatic habitat type or a riparian area type that currently exists in the region where the proposed NWP 27 activity is located. Alternatively, an ecological reference may be based on a conceptual model for the aquatic habitat type or riparian area type to be restored, enhanced, or established as a result of the proposed NWP 27 activity. An ecological reference takes into account the range of variation of the aquatic habitat type or riparian area type in the region. Enhancement: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of an aquatic resource to heighten, intensify, or improve a specific aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement results in the gain of selected aquatic resource function(s), but may also lead to a decline in other aquatic resource function(s). Enhancement does not result in a gain in aquatic resource area. Ephemeral stream: An ephemeral stream has flowing water only during, and for a short duration after, precipitation events in a typical year. Ephemeral stream beds are located above the water table year-round. Groundwater is not a source of water for the stream. Runoff from rainfall is the primary source of water for stream flow. Establishment (creation): The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics present to develop an aquatic resource that did not previously exist at an upland site. Establishment results in a gain in aquatic resource area. High Tide Line: The line of intersection of the land with the water’s surface at the maximum height reached by a rising tide. The high tide line may be determined, in the absence of actual data, by a line of oil or scum along shore objects, a more or less continuous deposit of fine shell or debris on the foreshore or berm, other physical markings or characteristics, vegetation lines, tidal gages, or other suitable means that delineate the general height reached by a rising tide. The line encompasses spring high tides and other high tides that occur with periodic frequency but does not include storm surges in which there is a departure from the normal or predicted reach of the tide due to the piling up of water against a coast by strong winds such as those accompanying a hurricane or other intense storm. Historic Property: Any prehistoric or historic district, site (including archaeological site), building, structure, or other object included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the Secretary of the Interior. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. The term includes properties of traditional religious and cultural importance to an Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization and that meet the National Register criteria (36 CFR part 60). Independent utility: A test to determine what constitutes a single and complete non-linear project in the Corps Regulatory Program. A project is considered to have independent utility if it 34 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 73 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 107 of 304 would be constructed absent the construction of other projects in the project area. Portions of a multi-phase project that depend upon other phases of the project do not have independent utility. Phases of a project that would be constructed even if the other phases were not built can be considered as separate single and complete projects with independent utility. Indirect effects: Effects that are caused by the activity and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. Intermittent stream: An intermittent stream has flowing water during certain times of the year, when groundwater provides water for stream flow. During dry periods, intermittent streams may not have flowing water. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. Loss of waters of the United States: Waters of the United States that are permanently adversely affected by filling, flooding, excavation, or drainage because of the regulated activity. Permanent adverse effects include permanent discharges of dredged or fill material that change an aquatic area to dry land, increase the bottom elevation of a waterbody, or change the use of a waterbody. The acreage of loss of waters of the United States is a threshold measurement of the impact to jurisdictional waters for determining whether a project may qualify for an NWP; it is not a net threshold that is calculated after considering compensatory mitigation that may be used to offset losses of aquatic functions and services. The loss of stream bed includes the acres or linear feet of stream bed that are filled or excavated as a result of the regulated activity. Waters of the United States temporarily filled, flooded, excavated, or drained, but restored to pre-construction contours and elevations after construction, are not included in the measurement of loss of waters of the United States. Impacts resulting from activities that do not require Department of the Army authorization, such as activities eligible for exemptions under section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act, are not considered when calculating the loss of waters of the United States. Navigable waters: Waters subject to section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. These waters are defined at 33 CFR part 329. Non-tidal wetland: A non-tidal wetland is a wetland that is not subject to the ebb and flow of tidal waters. Non-tidal wetlands contiguous to tidal waters are located landward of the high tide line (i.e., spring high tide line). Open water: For purposes of the NWPs, an open water is any area that in a year with normal patterns of precipitation has water flowing or standing above ground to the extent that an ordinary high water mark can be determined. Aquatic vegetation within the area of flowing or standing water is either non-emergent, sparse, or absent. Vegetated shallows are considered to be open waters. Examples of “open waters” include rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds. Ordinary High Water Mark: An ordinary high water mark is a line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics, or by other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas. Perennial stream: A perennial stream has flowing water year-round during a typical year. The water table is located above the stream bed for most of the year. Groundwater is the primary 35 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 74 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 108 of 304 source of water for stream flow. Runoff from rainfall is a supplemental source of water for stream flow. Practicable: Available and capable of being done after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes. Pre-construction notification: A request submitted by the project proponent to the Corps for confirmation that a particular activity is authorized by nationwide permit. The request may be a permit application, letter, or similar document that includes information about the proposed work and its anticipated environmental effects. Pre-construction notification may be required by the terms and conditions of a nationwide permit, or by regional conditions. A pre-construction notification may be voluntarily submitted in cases where pre-construction notification is not required and the project proponent wants confirmation that the activity is authorized by nationwide permit. Preservation: The removal of a threat to, or preventing the decline of, aquatic resources by an action in or near those aquatic resources. This term includes activities commonly associated with the protection and maintenance of aquatic resources through the implementation of appropriate legal and physical mechanisms. Preservation does not result in a gain of aquatic resource area or functions. Protected tribal resources: Those natural resources and properties of traditional or customary religious or cultural importance, either on or off Indian lands, retained by, or reserved by or for, Indian tribes through treaties, statutes, judicial decisions, or executive orders, including tribal trust resources. Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former aquatic resource. Reestablishment results in rebuilding a former aquatic resource and results in a gain in aquatic resource area and functions. Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural/historic functions to a degraded aquatic resource. Rehabilitation results in a gain in aquatic resource function, but does not result in a gain in aquatic resource area. Restoration: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural/historic functions to a former or degraded aquatic resource. For the purpose of tracking net gains in aquatic resource area, restoration is divided into two categories: re-establishment and rehabilitation. Riffle and pool complex: Riffle and pool complexes are special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1) Guidelines. Riffle and pool complexes sometimes characterize steep gradient sections of streams. Such stream sections are recognizable by their hydraulic characteristics. The rapid movement of water over a course substrate in riffles results in a rough flow, a turbulent surface, and high dissolved oxygen levels in the water. Pools are deeper areas associated with riffles. A 36 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 75 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 109 of 304 slower stream velocity, a streaming flow, a smooth surface, and a finer substrate characterize pools. Riparian areas: Riparian areas are lands next to streams, lakes, and estuarine-marine shorelines. Riparian areas are transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, through which surface and subsurface hydrology connects riverine, lacustrine, estuarine, and marine waters with their adjacent wetlands, non-wetland waters, or uplands. Riparian areas provide a variety of ecological functions and services and help improve or maintain local water quality. (See general condition 23.) Shellfish seeding: The placement of shellfish seed and/or suitable substrate to increase shellfish production. Shellfish seed consists of immature individual shellfish or individual shellfish attached to shells or shell fragments (i.e., spat on shell). Suitable substrate may consist of shellfish shells, shell fragments, or other appropriate materials placed into waters for shellfish habitat. Single and complete linear project: A linear project is a project constructed for the purpose of getting people, goods, or services from a point of origin to a terminal point, which often involves multiple crossings of one or more waterbodies at separate and distant locations. The term “single and complete project” is defined as that portion of the total linear project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers that includes all crossings of a single water of the United States (i.e., a single waterbody) at a specific location. For linear projects crossing a single or multiple waterbodies several times at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. However, individual channels in a braided stream or river, or individual arms of a large, irregularly shaped wetland or lake, etc., are not separate waterbodies, and crossings of such features cannot be considered separately. Single and complete non-linear project: For non-linear projects, the term “single and complete project” is defined at 33 CFR 330.2(i) as the total project proposed or accomplished by one owner/developer or partnership or other association of owners/developers. A single and complete non-linear project must have independent utility (see definition of “independent utility”). Single and complete non-linear projects may not be “piecemealed” to avoid the limits in an NWP authorization. Stormwater management: Stormwater management is the mechanism for controlling stormwater runoff for the purposes of reducing downstream erosion, water quality degradation, and flooding and mitigating the adverse effects of changes in land use on the aquatic environment. Stormwater management facilities: Stormwater management facilities are those facilities, including but not limited to, stormwater retention and detention ponds and best management practices, which retain water for a period of time to control runoff and/or improve the quality (i.e., by reducing the concentration of nutrients, sediments, hazardous substances and other pollutants) of stormwater runoff. 37 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 76 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 110 of 304 Stream bed: The substrate of the stream channel between the ordinary high water marks. The substrate may be bedrock or inorganic particles that range in size from clay to boulders. Wetlands contiguous to the stream bed, but outside of the ordinary high water marks, are not considered part of the stream bed. Stream channelization: The manipulation of a stream’s course, condition, capacity, or location that causes more than minimal interruption of normal stream processes. A channelized stream remains a water of the United States. Structure: An object that is arranged in a definite pattern of organization. Examples of structures include, without limitation, any pier, boat dock, boat ramp, wharf, dolphin, weir, boom, breakwater, bulkhead, revetment, riprap, jetty, artificial island, artificial reef, permanent mooring structure, power transmission line, permanently moored floating vessel, piling, aid to navigation, or any other manmade obstacle or obstruction. Tidal wetland: A tidal wetland is a jurisdictional wetland that is inundated by tidal waters. Tidal waters rise and fall in a predictable and measurable rhythm or cycle due to the gravitational pulls of the moon and sun. Tidal waters end where the rise and fall of the water surface can no longer be practically measured in a predictable rhythm due to masking by other waters, wind, or other effects. Tidal wetlands are located channelward of the high tide line. Tribal lands: Any lands title to which is either: 1) held in trust by the United States for the benefit of any Indian tribe or individual; or 2) held by any Indian tribe or individual subject to restrictions by the United States against alienation. Tribal rights: Those rights legally accruing to a tribe or tribes by virtue of inherent sovereign authority, unextinguished aboriginal title, treaty, statute, judicial decisions, executive order or agreement, and that give rise to legally enforceable remedies. Vegetated shallows: Vegetated shallows are special aquatic sites under the 404(b)(1) Guidelines. They are areas that are permanently inundated and under normal circumstances have rooted aquatic vegetation, such as seagrasses in marine and estuarine systems and a variety of vascular rooted plants in freshwater systems. Waterbody: For purposes of the NWPs, a waterbody is a jurisdictional water of the United States. If a wetland is adjacent to a waterbody determined to be a water of the United States, that waterbody and any adjacent wetlands are considered together as a single aquatic unit (see 33 CFR 328.4(c)(2)). Examples of “waterbodies” include streams, rivers, lakes, ponds, and wetlands. 38 EXHIBIT 1 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Page 77 of 77 Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 111 of 304 EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF WVDEP’S APRIL 13, 2017 OF NWPS Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 112 of 304 :4.. dep west virginia deportment of envlronmenfal protectlon Division or Water and W~sl~ Manllgl.'lm:ol 60 1 ST..tOO_t14?_1074 J.:iWO.M?1074 J ~ Ron~/,4?_ln711 ' EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 114 of 304 Page 3 J\priIIJ.2017 /\pril t\prill3,20 I J, 20 17 88. Upon completion or of in·stream iin~streall1 n ~strea1l1 operat operations uperations ions all disturbance disturbancess below bell;lw the ordinary o rdinary mgh rugh hjgh water mark stabilized lized within with in 24 hours to prc\'cnl prcvt:nl prevc nt soil soi l erosion. e-rosion. possi ble, mark will be properly stabi erosion, Where possible, possible. ~ stabi stabilization labillz lization ation shall incorpomtc incorpornte incorporate revegetation using bioengineering bioengineenng 8S as an al ternative to rip rafl. rap. If rap.lf lized, \veight and ssize ri ripp rap is IS uti lIlil LltiliLed, iud, it is to be of such "veight weight ize thaI (hat bank stress or slump conditions condi tions will !lot Fill i::; is tn to In be clean, c1 can~ nOnha:a:trdo nonhaLJrdous nouha:audous us and of such suc h not be created due to its placement. fill compo~iti()n adversely aileel chemic.. l or physical properties prupt!rlies of composition compo~ il ion that it will wi ll not adverse ly affect IlLlCCI the Lhe biological, bio biological. logical. chemical chemica the rhe receiving recei ving waters. Unsuitable Unsui table materials include but arc not n Ol limited to to: 10:: copper chromium arsenate (CeA) and creosote Ircatt.d treated trea led lumber, lumber. car bodies, tires. rires. large househo hou housc:ho sehold ld appliances, appliance.Ii. appliances. ;'rsenate (eCA) co nstruction debris, debris. ;md ;:tnd and asphalt. asphall. To reduce po1ential potential slope failure Iililure and/or and/(If eros erosion ion behind the material containing com:relc s ize Ihat thaI promotes stabi stability material.., fill material. fitillll contailllng cont ai ning concrete conerell! must be of such weight weighr and nnd size Ihal lity expected cxpl."Cled high flows. Loose Loo se large Shib slab s lab placement of concrete sectiuns ssections ccliun~ fro from rrom m during expccted demolition demo lition projects greater than th Ihi tbi,rty-six irty-six ny-six inches in its longest lungt.'sl di dimension mension and ttires rircs ires arc prohibited. 011(' (l) 1\11 prohibilt!d concrell! ::should should not extend further than thall thrul Olle cnl' (D ( L) inch. All 1\.11 prohibi ted., Rebar or wire in concrete activit activities ies lequ require ire the usc: use of ust! of clean and coarse Ilon·crodible non-erodible Ilon~crod i ble mat<;!ria materials materi als ls with with 15% or less of 01' like li kt! ke lines that is properly v\",ithslanu ..i. ths t:.mu expected flows. properly sized s ized 10 to withsl:md t!xpecled high flows fl ows . 9. 9, Runoff Runon· from any e unless contained con taineu by tig lightly forms or eclls_ equipment' noL discharge di scharge waste washw3tcr wflshwater torms Or cclls_ cclls ~ Com:rete Concrete hand ling equi eC(lI ippmcnt mCJu shall not nul washw~Hcr into inlo Lime without trel:ltment wet lands or 'WntercOUfSCS wntercourscs at any lime Yontercourscs wi thout adequate adequ~' adequ:lte le wastewater treatment treatment as approved by the WV VEl' llI::1' DWWM DWWM.. 12. In stream work in design:lted designated designa ted warm water watcr streams streal1l~ s trearn~ and their adj adjacent Jdjacent acent tributaries tribu trib ularies taries during the fish spawn spawning ing season, April - June rune and trout waters WElters fmd and their thei r adjac.ent adjacent tributaries during durlng the th~ fishh spawn spawning sp:l\'ming ing sseason senson eason September Seplember 15 10 to March M:uch 3111 requires rcquires i.l1.1a spawning ~pawning season trout water fis Divi Natural (WV DNR) Coordination Unilt Unit, waiver from Ihe tbe the West Virginia Di vission ion of NnlUraJ Natu ra l Resources Rcsourct:s (\VV at "t ~t (304) 637-0245. 637·0245. 6J7~0245. Por For information abu about ut specific specifi c stream designat designations designalions ions contact contacl West Virginia Depal1lneut of Oepal'tmcut Depaltmcnt oj" Env Environmental ironmental Protection. Protecl ion. Watcr Water Qual Waler Quality QUCllily ity Standards Section at af (304) (3 04) 926mny occur during the respecti respective ve spawning seaSon season ephemerall waters 0495. [n-stream rn-stream work work. may seaSOn in ephemern whilOllt waivc:.r wa i \'~ r if iraJl all reasonable reasonabl e measures arc laken takt:n taken to minimize turhidity and sed scd imentation imcm3lion iml,.\.ntalion without a waivt: downstream associated with the do\VDslream Lh~ proposed project. project project.. EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 115 of 304 ~agc 4 Page April Apri l 13,2017 13.2017 13, 2011 "pril 13. 13 . ltcmoval well-established nparum npaTian nUl directly Uirecdy assoctated assocIated a5.'iOcmted With \\1th the project proJccl proJCl::t Removal of v:ell-esrablished ripaTlan vegetation nut nul wIth conslmction is prohibited. construction prohibited . Disturbance Dis turbance and nnd removal removal remova l of ....vegetation egetati on from Ii"om project construction cOllstnlction possibh::, area l.Iavoided~ voided, where possiblt::, possible, and minimized when when necessary. Removal Removal of an:a is to be avoided, vegetationn sshall vegetatio hall nul nul be allowed where strenm stream bank siability slnb stab ility ili ty under nomlal nomlai now cond conditions it ions compromised. he comprom ised. would be 14. 14 . Operation of equipment instream is 10 minimi7ed nim i7ed 8nd accomp accomplishl:.d lished during low flnow to be mi and accomplished ow periuds within the work periods when \vhen practical. Ingress and egress cgCt:~ for equipment shall he be wilhin w rk site. site . Location of ingress ill illgrc grcs~ s~ ami and egress ooutside utside the l11c immedjate immediate work. immerume work \vork area requires req uires prior pri or approval approval oflhe of the WV DEP D\\-WM O\VWM iinn co O\\-WM concurrence ncurrence wilh with lht: tht: WV the \VV DNR. IS. The pemlirtee penllittee pemliTtee wi willll comply wilt cl,)1nply wilh wi with th waler water quality qualily standards sstanda tandards rds as contained in ill the tht: West We-5t Virginia ing Water Quality Standards, SlamJard:s, Title 47 of Code or o f State Stare Regulations. Regulatiuns. Requirements Govem Governing Series 22.. 16. 16. St Stl'eam l'emn activities a l!t iviti~s pcmlitted perm itted tinder under the Nationwide Permit 'Program Program require requ ire that Sh'cmn permitted that. Ilan, West Virginia Application for Stream Virgi nia Public Lands Corporatiun Corporation Right of Entry he obtained. obrained. Applicatiun Activity sho should uld be made to the WV DNR. DNR, Otlice Onice of Lands and Streams, at omce m htm:l/www.wvdnr.gov/REl\.lIdefaull.shtm l.shtm or (304) 558-3225. udtlition. any activity ac tivity h1n):lIww·w.wvdnr.govIREM/dc1aui htn):/lwww.wvdnf.gov/REM/defaull.shtm 558-3 225. 225. In addition. Emergency Managcmt:nt wilhin Federal F.mergency ManagCmc-nl within the foederal Managcm~nt Agency delineated delinea.ted IOO-year floodplain floodplajn Ooodplain requi requires res npproval from approval fro m the appropriate Floodplain Floodp lain Manager. Managcr. The loll la ll owing website \vebsite provides afI statewide listing li sting of uf Floodplain Floodp lai n Managers MallDgers in West Wesl Virginia: Virgi nia: nia: hltp:l/w, . . w.dhsem.wv.gov/MitigationRccovcry/PagesiF http;/lwww.dhsem.wv.gov/MiligationRecovcrv/PageslF ht t p :// www.dhsem . wv.gov/MitigationRecovcry/P agesiF loudplain-Management.aspx. lnodplain-Managemcnt.asp.x l oo dplain-Manllgenlent . asp~ www.dhsem.wv.govJrnitigationlJloodplainlPagesldefault.nspx ww\v.dhsem.wv.gov/miligation/JloodplainIPagesJdefault.aspx www.dhsem. W\' . tlov/ mi ligfJlion/ lloodplainlPagesldefau II .os px 17. IIIf IJ applicable, upplicable, the pennittee penniHee perm ittee must measu measure re and nnd re report port Large,;: Larg~ Quantity btrgt: Quanti ty Water use pursuant purs uanl to §22·26§22-26-let §22· 26- 1et Cl seq of lhe the Wesl West Virginia Coue. Code. 18. 18 . Pri Prior or notificatio n describing the project iocrllion location loc ation and Dnd impacts ilnllUCIS must be gi gi\l~n vcn lo to the WV ORP DWWM for use of 3ny Ihe the Natioll\\oidc NtJlionwid..:: Permits Pellllits lor all alJ work in streams set forth fo rth in any of fhe Natiom\oidc B, Secrions A. S, B. and C below. Sections A, A. Tier Til.'T 3J Protection. Proteclion. Protecti on. We West sl Virginia Virgi nia Code of S Stall: StaLl: tate Regulations, Regulations. Requirements Gove11ling Water Quality Standards. 2 . Outstand S tandards. Title Titl e 47, 47. Senes Series 2. 2. Outstanding OUlsfanding ing National Governing Reso urce Waters: Outstanding Resource Outsl'Undillg I\a[ional Kational Resource Waters Water::; include, Outs tanding Kational include , but arc not to. all Area".. lilimited mited (0. ttll slruams slrt:ams Iimite..i strt;:ams and rivers ri vers within the boundaries of oj' Wilderness Area. Area designated hy 11,e (16 U.S.C. U.S,c. §113 1lI et seq.) within withi n the State. State • 11 TIle Wilderness Wilderncss Act [16 U.S.c. §IU State,• all Fcderally under [he Act, 16 U.S.c. Fcdcral1y designated rivers Federally riv'ers wlder the Wild and nnd Scenic Rivers An. Act. U.S.C . § 1271 et seq.; seq.: all st reams rea ms and other olher bodies of water in state slale parks which \vhich arc high quality waters or ur naturally reproducing reproduc ing trout streams; stl'eams ; waters waltrs walers in national park.e; parks and forests which are high quality waters or naturally reproduci reproducing ng trout sslreams; str~ams; treams; waters National designated under the "Jational Nati onal I>arks I>arlcs Parks and Re-creation Recreation Rt"Cl1::atiun Act of 1978. ac; as amended :; and I)ursuant pursuant to subsection pursuallt subseclion 7, 7.11 of 60CSR5, 7. 60CSR5. those wa waters lers whose \.\'hosc lmique unique character, vallie, or pristine pristim: nature constitutes consti tutes an va luable lu able nble national or ecological or recreational value, sta1e rcsoun;e. rCSOltrl,;l;}. The listing of of TTier ICI' IS loc.ated ot: located fi t; state rCSOlln,:~ , 3 streams IS loc, fit; EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 116 of 304 Page 5 A,prj I113.2017 April 133.. 2017 ht1p :llwww.dej).wv.govI\V\VEJProgrnms!owllsiDoculJ :ll 03~/o20 1nl o/ WV'f hnp ht1p-~ ll w\Vw.den.'\w.govI\VWEJProgrnms/";qS/Docunlcnts/ www.dell.W\f.gov/\V\\iF./ Pmgrnms. ~llS!DO(."lInlciltsi lcntsl' l'icr%203%20 jl ·icr%2 .icr.Io203%20 Inlo/ WV.T ieT ieT 3 Nov2013 web.xll web.xlt 13. B. All rullUiJlly-rcprmJuciog naturdlly-rcpruducing trout :>lreams. nalurdlly-reprudUl:ing :;:treams. :;:lreams. fio foof Forr infonnation information ahout :lhout specific '\pecific streams contac contac[t WV OK'R, contac( I1NR, Wi \Vild \\'ildlife ldtife tife Resource Section. Secti Section, on. Tro Trou fraul utt Fisheries Fisht:!rit:s Fish~ric,s Program at 304·637· 304·63 304·63770245. C. West Virgi Virginia Nalu[al Preservati on ,\ct. Act. llle owin g streams or Or rivers C, nia Natural Natural Stream St re;;tm Preservat'i Preservalion The following fo ll owing rivet's are rmlecred pmlecred ~ctiv iti ities es IbM thal \vould would impound, impou impound. nd, diwrt divert or ur Iloud Houd pm1ecred from activ that Or noud the body of water: Grl:'cnbri(;.'r Ri River ver from fro m its c. con confluence o nlluence fluence with Knnpp Knopp!>s Creek to lIS LIs conflllcncc confluence cOIill ucncc wilh wil w'jlhli the Greenbrier irom New River, A.nthony A..uthony Creek irorn Irom its ils headwaters headwalers to CO ils confluence confl uence with the Greenbrier River. River, Cranberry Cran berry River from its ils hcadwnlcrs hCildwntcrs to its conl1uence con nuen~e wilh with the hCfJdwllIcrs conlluence Gau ley Riwr. Birc..:h Bir(.;h Rive;:r rrom River rrom Cora DroY,/Il IlrO\·\'[\ Dridge Dridgc in N Nichola,) tbe lcy River. Bin;h Rivt:r from Drown icholas County Counry to the flnuence uence of the river with the Elk River) R.ivcr, and RjvCI, anti New Ncw Ri\f.;r Nc\\! Ri"cr R i\l~r from rrom its confl confluence uence with wi th c.on confluence i h~ Greenbrier River to its confl co nfluence Gauley th(! ue nce with the Oauley Cr,wley River. the confluc-nce 19. Wetland Wet land and stream strealll mitigation mitigalion guidelines. The T he dischru'ge dischm'ge discharge of dredged o orr fill material into inlo a strealll wetland is 3Ulbori..xd alilhoriLed b~d upon the [01l0",1n£ follo\\ing foll oy,ing criteria: authori zed b~t..I criteria: stream or weiland A. A. Onc·lcnlh One-tenth 10 to Y.z ~ ~4 acre of permanent pcmmnt!nl impac pennam:n! impactt 1to0 wetlandls) wetland(s) wet land(s} (including (i ncludi ng wetland wetl and l}' type rype pe req ui res prior notification noti ficati fi cation on describing 1hc the project projl.'Cl location and impacts conversion) requires proJtxt amI mill plan lor 10 the WV DF? DEP OW\VM wilJ} lh the l'Or mitigation to be submined submitted to DE? nwWVl OWWVt along aloug wi with plnn for mitigat mitigation ion provided to lhe the st'lle sta Slale le lor :tppruvaJ. ,Ipproval. ,;t pprovaJ. proposed plan B. The amount amnunt of -fiJI fiJI fiJI in a wet wetland. lA land, nd, wetland compJ\'\x cQmph;x t.:ompl t;x or wetland wet w~l land "md system without mi tigatio n is not nul La to cumulatively exceed 1/ 1110 11 10 acre. nere. mitigatio rnJtigalitm C. West Virginia Valuatio Metric (SWVM) is preferred method Wt::st Virginiu Virgin ia Stream Wetland Valuation IS the prefened Va luationn Metrie.(SWVM) MetrictSWVM) 1.0 Ihe delennillfltion detenni llation o fr requ req uired ired mit mitigatiun. mitigation. metric is available ava ilable at to assist with the llAtion of required igat iun. The metric the lIuntington c:;ites. IIIuntington Iuntington and Pittsburgh ACOE web sites. In all nil instances. instrulCcs, mitigatiun lor all impacts impac ts incurred through use of these thc!;e N Nalionwide Nationwide alionwide Permits inshmccs. mitigation eliminatio the n minimh:ation minirni..:alion must first he be directed to elimina elim inatio t.ionn of the th e impacts. then rni ni mil:a.tion of o f the impacts and lastly thruugh compensatory ,,~ompensatory mitigation. In many ca";es, Cll.':;e~, tthe ~l1vironlJlentaUy preferable pn.~(crabJc lasUy ca<;es, he environmentally environmenrally mitigation igation may mal' be providl!d provided thro tlJfough through ugh an approved Hppruvcd mitigation bank bank. or the West compensatory mit Vi rginia Program.. Penninee Pennittee responsible compensalory mitigaljon mitigation may be Virginia Virg inia In· In-Lieu Lieu fee Program reSI)Onsiblc resl)Onsible compellS<110ry compens..1lory restorat ion. enhancement. establ ishment and in certa perforllled llsing performed using the mcthods pcrfollllcd methods o[ of: rc.sloration. restoration. certain in In general: circ umstances preservation. circumstances preservation . fn general, the required compensa general. compensal'ory tory miligatiollshouJd mitigation should be ikel y 10 located in the same watershed watersht:d as the impact site. s ite. and located where it il is most lLikely ikely to successfully succes~fuJ successful ly replace Inst lost functi'ons functions and services as the impacted impactt::d siL impacteJ si s ite. te. e. IHowever, [fowever, fowever, the use of mi tigatiun banks or in-lieu fee_ fee for fo r inkind replacemenl nm rest reslrieted major miligCltion mitigation in· in-kind replacement is not nOi restricted ricted to the maj or wnrershed ill watershed in whjch whjc whichh Hle tJle impact has occurred until such sud timt.' timt: time as mitigation banks or in·lieu in-li eu projcct.s projt:cts projects are arc developed in each major watershed. watershed . Wetland s. When permittee responsi Wetlands. responsihle hl e in·k:ind in-kind replacement replacemenl replnccmen l mi rni ljgation tigation is lised, tjgatjon Llsed, used, it is i~ 10 1u tu be accomplished at al Ihe the follow lollowing ing n!lios r.:ilio ~ until such slic h time an 311 approved fune.tional func·tionnl assessment nssessment nilio~ su<.:h functional assessment methodolol!.v shed for the state Virt:!lOim Virt:!LOiH~ methodolol!v methodolor!.v is establi estab lished sta te of West Vinl.Loiw EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 117 of 304 Page 6 Apri Aprill 13.2017 13.20 17 Permanent impacts impac ts to open water wetland wetlandss ore are nre to he one ( I) acre flc llcre rc rep rcp laced lHccll for fo r one (I) ( I) at:re acre an e impacted., impacted wei t~"O (2) acres replaced PcrmanCJlt unpacls to wet wei meadow/emergent m~adow/emergent wetlands are to be two ncr rep replaccd laced for lor Permanent impacts imp'<)cled. (1) acre impacted. ne (I) oone Pennanenr Impflcts impActs to scmb-shrub sc mb-shrub and fu fo rested wt:1 we tlands Jands are to be three (3) acres replaced for fo r Pennanent one une (I) (1) acre impacted. in-kind mitigation mIt Igation is completed 12 months month s prior to the In instances where compensatory compensato ry 'in-kind impact of the resource. rCSOllrl~e. rcsourl~e. the replacement replac.emenl ratio may be reduced to as low as one (I) ( I) acre at: DWWM when thi is being used lor for waler withdrawal, detennjnation thiss permit pem,it;s water withdrawal. withd rawal. all owi ng for an detenninatlotl detennjnalion of uf ~il l have more Ihan im pacts on un aquatic rcquirc:s ual Placing in-stremll in-st ream Sionnwalcr facilit ies with (his (hi permit rcquirc!i Individ Individual Slale Water Qual Slate State Quality ity Celtification. Cenification. Certification. 40. AgriculturAl Agricultural Activities. Activiti .... Nationwide Permit Water Quality Ccnilil's Cerlilica.ion Co ndition~: Ccrtilication i-'ermil 4U 40 West W~-!f l Virginia 401 'Vafer 'ioD Special Sped:l) Conditions: Condition!i: Placing in-stream in-s in-sttream ream stomlwater stoml\vater management faci rncilitics fnciHtics lities wi with wilh th thi thiss permit pemlit requires Individual Individunl Stare Slam Slate Wfllcr Water Cerlification. Qual ity Ccrli(j!';C11ion. Cc rlifi!;alion . Quality Storm water Management Facilities. 43. Stormwater SlOrmwatcr l\"ationwid(> Wcst Wliter Conditions; l'o"ationwide Nationwide Permit 43 West "-Vest Virginia 401 40J Water W.ller Quality Certifi Certification catio n Special Conditions: Conditiuns: Placing Placi ng in-su:eam in-stream storm stormwater water walcr management fac fa.cilitie~ ilities with this pennil pennit penni t requires req uires Ind Individual ividual State Stare Water Wate r Quality Certiti Certifi Certification. cat ion. of Urlands 45. Repair or Uplands Oamaged Damaged by Discrete Events. NacioDwiut': Nationwide Na tionwide I'ermit I)ermit 45 West Vi Virginia Vil'gini3 rginia 40) 401 W'lter \Vttt Water cr Quality C Certification ertification Special Conditions: Co C onditions: nditions: A. Individuctl Waler Qual Quality Certificatjon ctn activil)' activilY grealcr than Jndiv idual State ity Certification Certi fication is requi required Indiv Slate Water req ui red lor an ac tivity impacting impacti ng greater onc more of Section Condit ion 200 linear feet on olle one or mure mort: uflhe the strea.ms streams identified in Sect ion H Standard Conditi on I R 1\, 1\ /\ , B, in. B. and C here herein. in. 48. Commercial Shellfish Aquaculture Activities. Notionwide I)ermit Nationwide Notinnwide Permit 48 West Wes t Virgini Virgini:i.. 401 Water Virginia Wotel' Quality Ccrtilicalion Certification Cc rtilication Special Conditions: A. Imtividuru Individual State Water Quality Q ua lity Certification activity impacting grealer g rt:iHe;:r Individual Ccrl ilicalion is required fo r an aetivlty feet on one or more of the streams idenliLied identilied identified in Sec Section tion H Standard SUlOdnrd Stundard than 200 linear feel Cond Condit ition it ion 18 A, Al B. and Dnd C herein. herein. herein . EXHIBIT 2 TO MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY RELIEF Appeal: 18-1173 Doc: 26 Filed: 02/23/2018 Pg: 129 of 304 Page 18 April 13, 13,20 2017 17 49. Cnal Cual i{emining Remining Activities. Coal Natiunwide 40t \-Vater Wat er Quality Qu a lity Certiliution Cer1ilication Spedal Spt'\:iaJ Conditions: Nat Na tionwide iunwide Permit -'9 49 West Virginia Virgini:l 401 Woter Certification Spe~ial Cunditions: A. lndividunl Ind ividual ividua l Siale Slate Water Quality Cerlilication CertiJication is required for actiVIties activities nCUV1Ue.o:; impacting impact impactiinng,g, ally auy ~lIly classification of stream SLTeam listed in West Virginia Virg inia 401 Water Quali Quality l)' Certification Certificat Ce.rtificat ion Standard Condition 18. 8. B. ivjdual State Stale Water QualilY Q Quality uality Certification Cert ificat ion is requ requiired red for for ror flcrivilics activities impact impacting Impacting ing an inh:nnittent inlemlitlcnl intermittent Ind ividual strcam(s) . stream(s) or perennial strcmn(s). c. C. .IIndividual ndividual State Slale Watc:r W