Present: Hon. til/mart. s. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK Patrolmen? Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., Petitioner, -against- Bill de Blasio in his of?cial capacityas Mayor of the City of New York, City of New York, James P. O?Neill in his of?cial capacity as Commissioner'of the New York City Police Department, and New York City Police Department, Respondents. For a Judgment Pursuant to ArtiCle 78 Of the Civil Practice Law and Rules Upon the reading of the annexed Veri?ed Petition, At an IAS Part of the Supreme Court 3 - of the State of New York held in and; for the County of New York at the CourthOuse located at 60 Centre Stre t, New York, New York on the day oprril, 2018 ,1 Index No.: i 53 (013" /90 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Petitioner?s Memorandum. of Law in Support of Its Article 78 Petition, the Af?rmation of Alexander Simkin, and the respective exhibits thereto, it is hereby: ORDERED that Respondents Bill (16: Blasio inhis official capacity as Mayor of the City Of New York, City of New York, James P. O?Neill in his official capacity as COmmissioner of the New York-City Police Department, and the New YOrk City Police Department (?-?Respondents?) shall show cause at the ?ourthOuse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York, on the '1 mi 3 (top M- day of 5_j ?t 2018, at 9299151111, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, Why an Order should . not be entered: This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 which, at the time of its printout from the court system?s electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 authorize the County Clerk to reject filings for various reasons, accepted for filing by the County Clerk. readers should be aware that documents hearing this legend may not have been (I) Annul-ling the determinationof Respondents to publically release or publish redacted summaries of the results of .police of?cer disciplinary hearings (the ?Disciplinary Record Summaries?); (2) Requiring Respondents to comply with N-eerork Civil. Rights Law SO?a-if they'seek to publically release or publish Disciplinary ReCOrd Summaries; and (3) Granting such other and further relief as the Co'urt deems just. . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that personal service of a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with the petition and other papers upon which it? is granted, shall be made upon I Respondents, on or before the i day of April, 2018', which shall be deemed good and suf?cient service thereof. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that answering papers to Petition, if any, shall be served upon counsel for Petitioner electronically via NYSCEF, on or before the MG __.day ofm?1018, which shall be deemed good and suf?cient service thereof. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that reply papers, if any, shall be serVed upon Respondents electronically via NYSCEF on or before I go 1 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pending a hearing and determination of this motion, (9 ReSpondents are hereby temporarily restrained from publically releasing or publishing the Disciplinary Record Summaries absent compliance with New York Civil Rights Law Signed this day of April, 2018, at New York, New York [9 . ?/Fcoc fed/i ENTER, I F. ENGORON 0m HON. ARTHUR F. 2 This is a copy of a pleading filed electronically pursuant to New York State court rules (22 which, at the time of its printout from the court system's electronic website, had not yet been reviewed and approved by the County Clerk. Because court rules (22 authorize the County Clerk to reject filings for various reasons, readers should be aware that documents bearing this legend may not have been accepted for filing by the County Clerk.