- rites tei rare earths Complaint- Abidv Googie 7353i? jam i US. District Court for the District of North Carolina ?it Pit i 1? i8 3} Plaintiff: Shajar nus Eijtguiiegrgr hem?; iC. Defendant: Googie inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 us i to gel Jurisdiction beiongs to the US courts in North Carolina since as a North Carolina resident, an American citizen's constitutional rights are being violated. I am an indepedent researcher, inventor and entrepreneur. Also the son of a chemistry professor (Phd NCSU 1991). Most recentiy was working as a senior engineer for left to work on and solve the problem of cancer, and this Jan 2017 tiled a patent "a colloidal suspension for the healing of various cancers". Then i proceeded to build a website. The idea was that i could find people tooking for cancer information and help them with this particuiar knowiedge, which in fact is based on prophetic medicine, or arabic herbal medicine it you like. First i ran ads on google with common cancer reiated words, my ad, originally said "divine cure for cancer". An astonishing claim, but aias neither the Nit-l would give me an opportunity to verity by government standards, since their feeble minded protocol, stipulates "oniy one purified chemical". This is the bastion of state science stupidity, compared to the 50 natural compounds in Anyways, after one week of ads running on google, at $10 a day budget, i received 500 visitors, and 5 emails. No actual sales but a $50 doliar biil. Then iast weekend on Friday March - 2017, i received an email that my site had been suspended. It was against google policies as they have detaiis about selling pharmaceuticals etcs.. said ok, i wiil call and tell them, i studied the google rules, tell me what to change. So the ?rst girl i talked to gave a bait a dozen modifications to do, including take out ?divine cure for cancer", which is my sincereiy held religious beiiet that it is. But what she doesn?t know is have done an intensive pharmacognosy study as well other in depth proprietary research. Case 1:17-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Pace 1 of 4 i feel this was the first violation, obstructing my ist amendment rights, however the kind and noble judge interprets. i also have not been aiiowed to advertise in the New England Journai of Medicine, they stated upfront, "only big pharma, not you". Also my press release was sgueiched and not distributed, another first amendment vioiation (freedom of press). My argument is simple, when i made the requested changes, was toid i could submit for a "review", when I caiied back after making the initial changes specified by the first giri, a different agent directed to me a pitch, where he will expand my keywords etc. and sent me an email and said to agree. i replied back, he said "this will help" and he expiained how. But he toici me it will be two days for the escaiation, then he said he tried to escalate it but now the "policy director" said no. The "poiicy director" overstepped and mentioned something about my business modei, and then said i was banned, Then i asked, i made sit the changes the first person said, why is it banned now, he said he is just reiaying the word, i said is there anybody else to taik to?, he said he is the senior guy, "been there the iongest". i said, who has an interest in these cancer keywords, does pharma pay you guys? he mentioned something, it is their policy or partners something to that effect. have honey spice and herb, which are "generaiiy recognized as safe" safe under US Federai law. The first giri asked me to remove this line from my site too, as wet! as the scientific information and some medical terminoiogy. My argument is two foid, First my first amendment rights were suppressed whether as religious freedom or freedom of speech. Demanding i remove "divine cure for cancer", when that is my sincere religious belief. i even compiied and sailed it a nature! eiixir instead, but that wasn't enough. They said, i couldn?t say, ?if you have cancer, than Why not? i am trying to heip cancer patients oniy. Case 1:17-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Pace 2 of 4 My philosophy of medicine is based on Moses's wisdom. One time Moses got sick, so he prayed to God for guidance. God guided him to a plant. So he went and ate it. Then he was cured. Sometime later Moses got sick again, and he went to the plant and ate it, but this time he didn't get cured. So he prayed to God again for guidance, and God spoke to him saying, ?The first time you came to Me, the second time you went to the plant?. i am combining a systems biology empirical approach based on prophetic medicine. His medicine (peace and blessings be upon him) is not like the medicine of the physicians, for the medicine of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him) is certain, definitive, emanating from (divine) revelation, the iantern of prophethood, and perfection of reason. As for the medicine of others, most of it is conjecture, presumptions and experimentation. So we have my constitutional rights being vioiated, whatever pecuniary interest of mine, i actually run as a devotional service. 42 US. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under ester of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liabie to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, or even under the spirit of Title of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 where i should be treated equally and fairly in business dealings. but my main argument and point of contention is the public interest, by banning me, has the public interest been severely hurt? this negligence caused by ignorance and incompetence of the adwords department? if i have an affordabie solution that uses only honey herb and spice and it is much more effective, with no adverse effects. Case 1:17-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Pace 3 of 4 Don't the American people deserve to know? My clients are dying people, in all likelihood have already been poisoned and/or irradiated! And now i have to fill out all these forms to some ask for the courts help to uphold rny rights, and the public interest. It is for the wise judge to decide to investigate who is controlling these cancer keywords, and what connections are between the pharma and the knowiedge i am sure there are conspicuous collusions here. That should be looked into under the antitrust laws. seek the following relief: $10 billion, for violating my first amendment rights, for loss of business and pain and suffering as well as an authorization to be allowed on google for when people search for the core for cancer. Also they sent me 88$ bill demanding payment after forcing me to cancel my account, please ask them what for? i would like that nullified court costs. will happily provide scienti?c knowledge to your honor. With gratitude and respect, Shajar Abid 5317 Roshni Ter Moleansyille, NC, 27301 USA ?rip a jg 3a.: see ?t April 5th 2017 *also years ago I made many transit apps to find out what time the bus comes, for many year (Boogie paid me royalties, ended giving up most of the apps for free, but then they banned me from the android market. When i had a legitimate claim, that i used the logo of the transit company as "fair use" Liftdef copyright laws, i had in fact made that technology ?rst before the bus companies and it was a de have use of a picture file on wikipedia. Case 1:17-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Paoe 4 of 4