Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 73 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the Matter of Search Warrants Executed on April 9, 2018 Case No. 1:18?mjw03161?KMW?l MOTION 0F ROBERT BEAUCHAMP T0 INTERVENE Pursuant to Rule the intervenor Robert Beau? champ/pro se (hereinafter ?Beauchamp") respectfully requests that any correspondence/attachments transmitted by Beauchamp to movant Michael Cohen, possibly seized by FBI agents on April 9, 2018, be returned to Beauchamp (UNCOPIED). Beauchamp asserts that his claims and interests in this matter involve attorney/ (prospective) client privilege, which isproteeted.underthe Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. IN SUPPORT WHEREOF, BEAUCHAMP ASSERTS AS FOLLOWS: 1.) On February 14, 2018, Beauchamp sent a letter/attachments to DOJ 10 Michael Horowitz wherein Beauchamp detailed/documented obstruction of justice/withholding information from the U.S. Senate, in 2013, by then FBI Director (now Special Counsel Robert Mueller (SECTION 1). 2.) On March 2 and April 10,2018, Beauchamp transmitted corre? spondence/attachments to movant Michael Cohen to explore the possiblity of Cohen's representing Beauchamp's legal 2.) 3.) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 2 of 73 2 interests in no. 1 supra. On March 9, 2018, DOJ IG Michael Horowitz informed Beauchamp that no. 1 supra had been referred to the FBI Inspection Di? vision for review (see also STONEWALL "preview" at A.2) (NOTE: There does exist the possibility that FBI agents intercepted my March 2, 2018 mailing to movant Cohen, so therefore would not have been seized in the April 9, 2018 searches of Cohen's office/ residence. Previously, the FBI has (illegally) intercepted legal mailings I have sent (SECTION 2). WHEREFORE, Beauohamp respectfully requests that ii his March 2, 2018 correspondence/attachments to movant Cohen were seized by FBI agents on April 9, 2018, that these docum ments be returned to Beauohamp (UNCOPIED). Respectfully submitted, kg? Robert Beauchamp Intervenor/Pro Se MCI?Norfolk P.0. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 May 16, 2018 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 3 of 73 U.S. Department of Justice A . I Office of the In3pector General Investigations Division i435 New York Avenue. N. Suite 7I00 Washington. DC 20530 March 9, 2018 . . '3 A a 93,555,535 Robert Beaucharnp EYES MCI Norfolk PO. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 Dear Mr. Beauchamp: Thank you for your correspondence (1 ted February 14, 2018. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Of?ce of the InSpector General, investigates allegations of misconduct by employees and contractors of DOJ, as well as waste, fraud and abuse affecting DOJ programs and operations. After reviewing your complaint, we have determined that the matters that you raised are more appropriate for review by another of?ce within the DOJ. Therefore, we have forwarded your correspondence to: - - Federal Bureau of Investigation Inspection Division 93 5 Avenue NW Washington, DC 20535 Phone: (202) 3243000 Please direct any further correspondence regarding this matter to that office. Of course, if you have information that involves other allegations or issues regarding DOJ employees, contractors, programs or operations, please feel free to submit that information to us. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns. Sincerely, April 4, 2018 Given the compelling national interest in this FBI review of my corruption allegations against Special Counsel Robert Mueller (see attached STONEWALL "preview"), I am requesting that official(s) from the FBI.Inspection Division phone or meet with me at the ear? 1iest possible date. Robert Beauchamp Office of the Inspector General Investigations Division Case Page 4 of 73 a A.2 LoginfRegister Support Cart g? Sl?le Create Learn Search' Bookstore To obtain STONEWALL, log onto (exemplar pages attached) Paperback, 84 Pages . $30 00 Be the ?rst of glourfriends to like this. rice: . . . - E??i ?g ?59 IE Prints in 3-5 business days STON EWALL This report details/documents a major act of corruption - . committed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. To wit: in early Robert Beauchamp 2013, then FBI Director Mueller withheld the following . information from the US. Senate, which was in the process ammo: of confirming Senatorjohn Kerry to succeed Secretary ?of State Hillary Clinton. That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADAS Thomas O?Reilljr and David'Cunis conspired to frame Robert Beauchamp for murder to retaliate against him for threateningto publicly expose Kerry's homosexual relationships with former DAJohn Droney and Gardner" Museum robber George Reissfeld er. DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI SAC Hank Shaw have been withholding the above- summarized Mueller corruption information from President Donald Trump since late May 2017i -- roan-Atria run use Preview Product Details ISBN 9781365284731 Copyright ROBERT BEAUCHAMP (Standard Copyright License) Edition Publisher Quail Valley Publishing Published February 28, 2017 Language English Pages 84 Binding Perfect-bound Paperback Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 5 of 73 SECTION 1 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 6 of 73 s1 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP P.O. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 February 14, 2018 Mr. Michael E. Horowitz Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Ave., NW Suite 4706 Washington, D.C. 20530?0001 Special Counsel Robert Mueller District Attorney Marian Ryan FBI Director Christopher Wray FBI Chief CRU Jeffrey Veltri FBI SAC Hank?shaw Obstructions of Justice Dear Inspector General Horowitz: 1.) 2.) On September 11, 2017, I sent F?l??rectorChristopher Wray ?a letter/attachments wherein I extensively detailed and highly documented a conspiracy to violate my federal civil rights by ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cu? nis and obstructions of justice in my case (Commonwealth v. _Bgauchamp/ Middlesex No. 7181CR95920) by then FBI Director Robert Mueller in 2013 and by DA Marian Ryan in 2015. I requested that Director Wray order the FBI to investigate my allegations of violations'of federal criminal statutes by these officials, who acted under color of law (see esp. Title 18 U.S.C. 8.242). (copy of Wray letter/attachments appended hereto) On December 5, 2017, FBI Chief, Civil Rights Unit Jeffrey Veltri sent me a letter stating that, "the FBI's Boston Field Office has reviewed your allegations and has deter? mined that no further action is Boston FBI SAC Hank Shaw had a serious conflict of interest in conducting this purported "review" of my allegations of violations of criminal statutes by the abovemnamed offi? cialsinvolvingmy case no. 7l810R95920. RB.37) 3.) On January 2, wherein I asserted 82 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 7 of 73 I sent FBI Chief CRU Veltri a letter that "the FBI did NOT conduct a ible review of my wrongful incarceration allegation cred? (RB.36), as I was not even interviewed once during this purported "review." from Mr. Veltri. respondence to attorneys Ty Cobb, Lowell (who represent targets of SC Mu believe these mailings were intercepte Predictably, I received no response whatsoever (NOTE: I sent copies of the Veltri cor? Kevin Downing and Abbe However, eller). by the FBI.) I Given the above/attached, I would request that your office conduct a credible investigation to determine if the above?reference civil rights and committed obstr Furthermore, I trust that your 0 attorneys representing President Trump 0 Thank You! Sincerely, ?obei' ?a?ca?ami? Robert Beauchamp_ BY: Certified Mail Nos. 7015 0640 0005 7233 8016 9590 9402 2752 6351 9972 71 Return Receipt Requested ?Aduli Slgnature Hestricted'Daihre?ry Postage Certi?ed Mai! Fee . . 3 . we, Extra Services &Feesfcheckhox, adn?fee sapp 3:52:er {?fe Heiurn Receipt (hart-loopy) $5 ,r i? Return Receipt: {elecimhlo} vPostmarK} ?4?12 DGadi?ed Mall Restricted Delivery 8 - ).Here (311 Ewell Signature Required . - - x. (25577"? - mu, 3 70l5 noun nuns 2233 anib' on}; State, ., 59:65-? we {'32 Iagoass ,Na?muaud?20?%' Seana ff . Degree. Jamel Streetand?pl?. or PO Box 0. wed 91.03 Ainr' 1.95: W03 Sci awe Satin nhau am Hinzeu 01139on "panama/nos womasuewueqwnu LA 8166 L989 3913 30176 0696 ~95: I g?ael?ii Elv-?u?d?bka ?lls gbt?oee gg?gar33:! ?aoelduew em 40 WC: 91410113190 81m max! i 1107: p180 an; tumor use am new, as ESJBAGJ euruo sseippe pus eweu Jno? mud (where I am actually interviewed) officials violated my federal uctions of justice in my case; ffice will expeditiously inform the above/attached. '9 am fa sum! eleldlUOO 31% a, 3?"eeuuggeeg :0 513\In(in. ?35 9; 2:13. as" :n ??gm?gnm, ?3 ?3 2925113323 .9123?9? 57 nes?eg?e Eha 13535-11 . ?0 51530. 3 - gig 3% :1 2'3? Ag ?11) :3 . out? ImpleuE?saAH amp? meme!) 5 'o 03.111819 GP 77"??x?d Mamet] 20 31,93 '0 Ifammwd] panacea '3 eessezppw El que?v Gimme 2Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 8 of 73 S3. ROBERT BEAUCHANIP P.O. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 September 11, 2017 Mr. Christopher Wray Director of the FBI 935 Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20535?0001 .RE: CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATB DESTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS SC ROBERT MUELLER ADA THOMAS DA-MARIAN RYAN ADA DAVID CUNIS Dear Director Wray: Pursuant to Title 18 0.3.0. 5.242 et al., I am request~ ing that you order FBI officials to investigate the following allegations of violations of federal criminal statutes commit? _ted_under color of law. To wit: A.) That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis conspired to violate my federal/state, constitutional/civil rights to due process by framing me for murder. The motive for their conspiracy was to retaliate against me for my implied threat to pub? licly expose Senator John Kerry's homosexual relationships with former DA John Droney and George Reissfelder, who was my lover,ondefendant(escape case) and Gardner Museum rob? ber. . That, to prolong my wrongful incarceration, ADAs 0' Reilly/ Cunis, Bethany Stevens and Adrienne conspired to sub? mit, last? ?minute, lien filled oppositions to the complicit? ous MA Parole Board in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015 so that I would be denied release on parole. B.) That, in January 2013, then FBI Director Robert Mueller, for corrupt legal/political motives, stonewalled ordering an investigation of (A supra), and reporting the findings to the U.S. Senate, which was in the process of confirming Senator Kerry to become U.S. secretanyof state. Mueller's stonewalling was an obstruction of justice because it ef? fectively prevented ADAs 0' Reil1y/Cunis from being prose? cuted for conspiracy to violate my federal constitutinnal/ civil rights to due process. 0.) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 9 of 73 SA That, in 2015, DA Marian Ryan committed obstruction of just: ice for refusing, for corrupt legal/political der an investigation into my highly detailed and well?docu: mented allegations that ADAs O'Reilly/Cunis conspired to frame me for murder. Additionally, DA Ryan was obligated to _report this prosecutorial criminality to the Middlesex Super? ior Court, and failed to do so. The following will preliminarily detail/document the above? summarized allegations of violations of federal criminal statutesearly 1998, my attorney, Eugene McCann, informed ADA Thomas O'Reilly that I had been provided evidence proving homosexual relationships between Senator John Kerry and former DA John Droney and between Kerry and George Reissfelder RB.10, RB.11) In early August 1998, ADAs O'Reilly/Cunis, to retaliate against me for (A supra) framed me for murder by submitting false evi? dence to the jury, at least, 8 times. As the results of their conspiracy to violate my federal/state, constitutional/civil rights to due process, I was wrongfully convicted of second degree murder, and have suffered over 19 years of false impris? onment to date. (see also Commonwealth's Exhibit A filed on 04.13.17 in Commonwealth v. Beauchamp/ '0n July 10, 2000, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed my 1998 second degree murder rewconviction in a decision that con? tained a plethora of lies, distortions, misrepresentations and half?truths Furthermore, the Appeals Court lacked jurisdiction to even decide my case. (Commonwealth v. Beauchamp,, 49 Mass.App.Ct. 591) On March 30, 2001, Middlesex Superior Court Judge Charles Grabau issued a lie?filled-decision denying my motion for a new trial. However, within a week after I threatened to initiate an invest? igation against Grabau for judicial corruption, he vacated his 14pp decision On January 3, 2013, I sent a letter (w/attachments) to then FBI Director Robert Mueller. I informed Director Mueller that since the FBI was required to conduct an utho?date background invest? igation on Senator John Kerry (who had been nominated by Pres? ident Obama to become U.S. secretary of state), the FBI should investigate (A supra). Predictably, for corrupt legal/political reasons, Director Mueller withheld this critical information from the 0.8. Senate, and Kerry was almost unanimously confirmed to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. (RB.12) On January 3, 2017, I sentarletter (w/attachments) to Senator Mitch McConnell re. an illicit $10,000 payoff that altered the probable outcome U.S. presidential election, and its Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 10 of 73 SS 6.) relevance to the Russian hacking investigations. Predictably,- for corrupt_1egal/political motives, Senator McConnell withheld this critical information from the members of Congress RB.21) 7.) On March 17, 2017, the Middlesex Superior Court issued a pro? cedural order to Bethany Stevens to respond to my verdict reduction motion (RB.22). On April 18, 2017, I sent a letter to ADA the Middlesex DA's office had an "egregious conflict of interest" in responding to my motion Nevertheless, on April 13, 2017, ADA Jamie Michael Charles filed a lie?filled opposition to my motion. On April 24, 2017, I filed an affidavit controverting some of ADA Charles' false statements 8.) On May 22, 2017, I sent DOJ DAG Rod Rosenstein a letter inform? ing him of Mueller's corruption summarized in (5 supra). Pre~ dictably, for corrupt legal/political motives, Rosenstein with~ held this information from President Donald Trump On June 27, 2017, I informed Boston FBI SAC Hank Shaw of (5/8 supra). Predictably, for corrupt legal/political motives, Shaw withheld this information from President Donald Trump 10.) On August 28, 2017, I sent a letter to DA Marian Ryan wherein I asserted that she should "finally Comply with Lher) funda? mental ethical and legal obligations, and expeditiously inform Middlesex Superior Court Judge Kathe Tuttman that my 1998 seem ond degree murder conviction mas obtained by PROSECUTORIAL Predictably, for corrupt legal/political motives, DA Ryan withheld this information from Judge Tuttman Additional norroborating details/documentation are incorporated in my reports GRAYMAIL (RB.20) and STONEWALL (RB.33). I trust Director Wray that you will order an immediate FBI in? vestigation into the above/attached allegations of violations of federal criminal statutes by SC Robert Mueller, DA Marin Ryan, ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis. Furthermore, I trust that you will inform President Trump and the attorneys repre? senting individuals under investigation by Special Counsel Mueller of the above/attached. Thank You! Sincerely, BY: Priority Mail Certified Mail Nos. 7007 0220 0004 5029 6319 . 9590 9402 2752 5351 9974 55 obert Beauchamp Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 11 of 73 APPENDIX (Rle tb Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page OFFICE 01? me ATTORNEY FOR MtoaLESex {inauw CAMSIHUGE 0214i JOHN J. (inane? ?Ru?qt aria?unr- OiGiIbt-L' S. Colounl cucqla ,19ch Gcaup (Jail: Divv?dl K1 614.31 Kl: 'Coxnd?smsigh V. rytri 9-4: gpIgn-L .au. to ch: denata ?t this linger, 1: it being daLIVqrid :9 10? in p??to? by Lt. nfqux. - 'Tai: vato intact you ch?c I concludid my p4xc at an: ipt ?4tl Kiahq-l 31C?ct will no; hi ATrOchd a. i?uurull: of (in: ocdqr at Inch}: Tire: any thtt.lp{ h: to tag jud?a?11 ?&4c piftlini to th: tilind ?uaialdd. Ky qtficq vlcud rchci Li Chi (li? vita-if to thi ?r?qld 4V1ntl that aulxinthd in thi xurdct of (talus A: in no Fif? of Ogc (criaqincnt{ I would 41k chic you gravid: Lc? waqr ?(ch All tudiQ?Viiual Kitctr you '?dlliccdd Genoccuinq In would liki Kitif??1 r(1&t1aq to Cook And hi: qg?lpd tro? thi tlit Cl?btidqi inzg' adc ta ugnc?6? th! Kittrill Ea if [It?f?ltin l1f1 ityli. Kj? Conttituiati lunr?a: can-toq- win-mar. l?ifd-tHEL?tfard?, Kr han??CqulLtf i! i xltt?r bittlf Li?t (acidunc?11y. i (Ocumgq?d you dqictag ch: intiritl ?013.16tld gt Ch! ?ciidlhdi (in Jinulrf 3.0.. 11114- you hzve ?at Atrquy don; to; Id ?161?qq?:1 vauld (dd Yoq.say ?1 ct tar zinc- I it 1: jun; ditpatnl. - ROLE: GAY DA JOHN DRONEY JOHN KERRY TO OF THE NEEDLESEX DISTRICT OFFICE LESS IRAN ERIE MONTHS AEIER KERRY GRADUATE) FROM A IAE SCHOOL. AT THE TIME, THE AIEJDIESEE WAS THE TEETH LARGEST THE U.S. YIIERIEORE, ASTDNISEENGLY FAST RISE IS ONLY ICAILY EXPIAMBIE BY A GAY REIATIONSIEID WITH DRONEY. TREES EXISTS NO OTHER LOGICAL FEDERAL OFFICIALS, WHO RAD DROREY ORDER SURVEILLANCE, AND WERE IEJIJNG I-DIM, TO SAVE ALSO PLACED KERRY UNDER SURVEDLLANCIE LESS THEY KNEW (OR SUSPECIED) THAT RE WAS ALEOEOSEEUAL RIIATIONSRIT WITH DROEEY. RDRYEERMORE, BISEKUALITY EAS 33m BY CO-DERENDANT, GEORGE REISSEEIDER, WHO WAS MOST SIGNIFICANT EXPERIENCE OF BRIEF LEGAL (TEE NEW AND BY HIS FER LAW PARITIER, ROANNE SRAGOW, WHO IS RRESEEILY TEE FIRST OF THE CAMBRIDGE DISTRICT COURT. n- Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 13 of 73 . AFFIDAVIT STATE OF SS COUNTY 53? mm 1 Ralph.Nethanson. bein?_first duly sword, deposes and sayslawyer: duly authorized to practice in Cal? ifornia: I have represented Robert Beauchamp for many years. In late got telephone call from Beauohamp. ?He was very arses, and told me had just had a ?terrible argu? ment" with John Kerry, then in private ?raotioe, but who had just?been elected Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts- Governor Ki?g had twiCe declined to extradite him with resgeot to his 1974'escape charge but Mr. Kerry told him that_in.spite of this he (KerryL and goVernor?elect Dukakis would, once they got into offide, find a way to extradite him. I then,telephoned office and spoke to his partner, Roanne Sragow and diss?ssed the matter with her. She told me she would discuss.the matter with Mr.Kerry. ?The-next day, or; the day following, I telephoned again, and Miss Sragow told we that she had indeed discussed the matter with Mr. Kerry. but that he had been elected Lieutenant Governor and would not make any oommeqt on Beauchampts CESE. . 2 . Subscribed and sworn to before -me, Jan-nary 21, 1988. - Mixe . -. 1. - . . ge??__?H_ss?em??vesosrswe m. t-ary Pubiio California 53 . .3: 1 so RB.2 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 14 of 73 STATEMENT ON THE APPEALS DECISION IN QQEMONWEALTE V. BEAUCHAMP, 49 MASS.APP.CT. 591 (2000) In the longest published decision of the year, on July 10, 2000, the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed my August 7, 1998 conviction for second degree murder. The primary issue I raised was that ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge David Cunis conspired to violate my federal/state civil rights to due process by altering the date of issuance of my gun permit. Their?purpose was to falsely convince the jury that I bought the gun to kill Charles McGrath, and that I lied to the first trial (1973) jury about the date of purchase of the gun. To protect the prosecut? ors? careers, the Appeals Court issued a lie?filled decision. To wit: 1.) With respect to the evidence alteration issue, the Appeals Court purported that it was irrelevant because, "The Common? wealth did not make any argument to the jury that hinged on 'the relationship between the date the defendant bought the gun and obtained his permit, and the date of the killing." Beauchamp at 611 The Commonwealth did not even deny this evidence alteration allegation in their brief to the Appeals Court.) The truth is that the prOsecutors 1ihinged" the dates 1; times during the course of the trial? 2 times in their closing argument. (Tr. 1~12, 1?13, 2?13, 2-30, (see also B.20_B.21_in "Petition For Parole") 2.) The Appeals Court purported at 593 that Beauchamp "shot the victim five times." The truth is that I shot Charles McGrath four times. This is confirmed by the "The victim had been shot four times at.close range" 424 Mass. 583; by the Commonwealth, "four bullets struck McGrath" and by the medical examiner "four separate bullets" (B.52). By falsely claiming that I shot McGrath "five times," the Appeals Court totally undermined my testimony that-I fired a warning shot. (The gun held five bullets.) 3.) The Appeals Court told this bald?faced lie at 593. "Medi: cal evidence indicated that one shot had been fired from behind the victim, apparently as he turned to escape the fusilade." The medical examiner repeatedly testified that, "It's an exit wound in the back." (B.51 in "Petition For Parole?) 4.) The Appeals Court falsely claimed at 600 that McGrath was not killed by "a series of shots in rapid succession." Yet, Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 15 of 73 the Commonwealth?s ear witness, Gary Thompson, told Arlington? detectives he heard five shots "in quick succession" (B.34). The Appeals Court claimed at 600 that "one of the bullets would have been so instantly-disabling that the victim could not have walked out of the defendant's apartment, down a .. stairway, and then down a flight of stairs, but rather must have been shot at least once while lying prostrate on the stairway where the body was found.? The is 100% 8.3. by three "justices" of the Appeals Court! First, the medical .examiner, who actually performed the autopsy on Charles McGrath, testified that McGrath with all his wounds could have travelled that distance (8.49uB.50 in "Petition For Parole]. Second, even the Commonwealth asserted, "Four bullets struck McGrath. He managed to flee the apartment,' but collapsed and died on a landing one flight down from .the defendant's.apartment (B.44 in "Petition For Parole?). Third, Gary Thompson?s five shots I'in quick succession"? (B.34 in I'Petition For Parole?)demonstrates the utter ab- surdity of the deliberate lie by the Appeals Court. The Appeals Court, in tortured legal reasoning, at 593 to 597 purported that therevnnxano constitutional violations whatsoever in the Commonwealth?s reading Beauchampls 1973 'trial testimony to the 1998 re?trial jury during their case?inrchief notwithstanding the SJC'sdEeiSionin Common? wealth v. Parker; 420 Mass. 248 n.7 (3.9) and Beauchampts trial prosecutorls ADA Thomas O'Reilly's own admission that, know of no rule.or_case law that allows me to use in my case-inschief the defendant's testi~ mony in a prior trial. (B.10). Lastly, what is most monumentally egregious about the Appeals Court's lieufilled decision in Beauchamp is that the Appeals Court lacked jurisdiction to even decide this appeal. This assertion is confirmed by trial_judge Thayer Fremont?Smith (B.65), trial attorney Eugene appellate attorn? ney Russell Sobelman (B.67), trial prosecutor ADA David Cunis (B.68) and former SJC Justice Charles Fried The rea? son that the Appeals Court lacked jurisdiction is that the' killing took place in 1971, and G.L. 0.278 was not amend? ed until 1979. (see Commonwealth v. Davis, 380 Mass. 1, 14?17 1980. I W??nd I 41:49 Robert Beauchamp Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 16 of 73 ROBERT BEA Robert Beauehamp Bay State_Corr. Center v.0. Box 73 Nor?olk June 23. 2001 Judge Charles Gtabau Hiddlesex Superior Court 40 Thorndike Street Cambridge MA 02141 Commonwealeh_?, Beauchamg ?Hiddlesek Grim. Ho. 95920 Dea? Judge Grahau: . . Yesterday, as a result of my June 1 memo to. the Clerk (5-23~ 30 ?Hemorendum and Order on Defen 3-29). I finally received a'oopy of your March dantfs Motion For a New Trial" in the above?ref?renee? case- (1330-3.34) 1-4' new trial motionS? As foo well k?ow. you were not the ?trial judge?? and Rule Bosh! explie? gtly mandates ?hat the. trial iudge shall have ?original jurisdiction? over.any The trial judge was Thayef EremontQS?i?h; who is not retire?; disabie?: on sabbatical or deceased. 'iu fact. Eremont?Smith has been eittiug just aoroES the river from yen in the Su?felk Sayerior Court-for months. ?In-faet, when I ?lled my mo? tion for a new trial and motiOn.for appointment of acne? eel on March 7. I clearly stated to the Clerk in the cove er letter. ?Please theSe motions to the trial Judge Theyer NevertheleSe. seme? hovf my?new trial motion gets before you. Hoqever?'inw stead'of correcting-the aesignment error, and tranefer- ri?g my hEV'trial motion to Judge Fremont?Smith. you take it upon yourself to unlawfully issue a memorandum end o;Qer,on it- ?Your action.conetitute$ corrupt motive: bad ?eith and fraud. You leaked juxisdiction to take' ahy action HhatSoever on my new trial motion. Therefore. you: Hardh 30 ?Hemorand?m and is gotally inval? id. Fu?thernore, your ?Hemorandum and ibaelf pro- videafaubataetiel.evidenee of corrupt motive.?bad faith 134 RBJS Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 17 of 73 RB.6 (H%4Yk??l Z-) (oonba) and fraud. Your justification for denying me any consideration was that this waa a "second? new trial motion; and therefore I ?waived? the issues by not raia~ ing them in my first new'trial motion. be you well know: thia is 100% judicial b.a. my first new trial motion was filed on August 14f 1993 {one week after I was found guil? ty of murder-2d}, and this new trial motion was filed ?pur? -suant to Rule (n.26) The Reporters Notes clearly.atates. It should be noted that the motion for a new trial, Which may be made under this subdivis- ion (Rule is in addition,to those rights a defendant has under Rule 30(b). (Emphasis supplied.) Therefore, your waiver justification pursuant to Rule 30 is completely bogus because the new trial motion I filed on March 7 is my first new trial motion pureuant to Rule 30th?. You are intentionally'misrepresenting the Rule 25(b2(21 motion as_a gostoonvicbion new trial motion; which it was nob;ae the did not even deny my ap? plication for fur?her appellate review until two-years at? -her my Rule motion was filed. Until the 3.3.0 aenies earther_appe11ate review} then ano only -then does the poetcenviction period beginr? (E319) the motivation far:your corrupt acts is to fur~ ?ther the ooverup of evidenoe alteration at my 1998 trial by Middlesex Aea+t. D.h.s Thomas O'ReiIIyFana David Cunis. (See_new trial motion pgu 5-8 and referended-appendix pp.) in fact; your corrupt acts are just a coatinua?ion of cor~ rupt acts by HEddleaex B.a.a Thomas Reikly/Martha Coakley; Appeals Court Judge Kenneth.Laurenoe and as sum? marized-below. HIDDLESEK D.R.B REIELYZGOEKLEYH On Angust 7, 1998;.1 was reoonvicted of murder 26 by a_jury of the Middlesex.3uperw 10: Court; Several weeks?after, I diacovered?that AJ31A.3 O'Reiily and Cunis had altered the date on my gun permit. Their.purpose aas_to make it falsely appear to the jury that I pnrohased the gun to E11 Charies HoGrath, and that I lied about the purchase date at myz?irst trial. I in? -formed then Middlesex v.3. Reilly about this evidence tame poring. Reilly took no action. Subsequently.?1 in? formed 0.3. Coakley of this evidence tampering;Ibut Cooke lay stonewailed it also aotwithetanding her and Reilly?s fundamental legal obligation to investigate. 135 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 18 of 73 JUBGE KENNETH In his brief to the Appeals Court. Beauohamp?s appellate attorney. Russell Sobelmsn, raised the issue of evidence tampering by A-D.A.s O'Reilly and Cunis. (5.9?1.12} However. Judge Lahrence repeatedly lied in the decision he wrote about this evidence and other evi? dentiary matters. .(Commonwealth v. BeauChamB, 49 Hass: 591. July 10, 2000) Therefore. On august 25, 2000, I filed a complaint against Judge Laurence with the Commission on Ju: oicial Conduct Egg-sent a copy to 3.3.C. Chief Justice Hargaret Marshall Naturally, the Commis- sion on Judicial Conduct (?the farce of the Massachusetts judicial branch? 5.25) took no action whatsoever. SUPREME JUDICIAL 0n Sep?ember 8: 2000; (just 3 days after CJ Marshall received a copy of my complaint against' :Judge Laurence (1.19), the denied me further appel? 'late review. Commonwealth v. BeauchamE; S-J-C. FAR 11519. The trial prosecutor David Cunis the trial Judge Fremoat~8mith (3?22n5.23} and my trial attorney Eu? gene McCann (?424) are all. on record, (orally or in writ? ing} to the effect that I was absolutely entitled to a di~ rest review of-my 1998 murder 2o conviction by the 3.3.C. because the shooting occurred in 192;. and the original in- dictment was for first degree murder. The Apgeals Court did not even start hearing any second degree murder convic? ?ions un?il 1912. Non; I?m not going to waste time an? ettort delineating all of the misstatements you made in your illegal Hardh 30 re; my sup?osedlf 'uaiving? issues (mean-a;351r- suf? - :3 fine is to say that you had-no jurisdiction over my new brie a1 motion to begin with, There-are sound reasons why Rule 39gb} mandates that the tria1_judge shall have *originai jur~ isolation? over new trial motions. such as intimate famiti? arity with the case et 31. Your March 30 order simply con? firms those sound reasons. (See 1995 Reporter?s Nobes/ Sub? divison (a3) . The bottom line is this. I am requested that you re? Toke your Haroh 30 order {5430 et and transfer all my new trial motion filings (Docket Entries #3 to the trial Judge FremonewSmith- Then, 1 would further re? quest that Judge Fremont?Smith; immediately'thereafter, hold an in chambers conference Hith menand'a representative of the Hiddlesex District Attorney?s office to work out an equitable- resolutio? to this oasei 136 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 19 of 73 RB.8 If both of these actions do not occur within 20 ?ags of the date of this letter. I will: Request that the Mas? sachusetts Senate/House Judiciary Committees investigate yours and Judge Laurence?s actions in this case- (n.9wh.12) I will rile charges with the Board of Bar Overseers against Mid? dlesex Thomas O?Reilly'and David Cunis for submitting altered evidence to the jury. (A-1?h-12) It?s truly amazing how a ?judge? can m?nage not to find any "miscarriage of justice? whatsoever in a cagital case wherein the prosecutors perpetrate a fraud on the court and the jury by submitting altered evidence. ggx_hones? judge would be outraged at-such conduct. and bake the necessary steps to correct_it. Evidently: that?s not a category that fi?s your personna. Sincerelyz Iza??ijQEEaazi??gr Robert Beauchamp Se c: CJ Margaret Supreme Judicial-Courb Judge There: Fremont?Smith D.h. Martha Coakley file 137 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 20 of 73 RE ROBERT BEA UCHAMP COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS MIDDLESEX, ss. SUPERIOR COURT INDICTMENT NO. 95920 COM MONVVEALTH 35? ROBERT BEAUCHAMP ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION The Defendant, Robert Beauchamp, (?Beauchamp?) has addressed a letter to the court indicating that I should not have acted on his Motion for New Triai because the trial judge, Thayer Freemont-Smilh, had not retired as of March 29, 2001, the date of my Memora?dum and Outer. First1 I have treated Beauchamp?s letter of June 28, 2001. as a Motion for Reconsideration. Second, {allow Beauchamp?s Motion because he is correct in his asseftion?. Finaiiy, I otiier that my {timomdmn and Order 0mm: 23, 2001, (Paper Number 221), bevaeated. OBQER .For the fooegoing reasons, the Defendant?s Motion for Reoonsideiation is ME. My Memoiandum and Order dated June 28, 2001?is vacated: This matter be assigned by me in my capacity as the Regional Administrative Juaticc to another impartial Justice of the Superior Court sitting in Midd?lesex County. Charies M. Gm au 1 ustice' of the perior Coort Dated: July 6, 2001 '138 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page Egg 1hr hath?? mg e; wit?? . a?thaitatlhd?tart: i?'m?f?luih: a. 33 $03190th that ef??dn? havya?hlt ?n n?m?ediibif ti?gi?m?; if: 3331;?? [15- 3&1? "ii mm?ytmatl?v ?lms "rat - it" ?1 - a? :E??ah a? tr? ta -. sits: BOSTON HERALD if, 07.30.04 HTi.r? ..mA g' a. 52., mm- . - ..- '5 GEORGE REISSFELDER ROANNE SRAGOW BOSTON-HERALD 05.24.04 v-y? . RB.10 Ilda mxad pequ 'pIEIeH'U04soa eqq ;6 U0 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 22 of 73 sent Rec'd. by RCB on 05.31.08 ISABELIA GARDNER MUSEUM Mr. Brian Kelly Assistant United States Attorney Of?ce of the United States Attorney - John Joseph Moaldey Courthouse '1 Courthouse Way Boston, MA 02210 Dear Mr. Kelly: On May l4, 2.008, I met with Robert C. Beaucharnp, an inmate at MCI-Norfolk. Accompanying me at this meeting was Kenneth Chiavarini. an attorney used by the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum on certain theft?related matters. -Mr. Beauchamp, who is currently serving a life sentence for murder in the second degree, had previously contacted your office in writing. He later wrote to me. Because he stated that he held valuable information about the perpetrators of the March 18, 1990, theft of 13 priceless works of art from the Gardner Museum, I agreed to meet with Mr. Beaucharnp to discuss what information he held and to ascertain his tenns for revealing all that he knows about the the?. During our meeting, Mr. Beaucharnp laid out a plausible and intriguing set of facts related to the alleged thieves George A. Reissfelder, David A. Turner, and Cannello erlino) as well as some information he believes can lead investigators to the current location of the stolen Gardner art. However, he held back certain pertinent details about the present location of the art. Mr. Beauoharnp provided me enclosed court ?lings related to his conviction and What he alleges to be serious misconduct on the part of state prosecutors. have also enclosed a copy of an af?davit he prepared on May 22, 200 8, that describes his understanding of the theft and the whereabouts of the art. Please accept this letter as my request that a member of your offiCe review Mr. Beauchanrp?s materials and allegations in the hope that he will be moved to assist us further in our search for our missing art. Please contact me with any questions. "Reissfelder might have been some? one to keep the paintings? he had . connections at some of the high?. est political levels. -One?time -. Democratic presidential nominee Dammnorbamnnr John Kerry had served as his at? . torney for years.? cc: Robert C. Beaucnarnp . KennethB. Chiavaririi, Esq. Ulrich Boser. The Gardner Heist. p199; pub'd. 2009. Harper Collins. 280 THE FENWAY BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS 02115 TEL 617 565 1401 FAX 613"r 566 7653 Case Document59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 23'0f73 ROBERT - 123.12 MCLNORFOLK . . P.0JBOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056; January 3, 2013. Mr. Robert S. Mueller RE: Senator John Kerry 'Director of the FBI Concealed Bisexuality 950 Ave., NW Violations of Federal Washington, D.C. 20535?0001 Civil Rights Dear Director Mueller: On December 1, 2012, I sent a letter to MA SJC CJ Roderick Ireland, and copied MA USA Carmen Ortiz and Boston FBI SAC Rich? ard DesLauriers. I requested that CJ Ireland order an investi? gation to determine if state_prosecutors altered critical_evij dance in my case to cause_me_to be falsely convicted of_second degree murder. I affixed numerous docunents to corroborate my allegation that the prosecutors' motive for conspiring to viow late my federal civil rights (18 U.S.C. 3.242) was to retaliate topubliclyexpose Senator John Kerry's concealed bisexuality (see attached). Predictably, for corrupt legal/political reasons, CJ Ireland is stonewalling my request. On December 21,-2012, President Barack Obama nominated Sen?. 'ator John Kerry to become secretary of state. On December 24, 2012, I sent a letter to Boston FBI ASAC Norm een Gleason re. the above/attached as "the FBI is required to con~ duct up?tOHdate background investigations on all nominees for cab? inet positions" (see attached). To date, I have received no re? sponse from ASAC Gleason. - - In the near Foreign Relations Committee will hold hearings on Kerry's nomination. Therefore, it is now incumbent upon you to . the above/attached.- Obviously, - _m political repercussions if the FBI fails to conduct a credible? investigation if these well?documented allegations become public, after Kerry is sworn in as secretary of statell-S- Postal Sewice??eliuery Con?rmation? Receipt '0 Pastaga an'd Beilvarycon?nna?un fees musthepald hetero mailing. . 6 an: A?r?cla 0 art eauc amp a r" FBI DIR. - at} mum-4M . byAAG Todd Blume gg ASAC Noreen Gleason ge 1 CJ Roderick Ireland dmmi?? g??g?hnn c: ROBERT g?xontmosmusmum 3 MalIWSewica no. BOX 43 Dam-crass MaIPparce: NORFOLK MA 02056 DPackageSewim pm Case Document59 Filed?05/22/18 Page 24 of73 MCI-NORFOLK 13.0. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 June-24, 2015 DA Marian Ryan . 6 thru: ADA Bethany Stevens Middlesex County 15 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01801 RE: Commonwealth v. Beauchamp Case No. Dear DA Ryan: On July 9, 2013, I sent you a letter wherein I detailed and highly documented that ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis conspired to alter critical evidence in my .1998 re?triar for.second degree murder .To wit: The prosecutors altered the date of issuance of my gun card to "prove" that I bought the gun to kill'Charles McGrath, and lied about the date of purchase to the 1973 trial jury- Egg prosecutors?_motive for submitting-false evidence to the jury -was to retaliate against me for threatening to expose then U.S. Senator/now U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry?s homosex? ual relationships with'former Middlesex DA John Droney and George Reissfelder, who was my codefendant (escape'case), lov? -er and Gardner Museum robber .Predictably, you 'stonewalled ordering any investigation whatsoever! On April 30, ZOTS, CPCS assigned screening counsel to re? view my Case to determine_if I had meritorious issues to ap? point counsel to file a Rule 25(b)(2) motion to have my second degree murder verdict reduced to manslaughter, or dismissed with prejudice due to prosecutorial,misconduct. As of this date} Z_additional instances of submission of false evidence, by ABAs O'Reilly and Cunis, to the re?trial jury have been. identified, plus ?_instances of ineffective assistance of tri? al counsel. To wit: 1.) The prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury that "one of the?bullets would have been so instantly disab- ling_that the victim could not have walked out of the de? fendant?s apartmenty_down a stairway, and then downma; I flight of stairs,r but rather must have been shot at least 1-) A3.) 4.) .5.) 5.9; exactly what Gary Thompson (Commonwealth's witness) told 7.) 8-) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 25 of 73 RB.14, once while lying prostrate.on the stairway where the body was found" (see 3.12 #5 and referenced documents). The prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury that "medical evidence indicated that one shot had been fired from behind the victim, apparently as he turned to escape the fusilade." The medical examiner repeatedly testified that "It's an exit wound in the back" (B.11 B.51). The-prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury that I l?ambushed" Charles McGrath as soon as he entered my apartment The prosecutors submitted_false evidence to the jury that no argument was heard in my apartment by downstairs.neigh?? bors William and Susan_Howe_ The prosecutors accomplished this fraud my misreading William Rowe's 1973 trial testi? mony to the 1998 reutrial jury. The prosecutors deliber? ately omitted reading the parts of Rome's testimony that he and his daughter Susan Howe heard an :argument before and after the shooting The-prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury that I called Gary_Thompson at to relay a message to McGrath to call me.to "prove" that there wasn't enough time for?an argument if McGrath was shot at 6:302?, and that McGrath came "at the defendant's invitationj to his. apartment" (B.45). What Thompson actually told Arlington detectives is that I called him "around (B.34), and asked Thompson to ask McGrath "to get in touch with" me (B.34). There was no invitation issued to McGrath tO' come to my apartment. McGrath insisted on-coming over! The prosecutOrs submitted false evidence to the j?ry that I did not fire five shots "in quick succession," which is Arlington detectives he heard 3.34). The prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury that I did not fire a warning shot (B.11 (NOTE: All five shots were fired "from two feet or less" (3.53) so I could not have accidentally missed shooting McGrath.) My trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to question Commonwealth?s witnesses Gary Thompson and David Pascucci about threats McGrath me ?days before the shooting (13.34, 3.35). Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 26 of 73 RB.15 9.) My trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to question Commonwealth's witness Lt. James Doherty about the can of mace he found in McGrath's pocket, and about his 1973 admission that the Arlington police conducted a ?fouled? up investigation" of the shooting of Charles McGrath (3.46). 10.) My trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by simply resting after the prosecutors completed their case?in-chief because defense counsel did not properly prepare for trial believing that I would be offered a manslaughter plea deal. Given that the prosecutors submitted false evidence to the jury times, and my useless trial attorneys, Eugene McCann and Richard Seccarechio, put on_ng defense whatsoever, trial Judge Thayer'Fremont~Smith still found the Commonwealth's "evidence" a "fairly close" call between second degree murder and man? slaughter 13.54). Greatly compounding all of the above, on July 10, 2000, the Massachusetts Appeals Court issued a lie?filled decision affirm? ing my August 7, 1998 re-conviction for second degree murder. (Commonwealth v. Beauchamp, 49 MassAppCt 591/ see also 3.11?3.12) On June 13, 2015, I sent a copy of my "Supplement to 'Petit~ ion For Parole'" to ADA Bethany Stevens. Attached to this supple? ment was a partial copy of my report, STONEWALL, which I intend to submit t0"the publisher in early September so that it will be pub? lished in January 2016. The report details, inter alia, the links between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry's concealed bisexuality, and the submission of false evidence to the jury in my case. Therefore, given the above/attached, I am renewing my July 9, 2013 request that you comply with the SJC's Canon of Ethics, and expeditiously order an investigation into the submission of false evidence to the jury in my 1998_re?trial by ADA Thomas_0?Reilly and ADA David Cunis. As the result of this prosecutorial crimin? ality, I have now for 12_yearsi Thank?Youi (LS. Postal S?rvice'? Sincerely: CERTIFIED RECEIPT . . Dam?stic Mai! Only. @1171; (2a: ffofl?ipa-O - For delivery information, visit our website at mm uspsmam?i'. 0 er eauc amp t?t??ie E?g?a - id}, g' a 1 'm Postage {87" BY: Certified Mail No. Cem?edm 3,49,! 7014 2120 0004 239? 8107 3 pwmm,g Return Receipt Requested {Endorge?ig?nte?gh?l?? W80 "55.33 FiesIriciad Deiivezy Fee Cl [Endorsement?equired} . -. c: Parole Board . eg- real?presea? T?i?a'm?agmet ?33 farm as? 205$ Sent To . . a S, PIMWWJ/eeaanzarem - res g. 0.. . regexp"; eve.- Gina (are,ZP+4 . . ?09ch #4 0:50}- i?S Form sane-am up: 1 - isee Re??r?e_forln51ruc?ons DATE: FROM 3 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 27 of 73 July 22, 2015 -Ms. Maura Healey Attorney General One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 WM ff?KIED/?xtb ?bbert Beauchamp/ $33990 MCI~Norfolk P.O. Box 43 RB.16 MAILING CHARGES UNH 5212 urn; Doors noma?hsg?i??g?w?samf wear?asserts) 4' x?l JUL 3 ()Rsrasgmnasi ?Nm?mD CERTBHED (a SIGNED Norfolk, MA 02056 Commonwealth v. Beauchamp' DA Marian Ryan Case No. Failure to Investigate Conflict of Interest On July 18, sent the attached correspondence to the Chair and Members of the MA Parole Board. I profa ferred that if DA Marian Ryan would order an investigate ion into my allegations of submission of false evidence, in the above-referenced case, by ADA Thomas O'Reilly and' ADA (now Judge) David Cunis I would withdraw my "Petition For Parole." Shortly after receiving my renewed request for an investd_ igation, dated June 24, 2015, DA Ryan retaliated against me by ordering ADA Adrienne to draft a lie?filled.6pp opposition to the?Parole Board, and submit it at the last minute so that I would not have an Opportunity to effectm ively counter numerous falsehoods at my hearing. (I received ADA opposition on July 7, 2015 about hour before my hearing began.) I . ?To further retaliate against me, DA Ryan subsequently or? dered ADAs Thomas O'Reilly and Bethany Stevens to appear before the Parole Board, and oppose my being granted a parole. Given that DA Ryan has been stonewalling ordering any in? vestigation into my highly detailed and documented alleg- ations of prosecutorial criminality in my case by her of?w fice since July 2013 there obviously exists an egregidus conflict of interest in DA Ryan's ordering three ADAs to oppose my "Petition For Parole.? Obviously, when a DA has a conflict of intereSt in a case, the DA is obligated to refer the case to the AG's office or appoint a special prosecutor. DA Ryan did neitherl . Therefore, I respectfully request that you expeditiously order an investigation into the aboyefattached. Thank You! c: SJC CJ Ralph Gants Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 28 of 73 R3117 ROBERT BEAUCHAMZP - MCIL-NORFOLK no. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 December 2g 2015 Mr. James O'Brien Chief, Public Integrity Division Office of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place/ 19th Floor Boston, MA 02108 RE: 'ggmmonwealth v. Beauchamp Case No. Dear AAG O'Brien: Attached is a "News Release" and appendix documents, which preliminarily detail and highly corroborate violations of feder? al/MA criminal statutes by a number of Massachusetts officials involving the aboveereferenced case. To wit: 1.) That members of the Parole Board, acting under color of law, conspired to retaliate against me for exercising my constitutional rights to due process, freedom of speech and access to the courts, after my July 7, 2015 hearing before the Board was held. 2.) That Middlesex County ADA_Thomas O?Reilly and ADA (now Judgellxn?UiCunis, acting under color of law, conspired to submit false evidence to the jury times during my 1998 retrial to retaliate against me for exercising my constitutional rights to due process, freedom of Speech and access to the courts. As the result, I was wrongfully convicted of second degree murder, and have been falsely imprisoned for the last 17+ years.. Both of the above?summarized crimes are linked directly to my knowledge of homosexual relationships between now U.S. Seeretary of State John Kerry, former Middlesex DA John Droney and George Reissfelder, who was-my lover, codefendant (escape case) and Gardner Museum robber. I am requesting that your office review the attached ap? pendix documents, and, if warranted, initiate a criminal in? vestigation into the above?summarized crimes. Please have Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 29 of 73 123.18 one of_your staffpersons meet with me, as soon as convenient, to discuss the above/attached. I thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerelyt 3&1ng 5% Robert Beanchamp c: SJC Chief Justice Ralph' Gents AC Chief Justice Scott Kafker Gen. Coun. Doug Levine (Boston) FBI SAC Vincent Lisi U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz BY: Certified Mail No. 7014 2120 0004 2397 7711 Return Receipt . a . . . .- same rem i I ite?f?s'ig?g. end 3. - Si hatuna a Print name and address on the reverse \f?s ,2 A we can return the card to you. 3 . .. - 4* ?it-31.5 I __Atk?ach this card to the back of the maiipiece, 5' Renew? by (3311?"de Name) 0- Date 1 ?or?errti-ie from it space permits. 1. Artiste Addressed to: D. is deiivery address different item Yes @5216: Wit/?23" 0K ?137) ?53' ?9?qu address below: - 1: No OPE OFMEWA ??wwc REQEW ED 2M5 ewe/mama 771/ We? :74: . . E?aww), 02203 3. Service Type El Priority Mail Express? h. WW ?gig?nmahg Heshic?red Delivery 13 gagisiered'h?all Restricted; . . at aliveiy -. 9590 9403-04?1 51%: 596?? 33' Certi?ed MaJlResi?cted De?yery etum?epeiptfer El Coilecton Deiivery Slemht?ndge at . 130]!th Dii Re?ned 7 metre onn'n on 2 Article Number {Transfer from semce iabe? 1.3 qum?ane very D8 New Signature Continuation . BLED ?711 Resecteqnerm . Farm 3811, Aprj12015 PSN 7530-02?00043053 . Demestiq Return Receipt Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 30 of 73 ?3.19 ROBERT . NORFOLK, MA 02056 I a January 3, 2017 Senator Mitch McConnell 361A Senate Russell Office Bldg. Washington, D.C. 20510 RE: Russian Hacking Investigation Election of President Donald Trump Dear Senator McConnell: Since a bipartisan congressional committee with be in? vestigating the impact of Russian hacking on the election of Donald Trump to the presidency, the below statement will be of extremely important interest to Congress at al. A $10,000 PAYOFF IN 1988 WAS THE CATALYST THAT ALTERED THE COURSE OF AMERICAN HISTORY. THE CHAIN REACTION DYNAMICS OF U.S. IAL ELECTIONS, ABSENT THIS PAYOFF (IE AEE PROB- ABILITY), DONALD TRUMP WOULD NOT BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED The evidence to corroborate the above statement is ex? tensively detailed and highly documented in two reports: GRAYMAIL and STONEWALL Attached is my "Affidavit of Robert Beauchamp" documents Please provide copies of this cover letter/attachments to the members of Congress at al. involved in the Russian hacking investigation. Sincerely, Robert Beauchamp 3 0: MA AG Maura Healey BY: Priority Mail Prof. Lawrence Lessig Certified No. FBI SAC Vincent L151 7015 1520 0000 7903 4538 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 31 of 73 RB.20 REPORT RELEASE $10,000 PAYOFF BY CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL FOR GOV. MITT ROMNEY AND SEN. SCOTT BROWN ALTERS COURSE OF 0.5. HISTORY THE END PRESIDENT DONALD During the 1988 presidential campaign, Republican strategists made_Willie Horton the decisive issue. Essentially, Vice President George H.W. Bush relentlessly attacked MA Governor Michael Dukakis for being "soft on crime." Bush's "evidence? was the Dukakis al- lowed MA DOC officials to grant furloughs from prison to convicted murderers like Willie Horton. However, when Bush was CIA director, he had knowledge of and/ on approved payments to me, when I was under the legal status of furloughed, escaped murderer from Massachusetts. Obviously, Bush realized that if the voters learned of his gross hypocrisy, it would devastate his campaign. 80, Bush directed MA Republican Party General Counsel Daniel Winslow to pay me (formerly a CIA in" formant/Pentagon Papers case) $10,000 to remain silent.* Had the Ameridan people been informedx?iBush's monumental hypocrisy and Winslow?s payoff to me, Michael Dukakis would have been elected president of the United States. Had Dukakis been elected president, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump would probably never have been elected president given the chain reaction dynamics of the American political system. THEREFORE, THE ENTIRE COURSE OF v.5. HISTORY FROM 1988 To THE PRESENT HAS BEEN RADICALLY ALTERED as THE DIRECT RESULT OF $10,000 PAYMENT To ME. AS THE END DONALD My report, GRAYMAIL extensively de? tails and highly documents the above statement. This was a mon? umental against the People of the United States! January 3, 2017 Robert-Beauchamp Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 Winslow actually made the $10,000 Reissfelder, who was my lover, codefendant (escape case) sex partner of John Kerry (presently U.S. secretary of state) and Gardner Museum robber. - President?elect Donald Trump seriously considered nominating Mitt Romney as secretary of state and Scott of veterans affairs. In a supreme act of political infamy, the Boston Herald reported on 12.05.16/p5 that Trump may nem? inate Daniel Winslow as U.S. attorney (District of Massachu? setts). - Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 32 of 73 RB.21 emcee:- chPLerE Tells seduce . I Complete items 1. 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. I Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. I Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece; or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: gg?f?gme H?C?amee??ij?} Jccm?rjereryrs seems or?? cement: ?tment IA. Signa're . Kw. M- CI Addresses B. Fifeived by {Print dName} C. Date of Delivery cum 0 my? 7 D. is delivery address different from item U'Yes it YES. enter delivery address below: 'Wc 3 A Jar/1472759 WJELL pFP?lc? ?arw/N??r Wit/vertex; 29rd 20570 3. Service Type Heartl?ed Mali? El Priority Mail Express? Registered Return Receipt for Merchandise El Insured Mall El Collect on Delivery 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee} 13] Yes 2. Article Number {Transfer from service iebi "?+eie rag: ?ees i PS Form 3811, July 2013 Domestic Return Receipt I ?r E1 ta . e. emi- .- :uga?E ?t?kw .qb I :7 i k.j.Mz qu?? Q) .Q .. i. Est?: a: We: gs, . 3.3? East?s-3? 39%) i-xm. saw?; es Wamf n. ?e as ?a we. 5: Wg?g: 1?mg? L7: ?sauna ?Em 'u I In ?E?u 2? rel-ls. er News term-e. retro, gar/7m.? ?ca-m '?Qua my 2 1 - semi-res a. r. 155%" re it?; 'W-re -: - a Meyer: 53 aim-e - 399., has eraser; e. EDEL BEST mm 4?10 L'l-i-l Eli-I :10 (J 00.3 "c1422 ClJ-i-l UU '?JJ?lr?i Hidr?i UJOCIJ Cl AC.) LHKDU ONE ?041.51 CUIU u?ir-l-i?I D-i-w-i 04:2 5-1 Edi-J66 #Cdi: .mciw O-r-iC/Zi 00 OCULH E-Icuo NOTE TO REPORTERS ET AL. 444W i" ?QbE/ii: gem Robert Beauchamp Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 33 of 73 RB. 22 COWONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS N?ddlesex, SS. Superior Court Indictment 27?9125 ?gra ?04,544 ,0 DEFENDANT PROCEDURAL ORDER The defendant has ?led a motion for post~eonvietion relief. The court ORDERS that the Commonwealth ?le a response to the defendants pending motion on or before 2017. Charge: 420/45 x8e . ADA: ?gM?n ?1 ff?Ve/kf . Weft/lotion War-? ?ag/gag,? Motion Filed By ,42 f74?4? . Sentencingludge: i By the Court Piee,J f/ WU DATE: .. 7/ Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 34 of 73 RB.23 P.O. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 April 18, 2017 ADA Bethany Stevens RE: Commonwealth v. Beauchamp Middlesex District Case No. Attorney's Office 15 Commonwealth Avenue APPOINTMENT OF A Woburn, MA 01801 SPECIAL PROSECUTOR :?Dear ADA Stevens: 'On March 17, 2017, Judge Laurence Pierce issued a proced? ural order directing you to file an opposition to my reductw ion of verdict motion on or before May 1 (A.1). As you well know, the MiddleSeX office would have an egregious conflict 2f interest in filing an opposition to my motion. lg wit: On June 24, 2015, I sent a letter (w/numerous corroborating documents) to DA Marian Ryan (thru you) wherein I extensively detailed/documented unethical and illegal acts committed durw Iing my 1998 re~trial by ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis to cause me to be wrongfully convicted of second dew- gree murder in violation of l? 0.8.0. 3.242 and other relevant federal/state criminal statutes. In this letter, I renewed my July 9, 2013 request that DA Ryan "expeditiously order an in? attached). Needless to state (except for the record), there was, pre~ dictably, no reaponse whatsoever from DA Ryan. Obviously, it is common knowledge (at least in the legal community) that the only time DA Ryan will order an investigation into allegations of criminal acts by prosecutors is when the allegations become public, and DA Ryan has no choice but to order an investigation! (A.2) Otherwise, DA Ryan simply covers up criminal acts by em? ployees in her office. Therefore, if the DA's office.intends to file an opposition to my reduction of verdict motion that, due to the above?summar? ized/referenced, DA Ryan must comply with the 830's Canon of Ethics, and appoint a special prosecutor. Contrarily, if the DA's office does not intend to file an opposition, then I suppose the matter is moot, and I would withdraw my request to appoint a special prosecutor. Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 35 of 73 RB.24 I thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Robert Beauchamp NOTE: Essentially, my verdict reduction motion is asserting that I was caused almost 19 years of wrongful imprisonment due solely to the_two ineffective assistance of trial counsel grounds raised therein. Therefore, the elephant in the motion is massive financial liability for the two defense attorneys. Nevertheless, I will not file a lawsuit against my retrial attorneys. . In BY: IPriority Mail us; Certified Mail No. B: 5 7014 1370 0000 8279 9765 n? ryg? Return Receipt Requested . -- addfe ?59 A E3 Receipithardoopy} 5m . E: ?s4' Po?ma?t igf- :12; Here ?eewe?ewr? n'aejeggee? f2 bu Merger; Mi 02055 Se tT gifn?ufgeggenww Lira/EM treeten p. 0.,or ex 0. l? 15' sqee??rlgemi We?; ie,ZiP+4? . . Mum! (7195?! I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. I Print your name and address on the reverse so that We can return depend to you. I Attach this card to the back of the maitpiece, or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D/Jrezcr?w/wea I 5? COMM Mg, W?gafd @1530/ I A. ature I El Agent El Addressee s: 553?s (Pr' tedNamei C. Date of Delivery tr 5-9 I we n?rdr?tglmin? awe/1f?? ?rift/EM" lumnmuli nu 9590 9402 2525 6305 4712 43 3. Service Ty? El Adult Signature El Collect on Delivery 2. Article Number (Tweeter from sewice label) he El Collect on Delivery Restricted Del Etfr'tihrity Mall El Registegee Mail?! El Adult Signature Fl tricted Delivery Registered Mail Restricted erti?ed Mail? ?3 Egeni?ed Mail Restricted ellu?Ei?E? Delivery Return Receipt for Merchandise [very El Signature Con?rmaticnm El Insured Mel] Signature Continuation Ensure$d5 3:103? Restricted Delivery Restricted Delivery over Dc: :nrm $191 .lnlu om new Domestic Return Fleceint . Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 36 of 73 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) )ss. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX -) AFFIDAVIT 0F ROBERT BEAUCHAMP The defendant, Robert Beauchamp, deposes and says: I.) In the Commonwealth's opposition to my verdict reduction mot? ion, it is asserted "several appellate courts have recognized, evidence (that) defendant?s guilt was overwhelming" (2), and that the Commonwealth?s 1998 re?trial evidence was of "except? ional strength" There are several major problems with the Appeals Court's evidence assessments in my case. 1.) Trial Judge Thayer Fremont?Smith, who actually had the "advent? Wage (based_on)nface to face evaluation of the witnesses and the evidence at trial, which place the judge in a far better position to make the judgment required by Rule Com? monwealth v. thim, 447 Mass. 370, 381 (2006), did not find the Commonwealth's evidence against me to he ?overwhelming" or of "exceptional strength". Judge Fremont?Smith found the Commonwealth's evidence to be merely a "fairly close" call between second degree murder and manslaughter (1998 Tr. Predictably, the Commonwealth's opposition conven? iently fails to acknowledge this decisive fact, and relies on evidence assessments made by Appeals Court judges? none of whom spent a nano second at my 1998 re?trial. 2.) Additionally (and predictably), the Commonwealth conveniently fails to inform this Court that the "overwhelming" and of 2.) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 37 of 73 RB.26 "exceptional strength" evidence assessments made by the ap? pellate judges are based upon egregious falsifications of evidence by the 1998Jrewtrial prosecutors, ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis. (see Commonwealth's opposit? ion/ filed improperly by deliberately omitting the referenced exhibits). In fact, the corrupt political/legal motivations of the 1998 re?trial prosecutorsraise the gravest questions of conflict of interest by the Middlesex DA's office in even filing its opposition? A special prosecutor should have been appointed" see STONEWALL It should also be strongly noted that-no court has ever held a hearing on my prosecutorial misconduct allegations. Furthermore, this is the first time I have ever been represented by counsel on a postconviction motion since my 1998 rentrial. The Commonwealth incredible hypocrisy) proffers evidence assessments by-Appeals Court judges which the Commonwealth previously argued latked jurisdiction to even decide my ap- peal see esp. A.47). The reason?_the Appeals Court did not even exist on August 5, 1971? the day of the shooting! I am respectfully requesting that the Court hold a hearing on my "Defendant's Post?Conviction Motion for Reduction of Verdict." A hearing is critically necessary to establish that a miscarriage of justice (at least to degree of guilt) has occurred in this case. At the hearing, ADA Thomas O?Reil? ley and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis can be questioned, under oath, concerning my allegations of falsification of evidence 4.) 5.) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 38 of 73 RB.27 Aduring my_1998 re?trial, which are extensively detailed and highly documented (see Commonwealth?s EXHIBIT A). Upon this foundation of falsified evidence, the appellate judges dew termined that the Commonwealth?s "evidence" was "overwhelming" and of "exceptional strength". One particularly salient examw plea In the Commonwealth's opposition at pll, it is asserted "relying again on the findings of the Appeals evidence indicated that one shot had been fired from behind the victim, apparently as he had turned to escape the fusil? lads." This is sheer fabrication! The medical examiner tese tified, ?It?s an exit wound in the back" (1998 Tr. A miscarriage of justice (at least to degree of guilt) has occurred in my case as the result of a fatal combination cf ineffective assistance of trial counsel (who simply rested after the Commonwealth completed its case in chief) and the falsification of critical evidence by prosecutors who had corrupt political/legal motives. SIGNED AND SWORN TO, UNDER THE PAINS AND PENALTIES OF PERJURY, PURSUANT TO SUPERIOR COURT RULE 15, THIS 24th DAY OF APRIL 2017. Respectfully submitted, 4/320 c7? - Robert Beauchamp/WE3990 Defendanti. MCI?Norfolk P.O. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 ROBERT BEAUCEAMP MCI-NORFOLK P.0. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 May 22, 2017 Mr. Rod Rosenstein Deputy Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Ave., NW Washington, D.C. RE: SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER RUSSIAN BACKING INVESTIGATION Dear Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein: Page 39 of 73 On January 3, 2013, I sent a letter (w/attachments) to then FBI Director Robert Mueller (552). I informed Director Mueller that since the FBI was required to conduct an up?t0w date background investigation on Senator John Kerry (who had been nominated by President Obama to become U.S. secretary of state), the FBI should investigate the following. That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis conspired to frame me for murder for "threatening to publicly expose Senator John Kerry's concealed bisexuality" (352). (see also attached-S4, 35,38;326) To wit: Predictably, Director Mueller withheld this critical in? formation from the U.S. Senate, and Kerry was almost unani~ mously confirmed to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Once DOJ officials inform_the media of Mueller's 2013 withhold? ing, the public will seriously question Mueller's integrity and his fitness to conduct the Russian hacking investigation. Therefore, I believe that it is incumbent upon you to expedit? iously terminate Mr. Mueller as special counsel! (NOTE: I would point out that the aboveureferenced murder case was reactivated in March 2017. (Commonwealth v. Beauchamp/ There now exists the issue of whether or not corrupt DA Marian Ryan will be forced to apn point a special prosecutor due to an egreg~ ious conflict of interest. (see attached AA.1, AA.2, A.1, A.2) RB.28 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 40 of 73 RB.29 2017, I sent a letter (w/attachments) to Senator Mitch McConnell. I informed Sen. McConnell that a $10,000 payoff altered the probable outcome of the 1988 presidential election. This payoff was the history altering catalyst that ultimately led to the election of President Donald Trump! (3,14, On January 3, "provide copies of this cover I requested that Sen. McConnell involved in letter/attachments to the members of Congress at al. the Russian hacking investigation" (see enclosed). However, to date, for corrupt legal and political motives, Sen. McConnell con?~ tinues to withhold my January 3, 2017 letter/attachments from other members of Congress at 31. (see -In addition to the attached/enclosed, substantial corroborat? ing evidence re. the above is incorporated in GRAYMAIL (authorhouse. com) (A.5) and STONEWALL (A.13). Thank You! Sincerely, Domestic Return Receipt . City, State, . sm-.igvmamawa_ 1L0 Mama) swarm inn 'Robert Beauchamp mo SEE :92 ngEE El +3 13 El E313 8%?3?31(.0 ammauz?mmuBY: Priority Mail 2 g??ig if a . I 3? Certified Mail No. ?g asgi E: a 7015 1520 0000 2418 6701 g? ?53 g: . a Return Receipt Requested sass a as 4: r-"l .47} .JSI . .. . .. - . {as #11524Certi?edMailFe-e .1 i? [3 if] wiw?dp" 2 93:6 ms 3% '0 $05 2 UR. ==casm ExtraSeWiceS&Feesfcheckbax. addfeeasa "re?k 4'5 JP. E: D?eium?eceiplmardcop? 'sgig ii[Imam Receipuelectmnic?AdultSignatum Required ?065.37. 3590514494?in. ?7 Eag?i?fB 541? ED TotaiPostagaa dFees N??Fatk,?? ?32033;: . Eve 3? 3 ~13 ElfinSENT-0 a) 9-1? [.11 ?rq Zkg?g? a0 '3 0 L332mu 223 ?0-9 be nu-Form 3811, April 2015 PSN 7530,02-000-9053 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 41 of 73 ROBERT BEAUCHANIP P.0. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 June 2017 Mr. Hank Shaw 201 Maple Street Chelsea, MA 02150 Dear SAC Shaw: RB.30 RE: TERMINATION OF SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER On.May 22, 2017, sent a sures) to DAG Rod Rosenstein. In this correspondence, I detailed/documented a major act of ion committed, in 2013, by then FBI Director Robert Mueller. (see attached/enclosed) Over a month has now elapsed since DAG Rosenstein re? ceived the above?referenced_information. However, to date, notwithstanding the gravity of this matter, (predictably) I have not received any response whatsoever from any official. Recently, there were widespread media reports that President Donald Trump considered terminating Mr. Mueller as special counsel, but lacked any legitimate justification to do so. Consequently, this raises grave concerns that DAG Rosenstein and other officials conspired to withhold the attached/enclosed information from President Trump. Otherwise, the president would have almost certain? ly have fired Mr. Mueller Pl now! Therefore, I think that it would be highly advisable for a official to.meet as conveni? ent, to discuss this matter of substantial national import? ance. Thank You! Sincerely,- 3% ?142! 5%2 Robert Beauchamp BY: Priority Mail . Certified Mail No. 7015 1520 0000 8224 6713 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 42 of 73 RB.31 r??l le Certified MallFea FU .1 ED Extra Services&Fees (enactment; addre gram?ire? E1 [JRetumReceipt?Iardoopyj WW 4 Wary at! 5 Pea-11:16; 5 3137??- fig?) 0? Ra Eve 72% rq TctatPostageand Fees Ng?Foqi 5.12052; Ln. F: .- eniTo . :3 :52k3444545 QWeei/F??r? Streetand orPO BoxN C, 8? IMHFLE 112W M51 02/51:: PS Ft: en 28 b?g'?nrilg2ilj 5f=si1t ?964 SeeReVerse ri?es-rs; Teresecnom I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete Item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. I Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. I Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,_? or on the front if space permits. A. Signature '3 Agent Addressee KW 3. by (Printed Name) 0. Date of Delivery 1 . Article Addressed to: 5/45 FEDQML 5122340; t/ 611764770 A) 2.0) is delivery address different from item 1? If] Yes if YES, enter deilir?ry. address below: No . ?re-1143?; 3)h 1 if, ?15? ?4 ?4 L- 4:1 3. Service'i?ype ?Certified Melta Ij Priority Mail Express? . El Registered El Return Receipt for Merchandise El InsIJred Mall I3 Collect on Delivery 4 Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) [3 Yes 2. Article Number (Fensfer from service label) 7n15 iSEu need Eae4 A PS Form38'l'i,duly2013 Domestic Return Receipt Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 43 of 73 ROBERT BEAUCHAMZP MCI-NORFOLK no. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 August 28, 2017 Ms. Marian Ryan District Attorney Middlesex County 15 Commonwealth Avenue Woburn, MA 01801 Commonwealth VJ Beauchamp Case No. PROSECUTORIAL CRIMINALITY Dear DA Ryan: RB.32 The attaChed documents have begun to circulate among attorneys representing some of the individuals targeted by Special Counsel (SC) Robert Mueller in the Russian hacking investigation.'These documents provide preliminary evidence that.Mueller violated federal, criminal statutes connectedr to the above?referenced Case. Therefore, it may be well?advisable for you to finally comply with your fundamental ethical and legal obligations, and expeditiously inform Middlesex Superior Court Judge Kathe iction was ob? Tuttman that my 1998 second degree murder conv tained by PROSECUTORIAL Thank You! Sincerely, Robert Beauchamp -Defendant c: SJC CJ Ralph Gants FBI SAC Hank Shaw BY: Certified Mail Nos. 7015 1520 0000 2418 6695 9590 9420 2752 6351 9974 62 Return Receipt Requested R015 1520 0000 3910 BEES (see esp. City, Staie, 2/5?ng .64} 0180/ certified hail-Fee?2.9 ?15-?95 - ?in: Pd Delivery 5 . . Posts 3 ?0?3 {a a . . Tota! Postage and Fees - 73' 0? ?0 ?re/(Fads Mai? @2051: Sent To g? A maria/1g gas/M Sfreer andApt. No., or PO Sax No. Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 44 of 73 RB.33 REPORT RELEASE SC ROBERT MUELLER CORRUPT DA MARIAN RYAN On January 3, 2013, I detailed/documented to then FBI Director/ now Special Counsel (SC) Robert Mueller the following: That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADA Thomas O'Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis conspired to frame me for murder for ?threatening to publicly expose SenatOr John Kerry's concealed bisexuality" (552) (see also attached Notwithstanding his statutory duty to investigate the above, and report the findings to the U.S. Senate, which was in the process of confirming Kerry to become U.S. secretary of state, Mueller corruptly withheld this critical information from the U.S. Senate! On June 24, 2015, I detailed/documented the above to Middle? sex County (MA) DA Marian Ryan Notwithstanding her statutory duty to investigate the above, Ryan corruptly stone? walled reporting this prosecutorial criminality to the superior court! (see also 363,388?390) Since May 2017, DOJ DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI SAC Hank Shaw have been withholding the aboveusummarized Mueller corruption in? formation from President Donald Trump so that he will be deprived of havingezlegitimate justification to terminate Mueller as spec? ial prosecutor! (884?387) Predictably, DA Ryan (by means of a lie?filled opposition filed in the Middlesex Superior Court on April?13, 2017 Commonwealth v. Beauchamp/MICR 197la95920) continues to vehemently attempt to maintain her office's fraudulently obtained-second de? gree murder conviction against me! 7 My report, STONEWALL (referenced exemplar pages attached) extensively details and documents these unethical and illegal acts by Corrupt SC Mueller and Corrupt DA Ryan! To obtain STONEWALL, log onto ?/g/zow Robert Beauchamp MCI?Norfolk P.0. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 45 of 73 . I RB.34 mWe/ge (gm gigamw 44 ?gmm/zfs/i/?mj ?fe/m Anthony J.Benedetti CHIEF COUNSEL TEL: (413)750-1520 DEPUTY CHIEFCOUNSEL FAX: (617)988-3493 PRIVATE COUNSEL DIVISION November 7, 2014 Robert Beauchamp, W33990 MOI Norfolk PO. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 Dear Mr. Beauchamp: This was posted on the website: BOSTON (CBS) A prosecutor in the Middlesex County District Attorney?s Office is now the target of an investigation, sources told The sources said the probe involves Stephen Gilpatric's work on drug cases. ?Any allegation of this nature is troubling. Our employees hold important positions Of WL public trust and we will work with other law enforcement agencies to review and address this serious matter," Middlesex District Attorney Marian Ryan said in a statement to 5: WBZ. - . No other information is available at this point in the investigation. Very truly you s, Terry a - Senio Staff 0 nsel Private Counsel Appeals Unit NOTE: The only time DA Marian Ryan will order an investigation into allegations of criminal acts by prosecutors in her Office is when the allegations become,public} and DA Ryan has no other choice but to order an investr gation.. Otherwise, DA Ryan simly covers up ?criminal acts by her subordinates! Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 46 of 73 93 Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee {Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage 8t Fees or' PO Box No. 7nd? DEED nuns sues Eats 0 RB.35 . a Complete items 1, 2, and-3. . 7n Print your name and address on the reverse so that we Can return the card to you. 3 Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, or on the front if space permits. A. Signature - .131 Agent. "El Addresses 1. Addressed to: Hf aegsz/rge QEAEI Dir?ecmg, aF'fJ?fE? Warm/ere? 23 axoxrrw_ ere/m2 rev/7 D. is delivery address differerlt {rem item 1? El Yes if YES, enter delivery address below: No 5.1? i i ll ll lie 3. Serviee Type met. riser: asses El Adult Signature El Registered Mattm i El Adutt Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Matt Restricted Certified Mallet Delivery 9590 9402 2752 6351 9974 55 pertj?ed Mail Restricted Delivery ElFteturn Receipt for a -- . a Article NumtterrTransfer from service label] . . "a Eggfm??a?elwew Restricted Delivery Con?gauon- - rs Form 3811, July 2015 PSN 7530- 132-000-9353 f3 Insured Restricted Delivery g?estnoted Delivery. (over$5t} Domestic Heturri Receipt . i i . NOTE: DOCUMENTS PAGINATED (R. 36? RB. 46) WERE NOT ATTACHED TO MY 09.11.17 LETTER TO FBI DIRECTOR CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (RB) Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 47 of 73 RB.36 U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D. C. 20535-0001 December 5, 2017 Mr. Robert Beauchamp, MCI Norfolk Post Office BOX 43 Norfolk, MA- 02056 Dear Mr. Beauchamp: This letter is in response to the correspondence you mailed to the FBI in which you claim you are wrongfully incarcerated. The FBl?s Boston Field OffiCe has reviewed your allegations and has determined that no further action is necessary. Sincerely yours, January 2? 2018 - Jeffrey B. Veltri - . - Chief, Civil Rights Unit Dear Mr. Veltri:' Criminal Investigative Division As you well know, the FBI did conduct a credible review of my wrongful incarceration allegation. One reason? a credible review-would have proven that, in 2013, then FBI Director Robert Mueller committed an obstruction of justice in my case. Addit? ionally, I was not even interviewed once during this ?review" by officials. If the above/attached becomes public, then U.S. Attorney General William Sessions will have'no choice but toappoint a special counsel to investigate Special Counsel Robert Mueller et al.. I await Your expeditious response. Sincerely, c: Mr. Ty Cobb, Esq. ., . WHW . Mr. Kevin Downing, Beg. ?rm-12"? A A 3' Robert Beaucbamp; Mr. Abbe Lowell, Esq. FBI SAC Hank Shaw Case 1:18-mji03161-KMW Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 48 of 73 Stonewall by Robert Beauohamp (Paperback) Lulu 37 Logianegister 1: Support Cart Er Shop Create Seil Learn - Search Bookstore Product Details 9781365284731 . ROBERT BEAU CHAMP (Standard Copyright License) Copyright Edition ?l-st Publisher Quail Valley Publishing Published February 28, 20i7 Language English Pages 84 Binding Perfect?bound Paperback Paperback, 84 Pages 572:1;- Be the ?rst of your friends to like this. Price: $30.00 - ,Printsin 3-5 business days I Sig} STONEWALL This report detailsfdowmens a major act of corruption committed by Special Counsel Robert Mneiler. To wit: in 2013, then FBI Director Mueller withheld the following information from the US. Senate, which was in the process of con?rming Senatorjohn Kerry to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. That, in 1998, Middlesex County (MA) ADAs Thomas O?Reiily and David Cunis. conspired to frame Robert Beauchamp for murder to retaliate against him for threatening to publicly expose Kerry's homosexual relationships with former DAJohn Drone}:r and Gardner Museum robber George Reissfelder. DAG Rod Rosenstein and FBI SAC Hank Shaw have been withholding the above? summarized Mueller corruption information from President Donald Trump since late May 2017!- Robert GARDNER ART {5255113 01.115 I31 emanates eon use ewes mean Preview NOTES To ET AL. 1) Since midHSeptember 2017, FBI Director Christopher Wray continues to stonewall ordering a.credible?review of the above?summarized Mueller corruption information. 2) To protect the legal/political interests of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, DA Marian Ryan et al., Judge Kathe Tuttman acted with corrupt motive! (see "Defendant's Motion For Reconsideration" filed on 09.15.17 in Commonwealth v. Beau? champ/ Docket No. Middlesex County (MA) Superior Court.) This motion (40pp) is a public record document. The Tuttman/Mueller coverup will be investigated by the Massachu? setts Commission on Judicial Conduct. - 3) To obtain STONEWALL, log onto (see att. ex. pp) (see also GRAYMAIL - . Robert Beauchamp/ MCInNorfolk/ P.0. Box 43/ Norfolk MA 02056 Document59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 49 0f73 ROBERT BEAUCHARIP MCI-NORFOLK P.O. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, 1V1A 02056 i November 13, 2017 Judge Amy RE: 0.8. y. Paul Manafort 0.8. District Court v. Rick Gates 333 Constitution Ave., NW SC Robert Mueller Washington, 20001 Obstruction of Justice. Dear Judge Jackson: My report, STONEWALL details/documents major acts of corruption committed in 2013 by then FBI Di? rector Robert Mueller to protect the legal/politiCal inter? ests of then 0.8. Senator John Kerry (see "preview" next pg). Shortly after Mueller was appointed special counsel in May 2017, current officials were informed of the above/attached, but concealed this information from Presiu- dent Donald Trump. By mideeptember 2017, Mueller's 2013 obstruction of justice became an entanglement in my criminal case, and Judge Kathe Tuttman issued 2 corrupt decisions to protect Mueller et al. (see attached "Defendant's Motion For Re? consideration"). Presently, the above/attached information re. Mueller and other officials could seriously Undermine the integrity of the prosecutions of Manafort, Gates et a1. Therefore, I believe the court should take Whatever actions it deems appropriate to serve the interests of justice in the above?referenced casesh Sincerely, .Robert Beauchamp c: MA SJC CJ Ralph Gants MA AG Maura Healey Priority Mail Certified Mail Nos. 7015 0640 0005 7233 0843 RB.38 9590 9402 2752 6351 9962 29 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 50 of .73 MAILJNG CHARGES UNIT DATE ?372/7 Me MATES NAMEM ?26 .5: Writ-52f g?a?dcrw $2 HAS EEBN TO YOUR ACCOUNT OR W?gm i AJRFOREIGN [49/ LETTER ,2 SPECIAL DEL. . REGISTERED par RET. RECEIPT REQ. AIRMAIL INSURED 3 CERTIFIED :54) SIGNED . MAILOFFICER . Ii Complete items 1, 2, and 3. a Print your name and address on the reverse so that: we can return the card to you. ?t Attach this card to memoir of the . or on the front if space permits. ?dl5 cans 7233 cave RB.39 Certified Mail Fee joy? Ii? Extra Services EL Fees-?eci?rbmr, addfee gs .11. 11:. .- D?eturn?eceipt?rardcopy} In? . in: . [3 Return Receipt {eiectmnic} if: 3 it: Posimari: . Mail Fissiricted Delivery 5 AI 73" i. Here Cir:- EI Actuit Signature Required 3 . [IMuit Signature Restricted Delivery? .3 (3:1 mm? Postage 6 6 034 3 Total Postage and Fees 0' "g 0 4 if (e 33mm $196567;ny IXJ can? Street andApr. No? or PO Box No. S??w chsrare .D (1157057 ?733 El Agent El Addressee 0.. Date of Delivery B. Received by (Printed Name} Article Addressed to: L1.J 333 Cow?n'mm) talc; 2000; 9590 9402 2752 6351 9962 29 is delivery address?dszerentfrom item El Yes iinEIS ent?r? cl?iivew No we riser? 3 - ?mu. I?qung 3e geese Type 5" - I'j Fnonii Mari EprressiEl Aduit Signature El Registered trial!TM Ci Admit Signature Restricted Delivery El Registered Mail Restricted Mail?! Deiivery I :3 Certified Mail Restrictegl Delivery El _eturn Hecslp?or erEhand ise El Collect 9n Delivery 31.997919 INIumb er [Transfer {(9.133 semice iabe? - "#9115 [Haiti] DUES PS Form 3811, July 2015 PSN resecz-coc-scSS 9911.26: 9n carve); Restricted Deiivery '3 SignalureCcnf?r-mahonm E1 insured 1"{311 ElEjign?Iturs C?n?rmaticn El insured Mail Hashigigctneiwgry Residcted Delivery (ov?r$50 0) I ches?c Return Receipt . Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 51 of 73 RB. 40 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP MCI-NORFOLK PO. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 January 23, 2018 Judge Amy Berman Jackson . United States District Court RE: USA V. MANAFORT et al. 333 Constitution Ave., NW . No. Washington, D.C. 20001 Dear Judge Jackson: On November 13, 2017; I sent you a letter/attachments wherein I informed this court that my report, STONEWALL details and documents "major acts of corrupt" ion, committed in 2013, by then FBI Director Robert Mueller to protect the legal/political interests of then U.S. Sena? tor John Kerry" (A.35). In closing,'I stated that this Mueller corruption in? formation "could seriously undermine the integrity of the prosecution of Manafort, Gates et a1." However, notwithu standing its fundamental judicial duties, this court_con? tinues to withhold this Mueller corruption information from attorneys representing Paul Manafort and Richard Gates. the end result 2f this court's misconduct, I re? cently compiled a supplement to STONEWALL (A.36) titled CORRUPT MUELLER, Which should be publiShed as an Ebook in" the next 60 days. CORRUPT MUELLER exposes, inter alia, this court's attempts to protect the legal/political in? rterests of Special Counel Robert Mueller (partial pre~Ebook copy of CORRUPT MUELLER appended hereto). This court?s misconduct is highly prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of justice in Manafort et a1.? Therefore, I believe that it is now incum? bent upon you to recuse yourself from presiding over this case. Sincerely, Robert Beauchamp BY: Certified Mail Nos. 7007 0220 0004 5029 6309 9590 9402 2752 6351 9961 06 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59' Filed 05/22/18 Page 52 of 73 MAILING CHARGES UNIT 5ng DATE {22? 23? f3 MW :1?qu 191W 1'17}va HAS BEEN CHARGED TO YOUR ACCOUNT FOR THE OF A: RB.41 ?w SPECIAL 'pd RET. RECEIPT: BBQ .ng SIGNED LETTER )4 PKG. *msumen CERTINED MAIL OFFICER res: - I Complete items 1 2, and 3. I Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. i. Attach this card to the back of the maiipiece, or on the front if space permits. - \0 '3 Agent El Addressee B. lamented Name) C. Date of Delivery 1. Article Addressed to: meet: {my 5752er J. 60606". 3337 Gamma?! w) mew/Neva}! ID a. 400W 9590 9402 2752 6351 9961 06 e. is deiive?r ?aEidr??-Zs 12' titres If YES enter deityenL Articiebiumher ?g t?ee? mean acne suae eaeef Tummy MailExpresse asewic'?- Type- UAduit Signature El Registered Mailm dull Signature Restricted Ei Registered Mail Restricted EiCe?i?edM Delivery Qg{ti?ggi_ Maii? Hest?ptgd gg?very El eturn ngelgt for 1:1 c'u'iieqtbp beliygty Ei Co?egt- gri Restricted Delivery Signature Cen?rmation'? Insured Mail i3 Signature Continuation Ei- insured Mei! Restricted Deiivery Delivery (over r$50 00) PS Form 381 1, July 2015 PSN 7530-02-030?9053 Domestic Return Receipt . I Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 53 of 73 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP MCI-NORFOLK P.0. BOX 43 . NORFOLK, MA 02056 DATE: August 13, 2013 FROM: . - Robert Beauchamp T0: Inspector General RE: Withholding of Highly Dept. of Justice Damaging Information_ 950 Ave., NW About John Kerry from Washington, D.C. 20530 the 0.3. Senate by - Officials Enclosed is a pre?publication copy of a report I compiled titled STONEWALL, which will be published in early 2014. This report details and documents the links between John Kerry's con? cealed bisexuality, and three major federal crimes committed by Massachusetts officials and civilians (see "Opening Statement"/ STONEWALL p1 for preliminary summary). Although officials were well aware of this Kerry in? formation, they withheld it from the 0.3. Senate after President Barack Obama nominated then Senator John Kerry to become secret? ary of state. These officials include Boston FBI ASAC Noreen Gleason, USA Carmen Ortiz, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, Attorney General Eric Holder et al. Absent this withholding, it is highly probable that thg. 0.8. Senate would not have confirmed Kerry. Therefore, it is now incumbent upon your office to expeditiously initiate a cred? ible investigation into my'well?documented allegations. Lastly, as I am not presently asserting any copyright priv? ileges to STONEWALL (l75pp), your office may make whatever hum?x ber of copies are reduired for the investigation, White House officials, media at 31. Thank you for your.time and consideration. will await your response. - BY: Priority Mail USPS Tracking No. 9505 5109 5745 3226 3789 43 RB.42 Case Document 59 Filed'05/22/18 Page 54 of 73 RB . 43 US. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Investigations Division 1425 New York Avenue NW Suite 7100 Washington, D. C. 20530 August 29, 2013 Robert Beauchamp W33990/MCl?Norfolk Post Office Box 43 Norfoik, MA 02056 Dear Mr. Beauchamp: The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge?receipt of your correspondence dated August 13, 2013. The Investigations Division of the Office of the inspector General has thoroughly reviewed the material and concluded that the issues raised do not warrant an investigation by this of?ce. Accordingly, this office wiil take no further action regarding your correspondence and considers the matter closed. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your concerns. Sincerely, Of?ce of the lnspector General Investigations Division Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 55 of 73 RB.44 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP P.O. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 DATE: September 18, 2013 FROM: Robert Beaucham T0: Inspector General RE: Request For 'Dept. of Justice "Thorough Review" 1425 New York Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20530 On August 13, 2013, I sent a cover letter (see attached) and enclosed a prenpublication copy of my book? STONEWALL (175 pp) to the DOJ Inspector General. This mailing was received by the 10's office on August 19, 2013. STONEWALL details_and ex? tensively documents a conspiracy officials to withhold highly damaging information about then Senator John Kerry from the 0.8. Senate after President Barack Obama nomin? ated Kerry to become secretary of state (see attached "Opening Statement"). -On August 29, 2013, some unidentified bureaucrat in the 18's office sent me a form letter purporting that, "The Invest? igations Division of the Office of the Inspector General has thoroughly reviewed the material and concludes that the issues raised do not warrant an investigation by this office"f?see ae? tached). - It is patently beyond belief.that the 10's office could possibly have "thoroughly reviewed" STONEWALL in just 2 work? ing days, especially given the extraordinary seriousness of the ethical and statutory yiolations alleged against dfficials. Once STONEWALL is publiShed in 2014, it will undoubtedly generate a-major congressional investigation, and the integrity of the IG's office will then become a significant issue. To avoid this scenario, I would request that STONEWALL now be (in reality) "thoroughly reviewed" by the 10's office. Thank You! - c: Senator Ted Cruz Senator James Inhofe Senator Rand Paul Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 56 of 73 . - ROBERT BEAUCHANIP RB - 45 P.O. BOX 43 - NORFOLK, MA 02056 December 11, 2014 Mr. James B. Comey Director of the FBI 950 Washington, D.C. 20535~0001 RE: Secretary of State John Kerry's Concealed Bisexuality Violations of Federal Criminal Statutes Dear Director Comey: On November 6, 2014, I sent, by Priority Mail/ Certified No. 7012 3460 0003 3493 6481/ Return Receipt Requested, a pre? publication copy of my report, STONEWALL (100pp) to attorney Jonathan Lyons at Curtis Brown, Ltd. in New York City. WALL eXtensively details and documents the links between Sece:_ retary of State John Kerry's concealed biSexuality and three major federal crimes committed by Massachusetts officials et a1. (exemplar paginated pages attached hereto) (see also my book, Given the attached evidence there exists a virtual 100% certainty that MA DOC officials intercepted my legal mailing to attorney Lyons, and transmitted it to FBI officials.' As a result of this illegally obtained evidence, the FBI has evidently initiated a clandestine investigation into Secretary Kerry, DA Marian Ryan et a1. Ironically, it had been my intention to submit a prepub~ lication copy of STONEWALL to the FBI in early December once I had an opportunity to conference with attorney Lyons (who, of course, never received my mailing). Additionally, I am not asserting any copyright privileges to STONEWALL so the FBI may comply with any FOIA requests for a copy if/when the Kerry/Ryan et a1. investigation becomes public knowledge. In closing, I am now willing to cooperate with FBI of? ficials in their probe of Kerry/Ryan et a1. Therefore, it is Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 57 of 73 1:13.46 unnecessary (and probably inadvisable) for the FBI to have MA DOC officials pirating any more of my legal mail. Sincerely, Pff?tb?lt ?8?de Robert Beauchamp Street, Apt. Na; amuse/ewe. ?1351 A City; State, c: Mr. Jonathan Lyons Attorney at Law. El" Postage CURTIS BROWN, LTD. Cem?edm ?3 Fleium Receipt Fee Ci (Endorsement Required) in! -. '3 Restricted Delivery Fee . 3M ?fd??r?f?p BY: Certified Mail No. 7011 3500 0001 3960 6907 Tommgemes 45 .. ?Return Receipt Requested 88?? I 2 $265,176 Meadb?e? Jamie's? ea, laser-.0001 coMPLETEITi-ris'secriom om astigm- i- - . as?; DE R: COMPLETE ems SECTION Complete items 1. 2. and 3. Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. 13 Agent Print your name and address on the reverse Addresses so that we can return the card to you B. Received Printed Name C. Date of Delive Attach this card to the back of the mailpieoe, 3; or on the front if space permits fn/F? is deIiVery address different from item 1? Yes 1' Article Addressed to' If YES. enter delivery address below: CI No at?. Mega" ewes . 74ng 70:5) El Priority Mall Express" El Registered El Return Receipt for Merchandise 9520;125:000} E3 insured Mail El Collect on Delivery 4. Restricted Delivery? (Em?ra Fee) Yes 35GB E?ll]? (Transfer from service labelJuly 2013 Domestic Return see-.- i. Case Document 59 ""Filed 05/22/18 Page 58 of 73 SECTION 2 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 59 of 73 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP 13.0. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 January 9, 2017 Mr. RobErt Bethel Inspector?in~Charge UNITED STATES POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE 465 Summer Street Suite 600 Boston, MA 02210?2114 Dear 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) 6.). Politically Motivated Theft of Mail Mr. Bethel: The following: On September 2, 2016, I sent a letter AmnestyIntEInationaLCAdl)by certified mail no. ?007 02203 0004 5029 6255/ return receipt requested (A.2). On September 22, 2016, I sent a letter to the Norfolk, MA postmaster stating that I had not received the "green,-re? turn-receipt requested card for the above certified mail? ing" (A.3). On October 6, 2016, the Norfolk, MA postmaster sent me a postfit stating that the USPS "cannot validate delivery? of my 09.02.16 letter to Amnesty International (A.3), and enclosed a refund form for me to_sign (A.4). On October 22, 2016, the Norfolk, MA postmaster sent me a postwit requesting the "original Lcertified mail) rem ceipt" (A.5). On October 25, 2016, I sent the original certified mail receipt to the Norfolk, MA postmaster, and requested that s/he "refer this matter to the 0.8. Postal Inspection Ser? vice as a likely theft of mail" (A.5). On November 15, 2016, I sent a letter (w/attachments) to FBI Director James Comey re. the subject matter of my 09. 02.16 letter to Amnesty International, and the likelihood that the theft of this mailing was committed by FBI agents (NYC office) (A.6, A.7). Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 60 of 73 7.) On December 5, 2016, I sent a letter to the Norfolk, MA post? master inquiring "as to when I will receive my refund and when I will be contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspection Ser? vice" (A.8). 8.) On December 6, 2016, the Norfolk, MA postmaster sent me a re? fund of $7.78 (A.9), on how to file a complaint with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service" 9.) On December 10, 2016, Ia??ilthe Norfolk, MA postmaster a let? ter informing him/her that, am unable to call 800 numbers or to go online." Furthermore, I stated, would again re? quest that you refer this theft of mail to the and copied my letter to FBI SAC Vincent Lisi and Mark Toner, a staff person at the U.S. Department of State As of January 9, 2017, I still have not been contacted by the USPIS notwithstanding the extraordinary politicaleegal gravity of this matter. Additionally, I mailed around 200 copies of the en? .closed "Report Release" to various media from July to mideecember 2016. However, notwithstanding the extraordinary political/legal gravity of the information summarized in the enclosed "Report Re? leasef" I did not receive a single response from any of the media at al. that I mailed this release. Obviously these mailings were stolen. Finally, if the attachments to_this letter and the enclosed "Report Release" do not cenvince'yOu of'the extraordinary politi~ cal/legal gravity of this matter, I have also enclosed a copy of my January 3, 2017 letter/attachments to U.S. Senate Majority; Leader Mitch MCConnell. Therefore, I am requesting that you expeditiously order USPIS officials to initiate an investigation of the theft of my 09.02.16 letter/attachments to Amnesty International, and the theft of my "Report Release" mailings to the media at al. Thank You! Sincerely, . . Robert Beauchamp BY: Priority Mail Certified Mail No. 7007 0710 0005 4636 8086 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 61 of 73 ROBERT BEAUCHAMP P.O. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 September 2, 2016 Amnesty International 5 Penn Plaza New York, NY 10001 RE: Secretary of State John Kerry's Concealed Bisexuality Linked To Politically?Motivated Wrongful Imprisonment Dear Amnesty International: In late July 1998, my attorney, Eugene McCann, reiterated to Middlesex County (MA) ADA Thomas O'Reilly my earlier commune ication that I was aware of then U.S. Senator John Kerry's homo? sexual relationships with former Middlesex DA John Droney and George Reissfelder, who was my codefendant (escape case), lover _.and _Gardner Museum robber (S4, SB, 326). . .1 In retaliation, ADA 0' Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cu- nis conspired, while acting under color of law, to violate my federal civil rights in contravention-bf Title 18 U.S.C. ?242 by submitting false evidence to the jury times. As the re? sult, I was reconvicted of second degree murder (558?562). Sub? sequently, in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015, the Middlesex 5 office submitted last?minute, lie- filled oppositions so that I would be denied release from prison by the complicitous Massa? chusetts Parole Board (863?570). Recently, my report, STONEWALL was published. This report, inter alia, extensively details and.highly documents the above?summarized assertions. (Internet profiles and exemplar pages attached) - Given that John Kerry will only remain as U.S..secretary of state for about 4% months more, I am respectfully requesting that Amnesty International expeditiously assist me in making my status as a political prisoner publicly known. I believe that such pub- lic knowledge would force-Middlesex DA Marian Ryan to quickly ?file a motion to vacate my conviction, which was obtained by prosecutorial criminality. Thank You! Sincerely, - BY: Certified Mail No. 7007 0220 0004 5029 6255 Return Receipt Requested RObert Beauchamp Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 62 of 73 CHARGES .. $5 BEWED TO YOUR ACCOUNT FOR AIR FOREIGN LETTER p4 SPECIAL DEL. RECEIPT REQ CERTIFIED STGTEFV WWCER mean n?nu su?q E255 Pasiage 2 . Certi?ed Fee Heium Receipl Fee (Endorsement Required} m" ,u 030525 ?2 A ?age- 5933925: Delivery Fee {Endorsement Required} Total Postage Fees or PO Box No. [5300/ Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 63 of 73 ?/42 03, MAIL d?mca?/k/gjm) ZUIIMLD We; pigmg gm; '70 gwEe ??evwe My ?eas/ate (ML Hg??Ig/Jraosor: ?eZe?I/ PT OF 7WIJ 90?; Qabcyi? ?Emaz?aw/ September 22, 2016 Dear Postmaster, 7mm. heath see?=1" easel A.3 72:: MAR: ENCCOJEID If For?! you, "1?0 Ilsa) you U. 5; Postal. Semcem CERTIFIED RECEIPT (Dames?c Mai! any; No Insurance Coverage Pquded) 95:} 13;? 25 Postage Certi?ed Fee Ftetum Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery (Endorsement FEequ. red) Tot'al Postage a Fees or PO Box No. I did not receive the green, return receipt requested card for the aborewcertified mailing. As I need legal proof of receipt, would?you please send me a tracking print?out showing the date that Amnesty International received my mailing? Thank You! Robert Beauchamp MCI?Norfolk P.O. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 I0- 6 I0 MK, Emae/La/m/J, [jent_ H?bf' b??bd??iox we! U?le as 25"? ?aw/?Lie Itwt Imam-?L {Lame we Lat/:49? Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 64 of 73 unrest} STATES Application for Refund of Fees, arid Withdrawal of dusterner Accounts erompany Name Apt. or Suite No. State an 493) Telephone No. include area code} demotion Deanne-Dunn Customer Account or Postage Meter No. Pg?m7/? [?e/MAMMf/gz H. re Date of Pequest {MM/013nm Your information Will be used to process and respond to your transaction. Collection is authorized by 39 USC 401. 403, 404. 407. 411. 2098 31 USC 7701. Providing the information is voluntary. but ifnot provided. we may not process your refund request We do net disclose your information to third parties without your consent. except to facilitate the transaction. to act on your behalf or request. or as legally required. This includes the following limited circumstances: to a congressional of?ce on your behalf; to ?nancial entitiesre'garding ?nancial transaction issues: to a US. Posts! Service auditor; to entitie_s._inclu_d_ing law enforcement, as required by law or in iegal proceedings: and to contractors and other entities aiding us to ful?ll the service (service providers). For more information regarding our privacy policies. visit uspscomricrr?vacypoir?cy. Request Disbursement For: (Seiecithe appropriate cox) Post Of?ce Postage Meter-Pm Error (Arc 509; (if actual postage meter label is attached, no witness signature is required.) Refund for Postal ServiceTM Related Products sea) (err, merchandise) Re?rnd Postage and Fees {his 553} Refund Miscellaneous Non-Postal Service Revenue - 624} {Extra services not rendered, e. 9.. Coriri?ied Matti?, Registered Mad?, (P GWGUSW recorded W0 1,26) Deliver Con?meffonm-J Priority lviail Express? Refunds (MC 676} El SpoiledIUnused Printed Customer Meier Postage (NC 526) (Postage and fees for service fafiure rendered) (Legibie postage meter stamps must be submitted to USPS.) Sure on ey? Refund (NC 545i646) issued Refund Of Permit Postage and Fees (me 523} Withdrawai from Advance Deposit Account (Alt:- 4701453) [1 Close Account Partial Refund Other Refunds Postage Added on BRM Pieces i3 Damaged Mailings. Refund of Annual Fees DUB Refund of Fees and Retail Services 535) (PO Box keys and service fees) Explanation: Value Added Services (A16 541) - Refunds to mailing agents that perform value I added service and submit?rnali at discounted rates. This refund will require the Customer TIN Customer Tax identi?cation Number (V i N). or Approved Amount of 0le serumjidenas Post (3ch ZIP 4 Finance Number and Unit Telephone No. (inciude area code) - riots: Customer signature required in Part 1. ate Certifying Employee Signature Date Witness Signature - 1 no? 7aqn_n1_nfin?9932 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 65 of 73 DATE: TO: FROM: Postmaster October 25, 2016 Norfolk, MA 02056 /9 MCI?Norfolk P.O. Box 43 L/ij %ybd3b%? Norfolk, MA 02056 Certified Mail No. 7007 0220 0004 5029 6255 FEED. 446/ Per your above req?est, I have attached below the original certified mail receipt. Given that the mailing.I sent to Amnesty Internatu ional on September 2, 2016 could have generated a political firestorm during the presidential camp? aign (see attached cover letter), I do Egg believe that mailing was inadvertently lost by the post office. Therefore, please refer this matter to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service as a likely theft of mail. Thank You! O: file g3 :iires an egreg?lb e1: Postage 36 ?3 ?$1373 5? Cerli?ed Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 5 Ax? Iii.) 290%, .4 Restricted Delivery Free (Endorsement Required} Tot'al Postage Fees ?00? mean Dunn sn?e has; or PO Box No. Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 66 of 73 ROBERT no. BOX 43 NORFOLK, MA 02056 November 15, 2016 Mr..James Comey RE: Sec. of State John Kerry's Director of the FBI Concealed Bisexuality NW False Imprisonment Washington, D.C. 20535 FBI Criminal Acts Dear Director Comey: (1.) On September 2, 2016, I sent a letter/attachments to Amnesty International. I asserted that Middlesex County (MA) ADA Thomas O?Reilly and ADA (now Judge) David Cunis conspired to violate my federal civil rights by framing me for murder. Their motive? to retaliate against me for threatening to ex? pose Kerry's homosexual relationships with former Middlesex DA John Droney and George Reissfelder, who was my lover, codefendant (escape case) and Gardner Museum robber (SECTION-1). (2.) On or about September 3, 2016, I believe that FBI agents (NYC office)_stole my mailing to Amnesty In? ternational to prevent public disclosure Of no. 1 supra and-criminal acts by FBI officials involved in the Gardner Museum art heist investigation. (SECTION 2) Given your recent sabotage of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the FBI's egregious conflict of interest in my case, I would respectfully request that you appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the above/attached. Thank You! Sincerely, 'Robert Beauchampi BY: -Certified Mail No. 7015 1520 0000 8224 6706 Return Receipt Requested Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 67 of 73 IVIAILJNG CHARGES DATE if 5? [5 Mm 906 EWBEAWMF tht/ - ween TO YOUR ACCOUNTFOR THE - AIR FOREIGN 3 SPECIAL DEL 111 at RET. RECEIPT REQ. PKG- SIGNED MAIL OFFICER SENDER: COMPLEIE THIS SECTION I Complete items 1, 2, and 3. I Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you. I Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. Sent To M61 074m Gouge? [Pei-t? Street andApt N0. {f at 11193 . xii; it": a: Certified Mail Fee .. . Extra Services 8? Fees {choc-khan addfee as appropriate} I 2 B?etum Recelplmardcopsd Mud-w." Unetum RecolpHeleclronic} ?s :3 Postmark Certi?ed Mail Restricted Deliver Here EIAduit Signature Required DMutt Signature Restricted Delivery GHQ Hf Pasta 34 9 (?lit we; Wet/Mara) 1?1 Total Postage and Fees .6 2:55: at i7?? Ln Marmara, 02 as"; r?T p. I as my 'zz?Iy s: ?gg?f?m? Z) (3 2053,51 000' ES Fort-n ?3800, Instructions 5 THIS SECTION 0N DELIVERY - A. Signature Ci Agent I i Addressee Date el/iveryl X. ?eceiv by M?igj/z Mg?? 1. Article Addressed to: M3 :mHe?j com 53 awed-me oe'?e F637 4'50 ?ax/um yew 4V3, ma) lW?tsmnerw); 9?6 2053?:? Ill I El5?il3l Wm]; ??cll 51bit M155 MI I Article Number (Transfer_ from service iabe0_ gvnme Lean DUDE Beau Etna: PS Form 3811,April2015 PSN 7530-02-000-9053 D. ls delivery address different from item 1? Yes it YES enter detivery address below: No 3 Service Type Priority Mail Expresse [3 Collect on Delivery [3 Coltect on Delivery Restricted Detivery [3 Insured Malt . Ci insured Mall Restrioted Delivery (over $500} XAdult Signature El Registered Mail? El Adult Signature Restricted Delivery Registered Malt Restricted Certi?ed Mali? Delivery Certi?ed Mail Restricted Delivery El Return Receipt for Merchandise Signature Confirmation?! El Signature Con?rmation Restricted Delivery Domestic Return Receipt- . Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 68 of 73 DATE: T0: December 5, 2016 Postmaster Ndrfolk MA 02056 FROM: '7qb0nutijz?anau?aan RE: Robert Beauchampl. MCI?Norfolk P.O. Box 43 Norfolk MA 02056 Certified Mail No.' 7007 0220 0004 5029 6255 On October 25, 2016, I sent you a letter with the original certified mail receipt (per your request) so that the USPS could process a refund of $7.78 (plus the 3 stamps I've used writing to you about this matter) (see attached). To date, I have not received a refund. Additionally, I requesteithatyoumie?erthis matter to,the U.S. Postal Inspection Service as a likely mail." (see attached) To date, I have not been contacted by the U.S. Postal InspeCtion Service. Therefore, please inform me as to when I will receive my refund and when I will be contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service. I thank you for your time and attention to this matter. c: file Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 69 of 73 DUIVIWIUNVVEALI [1 ur MADaAbnua?l Ia DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTDN MCI NORFOLK ate: Inmate Income Receipt ReceiptiiI 31405087 15titution MCI NORFOLK lnit 2-2 Hock: 211 :ommit W33990 lame BEAUCHAMF, ROBERT 'ype Of Transaction; ML - Mail late of Transaction 20161206 iource Money ?ftiet- External Contact \mount 7.78 :omme'nts .POSTMASTER NORFOLK Cdrzent Balances Personal Savings ?13359]; Sentence Fees Restitution Fees Loan Amount 1,433.16 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Case Document 59? Filed 05/22/18 Page 70 of 73 United States Postal loopection Service HOME ABOUT US INVESTIGATIONS PRESS ROOM Home Contact Us File a Complaint FILE A COMPLAINT Report these issues to the LLS. Postal Inspection Service online: a Mail fraud May include scams or deceptive ads via the mail, or postage fraud. a Mail theft Under Where is My Package, enter the tracking number or select No and then click on Continue and enter all applicable information. a identity theft . a Unsolicited Sexually Oriented Advertising It you believe you're a victim of fraud related to the. LLB. Mali, including mailed - sweepstakes, lotteries, on-line auctions, work?at?home scams or chain letters. report your concern to the U.S. Postal Inspection Service as mail fraud. I All information is voluntary, but the more you provide, the more likely it is that We can help you. We may share your information with other agencies it it comes under their jurisdiction. See the Privacy Act Statement for more details. This site uses secure methods to transfer data. The Postal Inspection Service will contact you only it more information is needed. We gather data on mail-related crime to determine whether a violation has occurred. While we can?t guarantee we can recover lost money or items. your information can help alert Postal Inspectors to problem areas and possibly prevent others from being victimized. Inspectors base their investigations on the number, substance and pattern of complaints. We ask you to keep all original documents related to your complaint. ll you prefer to file your complaint over the phone, please call USPS Report problems with mail delivery or service to the 3.8. Postal Service. EMPLOYMENT Page 1 of 1 A310 CONTACT US It?! ACCESSIBILITY i FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT i PRIVACY POLICY 5 U.8. POSTAL SERVICE 1-877-8?6-2455 F2 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 71 of 73 A.11 Dr: DecEmber 10, 2016 T0: Postmaster RE: Certified Mail No. Norfolk, MA 02056 7007 0220 0004 5029 6255 Theft of Mail FR: Referral to USPIS Robert Beauchamp/W33990 Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 On December 5, 2016, I sent you a letter inquiring when I would receive my refund of $7.78 for the above?referenced stolen 'mailing On December 7, 2016, I received the refund. I had also inquired as to when I would be contacted by the Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) as I had Specifically re? quested that you refer this theft to the USPIS in my October 25, 2016 letter to you (A.1). However, in response, you sent me an informational sheet, which directed that complaints to the USPIS be made via number or online (A.2). As I am a prisoner, it.shou1d have been patently obvious to you that I am unable to call 800 numbers or to go online! Additionally, I also received a letter back from you that I sent to Mark Toner at the 0.3, Department of State (USDOS), with a sticker attached to the envelope. The-sticker stated, "Returned for Postage, Stamps are void when coated, covered, taped, defaced or reused." The stamp on that envelope did E9: fall into any of the sticker's categories. As the theft of my September 2, 2016 mailing to Amnesty Intern national concerned a highly sensitive legal/political matter in~ yolving*U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry (A.3), the return (for no legitimate reason) of my mailing to USDOS staffer Mark Toner may well constitute an attempt to obstruct justice on your part. Therefore, since the theft of my September 2, 2016 mailing to Amnesty International was (in all likelihood) committed by an USPS employee at the behest of FBI officials, I would again request that you refer this theft of mail to the USPIS. . Thank You! W. ?1 . get? t. -e 3 W. gram ?vefaaearpyid?ms c: Amnesty International . . . ii 452:5, 2 FBI SAC Vincent L181 Staggi?e??lta ESE Mark m- Postage 3" Certi?ed Fee E3 . Return HecaipiFea 1: (Endorsement Required} Restricted De?ve Fee 3 (Endorsement He?ir?d} :3 Total Postage 5 Fees E, W?gm S?aet, Apr. Na; orFO BoxNo. S- Kai/92 ?9 ahckroh/k?A?VJAQ?DX 1 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 72 of 73 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1, Robert Beauchamp, intervenor/pro se, depose and say that on May 16, 2018, I placed in the 0.3. mails, postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the aforegoing "Motion Of Robert Beau? champ To Intervene" (w/attachments) addressed to the lead attor? ney for movant Michael Cohen and the lead attorney for the United States Attorney's Office/SDNY as follows: Mr. Joseph B. Evans, Esq. McDermott, Will Emery, LLP (NY) 340 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10173 AUSA?kmdn&aMdchelle Griswold United States Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint New York, NY 10007 .25? w?flm-r 29,6? Robert Beauchamp Intervenor Pro Se MCI?Norfolk P.O. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 May 16, 2018 Case Document 59 Filed 05/22/18 Page 73 of 73 DATE: May 16, 2018 T0: Office of the Clerk UOS. 500 New District Court Pearl Street York, NY 10007?1312 FROM: Robert Beauchamp Intervenor/Pro Se MCI?Norfolk P.0. Box 43 Norfolk, MA 02056 RE: In the Matter of Search Warrants Executed on April 9, 2018 Enclosed herein for filing in the abovewreferenced case is the original of a "Motion To Intervene Of Robert Beauchamp" (w/attachments) and "Certificate of Service" at end. BY: Joseph B. Evans, Esq. AUSA Andrea M. Griswold Certified Mail Nos. 7016 1370 0000 8279 9611 9590 9402 2752 6351 9972 64 Return Receipt Requested