EXHIBIT E-6 Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments Chicago, Illinois Elevator Assessment 4227 S. Oakenwald Prepared for: Chicago Housing Authority c/o Globetrotters Engineering Corporation 300 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 By: Syska Hennessy Group, Inc. Consulting + Engineering + Technology + Construction Date: August 25, 2015 Syska Hennessy Group, Inc. 330 N. Wabash Ave., Suite 1505 Chicago, IL 60611-3586 Tel: 312.450.6302 Fax: 312.893.5505 www.syska.com Table of Contents Section Page No. I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................1 II. GENERAL DATA ON THE PROPERTY AND VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ................4 III. CODES, LAWS AND REGULATIONS ..................................................................................5 IV. DETAILED ELEVATOR OBSERVATIONS AND COMMENTS.....................................................6 V. PERFORMANCE REVIEW ..............................................................................................12 VI. MAINTENANCE REVIEW ................................................................................................14 VII. DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................16 VIII. SURVEY PHOTOGRAPHS ..............................................................................................20 Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page i August 25, 2015 I. Executive Summary A. B. Introduction: 1. The following is an independent assessment of the passenger elevators located at Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments, 4227 S. Oakenwald, Chicago, Illinois. The audit was conducted on August 24, 2015 by Michael Eden, Associate Partner of the Syska Hennessy Group. 2. This report will provide recommended maintenance, adjustments and upgrades in order to improve reliability, serviceability, safety, operation, appearance and performance. The report will also include budget pricing and lead-times for the recommended scope of work. 3. The elevator system consists of two overhead geared traction passenger elevators, originally manufactured by Otis Elevator Company. 4. The elevators were modernized in 2002 by Mid-American Elevator Company. It appears that all original equipment was replaced at that time, with exception of the car and counterweight guide rails, car sling and platform, counterweight frame, machine beams, and entrance frames and sills. All operational components appear to have been replaced. Findings: 1. With approximately 13 years of use, we found the operating equipment in very poor condition. This appears to be the result of a lack of proper maintenance, repair and adjustments and not a result of heavy use, wear or age. Normally, we expect to get 20-25 years of use from the major operating components before considering the next modernization. 2. The hoist cables for Elevator No. 1 show signs of heavy rust, likely a result of the nearby window type air conditioning unit blowing condensation onto the cables. The hoist cables are now undersized and must be replaced. 3. General housekeeping and cleaning of equipment is inadequate, with heavy amounts of rust and oil covering the hoist machines and heavy dirt and debris on car top and hoistway equipment. 4. Performance times are very slow, with an exceptionally slow final slowdown and leveling time, slow door close time and long door dwell time. See the Performance Review section of this report for details. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 1 August 25, 2015 5. C. The elevators lack the most current safety code enhancements, including ascending car over-speed and unintended car movement protection. Recommendations: 1. While a complete modernization would have a significant impact on the quality operation of these elevators, we recommend considering having the current elevator maintenance company address all noted deficiencies in the Performance Review and Maintenance Review sections of this report. If all noted deficiencies are properly addressed and the existing door operator for each elevator is replaced with a new model MOVFR door operator, we believe these elevators should provide quality service for at least 7-10 more years before requiring a complete modernization. The cost of correcting most deficiencies should be included in the current maintenance agreement. The cost to replace the existing door operators with new G.A.L. model MOVFR door operators is approximately $20,000.00. Additionally, we recommend replacing the existing window type air conditioning units with a new mini-split, ductless air conditioner. The lighting directly above, in front of and behind each elevator controller is very dim. We recommend the installation of new T8 fluorescent lights with protective bulb guards. 2. If a decision is made to move forward now with a complete modernization of the elevators, we recommend replacing the following major components: Controller, selector, door operator and related landing door equipment, roller guides, cab interior finishes, signal fixtures, traveling cables and all wiring. The hoist machines, over-speed governors, safeties and buffers are recommended to be retained and refurbished. Please refer to the Detailed Recommendations section of this report for additional details. a. Budget Price: $420,000.00 to $430,000.00, including one-year warranty maintenance and related building work. b. Lead Times: i. Shop Drawings/Cut Sheets: 5 weeks from award of contract ii. Drawing Review: 2 weeks iii. Fabrication/Delivery: 12-14 weeks from approved drawings iv. Installation: 12 weeks per elevator Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 2 August 25, 2015 D. Benefits of a Complete Modernization: 1. Improved reliability. 2. Improved performance. 3. Improved door operation. New VVVF-AC closed-loop door operators provide smarter, smoother, more consistent door operation, capable of automatic adjustments due to changing conditions. 4. Enhanced Safety. Current safety code requirements including Ascending Car Over-Speed and Unintended Car Movement Protection and the latest version of fire recall operation would enhance the safety of the elevators. 5. Improved appearance. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 3 August 25, 2015 II. General Data on the Property and Vertical Transportation Systems A. The facility is a 14-story residential building served by two passenger elevators. B. The elevators are the geared traction type, using an electric driving machine located overhead to raise and lower the elevator car. The power from the hoist motor is transmitted to the drive sheave through a worm and gear system. A mechanically applied friction brake is part of the machine. C. The elevators were originally manufactured and installed by Otis Elevator Company at the time of building construction. The elevators were modernized in 2002 by Mid-American Elevator Company. D. In the following table, general data is provided on the elevator systems, as existing: Identification: Type: Use: Original Manufacturer: Existing Controls: Rated Capacity: Inside Car Size: Rated Speed: Floors Served: Stops/Openings: Operation: Controller Power Supply: Machine Type: Machine Location: Motor Horse Power: Drive Type: Door Operator Model: Car & Landing Door Type: Door Opening Size: Door Protection: Car & Cwt Guide Rails: Guide Type: Main Car Station: Auxiliary Car Station: Direction Lanterns: Firefighter’s Service: Elevator Control Panel: Emergency Power: Cab Communication: 1 Electric Traction Passenger Otis Elevator Company MCE VVMC-1000 2500 lbs 4’-5”w x 6’-0”d +/200 fpm 1-14 14 front only Duplex 208 VAC, 3 Ph, 60 Cycle H-W Geared model 54OH Direct Overhead 15 (AC) VVVF-AC G.A.L. Single Speed, Side Opening 3’-0”w x 6’-8”h Multi-beam detector 15# Car, 8# Cwt Roller Applied type No Car Riding Lanterns Yes Yes Yes Pushbutton Activated Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment 2 Electric Traction Passenger Otis Elevator Company MCE VVMC-1000 2000 lbs 5’-9 ½”w x 3’-6 ½”d +/200 fpm 1-14 14 front only Duplex 208 VAC, 3 Ph, 60 Cycle H-W Geared model 54OH Direct Overhead 15 (AC) VVVF-AC G.A.L. Single Speed, Side Opening 3’-0”w x 6’-8”h Multi-beam detector 15# Car, 8# Cwt Roller Applied type No Car Riding Lanterns Yes Yes Yes Pushbutton Activated Page 4 August 25, 2015 III. Codes, Laws and Regulations A. Codes, laws and regulations applying to this study are as follows: 1. Chicago Building Code 2. The American National Standard, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, ASME A17.1-2007 3. The American National Standard, Safety Code for Existing Elevators and Escalators, ASME A17.3-2005 4. American National Standard Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities (ICC/ANSI A117.1) 5. American Welding Society (AWS) D1.1 - Structured Welding Code Steel 6. Illinois Accessibility Act 7. American Disabilities Act - ADAAG published in 28 CFR Part 36 Federal Register 8. Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) Note: When replacing elevator controls, the entire elevator system and related structure must comply with current code requirements. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 5 August 25, 2015 IV. Detailed Elevator Observations and Comments A. Machine Room Area and Components 1. The elevator machine room is located directly above the hoistways and is accessed from interior stairs and a vertical ships ladder. The machine room access door is code compliant; however, the door must be modified to have self-locking operation with lock that cannot be manually defeated. 2. We noticed various pipes (Photo 1) in the machine room that appear to carry water. In order to meet current safety code, these pipes must be enclosed or have a drain pan mounted below them. 3. The existing machine room lighting fails to meet the minimum code required illumination level of 200 lux (19 fc), measured throughout the machine room floor. We recommend the installation of new two new T8, double 4’ fluorescent light fixtures placed directly in front of and behind the existing elevator controllers. 4. We noticed an existing wall mounted fan to the outside air. The machine room lacks proper air conditioning for microprocessor controls. In order to meet microprocessor temperature requirements of 55 to 85 degrees Fahrenheit, 85% non-condensing. We recommend replacing the existing window type air conditioners with a new 3-ton minisplit unit. 5. The existing mainline power supply and 110 VAC supply disconnect switches (Photo 2) are the Heavy Duty type and may be retained. We were unable to determine if they contain a proper building ground wire. Each disconnect switch must be properly labeled. 6. The machine room is equipped with proper GFCI outlets. 7. The machine room is equipped with a proper fire extinguisher. 8. We did find a smoke detector inside the machine room that appears to be used for automatic elevator fire recall operation. We did not notice the three signal modules required in the machine room, including primary return, alternate floor return and fire hat signal for current code compliance. The elevators must be connected to an approved fire alarm system, with necessary signals and wiring brought to the elevator controllers at the time of modernization. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 6 August 25, 2015 9. 10. 11. Hoist Machines: a. Each elevator is raised and lowered with a Hollister-Whitney geared hoist machine (Photo 3) with foot mounted AC drive motor. The hoist machines were replaced in approximately 2002. b. Despite a lack of proper maintenance, the hoist machines appear to be in reasonably good condition and may be refurbished as part of a modernization. c. The hoist machines should be sealed from oil leaks and the housings should be cleaned free of rust and debris, as part of the current maintenance agreement. The hoist machine for Elevator No. 1 should be cleaned free of rust following hoist cable replacement. d. At the time of controller replacement, each elevator requires a new HollisterWhitney rope brake for compliance with current safety code. Control System: a. The elevators are controlled with Motion Control Engineering’s (MCE’s) model VVMC-1000 PTC microprocessor controls (Photo 4) with flux vector AC drive. While the control system appears to be in reasonably good condition, at the time of modernization, we recommend its replacement with a new system, including the latest safety code enhancements. b. In order to provide a high quality control system with minimum life expectancy of 20-years, we recommend the installation of new MCE model Motion 4000 controllers. Governors: a. A governor (Photo 5) is used to activate the car safeties in the event of an over speed condition. The governors are in good condition and are recommended to be retained and refurbished. b. The governors should be thoroughly cleaned as part of the current maintenance program. c. Test tags mounted at each governor indicate that required annual (Category 1) testing is current, having last been performed in March of 2015. Required 5-year (Category 5) testing is also current, having last been performed in July of 2013. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 7 August 25, 2015 d. B. Full load, full speed testing will be required at the time of modernization inspection. Hoistway and Components 1. The hoistways are constructed of concrete block and appear to be in good condition, requiring only minor patching. 2. Elevator No. 1 is equipped with a deflector sheave that deflects the hoist ropes from the hoist machine drive sheave down to the counterweight. The deflector sheave appears to be in good condition and is recommended to be retained and refurbished. 3. The existing car slings and platforms appear to be in good condition and are recommended to be retained. 4. Safeties mounted to the bottom the car sling are used to stop the car in the event of an over speed condition while the car is traveling in the down direction. The safeties appear to have been replaced with new Hollister-Whitney safeties in 2002. These safeties should provide quality service for at least 20 more years and are recommended to be retained and refurbished. 5. The car and counterweight for each elevator is suspended with four 5/8-inch diameter traction steel cables. The hoist cables for Elevator No. 1 are rusty and undersized (Photo 6), requiring immediate replacement. 6. The existing car top inspection stations operate properly and may be retained. 7. The car top access panel lacks a proper electrical shutdown switch. A shutdown switch must be added at the time of modernization. 8. The elevators are not equipped with a car top railing system. In order to meet current safety standards, a car top railing system must be added at the time of modernization. 9. The existing G.A.L. door operators (Photo 7) show signs of heavy wear and a lack of proper maintenance. The existing door operators should be thoroughly cleaned, worn belt on Elevator No. 1 should be replaced and the operators should be lubricated and adjusted for smooth operation, meeting performance standards. We recommend the replacement of existing door operators with new VVVF-AC, closed-loop door operators for improved performance and operation. We also recommend the installation of new car door tracks, hangers and clutch with a mechanical door restrictor. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 8 August 25, 2015 C. 10. The existing landing door tracks, hangers, closers, interlocks and door guides are in reasonably good condition and may be retained and refurbished as needed. 11. The existing counterweight frames are in good condition and have sufficient space to add additional counterweight. The counterweight roller guides (Photo 8) of inferior design, show signs of rust and recommended to be replaced at the time of modernization. 12. The existing car roller guides (Photo 9) are filthy and of inferior design. These guides should be thoroughly cleaned and lubricated. At the time of modernization, we recommend the installation of ELSCO model B car roller guides. 13. The car and counterweight rails are in good condition and are recommended to be retained. 14. There are a few conduit junction boxes without covers at the front right side of the hoistway for Elevator No. 1 (Photo 10) that require proper covers to conceal wires. 15. All wiring and traveling cables must be replaced at the time of controller replacement. Pit and Components 1. The pit area is presently accessed from the first floor entrance by sending the car to the 2nd floor and picking the door interlock with a door release key or by moving the car with an access keyed switch. 2. The existing pit ladders do not meet current safety code and must be replaced at the time of modernization. Current code requires that pit ladders extend 48-inches above the lowest entrance sill and a clearance of 4-inches is required from the rung to nearest obstruction. 3. The pit area for each elevator is equipped with a sprinkler (Photo 11); however, there is no sump pump or drain. At the time of modernization, the Elevator Bureau will either require the installation of a new sump pit and sump pump with proper cover and connected to a single non-GFCI outlet or will require the removal of the pit sprinkler. 4. The existing pit light for Elevator No. 1 is not functioning and lacks a proper light switch. The pit light for Elevator No. 2 works; however, the light switch is very low and must be raised for current safety code compliance. At the time of modernization, we recommend the replacement of existing incandescent pit lights with new T8 fluorescent lights, including proper bulb covers. 5. Each pit is equipped with a duplex GFCI utility receptacle, as required by code. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 9 August 25, 2015 6. D. E. The existing car and counterweight spring buffers (Photo 11) appear to be in fair condition and may be retained and refurbished. Cabs and Operating Fixtures 1. The existing cab enclosures (Photos 12) are in fair condition, but new interior finishes are recommended at the time of modernization. There are numerous interior finishes available within a wide price range. 2. The car operating panels (Photo 13) are in reasonably good condition, but must be replaced to comply with current fire service requirements. The existing panels lack the required fire service cabinet and it is not feasible to modify the existing panels to include the required cabinet. We recommend the installation of new ADA compliant car operating panels with vandal resistant LED illuminated pushbuttons, digital car position indicators, emergency lights and pushbutton activated telephones. 3. The existing car riding lanterns (Photo 14) are not working properly. The right (Car Operating Panel Side) down direction lights and both right and left up direction lights for Elevator No. 1 are burned out. The left (Car Operating Panel Side) up and down direction lights and 2 of 8 right up direction lights are burned out. At the time of modernization, we recommend the installation of new vandal resistant car riding lanterns with adjustable direction chimes. 4. While code does not require voice annunciation for elevators traveling at or below 200 fpm, we recommend the addition of voice annunciation for floor arrival and car direction, as this is a very beneficial feature for senior residents. Elevator Lobbies 1. The existing landing entrance frames and doors are in reasonably good condition. 2. The existing entrance jamb Braille plates meet ADA requirements and may be retained. 3. The existing hall stations comply with ADA guidelines; however, we recommend the installation of new fixtures matching the new car pushbutton design for aesthetic purposes. 4. There is an existing digital type hall position indicator at the 1st floor for each elevator. These fixtures may be retained. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 10 August 25, 2015 5. Approved fire initiating devices must be provided at each elevator lobby and connected to an approved fire alarm system with signals brought to the elevator machine room. Further investigation is required by a fire alarm professional to verify the adequacy of the existing fire alarm system for code required Elevator Recall Operation. 6. Proper Elevator Identification signs must be added to each entrance to meet code requirements. 7. The existing phase-1 fire recall switch located at the first floor must be replaced for current code compliance. 8. The existing high-rise elevator control panel must be modified, including new fire recall switch for current code compliance. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 11 August 25, 2015 V. Performance Review A. Speed Test: The actual speed of the elevator car was measured in both directions of travel without full load. The actual measured speed of the car should be within 10% of rated speed in each direction for traction elevators. No adjustments are required. Elevator ID 1 2 B. 1 2 Rated Speed, in FPM 197 199 214 199 200 200 Measured Up 19.7 18.5 Measured Down 19.0 17.0 Recommended Time 11.2 11.2 Floors Measured 13-14 13-14 Ride Quality: Ride shall be smooth and quiet without rumbles, bumps, vibrations, and excessive sway. Elevators were evaluated on experience with similar installations and compared to industry standards. A = Acceptable U = Unacceptable. No adjustments are required. Elevator ID 1 2 D. Measured Down Speed Floor-to-Floor Times: Measured with no load from the start of the door close until the door is 3/4 open at the next floor level. Measurements are in seconds. Variations of 2.0-seconds are generally acceptable. Highlighted times require adjustment. Elevator ID C. Measured Up Speed Vibration A A Noise A A Acceleration, Deceleration, Stopping and Floor Leveling: Acceleration and deceleration should be smooth without noticeable transition. Leveling should be within 1/4-inch of floor level for traction cars. Deceleration and leveling times are extremely slow and require adjustment. Elevator ID 1 2 Acceleration A A Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Deceleration U U Leveling A A Stopping A A Page 12 August 25, 2015 E. Door Open and Close Times: Door open is measured from the start of door open until fully open. Door close is measured from the start of door close to fully closed. Variations of .5 seconds are acceptable. Measurements are in seconds. Highlighted times require adjustment. Elevator ID 1 2 F. Door Open (Front) 2.5 2.4 Std 2.4 2.4 Door Close (Front) 4.3 4.0 Door Close (Rear) N/A N/A Std 3.4 3.4 Door Dwell Time (Car Calls): Door dwell time is measured from when the car door is fully open, until the door starts to close. Measurements are in seconds. Excessive door dwell time will cause longer average waiting time. Minimum Code allowable setting is 3.0-seconds. Highlighted times require adjustment. Elevator ID 1 2 G. Door Open (Rear) N/A N/A Car Call Dwell Time 3.6 6.5 Recommended 3.0 - 5.0 3.0 - 5.0 Nudging: This feature shall close the doors at a reduced speed and sound a buzzer when the doors are prevented from closing due to failure of the proximity device or an obstruction in the doors. Measurements are in seconds. These elevators are set up to sound a buzzer, but stand open after 60-seconds. This time should be reduced to 20-seconds. Elevator ID 1 2 Front Opening 60 60 Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Rear Opening N/A N/A Standard 20 20 Page 13 August 25, 2015 VI. Maintenance Review A. The following deficiencies are in need of correction to insure optimum equipment safety, reliability and performance. Unless otherwise noted, all the items listed are covered under the terms of most full maintenance agreements and are therefore the assumed to be the responsibility of your service provider to correct. 1. 2. 3. Deficiencies Applicable to Both Elevators: a. Seal all hoist machine leaks and thoroughly clean the machine housing. b. Clean car top and related equipment free of dirt and debris. c. Clean and lubricate counterweight roller guides. d. Thoroughly clean, lubricate and adjust door operators to provide smooth operation meeting required performance standards. e. Adjust floor to floor performance times to meet performance standards. Adjust slow deceleration and leveling time. f. Adjust nudging timer to sound buzzer after 20-seconds of elapsed door reversal time. g. Replace burned out car riding lantern bulbs. Elevator 1: a. Renew the hoist cables and clean surrounding equipment, including machine bedplate and governor free of all rust. b. Replace missing selector box cover. c. Replace worn door operator belt. d. Replace missing conduit junction box covers near pit, in hoistway and in overhead area. Elevator 2: a. Replace non-functioning cab interior fan. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 14 August 25, 2015 b. 4. Adjust car call door dwell time to under 5.0-seconds. Recommended Work by Building: a. Repair non-functioning pit light for Elevator No. 1. b. Add additional lighting in front of and behind existing elevator controllers. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 15 August 25, 2015 VII. Detailed Recommendations A. Submit the Performance Review and Maintenance Review sections of this report to the current maintenance provider, requesting they complete all required corrective work. B. Short Term Solution: C. 1. Consider obtaining a proposal to replace the existing G.A.L. door operator with new model MOVFR door operator, with adjustments meeting noted performance standards. Budget Estimate: $20,000.00 2. Consider replacing the two window type machine room air conditioners with a new 3-ton mini-split system. Budget Estimate: $25,000.00 3. Consider adding additional lighting in front of and behind each elevator controller. Budget Estimate: $2,500.00 Long Term Solution: Proceed with preparation of bid documents for the complete modernization of both elevators, including the following scope of work for each elevator: 1. Refurbish existing Hollister-Whitney geared hoist machine. 2. Provide a new code complaint rope brake. 3. Provide a new MCE model Motion 4000 control system with VVVF-AC drive. 4. Replace the existing landing system. 5. Refurbish and test the existing governor. 6. Provide a new car top escape hatch electrical shut-down switch. 7. Provide a new car top guardrail system. 8. Replace the door operator with a new G.A.L. model MOVFR closed-loop door operator. 9. Replace the car door tracks, hangers and door guides. 10. Replace the car door clutch with new zone lock type. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 16 August 25, 2015 11. Replace the multi-beam door detector. 12. Replace the landing door tracks, hangers, closers, interlocks and door guides. 13. Replace the car and counterweight roller guides. 14. Provide a new load-weighing device. 15. Replace traveling cables and wiring. 16. Refurbish and test the existing flexible guide clamp safeties. 17. Provide new top and bottom hoistway access stations. 18. Replace the existing pit access ladder for code compliance. 19. Replace pit switches. 20. Refurbish spring buffers. 21. Modify cab interior finishes as selected by the owner/architect. 22. Provide a new car operating panel with fire recall cabinet, digital position indicator, emergency cab lighting and pushbutton activated telephone. 23. Replace the car riding lanterns. 24. Provide new voice annunciation. 25. Replace the hall stations. 26. Provide a new fire recall switch at main lobby. 27. Modify the high rise elevator control panel for code compliance. 28. Provide code required features, testing and inspection. 29. Budget Estimate (Elevator Work): a. We recommend a budget of $347,500.00 to cover the aforementioned upgrades on both elevators. This budget price covers labor, materials, tools, equipment, permit fees, warranty maintenance, sales tax, freight, overhead and profit. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 17 August 25, 2015 D. b. Price is based on historical perspective with industry verification. c. Price excludes related work made necessary by these upgrades, including: electrical, life safety and general construction. Related Building Work (To be Sub-contracted by Elevator Contractor): 1. 2. General: a. Modify machine room door for proper self-locking operation. b. Install a pan enclosure below machine room water or drain lines. c. Provide proper machine room air conditioning. d. Remove the existing pit sprinklers or furnish and install a new sump pit and sump pump at each pit, with proper steel cover and single non-GFCI power outlet. Electrical: a. 3. 4. Installation of new fluorescent machine room and pit lighting with light switches at proper location. Fire Alarm: a. Installation of elevator machine room smoke detector(s) with primary floor return, alternate floor return and auxiliary contacts to flash the in-car fire hat, tied to an approved fire alarm system. b. Approved fire alarm initiating devices at each floor with signals brought to the group controller. Budget Estimate (Related Building Work): a. We recommend a budget of $72,500.00 to $82,500.00 to cover the above referenced related building work. Our estimate is broken down as follows: i. General Work: $30,000.00 to $40,000.00, depending on possible sump pit and pump addition. ii. Electrical Work: $2,500.00 Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 18 August 25, 2015 iii. Fire Alarm Work: $30,000.00 iv. Miscellaneous Work & Contingency: $10,000.00 E. Overall Project Budget: $415,000.00 F. Lead Times: 1. Shop Drawings/Cut Sheets: 5 weeks from award of contract 2. Drawing Review: 2 weeks 3. Fabrication/Delivery: 12-14 weeks from approved drawings 4. Installation: 12 weeks per elevator Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 19 August 25, 2015 VIII. Survey Photographs Photo 1 If wrapped pipes carry water a pan must be mounted below for code compliance. Photo 2 Existing disconnect switches are code compliant but must be properly labeled. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 20 August 25, 2015 Photo 3 Hoist machine for Elevator No. 1 covered with rust, oil and debris. Photo 4 Existing MCE model VVMC1000 controller. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 21 August 25, 2015 Photo 5 Existing governor for Elevator No. 1 requires cleaning. Photo 6 Undersized hoist cables for Elevator No. 1 must be replaced. Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 22 August 25, 2015 Photo 7 Existing G.A.L. door operator for Elevator No. 1 is filthy, belt requires replacement and chain requires lubrication. Elevator No. 2 is similar. Photo 8 Existing counterweight roller guides areatrusty, Windows Otis battery cabinet back requiring of shaft must be cleaningup and boarded at lubrication. the time of modernization; unusual round counterweight rails Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 23 August 25, 2015 Photo 9 Existing car roller guides require cleaning. Photo 10 Open junction box requires cover. Windows Otis battery at cabinet back of shaft must be boarded up at the time of modernization; unusual round counterweight rails Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 24 August 25, 2015 Photo 11 Existing inferior car roller guides. Existing sprinkler without sump or drain. Photo 12 Existing sump pump for Elevator No. 1. Windows Otis battery at cabinet back of shaft must be boarded up at the time of modernization; unusual round counterweight rails Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 25 August 25, 2015 Photo 13 Existing cab enclosure. Photo 14 Existing car operating panel. Windows Otis battery at cabinet back of shaft must be boarded up at the time of modernization; unusual round counterweight rails Vivian Gordon Harsh Apartments – Elevator Assessment Page 26 August 25, 2015