TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report slim we; 3L: Report (Sun) Iomeemwaa- HAUBOLD, THOMAS lApproved by:11793 - CARBAJAL, STEVEN A Date Occurreo:Mar.1e201a (Sun) Time:2200 ILatest Possible Date: lTime: Location of Occurrence: MILL AVE IE CURRY RD TEMPE District: Beat: 2 Grid: 0702 Domestic Violence: No ILoss: lDemage: [Recoveredz Offense: #1 ACCIDENT-FATALITY - COMPLETED hmm: Mme; giggle . VICTIM 1 - HERZBERG, ELAINE MARIE Sex:- Racez- DOB- Height- Weight. IHair- Eyes - Address: Home at: [Work lCelI Employer: Employer Address: Driver's License Social Security SUBJECT 1 - DALY, SHARON Sex: Female Race: WHITE Height:5'08 Weight2241 I Employer: Employer Address: Driver's License Social Security SUBJECT 2 - WOOD, SHEILA Sex: Female Race: WHITE DOB- Height: Weight: lHair: Eyes: Address Home Wort-c Fell! Employer: Employer Address: Driver's License #2 Social Security DRIVER 2 - VASQUEZ, RAFAEL STUART Sex: Male Race: WHITE DOB- Height:5?0? Weight:180 Address Home lWork ICeil Employer:UBER Employer Address: Driver?s License Social Security iize? was} 'Tioaliegmijgs Seized for Evidence #1 - 2017 Volvo X69 License Plate: Miscellaneous Information: I License State: Arizona 1w! Style: 4BR AUTOMOBILE Color: Gray TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report s68 ff: 51:13:! e?iit?lhn?i? dams: Weiss he Document: ORIGINAL OFFICER NARRATIVE Author: 22491 - LOEHR, KYLE Related Daterrime: Mar?212018 (Wed.)2236 Subject: INTERVIEW, DRIVER BODY WORN CAMERA WAS USED THROUGHOUT MY INVOLVMENT IN THIS INVESTIGATION. ALL FOOTAGE WAS DIGITALLY UPLOADED TO On 03/18/18 at approximately 2340 hours, I was called out to a fatal Uber vehicle vs bicyclist collision near Mill Ave/S Curry Rd, Tempe. I arrived on scene at approximately 0011 hours and met with Sergeant Carbajal #11793 and VCU Detective Haubold #11638, who advised me that there was a fatal collision between an autonomous Self Driving Uber vehicle and a bicyclist. I was requested to contact the Uber's 'Safety Driver', interview her, and check for impairment. I located the safety driver, identified via - as (SIRAFAEL STUART VASQUEZ (RAFAELA) in a Ford crossover parked in front of the scene. It was relayed to me that VASQUEZ was in her supervisor's vehicle and was cooperating with Police. I activated my AXON Body Worn Camera and contacted VASQUEZ. The following is not verbatim and not intended to act as a transcript. For complete details, refer to footage. VASQUEZ advised she was willing to submit to tests to ensure she was safe to operate a vehicle. VASQUEZ followed me to a level, smooth, flat portion of sidewalk on Curry Rd just east of Mill Ave. I observed no sway, and no gait ataxia as VASQUEZ walked. I noticed VASQUEZ's eyes appeared clear, as did her face. VASQUEZ's speech also sounded clear as she spoke, and she could articulate her thoughts clearly with no issues or delay. VASQUEZ advised me that she is prescribed the but had not taken the medication that day. VASQUEZ also adViSEd She takes for a When asked if VASQUEZ had consumed alcohol that day, VASQUEZ advised me she does not drink alcohol. VASQUEZ also advised she had not consumed cannabis in "years". VASQUEZ stated that she was non?diabetic, had no illnesses, had no recent head/eye injuries, had no physical disabilities, was uninjured (besides general soreness from the seatbelt lockini uill and VASQUEZ advised me that she had woken up for her day at 1100?1130 hours after 6?7 hours of sleep. VASQUEZ advised me that she had driven to Tucson to visit her father, and drove back home prior to her shift starting. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?101er . mam ass-.3: VASQUEZ advised she arrived at work at 1830 hours and hit the street between 1945?2000 hours. I then used my illuminated green colored pen light as a stimulus for HGN testing. VASQUEZ exhibited no resting nystagmus, had equal pupil sizes, and had equal tracking. During the test, VASQUEZ exhibited none of the validated clues of impairment. I then checked VASQUEZ for VGN. VGN was not present. I then checked VASQUEZ for Lack of Convergence. When I brought the stimulus towards nose, she successfully tracked the stimulus inward, exhibiting the ability to converge her eyes. During the tests, I noticed that pupils appeared to be normal in size per our current lighting conditions. When I shined my LED Flashlight into her eyes, they reacted appropriately to the lighting by constricting with no obvious delay. When VASQUEZ closed her eyes, I observed no eyelid tremoring. During a Rhomberg Modified Test, VASQUEZ estimated 30 seconds in 38 times seconds, and displayed no muscle tremoring and no sway as she stood. Lastly, I measured VASQUEZ's pulse using her left radial pulse point. VASQUEZ's resting heart rate was measured at 86 bpm, which is within the DRE Average Range. Based on my training and experience, I made the determination that VASQUEZ was not impaired. I received my police training at the Mesa Police Academy, which I graduated from in June 2014; that training included a block of DUI investigation. After the police academy, I entered the field training phase where I received additional training in DUI investigations while having an experienced Field Training Officer observing and providing further instruction. I also attended a class instructed by DPS where I obtained my certificate to operate the Intoxilyzer 8000 in October of 2014. In April 2015 I attended and successfully completed a 24?hour HGN course (final exam and practical wet workshop) instructed by Yavapai County. In June 2015, I became certified in HGN after showing proficiency during a second practical wet workshOp hosted by Scottsdale Police Department. In July 2015 I attended and successfully completed the A.R.I.D.E. program hosted by the Phoenix Police Department. In September 2016 I attended and successfully completed DRE School hosted by AZDPS and Phoenix Police Department. At 0047 hours, I sat alone with VASQUEZ inside Care 7's van. I read VASQUEZ her Miranda Rights verbatim from a department issued card. VASQUEZ advised she understood her rights and would willingly answer my questions. Post Miranda, VASQUEZ advised me that the Uber Vehicle she was operating at TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ans: w: the time of the collision was in "autonomy" or automatic mode. VAS UEZ stated that she - in any way leading up to the collision. When asked where her hands were, VASQUEZ advised me that her hands where "hovering" over the steering wheel. When asked what she meant by that, VASQUEZ held her hands in front of her and told me to imagine a steering wheel directly in front of her. hands where at the imaginary steering wheel's 5-O'clock and 7?O'clock positions with her palms facing up and her hand in a shape, as if she was prepared to grab a steering wheel at a moment's notice. VASQUEZ stated that prior to the collision, the vehicle had successfully passed its diagnostics, and was operating with no issues. I asked VASQUEZ to walk me through how she put her car in autonomy mode. VASQUEZ stated that prior to placing the vehicle in autonomy mode, the vehicle does diagnostics and ?into the system. Upon passing the diagnostics, and VASQUEZ stated that if the vehicle sensed any issues with its instruments during its Operation, the vehicle would kick her out of autonomy mode. VASQUEZ stated she was'in autonomy mode for "quite a while". VASQUEZ stated that her vehicle was programmed for a circular route that took her northbound on 8 Mill Ave across to the north side of the Mill Avenue Bridge to Curry Rd, where she goes eastbound to Scottsdale Rd and then north into the City of Scottsdale. The route then takes her back southbound into Tempe, where it repeats. VASQUEZ stated that she was on her 3rd lap around this route, in autonomy mode, and was traveling northbound in the curb lane of Mill Ave, just south of where a northbound R1 lane opens?up for traffic turning eastbound onto Curry Rd. At that point, VASQUEZ advised her vehicle struck a bicyclist, later identified as ELAINE HERZBERG. VASQUEZ stated the vehicle was traveling straight, and was not making a lane change at the time of the impact. VASQUEZ stated that immediately after her vehicle struck HERZBERG, VASQUEZ slammed on her vehicle?s brakes sto VASQUEZ then stated she immediately attempted to call 9?1?1. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :agxe'w11wga'wmw VASQUEZ stated that HERZBERG had "came out of no?where" and that she did not see HERZBERG at all prior to contact. VASQUEZ also stated that HERZBERG was perpendicular to the roadway, as if she was crossing the road mid?block, not in a crosswalk. VASQUEZ was unable to articulate which direction HERZBERG was traveling at the time of my interview with her. My interview with VASQUEZ was video/audio recorded. Refer to recording for more details. I was then requested to perform a body examination on HERZBERG with Crime Scene Photographer Cynowa #15781, at Scottsdale Osborn Hospital. Officer Santana #22953 was on scene with HERZBERG's body. I took notes on what injuries I observed on HERZBERG, while Cynowa photographed. For more details, refer to Evidentiary Photos. To reSpect HERZBERG's body, I did not utilize my AXON Body Worn Camera during this body examination. During the examination, I observed the following obvious injuries: Bruising and abrasions across HERZBERG's stomach Abrasions across right hip and right ribs Abrasions across right outer forearm Obvious fracture with torn skin to right humerus Abrasions left inner thigh Abrasions left outer thigh Obvious lower extremity deformity right and left side Abrasions left elbow Abrasion under chin While performing the evaluation, I noted slight lividity and blood settling. The Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Officer later took custody of body and would performed an autopsy at a later date/time. For complete details of HERZBERG's injuries, refer to autopsy notes/documents. This concludes my involvement in this incident. For more details, refer to Supplemental Reports, Original Reports, and Accident Reconstruction associated with this incident. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ass: 1a masses; . alalrmli?ezs . -, .. .an Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATIVE Author: 21782 - SCHARRER, JAMIE Related Daten?ime: Mar-182018 (Sun.)2201 Subject: COLLISION FATALITY EVIDENCE On 03/18/18, at approximately 2201 hours, I was dispatched to a female subject who was laying face down in the street possibly involved in a collision with injuries just north of N. Mill Ave. and W. Washington St., Tempe, AZ. Dispatch then updated the incident occurred on N. Mill Ave., just south of E. Curry Rd. I arrived on?scene when I saw Officer J. Guajardo standing near Tempe Fire Fighters who were performing CPR and treating a female subject with blonde hair who was across some of the traffic lanes. I then started contacting vehicles which were stopped nearby attempting to locate the involved driver and any witnesses. I was then directed to the involved vehicle with the collision which was a self?driving Uber vehicle, a Volvo SUV bearing I contacted the driver who seemed confused and was later identified by their as Rafael Vasquez. Vasquez explained they thought they hit a person while driving, but the vehicle was actually being operated in self?drive mode. Vasquez explained they were not controlling the vehicle since it was automatically driving and they did not realize they hit someone. Vasquez then expressed after they stopped they realized they hit someone. I told Vasquez their vehicle had damage and did hit a person on a bicycle. I had Vasquez retrieve their license, registration, and insurance. I remained on?scene providing security and helping direct traffic during the rest of the investigation. For more information, please refer to the original narrative and all other supplemental narratives. This report is only a summary and for further details, please refer to the video recording of my investigation which was later uploaded to evidence.com. Photographs were taken and later uploaded to evidence.com. This concludes my involvement in this investigation. Pending (301.169 arch-apt" em?? if: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report amaavatannes- -, gnxaianmlamsr .. . - 1. .. . 1+ Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATIVE Author: 22953 - SANTANA, EDGAR Related DateITime: Mar-182018 {Sun,)2349 Subject: Evidence On 03?18?18 at 2200 hours, I responded to the intersection of Mill Ave. and Curry Rd. Tempe, reference an accident. Notes on the call stated there were injuries and a person who was riding a bike was now laying on the road. Upon arrival, I made contact with other officers on scene who were collecting information from the parties involved. I made contact with Tempe Fire Medical Rescue who advised the victim was unconscious and was being transported to Scottsdale Osborn Hospital. Tempe Fire and Medical Rescue Engine 276 A?shift Captain Williams was on scene and Medic 276 conducted the transport under Run# 18?103021. Once at Scottsdale Osborn Hospital Trauma Dr. Hu provided further medical treatment and pronounced the victim deceased at 2230 hours. The medical staff documented injuries as I was present. I requested assistance from Tempe Police Sergeant Breen to identify the victim using the fingerprint reader. The fingerprint reader provided a name of Elaine Marie Tony which returned as no record through police databases. I tried running the name on - and it provided the name of Elaine Marie Herzberg which showed an MVD photograph matching our victim. I searched - once again for tattoos they may have been documented through previous contacts with Elaine. I found a photograph of a butterfly in a triangle located on Elaine's left shoulder blade. It should be noted the victim Elaine had the tattoo seen in the photograph on her body. I stood by with Elaine until Officer Loehr and ID Tech Cynowa arrived at the hospital to conduct a body exam. This concludes my involvement in the incident, see all other Tempe Police officer narratives for further information. I later uploaded a video taken by my body worn camera as evidence into evidence.com. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ac} is cum/v1 ?of mam semi waging-s [as '6 Author: 23599 - Related DatefTime: Mar-192018 (Men) 211 Su?em: On 03?18?2018 at approximately 2204 hours, I responded to the area just south of N. Mill Ave. E. Curry Rd. on the northbound lanes in Tempe reference an accident with injuries. Comments on the call stated there was a person with a bicycle laying in the road. Upon arrival, I observed a female who appeared to be unconscious laying on the road. I attempted to get a response from the female who was laying on the ground with no success. I observed her bicycle damaged on the road just north of her with all her property spread out around her. The Tempe Fire department (TFD) arrived on scene and began treating the victim. As TFD was conducting chest compressions, TFD ambulance arrived on scene transported the victim to Scottsdale Osborne hospital. I contacted the involved vehicle which was a grey marked self?driving Uber Volvo I observed damage to the front passenger side of the vehicle. Inside the vehicle on the driver seat was Rafael Vasquez who appeared to be scared and in shock. As I contacted Rafael, I was not able to detect any signs of impairment. I asked Rafael if he would be able to tell me how the incident occurred which he appeared to be confused. Rafael then stated the Volvo was self?driving and he was not in control at the time of the collision. Rafael stated the vehicle was traveling northbound on N. Mill Ave., from the Mill avenue bridge, in the lane closest to the bike lane. Rafael stated as the vehicle approached the 'right turn only? lane, the vehicle hit the victim who was on the bike. Rafael stated he did not see the victim prior to the collision. Rafael stated the vehicle's speed would have been going the Speed limit as it is programmed prior to the collision. This concludes my involvement in this investigation. My involvement was captured on my body worn camera which was later uploaded as evidence to evidence.com. For complete details of this investigation, refer to the original report under this IR. PENDING TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report see 3:3} the? ?553.53 rum aha]? 83538133) .3331} his be?ilmq - . . \7 'o 3.3.3.132 .. -: xx Author: 14616 - MORIARTY, TIMOTHY Related DatefTime: Mar-212018 (Wed.)943 SuMect On 3/20/18 at approximately 1430 hours Detective Ramos and I responded to the Tempe Police Apache Substation located at 1855 E. Apache Blvd., Tempe, to meet with Sgt. Carbajal, Detective Kelly, and Detective Haubold regarding a fatal accident investigation. The accident occurred on 3/18/18 and involved a pedestrian who struck by an autonomous Uber car while crossing the roadway in the area of Mill Ave and Curry Rd., Tempe. Detective Ramos and I were tasked with locating Rafael Vazquez (aka Rafeala Vazquez) who is an Uber employee seated in the driver seat of autonomous vehicle at the time of the accident. Detective Kelly needed to locate Vazquez to conduct a follow up interview and to seize the cell phones in Vazquez's possession. The address Vazquez provided during the initial investigation was found to a bad address and Detective Kelly's attempts to locate Vazquez ended with negative results. Detective Kelly had obtained a search warrant, 2018?002912, to seize Vazquez's cell phones. Through investigative techniques, Vazquez was found to be staying at a Sgt. Carleton, Detective Ramos, and I went to in an attempt to locate Vazquez. While at Vazquez was found to be staying in At approximately 2157 hours on 3/20/18 Sgt. Carleton, Detective Ramos, and I contacted Vazquez at Vazquez was informed that a search warrant was obtained to seize the cell phones in her possession. Vazquez was shown a copy of the search warrant and complied with the warrant. Vazquez turned over two LG cell phones in her possession. One cell phone was an LG MP450, with a silver case and the other cell phone was an LG M5550. with a black case. The cell phones were seized as evidence and Vazquez was provided a copy of the search warrant and a receipt for the two cell phones seized for the search warrant. I attempted to conduct a post Miranda Rights interview with Vazquez regarding the accident. However, Vazquez stated she was advised by her attorney not to answer questions. Sgt. Carleton, Detective Ramos, and I recording the service of the search warrant on our body worm cameras. The recordings were uploaded as evidence. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report we c) was On 3/21/18 at approximately 0020 hours the two seized LG cell phones were placed in a temporary evidence locker, locker #24, at the Tempe Police Hardy Substation located at 8201 S. Hardy Dr., Tempe. On 3/21/18 at 0730 hours I removed the seized cell phones from the Tempe Police Hardy Substation and took them to the Tempe Police Headquarters located at 120 E. 5th St., Tempe. At approximately 0815 hours on 3/21/18 I turned over the cell phones to Detective Barutha for a Forensic Analysis. See the original report and all related supplements for further details regarding this investigation. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ear?Tabasnis??nmas . . shameless; elements}? was? .. 7 . 1? J??w Larisa-Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATNE Author: 18382 - RAMOSALBERT Related DatefTime: Mar-222018 (Thu.)2232 Subject: On at approximately 1350 hours I was contacted by Sergeant M. Carleton who advised me to respond to the Tempe Police Apache Substation to assist Detective B. Kelly of the traffic unit. I reaponded to the Tempe Police Apache Substation and met with Detective Kelly at approximately 1450 hours. I was provided a search warrant to seize all cellular phones that Rafaela Vasquez had in her possession. Through investigative means I learned that Vasquez has family and a previous address in Tucson. Additional information obtained revealed that Vasquez may be as The address for is At approximately 2140 hours Sergeant M. Carleton, Detective T. Moriarty and I arrived at and spoke with the front desk employee. I showed the employee a photo of Vasquez and provided her name. The employee advised me that Vasquez had previously been in but got moved to - after complaints of her television not working. Sergeant Carleton and Detective Moriarty responded to and contacted vasquez. Once there they served the warrant to obtain her cell phones. I retrieved Vasquez's physical copy of search warrant 2018?002912 and went to - Upon arriving at the motel room I activated my body worn camera. I turned the copy of the search warrant over to Sergeant Carleton who provided it to Vasquez. Vasquez complied with the warrant and obtained two LG cell phones. Vasquez turned the phones over to me but asked me to obtain information out of them for her. She input her passcode and to allow me access and then asked me to retrieve her dad's phone number and her lawyer's phone number. I did not ask Vasquez any questions about the accident due to her stating that her lawyer advised her not to talk to the police about it. The phone's were turned over to Detective Moriarty. Refer to Detective Moriarty's report for the specifics of the warrant service and the disposition of the cellular phones. On at 2330 hours I returned the search warrant to Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Lori Ash. This concludes my involvement in this investigation, refer to the attached reports for further details. TENIFDE- . l5.? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :mI I'm MW TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?sea :s as 1-. mm - iiftgtate'utairlt sis-ate; .ifpij?tjg?gzr frag ?33; Assigned to:15781 - CYNOWA SR, JAMES Assigned on: Mar?192018 (Mon) 402 Capacity:Supplemental Completed2Yes Approved on:03!232018 Approved LAURA Narrative Text #1 Document: LABIFORENSICS RESULTS Related Date?'ime: Mar-202018 (Tue) 1213 Notification: 011 Sunday, March 18, 2018, at 23:00 hours, I was contacted by Tempe Police dispatch, and asked to respond to Mill Avenue and Curry Rd. Tempe, Arizona, to assist the Vehicular Crimes Unit with a fatal accident investigation. Arrival/Brie?ng: I arrived at 23:50 hours, I observed the curb lane of 1101111 bound Mill Avenue closed to traf?c. I was briefed by Detective T. Haubold #11638 and learned the following. The decedent identi?ed as Elaine Herzberg DOB was crossing Mill Avenue mid?block from the west to east, when she was struck by a Gray Volvo XC 90 Arizona license?Uber vehicle traveling north bound 011 Mill Avenue in the curb lane. Scene processing: Using my Nikon digital camera, approach and overall photographs were taken. (Refer to photographs 1-45). Photographs were taken of the following placarded items. (Refer to photographs 46-81). . Marks on the roadway . Marks 011 the roadway . A white handle from a water jug and a towel on the east sidewalk . Marks 011 the roadway . Marks 011 the roadway . A blood stain on the roadway . A white lid from a water jug 011 the east sidewalk . The bicycle in the roadway . A blue water jug in the grass on the east side of the road 10. The Uber vehicle 11. A shoe in the roadway Photographs were taken of the position of the bicycle to the vehicle. (Refer to photographs 82-101). Detective Haubold requested I respond to Honor Health Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center located at 7400 E. Osborn Rd. Scottsdale, Arizona to photograph the decedent. I left the scene at 02:05 hours. I arrived at Scottsdale Osborn at 02: 17 hours, I met with Of?cer K. Loehr #22491. and was directed to trauma room #54. PM TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at)? r: arm-Ema? .tigiaaihzms? 3mm: gx'urrirrerar?? With the assistance of Of?cer Loehr photographs were taken of the decedent and injuries to the right side, right hip, stomach, right arm, left leg, back, left ankle, chin and eyes. I cleared from the medical center at 02:50 hours. Upon returning to the Forensic Services Unit the photographs were uploaded into Portfolio and Axon. Photograph number 23 was uploaded out of order in Axon due to an error. This concludes my involvement in this investigation. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @263? "(it raililfiteit?i}?ka tr?? Eritrea; A) ?irt? its "Era and P62 Assigned to:19443 - BARUTHA, Assigned on: Mar-202018 (Tue) 1323 Capacity:Evidence Processing Completed:Yes Approved on:04f1 912018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DatelTime: Mar-30-2018 (Fri.) On 3/19/2018 at approximately 0040 hours, Sgt. S. Carbajal contacted me by telephone requesting my assistance with a fatal vehicle vs. pedestrian car accident. Sgt. Carbajal stated the vehicle was an Uber autonomous vehicle driving northbound on Mill Avenue approaching Washington Street in Tempe when the accident occurred. Sgt. Carbajal advised there was a rear?view mirror camera that contained a Secure Digital (SD) card and requested that I write a search warrant to remove the card and extract the video possibly showing the accident contained on it. Currently, I am a Detective within the Tempe Police Criminal Investigations Bureau assigned to the Digital Forensics Unit. At approximately 0130 I arrived at the Tempe Police Headquarters where I began receiving information from Sgt. Carbajal and Det. T. Haubold about the incident to write the search warrant on their behalf. After the search warrant was written, I responded to the Apache Substation located at 1855 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, AZ to fax the warrant to the Search Warrant Center. At 0346 hours, Honorable Lori Ash signed search warrant #2018-002883 which allowed us to remove a SD card containing video of the incident from a rear-view mirror camera that was located inside a 2017 Grey Volvo XC90 four door station wagon registered to a UATC (Uber Advanced Technologies Center) LLC and extract the video. Shortly after writing and obtaining the search warrant I responded to the Tempe Police Property and Evidence facility located at 1875 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, which is located behind the Apache Station. I met with Sgt. Carbajal and Det. Haubold at this location and the current location of the 2017 Grey Volvo XC90. Det. Haubold unlocked the vehicle and allowed me to enter it at approximately 0400 hours. 1 located a Janus V3 commercial grade dash camera located just below the rear?view mirror. On the driver's side of the device was a slot for a microSD. Photographs were taken of the device and the microSD card slot using my department issued cell phone. I removed the SD card and observed it to be a 64GB SanDisk Extreme PLUS. Additional photographs were taken of the SD card. These photographs were uploaded to Evidencecom. The SD card was then taken to the Tempe Traffic Bureau conference room located at the Apache Station. In the conference room I set up my forensic laptop and connected a Tableau T8u Forensic USB 3.0 Bridge to the laptop. This device is a hardware write blocker. Write blockers are devices that allow for the acquisition of information from digital storage media (hard drives, solid state drives, thumb drives, ?ash cards) without creating the possibility of changing the digital content of that media. 1 then connected the microSD card via a microSD to USB adapter to the Tableau T8u write blocker. Using Windows 10 File Explorer to View the contents of the SD 1 located the following in the root directory: EMERGENCY (File folder) TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report eos?a 2.2 1' tea-as). (crates?semi arias airlift 1a EVENT (File folder) LOG (File folder) MOTION (File folder) NORMAL (File folder) OB S-Studio-20.0. 1 -F ull?Installer.exe (Application) Passops_Rev_1 (File) PCManagerInstall-l .6.2.27.exe (Application) setupcfg (CFG File) Upon review of the folders, the video was stored in the NORMAL folder. During this time, Uber representatives were present and were provided with some of the video located in the NORMAL folder to assist with playing and locating the video of the accident. which is the player to play the .kds video ?les was installed and utilized. After reviewing several .kds video files, UTC201 803 9_045552.kds was located. UTC20180319_045552.kds was located at This video ?le showed the accident. Sgt. Carbajal and Det. Haubold were shown the video and provided a copy for additional review. Although I did review the video, please refer to Det. Haubold's repot for further details. Uber representatives kept a copy of the video as well as provided a copy of search warrant #2018-002883. They were also advised that 1 would be impounded the microSD card as evidence. On 3/20/2018, search warrant #2018?002883 was returned and signed by Honorable Melissa Zabor. A copy of the search warrant was impounded as evidence Additional a forensic image was created of the microSD card using EnCase v8.05 and a Tableau write blocker. The microSD card was impounded as evidence (TE321768-1) after the forensic image was created. A copy of the video files along with the forensic image of the microSD card will be saved to a secure, on?site forensic server if needed at a later date. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report new Brasserttm} neutra- .. A 91%th instill/?g station Us 7mm 11%? Assigned to:17225 - KELLY, WILLIAM Assigned on: Mar?202018 (Tue.)1630 Capacity:Secondary Investigator Completed:Yes Approved on:03f26/2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DatetTime: Mar-202018 (Tue) 1633 On 03/19/18 at approximately 0530 hours I was contacted by Sgt. Carbajal requesting I respond to the Tempe Police Substation, 1855 E. Apache Blvd., Tempe, to assist with a fatal collision investigation. I arrived at the station at approximately 0630 hours and Sgt. Carbaj a1 and Det. Haubold explained to me that Elaine Herzberg had crossed outside of a crosswalk in a dark portion of Mill Ave. south of Washington St, Tempe and had been struck by an Uber self-driving vehicle on 03/18/18 at approximately 2200 hours. She was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours at Scottsdale Osborn Hospital. It was further explained to me that Elaine's family had not been identi?ed or contacted regarding this incident. Iwas asked to help identify and locate Elaine's family. At approximately 0640 hours on 03/19/18 I began checking to assist in identifying Elaine's next of kin. Through these? con?rmed that Sharon Daly was Elaine's mother. Sharon's most current known residence was listed as being At approximately 0730 hours I began to drive to Sharon?s residence. I arrived at approximately 0815 hours. I spoke to a male subject on the property and asked if Sharon was a resident. He said she was and agreed to get her for me. When the subject returned from the residence he said Sharon was just waking up and would take a few minutes to come out. I asked if I could enter the residence and he said Sharon was a hoarder and there was no room inside for 11s to speak. At approximately 0825 hours Sharon exited the residence. I asked if Elaine was her daughter and she said she was, I also showed her a current photo of Elaine to verify it was the same person and she said it was. I then advised Sharon that Elaine was deceased and explained how the incident occurred. I offered Sharon resources, including grief courtselor's, but those resources were denied. Sheila Wood, Elaine's sister, was also present at the time of the noti?cation. I provided both of them Det. Haubold's business card and directed them to him for any questions regarding the investigation. On 03/19/18 at approximately 1000 hours I sat in on a brie?ng with Sgt. Elcock regarding the press release. After this meeting I had no involvement in the investigation until Sgt. Carbajal contacted me at approximately 1300 home. At that time he requested that I author a search warrant to seize the Uber driver's cell phone. I was advised the Ubers driver's name was Rafael Vasquez. I then wrote a search warrant to seize from Rafael her cell phone. The search warrant was sent to the Maricopa County Superior Court Search Warrant Center and was signed by Honorable McLaughlin. The search warrant was assigned number 2018002912. I received the signed search warrant via fax at approximately 1445 hours on 03/ 19/18. After receiving the search warrant I tried calling Rafael at? three times, each time the call went immediately to voicernail. I left a voicemail after the ?rst call. At approximately 1450 horu's I responded to the address Rafael had written on her witness statement and provided to officers at the scene at the time of the collision. When] arrived at approximately 1550 hours I noticed an orange Dodge Caliber parked in the driveway with Idaho license plate K491935. I ran this plate and it returned to?. I then attempted to contact the occupant of the residence. After ringing the doorbell a white female, who I recognized not to be Rafael answered the door. I asked if I could speak to Rafael. The female, who was identi?ed as Sherry Delarre, stated TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report saga TE gar was} unaware}: sat-atria trig? Rafael did not live there. She said she had never met Rafael, but believed Rafael was the previous renter of the house. She said she was upset at the fact that Rafael's mail and packages were still delivered to the house. and Sherry had to return them to their senders. She further told me the property was managed by Service Star Realty. 011 03/ 19/18 between 1700 hours and 1900 hours I spoke to Sgt. Carbajal several times regarding what was going to be done to locate Rafael for the purposes of serving the search warrant. Through these conversations he advised me the Tempe Police CAST. was going to respond and attempt to locate Rafael. At 2000 hours I received a phone call from Det. Perkett. I advised Det. Perkett with the information I had regarding what efforts had been made to that point. At approximately 2200 hours I received an email from Sgt. Petersen stated that .A.S.T. had not located Rafael. On 03/20/18 at approximately 0700 hours I arrived at the Tempe Police Apache Substation and began checked to determine if Rafael and Sherry were associates. I wanted to verify that Sherry did not provide false information about not knowing Rafael. Based on all of the databases and websites I checked I found no evidence showing Sherry and Rafael knew each other or should know each other. After checking these databases I checked my email. When I checked my email I saw I had a missed voicemail that was time stamped 03/20/18 at 0304 hours I listened to the message and caller identi?ed herself as Rafael. She apologized for missing my call, and said she would call me on 03/20/18 in between doctor's appointments she was going to. At approximately 0730 hours I attended a brie?ng to determine assignments for the day regarding this case. I was assigned to write a search warrant to obtain digital information from Rafael?s cell phone provider to assist in locating her. I spoke to Det. Perkett at approximately 0920 hours and obtained information about writing this type of search warrant. Det. Perkett emailed me a copy of a sample of this type of warrant which I used to assist in writing the warrant. After reviewing the sample I began writing the search warrant at approximately 0935 hours. I ?nished the search warrant at approximately 1030 hours, but was unable to send it via fax due to the fax machines not working. 011 03/20/18 at approximately 1030 hours I attempted to contact Service Star Realty at but there was no answer. Since I was unable to speak to a representative of Service Star Realty I was unable to determine if they had any forwarding address information for Rafael. At approximately 1243 hours I tried calling Rafaela again. This time the phone rang, but still went to voicemail. I again left a voicemail asking her to call me. As of 1800 hours on 03/20/18 I still had not received a return call from Rafael. At approximately 1325 hours I responded to the Search Warrant Center, I hand submitted the search warrant which was reviewed by Honorable Zabor. Honorable Zabor granted the warrant to track Rafael's phone and signed the warrant. After obtaining a copy of the signed search warrant #2018002982 Iresponded back to the Apache Substation. At approximately 1450 hours I met with Det. Ramos who took over attempting to locate Rafael. I provided Det. Ramos with copies of the original warrant for the cell phone and a copy of the cell phone tracking warrant. Upon review of the cell phone tracking warrant Det. Ramos noticed a minor error in wording of the warrant. I then corrected the warrant and began attempting to fax the corrected warrant and return of the unserved warrant to the Search Warrant Center. Between 1450 hours and 1630 hours I TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ace it; 1H mammal mate you attempted to ?nd a working fax machine at 1855 E. Apache Blvd. At 1630 hours 1 found the fax machine in the Tempe Police Dispatch Center was working and was able to fax the paper work to the Search Warrant Center. On 03/20/18 at approximately 1757 hours I received a phone call from Honorable McLaughlin from the Search Warrant Center. After swearing me in she advised she was signing the warrant and would fax it back. At approximately 181 1 hours I received a fax with a signed copy of search warrant #2018-002991. This warrant was turned over to Det. Ramos to serve on T?Mobile. This concluded my involvement in this case at this time. -Pending- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ears dittle?dh erg streamer: datum: =5 4? mm; Etc on? Assigned 10:19443 - BARUTHA, Assigned on: Mar?212018 (Wed) 916 Capacityfvidence Processing Completed2Yes Approved on:04t1 9/201 8 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DatetTime: Apr-192018 (Thu) 011 3/21/2018, at approximately 0830 hours I received two LG cell phones from Det. T. Moriarty. Det. Moriarty indicated he recovered the two phones from Rafael(a) Vasquez in Tucson, AZ earlier in the morning. The phones were in a clear plastic bag along with the swipe pattern passcode to unlock both phones? -. Det. T. Haubold who was aware the phones were being brought to me for forensic examination also provided to me a copy of search warrant #2018-002912 which allows us to extract and examine the data stored on the phone(s) belonging to Rafael(a) Vasquez. On 3/19/2018, I had been previously involved in this investigation. The search warrant was authored by Det. B. Kelly #17225, and allows us to review all content contained on the phone immediately leading up to and immediately following the collision, which occurred on 3/ 18/2018 at approximately 2200 hours. TE321768-3 LG MP450 Stylo 3 Plus At approximately 0930 hours I began the examination on the phone. The phone was removed from the clear bag. Photographs were taken of the phone utilizing a USB document camera attached to my forensic computer. I noticed the phone contained a SIM card and no microSD card. The phone was also still powered on and had already been placed into airplane mode, terminating cellular network connectivity, preventing remote access to the device. The phone was then connected to Cellebrite's UF ED Touch. Following on-screen instructions, I enabled developer options on the phone to turn on USB debugging. The UFED Touch indicated it could perform a physical data extraction, however, when this extraction method was attempted, it failed and there was an indication the phone was not naming the correct operation system to be able to perform this type of extraction. I then tried to obtain a ?le-system extraction which also failed and caused the phone to reboot several times while attempting to obtain a ?le-system extraction. I was successful at obtaining a logical data extraction. That data extraction was transferred to my forensic computer and loaded into Cellebrite's Physical Analyzer software. ellebrite's Physical Analyzer Software decodes and analyzes the extracted data from the above-mentioned device(s) and allows investigators to sort through call logs, contacts, text messages, application (app) data, images, videos and other data capable of being stored on a cell phone. The software then allows for reports to be generated of your ?ndings and export them in various ?le formats, such as PDF, HTML and UFED Reader. I navigated to the timeline which shows activity for texts, phone calls, images taken in chronological order. I did not locate any artifacts that this phone was being used prior to or during the accident for texts, phone calls. The following video applications and associated user accounts were located on the phone during a manual scroll analysis: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 5, Farleigh? iagiaanta?ntl am ia- instants} mama YouTube (Account email: Hulu (unable to View account details due to an Internet connection is required) Net?ix (Account email: I am unable to determine if any of these video applications were in use at the time of the accident. Most of these applications require an Intemet connection to gain more details and might not store viewing history locally on the device. The Tempe Vehicular Crimes Unit was noti?ed that they would need to reach out the YouTube, Hulu, and Net?ix to see if they retain additional information and if they could provide that information if the necessary legal paperwork was served on them. A Cellebrite UFED Reader report was generated containing basic cell phone information (make/model) and a three phone calls placed. 1 well before the accident and 2 after. None of these phone calls were placed during the accident. After the exam, the cell phone was powered off and placed back into the evidence bag. TE321768-4 LG Style 2 Plus At approximately 105.5 hours I began the examination on the phone. The phone was removed from the clear bag. Photographs were taken of the phone utilizing a USB document camera attached to my forensic computer. I noticed the phone contained a SIM card and no microSD card. The phone was also still powered on and had already been placed into aiiplane mode, terminating cellular network connectivity, preventing remote access to the device. I was able to unlock the device using the same swipe pattem passcode provided to me. I connected the phone to the UFED Touch. Following on-screen instructions, I enabled developer options on the phone to turn on USB debugging. I was successful at obtaining a logical data extraction. That data extraction was transferred to my forensic computer and loaded into Physical Analyzer. I navigated to the Timeline and did not locate any calls, texts. or images immediately before or after the accident. YouTube was the only installed media application that I could locate during a manual scroll analysis. A UF ED Reader report was generated only containing basic information about the phone (make/model). After the exam the cell phone was powered off and placed into the evidence bag. Both cell phones were impounded as evidence. Based on my examination of the two phones, I am unable to determine if the phones were being used prior to or during the accident. I can say that from the information I was able to extract that no calls were being made or text messages were being sent or received. Further follow up would be needed to determine if any of the three media apps were being used that are associated with the user accounts Iliad listed. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as; re arias-2:332: earth-n; It should also be noted that logical extractions were obtained. Deleted information is typically not recoverable during logical extractions. Deleted information can only be recovered during physical data extractions which I was not able to do on these phones due to their operating system version. All data obtained during this investigation will be saved to a secure on-site forensic server if needed at a later date. This concludes my involvement in the investigation. Cell Phone Forensic Equipment/Software Utilized Cellebrite's Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED) Touch device extracts user data from a cell phone, tablet, SIM card and stores the extracted data onto a computer, thumb drive or portable hard drive. The UFED Touch supports the following types of extractions: -Physical extractions ?File?system extractions -Logical extractions card extractions -Password extractions and bypasses The type of extraction will depend on the make and model of the mobile device. Cellebrite's Physical Analyzer Software decodes and analyzes the extracted data from the above-mentioned devices and allows investigators to sort through call logs, contacts, text messages, application (app) data, images, videos and other data capable of being stored on a cell phone. The software then allows for reports to be generated of your ?ndings and export them in various ?le formats, such as PDF, HTML and UFED Reader. Cellebrite Extraction Methods Explained Explained below are the three most common extraction methods. This information was obtained from page 78 of the Cellebrite Certi?ed Physical Analyst Participant Guide. The extraction methods are listed in order from most data obtained to least data obtained. Physical extraction: A bit-by-bit binary image (.bin) of the ?ash memory. Contains ?le system information, user data, hidden ?les, unallocated space and can contain deleted data such as texts, calls images and video. File system extraction: Extracts the ?le system of the device, user data, mobile application data and possible hidden ?les (protected ?les). Logical extraction: Extracts user data from a mobile device (SM S, call logs, pictures, phone book, videos, audio certain application data and more). Based on my experience, sometimes deleted data can be recovered during a logical extraction. A fourth option is manual scroll analysis. This requires the examiner to manually access the data on the device through the device interface (example: touch screen). TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as? award: ?ea whens] saris: agree 0a: $359 Assigned t0220193 - PALMAIOLI, ANGELENA Assigned on: Mar-272018 (Tue.) 1508 Capacity:Supplemental Completed:Yes Approved on2032'28l2018 Approved HEATHER Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related Datel?l?ime: Mar-272018 (Tue) On 3/20/18 at approximately 1954 hours I was tasked with drafting a night?time exception search warrant reference a vehicular manslaughter case that occurred on 3/19/18 in the area ofMill Ave and Washington St, Tempe. On 3/20/18 Search Warrant (2018?0013000) was obtained from the Honorable Jane McLaughlin of the Maricopa County Superior Court after I was sworn in using my department issued cell phone. I was advised on 3/21/18 at approximately 0002 hours by Tempe Police Sergeant M. Carleton that the night-time exception warrant (2018?003000) was not executed due to the daytime warrant having been served. A copy of the signed search warrant and non-executed return was impounded as evidence at 120 E. 5th St., Tempe. Refer to the original report and supplements for further details regarding this investigation. Pending TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report etc}? ii:- amicstil??h. sarcasmsaris. F36) aggro}? "?53 Assigned to:22020 - MCCORMICK, MICHAEL Assigned on: Apr-02-2018 (Mon) 1443 Capacity:Secondary Investigator Completed:Yes Approved 0113410912018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATIVE Related DatefTime: Apr-05-2018 (Thu.)1627 NARRATIVE On 03/20/18 at approximately 0725 hours, I was contacted by Sergeant Carbajal and he requested I respond to the Tempe Police Department's Apache sub?station in order to assist with this investigation. I arrived at the Tempe Police Department's Apache sub-station and immediately attended a brie?ng at approximately 0810 hours. In this brie?ng I was advised I would complete a search warrant on the 2017 Volvo XC90 Uber vehicle in order to image the EDR data from airbag control module. I also learned some basic information about how the collision occurred. 1 also spoke with the lead investigator, Detective Haubold. Detective Haubold provided me with additional information about how the collision occurred. I was also shown the dashcam video footage of the collision which was obtained from the 2017 Volvo XC90. I completed the search warrant and faxed it to the Maricopa County Superior Court search warrant center. At 1125 hours, I was contacted by Superior Court Judge James Rummage on the telephone. I was sworn in and Judge Rummage advised the search warrant was signed, SW2018-002956. This search warrant granted me the ability to image the event and crash data from the 2017 Volvo XC90. At 1200 hours, I arrived at the storage bay where the 2017 Volvo XC90 was being stored located at 1875 East Apache Blvd. I was accompanied by Detective Strohmeyer of the Scottsdale Police Department. Detective Strohmeyer was present in order to assist with the image of the EDR data from the airbag control module. At approximately 1220 hours, Detective Strohmeyer completed the image of the EDR data and he provided me with a digital copy of that information. A digital copy of this information was placed onto a CD and impounded into evidence. A copy of this data was printed and attached to this report. I remained in the storage bay with Detective Guzman while agents from the National Highway Traf?c Safety Administration (NHTSA) and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) viewed the vehicle. Detective Guzman and I also remained while employees from Uber downloaded data from the 2017 Volvo XC90. Detective Guzman and I secured the evidence bay and the 2017 Volvo XC90 at 1631 hours. On 03/21/18, I completed a search warrant that would allow detectives with the Tempe Police Department to move the 2017 Volvo XC90 from police impound to the location ofthe collision and to use that vehicle for a visibility study along with a brake ef?ciency study. At 1307 hours, I was sworn in by Judge Melissa Zabor of the Maricopa County Superior Court. Judge Zabor advised she signed the search warrant allowing the testing, SW2018-003020. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report QC it?; rays? 511%?" zit} ?rm -5i'i31'1till'tli??fl?sitii?; WE 011 03/21/18 at approximately 1310 hours, Sergeant Carbajal asked me to contact Detective Barutha, who is a Computer Forensic Examiner, about serving search warrants for video viewing history 011 the two cell phones collected from Rafael Stuart Vasquez. I contacted Detective Barutha on the telephone and he told me he processed the two cell phones obtained from Rafael using Celebrite. Detective Bamtha told me the LG LGMP450 had the YouTube, Hulu and Net?ix applications downloaded onto it. Detective Barutha explained the YouTube application used the email address of and the application was showing forty-four noti?cations. The Net?ix application on the cell phone was also associated with the same email address as YouTube, . Detective Baiutha explained he could not get any user information for the Hulu application because the cell phone was not connected to the internet and for that same reason he could not get the video viewing history from the YouTube or Net?ix applications. Detective Baiutha told me the cell phone LG had only the YouTube application on it, which was associated with email address . The video viewing history could not be obtained from this cell phone either because it was not connected to the internet. ours, Detective Seal and I arrived at the local Uber Inc. of?ce On 03/22/18 at a fox Detective Seal served a search warrant on employees of Uber. Detective ea an were a vase tie items requested would be provided at a later date and time. Detective Seal and I left the business without any of the items listed in the search warrant. On 03/22/ 18, I completed three search warrants to obtain the video viewing history for the cell phones collected as evidence and associated with email 011 03/18/18 between 2100 horu?s to 2300 hours for YouTube/Google, Net?ix and Hulu. I faxed the three search warrants to the Maricopa County Superior onrt search warrant center. On 03/22/18 at 1348 hours, I was sworn in by Judge Melissa Zabor and she advised she signed all three search warrants, SW 2018-003079, and 1 reviewed the method YouTube, Net?ix and Hulu listed as the method they preferred to be served legal documents. YouTube has an onliue law enforcement website to upload the documents, which required me to get an account. After registering, I learned I would be unable to ?nish the process until 03/23/ 18 because of the veri?cation process. I found that both Net?ix and Hulu required legal documents to be mailed to them and it said they would not accept service by fax or email. I placed the search warrants for Net?ix and I-Iulu into envelopes and I mailed the search warrants via certi?ed mail to the address each company listed for legal documents. Since there would be a delay in each company getting the warrants, I completed a preservation request for each company. After completing the preservation requests, I emailed them to YouTube, Net?ix and Hulu using email addresses 1 found for legal processes. A copy of the preservation letters have been attached to my supplement. 011 03/22/ 18 at approximately 1855 hours, Detective Haubold and I went to the property bay where the 2017 Volvo 90 was stored. Detective Haubold and I entered the vehicle and installed the ericom pursuant to the search warrant, which would be used in the upcoming tests planned for later that night. I also assisted Detective Haubold with taking a couple of damage measurements on the front of the vehicle. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Seer an Misa- ease-am merit-listing: rm. On 03/22/18 at approximately 2030 hours, I attended a brie?ng where the tests that were going to be conducted on the vehicle were brie?y discussed. During this brie?ng, I was tasked with driving the pickup with Elaine Herzberg's bicycle in it to the scene of the collision. I was also tasked with letting the tow truck driver into the property room to load the 2017 Volvo XC90 and to follow the tow truck to the scene of the collision. Detective Haubold provided me with the keys for the pickup and he told me he already placed the bicycle in the bed of the pickup, which was secured with a locked cover over the bed. I also agreed to give Of?cer Vella a ride in the vehicle I was driving, since she was playing a part in the testing. I let the tow truck into the secured lot at the Apache sub-station and I then allowed him access to the property bay where the 2017 Volvo XC90 was secured. We entered the impound bay at approximately 2050 hours and the driver loaded the vehicle onto a flatbed tow truck. I followed the tow truck as it pulled out of the parking lot of the Tempe Police Department sub-station at approximately 2105 hours. I followed directly behind the tow truck to the scene where it arrived at 21 18 hours. After the tow truck and vehicle were taken onto the Mill Avenue bridge where the tests would be conducted, I was tasked with watching the bicycle at the location of the collision while the tests were prepared. I then assisted with scene security while the test was being conducted. At the conclusion of the testing, I relieved Detective Marsland of security over the 2017 Volvo XC90 at 2241 hours as the tow truck began to load the vehicle. I remained with the vehicle at this location until we were cleared to return the vehicle to property impound. I followed the tow truck as it pulled out of the location of the testing at 2304 hours. I followed the tow truck from the area of the testing back to the Tempe Police Department Apache sub-station, where it arrived at 2316 hours. The vehicle was secured in the property bay at 1875 East Apache Blvd. Prior to leaving the vehicle, I took photographs and a video of the exterior of the vehicle showing the condition of the vehicle as it was returned to property impound. On 02/23/18 at approximately 1000 hours, I uploaded the search warrant for YouTube/Google into their website that I gained access to. On 02/23/18 at approximately 1214 hours, I returned all ?ve search warrants to Judge Melissa Zabor of the Maricopa County Superior Court. On 03/28/18 at approximately 1330 hours, Detective Seal and I completed a vehicle inspection on the 2017 Volvo XC90. This was an exterior inspection only. For further on the inspection, refer to the Vehicle Inspection Form. After the inspection, the vehicle was left secured in the property bay. On 04/02/18 at approximately 0852 hours, I obtained the medical records for Elaine Herzberg at Scottsdale Osborn's medical records department located at 7300 East 14th Street, Scottsdale. The medical records are attached to this supplement. This concludes my involvement in this case. Pending TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report T7 (?Hawaiians sealer Wiles? Uno- Tiiejafoak Assigned to:20595 - MARSLAND. KASEY Assigned on:Apr-03-2018 (Tue.)908 Capacity:Secondary Investigator Completed:Yes Approved on:04f03f2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DatelTime: Apr-03-2018 (Tue) 910 Noti?cation: On 03-21-18, I reported for duty at 0700 hours and was briefed by Sergeant S. Carbajal and Detective T. Haubold regarding this case. Throughout the investigation, I was assigned the following tasks: Analyze dashcam footage from the Uber vehicle Author search warrants for Uber documents Assist with nighttime visibility study Assist with braking data collection Analyze data to determine the degree of avoidability of the crash Dashcam Video Analysis: To assist in this case, I first analyzed the on?board video footage from the camera mounted just ahead of the rearview mirror. I was provided a digital copy of the evidence by Detective T. Haubold. I found that the footage of the crash existed in a digital ?le with the ?lename UTC20180319_045552.kds. The video could be played with the software which comes from the video recorder?s manufacturer called PC Manager. After playing the video file, I noted that there are three views provided with a single video ?le. The first view is out of the front of the windshield, just ahead of the rearview mirror. The second view is from the same location, but faces the cockpit of the vehicle. The third view appears to be a view to the rear of the vehicle. It was apparent that the three video views, when played through the native software, are not precisely Each view appears to play at the appropriate speed, but the timestamps in the frames do not match, and the correlation between views can vary with each playing of the video. The video player allowed for an export of the video ?le to a .AVI ?le format, so this export was used and a .AVI ?le was created. It was found that this ?le showed the same three views, but that the timing was also not Therefore, when playing the video file and analyzing its contents, each view was treated independently from the other, and the native ?le format was used for this analysis. Triangulation of area ofimpact: I ?rst used the video ?le from the forward?facing cockpit camera (dashcam) to triangulate a location that the camera occupied at the time the impact occurred. Since the video frame at the point of impact showed blurry characteristics consistent with the impact itself, I used the frame immediately prior to impact. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an; r; zenith/st This video frame recorded the latitude and longitude of Lat:3326.l456 Long:1 1156.5195. This frame was analyzed to ?nd points in the photo which could be used to triangulate the location of the camera. The ?rst line drawn was from the traf?c light pole on the southwest corner of Curry and Mill to the far end of the second white lane line dash visible in the frame. These two items fall on a nearly vertical line within the frame. The second line was drawn from the street light support on the northeast corner of Mill and Curry to the east edge of the blue informational sign directing drivers to various area of the nearby parks and beach. The third line was drawn across the access cover over the storm drain which is visible on the sidewalk in the lower right corner of the frame. These three lines were plotted using aerial photography from the Maricopa county assessor?s website and were extrapolated back to a point of common intersection. 1 used the north end of the solid bicycle lane line at this location as a reference point. I measured the point of intersection to be 22.5 ft prior to the end of the solid portion of the bicycle lane line and 5 ft to its left. The distance from the camera's position to the front edge of the Volvo's front bumper was measured at 70 inches. These measurements were transferred to the scale diagram produced from the total station data, and the resulting coordinate point for the location ofthe Volvo?s front bumper at this frame of video is 15.5, ?69.1 feet. This point would correlate to the center of the front bumper at that point, and not necessarily the location where the pedestrian was standing when she was struck. To check this method of triangulation using aerial photography, 1 also responded out to the scene of the crash and used a printed copy of the ?nal video frame before impact to stand in the roadway and achieve the same view that was depicted in the camera. I used the same landmarks described in the aerial photography method to place myself as close as possible to the same location as the camera was in the ?nal pre?impact video frame. Once my view matched the camera's view, I marked my location and measured 70 inches forward to account for the length of the hood and bumper ahead of the camera lens. I placed a mark on the ground at this point. 1 then went to the end of the solid portion of the bicycle lane line and measured back to the coordinate point that I had attained from triangulation on aerial imagery. I marked this point on the roadway as well. I measured the distance between the two marks and found them to be three inches apart. In our subsequent visibility study, and for calculations, this area was used as the location of the front bumper of Uber?s Volvo vehicle at the point of impact. Crash Events: In watching the video leading up to the crash, the driver, Rafael Vasquez, can be seen in the driver?s seat with her seatbelt buckled. She appears to be looking down at the area near her right knee at various points in the video. Sometimes, her face appears to react and show a smirk or laugh at various points during the times that she is looking down. Her hands are not visible in the frame of the video during these times. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report aria re an twain fins atria sail Before impact, Rafael is looking at the area of her right knee for a notable length of time. Before looking up, her eyes are focused on the area of her right knee. When played at normal speed and measured with a stopwatch, her eyes are averted from the roadway for a total continuous length of time of 5.3 seconds. When using the built?in timer on the video player and moving the video frame by frame, the video player shows that her eyes were averted from the roadway for 4.2 seconds. When she looks back up at the roadway, the vehicle is 0.50 seconds from impact. Approximately coinciding with the point of impact with the pedestrian, the driver appears to attempt a steering input to the left. This video ceases recording with a UTC time of 04:58:50, just moments after striking the pedestrian. The subsequent video ?le from this dashcam begins recording after the vehicle has come to its controlled point of rest. In this second video ?le begins with a UTC time of 04:59:07 the vehicle is at rest and in the right turn lane ofMill Ave, just south of Curry Rd. The driver appears to be looking around, but does not exit the vehicle until a passerby approaches her door. The rear?facing camera shows traf?c approaching from the northbound lanes of Mill Ave. The headlights of these approaching vehicles illuminate a dark object lying in the roadway. This object, presumably the pedestrian, is nearly struck by another approaching vehicle as it moved to enter the right turn lane behind the Volvo. This second vehicle makes an abrupt braking maneuver and appears to have avoided colliding with the pedestrian before backing up and stopping. Several other vehicles pull over to the side of the road after the near-collision, including one vehicle which stops immediately behind the Volvo. This stopped vehicle blocks the camera?s view of further events to the rear. The video plays through its 2 minutes and 58 seconds of video without the driver leaving the driver's seat The next video ?le (UTC20180319_050208.kds) picks up where the previous video ?le left off. The driver is still in the driver's seat, and she can be seen making a phone call. During the length (2 minutes, 57.93 seconds) of the video, she does not exit the driver's seat at any time. Emergency lights can be seen arriving on scene approximately 2:20.00 into the video's rear-facing camera. Matching video with EDR data: Det. T. Haubold provided me with a copy of the data reported by the Volvo's on?board airbag control module (Event Data Recorder, or EDR). The data reports pre?crash data every 0.5 seconds. The data shows that this was a non-deployment event lasting longer than 300 milliseconds. The service brake is reported as "off? until the data point at t=0.0s. Vehicle speed is shown as gradually decreasing after This was noteworthy since the video was showing a speed which was gradually increasing in the ?nal seconds before impact. Of particular note was the fact that the video reports a speed of 40 at the time of impact with the pedestrian, but 42 immediately thereafter. This data appeared suspicious, and further analysis shows that the speed on the video is unreliable. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at}? ?i?zii?:zisi:ia. hiatus-:1. The speed on the dashcam video is based on a calculation made from GPS locations and times between those reported locations. Immediately after the Volvo passes the sign which changes the speed limit from 35 to 45 mph, the Volvo can be seen accelerating while also passing under the Loop 202 overpass in the video. The acceleration is visible in the video, but the speed reported via the dashcam does not change immediately. The same video, when played from 00:25, shows the Volvo making a right turn from southbound Scottsdale Rd to westbound Rio Salado Pkwy. The turn appears to be a normal turn in the video, with deceleration leading up to the turn and acceleration leading away from the turn. However, when the reported speed is viewed in conjunction with the video, it shows that the Volvo enters the turn at approximately 19 and continues to decelerate while turning. The Volvo aligns itself with Rio Salado while the reported speed on the video is 1.3 mph. Then, while acceleration is obvious in the video footage, the reported speed continues to drop to 10 mph. The speed remains at 10 for a few seconds and then begins to rise. This same mismatch between visible vehicle acceleration and actual reported speed change can be seen again at 02:00 into the video footage when the Volvo makes a right turn from westbound Rio Salado to northbound Mill Ave. The same delay is present Knowing this infomiation, the speed reported by the on-screen display of the dashcam was determined to be unreliable for use in speeds with the reported speed of the EDR data. In examining other portions of the pre?crash data, I noted that the Volvo reported a slight steering input to the vehicle's right from 1% at to 2% at t=?l .0 5. At s, the vehicle reported a 4% steering input to the vehicle?s left, followed by at 2% steering input to the vehicle's right. Noting the abrupt change in steering, I expected to find similar evidence of steering changes in the video. Upon examining both the forward?facing camera view and the in-cabin view, I found that the steering inputs described in the EDR report could be matched to the relative motion of background objects in the video. When looking at the timing in relation to impact, however, it was obvious that the left turn input began at approximately the same instant as impact. For this reason, actual impact with the pedestrian correlates to some point in time prior to as listed in the EDR data. Analysis of Driver Behavior: Since the driver appears to be looking down in the area of her right knee/center console with unusually high frequency for a normal driver, and due to the apparent facial reactions to whatever item has her attention, I began to examine the dashcam video ?les from the point Rafael begins her shift. The first video ?le showing Rafael driving and leaving the garage at her workplace is titled UTC20180319_040440.kds. At approximately UTC 04:06:42, she picks up a gray bag and removes a cell phone with a black case as she is waiting for the garage door to open. She pulls out of the garage and into the parking lot where she remains. During this time as she is parked in the parking lot, which spans 3 subsequent video files, she seems to be continually moving and focused on the center console area. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an Cinea?iicj'nr?ii?i?aittis: At UTC 04:17:05, the driver seems to reach toward the center console area near her right knee with both hands. The exact item she is manipulating is out of camera view. The vehicle then begins to move toward the driveway?s exit at 04:19:06. This video ends as the vehicle arrives at the exit onto 14th St. Video ?le UTC20180319_041943.kds begins with the driver pulling out of the driveway making a left turn onto 1. 4th St to head toward Priest. The vehicle?s steering wheel can be seen as it is manipulated by the driver, indicating that the vehicle is being driven manually. Rafael stops the vehicle approximately 6 car prior to the red light at Priest. After a few moments, the vehicle begins to move forward toward the intersection and stops again at the red light. At UTC 04:20:48, the driver receives a green light and the vehicle begins to accelerate through the left turn to proceed northbound on Priest. The driver's hands are visible and not on the steering wheel as the vehicle begins its turn, indicating that the vehicle is in its autonomous mode. The vehicle proceeds northbound on Priest to University Dr. and then east on University. The video stops just prior to the point the vehicle reaches the intersection with Beck Ave. Video file UTC20180319_042244.kds begins where the previous video left off, and the vehicle is eastbound on University at Beck and ends with the vehicle eastbound on University at College Ave. The driver can be seen looking down toward the console area near her right knee at various points during this video. Video file UTC20180319_042544.kds begins where the previous video left off, and the vehicle is eastbound on University at College. The driver is frequently looking down at the lower center console area near her right knee. At UTC 04:26:01, she appears to state something, then laugh a moment later. The vehicle reaches Rural Rd near the middle of the video clip. The vehicle makes a left turn onto northbound Rural at that time. The driver is still glancing at the same area repeatedly during this clip. The clip ends when the vehicle is northbound on Rural between 6th St and Rio Salado Pkwy. Video ?le UTC20180319_042844.kds begins where the previous video left off, and the vehicle is northbound on Rural before Rio Salado. The vehicle turns left on Rio Salado, then right on Mill Ave. The video ends as the vehicle is beginning to cross the Mill Ave bridge over the Tempe Town Lake. The driver is frequently looking down at the lower center console area near her right knee during the video. At this point of watching these clips, I noted that the driver was frequently taking her eyes off the roadway to look at the lower center console area. I decided to log the times she was looking down to compare the times she was alert and looking over the dash. The following information comes from the subsequent 9 video clips leading up to impact. Video Statistics: The approach to this analysis was to time the video portions where the driver was looking down at the lower center console area, or in another location which is not attributable to a normal driver's gaze. For example, if the driver?s glance appears to have landed on the vehicle?s gauges, the rearview mirror, or out the side window, it was not counted as time not looking at the roadway. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as; cam-rims? a was; All time where the driver's eyes were clearly below the dash and not on the gauges was recorded as "down? time. All times where the driver appeared to be looking into a mirror, out the windshield, over her shoulder, or out the side window was recorded as "up? time. Each of the 9 video segments were watched in their native format and timed with the timer built into the video player. Each segment of "up" and "down" was recorded in chronological order, and was recorded to the nearest tenth of a second. Refer to the attached Excel spreadsheets containing this information. In addition to noting the of each time segment, I recorded which segments occurred during times that the vehicle was in motion, and which segments were found to have occurred while the vehicle was stopped. Portions where the vehicle is stopped were highlighted on the attached spreadsheet, along with a note in the ?motion" column to describe the motion ofthe vehicle through the video clip. The ?rst frame of the ?rst video clip of the 9 that were analyzed here shows a UTC time of 04:31 :46. The frame of video at impact with the pedestrian shows a UTC time of 04:58:50. The total time elapsed in the 9 video clips prior to impact is therefore 1,624 seconds. The total distance, measured with the Maricopa County Assessor's GIS map measurement tool, that the vehicle traveled over these 9 video clips was 62,345 ft (1 1.8 miles). Adding up all ofthe intervals in the video where the vehicle was stopped gave a total time spent stationary of 315.4 seconds. This allowed me to calculate that the average velocity of the vehicle while it was in motion was 47.64 ft/s (32.5 mph). During the 9 video clips, 1 found that the driver looked down 204 times with nearly all of them having the same placement at the lower center console near her right knee. 166 of these instances of looking down occurred while the vehicle was in motion. The vehicle was in motion for 21 minutes, 48 seconds. Of that time, the total amount of time the driver's eyes were averted from the roadway was 6 minutes, 47.2 seconds, or approximately 32% of the time. Extrapolating this over the entire 21 minutes and 48 seconds of motion, and using the average moving velocity of 47.64 ft/s, the driver's eyes were offofthe roadway for 3.67 miles ofthe 1.8 total miles traveled. For further information regarding the data and ?ndings of this analysis, refer to the attached worksheets and visual aids. The attachments total 6 pages and are titled "Breakdown of Driver?s Movement." Search Warrants Authored: On 03-21?18, I drafted an affidavit in support of a search warrant in order to obtain Rafael Vasquez's testing and quali?cation records, records regarding the performance speci?cations of the Volvo XC90 as out?tted by Uber, the digital video ?les captured by the on-board self-driving system up?tted by Uber, and the digital document ?le titled Tempe Incident - Preliminary Uber Data Review.? On 03 ?21-1 8 at approximately 2010 hours, I was contacted by Honorable Jane McLaughlin of the Maricopa County 1A courts. 1 was sworn in and informed that the warrant was being issued and faxed back to me. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an; r: gamut ear-a. sunrise-rsatin?: On 03?22-18, I provided this signed warrant (#2018?003045) to Detective J. Seal, who served a copy of the warrant to Uber personnel on that same day. On 03-27-18, I learned that the Uber company requested more time to put the ?les together and was also in legal discussions with my superiors and legal advisor about con?dentiality regarding the documents. As such, the decision was made to return the search warrant without seizing any items, and to abtain a new search warrant for the same documents to allow Uber more time to come to a legal agreement. The search warrant was returned to the IA Courts on 03-27-18 and it was documented that no items were seized. A copy of this warrant and its return are attached to this report for reference. On 03-27-18, I drafted an af?davit in support of a search warrant to obtain the same four documents that were listed in the above warrant. This warrant (#2018?003228) was issued by Honorable Richard Nothwehr after he swore me in telephonically at approximately 10] 1 hours that same day. This warrant was provided to the Tempe PD legal advisor for review prior to delivering to Uber. As if this date, 03-28-18, the warrant remains open and has not yet been served. Nighttime Visibility Study and Brake Performance Testing; On 03-22-18, at approximately 2100 hours, I assisted Sergeant Carbajal along with Detectives Haubold, Seal, McCormick, and Guzman in performing a visibility test of the collision scene under the same lighting conditions that existed on the night of the crash. For more information regarding the parameters of the test and the instructions given to the test driver, refer to Det. Haubold's report. I lent assistance by placing and instructing the person acting as our pedestrian. I ?rst located the area of impact on the roadway from the previously mentioned measurements. I placed the pedestrian and the bicycle so that the bicycle was perpendicular to the roadway and the pedestrian was standing on the south side of the bicycle, which is consistent with the video footage. The bicycle was placed so that it was facing the area of impact and the pedestrian's hands were on the handlebars. These parameters remained constant for all locations we tested. We decided to place the pedestrian in three different conditions and test how visible the pedestrian was with each of those conditions. The ?rst placement of the pedestrian was longitudinally even with the area of impact, and laterally even with the left edge of the #1 lane. She was instructed to stand still at this location. Distances to the two nearest light poles were recorded for triangulation purposes. For this ?rst location, the test driver, Detective Seal, drove northbound along the Mill Ave bridge until he could see the pedestrian and identify her as a pedestrian. He then stopped the vehicle at that location and advised that he could see her. I then went to where the pedestrian was standing and measured the distance to the front bumper of the car three times to ensure a consistent number. Measurements were recorded with Laserlyte laser speed and survey measurement device This is assigned to Detective Seal, and the unit was found to pass all quality tests before TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "ea-n? ire "loss-airrarm sea-a. uni/r and after this study was performed. When using this device to measure the ?rst test distance, the distance was 637.7 ft. For the second position, the bicycle and pedestrian were moved forward toward the area of impact until they were at the lane line separating the #1 and #2 northbound lanes. The pedestrian was given all of the same instructions and the test was repeated. When Det. Seal stopped the vehicle, 1 measured the distance from the pedestrian to the front bumper of the vehicle at 812.3 ft. For the third and ?nal position, the pedestrian was left in the same location, but was told to march her feet in place to simulate the motion created by a pedestrian who is walking. She did not actually move forward or backward in relation to the ground during this test, but moved her feet and knees up and down to simulate a walking motion. The test was repeated and Det. Seal stopped his vehicle when he could see and identify the pedestrian. This distance was recorded at 818.3 ft. This concluded the visibility portion of the study. The second portion of this study with which I assisted was testing the braking performance of the Volvo XC90 involved in this crash. Det. Haubold operated the vehicle and installed a Vericom (SN VC4101 10602). 5 test runs were completed to test the braking capabilities of the vehicle. In each test, the vehicle was driven northbound in the #2 lane of Mill Ave at approximately 40 mph. The brakes were applied fully when the vehicle was nearing the area of impact and was on the asphalt portion of the roadway. Full braking was applied until the vehicle was at a complete stop. The results of these tests were printed and attached to this report. The five average f?values obtained for each brake test were 0.932, 0.91 1, 0.926, 0.918, and 0.914. These numbers were averaged to a drag factor of 0.92 for this vehicle at the area of the crash and in the same direction of travel and same lane as the crash event. For more information regarding the data obtained from this testing, refer to the printed attachments marked as Run #1 through Run each attachment being three pages. Avoidability Analysis Using the numbers obtained in the visibility study and braking study, I analyzed the data to determine the avoidability of the crash in this case based on a sober, alert, and attentive driver. The first step in this process was to adjust the distance at which the pedestrian was visible in order to account for driver expectancy and statistical variability. This process was done according to the processes outlined in "Forensic Aspects of Driver Perception and Response," authored by Olson, Dewar, and Farber. The speci?c method used was the method set forth by Hyzer and Hyzer in Chapter 12 of that publication. For this approach, I used the shortest distance obtained in the visibility study of 637.3 ft. This method was multiplied by 0.67 to adjust the value to the expected mean value for drivers in a controlled study with a larger population, which yielded a distance of 426.99 ft. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em .i?iji'illiillriil arr-rive This result was then multiplied by 0.5 to adjust for driver expectancy since the test driver was told that he would be looking for a pedestrian. This result was a distance of 2 3.5 ft. Then, to obtain the distance at which 85% of drivers should be able to see and identify the pedestrian clearly, the distance was reduced by 33% to a ?nal distance of 143.04 ft. 1 then had to determine an appropriate reaction time for the driver. The text suggests that the range to use in this case, where expectancy was already accounted for by the 0.5 multiplier above, could be between 0.6 and 1.25. I looked to the video for information regarding this specific driver to determine the best reaction time to use for this particular case. I found the very first frame where the driver's eyes are open and focused above the level of the dashboard. I then advanced each frame until the image of the driver blurs, indicating that impact had occurred. 1 found this time to be 0.50 seconds. Data provided by Uber indicated that the driver was able to grab the steering wheel and begin moving it at 0.02 seconds prior to impact. This matched the information viewed in the video since the driver's left turn begins at approximately the same time as impact. For these reasons, the most appropriate reaction time for the driver was determined to be 0.50 seconds. The next step was to determine the vehiCle's approach speed at the time that the driver would be reacting to the danger. I analyzed the EDR data to determine what speed the EDR was reporting at the time the vehicle was 143 feet from impact. The methodology and data were plotted on a graph attached to this report. It shows that the speed the vehicle was traveling when it was at the sight distance was 43.5 mph. Using the 85th percentile sight distance of 143 feet, the driver's actual reaction time of 0.50 seconds, the vehicle's reported speed of 43.5 mph, and the average drag factor determined from skid testing of 0.92, I found that the driver in this case could have reacted and brought the vehicle to rest 42.61 feet prior to the pedestrian. Even when the reaction time was changed to the maximum value suggested by the literature at 1.25 seconds, the crash was found to have not occurred. For these reasons, the crash was deemed entirely avoidable. Speed Determination for Pedestrian In an attempt to determine the speed at which the pedestrian was moving at the time she was struck, I analyzed the final frames of the dashcam footage. I found the ?rst and last frames where her shoes were clearly visible. I copied these images into a drafting program and overlaid guidelines on the road lines and at ground level where her shoes were. 1 then correlated the width of the vehicle's lane in each image at the location where the pedestrian was standing to the width of the lane measured by the total station equipment by Det. Haubold. This lane width was 13.65 feet. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report satin?r a airman. giiaemagm estrus: I then added a vertical line at the approximate location of the pedestrian?s center of mass based on shoe location and, for the second image, posture. I then measured the relative distance her center of mass had moved across the lane width and found that the total distance moved between the frames was 4.67 feet. In playing the video in the native ?le format, the timer would time out and stop counting before the video was done playing, so I counted how many frames I had to advance to get from the ?rst frame to the second frame. I found that it took 13 clicks of the frame-advancing button to move from the first image to the second. I then played several other portions of the video which had the timer counting upward. I clicked the frame-advancing button 13 times and found that the timer would advance between 0.97 and 1.02 seconds. For these reasons, I used a time passage of 1.0 seconds between the two images and calculated the pedestrian?s speed at 4.67 feet per second, or 3.18 mph. Using this information and knowing that the pedestrian was 43.5 ft from the west curb at the time she was struck, I calculated that the pedestrian had been in the roadway for approximately 9.3 seconds prior to impact. I also measured the distance between the location the test pedestrian was placed for the first visibility study trial (which yielded a sight distance of 637.7 ft) and the area of impact. That distance was 21.79 ft. At the speed of 4.67 feet per second, the pedestrian crossed this distance in 4.66 seconds. This was a significant ?nding since the calculation of avoidability was based on a time of perception far less than 4.66 seconds prior to impact. This means that the pedestrian would have been closer to the vehicle's own lane at the time of perception in the avoidability assessment. For more information regarding the analyses explained in this supplemental report, refer to the related attachments prepared in this case. For further information regarding this case, refer to the original report authored by Det. Haubold and the related supplements that are thereto referred. PENDING TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .ejim-?aama sine; "inninifies-"tie-Ainvifza as) 11m UK, Raster 353} Assigned to:11638 - HAUBOLD, THOMAS Assigned on: Apr-03-2018 (Tue) 930 Capacity:Lead Investigator Completed:Yes Approved on:04i19f2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DateiTime: Apr-192018 (Thu) 1332 RESPONDING PERSONNEL Detective T. Haubold #1 1638 Lead Investigator, Vehicular Crimes Unit Detective J. Guzman #20782 Investigator, Vehicular Crimes Unit Detective K. Marsland #20595 Investigator, Vehicular Crimes Unit Detective M. McCormick #22020 Investigator, Vehicular Crimes Unit Detective J. Seal #19343 Investigator, Vehicular Crimes Unit Detective W. Kelly #17225 Investigator, Next-of?kin notification, Vehicular Crimes Unit Of?cer K. Loehr #22491 Drug Recognition Expert, Driver Interview, Traf?c Bureau Detective J. Barutha #19443 Investigator, Criminal Investigations Bureau Sergeant S. Carbajal #11793 Scene Supervisor, Traf?c Bureau Lieutenant C. Coppersmith #17023 Initial Response Supervisor, Patrol Bureau Sergeant D. Breen #11569 Initial Scene Supervisor, Patrol Bureau Sergeant D. Hoobler #1 1604 Initial Scene Supervisor, Patrol Bureau Tan-1F}: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report raining} if Of?cer E. Santana #22953 Initial Response, Hospital follow?up/Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center, Patrol Bureau Of?cer J. Scharrer #21782 Initial Response, Patrol Bureau Of?cer J. Guajardo #23599 Initial Response, Patrol Bureau Of?cer T. Allen #221 10 Initial Response, Patrol Bureau Forensic Technician J. Cynowa #15781 Scene Photographs, Forensic Services Unit Noti?cation and Arrival On 3/18/18 at approximately 2246 hours, Sgt. S. Carbajal contacted me at my residence by telephone. I was informed that a fatal collision had occurred near the intersection of Mill Avenue and Curry Road, Tempe, and that my assistance was needed at the scene. I ?rst responded to the Tempe Police Department to pick up the Vehicular Crimes Unit (VCU) vehicle and measuring equipment. I arrived on scene at approximately 2340 hours and saw that the northbound #2 traf?c lane on Mill Avenue was closed between the north end of the Mill Avenue bridge and the intersection at Curry Road by patrol of?cers. 1 saw a red and black adult size mountain bike lying in the roadway near the east side curb on Mill Avenue approximately 300 feet south of Curry Road. Approximately 30 feet south of the bike, clothing from the pedestrian and medical waste was observed in the northbound #2 lane. Initial brie?ng from Sgt. Hoobler Upon arrival, I learned from Sgt. Hoobler, that at approximately 2200 hours, the Tempe Police Department received reports of a collision at that location. Sgt. Hoobler stated that Rafael Vasquez was the vehicle operator of a 2017 Volvo XC90 displaying Arizona license plate which was northbound on Mill Avenue when the collision occurred. The Volvo XC90 is owned by Uber Technologies Inc. and was operating in autonomous mode when the collision occurred. Sgt. Hoobler said that the pedestrian, later identi?ed as Elaine Marie Herzberg, was crossing Mill Avenue but was not sure if she was crossing westbound or eastbound. Herzberg had a bicycle with her, and it was unknown if she was riding the bike or pushing it across the roadway when the collision occurred. Herzberg was transported to Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center and was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours. A supervisor from Uber, who had responded to the collision scene, advised that the Volvo XC90 was equipped with a dash camera which worked independently from Uber's onboard computer systems and programs. Scene assignments TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 5.539%; 7233+ an? its} use. I was assigned as the primary investigator. Of?cer K. Loehr was assigned to contact Rafael Vasquez and check for signs and of impairment. Of?cer E. Santana was assigned hospital follow up. Initial responding of?cers brie?y contacted the driver of the Volvo XC90, checked for witnesses, and provided scene security. Involved parties and vehicles Pedestrian: Elaine Marie Herzberg (DOB: -) Residence: - Bicycle: Red/black 21 speed Spin?t700C Hyper Mountain Bike, Serial Bicycle Owner: Elaine Marie Herzberg Vehicle Operator: Rafael Vasquez (DOB: Residence: ireerse Vehicle: Gray 2017 Volvo XC90 T8 four door Sport Utility Vehicle, Arizona license VIN: Vehicle Owner: Collision Scene Randi-my Area The collision occurred on Mill Avenue approximately 400 feet south of the intersection with Washington Street/ Curry Road, Tempe. This area is in the northern part of Tempe, approximately 250 feet north of Arizona SR202 freeway which crosses over Mill Avenue and approximately 2 miles east of Arizona SR143 freeway. The roadway at the area of the collision is bordered on the northwest by the Marque Theater (3 music venue) and on the north east by a City of Tempe desert park area. The Tempe Town Lake is located south of the collision site. Mill Avenue is a major north/south arterial roadway in the City of Tempe. As Mill Avenue crosses over the Tempe Town Lake, there are two separate bridges. One bridge is dedicated for northbound traf?c with two traf?c lanes and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. The second bridge is dedicated for southbound traf?c with two traf?c lanes and has a posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour. The roadway at the collision site is comprised of two northbound through traf?c lanes and a dedicated bike lane. Just south of the collision site the roadway begins to widen on the west side in preparation for two dedicated left turn lanes to go westbound on Washington Avenue. Just north of the collision site, the roadway begins to widen on the east side in preparation for a dedicated right turn lane to go eastbound on Curry Road. The posted speed limit on Mill Avenue where the collision occurred is 45 miles per hour. Mill Avenue in this area is constructed of bituminous asphalt and was in good repair. Street lights were observed at regular intervals 011 the roadway illuminating the roadway and surrounding area. On northbound Mill Avenue between the Loop 202 Freeway and Washington Street/Curry Road, there are a total of six street lights. Four on the east side of the road and two on the west side of the road. All four street lights on the east side of Mill Avenue were illruninated at the time of this investigation and appeared to be frurctioning properly. The street TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ecst- iZtPiilaileEiliizi-i?k- sine light closest to Washington Street/Curry Road on the west side of the roadway was not illuminated at the time of this investigation. This street light is approximately 162 feet north of the area of impact. The street light closest to the Loop 202 Freeway on the west side of the roadway was illuminated at the time of this investigation and appeared to be functioning properly. This street light is approximately 51 feet south of the area of impact. Scene and Roadway Evidence Upon reviewing the scene, I noted that the collision?s area of impact was in the northbound #2 lane (curb lane) near the area where the bike lane's white solid painted line stops and tums into a white dashed painted line. The roadway near the area of impact was well lit with little need for supplemental lighting during the investigation. The roadway near the area of impact is generally ?at. The approach on Mill Avenue across the bridge is straight. After leaving the bridge, there is a slight curve to the left as you cross under the Loop 202 freeway, then the roadway straightens out again for the ?nal approach to the area of impact. Walking the scene northbound towards the area of impact, I did not locate any skid marks or antilock brake marks from the Volvo XC90 that would indicate dynamic braking prior to or after impact. I was not able to locate any tire scuff marks from the bicycle or any scuff marks from the pedestrian?s shoes to indicate the point of impact. As I continued northbound through the scene, I observed the following points of evidence: Evidence #1 was a light color scratch mark on the pavement from the bicycle sliding on its side in the bike lane. This mark was approximately even with the end of the solid white painted line of the bicycle lane and approximately 4.5 feet west of the east side curb. This mark was approximately 14 feet in length and was in line with the bicycle at ?nal rest. Evidence #2 was a light color mark that was approximately 7 feet west of the ?rst scratch mark (Evidence in the northbound #2 traf?c lane. When I was measuring this mark, I noticed it continued past the ?nal resting point of the pedestrian and angled into the dedicated right turn lane. This mark was identi?ed as not being related to this collision. Evidence #3 was a white plastic handle from a thermos found on the east sidewalk approximately 7 feet east and 8 feet north ofwhere evidence #1 began. Evidence #4 was a light color scratch mark from the bicycle sliding on its side. It was located in the bike lane approximately 6 feet north of evidence This mark was approximately 25 feet long and was in line with the bicycle at ?nal rest. Evidence #5 was a blue fabric color mark approximately 6 feet long and was from the blue jeans worn by the pedestrian when she landed in the roadway. It began approximately 17 feet after evidence #4 started and was 9 feet west of the east curb. Evidence #6 was a spot of blood approximately the size of a quarter found on the asphalt where the pedestrian came to rest after the collision. It was located approximately 8 feet north of evidence #5 and was 1 1 feet west of the east side curb. There was also medical waste surrounding the area where the blood was found. (JOLICE- TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report a; as: Tammie-1.31 assess: Evidence #7 was a white plastic lid from a thermos which was on the east sidewalk and approximately 30 feet north of evidence Evidence #8 was the bicycle that was being pushed across the street by the pedestrian prior to the collision. It was located approximately 30 feet north of evidence #6 and approximately 5 feet west of the east sidewalk. Evidence #9 was a blue thermos and was found in the grass area approximately 14 feet east of the bicycle. Evidence #10 was the Uber/Volvo XC90 vehicle. It was located at its controlled point of rest, in line with the dedicated right turn lane and approximately 66 feet north of the bicycle. Evidence #11 was the right shoe belonging to the pedestrian. It was found in the northbound #1 traf?c lane approximately 19 feet west and 5 feet north of where the pedestrian came to rest. See attached diagrams for further information. Evidence items 1 through 11 were numbered and photographed on scene. Seized items The following vehicles were seized as evidence and impounded at 1875 E. Apache Boulevard, Tempe, and police records was noti?ed of the impoundment. 20.17 gray Volvo XC90 - Bicycle, red and black 21 speed Spinfit 700C Hyper Mountain Bike, Serial Safekeeping - Green bag with miscellaneous personal belongings - Elaine Herzberg - Black bag with miscellaneous personal belongings - Elaine Herzberg These items were released to Elaine Herzberg's mother, Sharon Daly, on 3/28/18. Fire Department Response Fire Department incident number: 18103021 The following units from the Tempe Fire Department responded to the scene: Engine 276 Medic 276 (Transported Herzberg to Scottsdale Osborn Hospital for treatment) Weather conditions TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report sea r" I ("in am he rim: 1 as: i: pr: Afr) Ditty? Lil-4 am v?E The following weather conditions were recorded at the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport on 3/18/18 at 2151 hours, on the evening ofthe collision: Mostly cloudy skies, 59.0 degrees (F), calm winds, 10-mile visibility, 21% humidity, and a dew point of 23 degrees (F). Scene Diagramming The scene was electronically measured using a Leica Geosystems TS 1.6i total station. The measurements were later downloaded into the IMS Map 360 drafting program where a scene diagram was created. For additional information regarding the scene diagram, please refer to the attached diagram and measurement sheet. Driver's initial interview Of?cer Scharrer Upon arrival, Of?cer Scharrer contacted Rafael Vasquez. Vasquez told Of?cer Scharrer that she thought she hit a person while driving and the vehicle was being operated in ?self?driving mode". Vasquez said she was not controlling the vehicle, because it was automatically driving, and she did not realize she hit someone. Vasquez said after she stopped, she realized she hit someone. See Of?cer Scharrer's supplement for further information. Officer Guajardo Of?cer Guajardo also contacted Rafael Vasquez, who was sitting in the driver sear of the UberNolvo vehicle shortly after he arrived. Vasquez told Of?cer Guajardo that the Volvo was ?self-driving" from the Mill Avenue bridge and was in the lane closest to the bike lane. Vasquez said as the vehicle approached the right turn only lane, the vehicle hit the victim who was on the bike. Vasquez said she did not see the victim prior to the collision. Vasquez said the vehicle would have been going the speed limit as it is programmed to go. See Of?cer Guajardo's supplement for further information. Of?cer Loehr Of?cer Loehr was assigned to interview Vasquez and check for signs and of impairment. During that interview, Vasquez stated that she had approximately 6 to 7 hours of sleep the night before and had woken up between 11:00 am and 1 1 :30 am. Vasquez drove to Tucson to visit her father and drove back home prior to starting her work shift. Vasquez told Of?cer Loehr she arrived at work at approximately 6:30 pm and ?hit the street" between 7:45 pm and 8:00 pm. Vasquez said the Uber vehicle was driving in autonomous mode at the time of the collision. When asked where her hands were, Vasquez stated that her hands were "hovering? over the steering wheel. When asked what she meant, Vasquez held her hands in front of her and said to imagine a steering wheel directly in front of her. Her hands were at the imaginary steering wheel?s S?o?clock and 7?o'clock iositions with TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no}? 137:: 21:13} 43233: in Wm as) av samurai-r an I this? Fia- a flV/E Vasquez said prior to the collision, the vehicle had successfully passed its diagnostic check and was operating as expected. Vasquez was on the third lap of the designated route, and the vehicle was in autonomous mode. Vasquez was traveling northbound in the curb lane on Mill Avenue, just south of where a dedicated right lane begins for traf?c to turn eastbound on Curry Road. Vasquez stated that it was at this point that her vehicle struck a bicyclist (Elaine Herzberg). Vasquez said the vehicle was traveling straight and was not making a lane change at the time of impact. Vasquez said she slammed 0n the vehicle brakes stopping the vehicle immediatel after the vehicle Herzberg. Vasquez said she immediately attempted to call 91 1. Vasquez said Herzberg ?came out of nowhere? and she did not see Herzberg prior to impact. She also said that Herzberg was perpendicular to the roadway as if she was crossing the road mid?block and she was not in a crosswalk. Vasquez was not able to articulate what direction Herzberg was headed at the time of the collision. See Of?cer Loehr's supplement for additional details. Uber Law Enforcement Liaison On 3/19/18 at approximately 01 18 hours, I was contacted by Mark Jones, the Law Enforcement Liaison for Uber. Jones informed me that he had been in contact with Uber Supervisor, Matthew Gore, and that authorization had been given for police to view that dash camera video footage and to record that video footage. Jones provided me with a website address where I could communicate directly with Uber to obtain information related to my investigation, and he also advised that I could upload search warrants and subpoenas directly into this website. Jones stated that he would work directly with me and assist in obtaining information from Uber. Dash Camera Video On 3/19/18 at approximately 0037 hours, Det. Barutha was contacted and responded to assist with this investigation. Det. Barutha obtained a search warrant to seize the Secure Digital (SD) memory card containing video associated with the dash camera located in the Volvo XC90. Det. Barutha was able to download all the recorded videos and data on the SD card. Each recorded video is approximately three minutes in len th. The ?rst video shows the Volvo XC90 and the vehicle operator, Vasquez, leaving the Uber The videos show the route traveled by the Volvo XC90, the impact with Herzberg, and immediately after impact. There are three camera views in each recorded video segment. One view is out the front windshield ofthe vehicle, one view is ofthe vehicle operator and the third view is facing behind the vehicle. Det. Barutha was able to view the videos using the software from the video recorder?s manufacturer called PC Manager. With this program, he was able to export the video ?le and convert it to an .AVI ?le format. The same three camera views are seen when played in the .AVI ?le format. Det. Barutha provided me with a copy of the videos in the .AVI format for analysis purposes. Two representatives from Uber were also present during the download of the SD card, and they were provided with a copy of the downloaded information. See Det. Barutha?s supplement for further details. NHTSA and NTSB Contact TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report scar: ma: 3:13;;er amiss On 3/19/18 at approximately 0738 hours, Sgt. Carbajal was contacted by the National Highway Traf?c Safety Administration (NHTSA) and advised that a team from NHTSA would be arriving to conduct an independent investigation of this collision. At approximately 0825 hours, I was contacted by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and advised that a team from NTSB would also be arriving to conduct an independent investigation ofthis collision. Search Warrant #2018-002912 On 3/19/18, Det. Kelly obtained a search warrant to seize the cell phones in Rafael Vasquez's possession at the time of the collision and to digitally extract all the content from the cell phones. Det. Kelly attempted to contact Vasquez at the address listed on her driver's license in Phoenix but was met with negative results. I contacted Uber Liaison Jones and requested all addresses and phone numbers Uber had for Vasquez. I was provided with the same address in Phoenix Det. Kelly tried and an address in Tucson. Jones also provided me with two phone numbers for Vasquez. This information was provided to Det. Kelly and Det. Perkett, who was assisting in locating Vasquez. Vasquez was later located in Tucson by Det. Ramos and Det. Moriarty. Vasquez?s personal cell phone and her assigned work cell phone from Uber were seized as evidence. See their supplements for further information. Informational Brie?ng On 3/20/18 at approximately 1000 hours, I attended a brie?ng that included members from the Tempe Police Department's Command Staff, representatives from Uber, NHTSA, and the NTSB. The purpose of this meeting was to provide all parties involved with a timeline of events beginning at noti?cation of the collision. Arrangements were also made to allow access to the Volvo XC90 for the below listed representatives from NHTSA, the NTSB, and Uber. NHTSA personnel Harold Herrera Bill Collins James Perry NTSB personnel Jennifer Morrison David Pereira Jane Foster Rafael Marshall Uber personnel Matthew Gore Jacob Driggs Daniel Tascione Noah Brandon Basso Stephen McHenry TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report aria ire; 4min? esamiirami. sane Ann'n'nis'u?iv Search warrant #2018-002956 Det. McCormick obtained a search warrant on 3/20/19 to image the event and crash data from the Volvo XC90. Det. Strohmeyer from the Scottsdale Police Department assisted Det. McCormick with the image of the Event Data Recorder (EDR) data from the airbag control module. A digital copy of the data was impounded into evidence. See Det. McCormick?s and Det. Strohmeyer's supplements for additional information. Det. McCormick provided me a copy of the data reported by the Volvo?s on?board airbag control module (Event Data Recorder/EDR). The data shows this was a non?deployment event lasting longer than 300 milliseconds. The data provides pre-crash data every 0.5 seconds and gives the vehicle?s indicated speed, accelerator pedal percent, if the service brake is on or off, the steering input percent, if ABS is on or off, and the stability control status. See the attached copy of the EDR data for additional information. Volvo XC90 Access Immediately following the download of the EDR data, access was provided to the Volvo XC90 to the above listed members of NHTSA, NTSB, and Uber. Members from NHTSA and the NTSB were allowed to photograph and document any evidence they needed. 1 also removed Herzberg's bicycle from evidence and allowed it to be photographed during this time. The bicycle was then placed back into evidence. The above listed members from Uber were allowed access to the vehicle so they could complete a data off load from their computer systems installed in the vehicle. Det. Guzman and/or Det. McCormick were present during the time access was allowed to the Volvo and the entire time was recorder on their body worn cameras. The information downloaded by Uber was presented in an informational brie?ng on 3/21/18 which was titled K145 Tempe Incident - Preliminary Uber Data Review. A copy of the information was obtained through Search Warrant #2018-003045 and Search Warrant #2018-003228. Order for Disclosure of Medical Records #18-0003 Det. Seal petitioned the Tempe Municipal Court and obtained an Order for Disclosure of the medical records documenting the injuries of Elaine Herzberg from Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center. These records were obtained and are attached to this report. Order for Disclosure of Employer Personnel and Training Records #18-0004 Det. Seal petitioned the Tempe Municipal Court and obtained an Order for Disclosure of any employer personnel and training ?les pertaining to the employment of Rafael Vasquez. The order also included all documents related to company policies, procedures, and training requirements pertaining to drivers of autonomous vehicles. Video Analysis Det. Marsland was provided with a digital copy of the videos obtained from the vehicle dash camera's SD card, and he conducted an analysis of those videos. Det. Marsland informed me that the video views were not precisely when played through the original program. He said each view appears to play at the appropriate speed, but the timestamps in the frames do not match, and the correlation between views can vary TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report are are air is .agefra'si?. was mi with each playing of the video. Det. Marsland also found the videos were not when played in the .AVI format. Det. Marsland used the video to triangulate the point of impact. He plotted this location using aerial photography from the Maricopa County Assessor's website. This point was transferred to the scaled diagram and provided the location of the center of the Volvo's front bumper when it collided with Herzberg. Det. Marsland also went to the collision scene and triangulated the point of impact. He found only a 3 inch difference between the points of impact he calculated using both methods. Det. Marsland told me that while reviewing the videos, he noticed that Vazquez kept taking her eyes off the road and would look down and to her right. Det. Marsland said the video does not show the area where Vasquez kept looking and it was unknown why she kept looking down in that area. Det. Marsland measured the amount of time Vasquez's eyes were averted from the roadway right before impact and found it was 5.3 seconds. When Vasquez looks back up at the roadway, the vehicle is 0.50 seconds from impact. This video segment ends moments after the vehicle strikes Herzberg. Det. Marsland conducted an analysis of Vasquez?s behavior from the time Vasquez left the garage at the Uber facility, to the time when the collision occurred. Det. Marsland said that Vasquez appeared to be looking down in the area of her right knee/center console with an unusually high frequency for a normal driver. He also noticed that Vasquez had apparent facial reactions to whatever item had her attention. Det. Marsland logged the times Vasquez looked down to compare the times she was alert and looking over the dash at the roadway. He used nine video clips leading up to the point of impact for this comparison. The total distance the vehicle traveled over the nine video segments was 62,345 feet or 1 1.8 miles and the average velocity ofthe vehicle while it was in motion was 47.64 ft/s or 32.5 miles per hour. During the nine video segments, Vasquez looks down 204 times with nearly all of them having the same placement at the lower center console near her right knee. 166 of those times looking down occurred while the vehicle was in motion. The vehicle was in motion for 21 minuets and 48 seconds. Of that time, the total amount of time Vasquez's eyes were averted from the roadway was 6 minuets 47.2 seconds. Using the average moving velocity of47.64 ft/s, Vasquez's eyes were off the roadway for 3.67 miles ofthe 1 1.8 total miles traveled. See Det. Marsland's supplements and the six?page attachment he titled ?Breakdown of Driver's Movement? for additional information. Speed Analysis After the measurements were downloaded into the IMS Map 360 drafting program and a scene diagram was created, I was able to measure and calculate the speeds the pedestrian and the bicycle obtained from impact. Using the point of impact calculated by Det. Marsland, the pedestrian came to rest 74.92 feet after impact. Using the Searle Minimum Throw equation with a 10 degree take off angle, this calculated to a speed of 35 miles per hour. Using the Searle Minimum and Maximum equations, this calculated to a speed of 32 to 39 miles per hour. The bicycle came to rest 105.25 feet after impact. Using a minimum speed loss equation with an adjusted drag factor, this calculated to a speed of 39 miles per hour. These calculated speeds were consistent with the data reported by the Volvo's on-board airbag control module. Information Briefing from Uber TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report aort- Q?tar?cittiot?nii ?ts-?ttest On 3/21/18 at approximately 1500 hours, 1 attended an information brie?ng at the Uber facility located in Tempe. Representatives from Uber presented their preliminary review of the data they downloaded from the Uber/Volvo on 3/20/18. The title of this presentation was K145 Tempe Incident - Preliminary Uber Data Review. Members previously listed from NHTSA and the TSB were also present at this brie?ng. The information in the presentation showed that the Uber computer system did recognize Herzberg prior to im act. The com uter stern also because this is the vehicle operator?s responsibility. The data registered that Vasquez took the vehicle out of autonomous driving mode at about the same time the collision occurred. Video from the camera system located on top of the vehicle captured moments prior to the collision, the collision, and the time period after the collision. The vehicle involved in the crash was equipped by Volvo with City Safety Technology that would allow the vehicle to detect the hazard and initiate an avoidance response. That technology was overridden by Uber. As such, the vehicle could not initiate an avoidance response as designed by Volvo. Search Warrant #2018-003045 and Search Warrant #2018-003228 On 3/21/18, Det. Marsland obtained a search warrant get Rafael Vasquez?s testing and quali?cation records, records regarding the performance speci?cations of the Volvo XC90 as out?tted by Uber, the digital video ?les captured by the on-board self?driving system up?tted by Uber, and the digital document ?le titled Tempe Incident Preliminary Uber Data Review". This search warrant was served at the Uber facility at The Uber company requested additional time to put the ?les together and there were discussions about con?dentiality regarding the requested documents. The decision was made to return the search warrant without seizing any items and to obtain a new search warrant for the same documents to allow Uber more time to come to a legal agreement. Det. Marsland later obtained the second search warrant for the same four documents that were in the previous listed warrant. This warrant was provided to the Tempe PD Legal. Advisor, B. Amato for review prior to delivering to Uber. This warrant was served to Uber and the requested documents were obtained. After reading through the documents obtained from Uber, 1 found that the vehicle operator's initial training covers their responsibilities while operating the vehicles in both manual and in self?driving mode. They learn how to take manual control of the vehicle from the self?driving mode and when driver interventions should take place. There is also an emihasis ilaced on safeti throuihout the trainini and certi?cation irocess. - When the Uber vehicle is in self-driving mode, vehicle operators are taught speci?c The purpose of the the vehicle operator is in the proper position to react as quickly as possible ey are also taught foot positioning referred to as hovering/ shadowing pedals. They are taught that? and the accelerator hover are critical for ensuring safety and rider/passenger comfort. Safety is dependent on the vehicle operator?s capability to manually control the vehicle to mitigate hazards while the vehicle is in self?driving mode. During the current development phase, vehicle operators are relied upon to perform evasive maneuvers. During the vehicle operator training and certi?cation, the trainer watches for TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ears 32w airman" egalitarian" Sauna-5 Wt: Speci?c constraint limits for vehicle steering, braking and acceleration ensure controllability of the self?driving system during vehicle operator activities. These limits allow the vehicle operator an appropriate amount of time to react and perform an evasive or overpowering maneuver, if needed. I was not able to ?nd anywhere in the literature that the self?driving systems alerts the vehicle operator to potential hazards or when they should take manual control of the vehicle to perform an evasive maneuver. Video surveillance Det. Guzman obtained security video footage from the Marquee Theatre located at 740 N. Mill Ave, Tempe. The video footage was from the Marquee Theatre camera #2 from 3/18/18, between approximately 21.44 hours to 2150 hours. Det. Guzman was not able to identify the path of travel taken by Herzberg prior to the collision. He said the quality of the video footage gets poorer the farther the objects are from the camera. He said objects in the immediate area of the camera are fairly clear and identi?able however, objects in the distance are grey and blurred out. Even when the collision takes place, he could not identify the victim in the video. See his supplement for additional information. Autopsy report - Elaine Herzberg aricopa County Office of the Medical Examiner, Case 2018?2500 At the time of this report, the final autopsy report has not yet been completed by the medical examiner. However, the manner and immediate cause of death of Elaine Herzberg was available for release. Manner: Accident Immediate cause of death: Multiple blunt force injuries Search W?arrant #2018-003079, #2018-003080. and #2018-003081 On 3/22/18, Det. McCormick obtained search warrants for the video viewing history of the cell phones collected as evidence from Vasquez. The warrants were served to YouTube/Google, Net?lx and Hulu for the time period of 3/18/18 between 2100 hours and 2300 hours. Netflix reported that there was no activity during the speci?ed time period on either phoneare still waiting for a reply from YouTube/Google and Hulu. See Det. McCormick's supplement for additional information. Vehicle Inspections Det. Seal and Det. McCormick completed a vehicle inspection of the Volvo. See the Vehicle Inspection Form and their supplement for further details. Visibility Studv and Brake Ef?ciency Study (Search Warrant #2018-00302?) TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no? 1.2% it} my amt-3:4 an m- sis-rive On 3/21/18, Det. McCormick obtained search warrant #2018-003020 allowing the Tempe Police Department to move the 2017 Volvo XC90 from impound and to use that vehicle for a visibility study and a brake ef?ciency study in the area where the collision occurred. On 3/22/18 at approximately 1855 hours, Det. McCormick and I entered the vehicle and installed a Vericom VC-4000 (SN VC4101 10602) on the inside of the front windshield. Video of the outside of the vehicle was taken to show the condition of the vehicle prior to the visibility study and the brake ef?ciency study. On 3/22/18 at 2030 hours, I attended a brie?ng that discussed how the visibility and brake performance tests were going to be conducted along with safety procedures. Present at this meeting were the following people: - Commander Pooley - Sergeant Carbajal Detective Marsland Detective Guzman - Detective McCormick - Detective Seal - Of?cer Vela - Arron Harder, Maricopa County Attorney's Of?ce (MCAO) - Tiffany Brady, MCAO - Kayla Halloway MCAO Harold Herrera, NHTSA - James Perry, NHTSA Rafael Marshall, NTSB David Pereira, NTSB Ken Harmon, Institute of Police Technology Management (IPTM) After the brie?ng concluded, I removed the bicycle that was involved in the collision from evidence and secured in the bed of a Tempe Police vehicle. This vehicle was then turned over to Det. McCormick. Det. McCormick was tasked with transporting the bicycle to the collision scene and escorting a tow truck that would transport the Volvo XC90 t0 the collision scene. Northbound Mill Avenue was closed to vehicle and pedestrian traf?c from Rio Salado Parkway to Washington St/Curry Road. Everyone that attended the brie?ng parked near the middle of the northbound Mill Avenue bridge in the #1 traf?c lane. The tow truck transporting the Volvo XC90 parked behind all the vehicles but was in the #2 traf?c lane. Ken Harmon, who instructs courses related to pedestrian/vehicle collision reconstruction for the Institute of Police Technology and Management and an expert in the ?eld, agreed to assist the Tempe Police Department with the visibility study. Det. Seal is 5 feet 7 inches tall and the same height as Vasquez, so he was tasked with driving the Volvo during the visibility study. Of?cer Vela is 5 feet 2 inches tall and the same height as Herzberg, and she was tasked with standing at different locations during the visibility study with the bicycle. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ea} ire slim as its: To avoid in?uencing the outcome of the visibility study, Ken Harmon, who had no previous involvement with this investigation, provided the instructions to Det. Seal. Det. Sea] was told to forget everything he had seen and heard about the collision and that he will not see the exact same things the driver did at the time the collision occurred. Det. Seal was instructed to drive the Volvo northbound across the Mill Avenue bridge at 5 miles per hour towards the area where the collision occurred. He was to stop immediately after he was able to see a pedestrian. He was then to flash the vehicle headlights and to radio to us that he was stopped and was able to see the pedestrian. He was to stay at that position until distance readings could be obtained. After distance readings were obtained, Det. Seal was to turn the vehicle around and drive back to the area where the tow truck was located. Once the next test was ready to begin, he was to turn the vehicle around and begin driving again northbound across the Mill Avenue bridge towards the scene of the collision. The instructions provided to Det. Seal were recorded with my body worn camera and later uploaded to Evidencecom. After the visibility instructions were given to Det. Seal, I then instructed him how to operate the Volvo X90. These instructions were also recorded with my body worn camera and later uploaded to Evidencecom Det. Marsland provided instructions to Of?cer Vela who, was acting as our pedestrian. For each of the visibility tests, Of?cer Vela stood wheredirected and had the bicycle on her left side perpendicular to the roadway similar to how Herzberg was positioned when the collision occurred. We placed Of?cer Vela in three separate locations and tested how visible she was at each location. Of?cer Vela was dressed in dark clothing as Herzberg was the night of the collision. See Det. Marsland's supplement for information regarding the locations Of?cer Vela was placed at during the visibility study and the distanced recorded. Once the visibility tests were completed, Det. Marsland and I tested the braking performance of the Volvo XC90 involved in this crash. I drove the vehicle during the testing, and Det. Marsland recorded the readings from the Vericom for each test. A total of 5 test runs were complete to test the braking capabilities of the vehicle. In each test, the vehicle was driven northbound in the #2 traf?c lane on Mill Avenue at approximately 40 miles per hour. 1 fully applied the brakes when the vehicle was nearing the area of impact and was on the asphalt portion of the roadway. Full braking was applied until the vehicle came to a complete stop. The results of these test were also recorded with the Vericom, and they were later printed out and attached to Det. Marsland?s supplement. The ?ve-average f?values obtained were 0.932, 0.91 1, 0.926, 0.918, and 0.914. These f-values were averaged to a drag factor of 0.92 for this vehicle at the area of the crash, in the same direction of travel, and the same lane as the crash event. For additional information regarding the data obtained from the braking performance tests, refer to the attachments to Bet. Marsland's supplement marked as Run #1 through Once the testing was complete, the Volvo XC90 was loaded back onto the tow truck and transported back to the Tempe Police Department Property and Evidence Facility. Det. McCormick transported the bicycle used in the testing back to the same facility. Both the vehicle and the bicycle were placed back into impound as evidence. Det. McCormick then took pictures and video to document the condition of the vehicle after testing. See his supplement for further information. Weather conditions for visibility study The following weather conditions were recorded at the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport on 3/22/18 at 2151 hours on the evening of the testing: Overcast skies, 77.0 degrees (F), west southwest wind at MPH, lO?mile visibility, TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report am swim. 53?; satin an SarinaSimillit1E8??thrill??1?? 21% humidity, and a dew point of 34 degrees (F). Which were consistent with the conditions at the time of the crash. Additional Access to Vehicle On 3/23/18, representatives from Volvo and Uber were allowed access to the Volvo XC90, so that data related to this crash that was recorded by Volvo could be downloaded. As of4/18/18, a copy ofthe downloaded data has not been obtained. Det. Marsland and Det. Guzman were with the below listed team members while they had access to the vehicle. Det. Guzman also took photos ofthe vehicle to document the condition it was left in. Kate Wolf, Uber - Mark adeau, DLA Piper Law Firm Vincent D'Auria Volvo Cars USA - Jason Guidi, Volvo Cars USA Steve Fenton, Kineticorp (Uber) - Peter Andreasson, Volvo Cars Sweden Jan lvarsson, Volvo Cars Sweden - John?Fredric Gronvall, Volvo Cars Sweden - Henrik Wallin, Volvo Cars Sweden Det. Guzman also allowed David Pereira with NTSB to access the Volvo XC90, so additional photos could be taken of the vehicle. Crash Avoidability Analysis Det. Marsland conducted an analysis to determine if the crash was avoidable using the information learned from the visibility study and braking study. The shortest distance obtained in the visibility study to see the pedestrian, was 637.3 feet. This was adjusted to find the distance at which 85% of drivers should be able to see and identify the pedestrian clearly. 143.04 feet is the adjusted distance at which a driver who is sober, alert, and attentive should be able to detect the pedestrian in this crash. Det. Marsland determined that Vasquez?s actual reaction time for this collision was 0.50 seconds. Det. Marsland determined that the speed of the Volvo XC90 was 43.5 miles per hour when it was 143.04 feet prior to impact. Using the 85th percentile sight distance of 143 feet, the drivers' actual reaction time of 0.50 seconds, the vehicle's reported speed of 43.5 miles per hour, and the average drag factor from testing of 0.92, the driver in this case could have reacted and brought the vehicle to a stop 42.61 feet prior to the pedestrian. Det. Marsland then changed the reaction time of 0.50 seconds to the maximum suggested value from literature to 1.25 seconds and calculated that the crash would still not have occurred. See his report for further information. Findings On 3/18/18 at approximately 2200 hours, Elaine Marie Herzberg was walking westbound across Mill Avenue, south of the intersection with Washington Street/Curry Road, and was not in a marked or unmarked crosswalk. As Herzberg attempted to cross the northbound #2 traffic lane, she was pushing her bicycle and was struck by a vehicle. The vehicle, a gray 2017 Volvo XC90 T8 was registered to Uber and was operating in autonomous TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at? rs? :EiLU'l-s} siea rigs-airmail :3 arms; Quinlanire-raag- rive-- driving mode heading northbound in the #2 lane. Immediately after the collision, Herzberg was transported to the Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center for emergency medical treatment. At approximately 2230 Hours, Herzberg was pronounced deceased because of the injuries she sustained in the collision. Rafael Vasquez was the operator of the Volvo at the time of the collision. Vasquez was responsible for monitoring the vehicle and roadway conditions along its designated route while the vehicle was in autonomous driving mode. In the event of an emergency situation, Vasquez was supposed to take manual control of the vehicle and take evasive action to avoid collisions and/or other potential emergency situations. The Uber/Volvo XC9O vehicle was equipped with a dash camera, and nine recorded video segments from the dash camera were examined leading up to the point of impact. The total distance the vehicle traveled over the nine video segments was 1 1.8 miles. The average velocity of the vehicle while it was in motion during the nine video segments was 47.64 ft/s or 32.5 miles per hour. During the nine video segments, Vasquez looked down 204 times with nearly all of them having the same placement at the lower center console near the area of her right knee. The vehicle was in motion for 21 minutes and 48 seconds, and Vasquez's eyes were averted from the roadway for 6 minutes 47.2 seconds. Using the average moving velocity of 47.64 ft/s, Vasquez?s eyes were off the roadway for 3.67 miles ofthe 1 1.8 total miles traveled. A visibility study and a brake efficiency study were conducted using the Volvo XC90 involved in the crash. The shortest distance obtained in the visibility study to see the pedestrian was 637.3 feet. The distance was adjusted to obtain the distance at which 85% of drivers should be able to see and identify the pedestrian clearly. The ?nal adjusted distance was calculated to be 143.04 feet. Per the dash camera video, Vasquez looked up .50 seconds prior to the crash. Therefore, this time was used as her reaction time for the crash. The vehicles approach speed at the time Vasquez could have reacted to the pedestrian was calculated to be 43.5 miles per hour at 143 feet before impact. Using this distance of 143 feet, the driver's actual reaction time of 0.50 seconds, the vehicle?s reported speed of 43.5 miles per hour, and the average drag factor from testing of 0.92, the driver in this case could have reacted and brought the vehicle to a stop, 42.61 feet before impact if she would have been paying attention to the roadway conditions. Even when changing the reaction time from 0.50 seconds to the maximum suggested value from literature, 1.25 seconds, this crash would not have occurred if Vasquez would have been monitoring the vehicle and roadway conditions and was not distracted. Based on this investigation, the following factors lead to the crash that resulted in the death of Elaine Herzberg: Herzberg unlawfully crossing the road at a location other than a marked crosswalk. Vasquez's inattention to the roadway conditions while operating the vehicle. Vasquez was distracted and looking down for 31% of the 21 minutes and 48 seconds prior to the collision. Vasquez was distracted and looking down for 5.2 seconds of the 5.7 seconds prior to impact. Failure on the part of Vasquez to take control of the vehicle and avoid the crash. Vasquez's disregard for assigned job function to intervene in a hazardous situation. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report rag-{EL e: ,5E)1mrevs-22W; This case is being submitted to the Maricopa County Attorney's Of?ce for review for charges against Rafael Vasquez Pending. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (not TE sin-3:3 ease. ilsl?nt?itp?r?nli Sililkjw/ imam {in Assigned to:20782 - GUZMAN, JAIME Assigned on: Apr-032018 (Tue.) 1240 Capacity:Supplemental Completed:Yes Approved on:04/03/2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related Date/Time: Apr-03-2018 (Tue) On 03/20/18 at approximately .1055 hours, I was requested by Sgt. Carbajal to join him in a meeting at the Tempe Police Department, Apache Substation Community Room located at 1855 Apache Boulevard in Tempe, AZ. Sgt. Carbajal informed me that I was to be a liaison between the Tempe Police Department and all the involved parties. The following members of the Tempe Police Department were present at this meeting: Chief Moir - Assistant Chief Carbajal Assistant Chief Humble - Assistant Chief Buren - Commander Glover - Commander Pooley - Attorney Bill Amato - Sgt. Carbajal Sgt. Elcock - Det. Haubold - Det. Duran Also in attendance were several members of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the National Highway Traf?c Safety Administration (NHTSA). Sgt. Carbajal commenced the meeting with a brief time?line of the incident as follows: Day 1 03/18/18 - 2223 hours - 2230 hours - 2242 hours 2319 hours - 2351 hours Day 2 03/19/18 0037 hours - 01 18 hours 0139 hours 0405 hours 0738 hours 0825 hours 0900 hours 1000 hours First call from Patrol Time of death Traf?c Unit called out Traf?c Unit onscene PD Legal Noti?cation Forensic Unit called out First call received from Uber LE First media inquiry Apache Substation - Warrant for SD video/impound vehicle NHTSA called NTSB called Executive Command Team brie?ng P10 meeting OLIC 1v TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT .1 ?p.31 3' General Offense Report eat; rs imam yams-m saints - 1445 hours Warrant for Vasquez's phone obtained 1555 hours Det. Kelly ATL Vasquez at listed address Vasquez was not there - 1729 hours Det. Haubold contacted Uber LE to get more information on Vasquez 1843 hours New information obtained to locate Vasquez - Information provided to CAST - 2000 hours Det. Kelly contacted by Det. Perkett (CAST) - 2200 hours CAST ceases their attempts to locate Vasquez Day 3 - 03/20/18 - 0730 hours Round table and assignments During this meeting, all the involved parties spoke about their objectives and roles for this investigation. I learned that Det. McCormick was already in the process of obtaining a search warrant in order to complete an Event Data Recorder (EDR) download with the assistance of Det. Strohmeyer of the Scottsdale Police Department. The meeting concluded at approximately 1 145 hours at which time I escorted a group of investigators to Tempe Police Property and Evidence Facility at 1875 Apache Boulevard, Vehicle Bay #Pl35 where the EDR download was going to be completed. We arrived at the vehicle bay at approximately 1205 hours and met with Det. McCormick and Det. Strohmeyer who had already commenced the EDR download. At this time, I informed all the personnel present that I would be activating my Body Worn Camera (BWC) and recording the download process along with any activity inside the vehicle bay. The following personnel were present in Vehicle Bay during the EDR download: David Pereira, NTSB Jane Foster, NTSB - Rafael Marshall, NTSB Harold Herrera, NHTSA - Bill Collins, NHTSA - James Perry, NHTSA After the completion of the EDR download, the above personnel were provided the opportunity to photograph and document any evidence they needed from the involved vehicle. Personnel from NTSB and NHTSA completed their evidence gathering at approximately 1330 hours. At approximately 1334 hours, a group of representatives from Uber were granted access to vehicle bay 35 so they could complete a data off load from their vehicle. The following representatives were present: - Matthew Gore, Uber . Jacob Driggs, Uber - Daniel Tascione, Uber - Noah Zych, Uber . Brandon Basso, Uber TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report F's? 31c; paganism stints; in - Stephen McHenry, Uber According to Brandon Basso, the vehicle was powered and plugged in for the data download at approximately 1340 hours. I was relieved for a break by Det. McCormick at approximately 1424 hours. At this time, I turned off my BWC. I returned to the vehicle bay at approximately 1544 hours and relieved Det. McCormick. I also re-activated my BWC. At approximately 1600 hours, Basso informed me that the data download was complete and the team had re-connected to the vehicle to complete the Volvo data offload. The Volvo data offload was completed at approximately .1620 hours. At approximately 1631 hours, everyone was cleared from vehicle bay and the vehicle bay was secured. On 03/22/ 18 at approximately 1650 hours, I contacted Donny Johnson, the General Manager at the Marquee Theatre located at 730 Mill Avenue in Tempe, AZ. Donny assisted me with reviewing the business' security cameras for any possible angles that may have captured the collision from 03/18/18. While reviewing the numerous exterior camera angles, I observed that camera #2 was pointed towards the southeast and captured vehicles traveling north and southbound on Mill Avenue. The security video footage from 03/18/18 at 2200 hours was queued up and it appeared the collision had already taken place. The video was re-wound until the collision was observed to have taken place on the video. The footage of the collision is not clear, however the Uber vehicle can be observed approaching northbound on Mill Avenue and then stopping once the collision took place. According to the time stamp on the Marquee security video camera, the collision occurred at 21:46:55. I was provided with a copy of the security footage from Marquee Theatre camera #2 for 03/ 18/ 18 from 21:44:11 to 21:50:58. This video was later uploaded to evidencecom as evidence. Once at my desk, I reviewed the Marquee Theatre video footage numerous times, attempting to locate the victim prior to the collision. My goal was to identify the victim's path of travel prior to the collision. After viewing the footage multiple times, 1 was unsuccessful in locating the victim in the video footage prior to the collision. The quality of the video footage becomes poorer the farther the objects are from the camera. Objects in the immediate area of the camera are fairly clear and identifiable however, objects in the distance appear grey and blurred out. Even at the time that the collision took place, I could not identify the victim in the video. At approximately 2030 hours, I attended a briefing at the Tempe Police Department Apache Substation Community Room located at 1855 Apache Boulevard in Tempe. Also present in the meeting were the following people: - Commander M. Pooley - Sergeant Carbajal Detective Haubold Detective Marsland TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report aw rs; .ilr?gra'mlmral alert-es - Detective McCormick Detective Seal - Of?cer Vela - Aaron Harder, Maricopa County Attorney?s Of?ce (MCAO) - Tiffany Brady, MCAO - Kayla Halloway, MCAO - Harold Herrera, NHTSA James Perry, NHTSA - Rafael Marshall, NTSB - David Pereira, NTSB - Ken Harmon, Institute of Police Technology Management (IPTM) Sgt. Carbajal reviewed the goal for the tests and some safety procedures. The brie?ng concluded at approximately 2040 hours. At approximately 2050 hours, with the assistance of Sgt. Bulson and Of?cer Trader, I began setting up the road closures in the area of Mill Avenue and Rio Salado Parkway in order to shut down all northbound Mill Avenue traf?c from Rio Salado Parkway. Once everyone that was at the brie?ng arrived at Mill and Rio Salado and the northbound Mill Avenue bridge was cleared of vehicular and pedestrian traf?c, the group was escorted to the middle ofthe northbound Mill Avenue bridge. All vehicles were parked on northbound lane #1 ofMill Avenue with the exception of the tow truck transporting the Volvo which parked in lane Testing commenced at approximately 2136 hours, with instructions from Harmon and concluded at 2230 hours. All the data collected during the testing was recorded by Det. Marsland. Please refer to his report for further details. After a short debrief, northbound Mill Avenue was opened up for regular traf?c at approximately 2330 hours. On 03/23/18 at approximately 1000 hours, Sgt. Carbajal requested 1 relieve Det. Marsland in vehicle bay as he was standing by with some representatives from Volvo and Uber. At approximately 1024 hours, I relieved Det. Marsland and observed the following people inspect the Volvo involved in the collision: - Kate Wolf, Uber - Mark Nadeau, DLA Piper Law Firm - Vincent D?Auria, Volvo Cars USA - Jason Guidi, Volvo Cars USA - Steve enton, Kineticorp (Uber) - Peter Andreasson, Volvo Cars Sweden - Jan Ivarsson, Volvo Cars Sweden - John-Fredrik Gronvall, Volvo Cars Sweden - Henrik Wallin, Volvo Cars Sweden At approximately 1047 hours, H. Wallin, V. D'Auria, P. Andreasson and J. Ivarsson left the vehicle bay and the property. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report cam re swans: swung"Ringling-- r?t?l-EX?l?? At approximately 1 102 hours, J. Gronvall and J. Guidi left the vehicle bay and the property. At approximately 1219 hours, M. Nadeau left the vehicle bay and the property. At approximately 1245 hours, K. Wolf and S. Fenton left the vehicle bay and the property. At approximately 1246 hours, I took several photos of the Volvo to document the condition it was left in. These photos were uploaded as evidence. The vehicle bay was secured at approximately 1253 hours. At approximately 1320 hours, I returned to vehicle bay with David Pereira (NTSB). Pereira was given access to the vehicle bay so he could take some more photos of the Volvo. The Volvo was reversed approximately 8-10 feet within the bay for the photos. Once Pereira ?nished taking the photos, the Volvo was returned to its original position and secured inside the bay at approximately 1327 hours. This completed my involvement in this investigation. For further details, please refer to Det. Haubold's original report as well as all other involved Officer and Detective supplemental reports. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 9?10}? .Eiirl?ii??i??h- 59:11:; or trait-.11 :?iint?ilii?r aware f?ii's'II .01" ?tsists?irii 5-51? Assigned to:19343 - SEAL, JONATHAN Assigned on: Apr-03-2018 (Tue) 1444 Capacity:3eeondary investigator Completed:Yes Approved on:04i03l2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: DETECTIVE NARRATIVE Related DateI'Time: Apr-032018 (Tue) On 3-20?18, I was asked by Sergeant Carbajal to assist with this collision investigation. After being provided background information on the investigation, I was tasked with obtaining a subpoena for the medical records of pedestrian Elaine Herzberg from her treatment at Scottsdale Osborne Hospital for injuries sustained in this collision. I was also tasked with initiating an emergency request from Uber 0f the vehicle driver, Rafael Vasquez's training records and personnel ?les, as well as all of Uber?s policies, procedures, and driver training requirements for the operation of autonomous vehicles. I ?rst logged into Uber?s law enforcement response team (LERT) portal where I put in LERT request number 0001 1562 for Vasquez?s training records, personnel ?les, and all of Uber's policies and procedures governing the operation of autonomous vehicles. I was contacted shortly thereafter by Uber LERT employee Lisa O'Conner who advised that she would be processing my emergency request and that Uber would need a subpoena for the records within 7 days. I then petitioned the Tempe Municipal Court for an order for disclosure of medical records for Herzberg's medical treatment at Scottsdale Osborne Hospital. At approximately 1001 hours, Tempe Court Judge S. Fuller signed order number 18-0003 ordering the release of Herzberg?s medical records from Scottsdale Osborne Hospital. At approximately 11 15 hours I served order number 18?0003 to Honor Health corporate of?ces located at 8125 S. Hayden Rd, Scottsdale. On 3-21-18, I petitioned the Tempe Municipal Court for an order for disclosure of records pertaining to vehicle driver Rafael Vasquez's training records and personnel ?les, as well as all of Uber's policies, procedures, and driver training requirements for the operation of autonomous vehicles. At approximately 1330 hours, Tempe Court Judge S. Fuller signed order number 18?0004 ordering the release of such documents by Uber Technologies, Inc. Shortly thereafter, I spoke with Uber LERT employee Lisa O'Conner about delivering the order to Uber. After speaking with O'Conner, I uploaded the subpoena to the Uber LERT portal, and mailed an of?cial copy with the Court seal to Uber Technologies' Custodian of Records in San Francisco, CA. On 3-22?18, at approximately 0730 hours, 1 was provided search warrant number SW2018003045 signed by Judge McLaughlin of the Maricopa County Superior Court and asked to serve it to the Uber Technologies, Inc of?ce at_ At approximately 0829 hours, I served Uber Technologies, Inc search warrant number SW2018003045 authorizing police to seize the following: 1. Digital Document titled, Tempe Incident Preliminary Uber Data Review" containing data of the collision which occurred on 3-18?1 8 at approximately 2158 hours in the area ofMill Ave and Curry Rd, and which involved the Volvo XC90 with AZ plate 2. Digital video ?les captured by on?board cameras of the Volvo XC90 Self?Driving-System (SDS)which shows the events immediately before, during, and immediately after the crash described above. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as} at [awaits as; mm aaiatiaa' .sxiu Momma: 3. Any digital documentation to support the maximum allowed vehicle maneuvering commands supplied by the Self-Driving?System (SDS) to the vehicle involved in this event, including, but not limited to, maximum steering rate, maximum braking force, and curb weight of Volvo XC90 out?tted with the SDS. 4. Any documentation regarding the testing and quali?cation of the driver, Rafael Stuart Vasquez, with respect to documented perception/reaction times during training exercises/exams. The warrant was left with Uber employee Matthew Gore who advised that Uber attorney Matthew Burton would be in contact with Sergeant Carbajal regarding the search warrant and the handing over of the above listed documents. On 3-22-18, at approximately 2100, I participated in a nighttime visibility study at the scene of this collision. This study was conducted using the crashed Uber vehicle that had been driven by Vasquez, as well as the bicycle that had been pushed across the roadway by Herzberg. During this study, as I am the same height as Rafael Vasquez, I drove the Uber vehicle that was involved in this collision. Of?cer V. Vela also participated in this study as she is close to the same height as Herzberg. During the study, Of?cer Vela wore similar clothing as to what Herzberg had been wearing during this collision. Of?cer Vela also stood in the roadway with Herzberg's bicycle close to the point of impact from the collision. While Of?cer Vela was standing in the roadway, I drove the Uber vehicle northbound in the number 2 lane of Mill Avenue at approximately 5 MPH. At the point at which I could see Of?cer Vela and discern that she was a pedestrian in the roadway, I immediately stopped the Uber vehicle and stayed there Detective Marsland could use a LIDAR unit to measure the distance between Vela and the Uber. Three separate "runs? were conducted in this manner, each time with Of?cer Vela in different positions in the roadway, but even (north/south) with the collisions point of impact. It should be noted that prior to this study, I did not go to the scene of this collision and did not know exactly where the point of impact was at the scene. Additionally, I was not told any information prior to the study about how or where Of?cer Vela would be positioned in the roadway. For information regarding the data collected and exact parameters of this study, refer to the original report written by Detective Haubold. On 3-29?18, I asked Detective McCormick to follow up with Scottsdale Osborne Hospital regarding Herzberg?s medical records. This concludes my involvement in this investigation. For further information regarding this investigation, refer to the original report written by Detective Haubold. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report *?te asst Ainslie-rsearns; he 42*? Lie raglan ail?) Assigned to:22020 - MCCORMICK, MICHAEL Assigned on: May-172018 (Thu) 1444 Capacity:Supplemental Completeszes Approved on:05/17/2018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Related Date/Time: May-172018 (Thu) 1445 NARRATIVE: site and was available for me to view Rafaela Vasquez. There was also an the time period requested. shared the same time. documents provided included a certi?cate of authenticity, shows the hash values for the two zip ?les they provided. In viewing the spreadsheet provided by six entries ranging from 1845 hours to ID, Device and Internet Service Provider that wa Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATIVE On 04/02/18, I received a response from Net?ix in reference to search warrant number 8-00308]. I received the response via email through an history during the requested time period for the accoun from Net?ix are attached to this supplement. 1e. I opened the ?le and it showed there was no viewing registered to Rafaela Vasquez. The documents received On 05/07/18, I received an email noti?cation from Google that the information requested in the search warrant I served on them, search warrant number 8?003079, had been uploaded onto their secure law enforcement . I went to the site and I printed the documents that had been prepared. The I viewed the two zip ?les and each merely contained the Google Account, which was and it listed the information that would be contained in this ?le was the YouTube watch history. There was not additional information in either of the zip ?les, which indicates there requested. The documents received from Google are attached to this a general response letter and an Attachment A which 7 as no viewing history during the period upplement. On 05/07/18, I found an envelope from Hulu in my work mailbox. Upon reviewing its contents, I found this was a response from Hulu reference search warrant number SW2018-003080. In the response there was account information, which con?rmed the account associated with the email address was for Attachment A, which showed the viewing history for this account during In viewing the spreadsheet of the watch history, the show Bones episode watched from 18:45:22 hours to 19:27:49 hours. The show Bones episod Hulu for the watch history on 03/18/18, I could see there were a total of 2142 hours. On each of these entries there is a start and end time along with the series and episode being watched. The spreadsheet also shows the subscription ID, IP Address, Source 3 streaming the videos. During the time period provided the Subscription ID was_ which is the subscription ID for the account assigned to Rafaela Vasquez. The device streaming the video was an iPhone 7 and Sprint is shown as the internet provider. In the search warrant] served to Hulu, I requested the times be provided in Mountain Standard Time. The spreadsheet I was provided had the viewing history in Paci?c Standard Time. In doing some research, I discovered that on 03/ 1 1/18 daylight savings time went into effect and California began observing Paci?c Daylight Time (PST). On the date of the collision Paci?c Daylight Time and Mountain Standard Time were "Spaceman in a Crater" was being "The Glowing Bones in the Old Stone TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report m5: re; re reassign -, Urmm?r?l am Lisa-1:1. airless House" was being viewed from 19:30:19 hours to 19:53:01 hours. There was a break for twenty?six seconds and the show Bones episode "The Glowing Bones in the Old Stone House" continued at 19:53:27 hours and ended at 20:13:28 hours. The show Bones episode "Stargazer in a Puddle" began at 20: 13:53 hours to 20:56:45 hours. The show Bones episode "The Widow?s Son in the Windshield" played from 20:57:07 hours to 21:40:05 hours. The last entry was for the show Bones episode "Soccer Mom in the Mini-Van? which began at 21 :41 :59 hours and played for only seventeen seconds, ending at 21:42:16 hours. The latest episode that is played ended at 21:42:16 hours and the collision as reported at 2200 hours. Although these two times do not overlap, it is certain that there is watching history through Hulu while Rafaela was operating the self?driving vehicle. 1 have sent Hulu a request to clarify the times provided for the viewing history, since it was not provided in Mountain Standard Time as requested. Also, 1 have inquired about a possibility of a variance in times reported in their viewing history. When clari?cation is received, the information will be added to this report. The documents provided by Hulu are attached to this supplement. Pending TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?ea-rs classes .979 e11 ?rst airs his: res-71W; Sicilians up sigma: an Assigned to:20595 - MARSLAND, KASEY Assigned on: May-172018 (Thu) 1532 Capacity:8upplementa Completed:Yes Approved on:0571772018 Approved STEVEN A Narrative Text #1 Document: NARRATIVE Related Datei'Time: May-17-2018 (Thu) 1534 This supplement is meant to add detail and clari?cation to the ?nal paragraph of the "Avoidability Analysis" section in my ?rst supplemental report. Speci?cally, the details of the analysis and methodology regarding the crash reconstruction based on a 1.25 second perception and reaction time will be outlined in this supplement. The approach to this analysis was conducted using the same parameters as the reconstruction showing a 0.5 second perception and reaction time. The original visibility distance of 637.3 ft was adjusted for all factors to a distance of 143.4 ft. The reported speed of the Volvo, based on the EDR report, at 143.3 ft prior to impact was 43.5 mph, or 63.77 fps. In examining the referenced literature regarding perception and reaction time by Olson, Dewar, and Farber (Chapter 18, speci?cally), I noted that the speci?c situation of a pedestrian in front of a vehicle was addressed. In this case, a reaction time range of 0.6 to 1.25 seconds was stated to be likely. I used the upper end of this range for this analysis at 1.25 seconds. With 143.3 feet remaining prior to the location of impact, the vehicle would travel 79.71 feet during the 1.25 second reaction time, leaving 63.33 feet remaining. At the Volvo?s determined drag factor, the vehicle would need 68.84 feet to come to a complete stop from that speed, so the vehicle would reach the point of impact at a speed of 12.00 mph, or 17.59 fps. The time it would take for the vehicle to slow from 63.77 to 17.59 at a drag factor of 0.92 was calculated to be 1.56 seconds. Ifthe vehicle had not braked and had continued to travel at the original speed of 63.77 fps, it would have continued to the point of impact over the ?nal 63.33 feet in 0.99 seconds. Because of this, the driver could have given the pedestrian an extra 0.57 seconds in which to continue walking forward. Using the speed analysis from the video, which showed the pedestrian's walking speed at 3.18 mph, 1 calculated how much further forward the pedestrian could have walked in 0.57 seconds. 1 found that the pedestrian would have advanced another 2.64 feet toward the vehicle?s right side. Detective Haubold advised me that he had measured the damaged area on the hood of the Volvo and determined that the pedestrian would have needed to advance feet to clear the front bumper of the vehicle. Because the braking of the vehicle gave the pedestrian an extra 0.57 seconds, the pedestrian would have been able to advance past the end of the front bumper of the Volvo before the Volvo arrived at the pedestrian?s path. For this reason, the crash was deemed avoidable. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report I :2 its} :a etiliaahi militant .43."st Rapier: ?21.81? Assigned to:22020 - MCCORMICK, MICHAEL Assigned on: Jun-19-2018 (Tue) 1224 Capacity:8upplemental Completed:No Approved on: Approved by: Narrative Text #1 Document: SUPPLEMENTAL OFFICER NARRATIVE Related Date/Time: Jun-19-2018 (Tue) 1225 On 05/07/18, I received a response from Hulu reference the search warrant I served on the company, search warrant number I completed a supplement documenting the information I received from Hulu and I attached a copy of the viewing histo ry to the report. I had some questions about the information provided by Hulu, so I sent them an email looking for clari?cation on some of the information. I sent this email on 05/10/18. On 05/17/18 at 1741 hours, I received an email response from Hulu Legal. The email read, ?We received your email below and are gathering answers to your questions. In reviewing the previous response, we determined that we may have inadvertently included data relating to another user. Please disregard the previous response. with the correct data." At the time I received this email, I had completed We will serve an amended response a supplement regarding the information they already provid provided to the report. On 05/31/18 at 1745 hours, I received another email from Hulu Le answers to the questions I had given them. Attached to the email was being provided pursuant to the search warrant. ed to me and I had attached the documents they gal. In this response Hulu Legal provided was the new viewer history information which In this document it shows the information is for the account associated with email address and the account user name was Rafaela Vasquez with date of birth? The user ID for shown for this account is- and it shows the Internet Service Provider for the viewing was T- Mobile USA Inc. In looking at the viewing history, I saw Rafaela Vasquez? Hulu account was playing The Voice, which is a talent show. The viewing began on 03/18/18 at approximately 21 :16:45 hours and the last viewing time shown was 21:59:00 hours. Hulu made notice that there were times were heartbeats were not sent every twenty-nine to thirty seconds between 21:37:33 hours to 21:40:23 hours. Hulu stated the "delay in heartbeats could have been caused by any one of a number of circumstances including, but not limited to, the user pausing the player, the user switching to a different app, a buffering issue, or the phone losing service." The end time of 2 :59:00 hours coincides with the approximate time of the collision. For further on the viewing history, refer to the spreadsheet provided by Hulu, which is attached to this supplement. I have also attached the email I sent Hulu with clarifying questions regarding the information the initially provided along with their response to on the spreadsheet. Pending questions clarifying what heartbeats are and how those appear TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report cm? ?j?m?iu Dramas} my?? HQ I 1. ?7 mmimhwsa I Entry Papenzvork Description:VEH HELD FOR EVIDENCE 18-32694 VEHICLE IMPOUNDIIVIODIFY HELD FOR EVIDENCE DETECTIVE HAUBOLD #11638 MILucunRv 31?19f18 NUAJLNATBCUO 12:50 03/19/2018 16878 12:50 03X19I2018 10827 A20072921 TXT IMPOUND RECORD UPDATED FILII1807801678 ORIGINATING TRANSACTION H296 A.C.I.C. IMPOUNDED VEHICLE OPII H296 ORIGINATING TRANSACTION MVD.18-01 RR.00729210.A20072900.TXT N0 PRIOR PLATES ORIGINATING TRANSACTION ?oz 2/ POLICE ?En-"255? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ma TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE Location: 601%: INFORMATION: 1 21-32694 Reporting Of?cer: Stolen DETECTIVE HAUBOLD #11638 Recovered Date (earliest): Time [earliest]: Date (latest): Time (latest): Recovered FOJ 03r'l9f2018 0500 I License it: License State: '7 Police Impound AZ ?ed r- lmmohil'ranlion Device illegally Parked Year: 2017 Make; VOLVO l? Traf?c Hazard Hil Run Model: XCQU Color: GRY Other EVIDENCE Doors: Misc: IJ. Releasable; Release Contact Person: Release Contact Phone: t? Yes No RIO UATC, LLC Th" Sim:? Zii; (CelUMessageifm ?Vehicle Conditi?f Who Else}; t?heft? ?Door locfed: Ignition?Locked: - Keys in Vehicle: Pegietration in Vehicle: Yes No Unknown [3 Yes No Unknown DYes BN0 [:IUnknown DYes BNO Unknown Recovery Condition: Value oi'Vehicle [Stolen?Recovered only: Owner Different than Victim (Specify): Towing Company: Telephone Number: . Vehicle Stored at': . . . Owner Noti?ed on (Date): By: Whmf? Method nFIFd?lT?a?Jon: Telephone 1" Message Note Fax Other If Other: Recover Notice Mailed on (Date): By: Certi?ed: CI Letter (Recovered Tempe stolen ONLY) Card Note: If owner was not contacted. Specify reason: Processed for Prints: Yes No Suspect Information: Computer Entries C'OIquleted {Copies Attached Entered by: lAcoUE Ill?#21894 Date: 03/190013 Tillie: 130 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (mire renew onitlemmomwe Starter mo nee-tote) Type:Document Description:SEARCH WARRANT orzuzuw (revue PM your: your rag: Tempo Police Department City of Tempe AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF If? I 2" I r' Warrant Number: 5,11? Tempe Poiice incident Report 18-3 2694 Your aifieni. Detective K. Marsiand. #20595, a peace of?cer in the State of Arizona. being first duly swam. upon oath, deposes and says: That on or aboul the 18in day oi March. 2018, in the County of Maricope. State at Arizona. the crime of Manslaughter was committed by Reiasi Stuart Vasquez AKA: Refaeie Dore oi Birth. That the affront has probable cause to believe that on the personfsi of. on the prom ises known as; Ubei Sell Drivii. Vehicle Center .9 the vehioiets) described as; In the City or Tempe. County oi Maricopo. State of Arizona. there is now being processed or concealed Certain persons. property. or [hinge which: E: was stolen or embezzled. was used as means of comiiting a public offense. is being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. is in posseSsion of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. El constitutes evidence tending to Show that at public offense has been committed, or tending to show that the suspect named above has committed the offense. Ci such person is the sablecl at an outstanding arrest warrant. That said property or things are described as follows.- 1 Digitai document litied? Tempe incident Preliminary Uber Data Review.? containing data of the collision which occurred on 0-3-1346 at approximately 2158 hours in the area of and Curry Rzi. and which involved the Volvo x090 with AZ plate of (280955? Page 1 r. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report roe-rift: ("Tittle to] Eti?titeti? Elite-3t"? like. Temlfar 23, 2313.? Mil/20.15 Pnuo crow rah? 93mm 3' Tempe Police Department City 0! Tempe 2. Digital video files captured by era-board cameras oi the Volvo X090 Selt-Grtving-Syelem (SDSJ which show the events Immediately before, dunng, and immediately after the crash described above. 3. Any digital documentation to support the maximum allowed vehicle maneuvering commands supplied by the (5 to the vehicle Involved in this event, including. but not limited to; maximum steering rate. maximum braking force. and curb weight of Volvo X090 out?tted with SDS. 4. Any documentation regarding the testing and qualification of the driver, Rafael Stuart VaSquez. with respect to documented perceptior?reaotlon times during training exerciseatexarns. That the tollowing facts establish probable cause for believing that the grounds tor the issuance of a search warrant for the aforementioned items extst: Your Ar?ani is a police of?cer in the State otArlzona and has been employed by the City of Tempe, Tempe Police Department, for 9.5 years. i am currently assigned to the Traffic investigation Bureau, Vehicular Crimes Unit I have the toitowrng training and experience: i received certi?cation as a police of?cer after attending at the: Phoenix Regional Police Academy Anzona Law Enforcement Academy Other: Mesa Police Academy My duty ?slam-lento have included traf?c entorcemenl. impaired driving investigation, and collision investigation. i have specialized training in: Impaired Drrving tnvesligetton El Horizontal Gaze Nyetagrnus Drug Recognition and Classi?cation (Drug Recognition Expert) Collision intrestigalton Reconstruction Methodology and Techniques of Crush Date Retrieve: Commercial Motor Vehiote Inspection {Commercial vehicle Safety Specialist} Weights and Measures {Limited Wetghmaster) Other: Page 2 l6" Barrow .41 . TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report oer; ramming! odometer deities; Temiviar 21 3/21/2011: rtzemu your. roll: 9-331m; ix; Tempe Police Department i City of Tempe REG UL AR INFORMATION FORM That on or about the 13th clay of March 2016. your At?anl learned the totiowing inlormation in the following manner: On at approximately 2158 hours, Rafael Vasquez was driving a Volvo X090. owned by Rafael's employer, the Uber company. Rafael-was northbound in the euro lane of Mill Ave jest south of Curry Rd in the City of Tempe. County oi Marlcopa. State ot Arizona. This particular vehicle Wars out?tted with a salt-driving system for research and development oy the Uber company. and Rafael had the system engaged at the time of this incident. While Rafael was northbound on Milt live and approaching Curry Rd. a pedestrian was walking her bicycle across the roadway from west to east. Ralael's vehicle struck the pedestrian, resulting in the pedestrian's death Video footage from the interior oi the Volvo was viewed, showing that Rafael had been looking down at an unknown item near her right knee for approximately 5.3 seconds before looking up at the roadway. As ellidenced by the video footage. Rafael looked up only 0.5 seconds priorto impact with the pedestrian. A document was prepared by the Uber company detailng their preliminary data analysis of this crash. Since the Utter company Identi?es vehicles with a unique identi?er number. they have titled this document to re?ect that it contains the Preliminary Data Analysis for the K145 Event: being the identification number of the Volvo XCBO vehicle involved in this crash. This document was viewed by your alliant. a detective with the Tempe Police Department. on 03-21-18 at approximately 1530 hours and was found to contain information outlining the driver?s training? duties. and qualifications. Most notably, this document outlines the limitations ot the Soil-Driving-Syste'm (805) In Its current state of deployment in its research and development process. as well as the duties that the Uber company places on the driver in relation to those limitations when an emergency situation apparent. r. This document also outlined information that drivers are tested tor reaction times to an emergency sliuetion as part of theirqualliioation process for drivers operating a vehicle equipped with an 508, Also shown with the document were digital video ?les from the cameras mounted in the rooftop 503 which captured the alronts surrounding the Crash. Based on this information your amanl is requesting a search warrant for obtainan data andler documents involvedin this case tor reoonetmotion and investigative purposes Page 3 lg? 32er OLIC IL TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Ed NE 'l?Hlnirrar 5' . 5: :Ijjrh?. r.1..3.vu rm rnuu utvv. a- f. Tempe Paiice Depanment City of Tempe . I [j SEARCH WARRANT: I The time is now hours am: the warrant mus! be served a?er 10:00 PM and before 5:30 AM because: The evidence requesiad is are perishable nature and a time deiay would render Ii uselessi Based upon the prececing Facts, 1, Daieciive K. Marsiand #20595. your A?iam. requesr a nighttime search warrani be issued. DAYTIME SEARCH WARRANT: .Based upon the preceding racks. i. Detective K. Marsland #20595. your Miami, request a dayiime search warrant iba issuea?. Wherefore airrant prays that a search warrant be issued commanding thai an immediate search be made of the person(s), premises. andfor vehiciets) described herein for the permns, pmpony? and thin 93 herein described and the! the same be retainud In the custody or the Af?ant or in the custody of the agency which A?iant represents and dispersed of according to law. pursuant to ARS. 13-3911 and 13-3924. 1/ Win-??6 Sariai No. #20595. Tempe Police Department 3mm AF files-95? . Subscribed and sworn berore Page 4 r8r TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report in tot. Wt 0* i i3". ii'Eic?iTWE?; '3'?icii?ie Toni-Ear 2i 3/21/2018 7:29:38 PM PAUL mum Tempe Police Depanment City of Tempe SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF STATE OF ARIZONA Warrant Number: GI ?3?)sz Tempe Police incident Report: 1&3269d MW PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by mam having been made this day to me by Tempe Poiice once} Detective Marsland #20595. lam satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: On the osteonis) oi: On the premises known as: Uber Scii Drivini Vehicle Center [3 In the vehicieis) described es' in the City of Tempe. County of Maricopo. State of Arizona. there is now being processed or condeeled certain persons. property. or things described as: 1.. Digital document titted. Tempe incident - Preliminary Uber Date Review." containing data or the collision which occurred on 03-18-13 at approximately 2156 hours in the area of Mill Ave and Curry Rd, and which involved the Volvo x090 with AZ plate of 1. Digital video ?les captured by ran-board cameras of the Voivo X090 Seil-Driving-Systam (SIDS) notch snow the events immediately before, during, and immediately after the crash described above. 2. Any digital documentation to support the maximum allowed vehicle maneuvering commands supplied by the Sell-Driving-System (SDS) 20 the vehicle involved in this event. including. but not limited to. . maximum steering rate. maximum braking force. and curb weight of Volvo X090 out?tted with SDS. 3. Any documentation regarding the testing and quali?cation of the driver, Rafael Stuart Vasquez. with resoeot to dowrnented pomoo?onireoction times during training oxerciseciexams. which property or things: [3 was stolen or erribezzied. . El was used as means of committing a public o?ense. is being possessed with the inter-t to use as a means of committing a public offense. 533' is in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public onenae has been committed, or tending to show that the L- listed suspect has committed the offense. loch person is the subject oi an outstanding arrest warrant. {i Page 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report re. fZQFI-iw?giggigyt 0) Am ?tit-3i: tA HEYAEE .1. 4 O?irie- '33 HF 8.34% arm/zeta 7:24:38 pm PAGE '?/007 nun?h. Tempe Police Depariment Crly of Tempe Such public o?ense being Manstaughtet, which occurred on or about the 18th day of March. 2016, In Temps. Maticopa. Arizona. YOU ARE THEREFORE in the daytime (exctuding the time period of between 13:00 PM and 6:30 in the nighttime (good cause therefore having been Show)1 to make a search of the above described person premises, andior vehioie(5). for the herein above described property or things. and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof. to retain such in your custody or in the custody of the Tempe Ponce Dope rtmont, as provided by ARS. 13-3920. Execute this warrant within ?ve calendar days from Its issuance and return this warrant within three court business days alter the wananiis executed, as directed by ARS. 13-391 . Given under my hand and dated this 1 day of [figs Time: Of Court 6mm . armaicom COUNTY sweeten count WARRANT SERVICE Time: Ci AM [3 PM Receipt for property taken: Tempe incident - Ubar Date Review," digital document. Ivrdeo mes documenting incldent of maximum EDS inputs to venicte a from testing of suspect, Retest Vasquez [3 See attached property to Page 6 New . TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "Toe-23' re. rummage are) mi store 2; Tempe Police Department City of Tempe STANDARD ARIZONA INVENTORY AFFIDAVIT RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT Warrant Number: SW2018003045 Tempe Police Incident Report: 18-32594 I, Detective K. Marsland #20595. a peace of?cer of the State of Arizona, being duly sworn upon oath depose and say. that on the 22nd day of March, 201 B, executed this search warrant, issued by Judge Jane McLaughlin, and the following described property or substance was seized: Tempe incident Preliminary Uber Data Review.? digital document. Digital video files documenting incident. Documentation of maximum SDS inputs to vehicle. PerceptionfReaction data from testing of suspect, Rafael Vasquez. . See attached property formts). no ITEMS senzeo due to ongoing legal discussions with Uber. [further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of all property taken by me, pursuant to ARS, 13?3921 and that a detailed receipt for the property taken was: Reviewed with the suspect and then left in the suspect's property locker at the jail or the location the property was seized. Given to the suspect. Other: A copy was qiven to Uber ieqai representation. This warrant was returned subscribed and sworn before me this 27th day of March, 2018. L'Mt??j $21; AFFIANW Detective Marsia rid #20595 JUDGE OR MAGISTRATE Of the Court HONORABLE MICHELLE CARSON A COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report am comm; to?ixi :taf?xoi?ii 1%??th Type:Document Description WARRANT 2018-002883 ""?iuiar. 19. 20TH No. 8??3 P. 2" 33% Goszuwoszm POLICE DEPARTMENT [ft/jg. CITY OF more, ARIZONA if; COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 23/8 ?001.833 REPORT #2913?032594 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by af?davit having been made this day to me by: Detective J. Barutha, #19443 i am satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: in the Vehicle/(s) described as: 2017 Grey Volvo XC99 4 Door Station Wagon) VIN: Arizona license Piste: Registered Owner: UATC Luz, Currently located at Tempe Police Property and Evidence Unit located at 1875 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, AZ. in the city of Tempe, County oanrieupa, State of Arizona, thorc is now being processed or concealed certain persons, property, or ?lings described as: 0 Seizure of :1 SD (Secure Digital), non-volatile memory card containing video and meta data associated with that video located in a review min-or camera. I Seizure of any additional video andfor audio From March 2018 and any meta data associated with the video or audio stored on digital storage devices and computer systems within the vehicle or stored remotely at a remote facility on a remote server or computer. I The ability to conduct OIL?site previeWs andfur conduct complete furorilic examinations to include the examination of all stored lists on the electronic items solved during the semi: warrant. - Photographs of any recording, storage or computing devices located inside or outside of the vehicle. Which property or things: El Were stolen or embezzled. - were used as means ofoommitting a public offense. TEMPE 12.2. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT ?235-3 General Offense Report @222 r: 22 6322 2.222 222 2013* [110.8323 P. 3 is (are) being possessed with the inter-Ho use as a means of committing a public offense. is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it ?ombeing discovered. +3 constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. A peace o??lcer in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That on March 18, 2018 in the County of Mnricopa, State of Arizona, the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter (Arizona Revised Statute 13-1103.A.1) was committed. YOU ARE COIVIMANDED in the dwtime (excluding the time period ofbetWeen 10:00 RM. and 6:30 AM.) Or nighttime (good cause the-efore havingbeen shown) to make a search of the above named or described person(s), premises, vehicles fur the herein about described property or things, and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof, to retain such in your custody Or in the custodybr in the custody of the Tempe Police Department, as provided WARS. 13-3 920. [3 On a reasonable showing that an atmonneed entry to execute the warrant would endanger the safety of any person or would result in the destruction of any of the items described in the warrant. the magistrate shall authorize an unannounced entry, as provided by A.R.S- 13-39] 5.13. Ream: this warrant to me within three (3) days ofthe elem: as directed by A.R.S. 13-3918. Given under my hand and dated this 19th day ofMarch, 2018. ?42? IndgefCommissione-r Mariwpa County Search Wanton: Center Lem ASH whim? 2222022220222" ummom or?: 7? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 5&0 m: h??eh's Tim-enema] came AD mimett?egxss we RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT I certify that on 3i19f2018, I executed search warrant SW2018-002883 issued by Honorable Lori Ash and that seized the following described items of preperty: Itemstescriptiens SanDisk Extreme Plus 64GB MiereSD card from a Janus V3 Dash Camera (Installed Near Rear View Mirror). Contains video oi accident. IE I further certify that I gave a detailed receipt for the property taken 10: Vehicle Owner Representatives OR [3 I further certify that I left a detailed receipt for the property taken ?om, with the tenants, Dated this day of March 2018 J. Barutha #19443 VERIFICATION OF RETURN SWORN TO AND TO BEFORE ME THIS 22. DAY OF 2018. MELISSA ZABOR SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report more memo-a mom or me e: nodoomeome I9. 2018' air-MAW tea. 8723 4 .l POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA FOR SEAR CH EARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 245118 - 00166 3 REPORT #2018-032694 YOUR Detective J. Berutha, #19443 A peace of?cer in the State ofAz-izone, being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and sayez'Thet on March 18, 2018 in the County of Marleope, State of Arizona, the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter (Arizona Revised Statute 13-1103.A.1) was committed. THAT THE AFFIANT bee probable cause to believe that in the vehielde) described 83: 201.7 Grey Volvo :4 Door Stelion Wagon) VIN: Arizona License Plate: Remand owner: me Im? Currently located at Tempe Police Property and Evidence Unit located at 1875 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, AZ. were stolen or embezzled. Were used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public. offense. is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. Ii! constitutes evidence-tending to ehow~ that a public offense has been committed. in the city of Tempe, County of Marisol-m, State of Arizona, there is now being processed or concealed oertem' 199150115: 01? Things described as: That said property or things are described as follows: . Seizure of so (Secure Digital), non-volatile memory card containing video and meta data associated with that video located in a review mirror camera. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no: lines?non oneonmssons Mar. l9. 2013 ?0.333 P. 5 Gonzo} 8-032694 Seizure of any additional video audio:- audio from March 2018 and any meta data associated with the video or audio stored on digital storage devices and computer the vehicle or stored remotely at a remote facility on a remote center or computer. a The ability to conduct oil-site previews andfor conduct complete forensic examinations to include the examination of all stored data on the electronic items seized during the search warrant. I Photographs of any recording, storage or computing devices located inside or outside of the vehicle. That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search warrant for the aforementioned items exists: Your af?ant is assigned to the Tempe Police Department, Criminal Investigations Division, Digital Forensics Unit, primarily hivcstigating homicides, deaths, missing persons, violent crimes, sexual assaults. crimes against children and assisting investigations in the capacity of a Digital Forensics Detective. Your c?innt holds a Bachelor's of Science Degree in Justice Studies from Arizona State receiVed low cnforoemmt of?cer training from the Arizona Law Enforcement Academy in Phoenix and is a Certi?ed Forensic Computer EXamincr (CFCE) through the International Association of Computer Investigative Specialists . During my 11-year career I have Worked as Patrol Of?cer, Records Management Software implementation and Training Of?cer, and Forensic Computer Detective. This diverse experience has provided me with a wide range of experience in conducting a variety of investigations. While working in Digital Forensics since January 2014, I hevo received extensive specialized training regarding computer crimes and digital forensics. The specialized training covered the proper techniques for the seizure and examination of digital storage media to include hard drives, solid state drives, non?volatile and volatile memory, oomputois, cell phones and various video and audio recording devices. The training ranged from genetic computer crime hivestigatione, advanced data. rowVery techniques, and interact related investigations which include the identi?cation of electronic evidence and the proper collection methods to preserve the integrity ofsuoh evidence. Your Af?ant is responsible for the gathering of electronic evidence of crime scenes and analyzing cell phones, oompunn- hard drives, storage devices and digital video recorders. Synopsis Based on the infomation Your Af?ant has learned 130111 the Tempe Police Vehicular Homicide Unit (VCU), it is believed that the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter (AIRS 13-1103A13may have been committed and that c'v'idcnce of this offense is currently located in 2017 Grey Volvo bearing Arizona License Plate 011 Bil 81'2018 at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo XC90 driving in autonomous mode was traveling north on Mill Ave approaching Washington Sheet in Tempe, AZ when it collided with a person riding a bicycle. The person riding the bicycle was monounood dead as a result of the collision at 2230 home. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 751 eisrremsam Mar.19. No.8?23 P. 6? 18-032 69-1 During interview with the vehicle's operator, they indicated their hands were off the steering wheel and their feet were off the accelerator/decelerator pedals during the collision. Your A??iant learned that the self-driving vehicle is equipped with a camera system located in the rear-view mirror. This camera system contains a removable Secure Digital (SD) card which is a non-Volatile memory card. If Dot. T. Haubold with the Tempe Police VCU informed me that the vehicle is being towed to the Tempe Police Property and Evidence Facility located at 1875 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, AZ and requested that I respond to this location to retrieve any and all video data related to this investigation for immediate viewing. Your si?ant therefore requests that this search warrant be granted. CI in the daytime (excluding the tired period of bemoan 10:00 PM. and 6 :30 AM.) El Af?aot believes that the following infomation demonstrates good cause for permitting this warrant to he served between 10:00 RM. and 6:30 AM. . Merci?ore af?ant prays that a search warrant be issued demanding that an immediate search be made of the persons, prenuses, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the persons, property and things herein described. and that the same be retained in the custody of the affront or in the custody of the agency which the af?ant represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to ALS. 13-3920. . . #19443 Tempe Police Department AND SWORN to before me this 19th day of March, 2018. Judge'Commissicner {ff-tio?cet? LORI ASH e: SUPERIOR COURT common aim the "tier! it no mov- C) I 1' E. h?l Pg;- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report WEEWMIN .. Description:KM - FINAL FRAME CAMERA TRIANGULATION Final Frame Camera Triangulation TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report w?f~513, Type:Attachment DescriptionzKM - PED POSITION ?Em? @hwmw TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 3011:4131; 0151341110613} ,6 22101-3. 766141637 mum. Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 1 Run Number 1 Data From Skid Testing Run 1, p.1 Run Length 2.11 Run Date? Time Thursday, March 22, 2016 10:20 PM Caset? 16-32694 Vehicle 201? Volvo X690 T8 Detective K. arslend 920595 Location ill Ave? Curry Rd, just south Notes: Actual crash vehicle used in tests Time Amel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Tirne Accel Speed Dist Sees PH 11. Secs PH Sees PH fl. 0.000 0.000 40.14 0.00 0.480 -0.8?6 31.36 25.46 0.960 -0.934 20.98 43.93 0.010 -0.505 40.03 0.59 0.490 -0.862 31.16 25.92 0.9?0 0.921 20.?6 44.23 0.020 ?0.349 39.96 1.1? 0.500 -0.66? 30.9? 26.38 0.960 ?0.909 20.56 44.54 0.030 -0 360 39.8? 1.?6 0.510 ?0.696 30?? 26.63 0.990 -0.90? 20.38 44.84 0.040 -0.399 39.?6 2.34 0.520 -0.904 30.58 2?.26 1.000 -0.906 20.16 45.14 0.050 ?0.449 39.69 2.93 0.530 -0.914 30.3? 1.010 ?0.913 19.98 45.43 0.060 -0.499 39.58 3.51 0.540 ?0.924 30.1? 28.1? 1.020 -0.921 19.?8 45.?2 0.0?0 -0.592 39.45 4.09 0.550 ?0.935 29.9? 26.61 1.030 ?0.924 19.56 46.01 0.080 -0.620 39.31 4.6? 0.560 ?0.939 29.?6 29.05 1.040 -0.92? 19.38 46.30 0.090 -0.649 39.1? 5.24 0.5?0 -0.942 29.55 29.49 1.050 -0.930 19.1? 46.56 0.100 -0.691 39.02 5.81 0.560 -0.952 29.35 29.92 1.060 ?0.932 16.9? 46.86 0.110 -0.?33 38.68 6.39 0.590 ?0.983 29.13 30.35 1.0?0 -0.933 16,?6 4?.14 0.120 38.69 6.95 0.600 -0.9?1 28.92 30?? 1.060 -0.943 16.56 4?.41 0.130 ?0.?61 38.53 ?.52 0.610 -0.960 26.?1 31.19 1.090 -0.952 18.35 4?.68 0.140 36.35 8.08 0.620 -0.968 26.49 31.61 1.100 ?0.962 18.14 4?.95 0.150 43.602 38.18 8.55 0.630 -0.991 23.2? 32.03 1.110 43.956 1?.92 48.21 0.160 -0.82? 38.00 9.20 0.640 -0.994 26.05 32.44 1.120 -0.9?4 48.4? 0.1?0 ?0.845 3?.61 9.?6 0.650 -1.000 2?.83 32.65 1.130 -0.9?5 1?.50 48.?3 0.160 -0.663 3?.62 10.31 0.660 ?1.00? 2?.61 33.26 1.140 -0.9?6 1?.26 48.99 0.190 -0.902 3?.42 10.66 0.6?0 ?1.016 2?.39 33.66 1.150 -0.9?6 49.24 0.200 -0.928 3?.22 11.41 0.680 -1.022 34.06 1.160 16.65 49.49 0.210 -0.954 3?.01 11.95 0 890 -1.029 26.94 34.46 1.1?0 16.64 49.?3 0.220 36.60 12.50 0.?00 -1.034 26.?1 34.85 1.160 ?0.9?5 16.43 49.9? 0.230 -1.001 36.58 13.03 0.?10 ?1.040 26.49 35.24 1.190 -0.9?2 16.21 50.21 0.240 ?0.99? 36.36 13.5? 0.?20 -1.040 26.26 35.63 1.200 ~0.9?8 16.00 50.45 0.250 ?0.993 36.14 14.10 0.?30 -1.041 26.03 36.01 1.210 -0.963 15.?6 50.66 0.260 ?0.969 35.92 14.63 0.?40 -1.042 25.60 36.39 1.220 ?0.9?6 15.5? 50.91 0.2?0 -0.968 35.?1 15.15 0.?50 ?1.03? 25.5? 36?? 1.230 -0.9?6 15.35 51.14 0.280 -0.96? 35.49 15.66 0.?60 -1.033 25.35 3?.14 1.240 -0.9?5 15.14 51.36 0.290 ?0.991 35.2? 16.20 -1.032 25.12 3?.51 1.250 ?0.9?8 14.92 51.58 0.300 -0.994 35.06 16.?1 0.?60 ?1.031 24.89 3?.88 1.280 -0.962 14.?1 51.60 0.310 -0.999 34.84 1?.22 0.?90 ?1.030 24.6? 36.24 1.2?0 ?0.965 14.49 52.02 0.320 -0.99? 3462 0.600 ?1.031 24.44 38.60 1.260 -0.98? 14.28 52.23 0.330 ?0.99? 34.40 18.24 0.810 -1.032 24.22 38.96 1.290 -0.989 14.06 52.43 0.340 -0.990 34.16 18,?4 0.620 -1.026 23.99 39.32 1.300 ?0.964 13.84 52.64 0.350 -0.963 33.9? 19.24 0.830 ?1.021 39.6? 1.310 -0.9?9 13.63 52.84 0.360 33.?5 19.?4 0.840 -1.009 23.55 40.01 1.320 -0.9?9 13.41 53.04 0.3?0 ?0.9?1 33.54 20.23 0.650 -0.996 23.33 40.36 1.330 -0.960 13.20 53.23 0.360 ?0.964 33.33 20.?2 0.660 -0.993 23.11 40.?0 1.340 -0.988 12.96 53.43 0.390 -0.951 33.12 21.21 0.6?0 ?0.993 22.89 41.03 1.350 0989 12?? 53.61 0.400 -0.939 32.91 21.69 0.680 -0.994 22.6? 41.3? 1.360 -0.991 12.55 53.60 0.410 ?0.923 32.?1 22.16 0,890 -0.966 22.48 41.?0 1.3?0 -0.989 12.33 53.96 0.420 -0.90? 32.51 22.65 0.900 ?0.963 22.24 42.03 1.380 ?0,966 12.11 54.16 0.430 -0.664 32.32 23.13 0.910 ?0.9?4 22.03 42.35 1.390 ?0.961 11.90 54.34 0.440 -0.6?9 32.12 23.60 0.920 ?0.965 21.81 42.6? 1.400 -0.9?4 11.69 54.51 0.450 ?0.8?3 31.93 24.0? 0.930 -0.95? 21.60 42.99 1.410 -0.966 11.4? 54.56 0.460 -0.8?2 31 24.54 0.940 -0.952 21.40 43.31 1.420 ?0.961 11.26 54.85 0.4?0 -0.8?2 31.55 25.00 0.950 ?0.948 21.19 43.62 1.430 -0.955 11.05 55.01 POLICE TEMFE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 61148858318803:. 3 614111111; 1171:1110; 18-32694 Deteclive MarSFand #20595 Run 1, p2 Accel Speed Time Accel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist PH ft. Sees MPH ft. -0.950 10.84 55.17 1.920 -0.957 0.84 59.28 -0.946 10.64 55.33 1.930 -0.955 0.63 59.29 ?0.954 10.43 55.48 1.940 ?0.951 0.42 59.29 -0.970 10.21 55.64 1,950 -0.960 0.21 59.30 -0.987 10.00 55.78 1.960 -0.969 0.00 59.30 ?0.980 9.78 55.93 1.970 ?0.959 0.00 59.30 0.972 9.57 56.07 1.980 0949 0.00 59.30 0967 9.36 56.21 1.990 -0.912 0.00 59.30 -0.963 9.15 56.34 2.000 -0.875 0.00 59.30 -0.958 8.94 56.48 2.010 43.838 0.00 59.30 -0.961 8.73 56.61 2.020 ?0.762 0.00 59.30 -0.964 8.51 56.73 2.030 -0.687 0.00 59.30 -0.963 8.30 56.86 2.040 -0.598 0.00 59.30 -0.961 8.09 56.98 2.050 -0.509 0.00 59.30 -0.951 7.88 57.09 2.060 0380 0.00 59.30 -0.952 7.67 57.21 2.070 -0.298 0.00 59.30 41953 7.4? 57.32 2.080 -0.228 0.00 59.30 ?0.940 7.26 57.43 2.090 0153 0.00 59.30 ?0.927 7.06 57.53 2.100 -0.128 0.00 59.30 -0.920 6.85 57.63 2.110 0.172 0.00 59.30 -0.914 6.65 57.73 0.908 6.45 57.83 -0.916 6.25 57.92 -0.925 6.05 58.01 -0.932 5.85 58.10 -0.939 5.64 58.18 ?0.955 5.43 58.27 43.960 5.22 58.34 -0.965 5.01 58.42 ?0.961 4.80 58.49 ?0.958 4.59 58.56 -0.956 4.38 58.63 -0.953 4.17 58.69 0.950 3.96 58.75 -0.956 3.75 58.80 -0.961 3.54 58.36 -0.960 3.33 58.91 -0.958 3.12 58.95 ?0.942 2.91 59.00 43.930 2.71 59.04 -0.918 2.51 59.08 -0.918 2.31 59.11 ?0.919 2.10 59.15 -O.933 1.90 59.18 43.957 1.69 59.20 ?0.977 1.47 59.23 ?0.963 1.26 59.25 -0.958 1.05 59.26 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 6613? '66 61666161316671 36018:? .1611?111123- 46 1111.6: 63616121361 1336161 Type:Attachment DescriptionzKM - SKID TESTING RUN 2 Run Number 2 VC4000 Data From Skid Testing Run 2. p.1 Run Length 2.23 Run DatefTime Thursday, arch 22.201810:23 PM Case?! 113?32694 Vehicle 201 Volvo X090 T8 Detective ersland #20595 Location Mill Ave? curryI Rd. just south Notes: Actual crash vehicle used in tests Time Aeoel Speed Diet Time Accel Speed Time Accel Speed Secs 5 MPH it. Sees 6 MPH Secs MPH 0.000 0.000 41.60 0.00 0.480 -0.8?6 32.82 26.63 0.960 -0.954 22.?8 46.3? 0.010 -0.2?9 41.54 0.61 0.490 -0.869 32.63 2?.11 0.9?0 -0.946 22.5? 46.?0 0.020 -0.299 41.4? 1.22 0.500 -0.862 32.44 2?.59 0.980 -0.92? 22.3? 4?.03 0.030 ?0.324 41.40 1.83 0.510 ?0.850 32.25 28.0? 0.990 ?0.933 22.1? 4?.35 0.040 0346 41.33 2.43 0.520 -0.838 32.0? 28.54 1.000 0938 21.96 4?.68 0.050 -0.368 41.25 3.04 0.530 -0.826 31.88 29.01 1.010 -0.945 21 48.00 0.060 ?0.416 41 16 3.54 0.540 ?0.814 31.?1 29.4? 1.020 0944 21.55 48.32 0.0?0 ?0.465 41.05 4.25 0.550 ?0.801 31.53 29.94 1.030 -0.943 21.34 48.63 0.080 ?0.508 40.94 4.85 0.560 -0 812 31.35 30.40 1.040 ?0.931 21.13 48.94 0.090 -0.552 40.82 5.45 0.5?0 -0.824 31.1? 30.86 1.050 -0.920 20.93 49.25 0.100 -0.622 40.68 6.04 0.580 ?0.838 30.99 31.31 1.060 -0.911 20.?3 49.56 0.110 ?0.655 40.54 6.64 0.590 -0.859 30.80 1.0?0 ?0.902 20.53 49.86 0.120 -0.588 40.39 ?.23 0.600 -0.880 30.61 32.22 1.080 -0 893 20.34 50.16 0.130 -0.?19 40.23 ?.82 0.610 -0.888 30.41 32.66 1.090 -0.901 20.14 50.45 0.140 41750 40.0? 8.41 0.620 ?0.897 30.21 33.11 1.100 43.908 19.94 50.?5 0.150 ?0.?56 39.90 9.00 0.630 ?0.898 30.02 33.55 1.110 ?0.906 19.?4 51.04 0.160 -0.?63 39.?3 9.58 0.640 0899 29.82 33.99 1.120 ?0.904 19.54 51.33 0.1?0 39.5? 10.1? 0.650 -0.900 29.62 34.42 1.130 -0.902 19.35 51.61 0.180 ?0.?93 39.39 10.?4 0.660 ?0.910 29.42 34.86 1.140 0896 19.15 51.90 0.190 ?0.816 39.21 11.32 0.6?0 0920 29.22 35.29 1.150 -0.890 18.96 52.18 0.200 ?0.842 39.03 11.89 0.680 -0.924 29.02 35.?1 1.160 ?0.891 18.?5 52.45 0.210 -0.869 38.84 12.4? 0.690 -0.928 28.82 36.14 1.1?0 -0_893 18.56 52.?3 0.220 ?0.910 38.64 13.03 0.?00 0946 28.61 36.56 1.180 -0.894 18.3? 53.00 0.230 0929 38.43 13.60 0.?10 ?0.951 28.40 35.98 1.190 0895 18.1? 53.26 0.240 -0.949 38.23 14.16 0.?20 -0.956 28.19 3?.39 1.200 -0.89? 53.53 0.250 -0.9?8 38.01 14.?2 0.?30 -0.9?4 2?.98 3?.80 1.210 -0.900 53.?9 0.260 -1.008 15.28 0.?40 40.992 38.21 1.220 -0.903 1?.58 54.05 0.2?0 ?1.035 3?.55 15.83 0.?50 ?0.993 2?.54 38.62 1.230 -0.912 1?.38 54.31 0.280 -1.062 3?.33 16.38 0.?60 -0.994 2?.32 39.02 1.240 ?0.920 1?.18 54.56 0.290 -1.089 3?.09 16.92 -0.996 2?.10 39.42 1 250 -0.920 16.98 54.81 0.300 ?1.106 36.85 0.?80 ?1.012 26.88 39.82 1.260 -0.918 16.7? 55.06 0.310 ?1.124 36.60 18.00 0.?90 ?1.029 26.66 40.21 1.2?0 -0.916 16.5? 55.30 0.320 -1.124 36.36 18.54 0.800 -1.03? 26.43 40.50 1.280 ?0.910 16.3? 55.54 0.330 -1.124 36.11 19.0? 0.810 -1.045 26.20 40.98 1.290 -0.904 15.18 55.?8 0.340 -1.124 35.86 19.60 0.820 ?1.066 25.96 41.3? 1.300 -0.916 15.9? 56.02 0.350 ?1.118 35.62 20.12 0.830 -1 .06? 25.?3 41.?5 1.310 ?0.92? 15?? 55.25 0.360 -1.112 35.3? 20.64 0.840 -1_05? 25.50 42.12 1.320 ?0.939 15.56 56.48 0,3?0 -1.093 35.13 21.16 0.850 -1.066 25.26 42.49 1.330 ?0.943 15.36 56.?1 0.380 -1.0?3 34.90 21.6? 0.860 ?1.065 25.03 42.86 1.340 -0.94? 15.15 56.93 0.390 ?1.048 34.5? 22.18 0.8?0 4.058 24.80 43.23 1.350 -0.946 14.94 5?.15 0.400 -1.023 34.44 22.69 0.880 -1.052 24.5? 43.59 1.360 0946 14.?4 0.410 -0.998 34.22 23.19 0.890 -1.045 24.34 43.95 1.3?0 0936 14.53 5?.58 0.420 419?? 34.01 23.?0 0.900 ?1.042 24.11 44.30 1.380 -0.931 14.33 5?.80 0.430 ?0.956 33.80 24.19 0.910 ?1.038 23.88 44.65 1.390 -0.92? 14.12 58.01 0.440 0933 33.60 24.69 0.920 ?1.034 23.65 45.00 1.400 ?0.931 13.92 58.21 0.450 -0.911 33.40 25.18 0.930 -1.030 23.43 45.35 1.410 ?0.934 13.?1 58.41 0.460 088? 33.20 25.6? 0.940 -1.001 23.21 45.69 1.420 -0.942 13.51 58.61 0.4?0 ?0.881 33.01 25.15 0.950 0983 22.99 46.03 1.430 -0.950 13.30 58.81 OLK: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?1 173-671142111 ":cJ-gzamm 417111.15 @111116732511111? CaseliiE 18?32694 Detective Marsiand #20595 Run 2, p2 Time Acoel Speed Dist Time Ame! Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist Secs PH ft. Secs 6 PH 11. Secs PH H. 1.440 -0.958 13.09 59.00 1.920 -0.582 3.35 54.77 1.450 -0.954 12.68 59.19 1.930 ?0.897 3.16 64.82 1.460 -0,950 12.67 59.38 1.940 -0.911 2.96 64.86 1,470 -0.950 12.46 59.57 1.950 -0.929 2.75 54.90 1.480 -0.950 12.25 59.75 1.960 -0.946 2.55 64.94 1.490 ?0.946 12.05 59.92 1.970 -0.960 2.34 64.98 1.500 43.941 11.84 60.10 1.980 ?0.954 2.13 65.01 1.510 -0.935 11.53 50.27 1.990 -0.947 1.92 55.04 1.520 -0.938 11.43 50.44 2.000 -0.952 1.71 55.07 1.530 -0.941 11 22 60.61 2.010 ?0.958 1.50 65.09 1.540 -0.941 11.02 60.77 2.020 0.964 1.29 65.11 1.550 -0.941 10.81 50.93 2.030 -0.959 1.08 55.13 1.550 -0.942 10.60 51.09 2.040 -0.975 0.55 55.14 1.570 -0.927 10.40 61.24 2.050 43.982 0.65 65.15 1.580 ?0.913 10.20 61.39 2.060 -0.988 0.43 65.16 1.590 -0.915 10.00 51.54 2.070 -0.952 0.21 55.15 1.600 -0.918 9.80 61.69 2.080 41976 0.00 65.17 1.610 ?0.917 9.60 61.83 2.090 ?0.961 0.00 65.17 1.620 41923 9.39 61.97 2.100 -0.937 0.00 65.17 1.630 -0.929 9.19 62.10 2110 -0.912 0.00 65.17 1.540 -0.934 8.95 52.24 2.120 41855 0.00 55.17 1.650 ?0.940 8.78 62.37 2.130 ?0.817 0.00 65.17 1.660 -0.940 8.57 62.49 2.140 -0.735 0.00 65.17 1.570 -0.940 8.37 52.62 2.150 -0.553 0.00 55.17 1.580 -0.941 5.16 52.74 2.150 -0.572 0.00 55.17 1.690 -0.929 7.96 62.86 2.170 -0.479 0.00 65.17 1.700 7.75 62.97 2180 4.1388 0.00 65.17 1.710 -0.916 7.55 53.09 2.190 -0.301 0.00 55.17 1.720 ?0.919 7.35 63.19 2.200 -0.206 0.00 55.17 1.730 ?0.904 715 63.30 2.210 -0.137 0.00 65.17 1.740 ?0.892 6.96 63.40 2.220 0.156 0.00 65.17 1.750 43.580 5.75 53.51 2.230 0.275 0.00 55.17 1.750 -0.882 5.57 53.50 1.770 41883 6.38 63.70 1.780 -0.899 6.18 63.79 1.790 -0.915 5.98 53.88 1.500 -0.931 5.78 53.97 1.810 421.929 5.57 64.05 1.820 ?0.927 5.37 64.13 1.530 -0.923 5.17 54.21 1.840 -0.919 4.96 64.28 1.850 ?0.924 4.76 64.35 1.860 ?0.928 4.56 64.42 1.570 -0.932 4.35 54.49 1.680 -0.931 4.15 54.55 1.890 -0.930 3.95 64.61 1.900 -0.914 3.74 64.66 1.910 -0.895 3.55 54.72 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report E5. . 63987581813905; .1151111?111573131103222 77451190 73311151117 17175191313) TypezAttachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 3 Run Number 3 I VC4000 Data From Skid Testing I Run 3. p.1 Run Length 2.26 Run Dater?Time Thursday. arch 22, 2018 10:25 PM 18?32694 Vehicle 2017 Volvo 1090 T8 Detective Marsland #20595 Lunation Mill Ave! Curry Rd. lust south Notes: Actual crash vehicle used in tests Time Accel Speed Dist Time Aocel Speed Time Acoel Speed Dist Secs 6 MPH it, Secs MPH Secs MPH ft. 0.000 0.000 42.33 0.00 0.480 -0.878 33.41 26.95 0.950 -0.983 23.35 47.08 0.010 ?0.512 42.22 0.62 0.490 -0.868 33.22 27.43 0,970 -0.969 23.14 47.42 0.020 -0.420 42.13 1.24 0.500 -0.858 33.03 27.92 0.980 -0.955 22.93 47.76 0.030 -0.424 42.04 1.86 0.510 ?0.842 32.84 28.40 0.990 ?0.943 22.72 48.09 0.040 ?0.445 41.94 2.47 0.520 -0.825 32.66 28.88 1.000 -0.931 22.52 48.42 0.050 -0.447 41.84 3.09 0.530 -0.807 32.49 29.36 1.010 -0.907 22.32 48.75 0.050 -0.497 41.73 3.70 0.540 ?0.799 32.31 29.84 1.020 ?0.892 22.12 49.08 0.070 -0.546 41.61 4.31 0.550 0792 32.14 30.31 1.030 ?0.877 21.93 49.40 0.080 0582 41.48 4.92 0.560 ?0.808 31.96 30.78 1.040 0887 21.73 49.72 0.090 ?0.618 41.35 5.53 0.570 -0.824 31.78 31.25 1.050 -0.897 21.54 50.04 0.100 -0.670 41.20 613 0.580 -0.844 31.59 31.71 1.060 -0.900 21.34 50.35 0.110 -0.722 41.04 6.74 0.590 ?0.864 31.40 32.17 1.070 ?0.903 21.14 50.67 0.120 ?0.774 40.87 7.34 0.600 -0.884 31.21 32.63 1.080 -0.907 20.94 50.97 0.130 ?0.785 40.70 7.93 0.610 -0.893 31.01 33.09 1.090 -0.902 20.75 51 28 0.140 -0.799 40.52 8.53 0.520 -0.902 30.82 33.54 1.100 -0.898 20.55 51.58 0.150 -0.816 40.35 9.12 0.630 ?0.902 30.62 33.99 1.110 ?0.901 20.35 51.88 0.160 ?0.834 40.16 9.71 0.640 0.902 30.42 34.44 1.120 -0.904 20.15 5218 0.170 -0.867 39.97 10.30 0.550 -0.912 30.22 34.88 1.130 -0.915 19.95 52.47 0.180 -0.888 39.78 10.89 0.660 ?0.914 30.02 35.33 1.140 ?0.913 19.75 52.77 0.190 -0.909 39.58 11.47 0.670 ?0.918 29.82 35.77 1.150 ?0.910 19.55 53.05 0.200 -0.936 39.37 12.05 0.680 ?0.937 29.61 36.20 1.160 0929 19.35 53.34 0.210 ?0.963 39.16 12.62 0.690 -0.957 29.40 36.53 1.170 -0.948 19.14 53 62 0.220 -0.991 38.94 13.20 0.700 -0.969 29.19 37.06 1.180 -0.949 18.93 53.90 0.230 ~1.019 38.72 13.76 0.710 ?0.981 28.98 37.49 1.190 ?0 950 18.72 54.18 0.240 ?1.048 38.49 14.33 0.720 -0.993 28.76 37.91 1.200 -0.951 18.51 54 45 0.250 ?1.061 38.26 14.89 0.730 -1.004 28.54 38.33 1,210 -0.952 18.31 54.72 0.260 -1.074 38.02 15.45 0.740 -1.015 28.31 38.75 1.220 -0.954 18.10 54.99 0.270 -1.061 37.79 16.01 0.750 ?1 .018 28.09 39.15 1.230 ?0.960 17.89 55.25 0.280 -1.048 37.56 16.56 0.760 ~1.022 27.87 39.57 1.240 -0.956 17.67 55.51 0.290 -1.039 37.33 17.11 0.770 -1.033 27.64 39.98 1.250 -0.983 17.46 55.77 0.300 -1.034 37.11 17.66 0.780 ?1.033 27.41 40.39 1.250 41.990 17.24 56.02 0.310 -1.028 36.88 18.20 0.790 ?1.034 27.19 40.79 1.270 ?0.997 17.02 56.27 0.320 ?1.024 36.65 18.74 0.800 ?1.040 26.96 41.18 1.280 ?1.002 16.80 56.52 0.330 ?1.021 36.43 19.27 0.810 -1.047 26.73 41.58 1.290 -1.007 16.58 56.77 0.340 -1.015 36.21 19.81 0.820 -1.053 26.50 41.97 1.300 -0.998 16.36 57.01 0.350 -1.010 35.99 20.34 0.830 ?1.058 26.27 42.35 1.310 ?0.989 15.15 57.25 0.360 ?1.005 35.77 20.86 0.840 -1.064 25.03 42.74 1.320 -0.999 15.93 57.48 0.370 ?0.989 35.55 21.39 0.850 -1.060 25.80 43.12 1.330 .1014 15.70 57.71 0.380 0974 35.34 21.91 0.860 -1.057 25.57 43.49 1.340 -1.030 15.48 57.94 0.390 -0.946 35.13 22.42 0.870 ?1.045 25.34 43.87 1.350 ?1.037 15.25 58.17 0.400 ?0.917 34.93 22.94 0.880 ~1 .033 25.11 44.24 1.360 ?1.044 15.02 58.39 0.410 ?0.882 34.73 23.45 0.890 -1.020 24.89 44.60 1.370 -1.029 14.80 58.51 0.420 -0.868 34.54 23.96 0.900 -1.017 24.67 44.97 1.380 ?1 .015 14.57 58.82 0.430 -0.855 34.36 24.46 0.910 ?1 .013 24.44 45.33 1.390 -1.001 14.35 59.04 0.440 -0.855 34.17 24.96 0.920 ?1 .010 24.22 45.58 1.400 ?1.000 14.13 59.25 0.450 ?0.855 33.98 25.46 0.930 -1.007 24.00 46.04 1.410 -0.999 13.92 59.45 0.460 -0.853 33.79 25.96 0.940 -0.999 23.78 46.39 1.420 -0.996 13.70 59.65 0.470 -0.870 33.60 26.45 0.950 ?0.991 23.56 46.74 1.430 ?0.993 13.48 59.85 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?shing 11911611 918111159: 18?32694 Detective K. Marsland #20595 Run 3. p2 Accel Speed Time Acne! Speed Dis: Time Ansel Speed Dist MPH ft. Secs PH ft. 0997 13.26 60.05 1.920 ?0.934 3.34 65.89 ?0.999 13.04 50.24 1.930 3.14 55.93 -1.002 12.82 60.43 1.940 -0.898 2.94 65.98 -0.999 12.60 60.62 1.950 -0.903 2.?4 66.02 - -0.996 12.38 60.80 1.960 -0.909 2.54 66.06 -0.981 12.11' 60.98 1.9?0 -0.935 2.34 66.09 -0.965 11.96 61.16 1.980 -0.961 2.13 56.13 -0.950 11.?5 61.33 1.990 -0.988 1.91 66.16 ?0.940 11.54 61.50 2.000 ?0.989 1.69 66.18 ?0.930 11.34 51.67 2.010 -0.990 1.48 56.21 -0.936 11.13 61.84 2.020 -0.982 1.26 66.23 -0.943 10.93 62.00 2.030 ?0.973 1.05 66.24 -0.944 10.12 62.16 2.040 0961 0.84 66.26 ?0.949 10.51 62.31 2.050 {1.955 0.63 65.2? -0.955 10.30 62.46 2.060 -0.949 0.42 66.2? -0.945 10.09 62.61 2.0?0 ?0.952 0.21 66.28 -0.936 9.89 62.76 2.080 -0.956 0.00 66.28 -0.933 9.68 62.90 2.090 -0.948 0.00 66.28 0931 9.48 63.04 2.100 -0.940 0.00 66.28 -0.929 9.28 63.18 2110 -0.933 0.00 66.28 ?0.919 9.0? 63.32 2.120 ?0.901 0.00 66.28 -0.909 8.8? 63.45 2.130 -0.8?0 0.00 66.28 -0.896 8.68 63.58 2.140 -0.826 0.00 66.28 -0.883 8.48 63.?0 2.150 0.00 66.28 -0.8?3 8.29 63.83 2.160 ?0.693 0.00 66.28 ?0.8?4 8.10 53.95 2.170 ?0.622 0.00 56.23 1'91 64.06 2.130 -0.553 0.00 66.28 -0.889 64.18 2.190 -0.469 0.00 66.28 ?0.903 1.52 64.29 2.200 ?0.386 0.00 66.28 -0.912 ?.32 64.40 2.210 -0 308 0.00 66.28 -0.922 64.50 2.220 -0.233 0.00 66.28 43.932 6.91 64.61 2.230 -0.1?0 0.00 66.28 43.933 6.?0 64.71 ?0.935 6.50 64.80 -0.938 6.29 64.90 -0.942 6.09 64.99 -0.95? 5.88 65.08 43.963 5.56 65.16 ?0.980 5.45 65.24 -0.982 5.23 65.32 0985 5.02 65.40 43.9?5 4.80 55.4? -0.968 4.59 65.54 -0.959 4.38 65.60 -0.958 411? 65.66 -0.958 3.96 65.?2 -0.954 3.?5 6518 -0.950 3.54 65.83 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report r404 ur': 4:113:34}? 5521:1131 591171151 88155.4; 01010530843201.1215 8511:8551 193100114313 Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 4 Run Number 4 Data From Skid Testing Run 4, p.1 Run Length 225 Run Date:r Time Thursday. March 22. 2018 10:2? PM Case# 18?32894 Vehicle 201 Volvo X090 T8 Detective arsland #20595 Location ill Ave? Curry Rd,jus1 south Notes: Actual crash vehicle used in tests Time Accel Speed Dist Time Aecei Speed Diet Time Ansel Speed Diet Secs 6 MPH ft. ans 6 MPH fl. Secs 5 PH ft, 0.000 0.000 42.90 0.00 0.480 -0.928 33.94 2?.45 0.950 -0.955 23.84 4?.88 0.010 ?0.302 42.83 0.53 0.490 -0.931 33.?4 2?.95 0.9?0 -0.955 23.53 48.22 0.020 -0,350 42.?5 1.25 0.500 ?0.91? 33.53 28.44 0.980 -0.952 23.42 48.5? 0.030 -0.355 42.5? 1.88 0.510 -0.912 33.33 28.93 0.990 -0.945 23.21 48.91 0.040 ?0.38? 42.59 2.51 0.520 0908 33.14 29.42 1.000 -0.939 23.01 49.25 0.050 -0.411 42.50 3.13 0.530 ?0.895 32.94 29.90 1.010 0944 22.80 49.59 0.050 -0_455 42.40 3.?5 0.540 0.883 32.?5 30.38 1.020 -0.950 22.59 49.92 0.0?0 -0.503 42.29 4.38 0.550 -0.8?5 32.55 30.85 1.030 -0.93? 22.39 50.25 0.080 -0.552 42.1? 5.00 0.550 -0.8?0 32.35 31.34 1.040 ?0.924 22.18 50.58 0.090 -0.503 42.04 5.51 0.5?0 0884 32.1? 31.81 1.050 0.912 21.98 50.90 0.100 -0.543 41.90 5.23 0.580 0885 31.98 32.28 1.050 -0.903 21.?9 51.22 0.110 -0.584 41.?5 8.84 0.590 -0.859 31 32.?5 1.0?0 ?0.894 21.59 51.54 0.120 ?0.?09 41.59 ?.45 0.800 -0.885 31.50 33.22 1.080 -0.913 21.39 51.85 0.130 ?0.?33 41.43 8.05 0.510 -0.904 3140 33.88 1.090 -0.933 21.19 52.1? 0.140 -0.?58 41.2? 8.5? 0.520 ?0.920 31.20 34.14 1.100 -0.935 20.98 52.48 0.150 -0.?62 41 10 9.2? 0.530 41924 31.00 34.59 1.110 4192? 20.?3 52.73 0.180 40.93 9.8? 0.540 -0.929 30.?9 35.05 1.120 -0.918 20.58 53.08 0.1?0 ?0.811 40.?5 10.4? 0.550 -0.935 30.59 35.50 1.130 -0.904 20.38 53.39 0.180 -0.856 40.56 11.0? 0.660 -U.942 30.33 35.34 1.140 -0.890 20.18 53.63 0.190 -0.902 40.3? 11.58 0.5?0 -0.945 30.1? 35.39 1.150 -0.905 19.98 53.98 0.200 -0.930 40.15 12.25 0.580 -0.950 29.95 35.83 1.150 ?0.920 19.?8 54.2? 0.210 095? 39.95 12.84 0.590 -0.955 29.?5 1.1?0 -0.935 19.58 54.55 0.220 419?? 39.?4 13.43 0.?00 43.950 29.54 1.180 43.936 19.3? 54.84 0.230 -0.99? 39.52 14.01 0.?10 -0.955 29.33 38.13 1.190 ?0938 19.1? 55.13 0.240 ?1 .013 39.30 14.58 0.?20 -0.9?2 29.12 38.55 1.200 0930 18.95 55.41 0.250 ?1.030 39.0? 15.15 0.?30 -0.980 28.90 38.99 1.210 ?0.922 18.?5 55.58 0.250 -1.04? 38.84 15.?3 0.?40 ?0.995 28.59 39.41 1.220 -0.915 18.58 55.95 0.2?0 -1.044 38.51 15.30 0.?50 4,002 28.4? 39.83 1.230 -0.921 18.35 58.23 0.280 ?1.042 38.38 15 85 0.?80 -1.010 28.24 40.24 1.240 -0.925 18.15 55.49 0.290 ?1.041 38.15 1?.42 ?1 .014 28.02 40.85 1.250 -0.92? 1?.95 55.?8 0.300 -1.040 3?.93 1?.98 0.?80 -1.019 2?.80 41.0? 1.280 -0.929 5?.02 0.310 -1 050 3? 70 18.54 0.?90 -1.018 41.4? 1.2?0 -0.933 1?.54 5?.28 0.320 -1.052 3?.45 19.09 0.800 -1.018 2?.35 41.8? 1.280 ?0.93? 1?.34 5?.53 0.330 ?1.0?5 3?.23 19.54 0.810 -1 .01? 2?.13 42.2? 1.290 -0.941 1?.13 0.340 -1.08? 38.99 20.18 0.820 -1.019 25.90 42.5? 1.300 -0.939 15.92 58.04 0.350 -1.100 35.?5 20.?2 0.830 -1.021 25.58 43.05 1.310 ?0.93? 15.?2 58.28 0.350 ?1.08? 35.51 21.25 0.840 -1.022 28.45 43.45 1.320 -0.938 15.51 58.53 0.3?0 ?1.0?3 35.28 21.?9 0.850 -1.023 28.23 43.84 1.330 -0.939 15.31 58?? 0.380 4.050 38.04 22.32 0.850 ?1.020 25.01 44.22 1.340 -0,935 15.10 59.01 0.390 -1.045 35.81 22.85 0.8?0 -1.01? 25.?9 44.50 1.350 -0.938 15.90 59.24 0.400 ?1.033 35.59 23.3? 0.880 -1.014 25.55 44.98 1 350 ?0.93? 15.59 59.4? 0.410 0999 35.3? 23.89 0.890 ?1.012 25.34 45.35 1.3?0 -0.935 15.49 59.?0 0.420 -0.955 35.15 24.41 0.900 ?1.009 25.12 45.?2 1.380 -0.935 15.28 59.93 0.430 -0.944 34.95 24.92 0.910 -0.99? 24.90 45.09 1.390 -0.940 15.0? 50.15 0.440 -0.925 34.?5 25.44 0.920 -0.985 24.58 45.45 1.400 ?0.945 14.8? 80.3? 0.450 -0.908 34.55 25.94 0.930 -0.9?4 24.4? 45.81 1.410 ?0.949 14.58 50.59 0.480 -0.915 34.35 28.45 0.940 -0.985 24.25 1.420 -0.953 14.45 80.80 0.4?0 -0.925 34.14 28.95 0.950 -0.955 24.05 4?.52 1.430 -0.958 14.24 51.01 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 011981114161 3611105}? 1.111.131.10060017111121721; Case)? 18v32694 Detective K. Marsland #20595 Run 4. 53.2 Time Ansel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist Secs 6 MPH ft. Secs MPH ft. Secs (5 MPH H. 1.440 0959 14.03 61.22 1.920 0933 4.15 6?.60 1.450 0.960 13.82 61.42 1.930 -0.926 3.94 6?.65 1.460 -0.964 13.61 61.62 1.940 -0.912 3.?4 1.4?0 -0.962 13.40 61.32 1.950 ?0.903 3.55 1.480 -0.961 13.18 62.01 1.960 -0.393 3.35 5?.32 1.490 -0.960 12.9? 62.21 1.9?0 -0.88? 3.16 6?.86 1.500 -0.959 12.?6 62.40 1.930 -0.331 2.96 6?.91 1.510 -0.959 12.55 62.53 1.990 -0.8?3 6?.95 1.520 -0.959 12.34 62.?6 2.000 -0.866 2.53 6?.99 1.530 -0.959 12.13 62.94 2.010 -0.360 2.39 68.03 1.540 -0.954 11.92 63.12 2.020 -0.368 2.20 63.06 1.550 0949 11.?2 63.29 2.030 ?0.8?5 2.01 68.09 1.560 ?0.943 11.51 63.46 2.040 0838 1.32 63.12 1.5?0 ?0.936 11.30 63.63 2.050 -0.902 1.62 63.14 1.530 -0.929 11.10 63.?9 2.060 -0.915 1.42 68.1? 1.590 -0.929 10.90 63.96 2.0?0 0913 1.22 63.19 1.600 ?0.929 10.69 64.11 2.080 ?0.911 1.02 63.20 1.610 -0.931 10.49 64.2? 2.090 -0.922 0.32 68.22 1.620 -0.934 10.28 64.42 2.100 -0.934 0.61 68.23 1.630 -0.940 10.03 64.5? 2.110 -0.931 0.41 63.23 1.640 ?0.94? 9.3? 64.?2 2.120 ?0.92? 0.20 68.24 1.650 -0.954 9.66 64.86 2.130 -0.924 0.00 68.24 1.660 -0.946 9.45 65.00 2.140 -0.882 0.00 63.24 1.6?0 ?0.933 9.25 65.14 2.150 ?0.340 0.00 68.24 1.680 ?0.930 9.04 65.2? 2.160 -0.?63 0.00 63.24 1.690 0.922 8.84 65.40 2.170 ?0.636 0.00 63.24 1.?00 -0.920 3.64 65.53 2.180 -0.56? 0.00 68.24 1.?10 0929 8.43 65.66 2.190 ~0.4?5 0.00 63.24 1.?20 0938 3.23 65.?8 2.200 -0.335 0.00 68.24 1.?30 -0.935 3.02 65.90 2.210 -0.309 0.00 68.24 1.?40 -0.931 11.82 66.01 2.220 -0.231 0.00 68.24 1.?50 0924 ?.62 66.13 2.230 -0.181 0.00 68.24 1.?60 ?0.916 7.42 66.24 1.?70 -0.908 ?.22 66.34 1.?30 -0.920 ?.01 66.45 1.?90 ?0.932 6.81 66.55 1.800 ?0.92? 6.61 66.65 1.810 ?0.922 6.40 66.?4 1.820 -0.931 6.20 66.34 1.330 -0.930 6.00 66.93 1.840 ?0.929 5.79 6101 1.850 -0.935 5.59 6?.10 1.360 -0.940 5.33 6?.13 1.8?0 -0.933 5.1? 6?.25 1.880 ?0.936 4.9? 67.33 1.390 -0.935 4.?6 6?.40 1.900 -0.93? 4.56 1.910 0940 4.35 6?.53 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 1711946119116146333;. 30311397 493641;: ?9474 Hum Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 5 Run Number 5 vaoou Data Ftom Skid 1251313 I Run 5. p.1 Run Length 2.23 Run Date? Time Thursday. March 22, 2013 10:29 PM Ca3e# 13-32694 Vehicle 2017 Volvo X690 T3 Detective K. arsland #20595 Location ill Ave? Curry Rd, just south Notes: Actual crash vehicle used in tests Time Accel Speed Dist Time Awel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist Secs MPH ft. Secs PH ft. Secs MPH ft. 0.000 0.000 41 77 0.00 0.480 -0.821 32.53 26.44 0.960 -0.926 22.70 46.01 0.010 -0.437 41.66 0.61 0.490 -0.831 32.35 26.92 0.970 -0.914 22.50 46.34 0.020 -0.335 41.59 1.22 0.500 -0.841 32.16 27.39 0.930 -0.901 22.30 46.6? 0.030 ?0.330 41.50 1.33 0.510 ?0.339 31.93 27.86 0 990 ?0.905 22.11 47.00 0.040 -0.413 41.41 2.44 0.520 -0.336 31.79 23.33 1.000 -0.910 21.91 47.32 0.050 -0.470 41.31 3.05 0.530 -0.835 31.61 23.30 1.010 -0.912 21.71 47.64 0.060 0.527 41.19 3.65 0.540 ?0.335 31.43 29.26 1.020 -0.915 21.51 47.96 0.070 -0.534 41.06 4.25 0.550 ?0.334 31.24 29.72 1 030 -0.913 21.30 43.27 0.030 -0.603 40.93 4.36 0.560 -0.335 31.06 30.17 1.040 -0.903 21.11 43.58 0.090 -0.632 40.79 5.46 0.570 -0.837 30.88 30 63 1.050 -0.833 20.91 43.39 0.100 -0.674 40.64 6.05 0.530 ?0.336 30.69 31.03 1.060 -0.833 20.72 49.20 0.110 -0.716 40.49 6.65 0.590 -0.335 30.51 31.53 1.070 ?0.337 20.52 49.50 0.120 -0.783 40.32 7.24 0.600 -0.341 30.33 31.97 1.080 -0.376 20.33 49.30 0.130 -0.817 40.14 7.33 0.610 -0.352 30.14 32.42 1.090 -0.3?7 20.14 5010 0.140 -0.847 39.95 6.42 0.620 ?0.363 29.95 32.36 1.100 -0.873 19.94 50.39 0.150 ?0.331 39.76 9.00 0.630 -0.371 29.76 33.30 1.110 ?0.856 19.76 50.63 0.160 -0.916 39.56 9.53 0.640 -0.379 29.57 33.73 1.120 -0.335 19.57 50.97 0.170 -0.937 39.35 10.16 0.650 0.387 29.37 34.16 1.130 -0.353 19.39 51.25 0.160 ?0.957 39.14 10.74 0.660 ?0.396 29.13 34.59 1.140 -0.381 19.19 51.54 0.190 ?0.979 38.93 11.31 0.670 ?0.905 28.98 35.02 1.150 ?0.904 18.99 51.62 0.200 -1 002 33.71 11.33 0.630 -0.918 23.73 35.44 1.160 -0914 13.79 52.09 0.210 -1.025 33.43 12.45 0.690 -0.932 23.57 35.36 1.170 -0.924 13.59 52.37 0.220 -1.049 33.25 13.01 0.700 -0.945 23.36 36.28 1.130 -0.922 13.39 52.64 0.230 -1074 33.02 13.57 0.710 -0.953 28.15 36.70 1.190 ?0.921 18.19 52.91 0.240 -1.097 37.77 14.12 0.720 -0.973 27.94 37.11 1.200 -0.907 17.99 53.17 0.250 -1.111 37 53 14.63 0.730 -0.931 27.72 37.52 1.210 -0.916 17.79 53.44 0.260 -1.125 37.23 15.22 0.740 ?0.990 27.51 37.92 1.220 0925 17.53 53.69 0.270 ?1.122 37.04 15.77 0.750 ?0.993 27.29 33.32 1.230 -0.925 17.33 53.95 0.230 -1.119 36.79 16.31 0.760 -0.996 27.0? 33.72 1.240 -0.924 17.13 54.20 0.290 -1.111 36.55 16.35 0.770 -1.002 26.35 39.12 1.250 -0.935 16.97 54.46 0.300 ?1.103 36.31 17.33 0.730 -1.003 26.63 39.51 1.260 -0.945 16.77 54.70 0.310 ?1.095 36.07 17.91 0.790 ?1.014 26.41 39.90 1.270 41955 16.56 54.95 0.320 -1.034 35.33 13.44 0.300 -1.013 26.19 40.23 1.230 ?0.951 16.35 55.19 0.330 -1.073 35.59 13.96 0.310 -1.022 25.96 40.67 1.290 -0.947 16.14 55.43 0.340 -1.056 35.36 19.43 0.320 ?1.024 25.74 41.04 1.300 -0.950 15.93 55.66 0.350 ?1.039 35.13 20.00 0.830 4.026 25.51 41.42 1.310 ?0.954 15.72 55.39 0.360 -1.010 34.91 20.52 0.840 -1.021 25.29 41.79 1.320 -0.959 15.51 56.12 0.370 -0.965 34.70 21 03 0.850 -1.017 25.06 42.16 1.330 -0.957 15.30 56.35 0.330 -0.960 34.49 21.53 0.360 -1.013 24.34 42.53 1.340 -0.976 15.09 56.57 0.390 ?0.950 34.23 22.04 0.370 ?1.003 24.62 42.89 1.350 -0.976 14.37 56.79 0.400 -0.942 34.07 22.54 0.830 -0.994 24.40 43.25 1.360 0976 14.66 57.01 0.410 -0.935 33.87 23.04 0.890 -0.992 24.19 43.61 1.370 -0.9?3 14.44 57.22 0.420 0923 33.66 23.53 0.900 0990 23.9? 43.96 1.330 -0.980 14.23 57.43 0.430 ?0.921 33.46 24.02 0.910 0987 23.75 44.31 1.390 -0.933 14.01 57.64 0.440 -0.392 33.27 24.51 0.920 -0.961 23.54 44.66 1.400 ?0.933 13.30 57.84 0.450 -0.862 33.03 25.00 0.930 -0.976 23.32 45.00 1.410 -0.933 13.53 53.04 0.460 -0.847 32.89 25.48 0.940 -0.960 23.11 45.34 1.420 -0.973 13.37 53.24 0.470 41332 32.71 25.97 0.950 ?0.944 22.91 45.68 1.430 ?0.974 13.15 58.44 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 131.615.21.16 ?151 .8 1.5.1165: (3.35.1311L 18-32694 Detective K. Marsland #20595 Run 5. p.2 Time Acne! Speed Dist Time Aocel Speed Dist Time Accel Speed Dist Secs MPH Secs MPH ft. Sees MPH fl. 1.440 ?0.967 12.94 58.63 1.920 -0.938 3.30 64.34 1.450 -0.964 12.73 58.82 1.930 -0.942 3.09 64.39 1.460 -0.960 12 52 59.00 1.940 -0.945 2.89 64 43 1.470 ?0.957 12.31 59.18 1.950 -0.950 2.68 64.47 1.480 -0.953 12.10 59.36 1.960 ?0.955 2.47 64.51 1.490 -0.944 11.89 59.54 1.970 -0.951 2.26 64.54 1.500 -0.936 11.69 59.71 1.980 ~0.948 2.05 64.57 1.510 ~0.927 11.48 59.88 1.990 -0.942 1.84 64.60 1.520 -0.923 11.28 60.05 2.000 ?0.939 1.64 64.63 1.530 -0.919 11.08 60.21 2.010 -0.936 1.43 64.65 1.540 -0.911 10.88 50.37 2.020 -0.933 1.23 64.57 1.550 ?0.902 10.68 60.53 2.030 ~0.930 1.02 64.69 1.560 -0.908 10.48 60.69 2.040 -0.933 0.82 64.70 1.570 -0.908 10.28 60.84 2.050 -0.935 0.61 64.71 1.580 -0.909 10 08 60.99 2.060 -0.938 0.41 64.72 1.590 ?0.915 9.88 51.13 2.070 -0.934 0.20 64.72 1.600 .0923 9.68 61.28 2.080 ?0.931 0.00 64.72 1.610 -0.914 9.48 61.42 2.090 -0.913 0.00 64.72 1.620 -0.905 9.28 61.56 2.100 ~0.895 0.00 64.72 1.630 ?0.896 9.09 61.69 2.110 -0.858 0.00 64.72 1.640 -0.887 8.89 61.82 2.120 ?0.827 0.00 64.72 1.650 -0.877 8.70 61.95 2.130 -0.796 0.00 64.72 1.660 -0.888 8.50 62.08 2.140 -0.739 0.00 64.72 1.670 -0.899 8.31 62.20 2.150 0682 0.00 64.72 1.680 -0.889 8.11 62.32 2.160 -0.600 0.00 64.72 1.690 -0.887 7.92 62.44 2.170 ?0.520 0.00 64.72 1.700 -0.884 7.72 62.55 2.180 -0.441 0.00 64.72 1.710 ?0.882 7.53 62.66 2.190 -0.354 0.00 64.72 1.720 ?0.880 7.34 62.77 2.200 ?0.270 0.00 64.72 1.730 -0.887 7.14 62.66 2.210 -0.201 0.00 64.72 1.740 -0.895 6.95 62.98 2.220 -0.136 0.00 64.72 1.750 ?0.902 6.75 63.08 2.230 0.163 0.00 64.72 1.760 -0.899 6.55 63.18 1.770 -0.896 6.35 63.28 1.780 41.899 6.15 53.37 1.790 -0.902 5.96 63.46 1.800 -0.917 5.76 63.54 1.810 -0.926 5.55 63.63 1.820 -0.934 5.35 63.71 1.830 ?0.940 5.14 63.78 1.840 -0.945 4.94 63.35 1.850 -0.937 4.73 63.93 1.860 -0.930 4.53 63.99 1.870 41926 4.32 54.06 1.880 -0.929 4.12 64.12 1.890 -0.932 3.92 64.18 1.800 41933 3.71 54.24 1.910 -0.935 3.51 64.29 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?863 r: ?mmim 63-11mm: 11-31 meme: 13111:;st Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 1B Run Number Run Length Run DateITime Vehicle Location Notes 1 2.11 Thursday, arch 22, 2018 10 20 PM Time Awe! Secs 0 000 0.000 0 010 -0.505 0 020 -0.349 0 030 -0.380 0 040 -0.399 0 050 ?0.449 0 060 ?0.499 0 070 ?0.592 0 080 -0.620 0 090 -0.649 0.100 -0.691 0.1 10 -0.733 0.120 ?0.747 0.130 ?0.761 0.140 -0.776 0.150 -0.802 0.160 -0.827 0.170 -0.845 0.180 -0.863 0.190 0.902 0 200 ?0.928 0 210 ?0.954 0 220 -0.977 0 230 -1 .001 0 240 -0.997 0 250 -0.993 0 260 ?0.989 0 270 -0.988 0 260 -0.987 0 290 ?0.991 0 300 -0.994 0 310 -0.999 0 320 -0.997 0 330 -0.997 0 340 -0.990 0 350 ?0.983 0 360 ?0.977 Speed Dist MPH ft. 40.14 0.00 40.03 0.59 39.96 1.17 39.87 1.76 39.78 2.34 39.69 2.93 39.58 3.51 39.45 4.09 39.31 4.67 39.17 5.24 39.02 5.81 38.86 6.39 38.69 6.95 38.53 7.52 38.35 8.08 38.18 8.65 38.00 9.20 37.81 9.76 37.62 10.31 37.42 10.86 37.22 11.41 37.01 11.95 36.80 12.50 36.58 13.03 36.36 13.57 36.14 14.10 35.92 14.63 35.71 15.15 35.49 15.68 35.27 16.20 35.06 16.71 34.84 17.22 34.62 17.73 34.40 18.24 34.18 18.74 33.97 19.24 33.75 19.74 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 717 0 370 0 380 0 390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 0.460 0.470 0.480 0.490 590 0.600 0.610 0.020 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.670 0.680 0.690 0.700 0.710 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 .971 ?0.964 43.951 -0.939 -0.923 -0.907 -0.884 -0.879 -0.873 -0.872 -0.872 -0.876 -0.882 -0.887 -0.896 -0.904 -0.914 -0.924 43.935 0.939 ?0.942 -0.952 -0.963 50.971 -0.980 -0.988 -0.991 -0.994 -1.000 -1 .007 -1.016 -1.022 -1 .029 ?1.034 -1 .040 -1 .040 -1.041 -1 .042 -1 .037 -1.033 -1.032 ?1 .031 -1.030 -1.031 -1 .032 -1 .026 -1 .021 33-54 20.23 33.33 20.72 33.12 21.21 32.91 2159 32.71 22.13 32.51 2265 32.32 23.13 3212 23.60 31.93 24.07 31.74 2454 31-55 25.00 31.36 25.43 31.13 25.92 30.97 26.39 30.77 23.33 30.58 27.28 30.37 27.73 30.17 28.17 29.97 23.61 29.79 29.05 29.55 29.49 29.35 2992 29.13 3035 28.92 30.77 28.71 31.19 23.49 29.27 3203 28.05 32.44 27.83 32.85 27.39 33-66 27.17 3406 26.94 34.40 26.71 34.35 26.49 35.24 25.23 35.63 25-80 36.39 25.57 3537 25.35 37.14 25.12 37151 24.89 37.33 24.97 39.24 24.44 38.60 2422 38.96 23.99 3932 23.77 39.07 ipoucE TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Git/11'" 361131333 31.133311123111211 #1321133: :1 01.41 R113 070 080 090 100 .110 120 .130 140 .150 .160 170 .180 .190 200 210 .009 -0.998 -0.993 -0.993 -0.994 -0.988 ?0.983 -0.974 -0.965 -0.957 -0.952 -0.948 -0.934 ?0.921 ?0.909 -0.907 -0.906 -0.913 -0.921 -0.924 ?0.927 ?0.930 -0.932 -0.933 -0.943 -0.952 -0.962 ?0.968 ?0.974 -0.975 0.976 -0.976 -0.977 -0.977 ?0.975 ?0.972 -0.978 ?0.983 -0.978 -0.976 ?0.975 0.978 ?0.982 -0.985 -0.987 -0.989 -0.984 23.55 40.01 23.33 40.36 23.11 40.70 22.89 41.03 22.67 41.37 22.46 41.70 22.24 42.03 22.03 42.35 21.81 42.67 21.60 42.99 21.40 43.31 21.19 43.62 20.98 43.93 20.78 44.23 20.58 44.54 20.38 44.84 20.18 45.14 19.98 45.43 19.78 45.72 19.58 46.01 19.38 46.30 19.17 46.56 18.97 46.86 18.76 47.14 18.56 47.41 18.35 47.68 18.14 47.95 17.92 48.21 17.71 48.47 17.50 48.73 17.28 48.99 17.07 49.24 16.85 49.49 16.64 49.73 16.43 49.97 16.21 50.21 16.00 50.45 15.78 50.68 15.57 50.91 15.35 51.14 15.14 51.36 14.92 51.58 14.71 51.80 14.49 52.02 14.28 52.23 14.06 52.43 13.84 52.64 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @031 155219111412. 5 1. $3148441:1:113111191 Afr-1573 1 1 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 .400 .410 .420 .430 .440 .450 .460 .470 .480 .490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 .600 610 .620 .630 .640 .650 .660 .670 .680 .690 .700 .710 .720 .730 .740 .750 .760 .770 -0.979 -0.979 -0.980 -0.988 ?0.989 -0.991 -0.989 -0.988 -0.981 -0.974 -0.968 ?0.961 -0.955 -0.950 -0.946 -0.954 -0.970 0.987 -0.980 -0.972 ?0.967 -0.963 -0.958 -0.961 -0.964 ?0.963 0.961 -0.951 -0.952 -0.953 -0.940 -0.927 -0.920 ?0.914 0.908 -0.916 -0.925 -0.932 -0.939 -0.955 -0.960 -0.965 0.961 -0.958 -0.956 -0.953 0.950 13.63 52.84 13.41 53.04 13.20 53.23 12.98 53.43 12.77 53.61 12.55 53.80 12.33 53.98 12.11 54.16 11.90 54.34 11.69 54.51 11.47 54.68 11.26 54.85 11.05 55.01 10.84 55.17 10.64 55.33 10.43 55.48 10.21 55.64 10.00 55.78 9.78 55.93 9.57 56.07 9.36 56.21 9.15 56.34 8.94 56.48 8.73 56.61 8.51 56.73 8.30 56.86 8.09 56.98 7.88 57.09 7.67 57.21 7.47 57.32 7.26 57.43 7.06 57.53 6.85 57.63 6.65 57.73 6.45 57.83 6.25 57.92 6.05 58.01 5.85 58.10 5.64 58.18 5.43 58.27 5.22 58.34 5.01 58.42 4.80 58.49 4.59 58.56 4.38 58.63 4.17 58.69 3.96 58.75 - ef?h?lp? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?19.25? Fairways). mam-53.: 523701353; wwgmA?-?. 1.780 1.790 090 2.100 2.110 ?0.956 -0.961 -0.960 -0.958 -0.942 0.930 -0.918 ?0.918 ?0.919 -0.938 ?0.95? -0.977 -0.968 -0.958 -0.957 ?0.955 ?0.951 -0950 ?0.959 -0.959 -0.949 -0.912 -0.875 ?0.838 ?0.762 -0.687 -0.598 -0.509 -0.380 0.298 -0.226 -0.1 58 ?0.128 0.172 3.75 3.54 3.33 3.12 2.91 2.71 2.51 2.31 2.10 1.90 1.69 1.47 1.26 1.05 0.84 0.63 0.42 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 58.80 58.86 58.91 58.95 59.00 59.04 59.08 59.11 59.15 59.18 59.20 59.23 59.25 59.26 59.28 59.29 59.29 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 59.30 Case# -0 2O Acceleration (9) -1 DB .9 .- Cl TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Detective Mardand #20595 Run 1 - Braking Time Avg Accel -0332 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 61381131193115.2161: @108 7'78 32.00.884.892! ?akm?l Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 28 Run Number 2 Run Length 2.23 Run Date;r Time Thursday, March 22, 2018 10 23 PM Vehicle Location Notes Time Aocel Speed Dist Secs MPH ft. 0 000 0.000 41.60 0.00 0 010 -0.279 41.54 0.61 0 020 ?0.299 41.47 1.22 0 030 ?0.324 41.40 1.83 0 040 -0.346 41.33 2.43 0 050 -0.368 41.25 3.04 0 060 -0.416 41.16 3.64 0 070 -0.465 41.05 4.25 0 080 ?0.508 40.94 4.85 0 090 ?0.552 40.82 5.45 0.100 ?0.622 40.68 6.04 0.110 ?0.655 40.54 6.64 0.120 -0.688 40.39 7.23 0.130 -0.719 40.23 7.82 0.140 -0.750 40.07 8.41 0.150 -0.756 39.90 9.00 0.160 ?0.763 39.73 9.58 0.170 -0.770 39.57 10.17 0.180 -0.793 39.39 10.74 0.190 0816 39.21 11.32 0 200 -0.842 39.03 11.89 0 210 -0.869 38.84 12.47 0 220 -0.910 36.64 13.03 0 230 -0.929 38.43 13.60 0 240 ?0.949 38.23 14.16 0 250 -0.978 38.01 14.72 0 260 -1.008 37.79 15.28 0 270 -1.035 37.56 15.83 0 280 -1.062 37.33 16.38 0 290 -1.089 37.09 16.92 0 300 -1.106 36.85 17.47 0 310 -1.124 36.60 18.00 0 320 ?1.124 36.36 18.54 0 330 ?1.124 36.11 19.07 0 340 -1.124 35.86 19.60 0 350 -1.118 35.62 20.12 0 360 -1.112 35.37 20.64 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em mum .ngeir?k?bj?t ?338 11413390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 0.460 0.470 0.480 0.490 590 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.670 0.680 0.690 0.700 0.710 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 .093 -1.073 -1 .048 ?1.023 -0.998 -0.977 -0.956 -0.933 -0.911 ?0.887 -0.881 -0.876 ?0.869 -0.862 -0.850 -0.838 -0.826 0.814 -0.801 -0.812 -0.824 -0.838 -0.859 -0.880 -0.888 ?0.897 -0.898 -0.899 -0.900 -0.910 -0.920 -0.924 -0.928 ?0.946 -0.951 -0.956 -0.974 ?0.992 -0.993 -0.994 ?0.996 ?1 .012 ?1.029 ?1.037 -1.046 -1.066 -1.067 35.13 21.16 34.90 21.67 34.67 22.18 34.44 22.69 34.22 23.19 34.01 23.70 33.80 24.19 33.60 24.69 33.40 25.18 33.20 25.67 33.01 26.15 32.82 26.63 32.63 27.11 32.44 27.59 32.25 28.07 32.07 28.54 31.88 29.01 31.71 29.47 31.53 29.94 31.35 30.40 31.17 30.86 30.99 31.31 30.80 31.77 30.61 32.22 30.41 32.66 30.21 33.11 30.02 33.55 29.82 33.99 29.62 34.42 29.42 34.86 29.22 35.29 29.02 35.71 28.82 36.14 28.61 36.56 28.40 36.98 28.19 37.39 27.98 37.80 27.76 38.21 27.54 38.62 27.32 39.02 27.10 39.42 26.88 39.82 26.66 40.21 26.43 40.60 26.20 40.98 25.96 41.37 25.73 41.75 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @3913 75267113541} f?j?i?j??ij?iml090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 1.160 1.170 1.180 1.190 .067 -1.066 -1 .065 ?1.058 ?1 .052 -1.045 ?1 .042 -1.038 -1.034 -1.030 -1.001 ?0.983 -0.964 -0.946 -0.927 -0.933 -0.938 -0.945 -0.944 ?0.943 ?0.931 ?0.920 -0.911 -0.902 -0.893 -0.901 -0.908 ?0.906 -0.904 -0.902 ?0.896 -0.890 -0.891 -0.893 -0.894 -0.895 -0.897 -0.900 -0.903 -0.912 ?0.920 ?0.920 -0.918 -0.916 -0.910 -0.904 -0.916 25.50 42.12 25.26 42.49 25.03 42.86 24.80 43.23 24.57 43.59 24.34 43.95 24.11 44.30 23.88 44.66 23.65 45.00 23.43 45.35 23.21 45.69 22.99 46.03 22.78 46.37 22.57 46.70 22.37 47.03 22.17 47.35 21.96 47.68 21.75 48.00 21.55 48.32 21.34 48.63 21.13 48.94 20.93 49.25 20.73 49.56 20.53 49.86 20.34 50.16 20.14 50.45 19.94 50.75 19.74 51.04 19.54 51.33 19.35 51.61 19.15 51.90 18.96 52.18 18.76 52.45 18.56 52.73 18.37 53.00 18.17 53.26 17.97 53.53 17.78 53.79 17.58 54.05 17.38 54.31 17.18 54.56 16.98 54.81 16.77 55.06 16.57 55.30 16.37 55.54 16.18 55.78 15.97 56.02 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report cic? 5.3111213390 1.400 1.410 1.420 1.430 1.440 1.450 1.460 1.470 1.480 1.490 1 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 .600 610 .620 .630 .640 .650 .660 .670 1.680 1.690 1.700 1.710 1.720 1.730 1.740 1.750 1.760 1.770 -0.927 -0.939 -0.943 ?0.947 -0.946 -0.946 -0.936 -0.931 -0.927 -0.931 -0.934 -0.942 0.950 -0.958 -0.954 -0.950 -0.950 -0.950 -0.946 ?0.941 ?0.935 0.938 -0.941 -0.941 -0.941 -0.942 -0.927 -0.913 -0.916 -0.918 ?0.91 7 -0.923 -0.929 0.934 -0.940 -0.940 -0.940 -0.941 -0.929 -0.917 ?0.918 0.919 -0.904 -0.892 -0.880 -0.882 -0.883 15.77 56.25 15.56 56.48 15.36 56.71 15.15 56.93 14.94 57.15 14.74 57.37 14.53 57.58 14.33 57.80 14.12 58.01 13.92 58.21 13.71 58.41 13.51 58.61 13.30 58.81 13.09 59.00 12.88 59.19 12.67 59.38 12.46 59.57 12.25 59.75 12.05 59.92 11.84 60.10 11.63 60.27 11.43 60.44 11.22 60.61 11.02 60.77 10.81 60.93 10.60 61.09 10.40 61.24 10.20 61.39 10.00 61.54 9.80 61.69 9.60 61.83 9.39 61.97 9.19 62.10 8.98 62.24 8.78 62.37 8.57 62.49 8.37 62.62 8.16 62.74 7.96 62.86 7.75 62.97 7.55 63.09 7.35 63.19 7.15 63.30 6.96 63.40 6.76 63.51 6.57 63.60 6.38 63.70 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report rec)? 1:3 2mm; 161237;; emm?mam. 1.780 1.790 090 2.100 2.110 2.120 2.130 2.140 2.150 2.160 2.170 2.180 2.190 230 -0.899 ?0.915 ?0.931 -0.929 -0.927 -0.923 -0.919 ?0.924 -0.928 ?0.932 ?0.931 -0.930 -0.914 -0.898 -0.882 ?0.897 -0.911 ?0.929 -0.946 -0.960 -0.954 -0.947 -0.952 -0.958 ?0.964 -0.969 -0.975 -0.982 -0.988 -0.982 -0.976 -0.961 -0.937 -0.912 -0.865 -0.817 ?0.735 0.653 -0.572 -0.479 -0.388 -0.301 -0.206 -0.137 0.156 0.278 6.18 63.79 5.98 63.88 5.78 63.97 5.57 64.05 5.37 64.13 5.17 64.21 4.96 64.28 4.76 64.35 4.56 64.42 4.35 64.49 4.15 64.55 3.95 64.61 3.74 64.66 3.55 64.72 3.35 64.77 3.16 64.82 2.96 64.86 2.75 . 64.90 2.55 64.94 2.34 64.98 2.13 65.01 1.92 65.04 1.71 65.07 1.50 65.09 1.29 65.11 1.08 65.13 0.86 65.14 065 65.15 0.43 65.16 0.21 65.16 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65,17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 000 65.17 0.00 65.17 0.00 65.17 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report L-: Case?! 18452594 Detective Mardand #20595 Rm 2. p.3 Run 2 Braking 0.00 43 20 Acceleralion .6 lb I: 41.80 .1 i 4.20 Time I Avg Aocel POLICE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 60)? If: 2813:4715? 636??)3214183561 mm ?911!01817314477187? Rig? 6813.6111814'132} Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 3B Run Number 3 Run Length 2.26 Run DateITime Thursday. March 22, 2018 10 25 PM Vehicle Location Notes Time Acoel Speed Dist Sew MPH ft. 0 000 0.000 42.33 0.00 0 010 -0.512 42.22 0.62 0 020 -0.420 42.13 1.24 0 030 -0.424 42.04 1.86 0 040 ?0.445 41.94 2.47 0 050 ?0.447 41.84 3.09 0 060 ?0,497 41.73 3.70 0 070 ?0.546 41.61 4.31 0 080 -0.582 41.48 4.92 0 090 -0.618 41.35 5.53 0.100 -0.670 41.20 6.13 0.110 -0.722 41.04 6.74 0.120 ?0.774 40.87 7.34 0.130 ?0,786 40.70 7.93 0.140 -0.799 40.52 8.53 0.150 -0.816 40.35 9.12 0.160 -0.834 40.16 9.71 0.170 -0.867 39.97 10.30 0.180 ?0.888 39.78 10.89 0.190 -0.909 39.58 11.47 0 200 ?0.936 39.37 12.05 0 210 0963 39.16 12.62 0 220 -0.991 38.94 13.20 0 230 -1.019 38.72 13.76 0 240 -1.048 38.49 14.33 0 250 -1.061 38.26 14.89 0 260 ?1.074 38.02 15.45 0 270 ?1.061 37.79 16.01 0 280 ?1,048 37.56 16.56 0 290 ?1.039 37.33 17.11 0 300 -1.034 37.11 17.66 0 310 -1.028 36.88 18.20 0 320 -1.024 36.85 18.74 0 330 -1.021 36.43 19.27 0 340 ?1.015 36.21 19.81 0 350 ?1.010 35.99 20.34 0 360 ?1.005 35.77 20.86 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 186;": 17:? MILWM 2.1611111390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 0.460 0.470 0.480 0.490 590 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.670 0.680 0.690 0.700 0.710 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 830 -0.989 -0.974 -0.946 -0.917 -0.882 -0.868 -0.855 -0.855 -0.855 -0.863 -0.870 -0.878 0.868 -0.858 -0.842 -0.825 -0.807 -0.799 -0.792 ?0.808 ?0.824 -0.844 -0,864 -0.884 -0.893 -0.902 -0.902 -0.902 -0.912 -0.914 -0.918 -0.937 -0.957 -0.969 -0.981 -0.993 -1.004 ?1.015 -1 .018 -1.022 -1 .033 ?1.033 -1 .034 ?1.040 ?1 .047 -1 .053 -1.058 35.55 21.39 35.34 21.91 35.13 22.42 34.93 22.94 34.73 23.45 34.54 23.96 34.36 24.46 34.17 24.96 33.98 25.46 33.79 25.96 33.60 26.45 33.41 26.95 33.22 27.43 33.03 27.92 3284 28.40 32.66 28.88 32.49 29.36 32.31 29.84 32.14 30.31 31.96 30.78 31.78 31.25 31.59 31.71 31.40 32.17 31.21 32.63 31.01 33.09 30.82 33.54 30.62 33.99 30.42 34.44 30.22 34.88 30.02 35.33 29.82 35.77 29.61 36.20 29.40 36.63 29.19 37.06 28.98 37.49 28.76 37.91 28.54 38.33 28.31 38.75 28.09 39.16 27.87 39.57 27.64 39.98 27.41 4039 27,19 40.79 26.96 41.18 26.73 41.58 26.50 41.97 26.27 42.35 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em: 1% 41161511721351: 1 5298113111541 3151113090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 1.160 1.170 1.180 1.190 .064 ?1.060 ?1.057 -1 .045 -1 .033 -1.020 -1 .017 -1 .013 -1.010 ?1 .007 -0.999 -0.991 v0.983 -0.969 -0.955 -0.943 -0.931 -0.907 ?0.892 -0.377 -0.887 -0.897 -0.900 -0.903 -0.907 -0.902 -0.398 -0.901 -0.904 -0.915 -0.913 -0.910 ?0.929 -0.948 -0.949 -0.950 0.951 -0.952 -0.954 -0.960 -0.966 -0.983 -0.990 -0.997 ?1 .002 ?1 .007 -0.998 26.03 42.74 25.80 43.12 25.57 43.49 25.34 43.87 25.11 4424 24.89 44.60 24.67 44.97 24.44 45.33 24.22 45.68 24.00 46.04 23.78 46.39 23.56 46.74 23.35 47.08 23.14 47.42 22.93 47.76 22.72 48.09 22.52 48.42 22.32 48.75 22.12 49.08 21.93 49.40 21.73 49.72 21.54 50.04 21.34 50.35 21.14 50.67 20.94 50.97 20.75 51.28 20.55 51.58 20.35 51.88 20.15 52.18 19.95 52.47 19.75 52.77 19.55 53.05 19.35 53.34 19.14 53.62 18.93 53.90 18.72 54.18 18.51 54.45 18.31 54.72 18.10 54.99 17.89 55.25 17.67 55.51 17.46 55.77 17.24 56.02 17.02 56.27 16.80 56.52 16.58 56.77 16.36 57.01 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "93775174? 731. cm #:1331131 51am; 23.01.311.21 82-. 31.7111390 1.400 1.410 1.420 1.430 1.440 1.450 1.460 1.470 1.480 1.490 590 1.600 1.610 1.620 1.630 1.640 1.650 1.660 1.670 1.680 1.690 1.700 1.710 1.720 1.730 1.740 1.750 1.760 1.770 ?0.989 0.999 -1 .014 -1.030 -1.037 -1.044 -1.029 ?1 .015 ~1.001 -1 .000 -0.999 -0.996 -0.993 -0.997 -0.999 ?1.002 -0.999 -0.996 -0.981 -0.966 -0.950 0.940 -0.930 -0.936 -0.943 -0.944 -0.949 -0.955 -0.945 ?0.936 ?0.933 ?0.931 -0.929 -0.919 -0.909 -0.896 ?0.883 ?0.873 -0.874 -0.875 -0.889 -0.903 -0.912 -0.922 ?0.932 ?0.933 -0.935 16.15 57.25 15.93 57.48 15.70 57.71 15.48 57.94 15.25 58.17 15.02 5839 14.80 58.61 14.57 58.82 14.35 59.04 14.13 59.25 13.92 59.45 13.70 59.65 13.48 59.85 13.26 60.05 13.04 6024 12.82 60.43 12.60 60.62 12.38 60.80 12.17 60.98 11.96 61.16 11.75 61.33 11.54 61.50 11.34 61.67 11.13 61.84 10.93 62.00 10.72 62.16 10.51 62.31 10.30 62.46 10.09 62.61 9.89 62.76 9.68 62.90 9.48 63.04 9.28 63.18 9.07 63.32 8.87 63.45 8.68 63.58 8.48 63.70 8.29 63.83 8.10 63.95 7.91 64.06 7.71 64.18 7.52 64.29 7.32 64.40 7.11 64.50 6.91 64.61 6.70 64.71 6.50 64.80 POLICE TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 6404?: 2.611841%! meg-yam .780 .790 800 810 820 830 840 850 860 870 880 690 900 910 920 930 940 950 960 090 2.100 2.110 2.120 2.130 2.140 2.150 2.160 2.170 2.180 2.190 230 ?0.938 -0.942 -0.957 -0.968 -0.980 -0.982 -0.985 -0.976 ?0.968 -0.959 -0.958 -0.958 -0.954 -0.950 -0.934 -0.916 ?0.898 -0.903 -0.909 -0.935 -0,961 ?0.988 0.989 -0.990 -0.982 -0.973 -0.961 -0.955 -0.949 0.952 -0.956 -0.948 -0.940 -0.933 -0.901 -0.870 ?0.826 ?0.782 -0.693 -0.622 -0.553 -0.469 -0.386 0.308 ?0.233 ?0.170 6.29 64.90 6.09 64.99 5.88 65.08 5.66 65.16 5.45 65.24 5.23 65.32 5.02 65.40 4.80 65.47 4.59 65.54 4.38 65.60 4.17 65.66 3.96 65.72 3.75 65.78 3.54 65.83 3.34 65.89 3.14 65.93 2.94 65.98 2.74 66.02 2.54 66.06 2.34 66.09 2.13 66.13 1.91 66.16 1.69 66.18 1.48 66.21 1.26 66.23 1.05 66.24 0.84 66.26 0.63 66.27 0.42 66.27 0.21 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 0.00 66.28 Ebe?TiE 201832694 18-32694 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Detective Mardand #20595 . -.- .mp? Run 3, p.3 Acceleration 0.20 Run 3 - Braking 011D -0 2i] 41.60 0.20 0.80 1 .DD 120 Turn a 1440 1.00 1.80 . ?pef?tiq?al StatiE ADMINISTRATIVE .. . -o.926 I TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report en 1813.me wmwm: 3911.19 819685398333 3m 8119:1913? Type:AttachmenI Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 4B 4 2.25 Thursday, arch 22, 2018 10 27 PM Run Number Run Length Run DateITime Vehicle Location Notes Time Accel Sees 0 000 0.000 0 010 ?0.302 0 020 ?0.350 0 030 ?0.355 0 040 0367 0 050 -0.411 0 060 -0.456 0 070 -0.503 0 080 0.552 0 090 ?0.603 0.100 -0.643 0.110 ?0.684 0.120 -0.709 0.130 -0.733 0.140 -0.758 0.150 -0.762 0.160 0.767 0.170 ?0.811 0.180 -0.856 0.190 0.902 0 200 -0.930 0 210 -0.957 0 220 -0.977 0 230 -0.997 0 240 ?1.013 0 250 ?1.030 0 260 4.047 0 270 ?1.044 0 280 -1.042 0 290 -1.041 0 300 4.040 0 310 -1.050 0 320 ?1.062 0 330 ?1.075 0 340 ?1.087 0 350 ?1.100 0 360 -1.087 Speed Dist PH ft. 42.90 0.00 42.83 0.63 42.75 1.26 42.67 1.88 42.59 2.51 42.50 3.13 42.40 3.75 42.29 4.38 42.17 5.00 42.04 5.61 41.90 6.23 41.75 6.84 41.59 7.45 41.43 8.06 41.27 8.67 41.10 9.27 40.93 9.87 40.75 10.47 40.56 11.07 40.37 11.66 40.16 12.25 39.95 12.84 39.74 13.43 39.52 14.01 39.30 14.58 39.07 15.16 38.84 15.73 38.61 16.30 38.38 16.86 38.16 17.42 37.93 17.98 37.70 18.54 37.46 19.09 37.23 19.64 36.99 20.18 36.75 20.72 36.51 21.26 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?416.23? it: 27351334581384?- mma'hm imp. 0 370 0 380 0 390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 0.460 0.470 0.480 0.490 590 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.670 0.680 0.690 0.700 0.710 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 830 -1.073 ?1 .060 ?1 .046 ?1 .033 -0.999 -0.965 -0.944 -0.925 -0.906 ?0.91 5 ?0.925 -0.928 -0.931 -0.917 -0.912 -0.908 -0.895 ?0.883 ?0.876 -0.870 ?0.864 -0.866 -0.869 ?0.886 -0.904 -0.920 ?0.924 -0.929 -0.935 -0.942 -0.946 ?0.950 ?0.955 -0.960 -0.965 -0.972 -0.980 -0.995 ?1.002 ?1 .010 -1 .014 ?1 .019 -1.018 -1.018 -1.017 -1 .019 ?1 .021 36.28 21.79 36.04 22.32 35.81 22.85 35.59 23.37 35.37 23.89 35.16 24.41 34.95 24.92 34.75 25.44 34.55 25.94 34.35 26.45 34.14 26.95 33.94 27.45 33.74 27.95 33.53 28.44 33.33 28.93 33.14 29.42 32.94 29.90 32.75 30.38 32.55 30.86 32.36 31.34 32.17 31.81 31.98 32.28 31.79 32.75 31.60 33.22 31.40 33.68 31.20 34.14 31.00 34.59 30.79 35.05 30.59 35.50 30.38 35.94 30.17 36.39 29.96 36.83 29.75 37.27 29.54 37.70 29.33 38.13 29.12 38.56 28.90 38.99 28.69 39.41 28.47 39.83 28.24 40.24 28.02 40.66 27.80 41.07 27.57 41.47 27.35 41.87 27.13 42.27 26.90 42.67 26.68 43.06 Temp-E TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ear 090 1.100 1.110 1.120 1.130 1.140 1.150 1.160 1.170 1.180 1.190 .022 ?1 .023 -1.020 -1 .017 -1.014 -1 .012 -1.009 -0.997 ?0.986 -0.974 -0.965 -0.955 -0.955 -0.955 -0.952 -0.945 ?0.939 -0.944 0.950 -0.937 -0.924 ?0.91 2 -0.903 -0.894 -0.913 -0.933 -0.936 -0.927 -0.918 ?0.904 -0.890 -0.905 -0.920 -0.935 -0.936 -0.938 ?0.930 ?0.922 ?0.916 0.921 -0.925 -0.927 0.929 -0.933 -0.937 ?0.941 -0.939 26.46 43.45 26.23 43.84 26.01 44.22 25.79 44.60 25.56 44.98 25.34 45.35 25.12 45.72 24.90 46.09 24.68 46.45 24.47 46.81 24.26 47.17 24.05 47.52 23.84 47.88 23.63 48.22 23.42 48.57 23.21 48.91 23.01 49.25 22.80 49.59 22.59 49.92 22.39 50.25 22.18 50.58 21.98 50.90 21.79 51.22 21.59 51.54 21.39 51.85 21.19 52.17 20.98 52.48 20.78 52.78 20.58 53.08 20.38 53.39 20.18 53.68 19.98 53.98 19.78 54.27 19.58 54.56 19.37 54.84 19.17 55.13 18.96 55.41 18.76 55.68 18.56 55.96 18.36 56.23 18.15 56.49 17.95 56.76 17.75 57.02 17.54 57.28 17.34 57.53 17.13 57.79 16.92 58.04- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .6210 EE I 'Eraim?a 1.61 1 310 -0.937 16.72 58.28 1 320 ?0.938 16.51 58.53 1330 ?0.939 16.31 58.77 1 340 ?0.935 16.10 59.01 1 350 ?0.936 15.90 59.24 1 360 -0.937 15.69 59.47 1 370 -0.936 15.49 59.70 1 380 -0.936 15.28 59.93 1 390 -0.940 15.07 60.15 1.400 ?0.945 14.87 60.37 1.410 ?0.949 14.66 60.59 1.420 -0.953 14.45 60.80 1.430 ?0.958 14.24 61.01 1.440 -0.959 14.03 61.22 1.450 -0.960 13.82 61.42 1.460 -0.964 13.61 61.62 1.470 -0.962 13.40 61.82 1.480 ?0.961 13.18 62.01 1.490 ?0.960 12.97 62.21 1 500 -0.959 12.76 62.40 1 510 -0.959 12.55 62.58 1 520 -0.959 12.34 62.76 1530 -0.959 12.13 62.94 1 540 -0.954 11.92 63.12 1 550 ?0.949 11.72 63.29 1 560 ?0.943 11.51 63.46 1 570 ?0.936 11.30 63.63 1 580 -0.929 11.10 63.79 1 590 -0.929 10.90 63.96 1.600 -0.929 10.69 64.11 1.610 -0.931 10.49 64.27 1.620 -0.934 10.28 64.42 1.630 -0.940 10.08 64.57 1.640 ?0.947 9.87 64.72 1,650 -0.954 9.66 64.86 1.660 -0.946 9.45 65.00 1.670 -0.938 9.25 65.14 1.680 -0.930 9.04 65.27 1.690 ?0.922 8.84 65.40 1.700 ?0.920 8.64 65.53 1.710 -0.929 8.43 65.66 1.720 -0.938 8.23 65.78 1.730 -0.935 8.02 65.90 1,740 -0.931 7.82 66.01 1.750 -0.924 7.62 66.13 1.760 -0.916 7.42 66.24 1.770 ?0.908 7.22 66.34 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mm .?-alammgag?ma; 1.780 1.790 090 2.100 2.110 2.120 2.130 2.140 2.150 2.160 2.170 2.180 2.190 230 -0.920 -0.932 -0.927 -0.922 ?0.931 -0.930 ?0.929 -0.935 -0.940 -0.938 -0.936 ?0.935 ?0.937 -0.940 -0.933 -0.926 -0.912 -0.903 -0.893 ?0.887 ?0.881 -0.873 -0.866 -0.860 -0.868 ?0.875 0.888 -0.902 -0.915 -0.913 -0.91 1 -0.922 -0.934 ?0.931 -0.927 -0.924 -0.882 -0.840 -0.763 -0.686 ?0.567 ?0.475 -0.385 -0.309 -0.231 -0.181 7.01 66.45 6.81 66.55 6.61 66.65 6.40 66.74 6.20 66.84 6.00 66.93 5.79 67.01 5.59 67.10 5.38 67.18 5.17 67.25 4.97 67.33 4.76 67.40 4.56 67.47 4.35 67.53 4.15 67.60 3.94 67.65 3.74 67.71 3.55 67.76 3.35 67.82 3.16 67.86 2.96 67.91 2.77 67.95 2.58 67.99 2.39 68.03 2.20 68.06 2.01 68.09 1.82 68.12 1.62 68.14 1.42 68.17 1.22 68.19 1.02 68.20 0.82 68.22 0.61 68.23 0.41 68.23 0.20 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 0.00 68.24 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report w: . .k-Alu, Case# 18-32594 Detective Marsland #20595 Rm 4, p.3 Run 4 - Braking Amelaation 41.80 Time Ava. Accel 43.918 1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :91W10Jn?l SEEM 350511311658 91.511575; @665 ?59: 11.513313 Type:Attachment Description:KM - SKID TESTING RUN 5B1 Run Number Run Length Run Date:r Time Vehicle Location Notes 5 2.23 Thursday, arch 22, 201810 29 PM Time Aocel Secs 0.000 0.000 0.010 ?0.487 0.020 ?0.335 0.030 -0.380 0.040 -0.413 0.050 -0.470 0.060 -0.527 0.070 -0.584 0.080 -0.608 0.090 ?0.632 0.100 ?0.674 0.110 ?0.716 0.120 ?0.788 0.130 ?0.817 0.140 ?0.847 0.150 -0.881 0.160 -O.916 0.170 -0.937 0.180 -0.957 0.190 -0.979 0.200 -1.002 0.210 ?1.025 0.220 ?1.049 0.230 4.074 0.240 ?1.097 0.250 ?1.111 0.260 ?1.125 0.270 -1.122 0.280 -1.119 0.290 -1.111 0.300 -1.103 0.310 -1.095 0.320 -1.084 0.330 ?1.073 0.340 -1.056 0.350 ~1.039 0.360 -1.010 0.370 -0.985 Speed Dist MPH ft. 41.77 41.66 41.59 41.50 41.41 41.31 41.19 41.06 40.93 40.79 40.64 40.49 40.32 40.14 39.95 39.76 39.56 39.35 39.14 38.93 38.71 38.48 38.25 38.02 37.77 37.53 37.28 37.04 36.79 36.55 36.31 36.07 35.83 35.59 35.36 35.13 34.91 34.70 0.00 0.61 1.22 1.83 2.44 3.05 3.65 4.25 4.86 5.46 6.05 6.65 7.24 7.83 8.42 9.00 9.58 10.16 10.74 11.31 11.88 12.45 13.01 13.57 14.12 14.68 15.22 15.77 16.31 16.85 17.38 17.91 18.44 18.96 19.48 20.00 20.52 21.03 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?t 28613341?? Q?sliim?m?r 97841743; 0.380 0.390 0.400 0.410 0.420 0.430 0.440 0.450 0.460 0.470 0.480 0.490 0.500 0.510 0.520 0.530 0.540 0.550 0.560 0.570 0.580 0.590 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.670 0.680 0.690 0.700 0.710 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 0.800 0.810 0.820 0.830 0.840 -0.960 ?0.950 ?0.942 ?0.935 ?0.928 ?0.921 ?0.892 -0.862 -0.847 -0.832 -0.821 -0.831 -0.841 ?0.839 -0.836 -0.835 -0.835 -0.834 -0.835 -0.837 ?0.836 -0.835 -0.841 -0.852 -0.863 ?0.871 -0.879 -0.887 -0.896 -0.905 -0.918 -0.932 0.945 -0.958 -0.973 -0.981 -0.990 -0.993 -0.996 -1.002 -1.008 -1.014 -1.018 ?1.022 ?1.024 ?1.026 ?1.021 34.49 21.53 34.28 22.04 34.07 22.54 33.87 23.04 33.66 23.53 33.46 24.02 33.27 24.51 33.08 25.00 32.89 25.48 32.71 25.97 32.53 26.44 32.35 26.92 32.16 27.39 31.98 27.86 31.79 28.33 31.61 28.80 31.43 29.26 31.24 29.72 31.06 30.17 30.88 30.63 30.69 31.08 30.51 31.53 30.33 31.97 30.14 32.42 29.95 32.86 29.76 33.30 29.57 33.73 29.37 34.16 29.18 34.59 28.98 35.02 28.78 35.44 28.57 35.86 28.36 36.28 28.15 36.70 27,94 37.11 27.72 37.52 27.51 37.92 27.29 38.32 27.07 38.72 26.85 39.12 26.63 39.51 26.41 39.90 26.19 40.28 25.96 40.67 25.74 41.04 25.51 41.42 25.29 41.79 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (83.914 1?3 chmaxmj mam. 0.850 0.860 0.870 0.680 0.890 0.900 0.910 0.920 0.930 0.940 0.950 0.960 0.970 0.980 0.990 1.000 1.010 1.020 1.030 1.040 1.050 1.060 1.070 1.080 1.090 .100 110 .120 130 .140 150 .160 .170 .180 190 .200 .210 .220 1.230 1.240 1.250 1 .260 1.270 1.280 1.290 1 .300 1.310 -1.017 -1.013 -1.003 -0.994 -0.992 -0.990 ~0.987 ?0.981 -0.976 -0.960 -0.944 -0.926 ?0.914 -0.901 -0.905 -0.910 -0.912 -0.915 -0.918 -0.903 -0.888 -0.888 -0.887 -0.876 -0.877 -0.878 -0.856 ?0.835 ?0.858 ?0.881 -0.904 -0.914 -0.924 -0.922 -0.921 -0.907 -0.916 ?0.925 -0.925 ?0.924 ?0.935 -0.945 ?0.955 -0.951 -0.947 -0.950 -0.954 25.06 42.16 24.84 42.53 24.62 42.89 24.40 43.25 24.19 43.61 23.97 43.96 23.75 44.31 23.54 44.66 23.32 45.00 23.11 45.34 22.91 45.68 22.70 46.01 22.50 46.34 22.30 46.67 22.11 47.00 21.91 47.32 21.71 47.64 21.51 47.96 21.30 48.27 21.11 48.58 20.91 48.89 20.72 49.20 20.52 49.50 20.33 49.80 20.14 50.10 19.94 50.39 19.76 50.68 19.57 50.97 19.39 51.25 19.19 51.54 18.99 51.82 18.79 52.09 18.59 52.37 18.39 52.64 18.19 52.91 17.99 53.17 17.79 53.44 17.58 53.69 17.38 53.95 17.18 54.20 16.97 54.46 16.77 54.70 16.56 54.95 16.35 55.19 16.14 55.43 15.93 55.66 15.72 55.89 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report am 77:: mm tit-2718333136.: #3er 1:2. 1.320 1.330 1.340 1.350 1.360 1.370 1.380 1.390 1.400 1.410 1.420 1.430 1.440 1.450 1 .460 1.470 1.480 1.490 1.500 1.510 1.520 1 .530 1.540 1.550 1.560 1.570 1.580 1.590 1 .600 1.610 1.620 1.630 1 .640 1.650 1.660 1.670 1.680 1.690 1.700 1 .710 1.720 1.730 1.740 1.750 1.760 1.770 1.780 -0.959 -0.967 -0.976 -0975 -0.976 -0.978 ?0.980 -0.983 -0.983 -0.983 -0.978 -0.974 -0.967 -0.964 ?0.960 -0.957 -0.953 -0.944 -0.936 -0.927 -0.923 -0.919 -0.911 -0.902 -0.908 -0.908 -0.909 ?0.916 ?0.923 -0.914 ?0.905 -0.896 -0.887 -0.877 -0.888 -0.899 -0.889 ?0.887 ?0.884 ?0.882 ?0.880 ?0.887 ?0.895 -0.902 -0.899 -0.896 -0.899 15.51 56.12 15.30 56.35 15.09 56.57 14.87 56.79 14.66 57.01 14.44 57.22 14.23 57.43 14.01 57.64 13.80 57.84 13.58 58.04 13.37 58.24 13.15 58.44 12.94 58.63 12.73 58.82 12.52 59.00 12.31 59.18 12.10 59.36 11.89 59.54 11.69 59.71 11.48 59.88 11.28 60.05 11.08 60.21 10.88 60.37 10.68 60.53 10.48 60.69 10.28 60.84 10.08 60.99 9.88 61.13 9.68 61.28 9.48 61.42 9.28 61.56 9.09 61.69 8.89 61.82 8.70 61.95 8.50 62.08 8.31 62.20 8.11 62.32 7.92 62.44 7.72 62.55 7.53 62.66 7.34 62.77 7.14 62.88 6.95 62.98 6.75 63.08 6.55 63.18 6.35 63.28 6.16 63.37 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report cedar?ewe?? 9.9mm] 1.31.115 1.790 1.800 1.810 1.820 1.830 1.840 1.850 1.860 1.870 1.880 1.890 1.900 1.910 1.920 1.930 1.940 1.950 1.960 1.970 1.980 1.990 2.000 2.010 2.020 2.030 2.040 2.050 2.060 2.070 2.080 2.090 2.100 2.110 2.120 2.130 2.140 2.150 2.160 2.170 2.180 2.190 2.200 2.210 2.220 2.230 ?0.902 -0.917 -0.926 -0.934 -0.940 -0.945 -0.937 -0.930 -0.926 -0.929 ?0.932 ?0.933 -0.935 -0.938 ?0.942 -0.945 -0.950 -0.955 -0.951 -0.948 -0.942 -0.939 -0.936 ?0.933 ?0.930 -0.933 -0.935 -0.938 -0.934 -0.931 -0.913 -0.895 -0.858 ?0.827 -0.796 -0.739 -0.682 -0.600 -0.520 -0.441 -0.354 -0.270 -0.201 ?0.136 0.163 5.96 63.46 5.76 63.54 5.55 63.63 5.35 63.71 5.14 63.78 4.94 63.86 4.73 63.93 4.53 63.99 4.32 64.06 4.12 64.12 3.92 64.18 3.71 64.24 3.51 64.29 3.30 64.34 3.09 64.39 2.89 64.43 2.68 64.47 2.47 64.51 2.26 64.54 2.05 64.57 1.84 64.60 1.64 64.63 1.43 64.65 1.23 64.67 1.02 64.69 0.82 64.70 0.61 64.71 0.41 64.72 0.20 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 0.00 64.72 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report TE (5153?:an {Related R?port ?Imagem' Type:Attachment DescriptionzKM - SKID TESTING RUN 5B2 1%:32594 Deied?w Runs-9%, Run 5 - Braking 0 0 I i ,1 0.00 . 020 0?0 050 080 1.43.20 1 -c 40 . .9 41.60 1' 41.4.20 _l Time i- i AvoAceel 43.914 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em Themed; "6:322:12: amt; ~3hiue $1th} idem ti]: et?jtegtei) Type:Attachment DescriptionzKM - VISIBILITY STUDY 1 Casedi 1 8-3 26 94 Vehicle Year: 2017 ake: Volvo Model: X090 Trim: T8 vw: ABS: Yes Notes: Vehicle is equipped with self- driving system (EDS) proprietary to UBER Detective: SKID TESTS Location City, Tempe, AZ Road: Mill Ave Cross: Curry Rd Just: South Direction: Northbound Lane: #2 K. Marsland #20595 Scene Date: 3I22f2018 Trr'n e: 2000 Surface: Asphalt Grade +1 3% DryIWet: Dry Refer to attached VC4000 data for further details on the information gathered in this testing Run# Averagef 1 10.1 0.932 2 41.6 0.911 3 42.3 0.926 4 42.9 0.918 5 41.7 0.914 Overall Average Fwaiue: 0.9202 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report sir?mum more new, "rises-er {91m migrate? Type:Attachment Description:KM - VISIBILITY STUDY 2 Case# 18?32594 Detective: arsland #20595 Visibility Testinq Ped's dist from: Distance (ft) West LP East LP Notes 1 'd Run# 637.3 56.8' Ped standing sti ,south sr eofbike un #1 812.3 55.0. 50.6' Ped standing still. sout side of bike Run #3 818.3 55.0' 50.6? Ped simulating walking motion, south side of blke Avg. Dist: 755.97 ft Vehicle Location Soene Operator Year: 2017 City, St; Tern pe, AZ Date: 3i?222?2018 Name: Detective J. Seal Make: Volvo Road: Mill Ave Time: 2030 Height: 5?07" Model: X890 Cross: Curry Rd Surface: Asphalt Soeed: 5 Trim: T8 Just: South Grade +13% Direction: Northbound Drinet: Dry Headlts.: On Lane: #2 Weather: Cloudy Hi-beam: Off Rain: None Notes: ?Vehicle is equipped with self- driving system (SDS) proprietary to UBER TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 0' i: . . .0- TypezAtlachment DescriptioniKM - VISIBILITY STUDY 3 Onset! 18-32894 Detective: arsland #20595 Ttme to Impact Avg awed Time Seg. Dist 829. Cum. Dist to impact (S) Ph} (MW) (5) If!) -4.0 44.1 246.8 -3.5 44.1 44.1 0.5 31 9 214.9 -3.0 44.1 44.1 0.5 31 9 183.0 -2.5 43.5 43.8 0.5 31.7 151.3 ?2.0 43.5 43.8 0.5 31.7 119.7 -1.5 42.9 43.2 0.5 31 2 88.4 4.0 41.5 42.2 0.5 30 5 57.9 -0.5 40.4 41.0 0.5 29.6 28.3 0.0 37.9 39.1 0.5 28 3 0.0 VSS SPEED (M PH) 4.1.1 44-1 43.5 luau?? 43.5 42.9 41.6 40.4 37.9 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report muss/m: as [site mil-States. fisi'iaii?is?i tecicirit =iijaeztgisf?si} Type:Attachment Description:KM - VISIBILITY STUDY 4 DOES CRASH N0 Cases! Detective: K. arsland #20595 I Avoidability of Crash Based on Actual Driver Reaction Time and Hyzer 8t Hyzier Approach Distance Adjustment Factor Result Adjustment to Median 637.30 0.67 425.99 Adjustment for Expectancy 426.99 0.50 213.50 Adjustment to 15m Percentile 213.50 0.67 143.04 Assigned Snead (From Distance and EDR) Speed: 43.50 Distance Required to Stop: 68.54 ft Velocity: 63.77 Reaction Time (from dashcam} Time: 0.50 sec Distance Traveled During Distance: 31.89 ft Remaining Distanceto Impact Distance: 111.16 ft Distance Vehicle Can 30;) Prior to Impact: 42.61 ft TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ectt r1. 14141100: summit?11 Siam-.4 3111.11 14..) 141.013; Type:Attachment DescriptionzKM - VISIBILITY STUDY 5 18-32694 Detective: K. Marsland #20595 p.1 Breakdown of Driver's ovement Yellow Highlighted sections show times he vehicle is stopped? File Name: UTC20180319 043145 UT020180319 043446.kds UTC20190319 043?4? Driveris Looking: Motion 02 Motion Q2 Motion Time 2.2 2.9 NB Mill 0.5 31.2 3.9 8.9 5.1 9 Goes 6.2 5.5 0.5 EB Curryr 1.3 2 NB Scotts 1 4.5 1 2,2 0.5 1.4 121.3 0.9 4.2 2.8 1.1 39Stops 2.1 0.5 0.2 13 Goes 2.5 0.8 1,6 1 2.9 13.3 5.6 0.6 1.5 2.6 1.1 1.4 150.5 Stopped Drink? 124 water Totals: 96.4 30.9 ?3.3 108 3 36.4 131.? LTotalswhen moving: 64.4 66.5 38.6 ?3.1 36.4 131.? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 56:13.24 11511111203511 1755.15 5.. 2116111111121155111155 5151:1151" 1:153:61} 5111013116 Type:Attaohment Description:KM - STUDY 6 18?32694 Detective: K. arsland #20595 p.12 Breakdown of Driver?s ovement File Name: UTC20180319 044048 UTC20180319 044349de UT020180319 044560 Driver is Looking: 9w Motion 02 Motion 09 Motion Time 5.3 3.5 3.2 0.7 5351:5115 1.1 1.5 2.3 12.5 Stops 2.3 130.5 16.9 0.9 Goes 38.6 1.3 24.6 1.5 1.3 3 Stops 8 1.8 Stops 1.8 1.3 6 1.3 Goes 14 18 Goes 6.5 1.8 19.5 Stops 1.3 0.9 2.2 14.6 3.1 0.6 Goes 1 1 14.1 Sops 11.8 3.4 3.5 36.5 4.5 2 1.6 5.1 Sons 2.8 0.6 14 0.5 12.? 4.6 Goes Gold- 1 0 6 1 Goes 4 water 0.5 55 WE ind. 4.2 1 1.5 School Totals: 55.4 127 3 92.1 35.? 38.6 139.1 I Totalswhen moving: 23.3 85.9 60.? 56.2 31.3 136.1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 61:14 13.211115142133111 67.14 1+1 1511;111:511 $119.} 11135 412.111" .1ku Mil 5E19f91?1?a7r 1111215131173; Type:Attachment Description:KM - VISIBILITY STUDY 7 Case-4? 13-32694 Detective: K. Marsland #20595 p.3 Bteakdown of Driver's ova-men! File Name: UT020180319 044951 UTC20180319 045252de UTC20180319 045552 Driver is Looking: 02 Motion 09 Motion M1 Motion Tlme 1.2 1.5 6 12.4 4.5 11.1 1.5 24.2 2.2 4.3 1.1 3.2 1.3 103.5 1.1 6.5 1.8 0.9 1.9 1.3 1.3 4.1 Stops 1Curry 2.2 4.2 3.3 2 6.2 1 2.1 19.5 1.8 2.3 2 4 0.9 2.9 1?.0.5 29.5 0.9 10.5 1.8 0.8 1.3 0.9 NBMIIJ 2.4 0.9 3 Goes 02.3 0.8 132.5 2.3 4.2 4.2 0.5 Crash 0.6 10.8 Sons 0.8 Goes 1.9 0.5 2.2 2.5 Totals: 8?.6 91.8 41.1 1346 5?.9 1205 Totalswhen moving.? ?3 32.9 21.6 114 2 57.9 120 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense RepOrt Type:Atlachmenl DescriptionzKM - VISIBILITY STUDY 8 use)! 18-32694 Detective: Mardand #20595 [3.4 mm Driver's Eyes - Total Clip! Down Up -3145 96.4 309 43445 73.3 108 .3 -3?47 36 ,4 1 31 .7 4048 55.4 1 27 ,3 4349 92.1 86.? 4560 38.6 139.1 ?1951 37.6 91 a -5252 41.1 134 .6 -5552 57.9 120.5 Grand Total: 578.8 10203145 .3445 4374? Down 36% - Down Up Bteakdown by Vldeo in ?SM-v-w?rf?v-m . . . WNb?nwqu . .n wot4048 4349 4560 4951 -5252 Video Gip with FIIE Name Ending in- .Down guy Type :Attachment TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . DescriptionzKM - STUDY 9 .n Cl 1: TTolal Time 33ml 8 8 8 1 8-32694 Deleciive: K. arsland 820595 11.5 Driver's Eyes - Totals while oving Totals While owing Clip 3 Down Up -31?5 64.4 65 5 4446 38 6 73.1 3747 36.4 131 .7 4048 23 3 85 9 4349 60.7 66 2 up 4560 31 3 136.1 as! ?1951 73 a2 9 -5252 21 6 114.2 -5552 57 9 120.5 Grand Total: 407.2 677.1 Total Breakdown by Video (lip - While Mowng #349 ?4500 45145 4446 41747 4043 Video Clio with ?le Name Ending In? I Down Up Dow 32% - Down Up 4951 43252 -5552 POLICE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at?) fie 55%}15339 grime-169.1161 305121437; 161?.in; Mm! war meme Type:Attachment Description:KM - VISIBILITY STUDY 10 Case# 18-32694 Detective: K. Marsiand #20595 p.6 Distance Traveled Not Looking (based on avg. moving speed and time} Start Time (UTC): 4:31:46 Clip Time (3) Dis! (ft) Dist End Time (UTC): 4:58:50 -3145 64.4 3068.0 0 58 -3446 38.6 1838.9 0 35 Total Time Elapsed: 1624 sec -3747 36.4 1734.1 0 33 ?me Stopped: 315.4 sec 4048 23.3 1110.0 0 21 Time Moving: 1308.6 sec ?4349 60.7 2891.7 0 55 ?4560 31.3 1491.1 0 28 Distance Traveled: 62.345 ft -4951 73.0 3477.7 0.65 Avg. Moving Speed: 47.64 Ills -5252 21.6 1029.0 0.19 32.5 ?5552 57.9 2758.4 0 52 Grand Total: 407.2 19399.0 3.67 Total of times driver looks down: 166 L. I: TE- h-1 PE- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . w. .zw. wooSTROHMEYER SUPPLEMENT Pouc DEPA RTMENT A Internationally Accredited Police Agency Since 1994 Tempe PD 18-32694 3f20l201 8 On 3120/13, I was requested to respond to the Tempe Police Department Apache Station to assist with the imaging ofthe Airbag Control Module that was still located in the 2017 Volvo XC90 that was involved in a pedestrian collision causing fatal injuries. I was advised that the collision occurred on 311819018. I arrived at the Apache Station at approximately 1200 hours. I was met at the gate to the secure lot by Of?cer McCormick who escorted me to the vehicle bay where the vehicle was located. Officer McCormick advised he had obtained a search warrant granting pennission for the imaging I used the Bosch CDR Tool to access the Airbag Control module through the OED connection. The DR software connected to the vehicle and read the VIN directly from the vehicle. The Volvo was then placed in mode and the imaging of the data contained on the airbag control module was completed without issue. The CDR File was saved to disk at 1220 hours and a .pdf ?le was created at the same time. The CDR File showed there was 1 Event recovered. I then disconnected the DR Too] from the vehicle. I obtained a USB Drive from Of?cer McCormick and transferred two ?les: W4BCOPL5H1 YV4BCOPL5HI I 49667_ACM.pdf to that USB Drive. This concluded my involvement in the matter. K. Strohtneyer #83] MOI E. McKellips Rd. Scottsdale AZ. 8525? 480.312.20?8 POLICE it}: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . - - Wrw? - A Report Number: 18-32694 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT PROPERTY FIELD RELEASE SUPPLEMENT The following property has been released by Of?cerfDetective: T. Haubold #1 1638 ITEM DESCRIPTION: 5 a have received the above listed propcny \9 i Printed Name Signature TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Ta Antih??m Gigi?1 m?m min?412i in M232 ESE) mm :ria?e?mri.i TypezAttachment PRE-HOSPITAL CARE REPORT Name: Doe,Jane Incident 13103021 incident ramming: mm {9 Pre-Hospital Care Report {Full Report} Patient information 0.0.3.- Unable to Complete Gender: Female Name: Doe, Jane Address: . Not Retarded Be?ent'i?eeled?rei None?none Is the patient Yes Isthe patient an ASU Unknown homelessh student?h ts the patient 1: Unknown Veteranh Impression Primary Death Alcoholiorug Use Unable to Complete Barriers to Patient None Noted Indcators: Care: Provider?: Primary Cardiac Arrest Impression: Cardiac Arrest Datemme of Cardiac 03,?1812018 22:02:02 Cardiac Arrest Trauma Arrest Witnessed Witnesses! Aime: Etiology: Br- by Lay Person CPR Care Provided No Prior to EMS Arrival: AED Use Prior to No EMS Arrival: Resuscitation Initiated Chest Compressions. Type of CPR CPR Attempted By EMS: Attempted Ventilation Provided: First Monitored Asystoie Arrest Rhy?'lm: ROSC: No Page 1 of 13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Ewart: Nehru?raking; 17? 71% Name: Due.Jane incidnnt 13103021 Incident Dittfl?imu: Number: End of EMS Ongoing Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Event: in ED 12 Lead ECG Used? 1_2_I._Iar1 ECG Interpreted By No Paramedic Injury Information Cause of Injury: 962 w/ Pedestrian (Car. Vehlwlar. Pedestrian. Auto v. Pedestrianf?icyclist Thrown, or Other Injury Risk Run Over, or 20 MPH Impact Factor: Pagez 9113 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report - E) ?i?bm?l?z E3 WV - r7533 432533 Name: Due,Jane Incident 18103021 incident Datelfime: 03!18l201822:02:18 Number: Time: 03f18f201B 22:16:41 File Pageaof?la TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?13134331113: Norma! Findings Not Done Page 4 of 13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report C41 C135 61611;} 43*? 31.1. (3:15:15; mman?f. 431311113;- Name: Dne,Jane Incident 18103021 Inddanlmte?ime: 03/18/201822;02718 1 .- ,1 4.3.131; eyrgsai?ieiag" ?in. w; Page50l13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mm 9540?1 :1 mm gamma @325? ?4 Name: Doe, Jane Incident 18103021 Incident Dateffime: 03/131201822:02:18 Number. Page?ollS TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 151%? its; 1 - -. -. ., Ejjl?j?ilit?g?m?mwfp?lm HOME: DD!.Jane incident 13103021 Incident Datef'l'irne: 0331812016 22:02:18 her: Nlln?l Transferofcare Not Transportfrom Code 3 Transport Ground- Transportde NonefNo Time: Applicable Scene: Method: Ambulance Delay Hospital Scottsdale Typeof Hospital- TransportedTo: Osborn Destination: Emergency Department Hospital Address: F400 E. OSBORN RD. Scottsdale, AZ 5251 conditionof Unchanged Hospital Capability: Trauma Reason for ProtocoUClose-st Patient at Center Choosing Most Transfer: Level 1 Destination: Appropriate Tempe Agency Unit: MZT6 Base Hospital Contact Date: 22:16:00 (in-Scene Odometer 7541.8 Patient Destination T5465 Mileage To Reading of Odometer Reading of Destination: Responding Vehicle: Responding Vehicle: File Name: Modi?ed By: Sandie Lee Modifitd On: 03/? 9,1201 8 01:45:28 File Name: image Modified By: Sandie Lee Modi?ed On: 03f19f2018 01:45:30 Page 7 of 13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 3:54:65: rt: 512?: gimarotml' ?mm-j :W?i??'nj?mrHr?TW (325%; Nlmei Doe, Jane Incident 18103021 Incident Dne?ime: 03/18/2018 22:02:18 NumbHONORHEALTHF Page 8 of 13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mu mews .f . Lw Name: Doe,Jone Incident 13103021 incident Date?ime: Number. File Name: UpdatedFacesheet?im 03021 Modified By: Tiffany Fields Modi?ed On: osnofzom 13:20:55 PageeoHa out: Elam TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report I: I Jy?-f' I <5 {15:7 fig-lemma?aha-um MJMM Name: Doe.Jane Incident 18103021 Incident Datefrime: 03115120133321: Number: SOME EMERGENCY Fag-210 0113 POLICE: Temp}: IL I TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report array {may}. .f a Hm: Doe.Jane Incident 13103021 Number. Incident Dateffime: DBNBIZOI 8 22:02:18 Patient Belongings Patient Belongings: None ClewMernber Williams, Scott Completing this Report: Time of Signature: 03/18f2013 22:30:22 Typeof Person signing: Nurse Type or Patient Representative: Signature Reason: Transfer of Patient Care Signature Status: Slgnature Name: Hayden Time ofsignatura: 03/13/2018 23:23:59 Type of Person Signing: Patient Type OF Patient Representative: Signature Reason: Patienthedical Necessity Unable to Sign Signature Status: Not Signed Deceased Signature Name: Doe . Jane Time ofsignature: 03/18?01 8 23:2d:05 Type of Person signing: EMS Paramedic Type of Patient Representative: Signature Reason: EMS Provider signature Status: Signature Marne: Lee . Sandie Pageiiuf?. POLICE TENIF-E .- e1. . TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report I muewmmu Name: Doe, Jane Incident 13103021 Incident Datef?rime: 22:02:13 a? Time of Signature: 03(18/2018 23:25:13 Type of Person Signing: EMS Paramedic Type or Patient Representative: Signature Reason: EMS Provider Signature status: signature Name: Williams Scott Insurance Info Primary Method of No Insurance Identi?ed Payment: Gloves (pair): 9 Disposable Fitted 1 Gurney Sheet: Adult Disposable 3P 1 Cuff: Adult EVM: 1 Aduithedletric C02 1 Sampling Line: l?Gel Device (all 1 sizes}: King Disposable 1 Laryngescope Blade: Syringe 10cc Blunt 1 Th: Lubricating Jelly: 1 Vionex Trude-rte: 1 CI Biohazard Bag 7-10 1 Gallon: Page 12 nl13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report a) ma 311M mam a 113me 152,5 57 Name: Doe,Jane Incident 18103021 incident Date?ime: Gym/20182202118 Number: Adult Quid: Combo 1 Pad: LP 15 Paper (roll): 1 Blue Sensor 1 Electrode {pack}: Adult Extrication 1 Conan Nylon D-Ring 1 Restraint Straps (pack)- Headblodc 1 Lubricating Jelly: 1 Hie! Device (all 1 sites}: ETTubeCuff-d 1 5.5111111 - 9.0mm: doth Tape 1 in: 1 NormalSaIJne 1000 1 mL Bag: Tubing Blood Set 1 Y?Tylie: Normal Saline Flesh 1 10 mL: EZ-IO Needle - All I Sizes: EZ - 10 Stabilizer: 1 Sharps Shuttle: 1 Epinephrine PreFIll 3 1 mgl1 and.- Oxygen: 1 Page 13a113 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ac): hooligan iterator . Type:Attachment PD BOSCH CRASH DATA RETRIEVAL r8" 326% or BOSCH can 23:??ng IMPORTANT NOTICE: Robert Bosch LLC and the manufacturers whose vehicles are accessible using the CDR System urge end users to use the Iolesi production release of the Crash Data Retrieval system somare when iterating. printing or exporting any retrieved data lrom within the CDR program Using the latest version of the CDR sottwaro is the best way to ensure that retrieved data has been translated using the most current information minded by the manufacturers of the vehicles supported by this product. CDR File Informationhw User Entered VIN User Scottsdale Polic?_Degt #331 Case Number 13-32594 EDR Data Imaging Date? melanoma Crash Date condoms - . graham . Saved on Tuesday. March_2_0__2_018 at 12:20:32 Toma: with Cp?nverstm Crash Data Retrieval Tool 111? lmeged with Software Licensed to [Company Namol? Scottsdale Police Dwam Maori with con version 1 Crash Data Retrieval Tool 17.7 Reported with Software Licensed to (Company Scottsdale Police Department ?ame} . Airbag Control Module Eveaneoord1 _v Comments Tempe PD Search Warrant on File DLC Data Limitations General storage Information: - The EDR can store up to six events. - The information stored is the same for deployment events and non-deployment events - Deployment event data is locked alter writing - Airbag deployment data can overwrite Other deployment data if there is no other data area available - Non-deployment event data is unlocked - Unlocked data can be by new data - An event will not start oaptureistorage of data if there is already an ongoing event that is being captured An event will start a mpturetstorege ofdata ii there is capture going on for an event that has ?nished Data Element Sign Convention: The following table provides an explanation oithe sign notation for data elements that may be Induded in this CDR report. polio-v. Lateral . Vehicle Roil?ngle _eerin ut Date limitations: - All data contained in this CDR report is indicative of what information the 5R5 control unit has masured or received on the vehicle communication bus at and around the time of crash. Data should be examined in conjunction with all other available evidence to give a better understanding oi the situation. All data elements have additional functional encoding. giving extra information about the data element in question when there's no data value stored: - OIFF 'not written" means the data element was never written (UKFF stored by default in a fresh control unit) - ?written but no data available' means the data element was mitten. but there was no iniorrnetion to write - :1bu ?not equipped? (where applicable] means the source of the information is not equipped in the car - ?not commanded" (where applicable) means the deployaole device was never activated Special care has to be taken when ?Complete file recorded" data element does not read 'Yes'. The writhg process oi the recorder has then not been able to run its full course, and the validity of information stored cannot be guaranteed. - Signal intormation originating from other omool units in the car have delays. this have to be taken into amount when observing lnl'on'nation or crash time. Examples of signals In the EDR record originating from other control units are: . Speed. vehicle indicated (ABS module) - Engine throttle (ECM module) Pago?l 0115 Printed on: Tuesday. March 20 2018 81 12:21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Jaa?w mmi?jamafia?ma??ii? M3 {1 BOSCH can - Service brake (ABS module) - Occupanl size classi?cation {ows moduie) - Time to deww? dala elements are related to TimeZem. which means that they are sumac: [a when the restraint oontwl aigorilhn'l becomes active. This can vary from case to case and is individual to each crash silualion. These lJ-mes are therefore not well suited for oompan'son between EDR records. 1002_Volv0002_r001 Page 2 r115 Primed on Tuesday. March 213 2018 a! 12:21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 53:63:"? In?ammw 22.121222322222222 BOSCH S?tem Status ag?etrievgl Vahide idQI]_ti_li_cation Number M_chatjgp_p_i_ggnostic Database Part Numhgr _Igni1ion Cycle. Download 18 '3 245?? 9 22:22:22 3138?255 AL 1,355! ian?e?mgraling Timer {sag} 14966? Page?ul?l? 7.050.5?5 Printed on Tuesday. March 20 20185t12'21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report fat-31'3? it?; .1 . . (Lg. BOSCH System Status _at Lvent _(Event Record 11 Data Area Status _enl Record 1 __l_JnIo_,_cked Date? Stored Date Area Read Slalus Event Record _1 - MRead 'Comglele File Recorded Yea Mum-Event Numbe_r _01 Events (12] Event Number i-T Time_ from Preceding Event (seal Written but No Data Aggie?hie? Maximum Delta? 4; Longitud lnal (MPH [ka711} ?1 44.9 Time Maximum Darts-V. Longitudinalgmsec) ?300 ijimum Delta-V, Lateral Emil: 4.21-2.01 Time Maximum Delta-V, LateraLLm?sec)_ Deglp?nent Command Data (Event Record 1} . i Frontal Almag Dglloxmenl Time to Denim. First Stage. __D_riv_e_r_(msec} Nat Degloxsd? 'F_runtal_ Airbag Degiov ment. Time t9 Deploy. First Fanl Passenger [mseci Not Deppiegi F?rontal Airbag Time t_o Deglog Seconq _Stgge. Passenger [mseci 110} D_ep_lo)red _Erental Airbaq Deployment Time to Denim.r Third Stage, Passenger gm sec} Not Deplgiegl Frontal Airbag Dggloxmetlt Time to DgpleyJSe oond Siege. Driver (msec) Nihiig Time 10 Th? 3139*? _L_eft Side Alma .TimeteDe lo msec] Right Side Airbag. Time to Deglox [mseci Left Side Curtain, Time to Deploy [_mseci Right Side Curtain, Time to Depioy {msec} Driver Belt Prelensionegjime to Deploy (msec} Passenger Shoulder Bell Pretensioner, Time to Deploy (?13ch Adaplive Steering Ceiumnl Time to Deploy (mseci Driver Lag. Belt Pretensioner Time to Deglgg tmsecl . Passenger Lag Belt Pretensjener to __D_epl gr tmseci Not Equipped Driver Belt Load Limiter Time to De?glimsecl Not Deplqted Passen er Betl Lead Limit ter Time to Depig] [[nsec} . Nol Depl_oyed] _thR?ow Right Belt Pretejsipner, Time to Begin)! 2nd Row Middjg?el?t Pretensiuier._Time to Dayle! imseci Nat Degloyed 2nd Row Left Belt Pretensionar, Time to Denim.I [mseci _Mt Dgglogee 3n: Belt Pretansioner. Time to Beale! (meets) Not quiggeg 3rd Row Lel?l _Belt Prelensioner Time to Deploy (msec) . . _Nat Eguim. __Driver knee airbag time to Not Deplo 3 Driver knee airbaq time to deploy second 81896 tmsec] Not Deployed gis?ev knee at time tottering ?rst stage {niset? Nol Equipped; Passenger knee aim, timetq 539L033 semnd stage Not Equipped 1336? Page 1 DUB ane? on Tuesday. March 20 2018 at 12:21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 1* 010.001 1.0010303001031001. <1 010mg 1 . - I 8 ., 32,59 9? BOSCH . Pre-Crash Data -1 Sec (Eyent Record 1) jgnilion Cycle, Clash 5213151 gel! Status. Driver . 551g! Belt Status, Passenger Frontal Airbag Warning Lamp airbag SuggressioLSwitrh Slalus, EgpLE?aise?ggL SealTrarx P051001 Switch Foremget?tatus Driver Seal Track Position Switch Foremost ?tment S?ze Right Front Passenger Chiid rPre-Qrag?? to 0 sec (Event Record 1 Speed. Vehicle Accelerator I Indicated Pedal. 01. Full Swim Brake steorlng input I Stabllity Timeisac} [Emma-'01) - {o .o_rr[ ABS mung? 31111315111105 -5.0 44.1 171.0} . 1 011 0.0 On 44.1171044.1 [71.01 . 0.0 On 43.517001 . . 0.0 0n _43.5 110.0} . 0.0 cm 42.0 169.0] . 0.0 On 410103.01 . .1.0 011 On 40.4 105.0] . . .10 0n 31.9 [01.0] . . . -2.0 On I - . On 333154.01 -2.0 On 14966? Page 5 Primed on Tuesday. March 20 2013 9112:2130 TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 22222 23222253222212 RSHD TA BOSCH @1124?; Longitudinal Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Delta V. Longitudinal {Event Record 150 160 180 1930 200 2?10 220 230 240 250 msec Acceleration, Longitudinal {Event Record 100 110 120 130 140 15-0 150 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 msec Page 6 01 15 anzd on: Tuesday. March 20 2013 SI 12:21.30 2; TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 2n mm . ?3w ?7 L) ?Ev BOSCH Longitudinal Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Longltud-lnal I Doha-V. . Longitudinal Acmlamtion Timelmwl . -D100 110 120 130 1310 150 150 170 Page 1" of 15 mm on' Tuesday, March 20 2016 al 12:21'30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an mag . . (8 (52/6? CRASH DATA (H) BOSCH RETRIEVAL Lateral Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Delta V. Lateral (Event Record 100 110 120 130 1:10 150 160 no 180 190 200 2'10 22B 230 2410 25!] msec Acceleration, Lateral (Event Record 100 110 120 130 MCI 150 180 170 160 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 meet: W4BCUPL5HI 14966? Page 5 of 15 Printed on Tuesday. March 20 2015 311221130 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report r??3z??17? new; Boson can 2mm Lateral Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Delta-V, lateral Lateral Acmlera?J? 111119 {maul [Il?Hlkn-Ifhn 0 0.0 Page 9 of 15 Pnnled Tuesday. March 20 2018 al 1221:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :45 . BOSCH 3 magma Vertical Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Acceleration. Normal (Event Record 100 110 120 130 LID 150 150 1]"0 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 250 msec Normal Acceleration 14966? Page 10 0 15 Pnnied on: Tuesday. Mulch 2D 2018 a! 1221 30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mow; Winr?l-H . 6113mm} ?35 mm (355341;? 1/ 5?55? 2:12:11?: Rollover Crash Pulse (Event Record 1) Vehicle Roll Angle (Event Record 1) Vehicle Roll Anglo Page 11 0115 Pnnlad on- Tuasuay. March202?1a at 12:21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report area ?itis??mo . . . vim/W ?a sum 5 annotate: Hexadecimal Data Data that the vehicle manufacturer has speci?ed for data retrieval is shown in the hexadecimal data section of the CDR report. The hexadecimal data section of the CDR report may contain data that is not translated by the CDR program. The control module contains additional data that is not retrievable by the CDR system. DID Data Page 12 M15 Printed on- Tuesday. March 20 2018 ll 12 21 30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :1 in ma; mm: madam 3 maxim Page 13 cl15 Primed orr Tuesday. March 20 2015 5112.213!) TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report WT BIL-mks . hm?mumm ummwm BOSCH 8/5217? CRASHDATA RETRIEVAL Page of 15 aned on. Tuesday, Math 20 N18 a1 12:21:30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report M. mm r? 7% mew Disclaimer of Liability The users of the CDR product and reviewers of the CDR reports and exported data shall ensure that data and intern-nation supplied is applicable lo the vehicle. vehicle's systems) and the vehicle ECU. Robert Bosch LLC and all its directors. of?cers. employees and members shall not be liable for damages arising out afar related to incorrect. incomplete or misinterpreted software andror data. Robert Bosch LLC expressly excludes all liability for incidental. cansequenlial. special or punitive damages arising from or related to the CDR data, CDR so?ware or use thereof. 4&6? Page 15 D715 Prmled on. Tuesday. March 20 2013 at 12:21'30 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report MISHMWE im4 T'?'fl??iik?zz??g?y gamut m; kalpf?) Type:Accident Crash Report Description: 51mm" mum Cl Law Enforcement 2 8 TRAFFIC UNIT NO. 2 P185 ENGERS [cun?E Jul, Thu? WITNESSES 1 1 RIM-7 VEHICLE DAMAGED REPORT ID 1001 TRAFFIC RECORDS SECTION. 0649. s. we ARIZONA ?oor-3233 1 8031822000 Him B'Onr UMUI uni": em I: Fran mum-me cam-murdud I EYES. . one news UYwOparnru ?1907ka Tm ?swam 5?lelruu'y 5I?Unlmv Mlnm? Wan Swami-H Elaine Mane MMEI LIm-t 18-326941963 T29011638 Mama'ofsm?s 10 WTWIU a: m7 0702 0300 Clear. I iD?mmwm 11-mmwosoclcamoalm R?nunll me Emmr - If 51-mnovm Panwrian aways-marl Van Man Cl IV 6 Mn :1 um 10?? UNDERWWAGE 51 - UNKNOWN A?SlaLeaannM $15?81 A: I3 Nu 3H BAJAL #11 Professionals ID UWWRIAGE 5 a1 umnown 8:18 Police TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report jgam?unm z??m REPORT ID DAY NGC no. OFFICER ID no. 1532 594.953 cm poms ONLY FORWARD CDPY To TRAFFIC RECORDS 59311051. 0641: 206 5. PHOENIX ARLIDM 35037423.! YEAR m? [a??lal?l 8 I WWIGRAVE USAND Trio ?01 JUNCTION RELATED I INTERSE 34w" 131mm" amps): CI 2 INTERSECTIOIILHELA :1 5I UNKNOWN 5 3 Emma RAWD 4 GRADE CROSSNG FDRNEWLY 0' ACCESS TWOWIY MDT WEED [m "mp-ma nu) 3 TwownrDNIDED. Kenn: I-EDIAN EMIRER Cl E1 UMNCMIN A sumam ?mam IDNISJ in starmamnwmuE II UPTO WISHES PER WY NO CONTRIBUTING CIRCUMSTANE 1.5m :34 3 mo $1.:me counmou KENS 5: WORK ME :1 OBSTRUCTICM IN ROAM-W CHANGNG ROAD WIDIH WORK BLOCKS - Chick CHECK AH. WFIIPHY UNII I .L :1 El 1 NO ACTION DISREIIARDED TRAJHC SIGNAL I1 POSSIBLE HOADMGE INCIDENT I9 50 OTHER 5 UNKNOHN 1' -W ND CDN1RDL5 n? PERSOHIINW.. I6 mug gamma men I STOP SIGN 8 TRAFFIC YIELD SIGN WARNING SIGN fl 9 PE DESTHLIIN RAILROAD CROSSING SIGN BENOOMMWH TRAFFIC SIBNIIL an OTIER El 5! WNW a [133' na?muanauh :5 Waterman anlIu'rI mamuhuaa A WT DIWWTEWT APPL 03.! YALKNGON MNDS FHEE DEVICE Tammi MICE EASSENGER UT HER ICTNITY. ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAMLIN WAITING AN ELECTRONIC 2 THEE PER UMT NO INFLLENCE ILLNESS DR PHYSIQL :1 GOING STEIIGNT 1 SLONIMS IN TRAFF WAY MIOIDING VEHQE CTFEWC IST .I 2 .. a; ?3 LEAVM PNIKNG $05 ITIOIN .II 5 WE SSN GROAD IN TRAFFIC ILLEGAL DRUGS BED LIERIJLMM (1RD PRESENTED 2 DRE [mun-rm 5:1 a DRE RESPDNIID II SUSFECT 5 SUSPECT 1 9 nus AGAMT THAFF IC um 34sou?rIwE51 a 1'1 a SOUTI-E 451 . I EI '11 UNKNOWN . mew-moon STOPPED VEHICLES. mac?: swam" ms was was acme THE TIME OF ms mask (nun-u u? as.) gum-.1 .. ?an? I MARKED AT INTERSEK CTIDN IF MARKED CROSSWN. IIT INTERSECTION-NOT IV CROSEWALK AT NTERSECTIDN- UNKNOWN ION HOT AT INTERSECTION IN MARKED CHDESWALK NOT AT ROADV-IAY NOT IN MARKED N01 RT INTERSECTID-N- 0N ROAEWIMY CROSSWALK MIMI UMN OWN CRDSEWILII PARKING I m: am: Cl BICYCLE LANE I SIDEWIIL I I I ?3 ISLAND I OCESS I 1 6 NONJW AREA I9 01 SI UNKNOWN LOCATION zi-W um i I 3'51 STRAIGHT 333 cum: RIGHT :1 :12 wavntn :1 I1 mmovw :u luau Ana ORDER ??1.383 mass mar m?l'n number and Inns aItrle Dene ml was" wean UNITI UNIT 2 2 WAY LEFI IUHN FIHST if)" To I THRU Lx- LEFT IURN I 1" TURN AFTER EDINWCE NTEFAI THHU RIGHT LINES 1 TURN AFFER THROUGHLA DEDICATED BKE LANE HIGH 00:me ye HIGLE 01 IER UNKNOWN FOUR EVENTS run EACH n: 0F ODSURRENCE LOSS-SHIFT FELUJUWED VEHICLE EQUIPMENT FAILURE {em-e. mks: EEBRMTIONG RM OFF RDQU RIGHT RAM ROAD CROSS MEDM CROSS DWNNILL MOTOR VEHCLE TRANSPORT PEDESTRIAN TRAIN RAIWAYRALGAR VEHICLE ANIMAL PARIED VE HOLE ST RUCK Br SMIFTNG CARGO OR ANYTHING SET IN BY UE MLE OTHER CN- IXEDOBJ IMPACT cusmmumnmn END GDNCIETE cum; 3 IE FACE 3?5 uEDuw BARRIER at! CABLE BARRIER 1? TREE. BUS H. ETLW Ismrm II: TRAP FIC SIGN 51PM I: TRM FIC SIGNAL WI ?41 UTILITY POLEIUGHT SUPPORT ?6 50 5 FENCE FIXED UBJ mmul. DF TI-E SEQUENCE OF EVENTS PER TRAFFIC UNIT Uri: 2 FIRST EVENT IE 11' SECOND EVENT THIRD EVENT FOURTH EVENT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mm: Jamar? mama-k?rmf Agency: Drawn By: Case Hum Tempe Police Department T. Hauboid #11638 18-32594 bar: Location: Miil Avenue/Curry Road 03/18/18 963 Date Occurred Case Type: Drawing Title: Impact Diagram (E) TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ea: rimlhimt Agency: Drawn By: Case Number: Tempe Police Department T. Haubold #11638 18-32694 Location: Date Occurred: Case Type: Mil! Avenue/Curry Road 963 Scene Diagram I I HT I 1.5% Drawing Title: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Drawn By: Cass Number: Tempe Police Department T. Haubold #11638 13-32594 Location: Date Occurred: Case TVpe: Mill AvenuefCurry Road 03/18/18 963 Scene Diagram Drawing ?rltla: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report eel? . Case Number: Agency: Drawn Tempe Poiice Department T. Haubold #11638 18-32694 Location: Date Occurred: Case Type: Mill Avenue/Curry Road 03/18/18 963 Evidence Diagram I I 3 Drawing Title: (0 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Wiif??ze}?13m?}cb . ammonium Ram Mme! RE ID CONTINUED MONTH HOUR '0 "0 18-326941'963 COPY TO I I a 1 TWICE RECOREE SECTION. 296 S. ITTH AVE, FIDENIK. ARIZONA EMF-3233 8 zlzlolo mnawmsm mama-.1: are now To sons 28 RAS DIAG RAM a. MEASUREMENTS ARE scum lsuLE a ?mum NORTH 30 NARRATIVE Describe what happened Unil a pedestn'an. was crossing Mill Avenue eastbound. south oi Curry Road. was not in a msswak and collided with U2. which was nonhbound on Mill Avenue in the #2 lane south of Curry Road. The pedestrian was transponed to a local hospital where she died as a reaull of the injuries sustained in the collision. See narrative lot addition Intonation iguana? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mammal 3mm Am Revert Hunts! 3.1 OFFICER ID NO 1942694863 16H I8 Fl HM. El Wm Ow: Elalne Malia Putz-Igor mm; El Udnuwn m?m?lm Height Dal dam - - mm Scan: Deceased Rammed To Dacaasaa Rammed By I: Yes dun I Transpmaam In Fm Had-ail Fla'knr Fist may Full Iy Tmsponacl 10: ler051 Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center IGIZIOI REPORTID TRIFFIC RE m5 SECIION. 064R 20! S. If? IVE. FIDENIX. am Name I'll}. YEAR POLICE ONLY- FORWARD 10 I I a I 11mm lo Fws?. Mel-Illa: lelly By: Tempe Fire Medic Hold-av Burt-u Two II leI Sum: m?De?n (mm 3J 1mm I Inn-mum or hm ?an-Rum. Mm Type 0! Inn-Indian: 5 1 Four 5 mam: :12 14am FIB YW 7 L-Inwacoon 5 II Trd?l: Cirde Cl 51 urnnown . 6 -. 5 Dn?l DEW 1 Il' lama-I or Hamlin-Rum. and mm: Elan-lo Flaunt. In?luu Tm SIpnal: I Tram: Cal-mu! Soul Wm Paoaslnan Signal Cl 2 coma Siw1W?IDUEPedesl?arl Sign! CI 3 um; a 4 Work Zone. Type Unknown Tall" mum-Inn now vouch Gonna-lung Clrcurnuncn: [cm all and? a - UNIT #3 unrr :1 Um: Uni] a Ito Hal-Io 01 CI CI: Bahama? 3 ~33 51.0fm FlraDc: Dd UNITS ?2 a I Me hummus?? MWOIIHJ Cl 5 Pour Tram 3 l3 Imam Comings! Tmllar Hmcm?SaIaIy Chain: 011 Sawsy'itm 050%. ?151 Urum 3 Ms: .1 ll'l r15 Unoarrid VEHICLE INFORMATION 2 Unoarrlong I How Ml?el? Transport mamml Intrusion 3 my a Lulu mine in WMWL N: Maren! 1W 4 Unmrridmn I Molar Mlde In Transom. Urtmu "9 Cl 7 Unduduing a Metal ma Nd In ?mnsoo?, mm Inrusm Unknown El 6 ?anking I Muerelida I'l1 I1 9 Darling I No: In TrinIDofl uuDqug El 5 mm I Mala Vmida Na! in ?Ilanspon. Intrusion 0 lo Mom limos 0! Woman Him! 5 . Fl In walw: 1E del'm No l?l?Yes Cwn?ma Mm Llcom Ramona: CDL LIMT 7?1 i?u NaEmMnaReqL-adlww 1 Oman mm 2 w-lh 3 Complianm Ural-Imam 51 Umm II WIN omen AW Maid-n:- Mam (chock Only Om} 3 1 BMW Did M1 Manama! La Avud . N0 Ava-name ?mauve :l 2 Obie-c: Ewing: Bram :1 3 Poor Fined Emotionalbmae. 03.001160 em Braking :?61an60 [In may] l' 6 Wan. Ma?wm or 01w Nm- Moms! B?aklno and sue-Ina Lafl 7 Man-Gama van-dc Baking and sue-mu Riahl 51 Unknown Braking and Unknown Swarm: Brennan DRIVER NFMRATIM Other Miami 5! Ut?lwn Falwodama Maneuver Immune In?ounclnu Su?sm" Dav" Toning Rum Dtugs Uri! It Ural n_ anu?l'ust?rype. who! Tasl 1m Mo Tut Gnar- Nu Teal Gwen Alcohol Tau Rama. Given Tesl Evan Drug Tul 1m 195mm rial Mead Drug Teal Rumin- 1991 Flssu?s? 1' an no Uni: 7 ?we Wm ol-J?M Im'u TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report a?h 163] '53 mm: E3 is? \jr'ly'" EMS time at Howilal. Unll i Seal. Pas. Elector- Exhiafhc? Transom 1 00 2 00 Net wuumnmm ?Minerva am 51- In mondnm wanna-mo In 5'2 ?ling an mm malt! 53 ll'l idling unil 5-1 55 Unknown Safety Devices (SD) e?Nune D-wmoha? Boasts. 1-upmont, 9? 0qu Hairs-nt? 10 Type Umnam 3 - smog and Lap Bail used - DOT-lelnm Mower-cw Helmel 1- Row-.m- ?I'yv: Unknown 5 - Omar: 12- Helm. 01w Tm wT-Cumhim MC Helm 13 Hamel. Unan n? smur? a- Child leraml - Fm Fame 50 Unknown ill-hairnal worn 51 - Urine-m Reslmm? Rea Fauna Ejeclian Ejection Path Extricaliun Transport to First Medical Facillty 0- Hot ?195:li Mohave 1 - Em. Tuallv 2 - Epcten, Pan-2hr 5- Na. Manuals mm 5m Door Open-no ?I?nrounn 36? 3- mm: - Bid: Wln?ow 5 Tll'DupII Bad: Opening 6 Through Real 00mm 7 Through and rel?! w} a - Omar Pam man. at puck-up Irucxl 5 Epchm Path Unknown MOTOR VEHICLE Extricated 51? Unknown ll Emuad 5? Tranepcnm Urknom Source 6 .. om: 3? Unknown II Transpmed ?otomwle Body Style I Tun ?I'll Styles 5 '51 Mum-l Worms 3 CI El:> mammam :3 E1 D3 OH-RaadMulucyde a Mascmar 6 00m thzeacwle Tm sou-mm memo IOTDH CYCLE INFORMATION momma - Who-I sum UMT Three Wheel We {2 [as Much] Unnamed Three Wham ??1135de Aubcyci- roar meal] ANATC Tau-rein Ewe] Fem" Type UMI I it" 1 We" 2 Badisl El 3 Farmer Perme Cmvaya'mes (skates 5mm: mum. elc] 4 mmusltme. mm! :1 5 Pawn ln?n Ming '3 mm of 3 mn- Halal Vehicle Trnnepcrt Danae (tr-an. on an nus-mall 5 Unknown Type a! ?anaemia-It 5m Enulnment: {Check Ill that Ipplf} 34 Mammalmng 2'5 LierIIineLu :15 Omar 351 we Pans a: Roman Safely Equine-rem Non-Occupnnl In?uencing Subaru-nus cl Drugs Uni? Unll it Unit I I I No Test Gum ?leel Gwen 1esl Mam TBIMQ mkm? NON-MOUPANT T351 Gwen Ho Test Gm Tes?. Reluwd Tenn: Unknown Unit I Alumni Teal Im- NW6 Dung 1951151? Drug 1est mum. Noll-Occuplm Alcotnmm Tonlm mm Um News 1951 Type. Naomi Drug 1951 Type Due Tm Results Cl?m?s Name Badge T. Haubold #11638 5499mm! Signet?! S. CARBAJAL #11? Anna! Nam rnpe Police Department Dale (km-plum! 4101318 Irv-nus Mul- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ems Misea?zaae Em email eerie gamma ,mv - 610? 35 5 2 (5 (N. ii: Log-4Q 90' BASIC INFORMATION TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT COLLISION STATEMENT STATEMENT COMPLETED BY: Driver: 0 Passenger: Witness: 0 Name: i ii DRIVERS ONLY Last/?ame: Date of Birth: Insurance Company Name: Policy Number: Expiration Date: Phone Number Direction oftravel (circle one]: NORT SOUTH EAST WEST Lane of travel: Approximate speed at the time of the collision: PASSENGERS IN YOUR VEHICLE [If any} 3 me Last Name Date of Eirth: Phone Number: Mark Seat Position Complete Address: First Name: last Name- Date of Birth: Phone Number: Mark Seat Position Complete Address: DOD Dg@ First Name: Last Name: Date of Birth Phone NumberComplete Address; ODD ODD age First Name: Last Name: Date of Birth: Phone Number: Mar Seat Position Complele Address: ODD First Name; Last Name: Date of Birth: Phone Number: Mar Seat Position CompIeIe Address: ODD COMPLETE REVERSE SIDE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mar-9 eaxlfaeym? gamma DETAILED COLLISION DESCRIPTION -. a WITNESSES ONLY Approximate distance from the collision: COLLISION DIAGRAM A Driver, Passenger, Witness Date: 3 r/8 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em r. zl??tlirWdLi. .22.) stars?131mm! sew 'Ftainksd e916) "Fink?giggle? Type:Attachment Description:KM - DRIVER HIGH REACTION TIME Cases! 18-32694 Detective: K. arsland #20595 I Avoidabllity of Crash Based on High Driver Reaction Time and Hyzer Hyzer Approach I Distance Adjustment Factor Result Adjustment to edian 637.30 0.67 426.99 Adjustment for Expectancy 426.99 0.50 213.50 Adjustment to 15th Percentile 213.50 0.67 143.04 Assigned aaeed {From Distance and Snead: 43.50 Distance Required to Stop: 68.54 ft Velocity: 63.77 Reaction Time (no expectancy) Time: 1.25 sec Distance Traveled During Pi Distance: 79.71 ft Remaining Distance to Impact Distance: 63.33 it DOES CAR REACH CRASH YES Time to Impact if vehicle HAD NOTSlowed Time: 0.995 Speed At lm pact Speed: 12.00 Velocity: 17.59 Time to Slow Time: 1.56 sec Additional Time Given to Ped Tim e: 0.57 sec Extra Distance Ped oves 3.13 Distance: 2.64 ft Distance Ped Needs to Clear Hood Distance: 2.10 ft IS CRASH YES TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Gig Sarto; Related Rama Whitejjaf?i?; TypezDocument SEARCH WARRANT Zola'glio?l? Via EMAIL: April 2, 2018 Tempe Police Department Attn: Detective, Michael McCormick 22020 RE: 2018-32694 Netflix has received the Search Warrant dated March 22, 2018, involving email address . information, to the extent it exists, will be narrowed by the date range (if provided) and/or the date your request was issued. Below is the available and responsive information for the Netflix accounts associated with your request. Please refer to the ?request details? and the "production glossary.? Note that Netflix's internal and confidential information that is non-responsive to your inquiry has been omitted from this production. The production consists of 3 pages, including this cover page. Questions can be directed to Request Details Identifier {Email}: Date and time Range [if any): March 18, 2018 2100 hours to 2300 hours 1 account is associated with the identifier provided. 100 Winchester circle Los Gatos. CA 95032 Phone 408 540 3700 Fax 403 317 0488 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Tiff}? Mew}; matte: liEiFLll Production Account: Rafaela Vasquez CID: . Streaming Member Since: Mar 27, 2017 .. United States (North America} English 1 USD Membership: Active MOP: MC 2572 {3,2519} Plan: 2 screens at a time H0 (10.99 Next Billi DateiA 29.2018 Phone: Ending in- "3 Active Profiles: 5 Concurrent Streams (activeimax): 012 [1 urgim?i?} Account Opened in UTC Account Closed in UTC 2037-03?25 06125213934300 yigwing Higgu: Please be advised there is no Viewing History available for the requested date and time, March 181 2018, 2100 - 2300 hours MST. 100 Wncnesler Circle Los Gales. CA 95032 Phone 408 540 3700 Fax 408 31?! 0488 mm 3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report eggs Fe vim-arm sans-.5- Production Glossary Netflix collects limited personal data from our members. All that is required to sign up for the Netflix streaming service is an email address and a valid method of payment. To locate records, at least one of these identifiers {email address or the full method of payment) associated with the Netflix account is required. Please be advised that data is only retained for a limited time. Category About this category Account Contains current registration information and membership status of the {Times listed in Netflix account. "Member Since? - date is when an email address was entered into our system to create the account. - - last four digits of the method of payment currently associated with the account. Phone? last four digits of the phone number associated with the streaming service. ?Never-Member" occurs when sign?up was never completed. Plan History ?Account Opened? is the date when a method of payment was added to {Times listed in UTC) the account. May also contain a date and timestamp of when an account was closed. Viewing History Contains information related to the available viewing activity for the [Times listed in account. Includes title, timestamp and the device used to stream the content. Attributes column may contain "autoplays.? 100 Winchester Circle Los Gatos. CA 95032 Phone 408 540 3700 Fax 403 31? 0488 2 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ea were; Queries-rail aerate; mammograms I tun rt 35 In.? Ira-mg ("aloe-H t" it"?i til rs! (JUL-tilt? art-i CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY I hereby certify: t. I am employed by Google LLC ("Google"), located in Mountain View, California. I am authorized to submit this a?idavit on behalf of Google. I have personal knowledge of the following facts. except as noted, and could testify competently thereto if called as a witness. 2. I am quali?ed to authenticate the records because I am familiar with how the records were created. managed, stored and retrieved. 3. Google provides Internet?based services. 4. Attached is a true and correct copy of records pertaining to the Google account-holderts) identi?ed with account(s)? with Google Ref. No. 1468015 Accompanying this Certi?cate of Authenticity as Attachment A is a list of hash values corresponding to each ?le produced in response to the Search Warrant. 5. The Document is a record made and retained by Google. Google servers record this data automatically at the time, or reasonably soon a?er, it is entered or transmitted by the user, and this data is kept in the course of this regularly conducted activity and was made by regularly conducted activity as a regular practice of Google. 6. The Document is a true duplicate of original records that were generated by Google's electronic process or system that produces an accurate result. The accuracy of Googlc?s electronic process and system is regularly veri?ed by Google. 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746, I declare under penalty ofperjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _Is_Terr Zschach Date: 05.10?? 8 (Signature of Records Custodian) Tyler Zschach (Name of Records Custodian) TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as re; as assertion] seat is: so Entertaining-"i. I its?? r- l-?ltizrrt?f?ir. I.-: Iii-ii inn-i 8 Detective Michael McCormick Tempe Police Department 120 East 5th Street Tempe, AZ 85281 Re: Search Warrant dated March 22, 2018 (Google Ref. No. 1468015) 2018-32694. Sit/20180c3079 Dear Detective McCormick; Pursuant to the Search Warrant issued in the above-referenced matter. we have conducted a diligent search for documents and information accessible on Google?s systems that are responsive to your request. Our response is made in accordance with state and federal law, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. See 18 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. Accompanying this letter is responsive information to the extent reasonably accessible from our system associated with the Google account(s), . as speci?ed in the Search Warrant. We have also included a signed Certi?cate of Authenticity which includes a fist of hash values that correspond to each ?le contained in the production. Google may not retain a copy of this production but does endeavor to keep a list of the ?les and their respective hash values. To the extent any document provided herein contains information exceeding the scope of your request, protected from disclosure or otherwise not subject to production> if at all, we have redacted such infonnat ion or removed such data ?elds. Please note that Google Wallet service data is under the control of Google Payment Corporation. Any request for such data must be Speci?cally addressed to Google Payment Corporation and can be served through the email address googiepayrnents@google.com. Finally, in accordance with Section 2706 of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Google may request reimbursement for reasonable costs incurred in processing your request. Regards. Tyler Zschach Google Legal investigations Support TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @335} 4?53 nga?jjgg?f?: 3mm? ?mi (EMAIL: i. ]r {3:314} ?1leer an'r lthl?I'f r. r; .LJ 1':th . Ft.? I. Attachment A: Hash Values for Production Files (Google Ref. No. 1468015) MDS- 2- 6e7cf30fl 456944fh92 l444d556d5730] d3000b866be42 ?-YouTubeWatchHistory .txt: MDS- 7cd72f6c5 b28be347d3 779 7d6c cd9bfc SHAS 2- 722c9f478] 455? bab3 9f9ce63 f4d8733 l96d408f7 60 7294 2127 768aac3 ma TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ears, . mags: ?1-YouTubewatChH?i story. RecordingSettings . GoogTe Confidentia] and Proprietary Gnome Account: YouTube watch Recording Settings events: Google confidentiaT and Proprietary Page 1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report BM mei?jn?j ?fwum FuYouTubewatchI-I'i story . Goog Con idential and Proprietary Geome Account: YouTube Watch events: Goog'le confident?i a'l and Proprietary Page 1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 11': 95:35:11 211111111115:111:31 1.11fi11ieitm1 rive - April 25, 2018 Via Email Detective McCormick Tempe Police Department 120 East Street Tempe, AZ 85281 Dear Detective McCormick: We received your Subpoena dated March 22, 2018 related to Report #2018?32694. The requested information is below: Subscriber Name Rafaeia Email Address Date of Birth Subscri ID No. Account Creation Date NovemberZ 2016 Account Status Bi Hold Zi Code - Viewi Histo AttachmentA Sincerely, Hulu Legal legal@hulu.com 2500 Broadway Floor Santa Monica. CA 90404 ww.hulu.com Attachment A CONFIDENTIAL 17:? Subscription IP Address Series Episode SourcelD Device ISP Start Time {in End Time {in a: In Paci?c Standard Pacific Standard Time} Time] 2 it; 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones Soccer Mom in the iPhone 7,2 Sprint 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 2 Mini-Van 9FEC-0A8203E11687 21:41:59 21:42:15 1% 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones Stargazer inaPuddle iPhone 7,2 Sprint 2013-03-18 2018-0348 1: ?3 9FEC-0A8203E11687 20:13:53 20:55:45 4 a 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones SpacemaninaCrater iPhone 7,2 Sprint 201803-18 2018-03?18 O. at: 9FEC-0A8203211687 13:45:22 19:27:49 (D :1 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones TheGlowing Bonesin 5F054586-819F-4042- iPhone 7,2 Sprint 2018?03-18 2018-03?18 0 U) the Old Stone House 9FEC-0A8203E11687 19:30:19 19:53:01 5 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones The Widow's Sonin 5FDS4586-819F-4042- iPhone 7,2 Sprint 2018-03?13 2018-03-18 0 15.5: the Windshield 9FEC-0A8203E11687 20:57:07 21:40:05 80104807 99.203.14.117 Bones The Glowing Bonesin iPhone 7,2 Sprint 2018-0348 2018-03-18 themd Stone House 9FEC-0A8203E11687 19:53:27 20:13:28 CD D. 0 If?; 3:33 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "aoss tenement "degassed-i same gyai?di?rzasfnna a {gm?ties) was) Type:Request for Records Description:AZDOT - FARS i? PATRICIA GEANS 1? EMAILED Anderson, Allison From: Patricia Geans Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 2:04 PM To: Anderson, Allison Subject: Jan?Mar 2018 Missing Fatal PAR's Attachments: Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good Afternoon Allison Attached is the JAN-MAR 2018 list of missing fatal Police Accident Reports that we have knowledge of andlor names of individuals that we have received a Death Certificate for or they are on our Medical Examiner?s List and we have no other information. Could you please send a copy of the listed reports and any other fatal crash reports that we may not have listed to my attention at your earliest convenience? If you have no record of the crash or you know who the investigating agency is please let me know? Thank You Patricia Geans FARS Analyst Adaidmi' WW [gamut 206 17th Ave MD 064R Phoenix, AZ 8500? En: Elwin? 2105? 602-712?6339 Office 3 602-712-3488 Fax 1:ij POLICE RELEASE "(new "In- mEBt-Lsr - - route: 5? r. i Please Visit WEbSite at C: - . and FARS website at is $751456 Willy Sud EU 12w?? *0 945* gamma/mica pmz?j 3/9} TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT 2018 MISSING FATAL DATE TIME PERSON NAME OF DECEASED TYPE LOCATION DOD JAIN -FEB NONE MAR 3f12a'18 1130 UNK PENNY LYNN BROWN PEDESTRIAN PRIEST DR BASEUNE RD 3I1QI18 0522 UNK ELAINE MARIE HERZBERG PEDESTRIAN MILL AVE CURRY RD 93? 3:37.01) 193241994 JI .n ?316 - ~54: ?ma mm 6391:; Ema-?635! mm: A General Offense Report TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report as)? aii?isicam saga ii?itizil ease; mi teammate Anderson, Allison From: Pooley, Michael Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 12:00 PM To: Andersonl Allison: Carbaial, Steven Subject: RE: Jan Mar 2018 Missing Fatal PAR's Hi Allison, You may have access to this report. Let me know what you need me to do to help you out with this. Mike From: Anderson, Allison Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:38 AM To: Carbaial, Steven Pooley, Michael Subject: FW: Jan-Mar 2018 Missing Fatal Importance: High Hello Sgt. Corbojol a Cmdr. Pooley I received the request below from ADOT. They ore for occident tololity reports they ore missing. The ottochmenl shows that they are following up on the reports regarding Penny Brown {60 18?299l0) ond Eloine Herzberg Privotized}. Sgt. Corbojol As the report for Brown is OPEN do hove your approval to send the copy of the report to the requester below? Cmdr. Pooley - As the report for Herzberg is Privotized may get access to it to futfill the request or would you rother handle this request? Thonk you for your ossistonce. Respectfully, (father: antler/start Records Supervisor Tempe PD Records From: Patricia Geans [mailto:PGea ns@azdot.gov] Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 2:04 PM To: Anderson, Allison Subject: Jan-Mar 2018 Missing Fatal PAR's Good Afternoon Allison Attached is the JAN-MAR 2018 list of missing tatal Police Accident Reports that we have knowledge of names of individuals that we have received a Death Certificate for or they are on our Medical Examiner?s List and we have no other information. Could you please send a copy of the listed reports and any other fatal crash reports that we may not have listed to my attention at your 1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mow gmwm, '??Jgraaim-c?iaimuoa to ulmlomxmr earliest convenience? If you have no record of the crash or you know who the investigating agency is please let me know? Thank You Patricia Geans FARS Analyst 206 17th Ave MD 064R Phoenix, AZ 85007 602~712?6339 Office 602-712-3488 Fax pgeans@azdot.gov r9255 a l? .. n? Please visit website at and FARS website at TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report some. shim Anderson, Allison From: PD?RecoidsFileTransler Sent: Tuesday. May 22, 2018 1:17 PM To: pgeans@azdot.gov Subject: TPD Report 18?32694 (Accident Fatality) Your Tempe Police documents have been sent electronically. To retrieve the requested item. click on the link. A login prompt will appear and you will need to enter the e?mail address that you are receiving this e-mail at. You will then receive a second e-mail where you can click it and retrieve the document. Be aware the report is still on Tempe?s server and you either need to print it or save it within 2 weeks before it is deleted, and no longer available. Files attached to this message Fliename Size . :23: TPD18- 34.3 32694.pdf MB Please click on the following link to download the attachments: Lil raw-M - 1" -. Int.? Hi This email 0r download link can not be forwarded to anyone else. The attachments are available until: Tuesday, 5 June. Message ID: 'l er. 9:1; -.. 0 1-1-3: iE:mi Sir-serif. i . . General Offense Report TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT an; er; a. an) lief-gasp one refit) m] smut): A ulnar: 9mm me Elation new Fr? Initials is); Type:Document Description:PET T ON FOR ORDER FOR COURT DISCLOSURE 18-0004 13- 3:997 TEMPE MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF MARICOPA. State of Arizona PETITION FOR ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS STATE OF ARIZONA, SS. Uber Technologies. Inc COUNTY OF MARICORA deposes and says that: pertaining to drivers of autonomous vehicles. for Uber at the time of the collision. following company: Uber Technologies, Inc. collision. of said person from whom the evidence is to be taken. Detecti eel #19343 Tempe olice Department 1 . er sussc?msn AND to before me this 921* day of Municipal Court Judge. Tempe Municipal Court County of Maricopa. State of Arizona CR 0004 Your petitioner, Detective J. Seal #19343 being first duly sworn, upon oath, 1. The Tempe Police Department has received information that the offense of manslaughter may have been committed on or about the 18th day of March, 2018. 2. I believe that the following record or other information is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry: Any and all employer personnel and training files pertaining to the employment of Rafael Vasquez (DOB and any and all documents related to company policies, procedures, and training requirements 3. I believe this information is relevant to an investigation concerning the offense listed in Paragraph 1 because: Rafael Vasquez was the driver of an Uber autonomous vehicle involved in a fatal collision and was employed by, and working 4. I believe this record or other information is presently held by the 5. I believe this information is held by the above company because: Vasquez was employed by and working for Uber Technologies, Inc at the time of this WHEREFORE Petitioner prays that a court order be issued commanding the taking of such evidence from the company described herein, and commanding the cooperation 2018. OLJCE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :mamm sens: "an? in} use a 0M TEMPE MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA ORDER TO DISCLOSE A RECORD OR OTHER INFORMATION TO ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof having been made before me by that: 1. The matter specified by petition is a legitimate matter for law enforcement inquiry, and that there is reason to believe the following record or other information is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry: Any and all employer personnel and training files pertaining to the employment of Rafael Vasquez (DOB and any and all documents related to company policies, procedures, and training requirements pertaining to drivers of autonomous vehicles. YOU ARE THEREFORE COWNDED to serve this order on the following company,- Uber Technologies. Inc. and such company is hereby ordered to disclose to the executing peace officer on the date below or as soon as possible thereafter, the following record or other information: Any and all employer personnel and training files?pertaining to the employment of Rafael Vasquez and any and all documents related to company policies, procedures, and training requirements pertaining to drivers of autonomous vehicles. 2. You are required not to disclose the existence of this Order to your subscriber. Any such disclosure could impede the investigation being conducted, and thereby interfere with the enforcement of the law. Given under my hand and dated this al?day of Mal/m 2018. Municipal Court: Judge, Tempe Municipal Court County of Marioopa, State of Arizona TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report re 32:37? lists-3:15? massages-a ream?mm-mmes? Type:Document Description:PETlT ON FOR ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE OF MED 18-0003 on grow?? TEMPE MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF MARICOPA PETITION FOR ORDER FOR DISCLOSURE OF MEDICAL RECORDS STATE OF ARIZONA, SS. Scottsdale Osborn medical Center COUNTY OF MARICOPA 1 Your petitioner, Detective J. Seal #19343 being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that: l. The Tempe Police Department has received information that the offense of manslaughter may have been committed on or about the 18? day of march, 2018. 2. I believe that the following record or other information pertaining to the medical records/notes is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry: The medical records documenting the injuries of Elaine Herzberg, DOB 3. I believe this information is relevant to an investigation concerning the offense listed in Paragraph 1 because: The medical records are needed to pursue criminal proaecution of the snapect involved in this case. 4. I believe this record or other information is presently held by the following hospital: Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center. 5. I believe this information is held by the above company because: This is where the victim in this incident, Elaine Herzberg, was treated for her injuries from this incident. WHEREFORE Petitioner prays that a court order be issued commanding the taking of such evidence from the company described herein, and commanding the cooperation of said person from whom the evidence is to be take Detecti J. seal #19343 Tempe lice Department fh CRIBED AND snow to before me this day of 2018. WM Municipal Court Judge, Tempe Municipal Court County of Maricopa. state of Arizona TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Gigi? 2'9 Wm? . a-?L-ot; ;Jo- Eng-mam sane: CR - 0003 TEMPE MUNICIPAL COURT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA ORDER TO DISCLOSE A RECORD OR OTHER INFORMATION TO ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof having been made before me by that: 1. The matter specified by petition is a legitimate matter for law enforcement inquiry, and that there is reason to believe the following record or other information: The medical records belonging to Elaine Herzberg, is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry. YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED to serve this order on the following hospital; Scottsdale Osborn Medical Center. and such hospital is hereby ordered to disclose to the executing peace officer on the date below or as soon as possible thereafter, the following record or other information: (1) Medical records/notes for Elaine Herzberg generated from injuries she was treated for that occurred on 03/18/18. 2. You are required not to disclose the existence of this Order to your subscriber. Any such disclosure could impede the investigation being conducted, and thereby interfere with the enforcement of the law. Given under my hand and dated this ionLday of 2018. Judge municipal Court Judge Tempe Municipal Court County of Enricopa, State of Arizona TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?1033 3- 4:334:31) 09:3: 1512?} 31:11 Frill H?l?illi-??al Hz? [9:1 r?J'r it TypezAttachment Description:MED RECORDS FOR VICT HERZBERG FROM SCOTTS OSBORN TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 2 f} I .4572 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 93?}?l 99:: r?ihilwm; :45ng TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (1,0333?53v:43, v; :1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Eff: [1.25% "if: '2 U?l :1 as): ?3 ti? 3% {hit 3 i? m: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report c-tf- if}: xivz?}: Us) 2:21;; TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (full-"E :0 :19 i393 ?ji?fc?L?J Generated by 22177 at 6/19l18 2:58 PM Page 7 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @051 F573 2.332%! GEM awry-12.1.! f?J-hWh?Ei?? Generated by 22177 5116319118 2:58 PM Page 8 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mg: - 2'3?31 :3 =3 :3 We: gum-rm 3:3" mm nor-uremic -w . 2(10 Generated by 22177 HIGHS-H18 2:58 PM Page 9 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report r? 2.1.1.: 51-11231-- (31151111111111 1.11111 1:11 ,11-1- 11-11 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report a Etta) 'r {i Eel! w: A 01?;le 9' .52 ENE: - mMme-?3 mo Generated by 22177 316/19i18 2:58 PM Page 11 EM I TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Git)? "If?Piirnf'iiQ'Eif} ream-rail it} We; Generated by 2217? at 6f19r?18 2:58 PM Page 12 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Gian-'4 F5 201 P3743"35i11ka Generated by 221?? at 6i19l18 2:58 PM Page 13 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report tibia-?3 r1:- ?Nl Generated by 22177 at 6l19f18 2:58 PM Page 14 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (?"1031 f: [3-1 7:50:19}! 09:; m. rm: M'c a If) i?H-t? r? 5.x TN :3 Generated by 22177 at 6119318 2:53 PM Page 15 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Gil-'3 TEE ire-+159. 3:5? 5) e33. Generated by 22177 316/19/18 2:58 PM Page 16 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?i r? '20 I $143233Ifr?' r? 54 If . mhb?m" . Page 17 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .. I, . t! 4.3-2 q' with? r? In 4:12.213} ?151=ar21rm>srzy aka-u .r st-wir .r rm :7 h. Generated by 22177 at 61?19118 2:58 PM Page 18 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report if; gain m: :1 n11. Mi)" ?r TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report trim)? r? $551253? Maj guin?gjj?m E23 VHF-X Page 2 of 3 age20f3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report if}: 091:; mm rm: {izarrm Page 3 01?3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report CFEW 204 WM CJE'mmtic-inmr ~3E?ttl?z. ?435 Page I ofl age 1 of] TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report TE 2% Sin-2451253533: Ob?ha?s?'??xrkzif Et?pitmu? MA FWE Paelof! TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report tic-If? F: ism war-{m} Semi: iguiaifimkm?eww: Type:Cour1 Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT #2018-003228 If 1 Lug-yyv u. .- .. up. My. Tempe Police Department 120 East Fifth Street Tempe. Arizona 8528'! Trams Bureau Crimes Unit I - a an Mancnpa County Superior Conn - Search Tm Wmam Center Detective #20595 in: Panes-a Coverpius 5121!-? meow . Request is! search warrant Urgent C1 fat Novicw [3 Comm: [3 Pm? Repty Plus- Return fax number: 480- WW: uni-"w TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at} in} 3 guz ;?~iiyu nun p.414 Iv. .oA nu L?Uh?l Tempe Pclice Department City of Tempe AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF STATE OF ARIZONA Tempe Po?ca inclde?it Rapon' Iii-33694 Yaur emanL Da?lecl'va Maraiand, #20595, a peace officer In Ihe Stale of Arizona. being ?rs: duly sum-n. upon ualh. deposes and says: The! on araboul the 1am day 0! March. 2013. in the (Emmy of Marianna State of Arizona. the crime of Menslaughtm was cammi?ed by. Rama! Swan Vasquez AKA: Rafa-la Siuarl Vasquez Data of 3hr:? Tnet the ai?a-?i: has probable cause to believe that [j on me pe'sungs) or. an The premises known as: Ubel Self Driving Vehicle Center 5 in the L-ehleleis} described as; In me 0in oiTeir:pe.Coun1y ofManzopa. State 01 Arizona, than; is now lasing processed at wncealec cedain persons. prepay. or things which: was stolen or embezzled was Used as means of a pubitc ot?ense. is being possesses wath the intent to Lift: as a means of committing a nubiic o?enaa. is in possession a! to whom ii is forth! purpose of concealing iler preventing il from berg dimmed canslitutea evidence tending to show mat a punii: offense has bee". committed, or lending to show max {he suspatl named above hes the offense such person is the subject of an eutsianding errant warrani 13mm in: said property or Things are described as folio? 1_ Dignai document rattan. Tempe incideni - Preliminary Ute: Data Review? containing dam o! the Coliision which occurred en 03?19-18 alappromnaiol 2158 hours in the area of Mid Cum; Re. and whim involved the Vcivo 1590 with A2 piste oh Page '1 Lem-a?em} Team'iemgvriwe TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report cc} I .3 .. -.-- vii-IDA v- Tempe Police Department any of Tempe 2 Drgila! vIdeD [Elsa captured by arr-board cameras the Volvo XC90 whim show ma Immediately before. during. and Immedlstety amr the crash described above. 3. aocumntal?rcn lo support the matimum allowed vehicle maneuvering supplled by the Io the vehlcla irwolvad this event. inciudmg. cut not to. maxlmum $1.3:an rate. maximum brainy force. and curb weights! Volvo x090 out?tted with 508 4 Any documentation the testing and quali?cation at the driver Rarau! Stuart Vasquez. wizh respect to documented times dudng axarciwsfexams The: the facts {Namibia cause for believing thattnc ground: for the issuance ct a search warrant tor the. clot: mentioned Item: axial: Your Af?ant 15 a polite of?cer In the State olArizona and has been employed by Ihe City at Tampa. Tampa Police Department. tor 9.5 years lam currently assigned to the Traf?c Invesliga?cr Bureau. V'ohrcurar Crlmec Unit. I have the lollun'ing training and :xpanonco: I received earli?catton as a police of?cer alto: attending at the: Phoenix Regional Ponce Academy Arizona Law Enforcement Academy 3! Other. Mesa Pollca Academy My duty assignments have included traf?c enforcement. Impaired driving. invasttgaucn. and willslu-r investigatrun. lhave specialized in: lmparmct Invasligatim Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Drug Racognmon and Classi?ca'Jon {Drug Hecognniv'r Elpe?l Colilslon lnwatigallon Col?sion Reconstruction Methodclogy and of Crash Dale Retriever Cum-normal Molar Vehltie Inspecuun (Ccmmerciat Vania;- Safety Weights and Measures (Limited Wetgnmaslcr} Other Page 2 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report *Qiiarar??ithMI ??m?ai'i?ai Igniting-?nk mgr, 3h: Iii-air ..: tqlily?v l?dh Hedi??l JILIILUJO 81W ?1!ou ."dx no? .. 9' 'rnur. Hal Tempe Police Department City of Tempe REGULAR FD RM That on or shut [no 13111 any of March. 2018 At?ant 'oarncd the 1n the renewing manner 0n ariarzore ill approximately 2158 hours, Rataai Vasquez was driving a Votvo x030. owned by Rafael?s emptoycr, the Uber company. Raiaet was in the curbtane of Mill Ava Just acute-r ct Curry in the City of Tempe, Craunty ct Maricopa. State of Arizona This particu-ar vehicle was outtittud with a sch-driving for research an: development by the Ubur company, and Rataei had the system engaged atthe t?me ct this incrdeni. While Rafaat was northbourd on Milt Ave and approaching Curry Rd. a pedestrian was bicycle across thu roadway tron west to east. Rafaai'a vehicle struck the pcdeatriun, resulting in this pedestrians death. Video [octane from the tnter?cr ot the Was viewed. showing that Rafael had bean Waiting at an unknown Item near her right knee tor approximately 5.3 semnda baton looking up at the roadway As evidenced by tha video footage. Rateei looked up oniy 5 seconds prior to impact with the pedestrian. A document was prepared by the company dictating their preliminary data anafyais of this crash Since the Uber company identities vehicles with untqu: identi?er number, they have titted this document to reflect that it contains the Preliminary Data Anaiyais for the: K145 Event. being the Identification number the Volvo XC90 vehicle invciwd in this crash. This decument was viewed by your a?iant. a distinctive with the Tempe Police Department, on 03-21-18 31? approximataty 1530 hours and was tour-J to contain intormstion outlining the driver?s training. duties? and qualifications. Most notably, this document out-'inac the limitations 0! the S?ltDrivtng-Syetarn 1505)?! its cumnt state of in its research and devetopment procass. as we?! as the dutias that the User company places on the driver In reiatien to those limitations when an emergency situation becomes apparent. This document also information that drivers are tested reaction times to an emergency situatfcn at: part of their qualification process tor drivers oporatina a vehicle equipped with an 808. Also shownwith the document were digital video files from the- camcras mounted in the rooftop SE35 which captured the events surrounding the crash Basec on this tnrormauon. your a?tant Is requesting a search warrant. rm obtaining data documams Involved In th'c can for reconstruction and investigative Pumas? Page 3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "if-:3 331% mm: mm wmm??m N213 El? a. ., . . - 3?"le at}: in: Lu?: 0 . '13. OJ rhu: uut .qu :61 . Tempe Helm Department . Cay oi Tempe HIGHTTIME SEARCH The time 15 now hours and tha warrant must be sewed after 10:00 PM and neg-lore 5:30 AM because 8 The ewdance requested :a of a nerishanls nature and a 1m; delay vault: render I1 useless. Based upon the weaning Facts: i. Delecuvc K. Mama-1d #20595. your P?mm. request a watch warrant be issuad. SEARCH Bust: upon the preceding tam, I, Deleww: K. Marsiana ?0595. yam M?ann reams: a daytime search warrant he isww. Whamfom amen: prays that a watch warrant be Issued commanding 1mm immediate scarcr. be mean of ma poisonw 1. premises. anr?cr venicreis} described herein for Ihe persona, property, and things heroin dammed and the: the game be retained in il?a custody c4916 AMEN or In the 0' the agency which Af?ant represents and disposes of according to law. pmuant to AR 5 13-3911 and 13-3924 Saliai P40120595. Te'r-pc Putiue Cepaslmm m. 1w Subscribad and sworn before to me on. ARM 2? MEWchard Nolhwem aawm Warm! a?W?m Maricopa County Superior 0t Ina Court Faced TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 63w 2? T?wm?n Omaha: mm mm; ?gt-uy-uyn ?nun? u. nu rnua. (Java: Fax ?95; Tampa F'cljce Guy 01 Tempe SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA. STATE OF ARIZONA Warrant Number. r901; Tempe Police Incident Reps" 16-82694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN HE STATE OF Prod by a'?davll having been madalhis day In me by Temce Polio: Urns-r UQIQGIWB K. Marmnd #20595. I am ?hushed EhSIthere I5 prcbame cause In baliavn Shoi? I: On the personm 01. On the premises known as: UhOf Self Drivini Vehioae Center In Ihe vehlcleis) described as: In Me City ofTarrIpe, (:05an 0! Mancopa State a: A: Inna. male Is now being plocosscd 0r cowcaalcd oadain persons. propeny, described as: 1 Dug-iai titled, Tempe Incident PIeIImlnary Ubnr Data Rev ew.? conIaInInrg data of tho amnion moaned on 03-13-18 at approrlmatglyi?l?a home In the was of MI: Ave and Cum: Rd. and which ianI-ed the who X090 war? AZ pisln of? I Dlgual vldeo I-Ies caplured by on-boa-Ii canlua? 011m Volvo X090 which show the events Immediateiy halal; dunng. and Immediately after the wash described above 2 Any digital documenleuor Io support the maximum alkmeo vuhlcle maneuvering command! suppilad by Ihu Se?-Driwrg-Syszem ?805) to Ihe vehthe involved In rhla went, IncludIng, on! rat ?rmly: to maximum sIeerlng late, mulmuan braking tome and curb weigh! 0! Volvo X090 out?tted $08. 3 Any documentation regarding the lostIng and quah?calrm oI lha omen Rafae: Stuart Vasquez mama! to doournamod pormptonrreaclzon I-me: owing Iraimr:g swarcboerexams. pregame 0r was stolen or emboulno. was uaad as means of a public o?ehse. Is ham-3 possaued wIIh :he Inka to use as a means at cernmimng a public o?anbu is possesslon o! :0 whom II vs deIivered Io! Ihe purpose of concealing II Oi preventing It Irom beng discovered. comrades evndence {charm to show ma! a pa hm: Gnome has been or (ending 10 show that ?ha :iatod nape-01 has commIned Ihg o?ense. such person Is subjecl of an ouchandIng arrasl warrant. Page 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Bic}? wyh?? mmwa u_ In 1? 1" in." .- IuVll?'vv?u II . Tempe Police Dapa1ment City at Tampa Such pubhc Manse beer-g MansiaughtaL which comma on or aha-u! the 1am cay'ol Match. 2016, 1. Tampa. Marlzupa. Arizona. YOU ARE. THEREFORE COMMANDED: to make a saarch of the above desmbw 99.110051 premises. andm: whim-ts). for the herein abov: descnbad property or things. and it you ?nd aha same or any can hereof. Io relain such in you: cuslody o: in lhe custody of the Tampa Police Dapnnment, as uququd by A RS 13-3920 In lhe daylime {naming the lime peliocl of amen 10:00 PM am 6:30 1n the n'ghtume (good name therefore having bun shown}, Execute Ihis walranl within ?ve calendar days from us Issuance and ratum this wan-m: w?hln Ihrae court buaimss days a?ar the warrant is axecuiec. dimmed mm as, Given under my hand and dated {his 2?th day of March . - . '11 . . - T'ma' jp?a-I?EL- Mai-L, Richard Nothwehr of Maricopa County Superiol WARRANT SERVICE Warrant Served: Dale; 2 'nma: ?3.30 AM Reason for non sewing [f?hs Tampa Inaderlt - Prettm?nary Uber Data Review.? dismal document. Digital vidw {den cocumenling lacidem IZ/Oocumsntatlon 01 maximum 808 Input: 10 which Percaplfonmoacuon data from tesung oI suspect. Raf?; Unequaz [3 Sue attached propony Receipt steamy taken: Am; mu we Ream/?55 of 19.65? of 77A: Dam/m cow?s Flam #1551. Page 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Lap-:1 is" rainwater! strraerirarars?iie Tempe Police Department City of Tempe STANDARD ARIZONA INVENTORY RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT Warrant Number: SW2018-003228 Tempe Police Incident Report: 2013-0313594 I. Detective J. Guzman, #20782, a peace officer of the State of Arizona. being duly sworn upon oath depose and say, that on the day of _March 2018, Tempe Police Department Legal Advisor, Attorney B. Amato executed this search warrant. issued by Judge __Richard Nothwehr and the following described property or substance was seized: Tempe incident Preliminary Uber Date Review? digital document. Documentation of maximum 805 inputs to vehicle Digital video ?les documenting incident. {Still in the process of obtaining this from Uber) PerceptioniReaction data from testing of suspect. Rafael Vasquez. (Still in the process of obtaining this from Uber} [1 See attached property formts}. i further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of all property taken by me. pursuant to A.R.S. 13-3921 and that a detailed receipt for the property taken was: [3 Reviewed with the suspect and then left in the suspect's property locker at the jail or the location the property was seized. El Given to the suspect. Other: Copy provided to Uber representatives. ?rt-i? A This warrant was returned subscribed and sworn before me this day of 20_ AFFIANT JUDGE OR (315 J. Guzman #20782 of the Court rim JANE named a? meteors ooumv supenioa COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report wmma: swim-:5 mam ATEWEX @215)? 7:75 genjw??' 19mm Mama 1' rrl?ll-?b?j? Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT #2018-002912 . 'l?GWrar. 1-9 2913:" 3:48?? or 152131.143 mu rnuu. mum. P. 7/5 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA COUNTY WARRANN REmRT'ms-azm ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by af?davit having been mode this day to m: by: Demuve Bill Kelly #17225 I am satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: on the pmm?s) of on the premises known as: in the vehicle-(s) dcsm?hed as: Rafael-Vanna, also known as Rnfaela Vasquez, an- individual who is 180 pounds with black hair and-brown eyes. 'Rafael's dated birth is and social security umber-is Rafacl?s unjmown atthis?mc. tame-City 01113325 County of. a-Smte ot?AtiZona, there is now being processed or concealed certain or things described??f' . - Cain?hon'?u initial?! V?qnez?s?pot'sassion at ?ine of the collision. a - Digital uka??on oflall 5911(th Mime-call not limited to call logs, ten mum, org, _u'ml social n?i?dij usage lending up and ly?i? 9"?ch . Which property or things} wore used as means of with the intent to .use as" nmeans :of' committing a public _offmse. iaw?j?In-possuasion of to whom it is delivered for die purpose of concealing it-o: preventingit-from being discovamd. cons?tutas widow: tending to show that a pubiio o?ehse has been committed. such per?son is the subject of an outstandmg mm warrant. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report we we? we MUW mam 2018? 3/6 Such ?ublic o?'mse of the Arizona Revised Statute Title 1-3 A.R.S. auctions 13-1204A2 YOU ARE THEREFORE in the daytime (exaludjng-the timoperiod P.M. Ind 6:30 '42 -. . .. . 01' nighttime (good cause therefore having been shown) to make a march of the above named or desmibod-pusonm, pmnises, vehicles for theherein ahoire demibed pmpexty or things, and ifyou ?nd thesame oranypar't mereof, [ordain cusmdyofthe Taupe Police Department, as provided by A.R.S. 13?3920, On .a reasonable alarming that an mounwdenby to exeeute the NW would-.mdmgor the safety of mypmon or would resultiu theded?uctinn of of_the iterus_d?scn?bcd in?v: warrant. the magistahe shell euthanize-an unnmaauneed cut-y, 136911-13; Retumthi: merino-me within?three (3) days of?acjhereof, as directed-by A.R.S. 1-3?3918. Givegj?rdermyhandanddamdthis TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report gee-mm: my 5:3 me l?llmarl 9018! allulLuLo rri rnuu. enuvu 4/6 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF ARIZONA DA SEAR COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA a )5 .1, WM 30 REPORT #1342694 YOUR Detective mu #172251 Alpeaee of?cer in the State of Arizona, being-?rst dulyswom, upon oath, deposes and says: That on Mm 19, 2018 in ?le City of Tempe, County of hill?mpl? Suite of Arizona, the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter, ARS 13410341.] in: commilled. 11m THE has probable cause to believe that on the persona) of on the premises known as: inlhe described as: Rafael Vasquez, alaoknami Rafael: Vasquez. mindividual who is 180 ands will: black hair and brown eyes. Rafters-?ute of birth is_ and social. secu?ly number eh. Rsfael's whereabouts are unlmown at this time. That said property or things are described as follows: in 1mm Viuquez'a possenlfm at time aflthe collision. Dliltilze?fa'c?on the cell gihbna, m?lii?l?g but not limited to call logs, text a nil-faunas; Gm; lam needles and social" media usage immediately leading up in and lrh?bi'edla'uljr Tallow; eulliilon. were stain or unbezzled. were used as means-afoonunit?ng a public offemze. is (am-being possessed with the intent to use as a means of commitmg a public offense is (are) in_possessien' of to Wham it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it ?om being discovered. DEED conslil'ul?s evidence tending to show that a public o?emse has been committed. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (fa memorial totality fill? Moor. ma? "to 383?? P. 5x6 El such person is the subject ofan outstanding arrest Wmant. That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of It search warrant for the aforementioned items exists: Your A?iant has been n.Pol.ieo O?ioer for the City ofTempe since Nova-be: of 2002. I attended the Adzona Law Enforcement Aoedemy who-re I was trainee! in the practices and procedures ofa law enforcement of?cer. Cutrently, I unassigned as a detective with the Traf?c Bureau?s Vehicular Crimes Unit. I have been assigned as a-Hit and Run Detective since amt/201's. Department's Criminal Investigations Bloom-Robbery also spent 2 years as a titteetive with Tet-ope Police quad. During this time Ihavls learned much about the criminal. investigative pro cons. An exumple of some of the skills and abilities I investigations, ?ling cases with the ct this time licensed whet ittaltes to he policies and pmcedmes gaining a good and wumyettorneye, and oompletingi havelgnined working complex n?depth all imaiusive reports. . 011161" ??mmts I hetie Worked incltide Patrol Division for approximately 3 years and the Central City Bureau Bilte Squad for approximately 2 years. I spent 4 of the your in p'alml as a ?eld training of?cer. During competent police of?cer. Ihavc studied in depth the department?s understanding of the expectations and'gosls of the department. Ihave ooninnmioetions skills, good Working relations with eta-workers, excellent of?cer safety skills, andthe ability to perfume allforms of investigations. I have also attended numerous trainings, mom, and lectures to further my knowledge base in search and soizutc issues. - REGULAR INFORRIATION FORM Based on information Your Af?tmt has learned ??om Dot. Hauhold of the Tempe Police Vehicular Chimes Unit, it is belieVed the crime of Vehicle Manslaughter (ARS 13-1103.A.l) may have been committed . and thatevidenoe of this offense is currently located with: cellphones in passessiOn of Rafael Vasquez. also 1 - lemmas Rafael: Vasquez, the driver oft: 2017 Gray volvo XC90 bearing Arizona License Plate?t 1 - the time of the collisiOn. 0n at approximatdx 2200110133 an Uber Volvo X090 driving mode was traveling nbl'lh?l} Mill-Ave. appiosclting Weshing'mn Sh. Tempe, AZ when it collided with a person crossing of Mill-AW; Injthe east side of Mill Ave. south of Washington-St. Tm: pedestrian Was 2230 hears. IZDUting-en interview 'with Rsihel, she'ihdi'e?sted her hands were o?'th?z?stee?ng sirheel and their feet Wm off [be-acceleratozfdecelemtor pedals during the collision. Your A?ient?in smelting this search warrant to seize any cell-phones its-Rafael Vasqucz?s possessions: the time of the antl'digitally mitt-entail}! use immediame leading up to and emanates: folloWin'g the collision-to detennine'if Rafael was-dlsn?saed md'lmable to take eon-come actions to avoidthe collision. OOLIC Ramps? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report T: 2m Hm Q9113 .r'?i?iru 1H1 1212121111212 . 19. 2918' 6156?"- Your af?mt therefore request: that this search warrant be grated. in the daytime (excluding the ?meperiod 10:00 PM. and 6:30 A.M.) Af?nni believes that the following information demonstrate: good cause for permitting this wmant to be served heave-m 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM. Wherefore af?anl prays that a search warrant be issued commanding that an mediate search be made of 'thc persona, premises, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the persons, 1:10me and things hm?n (laser-?ied, and that. tin: game be retained in the custody of the a??iant or in the custody of the agency which the af?ant represmis and disposed of according to law, pursuant to A.R.S. 13-3 9201;; Illuminati! Marianna County HONORABLE JANE MARICDPA COUNTY TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report E?w "7?5 ?xm?mm 3MB Return "?ng - 00.2 7/ la"; Police Department Search Wanant SW2018- Standard Arizona Inventory Receipt Report 31 2.0 3 2 f9 Af?davit and Return bf Search Warrant 1 Of?cer 4. 2/4/74 05 Badgv:# a I O?cer of the State of?nzona, being ?rst dulyr swam upou, dcposes md says: Thar on Mela}? of Z??gol? 2018,] executed this mam issued by Judge I and the folloving descubed property was seized: 247%: gage; I further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of all property taken by me, pursuant to ARS 13-3921, and that a detailed receipt for the property taken was: . Given to: ??45 (QC-CL Le?rat Af?znt?git/MMJ Badge Pm awe Department ?Z/W?xi vac This warrant was returned, subscribed 19d swom to me before thus day of 4 - Pursuant to ABS 136918.31. Judge LORI ASH Of the ?up IntT Court . rt ?1 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report smite. Tempe Police Department Property Receipt co Number 3 :94? 7?3/ .. Of?cer: Date: 3/90/18? The Tempe Police Department Properly/EvidenCe Facility is located at 1875 E. Apache Blvd, Tempe, AZ 85281 and the number is (480) 350-8338. The hours are Monday 12:00pm 4:00pm, Tuesday Friday 7:00am 4:00pm, and closed weekends dc holidays. You must bring this receipt and photo when retrieving property- Description Circle appropriate type for each item and provide description (8 Safekecping, Evidence, Found~11 I1: ALL CONTRABAND WILL BE DESTROYED SAFE- ltems will be held for 30 days. You must pick up your property or make arrangements to KEEPING: haw your property picked up within that time frame. A person named by you a notarized letter giving that person permission may retrieve your property. Items not picked up after 30 days will be disposed of in accordance with state law andfor city code. EVIDENCE: ems will only be released upon completion of the criminal case with authorization from the assigned case detective and/or prosecutor. You will be noti?ed by mail when these items are authorized to be released. You will have 30 days after being noti?ed to pick up these items or they will be disposed ofin accordance with state law and/or city code. FOUND: Citizens turning in items as found, which are not claimed \iithin 30 days by the (m?ner. may be claimed by the ?nder. You will be noti?ed by mail when you are eligible to claim found items. After noti?cation is made you have 30 days pick up the items or they will be di sod of in accordance with state law and/o Owner/Finder: Signamr While perry Yellow - TPD Form 1193 Revised 09l2013 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @195? 7:15. semi-mm 23wMm?mwga 735%an m5] mm; manta} TypezCourt Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT 2918 12am DUI nudw nu v0 .. I Lin-Am? Tempe Pollce Department 120 East Fifth Streel Tempe. Arizona 63281 Traf?c Bureau Vehicular Crimes Unit Datao?ue M. McCormick #22020 Pngur Caver plus 6 Dan: March 20. 2018 Reguasl for searqn wan-am Urn-mt [3 PM Review coma?! Flme Reply Please Recycle Return fax number: Contact number: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report <3 3317353: nun 2mg 90-13Tempe Polioe Dopariment City of Tempe AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICDFA, STATE OF ARIZONA Warrant Number; 1 pg pg; Tempe Police Incident Report: 201332394 Your of?anl. Deicotive M. MoConnloi-z, 22020. a peace ofilcor in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duly sworn. upon oath. dapuscs and says: That on or about the 18'" day of March. 2018. In the County of Martcopa. Slate 0f Anzona. tho crlmo of A35 13-1103A1Nehlcoior Manslaughter. was committed by; Rafael Stuart Va: no: Date of Birth: i Thai the affiant ha: probable cause to betleve the! an the panama) of: on the premises known as; Tempe Pollcapepartment In the vents-lain} described as: Year 201 7 Make Volvo Model X030 Style 405w Color Gray License Plate Stain Arizona License Plate Number Vehioie Idenli?cation Number Registered Dwnar Name UATC LLB Ragiaiared Owner Address Regisierod Duvner Cliyt?iaiamip In the City of Tempe, County of Madonna, 81an of Arizonai there Is now b?ing pmsasaed or concealed certain '3ngan property. or things which: was stoien or embezzled. was used as mean: of committing a public offense. . I: being possessed with the lnieni to use as a means of committing a public offense. Is in possession oi to whom it it. detivered for the purpose of concealing It or preventing It from batng discovarad. constitutes evidence tending to a oubiie o?enne has been oommiitod, or [ending to show that Rafael Stuart Vasquez has committed the offence. such person is the guinea! of an outstanding arrest wartani. USED Page 1 POLICE TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report at}? if: in 130MB 9153i ?te?t?i?i not on tree; intro. 2013 1?.i2PIil logii?? Lv?v an. a. - urn . Tempe Police Department City of Tempe That an Id property or things are described as follows: 1. Year 2017 Make Volvo Model X090 Style 201?? [Solar Gray Licence Plate State Arizona Licence Plato Number Vehicle identi?cation Number Registered Owner Name UATC LLC Registered Owner Address Registered Owner CiiylStateiZio 2. Event and oreoh data recording devices and equipment 3. Evont and crash data That the following facts establish probable cause for that the grounds for the Issuance of a search warrant tor the aforementioned items artist: Your A?iant is a police of?cer In the State of Arizona and has been employed by the City of Tempe, Tempe Police Department. for 5 years. 1 am currently assigned to the Traf?c Investigation Bureau. Vehicular Crimes Unit. have the following training and experience: irecciued certi?cation on a police. of?cer after silencing at the: Ci Phoenix Regional Police Academy Arizona Law Academy 0th or: LETA My duly assignments have Included traf?c enforcement, impaired driving Investigation. and collision investigation. there specialized training In: Impaired Driving Investigation *3 Horizontal Gaze Nyetcgmua *3 Drug Recognition and Classi?cation (Drug Recognition Expert) at Collision Investigation Pd Collision Reconstruction {11 Methodology and Techniques of Green Data Retrieval Commercial Motor Vehicle Inspection (Commercial Vehicle Safety Specialist) b3 Weights and Mattel-Iron {Limited El Other: In addition to mytime with the Tempe Police Department, I was also a Petrol Deputy with the Yuma County Sheriff's Of?ce for approximately one year nine months and a police of?cer with the Yuma Police Depanmont for seven years. During my time with the Yuma Police Department, I served at. a DUI Enforcement Officer for approximately two years where one of my duties was to investigate oerloue and fatal collisions. i was also a Property Crimes detective for three years while working tor the Yuma Police Department Page 2 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report dam r2: nan-main: cm ?v.20. tagger, F. 4.9m: uy.uu aqua-mun av rum: n? guru-v.? will u: Tampa Department City oiTet-npo REGULAR INFORMATION FORM That on or about the 18th day of March. 2018. your N?ant loerned tho followlng information in the following mariner: Baked on Information your afilani has learned l'rom Detective Haubold oi the Tampa Potion Department's Vehicular Crimea Unlt. it Is believed the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter 1 3-1103A1) may have bean committed and evidence that could assist with this invootglatlon Ia ourrently located within the onboord diagnostic oomputerts) of the 201? Voivo Arizona license On 03? all 8 at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo X090 with Arizona license plate ?drlving in autonomous mode woo traveling north on Mill Avenue Washington Street. Tampa, A2 when It collided with a person crossing from tho west side of Mill Avonuo to the east side o?rMiII Avenua south of Washington Stroot. The pedestrian was pronounced decreased at approximately 2230 hours from injuries caused during collision, During an interview with Ralool. she lndioated her hands were off the steering whoel and her feet were off of the aoceieroiortdeoalorotor pedals during the The 2017 Volvo XC90 with Arizona license plate was taken as evidence and impounded at the Tempe Police Department impound lot located at 1875 East Apoo Btvd. Booed on the this lntonnallon, your attiant is a soaroh warrant for obtaining data andlor equipment related to data siorago from the onboard dlagnoo?o oompulertsi or the 2017 Volvo x090 Arlzona license plate Involved in this case for reconstrudlon purposes. Page 3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report - ion? arr Tempe Police Department City of Tempe Ci SEARCH WARRANT: The time is new hours and the warrant must be sewed after 10:00 PM and before 6:30 AM because: The evidence requested ls of a perishable nature and a time delay would render It useless. upon the preceding lacts. I. Detective M. McCormick. yourAtilanl. request a nighttime search warrant be ISBUB . DAYTIME SEARCH WARRANT: The evidence requestnd is at a perishable nature and a time delay would render it useless. Based Upon the preceding facts. i. Detentlve M. McCormick, yeur A?tent. request a daytime search warrant be issued, Wherefore a?iant pray: that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search be? made of the premises. andinr Vehicletsl deacnbed herein for the persons. property, and things herein described and that the same be retained In the custody at the Amant or in the custody ?fth: agency which Affiant represents and disposed at according to law. pursuant in A118. tit-3920? Maw Seriai Na. 2202i], Tempe Pollne Department SIC erwuut Subscribed and sworn before to me on. (21312222 243 . (on enorable James Rummage ot the Court Page 4 ?nmetit?trnj entering-title manna OLICE TEMPE ll. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report etc} if": 9) sees: 291.30.151.11 .H . HEM F?s" 99'3?" . mi Tempe Poiloe Department City of Tampa SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA. STATE OF ARIZONA Warrant Number?wgz? f" 052 ?g 1' Tempo Police incident Report: 2018-32694 ANY PEACE DEFICERIN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Pro at by amd avli having been made this day to me by Tempe Ponce D?ieer Detective M. McConnick, tam satis?ed that there is probable eause to believe that: On the perennts} of; On the premises known on: Tampa Police Department Property Facility 1875 East Apache Boulevard Tempe. Arizona 85281 tn the vehioietoi described as: Year 201 7 Make Voivo Model X090 Sim 2017 Color Gray License Plate State Arizona Lioenae Piste Number Vehio'le identi?cation Nurr?tber Registered Owner Name UATC LLC Registered Owner Addroas Registered Owner GILyIStaterzi'p In the City oi Tampa. County of Marioopa, State of Arizona. there Is now being or concealed certain persons. property. or things described as: 1. Year 2017 Make Vol uo Model X090 Suite 2017 Color Gray License Plate State - Arizona License Plate Number Vehicle identi?cation Number Registered Owner Name UATC LLG Registered Owner Address Registered Owner Cliyi?StatefZin 2 Event and crash data recording devices amt equipment 3. Event and crash data Page 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 2 ?ziiri?ponooe: it. 90136 - we.? iia' 20. 2.918116% sun 1.3-: Tempe Police Department City of Tempe which property or things: was stolen or embezzioti. wee used as mean: of committing a public offense. [3 is helng possessed with the intent to use as a manna of committing a public oftense. L51 :zapoesezesion at to whom it Is delivered for the purpose oioo'noeellng it or preventing ?from being V?t' IZI constitutes evidence tending to'Bhow that a public offense has been cemmiued. or tending to show that Rafael Stuart Vasquez has the offense. Ci such person In the euojeot of an outstanding arrest warrant. Such public offense being ARE. tottosniwehiouler Mnnsieughter, occurred on or about the 18th titty of March. 2013 In the County of Marioopa. State omnzona. YOU ARE THEREFORE CDMMANDED: In the daytime texoiuding the time period at between 1013i.) PM and 6:30 AM), In the nighttime {good therefore having been shown}. to make a search of the above described poreor?ai. premises, anoint vehiclets). for the herein above described property or things. and it you find the same or any part Inereof. to rolain evoh In your custody or in the ouetod of the Tempe Police Department. as provided omits. 1323920. Execute this warrant within five oeiendar days from its issuance and return this warren! within three oourt business days after the warrant is executed. as directed by ARS. 13-3913. Upon oomoietion of at! own actions or proceedings which would necessitate the further use oi the listed property; pursuant to me $313-$920 andfor Ans ?13-3941. the property may be disposed of as authorized by low. Given under my hand and dated this TimeHonor ble James Rummage Of Court WARRANT SERVJCE Warrant Served: Date: Time; [3 AM PM Reawn for non-newton: Receipt for property taken: 1] Event and crash data recording devices and equipment from the listed vehioie. Ci Event and threat: data download from listed uehiole. See attached property forrnteJ. Page 8 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 'r'smasmseine Tempe Police Department City of Tempe STANDARD ARIZONA INVENTORY AFFIDAVIT RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT Warrant Number: SW201B-002955 Tempe Police Incident Report: 2013-32694 I, Detective M. McCormick. 22020. a peace officer of the State of Arizona. being duly sworn upon oath depose and say, that on the 20fh day of March, 2018, I executed this search warrant. SW2018-002956. issued by Judge James Rummage and the following described property or substance was seized: El Event and crash data recording devices and equipment from the listed vehicle. Event and crash data download from listed vehicle. See attached property form[s). I further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of all property taken by me. pursuant to ARS. 13-3921 and that a detailed receipt tor the property taken was: Reviewed with the suspect and then left in the suspect?s property locker at the jail or the location the propeny was seized. Given to the suspect. Other: Left in Vehicle This warrant was returned subscribed and sworn before me this 20% email AFFIANT JUDGE ORVMAGISTRATE Of the Court MELISSAZABOR comm SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report it}? rim?sin amitaag?sninirmmn shim; rem; integrate) Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT #2018-002982 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 CITY OF TENIPE, ARIZONA 3 TRACKING AND CELL SITE 4 SIMULATOR SEARCH WARRANT 5 COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 6 7 WARRANT MM 8 9 TO ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: 10 Proofby af?davit, having been made to me this day pursuant to A.R.S. ?13-301?, and Title 11 18 U.S.C. ?2703 (Pen register or a Dialed Number Recorder), A.R.S. ?13-4293 (Tracking Device 12 Search Warrant) and A.R.S. ?]3-4294 (Cell Site Simulator Device Search Warrant) by Detective 13 Bill Kelly #17225, who is employed by the Tempe Police Department, State of Arizona; 14 The Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: 15 Rafael Vasquez has committed andfor is committing the following violations of Arizona 16 Revised Statutes: 1? II Vehicular Manslaughter 13 . . 1 Further, this Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to authorize Detective Kelly, or 19 any other police of?cer to utilize, anywhere within the State of Arizona, the use of a Dialed Number 20 Recorder Device, Trap and Trace Device, Caller Identi?cation, precision location of the Target 21 Communications Device (GPS location), cell site and sector information and 3 Signal Information 22 Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to determine the location of the Target 23 Communication Device in the possession of Rafael Vasquez (Target Communications Device(s)). 24 Further, this Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to authorize Detective Bill Kelly 25 #17225, United States Marshals Service, or any other peace officer to use, anywhere within the 26 State of Arizona, to utilize a Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) 27 which identi?es the Electronic Serial Numbers (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Number?s (MIN), 28 Mobile Equipment Identi?ers (MEID), Mobile Directory Numbers (MDN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cations (IMSI), International Mobile Equipment Identities audior -1- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report nos re en sen-n sis-arm shine innitmsarnnima 1 Mobile Station Identities (MSID) in order to identify any additional communication devices 2 (Communications Device(s)) in the possession of Rafael Vasquez. 3 TARGET COMMUNICATIONS 4 Telephone: Service Provider: T-Mobile 5 Subscriber: Rafael Vas uez 6 Address: Utilized by: Rafael Vasquez 7 Herein referred to as FNU LNU, aka 8 This order is for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days after the date that the search warrant was 9 signed. 10 Further, this Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that 1] on the person of Deshawn Davis Herein referred to as FNU LNU, aka 12 In aricopa County, State of Arizona, there is now being possessed or concealed certain property 13 described as: 14 Target Communications Device(s) 15 Communications Devi ce(s) 16 Which property; has been used, is being used or is about to be used as a means for committing a public offense. 18 constitutes any evidence that tends to show that a particular public offense has been, is being or 19 is about to be committed or tends to show that has committed or is committing a public 20 offense. 2] is in the possession of a person who has committed, is committing, or is about to cemmit a 22 public offense. 23 24 The Tempe Police Department, the United States Marshals Service, or designee is 25 authorized to employ the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) and cell 26 site and sectm information on the Target Communications Device{s) identi?ed herein, and use that 2? information to determine the Target Communications Device" 5 location, even if it is located inside 28 a house, apartment or other building. -2- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Eats)? Ts fatrjsasyijajsii _??J??iai?sittana'l sienna It is ordered that T-Mobile, beginning within 10 calendar days from the date of this Warrant?s issuance and for a period not to exceed 30 days from the issuance of this warrant, shall provide to Tempe Police Department, the US MS, or designee the information requested below for the Target Communications Device. to extend to any time of the day or night as required, including when the Target Communications Device leaves the State of Arizona. It is ordered that T-Mobile, a communication common carrier under Title 18 U.S.C. ?2510 (10) and a communication service provider under A.R.S. ?l 3-3001, will disclose the current telephone number(5), subscriber-(s) information, location(s) and Electronic Serial Number (ESN) numbers, of the above listed-communication device(s). 10 The Service Provider (collectively with any other communication service provider which 11 may provide service other Target Communications Device during the authorized period) shall 12 provide all information, facilities, and technical assistance needed to ascertain the physical location 13 of the Target Device, including but not limited to cell site and sector data, signal 14 tracking technology, and data indicating the Speci?c latitude and longitude of the Target 15 Communications Device (or other precise location such as E-911 Phase II data) (hereinafter 16 referred to as the ?Requested Information?). 17 The Service Provider shall assist Tempe Police Department, the USMS. or designee by 18 providing all information, facilities, and technical assistance needed to ascertain the Requested 19 Information, and initiate a signal to determine the location of the Target Communications Device 20 on the Service Provider's network or with such other reference points as may be reasonably 21 available, as and if requested by Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee and at such 22 intervals and times as may be directed by Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designec 23 serving this Warrant, and ?nnish the techni ca] assistance necessary to accomplish the acquisition 24 of the Requested Information unobtrusively and with a minirnum of interference with such services 25 as the Service Provider accords the user-(5) of the Target Communications Device. 25 The Service Provider will provide the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) 27 such that the service provider shall initiate a signal to determine the location of the subject? 5 mobile 28 device on the service provider?s network or with such other reference points as may be reasonably available and at such intervals and times as directed by the Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or their designee. -3- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report soars Jll?lis?i-Ll sham illr?tii?it?s gs 9mm re?t/Ea The Service Provider will provide the cell site and sector information for each telephone transactionicall captured by way of any accompanying Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder and Trap and Trace device installed on the herein identi?ed targeted telephone(s) with a minimum of intrusion and inconvenience. The Service Provider will furnish the location of cell site and sector/face data (physical address) at call origination (for outbound calls) and call termination (for incoming calls} for the target telephone for calls made and received during duration of this order. alarm-hulk) The service Provider will continue and implement the operation of the Pen Register, Dialed 8 Numbered Recorder, Trap and Trace Device and Caller identi?cation for a period not to exceed 9 thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. In any event, this order shall terminate thirty (30) days 10 from the date this Order is signed, unless otherwise ordered by this Court; 1 The Service Provider and?or any communication service provider will perform a ?Dial Digit ]2 Search? or 3 ?Calls to Destination Search? on the target telephone number(s) or any telephone 13 number, upon request, and provide the responding telephone number(s) and subscriber(s) 14 information resulting from the ?Dial Digit Search" or a ?Calls to Destination Search" operation; 15 The Service Provider will furnish the applicant forthwith all information, services, facilities }6 and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the installation and utilization of the requested 1? Pen Register, Dialed Numbered Recorder, Trap and Trace Device and Caller Identi?cation 18 unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that the carrier is providing 19 according its subscribers. Call tracing is initially requested for the ?fty (50) United States; 20 Directing that the Service Provider shall ?lrnish officers of the Tempe Police Department 2] or agents with the USMS, with the subscriber?s name, the subscribers? date of birth, the subscribers? 22 social security number, address, current andfor historical call records, Calls Detail Reports 23 toll records, long distance and ?roaming? information for between the date this order 24 is signed and 30 days prior to its issuance and for the authorized period of this warrant. 25 The Service Provider, a communication common carrier under Title 18 U.S.C. ?2510 (10) 26 and a communication service provider under A.R.S. ?13-300] and?or any communication provider 27 be directed to furnish the applicant with subscriber information for those telephone numbers, names, 28 or addresses identi?ed by the Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder, and Caller Identi?cation equipment installed as part of the monitoring facility, twenty- four hours a day, seven days a week, TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report canvas, anastiness-item ailihlmi?rl?ehf?l? pursuant to the Court?s order, and that this application has been made in good faith in furtherance to of an ongoing criminal investigation involving criminal activity based on probable cause. The Service Provider will disclose the telephone number(s), location(s), and Electronic Serial Number (ESN) numbers, Mobile identi?cation Number's MIN), Mobile Equipment 43AM) Identi?ers (MEED), Mobile Directory Numbers (MDN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cations (IMSI), International Mobile Equipment Identities (IMEI), andfor Mobile Station Identities (MS ID) of the above listed-communication sendce(s) if changed by the current subscriber to a new number, location, or (BEN). (MIN), (MEID), (MDN), (IMSI), (MEI), andfor (MSID) number, per subscriber name during the period authorized by this Tracking Device Search Warrant, and shall transfer the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) capability 1 1 along with service to any new number, location, or ESN number (ESN), (MIN), (MEID), 12 (IMSI), (IMEI), andfor (MSID) number and shall advise the Tempe Police Department, or the 13 USMS, of the telephone numberis) to which service has been transferred; i4 Directing that the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) and cell 15 site and sector information shall be authorized for a period of thirty (30) days ?'orn the date this 16 Tracking Device (GPS location) Search Warrant was signed. 1? The Tempe Police Department or the USMS shall compensate the Service Provider for 18 services in this matter at the prevailing rate of payment; 19 T-Mobile, their employees and agents not reveal to NAMEI or to any person, the existence 20 of this investigation or the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) 2] information request; 22 Pursuant to A.R.S. use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS 23 location) and cell site and sector information on the Target Communications Device(s) may be 24 used any time of the day or night. 25 lnvesti gators with the Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee are authorized to 26 use the Signal biformation Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) only when investigators 27 have reason to believe that is present. The Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or 28 designee is authorized to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) even if is believed to be located inside a house, apartment or other building. Absent further order of a court, law enforcement will make no af?rmative investigative .5- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report daft anteater QT-i?ibifstl sign-a Attila Misfit? A?t?d use of any identi?ers collected from cellular devices other than the Target Communications except to identify the Target Communications Devicc(s) and-distinguish it from the other cellular devices. Furthermore, the Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee is authorized to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to monitor the signals broadcast by the Target Communications Device(s) and use that information to determine the name-mm Target Communications Device-?5 location, even if it is located inside a house, apartment or other 8 building. To the extent that any information ?'om a cellular device other than the Target 9 Communications Device(s) is collected by the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site 10 Simulator Device), law enforcement will delete that information pursuant to A.R.S. 11 Pursuant to all non-target data must be destroyed within 30 court 12 business days after the return of the search warrant to a magistrate unless a court orders the non- 13 target data to be preserved. 14 Pursuant to A.R.S. the cell site simulator device may not be used to intercept, 15 obtain or access the content of any stored oral, wire or electronic communication unless the 16 interception or access is authorized by Chapter 30 of Title 13. This search warrant also prohibits 17 the seizure of any tangible property. It does allow the capturing of Electronic Serial Numbers 18 (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Number?s (MIN), Mobile Equipment Identi?ers (MEID), Mobile 19 Directory Numbers (MDN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cations (IMSI), Intemational 20 Mobile Equipment Identities (IMEI), and/or Mobile Station Identities (MSID) number(s). In 21 addition it also allows the use of the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator 22 Device) to determine the location of Target Communications Device(s) by locating the signals 23 emitting ?om the Target Communi cations Device(s). 24 PurSuant to A.R.S. and A.R.S. use of the cell site simulator 25 device may be any time ofthe day or night. 26 Pursuant to A.R.S. and A.R.S. law enforcement is ordered to return the search warrant to a magistrate no later than three court business days after the conclusion 28 of the electronic surveillance authorized herein. Pursuant to A.R.S. l3-4293(F) and A.R.S. a copy of the search warrant shall be Served within 90 days upon the conclusion of the electronic surveillance authorized herein, -5- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report :rf nae: aansgazrim Assassins-14:11 saints- saintscarecrow unless additional time is applied for and granted by the court based upon the showing of good 2 cause. 3 Pursuant to A.R.S. A.R.S. and reasonable cause 4 having been shown that a delay of service of the notice of search warrant is necessary to protect 5 the safety of any person and/or to prevent ?ight from prosecution, tampering with evidence, 6 intimidation of witnesses andfor jeepardizing the investigation, and because this warrant prohibits 7 the seizure of any tangible property, any wire or electronic communication or any stored wire or 8 electronic information, law enforcement is hereby ordered to delay service of the copy of the search 9 warrant. The copy of the search warrant shall be sent no later than 270 days after issuance and 10 upon the conclusion of the electronic surveillance authorized herein, unless additional time is granted by the court based on an application and judicial ?nding. Service of the copy of the search 12 warrant shall be made pursuant to A.R.S. ?l3-4293(F) and A.R.S. 13 The Court ?nds that due to the nature, complexity andfor projected duration of the 14 investigation that the period of delayed noti?cation is appropriate. It is further ordered that law 15 enforcement shall ?le a supplemental return of the search warrant to a magistrate con?rming that 16 a copy of the search warrant was provided in accordance with methods detailed in A.R.S. ?13- 17' and A.R.S. The supplemental return shall be provided within three court 18 business days after service of the copy of the search warrant. 19 This Order is sealed until otherwise ordered by this Court. or other court of competent 20 jurisdiction. 21 Given under my hand and dated this 20?? day of March, 2018. 22 23 24 25 Judge, Maricopa County Superior Court -7- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report am it: inns-n site's. 61mm; arms series {It E335 NEW :31, 1 AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT 2 COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA No. ?12 YOUR AFFIANT, Detective Bill Kelly #17225 a peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: 3 4 5 6 1, your Af?ant, Detective Matt McFarland #18205, am a certi?ed peace of?cer in the State 7 of Arizona, employed by the Tempe Police Department, Maricopa County, Arizona. 8 This af?davit is submitted for authorization of the installation and use of a Pen Register, 9 Dialed Number Recorder Device, Trap and Trace Device and Caller Identi?cation over- 10 - utilized by Rafael Vasquez (NAMED and other co-conspirators both known and yet 1 1 unknown, within Maricopa County, Arizona. This request is for a period of thirty (30) days. 12 This af?davit is submitted pursuant to A.R.S. ?13-3017, and Title 18 U.S.C. ?2703 for an 13 order from the Court authorizing the installation and use of a device, designed to record and identify 14 dialed telephone numbers from a speci?c enumerated telephonets). This device is commonly 15 known as a Pen Register or a Dialed Number RecOrder. 16 This af?davit is submitted pursuant to A.R.S. ?13-301?, and Title 18 U.S.C. ?2703 for an 17 order from the Court authorizing the installation and use of a device designed to trace and identify 18 telephone numbers of parties placing telephone calls to the speci?c enumerated telephone(s). This 19 device is commonly known as a Trap and Trace Device. Further, your Af?ant requests the 20 installation of Caller ldenti?cati on. The authorized Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder, Trap 21 and Trace Device, and Caller Identi?cation will be used to record telephone numbers dialed den 22 and record and identify incoming telephone numbers calling to the targeted telephone(s). 23 This af?davit is submitted for authorization to employ the use of the precision location of 24 a mobile device (GPS location) and cell site and sector information on the Target Communications 25 Device(s) identi?ed herein, to determine the location of the cellular device or devices carried by 26 27 This af?davit is also submitted for authorization to use a Signal Information Collection 28 System (Cell Site Simulator Device) in order to determine the location of the Target Communications Device{s) and further to identify any additional communications device(s) carried by The Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) -3. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report art-ms simulates a cellular tower and sends signals to cellular devices that are nearby. Target and non- target cellular devices that are nearby then respond to the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) with unique non-content electronic signals containing Electronic 4am!? Serial Number?s (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Number?s (MIN), Mobile Equipment identi?er (ME ID), Mobile Directory Number (MDN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cation (IMSI), International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), and/or Mobile Station Identity (MSED) allowing the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to capture the previously listed identi?cation numbers. In order to identify additional communications device(s) carried by NAMEI, Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) may need to be utilized at multiple 11 locations and/or multiple times at a common location but will only be utilized when investigators 12 have reason to believe that is present. 13 While utilizing the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device). the 14 Target Communications Device(s) and non-target cellular devices might experience temporary 15 disruption of service from the service provider, however the ability to make ?911" calls is not 16 affected. The Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) will be utilized 1? in a manner to ensure the minimal amount of interference to non-target cellular devices. 18 Absent further order of a court, law enforcement will make no af?rmative investigative use 19 of any identi?ers collected from cellular devices other than the Target Conununi cations Devicets), 20 except to identify the Target Communications Devi ce( 5) and distinguish it from the other cellular 21 devices. 22 TARGET COMMUNICATIONS DEVICEIS): 23 Telephone: Service Provider: T-Mobile 24 Subscriber: Rafael Vasquez 25 Address: Utilized by: Rafael Vasquez 2'5 Herein referred to as FNU LNU, aka 27 28 By employing the requested Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device), I believe that it will assist in identifying the communications device(s) in the possession -9- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em? re animate; I aim senile a with of and it will assist in identifying the location of the Target Conununications Device(s). 2 This af?davit is submitted for authorization to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell 3 Site Simulator Device) and Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device for a period not to exceed 4 thirty (30) days. 5 6 THE AFFIANT has probable cause to believe that: 7 Deshawn Davis has committed and/'or is committing the foliowing violations of Arizona 8 Revised Statutes: 9 I ?l3-1103.A.l, Vehicular Manslaughter 10 1 1 Further, there is probable cause to believe that: 12 on the person of Rafael Vasquez Herein referred to as FNU LNU, aka 13 In Mar-icopa County. State of Arizona, there is now being possessed or concealed certain property I 4 described as: 15 A Communications Device(s) 16 Target Communications Device 17 Which property 13 has been used, is being used or is about to be used as a means for committing a public offense. 19 constitutes any evidence that tends to show that a particular public offense has been, is being or 20 is about to be committed or tends to show that Rafael Vasquez has committed or is committing a 21 public offense. 22 is in the possessiOn of a person who has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a 23 public offense. 24 In addition, in order to obtain additional evidence relating to the Target Communications 25 Devicct's), its user, and the criminal violations under investigation, law enforcement must ?rst 26 identify the Target Communications Device(s). There is probable cause to believe that the use of 27 the investigative technique described by the warrant will result in of? cers learning that identifying 28 information -10- POUCH TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Tait}? antenna La! Li?lrsrarai?ttarell ?ernra? arm 35 user snows 1 There is also probable cause to believe that the location of the Target Communications 2 Device(s) will constitute evidence of those criminal violations including leading to the 3 identi?cation and/or location of who is engaged in the commission of these offenses. 4 5 REGULAR INFORMATION: 6 That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance 7 of a search warrant for the aforementioned person: 8 9 PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT 10 On 03/18118 at approximately 2200 hours a 2017 Volvo XC90 bearing AZ license plate - 1 1 was travelling north on Mill Ave. approaching Washington SL, Tempe, AZ when it collided with a 12 pedestrian crossing, from the west side of Mill Ave. to the east side of Mill Ave. south of 13 Washington St. The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours. The sole 14 occupant of the vehicle, Rafael Vasquez, stated the Volvo was a self-driving vehicle and was in 15 full autonomous mode. Raphael stated her hands were oil" the steering wheel and her feet were oil" 16 the acceleratorr'decelerator pedals at the time of the collision. TILE. "w ease at? caveats-"ft? 252? 18 Your Af?ant is seeking this search warrant to assist in locating Rafael Vasquez to serve search 19 warrant 2018-002912 which was granted by the Marieopa Superior Court Search Warrant Center?s 20 Honorable Jane McLaughlin to seize Rafael?s cell phone. Rafael provided investigators at the 2] scene of the collision with a false address, and further attempts to locate Rafael have been 22 unsuccessful. 23 24 DELAYED NOTICE OF SERVICE 25 26 Provided this Court authorizes the use the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location), cell 27 site and sector information and authorizes the use of the Signal Information Collection System (Cell 28 Site Simulator Device) identi?ed herein, your Af?ant respectfully requests to delay the notice of service pursuant to A.R.S. A.R.S. and until 270 days alter the order terminates. Based on the following justi?cations: -1 1- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ens rs doli?tam} easements ems: animate 2 It has been the experience of your Af?ant that should targets of these types of 3 investigations become aware that an ongoing investigation exists, it is likely these 4 targets will discontinue the use of the Target Communications Device(s). 5 I It has also been the experience of your Af?ant that should targets of these types of 6 investigations become aware that an ongoing investigation exists, it becomes likely that 7 they will ?ee for the purpose of avoiding prosecution. 8 0 It has been the experience of your Af?ant that should targets of these types of 9 investigations become aware that an ongoing investigation exists; it is likely that they 10 will inform other co-oonspirators of the investigation, therefore impeding our ability to 1 1 effectively investigate the organization. 12 13 Law enforcement will ?le a supplemental return of the search warrant to a magistrate con?rmin 14 that a copy ofthe search warrant was provided in accordance with methods detailed in A115. ?13- 15 and A.R.S. The supplemental return will be provided within three court 16 business days after service of the copy of the search warrant. 1? In addition, your Af?ant respectfully requests that this Af?davit be sealed. 18 19 20 2] Detective Bill Kell 17225 22 Tempe Police Department 23 24 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF MARCH, 20] 8. 25 WWln?x Judge, Maricopa County Superiorg HOE ltr?I-x; ZABOR seer-?03?. .Hnl .W r31 waltz-tn: Pf". QT .12- Tan-1P1: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report it messes ~3th iltl?t?ll?eli??ir??ii?tl?m? "@i?lii ?ill-E, Related jite?islg?i?i tiling Lula?) Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT #201 8-002991 EU CI rerupe ru Ilia. 9mg P. 1 POLICE DEPARTMENT 2 CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA 3 TRACKING AND CELL SITE SIMULATOR SEARCH WARRANT 5 COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 6 7 59015 8 9 TO ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: 10 Proof by af?davit, made to me this daypmuant to ARS. ?13-301?, and Title 11 18 U.S.C. 52703 (Pen register or a Dialed Number A.R.S. ?13~4293 (Tracking Device 12 Search Warrant} and A.R.S. #134294 (Cell Site Simulator Device Search Warrant) by Detective 13 Bill Kelly #1725, who is employed by the Tempe Police Depot-uncut, State of Arizona; 14 The Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: 15 Rafael Vasquez has committed and/or is committing the following violations of Arizona 15 Revised Statutes: 0 513-! Vehicular Manslaughter 18 Rather. this Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to authorize Detectiv: Kelly, or any other police of?cer to utilize, anywhere within the State of Arizona, the use of Dialed Nmnber Recorder Device, Trap and Trace Device, Caller Identi?cation, precision location of the Target 21 Communications Device (GPS location), cell site and sector information and :1 Signal Infomation 22 Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to determine the location of the Target 23 Communication Device in the possession of Rafael Vasquez (Target Communications Device(s)). 24 lumber, this Court is satis?ed that there is probable cause to authorize Detective Bill Kelly 25 #17225, United States Marshals Service, or any other peace of?cer to use, anywhere within the 26 State of Arizona, to utilize 8 Signal Infomation Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) 27 which identi?es the Electronic Serial Nmnbers (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Number-'s (MIN), 23 Mobile Equipment Identi?em (MBID). Mobile Directory Numbers (MDN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cations (MEI), International Mobile Equipment Identities (MEI), and/or -1- r-r?v?NI-pwa-? Hen?v. . TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report nos rs owns/ammo "Ear. like! 6.. ?IFMauonu; ru :20, man.) _n Mobile Station Identities (MSID) in order to identify my additional communication devices (Communications Devioe(s)) in the possession of Boise] Vasquez. GET CO Telephone: Service Provider: T-Mobile Subscriber: Rafael Vas uc Address: Utilized by: a eel Vasquez Herein referred to as LNU, eke NAMEI This order is for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days after the date that the search warrant was signed. Further, this Com is satis?ed that there is probable Cause to believe that on the person of Rafael Vasquez Herein referred to as FNU LNU, aka In Madcap: County, State of Arizona, then: is now being possessed or concealed certain property described as: Target Communications Comm?oetions Devicqs) Which promo; [1 has been used, is being used or is about to be used as a means for committing a public offense. caustitutes any cvidvmce that tends to show that a particular public offense has been, is being or is about to be or tends to show that has committed or is committing a public offense. [at] is in the possession of a person who has committed, is mum-lining, or is about to commit a public o??ensc. The Tempe Police Department, the United States Marshals Service, or designee is authorized to employ the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location] and cell site and sector information on the Target Communications Devicefs) identi?ed herein, and use that information to data-mine the Target Communications Dcvice?s location, even if it is located inside a house, apmment or other building. .2. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report r7" delicacies gm?ounmlunruatsuus r. MD. 92139 F. Lil-13?? coder days from the date of this . . . . i It is ordered that T-Moblle. beginmng Within 10 on I mega l3 Warrant's issuance and for a period not to arrested 30 days from this Warrant, shall nitri?cation requested below for as required, including y?n eat, the USMS, or designee the cc to extend to any time of the day or ni De?ne leaves the State of Arizona- provide to Tempe Police Departm the Target Commwcations Devi when the Target Communications 11 is ordered that T-Mobile, Title 1 a use. arm a conununioation common carrier under close the current vider under A.R.S. ?13-3001, will dis communication service pro 1 . and a locations) and Electronic Serial timber telephone subseriber(s) information, numbers, of the above listed-communication device(s). I other communication service provider which evice during the authorized period) shall coauthor-emu 10 The Service Provider (collectively with any 11 may provide service other Target 12 provide all infomntion, facilities, and technical assistance needed to ascertain the physical 109?? 13 of the Target Communications Device, including but not limited to cell site and Sector data, signal 14 tracking technology, and data indicnting the speci?c latitude and longitude of the Target 15 Communications Device (or other precise location such as 2-911 Phase II data) (hereinafter 16 referred to as the ?Requested Information"). 17 The Service Provider shall assist Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee by 18 providing all information, facilities, and technical assistance needed to ascertain the Requested 19 Information, and initiate a signal to determine the location of the Target Communications Device 20 on the Service Provider?s network or with such other reference points as my be reasonably 21 available, as and if requested-by Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designer: and at such I 22 intervals and times as may he directed by Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee 23 serving this Warrant, and finish the technical assistance necessary to accomplish the acquisition 24 of the Requested Information unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with such services 25 as the Service Provider accords the user(s) of the Target Communications Device. i 26 I The Service Provider will provide the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) 27 such that the service provider shall initiate a signal to determine the location ofthc subject?s mobile 28 device on the service provider's netwark or with such other reference points as may be reasonably available and at such intervals and times as directed by the Tempe Police Department, the USMS. ,l .3, e-vn TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no r; Aul?r?ih mare-inner tom enumerates 20151 El tiFrfnuu-uuv? AhlIkW?t Au The Service Provider will provide the cell site and sector information for each telephone transactiom'call captm-ed by way of any accompanying Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder and Trap and Trace device installed on the heroin identi?ed targeted telephonc(s) with a minimum of 4&th intrusion and inconVcnienoe. The Service Provider will ?zmish the location of cell site and scctorifece date (physical address) at call origination (for outbound calls) and call termination (far LII incoming calls) for the target telephone for calls made and received during duration of this order. The service Provider will continue and implement the operation ofthc Pen Register, Dialed Numbered Recorder, Trap and Trace Device and Caller Identi?cation for a period not to cched thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. In any event, this order shall terminate thirty (30) days 10 from the date this Order is signed. unless otherwise ordered by this Court; soc-ouch 1] The Service Provider andfor any communication service provider will perform a "Dial Digit 12 Search" or 3 ?Calls to Destination Seal-c on the target telephone numbeds) or any 13 number, upon request, and provide the responding telephone number(s) and subsctiherfs) 14 information resetting from the ?Dial Digit Search" or a "Calls to Destination Search" operation; 15 The Service Provider will furnish the applicant forthwith all information, services, facilities 16 and technical assistance necessary to accomplish the installation and utilization of the requested Pen Register, Dialed Numbered Recorder, Trap and Trace Device and Caller Identi?cation 18 unobtrusively and with a minimum of interference with the services that the carrier is providing 19 according its subscribers. Call tracing is initially requested for the ?fty (50) United States; 20 Directing that the Service Provider shall furnish of?cers of the Tempe Police Department 21 or agents with the USMS, with the subscriber?s name, the subscribers? date of birth, the subscribers? 22 social security number, address, current auditor histories! call records, Calls Detail Reports 23 toll records, long distance and ?roaming" information for between the date this order 24 is signed and 30 days prior to its issuance and for the authorized period of this warrant. I 25 The Service Provider, in communication common carrier under Title 18 use. ?2510 (10) 26 and a communication service provider under A.R.S. ?13-3001. andfor any communication provider 2? he directed to furnish the applicant with subscriber infometion for those telephone numbers, names, 23 or addresses identi?ed by the Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder, and Caller Identi?cation equipment installed as part of the monitoring facility, twenty-fem hours a day, seven days a week, TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report e) rs: writ) 6:12.53! -- W- $0.910? a 5:13" pursuant to the Court's order, and that this application has been made in good faith in ?ntherance of an ongoing criminal inVestigation inVOlving criminal activity based on probable cause. The Service Provider will disclose the telephone number(s), iocation(s), and Electronic Serial Number (ESN) numbers, Mobile Identi?cation Number??3 (MIN), Mobile Equipment Identi?ers (MEID), Mobile Directory Nurnbers (MUN), International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cations (IMSI), International Mobile Equipment Identities (IMEI), and/or Mobile Station Identities (MSID) of the aboVe iisted?commtmication service(s) if changed by the current subscriber to a new number, location, or (ESN), (MIN), (MEID), (MDN), (IMSI), (IMEI), and/o: (MSID) number, per subscriber name daring the period authorized by this Tracking Device Search Warrant, and shall transfer the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) capability along with service to any new number, location, or ESN number (BEN), (MIN), (MDN), (JMEI), audio: (MSID) number and shall advise the Tempe Police Department, or the USMS, of the telephone number-(s) to which service has been transferred; Directing that the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) and cell site and sector information shall be authorized for a period of thirty (30) days ?'orn the date this Tracking Device (GPS location) Search Warrant was signed. The Tempe Police Department or the USMS shall compensate the Service Provider for services in this matter at the prevailing rate of payment; T?Mobile, their employees and agents not reveal to or to any person, the existence of this investigation or the use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) information request; . Pursuant to A.R.S. use of the precision location of a mobile device (GPS location) and cell site and sector information on the Target Device(s) may be used any time of the day or night. Investigators with the Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee are authorized to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) investigators have reason to believe that NAMEI is present. The Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designer: is authorized to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) even if is believed to be located inside a house, apartment or other building. Absent further order of a court, law enforcement will make no af?nnative investigative -5. ?osrejtto re: "seem TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @391 to 5,511 stores; cones on Sienna? venous. we r. JclIu-tl: lu uullu?UllLL?b-?unn -f?J-v ll' :4 use of any identi?ers collected from cellular devices other than the Target Communications Device(s), except to identify the Target Communications Device{s) and distinguish it from the other cellular devices. the Tempe Police Department, the USMS, or designee is authorized to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to monitor the signals broadcast by the Target Communications Device(s) and use that infomation to. determine the Target Conununicntions Device? 5 location, even if it is located inside 9. hence, apartment or other building. To the extent that any infatuation from a cellular device other than the Target Communications Device(s) is collected by the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device), law enforcement will delete that information pursuant to A R..S Pursuant to A .R ?l342940), all non- target date must be destroyed within 30 corn-t business days after the return of the search warrant to a magistrate unless a court orders the non- tnrget data to be preserved. Pursuant to A.R.S. the cell site simulator device may not be used to intercept, obtain or access the content of any stored oral. wire or electronic communication unless the interception or access is authorized by Chapter 30 of Title 13. This search warrant also prohibits the seizure of any tangible property. It does allow the capturing of Electronic Serial Numbers (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Numbet's (MIN). Mobile Equipment Identi?ers (MEID), Mobile Directory Numbers (MON), International Mobile Subscriber-Identi?cations (IMSI), International Mobile Equipment Identities (IMEI), auditor Mobile Station Identities (MSID) oumbons}. In addition it also allows the use of the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to determine the location of Target Communications Device(s) by locating the signals emitting ?-oni the Target Communications Pursuant 'to ARE. and A.R.S. use of the cell site simulator device may be any time of the day or night. Pmsuent to A.R.S. and A.R.S. law enforcement is ordered to return the search warrant to a magistrate no later than three court business days after the conclusion of the electronic surveillance authorized herein. Pursuant to A.R.S. and A.R.S. a cepy of the search warrant shall be served within 90 days upon the conclusion of the electronic surveillance outhon'Zed herein, .5. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report oer r25: litih?ir. .emodem-teem (um: (G. ll. 51' a: JEINHC nu if. r. r. . . unless additional time is applied for and granted by the court based upon the showing of good cause. Pursuant to ans. ans. and reasonable cauae having been shown that a delay of service of the notice of search wnrrent is necessary to. protect the safety of any person andtor to prevent ?ight from prosecution, tampering with evidence, intimidation of witnesses andfor jeopardizing the investigation, and because this warrant prohibits ?at-"Am? the seizure of any tangible peoperty, any wire or electronic communication or any stored wire or 3 electronic information, law enforcementis hereby ordered to delay service of the copy of the search 9 warrant. The copy of the search Its-errant shall be sent no later than 270 days after issuance and 10 upon the conclusion of the electronic surveillance authorized herein, unless additional time is 1 granted by the court based on an application and judicial ?nding. Service of the copy of the search 12 warrant shall be made pursuant to A-R.S. and A.R.S. 13 The Court ?nds that due to the nature, complexity endfor projected duration of the 14 investigation that the period of delayed noti?cation is appropriate. It is flu-thee ordered that law 15 enforcement shall ?le a supplemental return of the search warrant to a magistrate con?rming that 16 a copy of the search warrant was provided in accordance with methods detailed in A.R.S. ?13~ 17 and A.R.S. The supplemental return shall be provided within three court 18 business days a?er service of the copy of the search warrant. 19 This Order is sealed until otherwise ordered by this Court, or other court of competent 20 21 Given under my hand and dated this 20? day ofMareh, 2018. . 22 23 414% 24 25 Judge. Marieepa gnu; Superior Court 26 . HONORABLE JANE MCIAUGHLIN 27 mantcom cousmr SUPERIOR COURT . 23 -7- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no @713? chills?s3? 23'5" C) a mornings :3 nine: _-?toiuutlomlt this "war. 3U. macadamia-UM 10 [Bibi a. h. .l \g'e AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 0. (xi '0 [i YOUR AFFIANT, Detective Bill Kelly #1 ?225 a peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duty swan], upon oath, deposcs and says: 1, your Af?ant, DetectiVe Matt McFarland #18205, cm a certi?ed peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, employed by the Tempe Police Department. Maricopa County, Arizona. This af?davit is submitted for authorization of the installation and use of a Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorder Device, Trap and Trace Device and Caller Identi?cation over - -, utilized by Rafael Vasquez (NAMED and other co?conspirators both knowo and yet unlmom, within Mat-loops County, Arizona This request is for a period of thirty (30) days This af?davit' is submitted pursuant to A R. S. ?36017, and Title 18 S. C. ?2703 for an order ?orn the Court authorizing the installation and use of a device, designed to record and identify dialed telephone numbers ?orn a speci?c enumerated telephonsm. This device is commonly known as a Pen Register or a Dialed Number Recorder. This af?davit is submitted pursuant to A.R.S. Mfr-3017, and Title 18 U.S.C. ?2703 for an order from the Court authorizing the installation and use of a device designed to trace and identify telephone numbers of parties placing telephone calls to the speci?c commented telephone(s]. This device is commonly know: as a Trap and Trace Device. Further. your A?isnt requests the installation of Caller Identi?cation. The authorized Pen Register, Dialed Number Recorden Trap and Trace Device, and Caller Identi?cation will be usad to record telephone numbers dialed from, and record and identify incoming telephone numbers calling to the targeted telephoods). This a?davit is submitted for authorization to employ the use of the precision location of 3 mobile device (GPS location) and cell site and sector information on the Target Communications Device?) identi?ed herein, to determine the location of the cellular device or devices carried by NAMEI. This af?davit is also submitted for authorization to use a Signs] Infonnstion Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device] in order to determine the location of the Target Communications Device(s) and further to identify any additional communications carried by NAMEI. The Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) .3- <11; 9:13?- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report none ?airliane?iild?b .I'Enrseiao?ror enable endure zc-fa? anarmm c.9139 101:3" simulates a cellular tower and sends signals to cellular devices that are nearby. Target and none target cellular devices that are nearby then respond to the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) with unique non-content electronic signals containing Electronic Serial Nurnber?s (ESN), Mobile Identi?cation Number's MIN), Mobile Equipment identi?er (MEID), Mobile Directory Number (MDN). International Mobile Subscriber Identi?cation (IMSI). International Mobile Equipment Identity (IMEI), andlor Mobile Station Identity (MSID) allowing the Signal Infomiation Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) to capture the previously n-u-o listed identi?cation numbers. In order to identify additional communications device(s) carried by Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) may need to be utilized at multiple locations andfor multiple times at a common location but will only be utilized when investigators have reason to believe that NAMEI is present. While utilizing the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device), the haw?HF- hams?g Target Communications Devioetis) and nonotarget cellular devices might experience temporary disruption of service from the service provider, however the ability to make ?911" calls is not affected. The Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) will be utilized in a manner to ensure the minimal amount of interference to non?target cellular devices. n?l en.) Absent timber order of a court, law enforcement will make no af?nnative investigative use on of any identi?ers collected from cellular devices other than the Target Communications Devicetjs), except to identify the Target Communications Device{s) and distinguish it item the other cellular pm 8m devices. GT IA Telephone: Service Provider. T-Mobile Subscriber: Rafael Vasquez Address: Utilized by. Rafael Vasquez By employing the requested Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device), I believe that it will assist in identifying the device(s) in the possession .9- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no: Tr: lotion}! vol LMar' 2:3 2:318 ?nu-t. 3.0 9:09 P. lid-lg of and it will assist in identifying the location of the Target Communications Devioe?z). This af?davit is submitted for authorization to use the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) and Pen Register and Trap and Trace Device for speriod not to exceed thirty (30) days. THE It ?hns 13:?meio bayou . has committed an or is committing the following Violations of Arizona Revised Statutes: Vehicular Manslaughter Further. there is probable cause to believe that on the person of Rafael Vasquez Herein referred to as FNU LNU. aka NAMEI In Maricopa County, State of Arizona, there is now being poresecsod or concealed certain property described as: A Communications DeviceIs) Target Communications Device (5) Which property has been used, is being used or is about to be used as a means committing a public oifeose. constitutes any evidence that tends to show that a particular public offense has been, is being 0: is about to be committed or tends to show that Rafael Vasquez has committed or is committing a public o??ense. {11] is in the possession of a person who has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a public offense. In addition, in order to obtain additional evidence relating to the Target Conununications Device(s}, its user, and the criminal violations under investigation, law enforcement must ?rst identify the Target Conunonieations Dovice?s). There is probable cause to believe that the use of the investigative technique described by the warrant will result in of?cers looming that identifying information. tiniennusrnt 1.3m" on; snowman mums: TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report fees rs enemies wm?o?th'ihwu mqmuemu?owa?aahm?za it}. 2013' reg-.09 F. 1-2913 There is also probable cause to believe that the location of the Target Communications Devioe[s) will constitute evidence of those criminal violations including leading to the identi?cation andlor location who is engaged in the commission of these o??cnses. REGUIAR INFORMATION: That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search warrant for the atorem?nttoned person: :3 OBABLE CAUSE summon On 03x1 ans at approximately 2200 been a 2m 7 Volvo xcsao bearing AZ license plate was travelling north on Mill Ave. approaching Washington St, Tempe, AZ when it collided with a pedestrian crossing ?om the west side of Mill Ave. to the east aide of Mill Ave. south of Washington St; The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours. The sole oomtpant of the vehicle, Rafael Vasquez, stated the Volvo was a self-driving vehicle and was in full autonomous mode. Raphael stated her hands were oil? the steering wheel and her feet were off the aocelemto?decclerator-pedals at the time of the collision. Wine?ci'ett??szt?tsll??l? . Your Af?ant is seeking this search warrant to assist in locating Rafael Vasquez to serve search ?retreat 201 8?002912 which Was granted by the Malicopa Superior Court Search Warrant Center?s Honorable Jane McInughlin to seize Rafael's cell phone. Rafael provided investigators at the scene of the collision with a false address, and further attempts to locate Rafael have been 9? ?Willi ?elf, unsuccessful. LA I) FS VI Provided this Court authorizes the use the precision location of a mobile dcuice (GPS location), cell site and sector information and authorizes the use of the Signal Information Collection System (Cell Site Simulator Device) identi?ed herein, your Af?ant respectfully requests to delay the notice of Sctvicc plmuant to A.R.S. t1 3-4294fF) and until 270 days alter the order terminates. Based on the following justi?cations: -11- one in) m] TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ole)? goo? sigh; .4 . oases-t ?rst? s: some: with For it}. 9199 t; 13513? 1 2 I It has been the experience of mu: A?iant that should targets of these types of 3 investigations become aware that an ongoing investigation exists, it is likely these 4 targets will discoutinue the use of the Target Communications Devioe(s). 5 It has also been the experience of your Af?ant that should targets of these types of 6 investigations become swam that an ongoing investigation exists, it becomes likely that 7 they will ?ee for the purpose of avoiding prosecution, 8 It has been the experience of your Af?snt that should targets of these types .of 9 inVestigations become aware that an ongoing investigation exists; it is likely that they 10 will inform other oo-conSpii-ators ofthe investigation, therefore impeding our ability to 11 effectively investigate the organization. 12 13 Law enforcement will ?le a supplemental return of the search warrant to a magistrate continuing 14 9 that a oopyof the seaieh warrant was provided in accordance with methods detailed in A.R.B. 15 and The. supplemental return will be provided within three court 16 business days after service of the eopy of the search warrant. 17 In addition, your A?innt respectfully requests that this Affidavit be sealedBill Kellzz/Szzs 22 Tempe Polio: Dep eat 23 24 SUBSCRIBED AND swoms BEFORE ME ON THIS 20" DAY or MARCH, 2013. 26 ?r 27 Judge, Madcap: County Superior Court 28 - JANE nctsuosun . m?ih%%?%uuw sum-mos count .12- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Us [id 4231?1033?474? l1 gramme]! ?tting: [g Return Police Department Search Wanant ?74 Standard Arizona Inventory Receipt Report 11 57 I 6% Af?davit and Return of Search Warrant IOf?ccr W05 Badgeii a K95 Of?ce: of the State of Auzom, being ?rst duly swam 11pm deposes and says: _r 1' That on why of I 2018, I executed thus warrant issued by judge 1'1;ng and the following described operry was seized gm Loam/#715 0P ?ew?ea: I further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of 31] property taken by me, pursuant to ARS 13?3921, and that a detailed recap: for the property taken was: 0 Given to: Lc??at 2 Was/Li mm: A L85 2/1/90; Badge; mZPE?xf V6 Department ?u 65?. F/fL/r/f This man: was returned, subscribed 19d sworn to me before 11-115 day of .-, 2018 Pursuant to ARE Judge 5 thhe m- Com- MAHICOPA SUPERIOR CUJCIT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @193? r35 Eil?t?i?w?fn-M?? 3539535111?in R9 tr?iif?i 191% Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT #2018-003000 201st- 9330M: axzwzowuueaz PAUI: 1/5 - rW'Tempe mas?m 180450-8311 Police Deparlment - Criminal Invu?gu?om EAX COVER .u .. DATE: 3:20:13 T0: Sui-ch anniCmter . COMPANY: Sou-cl: Center . FAX 11: PHONE w: IR Tempe PD 2018-32694 mam: Dmacu'vc manic-Ii #20193 00mm: Tm: roucn DEPARTMENT Wt EMAIL: or molas- INCLUDING com: COMMENTS: Please contact my cell phane with any issues, return FAX TEMPE POLICE RELEASE Dissemination i: maimed to Jnll?ltc Agenda ONLY Smndary to Non-krlmin? Jutnlu watch: Th: 100? lntarnxlion?ly Amadilrad Law Enfommnl Many TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report of?? re.- egg}. Item -- ?i?w?im m1 see-tee: ?s?t?mHa l. 20 2018! 9.30?? or av: Luna 0:11:21. tn rnuL'. vvu [ti-H0. 9129:? P. 2/5 CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA FOR SEARCH COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 5701?s 3w GO 0 REPORT #1842694 YOUR Detective L. Palmaloll #20193 A peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That on Match 19, 2018 the City of Tempe, County of Merloope, State of Arizona. the mime of Vehicular Menelaughterl ABS 13-1103. A. 1 Was committed. THAT THE AFFIANT has probable cause to believe that on the persona) of on the pruniaes known as: CI in the vehiclem described as: Rafael Vasquez, also known as Rafaela Vasquez, an individual who is 180 pounds with black hair and broom ey'es. Rafeel' 5 date of birth is_ and social security number is Rafael? whereabouts an: unknown at this time. That said property 01' things are descn'bod as follows: Cell Phones in Rafael Vesqoez' possession et time of the collision. Digital elk-action of all content of the cell phones. including but not limited to cell logs. text messages, GPS, inter-net searches and social media usage immediately leading up to and immediately following .mllieion. Cl were stolen or embezzled. were used as means of committing a public offmse. is (me) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public o??ense E3 is (are) in possession of to whom it is doliVered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitute; evidenee tending to show that a public offense has been committed. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report no il'fllaii?iutlsla: 'ficigrernitnsn?m stators ?f'llar.2ll. 2018? "No.9l29'wi. 3/6 such person is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search warrant for the aforementioned ltetns exists: Your Af?ant, Tempe Police Department Detective L. Palmaioli #20193, has been employed as a Police Of?cer by the City of Tempe Police Department for approximately 5 and yearn (5 1/2) years. Your A?iant joined the Tempe Police Department in September of2012 as a patrol of?cer. in 20l2. your At?ant attended the Arizona Law Enforcement Academy in Phoenix for initial twining, and suecess?tlly conipleted all required courses where I was trained in the practices and procedures of a Law Enforcement Of?cer. Upon graduation, your Af?ant was assigned to the Patrol Division of the Tempe Police Department. During your Af?ant?s assigrunent to the Patrol Division. she performed the duties of a uniformed police officer. From 2012 to 2014 your A?iant worked' in the Patrol Division as a Patrol Ot?eer where I drafted and was authorized to serve multiple warrants for drug offenses, property crimes and persons crimes. in August 2014, your a?iant tested for, was assigned to and warmly Works in the Central City Bureau Bike Squad which primarily addresses liquor law Violations. street-level illegal drug violations, and property crime invutlgationa among ether criminal and civil situations common within commercial and residential enviroumatts to include persons crimes. in January 2013, I transferred to the Tempe Police Department Criminal investigations Bureau, and vras assigned to the Domestic Violence Detail. During my time in this detail 1 participated in several criminal investigations involving assaults, criminal damage, diminishing or intimidating and other related crimes. During my career as a Law Enforcement Of? oer, I have been involved in and have learned an extensive amount regarding uiminal invasti gallons and the investigative process. i learned what it takes to be a competent officer, with the ability to perform all aspects of investigations. I have studied in depth the department's policies and procedures. gaining a good understanding of the expectations and goals of the Department. Including, but not limited to search and seizure issues. I have also attended numerous trainings. seminars, and lecmres to further my criminal justice knowledge base. REGULAR INFORMATION FORM Based on information Your Af?am has teamed from Der. Haubold of the Tempe Police Vehicular Crimes Unit, it is believed the crime ofVehicIe Manslaughter (A115 lit-1103A.? may have been committed and that evidence of this offense is currently located on the cell phones in possession of Rafael Vaquuez, ales known as Rafaels Vasquez, the driver of a 2017 Gray Volvo X090 boating Arizona License Plate?at the time of the collision. On 03!] an 8 at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo XC90 driving in autonomous mode was traveling north on Mill Ave. approaching Washington St.. Tempe. AZ when it collided with a person crossing .-.. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ?on? "r?a act-carton}; minim: ohms: acorn[growths 20 2013s gram.? (nun; 9.4.10.1.? r? raun? vvu l?h'o- from the west side of Mill Ave. to the east side of Mill Ave. south of Washington St. The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours. During an interview with Rafael, she indicated her hands were off the steering wheel and their feet were off the accelerator/deodorant" pedals during the collision. Your A?iant is seeking this search warrant to seize any cell phones in Rafael Vasquez?s possession at the time of the collision, and digitally extract any data from the phone(s) showing use immediately leading up to and immediawa following the collision to determine if Rafael was distracted and unable to take corrective actions to avoid the collision. Your af?ant therefore requests that this search warrant be granted. in the daytime (excluding the time period of between 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM.) 3 At?ant believes that the following information demonstrates good cause for permitting this warrant to be served between 10:00 RM. and 6:30 AM. Your af?ant requests night time exception for this warrant based on that fact the destruction andtor removal of evidence is possible and likely reference a vehicular manslaughter case. At the present time. Law Enforcement officers will be err-route to the scene where their arrival wiil be after 2200 hours upon the issuance of this warrant and due to manpower constraints; it is not feasible to delay for a daytime warrant issuance. Wherefore af?ant prays that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search be made of the persons. premises. buildings, and vehicles described herein for the persons. property and things herein described, and that the same be retained in the custody of the affiant or in the custody of the agency which the af?ant represents and diaposod of according to law, pursuant to A.R.S. 13.3920. Got 1 Detective L. Palmaioli #20l93 Tempe Police SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of Mgr-g 2013. mama; JudgdCommisai 1' Marisopa County upericr oun HONORABLE JANE COUNTY TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report f??ikWE "."Mar.20. 2013' 5/6 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY or TEMPE, ARIZONA RC COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA ant-1?6 ?0 03? God REPORT 3313-32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE. OF Proof by af?davit having been made this day to me by: Detective L. Patmatoli #20193 I am satts?cd that than: is cause to believe that: on the person(s) of I [j on the premises known as: in the vehicle?s) as: Rafael Vasquez, also known as Rafaela Vasquez. an individual who is 180 pounds with black hair and broom eyes. date of birth is_ and social somrity number is_ Rafael's whereabouts are Unknown at this time in the City 013m Coonty MW, Stat: ofArizona. than: is now bcing processor} or concealed certain poreons, property, or things described as: Cell Phones in Rafael Vasquez?s possession at time of the collision. - 'Digitll extraction of all content of cell phonon, including but not limited to call logs, text meager, GPS. internet searches end main} medi: usage Immediately leading up to and Immediately following collision. Which or things: ?3 were used as moans of committing a public offmse. is (are) being posswsod with the intent to use as a mans of committing a public o?onse. is (are) in poss?sion ofto whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovcmd. r21 oonstitutm evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. soch pmon is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. POLICE - .IL TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an}; magenta inseam 2013' ?No.91? 6/6 Such public offense at? the Arizona Review Statute Title 13 A.R.S. seetions 13-] 204A2 YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED in the daytime (excluding the time period ofbetWeen 10:00 RM. and 6:30 AM.) ?3 Or nighttime (good cause therefore having been shown) to make a search of the above named or deseribed personal), premises, uehielea for the hmin?above described property or things, and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof, to retain such in your custody or in the custody or in the custody of the Tempe Police Department. as provided by A.R.S. 1341920. . Your af?ant requests night time exception for this warrant .based on that fact the deatmction endfor retrieval of evidence is poaslble and likely reference a vehieular manslaughter ease. At the present time, Law Enforcement of?cers will be ell-route to the scene where their arrival will be after 2200 hours upon the issuance of this warrant and due to manpower constraints; it is not feasible to - delay for a daytime warrant issuance. El On a reasonable showing that an announced entry to execute the warrant would endanger the safety of any poem or would result in the deal-motion of any of the items described in the warrant, the magistrate shall authorize an unannounced entry, as provided by ARE. 13-39153. Return this warrant to me within three days ofthe thereof. as directed by A.R.S. 13?391 3 Given under my hand and dated this 29g; day ofm 2015 OHABLE JANE MCLAUGHUN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @103 5th} iwjii?i?jn Cjom??tc} fie} Strit?yt?ti WPBEXT WE. RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT I certify that on 3.3201?18, seaIch warrant #2018-003000 was NOT EXECUTED, issued by the Honorable Jane McLaughlin and that I seized the following described items of property: Items/Descriptions: SEARCH WARRANT NOT EXECUTED DUE TO ISSUANCEIEXECUTION OF DAYTINIE WARRANT I further certify that I gave a detailed receipt for theyroperty take to: MUST LEAVE A COPY OF THE AND PROPERTY LIST AT THE LOCATION OR GIVE THESE ITEMS TO THE SUSPECTKHOME OWNER OR I further certify that I left a detailed receipt for the property taken from and a copy ofthe warrant 0n Dated this 22nd day of March, 2018 ?30 m3 Tempe Police Department animal} VERIFICATIEN OF RETURN SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED TO BEFORE ME THIS 2; DAY OF 2018. WCommissioner JANE MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COUFIT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report es}; 7? an}? in i steaming}saris. POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA WARRAN Til REPORT #18?32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by af?davit having been made this day to me by: Detective L. Palmaioli #20193 I am satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: in El El on the person(s) of on the premises knowu as: in the vehicle(s) described as: Rafael Vasquez, also known as Rafaela Vasquez, an individual who is 180 pounds with black hair and brown eyes. Rafael?s date of birth is and social security number is Rafael?s whereabouts are unknown at this time. in the City ofT meg County of Maricopa State of Arizona, there is now being processed or concealed certain persons property or things described as. Cell Phones' In Rafael Vasquez? possession at time of the collision. Digital extraction of all content of the cell phones, including but not limited to call logs, text messages, GPS, internet searches and social media usage immediately leading up to and immediately following collision. Which property or things: were used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. El is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. such person is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an? timer). Such public offense of the Arizona Revised Statute Title 13 A.R.S. sections 13-1204A2 YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED in the daytime (excluding the time period ofbetween 10:00 RM. and 6:30 AM.) Or nighttime (good cause therefore having been shown) to make a search of the above named or described person(s), premises, vehicles for the herein above described property or things, and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof, to retain such in your custody or in the custody or in the custody of the Tempe Police Department, as provided by A.R.S. 13-3920. Your af?ant requests night time exception for this warrant based on that fact the destruction andfor removal of evidence is possible and likely reference a vehicular manslaughter case. At the present time, Law Enforcement officers will be en-route to the scene where their an-ival will be a?cr 2200 hours upon the issuance of this warrant and due to manpower constraints; it is not feasible to delay for a daytime warrant issuance. On a reasonable showing that an announced entry to execute the warrant would endanger the safety of any person or would result in the destruction of any of the items described in the warrant. the magistrate shall authorize an unannounced entry, as provided by A.R.S. 13-39153. Return this warrant to me within three days ofthe thereof, as directed by A.R.S. 13-3918. Given under my hand and dated this 20th day of March . 2018 JudgefCommissioner Maricopa County Superior Court wait-idiom: are this is ithl?l?r?ti?l?? TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA REPORT #1 8-32694 YOUR Detective L. Palmaioli #20193 A peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says: That on March 19, 2018 in the City of Tempe, County of Maricopa, State of Arizona, the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter, ARS 13-1103.A.1 was committed. THAT THE AFFIANT has probable cause to believe that on the personls) of on the premises known as: in the vehic]e(s) described as: Rafael Vasquez, also known as Rafaela Vasquez. an individual who is 180 pounds with black hair and brown eyes. Raiael?s date of birth is and social security number is Rafael?s whereabouts are unknown at this time. That said property or things are described as follows: - Cell Phones in Rafael Vasquez?s possession at time of the collision. - Digital extraction of all content of the cell phones, including but not limited to call logs, text messages, CPS, internet searches and social media usage immediately leading up to and immediately following collision. were stolen or embezzled. Were used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. CI is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an an "stirrer-es intestinal ants. such person is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search warrant for the aforementioned items exists: Your Af?ant, Tempe Police Department Detective L. Palmaioli #20193, has been employed as a Police Of?cer by the City of Tempe Police Department for approximately 5 and years {5 years. Your A?iant joined the Tempe Police Department in September of 2012 as a patrol of?cer. In 2012, your A?iant attended the Arizona Law Enforcement Academy in Phoenix for initial training, and successfully completed all required courses where was trained in the practices and procedures of a Law Enforcement Officer. Upon graduation, your Afiiant was assigned to the Patrol Division of the Tempe Police Department. During your Af?ant?s assignment to the Patrol Division, she performed the duties of a uniformed police of?cer. From 2012 to 2014 your A?iant worked in the Patrol Division as a Patrol Of?cer where I drafted and was authorized to serve multiple warrants for drug offenses, property crimes and persons crimes. In August 20121, your af?ant tested for, was assigned to and currently works in the Central City Bureau Bike Squad which primarily addresses liquor law violations, street-level illegal drug violations, and property crime investigations among other criminal and civil situations common within commercial and residential environments to include persons crimes. In January 2018, I transferred to the Tempe Police Department Criminal Investigations Bureau, and was assigned to the Domestic Violence Detail. During my time in this detail I participated in several criminal investigations involving assaults, criminal damage, threatening or intimidating and other related crimes. During my career as a Law Enforcement Of?cer, I have been involved in and have learned an extensive amount regarding criminal investigations and the investigative process. I learned what it takes to be a competent of?cer, with the ability to perform all aspects of investigations. 1 have studied in depth the department?s policies and procedures? gaining a good understanding of the expectations and goals of the Department. Including, but not limited to search and seizure issues. I have also attended numerous trainings, seminars, and lectures to further my criminal justice knowledge base. REGULAR INFORMATION FORM Based on information Your Af?ant has learned from Det. Haubold of the Tempe Police Vehicular Crimes Unit, it is believed the crime of Vehicle Manslaughter (ARS 13-] may have been committed and that evidence of this offense is currently located on the cell phones in possession of Rafael Va nez, also known as Rafaela Vasquez, the driver of a 201'? Gray Volvo XC90 bearing Arizona License Platehat the time of the collision. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ecrtriim?isriaihi On 03/18/18 at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo XC90 driving in autonomous mode was traveling north on Mill Ave. approaching Washington St, Tempe, AZ when it collided with a person crossing from the West side of Mill Ave. to the east side of Mill Ave. south of Washington St. The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours. During an interview with Rafael, she indicated her hands were off the steering wheel and their feet were off the acceleratorz?decelerator pedals during the collision. Your A?iam is seeking this search warrant to seize any cell phones in Rafael Vasquez?s possession at the time of the collision, and digitally extract any data from the phone(s) showing use immediately leading up to and immediately following the collision to determine if Rafael was distracted and unable to take corrective actions to avoid the collision. Your a?'iant therefore requests that this search warrant be granted. in the daytime (excluding the time period ofbetween 10:00 P.M. and 6:30 AM.) IE Af?ant believes that the following information demonstrates good cause for permitting this warrant to be served betwoen 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM. Your af?ant requests night time exception for this warrant based on that fact the destruction andfor removal of evidence is possible and likely reference a vehicular manslaughter case. At the present time, Law Enforcement of?cers will be en-route to the scene where their arrival will be after 2200 hours upon the issuance of this warrant and due to manpower constraints; it is not feasible to delay for a daytime warrant issuance. Wherefore af?ant prays that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search be made of the persons, premises, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the persons, property and things herein described, and that the same be retained in the custody of the af?ant or in the custody of the agency which the af?ant represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to A.R.S. l3?3920. Detective L. Palmaioli #20193 Tempe Police Department SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 201h__ day of March 2018. Judger?Cornmissioner Marieopa County Superior Court TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT earlier. 21. 20182 rams PELICE muggy] rp_ were: Tempe Police Department City of Tempe AFFIDAVIT FOR SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARIE-GPA. STATE OF ARIZONA Tempo Pollce Incident Report: 2018-32894 Your afflant. Detective M. McCormick, 22020. a peace of?cer in the State Arizona. being ?rst duly sworn, upon oath. depoees and says; That on or about the 189' day or March. 2018. In the County or Met-loops, State of Arizona, the crime of A.R.S 13~1 103A1Nehleuler Manslaughter. was committed by; Rafael Stuart Vasquez Dale of That the amen! has probable cause to believe that on the person?) of: on the premises known as: Tempe Pollne Department Property Facimy 18?6 East Apache Boulevard Tempe. Arizona 85261 in the vehie?ta) described as: persons. properly. or whloh: was stolen ctr-emanated. discovered. 3'14 Cl Year 2017 Make Value Model X090 Style 405W Odor any License Plate State License Plate Number Vehlole Identl?oatlon Number Registered Owner Name LLC Registered Owner Address Regislemd Owl'ter CItnytalat'le In the Olly of Tempe. County of Marlcopa. State of Manna, there Is now being brunessed a: mnoeeled certain was used as means of commuting a public o?ansa. ls being posueud with the intent to me as Insane of a public o?onee. is In possession of to whom It is dollwrod [or the purpose of concealing it or prevenflnu it from being evic'ience to show that a public. oftenee has been committed. or tending to show that Rafael sum Vasquez has committed the offense. web percents the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. Page 2 770555 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report "no-3.4 4 in Latt?iitt? :4 atom amen, .new]tint?notional 20:3: ?2E'9Ptlt6858649l3 TEMPE POJCE in. 9221 rp? 3 53m Tempe Police Department City of Tempe That said property or things are described as follows: 1. Year 2017 Make Volvo Model? X090 Starla 201? Color Gray License Plate State Arizona License Plate Number Vehicle identi?cation Number Registered Owner Name UATC LLC Registered Owner Address Registered Owner 2. Occupylmove 2017 Volvo xcoo from Tempe PD Impound at 1875 East Apache Blvd. to test location (location of collision) 3. the 2017 Volvo XC90 in test area to conduct visibl'rnr study along with brake efficiency study and any other tests deemed necessary for collision reocnotruoliun 4. Manipulate awttohes In 2017 Votvo XCBO to operate functions in vehicle to include but not limited to head tights, brake lights. parking brakes and Interior 5. Operate any onboard oomputer systems installed by the manufacturer or aftermarket component: installed In vehicle. 6. Photograph and video of lntartorloxterior of vehicle at points before. during and after testing That the facts establish probable cause for bellevlng that the grounds for the issuance of a search mnant tor the aforementioned items exist: Your Af?ent la a police o?icel? in the State at Arizona and has been employed by the City of Tampa, Tampa Poitce Department, for 5 years. I am currently assigned to the Tra?io Invaatigation Bureau, Vehicular Crimes Unit. I have the following training and experience: I received certi?cation as a police omoer after attending at the: Phoenbi Regional Police Academy Arizona Law Entrainment Academy outer: LETA My duly minnments have Included tra?'lo enforcement. impaired driving investigation. and collision Investigation. I have apootalized mining in: Impaired Driving Investigation {11 Horizontal Gaze Nyatagmus :1 Drug Recognition and Classi?cation (Drug Recognition Expert) rii Collision Investigation :4 Reconstruction Methodology and Techniques of Crash Data Retrieval Commercial Motor Vehtcte lntpeotlon (Commeroiet Vehloio Safety Specialist) and Measures (Limited Weighmaster} 0t tor: In addition to my time with the Tempe Polioa Department. I was also a Petrol Deputy with the Yuma County Sheriff's Of?ce for approximately one year nine months and a police officer with the Yuma Police Department for Page 3 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report f? one-321? onto-:5: 53tliar.2i. 20183 ltHl-?l: Push-l: Ho. 9291 MD. 4 uarur Tempe Potion Department Cil?y of Tempe Swen years During my time with the Yuma Folios Department, lserved as a DUI Entoroemenl Officer for approximately Mo years ?there one or my duties Woe to investigate serious injury and fatal collisions. I was also a Property Crimes detective for three years while working for the Yuma Police Department. REGULAR INFORMATION FORM That on or about the 18m day of March. 2018. your Al?iiani learned the following information In the following manner: Based on Information your o?lnnt has learned from Detective Houhold of the Tempe Police Department's Vehlcdar Crimes Unit and from my own Investigation. it is believed the crime or Vehicular Manslaughter (ARE. 13- 1108A1) may have been committed and evidence that can be obtained from the 2017 Volvo will be helpful completing a collision reconstruction. 0n canons at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo xcso with Arizona license plateqdriving In Omonomtm mode was traveling north on Mill Avenue approaching Washington Street. Tempe, Mien It collided with a person crossing from the met side of Mill Avenue to the out side of Mill Avenue south of Washington Street. The pedestrian was pronounced decreased at approxinateiy 2230 hours from injuries caused during this ool?ston. During an interview with Rafael, she indicated her hands were oft the steering Wheel and her feet were oft oi the mientorideoelerator pedals during the collision. Video footage from dashboard camera was obtained, which showed footage of the oollision looking tom-aid from the vehicle's cabin and a view of the driver. Prior to the collision. Rafael can be seen tool-tine dovm multiple time inside ottho vehicle?s oebln.? While looking down at this unknom distraction. Rateol can be seen smirking as if the were reacting to this unknown immediately prior to the collision oomring. Rafael can be seen looking dam and only looked up Just as the collision was about to At this tlrno it is on kan what Rafael me looking at. The 2017 Volvo X090 with Arizona license plate_ was taken as evidence and Impounded at the Tempe Police Department impound lot located at 1575 East Apooho Blvd. in order to complete a full and accurate reconstruction of the collision, it is requested that the detectives with the Tempe Pottoe Department take the lmpomded 2017 Volvo X090 from property impound and tampon It bank to the location of the collision. While at the iooalinn of the collision, the vehicle will be operated by of?cers on the roadway in order to conduct a visibility shitty. brako ef?oienoy emdy and possibly outer tests that would provide Information that wwid he used In the collision reconstruction. Ofitoere will also manipulate switches In the vehicle to operate functions In the vehicle that would assist with this Investigation; Officers may also operate stock and ornamental onboard computer system. Photographs of the hierior and exterior of the 2017 Volvo x090 Will be taken at multiple times during the Investigation to show the progress of the testing and also to document the condition of the vehicle. Blood on this Information. your affront is reouesting a search warrant be Issued in under to complete the speci?c testing requested above for the 2017 Volvo X090 Arizona license plate - Involved in this case for roomstruo?on pix-poses. Page 4 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Edit}? ET 3; 9m: amid; Warm} i trailiihii?rrm ?lial IN Ho. 92% 5 Tempe Police Department City of Tempe l3 morn-nus semen WARRANT: The time Is now hours and the warrant must be served after 10:00 PM and before 8:30 AM because: The evidence requested is of a perishable nature and a time delay would render It useless? asset-l upon the preceding facts. I. Detective M. McCormick. yew Affiant. request a nighttime search warrant be sued. DAYTIME semen The evidence rdquoutod In of a perishable nature and a time delay would render It useless. Based upon-tho preceding facts, i. Detective M. McCormick. your Af?ant. request a daytime search warrant be issued. Wherefore prays that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate seem}: be made of the nutrients). premises. andior vehicleis} described herein for the transom. Marty. and things herein described and that the some be retained in the custody of the Milan! or in the custody of the agency which Afflant represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to ARS. 13-3920. Serial No. 22020, Tempd Police Department Subaodbad and sworn before to me on 20 1, . Page 5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report and om do} "ago-Leanna:Qnoos ncln.linll3misfrw_z 2t. 20183 't?t?t ?1?101 No. 9221 Tempo Police Department City of Tempe SEARCH WARRANT COUNTY OF MARICOPA. STATE OF ARIZONA Warrant Number: 9mm) fgm%9\? Tempe Folios Report.- 2018-32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by af?davit having been made this day to me by Tampa Police Of?cer Detective M, McCormick, I am sa?s?ed that there ls probable cause to believe that Cl On the personta} of: On the premises known as; Tempe Police Department Property 1875 East Apache Boulevard Tempe. Arizona 85281 In the vehicle?) described as: Year 2017 Make Volw ?Odo! X090 Style 2017 Color Gray Lloemo Plate State Arizona license Plate Number 5 Vehicle Identt?oallon Number Reglstared Ownnr Name UATC LLC Registered Owner Address Reglelered Owner In the City of Tempe. County of Martoopa, State at Arizona, there ts now being or concealed oortatn percent. property, or things described as: 1. Year 2017 Make Volvo Model X090 Style 2017 Color Gray License Plate State Arizona Lloenae Plato Number Vehicle Identi?cation Number Reglslarod Name UATC LLC Reglslered Owner Address Registered Owner CinISIatelle 2. Oooupyfmove .2017 Volvo X090 from Tempe PD impound at 1375 East Apache Blvd. to test location (location 01 3. the 2017 Volvo man In test area to conduct study along wlih brake ef?ciency study and any other test! deemed necessary for collslon roconstructlon Page 6 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 1n to; oitiomi gimme: do with" i terror 5 usriiar. 2013: j;315w59595495 ital 9231 iP? 7 error Tempe Police Department City of Tempe 4. Manipulate switches In 201? Voivo X090 to operate iunctiom in vehicle to include but not limited to head lights. brake lights! parking brakes and interior tights 5. Operate any onboerd computer systems installed by the manufaotirer or altennarkei components installed In Vehicle. 6. Photographs and video of oi vehioie at multiple points before. during and after testing Which property or things: CI was stolen or embezzled. E1 was used as means of committing a public offense. is being poseeseed with the intent to use so a Means of committing a public offense. I is in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing It or preventing it from being attenuated. oonetltutos evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. or tending to snow that Rafael Stuart Vasquez has committed the offense. [3 such person is the eubieoi of an outstanding arrest warrant. Such public offence being A.R.S. 13-1103A1Nahioular Manslaughter. which occurred on or about the 13th day of March. 2013 in the County of Meroopa. State of Ariadne. YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED: at in the daytime (excluding the time period or between 10:00 PM and 6:30 In the nighttime {good cause therefore having been shown). to maize a search of iheobove deecribed percents}. premises. andtor vehicieis). for the heroin above described property or things, and ti you find the some or any part thereof, to retain In your custody or in the ouetody oi the Tempe Police Department, as provided by ARE. 13-3920. Execute this warrant within five calendar days from Its issuance and return this warrant within three ooun business days after the warrant is executed. as directed by ARS. 13-3913. Upon completion of all court actions or proceedings of any type would the further use of the listed property: owed-ant to ARE fats-3920 auditor ARS $513-$941, the property may be dispoeed of an authorized by law. is? Given under my hand and daled?thio in}; MM 20 Time: BAMDPM If?. l?nv Oi - COUNTY 00 com WARRANT SERVICE Warrant Served: Date: Time: PM Reason for non-certified: Receipt for property taken; Ci Event and crash data recording deuloee and equipment from the listed vehicle. [3 Event and crash data download from listed vehicle. [3 See attached property tennis). Page 7 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . ennui Tempe Police Department City of Tempe STANDARD ARIZONA INVENTORY AFFIDAVIT Er RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT Warrant Number: SW2018003020 Tempe Police Incident Report; 2018-32694 I, Detective M. McCormick, 22020, a peace of?cer of the State of Arizona, being duly sworn upon oath depose and say, that on the 22"? day of March. 2018. I executed this search warrant. SW2018003020. issued by Judge Melissa Zabor. and the following described property or substance was seized: Event and crash data recording devices and equipment from the listed vehicle. Event and crash data download from listed vehicle. See attached properly form(s}. I further certify that the foregoing inventory is a true and detailed account of air property taken by me, pursuant to A.R.S. 133921 and that a detailed receipt for the property taken was: El Reviewed with the suspect and then left in the suspect's property locker at the jail or the location the property was seized. Given to the suspect. Other: Left in 2017 Volvo 3 day of This warrant was returned subscribed and sworn before me this 2 20:32. AFFIANT JUDGE or: MAGISTRATE Of the Court HONORABLE MELISSA LABOR MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ee?r?: [page .i or I 5earcn warrantIFirearms SeizurelProperty Record luanlol'nzo Ream Item .Evldeme Found rem Na. Properly Type Ciolhhg?C Cu?rency?A Household-H UvestouII-J Dl?ioe Equlpmenti TYPE Stolen ?ecov. Choose Only 1 Consumable-1 Firearm-G Jewelry-B Weae?aneWs-K TWRadiu-F Brand Description To th} >194? EM am 1?0 Locol?a/I? ?aunt? mm Serial No. Model Omar Applied Nee Dale Slolen Date Reported Dale ReeIweIed Di?pQ 60pm Bike - Locker -N Prop. RM-P Lucker Ne. Value Slalen Value Rememd ?are Reid-sad Wm. Bilce- Locker - 3 Other -- Pmpa?y Tag ()er Name Address Yes No City sure lZip Code tion Removed From 1275 :5 9mm ?aw ?Iv/Te? Indlmiemhemle lndicalet?jghemls P?IIoedirIlnPruperly: Plundemr-my: 50ml: Mu Hem Evidence Found Property Type CwI-ency?A HaneheIdJ-I LivestedI-J Ol?oe Type: 'mpomd-d Stolen Rem. Choose Only 1 Consumable?1 Firearm?G Jewry-a s-K TWRadio-F Brand Ilequ) Wm 90:de Mi m1 Vic/(D nu 725;;- m: Serial No. Owner Applied No Dele? Dale Reporled Dale Recovered F. DISPO- 6 0 pm Elke - Locker -N Prop. RM-P Locker No/ Value Stale-n Value Recovered Dale Released cm Ema" Bike-S Locker-S Other 5 Pmpeny Evidence? Name i Yes No City lZip Code Hm Renmvod From Male Dab Ilern Is Indie-10m llem Is We Name! Pbmdirderpedy: Plaeedlrumper-ly. Serb? Me. ?ag HEM Enhance Found In Nd. Plenum Type Chiming?C Emmy-IA Wield-H LMI-s?loclr-J Of?ce EmipmenI-E TYPE Wood Stolen Rem. Chums Only 1 Consumable-1 Flreenn-G Miscellaneous - Serial No. Model Dimer Applied No. Dale Stolen Dela Reported Dale Recovered tho. prop. Bike - Looker -N Prep, Leeker Ne. Value StnIan Wue Recovered Date Released Code 60 Iowa:- Blloe - Locker - 5 Oliver 3 3 Properly Tag Evidence? J?Pmsor Name demea- Address Yes No City sum Code roam Removed From Indie-Se no]; Item Isl I [m um I. O?loer?s Nan-rel Placed 'I'Ile Placed inb Properly: A Serial I Item Em row on No. I pm Type 4: Sway?A Home LivestodI-J Of?ce Equiprnenl?E Type: Irrlpomded Slnlen Room Choose 0N1 1 Coneurnable?l Firearm?G Jewelry-8 TWRedio-F Brand Oew?pb?m Saris! No. Model I No Data Slolen Dale Reporled Dale Recovered Diapo. pm?, Bike? Leaner -N Prop RM-P Locker No. Value Stolen Value Recovered Dale Released Code 60 Loo-lion: Bike- 5 Lodrer- 5 Otheri?? 3 3 Property 159 Evidence? DvmerfPoee-eseor Address Yes No Qty sum 12pm Code ?rmed-n Removed From eLIuomIs mew Flee-ed Prop-my: Placed Intro Pmpeg; Serial II Item Evldem Fou W. Property type Clolhing?C We Household-H Liveeloekd OI'?oe Equipment-E Type: lmpomded Stolen DReem Only I Comm-1 Firearm?G Jewelry-8 Misde?enaous-K TVJ'Radva Bram Serial No. M'odel 0mm Applied No. 0819 Stolen Dare Reported Date [?390- Bllte? Locker -N Prop. RMP Locker N0. Value Stolen Value Recovered Date Released 60 Bike- 5 Lodcer- Olher 5 3 :leeI?I?y Tag Emma: Name OwnerfPesmmr Address Clly/ Stale Code [Location Removed From hints Dim Item ls Item ls D?l??cer's New Placed lab Property: Placed into Propeny; Serial Ir Perl 1 ORIGINAL Perl 2~ PROPERTY Part 3- PROSECUTOR Perl TPD FORM 602 (2)98} TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .E?l?tl?ii?ii?s?r 011$li ?11111 1:121; Wu 1: ll {~31 "4 71115116"! on); amaze; Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT ?mm. .1..- 10.9459 2 ZOE-32694 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA CH NT COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA WM .swzo 13?? 3?37 3018-32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proofb? af?davit having been made this day to me by: I am satis?ed that there IS probable cause to believe that: on the promises known as: Google Incorporated 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway. in the City ofW of Quota Q5: State of California, there is now being possossed or concealed certain persons, property. or things dosod?ood as: Fruits and evidence oftho crimes of: Vehicular Manslaughter I Any and all video viewing history through me use onouTube application for this account mooiatod with on 031?} 8.413 from 2100 hours no 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) We}: property or things: were stole: or embezzled. wm-e used as means of committing a public offense. [3 is (are) beingpomned with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. CI is {are} in pomaion of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing i: or provmting it from being discovered. :14 constimtea evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed, or tending to show that Rnfsel Stuart Vasquez, has committed the o?ense. such person is tho subject ofen outstanding arrest warrant. Such public offense of the Arizona Revised Statute Title 13 All. sections 13 Vehicular Mmluaghter, which occurred on March 18, 2018 and the cell phones containing tho artifacts were located :11 Tampa, Mal-loops County, located wit?m'n the Sum of A?znua TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Write-?aw 9st??=ttl?3??31 next-ate:- Aiil??ii?jtsf??ixiitW/TE "'Mar. 2018" No. 9459 3 2018-32694 YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED It in the damn: (excluding the time period of between 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM.) O: nighttime (good cause therefore having been shown) to make a scat-ch of the abut/e named or dwen?bed person(s), premises, vehicles for the herein above described property or things, and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof, to retain such in your custody or in the custody of In the custody of the Tmpe Police Department, as provided by 13?3920 andfor 18 U.S. Code 2703(1)). Geoglet'GmniI shall disclose rcsponsive data, if my, by sending to Detective M. McCormick at the Tempe Police 120 East 5" Street, Tampa 85281, using the US Postal Statics or another condor service, notwithstanding 18 U.S. Code 2252(a) or similar statute or code. . Return this warrant to me within tInoo (3) days of the thereof, as directed by A.R.S. 13-3918. Givm under my hand and dated this 22"? day ofMarcll 2018. ML) Comissionq? Superior Court Mexicopa County An?zom WE HELISGA ZABOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report smog; H. @7311 "I?ll/El 22. 9013* Ho. 9459 4 . 2013-32694 POLICE DEPARMNT CITY OF mm, ARIZONA AVIT AR COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 20 3 30'7?: maronm 2013-32694 YOUR Detoc?w. M. McCormick, 22020 A pom: of?cer in the State ofA?zoos, being ?rst duly sworn, upon ow), deposos and says: That on March 2018, lo the County of State of Arizona, the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter, was by Rafael Stuart Vasquez. THAT THE has probable cause to believe that El on the premises known as: Googlo Incorporated 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway in 016 City of 310311ng View, County of Mn. State of California, them is now being possessed or concealed certain persons, properly, or which: was stolen or ombuzzled. El was used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a. means ofoomn?uion a public o??mse- is in possession of to whom It is delivered for tho purpose of concealing it or preventing it ??om being disoome [El oonstilutos tending to show that a public offense has been committed, or loading to show that Katie! Stu-rt Vasquez has committed tho Offense. El such pol-son is the subject of?an outstanding mu! wammt. That said property or things are described as follows: Fruits and evidence of the mime: of: Vehicular Manslaughter Any and all video violating history through the use of You'I?uho application for tho account associated with on 03(18118 from 2100 boon: to 23001101111; (Mountain Standard Tune) framing pr"- TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report can re. fro insects} notonionreconnecting ?chain. c.9459 5 2013-32694 That the following facts establish probable cause for believin that round the warrant for the gamma-on?! mm aim: a . issuance of a search Your af?ant, Detective M. McCoImick, #22020. has been a police of?cer with the Ci of Tom cc October of2012. During my time with the Tempe Police Deparlment I served as a uniformed tgene} DUI EnforcennentIO??cen Daytime Collision Investigating Motor and I have been assigned as a detective with the Unit since October of201 IS. As a detective with the Vehicular Crimes Unit, I investigate serious truury and fatal collisions and complete collision reconstructions on those avails. lhave attended monotone collision investigation and reconstruction courses to assist me with these investigations. Prior to being a police of?cer with the Tempe Police Department, 1 was apollce officer with the Yuma Police Department for seven yeats. At the Yuma Police Department, I held the position ofPatrol O?iccr and then DUI Enforcement Of?cer for two yam where one of my duties was to respond to serious injury and fatal collisions to oitber assist or act as the lead investigator. was also assigned to the position of Property Crimes Dctectivo where I acted as lead investigator on crimes from Burglary, Theft and Shoplifting and assisted with many other types ofinvestigttions. Based on information your a?'ient has learned from Detective Haubold ofthe Tempe l?olice Department's Vehicular Crimes Unit and from my own investigation. it is believed the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter (ARS 13-1 teem) may have been committed and evidence that can be obtained the video viewing history through the use of the You'I?ubc application for the account associated with will be helpful in completing this investigation. 03/1 all 8 at approximately 2200 hours on Utter Volvo XC90 with Arizona license plate ?dtiving in autommcue mode was north on Mill Auntie approaching Washington Street, Tempe, AZ when it collided with a person crossing ?ow the West side of Mill Avenue to the east side of Mill Avenue south of Washington. Street. The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 22.30 hours ?om injuries caused during this collision. During an interview with Rafael. she indicated her hands were o??thc steering wheel and her feet were off ofthe eccelormoridecclamtor pedals during the collieion. Video ?aotagc from a dashboard womwaa obtained, which showed footage of the collision looldng forward 330111 the Vehicle's cabin and a View of the driver. Prior to the collision, Rafael can be seen looking down multiple times inside ofthc vehicle?s cabin. While looking down at this mourn distraction, Rafael can be seen smirking as ifahc were reacting to this unknown distraction. prior to the collision owning. Rafael can be seen looking down and only looked up just as the collision was about to At this time it is unknowrl what Rafael was looldug at. The 2017' Volvo XC90 with Arizona license plate ?was taken as evidence and impounded at the Tempe Police Depmonmt impound lot located at 1875 East Apache Blvd. At the time of the collision, Rafael was in possession of two cell phones. 'I?hese cell phones were obtained ?'orn Mel pursuant to a search wan-ant a?cr the collision occurred. A search warrant was also served on these cell phones and information gained during that search warrant is being used as the basis of this warrant. The ?rst cell phone is a siIVer LG model Lawson SIN?which is assigned a telephone monitor of?, item number T5321768-3. On this cell phone three video applications were found installed. The You'l?ubc application was associated to gnnil account . A total of forty four noti?cations Were found for the YouTube application indicating activity on this application. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report an.) em Fit Mill Mimic ?T'Mar. 2?2. Mill? No. 9459 6 201 8-32 694 The video application, Net?ix, was also found installed on the LG as well. The gmail account is associated with this th?ix application. Hutu was also found installed on this cell phone, but detectives were unable to locate any account information for that emulation. The second cell phone taken ??otn Rafael was a black LG model which is assigned a telephone number of_ item number TE3217684. On cell phone only the YouTube video a lication was installed. The YouTube application was associated with Email account it which is the same account as the other cell phone obtained flora Rafael. Based on the above facts, your A?icnt requests any and all Video viewing history through the use ofthe You?l?ube application for the account associated with on 03/18/18 ?-om 2100 hours to 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) to assist with determining what Rafael was viewing while driving the vehicle at the time of the collision. Wherefore a??am pmya that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search be made of the Famous, penises, buildings, and vehicles demibed herein for the mom, property and ?lings herein described, and that the same be retained in the custody of the man: or in the custody of the agency which the a?iant represents and diaposed of according to law, pursuant to AJLS. 13?3920. Wherefore af?ant prays that a search warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search be made of the persons. promises, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the pci?SOIla, and things herein determined, and that the some be retained in the custody of the of?cer or in the custody of the agency which the a?icm represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to ARS. 13-3920 auditor 18 US. Code 2703(1)). rig/mm Detective M. McCormick #22020 Tempe Police Department SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 22nd day of March. 2018. Commissioner I Superior Court Me?cops County Arizona HONORABLE MELISSA ZABOR MARIOOPA COUNTY GUPERIOR TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 1:315:33 summon: agate; ?t'??mtte?it?wi: 2018-32694 RETURN OF SEARCH I certify that on the 23rd of March, 2018, I executed search warrant #2018?003079, reference Tempe PD (309*? 2018-32694, issued by Judge Melissa Zabor, by sending it to Google, Inc. via their electronic system. At the time of this return, no response to the Search Warrant has been received yet from Google, Inc. ltemleeseripljons Digital Service to Googlc, Inc. I further certify that I gave a detailed receipt for the property taken to: OR [21 I further certify that I sent Google, Inc. a digital copy of Search Warrant 20123-003079: Dated this 19th day ofJanuary, 2018. Detective M. McCormick. 22020 Tempe Police Department VERIFICATION OF RETURN SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED TO BEFORE ME THIS 23rd DAY OF March, 2018. Commissioner Superior Court Mari eopa County Arizona HONORABLE MELISSA ZABOR MARICOPA COUNTY COURT POLICE TEMPE TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em: Tr: got?demon Chem HUM ems? ,ml?m?l? .7 gamed {Mom mileialg} Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT .votMaL 21 2913? No. 9459 12 2018-32594 POLICE CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA COUNTY OF MRICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA ?Wigwam $3 9030 80 20] 3-32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Proof by af?davit having been made this day to me by: Detective M. MoCorng-lg, man I am satis?ed that there is probable cause to believe that: IE on the promises known as: Hula, LLC 2500 Brondway, 2??i Floor. in the City of mm County of State of California, there is now being possessed or concealed certain persons, roomy, or things described as: Fruits and evidence ofthe re?nes of?. Vehicukr Mimlaughter Any and all video blowing history through the use of the Hulu application on 03/18/18 from 2100 hours to 2300 hours (Mountnm Standard Time) for the account associated with a cell hone identi?ed as an LG Lemme SIN?hat could be associated to email address h, Which property or things: 1] war: stolen or embezzled. were used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. Cl is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the pmpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed. or tending to show IP52 Rafael Stuart Vasquez. has committed the offense. such person is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. Such public offense of the Ail-120m Revised Statute Title 13 ports. sections 13711035.]. Manslaughter, which counted on March 18, 2018 and the cell phones containing the artifacts were located 111 Tempe, Marleopn County, loomed within the State of Arizona. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report *?eJ?Glg-?J Ta; AWE: ?Mann. Mew? No.9459 13?? 2013-32694 YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMANDED In the daytime (excluding the time pen?od of between 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM.) 01' nighttime (good cause therefore having been shown) to make a search of the above named or described panama), premises, for 11mm above deem-Eben! prqperty or thing, and if you ?nd the same or any part thereof, to retain such in your custody or in the custody 01? the custody ofthc Taupe Police Department, as provided by AJLS. 13-3920 andfor 18 US. Code 270303). 1-1qu Inc. shall disclose responsive data, if any, by sandmg to Detective M. McCormick at the Tempe Polica Depamnem, 120 East 5?11 Strael, Temp: 8528!, using the US Postal Snwicc or another courier service, notwithstanding 18 US. Code 2252(3) or similar statute or code. Retum this warrant to me wi?-Jin three (3) days of the memot; as directed by AJLS. 13-3918. Given under :11th and dated this 22-: day of March 2018. Commissionur Superior Court Mm?icopa County Arizona HONORABLE HEIJBSAIABOR OOUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ea"? ?fie 721341 Eta?@3515: Eismmtoieil :35 em; 22. 2033- WM No. 9459 14 2018-32694 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA AVIT SEAR COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA )7wa 80 2018-32694 YOUR AFFIANTTS) Detective M. McCormick, 22020 A peace of?cer in the State of Arizona, being ?nst duly sworn, upon oath. fie-poses and says: That on March 2013. in the County of Murlcopn, State of Arizona, the crime of 13-1 103A1, Vehicular Manslaughter, was committed by Rafael Stuart Vasquez. THAT THE AFFIANT has probable cause to believe that on the premises known as: Hulu, LLC 2500 Broadway, Floor. in the City of wing, County of W, State of California, were is now being possessed or concealed certain pawns, or which: were stolen or embezzled. [33 were used as means of committing a public offense. is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing a public offense. . is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of conceeiing it or preventing it ?-om being discovered. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been committed, or tending to ?110?? that Rafael Stuart anuu has committed the offense. such person is the subject of an Outstanding arrest warrant. That said property or things are descn'bed as follows: Fruits and evidence ofthe axiom of: Vehicular Manslaughter . Any and all video viewing history through the use ofthe Hutu application on 03/181'18 from 2100 hours to 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) for the account associated with a cell phone identi?ed as an LG LGMP450 SIM?that could be associated to email address w. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report hill: is nonsense a?oenttlomr ?nishes- guineasensations. Wham. warmers? M9459 mill?32694 That the fellondng facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search Warrant for the aforementioned items exists: Your a?lent, Petectlve M. McCormick, #22020, has been a police officer with the City of Tempe since October of 2012. During my time with the Tempe Police Department I served as a uniformed petrol omen, a DUI Enforcement Of?cer. Daytime Collision Investigating Motor and 1 have been assigned as a detective with the Unit since October of 2016. As a detective with the Vehiculnr Crimes Unit, I investigate serious lulury and fatal collisions and complete collision reconstructions on those events Iheue attended numerous collision investigation and reconstruction comes to assist me with these investieetions. Prior to being a police of?cer with the Tempe Police Depot-orient, I was a police o?ioer with the Yuma Police Department for seven years. At the Yuma Police Department, I held the position of Petrol Of?cer and then DUI Enforcement O?icer for two years where one of my duties was to respond to. serious injury and fetal collisions to either assist or not as the lead investigator. I was also assigned to the position of Property Crimes Detective where] acted as lead investigator on crimes from Burglary. Theft and Shopli?ing and assisted with many other types of investigations. Based on information your s?iant has learned ?om Detective Hnubold of the Tempe Police Department's VClIicular Crimes Unit and from my own investigation, it is believed the crime of Vehicular (ARE 13?1103Al) may have been committed and evidence that can be obtained the Video viewing history through the use of the Hutu ?i?m for the account associated with a cell phone identi?ed es an LG LGMP450 SIN: at could be associated to omnii address? will be helpful in completing this investigation. on 03!] 8/13 at approximately 2200 hours an Ubes Volvo XC90 with Arizona license plate?loving in autonomous mode was traveling north on Mill Avenue approaching Washington Street. Tempe, AZ when it collided with a poison crossing from the West side of Mill Avenue to the east side ofMill Avenue south of Washington Sheet. The pedestrian was pionounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours from injuries caused during this collision. During an interview with Rafael, she indicated her hands were off the steering wheel and her feet were off of the acceleraton'decelerutor pedals during the collision. Video footage horn a dashboard camera was obtained, which showed footage of the collision looking {onward from the vehicle's cabin and View of the dt?il'er. Priorto the collision, Rafael can be seen looking down multiple times Inside ofthe vehicle's cabin. While looking down at this unlmown distraction, Rafael can be seen smirking as if she Were reacting to this midtown distraction Immediately prior to the collision Incoming, Rafael can be seen looking down and only looked up just as the collision was about to occur. At this time it is unknown whet Rafael was looking at. The 2017 Volvo X090 with Arizona lineman plato? was taken as evidence and impounded at the Tempe Police Department impound lot located at 18% East Apache Blvd. At the time of the collision, Rafael was in possession cfmo cell phones. These cell phones were obtained from Rafael pmusnt to a search warrant utter the collision oectnred. A search warrant was also served on these cell phones and infonnetion gained during that search warrant is being used as the basis of this wet-rant The ?rst cell phone is a silver LG model which is assigned a telephone number of item nimble: On this cell phone three video applications were found TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report goo-omitteddiode: c.9459 2018-32694 installed. The YouTuhe application was associated to gmail account A total offo?y font noti?cations were found for the YouT?ubc application indicating activity on this applicatim . The video application, Net?ix, Was also found installed on the LG LGMP450 as well. The Email account '3 associated with this th?ix application. Hulu was also found installed on this cell phone, but detectives Wore unable to locate any account informaxiou for that application. The second cell phone taken from Rafael was a black LG model msso Sim?which is assigned a telephone number of item number 133217684. 011 this cell phone only the You'l?nbc video application was installed. The You'I?ube application was associated with midi account which is time same account as the other cell phone obtained from Rafael. Based on the above Facts, your A?iam requests any end all video viewing history through the use of the 1-1qu application for the account associated with a cell phone identi?ed es an LG LGMP450 SIN: that could be associated to email address on 03f18f18 foam 2100 hours to 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) to assist with determining what Rem! was viewing while dtiving the vehicle at the time collision. Whuefcre a?itmt pray: that a semi) warrant be issued comanding that an immodiatc watch be made of the persons, omniscs, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the persons, property and things herein described, and that the same be retained in the custody of the si??tmt or in the custody of the agency which the a?iunt represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to A.R.S. 13-3 920. Whmfore af?uent prays that a search warrant be issued commding that an immediate semi: be made of the pmons, premises, buildings, and vehicles described herein for the pmons, property and things herein described, and that the same be nominal in the custody of the ni?ant or in the custody of the agency which the af?aet memo and dispoeed of according to law, pursuant to A.R.S. 13-3920 andlor 18 US. Code 2703(b). Detective M. )4ch #22020 Taupe Police Department SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 22nd day of March, 2018. Commissioner Superior Court Maticopa County A?zona HONORAM MELISSA MGR MARIGOPAOGUNTY memos ?eum' TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report mm: 63a J?il?) sag-1': tn?: MW i: 20] 23-32694 RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT I certify that on the 22nd of March, 2018, I executed search warrant #2018-003080, reference Tempe PD 2018-32694, issued by Judge Melissa Zahor, by sending it to Hulu, Inc. via certi?ed mail. At the time of this return, no response to the Search Warrant has been received yet from Hulu, Inc. Itemsmescrip?ons Copy of Warrant mailed to Hulu, Inc. at company?s request I further certify that I gave a detailed receipt for the property taken to: OR I further certify that I sent Hulu, Inc. a copy of Search Warrant 2018-003080: Dated this 23rd day of March, 2018. JW Detective M. McCormick, 22020 Tempe Police Department VERIFICATION OF RETURN SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED TO BEFORE ME THIS 23rd DAY OF March, 2018. Commissioner 9 Superior Court Maricopa County Arizona HONORABLE MELISSA ZABOR MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report go}? no 2% ammo om "mm-oi iomjo?o?j Type:Court Order Description:SEARCH WARRANT w?lilflir. 22. EQISI- NC. 9459 2018-32694 POLICE DEPARMNT CITY OF TEWE, ARIZONA RC COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA WWI: - co ?:30 8' 1013?32694 ANY PEACE OFFICER IN THE STATE OF ARIZONA: Pmofby affidavit having boon made this day to me by: M. ??92m; 2202B I am satis?ed that than is probable cause to bolicvo than: on the known as: Net?ix, Inc. 10!! Winchester Circle. in lhe City of Lg; 53:10:,me ofSanta Clara, State oanlifomia,?1mis now being possessed or concealed cumin pol-sons, property, or things dosuiliod as: Fruits and codeine ofthc aimos of: Vehicular Mnlalaughter . Any and all Vida: viewing history Ihrough thouse ocht?ix application on 03i18118 from 2100 hours 10 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) for the account associated with Which proporty or things: were stolen or umbozzled. ?we used as means ofoommittins a public offanse. is (are) being possessod with the inlent to use as a mans of committing a. public o?rme. CI is (are) in posamion of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it from being discovered. constitutes cvidonoc tending to show um: 11 public offense has been committed, or tending to show that Rafael Stuart quuerq has committed the offense. such poison is the subjnm of an outstanding most wmmt. Such public offense of the Arizona Revised Statute Title 13 $11.5. sections lB-ll?zAl, Vehicular which occurred on March I8, 2018 and the cell phones containing the artifacts Were located in Tempe. Mldcopn County, located within the State of Arizona. gnome-E 121M PE .. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report - 63219i aha] ,5 3918? No. 9459 2018-32694 YOU ARE THEREFORE COMMNDED in the daytime (excluding the time period of between 10:00 PM. and 6:30 AM.) Ci Or nighttime (good cane: therefore having been shown) to make a search of the above named or desmhed persona), premises, vehicles for the herein above described preperly or things, and ifyau ?nd the same or my part thereof, to retain Each in your mated)! or in the gustody or the muted): of the Tempe Police Department, as provided I 3-3920 and/or 13 1.1.3. Cod: 27030;). Net?ix Inc. shall disclose responsive data. if any, by sending to Detective M. McConnick at the Tempe Police Department, 120 East Street, Tempe 85281, using the US Postal Service or mother comic: service, 18 Code 2252mm similar atltutc or code. Return this warrant to me within three days ofthn thereof, as directed by A.R.S. 13-3918. Given under my hand and dated this 22? day oanrch 2018. Commissioner Superior COurt Marloopa County Arizona HONORABLE MELISSA men MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report om?? Mama 3'53Eioi?i1ot?il ?Man 3018? Hc.9459 9 2018-32694 POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY OF TEMPE, ARIZONA AFFID COUNTY OF MARICOPA, STATE OF ARIZONA 8 REPORW 2013-6269? YOUR AFFIANWS) Detective M. McCormick, 22020 A peace of?cer' to the State ofArlzomI, being first duly swam upon oath dcposes and says: That on March 18?1 2018, in the County of Msriccpa, State of Arizona, the crime of13-1103A1, Vehicular Manslaughter. was commiuod by Rafael Stuart Vasquez. THAT THE AFFIANT has probable cause to bclieve that on the premises known as: Net?ix, Inc. 10!] Winchester Circle. in tho City elm County elm State ofCalifm-nia, there' is now being possessed or concealed certain poisons, property, or which: were stolen or embezzled. Were used as means of mlmnitting a public offense. Cl is (are) being possessed with the intent to use as a means of committing public offense. Cl is (are) in possession of to whom it is delivered for the purpose of concealing it or preventing it ??oun being discoveicd. constitutes evidence tending to show that a public offense has been commitiod or tending to show that Rafael Stuart Vasquez has committed the c?-?cnse. such person is the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant. That said moped}! or things are desciibed as follows: Fruits and evidence of the crimes of: Vehicular Manslaughter 0 Any and all video viewing history throng: the use of Net?is application on Gill all 8 from 2100 hours to 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time) for the account associated With TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report em rr lctlildlt common onto \rnlolommw ?nun ?who No.9459 e. ll 2038?32694 That the {cunning facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the Issuance of a search wammt for the aforementioned items exists: . Your a??innt, Detective M. McCormick, #22020, has been a police of?cer with the City of Tempe since October of 2012. During my time with the Tempe Police Department I served as a uniformed patrol of?cer. a DUI Enforcnnent Of?cer. Daytime Collision Investigating Motor and I have been assigned as a detective with the Veloculer Chimes Unit since October of 201 6. As a detective with the Vehicular Crimes Unit, I investigate serious Injury and fatal collisions and complete collision reconstructions on those events. I have attended numerous collision investigation and courses to assist me with these investigations. Prior to being a police o?i oer will: the Tempe Police Department, I was a police of?cer with the Yuma Police Department for seven years. At the Yuma Police Department, I held the position ofPeu-ol O?icer and then DUI Enforcement Of?cer for two years where one ofmy duties we: to respond to serious infer-y and fetal collisions to either assist or act as the lead investigator. was also assigned to the position of Property Chimes Detective where I acted as lead investigator on crimos from Burglary, The? and Shoplifting and assisted with many other types ofinVeotigetione. Based on. information your ef?anl has learned flout DetectiVe Hauhold of the Tempe Police Department's Vehicular Chimes Unit and from my own investigation. it is believed the crime of Vehicular Manslaughter (ARS 13-1103A1)may have been committed and evidence that can be obtained from the video viewing history through tho use of the Net?lx application associated with account will be helpful in complaints this investigation. On 03/1313 8 at approximately 2200 hours an Uber Volvo X090 with Arizona. license plate? driving in autonomous mode was traveling north on Mill AVenuc approaching Washington Street, Tempe. AZ when it collided with a person crossing from the West side of Mill Avenue to the east side of Mill Avenue. south of Washington Street. The pedestrian was pronounced deceased at approximately 2230 hours from injuries caused during this collision. Dining an interview with Rafael, she indicated her hands Were off the steering wheel and her feet me off ofthe eoceleroton?deoelemor pedals during the collision. Video footage ?our a dashboard camera was obtained, which showed footage of the collision looking forward them the vehicle?s cabin and a view of the driver. Prior to the collision, Rafael can be seen looking down multiple titties inside of the vehicle's cabin. While looking down at this unknown distraction, Rafael can be seen smirking as if she were reacting to this unlotown distraction. Immediately prior to the collision occurlng, Rafael can he soon looking down and only looked up just as the collision was about to occur. At this time it is unknown what Rafael was looking at - The 201? Volvo XC90 tvith Arizona license plate?war taken as otddcocc and itnpomtded at the Tempe Police Department impound lot located a: 1875 Best Apache Blvd. At the time of the collision, Rafael was in possession oftwo cell phones. Those cell phones were obtained from Rafael pursuant to a search warrant alter the collision occurred. A search wemot was also served on these cell phones and information gained during that search Warrant is being used as motions of this wet-mot. The ?rst cell phone is a silver LG model LGMP450 SIN: which is assigned a telephone number of item number T3321768-3. On this cell phone three video applications were found TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report odd 2o .oomdojoii homo-iron Md "Mar. 22. 2018? No. 9459 ll 2018-32694 installed. The YouT?ube application was associutcd to mail account A total of 1?me four noti?cations were found for the You'llthe application indicating activity on this application. The video application, Netfiix, was also found installed on the LG Lomdso as well. The gn'itlil account is associated with this thflix application. 1-1qu was also found installcd on this cell phone, but Wore unable to locate any account information for that application. The second cellphone taken from Rafael was a black LG model SW:?w11ich is ?Signed a telephone numbcr of item number 133217684. On this cell phone only the You'I?uho video application wan Installed. The You'l?ubc application was associated with gmaii account which is the same account as the other cell phone obtained from Rafael. Based on tho above facts, your Milan: Tequosia any and all video viewing history through the use of tho Not?ix application for the account associated with?on Oil/18118 from 2! 00 hours to 2300 hours (Mountain Standard Time.) to assist with what Rafael was viewing while driving the vehicle at die firm of the collision. Wherefoio af?am prays that a search Warrant be issued commanding that an immodiato scat-oh be made of the persons, pron?sco, buildings, and vehicles doacn?bed herein for the pct-sons. propmy and things heroin described, and that the name be rotained in the custody of the a?ient or in the custody ofthc agency which the af?aoi represents and disposed of according to law, to AILS. 134920. Whmforc a?iant prays that a scorch warrant be issued commanding that an immediate search bc made of the persons, promises, buildings, and vehicles described hemin for the persons, property and things herein described, and that the some be retained in the custody of the affront or in tho custody of the agcnoy whictt the af?ant represents and disposed of according to law, pursuant to Adios. 13-3 920 andfor Code 2'103 (130. botcctivc M. MoConnick #22020 Tempe Police Dopnrimmt SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 22nd day 201 Commissionct' Superior Court Maricopa County Arizona 0mm: 5 MEUESAZABOR maroon comm macaw TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report fee}; grown}; em tezll?rw memorize 201 8-32694 RETURN OF SEARCH I certify that on the 22nd of March, 2018, I executed search warrant #2018?003081, reference Tempe PD 60%? 2018-32694, issued by Judge Melissa Zabor, by sending it to Net?ix, Inc. via certi?ed mail. At the time of this return, no response to the Search Warrant has been received yet from Net?ix, Inc. Itemstescrip?ons Copy of warrant mailed to Net?ix Inc. at company?s request I further certify that I gave a detailed receipt for the property taken to: OR I further certify that I sent Net?ix, Inc. a copy of Search Wanant 2018-00308}: Dated this 23rd day of March, 2018. Detective M. McCormick #22020 Tempe Police Department VERIFICATION OF RETURN SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED TO BEFORE ME THIS 231rd DAY OF March 2018. Commissioner [7 Superior Court Marioopa County Arizona some MELISSAZABOR ooum sweeten TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report amass: git billets-$3: News! a a limits you: want: Type:Court Order Description:HULU MAY 2018 AMMENDED RESPONSE RE WARRANT SERVED McCormick, Michael From: legal Sent: Thursday, May 31. 2018 5:45 PM To: legal: McCormick Michael Subject RE: Questions Regarding Warrant Served Attachments: 2018 May - Tempe Subpoena - McCormick Amended Responsepdf Detective McCormick, Please see the attached amended response. Hulu responds to your questions as follows: 1. In the search warrant I asked for the times to be shown in Mountain Standard Time to only clear up any confusion when reading the document, In doing a little research it appears California switched from Paci?c Standard Time to Pacific Daylight Time on 03(11f18, which would mean that the time in California on 03/18/18 (PDT) was the same as the time in Arizona (MST). Can you confirm this is the case or was the time deliberately listed as Pacific Standard Time making the time one hour later than Hulu has attached an amended viewing history chart. Per my earlier emaiL please disregard the chart served with Hulu's original response. The times reflected on the amended chart are in PDUMST Can you advise how accurate the times are that were listed? Is there a variance in the times listed or any error that is known of? What I am looking for here is if the time Hulu uses on the document could off? The most accurate way to measure playback times is to look at player ?heartbeats". Heartbeats are sent every thirty seconds. Hulu records the time it receives each heartbeat. Included within the heartbeat is a measure called "playback_duration". which records how much of the selected content was played since the last heartbeat. If the player is playing consistently between heartbeats no pauses or errors}, the playback__duration should be approximately the same as the time between heartbeats, i.e. approximately thirty seconds. The attached chart reflects the heartbeat data for the relevant user during the relevant time frame. The user played one episode of the Voice on March 18, 2018 between 21:16:45 and approximately 21:59:00. There were instances in which heartbeats were not sent every 29?30 seconds lag. between The delay in heartbeats could have been caused by any one of a number of circumstances including, but not limited to, the user pausing the player) the user switching to a different app, 3 buffering issue, or the phone losing service. Do you know ifa person is watching Hulu on their cell phone and they lock their phone will the system continue to show that it is streaming or will the time and at that point and create a new start time when the episode continues to play when re-started? Hulu does not track when a user?s phone is locked or unlocked. lithe phone is locked, the phone will no longer send heartbeats and several other events may be triggered. However the termination of heartbeats and the other events may be the result of other circumstances beyond locking, eg. the user switching to another application. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report 5169i? Foaamima. gal-liner FM 5 From: legal Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2018 5:41 PM To: Subject: RE: Questions Regarding Warrant Served Detective McCormick, We received your email below and are gathering answers to your questions. In reviewing the previous response, we determined that we may have inadvertently included data relating to another user. Please disregard the previous resQnSe. We will serve an amended response with the correct data. -Hulu Legal From: McCormick, Michael [milthichael Mccormick@tempe.gov] Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 4:33 PM To: legal Subject: Questions Regarding Warrant Served Hello, my name is Detective Michael McCormick, #22020, with the Tempe Police Department in Tempe, Arizona. I served Hulu with a search warrant via certified mail, which you received on 03/26/18. I did reteive a response regarding this search warrant on 05107118. I have scanned and attached the documents Hulu sent me regarding my search warrant. I would like to thank you for your quick response in providing me with those documents. Although the information you provided was helpful, it did leave a couple of questions I was hoping somebody could answer for me. I am not asking for any additional information that was not included in the search warrant. lam only seeking clarification on a few issues. 1, In the search warrant I asked for the times to be shown in Mountain Standard Time to only clear up any confusion when reading the document. In doing a little research it appears California switched from Pacific Standard Time to Pacific Daylight Time on 03/11l18, which would mean that the time in California on 03/18f18 was the same as the time in Arizona Can you confirm this is the case or was the time deliberately listed as Pacific Standard Time making the time one hour later than 2. Can you advise how accurate the times are that were listed? Is there a variance in the times listed or any error that is known of? What I am looking for here is if the time Hulu uses on the document could off? 3. Do you know ifa person is watching Hulu on their cell phone and they lock their phone will the system continue to show that it is streaming or will the time end at that point and create a new start time when the episode continues to play when re-started? Any assistance in answering these questions would be greatly appreciated. This is a very serious case where the charges of Vehicular Manslaughter may be charged. so correctly interpreting the information provided to us is crucial. Thank you for your time, Detective M. McCormick, 22020 Tempe Police Department Vehicular Crimes Unit Desk: {480)350-8148 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report r? zmwmi Qtr?liw?irllibgAmflili?T?iW? i i I k. \e May 31, 2018 CONFIDENTIAL Via Email Detective McCormick Tempe Police Department 120 East 5th Street Tempe, AZ 85281 Email: Dear Detective McCormick; Below is Hulu?s amended response to your subpoena dated March 22, 2018 related to Report 32018-32694. Hulu will respond to the specific questions in your May 10, 2018 email in its email response. Subscriber Name Rafaela Vasguez Email Address Date of Birth User ID No. Subscription ID No. Account Creation Date November 21, 2016 Account Status Canceled, May 13, 2018 Zip Code Viewing History Amended Attachment A Sincerely, Hulu Legal 2500 Broadway Floor Santa Monica, CA 90404 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report @539 If? 2m 3113?}? EJ 4:31am AMENDED ATTACHMENT A TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report CONFIDENTIAL AMENDED ATTACHMENT A - User ID Client IP Series Episode Phone Manufacturer ISP Playback Start Time End Time Time Since and Model Duration Last Heartbeat The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?rnobile 23728 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 Part 5 use inc, 21:16:45 21:17:14 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29811 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 30.236 Part 5 usa inc. 21:17:15 21:17:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t?mobile 29891 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 29.81 Pan 5 use inc. 21:17:45 21:13:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGIVIP450 t?mobile 30350 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 30.161 Part 5 use inc. 21:18:15 21:18:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29800 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 30.612 Part 5 usa inc. 21:18:46 21:19:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t-mobile 29849 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29249 Part 5 use inc 21:19:15 21:19:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30285 2018-03?18 2018-0348 29.932 Part 5 use inc. 21:19:45 21:20:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29910 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.461 Pan 5 use inc. 21:20:15 21:20:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30303 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29.922 Part 5 usa inc. 21:20:45 21:21:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29773 201803-18 2018-03-18 30.408 Part 5 use inc. 21:21:16 21:21:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 2?mobiie 29848 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29825 Part 5 use inc. 21:21:46 21:22:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29909 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.561 Part 5 use inc. 21:22:16 21:22:46 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30467 2018-03-18 201803-18 29252 Part 5 use inc, 21:22:45 21:23:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29853 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 35.655 Part5 usa inc. 21:23:21 21:23:51 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29939 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 24.319 Part 5 usa inc. 21:23:45 21:24:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29820 2018-03~18 2018-03-18 30469 Part 5 usa inc. 21:24:16 21:24:46 OLIC . TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report C.) @115 431%.: me: A Li CONFIDENTIAL AMENDED ATTACHMENT A The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30392 2018-0348 201803-18 29.599 Part 5 use inc. 21:24:45 21:25:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 29760 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.557 Part 5 use inc. 21:25:16 21:25:46 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t-mobile 29930 2013-03-18 2013-03-13 29.656 Part5 usa inc. 21:25:46 21:26:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 30321 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 29.942 Part 5 usa inc. 21:26:16 21:26:46 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t~mobile 29824 2018?03-18 2018-03?18 29.562 Part 5 use inc. 21:26:45 21:27:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29915 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 3001 Part 5 use inc. 21:27:15 21:27:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 30338 201803-18 2018-03-18 30033 Part 5 use inc. 21:27:45 21:28:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 tvmobiie 29919 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.42 Part 5 use inc. 21:28:16 21:28:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29819 2018*03-18 2018-03?18 29658 Part 5 use inc. 21:28:45 21:29:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobile 29832 2018-03-18 201803-18 29.391 Part 5 use inc. 21:29:15 21:29:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 30368 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.196 Part 5 use inc. 21:29:45 21:30:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29877 2018-03?13 2018-03-18 29.959 Part 5 usa inc. 21:30:15 21:30:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29897 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29.947 Part 5 usa inc. 21:30:45 21:31:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29965 2018-03?18 201803-18 29.993 Part5 usa inc. 21:31:15 21:31:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 tvmobile 29873 2018-03-18 201803-18 29.969 Part 5 use inc. 21:31:45 21:32:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGM P450 t-mobile 30417 2018-03-18 2018-0348 30.058 Part 5 usa inc. 21:32:15 21:32:46 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 29884 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 29.965 Part 5 use inc. 21:32:45 21:33:15 LJC 8.35.544 1?25} TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report (310? r5 em a 5m ope-mm emits 9mm 19:3" CONFIDENTIAL AMENDED ATTACHMENT A The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE t~mobile 29899 2018-03-18 2018?03-18 30.002 Part 5 use inc. 21:33:15 21:33:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29395 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30 Part 5 use inc. 21:33:45 21:34:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobiie 29926 2013-03-18 2018-03-18 30.026 Part 5 use inc. 21:34:15 21:34:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30381 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.32 Part5 usa inc. 21:34:46 21:35:16 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 30014 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.34 Par! 5 use inc. 21:35:16 21:35:46 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29881 2018?03?18 2018-03-18 29.372 Part 5 use inc. 21:35:45 21:36:15 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t-mobile 2582 2016?03-18 2018-03?18 30141 Part 5 usa inc. 21:36:15 21:36:18 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 4371 2018-03-18 2013-03-18 77.426 Part 5 use inc. 21:37:33 21:37:37 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 15173 2018-03?18 2018-03?18 49.451 Part 5 use inc. 21:38:22 21:38:37 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobile 7323 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 7922 Part 5 use inc. 21:39:41 21:39:49 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 4473 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 10.602 Part 5 use inc. 21:39:52 21:39:57 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 28916 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30453 Part 5 usa inc. 21:40:23 21:40:51 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?rnobile 29384 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 31.162 Part 5 usa inc. 21:40:54 21:41:24 he Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE t-mobile 30330 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29.811 Part 5 use inc. 21:41:24 21:41:54 he Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29748 2018?0318 2018-0348 29.666 Part 5 use inc. 21:41:53 21:42:23 he Voice The Blind Auditions. LGE LGMP450 t-mobiie 30316 2018-03-13 2018-03-18 29537 Part 5 use inc. 21:42:23 21:42:53 he Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobile 29828 201803?18 2018?03-18 29.927 Part 5 usa inc. 21:42:53 21:43:22 'oL_lC - Erin-1P5 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report ,1 'zeii'.meig~ i" emitte- CONFIDENTIAL AMENDED ATTACHMENT A The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29867 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 29.901 Part 5 usa inc. 21:43:23 21:43:52 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30370 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.332 Part 5 usa inc. 21:43:53 21:44:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t-mobile 29944 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 29.724 Part 5 use inc. 21:44:23 21:44:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29836 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29.946 Part 5 use inc. 21:44:53 21:45:22 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29948 2018?03?18 2018-03?18 30.057 Part5 usa inc. 21:45:23 21:45:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 29873 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 30.266 Part 5 usa inc, 21:45:53 21:46:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30382 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.055 Part 5 use inc. 21:46:23 21:46:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 29925 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29702 Part 5 use inc. 21:46:53 21:47:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobile 29822 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 30019 Part 5 use inc. 21:47:23 21:47:52 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29839 2018-03-18 2018-03?13 29.984 Part 5 use inc. 21:47:53 21:48:22 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobiie 30347 2018-03?18 2018?03-18 29985 Part 5 use inc. 21:48:23 21:48:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30019 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.066 Part 5 use inc. 21:48:53 21:49:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29869 2018?03-18 2018?03-18 29.964 Part 5 usa inc. 21:49:23 21:49:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobiie 29968 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.238 Part 5 usa inc. 21:49:53 21:50:23 The Voice The Biind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 20462 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 32.075 Part 5 usa inc. 21:50:25 21:50:45 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 20232 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 27939 Part 5 usa inc. 21:50:53 21:51:13 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGM P450 t-mobile 29710 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30087 Part 5 usa inc. 21:51:23 21:51:53 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .653 C371 ii": 1151?s: BET-Tires: i WE CONFIDENTIAI. AMENDED ATTACHMENT A The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29890 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30373 Part 5 use inc. 21:51:53 21:52:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t?mobile 30339 201903-18 20180348 29408 Part 5 usa inc. 21:52:23 21:52:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 tvmobile 29879 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 30.098 Part 5 usa inc. 21:52:53 21:53:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29918 2018-03?18 2018-03-18 30.243 Part 5 use inc. 21:53:23 21:53:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-rnobile 30289 2018?0318 2013-03?18 32.663 Part 5 use inc. 21:53:56 21:54:26 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29845 2018?03-18 2018-03-18 26956 Part 5 use inc. 21:54:23 21:54:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE t?mobiie 29800 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 30.099 Part 5 usa inc. 21:54:53 21:55:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGIVIP450 t-rnobile 30347 2018-03-18 2018?03-18 3027 Part 5 usa inc. 21:55:23 21:55:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29837 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 29.933 Part 5 use inc. 21:55:53 21:56:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29916 2018-03-18 2018-03?18 29.799 Part 5 usa inc. 21:56:23 21:56:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 30332 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 29.985 Part 5 usa inc. 21:56:53 21:57:23 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29885 2018?03?18 2018-03?18 30.215 Pan 5 usa inc. 21:57:23 21:57:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE t-mobile 29849 2018-03?18 2018?03-18 30.208 Part 5 usa inc. 21:57:53 21:58:23 The Voice The Biind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 29951 2018?03?18 2018-03?18 29.736 Part5 usa inc. 21:58:23 21:58:53 The Voice The Blind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobiie 30367 201803-18 2018-03-18 30.37:! Pans usa inc. 21:58:53 21:59:24 The Voice The Biind Auditions, LGE LGMP450 t-mobile 3079 2018-03-18 2018-03-18 3.201 Part 5 usa inc. 21:58:57 21:59:00 011 2111 8-32694 ?elated Property Repor?s) tampertyReporta Property Case Status: EVIDENCEJSEIZED TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Related Items: 1 Submitted on: Mar-19?2018 (Mon) Submitted by: 11638 - HAUBOLD. THOMAS Related Item{s): Bicycles TYPE: Touring/Road MAKE: SPINFIT7OOC MODEL: HYPER COLOR: Red SERIAL TK17C31876 VALUE: $0.00 DESCRIPTION: BIKE WITH DAMAGE FRONT WHEEL RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 POL TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . may gjgjemmielr was}; "MEI?aging} Fllcaf?i?a??v its: sia?x?il?ag? 763?30 $7.1m 'r Property Case Status: EVIDENCEISEIZED Related items: 4 Submitted on: Mar-20-2018 (Tue) Submitted by: 19443 - BARUTHA, Related Item(s): Articles ITEM: CAMERA - MEMORY CARDISTORAGE DEVICE MODEL: EXTREME PLUS 64 COLOR: Red, Gold SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: 6463 MICRO SD REMOVED FROM JANUS V3 DASH CAM RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: COURT WARRANT SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: AUTHORED BY J. BARUTHA RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: CELL PHONE MODEL: LGMP450 COLOR: Silver Aluminum Black SERIAL VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: LG MP450 SILVER COVERKSILVER CASE RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: CELL PHONE MODEL: COLOR: Black. Black SERIAL VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: LG M8550 BLACK COVERIBLACK CASE RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report iOperatIonaI Status: ADMINISTRATIVE gtProperty Case Status: EVIDECEISEIZED Submitted on: Mar-23-2018 (Fri) Related Item(s): Articles ITEM: COURT WARRANT SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: SW RETURN FOR 21318-002991 AND 2018-002912 RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Relaetd items: 1 Submitted by: 18382 RAMOS, ALBERT TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Hairs r? We Mam: we; mam: awe mm ?ay it ?sr Rama: mm Property Case Status: EVIDENCEISEIZED Related items: 1 Submitted on: Mar-232018 (Fri.) Submitted by: 11638 - HAUBOLD, THOMAS Related ltem(s): Vehicles LICENSE PLATE: LICENSE STATE: Arizona VIN: MAKE: VOLV MODEL: X09 STYLE: 4DR HATCHBACK COLOR: GRY VEHICLE YEAR: 2017 MISC: DAMAGE TO FRONT END ICE: F. TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report . . pytara?tipi?ai Status: p- frOPer-tv Exam #322334 -, Property Case Status: Submitted on: Mar-272018 (Tue) Related ltem(s): Articles ITEM: COURT WARRANT SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE #3 $0.00 DESCRIPTION: NON-EXECUTED SIGNED SEARCH WARRANT AND RETURN RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Retated items: 1 Submitted by: 20193 - PALMAIOLI, ANGELENA TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report Ibper??gnal 513:9? AWIN-ISIRATNE Property Case Status: elated Items: 1 Submitted on: Apr-02-2018 (Mon) Submitted by: 22020 - MCCORMICK. MICHAEL Related Item(s): Articles ITEM: RADIO, COMPACT CASSETTE PLAYER COMBO - VEHICLE SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: CD WITH EDR DATA RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report e16} r7? ?mm m} 53% ?iml?m??lgfo?i??VITIE; Iii-5w Engage; $3ng Wage 4.167 rii WEEK Property Case Status: EVIDENCEISEIZED Related items: 7 Submitted on: Apr-052018 (Thu.) Submitted by: 11638 HAUBOLD, THOMAS Related ltem(s): Articles ITEM: SHOESISHOELACE MAKE: NIKE COLOR: Black SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: TENNIS SHOES RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles COLOR: Blue SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: BLUE AND WHITE THERMOS RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: JACKET COLOR: Black SERIAL UNK VALUE #2 $0.00 DESCRIPTION: BLACK JACKET RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: JACKET COLOR: Blue SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: JACKET, LIZ CLAIBORN RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: SHIRT COLOR: White SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: T-SHIRT RECOVEREDVALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: AUTOMOTIVE PART (UNLISTED, OTHER. IF BRAND UNKNNOWN then COLOR: Silver(Aluminum) SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: GRILL, BROKEN PEICES OF FRONT RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 Articles ITEM: DRUG PARAPHERNALIA COLOR: Clear SERIAL UNK VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: GLASS PIP WITH BURNT RESIDUE RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00 TEMPE POLICE DEPARTMENT General Offense Report .. ?5201332694 ?ai?tesfrewz Rep-orfi?) . iPrg-pel?ff?gPPi? #353333 Property Case Status: EVIDENCEISEIZED I Related items:1 Submitted on: Jun-192013 (Tue.) Submitted by: 20595 - MARSLAND, KASEY Related Item(s): Articles ITEM: DISK DRIVES MODEL: 64 GB COLOR: Black SERIAL UNKNOWN VALUE $0.00 DESCRIPTION: ALL VIDEO FILES FROM UBER VEH DASHCAM RECOVERED VALUE: $0.00