Response from Zoos Victoria, 2 July 2018

Q: The ABC’s 7.30 program has interviewed two former acrobats for Cirque Africa who allege they

have been underpaid and are still owed money by the circus. One of these men is taking civil action
against the circus in the federal circuit court. What is Werribee Zoo’s response to these claims given
Cirque Africa is currently performing at the zoo?

A: The starting point is that we expect all of our contractors to comply with relevant laws, including
in relation to their employees. We are aware that there is a matter currently before the courts
relating to an allegation of underpayment but we also understand that Cirque Africa are vigorously
defending the matter. We will continue to engage with Cirque Africa in light of our expectations
around compliance and will monitor the matter as the court processes take their course.

Q: Has Werribee Zoo sought assurances from Cirque Africa and is it confident that the current cast of

the circus are being paid in accordance with the award wage for live performers and are being
treated in accordance with Australian employment laws?

A: In our ongoing discussions with Cirque Africa, we have made clear our expectations that all
relevant laws must be complied with in relation to their engagement with us, including those laws
concerning the employment of performers. We understand that Cirque Africa’s position is that they
are paying their employees correctly and on that basis are vigorously defending the allegations
against them.

Q: Considering the serious nature of the claims made by the two former acrobats, will Werribee Zoo
reconsider its relationship with Cirque Africa or will the current run of shows continue?

A: The matter is currently before the courts and on our understanding is being vigorously defended
by Cirque Africa. Cirque Africa is well aware of our expectations around compliance with all relevant
laws, and on this basis we will continue to review our relationship with them and take appropriate
action should there be proven to be any substance in the allegations of non-compliance.