INDEX NO. 155226/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/2018 05:23 PM
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 670

SUPREME

RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2018

COURT

COUNTY

OF THE

NEW

OF

YORK:

STATE

OF

NEW YORK

BRANCH

CIVIL

--------------------------------------------------------------------X

RICHARD

SINJA

AMELIUS,

OLGA

FARKAS,

Index

JESSE

PAPKOVITCH,

Part

ILONA

CHO,

No.

ZHU,

155226/2016

2
Kathryn

(Hon.

Freed,

J.S.C.)

Plaintiffs,

NOTICE

OF

ENTRY

-againstMotion

GRAND

IMPERIAL

IMPERIAL

COURT

MICHAEL

EDELSTEIN

V

IMPERIAL

LLC,

Sequence

No.

015

LLC,

MANAGEMENT,
Defendants.

X

--------------------------------------------------------------------X

PLEASE
that

was

day

of

TAKE

that

the

attached

of the

Office

Clerk

is a true
of the

and

correct

copy

Supreme

Court,

Jackson

(SBN

New

New

York,

June

5, 2018

New

A.

232

New
Tel:

4937488)

PLLC

ZWILLGEN
Madison

Avenue,

NY

York,

Ste.

500

10016

362-5590

(646)

nick@zwillgen.com
Counsel

for

Non-Party

To:

Krist

Special

Assistant

Mayor's

Office

of New

City
22

Reade

New
(646)
Attorney

Special

Counsel
Enforcement

York

Street,

New

York,

Corporation
of

4th
York

Floor
10007

576-3460
for

Intervenor-Plaintiff

City

of New

York

1 of 3

Yelp

Inc.

an order

York

York

Nicholas

Brian

of

2018.

June,

Dated:

NOTICE
in the

entered

in this

County,

matter

on the

4th

 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/05/2018 05:23 PM
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 670

To

RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/05/2018

(cont'd):

Islam

Shafaq
Goddard

Riverside
Law
109th
Street

51 West

New

NY

York,
for

Attorneys

Puichun

Justice

123

William

New

York,

10025

Plaintiffs

Center
16th
FlOOr
St.,

NY
for

Attorneys

10038

Plaintiffs

Chehebar

Charles
Chehebar

&

Deveney

485

Madison

New

York,

Attorney

Project

Li

Urban

Avenue,

NY
for

INDEX NO. 155226/2016

Phillips
Suite

1301

10022

Defendants

and

Intervenor-Defendants

2 of 3

 INDEX
NO.
INDEX
NO. 155226/2016
155226/2016

FILED:
NEW YORK
YORK COUNTY
COUNTY
CLERK
FILED:
NEW
CLERK
06/05/2018
05:23
PM
06/04/2018
12:
42
PM 
NYSCEF
DOC. NO.
NO. 670
668
NYSCEF
DOC.

RECEIVED
NYSCEF:
06/05/2018
RECEIVED
NYSCEF:
06/04/2018

SUPREME

COURT

OF THE

NEW YORK
PRESENT:

KATHRYN

HON.

COUNTY
PART

FREED

E.

NEW YORK

OF

STATE

IAS

MOTION

2

Justice
——
——
------------------------------------------------------------------------X

—
—
—

SINJA CHO, ILONA FARKAS,
AMELIUS,
JESSE ZHU, CITY OF NEW YORK,
PAPKOVITCH,
RICHARD

—
——

NO.

INDEX

155226/2016

OLGA

MOTION

Plaintiff,

SEQ.

NO.

015

- v GRAND IMPERIAL
LLC,lMPERIAL
V LLC,lMPERIAL
COURT
MICHAEL
THE LAND AND
MANAGEMENT,
EDELSTEIN,
BUILDING
KNOWN AS 307 WEST 79TH STREET,
BLOCK
CITY AND STATE OF NEW YORK,
1244,1018,
COUNTY,
IMPERIAL
LLC,F & M IMPERIAL
SUCCESS
LLC,FLORENCE
JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, NUMBERS
I
EDELSTEIN,
THROUGH
NAMED PARTIES,
TRUE NAMES
10, FICTITIOUSLY
THE PARTIES
INTENDED
BEING THE MANAGERS
UNKNOWN,
OR OPERATORS
OFTHE BUSINESS
BEING CARRIED
ON BY
DEFENDANTS
GRAND IMPERIAL
LLC,lMPERIAL
V
LLC,IMPERIAL
COURT MAN...,

ORDER

AND

DECISION

Defendant.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
The
618,

e-filed
following
621, 628, 629,

were

read

on this

In this
its prior
Inc.

motion

632,

633,

number
document
by NYSCEF
634, 635, 636, 637, 638, 639,

to/for

649,

015) 614,
653

615,

616,

617,

REARGUMENT/RECONSIDERATION

abatement

to compel

(Motion
640,

plaintiff

action,

Inc.

Yelp,

nonparty

City

New

of

York

with

to comply

moves

a subpoena

for

leave

to reargue

tecum.

duces

Yelp,

opposes.
"A

motion

for

an opportunity

party

or misapplied
the

631,

nuisance

motion

listed

documents,
630,

any

unsuccessful

Roche,
School,
attention

302

to argue

any

567

558,

AD2d
matter

Accordingly,

that

259,
not

the

once

[1st

260
fully

Dept

[1st

Dept

briefed,

it is ORDERED

is not

again

the

very

1979]

[citations
The

argued,

and

that

City's

purpose
questions

has

rejected

failed

as a vehicle
decided."
v Pleasantville

initial

to this

facts,

to permit
(Foley

C.R.

to bring

the

for

to afford

relevant

previously

on

motion

the

to serve

; see

omitted]
City

is designed

court,

or misapprehended

Its

the

the

overlooked

law.

2003].)

of

discretion

to the

court
of

principle

controlling
party

AD2d

68

addressed

reargument,
to establish

v

Cottage
Court's

motion.

reargument

is denied.

5/30/2018
DATE
CHECK ONE:

HRYN
CASE DISPOSED
GRANTED

X
X

DENIED

E. FREED,

NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED IN PART

APPLICATION:

SETTLE ORDER

SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:

INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN

FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT

155226/2016
AMELIUS,
MotionNo.
015

RICHARD vs. GRAND IMPERIAL

LLC

of 13
13 of

J.S.C.

OTHER

REFERENCE

Page 1 of 1

a