July 26, 2018
Jeffrey Bezos
Chairman, President and CEO
Amazon.com, Inc.
410 Terry Avenue North
Seattle, Washington 98109
Dear Mr. Bezos,
We write to express our deep concerns about your facial recognition technology, sold and
branded as “Amazon Recokgnition,” and the potential impact of this technology on the civil
liberties, particularly in communities of color.
We request an immediate meeting with you to discuss how to address the defects of this
technology in order to prevent inaccurate outcomes. Before Amazon Recokgnition or similar
technology is on the market or used by law enforcement, we urge you to work with key
stakeholders, communities of color, and policy makers on a regular basis, so that we can create a
policy and regulatory environment that is able to adapt with the speed of technology.
As you know, a recent American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) report found that your
technology falsely matched 28 Members of Congress as suspected criminals. The ACLU
discovered in its test, “nearly 40 percent of Amazon Rekognition’s false matches in our test were
of people of color, even though they make up only 20 percent of Congress.”1 Given the results of
this test, we are alarmed about the deleterious impact this tool – if left unchecked without proper,
consistent, and rigorous calibration – will have on communities of color; immigrants; protestors
peaceably assembling and others petitioning the Government for a redress of grievances; or any
other marginalized group.
Facial recognition and artificial intelligence technology represents how far technology has come
and how far it has to go. While we understand that Amazon Rekongition is meant to “detect,
analyze, and compare faces for a wide variety of uses,”2 we are concerned that a match will
exacerbate existing biases and strip people of their Constitutionally protected rights. There is an
ongoing national debate about the critical need to address disparities in policing, sentencing, and
the imbalance in the execution of justice in minority communities. In the hands of law
enforcement, this technology would only aggravate this grave situation.
For these reasons, it is critical that developers of technology like Amazon Recokgnition should
include testing and regular consultation with diverse stakeholders -- especially civil rights and
civil liberty experts and advocates. Data software excels at finding patterns and aggregating data,
but those programs have yet to prove they can accurately analyze the context around the
information it collects. Without this context, facial recognition tools can falsely match
1Amazon’s Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots, ACLU (online at https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacytechnology/surveillance-technologies/amazons-face-recognition-falsely-matched-28)
2 What Is Amazon Rekognition? (online at https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rekognition/latest/dg/what-is.html)

 individuals with those who have committed crimes while also exacerbating existing biases. This
can and has led to irretrievable harm to innocent persons’ livelihoods; a cost that is too high to
ignore.
Thank you for your consideration of our views on this grave matter. Technology should improve
the lives and liberties of all people; it should not be a tool to oppress and suppress the rights of
any person. We look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,

_______________________
Jimmy Gomez
Member of Congress

_______________________
John Lewis
Member of Congress