Case 5 Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #221 JANET M. I-IEROLD Regional Solicitor SUSAN SELETSKY Counsel for Wage and Hour Litigation ABIGAIL G. DAQUIZ Senior Trial Attorney Daquiz.Abigail@dol.gov VERONICA MELENDEZ (CSBN 294106) Trial Attorney Melendez.Veronica@dol. gov UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Of?ce of the Solicitor 90 Seventh Street, Suite 3-700 San Francisco, CA 94103 Telephone (415) 625-2716 Fax (415) 625-7772 ,Attorneys for Plaintiff, R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary, US. Department of Labor R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, co oration; FISHER RANCH CO., a corporation; DANA BART FISHER JR., an individual, Defendants. PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT 011131 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DIVISION Case No.: Plaintiff, CONSENT v. JUDGMENT AND ORDER as to DEFENDANTS FISHER RANCH, FISHER RANCH, LLC, a California LLC, FISHER RANCH CORP., DEL Ca lfornia co oration; DEL RIO RIO HARVEST, and DANA HARVEST, C., a California BART FISHER JR. PAGE 1 Case 5 4'3 Ix.) Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 2 of 16 Page ID #:22 Plaintiff R. Alexander Acosta, United States Secretary of Labor, and Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher have agreed to resolve the disputes between them in this civil action and consent to the entry of this consentjudgment as provided below. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher Jr. agree to the terms of this consent judgment for settlement purposes only. I. BACKGROUND On March 15, 2017, a van carrying seven farm workers on their way to Fisher Ranch?s ?elds overturned, killing one worker and injuring six others. The California Highway Patrol investigation disclosed that the fatality resulted ??om a blown out tire and a seat belt that had been removed. The report also disclosed that the van had a bald tire (apart from the tire that blew out), two wheels did not have all lug nuts properly securing the wheels to the van, and the driver did not have a commercial driver?s license and his license had been suspended. The workers were recruited and hired by Fernando Pinedo and his company, Healthy Harvesting, while the van with the missing seat belt was owned by Jose Pinedo, Fernando Pinedo?s uncle, and owner of Harvesting Inc. Under the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Protection Act 29 U.S.C. 1801, et seq., all persons who recruit and furnish agricultural workers to work for a grower must register as a farm labor contractor with the Department of Labor FLCs that transport farmworkers must be approved to do so by the DOL, the vehicles they use must be inspected and certi?ed and they must maintain certain levels of insurance. Although Fernando Pinedo/Healthy Harvesting was registered as an FLC to recruit and hire workers, neither he, nor his uncle, Jose Pinedo, was authorized to transport them. PROPOSED CONSENT LIDGMEN 0RDLR PAGE 2 Case 5 Ix.) Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 3 of 16 Page ID #223 Fisher Ranch contracted for labor to be furnished by Healthy Harvesting, who then caused the workers to be transported daily from Calexico, California, to ?elds owned or controlled by Fisher Ranch in Southern California for its harvests. MSPA was originally enacted, in part, to address the low wages and unsafe working conditions suffered by many agricultural workers, particularly the high occurrence of vehicle accidents that killed or injured many workers because they were driven in unsafe vehicles or by persons who lacked drivers? licenses or the ability to drive safely. MSPA requires all persons who transport agricultural workers for their employers to undergo a medical examination, possess a valid driver?s license, drive a vehicle that meets certain safety requires, and maintain sufficient insurance to cover damage to persons or property. When these prerequisites are met, the DOL will certify a farm labor contractor as ?transportation authorized.? II. STATEMENT BY THE PARTIES: A. The Secretary ?led a complaint alleging that all Defendants violated the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act. B. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher waive formal service and acknowledge receipt of a copy of the Secretary?s Complaint. C. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher waive their answers and any defenses to the Secretary?s Complaint. D. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher agree that the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this civil action and that venue lies in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. E. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER PAGE 3 Case 5 Ix.) \omummgw Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 4 of 16 Page ID #224 Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher acknowledge that they and any individual, agent, or entity acting on their behalf or at their direction have notice of, and understand, the provisions of this Consent Judgment. F. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher agree to resolve all allegations against them in the Secretary?s Complaint. G. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher agree to the entry of this Consent Judgment without contest. H. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they contracted with Healthy Harvesting to ?lmish agricultural workers for their broccoli harvest in and melon harvests in Yuma, Arizona and throughout California since at least 2016. I. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that Healthy Harvesting was not authorized to transport workers. J. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that Healthy Harvesting transported workers from Calexico to every day to harvest broccoli for Defendants during the 2016 and 2017 harvests, and these workers depended on the transportation provided by Healthy Harvesting to get to the ?elds. These workers lived long distances from Defendants? ?elds, the fields were far from public transportation, and the workers did not have access to a personal car. K. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they failed to take steps to determine if Healthy Harvesting was authorized to transport workers, had the PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDI-R PAGE 4 Case 5 Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 5 of 16 Page ID #225 required insurance, and was transporting workers safely, by licensed drivers, in vehicles that met required safety standards when they hired it. L. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they employed the workers furnished by Healthy Harvesting for their broccoli and melon harvests in 2016 and 2017. M. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they failed to request or receive any payroll records for the workers furnished by Healthy Harvesting, nor did they maintain any such payroll records for these workers. N. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they failed to pay the workers furnished by Healthy Harvesting for all hours worked in that workers were not paid for the time spent at the beginning of the day while waiting for the crop to de-ice. O. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher do not contest that they failed to pay the workers furnished by Healthy Harvesting the wages promised, and disclosed, to the workers, when they failed to pay them for time spent waiting for the crop to de-ice. P. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher agree that they presently only hire LCs who are transportation authorized to ?lmish their agricultural workers and will continue to do so. 111. JUDGMENT Therefore, upon motion of the attorneys for the Secretary, and for cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJ UDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to Section 502 of MSPA, 29 U.S.C. 1852, Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE 5 Case 5 n?In?I HO ?ul 433- DJ ls.) 06 19 Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 6 of 16 Page ID #:26 Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher their of?cers, agents, servants, employees, successors and all persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently enjoined and restrained ?'om violating MSPA in any of the following manners: 1. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher Jr. shall not, contrary to MSPA 201(a) and 301(a), fail to disclose to all migrant and seasonal agricultural workers who work for them information regarding their wages and working conditions, including rates of pay and location of work, as set forth in 29 CPR. 500.75 and 500.76; a. Defendants shall require all FLCs who furnish workers to them to provide Defendants with a written list of the disclosures the FLC has made to these workers; b. Defendants must secure a copy of these disclosures prior to any worker beginning work so that Defendants can take steps to ensure that the FLC is complying with its obligations under c. Defendants shall distribute a copy of these disclosures to the workers prior to them beginning work for Defendants and must include the amounts workers are charged for transportation; (1. Defendants shall distribute to their FLCs a copy of the attached Exhibit ?Farm Workers? Rights to Accurate Information about the Job.? Defendants? FLCs should then distribute Exhibit to the workers prior to the workers beginning work for Defendants. e. Defendants shall take steps to ensure that their FLCs have made the disclosures to the workers at the time they recruit PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE 6 Case 5 Ix) Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 7 of 16 Page ID #227 the worker as required by 29 CPR. 500.75 and 500.76; 2. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher Jr. shall not, contrary to MSPA 202(a) and 302(a), 29 U.S.C. 1822(a) and 1832(a), and 29 CPR. 500.81, fail to pay, when due, all wages owed to migrant and seasonal agricultural workers whom they employ; a. Defendants must take steps to ensure that workers are paid for all hours they present themselves as available to work including any time spent waiting for the crops to be ready to be harvested, waiting to check in, and waiting to complete paperwork; b. The wages rates paid to workers must be computed based on the rate disclosed to the workers as set forth in paragraph 1; 0. Amounts charged to workers for transportation that were not previously disclosed must be treated as an illegal deduction and must be repaid; d. Defendants shall cure any underpayments within the following two pay periods; 3. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher shall not, contrary to MSPA 201(d) and 301(0), 29 U.S.C. 1821(d) and 1831(c) fail to make, keep or maintain all time and pay records; a. Defendants shall obtain a copy of the time and payroll records from the FLC at the time each payroll is made, if the workers are paid for pay period January 1 7, 2018 on January 8, 2018, Defendants must receive a c0py of that PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE 7 Case 5 DJ IQ Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 8 of 16 Page ID #228 payroll on January 8, 2018. 4. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher shall not, contrary to MSPA 402, 29 U.S.C. 1842(b), and 29 C.F.R. ?500.71, hire, use or employ any person to perform FLC activities (including recruiting, soliciting, hiring, or transporting migrant or seasonal agricultural workers) who does not possess a valid FLC or FLC employee Certi?cate of Registration from the Secretary authorizing those FLC activities; a. Defendants shall review each Certi?cate before entering into any contract with that 5. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher shall not, contrary to MSPA 29 U.S.C. use or cause to be used vehicles for the transportation of migrant or seasonal agricultural workers without failing to ensure that each driver providing transportation to migrant or seasonal agricultural workers has a valid and appropriate driver?s license; ensure that motor vehicles that are identi?ed by the LCs to be used to transport migrant or seasonal agricultural workers conform to vehicle safety standards (certi?cation by the California Highway Patrol that the vehicle is ?t for such use shall serve as compliance); and have the required minimum level of insurance. a. Defendants shall require all FLCs to provide the VIN number of all vehicles that will be used to transport workers prior to beginning work and an inspection report showing that the vehicle meets safety requirements set forth in 29 C.F.R. 500.104, and 500.105 (certi?cation by the California Highway Patrol that the vehicle is ?t for such use shall serve as compliance). PROPOSED ORDER PAGE 8 Case 5 IO Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 9 of 16 Page ID #229 b. Defendants shall not fail to ascertain all persons who are employed by the FLCs to transport workers, are authorized to transport, are competently able to inspect the vehicle to ensure it meets DOL safety standards as set forth in 29 CPR. 500. 104 and 500.105, possess a valid driver?s license, and have passed the required medical exam required when driving any vehicle other than a passenger automobile; c. Defendants shall maintain all vehicle inspection reports and records showing the names of the drivers with copies of their drivers licenses and medical forms for three years and make these records available to the representatives of the Department of Labor upon their request; 6. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher shall not request, solicit, suggest, or coerce, directly, or indirectly, any employee to return or to offer to return to the Defendants or to someone else for the Defendants, any money in the form of cash, check, or any other form, for wages previously due or to become due in the ?Jture to said employee under the provisions of this judgment or nor shall Defendants accept, or receive from any employee, either directly or indirectly, any money in the form of cash, check, or any other form, for wages heretofore or hereafter paid to said employee under the provisions of this consent judgment or nor shall Defendants discharge or in any other manner discriminate, nor solicit or encourage anyone else to discriminate, against any such employee because such employee has cooperated with the Secretary?s investigation, testi?ed against Defendants, or received or retained money due to him ?'om Defendants under the provisions of this judgment or MSPA. PROPOSED CONSENT 1 ORDER PAGE 9 case Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 10 of 16 Page ID #:30 Ix.) 7. Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher jointly and severally, shall not continue to withhold payment of $21,168.00, which represents the back wages hereby found to be due for the Subject Period under MSPA, to the employees named in the attached Exhibit A in the amounts set forth therein. 8. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, 1110., and Dana Bart Fisher shall not fail to ensure that all FLCs who ?lrnish agricultural workers are transportation authorized and are compliant with the transportation and safety requirements established by MSPA. a. These FLCs must, upon being hired and at reasonable times thereafter, provide Defendants the VIN of any vehicle used to transport workers, a list of designated drivers and proof that each designated driver possesses the appropriate driver?s license as required by law. 9. Defendants shall monitor all FLCs to determine compliance with MSPA. Defendants will conduct at least two random and unannounced audits of each FLC during work, at the peak and end of the 2018 and 2019 seasons. Defendants shall ensure that it has audited at least one FLC at each major location at which it cultivates and/or harvests crops. Any FLCs that has one or more crews with compliance issuances during one of the two audits will be subject to a third random audit during that year and if the FLC has not corrected the violations, that FLC shall be terminated. 10. The ?eld audit process will be as follows: a. Identify a team of people to conduct the audit b. On the selected day of the audit, review the prior date?s PROPOSED ORDER PAGE 10 Case Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 11 of 16 Page ID #:31 Ix) time records to identify all contractors/crews performing work. 0. On the date of each audit randomly select at least 3 motor vehicles used to transport workers for each FLC and inspect the tires, including tread depth, seatbelts, breaking lights, headlights, tail lights, and signal lights to ensure they function properly, and that the seats are securely fastened to the vehicle. d. For each crew performing work, interview a minimum of 4 employees for every crew. The workers should be interviewed away from the presence of their crew leader, foreman or supervisor, and should be asked the followingwork? ii. Where did you come Driver?s name iv. Driver?s position (employee v. supervisor) v. Number of co-workers transported vi. Fee that was collected, if applicable vii. Base rate of pay Regular pay day e. If any employees were transported by a supervisor/crew leader, then an audit of the crew leader will be conducted, and the following documents requested from the crew leader: i. Valid state and federal contractor license with transportation endorsement ii. Valid driver?s license Doctor certi?cate iv. Proof of insurance v. Vehicle inspection sticker PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE I I . Case 5: Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 12 of 16 Page ID #:32 f. Visual inspection of the work area for any vehicles that are not passenger automobiles that can transport 7 or more passengers. If the driver of the vehicle is deemed to meet the de?nition of a farm labor contractor, then an audit of the driver will be conduct similar to section above. g. Any and all records created during the audits shall be maintained for a period of three years and made available to representatives of the Department of Labor upon their request. 11. Defendants shall inform the FLCs of any MSPA compliance issues revealed by the monitoring and corrective action recommended. 12. Defendants shall con?rm that FLCs maintain business auto liability insurance that shall be no less than the amounts set forth in 29 CPR. 500.121 which is currently $100,000 for each seat in the vehicle. a. Prior to commencing the work and thereafter upon renewal or replacement of each certi?ed coverage, the FLC shall furnish Defendants with a certi?cate(s) of insurance, executed by a duly authorized representative of each insurer, showing compliance with the insurance requirements set forth above. 13. Defendants shall distribute the following Notice of Farmworker?s Rights Under Federal Law, attached hereto as Exhibit C, during the beginning and the peak of the season to all workers, including those hired directly and through FLCs, on their ?rst day of work, and, again, enclosed with their paycheck during the peak of the season. Defendants shall also post this Notice in areas workers frequent, including in the vehicles that transport them, the toilets, and where the workers eat lunch, drink water and take breaks. Defendants shall distribute this Notice for two years from the date this Consent Judgment is entered. 14. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Fisher PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE [2 Case Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 13 of 16 Page ID #:33 Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher Jr., jointly and severally, shall pay to the Secretary the aforementioned sum of $21,168.00, pursuant to MSPA 202(3) and 302(a), 29 U.S.C. 1822(a) and 1832(3), for the Subject Period to the employees named in the attached Exhibit A in the amounts set forth therein. 15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher shall pay the Secretary $49,104.30 in Civil Money Penalties assessed by the US. Department of Labor under 29 U.S.C. 1853 for Defendant?s violations of MSPA and ?nally determined. 16. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in the amount of $70, 272.30 against Fisher Ranch, LLC, Fisher Ranch Corporation, Del Rio Harvest, Inc., and Dana Bart Fisher Jr., jointly and severally, and in favor of the Plaintiff, Secretary of Labor. Defendants shall pay the $21,168 in back wages due under this Consent Judgment as set forth below. Defendants shall deliver all checks and documents required by this Consent Judgment to Assistant District Director Medina, Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, 770 The City Drive South, Suite 5710, Orange, California 92868 on or before the date due: a. Within 15 days of entry of this Judgment, Defendants shall deliver a list containing the last known home address, social security, email address, and telephone number for each person named in the attached Exhibit A, if known. b. Within 15 days of the entry of this Consent Judgement, Defendants shall make a certi?ed or cashier?s check or money order for $21,168 payable to ?Wage Hour Div., Labor.? The words ?Fisher Ranch/BWs? must be shown in the memo line. c. The Secretary shall allocate and distribute the backwages to the PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE 13 Case 5: I?lo u?o u?I ON 43?- DJ ?4 18 1 Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 14 of 16 Page ID #:34 persons named in the attached Exhibit A, or to their estates if necessary, in his sole discretion. Any money not so paid within a period of three years from the date of its receipt, because of an inability to locate the proper persons or because of their refusal to accept it, shall be then deposited in the Treasury of the United States, as miscellaneous receipts. . Within 30 days of entry of this Consent Judgment, Defendants shall purchase at least three radio advertisements to run between 6:00 AM and 8:00 PM in two of the following radio stations: i. 99.3 FM in El Centro, California ii. 100.9 FM in El Centro, California 94.5 FM in El Centro, California/Yuma, Arizona iv. 88.7 FM in El Centro, California v. 104.5 FM in Yuma, Arizona . The advertisement referred to in paragraph should include the following message in Spanish: i. If you worked for Healthy Harvesting or Harvesting Inc. harvesting broccoli from November 2016 to March 2017 in California or Palos Verdes, California you may be owed wages. Please contact Department of Labor at 415-625?7700. ii. ?Si usted trabajo para Healthy Harvesting Harvesting Inc. cosechando brocoli en California 0 Palos Verdes, California de Noviembre del 2016 a Marzo del 2017, puede ser que no se le hayan pagado todas sus horas tenga derecho a recibir un pago adicional por estas horas. Por favor de llamar a1 Departamento de Trabajo al f. For the civil money penalties, Defendants shall make the check or PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE 14 Case Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 15 of 16 Page ID #:35 Ln 4: b) Ix.) money order payable to the order of ?Wage Hour Div., Labor,? and shall list in the memo line. 17. Within 30 days of entry of this Consent Judgment, Defendants shall pay the $49,104.30 in civil penalties due under this Consent Judgment by delivering a certi?ed or cashier?s check or money order to Assistant District Director Medina. The check must be made payable to ?Wage Hour Div., Labor,? and shall list in the memo line. 18. The ?ling, pursuit, and/or resolution of this proceeding with the ?ling of this Consent Judgment shall not act as or be asserted as a bar to any action under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 216(b), as to any employee not named on the attached Exhibit A, nor as to any employee named on Exhibit A for any period not speci?ed therein. 19. Each party shall bear all fees and other expenses (including court costs) and attorneys? fees that might be available under the Equal Access to Justice Act incurred by such party in connection with any stage of this proceeding to date. 20. Nothing in this Consent Judgment and Order is binding on any government agency other than the United States Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division. 21. This Court shall retainjurisdiction of this action for purposes of enforcing compliance with the terms of the Consent Decree. The Plaintiff agrees that it will not oppose Defendants? motion to vacate the Consent Judgment if it is ?led at least ?ve years a?er entry, and Defendants have complied with this Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this day of 20 PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER PAGE IS C'ase Document 5-1 Filed 07/23/18 Page 16 of 16 Page ID #:36 C) ?l I-u-o DJ NAME Dated: RONALD H. BARSAMIAN BARSAMIAN MOODY, PC Attorneys for Defendants Fisher Ranch LLC, Fisher Ranch C0., Del Rio Harvest, Inc. Dated: (ream DANA BART FISHER JR., On behalf of himsei? individually Dated: Fame? DANA BART FISHER JR., Ranch C0., Del Rio Harvest, Inc. PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER On behalf of zshei Ranch LLC, Fisher UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: 71/20/ 20? 3 KATE S. Solicitor of Labor JANET M. I-IEROLD Regional Solicitor SUSAN SELETSKY Counsel for Wage and Hour Litigation . . ?df?jf? T, VERDNICA MELENDEZ Abigail G. Daquiz Trial Attorneys Attorneys for Plaintiff, US. Secretary of Labor PAGE16