Case Document 13 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal F6 QR "24.11 Violation: 18 U.S.C. 1028 (Identity Fraud) RICHARD PINEDO, I Defendant. FEB 1 2 2013 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts STATEMENT OF THE OFFENSE Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, the United States of America and the defendant, RICHARD PINEDO, stipulate and agree that the following bets are true and accurate. These facts do not constitute all of the facts known to the parties concerning the charged offense; they are being submitted to demonstrate that su?cient facts exist that the defendant committed the olfense to which he is pleading guilty. 1. From approximately 2014 through December 2017, the defendant, RICHARD PINEDO, operated an online service called ?Auction Essistance.? Through Auction Essistance, Pinedo offered a variety of services designed to circumvent the security features of large online digital payment companies, including a large digital payments company hereinafter referred to as Company 1. 2. PINEDO sold bank account numbers through interstate and foreign commerce, speci?cally over the intemet. PINEDO obtained bank account numbers either by registering accounts in his own name or by purchasing accounts in the names of other people through the intemet. Many of the bank accounts purchased by PINEDO over the internet were created using stolen identities of U.S. persons. Although PINEDO was not directly involved in the registration Case Document 13 Filed 02/12/18 Page 2 of 4 of these accounts using stolen identities, he willfully and intentionally avoided learning about the use of stolen identities. 3. Company 1 required users to submit bank account numbers as ameans of verifying a user?s identity. To circumvent this requirement, certain users (hereinafter ??Users?) registered for Company 1?s online services with bank account numbers in the names of other people. PINEDO sold Users bank account numbers over the intemet to aid and abet, and in connection with, this scheme to defraud Company 1 by means of internet in interstate and foreign commerce. 4. After acquiring bank account numbers ?om PINEDO, Users linked the bank account numbers to their accounts with Company 1 as if they were the real owners of the bank accounts. Company I sought to verify the bank account numbers by making de minimus trial deposits into the accounts and asking Users to identity the amount of those trial deposits. PINEDO told Users the amomts of those trial deposits, thereby further aiding the Users in their scheme to circumvent veri?cation processes by Company 1. 5. PINEDO ?equently purchased bank account numbers ?om an individual he knew to be outside the United States. Similarly, based on IP addresses and other information, PINEDO knew that many of the persons to whom he sold bank account numbers were outside the United States. 6. In total, PINEDO knowingly transferred, possessed, and used, without lawful authority, hundreds of bank account numbers to aid and abet, and in connection with, the use of the wires in interstate and foreign commerce to defeat security measures employed by Company 1. PINEDO personally collected tens of thousands of dollars, and more than $1,000 during a one? year period, through the sale of these bank account numbers. Case Document 13 Filed 02/12/18 Page 3 of 4 ACCEPTANCE Theprecedjng statement theCounwith a?ctual basis pleato?ae charge against me. Itdoesnotinludc allofthe facts known tome regarding this o??nse. Innkemis statement hnwingly amlvoluntarily and becauselam, m?acggn?tyofthecrhm charged. No?neatshavebeenmdemnemraml underthe in?uence ofanything that could impede myabilily tounderstam this Statement ofthe O?'eme ?JIly. Ilnve readevely word ofthis Statement ofthe O?ieme, orlnve haditreadtome. Pmsuant toFederaIRule ofCriminal Pmcedme 11,a?er consulting with my attormys, Iagree andstipulate tothis Slatemem ofthe O?ense, mldechremderpemlty ofpetjury Ihatit'smn andconect. Date: 3211321 I Defendant AC OWLEDGMENT Ihave readthis Statement ofthe Offense, andhave reviewed itwithmy client I concur desire toadOptands?pulate tothis Statement ofthe 0m: astme and mm. Date: L3, I Ian sem Attorney ibr Defendant Case Document 13 Filed 02/12/18 Page 4 of 4 ROBERT S. MUELLER, 111 Special Counsel J'ezjinie S. Rhee Se ior Assistant Special Counsel L. Rush Atkinson Ryan K. Dickey Assistant Special Counsels The Special Counsel?s Of?ce