LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY INTRA-AGENCY ROUTING FORM TO: Enforcement Division FROM: Surveillance Division Routing Date: 8/4/2017 Facility Information Company Name: V. Keeler Associates Facility Site Name: Lafayette Academy Agency Interest No: 8555 (contractor) lAlt. AI No: Facility 99933 Mailing Address: V. Keeler Associates Physical Address: Lafayette Academy Street: PO Box 3424 Street 2727 S. Carrollton Avenue City, State, Zip: New Orleans. LA 70] 77 City, Parish New Orleans. Orleans Responsible Party/Contact Person: Vern Keeler Jr.. Owner Responsible Party/Contact Person Telephone No: (504) 947-0447 InspectionfReferral Information Inspection Date: 3/22/2017. 3/27/2017 Hours Spent On Inspection/Report: i 25 Media: Check all that apply Air (inc. asbestos/lead): Water: Haz. Waste: Risk MPs: Remediation: El Solid Waste (inc. tires): UST: Radiation: Stage I 2: Complaint? Yes EINO i Follow up? Yes No lfyes Enforcement Action Number Inspector/Team Leader Name: Lindsay Maloan Inspector/Team Cpntaet Approved By: lOUQu/qjm Date: ?flail? Circuit Rider Review: Date Approved By: I K) {w Date: .o m" 7/23/47 Revised 02/08/2013 Basis for Routing (check all that apply) Areas of Concern: IXI Contamination Above RECAP: Conveyance Notice Only I TEMPO Task ID No: I Other Explain: Additional Information: This section should state the specific reason for the referral, actions that have been taken by the referring division and supporting documentation. This section should also provide su?icient discussion and/or documentation for the Division receiving the referral to take action including documentation of events leading to the referral and company contact information. LAC No demolition or renovation activity that disturbs RACM or ACDA shall be conducted at a facility regulated by this Subsection unless at least one asbestos abatement contractor/supervisor trained in accordance with Subsection of this Section is physically present. An accredited supervisor was not initially present at the time of inspection. The ?acting? supervisor was found to be unaccredited with falsi?ed paperwork. LAC Discharge no visible emissions to the outside air from collection, mixing, wetting, and handling operations, or use the methods speci?ed by Subsection 0 of this Section to clean emissions containing particulate asbestos material before they escape to, or are vented to, the outside air. Boot prints were visible on the ?oor between the two containment areas. Children were walking the halls between the two containment areas. LAC The RACM and any ACD shall be adequately wet, and contained in leak- tight, clear transparent wrapping. The wrapped ?ooring sections were not wet. LAC After wetting, seal all asbestos-containing waste material in leak-tight, clear, transparent containers bags) while wet; or, for materials that will not ?t into containers without additional breaking, put materials into leak-tight, clear, transparent wrapping, ensuring that the ACWM is securely wrapped and sealed. Only some asbestos containing waste materials were wet. The large sections were not wet or leak-tight. LAC For asbestos-containing waste material to be transported off the facility site, label containers or wrapped materials with the name of the waste generator and the location at which the waste was generated. Generator labels observed on bags of material on 3/22/20] 7 were not legible. Large sections of ACM that had been removed had no generator label at all. A follow-up inspection on 3/27/2017 revealed that generator labels still were not being used on every bag and removed section as required. Revised 02/08/2013 John Bel Edwards Governor Chuck Carr Brown, Secretary ?enartment of EEn?irn/nmerttal (Battling ?nutheaet QReginmtl (Effie): Asbestos Demolition/Renovation Compliance Inspection Report V. Keeler Associates-Lafayette Academy Company Name: removal job AI 99938 Inspection Date: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 Contractor 8555 39920-39921 Physical Location: 2727 S. Carrollton Ave New Orleans LA Parish: Orleans (City) (State) Mailing Address: PO Box 3424 New Orleans LA 70177 (Address) (City) (State) (Zip) Facility Representative/Title: Vern Keeler Jr. Facility Representative Telephone No.: (504) 947-0447 LDEQ Lead Inspector: Lindsay Maloan Other Inspectors: 1 0 on; MW 0 Report By: (?52me 7/3 ll [7 Lindsamaloan nvir ental Scientist (Date) Reviewed By: all Dionne MagnessJEiwiroWl Scientist Supervisor (Date) 201 Evans Rd., Bldg. 4 Suite 420, New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-5230 (504) 736-7701 Phone (504) 736-7702 Fax No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 INTRODUCTION A full compliance evaluation inspection of V. Keeler Associates (VK, AI 8555) conducting asbestos removal at Lafayette Academy (AI 99938) was made for compliance with applicable demolition/renovation (demo/reno) asbestos regulations. FACILITY DESCRIPTION Lafayette Academy is a school operated by the Recovery School District. It is located at 2727 S. Carrollton Avenue in New Orleans, Orleans Parish. Construction work has been ongoing at the school since summer 2016. CONTRACTOR HISTORY VK received an XP, AE-XP-13-01368, regarding asbestos violations in 2013. AREAS EVALUATED A ?le review in EDMS was conducted before conducting a site visit. The emergency AAC-2 was dated 3/13/2017 and assigned on 3/13/2017. According to the AAC-2, the general contractor, Tuna Construction, discovered a layer of asbestos ?ooring on 2/28/2017 that had not previously been identi?ed would need to be removed from the entire third floor of the school. The request for emergency status listed costs as the cause for emergency. On 3/22/2017, accompanied by Dionne Magness, I conducted an asbestos demo/reno inspection. Ms. Magness conducted a lead inspection while on site. Upon arrival, we noted that students were attending classes and roaming the halls outside of the containment area, which was not secured. A student was observed poking his head into the containment area (see photos.) Air monitoring equipment was set up throughout the hallways, and students were observed touching it. At the time of inspection, no air monitoring staff was on site. A gentleman named Patrick Delaney introduced himself to us as the on?site supervisor. I requested that he provide me with required paperwork and IDs for all workers on site. I also requested that he show me a bag of ACM waste from inside the containment. Mr. Delaney entered the containment on the north side of the building and brought out a sample, which was double bagged, goosenecked and wet as required, but no generator label was inside or on it as required. I informed Mr. Delaney of this, and he pointed to atom piece of looseleaf paper that was folded up in between the two layers of bags. He stated that that was the generator label, but it was hard to read because the ink had gotten wet due to the moisture inside the bag. I informed him that this was not acceptable and generator labels needed to be clearly legible. I also informed him of my concern that the containment was open and curious children had been sticking their heads inside. According to him, they were ??ne cleaning? the section at the moment and not doing removal. I also pointed out the boot prints on the floor between the two containment areas. Mr. Delaney brought us to the second area. Entire sections of floor that had been removed were being stored in an empty classroom. The material was wrapped but the plastic wrapping was full of holes. Asbestos warning labels were present but no generator labels were present and the material was not wet. Negative air machines were not functioning properly in the second containment area on the south side of the building, however, active removal was not occurring in AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 this area where the removed ?oor tile sections were being ?stored so they were not required to be running at the time. I requested identi?cation and accreditation paperwork from all workers. Workers on site had appropriate identi?cation but copies of the accreditation certi?cates were not on site. During this process, Mr. Roberto Falcon, who was the supervisor listed on the AAC-2, returned to the site from his lunch break. He informed me that he had the ADVF and the certi?cations with him while he was offsite. I reviewed them and informed him that the papers needed to be on site at all times. I requested Mr. Delaney?s paperwork. He was not able to produce an LDEQ accreditation card or certi?cate. Mr. Falcon contacted the V. Keeler of?ce requesting Mr. Delaney?s paperwork but they were not able to produce any at the time. I conducted an EDMS search from my phone and could not ?nd any paperwork indicating that Mr. Delaney was an accredited worker or supervisor. The last document in EDMS under Mr. Delaney?s (178220) was from 2013. informed Mr. Falcon of all of the issues 1 observed on site and he stated that they would be addressed. I informed him that I would be returning to the site to make sure that areas of concern had been corrected. Upon return to the of?ce, I sent an email (attached) to my supervisor, manager, the general contractor (Tuna Construction), Mr. Falcon, and Mr. Earl Cager, the representative from Jacobs CRS overseeing the construction activities at Lafayette Academy on behalf of the Recovery School District. I received an email from Mr. Falcon stating that he had located Mr. Delaney?s paperwork (attached) Attached were a training certi?cate for a contractor/ supervisor refresher training dated April 2016 and an undated money order for $99 indicating that he had submitted the required and fee to LDEQ but had not received his accreditation paperwork yet. No copy of an was provided. I contacted LDEQ?Noti?cations and Accreditations who informed me that they had not received any paperwork from Mr. Delaney, and they were able to trace the money order provided to a completely different person, indicating that Mr. Delaney had falsi?ed his information when he provided it to V. Keeler upon employment. I contacted Mr. Falcon to inform him of this information, and I also informed him that it was his job to vet his hires, and a contractor/supervisor accreditation costs $291, not $99. He stated that Mr. Delaney was no longer working with the company and he would be careful to review applicants? paperwork in the future. I contacted Ms. Tiffany Delcour of the Recovery School District and informed her of my ?ndings, Ms. Magness? lead inspection ?ndings, and my concern regarding the amount of work going on while children were present. On 3/27/2017, Dionne Magness and I returned to the site. Mr. Falcon and representatives from Tuna Construction informed us that starting 3/28/2017, work would be completed at night for the remainder of the school year while students were attending classes. No removal was occurring at the time of inspection. Clearance sampling was occurring at the time of inspection; I asked Dr. Andrew Rogers, who was sitting in the hallway upon our arrival, if aggressive sampling was occurring. He informed me that he did not have a leaf blower but that he would cease sampling immediately and go purchase one. He departed the site. I requested to see bags of waste in order to check if the AOCs noted on 3/22/2017 had been corrected. Generator labels were still not present on the bags of waste in the top portion of the AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 dumpster. Mr. Falcon emailed me on 3/27/2017 with photos showing that they had removed every bag from the dumpster to do a check for a generator label and added a label to each bag that had not been labeled as required. The job continued through July 2017. All subsequent ADVFs were assigned to me and the enforcement referral for the violations observed in March 2017 was held to ensure that no additional violations were noted during any subsequent inspections. Asbestos removal was completed and materials were shipped offsite by June 23, 2017, according to the completed ADVFs. Final cleaning and breakdown occurred during the remainder of the contractor?s time on site. I conducted an additional inspection on 6/7/2017 that did not have any areas of concern noted, which was forwarded to EDMS and can be viewed under EDMS Document ID 10754034. Air monitoring results for the bulk of the job were submitted all at once under the aforementioned EDMS document ID number. Emails regarding the speci?cs of air monitoring and job ?nalization can also be viewed under EDMS Document ID 10754034. AREAS OF CONCERN LAC No demolition or renovation activity that disturbs RACM or ACDA shall be conducted at a facility regulated by this Subsection unless at least one asbestos abatement contractor/supervisor trained in accordance with Subsection of this Section is physically present. An accredited supervisor was not initially present at the time of inspection. The ?acting? supervisor was found to be unaccredited with falsi?ed paperwork. LAC Discharge no visible emissions to the outside air from collection, mixing, wetting, and handling operations, or use the methods speci?ed by Subsection 0 of this Section to clean emissions containing particulate asbestos material before they escape to, or are vented to, the outside air. Boot prints were visible on the ?oor between the two containment areas. Children were walking the halls between the two containment areas. LAC The RACM and any ACD shall be adequately wet, and contained in leak-tight, clear tranSparent wrapping. The wrapped ?ooring sections were not wet. LAC After wetting, seal all asbestos-containing waste material in leak- tight, clear, transparent containers bags) while wet; or, for materials that will not fit into containers without additional breaking, put materials into leak-tight, clear, transparent wrapping, ensuring that the ACWM is securely wrapped and sealed. Only some asbestos containing waste materials were wet. The large sections were not wet or leak- tight. LAC For asbestos-containing waste material to be transported off the facility site, label containers or wrapped materials with the name of the waste generator and the location at which the waste was generated. Generator labels observed on bags of AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler& Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 material on 3/22/2017 were not legible. Large sections of ACM that had been removed had no generator label at all. A follow-up inspection on 3/27/2017 revealed that generator labels still were not being used on every bag and removed section as required. AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V . Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT 1 Demo/Reno Checklist ATTACHMENT 2 ADVF Forms ATTACHMENT 3 FIFs ATTACHMENT 4 Email Correspondence ATTACHMENT 5 Photos AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 ATTACHMENT 1 Demo/Reno Checklist Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality DEC/Surveillance Division Demolition/Renovation Inspection Report 12.1129 - - arm a - - Al 59) Inspection Date: ?22 ADVF ijl I Facility: WV Parish: 0 LOW) Facility Address: NM 0? 5 Owner Name: Owner Contact Name: 1_ 9 W. Phone 831.. Owner Mailing Address: tom ZIN E's M10507. Asbestos Removal Contractor: $~fW Al BCSS Contractor Mailing Address: 0 @1191 N0 LA- 10 i? Asbestos Contractor Contact: 12. Phone - '7 - ow Lead Inspector/Signature Other Inspectors: . mallow MNSS NOTE. All' ?"No answers are AOCs and requ1re further explanation in?Section C. (and Field lntervievtw ifissued). ?l?akc photos and samples as appropriate. Section A Asbestos Management: 1. Is the Owner/Operator in compliance with the noti?cation requirements in LAC (Verify information submitted on AAC-Z. ll? there are Areas of Concern (AOCs), list in Section and attach a copy ofthe AAC-Z) mYes No [3 Was the LDEQ Regional Of?ce notified of an emergency (LAC 33:111.5151.F.2.e.) revised (later) start date by fax or email or three days prior to the removal of resilient floor covering (LAC 33:1Il.5 5 1 lives No Is there an accredited asbestos contractor/supervisor gnsite? (LAC 33:Ill.5151.F.3.h) If yes, Name/Accreditation Yes Are all workers that are directly involved in the Demo/Reno accredited asbestos workers? personnel MUST have LDEQ Asbestos Accreditation Photo ID ml. LDEQ Asbestos Accreditation Certificate AND Photo ID.) Ems No If air monitoring is being conducted on-site, does the air monitor have a current Contrac Aor/Supervisor rai?cfeditation? (LACEO 331.115151 P.1.d) #1690901; 2 man on 8112 mines ggloslolb 0 Company conductingA ir Monitoring: 0 Air monitor 5 Name Accreditation If RACM is being removed or stripped from a facility component while it remains in place in the facility, are appropriate work area controls as outlined in OSHA 29 CFR 1926.]101.g being used? (LAC and 29 Yes 7. Has the RACM/structure/debris been wetted prior to and during [3 Yes 1 Revised 11/14/2016 I LDEQ Demolition Renovation Inspection Report 3122 17 Inspection Date: AI 61 5% removal/demolition, interim staging and loading? (LAC LAC 33:Ill.5151.F.3.c. LAC LAC LAC 8. Are the emission control methods employed by the ownerfoperator mes No reventing visible emissions to the outside air? (LAC 133111515111) #63? Will/5 01? HOOP 1? V?d 0? 9. Is all Asbestos Containing Waste Material (ACWM) maintained as Yes No intact as practicable? (LAC 33:111.5151J.l. LAC 10. Was the ACWM sealed in a leak-ti ht, clear trans arent wrapping? MYes (LAC Sb 1 I. Has the generator information label beenlplaced on the leak-tight, [3 Yes@ No [1 clear transparent wrapping? (Name of generator and location at which waste was generated.) (LAC .a.iv) 12. Has the asbestos warning label been placed on the leak-tight, Yes 0 transparent wrapping? (LAC 33:IlI.5151.J.1.a.iv) i 13. Is all ACWM stored in a labeled, secured area away from the Yes No public? (LAC 33:Ill.5151.J.l.a.vi) 14. Prior to completion, has the contractor completed the following: a. removed all loose debris (whether RACM or not) in and adjacent Yes No WA to the immediate work area (LAC and b. encapsulated all remaining RACM in the immediate work area? El Yes I: No (LAC 15. If the renovation was a response action at a school or state building, was the response action: a. designed by an accredited person (LAC EcYest b. completed by visual inspection (LAC and Ewes No c. air clearance sampling and analysis (LAC 33:IIl.27l Yes No 16. Are the vehicles used in transporting the ACWM marked Yes No appropriately during loading and unloading? (LAC 17. Is the ACWM being transported with an Asbestos Disposal Yes No Veri?cation Form AC 33: 5151. 2. lfyes, list the ADVF (1 El? (1146 3 18. If the Demo/Reno IS transported 11. an open- -bodied truck, Yes No IS a tar used to cover the load when the truck IS in motion? (LAC . 332111.1205.A.4 LAC W?lw (,de 19. Has the transport company noti?ed the Of?ce of Enviromnental Yes No [3 Services in writing as a Solid Waste Transporter? (LAC lfyes. SW Transporter IDall ACWM transported to a Recogni?zed Asbestos Land?ll for Yes No Disposal? If yes, Landfill Name: QAW %l 21. Was the LDEQ regional of?ce noti?ed by fax or email of the completion of the demolition, renovation, or response actions? (LAC . Yes No LDEQ Demolition Renovation Inspection Report 3 l7 #2 0] 614 3Q Inspection Date: Section Asbestos Workers: (if present, list below) AI Number AccreditationilE lame -.. Cert. Exp. 1 .1 ?ImlSS?bH?etin ll m2 3/ 11% memos 7M6 you?? '52ng mm 1.013? 1 om was. mo?btlt W4 63%. FWdo 42- "Lo 17 44% mm; nihw mam Section Summaq of Findings I Commentsvie, nun ?0 0? 5 cl Dtbnud? Wmsi no now Mose . 905030 New Mu; ooqulQC) M: lam/2 or Madam Am: 5555 ?rm Uwiwg ?edn?om No Wei loJoLls, Mr tons PM 8127 80mm 30% on, massive. 92. W3 Med wood COME, 80 W3 0\ \eafc NOW. N0 SWINUK WON 0R W35 Wm? AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 ATTACHMENT 2 AAC-2 ADVF Forms LDEQ-EDMS Doom-sent 10559863, Page 1 of 6 NOTIFICATION OF DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION AND Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Services Public Participation and Permit Support DivisiOn Notifications and Accreditations SeCtion ASBESTOS CONTAMINATED DEBRIS ACTIVITY FORM For LOEQ Use Only r? 1 Ck Noucher No. sass MAR I 7 Elli? No. of Asbestos Disposal Verification Forms (ADVFs) Requested I 2 41.1)le Phone (22$Iiills 3244 NC Please type and complete all required sections. Amt. Received Postmark Date (Elli ADVF No. Note: This imwmsed only when requesting $10st for Asbestos Contaminated Debris Activities (ACDA), Demolition, Renovation, and/or Response Action projects where Regulated Ashestos?cantaining Material (RACM) is present, or assumed to be present, above the established thresholds or as otherwise required by LAC For demolitions where RACM is absent or amount present is below established thresholds, use Asbestos Negative Declaration Demolition Notification Form Emergency [3 Revision ADVF its to be revised Note: Emergency notification is allowable only for a sudden, unexpected event that would cause an unsafe condition (or health hazard), equipment damage, or would pose an unreasonable financial burden, per LAC Cancellation ADVF its to be canceled I. Type of Notification (check only one box) 8 Original Disposal Only Additional Latest Annual (Maintenance) Check if Form AAC 2(a) is for non scheduled operations for repair or maintenance less than 1 Cubic Yard ol RACM- per operation (IndIcate total volume In Section as bin i ll. Type of Operation (check only one box) [3 Reno 8. Demo or RACM removal a subsequent demo) ?Renavatlon RACM Demo (entire structure treated as RACM) ls structure being demolished under order of a state or local government agency? ?for.-1 ACOA Response Action (schools state buildings) Facility Name facility Asbestos- containing Material Lafauette Elementary School Physical Address 372? Ave LA Dill-3 ans City Owner Name lOUISlana Department of Education Zip Contact Name Mailing Address 1201 N. 3rd St City Baton Rouge State LA Contact Phone 887 )453-2721 Project Designer La. ACCreditation No. (schools slate buildings) Yes (Complete Sec. Parish Orleans Building Size (soil) 79,000 sf No. Floors 3 Age of Building (Yrs) 70+ Location on site (Bldg, Floor, Zip 70302 Contact Email Room, etc.) where work is done 3'd Floor Present School State Bldg. Pubiic/Cornmercial Use Residential Industrial [3 Installation Other :i-l-h .. . n3?" ?3 . i Prior School E) State Bldg. [j Public/Commercial U59 Residential E) industrial installation Other 09/19/2016 Pagt. 1 0f 4 NOTIFICATION ANO RENOVATION ATVD ASBESTOS CONTAMINA TEO OEBRIS ACTIVITY FORM AAC- 2({1 I Docurnmt 10559863, Page 2 of 6 IV. Determination 0? ?5?05 Known or Assumed Asbestos Present (if checked, all suspect materials are ACM) Asbestos Determined to be Present Per Inspection andlor Lab Analysis {it checked, complete the items below) Inspector?s Name Certified Lab Name Inspector's Accreditation No. . Lab Accreditation No. Inspection Date (mm/dd/W) Analysis Date (mm/ddfw) Procedure, including analytical method. if appropriate. used to detect the presence of asbestos material Attach the follovving copies: 0 Signature page of inspection report for inspection date indicated (a bovel 0 Lab Analysis Report for analysis date indicated (above) NOTE: The Noti?cation of Demolition and Renovation and Asbestos Contaminated-debris Activity Form AAC?Zfolurill not be processed without these attachments it inspection or lab analysis was periorrned. v. Approximate Amount of Asbestos Removal Times (check applicable times) Business Haurs Alter Hours Weekends Holidays Nonregulated ACM [[03 to be Remover; 2 Material to be Removed Prior to Badge" l" applicable) -. 1' RACM Ceiling VAT Transite VAT Asphalt Roofing Asbestos Fireproofing VAT Piping Mastic Mastic Material 2 Other . Other Other Linear Feet i Linear Feet Linear Feet Square Feet 20.000 Square Feet Square Feet Amount of - Asbestos RACM Cubic Yard ACM Cubic Yard ACM Cubic Yard Cubic Yard i 'ACD-Asbestos?contammated Debris . - - :3 VI. Asbestos Removal Contractor Information for RACMIACD Asbestos Removal Name of On-site Contracror Name V. Keeler 8i Associates. inc Supervisor Roberto [3'60" LA Contractor?s 30227 On-site Supervisor . License N0. . - .. _w Accreditation No. 55175249 Mailing Address 5049:3529 mm Supervisor Accred. Expir. Date i City New Orleans .. Statew Zipmlotn Contact Name Vern Keel: .- Phone 504 Willi-0447 All. No. ContactEmail vkeelerjr@vkeeler:com ffVii. Other Operator/Demolition Contractor I Contractor Name Contact Name Mailing Address Contact Email State__ Zip?mm? Phone l0rm_?077_r06 0F DEMOLITION AND AND ASBESTOS CONTAMINATED ACTIVITY FORM AAC 310) 09/19/2016 Page 2 ul 4 OMS Doctmenl: 10559863, Page 3 of 6 . ?71? via- vm. Scheduled Dates for Asbestos Removal or Activities that may disturb Asbestos Material in a Demolition, Renovation, Response Action, or ACDA 5'3? Date (?m/dd/Wl Completion Date (mm/dd/W) 0? i117 -.- IX. Scheduled Demolition Dates Start Date Completion Date - -7. it. Solid Waste Transporter to Land?ll for Transporter Name Richldiglsoppsallnc. Contact Name Diedra Jones LDEQ SW T?ansporter No. Ell-10332 Contact Email Address W. 11600 Old GEEWLN Contact Phone 504 2412142 City New Orleans State LA Zip T0126 1 - XI. Solid Waste Transporter Only if Taken to O?slte Premises and Stored Prior to Disposal Transporter Name Physical Location of Drop Off Area LDEQ SW Transporter No. T- 01V Mailing Address Contact Name City ._State Zip Contact Email Contact Phone I. Recognized Asbestos Landfill (EAL) for Name River_Birch Contact Name :3 Physical Address - Contact Phone 504 ?36-1288 City -- Zip 70094 Mailing Address 200 South_itenner Ave City ?Mondale _State__i_._a 2 :3 79094 Governmental Agency Ordered Demoiition (Complete only if yOu checked ?Yes? in Section II) Gov't Agency Representative Name Gavernment Agency Representative?s Title Date Issued (m m/dd/yy) Date Ordered to Begin [mm/dd/Wl 3 Attach a copy of the Demolition Order from the governmental agency identified (above). NOTE: The Noti?cation of Demolition and Renovation and Asbestos Contaminated Debris Activity Form will not be processed without this attachment. XIV. Emergency Renovations involving RACM (Complete only for emergency event indicated by checked "Emergency" b0x on page 1} Datt' of Emergency {mm/dd/yy) 02/28/22 Time of Emergency unspeci?ed Tuna construction was in the process of renovating thr- Descnbe the sudden, unexpected event requiring immediate attention school [hen theyiound several layer_5_o_l_tile that were never Tested for Asbestos; after testing it was determined that all layers on the third floor needed to be removed. Some llooring was disturbed during the beginning of the renovation work and the lose flooring in the area needs to be addressed immediately fornt_7077_r06 Normal now or DEMOLITION AND RENOVATION AND ASBESTOS TED osems FORM AAC 2m) 09/19/2016 Page 3 oi 4 LDEQ-EDMS Doculunt: 10559863, Page 4 of 6 ,rEnplain how event would cause an unsafe condition (health hazard). equipment Renovationuofsaid continue and all damage, or pose unreasonable ?nancial burden (per LAC ACM that was disturbed needs :0 be removed Prior to any additional work being done in these spaces. The ?nding of ACM may cause the GC to have to pay liquidated damage?at can amount to of thousandsofdollars i_f_this abatement d_g_es not get underway quickly. r- .. ..- xv. Planned Demolition, Renovation Work, Response Action, or ACDA Flooring will be removed in a lull negative presswe . Description of activity including techniques of removal and facility components containment all work will be done as perfegs. All material will be double bagged and removed from the work area and placed in a lined dumpster. i Description of work practices 8i engineering controls including . . . . Full negative enclosure, wet methods, area and asbestos removal and waste handling emission control procedures I Personnel monitoring will be in place for this project. I Describe procedures to be followed in the event uneirpecte-dRACM is Stop work, Clean up and inform LDEQ of findings. found or CAT II nonlriable becomes RACM (per LAC 2.d.xviil XVI. Comments Provrde any additional comments [information relevant to this notification this project may have been notified before by LU Environmental; LU has since been removed from the contract and did not Amman XVII. Codi?cation . I certin that the above information is correct and that personnel performing Demolition or Renovation Activities, Response Action, or ACDA are trained and accredited in accordance with LAC when RACM is present, and that the evidence of the required training will be available on the prolect site for inspection by personnel. ,l I . . A hilt-4? 6. .. Printed Name of Owner or Operator/Contractor Signature of Owner rater/Contractor Date (mm/dd/yyi --. I ADVF Fees $66 each For non-emergencies {minimum of 10 working days notification given). 599 each For emergencies (less than 10 working days noti?cation given). No vouchers will be accepted for emergencies. NO FEE For revisions or cancellations. - .. 4 Submittal Information For Emergencies-Information may be Submitted by: fax (225-325-8283); email phone (225-219-3244); or hand-delivery. If faxed or emailed, a follow-up form with original signature and applicable fee payment must be submitted to the LDEQ by one of the methods of delivery (below) within 5 working days. 0 For Non-emergencies-Information MAY NOT BE FAXED. Forms may be submitted by email - with a follow-up form with an original signature submitted within 5 working days. I The form with an original signature and applicable fee payment must be submitted to the LDEQ by one of the following methods of delivery: By Mail: or By Overnight or Hand-delivery: LDEQ Oflice of Environmental Services LDEQ Office of Environmental Servizes Public Participation and Permit Support Division Public Participation and Permit Supaort Notifications 8. Accreditations Section Notifications 8i Accreditations Section P. 0. Boar 4313 602 North Street i Baton Rouge. LA 70821-4313 Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Pursuant to La. R5. 40.1574 Asia, be advised that no construction or renovation can begin until the plans and specifications are reviewed by the Office of the State Fire Marshall or it is determined by that Of?ce that plans are not required to be submitted. f' - . ?o iorm_7077_ros no~ or ocmounow AND RENOVATION AND ASBESTOS CONTAMINATED prams ACTIVITY FORM 09/19/2015 Page 4 of a Docment 10559863, Page 5 of 6 LDEQ-EDMS Document 10559863, Page THE U.S. ,1 i ARATION QUIRED. ):12.5 9.5 I0006 222222222222222 2222222 222222222 m- PRESS FIRMLY TO SEAL m, 23 . 7 5 R2305KI31577-2 EXPRESS AddresseePF?E! 7 MAIL umreo pom; smwc: Post Addressee 9856?]: I [1022557223u3 ?ki i I N. I 8 wit?)0 . ?ma as ?mun-33:3. In? n, 2 imp-tun SEE a: WMWIRY ?1 Elam My?_ .. I Si . FROM: mm? Will I I I TO. rumr ImamFOR PICKUP OH TRACKING Visil Call 1-800-222-1811 gg?s - '2 . uualnilsee um um. oesunatlons only. I VISIT US AT ORDER FRFF SUPPLIES ONLINE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. shlp'?t??ts. Misuse may Ior resaIe.EP13F u.s. postal Service; July 2013; All ?ghts ?sewed- Th5 packaging is the unpeny of the 11.5. Postal Sonics-Q) and Is ptovided sol rly for use In sending Priority 510?? be a violation of federal law. This packaging is not LDEQ-EDMS Document 10575772, Page 1 of 1 ?do oil-m 5530 um nomad ol {ml-0nd Only t! inmcwumu PQIICWIHNKN Mb: 0.0.5.103!) QEQ Ida law. um 7.3! JJIJ - Ammo: mu vamcmou tom mom mu: mum EXPRAHON DATE: MIMI SIARR L050 SIAFF: ESNMMEU DATE: 71 mm} ommcoum lunch Runny . . Cull-OI mun-4n at- uu 0h?: mu. mum Mi! 3" I COMRACIOR Knuth-uh." comamrocmo wins! aw? 335. mu my lu- O?um LA mu. 06mm man-u: -Iurlh:hm m3, IM-UII mo ?mun: a .39. um common mm! 0m 9m ECT COMPLETED con-m concur-out: 94 IMIDI ?0ch ?to com-ts with com-? on M: and ?cm-i] au?od? ob:w by pup" I-O and on (bu-M. yacht um! and like". and at ?Input: pnpucondln In Ibo hulpo? by may on." Io mic-bk Hand-ulna pun-ml mm m: 3511:; wuu summit 1?1.wa 3?29] 7 I A mm Nun-Purl! 5- I: ?nu urn-tun ONE RECEMD 3 41?; I 7 cm DELIVERED 3 JS I 7 PRNTED NAME Tumr? Stow-nun [111?] 7' ?cum ran ?cum CONT 1?3? ONE I RED PRNIEONAME la} MD le SIGMIURE Winniw C. comm 0 mum min-LDC!) mtmomw -.1uow HM mmworm boa) can!? LDEQ-EDHS Document. 10575832, Page 1 of 1 mm mm umkp?o: tub-cum Si?? or ?medium" {3 hutmihw?ku MM i v.0. In cm .2 i; Dg?q Ido- IWOI. In?ll-I ISSUE DAIE: ?.6705 mm (ADVF) MONTY: EXMAHON ONE: PRO ICT SIAM: mu LDEO sun: in COMPLETION DAIE: um ommoxcr Wait Academy LOCAIDON .0 man u- mm an I COMMCIOR In? hound" Gauntlet up new" man womnou an mu ?55 In Ohm :4 mun-us --mucn-. MCIJIY a mu NOMTION mush m- mo mm ?mm: a. oumnn sumo 30 '7 5 f1 amt-out amulet ?all" duh. uh 01H (OMIHIR by and ?cum-hr inch? above by pup" Mk. In shun-t picked. Into! an hickd. on b! Illupull pup? cowl-n lulu bumped by my ?nub. ?Inhi- ?-I?ud and pun-"l would-nu. mum mu: "Velma TAuth snow-aunt ?1.4.1 WJOIHW an mum mmnecemo 35 3(5 DATEDELNERED 3:35 17 mmo X?Amg fawn-.1? mu Mime DAIE ww? RICE Ww?k? glided/:1 mcmucm h?T?f?lM 1m WEENOMHWEWWCWOI bow-OM? AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of InsPection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 ATTACHMENT 3 FIFs LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FIELD INTERVIEW FORM AGENCY INSPECTION DATE. 22 I TIME OF ARRIVAL: 7/ 3 00 ALTERNATE IDII: DEPARTURE DATE: TIME OF DEPARTURE: FACILITY NAME. IDWC PHONE )?BfoI 8370 LOCATION: 4:11 ?3 ?3312 N3 10IIR PARISH: 6 RECEIVING STREAM (BASINISUBSEGMENT): MAILING ADDRESS: 73150 MUM ND DA (.StreeliP O. Box (City) (State) (Zip) FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE. 9-0?qu TITLE: WISORU- FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PHONE NUMBER: NAME, TITLE, ADDRESS and TELEPHONE of RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL (ifdifferent from above): INSPECTION TYPE: PROGRAM INVOLVED: AIR WATERD OTHER: OBSERVATIONS. AREAS AND EQUIPMENT INSPECTED PROBLEMS, DEFICIENCIES, REMARKS VERBAL OI. FROM ACILITY VPRESEITATIVESHH IMAM ct Aesooate?: Iowsios Hia?iwle on 6? PIOOB. - N0 IIUDQIS on Imsk, IIMIS Wm Sections been Imam not TWP, at Imtgemm AIS not IIOWC IMF on site? ., NIEPA Wild/Icy REP - Mil hang Imductct-L I03 09.. 90393635 AREAS OF CONCERN: REGULATION EXPLANATION YES NO YES CI NO PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO SAMPLES TAKEN: YESD NOIEI (Attach Chain-of-Custody) RECEIVED BY SIGNATURE: x9 PRINT NAME: (NOTE: SIGNATURE DOES NOT INDICATE AGREEMENT WITH NOTES) WIWA CROSS REFERENCE: ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWER: I The information Contained on this form reflects only the prelimin?ary observ?ations of the It should be interpreted as a final determination by the Department of Environmental Quality or any of its officers or personnel as to any matter, including, but not limited to a determination of compliance or lack thereof by the facility operator with am.?I requirements Of statutes regulations or permits. Each day of non-compliance constitutes a separate violation of the regulations andlor the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act. REVISED: 1210612011 (\Qsa .WI Om 1A3OV 75 I0 7 I LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY FIELD INTERVIEW FORM AGENCY $883! 0? INSPECTION DATE: TIME OF ARRIVAL: ALTERNATE DEPARTURE DATE: TIME OF DEPARTURE. (ID TypeINumber) FACILITY NAMEWW W?l PIKUU 65 PHONE (60? 5H 7 7 LOCATION: WA MD PARISH: OEQMS RECEIVING STREAM (BASINISUBSEGMENT): MAILINGADDRESS70177 {Street/P O. Box) (City) (State) (Zip) FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE: TITLE. OASIID FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE PHONE NUMBER: NAM TITLE, SS and OFFIC AL (if fferent fr ma azove) - OHSIFUUI - INSPECTION TYPE- 2W INVOLVED: AIR perm wmaam omsnm OBSERVATIONS: AREAS AND EQUIPMENT INSPECTED PROBLEMS DEFICIENCIES REMARKS VERBAL COMMITMENTS FROM FACILITY REPRESENTATIVES) - WWII {03 Slit i0 OI fol AW 5 $st spa/I7 PDIVUI loI likemch/UIQMN 3/29/l7 -: (TWIN Ideals? Still not Miran duiivz?al. Wham -m we BCILMIWQIIW oi lI\8?Qd?lCn Gamma swig (Iglo??l m?eme [Will/q LLIILS accut?IIch DIP-IA a Rages sioIIfcl PSWI NI MIIRSJN Iw AREAS OF CONCERN: Ira, E: REGULATION EXPLANATION YES N0 YES NO PHOTOS TAKEN: YES NO SAMPLES TAKEN: NOE: (Attach Chain-of-Custody) RECEIVED BY SIGNATURE. PRINT NAME: 27??rg?h (NOTE: SKINATURE DOES NOT INDICAT REEMENT WI NOTES) UNISON M0 ROSS REFERENCE: I ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWER: If NUVW2I 1r NOTE. The information contained on this fo?f??ects only the preliminary observations of the inspector(s). It should not be interpreted as a final determination by the Department of Environmental Quality or any of its officers or personnel as to any matter including but not limited to a determination of compliance or lack thereof by the facility operator with any requirements of statutes regulations or permits. Each day of non- -compliance constitutes a separate violation of the regulations andlor the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act REVISED: 1210612011 L45 0U PAGE OF I AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 ATTACHMENT 4 Email Correspondence Lindsay Maloan - From: Lindsay Maloan Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:50 PM To: 'Earl Cager': 'carter@tunaconstruction.com' Cc: Dionne Magness; Brian Tusa Subject: RE: Lafayette Academy 3.22.2017 Gentlemen, I have verified through headquarters/the permit support services office that there is no accreditation information whatsoever with LDEQ for a Patrick Delaney since 2013, and that was as an asbestos worker. He should not be in containment let alone acting as a supervisor. An email from Mr. Falcon also con?rmed that Mr. Delaney is not accredited by LDEQ as a worker 0R supervisor even though he was in containment and stated that he was the acting supervisor. This is unacceptable and a violation of on asbestos regulations. Original From: Earl Cager Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:04 PM To: Lindsay Maloan; 'carter@tunaconstruction.com' Cc: Dionne Magness,- Brian Tusa Subject: RE: Lafayette Academy 3.22.2017 Thanks- Lindsay We will address all issues. Original Message??--? From: Lindsay Maloan Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:58 AM To: 'carter@tunaconstruction.com' Earl Cager Cc: Dionne Magness Brian Tusa Subject: Lafayette Academy 3.22.2017 Gentlemen, have attached my report and photos from yesterday. The forms that Dionne were referencing re: Lead are also attached. Mr. Patrick Delaney, who claimed to be the supervisor on site at the time, had no DEQ accreditation information. Mr. Roberto Falcon is the listed supervisor site at the time of the inspection. Four workers on site had ID on their person and Roberto Falcon delivered the certificates, showed me a copy of the ADVF, his own accreditation, and sign in sheet when he got there, about 15 minutes after I arrived. According to LDEQ's public records database, EDMS, there is one Patrick Delaney that was accredited as a worker most recently in 2013. Accreditation needs to be renewed and approved by LDEQ annually. I need proof of Mr. Delaney?s accreditation. The following were noted areas of concern: ADVFs and accreditation certificates need to be on site at all times. Generator labels need to be on the outside of all bags, clearly legible and dated. All material needs to be wet and leak tight. Other observations: Any and all precautions to keep curious kids out of the work area and away from air monitoring equipment need to be diligently maintained. This is not the responsibility of school staff. There should be no evidence of tracking between the work areas. I will need copies of all air monitoring results from the hallway monitoring to date. Negative air units need to be properly functioning. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. My observations yesterday will result in an Enforcement referral. I will be making unannounced return visits to the school to check on the contractors. Thank you, Lindsay Maloan (504) 736-7741 Lindsay Maloan From: Roberto Falcon Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:39 PM To: Lindsay Maloan Subject: Patrick Delaney Attachments: Patrick Delaney AW.pdf Lindsay I asked my of?ce to send me Mr. Delaney?s paperwork and this is what they sent me: Attached you will ?nd the paperwork we have on ?le for Mr. Delaney as it pertains to his Asbestos Licence. After contacting Mr Delaney we determined he did his asbestos supervisor refresher back in April of last year (see attached Certi?cate but has not been working in the asbestos ?eld for quite some time, he sent his Emergency from last moth to get re?certi?ed as as an asbestos worker See attached money order copy but has not received his licence. FYI: Mr Delaney has been working as the containment's attendant since he started working with us last Friday. P8. All areas of concern outlined by you yesterday at Lafayette Elementary have been addressed, fell free to come by anytime. Regards Roberto Falcon Estimator - Env. Manager V. Keeler Associates Demolition, Abatement Utilities P.O. Box 3424 New Orleans, La 70177 Ph. 504-947-0447 Fax 504-947-9620 frkeeler@gmail.com TO This ceni?es that the above named has completed the Envimnmemal Training Accwdited Re?esher Cnmse {111' Asbestos in English. This course is EPA Appmved Under the Toxic Substance Contml Act (TSCA) Title II. Ctm?cnlc NI mbu? Environmental 1 Robena ?an. Count IlJncIor LA ID 007990300 sz?kxb W2 um Veterans Memorial Blvd. 01152. NT LONGPUINT Environmental Tmimng Course Datels}: April 10.2016 #5 lienner. LA 70062 Exam Date: NIA Al?enn Dun. School Director Expiration Date: April 10. 2017 (504! 667?3740 MONEY 17-536338453 A 351675 021417 1343 03 DD nn 17$63334535 000113 I I EXACTLY Balms AND NO ORDER a. awa-w 3.7-- May 9, 2017 Rodgers Associates 7 Yosemite Street Kennes, LA 70055 CLIENT PROJECT: Layfayette School; Class 328 325 CEI LAB CODE: T17-0872 Dear Customer: CEI Labs has completed the analysis of the air samples we received from your of?ce on May 9, 2017. These samples represent the ?nal clearance TEM samples for the Layfayette School; Class 328 325 project. The TEM counting procedures described for the asbestos-containing materials in schools under the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) were used during the analyses. Speci?cally, structures were counted in two categories: 0.5 to 5.0 micrometers in length and greater than 5 micrometers in length, which were added together for a total asbestos structure count. The results for the set of ?ve samples taken inside the work area are summarized on the attached report. Please note that the average number of asbestos structures per square millimeter is 19, which is below the speci?ed clearance level of 70 (40C FR Part 763). Thank you for your business and we look toward to continuing good relations. If you have any questions, please feel free to call our of?ce at 919-481-1413. Kind Regards, m?w/ng; Tianbao Bai, CIH Laboratory Director TESTING NVLAP LAB CODE 101758-0 730 SE Maynard Road Cary, NC 27511 919.481.1413 ASBESTOS ANALYTICAL REPORT By: Transmission Electron Microscopy Prepared for Rodgers Associates CLIENT PROJECT: Layfayette School; Class 328 325 CEI LAB CODE: T17-0872 TEST METHOD: EPA AHERA REPORT DATE: TEL: 866-481-1412 arr- ASBESTOS AIR ANALYSIS I. By: TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY ABS Client: Rodgers 8 Associates CEI Lab Code: T17-0872 7 Yosemite Street Date Received: 05-09-17 Kennes, LA 70065 Date Analyzed: 05-09-17 Date Reported: 05?09-17 Project: Layfayette School; Class 328 325 TEM AIR AHERA . [Area . 3 Grid I Analytical? - AsbeStos Asbestos A Asbestos Client ID _Volu_me Analyzed? Openings Sensitivity: ..ldenti?cation. Structures Concentration . Lab ID (Liters) mmzi Exa'rnined . ?25 pm 0.5 um 81cc? 1 1200 0.0686 7 0.005 None 0 0 <14.6 <0.005 T62174 Detected 28 1200 0.0686 7 0.005 1 0 14.6 0.005 T62175 3S 1200 0.0686 7 0.005 0 3 43.7 0.014 T62176 4S 1320 0.0588 6 0.005 None 0 0 <0.005 Detected 53 1320 0.0588 6 0.005 0 1 1 7 0.005 T62178 Page 1 of 2 CEI. LEGEND: None METHOD: EPA AHERA AVERAGE GRID OPENING SIZE: .0098 mm2 ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITY: 0.005 structureslcc REGULATORY LIMIT: 70 structures I mm2 ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT: JEOL Electron Microscope (JEM-1200 EXII) NORAN EDS System 7 (N881 12E) This report relates only to the samples tested or analyzed and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by CEI Labs. Inc. CEI Labs makes no warranty representation regarding the accuracy of client submitted information in preparing and presenting analytical results. Interpretation of the analytical results is the sole responsibility of the client. Samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U. 8. Government. Digital images of diffraction patterns and copies of analytical bench sheets pertaining to this project are available upon request. The estimated measurement of uncertainty for the test results is also available upon request. The laboratory is not responsible for data collected by personnel who are not part of the laboratory. Results reported in both structures/cm3 and structures/mm2 are dependent on the volume of air sampled and measured by non-laboratory personnel and are not covered by the laboratory's NVLAP accreditation. No Field Blanks were submitted for project ANALYST: . APPROVED BY: Je ifer Turner I Tianbao Laboratory Director TESTING 2?2 NVLAP LAB CODE Page 2 of 2 111-0312 Tau?111-11% 10? New Edition Court. Cary NC 27511 Tel: 866?481-1412: Fax: 919-481-1442 ASBESTOS CHAIN OF CUSTODY LASUSE 33:33" 3- Lab Code Lab! D. RanL Job Contact: A R5 On FIIQ, Company: 110213126 ARSSOCWJO Emaii 1 Tel: OkrDAmn?) (O 1m Address: Project Name: gel/00? 114.;er LA 310065 Project 1011 (1:13: 318 4 3?35 Email: ah 11-0393qu @3010 (I . CO P0 #1 Tel: 5 19 04 93?) Fax: STATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN: LA :11: TAT Is NOT MARKED STANDARD 3 DAY TAT APPLIES - . -- 3+ . . - . 2 TURN AROUND TIME - ASBESTOS EAEHRPLM BULK EPA 600 El [3 PLM POINT COUNT (4001 EPA 000 [3 El PLM POINT COUNT (1000) EPA 000 Cl PLM GRAV POINT COUNT EPA 6010 3 [3 PLM BULK CARE 435 C1 C1 PCM AIR NIOSH 1400 C1 l3 TEM AIR EPA AHERA Cl TEM AIR NIOSH 7402 Cl Ci El TEM AIR ISO 10312 El [3 :1 TEM AIR ASTNI 6281-09 CI TEM BULK CHATFIELD 3? {3 TEM DUST WIPE ASTM 0040005 El TEM DUST MICROVAC ASTM 05155-09 TEM SOIL ASTM 07521-13 - TEM CINCINNATI METHOD ?1 I: Cl OTHER: C1 REMARKS I SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: (.4. 1333.1 TAT Res-Alb and? WoQad Ql?om Accept Samples 13 Reject Sampies ?Rellnqulshed 331-13333 3 1333"" ?lms?1A2?- 23:3 3 3:3- Datel'l'ime I: 3 AH/?rgun A 9-00 Samples will be disposedof 30 days after analysis VERSION Customer COC Page-1 ASBESTOS SAMPLING FORM --0 Job ContactA R0 OGCRS Tel: 50 Y5 0 ul. Page VERSION CCOC.0215.212.LD Customer COC Page 2 [h I 1175? MANAGEMENT 2727 South Carrol/ton Avenue New Orleans, LA 70118 Project Information Scope of Work Recovery School District Refurbishment of existing elementary school including but not Status: Construction limited to structure, windows. doors masonry walls and roof. Funding Source: FEMA Architect: N-Y Associates. Contractor: Tuna Construction. Budget/Cost Information Project Financial Totals Committod Uncomml?od 56 Cost Description Current Budget Costa Cost- Coot to Dot! Raul-ion 54.390324 32.452.000 31.938324 $0 9.390.924 50 Design Fees $360,868 $405,878 50 $258.43? $405,878 545.010 Wt so 315.000 so 515.000 315.000 515.000 54 Environmental 54.400 517.640 50 56.336 517.640 313.240 5m 527.500 55.368 522.132 35.368 $27.51!] SO GeoTochn'Icat 516.500 50 516.500 50 516.500 50 32 Material I. Tut lnupodton $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Flow Test 5770 50 $770 80 5/70 80 Program Contingency 8720.282 50 $0 $0 $0 ($720,262) so Program Escalation 5144.052 50 $0 50 SD (5144.052) In Current Budget Commnled Costs Cost To Date Promoted Costs Pavements $787 $37? $0 $877 $877 $90 Tmll: 351.806.1303 $2,000,763 31.918320 $336,088 54.51541" {$790,914} Project Status Update Schedule Status Procurement ?ff/1889 Task Marne Finish" Date ?13; Complete - DHH to no city to release the bu ing permit . General contractor is n'robr'lr'zr'ng Design 1/23/2014 2/16/2016 89% Procurement 2/18/2016 6/ 1 7/201 6 42% Construction 6/17/2016 6/16/2017 0% Final Completion 6/17/2017 8/ 1 5/201 7 0% R80 - Lafayette Es - Refurb 6'9 Contractor Detail Contractor Information Business Name Mailing Address Phone Number Email Address Active Licenses License Number Type Status Effective Expiration First Issued Classi?cations Class BUILDING CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS AND LAW BUSINESS AND LAW HEAVY CONSTRUCTION V. KEELER 8: ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. P. O. Box 3424 New Orleans, LA 70177 (504) 947-0447 vkeeler299@aol.com 36690 Commercial License LICENSED 12/08/2016 04/24/2017 04/24/2000 HIGHWAY, STREET AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION MUNICIPAL AND PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION . SPECIALTY: ASBESTOS REMOVAL AN ABATEM ENT SPECIALTY: RIGGING, HOUSE MOVING, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING Qualifying Party Vernes Keeler Sr. Vernes Keeler Jr. Vernes Keeler Sr. Vernes Keeler Sr. Vernes Keeler Sr. Vernes Keeler Sr. Vernes Keeler Jr. Vernes Keeler Sr. Parishes ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL . AI No: 99938; 8555 Lafayette Academy/V. Keeler Assoc. Dates of Inspection: 3/22/2017, 3/27/2017 ATTACHNIENT 5 Photos Facility Name: Lafayette Academy-V. Keeler (Demo-Reno Contractor) AI: 99938 8555 City: New Orleans Parish: Orleans Photographe: L. Maloan Date: 3/232017 Reason: Inspection Other ID we ?55570: all? Hum . ?Emma-um . Photo #2 of 5 Description: Containment area one had an opening all the way through to the work area. Jl?liple children were observed sticking their heads in the hole to observe what was going on inside. The wooder door has the capability to be closed, but was open upon our arrival. Facility Name: Lafayette Contractor) Al: 99938. 8555 Cit}: New Orleans Parish: Orleans PhotOgrapher: L..\Ialoan Date: Reason: Inspection Other?) ii: I . 's p. Photot? of 2 Description: Air monitoring equipment in the hallu'a} ?here children ere present. No air monitor ?as on site at the time of' inspection. Facility Name: Lafavette Academy-V. Keeler (Demo-Reno Contractor) Al: 99938 8555 City: New Orleans Parish: Orleans Photographer: 1.. Maloan Date: 3/22/2017 Reason: Inspection OtherlD 1 g. Photo i of 5 Description: ?Burrito wrapped? sections of ?ooring were not wet or leak tight. Holes were visible throughout multiple sections. Generator labels were not present at all.