June 8, 2018 Dear JW August, Thank you for your email of August 4, 2018, regarding USDA inspections of ProSci, Inc. You have raised a number of questions in your message and I have provided a response to each of them below. • Request for an interview and video shoot I would be glad to respond to your questions in writing but respectfully decline the offer for an in-person, on camera interview. I want to ensure that my answers are carefully considered and complete. I must also decline the request for an on-site video shoot. ProSci is a private company in a competitive business with proprietary information. More importantly, the animals at the facility, especially the rabbits, are easily frightened and distressed by outside visitors walking through the facility. • Responsible Veterinarians Dr. Edward Little is a former manager at ProSci. Dr. Greg Smith was an attending veterinarian at our facility prior to his retirement. We now have a local veterinary practitioner serving as our attending veterinarian. She makes periodic visits to the facility, provides training to our animal care staff, and oversees the veterinary care of our animals. For privacy and confidentiality reasons and at her request, we are not providing you the name and contact information for our attending veterinarian. Documents prepared by our veterinarians are considered confidential under our veterinarian-client-patient relationships and we choose to keep them confidential, both for the privacy of our staff and the veterinarians involved in providing care to our animals. • USDA Inspections: Scheduled pre-license inspections – versus - Unannounced Routine Inspections In March 2017, ProSci lost its USDA Class B Dealer license due to an administrative oversight; we simply did not submit our license renewal form to USDA within the required timeframe. Therefore, we were required to go through a new licensing process, to include passing a pre-license inspection of our records and facility. By USDA policy, these pre-license inspections are on a scheduled basis; we worked out a time and date that was acceptable to both the USDA inspector and to ProSci. In contrast, and again by USDA policy, routine inspections of facilities that are already USDA licensed dealers or registered research facilities are done on an unannounced basis. The August 2017 inspection, referenced in your email, was a pre-license inspection and therefore it was by appointment and scheduled. The actual time and date were agreed upon between ProSci and our USDA inspector via email and/or phone call. Submitting our license application was the trigger that initiated the request for inspection that you reference in your email. I appreciate this opportunity to respond to your questions and hope that the information provided meets your needs. Please don’t hesitate to ask if you have additional questions. In the meantime, I would like to assure you that all of our staff at ProSci are committed to providing the best possible care to our animals. Providing the animals good care allows us to produce high quality products that benefit many people. But just as importantly, we are caring and compassionate individuals who simply want to provide the best animal care possible because it is the right thing to do. My best regards, Yu Geng President ProSci, Inc.