D Diamond Consulting
Deborah Diamond
(206) 200-3236
ddiamondconsulting@msn.com

__________________________________________________________________________
February 6, 2018

TO: Kelly Wicker, Deputy Chief of Staff
Office of the Governor
FROM: Deborah Diamond
Subject: Workplace Investigation (Peinecke)
Following is a report of my fact-finding investigation re: complaints of sexual harassment by
Employment Security Department Commissioner Dale Peinecke.
I. Background of the Investigation
On 12/22/2017, I was contacted by EEO Officer Teresa Eckstein and Chief Human Resource
Officer Ron Marshall and briefed on the scope of the complaint.
II. Investigative Process
From January 9-29, 2018, I interviewed ESD employees.
Based on analysis of the interview statements, documentation, and ESD policies, I reached
factual conclusions.
III. Investigation of Allegations
A. Interviews
Witness E (Complainant)





I have felt sexually harassed by ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke on several occasions
since he came to the agency.
It is common knowledge among my colleagues that Mr. Peinecke has roving eyes and
stares at women’s breasts. On the elevator, in the hallway, in offices, or in meetings, Mr.
Peinecke’s eyes start at a woman’s breasts and then move up to her eyes, and then back
down, constantly checking her out. I recall Witness G telling me about a time when Mr.
Peinecke made her very uncomfortable staring at her breasts when they were on the
elevator together.
When managers/supervisors know that Mr. Peinecke is going to be around, we remind
each other to wear turtlenecks, scarves, or loose-fitting clothing. The
1

 
















managers/supervisors see their positions as dependent on putting up with Mr. Peinecke’s
leering looks and his putting his arm around them. I tried to stay clear of Mr. Peinecke
whenever I could.
Mr. Peinecke’s inappropriate behavior is pervasive and indiscriminate. He puts his arm
around and/or leers at women of any age, body type, hair color, attractiveness.
In December 2015, during a progressive potluck, I was standing at a table with Mr.
Peinecke, Person R, and a fellow manager when Mr. Peinecke made me very
uncomfortable talking in intimate detail about how he had met his wife on a cruise ship.
Mr. Peinecke said something like, “You know what happens on cruise ships”, implying the
sexual antics that are associated with the Love Boat.
Person R was laughing, but I felt it was highly inappropriate for Mr. Peinecke to making
sexual innuendoes in the workplace. I should be able to enjoy a professional environment
and feel safe from being subjected to sexual conversation. I am sensitive and very aware
of inappropriate behavior by someone in a position of authority. (My sensitivity stems from
former ESD Commissioner Vernon Stoner and his inappropriate associations with female
employees during his tenure as Commissioner in the 1990’s.) My fellow manager and I
walked away from the inappropriate conversation. I internalized my discomfort and did not
report it to anyone.
On 01/05/2016, I made a presentation to the Executive Leadership Team (ELT) regarding
the Imaging Department’s LEAN initiative called The Staple Project. When I finished, Mr.
Peinecke came around the conference table to where I was standing and put his arm
around me. Mr. Peinecke’s entire upper body was pressed against me on my right side
and he had me pinned against a file cabinet on my left side. The photo shows that Mr.
Peinecke was looking down toward my breasts.
I froze and struggled to maintain my composure. My heart was pounding and I was
sweating. Mr. Peinecke talked to the ELT for 3-5 minutes with me in this position. The
ELT’s faces were a blur to me, because I was focused internally on trying to survive the
moment. I felt demeaned by Mr. Peinecke treating me (a professional woman) this way in
a professional work environment.
The photo of Mr. Peinecke cornering and leering at me was published on Inside ESD. I
got comments and phone calls from male and female colleagues saying something like,
“Oh, I see you have a special relationship with the Commissioner.” I was so embarrassed.
The comments continued throughout 2016 and into 2017.
I worked hard during my career to reach a position of leadership in this organization and
have successfully led many teams and groups of employees, based on my professional
and leadership ability. Mr. Peinecke should not have put me in the position where my
colleagues were sent an offensive, suggestive message.
I did not file a complaint because of rhetoric I had heard Mr. Peinecke state on several
occasions. Basically, the message was that you either get with his program or you are out
of here. I did not know what workplace behaviors Mr. Peinecke expected us to tolerate. I
had also seen other managers at ESD be fired. I was afraid of being retaliated against
and losing my job.
Sometime in 2017, Witness P was making a presentation at the Performance Board when
Mr. Peinecke came by for an impromptu visit. When Mr. Peinecke put his arm around
Witness P, her face turned bright red. I felt so sorry for her, because I knew what she was
going through.
2

 Witness C

















When I first arrived at ESD, coworkers made me aware that Mr. Peinecke lacked
personal-space boundaries. They indicated that he often attempted to put his arm around
them. They also stated that Mr. Peinecke often looked at female’s bodies rather than at
their face when interacting with them. I was also told that complaints had been made to
Human Resources.
Mr. Peinecke seems to think he is engaging in chummy camaraderie when he puts his
arm around someone’s shoulders or hugs someone, but even the men on the staff have
said that it is awkward and uncomfortable for them.
I have not experienced issues with Mr. Peinecke placing his arm around me. Early on, I
experienced an occasion or two where Mr. Peinecke appeared to be looking at my chest
rather than at my face. I have also experienced an instance when Mr. Peinecke appeared
to be looking me up and down, sizing me up, rather than looking me in the eye.
While I feel that this behavior was not appropriate, it never escalated to anything more
than one or two occasions. Because I assumed HR was aware, I did not feel the need to
escalate the issue. Since I have not experienced this behavior lately from Mr. Peinecke, I
assumed that he had corrected his behavior.
In order to protect myself, I step back from Mr. Peinecke and put out the vibe that it would
not be appropriate for him to enter my personal space.
At first, I believed that Mr. Peinecke was not conscious of his behavior. I am now
concerned that this may not be true, if in fact, the Chief Human Resources Officer Ron
Marshall talked to Mr. Peinecke and told him it was not appropriate to touch anyone in the
workplace. It seems to me that if Mr. Peinecke wanted to stop, he would.
I think Mr. Peinecke does not consider his behavior to be inappropriate or engaged in with
a sexual intent. I believe that his behavior may be coming more from asserting control. I
do not believe he is aware of his behavior, or perhaps Mr. Peinecke is not concerned if
anyone is uncomfortable or feels his behavior is inappropriate.
I have had another female coworker warn me that Mr. Peinecke will make a judgement
about a female if she is overweight. I was cautioned not to hire someone that is
overweight, because Mr. Peinecke will automatically discount the person if she does not
fit his desired body-type. I do have one female staff member who is overweight. Mr.
Peinecke has made it clear that he does not like her and does not want to interact with
her (without directly stating that it is because she is overweight). Mr. Peinecke has made
it very clear that he believes that this employee’s appearance is unattractive, which he
equates with being unprofessional.
I am very concerned that participating in this interview will result in me losing my job if Mr.
Peinecke learns about my statement. I have truthfully accounted for my experience and
what I am aware of occurring in the agency.
Mr. Peinecke can be abrasive. I have been treated disrespectfully in a non-sexual way by
him in the past. I have had to put up with a lot because he tends to fire, then aim. I do not
feel safe. I have also not felt that it was safe to go to HR with my concerns.

3

 Witness J






In late-2013, an incident occurred with Commissioner Dale Peinecke which made me very
uncomfortable.
Mr. Peinecke came in to a conference room where I was seated at the head of the table
presenting a part of the layoff plan. Mr. Peinecke stood very close to me (without actually
touching). I was uncomfortably aware of how close he was and did not look up. I did not
like Mr. Peinecke crossing in to my personal space bubble, but it would have been
awkward to say anything.
After Mr. Peinecke left, Witness D and some of the other women in the room said Mr.
Peinecke had been looking down at my chest area the whole five minutes he was there.
Although I think Mr. Peinecke was being inappropriate, I did not feel that I wanted to
pursue a complaint at that time.

Witness D








I was present in a late-2013 meeting when ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke came in
and stood very close to Witness J, staring down at her breasts while she was making a
presentation.
After Mr. Peinecke left, all the other women in the room (there were no men present)
commented on how uncomfortable they were with how Mr. Peinecke was looking at
Witness J.
After the meeting, I told Person Q that Mr. Peinecke’s behavior seemed very
inappropriate. Person Q said that Mr. Peinecke did something similar to her. We
commiserated about the situation.
I told Person Q that I thought someone should say something to Mr. Peinecke or the
Chief HR Officer. Person Q said she would. I do not know if she ever did. Witness J said
she did not want to file a complaint at that time.
When someone told Witness I about what happened to Witness J, Witness I said
something like that had happened to her in April 2013. I told Person Q about this
additional incident and told her I thought she should elevate it to the Chief HR Officer or
talk to Mr. Peinecke herself. Again, I do not know if she ever did.
Witness I told me she is still creeped out by Mr. Peinecke and will not go in to the kitchen
when he is there.

Witness I





In April 2013, Person R introduced new Commissioner Dale Peinecke to me while I was
standing in my office cubicle. Mr. Peinecke made eye contact with me and then looked
down my body and back up to my eyes slowly enough to make me feel very
uncomfortable.
I was really taken aback by this and turned to Person R. She must have seen that I was
shocked by Mr. Peinecke’s behavior, but she did not react.
I knew there was a process for filing a complaint, but at the time I did not feel it was
severe enough to report.
4

 





Later in 2013 and in 2014, I talked to a few coworkers about the incident. I told them it felt
really creepy to be looked at that way by someone, especially someone in Mr. Peinecke’s
position.
In 2015, a coworker (Witness L) told me Mr. Peinecke had made a comment to her about
her being pregnant that made her feel uncomfortable. I also heard from coworkers
Witness D and Witness J that Mr. Peinecke stood and looked down Witness J’s top when
she was seated making a presentation.
Sometime within the last year, I was in the kitchen with my back to the doorway when Mr.
Peinecke came in. Mr. Peinecke put his hand on my shoulder to alert me he was passing.
The gesture was not inappropriate, but I was wary because of his past behavior.
Since the 2013 incident, I try to avoid being near Mr. Peinecke. For example, I was in line
for a flu shot when Mr. Peinecke walked up and joined the line behind me. Mr. Peinecke
stood close and started chatting with me. I felt uncomfortable and left.

Witness O







Sometime in 2016, I had an interaction with ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke which
made me very uncomfortable.
Mr. Peinecke and I were talking as we walked up the stairs from the garage and took the
elevator together.
Quite frankly, I have never had a man gawk at me in such an obviously leering way, even
in a bar when people are under the influence of alcohol.
It was more than just a stare. It was as if Mr. Peinecke was undressing me with his eyes.
The looks he gave me were very sexual and made me very uncomfortable.
I was shocked at Mr. Peinecke’s behavior and told a few colleagues. Some women
indicated they had had similar experiences. A male colleague told me that he is
uncomfortable when Mr. Peinecke frequently puts his arm around him.
I did not report the 2016 incident, because Mr. Peinecke never actually touched me and
did not say anything with sexual overtones.

Witness L







In early 2015, my pregnancy was just starting to show. I was in the kitchen with ESD
when Commissioner Dale Peinecke came in and said hello. Mr. Peinecke made eye
contact with me, but then his eyes went down my body and up again, stopping at my
belly, then stopping at my breasts, and then back to my eyes.
I felt very uncomfortable. In my mind, I was thinking something like, “Yes, I’m pregnant.
Do you have any questions?” but did not say anything.
I felt Mr. Peinecke’s behavior was especially inappropriate because of his position as
ESD Commissioner.
I did not feel like the incident was serious enough to report/file a complaint, but I did feel
creeped out. I mentioned the incident to a couple coworkers who agreed that Mr.
Peinecke’s behavior was inappropriate.
It is the general consensus of my male and female coworkers that Mr. Peinecke stops his
glance and stares at women’s breasts.
5

 

Based on this incident, I will try to wait until Mr. Peinecke is out of the kitchen before I
enter.

Witness G






I have had at least two nerve-wracking encounters with ESD Commissioner Dale
Peinecke in the elevator. Mr. Peinecke was standing at my side and obviously staring
down at my chest.
One time, Mr. Peinecke asked me why I was not wearing a sweater when it was so cold
out. Sometime later, Mr. Peinecke said something like, “Oh, you’re wearing a sweater”.
Mr. Peinecke’s awkward small talk made me very uncomfortable in light of his having
stared at my breasts in the elevator.
After these incidents occurred, I avoided eye contact with Mr. Peinecke and tried to stay
away from his creepy vibe.
It was the general consensus of me and my coworkers that Mr. Peinecke is an extremely
creepy dude in the way that he stares at women’s chests, hugs, and puts his arm around
people. His behavior is just not appropriate for someone in that position.

Witness N






In October 2017, I was on the elevator alone with ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke. I
was very uncomfortable when Mr. Peinecke gave me a slow look down my body and then
back up. Mr. Peinecke’s seemed to be (unsuccessfully) struggling to keep his eyes from
returning to my breasts.
I had heard from several female colleagues that Mr. Peinecke stares at women’s breasts
and does not attempt to hide it. I recall Witness O telling me Mr. Peinecke had been
staring at her boobs in the elevator. Someone told me that she has seen Mr. Peinecke
staring at women and mentioned how inappropriately he looks at Witness C.
I know that I should have reported the October 2017 incident, but I was afraid of
retaliation and did not want to jeopardize my job.

Witness P






ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke has been totally professional around me in one-onone meetings.
In group settings, Mr. Peinecke put his arm around my shoulder once or twice. I am a bit
uncomfortable with a male making physical contact with me in the workplace, but I did not
feel it was a big enough deal to bring it up.
I recall one time when Mr. Peinecke put his arm around my shoulder in front of a group
that was gathered at the Performance Board. I was nervous and turned red, because Mr.
Peinecke was asking me very direct questions, which I was not sure I was prepared to
answer.
I have seen Mr. Peinecke walk up and put his arm around other women. In Executive
Leadership Team (ELT) meetings, I have noticed Mr. Peinecke looking at the chest of a
woman who was speaking. Mr. Peinecke seems to do this to women who are pretty (e.g.,
Witness H and Witness C).
6

 



In looking at the January 2016 photo of Mr. Peinecke with his arm around one of my
former employees (Witness E), I can see where Mr. Peinecke’s hand seems to be
touching her high on the shoulder. I would have thought that Witness E would have
expressed any concerns to me. I do not recall her doing so at the time.
In this day and age, I question whether someone in Mr. Peinecke’s position should risk
engaging in physical behavior that might be considered inappropriate.

Witness H





I am not uncomfortable with Mr. Peinecke putting his arm around me or his hand on my
shoulder, but I can see where Mr. Peinecke’s physical approach to engaging with his staff
could be off-putting to some who are not huggers like me. I have noticed that some
people are uncomfortable around Mr. Peinecke and seem to be put off by his
mannerisms.
Mr. Peinecke is a process-focused engineer and is not a real people-person. He is
awkward in his attempts at social interactions and could come off as intimidating in the
way he directly questions to people.
Witness B and Person S have given Mr. Peinecke feedback (coaching) about these
behaviors to assist him in how he engages with staff. I have seen some improvement in
the way he relates to people, but he still seems to be much more comfortable with men.

Witness F






ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke is outgoing and friendly. I have seen him shake hands
with individuals and then pat them on the back.
It is not uncommon to see Mr. Peinecke put his arm around someone, with his hand on
his/her shoulder.
Mr. Peinecke makes eye contact with me when we are talking. He is very performanceoriented and direct in his communications.
I am not aware of Mr. Peinecke staring at or checking people out with his eyes. Mr.
Peinecke is always on the move and is not in one place long enough for his eyes to
linger.
I have experienced creepy interactions with men in authority before. I have not
experienced any interaction with Mr. Peinecke which made me uncomfortable.

Witness M






ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke is a very boisterous, in-your-face kind of guy. He
stands close to people when he talks.
Mr. Peinecke frequently puts his arm around people’s shoulders, briefly, in a collegial
way. It seems to be his way of saying hello.
Times Mr. Peinecke has hugged me were at social events, such as a Christmas party
when everyone was hugging each other goodbye.
It does not bother me when Mr. Peinecke puts his arm around or hugs me or others.
Mr. Peinecke makes eye contact with me when we talk. I cannot recall having seen, nor
has anyone reported to me, that Mr. Peinecke stares at women’s chests.
7

 

I have not seen that Mr. Peinecke interacts with women any different from the way he
interacts with men.

Witness K






I have not personally experienced or noticed ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke doing
anything that made me uncomfortable.
Mr. Peinecke does stand close when he is talking, but this has not caused me any
concern.
I have noticed that Mr. Peinecke looks both men and women up and down when he
encounters them. I am under the impression that he is checking out the people’s clothes
and shoes. I think Mr. Peinecke is just taking note of how someone is dressed that day. I
do not sense any sexual overtones.
Early on, I overheard Mr. Peinecke talking about shoes with Witness T. On a later
occasion, when I complimented Witness T on his shoes, he responded that he was taking
fashion lessons from Mr. Peinecke.

Witness B









ESD Commissioner Dale Peinecke treats me with respect, has provided me excellent
opportunities for career growth and compensates me fairly.
Employees have told me that Mr. Peinecke seems more aloof than the prior ESD
Commissioner. I have encouraged him to walk around and connect with people more.
During a conversation about Mr. Peinecke’s personality and need to connect more with
employees, I mentioned that I liked how he welcomed me to the office with a hug when he
hired me.
One of my employees told me that, before I was hired, Mr. Peinecke touched her on the
forearm during a discussion with other people present and that it made her a little
uncomfortable. She did not frame her discomfort in terms of sexual harassment.
Personally, I am comfortable with Mr. Peinecke putting his arm around or hugging me. I
appreciate this sign of collegiality. My male and female bosses have always hugged me
(and sometimes kissed me on the cheek) in a collegial way. I understand that people
have different levels of comfort and we should always respect that.
When I converse with Mr. Peinecke, he looks me in the eyes or looks at the paper we are
discussing. I have not noticed Mr. Peinecke staring at women at the breast level. If I ever
saw or felt that, I would have said something to him.
I’m proud of how Commissioner Peinecke hires strong women leaders and respects our
leadership.

Witness A



When I initially briefed incoming Commissioner Dale Peinecke, the discussion included
civil service and ESD policies on ethics and workplace behavior.
Mr. Peinecke is very process-focused, bright, energetic, and friendly. Early on, I noticed
that Mr. Peinecke was hugging women and putting his arm around the shoulder of men
and women.
8

 











Within the first year, I provided guidance to Mr. Peinecke regarding his hugging people in
the workplace. I suggested that it might be okay to hug someone if he had established
that kind of relationship with the person, but that in general it was not a good idea for a
person in authority to hug subordinates. After I gave Mr. Peinecke this guidance, his
behavior seemed change to some extent. I did not see Mr. Peinecke spontaneously
hugging people after that.
At that time, I did not provide Mr. Peinecke any feedback or guidance regarding his
putting his arm around people. I do not recall anyone bringing to my attention that s/he
was uncomfortable with this behavior.
In late-2017, ESD received notification of a complaint filed with the EEOC. The complaint
included a claim that Mr. Peinecke had sexually harassed Witness E. The supporting
documentation included a photo of Mr. Peinecke with his arm around Witness E.
In looking at the photo, I see that Mr. Peinecke’s hand is actually resting on the Witness
E’s collar bone and is in contact with her hair. I see that Mr. Peinecke’s torso is in full
contact with Witness E’s arm. I see that Witness E is standing next to a file cabinet on the
other side. Mr. Peinecke appears to be looking at Witness E’s chest.
I have never personally observed Mr. Peinecke staring at women’s chest areas. I do not
recall that anyone reported that s/he thought/felt Mr. Peinecke stared women’s chest
areas until this investigation. If this had been reported to me, I would have given Mr.
Peinecke feedback and guidance that this behavior was making people uncomfortable
and should cease.
I have noticed that when Mr. Peinecke’s wheels start spinning (his mind is in deep
thought) on something, his gaze seems to freeze for a few moments while he is thinking.
It seems like Mr. Peinecke locks his eyes wherever he was looking when an idea came to
him. When Mr. Peinecke is ready to talk again, he looks up and makes eye contact.
I do not think Mr. Peinecke has any clue that he is making people uncomfortable by
putting his arm around them or staring at them.

Dale Peinecke (Respondent)






I am outgoing and gregarious, but I cannot recall doing anything that would intentionally
make someone feel uncomfortable in the ESD workplace. My team and I have worked
hard at employee engagement, at creating a respectful and diverse workplace, as
evidenced by our recent employee engagement scores. I would not purposefully take any
action to undermine this accomplishment.
It is not uncommon for me to shake hands, put my arm around, or hug both men and
women at ESD, from other state government offices, or from our stakeholder community.
I think this way of relating to people may come from years of coaching and being involved
with sports. Having had time to reflect on this, I imagine that there are any number of
individual and group photos that show me with my arms around someone or around
people in a group photo.
I have not felt I needed to ask permission to hug or put my arm around anyone in a
collegial way. I do not recall anyone objecting, recoiling, or stepping back, but I imagine if
that happened I would immediately disengage. To the best of my ability to recall, no one
has ever commented or provided me feedback to this effect.

9

 















I do not recall receiving any formal feedback or guidance from Chief Human Resources
Officer Ron Marshall regarding my hugging people, nor do I recall any direct feedback
from an employee.
When I put my arm around someone’s back or shoulder, it is usually brief, although it may
last as long as my address to them or to the group I am speaking with. My upper torso
may be in physical contact with the person’s side, but I do not knowingly grip or pull
anyone toward me. When I put my arm around someone, I am acting like the sports
coach. The message of my physical gesture is, “I am engaged in this with you. I am
appreciative of what you are doing.”
To be clear, there are people who I know well, and with whom I have a longer term
relationship, whom I will embrace and who may regularly embrace me in the workplace.
This differs from the following incident.
In looking at the photo presented to me in this interview, I see Witness E working really
hard at making a presentation and me being encouraging. Having had time to reflect on
this encounter, I recall we were reviewing incredibly good results of a LEAN project with
managers and with the workgroup in a very public setting. I was excited about the
outcome and their effort (including hers) and lauding their work.
I see that I have my arm around her shoulder. It looks like my thumb might be in contact
with her hair, which is long (falls to her shoulder). I see that from the position of my hip
that I am leaning out away from Witness E, which brings my upper torso in contact with
her arm. It was certainly not my intention to make her uncomfortable. It is hard for me to
imagine that Witness E would feel demeaned (as I was told she claimed) when I was
praising her project. I do not recall her pulling away, nor do I recall feedback about this
incident from her or her manager.
[The line of questioning changes here to encounters in the elevator, with the assertion
that I am looking at women’s breasts and physical attributes in the elevator, hall and/or
lunchroom:] I am dumbfounded that any woman thinks I am staring at her breasts or
dressing her down with my eyes. If I am doing that, it is not a conscious behavior. I am
surprised that anyone could think that was where my head is, when in fact I am thinking
about a lot of other important things. It would not surprise me to hear that people think I
am not paying attention to them when I am gazing off, not looking directly at them (faceto-face), and/or conversing, but this does surprise me. I am not conscious of treating men
or women differently in these situations.
Upon reflection, I wonder if people are misinterpreting my gaze. I am good at
remembering numbers but, as I have often commented, I am not as good at remembering
people’s names. I habitually look at people’s badges to refresh my memory so I can
address the person by name when I talk to them. Most people wear their badges on a
lanyard around their necks, so I would be looking down to try to read the person’s name.
When I am in a group, I scan the crowd, trying to read facial expressions and body
language to determine if people are engaged. It is certainly not my intention to be
assessing women’s physical traits or looking at women at the breast level. Again, I am
“reading” both women and men in these situations.
It is disappointing to me to get this feedback after all my and our team’s hard work to
move the agency forward toward engagement, respect, and diversity.

10

 


My intention is to be a positive, supportive, engaged coach and cheerleader for my
employees’ efforts. If my players do not see my behavior as positive reinforcement, I need
to take a different tack, particularly given the tenor of our times, today.
I had no awareness that I was making anyone uncomfortable. I am disturbed and
somewhat shocked by this feedback. (Even as I walk out the door from this session) I am
ready to move forward and immediately modify my behavior, so that all feel comfortable in
our workplace.

B. Documentation
[Investigator’s Note: Relevant sections of documents are excerpted.]


Exhibit 1: EEOC Charge of Discrimination 551-2018-00592, filed by Witness E
12/12/2017
On January 5, 2016, Witness E was at a meeting with the Executive Leadership Team,
which is comprised of the heads of all the divisions within ESD. The Commissioner of
ESD, Dale Peinecke, was present at the meeting.
Witness E and Mr. Peinecke had no prior relationship other than Witness E knowing that
Mr. Peinecke was the leader of ESD. During the meeting, Mr. Peinecke approached
Witness E and, with Witness E pressed against a file cabinet, placed his arm around
Witness E and held her against him while addressing the other members of the Executive
Leadership Team. A photograph of the incident was taken and, incredibly, posted on ESD
intranet website to be viewed by all ESD employees…This subjected Witness E to,
among other things, insinuations from other ESD employers that she must have a
"special relationship" with Mr. Peinecke.
Mr. Peinecke has exhibited the same behavior towards other ESD employees, including
two other employees that Witness E has witnesses Mr. Peinecke inappropriately interact
with. All of the employees that have been inappropriately touched by Mr. Peinecke have
been female. On another incident, Mr. Peinecke put his arm around a female director
while she was giving a presentation to a gathering of managers. This director was visibly
uncomfortable. In addition to inappropriately touching female employees, Mr. Peinecke
regularly stares at female employees, and particularly their breasts, to the point that
employees are extremely uncomfortable. Mr. Peinecke only treats female employees in
this manner. Mr. Peinecke's behavior is widely known among the employees at ESD. The
female employees, including Witness E and her peers, have often discussed the need to
wear loose fitting clothing whenever Mr. Peinecke is present.



Exhibit 2: Photos of Mr. Peinecke and Witness E, dated 01/05/2016.



Exhibit 3: ESD Required Policies List, signed by Mr. Peinecke 01/16/2013.
Policy #0014 Harassment Prevention (10/25/2011)

11

 Policy #0016 Employee Conduct (12/13/2016)
In keeping with Agency standards, I have reviewed these policies on-line, or I have been
provided with a copy of the following policies and procedures. I have discussed these
policies with my supervisor or manager and have asked any questions. By my signature, I
acknowledge that I have read, understand, and agree to adhere to the standards set forth
in each of these policies and procedures.
C. Laws, Policies and Other References
[Investigator’s Note: Relevant sections of references are excerpted.]


ESD Policy 0014 Harassment Prevention (10/25/2011)
The Department will provide all employees and clients with an environment free of
harassment. The Department expects all employees to treat everyone with dignity and
respect. The Department will take an aggressive role in eliminating harassment and
inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature from the work environment of its employees and
the delivery of services to its clients by responding immediately to observed or reported
incidents of harassment or inappropriate sexual behavior in the workplace. The
Department will also take an affirmative role in eliminating retaliation against the accused
harasser or against individuals who report/participate in the investigation of such matters.
Managers/supervisors must be aware of the potential impact regarding their social
relationships with co-workers. By law, supervisors have a greater responsibility, and are
also liable to be individually sued in court for acts of harassment as they hold positions of
authority over other employees. Sensitivity and sound judgment must be used by
managers/supervisors in order to avoid impropriety of any kind.
Inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature: Unwelcome sexual behavior which, could
interfere with an individual’s work or receipt of service, and could create an intimidating,
hostile or offensive environment. Inappropriate behavior(s) of a sexual nature are those
behaviors that do not rise to the level of sexual harassment because they may not be as
severe or not repeated. Examples of inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature are similar
to examples of sexual harassment behaviors and include, but are not limited to:
o Non-verbal behavior such as gestures, leering
o Physical behavior such as unwelcome touching, standing too close, cornering,
leaning over or brushing against a person’s body.



ESD Policy 0016 Employee Conduct (12/13/2016)
Appearance
The manner and style of dress for all employees has a direct bearing on the confidence
the citizens of the state place in the department. Employees are expected to portray an
image of professionalism and competence through their appearance, and maintain
12

 acceptable customs of personal hygiene. The department’s concern with employees’
appearance is limited to the effect on the work environment, employee health and safety,
and the public image.


Collective Bargaining Agreement between the State of Washington and the Washington
Federation of State Employees 2017-2019 (effective 07/01/2017):
Article 47 Workplace Behavior
47.1 The Employer and the Union agree that all employees should work in an
environment that fosters mutual respect and professionalism. The parties agree that
inappropriate behavior in the workplace does not further an agency’s business needs,
employee well-being or productivity. All employees are responsible for contributing to
such an environment and are expected to treat others with courtesy and respect.
47.2 Inappropriate workplace behavior by employees, supervisors and/or managers will
not be tolerated. If an employee believes he or she has been subjected to inappropriate
behavior the employee, and/or the employee’s union representative, is encouraged to
report this behavior to the employee’s supervisor or the Human Resources Office and/or
file a grievance in accordance with Article 29, Grievance Procedure.

IV. Summary of Factual Conclusions
Based on my investigation, I reached the following factual conclusions:



Mr. Peinecke makes some employees uncomfortable when he puts his arm around them.
Subordinate employees have felt they had to tolerate Mr. Peinecke’s physical gestures
because of his position.
Looking employees up and down and/or staring at women at the chest level, for whatever
reason, is inappropriate behavior which makes Mr. Peinecke vulnerable to claims of
harassment with sexual overtones.

DISCLAIMERS
The information in this report is based on statements made by the ESD employees
referenced and the documents made available to me in the course of this investigation from
12/22/2017 to 02/06/2018. This report is intended to provide you information to ascertain
what corrective actions, if any, are appropriate in response to the allegations made against
Mr. Peinecke.

Deborah Diamond

Attachments

13