CLERK, UNITED UNITED 700 STEWART: SEATT OFFICI. PENALTY FOR I: van, wouu mum (m'tuaifruu'?xw'; ATT Mini?; MANUAL REG 4 6 mum, Ml ihuvanhni se Document 213 ?mgamms Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page2 of 8 Case Document 174 Filed 03/30/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., CASE NO. LR Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS v_ TO INTERVENE DONALD TRUMP, et a1., Defendants. Before the court are motions to intervene by David A. Golden (Golden Mot. (Dkt. 121)), Kareem Salessi (Salessi Mot. (Dkt. 166)), Ann Dawson} (Dawson Mot. (Dkt. 167)), and Rick Satcher (Satcher Mot. (Dkt. 173)). The foregoing litigants are . 1 Ms. Dawson appears to ?le her motion, on behalf of three entities that she identi?es as ?Muslins [sic], Jews, and Christian [sic] against Terrorism,? ??We the People? Tea Party,? and ?Native Americans for 3 Unity Nation.? (Dawson Mot. at 1.) ORDER - Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page 3 of 8 Case Document 174 Filed 03/30/17 Page 2 of 3 proceeding pro se, and the courtliberally construes their ?lings as motions to intervene in these proceedings.2 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a), in order to intervene as of right in an action, a proposed intervenor must establish that he or she has (1) ?an unconditional right to intervene by a federal statute,? or (2) ?an interest relating to the . . . transaction that is the ?subj ect of the action . . . Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(a). For permissive intervention, a proposed intervenor must show that he or she has (1) ?a conditional right to intervene by a federal statute,? or (2) ?a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.? Fed. R. Civ. P. The burden is on the proposed intervenor to demonstrate that the, conditions for intervention are satis?ed. United States v. Alisa] Water Corp, 370 F.3d 915, 919 (9th Cir. 2004). The four proposed intervenors fail to demonstrate that the conditions for either intervention as of right or for permissive intervention are met. See Fed. R. Civ. -P. 24(a)- Accordingly, the court DENIES all four motions to intervene (Dkt. 121, 166, 167, 173). Further, the court DIRECTS the Clerk to refrain from placing any future 2 The court liberally construes the pleadings of pro se litigants. See Brazil v. US. Dep ?t of Navy, 66 F.3d 193, 199 (9th Cir. 1995). ORDER - 2 Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page 4 of 8 Case Document 174 Filed 03/30/17 Page 3 of 3 ?lings by any of these pro se litigants on the court?s docket for this case, unless the ?ling is a metion for reconSideration or a notice of appeal of this order. Dated this 29th day of March, 2017. mam JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge ORDER - 3 Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page50f8 a \F?57404135 136+" (Sc-m: CEWED Fir" 7246.. meg?v?m p3s?+r3zJ+ (3F 373333133 ?3.33 33m 5 3:61: 323?? ALL 3:3 Hard" A33: [nipmvomqw ., 'r 1334+?: 3 EB Hertm 6: Tu>hZ?6 i 9 4516 v3+ 0.343315, "fr 36,31? 6 L395 (3 LLS 06 3:6 3331(ng 7?9 A 33363463" ?5333 ?39341" .J Int S: u" WHF Dobmgai Efy JJ LU DC: 3?0Vf 1,147!? ?gm C) Fifi 6/89 NC U3 H360 HM 134612699 ?034,337? 1?67 ifs/3.3335363336333333 I Am L6 3,6 :12? 5412;? 3.33; P3313333 6/3453 3th 6 amid/33 3332: in 9663HFF Luau Can?; a] g: 3?3; H.333, 1533333 13433 cu? 56 35 Ag; A3 335+ c.3336! 3'5. 79:43:33,? PC6611 ma, 333 5033436.; 7: For (?*6ng V?mw/ L131 A 397 To N67 MC r?cd? Wide 31a? in ?Hd? Alli-VJ? W?y 14/13: Lao: giv?; 3" 4" J. I Lw'b?a Aim-3 Hand +0 A Davy" jvy?H?J VIC 3:376:15 V1 7&3 11?ch me Jawwds 1-36 Ali/'39 7?6 If?cm.? OCHS 7'1" Durnnf ?313; 3 3? V1 1433! 73 THIS ?43 A A/w?mm Iii/3M 33 T3131 For 2?34? LuvLHS _1p??v FDIC 13? aha?; 3?3 632-66 Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page 6 of 8 7 3: ((777153 E71117 A Fm}? ruff: Ph?mxc: FDIC i ?1?de thy? #664 Afr." 1266 want-I mu Czc?v?VL?/cuinll?? r" a JVfol+? (Jul [5 jg, V1 4&3; (56/1639; TH?f?l he ?H?h a 66661:? (56/ If: p?l?rxrv :m??mq Way Agavw 51h)? (769?s, ?5 7? 5 E17269 EVE ?7 173661? THC- Jvkij? i 3/ (?45 1.5 1.6696" Frn?aml a 4:1 HQS Servi- If? (3 fr? A 5 1/4157! 9va I. l/U?kd?ff' $l?ur?lh] aw 1% M, 5.6 {+14 Air: +ri'oci a r? ad?; 77%? EHEIJ A {50 A a) m5+ 7? 61- [,1st . Tim/gay/t. 5? ?>719 I 'r . E) EEO/{fly 3 ALB) Ht" l/[/62 7146 Am 7 3? Law>?a JHL [jjfy rm?ja TH 5? 55'? #156 ci mks-rd ma; {cafe/~14 714;; . KE [:73?525 8C 'f'Hc?f If but; Ala-'11? Hi 64%ch [:wa WU Lind. i5 WW J/?tici "he Ilium; (in 13% L66) Davie: '41? ,5 *4 1L ?31-'50: Agihyp i Ham/2 wow/7d 4 [5?0 56ml. f?67/ Care, 6; Wm} Law/1c; mg6g g: Lav/(rat A {5 my jg"; FR #6276}: Law.) 60 (.6 66v+ Heug?: THE ?nial/(E 6cmw+ lilo-.656 i 5 Li New(BEER 7'3. 46mg; Jud #1261?; jig/Ef . ?fl i771?) W1 3/ (617-5? 12? I Case Document 213 Filed 02/23/18 Page 7 of 8 PIMLL '1 1,1 1. 111 3? 1m 1:23: ""14 111?,171, 171 CD- 145'? 1L- Jury ill/1 @1157". Sig/1221:; .r I A11 ??1145 IO 6 ((11:71 127 AL bz?dd/ {?13 '11? 961 It?d: 1; 1 ?7l f?v?la {1671? ?11? Let?? it in?frimi +Hls 3/5? 1111f}, (LVEA D151~m?5 +115 cc; 5& 452 114511? 1 [Lew/{5 C67 '1 Due: 11717:?; a" .33 a. m) 0g? ?wjm? Via?) 1:14? And 7 4:1:1. Kc +5 H11: Hit: Han/(1 ??1113; Lu wig/?31% 3:64- waf?ad fH'eW? 7L0 "ny Cdad?vuf? Al?a?n?; I can 5/1 +146 CL UL 1321315 lCase217cv00141JLR Document 213 Filed 02/23/13 I cull ILE cums Madam-F 5+ 5wl+a13 0! 2? 313 Sam?H?la 93?? CT GUURT 0F WASHINGT 2 iim'?iin