Case 3:17-cv-00557-WHO Document 88 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9

JANE ROE 1, JANE ROE 2, JOHN DOE 1,
and JOHN DOE 2, on behalf of themselves
and others similarly situated, and JEWISH
FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
EAST BAY,
Plaintiffs,

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

v.

Case No. 3:17-cv-00557-WHO
ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO PROCEED
ANONYMOUSLY
Re: Dkt. No. 77

DONALD TRUMP, et al.,
Defendants.

14
15

On December 8, 2017, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, Dkt. No. 76, and an

16

administrative motion for leave to allow Jane Roe 2 and John Doe 2 to proceed anonymously in

17

this action, Dkt. No. 77. Defendants responded that they do not oppose the motion “[a]t this

18

time,” but “reserve the right at a future date either to request that the Court enter a protective

19

order, or to move to unseal the identities of one or more of the pseudonymous [p]laintiffs.” Dkt.

20

No. 86. Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED, with the understanding that I may need to revisit this

21

issue in the future.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 15, 2017

24
25
26
27
28

William H. Orrick
United States District Judge