Case 2:85-cv-04544-DMG-AGR Document 472 Filed 08/10/18 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:23463 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JENNY LISETTE FLORES, et al., Plaintiffs, - vs JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. _ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 85-4544-DMG (AGRx)
 ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE OF PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS RE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER/INDEPENDENT MONITOR [471] Case 2:85-cv-04544-DMG-AGR Document 472 Filed 08/10/18 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:23464 1 The parties have stipulated to a continuance of the submission date for the 2 Parties’ position(s) regarding the appointment of a Special Master/Independent 3 Monitor and Defendants’ filing responding to Plaintiffs’ declarations ordered to be 4 filed on August 10, 2018. See Minute Order [Doc. # 469]. 5 UPON CONSIDERATION of the Parties’ Stipulation and for the reasons set 6 forth therein, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Parties shall file their submission(s) 7 regarding the appointment of a Special Master/Independent Monitor, and Defendants 8 shall file their response to Plaintiffs’ declarations, on or before August 17, 2018. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 DATED: August 10, 2018 ______________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Peter Schey, declare and say as follows: 28 1 Case 2:85-cv-04544-DMG-AGR Document 472 Filed 08/10/18 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:23465 1 2 I am over the age of eighteen years of age and am a party to this action. I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. My business address is 3 4 5 6 7 256 S. Occidental Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90057, in said county and state. 
 On August 9, 2018, I electronically filed the following document(s):  [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING DUE DATE OF PARTIES’ SUBMISSION RE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL MASTER/INDEPENDENT MONITOR 8 9 with the United States District Court, Central District of California by using the 10 CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be 11 12 served by the CM/ECF system. 13 /s/Peter Schey 14 Attorney for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2