Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
STEPHEN ELLIOTT,
18 Civ. 5680
Plaintiff,

•
•

COMPLAINT

-againstMOIRA DONEGAN,and JANE DOES (1-30),
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X

Plaintiff, Stephen Elliott ("Plaintiff'), by his attorneys Nesenoff & Miltenberg, LLP, as
and for his Complaint(the "Complaint"), respectfully alleges as follows:
THE NATURE OF THE ACTION
1.

This action is brought by Plaintiff to recover, inter alia, damages caused by

Defendants' libelous communication ofknowingly false statements in a publicly accessible, shared
Google spreadsheet circulated via electronic mail("email")to the parties' professional colleagues,
namely women in the media industry. Upon information and belief, Defendants conspired to
create the Google Spreadsheet entitled "Shitty Media Men" (herein referred to as the List) and
circulated the link to the List via email, without password protection, for the stated purpose of
encouraging the female recipients to anonymously publish allegations of sexual misconduct by
men. The wholly unsubstantiated allegations published in the List, particularly with regard to
allegations about Plaintiff, contained numerous false statements alleging criminal sexual conduct
on the part of Plaintiff.
2.

Participants interested in contributing to the list, including the Defendants, published

defamatory allegations without corroborating evidence or a means of assessing the credibility of

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 2 of 15 PageID #: 2

the claimants. The List contained false information and unsubstantiated allegations, including
untrue statements alleging Plaintiff engaged in criminal sexual conduct, namely rape accusations,
sexual harassment, coercion and unsolicited invitations to his apartment. The inflammatory false
statements published in the List were abusive, vulgar, intentionally misleading as well as damning
to the Plaintiff's reputation and good name. The List was sent to numerous members ofthe parties'
shared profession, the media industry to intentionally harm Plaintiffs reputation and further cause
harm to Plaintiff's career.
3.

Plaintiff is a private citizen who is neither a politician nor a celebrity.

4.

The Defendants' actions were malicious in nature, taken solely to damage Plaintiff's

reputation and career.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5.

This Court has diversity and supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332

because Plaintiff and Defendants are citizens of different states and the amount in controversy
exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of costs and interest.
6.

This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants on the grounds that Defendant

Moira Donegan, and some of the Jane Doe Defendants reside within the Eastern District of New
York.
7.

Venue for this action properly lies in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391 because

a substantial part ofthe events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this judicial district
and Defendant Moira Donegan, along with at least some ofthe Jane Doe Defendants, reside in this
judicial district.
PARTIES
8.

Plaintiff Stephen Elliott is a resident of New Orleans, Louisiana.

2

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 3 of 15 PageID #: 3

9.

Defendant Moira Donegan (referred to herein as "Defendant Donegan") is a resident

of Kings County, New York.
10.

The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, or otherwise, of

Defendants Jane Does 1-30 (collectively referred to herein as the "Jane Doe Defendants") are
currently unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sue said Jane Doe Defendants by such fictitious
names.
11.

Plaintiff will know,through initial discovery, the names, email addresses, pseudonyms

and/or "Internet handles" used by Jane Doe Defendants to create the List, enter information into
the List, circulate the List, and otherwise publish information in the List or publicize the List.
Through discovery, Plaintiff can obtain the email address information, Google account, Internet
Protocol ("IP") address assigned to the accounts used by the Jane Doe Defendants by the account
holders' Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), email accounts and/or Google accounts, on the date
and time at which the Posts were published and/or information was entered into the List. Plaintiff
intends to subpoena the shared Google spreadsheet metadata for the List, email accounts, Google
accounts and ISPs in order to learn the identity of the account holders for the email addresses and
IP addresses.
12.

Though an email address or IP address alone does not reveal the name or contact

information of the account holder, it does reveal that person's full name, other identifying
information and/or physical location. IP addresses are distributed to ISPs by public, nonprofit
organizations called Regional Internet Registries. As the name implies, these registries assign
blocks ofIP addresses to ISPs by geographic region. In the United States, these blocks are assigned
and tracked by the American Registry of Internet Numbers.

Master tables correlating the IP

addresses with local regions are maintained by these organizations in apublicly-available and

3

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 4 of 15 PageID #: 4

searchable format. An IP address' geographic location can be further narrowed by crossreferencing this information with secondary sources such as data contributed to commercial
databases by ISPs. Plaintiff may utilize these techniques to uncover the geographic location of
each IP address associated with the Defendants. Further, upon information and belief, Plaintiff
intends to obtain the digital information, including but not limited to metadata, associated with the
List from Google, which can include information regarding Jane Doe Defendants who created the
list, information entered in the list, the account or email which accessed the List and otherwise
participated in the creation, editing, publication, publicizing and viewing of the List as well as the
time stamps for information entered, the various distinct versions ofthe list, and information about
the protection on the List as well as the circulation of the list both before and after the List was
circulated.
13.

Plaintiff believes that information obtained in discovery will reveal the Jane Doe

Defendants' true names, addresses and other identifying information and allow Plaintiff to amend
this Complaint to state the same. Plaintiff further believes that the information obtained in
discovery may lead to the identification of additional parties to be added to this action as
defendants.
14.

Upon information and belief, each of the Defendants named herein, including

Defendant Donegan and the Jane Doe Defendants(collectively referred to herein as "Defendants"),
performed, participated in, conspired to commit,or abetted the acts alleged herein and proximately
caused the damages alleged, and are thus liable to Plaintiff for the damages and relief sought
herein.

L~

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 5 of 15 PageID #: 5

FACTS RELEVANT TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION
15.

Plaintiff is an author living in New Orleans, Louisiana. He has published multiple

books and articles expressing his sexual preferences. In these nonfiction works, of which
Defendants are aware, Plaintiff openly describes his sexual preferences in detail so that it is clear
he could not physically participate in the false, unsubstantiated allegations published about him in
the List by Defendants.
16.

Defendant Donegan is a writer and activist who resides in Brooklyn, New York.

She was a former of employee of The New Republic magazine. Defendant Donegan has a welldocumented history of publicly publishing statements professing a hatred of men.
17.

On or about October 11, 2017, Defendants conspired to create the List, a publicly

accessible, shared Google spreadsheet entitled "Shitty Media Men," for the stated purpose of
encouraging women to anonymously publish allegations of sexual misconduct by men. Upon
information and belief, Defendants created the List and circulated it to numerous women in the
media industry via email and other electronic means. The List was not password-protected. It was
accessible via a link which was circulated without discernment, but for the caveat that it should
not be forwarded to men.
18.

The allegations were wholly unsubstantiated. Indeed, participants interested in

contributing to the List, some of whom were Jane Doe Defendants, were encouraged to publish
any and all defamatory allegations without evidence to corroborate the allegations or a means of
assessing the credibility of the anonymous accusers.
19.

On or about October 11, 2017, Defendants published Plaintiff's full name in the

List, along with the names of several other men connected to the media industry; Plaintiff's name
was entry #13, along with an AFFILIATION of"Freelance writer/novelist." Defendants further

5

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 6 of 15 PageID #: 6

published the defamatory allegations of, "Rape accusations, sexual harassment"[sic] under the
ALLEGED MISCONDUCT column heading. (Plaintiff's entry on the List hereinafter referred to
as "Plaintiff's Entry")
20.

On or about and between October 11, 2017, and October 12, 2017, Plaintiffs entry

was amended by Defendants to read: "Rape accusations, sexual harassment [sic], coercion,
unsolicited invitations to his apartment, a dude who snuck into Binders???" and Defendants
published "Multiple women allege misconduct" in the NOTES column of the List. Further,
Plaintiff's entry was moved to entry #12 on the list as other individuals' entries were removed by
the Defendants.
21.

Defendant Donegan, both herself and together with some of the Jane Doe

Defendants, actively edited, removed, organized, contributed, highlighted, published, and added
names to The List.
22.

At the top of The List Defendant Donegan wrote,"Men accused of physical sexual

violence by multiple women are highlighted in red." Defendant Donegan, both by herself and with
some of the Jane Doe Defendants, outlined Plaintiff s entry on the List in red along with some of
the other individuals named on the List.
23.

Defendant Donegan, along with some of the Jane Doe Defendants, outlined the

defendant's entry in red, with malice, to signify he was being accused of"physical sexual violence
by multiple women" a statement Defendant Donegan, and at least some of the Jane Doe
Defendants, knew or had reason to know was false.
24.

On October 12, 2017, Buzzfeed published an article about the existence of the List.

Articles referencing the List, in The New York Times, New ~'orke~, Atlantic, and Harpers, soon
followed.

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 7 of 15 PageID #: 7

25.

On or about and between October 11, 2017, and July 17, 2018, and many times

following the creation of the list Defendant Donegan publicized the existence of the list both in
traditional publications and on social media.
26.

On or about and between October 11, 2017, and July 17, 2018, Defendant Donegan

made public statements on social media stating "The problem is men," "I really hate men," "I like
the witch hunt," and re-publishing statements assuming the guilt of all men accused on The List.
27.

Since the List was created on or about October 11, 2017 it has been freely available

to download from public sites including Reddit and Wo~dp~ess.
28.

Plaintiffs book was released on or about November 7, 2017. Much of the planned

publicity for the book was cancelled, including a finished interview for The Pais Review as well
as an excerpt that was supposed to run in Lithub. Plaintiff was uninvited from multiple events
including readings and a panel at the Los Angeles Book Festival.
29.

Plaintiff's book sales, historically, are dependent on Plaintiff's ability to promote

his written works at publicity events like interviews in various media outlets, excerpt publications,
as well as public readings, panels and appearances. Plaintiffs book sales for his most recent book
were below projections and significantly less than previous works.
30.

In or about December 2017 Plaintiff was told by a producer that the producer

could not forward his work to film or television production companies. A substantial portion of
Plaintiffs income, historically, was generated from his written works being sold to film and
television production companies for adaptation to film.
31.

In or about December 2017 and thereafter, Plaintiff became extremely depressed

as a direct result ofthe List, finding employers, colleagues, business associates, friends and family

7

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 8 of 15 PageID #: 8

members did not return his calls as they had in the past. He attributed this to the false allegations
recently published in the List in which he was falsely accused of being a rapist.
32.

Following continued publicity in multiple publications for the List Plaintiff was

unfriended or blocked on social media by many friends, acquaintances, fans and readers. Plaintiff,
historically, utilized social media to market his works and maintain relationships.
33.

In or about January 2018 Defendant Donegan published an article in New York

Magazine's online page"The Cut"taking credit for creating and disseminating the List. The article
was entitled, "I Started the Media Men List My name is Moira Donegan."
34.

In or about January 2018 Plaintiffs sister, a researcher living in Chicago, called

to say she had heard the Plaintiff had been accused of rape.
35.

In or about January 2018 Plaintiffenrolled in therapy while actively contemplating

suicide.
36.

In January 2018 Plaintiff wrote an essay about being on The List which was

accepted and then, two weeks later, rejected by New York Magazine.
37.

On February 2, 2018, the same essay written by Plaintiff was accepted and then

rejected in the same day by the London Guardian.
38.

Defendant Donegan has benefited substantially from publication of the List. In

addition to favorable publicity, Defendant Donegan has been hired on contract at the New Yo~ke~
and was given a contract worth a minimum ofsix figures to write a book about the list for Scribner
Books.
39.

On September 25, 2018, Plaintiff published an essay about the experience of being

falsely accused ofrape. Despite the essay being widely circulated online, particularly in the literary

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 9 of 15 PageID #: 9

community, no one came forward to accuse the Plaintiff of rape, even though there were
supposedly "multiple rape accusations."
40.

Defendants' actions were malicious in nature and taken solely to damage Plaintiffs

reputation and career. Defendants published the List, with reckless disregard for the truth of the
allegations asserted therein, and circulated said List to numerous women in the media industry
with the intention the List be forwarded in perpetuity.
41.

Defendants knew the List contained false defamatory statements, including the

entirety of Plaintiff's entry, but published the List to numerous women to intentionally injure,
harass, defame, endanger, aggrieve and embarrass Plaintiff.
42.

Defendants published the List, and Plaintiff's entry, with the intention to damage

Plaintiff's reputation and good name,impugn Plaintiff's character to the parties' colleagues in the
media industry and otherwise diminish Plaintiff's earning potential and career opportunities.
43.

Plaintiff has suffered irreparable damage to his professional and personal reputation

as the direct and proximate result of Defendants' defamatory statements and publication of the
Letter.
44.

Plaintiff has suffered economic damage to his career as a writer/producer/content

creator including but not limited to diminished book sales, loss of income, loss of business
opportunities, including but not limited to an inability to market and publicize various works, as
well as diminished popularity, good will and interest of journalists, fans, friends, associates,
customers and the public at large.
45.

Plaintiff has endured severe emotional pain and suffering as the direct and

proximate result ofDefendants' defamatory statements, the Letter, and the public reaction to them.

D

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 10 of 15 PageID #: 10

46.

As the direct and proximate result ofDefendant's defamatory publications, Plaintiff

has required continued psychological therapy.

AND AS FOR A FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(Defamation of Character by Libel)
47.

Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as if fully stated herein.

48.

Defendants knowingly published the aforementioned false statements about

Plaintiff by maliciously circulating the defamatory List and publishing the false, unsubstantiated
allegations, alleging Plaintiff engaged in criminal sexual conduct, namely rape accusations, sexual
harassment, coercion and unsolicited invitations to his apartment, to numerous members of the
parties' industry, the literary community and media industry at large.
49.

Defendants are aware the published statements are false because of Plaintiff's

published sexual preferences, including his preferences as a submissive male in a BDSM context,
which are commonly known in the parties' industry. Defendants also published the defamatory
statements, in the List, with a reckless disregard for the truth of the allegations as Defendants
published the information anonymously without proof, corroboration or a means of assessing
credibility of the anonymous publishers.
50.

Defendant Donegan publicized the List and publicly admitted her hatred of men,in

particular her distrust of and bias against "straight" men, as well as her enjoyment of"the witch
hunt."
51.

Defendants published this defamatory information without privilege or

authorization. Plaintiff did not know about the publication of the List initially.

10

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 11 of 15 PageID #: 11

52.

Defendants published the false statements about Plaintiff, described herein, with

malice as they knew the statements were false as pertaining to Plaintiff.
53.

Defendants also published and circulated the List with a reckless disregard for the

truth of the unsubstantiated allegations which were published anonymously.
54.

Defendants' false publications achieved their desired effect of exposing Plaintiff to

contempt, aversion and vitriol. Plaintiff's personal and professional reputations were damaged as
the result of Defendants' defamatory statements.
S5.

Plaintiff suffered economic damages as the result of Defendants' defamatory

statements including, but not limited to, diminished books sales, loss ofemployment opportunities
and diminished ability to market and publicize his works or otherwise earn profit from his works.
56.

Plaintiff suffered emotional pain and suffering as the result of Defendants'

defamatory statements.
57.

Plaintiff is entitled to peg se damages because the defamatory statements made by

Defendant were inherently harmful, in that they addressed sexual morality and professionalism.
58.

Plaintiff is further entitled to Actual Damages, Compensatory Damages, and

Punitive Damages for Defendants' malicious, defamatory conduct, as Plaintiff has been damaged
in an amount to be determined at trial.
AS AND FOR THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
59.

Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges each and every allegation hereinabove as if fully set

forth herein.
60.

Based on the foregoing facts and circumstances, Defendants intentionally defamed

Plaintiff and intentionally inflicted emotional harm by creating the List and publishing the
unsubstantiated allegations about Plaintiff.
11

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 12 of 15 PageID #: 12

61.

In publishing the List with the intent to inflict said emotional harm, Defendants

were condoning publication of inflammatory, unsubstantiated allegations and permitting the
publication of false information about plaintiff with actual knowledge of the falsity, and a
deliberate indifference to and an apparent approval ofthe publication ofthe false allegations about
Plaintiff, with the consequence that Plaintiff has been effectively blackballed, with a ruined
reputation, and denied well-earned economic opportunities, thereby undermining and detracting
from Plaintiff's well-being and livelihood.
62.

The above actions and inactions by Defendants were so outrageous and utterly

intolerable that they caused mental anguish and severe psychological and emotional distress to
Plaintiff, as well as physical harm, financial loss, humiliation, loss of reputation and other
damages.
63.

As a direct and proximate result of the above conduct, Plaintiff sustained

tremendous damages, including, without limitation, emotional distress, loss of career
opportunities, other economic injuries and other direct and consequential damages.
64.

As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to damages in an amount to be

determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, expenses, costs and disbursements.
AS AND FOR THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Ne~li~ent Infliction of Emotional Distress)
65.

Plaintiffrepeats and re-alleges each and every allegation hereinabove as iffully set

forth herein.
66.

Based on the foregoing facts and circumstances, Defendants negligently defamed

Plaintiff and negligently inflicted emotional harm by creating the List and publishing the
unsubstantiated allegations about Plaintiff.

12

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 13 of 15 PageID #: 13

67.

In publishing the List with a blatant disregard for the truth of the allegations and

blatant disregard for the emotional harm caused, Defendants were condoning publication of
inflammatory, unsubstantiated allegations and permitting the publication of false information
about plaintiff with actual knowledge ofthe falsity, and a deliberate indifference to and an apparent
approval of the publication of the false allegations about Plaintiff, Defendants knew or should
have known their outrageous conduct would result in the consequence that Plaintiff has been
effectively blackballed, with a ruined reputation, and been denied well-earned economic
opportunities, thereby undermining and detracting from Plaintiff's well-being and livelihood.
68.

The above actions and inactions by Defendants were so outrageous and utterly

intolerable that they knew or should have known they would cause the mental anguish and severe
psychological and emotional distress suffered by Plaintiff, as well as physical harm,financial loss,
humiliation, loss of reputation and other damages.
69.

As a direct and proximate result of the above conduct, Plaintiff sustained

tremendous damages, including, without limitation, emotional distress, loss of career
opportunities, other economic injuries and other direct and consequential damages.
70.

As a result of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to damages in an amount to be

determined at trial, plus prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, expenses, costs and disbursements.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE,Plaintiff Prays for the following relief:
i.

This Court's FINDING that the information published by Defendants was false

and defamatory;
11.

This Court's FINDING that Defendants published the defamatory statements with

malice;

13

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 14 of 15 PageID #: 14

iii.

This Court's ORDER that Defendants issue a written retraction to each and every

person to whom they originally published the false and defamatory statements;
iv.

On the first cause of action for defamation, a judgment awarding the Plaintiff

damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than $1,500,000.00, plus
interest, attorney's fees, expenses, costs and disbursements, as described below:
v.

This Court's AWARD ofpeg se damages in an amount to be determined at trial,

but in no event less than the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00);
vi.

This Court's AWARD of Actual and Compensatory damages in an amount to be

determined at trial, but in no event less than the amount of five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000.00);
vii.

This Court's AWARD of Punitive Damages in an amount to be determined at

trial, but in no event less than the amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00);
Vlll.

Attorneys' fees as against Defendants jointly and severally, in an amount to be

determined at trial;
ix.

On the second cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, a

judgment awarding Plaintiff damages in an amount to be determined at trial, including, without
limitation, damages to physical well-being, emotional and psychological damages, damages to
reputation, past and future economic losses, loss of career and business opportunities, as well as
loss of future career prospects, plus prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, expenses, costs and
disbursements;
x.

On the third cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress, a

judgment awarding Plaintiff damages in an amount to be determined at trial, including, without
limitation, damages to physical well-being, emotional and psychological damages, damages to

14

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 15 of 15 PageID #: 15

reputation, past and future economic losses, loss of career and business opportunities, as well as
loss of future career prospects, plus prejudgment interest, attorneys' fees, expenses, costs and
disbursements; and
xi.

Dated this

Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper

l Oth

day of October, 2018
Respq~tft~ll~Submitted,
By:
Andrew T. Miltenberg, Esq.
Stuart Bernstein, Esq.
Nicholas Lewis, Esq.
Nesenoff& Miltenberg, LLP
363 7th Avenue, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10001

15

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1-1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 16

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Suininons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the

Eastern District of New York

STEPHEN ELLIOTT,

Plaintiffs)

v.

Civil Action No.

18-cv-5680

MOIRA DONEGAN, and JANE DOES (1-30),

Defendants)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant's name and address) MOIRA DONEGAN

1214 DEAN ST,
BROOKLYN, NY 11216-3101

A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)
or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or(3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,
whose name and address are:
Nesenoff & Miltenberg, LLP
363 7th Avenue, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10001

If you fail to respond,judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

DOUGLAS C. PALMER
CLERK OF CO UR T

Date:
SignatuYe ofCleYk or Deputy Clerk

 Case 1:18-cv-05680-LDH-SJB Document 1-1 Filed 10/10/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 17

AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Surninons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not befiled with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l))
Tl1is summons for (name ofindividual and title, ifany)

was received by me on (date)
~ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
or

Orl (date)

[~ I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name)
a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date)

,and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or

~ I served the summons on (name ofindividual)

who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of(name ofoYganiZation)
or

Orl (date)

~ I returned the summons unexecuted because

or

~ Other (specify):

My fees are $

for travel and $

for services, for a total of$

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:
Server's signature

Printed name and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00