Transcript of the Testimony of
EDDIE T. JOHNSON
Date: August 21, 2017
Case: KING VS. EVANS

TOOMEY REPORTING

312-853-0648
toomeyrep@sbcglobal.net
www.toomeyreporting.com

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
RITA KING,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GLENN EVANS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 13 C 1937

This is the VIDEOTAPED deposition of

EDDIE T. JOHNSON, called by the Plaintiff for
examination, taken pursuant to the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States
District Courts pertaining to the taking of

depositions, taken before PEGGY A. ANDERSON, a
Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of

Illinois, at 3510 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago,
Illinois, on August 21st, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

A P P E A R A N C E S:
THE LAW OFFICES OF:
THOMAS G. MORRISSEY
BY: MR. PATRICK MORRISSEY
MR. THOMAS G. MORRISSEY
10150 South Western Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60643
(773) 233-7900
patrickmorrissey1920@gmail.com
On behalf of the Plaintiff;
THE LAW OFFICES OF:
CITY OF CHICAGO
FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS
LITIGATION DIVISION
BY: MS. TIFFANY Y. HARRIS
30 North LaSalle Street
Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 744-7684
tiffany.harris@cityofchicago.org
On behalf of the individual
Defendants: Glenn Evans,
D.T. Clifford, R.A. Sutton,
K.L. Rodgers, Wilfredo Lapitan,
and Lloyd Gray;
THE LAW OFFICES OF:
HICKEY, O'CONNOR & BATTLE, LLP
BY: MR. KENNETH BATTLE
MR. WILLIAM BAZAREK
20 North Clark Street
Suite 1600
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 422-9400
kbattle@hoblawfirm.com
wbazarek@hoblawfirm.com
On behalf of the
Defendant, Glenn Evans;

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 3
1
2

A P P E A R A N C E S:

4

THE LAW OFFICES OF:
CITY OF CHICAGO
FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS
LITIGATION DIVISION

5

BY:

3

6
7
8

MS. STEFFANIE N. GARRETT
30 North LaSalle Street
Suite 900
Chicago, Illinois 60602
(312) 744-6959
steffanie.garrett@cityofchicago.org
On behalf of the
Defendant, City of Chicago;

9

11

THE LAW OFFICES OF:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT

12

BY:

10

13
14
15
16
17
18

MS. CHARISE K. VALENTE
3510 South Michigan Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60653
(312) 745-6115
charise.valente@chicagopolice.org
On behalf of the Witness,
Superintendent Eddie T. Johnson;

ALSO PRESENT
Milo Savich, Videographer

19
20
21
22
23
24

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

I N D E X

1
2
3
4
5

WITNESS
EDDIE T. JOHNSON
DIRECT EXAMINATION BY
MR. MORRISSEY:

Page 4

PAGE
7-103

6

C E R T I F I E D

7
8
9
10

Q U E S T I O N S

LINE

PAGE

3

36

11
12

E X H I B I T S

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MARKED
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
JOHNSON

EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT

NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.
NO.

18
27
33
31
11
7
1
******

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

PAGE
7
39
44
49
58
67
75

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

August 21st, 2017.

Today's date is

We are going on the

video record at 1:30 p.m.

We are present at the Chicago

Police Department headquarters, 3510 South
Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60653
for the purpose of taking a videotaped
deposition of Superintendent Johnson.

The

party on whose behalf the deposition is

being taken is the Plaintiff, and the party
at whose instance the deposition is being
recorded on an audiovisual device is the
Plaintiff.

This case is instituted in the

United States District Court, Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division.

The case number is 13 C 1937, and the case
is entitled King versus Evans.

My name is Milo Savich, and I am

the legal video specialist from Liticorp,
1919 North Milwaukee Avenue, Chicago,
Illinois 60647.

The court reporter is Peggy

Anderson from Toomey Reporting.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

I will now

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ask the attorneys to introduce themselves
starting with Plaintiff's counsel first.
MR. MORRISSEY:

Good afternoon.

MR. MORRISSEY:

My name is Patrick

name is Tom Morrissey.
Morrissey.

MR. BATTLE:

My

Do you want us to start?

My name is Kenneth Battle.
Defendant Glenn Evans.

I represent

MR. BAZAREK:

William E. Bazarek for

MS. VALENTE:

Charise Valente,

MS. GARRETT:

Steffanie Garrett on

Defendant Glenn Evans.
General Counsel, CPD.

behalf of the City of Chicago.
MS. HARRIS:

Tiffany Harris on behalf

of Defendants Clifford, Sutton, Rodgers and
Dixon.

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

The reporter will

now please swear in the witness, and we may
then proceed.

(WHEREUPON, the witness
was first duly sworn.)

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 7
1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREUPON:

called as a witness herein, having been first
duly sworn, was examined and testified as
follows:

D I R E C T

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

EDDIE T. JOHNSON,

BY MR. THOMAS MORRISSEY:

Q

Good afternoon.

A

Eddie T. Johnson.

name for the record?
Q

the Chicago Police Department?
A

Superintendent of Chicago Police

Department.

(WHEREUPON, Plaintiff's

Exhibit No. 18 was marked

17
19
20
21
22
23
24

Will you state your

What is your current position with

16
18

E X A M I N A T I O N

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

for identification.)

I'm going to show you what -- I will

show you what has been marked as Plaintiff's
Exhibit Number 18.

It's a two-page document --

actually, it's a three-page document, and it
has your name on it as -- with your resume.
I ask you to take a look at that
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

document for a moment, and does that look -Did you prepare this document?
A
Q

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Is there any information on that

document which is inaccurate?
MS. HARRIS:

Counsel, do you have an

MR. BATTLE:

You can use this one.

extra copy?

I do not have one.

MS. HARRIS:

9
10

It looks like I did.

short?

Are you going to be

Do you all have one?

MS. GARRETT:

share.

MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:

It's okay.

We can

Oh, okay.

A

No, it looks like it's correct.

Q

Is there anything now you would like

A

Superintendent of the Chicago Police

Q

When did you become superintendent?

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

to -- to add to that resume?
Department.
A

2016.

Q

I was officially sworn in 13 April of
Prior to that appointment, what was
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

your position?
A
Q

I was the chief of patrol.

During the period from March of 2008

to August of 2011, were you the commander of
the 6th District?
A

Yes.

A

It's located on the south side of

Q

Where is the 6th District located?

Chicago, 78th and South Halsted.
Q

What were your responsibilities at

A

As the commander of the district, I

the 6th District during that period of time?

was responsible for the day-to-day operations
of police personnel in the district.
Q

During that period of time, was there

a lieutenant by the name of Glenn Evans that
worked at the 6th District?
A
Q

Yes.

Was he within your leadership group

at the 6th District?
A
Q

Yes.

How many lieutenants did you have in

the 6th District during that period of time?
A

If I had to guess, it probably
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

fluctuated anywhere from six to seven.
Q

Page 10

When you were not present in the

building at 78th and Halsted, at times, would
Glenn Evans be the watch commander?
A
Q

At times, yes.

And what responsibilities would Glenn

Evans have if he was the watch commander in the
6th District?
A

As watch commander, he would be

responsible for the operations of the personnel
in the district during his tour of duty.
Q

Did you -- In April of 2011, did you

work a normal rotation as the commander in the
6th District?
A
Q

In April of 2011, yes.

What were your normal hours of work

at that time?
A

I really didn't have normal hours.

would start typically -- A typical day for me

I

back then would have been about a 9:00 or

10:00 a.m. start, and I typically wouldn't go
home until about 11:00 or 12:00 o'clock at
night.
Q

In the early morning hours in the 6th
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

District, was there a time period when the

prisoners that were locked up in the lockup
would be taken to court?
MS. GARRETT:

timeframe.

Objection, form as to

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In April of 2011.

Q

Sure, sure.

A

Okay.

Can you repeat the question?
At some point in the

morning hours, was there a period of time when
most of the arrestees that were in the lockup
in the 6th District were removed from the

lockup and taken to court for court hearings?
A
Q

that be?

Typically, yes.

And in April of 2011, what time would

A

My best guess would be probably

Q

Would it be faay that at

sometime between maybe 5:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m.
or about 10:00 a.m. in the morning in April of
2011, that the lockup should be relatively
empty?

MS. GARRETT:

foundation.

Objection, form,

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY THE WITNESS:
A

different.

It depends.

You know, every day was

It could be.

It could not be.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

How many lockups did you have in the

A

One main lockup.

6th District back in April of 2011?
Q

How many cells did you have, holding

cells, did you have in the lockup?
A

If my memory serves me correctly,

maybe about ten holding cells.
could be wrong.

I could -- I

Q

Were each of the holding cells

A

To the best of my knowledge, yes.

approximately the same size?
Q

Approximately how many arrestees

could be held in each of the holding cells in
the lockup in the 6th District?
A

I mean, if you had to -- We had a

what we call a bullpen that would hold quite a
few people at one time.

The individual cells,

I think, was designed for maybe two people.
Q

How large was the large holding cell

or bullpen?

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

A

Page 13

I couldn't give you the dimensions,

but I guess -- I don't know.
guess.

I really couldn't

Q

Approximately the size of this

A

Probably a little smaller.

A

So maybe about 3/4ths the size of

conference room?
Q

So would you say about --

this -- this conference room.
Q

So approximately 12 by 16?

Q

Now, in your experience as the

A

I suppose.

commander in the 6th District, were there times
of the day traditionally when the lockup would
be most active?
A

district.

The 6th District was a very active

So at all times of the day, officers

would bring in arrestees.
say it fluctuated.
time.

So I really wouldn't

It -- It was busy all the

Q

In the 6th District, was the building

A

About ten years old.

relatively new back in 2011?

I think that

building was finished in maybe 1998, so it was
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 14

about ten years old.
Q

When one -- the public entered the

6th District, was there a vestibule or an area
where the desk sergeant worked?
A

Yes.

A

It was fairly large, fairly large

Q
area.

How large an area was that?

So probably three times as long as this

conference room.

It was a huge area.

Q

Does the 6th District encompass the

A

Some of Englewood.

Englewood community?

The boundaries to

the south would be 75th Street.

So Englewood

would be on the west side of the Dan Ryan
Expressway.

So we did have from the Dan Ryan

to roughly Western Avenue to the west end of
the district.
Q

In the 6th District in April of 2011,

were there a fair number of homeless people, to
your knowledge?

MS. GARRETT:

Objection --

MR. BATTLE:

Objection to relevance.

MS. GARRETT:

Objection, relevance,

MS. HARRIS:

Objection, speculation.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

speculation and foundation.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

to time, yes.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

In the winter months when it was

extremely cold in the 6th District, were there

times when you as the commander would allow the
homeless to remain in the entryway to the
building in the 6th District?
A

Objection, relevance, foundation.
MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

13
14

I would see homeless people from time

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I'll join.
I'll join.

Police stations are typically warming

centers for homeless people.

So we would

routinely have homeless people sleep inside the
building when it was cold at night, yeah.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Now, part of your duties as the

commander in the 6th District was to

periodically inspect the front area of the 6th
District where the homeless people at times
would congregate, be allowed to congregate?
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

A

As commander?

A

No, that would be more the

Q

Page 16

Yeah.

responsibility of a watch commander.
Q

And my -- my focus on this, Glenn

Evans testified in his IPRA statement that, at
times, Rita King would be present in the

vestibule of the 6th District because she was
homeless.

Do you have any personal knowledge --

Prior to April of 2011, do you have any

personal knowledge of a woman by the name of
Rita King?

MR. BATTLE:

I'm just going to object

to the extent it mischaracterizes his
testimony, form and foundation.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

No, no personal knowledge.

Q

Did you ever participate in an arrest

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

or processing of Ms. King while you were the
commander of the 6th District?
A
Q

No, not that I recall.

At some point in your career, you
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

became a deputy chief of Area Central, correct?
A
Q

Correct.

And that -- You were in that position

for what period of time?
A

Let's see, I was promoted to deputy

chief in, I believe, August of 2012, and I held
the deputy chief position until December of

2015; but specifically Area Central, I served

as deputy chief of Area 4 until about February
of 2013, and that's when I became deputy chief
of Area Central.
Q

If we look back at your resume, it

has down here you were deputy chief of Area

Central from February of 2012 to April of 2014;
would that be accurate?
A
Q

Yes.

Was the third district one of the

districts you supervised as the deputy chief of
Area Central?
A
Q

Yes.

Was commander -- Was Glenn Evans

during that period of time a commander of the
third district?
A

Not for the entire time but for a
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 18

period of time, yes.
Q

And part of your duties would have

been to supervise then Commander Evans when he
was the commander of the 3rd District?
A
Q

Yes.

Prior to becoming the commander of

the 6th District in March of 2008, had you ever
worked with Glenn Evans?
A
Q

Yes.

On -- In what capacity prior to March

of 2008 did you work with Glenn Evans?
A

We were patrolman together in the 6th

District, so that was probably somewhere
between -- starting in 1988, and we made
sergeant at the same time in 1998.

I believe

it was September '98, somewhere around there.
Yeah, so we made sergeant in August of 1998.
So we probably worked in the same

district, in the 6th District, as patrolmen for
roughly ten years.
Q

Did you ever work in a beat car with

A

I don't recall us ever being

Glenn Evans when you were in the 6th District?
partners, I'm sure, because we typically -TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 19

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

back then, you did work with different people.

We may have worked in a squad car together, but
I -- I really don't recall that.

He was never

my regular partner; but there may have been an

occasion or two where we actually worked in the
car together, but I don't recall that.
Q

When you were a patrol officer with

Glenn Evans, did you work at times the same
shift?
A
Q

Yes.

At times, did you socialize with him

when you were a patrol officer after work?
A

No, I don't ever recall ever being at

Q

Did you ever go to a retirement party

A

Not with him, no.

a social function with Glenn Evans.
with Glenn Evans?
Q

Well, did you ever go to a retirement

party when Glenn -- Glenn Evans was -A

Was also there?

A

Could be.

Q

Yeah.

I don't recall ever being

at a retirement party at the same time, but
it's -- we probably did.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

Did you consider yourself a friend of

Glenn Evans when you were both patrolman in the
6th District for ten years?
A

I mean, we were acquaintances.

don't know how you define friends.

I

If you

define friends as hanging out together and

going over to each other's houses, then no, we
didn't do things like that.

I knew Glenn from work.

We may have

ran into each other at a retirement party.

I

can't recall if we did, but we didn't hang out
together as patrolmen.
Q

During that ten years when you were

both patrolmen in the 6th District, did you

ever talk to other fellow patrol officers about
Glenn Evans?

MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

this:

Objection, form.

Not that I recall, but I can tell you

If someone in the district made a good

arrest or something like that, we would often
talk about it; but I don't specifically

remember talking about Glenn Evans, though.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

District back when you were -- you and Evans

were patrol officers was known as an aggressive
police officer, would the other police officers
in the district also know that reputation?

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MR. BATTLE:

Objection, vague as to

MS. HARRIS:

Join.

aggressive definition.
MS. GARRETT:

10
11

If a patrol officer in the 6th

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I'll join.

It depends on what -- what you call

aggressive.

You know, we talked about officers

being good officers, aggressive in that they
were good officers.
terminology.

So that's how we used that

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When you were a patrol officer in the

6th District, what did you consider to be a
good officer?
A

Someone who was fair with the public,

enforced the laws the way we're supposed to --

to enforce them, someone that did their job and
did it in a fair respectful way.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 22
1

Q

Did you have an opinion when you were

2

a patrol officer with Glenn Evans whether or

3

not he fell into that category as a good

4

officer?

5
6
7

A

I thought Glenn was a good dedicated

Q

At that time did you know that -- Let

officer, yeah.

8

me give you a preliminary question.

9

know what a CR is?

10

A

Yes.

11

Q

What is a CR?

12
13
14

A

Do you

That's a complaint against a police

officer for a litany of allegations.
Q

Back when you were a patrol officer,

15

was the organization that reviewed citizen

16

complaints the Office of Professional

17

Standards?

18

A

Yes, OPS.

19

Q

When you were a patrol officer with

20

Glenn Evans, did you -- were you aware of the

21

fact that Glenn Evans had numerous CR

22

complaints against him as a patrol officer?

23

A

No.

24

Q

Did you have any knowledge in regards -TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

when you were a patrol officer in regards to

Glenn Evans' reputation as being a person that
had numerous civilian complaints against him?
MR. BATTLE:

foundation as to "reputation" as well as
being argumentative.
MS. GARRETT:
MS. HARRIS:

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Objection to form,

BY THE WITNESS:

I'll join.

I'll join.

A

No.

Q

In the 6th District in April of 2011,

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

was there an area of that building which was
used to process arrestees?
A

Yes.

A

On the first floor.

Q
Q

Where was that area located?
Where in relation to the lockup area

was the area that was used to process
arrestees?
A
Q

Adjacent to it, so right next to it.

To the best of your recollection, how

many rooms were there to process arrestees in
the 6th District?

And all of my questions are

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

geared toward April of 2011.
A

So the processing area wasn't really

split up into rooms.
cubicles.

It was split up more into

So there might have been like ten

computer stations inside that processing room

area, and that's where officers would do their
paperwork for the arrestee.
Q

Can you describe the dimensions of

A

Oh, crap.

that processing room?

Little, little -- probably

a little longer than this room but not quite as
wide, and the -- the computer terminals -Q

So at least 20 feet long?

Q

Were there desks or booths where the

A

Yeah, something like that.

Yeah.

officer would communicate with the arrestee?
A

The officer would typically sit on

one side of a -- It's kind of a booth setup.
It's kind of hard to describe it, but the -the arrestee would sit on the -- on one side
and the officer would sit on the other side
where the computer equipment was.

So they would have the offender

sitting on the other side handcuffed most of
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 25

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

the time, and the officer could see them but
they would be split because we had equipment

that you really wouldn't want arrestees being
able to get ahold of.
Q

You mentioned that -- Was there a

policy -- Did you have a policy or procedure
that when an arrestee was brought into the

building at the 6th District that they would
remain handcuffed?
A

Well, I think that's a safety issue

for the officers.

So when you -- You don't

take them out of handcuffs typically until

you're getting ready to turn them over to the
lockup keeper.
Q

As the commander in the 6th District,

before an arrestee was brought into the
building at the 6th District, were they
thoroughly searched?
A

Well, by our -- That's governed by

our general orders.
the city.

So that's universal around

So we would search an arrestee as

thoroughly as we could before we would bring
them into the building.
Q

So the arrestee, back in April of
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 26
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

2011, would be thoroughly searched to see if
the person was carrying any weapon or
contraband?

MR. BATTLE:

Objection,

mischaracterizes his testimony.
MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:

Join in the objection.

A

They should be.

Q

When they're brought into the

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

processing room, you mentioned they're
handcuffed.

Is it -- At times, were the --

were the handcuffs attached to any type of ring
or permanent device?

MS. GARRETT:

That's vague.

Objection, form.

We're not talking about any

particular incidents.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

there.

It's speculative.

Yeah, there were handcuff rings back

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

So for each of the positions where an

arrestee was processed in the processing room,

it was possible to have the arrestee restrained
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 27
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

to a ring?
A
Q

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Are there times in the 6th District

where the arrestee -- the identity of the
arrestee is known --

MS. GARRETT:

Objection.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

-- prior to the exchange of maybe

their identification?

MS. GARRETT:

foundation, vague.
MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

13
14

To the best of my recollection, yes.

Objection, form,

Join.

I'll join and add

speculation as well.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

When an officer makes an arrest, you

may have the occasion to know somebody prior to
making that arrest, yeah.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In the processing room, does the

arresting officer prepare like an arrest report
and the case report if it's a domestic
disturbance?
A

If the person is being arrested, yes,
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 28

they would.
Q

And it's normally the arresting

officers that complete the paperwork or the
computer entries for the person that they
arrest?
A
Q

Normally, yes.

After the arrest report and the case

report are prepared, is there a normal

procedure where the person is brought into
another area to be processed?
A

Yes, after the paperwork is completed

by the arresting officer, then that officer
would typically turn the person over to the

lockup keeper; and that's the person that would
hold -- detain them inside the lockup facility.
Q

Can you describe the lockup facility

A

So the processing area is where they

for me in the 6th District?

would generate the paperwork, and then there's
a door that they would go through where the
actual lockup is housed; and back there are
where you would find the actual detention
cells.
Q

Is the large holding cell also back
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

in the lockup?
A
Q

Correct.

In April of 2011, approximately how

many officers or detention aides worked in the
lockup at the 6th District?
MS. GARRETT:

Objection, form,

officers or detention aides.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Let me ask a preliminary question.

Were there detention aides that worked in the
6th District in April of 2011?
A

aides.

I don't know if there were detention

There would have been a lockup keeper

or a detention aide.

Now which one was back

there, I couldn't tell you.
Q

In the morning hours between 8:00 a.m.

and, let's say, noon in April of 2011, would
you have more than one lockup keeper?
A

During all shifts, there would be

more than one back there; but now lockup keeper
and detention aide is actually the same thing.
We just -- One is sworn and one is not sworn.
So at any given time, you're going to have at
least two or three back there.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Q

are not arrestees allowed back in the lockup
area?

A
Q

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

No.

Prior to placing an arrestee in a

cell or the holding bullpen, was there a

process generally that was followed in the
lockup --

MR. BATTLE:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Objection --

-- in April of 2011?
MR. BATTLE:

Just renew my objection

MS. HARRIS:

I'll join.

to incomplete hypothetical.
MS. GARRETT:

15
16

Are members of the general public who

BY THE WITNESS:

Join.

A

Can you repeat the question?

Q

Sure.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

When an arrestee in April of

2011 was brought into the lockup by the
arresting officer -A

Okay.

A

So once that -- that person is

Q

-- what happened in the lockup?

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

brought into the lockup, then the lockup

Page 31

keeper -- So the sworn officer or the detention
aide would then take custody of that person,

and they will start the booking process, which
included fingerprinting the individual and
putting them in a detention cell.
Q

Under the normal procedures in April

of 2011, did the arresting officers normally
accompany the arrestee into the lockup?
A

It's a case-by-case basis.

Q

If the arresting officers didn't

they would.

Sometimes they wouldn't.

Sometimes

bring them into -- bring the arrestee into the
lockup, who would?
A

there.

They would always bring them in

They just wouldn't stay back there.

maybe I wasn't clear on that.
would take them back there.

So

So the arresting

Sometimes they

would stay with the lockup personnel until the
booking process was completed, and sometimes
they would not.
Q

When you were a commander in the 6th

District, were there times when arrestees who
were

were brought

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 32
1
2
3
4

into the 6th District?

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Objection, incomplete

MS. HARRIS:

I'll join.

hypothetical.

MS. GARRETT:

5
6

MR. BATTLE:

and form.

MS. HARRIS:

as well.

THE WITNESS:

question.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

And I'll join in those
Okay.

MR. MORRISSEY:

repeat the question?

Repeat the

Peggy, do you want to

(WHEREUPON, the record

was read as requested.)

14
15

Objection, foundation

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I can't say that I have personal

knowledge of that, but I would guess that, yes,
that that would happen from time to time.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In addition, were there times when

arrestees were brought into the 6th District
that might have been high on street drugs?
MS. GARRETT:

foundation, form.

Same objection,

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 33

MR. BATTLE:

1

MS. HARRIS:

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24

Join.

Same objections,

speculation as well.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Again, I don't have any personal

recollection of that, but I'm sure just the

nature of what we do, I'm sure, at times that
that occurred.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When you were the commander of the

6th District, were there times, to your

knowledge, when an arrestee in the lockup area
was unwilling or unable to be fingerprinted?
A

Again, I don't have any personal

recollection of that, but I'm sure that
happened from time to time.
Q

If a prisoner was

and was brought into the lockup and was

uncooperative in being fingerprinted, what were
the options of the arresting officer and the
lockup keeper?

MR. BATTLE:

Objection, incomplete

hypothetical, form, foundation,
speculation.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 34

MS. GARRETT:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

those.

MS. HARRIS:

of those as well.

Join as to all of
And I'll join as to all

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Well, options would be to let the

person sit back there until they decided to
cooperate and be fingerprinted because that

would extend the time that they would actually
have to be back there.

You know, I have seen occasions where

we went and asked a judge to order the person
to be fingerprinted, so those were options.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In the lockup area, you mentioned

that one option was to allow an uncooperative

arrestee to sit back there until they agreed to
be fingerprinted, correct?
A
Q

Correct.

Where in the lockup area would an

uncooperative arrestee who didn't want to be
fingerprinted be placed?
A

Put them in the same detention cell

we put a person that had been printed.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 35
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Q

So one of the ten detention cells in

A

Correct.

the 6th District?
Q

April of 2011 in regards to what -- the names
of the arrestees that were in the detention
cells?
A

Was there rosters?

A

Yes, I'm sure there was.

Q
Q

20
21
22
23
24

(Indicating.)

To your knowledge, does the -- do

the -- does the police department keep records
of what cell or holding cell an arrestee was
placed in in the lockup?
MR. BATTLE:

now or in 2011?

Are you talking about

MR. MORRISSEY:
MS. GARRETT:

18
19

Now, were there records maintained in

In 2011.

Are you talking about

the 6th District or in general?
MR. MORRISSEY:

the 6th District.

Well, I'll ask for

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In April of 2011, did the 6th

District keep records in regards to what cell
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

an arrestee was placed in?
A
Q

Best of my knowledge, yes.

**** And to your knowledge, does the

superintendent of the Chicago Police Department
maintain those records for a period of time?
MS. GARRETT:

Objection, that's

beyond the scope of this deposition.
don't need to answer that question.
MR. MORRISSEY:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

You

We'll certify it.

As the commander of the 6th District,

were you familiar with the term command channel
review?
A

Yes.

A

So when a complaint is made against a

Q

What is the command channel review?

police officer, it's investigated either by
what was called OPS at the time or by a
department member.

Whichever way it's

investigated, at the conclusion of that

investigation, the investigating person makes a
recommendation and then they send it up the

accused person's chain of command, which starts
with the district command or the unit
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 37

commander.
Q

In April of 2011, was IPRA in

A

Oh, crap.

Q

Did the same process whether it was

existence?

I don't recall if it was.

I really don't recall whether it was IPRA or
not.

called OPS or IPRA in April of 2011 take place
in regards to a CR that was reviewed by one of
those organizations?
A
Q

To the best of my knowledge, yes.
Now, as commander of the 6th

District, were you aware of any CRs that were
brought -- by CRs, I mean civilian complaints
which were brought against Glenn Evans, a
lieutenant under your command?
MS. GARRETT:

April of 2011?

Are we talking about in

MR. MORRISSEY:

2011.

Prior to April of

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Not that I recall, no.

Q

To your knowledge, when there's a

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

command channel review of a CR, does the police
department's CLEAR system keep a record of the
commander that reviewed the CR complaint and
the finding by either IPRA or OPS?
MS. GARRETT:

Objection, form.

timeframe are we talking about?
MR. MORRISSEY:

2011.

What

Prior to April of

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Would the commander -- Repeat that.

Q

Sure.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
A

What is the CLEAR system?

It's a computerized database that the

Chicago Police Department utilizes to track
information.
Q

Is part of the information maintained

in CLEAR information in regards to command

channel review of CRs against a police officer?
A

Yes, that's maintained in that

Q

Would your memory be refreshed if we

system.

looked at several CLEAR records in regards to
CR files against Glenn Evans, which you

reviewed as commander of the 6th District?
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 39

MS. GARRETT:

1
2
3
4

foundation.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

I don't even know what that

question means.

MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

5

well.
Q

21
22
23
24

I'll join in that as

When you were a commander in the 6th

District and Glenn Evans worked under you, were
you aware of any citizen complaints against
Glenn Evans in regards to excessive force?
MR. BATTLE:

Objection, asked and

answered to the extent of any CRs.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Not that I can specifically recall.
(WHEREUPON, Plaintiff's

Exhibit No. 27 was marked

18
20

I'll join.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

17
19

Objection, form,

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

for identification.)

I'm showing you what has been marked

as Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 27.
in under CLEAR as 1006219.

It's logged

I would ask you to

take a look at this document for a moment.
MR. MORRISSEY:

(Document tendered.)

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 40

MS. GARRETT:

1

MR. MORRISSEY:

2

copies of this one.

3

MR. BATTLE:

4

MR. MORRISSEY:

6
7
8
9
10

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

I got a lot.

Q

Have you had an opportunity to look

A

Yes.

Q

On page 1 of Exhibit 27, does your

name appear?
A
Q

14
15

You got

at Exhibit Number 27?

11
12

We got a lot of

No problem.

enough of that one?

5

Thank you, Counsel.

Yes.

Why does your name appear on page 1

of Exhibit 27?
A

I was the first person it appears in

the command channel review being the district
commander of that district.
Q

What were your responsibilities in

A

My responsibility -- responsibility

regards to this civilian complaint by -- by -by

would be to review the packet and determine
whether or not I concurred or not concurred
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 41

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

with the investigating person's recommendation.
Q

If we look at page 4, does it reflect

the allegations that

against Mr. Glenn Evans?

brought

A

Page 4?

Q

And part of the allegations were that

allegations.

Yes, it reflects the

Glenn Evans punched
, placed

hold, pushed

, Tasered

in a choke

against the wall and

failed to provide any medical attention,
correct?
A
Q

Correct.

Did you make a recommendation in

regards to
A

' CR complaint?

I don't believe I made a

recommendation.

I believe I concurred with the

investigator's recommendation.
Q

If we look at page 11 of Exhibit 27,

A

Yes.

there's the investigation report?
Q

Do you know a Deputy Chief Tina

Skahill, S-k-a-h-i-l-l?
A

Yes.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 42

Q

1
2
3
4

Mr. Glenn Evans, did it go up to the deputy
chief?
A
Q

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

After you reviewed the CR against

Yes.

And initially, did IPRA return a

finding against Glenn Evans?
yes.

A

As far as I can determine from this,

Q

And the deputy chief of the Chicago

A

Some of this wording is blotted out,

Police Department didn't concur, correct?
but from the best I can tell -MS. GARRETT:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Don't guess.

Well, I'm going to show you a better --

perhaps a better copy of it.

The -- I believe

part of that was probably redacted by maybe the
defense lawyers, but I'm going to show you our

notebook, which has the investigation report of
page -- page 11.

MS. GARRETT:

Just so the record is

clear, none of this was redacted.
confidential stamp.
MR. MORRISSEY:

It's a

Well, apparently,

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

that makes it difficult for the witness to
see it.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Take a moment to look at the document

that isn't marked confidential.
MS. GARRETT:

So the record is clear,

it's still marked confidential.

It's just

not printed out with confidential coverings
and letters.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

All right.

So in reading the clearer

version, apparently Deputy Chief Skahill asked
that the case be returned to address some

concerns that was raised by her; but in this
particular document, it doesn't specify what
her concern was.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Did you participate in the -- You

participated in the command channel review in
regards to
A
Q

Correct.

complaint?

Did -- Did you agree with either IPRA

or OPS' finding against Glenn Evans?
A

Yes.

And if you look, the request by
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Deputy Chief Skahill was made in 2007.
District until 2008.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

So she had made that

request prior to me becoming the commander.

I have no idea what -- what her concern was.
Q

So

But you eventually weighed in on

' complaint against Commander Evans

or Glenn Evans?
A

Correct.

A

Do you want this back?

Q
Q

Do you mind if we -Thanks.

(WHEREUPON, Plaintiff's

Exhibit No. 33 was marked
for identification.)

15
17

I

didn't become deputy -- or commander of the 6th

14
16

Page 44

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

I'm going to show you what's been

marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 33.
a 33-page document.
document.

I'm sorry.

MR. MORRISSEY:

It's

It's a 15-page

And I think we don't --

We don't have any further copies.

If you

want to take a break, we can make a copy.
MR. BATTLE:

If you can identify it

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 45
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

for the record, I think that's fine.
MR. MORRISSEY:

Sure.

Plaintiff's Exhibit 33.
MS. GARRETT:

It's

No, he means actually

identify the document.
MR. MORRISSEY:

It's logged in as

1020192, and it's Bates Stamped King FCL -FCRL 003520.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Do you need some time to review that?
MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:

Yes.

A

Okay.

Q

Have you had an opportunity to review

A

Yes.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Exhibit 33?
Q
A
Q

That was a civilian complaint by
, correct?

Correct.

And it was filed or presented to IPRA

on September 22nd, 2008 if you look at page 11
of Group Exhibit 33.

MS. GARRETT:

Counsel, this document

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 46
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

is really difficult to read.
same reasons.

It's for the

The way that you printed out

the confidentiality mark cuts off most of
the narrative.

MR. MORRISSEY:

Well, it's the way

the -- the City presented it to Plaintiff's
counsel.

We can pull it up on the -- on

the computer if that makes it easier for
the deponent to read.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q
A

question?

Do you understand my question?
Yes.

Oh, can you repeat that

MS. GARRETT:

Yeah, he's going to

pull up the actual document, though, so you
can read it.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Superintendent Johnson, I'm -- I'm

presenting you with our notebook document,
Exhibit 33, page 11, for you to look at.
A
Q

That's much better.

Go ahead.

In looking at the allegations, does

it reflect that on September 19th, 2008 -- I'm
sorry, September 19th, 2008 at approximately
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 47
1

2345 hours that there are allegation against

2

Glenn Evans who was a lieutenant under you at

3

that time?
MR. BATTLE:

4

whether that document reflects that?

5
6

BY THE WITNESS:
A

7
8

Yes.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

9
10

You're just asking him

You were the -- You were Lieutenant

Evans' commanding officer at that time?

11

A

Yes.

12

Q

And the allegations in this civilian

13

complaint were that Glenn Evans shot
dog without justification, choked a

14
15

person by the name of

16

threw

,

,

against a fence and grabbed
by the hair and threw her to the

17
18

ground, directed profanities at

19

punched

20

that accurate?

and kicked

21

A

Yes.

22

Q

If we look at the first page of

(sic),
; is

23

Exhibit 33, were you -- did you review this

24

allegation?
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

A
Q

18
19
20
21
22
24

Yes.

That's because you were the

commanding officer?
A
Q

That's correct.

Did you interview Glenn Evans after

receiving these allegations from IPRA?
A
Q

No.

Did you as the commanding officer

take any action to discipline Glenn Evans in
regards to these --

MR. BATTLE:

That assumes that

discipline was warranted.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

-- allegations.
MS. HARRIS:

MS. GARRETT:

16
17

Page 48

I'll join as well.
Join.

form and foundation.

Objection as to

BY THE WITNESS:
A

No.

Q

Were these allegations sustained?

Q

Did you review the investigation that

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
A

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 49
1
2
3
4
5
6

IPRA did in regards to
A
Q

Yes.

Did you find any fault with IPRA's

investigation of this person's complaints?
A

No.

(WHEREUPON, Plaintiff's

Exhibit No. 31 was marked

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

for identification.)

I'm going to show you what is marked

as Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 31.
complaints brought by
MR. BATTLE:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

It's
--

You said 30 or 31?

MR. MORRISSEY:

14
15

' complaints?

It's Exhibit 31.

-- in regards to an incident on

May 24th, 2008.

I ask you to take a look at --

at that document for a moment.
A
Q

Okay.

Were you part of the command channel

review of this complaint by
A
Q

Yes.

And you're aware that

?

complained that Glenn Evans pointed a gun at
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

him, pulled his hair without justification,
arrested

MS. GARRETT:

for burglary?

Counsel, if you're

reading off a specific page, I would ask
that you reference it.
MR. MORRISSEY:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Page 1.

Entered and searched

vehicle without a warrant and threatened to
shoot

A

Yes.

A

Yes.

Q
Q

'

' dog?

Are those among the allegations?
And that was -- Those allegations,

again, were in May of 2008?
A
Q

Yes.

And did you make a recommendation

based upon your review of those allegations?
A

I didn't make a recommendation.

I,

Q

And what was the finding by the IPRA

again, concurred with the investigating person.
person?
A

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 51
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

When did you make those -- When did

A

It looks like I -- February of 2009.

you review it?
Q

If we looked to the right of the

first page, it says:

IPRA OTS case, what does

that mean, where two levels of CCR concur with
the findings.

This case should be forwarded to

implementation action.
A
Q

I'm not sure.

When you were the deputy chief of

Area Central, did you review or through a
command channel review of any complaints
brought by citizens against Glenn Evans?
A

I can't recall any specific ones, but

Q

When you were a commander of the 6th

I probably did.

District, did Glenn Evans have a reputation of
being an aggressive police officer?
MR. BATTLE:

Objection, asked and

answered, form, foundation as to
reputation.

MS. GARRETT:
MS. HARRIS:

I'll join.

I'll join as well.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 52
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

BY THE WITNESS:
A

being a good aggressive officer.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

18
19
20
21
22
23
24

As his commanding officer, would you

receive quarterly reports from the police
department if an officer had sustained
allegations against him?
A
Q

Yes.

As a commanding officer, if you found

that a police officer had repeat instances of
using excessive force against citizens, could
you recommend that he go to a behavioral
intervention program?

MS. GARRETT:
MR. BATTLE:

16
17

Yeah, he -- he had a reputation as

as well.

Objection, form, vague.

Incomplete hypothetical

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Let me ask a preliminary question.

What is the -- In April of 2011, what was the
behavior -- behavior intervention program for
the Chicago Police Department?
A

The behavior intervention program is

a program designed to flag what could be
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 53

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

considered problematic behavior in an effort to
correct it.
Q

How does that differ from what's

A

Personnel concern could be considered

called a personnel concerns?

more disciplinary than the behavior
intervention system.
Q

in his or her district for using excessive
force against citizens?
MS. GARRETT:

foundation.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Objection, form,

What timeframe are we talking

about?

MR. MORRISSEY:
MS. HARRIS:

15
16

Can a commander flag a police officer

April of 2011.

I'll agree with those

objections, concur, join.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Sustained allegations of excessive

force, yes.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

If IPRA had not sustained allegations

of excessive force against a patrol officer but
the commanding officer felt that there was some
credibility to the complaints, could the
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 54
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

commanding officer refer the patrol officer to
a behavior intervention program?
MR. BATTLE:

Objection to the extent

it's an incomplete hypothetical.
MS. GARRETT:

I'll join in the

objection, also as to form, foundation,
vagueness.

MS. HARRIS:

objections.

I'll join all of the

BY THE WITNESS:
A

In certain situations and instances,

I suppose a commander could, yes.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Under what circumstances where there

were repeated allegations of excessive force by
an officer could a commander refer that officer
to a behavior intervention program even though
the complaints were not sustained by OPS or
IPRA?

MS. GARRETT:

Objection, form,

compound, speculative, vague, hypothetical.
MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

Join.

I'll join.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

BY THE WITNESS:
A

22
23
24

I suppose if you were to look at

narratives of excessive force complaints and

those narratives were similar, you would take
some corrective action.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Would that include referring the

A

Yes.

person to a behavior intervention program?
Q

Would that include -- possibly

include the Personnel Concerns Program by the
police department?
A
Q

It could, yes.

In regards to Glenn Evans, when you

reviewed each and every one of those IPRA

referrals through the command channel review,
did you go back and look at other allegations
brought against Lieutenant Evans?
MS. GARRETT:
MR. BATTLE:

20
21

Page 55

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form.

Join.

If you're asking me did I compare

them, no, I didn't.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 56
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When you were a commanding officer,

did you -- Well, strike that.

In the -- As a

commanding officer, did you have the ability to
pull up in the CLEAR system CRs that were

brought -- charges which were brought against
one of your patrol officers?
A

No.

The only time you could review

it is when it was in your queue for command
channel review.
Q

After that, it's gone.

So when -- when -- The three examples

that we have just discussed, when you were
asked to review an IPRA or OPS finding in

regards to an allegation against Glenn Evans,
in any of those cases, did you pull up in the
CLEAR system information in regards to prior
CRs brought against Glenn Evans?
MS. GARRETT:

Objection.

testified he couldn't.
MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:

He just

Join.

A

No, I wouldn't have had that ability.

Q

You testified that when you were

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

doing a command channel review, you had the
ability to look in the CLEAR system to see

whether there were other prior CRs against a
police officer?
A

another CR, but you wouldn't be able to see the
details of that CR.
Q

prior claims of excessive force brought against
one of his officers?

MS. GARRETT:
MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

14
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

In April of 2011, what information

was available to a commanding officer about

13
15

You might be able to see if there is

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q
A

Objection, form, vague.

Join.

I'll join.

Do you understand the question?
Yeah.

The only thing that I would

have had would be like a quarterly report that
came from internal affairs and it -- the only
thing that it would have is a list of CR

allegations, but it wouldn't go into detail.
So I didn't have anything where I

could put all of them next to each other and
look at them like that.

There was nothing

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1

available at that time.
MS. GARRETT:

2
3

We're going to take a

break right now.
MR. MORRISSEY:

4
5

Page 58

Sure.

What time is

it?

6

MS. GARRETT:

It's 2:33.

7

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

Okay.

The time is

8

2:34 p.m., and we are going off the video

9

record.

10

(WHEREUPON, a short

11

break was had.)
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

and we are back on the video record.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Superintendent, prior to today's

deposition, what documents did you look at?
A

I looked at some documents that came.

It was correspondence between Sharon Fairley,
IPRA administrative director, and myself.

(WHEREUPON, Plaintiff's

20

Exhibit No. 11 was marked

21
22
23
24

The time is 2:50 p.m.,

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

for identification.)

Showing you what has been marked as
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 59
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiff's Exhibit Number 11.
exhibit, page 1 through 14.
A
Q

It's a group

Okay.

Did you look at Exhibit Number 11

prior to today's deposition?
A
Q

Yes.

In addition to Exhibit 11, did you

look at any other documents?
A
Q

No.

If we turn to Exhibit 11 for a

moment, page 7, there's a letter from a
Ms. Fairley to you, correct?
letter?
A

Correct.

A

Correct.

Q
Q

It's a three-page

And that's dated May 6th, 2016?
And it's in regards to Officer

Sutton, Officer Clifford and Glenn Evans,
correct?
A
Q

Correct.

Why would you receive a letter in

regards to an IPRA recommendation in regards to
Evans and the two other officers?
A

If IPRA and myself don't agree on a
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 60

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

disciplinary recommendation, then we will meet
and discuss it and see if we can come to a
resolution in that way.
Q

When you received this letter from

Ms. Fairley from IPRA, what did you look at in
reviewing the allegations by Ms. King against
Glenn Evans and the two other officers?
A

I was given the investigator's

Q

Were you given the IPRA file in

recommendations in their investigation.

regards to Ms. King's allegations against Glenn
Evans and the two other officers?
A
Q

The complete file, no.

Were you given the statement that

Glenn Evans gave to the IPRA investigator?
A

If it's contained in the -- in the

Q

And prior to responding -- You

IPRA investigator's summary, then yes.

responded to Ms. Fairley in regards to Glenn
Evans on May 13th, 2016?
5 and 6, correct?
A
Q

It's Exhibit 11, page

Yes.

Both you and Ms. Fairley mention in

the body of your letters that Glenn Evans
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 61
1

didn't have any sustained CRs against him

2

during his career; isn't that correct?

3

A

MR. BAZAREK:

4
5

THE REPORTER:
MR. BAZAREK:
THE REPORTER:
MR. BAZAREK:
MR. MORRISSEY:

15

stands.

16

you'd like.

18
19

I'm objecting.

It does

It's what?

Say it

Have him repeat the
Well, the record

You can read it -- read it back if
Do you want to read back that --

BY THE WITNESS:
A

So it indicates he didn't have any

sustained allegations in his disciplinary

20

history.

21

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

22

What did

question, so I can make the objection.

14

17

I'm sorry.

again.

12
13

You're

not say career.

10
11

I object.

you say?

8
9

Yes.

saying career?

6
7

Okay, right here.

Q

When you, as the superintendent,

23

responded to Ms. Fairley in May of 2016, did

24

you or your staff look at the total number of
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

CRs that had been filed or brought by citizens
in regards to Glenn Evans' conduct as a police
officer?
A

I can't speak to my staff; but me,

personally, every incident stands on its own
merits.

So I don't compare what happened with

another incident.
Q

As superintendent, in May of 2016,

were you aware that over 100 citizens

complaints have been brought against Glenn
Evans in regards to misconduct as a police
officer?
A
Q

No.

Did you do anything to check with

IPRA or OPS or any other agency within the
police department to determine how many

complaints had been filed in regards to Glenn
Evans' conduct as a Chicago police officer?
MR. BATTLE:

Objection and foundation

to the extent he said he did not review the
prior CRs.

MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

No.

Join in the objection.

Again, when I review the
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 63

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

investigation from IPRA, that investigation
stands on its own merits.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When IPRA said that there hadn't been

any sustained allegations against Glenn Evans,
were they speaking of a five-year-look-back
period or longer?

MS. GARRETT:

foundation.

MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form,
And speculation.

That would be a question IPRA would

have to answer.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When you said that there were no

sustained allegations in regards to Glenn

Evans' conduct as a police officer, did you

look only at a five-year period of time or did
you look at his entire career?
A

I believe per the FOP contract, we go

Q

Why as a superintendent of police,

back five years.

when you reviewed this file for IPRA in May of
2016, why didn't you go back more than five
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 64
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

years to determine whether Glenn Evans had a
history of using excessive force against
citizens?

MS. GARRETT:

answered, form.

MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, asked and
I will join it.

Again, each incident, each complaint,

when it's reviewed by IPRA and they give me the
recommendations, that investigation stands on
its own merits and that's what I review.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

As Glenn Evans' commanding officer in

the 6th District and as his deputy chief for

several years after he became a commander, you
personally are aware of other citizen

complaints filed in regards to Glenn Evans'
conduct; is that fair to say?
A
Q

Yes.

As either a commander or a deputy

chief for the Chicago Police Department, do you
personally know of any other officer or

lieutenant or commander in the Chicago Police
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 65
1
2
3
4
5

Department that had more allegations of
excessive force than Glenn Evans?

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

MR. BATTLE:

Yep, I'll join it.

MS. HARRIS:

I'll join it as well.

MR. MORRISSEY:

7
9

Objection, form,

foundation and beyond the scope.

6
8

MS. GARRETT:

scope.

It is not beyond the

The Judge specifically said during

the hearing that his state of mind is on
the table in regards to this deposition.
So I think it -- it is appropriate, the
question.

MS. GARRETT:

question is.

It's not what the

The question had nothing to

do with his state of mind, and any other

allegations against any other officers are
beyond the scope of this deposition.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

When you reviewed Ms. King's

allegation as part of the command channel

review in 2016, was Glenn Evans still with the
police force?
A

Yes.

Glenn Evans has never been

separated from the police department.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 66
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

Was there ever a finding, a sustained

finding, against Glenn Evans in regards to
Ms. King's allegations?
A

Yes.

IPRA did sustain the findings.

Q

Did -- To your knowledge, was Glenn

A

From this particular incident?

What we disagreed with was the recommendations.
Evans ever disciplined?
Q

Yes, the incident that Rita King

brought in regards to Glenn Evans?
A
Q

I'm not aware.

Do you still consider Glenn Evans to

be a good police officer?
A
Q

Yes.

You mentioned that you reviewed part

of the IPRA file in regards to Rita King's
allegations, correct?
A

Not the IPRA file.

I reviewed the

Q

Did you review the statement that

summary that the investigator forwards on.
Glenn Evans gave to IPRA?
MR. BATTLE:

answered.

MS. GARRETT:

Objection, asked and
Join in that objection.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 67
1
2
3
4
5

BY THE WITNESS:
A

If it was contained in the summary

that I was given, then yes; if it wasn't, then
no.

(WHEREUPON, Evans Exhibit
No. 7 was marked for

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

I'm going to show you what has been

marked for identification purposes exhibit -what is it -- Exhibit Number 7.
MR. BATTLE:

7?

MR. MORRISSEY:

13
14

identification.)

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

7.

It's a statement that Glenn Evans

gave to Rita (sic) Franko on November 7th, 2013
and it's 43-page document.

I will ask you as

part of your command channel review -MS. GARRETT:

Counsel, do you have

another copy of that?

MR. PATRICK MORRISSEY:

tendered.)

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

(Document

-- did you review the statement that
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 68
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Glenn Evans made?
A
Q

This particular document, no.

What documents did you review in

preparing this response to Ms. Fairley?
MS. GARRETT:

answered.

MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:

Objection, asked and

Asked and answered.

10
11
12
13
1
15
16

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 69
1

MR. BATTLE:

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Commander, before you

answer that question, I'd just like to log
an objection to foundation to the extent
this is Ms. Fairley's letter.
written by Ms. Fairley.

It was

She's not here to

testify as to this letter, and

Superintendent Johnson would only be just
reading it and acknowledging what it says
in writing.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Go ahead, Commander.

Do you see the portion of the -TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 70
1
2
3

Ms. Fairley's letter that I read from?
A

Yes.

18
19
20
21

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 71
1

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

As the commander then in April of

2011, there were available facilities in the

6th District to have removed Ms. King from the
area and allowed her to wait to be
fingerprinted?

MR. BATTLE:

Objection to the extent

you're saying "available facilities."
vague.

MR. MORRISSEY:

question.

It's

Let me rephrase the

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 72
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In the 6th District in April of 2011,

there were holding cells in the lockup where
Lieutenant Evans could have placed Ms. King
until she was willing to cooperate in the
fingerprinting process?
A

In the 6th District, no, because it

would have been inappropriate to put a female

arrestee in the back in the holding cells with
male arrestees.

So we wouldn't have done that

in the 6th District.
female arrestees.
Q

It isn't set up for

In the processing room, there were

rings where Ms. King could have been restrained
pending the time she was fingerprinted in April
of 2011?
A

There were rings in there, but I

don't think that would have been an appropriate
solution to it either for the same reasons.
Q

In the 6th District when you were --

when -- as commander, a female is brought into
the station under arrest and due to the fact

she was either high or mentally disabled, where
in the 6th District could you hold a prisoner
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 73
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

pending the fingerprinting?
MS. GARRETT:

speculative.

Objection, form, vague,

MR. MORRISSEY:

question.

Let me rephrase the

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In the 6th District in April of 2011,

were there areas in the 6th District where an
uncooperative arrestee could be restrained
pending fingerprinting and photographing?
MR. BATTLE:

form.

Objection to vague and

Uncooperative as to male or female?

I believe there's a differentiation that
you need to flush out.
MR. MORRISSEY:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

All right.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 74
1

l

5

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

l

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Do you know what time Ms. King came

A

No.

into the 6th District?
Q

Would the arrest report reflect the

time that she was brought into the 6th
District?

MS. GARRETT:

speculative.

MR. BATTLE:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form,
Join.

The arrest report will reflect the

time that she was arrested.

In terms of when

she was actually taken into lockup, I'm not -TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2

I'm not sure on that.

(WHEREUPON, Evans Exhibit
No. 1 was marked for

3

identification.)

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 75

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

I'm showing you what's -- Showing you

Exhibit 1, which is the arrest report for Rita
King on April 11, two thousand- -- April 10th,
2011.

Does that reflect the time of the

arrest?

MS. GARRETT:

his document.

Objection.

This is not

He can only testify to

what's on a document that he didn't author.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Superintendent, is that an arrest

report that was filled out by the arresting
officer for Rita King on April 10th, 2011?
MS. GARRETT:

form.

Objection, foundation,

He doesn't know.

MS. HARRIS:

MS. GARRETT:

computer screen.

I'll join in that.

It's a document on your

We don't even have copies

for people around the table.
original.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Never mind an

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 76

MR. MORRISSEY:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

We'll take five

minutes to print it out if there's any
question.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

It's indicating an arrest date of

10 April 2011, and a time of 0745.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

If we look further on that document,

does it reflect the time -- will it reflect the
time Ms. King was brought into the lockup?
MS. GARRETT:

foundation.

Objection, form,

It's not his document.

MS. HARRIS:

Join.

MR. MORRISSEY:

It's a document that

was tendered in discovery.

It's the

Chicago Police Department's record of Rita
King's arrest.

MS. GARRETT:

objection.

I stand on my

MR. MORRISSEY:

And if we want to

take five minutes -- We're doing this at
the convenience of the Superintendent.

If

you want to take five minutes, we'll print
it out and we'll attach it to the
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 77
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

deposition.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Showing you page 4 of Exhibit Number 1,

does it show -- does that arrest report show

the time Ms. King was brought into the lockup
area?

MS. GARRETT:

Same objections.

The

document is going to say what it says.

This witness has no personal knowledge of
it.

MS. HARRIS:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Join.

It's indicating received in lockup at

10 April 2011 at 10:28.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Between the time of arrest and the

time she was brought into the lockup, would it
be fair to say that Ms. King was in the
processing room in the 6th District?
MS. GARRETT:

foundation.
knowledge.

Objection, form,

The witness has no personal

He's also -- already testified

he was not there at the time.
MR. BATTLE:

Join.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 78

MS. HARRIS:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

add speculation.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I wouldn't know.

Q

As the commander in the 6th District,

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

are there times when arrestees spend one or two
hours in the processing room before being
booked in the --

MS. GARRETT:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

20
21
22
23
24

Objection.

-- in the lockup?
MS. GARRETT:

speculative.

Objection, form,

MR. BATTLE:

Join as to speculation

MS. HARRIS:

I'll join as well.

and incomplete hypothetical.
MS. GARRETT:

18
19

I'll join in that and

timeframe.

And we don't know the

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q
A

You can answer.

I would say, in general, there are

times when arrestees will spend more time than
others in the processing room, yes.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 79
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

24

Q

Is it your testimony that one of the

options if Ms. King was uncooperative in the

lockup area as far as being fingerprinted that
she could not have been brought back into the

processing room and held until such time as she
was willing to be fingerprinted?
MS. GARRETT:

Objection, form.

That's a double negative.
the question is.
MS. HARRIS:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

I'm unclear what

I'll join in that.

Q

Do you understand the question?

Q

Sure.

A

Can you repeat it?

At some point in time when

Ms. King was in the lockup area prior to being
fingerprinted, you stated that there was an

option that Commander Evans or Lieutenant Evans
could have removed her -- Strike that.

MS. GARRETT:

Objection, asked and

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 80
1
2

answered.

MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

3
4
5

9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY THE WITNESS:

I'll join.

I'll join as well.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

is there any other place in

the 6th District wherein Ms. King could have

been held until she was more cooperative to be
fingerprinted?
A

No.

Again, the 6th District wasn't

designed for female -- for detention of female
arrestees.
Q

You used the word "detention."

Was

Ms. King being held while she was -- her arrest
report was being processed?
A
Q

She was being processed, yeah.

And she would have been -- part of

the processing is filling out the arrest report
and case report?

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

A

1

Q

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 81

Correct.

Part of the processing is being

fingerprinted?
yes.

A

That's part of the booking process,

Q

And part of the process is being

A

Yes.

photographed?
Q

During that process of being

fingerprinted, it's your -- it's your statement
that you couldn't be held in any other spot in
the 6th District?

MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form.

Again, 6th District wasn't designed

to hold female arrestees in that manner.

Once

you're fingerprinted and photographed in the
6th District, you would be immediately

transported to Area South to that holding
facility.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

In the 6th District in April of 2011,

why were females processed in the 6th District
if there were no detention cells?
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

A

15
16
17
18
19
20

actually house arrestees.

Most of them are designed for just

male arrestees because the incident of female
arrestees is not that great.

23
24

All female

arrestees are housed at area facilities.
Q

MR. BATTLE:

Objection to the extent

of form and foundation.

letter that he authored.

This is not a

This is a letter

that was authored by Sharon Fairley.

He

does not know whether it's accurate or not
unless you're asking him whether or not it
says what you say it says.
MS. GARRETT:
MS. HARRIS:

21
22

So, in Chicago, the way that it works

is we have detention facilities where we

13
14

Page 82

Join in the objection.

I'll join in that

objection as well.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 83
1

MR. BATTLE:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Same objection to the

extent he does not know that it's accurate
or not.
says.

He just knows what the record

MS. GARRETT:

Join in the objection

and the date is 2016, not 2011.
MR. MORRISSEY:

Thank you.

MS. HARRIS:

I'm sorry.

2011 (sic).

And I will join in those

objections as well.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Do you see that in her letter?

Q

It's page -- It's Group 11, Exhibit

A

Which page?

11, page 8.
A

Oh, yes.

24

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 84
1

,

6
7
8
9

13
1
15
16

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 85
1

?

2

MR. BATTLE:

3
4
5
6

extent that it's an incomplete
hypothetical.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Go ahead.

MS. GARRETT:
MS. HARRIS:

7
8

I'll just object to the

well.

MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Join in the objection.

I'll agree with that as
Foundation, speculative.

That's difficult for me to answer

unless I was actually there.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Well, let me ask you something:

an arrestee be fingerprinted
MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form.

They could be, but it's highly

unusual that we would do that.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Can

?

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 86
1

MR. BATTLE:

4
5
6

answered.

MS. GARRETT:
MS. HARRIS:

7
8
9
10

well.

Objection, asked and
Join in the objection.

I'll join in that as

BY THE WITNESS:

11
12
13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

So as a commanding officer -- You

were the commanding officer in the 6th District
in April of 2011.

When there was an

uncooperative person in the lockup, as far as

being fingerprinted, what was the procedure in
the 6th District.

MR. BATTLE:

Objection, incomplete

hypothetical, foundation.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

That's vague.

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 87
1

We have no details related to that

2

question.
MS. GARRETT:

3
4
5

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

8
9
10

I'll give you -MS. HARRIS:

6
7

Join in that objection.

Join in that as well.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Assuming at or about 10:30 on April 11th,

2011 a female is brought into the lockup, she's
uncooperative, noncombative,
and refuses to

12

be fingerprinted, what were the procedures in

13

place under you as the commander?

14

MR. BATTLE:

Another objection,

15

incomplete hypothetical, and it assumes

16

facts that are not in evidence in this

17

case.

18
19
20

THE REPORTER:

Counsel, can you

repeat?
MR. BATTLE:

I'm sorry.

Another

21

objection, incomplete hypothetical and it

22

assumes facts not in evidence in this case.

23

MS. GARRETT:

Join in the objection.

24

MS. HARRIS:

I'll join the objection.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 88
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY THE WITNESS:
A

As commander, I didn't have a policy.

We are governed by general orders.

Those are

our guidelines, so that's citywide, not a
commander's policy.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

As the commander in 2011 in the 6th

District, what were the procedures given
those -- given that hypothetical?
MR. BATTLE:

Same objection to the

incomplete hypothetical.
MS. GARRETT:

Join in the objection.

It's speculative as to form and it's

different than the facts in this case.
MS. HARRIS:

I'll join in those

objections as well.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Given those factors that you put in

there, watch commanders have to assess each
incident on its own merit.

So it would -- it

would -- As I said before, one option would be

to just let her sit in a holding facility until
such time she cooperated.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 89
1
2

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

Q
A

Which one are you -- Which exhibit

are you looking at?
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q
A

I'm looking at Glenn Evans.
Pardon me?

MS. HARRIS:

number, Counsel?

What's the Bates stamp

MR. MORRISSEY:
MS. HARRIS:

Of her letter?

There should be a Bates

stamp letter on each page.
MR. MORRISSEY:

through 12.

Is that it?

MS. HARRIS:

number?

Her letter is page 11

Do you have the FCRL

MR. MORRISSEY:

No, I'm sorry.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 90
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

19

MR. BATTLE:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

I'm sorry.

His letter?

Looking at Ms. Fairley's

letter of May 6th, 2016 -MS. HARRIS:

So you're looking at

Plaintiff's Exhibit 11, page 7, FCRL
010522.

MR. MORRISSEY:

Actually, I'm looking

at page 8, the top of the page.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Okay.

MR. BATTLE:

Just for clarity's sake,

MS. HARRIS:

I believe so.

are we on FCRL 10523?
MR. MORRISSEY:

17
18

Looking at your letter of May 6th --

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

Correct.

Q

22

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 91
1

4

8

A

9
10

Okay.

f

18

l

23

i

"i

i

What was the question again?

i

l
30

30

i

l

" if

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

i

l
i l

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 92
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q
A

of me.
Q

And when was that?

I don't have that document in front
How many years did it take for IPRA

to make a recommendation, to your knowledge, in
regards to Rita King's complaint?
A

I'm not sure.

A

If it was more than five years, then

Q

Was it more than five years?

they would have been past the statute for the
expiration on excessive force.
within that five years.
Q

So it had to be

Is that the reason why, in the end,

Glenn Evans was not disciplined at all in
regards to Rita King's allegations -MR. BATTLE:

Are you asking about

IPRA's discipline?

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

years?

-- because it was more than five
MR. MORRISSEY:

superintendent.

MR. BATTLE:

I'm asking as a

You're asking him to

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 93
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

interpret IPRA's policies.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

21
22
23
24

MR. BATTLE:

Okay.

I want to object

to the extent he's asking him to interpret
IPRA's policy.

MR. MORRISSEY:

Mr. Battle --

MR. BATTLE:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

I'm not asking,

Okay.

I'm asking, to your knowledge, the

reason why Glenn Evans has not been disciplined
is because it took more than five years for

IPRA to review the allegations by Rita King?
MS. GARRETT:

I'm going to object as

to form, foundation and assuming facts not
in evidence.

MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

19
20

No, I'm asking you as superintendent.

objection.

I will join.

I will join in that

BY THE WITNESS:
A

No, to -- I'm not sure.

Q

Did you have any follow-up

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 94
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

19

conversation with Ms. Fairley after your letter
of May 13th, 2016?
A

I don't recall if we actually had any

Q

If we look at Exhibit 11, page 10,

conversation,

was there communications from Ms. Fairley to
you in regards to Glenn Evans?
A
Q

Yes.

It states here that you met with

Ms. Fairley on May -- May 23rd; is that
correct?
A

Yes.

Q

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 95
1
3

8
10
11
12
13
1
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

In order to terminate somebody from

the police department, do you have to go to the
police board?
A
Q

Yes.

Was this matter brought to the police

board for Glenn Evans' termination?
A

I don't recall.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 96
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

Anything that would refresh your

A

Yes.

Q

Was there a letter -- Is it part of

memory?
that it?

If we had a document, yes.

Is

the procedure to go to the police board to have
Ms. Fairley write a letter to the executive
director of the Chicago Police board?
MS. GARRETT:

vagueness.

Objection, form,

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I'm not sure what Ms. Fairley's

protocol is.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

If we look at Group Exhibit 11 page

11 and 12, it apparently is a letter from

Ms. Fairley to Max Capron (sic), C-a-p-r-o -A
Q

Caproni.

-- -n-i, executive director of the

Chicago Police board?
A
Q

Yes.

Do you know whether or not it ever

went to the police board?
A

I don't recall.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 97
1
2
3

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

16
17
18

MR. MORRISSEY:

We're going to take a

five-minute break.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

Okay, the time is

19

3:35 p.m.

This is the end of Tape 1, and

20

we're going off the video record.

21

(WHEREUPON, a short

22

break was had.)

23
24

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

The time is 3:43 p.m.

This is the beginning of Tape 2, and we're
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 98
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

back on the video record.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

the 6th District when Rita King was

uncooperative but noncombative in the lockup,
why was Glenn Evans' decision to use pain
compliance control techniques wrong?
MS. GARRETT:

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Objection, form of the

question, assumes facts not in evidence.
That's not his testimony.
MR. BATTLE:
MS. HARRIS:

12
13

On April 10th, 2011 in the lockup in

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Join.

I'll join with that.

Just based on what I know, if she was

uncooperative and she was already in custody,

in my opinion, we could have just waited until
she became more cooperative.
BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Is that the reason why you agreed

that Glenn Evans should be disciplined?
MR. BATTLE:

disciplined?

That he should be what,

MR. MORRISSEY:
MR. BATTLE:

Disciplined.

I'm sorry.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

I didn't

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 99
1
2
3
4
5

hear you.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Yes.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

8
9
10
11
12
13
1
15
16
18

21
22
23
24

MR. BATTLE:

Objection, assumes facts

MS. GARRETT:

Join in the objection.

not in evidence.
MS. HARRIS:

Join.

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 100
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

24

BY THE WITNESS:

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

Can -- Prior to going to the police

board, can a member of the Chicago Police

Department be disciplined for more than 30 days
without going to the police board?
MS. GARRETT:

BY THE WITNESS:
A

Objection, form.

I don't believe so.

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

A

.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 101
1
3

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Q

To your knowledge, was Sutton and

Clifford disciplined?
MS. HARRIS:

Objection, speculation,

MS. GARRETT:

Join in the objection.

foundation.

Go ahead.

BY THE WITNESS:
A

I'm not aware of it.

Q

How would you find out as a

BY MR. MORRISSEY:

superintendent whether or not Evans, Sutton and
Clifford received any discipline in regards to
their contact with Rita King on April 10th,
2011?

A

As superintendent, I would probably

confer with the chief of internal affairs and
ask him to review it for me.
Q

To your knowledge, Glenn Evans is

still working for the police department?
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

A
Q

20
21
22
23
24

Still receiving a salary from the

police department?
A
Q

Yes.

Still receiving a salary for a

lieutenant in the police department?
A
Q

Yes.

Did you as a deputy or a

superintendent of police, did you ever

recommend Glenn Evans for a promotion?
A
Q

No.

Could you have transferred Glenn

Evans as a lieutenant from the 6th District as
a commander?

MR. BATTLE:

vague.

Objection, incomplete,

Transfer him where?

MR. MORRISSEY:
MS. GARRETT:

18
19

To my knowledge, yes.

Page 102

timeframe?

BY MR. MORRISSEY:
Q

To another district.

Objection, form, what

What specifics?

During the time you were a commander

of the 6th District, did you have the ability
to have a lieutenant transferred?
A

No.

That's a contractual issue.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 103
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

MR. MORRISSEY:

Superintendent.

Thank you,

I appreciate it.

THE WITNESS:
MS. GARRETT:

signature.

Thank you, all.
We will reserve

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

follow-up questions?
MR. BATTLE:

No

No questions.

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

3:49 p.m.

Okay.

Okay.

The time is

This is the end of Tape 2.

also the end of the deposition of

It's

Superintendent Johnson, and we are going
off the record.
Johnson.

Thank you, Superintendent

THE WITNESS:

Thank you all.

FURTHER DEPONENT SAITH NOT....

19
20
21
22
23
24

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 104
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION
RITA KING,
Plaintiff,
vs.
GLENN EVANS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 13 C 1937

I, EDDIE T. JOHNSON, being first
sworn, on oath, say that I am the deponent
the aforesaid deposition, that I have read
foregoing transcript of my deposition,
consisting of pages 1-104 inclusive, taken
the aforesaid time and place and that the
foregoing is a true and correct transcript
my testimony so given.

duly
in
the
at
of

____________________________
EDDIE T. JOHNSON
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO
me before this ________ day
of ___________________, A.D. 2017.
_________________________
Notary Public

24

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 105
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)
COUNTY OF C O O K )

ss:

I, Peggy A. Anderson, a Certified

Shorthand Reporter in the State of Illinois do
hereby certify:

That previous to the commencement of

the examination of the witness, the witness was
duly sworn to testify the whole truth
concerning the matters herein;

That the foregoing deposition

transcript was reported stenographically by me,
was thereafter reduced to typewriting under my
personal direction, and constitutes a true
record of the testimony given and the
proceedings had;

That the said deposition was taken

before me at the time and place specified;
That the said deposition was

adjourned as stated herein;

That I am not a relative or employee

or attorney or counsel, nor a relative or

employee of such attorney or counsel for any of
the parties hereto, nor interested directly or
indirectly in the outcome of this action.
TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Page 106
1
2
3
4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereunto set

my hand at Chicago, Illinois, this 3rd day of
October, 2017.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

______________________________________
Peggy A. Anderson

Certified Shorthand Reporter
License No. 084-003813

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
A
A.D 104:21
a.m 10:21
11:18,18,20
29:16
ability 56:4
56:22 57:2
102:22
able 25:4
57:5,6 95:7
accompany
31:9
accuracy
90:24
accurate
17:15 47:20
82:12,17
83:5 94:22
95:1
accused
36:23
acknowled...
69:21
acquaintan...
20:4
action 48:9
51:8 55:5
105:24
actions 97:14
active 13:15
13:16
actual 28:21
28:22 46:15
add 8:18
27:13 78:2
addition
32:20 59:7
additional
95:8
address
43:13
Adjacent
23:21
adjourned

105:19
administra...
58:19
admission
68:18
affairs 57:19
101:21
aforesaid
104:11,14
afternoon 6:3
7:8
agency 62:15
aggressive
21:4,8,13
21:14 51:18
52:3
agree 43:22
53:15 59:24
70:21 85:7
86:12 91:10
91:15 94:4
agreed 34:17
98:19
ahead 46:21
69:22 85:5
101:10
ahold 25:4
aide 29:14,21
31:3
aides 29:4,7
29:10,13
al 1:6 104:6
allegation
47:1,24
56:14 65:20
allegations
22:13 41:3
41:6,7
46:22 47:12
48:6,14,21
50:12,14,18
52:8 53:18
53:21 54:15
55:17 57:21

60:6,11
61:19 63:5
63:16 65:1
65:16 66:3
66:17 92:16
93:14 97:7
allow 15:8
34:16
allowed
15:24 30:2
70:10 71:18
Anderson
1:14 5:24
105:3 106:8
answer 36:8
63:13 69:15
78:21 85:11
answered
39:13 51:20
64:5 66:23
68:6,7 80:1
86:5
apparently
42:24 43:12
95:11 96:16
appear 40:12
40:14
appears
40:16
appointment
8:24
appreciate
103:2
appropriate
65:11 72:18
approxima...
12:14,16
13:4,10
29:3 46:24
April 8:22
10:12,15
11:7,15,20
12:6 14:18
16:11 17:14

23:12 24:1
25:24 29:3
29:11,17
30:11,19
31:7 35:5
35:23 37:2
37:8,18,19
38:7 52:20
53:14 57:8
71:8,15
72:2,15
73:7 75:8,8
75:17 76:6
77:14 81:22
86:19 87:8
98:3 100:14
100:16
101:18
area 14:3,6,8
14:9 15:22
17:1,8,9,11
17:13,19
23:13,16,18
23:19 24:2
24:6 28:10
28:18 30:3
33:12 34:15
34:20 51:11
71:18 74:6
77:6 79:3
79:15 80:6
81:19 82:7
areas 73:8
argumenta...
23:6 97:9
arrest 16:20
20:21 27:16
27:18,21
28:5,7
72:22 74:15
74:22 75:7
75:10,15
76:5,17
77:4,16

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 1
80:19,23
arrested
27:24 50:2
74:23
arrestee 24:7
24:16,20
25:7,16,21
25:24 26:23
26:24 27:4
27:5 30:5
30:19 31:9
31:13 33:12
34:17,21
35:13 36:1
71:4 72:9
73:9 80:8
84:9 85:15
arrestees
11:11 12:16
13:18 23:14
23:20,23
25:3 30:2
31:23 32:21
35:6 72:10
72:12 78:7
78:23 80:17
81:16 82:3
82:5,6,7
arresting
27:21 28:2
28:12 30:21
31:8,12,17
33:20 75:16
asked 34:12
39:12 43:12
51:19 56:13
64:4 66:22
68:5,7
79:24 86:4
asking 47:4
55:22 82:18
84:9 92:17
92:22,24
93:3,5,7,11

assess 88:19
assumes
48:11 87:15
87:22 98:9
99:21
assuming
84:4,22
87:8 93:16
attach 76:24
attached
26:13
attention
41:11 70:16
86:1
attorney
105:21,22
attorneys 6:1
audiovisual
5:12
August 1:17
5:2 9:4 17:6
18:17
author 75:13
90:23
authored
82:15,16
available
57:9 58:1
70:13 71:16
71:21 73:19
79:21 85:22
Avenue 1:16
2:5 3:12 5:6
5:21 14:16
aware 22:20
37:13 39:10
49:23 62:9
64:17 66:11
68:18
101:13
B
B 4:13
B-o-e-n-s

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
47:15
back 10:20
12:6 13:22
17:12 19:1
21:3 22:14
25:24 26:19
28:21,24
29:14,20,24
30:2 31:16
31:18 34:7
34:10,17
44:11 55:17
58:13 61:15
61:16 63:21
63:24 72:9
73:17 79:4
98:1
based 50:18
91:16 98:14
basis 31:10
Bates 45:7
89:15,18
Battle 2:18
2:19 6:7,8
8:8,13
14:22 15:12
16:14 21:7
23:4 26:4
27:12 30:9
30:12 32:2
33:1,22
35:15 39:4
39:12 40:4
44:24 47:4
48:11 49:13
51:19 52:16
54:3,22
55:20 56:20
57:13 62:19
63:10 64:6
65:5 66:22
67:12 68:7
69:14 71:20
73:11 74:20

77:24 78:15
80:2 82:13
83:4,24
85:3 86:4
86:23 87:14
87:20 88:10
90:3,14,22
92:17,24
93:4,8,9,18
97:10 98:11
98:21,24
99:21
102:15
103:8
Bazarek 2:19
6:10,10
61:4,8,12
beat 18:21
becoming
18:6 44:4
beginning
97:24
behalf 2:7,14
2:23 3:8,15
5:9 6:15,16
behavior
52:21,21,23
53:1,6 54:2
54:17 55:8
behavioral
52:13
believe 17:6
18:15 41:16
41:17 42:16
63:20 73:13
90:16 95:6
100:11,24
101:4
best 11:17
12:15 23:22
27:2 36:2
37:11 42:12
better 42:15
42:16 46:21

beyond 36:7
65:4,7,17
31:24
33:17 68:22
82:11 83:3
83:22 84:6
84:23 87:11
blotted 42:11
board 95:20
95:23 96:6
96:8,20,23
100:6,8,20
body 60:24
Boens' 47:14
booked 78:9
booking 31:4
31:20 81:4
booth 24:18
booths 24:15
boundaries
14:12
break 44:23
58:3,11
97:17,22
bring 13:18
25:22 31:13
31:13,15
83:23 84:17
85:1
brought 25:7
25:16 26:10
28:9 30:20
31:1,24
32:21 33:18
37:14,15
41:3 49:12
51:13 55:18
56:6,6,17
57:10 62:1
62:10 66:10
72:21 74:16
76:10 77:5
77:17 79:4
84:8 87:9

95:22
building 10:3
13:21,24
15:10,18
23:13 25:8
25:17,23
bullpen 12:20
12:24 30:6
burglary 50:2
busy 13:19
C
C 1:5 2:1 3:1
4:7 5:17 7:6
104:5 105:2
C-a-p-r-o
96:17
call 12:20
21:12 84:11
86:12
called 1:10
7:3 36:18
37:8 53:4
capacity
18:10
Capron
96:17
Caproni
96:18
car 18:21
19:2,6
career 16:24
61:2,5,9
63:19
carrying 26:2
case 5:14,17
5:17 27:22
28:7 43:13
51:5,7
80:24 87:17
87:22 88:14
91:16
case-by-case
31:10

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 2
cases 56:15
category 22:3
CCR 51:6
cell 12:23
28:24 30:6
31:6 34:23
35:13,13,24
80:7
cells 12:8,9
12:11,13,17
12:21 28:23
35:1,7 72:3
72:9 81:24
centers 15:16
Central 17:1
17:8,11,14
17:19 51:11
certain 54:11
Certified
1:15 105:3
106:9
certify 36:9
105:5
chain 36:23
channel
36:12,15
38:1,18
40:17 43:19
49:20 51:12
55:16 56:10
57:1 65:20
67:18
charges 56:6
Charise 3:12
6:12
charise.val...
3:14
check 62:14
Chicago 1:16
2:5,9,12,21
3:3,6,9,10
3:13 5:4,6
5:21 6:15
7:12,13

8:19 9:9
36:4 38:14
42:9 52:22
62:18 64:22
64:24 76:16
82:1 91:12
96:8,20
97:2,5
100:6 106:2
chief 9:2 17:1
17:6,7,9,10
17:13,18
41:22 42:3
42:9 43:12
44:1 51:10
64:15,22
101:21
choke 41:9
choked 47:14
circumstance
86:15
circumstan...
54:14 69:12
70:12
citizen 22:15
39:10 64:17
citizens 51:13
52:12 53:10
62:1,9 64:3
city 2:9 3:3,9
6:15 25:21
46:6
citywide 88:4
Civil 1:12 2:9
3:3
civilian 23:3
37:14 40:20
45:18 47:12
claims 57:10
87:10
clarity's
90:14
Clark 2:20
clear 31:17

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
38:2,12,17
38:22 39:22
42:22 43:6
56:5,16
57:2
clearer 43:11
clearly 69:3
Clifford 2:15
6:17 59:18
84:5 99:13
99:14,15
101:8,17
cold 15:7,18
come 60:2
84:11
command
36:12,15,23
36:24 37:16
38:1,17
40:17 43:19
49:20 51:12
55:16 56:9
57:1 65:20
67:18
commander
9:4,12 10:4
10:7,9,13
13:13 15:8
15:21 16:1
16:4,22
17:21,22
18:3,4,6
25:15 31:22
33:10 36:11
37:1,12
38:3,10,24
39:8 40:18
44:2,4,7
51:16 53:8
54:12,16
64:16,21,24
68:18 69:4
69:7,10,14
69:22 71:15

72:21 78:6
79:17 87:13
88:2,7
102:14,21
commande...
88:5
commanders
88:19
commanding
47:10 48:3
48:8 52:5
52:10 53:23
54:1 56:2,4
57:9 64:14
86:17,18
commence...
105:6
communic...
24:16
communic...
89:3
communic...
94:7
community
14:11
compare
55:22 62:6
complained
49:24
complaining
82:10
complaint
22:12 36:16
38:3 40:20
41:15 43:20
44:7 45:18
47:13 49:21
64:8 92:7
99:7 100:16
complaints
22:16,22
23:3 37:14
39:10 49:1
49:4,12

51:12 53:24
54:18 55:3
62:10,17
64:18
complete
28:3 60:13
completed
28:11 31:20
compliance
70:9,10
98:7 99:18
compound
54:21
100:22
computer
24:5,12,22
28:4 46:8
75:22
computeriz...
38:13
concern
43:16 44:5
53:5
concerning
105:9
concerns
43:14 53:4
55:11 70:4
conclusion
36:20
concur 42:10
51:6 53:16
91:6
concurred
40:24,24
41:17 50:20
concurs 70:6
conduct 62:2
62:18 63:17
64:19
confer 101:21
conference
13:5,9 14:9
confidential

42:23 43:5
43:7,8
confidentia...
46:3
congregate
15:24,24
consider 20:1
21:19 66:12
95:8
considered
53:1,5
consisting
104:13
constitutes
105:13
contact
100:13
101:18
contained
60:16 67:2
continue
68:20
continued
95:4
contraband
26:3
contract
63:20
contractual
102:24
control 98:7
99:19
convenience
76:22
conversation
94:1,4
cooperate
34:8 69:8,9
72:5
cooperated
71:14 88:23
cooperative
70:15 71:12
73:21 79:22

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 3
80:13 85:24
98:17
copies 40:3
44:22 75:22
copy 8:7
42:16 44:23
67:20
correct 8:15
17:1,2 29:2
34:18,19
35:3 41:12
41:13 42:10
43:21 44:9
45:19,20
48:4 53:2
59:12,14,16
59:19,20
60:21 61:2
66:17 71:4
71:5 81:1
84:18 89:7
90:17 94:12
94:21
100:17,24
104:15
corrective
55:5
correctly
12:10
correspond...
58:18
counsel 6:2
6:13 8:6
40:1 45:24
46:7 50:3
67:19 87:18
89:16
105:21,22
COUNTY
105:2
court 1:1
5:15,23
11:3,13,13
104:1

Courts 1:13
coverings
43:8
CPD 6:13
CR 22:9,11
22:21 37:9
38:1,3,23
41:15 42:1
57:6,7,20
crap 24:10
37:4
credibility
53:24
crisis 69:3
CRs 37:13,14
38:18 39:13
56:5,17
57:3 61:1
62:1,21
cubicles 24:4
current 7:11
custody 31:3
98:15
cuts 46:3
D
D 4:1,7 7:6
D.T 2:15
Dan 14:14,15
database
38:13
date 5:1 76:5
83:9
dated 59:15
day 10:19
12:2 13:14
13:17 95:7
95:16
104:20
106:2
day-to-day
9:13
days 89:9
91:20,21

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
92:1 100:7
days' 99:6,13
dealing 70:11
71:3
December
17:7
decided 34:7
decision 70:8
70:9 98:6
dedicated
22:5
Defendant
2:24 3:9 6:9
6:11
Defendants
1:7 2:15
6:17 104:7
defense 42:18
define 20:5,6
definition
21:8
delaying
70:14 73:20
79:21 85:23
department
3:10 5:5
7:12,14
8:20 35:12
36:4,19
38:14 42:10
52:7,22
55:12 62:16
64:22 65:1
65:24 70:6
91:12 94:21
95:19 97:3
97:6 100:7
101:24
102:3,6
department's
38:2 76:16
depends 12:2
21:12
deponent

46:9 103:17
104:10
deposition
1:9 5:8,9,11
36:7 58:16
59:5 65:10
65:17 77:1
103:11
104:11,12
105:10,16
105:18
depositions
1:14
deputy 17:1,5
17:7,9,10
17:13,18
41:22 42:2
42:9 43:12
44:1,2
51:10 64:15
64:21 102:8
describe 24:8
24:19 28:16
designed
12:22 52:24
80:7,16
81:15 82:4
desk 14:4
desks 24:15
detail 57:21
details 57:7
87:1
detain 28:15
detainees
69:8
detention
28:22 29:4
29:7,10,12
29:14,21
31:2,6
34:23 35:1
35:6 71:13
80:7,16,18
81:24 82:2

determinat...
91:11
determine
40:23 42:7
62:16 64:1
determined
70:6
device 5:12
26:14
differ 53:3
differences
94:18 95:6
95:14,15
different 12:3
19:1 71:10
88:14
differentiat...
73:13
difficult 43:1
46:1 85:11
dimensions
13:1 24:8
DIRECT 4:4
directed
47:18
direction
105:13
directly
105:23
director
58:19 96:8
96:19
disabled
72:23
disagreed
66:5
disciplinary
53:6 60:1
61:19 68:14
89:6
discipline
48:9,12
92:18 94:5
100:19

101:17
disciplined
66:7 92:15
93:12 98:20
98:22,23
100:7 101:4
101:8
discovery
76:15
discuss 60:2
discussed
56:12
discussions
95:4,9,10
district 1:1,1
1:13 5:15
5:16 9:5,7
9:11,12,14
9:17,20,23
10:8,11,14
11:1,12
12:6,18
13:13,16,17
13:21 14:3
14:10,17,18
15:7,10,21
15:23 16:8
16:22 17:17
17:23 18:4
18:7,13,19
18:19,22
20:3,14,20
21:3,6,19
23:12,24
25:8,15,17
27:3 28:17
29:5,11
31:23 32:1
32:21 33:11
35:2,19,21
35:24 36:11
36:24 37:13
38:24 39:9
40:17,18

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 4
44:3 51:17
53:9 64:15
71:17 72:2
72:7,11,20
72:24 73:7
73:8 74:2,6
74:7,10,13
74:17 77:19
78:6 80:12
80:15 81:12
81:15,18,22
81:23 86:18
86:22 88:8
98:4 102:13
102:17,22
104:1,1
districts
17:18
disturbance
27:23
Division 1:2
2:10 3:4
5:16 104:2
Dixon 6:18
document
7:21,22 8:1
8:2,5 39:23
39:24 43:4
43:15 44:19
44:20 45:5
45:24 46:15
46:19 47:5
49:18 67:17
67:21 68:2
68:9 75:12
75:13,21
76:8,12,14
77:8 90:23
91:23,24
92:3 96:3
documented
100:2
documents
58:16,17

59:8 68:3
dog 47:14
50:10
doing 57:1
76:21
domestic
27:22
door 28:20
double 79:8
drugs 32:22
33:18 68:19
drunk 68:19
due 72:22
duly 6:23 7:4
104:9 105:8
duties 15:20
18:2
duty 10:11
E
E 2:1,1 3:1,1
4:1,7,7,7,13
6:10 7:6,6
early 10:24
easier 46:8
East 74:8
Eastern 1:2
5:16 104:2
Eddie 1:10
3:15 4:3 7:2
7:10 104:9
104:18
effort 53:1
either 36:17
38:4 43:22
64:21 72:19
72:23 84:10
elapsed 69:10
employee
105:20,22
empty 11:22
encompass
14:10
enforce 21:23

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
enforced
21:22
Englewood
14:11,12,13
entered 14:2
50:8
entire 17:24
63:19
entitled 5:18
entries 28:4
entryway
15:9
equipment
24:22 25:2
et 1:6 104:6
Evans 1:6
2:15,24
5:18 6:9,11
9:16 10:4,7
16:6 17:21
18:3,8,11
18:22 19:8
19:14,16,19
20:2,16,23
21:3 22:2
22:20,21
37:15 38:23
39:9,11
41:4,8 42:2
42:6 43:23
44:7,8 47:2
47:13 48:5
48:9 49:24
51:13,17
55:14,18
56:14,17
59:18,23
60:7,12,15
60:20,24
62:11 63:5
64:1 65:2
65:21,23
66:2,7,10
66:12,21

67:5,15
68:1,18
69:7 70:13
71:2,7 72:4
73:19 75:2
79:17,17,20
79:23 83:23
84:5,17
85:1,22
89:13 90:20
91:7,11
92:15 93:12
94:8,20
97:2,5
98:20 99:18
100:17
101:16,23
102:10,13
104:6
Evans' 23:2
47:10 62:2
62:18 63:17
64:14,18
69:4,10
70:7,22
82:10 95:23
98:6 100:13
evening 95:9
event 86:10
eventually
44:6
evidence 70:5
86:13 87:16
87:22 93:17
98:9 99:22
evidentiary
70:4
examination
1:11 4:4
105:7
examined 7:4
examples
56:11
excessive

39:11 52:12
53:9,18,22
54:15 55:3
57:10 64:2
65:2 92:12
97:6
exchange
27:8
executive
96:7,19
exhausted
101:5
exhibit 4:16
4:17,18,19
4:20,21,22
7:16,21
39:17,21
40:9,11,15
41:19 44:14
44:18 45:3
45:16,23
46:20 47:23
49:7,11,14
58:21 59:1
59:2,4,7,10
60:20 67:5
67:10,11
68:10 70:3
75:2,7 77:3
83:17 89:10
90:8 94:6
96:15
exigent 69:6
existence
37:3
experience
13:12
expiration
92:12
Explain
79:22
Expressway
14:15
extend 34:9

extent 16:15
90:20 91:21
39:13 54:3
94:1,7,11
62:20 69:12
94:14,19
69:16 71:20
96:7,17
82:13 83:5 Fairley's
85:4 90:22
68:12 69:17
93:5
70:1,19
extra 8:7
82:24 90:5
extremely
91:10 96:12
15:7
fairly 14:7,7
familiar
F
36:12
F 4:7
far 42:7 79:3
faay 11:19
86:20
facilities
fault 49:3
71:16,21
favor 97:1
82:2,7
FCL 45:7
facility 28:15 FCRL 45:8
28:16 70:17
89:22 90:8
71:13 80:11
90:15
81:20 83:23 February
84:12,18
17:9,14
86:2 88:22
51:3
fact 22:21
Federal 1:11
72:22
2:9 3:3
factors 88:18 feet 24:13
facts 87:16
fell 22:3
87:22 88:14 fellow 20:15
91:16 93:16 felt 53:23
98:9 99:21
101:3
failed 41:11
female 72:8
99:10,16
72:12,21
fair 14:19
73:12 80:8
21:21,24
80:16,16
64:19 77:18
81:16 82:5
Fairley 58:18
82:6 87:9
59:12 60:5 females 81:23
60:19,23
fence 47:16
61:23 68:4 file 60:10,13
68:24 69:2
63:23 66:16
69:18 70:21
66:18
73:18 82:8 filed 45:21
82:16 83:1
62:1,17
84:14 89:3
64:18

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 5
files 38:23
filled 75:16
filling 80:23
find 28:22
49:3 101:15
finding 38:4
42:6 43:23
50:21 56:13
66:1,2
findings
50:23 51:7
66:4
fine 45:1
fingerprint
86:14
fingerprinted
33:13,19
34:8,13,18
34:22 71:19
72:15 73:24
79:3,6,16
80:14 81:3
81:10,17
85:15 86:12
86:21 87:12
101:6
fingerprint...
31:5 72:6
73:1,10
fingerprints
70:17 86:2
finished
13:24
first 6:2,23
7:3 23:17
40:16 47:22
51:5 91:24
104:9
five 63:21,24
76:1,21,23
92:9,10,13
92:20 93:13
99:6,13
five-minute

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
97:17
five-year
63:18
five-year-lo...
63:6
flag 52:24
53:8
floor 23:17
fluctuated
10:1 13:19
flush 73:14
focus 16:5
follow-up
93:24 103:7
followed 30:7
follows 7:5
FOP 63:20
force 39:11
52:12 53:10
53:19,22
54:15 55:3
57:10 64:2
65:2,22
69:4,11,13
70:22 90:21
91:8 92:12
97:6
foregoing
104:12,15
105:10
form 11:4,23
16:16 20:17
23:4 26:15
27:10 29:6
32:6,24
33:23 38:5
39:1 48:17
51:20 52:15
53:11 54:6
54:20 55:19
57:12 63:8
64:5 65:3
73:2,12
74:18 75:19

76:11 77:20
78:13 79:7
81:13 82:14
84:19 85:16
88:13 93:16
96:9 97:8
98:8 100:9
100:21
102:18
forwarded
51:7
forwards
66:19
found 52:10
foundation
11:24 15:1
15:11 16:16
23:5 27:11
32:5,24
33:23 39:2
48:17 51:20
53:12 54:6
62:19 63:9
65:4 69:16
75:18 76:12
77:21 82:14
85:9 86:24
93:16
101:10
Franko 67:16
friend 20:1
friends 20:5,6
front 15:22
92:3
function
19:14
further 44:22
76:8 103:17
G
G 2:3,4
Garrett 3:5
6:14,14
8:11 11:4

11:23 14:21
14:24 20:17
21:10 23:7
26:6,15
27:6,10
29:6 30:15
32:5,23
34:1 35:18
36:6 37:17
38:5 39:1
40:1 42:13
42:21 43:6
45:4,11,24
46:14 48:16
50:3 51:22
52:15 53:11
54:5,20
55:19 56:18
57:12 58:2
58:6 62:22
63:8 64:4
65:3,13
66:24 67:19
68:5 73:2
74:18 75:11
75:18,21
76:11,18
77:7,20
78:10,13,18
79:7,24
81:13 82:20
83:8 84:19
85:6,9,16
86:6 87:3
87:23 88:12
91:1 93:15
96:9 97:8
98:8 99:23
100:9,21
101:11
102:18
103:4
geared 24:1
general 6:13

25:20 30:1
35:19 78:22
84:7 88:3
generally
30:7
generate
28:19
getting 25:13
give 13:1
22:8 64:9
70:4 87:5
97:4
given 29:23
60:8,10,14
67:3 69:2
69:11 70:12
88:8,9,18
97:6 104:16
105:14
Glenn 1:6
2:15,24 6:9
6:11 9:16
10:4,6 16:5
17:21 18:8
18:11,22
19:8,14,16
19:19,19
20:2,9,16
20:23 22:2
22:5,20,21
23:2 37:15
38:23 39:9
39:11 41:4
41:8 42:2,6
43:23 44:8
47:2,13
48:5,9
49:24 51:13
51:17 55:14
56:14,17
59:18 60:7
60:11,15,19
60:24 62:2
62:10,17

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 6
63:5,16
64:1,14,18
65:2,21,23
66:2,6,10
66:12,21
67:15 68:1
70:22 71:2
71:7 79:23
84:16 85:1
89:13 90:20
91:7,11
92:15 93:12
94:8,20
95:23 97:1
97:5 98:6
98:20 99:18
100:13,17
101:23
102:10,12
104:6
go 10:21
19:15,18
28:20 42:2
46:21 52:13
55:17 57:21
63:20,24
69:22 85:5
95:19 96:6
101:10
goes 69:2
95:3
going 5:2
7:19 8:9
16:14 20:7
29:23 42:15
42:18 44:17
46:14 49:10
58:2,8 67:9
77:8 93:15
97:16,20
100:5,8,19
103:12
good 6:3 7:8
20:20 21:14

21:15,20
22:3,5 52:3
66:13
governed
25:19 88:3
grabbed
47:16
Gray 2:16
great 82:6
ground 47:18
group 9:19
45:23 59:1
83:17 96:15
guess 9:24
11:17 13:2
13:3 32:17
42:13
guidelines
88:4
gun 49:24
H
H 4:13
hair 47:17
50:1
Halsted 9:9
10:3
hand 106:2
handcuff
26:19
handcuffed
24:24 25:9
26:12
handcuffs
25:12 26:13
hang 20:11
hanging 20:6
happen 32:18
happened
30:23 33:16
62:6
hard 24:19
Harris 2:11
6:16,16 8:6

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
15:13 21:9
23:8 27:13
30:14 32:4
32:7 33:2
34:3 39:5
48:15 51:23
53:15 54:8
54:23 57:14
65:6 75:20
76:13 77:11
78:1,17
79:10 80:3
82:21 83:12
85:7 86:7
87:6,24
88:15 89:15
89:18,22
90:7,16
91:2 93:19
98:12 99:24
101:9
headquarters
5:5
hear 84:1
99:1
hearing 65:9
hearings
11:13
held 12:17
17:6 79:5
80:13,19
81:11
hereto 105:23
hereunto
106:1
HICKEY
2:18
high 32:22
33:17 68:19
72:23
highly 85:18
history 61:20
64:2 97:6
hold 12:20

28:15 41:10
72:24 81:16
holding 12:8
12:11,13,17
12:23 28:24
30:6 35:13
72:3,9
81:19 88:22
home 10:22
homeless
14:19 15:3
15:9,16,17
15:23 16:9
83:23 84:8
84:11 85:1
85:15 86:11
hours 10:16
10:18,24
11:10 29:16
47:1 78:8
house 82:3
housed 28:21
82:7
houses 20:7
huge 14:9
hypothetical
30:13 32:3
33:23 52:16
54:4,21
78:16 85:5
86:24 87:15
87:21 88:9
88:11
I
idea 44:5
identification
7:17 27:9
39:18 44:15
49:8 58:22
67:7,10
75:4
identify

44:24 45:5
identity 27:4
II 68:14
Illinois 1:1,16
1:17 2:5,12
2:21 3:6,13
5:6,16,22
104:1 105:1
105:4 106:2
immediately
81:18 99:17
implement...
51:8
inaccurate
8:5
inappropri...
72:8
incident
49:16 62:5
62:7 64:8
66:8,9 82:5
88:20 97:12
99:11,16,17
incidents
26:17
include 55:7
55:10,11
included 31:5
inclusive
104:13
incomplete
30:13 32:2
33:22 52:16
54:4 78:16
85:4 86:23
87:15,21
88:11
102:15
increased
91:20,21
indicates
61:18
indicating
35:9 76:5

77:13
indirectly
105:24
individual
2:14 12:21
31:5
information
8:4 38:15
38:16,17
56:16 57:8
informed
84:4
initial 91:24
initially 42:5
69:8
inside 15:17
24:5 28:15
inspect 15:22
instance 5:11
instances
52:11 54:11
instituted
5:14
interested
105:23
internal
57:19
101:21
interpret
93:1,5
intervening
95:5
intervention
52:14,21,23
53:7 54:2
54:17 55:8
interview
48:5
introduce 6:1
investigated
36:17,20
investigating
36:21 41:1
50:20

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 7
104:9,18
investigation
36:21 41:20 join 15:12,13
21:9,10
42:19 48:24
23:7,8 26:6
49:4 60:9
27:12,13
63:1,1
30:14,15
64:10
32:4,7 33:1
investigator
34:1,3 39:4
60:15 66:19
39:5 48:15
investigato...
48:16 51:22
41:18 60:8
51:23 53:16
60:17
54:5,8,22
IPRA 16:6
54:23 55:20
37:2,5,8
56:20 57:13
38:4 42:5
57:14 62:22
43:22 45:21
64:6 65:5,6
48:6 49:1
66:24 74:20
50:21 51:5
75:20 76:13
53:21 54:19
77:11,24
55:15 56:13
78:1,15,17
58:19 59:22
79:10 80:2
59:24 60:5
80:3 82:20
60:10,15,17
82:21 83:8
62:15 63:1
83:12 85:6
63:4,12,23
86:6,7 87:3
64:9 66:4
87:6,23,24
66:16,18,21
88:12,15
92:1,5
91:1,2
93:14 94:19
93:18,19
IPRA's 49:3
97:10 98:11
92:18 93:1
98:12 99:23
93:6
99:24
issue 25:10
101:11
102:24
Jones 49:12
issues 68:20
49:21,23
J
50:2
job 21:23
Jones' 50:8
Johnson 1:10
50:10
3:15 4:3,16 judge 34:12
4:17,18,19
65:8
4:20,21,22 justification
5:8 7:2,10
47:14 50:1
46:18 69:20
K
103:12,14

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
K 3:12 105:2
K.L 2:16
kbattle@h...
2:22
keep 35:12
35:24 38:2
keeper 25:14
28:14 29:13
29:18,20
31:2 33:21
Kenneth 2:19
6:8
Keyshia
45:19
kicked 47:19
kind 24:18,19
King 1:3 5:18
16:7,13,21
45:7 60:6
66:9 68:19
69:3,6 70:7
70:15,22
71:17 72:4
72:14 73:21
74:12 75:8
75:17 76:10
77:5,18
79:2,15,22
80:12,19
82:9 83:20
84:4,15,17
84:22 85:24
93:14 98:4
99:19
100:14
101:18
104:3
King's 60:11
65:19 66:3
66:16 76:17
92:7,16
99:7 100:16
knew 20:9
know 12:2

letter 59:11
59:13,21
60:4 68:12
68:24 69:17
69:19 70:1
70:5,19
73:17 79:19
82:8,15,15
82:24 83:15
84:14 85:21
89:17,19,20
90:2,3,6
91:6,18
94:1 96:5,7
96:16
letters 43:9
60:24
level 97:15
levels 51:6
License
106:10
lieutenant
9:16 37:16
47:2,9
55:18 64:24
70:7,13
72:4 73:19
L
79:17,20
Lapitan 2:16
83:22 84:5
large 12:23
85:22 102:6
12:23 14:6
102:13,23
14:7,7
lieutenants
28:24
9:22
LaSalle 2:11 line 4:8 68:20
3:5
list 57:20
LAW 2:2,8
litany 22:13
2:17 3:2,10 Liticorp 5:20
laws 21:22
LITIGATI...
lawyers 42:18
2:10 3:4
leadership
little 13:6
9:19
24:10,10,11
legal 5:20
Lloyd 2:16
let's 17:5
LLP 2:18
29:17
located 9:7,8
13:2 20:5
21:6,13
22:7,9
27:17 29:12
34:11 39:2
41:22 64:23
74:12 75:19
78:4,18
82:17 83:5
90:24 96:22
98:14
knowledge
12:15 14:20
16:10,12,18
22:24 32:17
33:12 35:11
36:2,3
37:11,24
66:6 77:9
77:22 92:6
93:11 101:7
101:23
102:1
known 21:4
27:5
knows 83:6

23:16 74:5
locked 11:2
lockup 11:2
11:11,13,21
12:7,9,18
13:14 23:18
25:14 28:14
28:15,16,21
29:1,5,13
29:18,20
30:2,8,20
30:23 31:1
31:1,9,14
31:19 33:12
33:18,21
34:15,20
35:14 72:3
73:23 74:1
74:24 76:10
77:5,13,17
78:12 79:3
79:15 83:21
86:20 87:9
98:3,5
lockups 12:5
log 69:15
logged 39:21
45:6
long 14:8
24:13
longer 24:11
63:7
look 7:24 8:1
17:12 39:23
40:8 41:2
41:19 43:4
43:24 45:22
46:20 47:22
49:17 55:2
55:17 57:2
57:24 58:16
59:4,8 60:5
61:24 63:18
63:19 68:12

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 8
mean 12:19
20:4 37:14
51:6 73:22
86:3 91:21
means 39:3
45:4 101:5
medical
41:11 70:16
70:17 84:18
86:1,2
medicated
85:2
medication
M
68:22 82:11
M 7:6
83:3,21
main 12:7
84:1,6,24
maintain
87:11
36:5
medications
maintained
84:10
35:4 38:16 meet 60:1
38:19
94:14,15
making 27:18 member
male 72:10
36:19 100:6
73:12 82:5 members
manner
30:1
81:16
memory
March 9:3
12:10 38:21
18:7,10
96:2
mark 46:3
68:20
marked 4:15
7:16,20
31:24 72:23
39:17,20
mention
43:5,7
60:23 84:14
44:14,18
mentioned
49:7,10
25:5 26:11
58:21,24
34:15 66:15
67:6,10
71:1
75:3
merit 88:20
matter 95:22 merits 62:6
matters
63:2 64:11
105:9
97:13
Max 96:17
met 94:10
maximum
Michigan
100:18
1:16 3:12
70:3 73:17
76:8 82:24
91:18 94:6
96:15
looked 38:22
51:4 58:17
looking 46:22
89:11,13
90:2,5,7,10
looks 8:3,15
51:3
lot 40:2,6

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
5:6
Milo 3:18
5:19
Milwaukee
5:21
mind 44:10
65:9,15
75:23
minutes 76:2
76:21,23
mischaract...
16:15 26:5
misconduct
62:11
moment 8:1
39:23 43:4
49:18 59:11
months 15:6
morning
10:24 11:10
11:20 29:16
Morrissey
2:3,4,4 4:4
6:3,4,5,6
7:7,18 8:16
11:6 12:4
15:5,19
16:19 21:1
21:17 23:11
26:9,21
27:7,19
29:8 30:10
30:18 32:11
32:19 33:9
34:14 35:17
35:20,22
36:9,10
37:19,23
38:7,11
39:7,19,24
40:2,6,7
42:14,24
43:3,17
44:16,21

45:2,6,9,14
46:5,10,17
47:8 48:13
48:20 49:9
49:14,15
50:6,7 52:4
52:18 53:14
53:20 54:13
55:6 56:1
56:23 57:15
58:4,14,23
61:14,21
63:3,14
64:13 65:7
65:18 67:8
67:13,14,21
67:23 68:11
69:23 71:23
72:1 73:4,6
73:15,16
74:11 75:5
75:14 76:1
76:7,14,20
77:2,15
78:5,11,20
79:11 80:9
81:21 82:23
83:10,14
84:3,21
85:13,20
86:16 87:4
87:7 88:6
89:1,12,17
89:20,24
90:1,4,10
90:17,18
91:5 92:19
92:22 93:2
93:7,10,23
96:14 97:16
98:2,18,23
99:4 100:4
100:12
101:1,14

102:17,20
103:1

5:21
Northern 1:1
5:15 104:1
N
Notary
N 2:1 3:1,5
104:22
4:1,7 7:6,6 notebook
n-i 96:19
42:19 46:19
name 5:19
November
6:4,5,8 7:9
67:16
7:23 9:16
number 5:17
16:12 40:12
7:21 14:19
40:14 47:15
39:21 40:9
names 35:5
44:18 49:11
narrative
59:1,4
46:4
61:24 67:11
narratives
68:10 77:3
55:3,4
89:16,23
nature 33:7
Numeral
necessary
68:14
70:12
numerous
need 36:8
22:21 23:3
45:10 69:6
O
73:14 99:19
needed 68:21 O 4:7 7:6
105:2,2
82:11 83:3
o'clock 10:22
84:6,23
O'CONNOR
101:3
2:18
needs 87:10
negative 79:8 oath 104:10
object 16:14
never 19:3
65:23 75:23
61:4 85:3
93:4,15
new 13:22
objecting
night 10:23
61:8
15:18
noncombat... objection
11:4,23
87:10 98:5
14:21,22,23
noon 29:17
14:24 15:11
normal 10:13
10:16,18
20:17 21:7
23:4 26:4,6
28:8 31:7
26:15 27:6
normally
27:10 29:6
28:2,6 31:8
North 2:11
30:9,12
2:20 3:5
32:2,5,23

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 9
33:22 36:6
38:5 39:1
39:12 48:16
51:19 52:15
53:11 54:3
54:6,20
55:19 56:18
57:12 61:13
62:19,22
63:8 64:4
65:3 66:22
66:24 68:5
69:16 71:20
73:2,11
74:18 75:11
75:18 76:11
76:19 77:20
78:10,13
79:7,24
81:13 82:13
82:20,22
83:4,8
84:19 85:6
85:16 86:4
86:6,23
87:3,14,21
87:23,24
88:10,12
90:22 91:1
93:20 96:9
97:8 98:8
99:21,23
100:9,21
101:9,11
102:15,18
objections
33:2 53:16
54:9 77:7
83:13 88:16
observe
99:10
observed
99:16
obtaining

70:16 86:1
occasion 19:5
27:17
occasions
34:11
occurred
33:8 99:10
October
106:3
offender
24:23
Office 3:11
22:16
officer 19:7
19:12 21:2
21:5,18,20
22:2,4,6,13
22:14,19,22
23:1 24:16
24:17,21
25:1 27:16
27:21 28:12
28:12 30:21
31:2 33:20
36:17 38:18
47:10 48:3
48:8 51:18
52:3,5,7,10
52:11 53:8
53:22,23
54:1,1,16
54:16 56:2
56:4 57:4,9
59:17,18
62:3,12,18
63:17 64:14
64:23 66:13
75:17 84:4
86:17,18
99:5,6,9,12
99:14,15
officers 13:17
20:15 21:4
21:5,13,14

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
21:15 24:6
25:11 28:3
29:4,7 31:8
31:12 56:7
57:11 59:23
60:7,12
65:16
OFFICES
2:2,8,17 3:2
3:10
officially 8:22
Oh 8:13
24:10 37:4
46:12 83:19
okay 8:11,13
11:8 30:22
32:9 45:13
49:19 58:7
59:3 61:3
68:16 90:13
91:9 93:4,9
97:18 103:6
103:9
old 13:23
14:1
once 30:24
81:16
ones 51:14
operations
9:13 10:10
opinion 22:1
94:18 97:13
97:14 98:16
opportunity
40:8 45:15
OPS 22:18
36:18 37:8
38:4 54:18
56:13 62:15
OPS' 43:23
opted 80:5
option 34:16
79:17 83:22
84:20 88:21

options 33:20
34:6,13
70:13 71:2
71:7 73:19
79:2,20
84:13,16,24
85:22
order 34:12
84:7 95:18
orders 25:20
88:3
organization
22:15
organizatio...
37:10
original
75:24
other's 20:7
OTS 51:5
outcome
105:24

99:8,9
pages 104:13
pain 70:8,9
98:6 99:18
paperwork
24:7 28:3
28:11,19
Paragraph
68:15
paramedics
84:11
Pardon 89:14
part 15:20
18:2 38:16
41:7 42:17
49:20 65:20
66:15 67:18
80:22 81:2
81:4,6 96:5
participate
16:20 43:18
participated
P
43:19
P 2:1,1 3:1,1 particular
p.m 1:17 5:3
26:17 43:15
58:8,12
66:8 68:2
97:19,23
parties
103:10
105:23
packet 40:23 partner 19:4
page 4:2,8,15 partners
40:11,14
18:24
41:2,5,19
party 5:9,10
42:20,20
19:15,19,23
45:22 46:20
20:10
47:22 50:4 passive 70:11
50:6 51:5
Patrick 2:4
59:2,11
6:5 67:21
60:20 68:13 patrickmor...
70:3 73:18
2:6
77:3 83:16 patrol 9:2
83:17,18
19:7,12
89:19,20
20:15 21:2
90:8,11,11
21:4,18
94:6 96:15
22:2,14,19

22:22 23:1
53:22 54:1
56:7
patrolman
18:12 20:2
patrolmen
18:19 20:12
20:14
Peggy 1:14
5:23 32:11
105:3 106:8
penalty 91:19
pending
72:15 73:1
73:10
people 12:21
12:22 14:19
15:3,16,17
15:23 19:1
75:23
period 9:3,11
9:15,23
11:1,10
17:4,22
18:1 36:5
63:7,18
95:5
periodically
15:22
permanent
26:14
person 23:2
26:2 27:24
28:4,9,13
28:14 30:24
31:3 34:7
34:12,24
36:21 40:16
47:15 50:20
50:22 55:8
69:3 86:14
86:20
person's
36:23 41:1

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 10
49:4
personal
16:10,12,18
32:16 33:5
33:14 77:9
77:21
105:13
personally
62:5 64:17
64:23
personnel
9:14 10:10
31:19 53:4
53:5 55:11
pertaining
1:13
photograp...
81:7,17
photograp...
73:10
place 37:8
80:11 87:13
104:14
105:17
placed 34:22
35:14 36:1
41:9 72:4
placing 30:5
Plaintiff 1:4
1:10 2:7
5:10,13
104:4
Plaintiff's 6:2
7:15,20
39:16,21
44:13,18
45:3 46:6
49:6,11
58:20 59:1
90:8
please 6:20
point 11:9
16:24 79:14
86:12

pointed
49:24
police 3:10
5:5 7:12,13
8:19 9:14
15:15 21:5
21:5 22:12
35:12 36:4
36:17 38:1
38:14,18
42:10 51:18
52:6,11,22
53:8 55:12
57:4 62:2
62:11,16,18
63:17,22
64:22,24
65:22,24
66:13 76:16
90:21 91:8
91:12 94:21
95:19,20,22
96:6,8,20
96:23 97:2
97:5 100:5
100:6,8,19
101:24
102:3,6,9
policies 93:1
policy 25:6,6
88:2,5 93:6
Porter-Boen
47:18,19,19
Porter-Boens
47:15,16,17
Porter-Boe...
49:1
portion 69:24
position 7:11
9:1 17:3,7
positions
26:22
possible
26:24

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
possibly
55:10
preliminary
22:8 29:9
52:19
prepare 8:2
27:21
prepared
28:8
preparing
68:4
present 3:17
5:4 10:2
16:7
presented
45:21 46:6
91:17
presenting
46:19
previous
105:6
print 76:2,23
printed 34:24
43:8 46:2
prints 70:14
73:20 79:21
85:23
prior 8:24
16:11 18:6
18:10 27:8
27:17 30:5
37:19 38:7
44:4 56:16
57:3,10
58:15 59:5
60:18 62:21
79:15 100:5
100:19
prisoner
33:17 72:24
prisoners
11:2
probably
9:24 11:17

13:6 14:8
18:13,18
19:24 24:10
42:17 51:15
101:20
problem 40:4
problematic
53:1
procedure
1:12 25:6
28:9 86:21
96:6
procedures
31:7 87:12
88:8
proceed 6:21
proceedings
105:15
process 23:14
23:19,23
30:7 31:4
31:20 37:7
72:6 81:4,6
81:9
processed
26:23 28:10
69:6,9
80:20,21
81:23
processing
16:21 24:2
24:5,9
26:11,23
27:20 28:18
72:13 77:19
78:8,24
79:5 80:23
81:2
profanities
47:18
professional
22:16 97:14
program
52:14,21,23

52:24 54:2
54:17 55:8
55:11
promoted
17:5
promotion
102:10
properly
99:11
protocol
96:13
provide
41:11
prudent
70:12
public 14:2
21:21 30:1
104:22
pull 46:7,15
56:5,15
pulled 50:1
punched 41:8
47:19
purpose 5:7
purposes
67:10
pursuant
1:11
pushed 41:10
put 34:23,24
57:23 72:8
88:18
putting 31:6
Q
quarterly
52:6 57:18
question 11:8
22:8 29:9
30:17 32:10
32:12 36:8
39:3 46:11
46:13 52:19
57:16 61:13

63:12 65:12
65:14,14
69:15 71:24
73:5 76:3
79:9,12
84:2 87:2
91:9 98:9
99:12
questions
23:24 103:7
103:8
queue 56:9
quite 12:20
24:11

37:4,5,22
39:15 51:14
94:3 95:24
96:24
receive 52:6
59:21
received 60:4
77:13 89:2
91:24
101:17
receiving
48:6 102:2
102:5
recollection
23:22 27:2
R
33:6,15
R 2:1 3:1 4:7 recommend
7:6
52:13 99:6
R.A 2:15
99:13
raised 43:14
102:10
ran 20:10
recommen...
read 32:14
36:22 41:1
46:1,9,16
41:14,17,18
61:15,15,16
50:17,19
70:1 104:11
59:22 60:1
reading
89:7 90:19
43:11 50:4
92:1,6
69:21
recommen...
reads 90:24
60:9 64:10
ready 25:13
66:5 68:14
73:24
91:16
really 10:18
recommen...
13:2,18
91:4 100:18
19:3 24:2
record 5:3
25:3 37:5
7:9 32:13
46:1
38:2 42:21
reason 92:14
43:6 45:1
93:12 98:19
58:9,13
reasons 46:2
61:14 76:16
72:19 97:4
83:6 97:20
recall 16:23
98:1 103:13
18:23 19:3
105:14
19:6,13,22 recorded
20:11,19
5:12

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 11
records 35:4
35:12,24
36:5 38:22
redacted
42:17,22
reduced
105:12
refer 54:1,16
reference
50:5
referrals
55:16
referring
55:7
reflect 41:2
46:23 74:15
74:22 75:9
76:9,9
reflects 41:5
47:5
refresh 96:1
refreshed
38:21
refuses 87:11
regards 22:24
23:1 35:5
35:24 37:9
38:17,22
39:11 40:20
41:15 43:20
48:10 49:1
49:16 55:14
56:14,16
59:17,22,22
60:11,19
62:2,11,17
63:16 64:18
65:10 66:2
66:10,16
84:17 92:7
92:16 94:8
99:7,12
100:13,15
101:17

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
regular 19:4
related 87:1
relation
23:18
relative
105:20,21
relatively
11:21 13:22
relevance
14:22,24
15:11
remain 15:9
25:9
remember
20:23
removed
11:12 71:17
79:18
renew 30:12
repeat 11:8
30:17 32:9
32:12 38:10
46:12 52:11
61:12 79:13
87:19
repeated
54:15
rephrase
71:23 73:4
97:3
report 27:21
27:22 28:7
28:8 41:20
42:19 57:18
74:15,22
75:7,16
77:4 80:20
80:23,24
99:11,17,20
reported
105:11
reporter 1:15
5:23 6:19
61:6,10

87:18 105:4
106:9
Reporting
5:24
reports 52:6
represent 6:8
represented
94:19
reputation
21:6 23:2,5
51:17,21
52:2
request 43:24
44:4
requested
32:14
requesting
83:20 84:1
requires 84:7
reserve 103:4
resister 70:11
resolution
60:3
resolve 94:17
95:13,15
resolved 95:6
respectful
21:24
responded
60:19 61:23
responding
60:18
response 68:4
70:24 71:1
responses
70:18
responsibili...
9:10 10:6
40:19
responsibili...
16:4 40:22
40:22
responsible
9:13 10:10

restrained
26:24 72:14
73:9
resume 7:23
8:18 17:12
retirement
19:15,18,23
20:10
return 42:5
returned
43:13
review 36:13
36:15 38:1
38:18 40:17
40:23 43:19
45:10,15
47:23 48:24
49:21 50:18
51:2,11,12
55:16 56:8
56:10,13
57:1 62:20
62:24 64:11
65:21 66:20
67:18,24
68:3 93:14
101:22
reviewed
22:15 37:9
38:3,24
42:1 55:15
63:23 64:9
65:19 66:15
66:18 68:9
reviewing
60:6
Richard
49:12,21,23
50:2,8,10
right 23:21
43:11 51:4
58:3 61:3
73:15
RIGHTS 2:9

3:3
ring 26:13
27:1
rings 26:19
72:14,17
rise 97:14
Rita 1:3 16:7
16:13 66:9
66:16 67:16
70:22 75:7
75:17 76:16
83:20 92:7
92:16 93:14
98:4 99:7
100:14,15
101:18
104:3
Rodgers 2:16
6:17
Roman 68:14
room 13:5,9
14:9 24:5,9
24:11 26:11
26:23 27:20
72:13 77:19
78:8,24
79:5
rooms 23:23
24:3
rosters 35:8
rotation
10:13
roughly
14:16 18:20
routinely
15:17
Rules 1:12
Ryan 14:14
14:15
S
S 2:1 3:1 4:7
4:7,13
S-k-a-h-i-l-l

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 12
41:23
safety 25:10
SAITH
103:17
sake 90:14
salary 102:2
102:5
Samuel 47:13
sat 80:7
Savich 3:18
5:19
saying 61:5
68:17 71:21
says 51:5
68:21 69:21
77:8 82:19
82:19 83:7
95:3
scope 36:7
65:4,8,17
screaming
68:21 83:2
screen 75:22
search 25:21
searched
25:18 26:1
50:8
seat 71:13
second 68:13
see 15:3 17:5
25:1 26:1
43:2 57:2,5
57:6 60:2
68:23 69:13
69:24 83:15
94:17
seeking 70:15
85:24
seen 34:11
send 36:22
separated
65:24 90:21
91:7,12,22
separation

91:4
September
18:16 45:22
46:23,24
sergeant 14:4
18:15,17
served 17:8
serves 12:10
set 72:11
106:1
setup 24:18
seven 10:1
share 8:12
Sharon 58:18
82:16
shift 19:9
shifts 29:19
shoot 50:10
short 8:10
58:10 97:21
Shorthand
1:15 105:4
106:9
shot 47:13
show 7:19,20
42:15,18
44:17 49:10
67:9 77:4,4
showing
39:20 58:24
75:6,6 77:3
sic 47:18
67:16 70:5
83:1,10
96:17
side 9:8 14:14
24:18,20,21
24:24
signature
103:5
similar 55:4
Simmons
40:21 41:3
41:8,9,9,10

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
Simmons'
41:15 43:20
44:7
simply 71:11
sit 24:17,20
24:21 34:7
34:17 71:13
71:13 73:23
88:22
sitting 24:24
situations
54:11
six 10:1
size 12:14
13:4,8
Skahill 41:23
43:12 44:1
sleep 15:17
smaller 13:6
social 19:14
socialize
19:11
solution
72:19
somebody
27:17 95:18
sorry 44:19
46:24 61:6
83:10 87:20
89:24 90:5
98:24
100:15
south 1:16
2:5 3:12 5:5
9:8,9 14:13
74:6 80:6
81:19
speak 62:4
speaking
63:6
specialist
5:20
specific 50:4
51:14

specifically
17:8 20:22
39:15 65:8
specifics
102:19
specified
105:17
specify 43:15
speculation
14:23 15:1
27:14 33:3
33:24 63:10
78:2,15
101:9
speculative
26:17 54:21
73:3 74:19
78:14 85:9
88:13
spend 78:7
78:23
split 24:3,3
25:2
spot 81:11
squad 19:2
ss 105:1
staff 61:24
62:4
stamp 42:23
89:15,19
Stamped
45:7
stand 76:18
Standards
22:17
stands 61:15
62:5 63:2
64:10 97:12
start 6:7
10:19,21
31:4
starting 6:2
18:14
starts 36:23

68:17
state 1:15 7:8
65:9,15
73:18 83:2
85:21 105:1
105:4
stated 69:7
70:24 79:16
79:20 82:9
105:19
statement
16:6 60:14
66:20 67:15
67:24 69:13
70:5 73:22
81:10
statements
68:23
states 1:1,12
5:15 94:10
104:1
station 72:22
stations
15:15 24:5
statute 92:11
stay 31:16,19
Steffanie 3:5
6:14
steffanie.ga...
3:7
stenograph...
105:11
street 2:11,20
3:5 14:13
32:22 74:8
strike 56:3
79:18 84:15
100:15
SUBSCRI...
104:19
Suite 2:12,20
3:6
summary
60:17 66:19

67:2 91:19
superinten...
3:11,15 5:8
7:13 8:19
8:21 36:4
46:18 58:15
61:22 62:8
63:22 69:20
71:6 75:15
76:22 92:23
93:3 100:18
101:16,20
102:9 103:2
103:12,13
supervise
18:3
supervised
17:18
supervisor
101:4
suppose
13:11 54:12
55:2
supposed
21:22
sure 11:9,9
18:24 30:19
33:6,7,15
35:10 38:12
45:2 51:9
58:4 69:7
75:1 79:14
92:8 93:22
96:12
suspension
95:1 99:6
99:14
sustain 66:4
sustained
48:21,22,23
50:23 52:7
53:18,21
54:18 61:1
61:19 63:5

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 13
talking 20:23
26:16 35:15
35:18 37:17
38:6 53:12
Tape 97:19
97:24
103:10
Tasered 41:8
technician
86:13
technique
99:19
techniques
70:10 98:7
tell 20:19
29:15 42:12
ten 12:11
13:23 14:1
T
18:20 20:3
T 1:10 3:15
20:13 24:4
4:3,7,7,13
35:1
7:2,6,6,10
tendered
104:9,18
39:24 67:22
table 65:10
76:15
75:23
term 36:12
take 7:24
terminals
25:12 31:3
24:12
31:18 37:8 terminate
39:23 43:4
95:18
44:23 48:9 terminated
49:17 55:4
94:20 97:2
58:2 76:1
terminating
76:21,23
97:5
84:10 86:10 termination
92:5 97:16
95:23 97:15
taken 1:11,14 terminology
5:10 11:3
21:16
11:13 71:3 terms 74:23
71:7 74:24 testified 7:4
104:13
16:6 56:19
105:16
56:24 77:22
talk 20:15,22 testify 69:19
95:12
75:12 105:8
talked 21:13 testimony
63:16 66:1
Sutton 2:15
6:17 59:18
84:5 99:5,7
99:9 101:7
101:16
swear 6:20
sworn 6:23
7:4 8:22
29:22,22
31:2 104:10
104:19
105:8
system 38:2
38:12,20
53:7 56:5
56:16 57:2

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
16:16 26:5
79:1 82:10
98:10
104:16
105:14
Thank 40:1
83:11 103:1
103:3,13,15
Thanks 44:12
thing 29:21
57:17,20
things 20:8
71:10
think 12:22
13:23 25:10
44:21 45:1
65:11 72:18
third 17:17
17:23
THOMAS
2:3,4 7:7
thoroughly
25:18,22
26:1
thought 22:5
thousand75:8 100:14
threatened
50:9
three 14:8
29:24 56:11
three-page
7:22 59:12
threw 47:16
47:17
Tiffany 2:11
6:16
tiffany.har...
2:13
time 9:11,15
9:23 10:17
11:1,10,15
12:21 13:20
15:3,4 17:4

17:22,24
18:1,15
19:23 22:7
25:1 29:23
32:18,18
33:16,16
34:9 36:5
36:18 45:10
47:3,10
56:8 58:1,4
58:7,12
63:18 69:10
71:14 72:15
74:12,16,23
75:9 76:6,9
76:10 77:5
77:16,17,23
78:23 79:5
79:14 88:23
95:5,8
97:18,23
102:21
103:9
104:14
105:17
timeframe
11:5 38:6
53:12 78:19
102:19
times 10:3,5
13:13,17
14:8 15:8
15:23 16:7
19:8,11
26:12 27:3
31:23 32:20
33:7,11
78:7,23
Tina 41:22
today's 5:1
58:15 59:5
Tom 6:4
Toomey 5:24
top 90:11

total 61:24
totality 69:11
tour 10:11
track 38:14
traditionally
13:14
transcript
104:12,15
105:11
Transfer
102:16
transferred
102:12,23
transported
74:9 80:6
80:10 81:19
treatment
70:7
TRR 100:3
true 104:15
105:13
truth 105:8
trying 95:13
turn 25:13
28:13 59:10
two 12:22
19:5 29:24
51:6 59:23
60:7,12
71:10 75:8
78:7 100:14
two-page
7:21
type 26:13
typewriting
105:12
typical 10:19
typically
10:19,21
11:14 15:15
18:24 24:17
25:12 28:13
U

U 4:7
Uh-huh 89:5
unable 33:13
unclear 79:8
uncooperat...
33:19 34:16
34:21 71:4
73:9,12
79:2 84:22
86:20 87:10
98:5,15
understand
46:11 57:16
79:12
unfounded
48:23 50:24
unit 36:24
United 1:1,12
5:15 104:1
universal
25:20
unnecessary
69:4,11
70:23
unreasonable
70:8,23
unstable
31:24
unusual
85:19 86:15
unwarranted
69:5
unwilling
33:13
use 8:8 69:4
69:11 70:8
70:9,22
98:6
utilizes 38:14

Page 14
57:12 71:22
73:2,11
86:24
100:22
102:16
vagueness
54:7 96:10
Valente 3:12
6:12,12
vehicle 50:9
version 43:12
versus 5:18
vestibule
14:3 16:8
video 5:3,20
58:8,13
97:20 98:1
Videograp...
3:18 5:1
6:19 58:7
58:12 97:18
97:23 103:6
103:9
videotaped
1:9 5:7
vs 1:5 104:5

48:12
wasn't 24:2
31:17 67:3
80:15 81:15
91:23
watch 10:4,7
10:9 16:4
88:19
way 21:22,24
36:19 46:2
46:5 60:3
82:1
wbazarek...
2:22
we'll 36:9
76:1,23,24
we're 21:22
26:16 58:2
76:21 97:16
97:20,24
weapon 26:2
weighed 44:6
went 34:12
96:23
west 14:14,16
Western 2:5
14:16
W
WHEREOF
wait 71:18
106:1
waited 71:11 Whichever
98:16
36:19
wall 41:10
wide 24:12
want 6:7 25:3 Wilfredo
32:11 34:21
2:16
44:11,23
William 2:19
61:16 69:8
6:10
76:20,23
Williams
93:4
45:19
wanted 94:20 willing 72:5
94:24
79:6
V
warming
winter 15:6
vague 21:7
15:15
witness 3:15
26:16 27:11 warrant 50:9
4:2 6:20,22
52:15 54:21 warranted
7:3 8:14

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
12:1 15:2
15:14 16:17
20:18 21:11
23:9 26:7
26:18 27:15
30:16 32:9
32:15 33:4
34:5 37:21
38:9 39:14
43:1,10
45:12 47:6
48:18 52:1
53:17 54:10
55:1,21
56:21 61:17
62:23 63:11
64:7 67:1
68:8 74:21
76:4 77:9
77:12,21
78:3 80:4
81:14 85:10
85:17 86:9
88:1,17
90:12 91:3
93:21 96:11
97:11 98:13
99:2 100:1
100:10,23
101:12
103:3,15
105:7,7
106:1
woman 16:12
word 80:18
wording
42:11
work 10:13
10:16 18:11
18:21 19:1
19:8,12
20:9
worked 9:17
14:4 18:8

0745 76:6
084-003813
106:10

30:11,20
13 1:5 5:17
8:22 104:5
31:8 35:5
35:16,17,23
13th 60:20
37:2,8,18
79:19 91:7
1
37:20 38:8
94:2
1 4:22 40:11 14 59:2
52:20 53:14
40:14 50:6 15 89:9 92:1
57:8 71:8
59:2 75:3,7 15-page
71:16 72:2
77:3 97:19
44:19
72:16 73:7
1-104 104:13 16 13:10
75:9,17
1:30 1:17 5:3 1600 2:20
76:6 77:14
10 76:6 77:14 18 4:16 7:16
81:22 82:9
94:6
7:21
83:1,9,10
10:00 10:21
86:19 87:9
1919 5:21
11:20
1937 1:5 5:17
88:7 98:3
10:28 77:14
100:16
104:5
10:30 87:8
1988 18:14
101:19
100 62:9
2012 17:6,14
1998 13:24
X
1006219
18:15,17
2013 17:10
X 4:1,13 7:6
39:22
67:16
19th 46:23,24
10150 2:5
2014 17:14
Y
2
1020192 45:7
2015 17:8
Y 2:11
10523 90:15 2 68:15 97:24 2016 8:23
yeah 15:18
99:8,9
10th 71:8
59:15 60:20
16:2 18:17
103:10
75:8,17
61:23 62:8
19:21 22:6
98:3 100:16 2:33 58:6
63:24 65:21
24:14,14
2:34 58:8
101:18
68:13 79:19
26:19 27:18 11 4:20 41:19 2:50 58:12
83:9 89:4
46:14 52:2
42:20 45:22 20 2:20 24:13
90:6 94:2
57:17 80:21
46:20 58:21 2007 44:1
2017 1:17 5:2
94:16
59:1,4,7,10 2008 9:3 18:7
104:21
years 13:23
18:11 44:3
60:20 68:10
106:3
14:1 18:20
45:22 46:23 21st 1:17 5:2
70:3 75:8
20:3,13
46:24 49:17 22nd 45:22
83:17,18
63:21 64:1
50:15
89:20 90:8
233-7900 2:6
64:16 92:5
94:6 96:15 2009 51:3
2345 47:1
92:9,10,13
2011 9:4
96:16
23rd 94:11
92:21 93:13 11:00 10:22
10:12,15
24th 49:17
Yep 65:5
11:7,15,21 27 4:17 39:17
111th 74:8
12:6 13:22
11th 87:8
39:21 40:9
Z
14:18 16:11
100:14
40:11,15
23:12
24:1
12
13:10
41:19
0
26:1
29:3
89:21
96:16
003520 45:8
3
29:11,17
010522 90:9 12:00 10:22
18:18 19:2
19:5 29:4
29:10 39:9
working
101:24
works 82:1
wouldn't
10:21 13:18
25:3 31:11
31:16 56:22
57:6,21
72:10 78:4
write 96:7
writing 69:22
written 69:18
wrong 12:12
98:7

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 15
3 4:9
3/4ths 13:8
3:35 97:19
3:43 97:23
3:49 103:10
30 2:11 3:5
49:13 91:20
91:21 100:7
30-day 94:24
31 4:19 49:7
49:11,13,14
312 2:13,21
3:7,13
31st 95:10
33 4:18 44:14
44:18 45:3
45:16,23
46:20 47:23
33-page
44:19
3510 1:16
3:12 5:5
36 4:9
39 4:17
3rd 18:4
106:2
4
4 17:9 41:2,5
77:3
422-9400
2:21
43-page
67:17
44 4:18
49 4:19
5
5 60:21 70:3
5:00 11:18
58 4:20
5th 74:6,7
6
6 60:21 70:4

 EDDIE T. JOHNSON
August 21, 2017
73:18 83:1
60602 2:12
2:21 3:6
60643 2:5
60647 5:22
60653 3:13
5:6
67 4:21
6th 9:5,7,11
9:17,20,23
10:8,14,24
11:12 12:6
12:18 13:13
13:16,21
14:3,10,18
15:7,10,21
15:22 16:8
16:22 18:7
18:12,19,22
20:3,14
21:2,19
23:12,24
25:8,15,17
27:3 28:17
29:5,11
31:22 32:1
32:21 33:11
35:2,19,21
35:23 36:11
37:12 38:24
39:8 44:2
51:16 59:15
64:15 68:13
71:17 72:2
72:7,11,20
72:24 73:7
73:8 74:1
74:10,13,16
77:19 78:6
80:12,15
81:12,15,18
81:22,23
82:9 86:18
86:22 88:7

89:3 90:2,6
98:4 102:13
102:22
7
7 4:16,21
59:11 67:6
67:11,12,13
90:8
7-103 4:4
7:00 11:18
727 74:8
744-6959 3:7
744-7684
2:13
745-6115
3:13
75 4:22
75th 14:13
773 2:6
78th 9:9 10:3
7th 67:16
8
8 83:18 90:11
8:00 29:16
9
9:00 10:20
900 2:12 3:6
98 18:16

TOOMEY REPORTING
312-853-0648

Page 16