Case 2:17-cv-00497-RAJ Document 62 Filed 10/24/18 Page 1 of 2 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 CITY OF SEATTLE and CITY OF PORTLAND, Case No. C17-497-RAJ Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING DECLARATORY RELIEF vs. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 19 Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the balance of the record, the decision in City and County of San Francisco v. Trump, 897 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2018), and the parties’ agreement on the appropriate disposition of this case, it is hereby ADJUDGED against defendants Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General, and 20 Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, that Section 9(a) of Executive Order 21 13,768, “Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States,” is unconstitutional; 22 23 and it is further ORDER AND JUDGMENT - 1 Case 2:17-cv-00497-RAJ Document 62 Filed 10/24/18 Page 2 of 2 1 ADJUDGED against the same defendants that, because Section 9(a) of Executive 2 Order 13,768 directs Executive Branch administrative agencies to withhold funding that 3 Congress has not tied to compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373, it would be unconstitutional for 4 Executive Branch agencies to withhold appropriated funds from plaintiffs Cities of Seattle 5 6 and Portland pursuant to Section 9(a) of the Executive Order. This Order and Judgment does not address whether any specific statutory grant 7 program permits grants to be conditioned on compliance with 8 U.S.C. § 1373. 8 DATED this 24th day of October, 2018. 9 A 10 11 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER AND JUDGMENT - 2