Questions: 1) Would you be open to a referendum vote for or against a state lottery in Alabama, and if so, what areas of the state government do you think any proceeds should be directed toward? I have long been a proponent of Alabamians being given the opportunity to vote on a lottery. I also believe the proceeds of a state lottery would be best spent being earmarked for education. 2) Your website mentions that part of your platform is to “oppose bills that threaten the viability of public schools.” Do you think the Alabama Accountability Act is one of those bills? I ask because that law has recently come under increased scrutiny and Baldwin County schools issued a resolution last week officially encouraging the legislature to repeal it. The State Legislature’s obligation is to provide sufficient funding for public school systems across the state. Public schools have the huge responsibility of educating all children, including providing special education and services to children who need such services to learn. To meet the needs of all children, the State of Alabama needs to provide greater resources for grades K-12. I also believe that teacher salaries must be increased. Many teachers are leaving the profession, and college students are choosing other career paths because of the challenges that teachers and administrators face today, including substandard pay. The State Legislature should not take money away from public schools in order to fund scholarships to private schools. I will continue to oppose taking money away from public schools to pay for scholarships to private schools under the Alabama Accountability Act. I understand that many of the scholarships are used at schools that are not even accredited. That’s a double standard, and it should be prohibited. 3) I saw you’ve been endorsed by fair pay activist Lilly Ledbetter recently. I wanted to ask about that importance of that endorsement and your previous and ongoing efforts to ensure men and women are compensated equally in the state of Alabama? Lilly Ledbetter is the face of the Pay Equity Movement. Therefore, I am honored to have her endorsement. Although she lost her own pay discrimination lawsuit against Goodyear, she has worked tirelessly over the years to help close the gender pay gap and ensure that all workers get same pay for same work. I first introduced a Pay Equity Bill in the House of Representatives in 2016 because the wage gap is very real and its impact is enormous. It is a blatantly unfair practice that harms whole families and our greater community. While women are those most directly impacted, this cannot be dismissed as a ‘women’s issue.’ It is an issue of fairness and family and the consequences of allowing these wage disparities are far reaching. Women make up over 50% of our workforce, providing a significant amount of the family income, or acting as the sole providers for their families. So, when employers pay women less for the same work, they are not only cheating that woman out of fair wages, they are cheating her whole family out of well-deserved income. These are the reasons I was able to successfully build a bi-partisan coalition of 27 of my colleagues who signed on as co-sponsors when I introduced the legislation again this past session. The session was well underway when my Pay Equity Bill was placed on a committee agenda. Furthermore, I requested a public hearing to ensure the committee understood the need for and components of the bill. At the hearing, most of the speakers spoke in favor of the bill. However, the legislative session ended before the committee could meet again and vote the bill out of committee. Given the support I was able to garner before the session ended and the enormity of the issue and its impact on our families and communities, I am optimistic that the bill will be enacted in 2019. 4) You’ve publicly supported the expansion of Medicaid, but I wanted to ask what your thoughts were on the increased costs that could generate for Alabama in the future. Could you give some of the reasons why you do support expanding Medicaid? I feel strongly that we must expand the state’s Medicaid program to build a healthier Alabama. The failure to do so has already had a devastating impact on many families – including working families – who cannot afford health insurance and communities across the state. Sadly, several rural communities have already lost clinics and hospitals. These closures have resulted in whole communities being cut off from adequate healthcare and emergency healthcare services, and created more pressure on our hospitals in the bigger cities without any additional funding for them. We must address this crisis before it grows any more. An investment of state dollars in the Medicaid program would yield much larger federal resources for Alabama, allowing us to address these growing issues. The number of uninsured Alabamians would decline significantly and the influx of funding would trigger economic development for the state. Expanding Medicaid is the right thing to do for our citizens and for our state. 4B) Also, do you think the state will be able to handle any increased financial obligation in the future because of that expansion? This is a very important matter. The state must raise sustainable revenue to fund Medicaid fully. One option that seems to have significant support is increasing the tobacco tax. Whether we go with that proposal or another, it is important to note that expanding the program will have a positive economic impact by creating a healthier workforce and more jobs and, thereby, more income tax and sales tax revenue for the state. 5) I don’t want to dwell too much on the redrawing of House District 97’s district map, but I do think it’s important to mention. Do you think those lines were redrawn fairly to both parties? Every 10 years following the Census, legislative districts are redrawn. Legislators offer input and, historically, the party that is in control redraws the districts to its advantage. It is no wonder the Republican Party reshaped House District 97 in hopes that a Republican would win the seat in 2018. My opponent is the first Republican to run for the seat in decades. However, I believe a majority of the voters in House District 97 will re-elect me based on my record and service to the community over the years. 6) Do you think the state legislature is doing enough to address mental health care in Alabama? If not, do you have any thoughts on how the legislature could help improve the quality and availability of mental health services throughout the state? There is definitely more the Alabama Legislature and, frankly, all of our elected officials, can do to address the mental health care crisis across our city and state. Unfortunately, while my colleagues and I in the Democratic Caucus have advocated in this area, our Republican colleagues have often blocked such efforts. This is one of those areas where we could make real gains if only we had more balance in the State Legislature rather than the current supermajority. The truth is mental health struggles touch every part of our community – from our young to old, our new mothers to returning veterans – and the failure to ensure adequate funding levels and effective programs has a tremendous cost. These costs include everything from emergency care to incarceration, not to mention the human cost in countless lives devastated and families disrupted. I have advocated for a thorough review of state-funded mental health services to ensure that such appropriations are spent wisely and provide first-rate care as well as for additional funding for programs providing evidence-based practices accessible to all citizens, family caregivers, law enforcement personnel, and healthcare providers. 7) Given the struggles Alabama has had funding Medicaid, public education, mental health services and the court system: Do you think there’s a revenue shortage in Montgomery? Do you think new sources of revenue are needed for Alabama? If so, how would you address that? The answer to both questions is yes. We need to ensure we are spending our current tax dollars wisely and need additional revenue. Currently, we are spending tens of thousands of dollars a year to incarcerate over 1,000 Alabamians for offenses dealing with less than an ounce of marijuana. On the other end of spectrum, our state prison system could any day be taken over by the Federal Government due to inadequate mental health services, despite our having enormous contracts with private companies to provide those services to prisoners. So, first, I believe we need to ensure our current spending makes sense. As far as additional revenue, we have several options for this, including a state lottery. 8) Your opponent has centered his campaign around this idea that Montgomery is forgetting about the Gulf Coast and often refers to how the state’s BP Settlement was finalized. Would you agree with that? Also, could you talk about some of your efforts in Montgomery to make sure issues impacting the Gulf Coast are addressed in Montgomery? My opponent is clearly grandstanding and sadly mistaken if he believes for one minute that he could have convinced a majority of the 140 members of the State Legislature to vote to allocate the state’s first installment of BP Settlement funds to Gulf Coast counties. The vote wasn’t even close. The Mobile-Baldwin County Legislative Delegation consists of the No. 2 person in the House – Speaker Pro Tem Victor Gaston – and other influential leaders, including committee chairs Senator Trip Pittman, Rep. Randy Davis, Rep. Steve McMillan and Rep. David Sessions, and committee vice chairs Senator Bill Hightower, Senator Rusty Glover and Rep. Chris Pringle. Our entire delegation appealed to our colleagues in the House and Senate to allocate the BP money to Gulf Coast counties. Our efforts to obtain a larger share of the funds for the Gulf Coast were not limited to debate on the floor of the House and Senate. We also appealed to colleagues individually and in caucus meetings. Ultimately, $74 million was allocated for projects in Mobile and Baldwin County, while the majority of the Legislature voted to use the rest of the money for other purposes. There are various pots of BP Settlement money. For example, in out-of-court settlements, Baldwin County was awarded $11.565 million; City of Mobile, $7.1 million; and Mobile County, $1.8 million. For the record, Alabama will receive additional payments from BP annually through 2033. During this time, our bi-partisan coalition will continue to fight for funding for our region.