Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Monday, April 02, 2007 3:19 PM
Tamara Davidson
Vickie Wells
Meeting with Project Manager at Hunter's Point Wed, 2 PM

Tamara,
I just heard back from Bill Dougherty at Hunters' Point. He can give us a tour and overview of the soil excavation project
on Wednesday at 2 PM. Please confirm that this will work with your schedule.
Thanks
Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

1

 From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

Vickie Wells
Karen Heckman; Mark Matyjas/DHS/CCSF; Tamara Davidson; Shawn Holle; chris lynch/DPH/SFGOV
Fw: Radiation Monitoring at Hunters Point
Thursday, May 24, 2007 4:34:00 PM

Hi AllWe need to have a brainstorming session about the remediation work at Hunters Point. I am tentatively
scheduling the meeting for next Tuesday 5/29 at 1:30 PM in Room 220. Please let me know if you can
attend at this time. Karen has breifly described the project and some of the issues below. Karen, i'll be
asking you to present the project at the meeting.
Thanks
Vickie
----- Forwarded by Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV on 05/24/2007 04:28 PM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
05/24/2007 03:47 PM

To Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

cc Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject Re: Radiation Monitoring at Hunters Point

Vickie,
I agree that we should have a meeting to discuss options at HP. As I reported to you previously, after
the site visit on April 4th, the remediation contractor, Tetra Tech, estimates that they will be using the
soon to be constructed soil remediation pad yard, adjacent to Bldg 606, for approximately four years.
The area is quite large, covering the asphalt area to the East of bldg 606 and extending all the way out
the pier. There will be 100 pads on the site, each about 1000 square meters at a soil thickness of 6
inches. The soil in each pad will be filled, leveled, monitored and removed once per day. Dust
generation will be controlled by water spray.
Tetra Tech has ambient air monitoring done upwind and downwind of the site and takes samples
throughout the day. Sampling equipment is moved with prevailing wind conditions. According to Bill
Dougherty, the Tetra Tech Project Manager, they have yet to have an measurement that exceeds the
EPA PRG's. The primary radiological contaminants are RA226 and ST90. Bill also indicated that he
thought the most contaminated areas have yet to be excavated and material from those excavations
would be directed to the new pad yard.
In addition to the pad yard, Building 606 will also be adjacent to some of the actual storm sewer
remediation activities since the storm drains designated for removal are located on the street in front of
the buildings main entrance. At some point, building 606 will be surrounded by the remediation activity on
three sides of the building.
Issues to be addressed:
Should the Police continue to operate Building 606 during the activity?
Do we believe that there is a potential for Police to be exposed to the radiological or other chemical

 contamination in the excavated soils?
What monitoring would be necessary of Police employees to ensure they were not exposed to
contaminated soil either as inhaled dust or contact directly with potentially contaminated soil that migrates
from the pad yard or remediation activities nearby?
Would be conduct area sampling or some type of personnel monitoring/dosimetry?
What would be the frequency of this monitoring?
Who would do this monitoring?
What would happen if we found an exposure?
What exposure level would be determine to be acceptable for Police Exposures?
What areas of the building would need to be monitored (i.e roof HVAC system intakes, entryways, etc)
Who would do on-going communication and training of Police employees?

Here are the times I have available to meet prior to the conference.
Friday, May 25th anytime 8-11 3:30-5:00 PM
Tuesday, May 26th 8-845 AM, anytime after 1 PM
Wed, May 27th Anytime other than the OSH meeting
Thurs, May 31, Anytime
Let me know what works best for you.
Thanks
Karen
______________________________________
Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV

Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV
03/23/2007 02:04 PM

To Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

cc Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject Radiation Monitoring at Hunters Point

 KarenAs you know, the Navy is going to be screening some dirt at Hunters Point for radiation. In Peter's
absence, I need you to evaluate the Navy's proposed operation and determine what type of surveillance
DPH will need to do when the screening begins. This should happen relatively quickley in case we need
to buy anything. It may be that monitoring is not needed as part of the plan. Tamara will give you all the
information and points of contact that we have.
A chance to give yourself a good refresher on radiation safety!
Thanks
Vickie Wells

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



GUN 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 










 

 

 

 

 

NOTES:

 

RSY WORK AREA
WA WORK AREA
LEGEND

WORK AREA 36 BOUNDARY

BUILDINGS

IMPACTED BUILDINGS

IMPACTED BUILDING SITES

IMPACTED SHACK SITES

 

 

 

 

Cm RSY 2, 3 AND 4 SCREENING PADS
150 150 300

(feet)

 

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

 

 

EXECUTION PLAN - PARCEL E, 500 SERIES AREA
RADIOLOGICAL REMEDIATION AND SUPPORT

 

 

 

I
II 
I I 
I 
/4 HGURE14

I WORK AREA LOCATION MAP

I 
a? 9ng HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD, SAN FRANCISCO, CA
LING ff REVISION-

\v . AUTHOR: A. CRABTREE TETRA TECH EC: WC
PROJECT NO:
FILE: SEE BELOW
1 1/1 8/10

 

\\Ecisfofile1\projectS\CTO-07 CAD Files (Rad Files\Execution 1-1.dwg

 

FIGURE 1-2
PROJECT ORGANIZATION CHART
QUALITY
ASSURANCE OFFICER
Nars Ancog
NAVFAC SW

REMEDIAL PROJECT MANAGER
Jim Whitcomb/ Chris Yantos
NAVFAC SW

RADIOLOGICAL SITE MANAGER
Laurie Lowman
RASO

CSO
Mike Mentink
Doug DeLong

ROICC
Andy Uehisa
Shirley Ng

NAVFAC SF BAY

NAVY PROJECT TEAM

PROJECT MANAGER
Bill Dougherty
QC PROGRAM
MANAGER
Greg Joyce

PROGRAM
CHEMIST
Lisa Bienkowski

PROJECT QC
MANAGER
Rich Kanaya
ALTERNATE
Adam Berry

ASSISTANT
PROJECT
MANAGER
Rick Weingarz

CERTIFIED HEALTH
PHYSICIST/RSO
Erik Abkemeier

RADIOLOGICAL TASK
SUPERVISORS

SUPERINTENDENT
Dennis McWade /
Chris Hanif

PROGRAM
ENVIRONMENTAL
SAFETY MANAGER
Roger Margotto

SITE SAFETY AND
HEALTH OFFICER
Dan Keenan

RADIOLOGICAL
CONTROL
TECHNICIANS

CONSTRUCTION
SUPPORT STAFF
SUBCONTRACTORS
Legend

Abbreviations and Acronyms:
CSO – Caretaker Site Office
HPS – Hunters Point Shipyard
NAVFAC SW – Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest
QC – Quality Control
RASO – Radiological Affairs Support Office
ROICC – Resident Officer in Charge of Construction
RSO – Radiation Safety Officer
SF – San Francisco

Formal reporting relationship
Supporting relationship
Primary lines of technical
communication
Line of technical direction
(alternate where dashed)

Staff in shaded boxes are on-site at HPS and responsible for field
implementation of activities under the Work Plan.
The Construction Manager (Jeff Bray) has overall responsibility for
coordinating the activities of on-site technical staff.
Final Execution Plan
Parcel E, 500 Series Area Radiological Remediation and Support
Hunters Point Shipyard, San Francisco, California
DCN: RMAC-0809-0007-0005
CTO No. 0007

  

 

NOTES:
015 015 017 C18 019 020 021 
\0r3RSY RADIOLOGICAL SCREENING YARD
I I I I WA WORK AREA
LEGEND
WORK AREA BOUNDARY 
. 031 . 
RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL AREA
I I I - I 
STORM DRAIN LINE
BUILDINGS
~606 IMPACTED BUILDINGS
IMPACTED BUILDING SITES
IMPACTED SHACK SITES

SCREENING PADS
I I
1 500(feet)

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

 

 

EXECUTION PLAN - PARCEL E, 500 SERIES AREA
RADIOLOGICAL REMEDIATION AND SUPPORT

FIGURE 2-1
RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL AREA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD, SAN FRANCISCO, CA

 

 

 

 

 

REVISION:
AUTHOR: A. CRABTREE TETRA TECH EC, INC.
PROJECT NO:

FILE: SEE BELOW

 

 

\\Ecisfofile1\projects\CTO-07 CAD Files (Rad Files\Execution 2-1.dwg

 

11/18/10

 

 

 

 

 

 

a 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

    



GUN 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

elm-V_ - mum-n4;

 

 

 

   

   

STATION 12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  



         
 



 

LEGEND

WORK AREA BOUNDARY 

I LOCATION OF
10' 16' RUMBLE STRIP

LOCATION OF
10' 50' GRAVEL PAD

AIR MONITORING LOCATION
(PM10, ASBESTOS, MN, PB, TSP)

AREA OF CURRENT EXCAVATION AND SURVEY WORK

NOTES:

 

MN MANGANESE
PB LEAD

PM1O PARTICULATE MATTER SMALLER THAN
10 MICRONS IN DIAMETER

RSY RADIOLOGICAL SCREENING YARD
TSP TOTAL SUSPENDED PARTICULATES
WA WORK AREA
150 150 300

(feet)

 

     

BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

 

 

 

 

EXECUTION PLAN - PARCEL E, 500 SERIES AREA
RADIOLOGICAL REMEDIATION AND SUPPORT

FIGURE 3-1

DUST CONTROL TRACK-OUT POINTS
AND AIR MONITORING LOCATIONS

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD, SAN FRANCISCO, CA

 

 

REVISION:
AUTHOR: A. CRABTREE TETRA TECH EC, INC.
PROJECT NO:

FILE: SEE BELOW

 

 

\\Ecisfofile1\projects\CTO-07 CAD Files (Rad Files\Execution 3-1.dwg

11/18/10

 

Occupational Safety and Health Section

MEMORANDUM
Date:

May 31, 2007

To:

Bill Dougherty
Project Manager, TetraTech
Hunters Point Shipyard ~

From:

Karen Heckman, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienis

Subject:

.

.

·

Request for Information

The Department of Public Health, Occupational Safety and Health Section, provides health and safety
consultative services to the San Francisco Police Department personnel who are assigned to Building
606 at Hunters Point Shipyard. As you are aware, the new soil pad work area will be located next to
Building 606 and storm drain/soil evaluation activities will be occurring at this site for the next four years.
Given the potential for radiological and chemical contamination of materials transported to and placed into
the soil pad work area, we are evaluating the occupational exposure concerns for Building 606 personnel.
To assist with our evaluation, we are requesting the following information:
I

The current Work Plan for this project that includes information regarding the specific dust control
measures that will be implemented;
The Air Monitoring Plan specific to this project with detail that includes the standards that will be used to
measure compliance, the monitoring equipment used to collect samples, the limit of detection for each
device or method, frequency of sampling and proposed sampling locations. We would like to see
whatever plans are in place in the event that monitoring detects contaminant levels that exceed
compliance. In addition, we will want to review theair monitoring results and request your assistance in
developing a protocol for such a review.
·
We would also be interested in seeing any plans that exist for the personal protective equipment and
work practlees that that will be employed for workers in the soil pad work areas since those measures will
be visible to Building 606 staff.
Thank you for your assistance. I can be reached at (415) 554-2762

Cc:

Vickie Wells, Director, OSH Section
Tamara Davidson, Safety Office, OSH Section
v' Steve Johnson, Police Officers Association

S · c rr ( DEFT /PDL-1ct;-/ ,\,fol\f
Occupational Safety and Health

»

::>1..1i.vc· 1

1,0~,w'

6/ C.~1 - ~ L

/

1-1

101 Grove Street, Room 217 • San Francisco, CA 94102 • (415) 554-2793

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:
To:

Karen Heckman <karen.heckman@sfdph.org>
Monday, June 11, 2007 5:52 PM
Tamara Davidson

Subject:

FYI

Sent:

I left a message for Mr. Dougherty on his office voicemail this afternoon regarding the letter that was mailed on
5/31/07. No response, yet
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone ( 415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

 From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:

Vickie Wells
Karen Heckman
Tamara Davidson
Re: Hunters Point
Wednesday, June 20, 2007 2:38:00 PM

Thanks for the follow up. At some point we may need to ask the POA to help us press for the information.
Vickie
Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV

Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
To Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

06/20/2007 02:28 PM

cc Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject Re: Hunters Point

Vickie,
Last week I faxed a copy of the memo to Tetra Tech and then followed up with a phone call. Bill
Dougherty, the Tetra Tech Project Manager, said he needed to foward the memo to the Navy who has
oversight on the monitoring activity. I haven't heard anything else from Bill or anyone else. My plan is to
put in another call this week to get the names and contact information of the Navy personnel who have
responsibility for the monitoring program and ask them about getting copies of sampling results. I'll ask
Bill again for a current workplan.
-Karen
______________________________________
Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV

Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV
06/20/2007 01:41 PM

To Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

cc Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject Hunters Point

 Have you gotten any response to the memo you sent Re: Hunters Point?

Vickie

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST
1455 FFIAZEE RD, SUITE 900
SAN CA 92108-4310

Ser 
DEC 2 201.1

 

Mr. Craig Cooper

US. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX
75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105~3901

Mr. Ryan Miya

Department of Toxic Substance Control
700 Heinz Avenue, Bldg. F, Suite 200
Berkeley, CA 94710

Mr. Larry Morgan

California Department of Public Health
1616 Capitol Avenue, MS 7402

PO. Box 997377

Sacramento, CA 95899-7377

Dear Regulatory Team Members:

Please ?nd enclosed the Final Removal Action Completion Report (RACR), Parcel G,
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, San Francisco, California. Response to Comments (RTCs) from
the draft version of this report is included as Appendix Y. Technical review of the enclosed
report has been completed by the Navy?s Radiological Affairs Support Of?ce.

The Navy requests a letter of concurrence on the enclosed RTCs and the Final RACR for
Parcel no later than Friday, anuarv 6, 2012. If you have questions regarding the enclosed
report, please contact Mr. Chris Yantos at (619) 5320912, or Mr. Keith Forman at (619) 532?
0913.

Sincerely,

   
   

KEIT ORMAN
BRAC Environmental Coordinator
By direction of the Director

Enclosures: 1. Final Removal Action Completion Report, Parcel G, Hunters Point Naval
Shipyard, San Francisco, California.

Copy to:

Diane Silva (2 Hard Copies, 1 unbound, CD)
NAVFAC Southwest (Code EV3 3)

Naval Base San Diego

2965 Mole Rd., Bldg. 3519

San Diego, CA 92136

Laurie Lowman (Hard Copy and CD)
Building 1971

NWS PO. Drawer 260

Yorktown, VA. 23691?0260

Amy Brownell (CD Only)

SF Department of Public Health
1390 Market St., Suite 210

San Francisco, Ca 94102

Elaine Warren (CD only)
Of?ce of the City Attorney
City Hall, Room 234

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682

Leslie Lundgren (Hard Copy and CD)
33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94105

Dorinda Shipman (Hard Copy and CD)
Treadwell and Rollo

555 Montgomery St., Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94111

Stephen Proud (CD Only)
Lennar/BVHP

1 California St., Suite 2700
San Francisco, CA 94111

Stan DeSouza (CD Only)
1680 Mission St., First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94103-2414

Ser 
DEC 2 2011

Karla Brasaemle (Hard Copy and CD)
90 New Montgomery St., Suite 710
San Francisco, CA 94105

Janice Torbet (Hard Copy and CD)
100 Larkin Street

Gov. Information Ctr., 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Michael Sharpless (CD Only)
Paul Hastings, et a1.

55 2nd Street, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104?2635

Tamara Davidson (CD Only)
SF Health Department

101 Grove Street, Rm 217
San Francisco, CA 94102

Randy Brandt (CD Only)
475 14th Street, Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612

Linda Malvino (Hard Copy and CD)
Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
5341 Old Redwood Highway, Suite 300
Petaluma, CA 94954

Kristine Enea (CD Only)
951 Innes Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94124

Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310
CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
December 2, 2011
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179

PARCEL G
HUNTERS POINT NAVAL SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

 Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310

CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
December 2, 2011
PARCEL G
HUNTERS POINT NAVAL SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 750
San Diego, California 92101-8536

Bill Dougherty
TtEC Project Manager

Erik Abkemeier, CHP, PE, CSP, CHMM
TtEC Radiation Safety Officer

12/2/2011
Date

12/2/2011
Date

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The U.S. Department of the Navy (DON) directed Tetra Tech EC Inc. (TtEC) to prepare this
Removal Action Completion Report (RACR) to describe and summarize the Parcel G storm
drain and sanitary sewer systems time-critical removal action and buildings and former buildings
site Final Status Survey (FSS) radiological activities at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (HPNS)
located in San Francisco, California. The FSS and removal action activities were performed
under multiple contracts and task orders and were conducted in accordance with regulatory
requirements. The purpose of this RACR was to summarize the results of the radiological work
activities performed for Parcel G to protect the public health, welfare, and the environment from
actual or potential releases of radiologic contaminants and to document the achievement of the
implemented radiological removal action objective (RAO) identified in the “Record of Decision
for Parcel G” (ROD) (DON 2009). Except in relation to reuse or disposal of excavated soil
derived from the removal of the Parcel G storm drain and sanitary sewer systems, this RACR
does not address chemical contamination and does not include or affect any other designated
HPNS parcels.
Originally, the 98 acres designated as Parcel D located in the central portion of HPNS was part
of the industrial support area and was used for shipping, ship repair, and office and commercial
activities. Parcel D was divided by the DON in July 2008 into Parcel D-1, Parcel D-2, Parcel
UC1, and Parcel G. In addition, a small area perpendicular to H Street was added to Parcel G so
that the property boundary extended straight along H Street.
Approximately 40 acres in area, Parcel G extends from Spear Avenue on the north, to Morrell
Street on the east, to 3rd Avenue on the south, and to H Street on the west. Parcel G consists of
relatively flat lowlands with surface elevations between zero and 10 feet above mean sea level.
These lowlands were constructed with borrowed fill material from various sources. The geology
of Parcel G generally consists of artificial fill and undifferentiated sands. The majority of the
Parcel G ground surface is covered with buildings and pavement. Radiologically surveyed and
released Buildings 351, 351A, 366, 401, 408, 411, 439, and the Buildings 317/364/365 Site are
located within the boundaries of Parcel G. These buildings and site were identified in the final
“Historical Radiological Assessment, Volume II” (HRA) prepared by the Naval Sea Systems
Command (NAVSEA) in 2004 (NAVSEA 2004) as radiologically impacted.
Based on its radiological operational history, the DON determined that low-level radioactive
contamination potentially present in some buildings, storm drain and sanitary sewer lines, soil,
debris, and slag material at HPNS required a response action. This decision was documented in
the final “Base-wide Radiological Removal Action, Action Memorandum” (AM) (DON 2006).
Physical removal with proper off-site disposal was selected as the only viable remedial
alternative.
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-1

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 The majority of the radiological work for Parcel G was performed under the AM (DON 2006).
Appendix A of the AM presented the applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements for the
HPNS removal actions. The cleanup goals for localized radioactive contamination at HPNS
presented in the AM were derived in consultation with federal and state regulators to meet the
most conservative requirements at the time the AM was being written. The maximum
radiological dose release criteria delineated in the AM was based on the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission dose limit of 25 millirems per year (mrem/y). However, the residual dose for the
majority of the release criteria is well below that limit. Currently, the DON reviews all surveys
and remedial actions to ensure that residual radioactivity at HPNS meets the dose criterion of
less than 15 mrem/y and the risk criterion of less than 3 × 10-4 when clearing radiologically
impacted sites for unrestricted release.
The final Parcel G ROD (DON 2009) was signed on February 18, 2009 after fieldwork for the
storm drain and sanitary sewer systems removal action and FSS buildings and former buildings
site activities were largely completed. The ROD presented the selected remedy for Parcel G and
addressed both chemical and radiological contamination. The selected remedy for radiologically
impacted soil and structures identified in the ROD included survey, decontamination, excavation,
disposal, and release. As identified in the ROD, the RAO for radiologically impacted sites was
to prevent exposure to the radionuclides of concern (ROCs) in concentrations that exceed
remediation goals for all potentially complete exposure pathways. The remediation goals were
selected to achieve the RAO and were used to measure the success of the removal action. The
radiological remedy selected in the ROD met the RAO by 1) identifying and decontaminating
any radiologically impacted structures and 2) removing the source of contamination in soils by
excavating the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems with proper off-site disposal of
radiologically contaminated material. The Parcel G removal action activities performed under
the AM (DON 2006) achieved the remediation goals and RAO later specified in the ROD (DON
2009).
Site restoration activities were performed for Parcel G including the installation of temporary
drainage swales to manage overland stormwater flow. In addition, trench excavations in Parcel
G outside the buildings were backfilled to grade. The soil placed in these trenches was
compacted by pressing the soil down using mechanical compaction equipment. Compaction
activities provided for adequate road stability as well as dust control. Street repaving was not
performed since the Parcel G property likely will be transferred for future development.
Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewer Systems Removal Action
The present-day configuration of the HPNS storm drain and sanitary sewer systems is the result
of an evolutionary process. The combined systems grew in sections and then underwent a series
of separation projects to provide for installation of dedicated sanitary sewer piping and pump
stations that would discharge effluent off-site. Complete separation of the combined systems
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-2

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 was never achieved, and inspections have revealed that cross-connections may still exist. Due to
the evolutionary nature of the separation process, radiological contamination from the same
sources may have impacted the HPNS storm drain and sanitary sewer systems piping and other
components. Based on historical documentation, the ROCs selected for the Parcel G storm drain
and sanitary sewer systems included cesium-137 (Cs-137), radium-226 (Ra-226), and strontium90 (Sr-90).
The general approach to removing and radiologically surveying the storm drain and sanitary
sewer systems was:
1. Excavate soils.
2. Remove piping.
3. Conduct ex situ radiological screening and sampling of the piping.
4. Perform radiological screening and sampling of the excavated soil.
5. Conduct FSS activities for the excavated soils and exposed excavated trench surfaces.
6. Backfill the trenches and perform site restoration.
Excavation of the Parcel G storm drain and sanitary sewer systems was initiated on July 19, 2007
with the last truckload of Parcel G soil excavated on June 13, 2011. Due to the separation of
Parcel G from the former Parcel D area after the removal action activities had commenced, the
designated work areas and the Parcel G property boundary no longer completely corresponded to
each other. Consequently, some piping outside of the work area boundaries, but within Parcel G,
was left in place following the completion of the removal action. Located on the south side of
Parcel G, these storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes and manholes were subsequently removed
at the direction of the DON under a separate TtEC contract task order. The removal of these
pipes and manholes and backfill of the resulting trenches completed the storm drain and sanitary
sewer removal action and supported the DON’s recommendation for radiological release for
unrestricted use of Parcel G.
During the Parcel G removal action, 23,166 linear feet of storm drain and sanitary sewer trenches
(including soil, pipes, and manholes) excavated. At a minimum, soil associated with the storm
drain and sanitary sewer systems was excavated to a depth of 1 foot below and to either side of
the pipelines. The excavation of these trenches resulted in the transfer of 4,224 truckloads
(approximately 50,688 cubic yards) of soil to the Radiological Screening Yards (RSYs) for
processing. Prior to beginning radiological processing in the RSYs, these truckloads of
excavated soil were spread on specially constructed 1,000 square meter (m2) screening pads in
lifts that did not exceed a thickness of 6 inches. The excavated materials on the screening pads
often included small sections of crumbled pipe and crushed manhole pieces that were processed
along with the soil. Each screening pad containing Parcel G excavated materials was assigned a
unique survey unit identification number for tracking.
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-3

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 The radiological survey process in the RSYs was initiated for each of the excavated soil survey
units once the screening pads were filled. During processing, gamma scans were performed over
each of the excavated soil survey units and the results evaluated. Radioactive material identified
during the gamma scan activities was collected, segregated, and stored in appropriate containers
for subsequent disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor. Areas of soil on the
screening pads that showed the potential presence of radiation levels greater than the established
investigation limits were further evaluated, and biased soil samples were collected, as
appropriate. Identified radiological contamination was characterized and remediated.
Following the completion of scanning activities, systematic and biased (if appropriate) soil
samples were collected from the Parcel G excavated soil survey units in the RSYs. During
processing in the RSYs, a total of 7,742 soil samples (including biased, characterization,
verification, and systematic FSS samples) were collected from the Parcel G excavated soil
survey units and analyzed by the laboratory. Based on the surface scans and soil sample
analytical results, approximately 2,828 cubic yards of soil was remediated from the excavated
soil survey units in the RSYs. The contaminated soil was placed in low-level radioactive waste
(LLRW) bins for off-site disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor. Radionuclide
concentrations above the release criteria in the excavated soil survey units were limited to Cs137 and Ra-226. No concentrations above the release criterion were identified for Sr-90 in the
excavated soil survey units processed in the RSYs.
Once the excavated soil survey units in the RSYs were verified to be free of radioactivity above
the release criteria, 18 systematic FSS soil samples were collected and the laboratory analytical
results evaluated. With the concurrence of the Radiological Affairs Support Office (RASO),
excavated soil survey units processed in the RSYs were segregated for use as backfill soil or
staged for off-site disposal by the DON’s non-radiological waste contractor. The majority of the
soil processed in the RSYs was backfilled into appropriate trenches.
The Parcel G storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes and manholes (collectively called piping)
were removed during excavation of the trenches. During excavation, pipes were found at depths
ranging from 1 foot to 21 feet below ground surface and primarily consisted of 2-inch-diameter
to 24-inch-diameter concrete, cast iron, corrugated metal, vitreous clay, fiberglass, plastic, metal,
or concrete-encased pipes. Manholes excavated during the Parcel G removal action were
composed of brick, concrete, or a combination of the two. The majority of the piping was
crushed or disintegrated during removal and the debris was transferred along with the
surrounding soil to the RSYs for radiological processing. Pipe sections and manholes that were
not crushed during excavation activities were placed on plastic pending further activities. In
total, 185 manholes and 1,959 sections of pipe were removed and staged for further activities
during the Parcel G removal action.

ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-4

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 Sediment samples were collected from the excavated pipes and manholes when a sufficient
volume of materials were available. During the storm drain and sanitary sewer excavation
activities, a total of 90 sections of pipe and 35 manholes contained sufficient sediment for sample
collection and analysis by gamma spectroscopy. Although the majority of the laboratory
analytical results did not identify the presence of radioactive contamination, Cs-137 and Ra-226
above the radionuclide-specific release criterion was found in a number of the pipe and manhole
sediment samples. Pipes and manholes associated with contaminated sediment samples were
placed in LLRW bins for off-site disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor.
Typically, radiological survey activities were performed for those pipes and manholes that did
not contain contaminated sediments prior to final disposition.
Radiological survey activities were performed during the Parcel G storm drain and sanitary
sewer removal action for a total of 1,406 excavated sections of pipe and 150 manholes.
Radiological surveys consisted of a 100 percent surface scan, static measurements, and swipe
sample collection and analysis. Based on the survey results, the majority of the Parcel G piping
was released for off-site disposal or recycling.
The majority of the storm drain and sanitary sewer pipe sections and bricks and/or concrete that
formed the manhole sidewalls and bottoms were excavated during the Parcel G removal action
activities; however, small sections of piping were left in place. In general, the piping remaining
in place was associated with buildings or other physical obstructions that would be structurally
compromised or could not be removed due to worker health and safety considerations. Based on
survey results and other data generated during the Parcel G removal action, the DON concluded
that the piping remaining in place was unlikely to be contaminated.
Following the completion of trench excavation and piping removal, 63 unique trench survey unit
identification numbers were assigned for tracking purposes and FSS activities. None of the 63
designated trench survey units exceeded 1,000 m2 in exposed surface area. The total area of the
exposed trench surfaces in Parcel G was 39,440 m2 with 22,449 linear feet of trench. Gamma
scans were performed on the exposed trench surfaces and numerous soil samples were collected
from the sidewalls and bottom of the trenches to determine whether radiologic contamination
was present. A minimum of 18 systematic soil samples were collected from each of the 63
Parcel G trench survey units and analyzed by the laboratory using gamma spectroscopy. As
necessary, remediation was performed to remove any identified radiologic contamination
followed by the collection and analysis of verification soil samples. Once the analytical results
for the verification samples indicated that no additional radiologic contamination was present,
the final 18 FSS soil samples were collected from the sidewalls and bottom of the Parcel G
trench survey units and analyzed by the laboratory.
During the Parcel G removal action, a total of 5,709 trench survey unit soil samples (including
investigative, characterization, verification, and FSS samples) were collected and analyzed by
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-5

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 the laboratory. Of these, 4,575 soil samples were investigative and 1,134 were systematic FSS
soil samples. The highest investigative analytical results were identified in soil samples
collected from Trench Survey Units 84 and 99. Based on the laboratory analytical results,
approximately 3,400 cubic yards of contaminated soil was remediated from the Parcel G trench
survey units during the removal action. The contaminated soil was placed in LLRW bins for offsite disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor to either the U.S. Ecology facility in
Idaho or the Energy Solutions facility in Clive, Utah.
Chemical contamination at HPNS is addressed through the Installation Restoration (IR) Program
Site process. There are a total of 10 IR Program sites associated with Parcel G. Samples of
excavated soil derived from IR Program sites were collected and sent to the off-site laboratory
for chemical analysis to verify whether these materials met the release criteria. Based on the
analytical results, soil that did not meet the appropriate criteria was stockpiled for collection and
off-site disposal by the DON’s non-radiological waste contractor, along with any non-IR
Program soil that exhibited odor or staining.
The objective of the storm drain and sanitary sewer FSS activities for Parcel G was to
demonstrate that identified residual radioactivity levels inside the excavated trenches and within
the materials used as backfill met the release criteria. The results were documented in the
Survey Unit Project Reports (SUPRs) prepared for each of the 63 trench survey units.
The environmental as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) process was implemented for each
of the 63 trench survey units in addition to dose and risk modeling efforts. ALARA analyses were
performed based on recent estimates of dose to the public from HPNS operations. Based on
qualitative ALARA analyses, excavation projects that could cause the potential dose to the public
to exceed 1 millirem (individual) or 10 person-rem (collective) were subject to quantitative
ALARA analyses. To date, no Parcel G operations at HPNS have resulted in an individual dose to
the public greater than 1 millirem or a collective dose greater than 10 person-rem. In addition,
air monitoring results did not exceed 10 percent of the derived air concentration and the
processed personnel dosimetry badges did not identify a single gamma dose above background
levels.
Dose and risk modeling using the most current version of RESRAD software and the larger of
the method detection limit or reported activity was performed for each of the Parcel G trench
survey units and documented in the SUPRs. Based on the Parcel G trench survey unit dose and
risk modeling results, the highest net residual dose to workers or members of the public as a result
of exposure to radioactive material in soil was identified in Trench Survey Unit 115 at 7.696
mrem/y with an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1.387 × 10-4. These results meet the HPNS dose
criterion of less than 15 mrem/y and risk criterion of less than 3 × 10-4, which supports
radiological free release.

ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

ES-6

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 Work Area 27 North
Trench Survey Unit 103 (TU103)
Trench Survey Unit 104 (TU104)
Trench Survey Unit 105 (TU105)
Work Area 27 South
Trench Survey Unit 109 (TU109)
Trench Survey Unit 110 (TU110)
Trench Survey Unit 111 (TU111)
Trench Survey Unit 112 (TU112)
Trench Survey Unit 113 (TU113)
Work Areas 17, 18, 19, and 27 South
Trench Survey Unit 204 (TU204)
Some trench survey units crossed boundaries and were assigned to the Work Area in which the
majority of the excavation was physically located or were distinctly associated with a
radiologically impacted building or site. Detailed discussions of each of these trench survey
units are provided in Sections 4.0 (Work Area 17 North) through 12.0 (Work Areas 17, 18, 19,
and 27 South) of this RACR. The locations of the Work Areas and associated trench survey
units in Parcel G are depicted on Figure 3-2. Table 3-1 summarizes the activities performed for
each trench survey unit along with the assigned Work Area, associated trench segment
identification numbers, size, and pertinent data related to samples collected, contamination,
remediation, and dose and risk modeling results.
3.1.1

Pre-Excavation Field Activities

Pre-excavation field activities for the Parcel G removal action were initiated in June 2007.
Temporary fencing was installed or reconfigured around the excavation locations and RSY2 to
establish the radiologically controlled area (RCA). Pre-excavation activities included the
development and refinement of the procedures to be used by the on-site laboratory, instrument
calibration and testing and establishing operational practices for coordinating radiological
screening and sampling activities. Geophysical surveys were performed and the storm drain and
sanitary sewer lines were marked out. A total of 356 storm drain line segments and 152 sanitary
sewer line segments were designated in Parcel G for excavation (Figure 3-1).
Traffic controls were implemented prior to beginning excavation of the storm drain and sanitary
sewer lines. Wind socks were installed to determine the prevailing wind direction and ensure
proper placement of the air monitoring equipment on a daily basis. Air monitors were installed
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

3-4

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 upwind and downwind of the excavation activities to measure airborne asbestos, particulates,
lead, and magnesium and the results were uploaded to the DON’s website as follows:
http://www.bracpmo.navy.mil/basepage.aspx?baseid=45&state=&name=hps.
3.1.2

Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewer Systems Excavation Activities

Excavation of the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems was initiated on July 19, 2007 in Work
Area 17 North and the last truckload of Parcel G soil was excavated on June 13, 2011. As
indicated in Table 3-2, the depth of the excavations ranged from 1 foot below ground surface (bgs)
to 22 feet bgs. In total, 23,166 linear feet of trench (inclusive of soil and piping) was excavated
during the Parcel G removal action in accordance with the Work Plan (TtEC 2010). Of this
23,166 linear feet, 20,057 linear feet of piping was identified in the Design Plan (TtEC 2007c)
and an additional 3,109 linear feet of piping was discovered either during the excavation
activities or were associated with impacted buildings.
3.1.2.1

Soil Excavation

The soil generated during the Parcel G removal action was excavated in accordance with the Work
Plan (TtEC 2010). At a minimum, soil associated with the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems
was excavated to a depth of 1 foot below and to either side of the pipes. This soil often included
small sections of crumbled pipe and crushed manhole pieces that were processed along with the
excavated soil in RSY2 and RSY4. Each truckload of soil generated during excavation of the
Parcel G storm drains and sanitary sewers was transferred to RSY2 or RSY4 for radiological
processing. In total, 4,224 truckloads (approximately 50,688 cubic yards) of material was
excavated from the Parcel G storm drain and sanitary sewers and transferred to either RSY2 or
RSY4 for processing. Table 3-3 summarizes each truckload of soil generated during the storm
drain and sanitary sewer removal activities, the assigned screening pad, and unique excavated
soil survey unit identification number.
3.1.2.2

Radiological Screening Yard Processing of Excavated Soils

Excavated soil generated during the Parcel G storm drain and sanitary sewer removal action was
radiologically processed in one of the screening yards (RSY2 or RSY4) specifically constructed
for this purpose. This excavated soil was radiologically processed in the same manner,
regardless of whether the material was transferred to RSY2 or RSY4.
Each truckload of excavated soil was delivered to an appropriate screening pad and was assigned
an “ES” designation and unique sequential identification number for tracking purposes. A total
of 181 excavated soil survey units were processed in RSY2 and RSY4 during the Parcel G storm
drain and sanitary sewer systems removal action activities. Table 3-4 provides the unique ES
identification number, IR Program site (if present), date on which the final gamma scan was
performed, number of soil samples collected, identified ROCs and analytical results when
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

3-5

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 contamination was present, the volume of contaminated soil remediated, and final disposition of
the processed soil.
Prior to radiological processing in RSY2 or RSY4, the excavated soils from Parcel G were
spread on 1,000 m2 screening pads in lifts that did not exceed a thickness of 6 inches and allowed
to dewater. Radiological activities performed for the materials on each screening pad were
tracked by the assigned ES identification number.
Radiological surface scans were performed for each excavated soil survey unit. These highdensity gamma scans were conducted using gamma scintillation detectors supported by GPS
equipment and resulted in a 100 percent surface scan. A discussion of the various towed array
systems used for scanning is provided in the Work Plan (TtEC 2010) and the SUPRA (Appendix
A). Radioactive materials identified during the screening activities were collected, segregated,
and stored in appropriate containers for subsequent disposal by the DON’s radiological waste
contractor. Gamma scan data for each excavated soil survey unit used as backfill material were
presented in the individual SUPRs included in Appendices G through O.
Areas of excavated soil on the screening pads that indicated the potential presence of radiation
levels greater than the established investigation limits were further evaluated and biased soil
samples were collected and submitted to the laboratory for analysis, as appropriate. Any soil
associated with a sample result exceeding a radionuclide-specific release criterion was
remediated. The release criteria for the storm drain and sanitary sewer removal action are
identified in Tables 2-1, 2-2, and 2-3.
Following the removal of contaminated soils from the excavated soil survey units in RSY2 and
RSY4, verification soil samples were collected and analyzed. If additional contamination was
identified, further remediation was performed. This process was performed iteratively until the
soil samples analyzed after each remediation event showed results less than the radionuclidespecific release criterion.
Typically, a minimum of 18 systematic FSS soil samples were collected from each excavated
soil survey unit processed in RSY2 and RSY4 and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. The
systematic sample collection locations were based on a random start point using the most current
version of VSP software. Once the FSS soil samples were determined to be less than the release
criteria, concurrence was requested from the RASO to stage the excavated soil survey unit in the
stockpile area pending receipt of the results of the off-site laboratory Sr-90 analysis. The off-site
laboratory analytical results were evaluated against the release criteria, and a data package was
prepared for the RASO’s review. The RASO then concurred with whether or not the excavated
soil survey unit was acceptable for use as backfill material. Only those excavated soil survey
units that received concurrence from the RASO and were not chemically contaminated based on

ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

3-6

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 4.0 WORK AREA 17 NORTH
Work Area 17 North is located in northeast corner of Parcel G, just west of Drydock No. 4
(Figures 3-2, 3-3, and 4-1). It is bounded on the north by Parcels UC1 and UC2, on the east by
Parcel C and Parcel D-1, on the south by Work Area 17 South, and on the west by Work Area 18
North. The radiological work activities performed in Work Area 17 North included TU66
through TU71, TU100 through TU102, and Building 366. The following sections summarize the
work activities completed in Work Area 17 North to support the recommended radiological
release for unrestricted use of the Parcel G property.
4.1

TRENCH SURVEY UNIT 66

TU66 is located in the northeast corner of Work Area 17 North on Parcel G, at the north end of
Morrell Street and between Drydock No. 4 and Building 302 (Figures 3-2 and 4-1). TU66
connects to Trench Survey Unit 150 on the north, which is located on Parcel D-2. It also
connects to TU67 at two separate locations on the east and TU68 on the south. No pipe was
found west of Manhole MH281. A small section on the western end of TU66 is situated within
IR Program Site IR-33. The chemicals of concern associated with IR-33 are listed in Table 3-10.
TU66 consists of six storm drain trench segments and two sanitary sewer trench segments. As
identified on Figure 4-1, these trench segments include:
Storm Drain Trench Segments

Sanitary Sewer Trench Segments

70-D17-00-3C

70-D17-00-3D

70-D17-00-3G

70-D17-00-3I

70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-8A
70-D17-33-3G
70-D17-33-8A
Trench segment 70-D17-00-3I transitioned into TU68 on the south. With the exception of trench
segments 70-D17-00-8A and 70-D17-33-8A, each of the trench segments associated with TU66
was identified in the Design Plan (TtEC 2007c). Trench segments 70-D17-00-8A and 70-D1733-A were discovered during the excavation of trench segment 70-D17-00-3G.
4.1.1

TU66 Removal Action Activities

Excavation of TU66 was initiated on July 19, 2007 in trench segment 70-D17-00-3C. A total of
76 truckloads (approximately 912 cubic yards) of soil were excavated during the removal action
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

4-1

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 (Table 3-3). Soil excavated from TU66 was radiologically processed in RSY2 (Table 3-4).
Following the completion of excavation on July 25, 2007, TU66 exhibited an exposed surface
area of 651 m2 and was 378 linear feet in length (Table 3-1). The maximum excavated TU66
depth was 14 feet bgs (Table 3-2).
A total of 44 sections of pipe and Manholes MH281, MH282, MH283, and MH387 were
excavated from TU66 and placed on plastic pending further activities during the Parcel G
removal action. Piping that crumbled during excavation was transferred along with the
surrounding soil to RSY2 for processing. As indicated in Table 3-2, storm drain trench segments
70-D17-00-3C and -3H contained 8-inch-diameter and 10-inch-diameter VCP, respectively. The
pipe in these trench segments was found at depths ranging from 3 feet to 5 feet bgs. Storm drain
trench segment 70-D17-00-3G contained 3-inch-diameter steel pipe located at depths between
3 feet and 5 feet bgs and -8A contained 6-inch-diameter CMP located between 3 feet and 5 feet
bgs. Sanitary sewer trench segments 70-D17-00-3D and -3I contained 21-inch-diameter concrete
pipe located at depths ranging from 6 feet to 12 feet bgs.
Sufficient sediment for sample collection and analysis was obtained from eight sections of pipe and
Manholes MH281 and MH287 during the Parcel G removal action (Table 3-6). Sediment samples
collected from three pipe sections excavated from trench segment 70-D17-00-3I and Manhole
MH281 did not indicate the presence of radioactivity above the release criteria for any ROC. The
sediment sample collected from a pipe section excavated from trench segment 70-D17-00-3C
identified the presence of Cs-137 contamination at 0.42159 pCi/g. Sediment samples collected
from pipes excavated from trench segment 70-D17-00-3D identified the presence of Ra-226
contamination at 2.2179 pCi/g and Cs-137 contamination at 0.13621 pCi/g and 0.35878 pCi/g. In
addition, the sediment sample collected from Manhole MH287 showed Ra-226 activity above
the release limit at 4.2369 pCi/g. As indicated in Table 3-6, the pipe sections and Manhole
MH287 containing contaminated sediment analytical results were placed in LLRW bins for
disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor. The sediment sample analytical reports are
provided in Appendix D.
Radiological surveys were performed on 38 sections of pipe and the materials forming Manholes
MH281, MH282, and MH283 during the removal action activities (Table 3-5). Elevated survey
results were identified for only one pipe section excavated from trench segment 70-D17-00-3H.
Because elevated survey results were identified, sampling and analysis was performed to
eliminate the possibility of measurements in excess of 1,000 dpm/100 cm2 being attributed to the
presence of Sr-90. A solid sample was collected from the elevated pipe and submitted to the
laboratory for Sr-90 analysis. Following an evaluation of the analytical results and with the
RASO’s concurrence that no contamination above the release criteria was present, this pipe
section was transferred to the DON’s non-radiological waste contractor in September 2008 for
off-site disposal or recycling. The final disposition of pipes and the materials forming the
manholes excavated from Parcel G is provided in Table 3-5. The radiological survey reports are
ECSD-3211-0018-0179 FnlParcel G RACR.docx

4-2

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Trench
Survey
Unit No.
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66

Page 1 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Assigned ES
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
70-D17-00-3C
1
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
2
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
3
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
4
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
5
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
6
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
7
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
8
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3C
9
C01
ES-0001
70-D17-00-3D
1
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
2
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
3
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
4
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
5
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
6
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
7
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
8
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
9
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
10
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
11
C02
ES-0002
70-D17-00-3D
12
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
13
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
14
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
15
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
16
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
18
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
19
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3D
20
C03
ES-0003
70-D17-00-3G
1
C07
ES-0007
70-D17-00-3G
2
C07
ES-0007
70-D17-00-3H
1
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
2
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
3
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
4
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
5
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
6
C06
ES-0006
70-D17-00-3H
7
C06
ES-0006

Date
Excavated
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
19-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 2 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66
TU66

70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3H
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

C06
C06
C06
C07
C07
C07
C07
C03
C03
C04
C04
C04
C04
C04
C04
C04
C04
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07

ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0003
ES-0003
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007

Date
Excavated
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 3 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU66
TU66
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67

70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-C17-00-2C
70-C17-00-2C
70-C17-00-2C
70-C17-00-3E
70-C17-00-3E
70-C17-00-3E
70-D17-00-1Z
70-D17-00-1Z
70-D17-00-1Z
70-D17-00-2C
70-D17-00-2C
70-D17-00-2C
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-3E
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F

31
32
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

C07
C07
C03
C03
C03
C04
C04
C04
C09
C09
C09
C03
C04
C04
C01
C01
C01
C02
C02
C02
C02
C02
C02
C03
C02
C03
C03
C04
C04
C04
C04
C04
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05

ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0003
ES-0003
ES-0003
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0003
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0001
ES-0001
ES-0001
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0003
ES-0002
ES-0003
ES-0003
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0004
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005

Date
Excavated
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
20-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
23-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 4 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU67
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68

70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-C17-00-2P
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C07
C07
C07
C09
C09
C09
C36
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C13
C13
C13
C13

ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0028
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011

Date
Excavated
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
24-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
09-Aug-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
27-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 5 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68

70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L

26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62

C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C18
C17
C16
C16
C19
C19
C18
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C20
C19

ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0018
ES-0017
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0018
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0015
ES-0014

Date
Excavated
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 6 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68

70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2N
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2O
70-D17-00-2P
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I

63
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
33
34
35

C20
C33
C33
C34
C34
C34
C33
C34
C33
C34
C33
C34
C33
C34
C33
C33
C34
C33
C34
C33
C34
C33
C34
C34
C34
C33
C33
C33
C34
C32
C32
C34
C34
C36
C07
C07
C09

ES-0015
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0028
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0008

Date
Excavated
30-Jul-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 7 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68
TU68

70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I
70-D17-00-3I

36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C36
C36
C36
C36
C36
C34
C34
C33
C33
C33
C34
C33
C34
C34
C34
C34
C34
C35
C35
C33
C33
C33
C33
C33
C33

ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0030
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031

Date
Excavated
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 8 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69

70-C17-00-1W
70-C17-00-1W
70-C17-00-1W
70-C17-00-1W
70-C17-00-2P
70-C17-00-2P
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1R
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U

1
2
3
4
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

C36
C36
C35
C35
C36
C28
C06
C04
C06
C07
C07
C07
C07
C09
C09
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C09
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10
C10

ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0153
ES-0028
ES-0026
ES-0006
ES-0004
ES-0006
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0008
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009
ES-0009

Date
Excavated
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
01-Oct-08
09-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 9 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69

70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

C10
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C20
C20
C20
C20

ES-0009
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0010
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0011
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0012
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0014
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015

Date
Excavated
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
26-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
27-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 10 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU69

70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1U
70-D17-00-1W
70-D17-00-1W
70-D17-00-1W
70-D17-00-2P
70-D17-00-2P
70-D17-00-2P
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
1
2
3
2
3
4
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40

C20
C20
C20
C19
C22
C01
C01
C02
C02
C06
C36
C34
C33
C36
C36
C35
C09
C09
C09
C36
C36
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C36
C35
C36
C35
C36
C35
C34

ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0014
ES-0016
ES-0001
ES-0001
ES-0002
ES-0002
ES-0006
ES-0028
ES-0030
ES-0031
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0029
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0030

Date
Excavated
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
25-Jul-07
09-Aug-07
09-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
10-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 11 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU69
TU69
TU69
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70

70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-3F
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L

41
42
43
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97

C33
C33
C33
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C03
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C04
C06
C06
C06
C04
C07
C07
C07
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C10

ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0031
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0015
ES-0003
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0005
ES-0004
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0006
ES-0004
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0007
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0009

Date
Excavated
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
13-Aug-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
30-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 12 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70

70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S

98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

C10
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C18
C17
C18
C17
C31
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31
C30
C31

ES-0009
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0013
ES-0018
ES-0017
ES-0018
ES-0017
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033

Date
Excavated
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
31-Jul-07
14-Aug-07
14-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
15-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 13 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70

70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58

C30
C31
C30
C30
C31
C31
C30
C30
C30
C30
C31
C30
C30
C31
C31
C30
C31
C31
C30
C31
C31
C31
C29
C29
C29
C21
C21
C21
C21
C29
C21
C29
C21
C29
C29
C29
C21

ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0034
ES-0034
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0034
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0033
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0036

Date
Excavated
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
16-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 14 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU70
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71

70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-1S
70-D17-34-2M
70-D17-34-2M
70-D17-34-2M
70-D17-34-2M
70-D17-34-2M
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-1L
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P

59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
1
2
3
4
5
114
115
116
117
118
119
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

C29
C29
C29
C29
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C29
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03

ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0035
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037

Date
Excavated
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
22-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 15 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71

70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1P
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C30
C32
C32
C32
C30
C32
C32
C32
C30
C32
C30
C32
C32
C30
C32
C32
C30
C32
C29
C32
C32
C29
C32
C29
C32
C29
C32
C29

ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035

Date
Excavated
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 16 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71

70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-1Q
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2J
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K

29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

C32
C29
C32
C29
C21
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C21
C21
C03
C03
C03
C03
C32
C30
C32
C32
C30
C32
C30
C32
C29
C32
C29
C32
C29
C21
C29

ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0036
ES-0036
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0037
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0034
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0032
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0035

Date
Excavated
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
23-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
24-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
20-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 17 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU71
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72

70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-34-2K
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1M
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

C21
C29
C21
C29
C21
C29
C21
C25
C25
C24
C24
C24
C24
C25
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C09
C09
C17
C17
C17
C18
C18
C17
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18

ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0035
ES-0036
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0008
ES-0008
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0017
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0017
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018

Date
Excavated
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
21-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 18 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72

70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1O
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-1X

24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

C18
C18
C18
C22
C22
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C24
C24
C25
C25

ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0022

Date
Excavated
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 19 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72

70-D17-00-1X
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H

14
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

C25
C17
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C18
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C14

ES-0022
ES-0017
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0018
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0019
ES-0020

Date
Excavated
03-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 20 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72

70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H

45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81

C14
C14
C14
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C25
C25
C24
C24
C25
C24
C25
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C25
C25
C24
C14
C14
C12
C25
C25
C18
C24
C24
C25
C26
C26
C24

ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0010
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0018
ES-0021
ES-0021
ES-0022
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0021

Date
Excavated
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 21 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU72
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73

70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-8B
70-D17-00-8B
70-D17-00-8B
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8C
70-D17-00-8D
70-D17-00-8D
70-D17-00-8D
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G

82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

C26
C25
C25
C25
C26
C26
C25
C24
C22
C22
C22
C07
C07
C07
C27
C07
C27
C27
C07
C07
C07
C07
C14
C14
C14
C27
C27
C28
C28
C28
C27
C27
C27
C27
C28
C28
C28

ES-0023
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0022
ES-0021
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0016
ES-0038
ES-0038
ES-0038
ES-0039
ES-0038
ES-0039
ES-0039
ES-0038
ES-0038
ES-0038
ES-0038
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0020
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026

Date
Excavated
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
03-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
01-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
27-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
28-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
02-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 22 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73

70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-1G
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2E

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

C27
C28
C28
C27
C28
C28
C37
C37
C37
C28
C37
C37
C37
C37
C37
C37
C28
C28
C28
C28
C28
C28
C37
C37
C37
C37
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C11
C11
C11
C27
C27

ES-0025
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0025
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0025

Date
Excavated
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 23 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73

70-D17-00-2E
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G

12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36

C11
C26
C11
C27
C27
C11
C11
C27
C27
C11
C11
C27
C11
C27
C27
C28
C20
C27
C27
C27
C27
C11
C11
C37
C37
C37
C28
C37
C37
C28
C28
C37
C37
C37
C37
C11
C11

ES-0024
ES-0023
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0026
ES-0015
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0024
ES-0024

Date
Excavated
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 24 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73

70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2G
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H

37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105

C28
C37
C37
C37
C28
C37
C37
C28
C36
C36
C36
C28
C36
C28
C28
C36
C36
C36
C36
C36
C35
C26
C25
C26
C25
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C25
C25
C25
C25
C25

ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0027
ES-0027
ES-0026
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0026
ES-0028
ES-0026
ES-0026
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0028
ES-0029
ES-0023
ES-0022
ES-0023
ES-0022
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0022
ES-0022

Date
Excavated
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
08-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 25 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU73
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74

70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2H
70-D17-00-2L
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D17-00-8F
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y

106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

C11
C11
C11
C11
C11
C11
C11
C11
C26
C26
C26
C26
C11
C26
C11
C11
C11
C01
C27
C27
C27
C11
C11
C27
C11
C11
C04
C04
C04
C05
C05
C04
C04
C04
C04
C05
C04

ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0023
ES-0024
ES-0023
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0001
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0025
ES-0024
ES-0024
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0043

Date
Excavated
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
20-Jul-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
06-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
07-Aug-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 26 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU74
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75

70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-8A
70-D19-00-8A
70-D19-00-8A
70-D19-00-8A
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K

26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6

C04
C04
C04
C05
C05
C05
C04
C10
C10
C09
C10
C10
C10
C09
C09
C09
C02
C02
C02
C02
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C03
C04
C04
C05
C05
C04
C05
C05
C04
C04
C05

ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0043
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0066
ES-0066
ES-0066
ES-0066
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0067
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044

Date
Excavated
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
06-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
10-Oct-07
10-Oct-07
10-Oct-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
16-Nov-07
19-Nov-07
19-Nov-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 27 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75

70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-1K
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2N
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2P
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2Q
70-D19-00-2R

7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1

C09
C09
C05
C10
C10
C10
C04
C04
C05
C05
C05
C09
C10
C10
C09
C10
C10
C09
C04
C04
C09
C09
C05
C09
C05
C10
C10
C10
C10
C04
C04
C04
C05
C05
C05
C10
C10

ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0044
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0044
ES-0045
ES-0044
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0043
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0044
ES-0046
ES-0046

Date
Excavated
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 28 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU75
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76

70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-2R
70-D19-00-1U
70-D19-00-1X
70-D19-00-1X
70-D19-00-1Y
70-D19-00-1Y
70-D19-00-1Y
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

C10
C09
C10
C09
C09
C09
C10
C10
C09
C10
C10
C09
C10
C10
C10
C10
C22
C35
C14
C17
C25
C25
C06
C14
C06
C31
C32
C31
C33
C33
C33
C32
C22
C32
C33
C33
C22

ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0045
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0053
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0050
ES-0051
ES-0050
ES-0052
ES-0052
ES-0052
ES-0051
ES-0053
ES-0051
ES-0052
ES-0052
ES-0053

Date
Excavated
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
08-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 29 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76

70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2B
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

C22
C22
C22
C22
C33
C33
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C33
C22
C22
C33
C06
C06
C14
C14
C14
C31
C31
C13
C13
C13
C31
C31
C13
C13
C13
C31
C13
C31
C13
C31
C31
C31

ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0052
ES-0052
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0052
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0052
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0050
ES-0050
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0050
ES-0050
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0050
ES-0047
ES-0050
ES-0047
ES-0050
ES-0050
ES-0050

Date
Excavated
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
18-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 30 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76

70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37

C06
C06
C06
C14
C14
C06
C06
C14
C06
C14
C06
C06
C14
C06
C14
C35
C14
C35
C14
C14
C35
C14
C35
C35
C35
C35
C14
C14
C35
C35
C35
C28
C28
C35
C35
C35
C28

ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0058

Date
Excavated
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
22-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 31 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU76
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77

70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-2A
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S

38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
4
5
6
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

C28
C01
C01
C01
C28
C28
C01
C28
C01
C01
C28
C01
C28
C01
C01
C20
C14
C06
C14
C14
C06
C14
C14
C14
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C14
C14
C06
C06
C06
C14
C14
C06

ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0059
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0055

Date
Excavated
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 32 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77

70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88

C06
C06
C35
C35
C14
C35
C35
C14
C14
C35
C35
C14
C14
C14
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C14
C14
C14
C14
C14
C35
C35
C35
C35
C28
C28
C28
C01
C01
C01

ES-0055
ES-0055
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0056
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054

Date
Excavated
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 33 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU77
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78

70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-66-2A
70-D19-00-1O
70-D19-00-1O
70-D19-00-1O
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P

89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

C01
C28
C28
C28
C28
C17
C17
C17
C25
C25
C17
C17
C26
C19
C26
C26
C19
C26
C19
C19
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C26
C15
C16
C17
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C21

ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0042
ES-0041
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0041
ES-0042
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0064
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060

Date
Excavated
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 34 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78

70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

C21
C21
C21
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C15
C16
C16
C15
C15
C15
C16
C16
C16
C15
C15
C16
C16
C15
C15
C15
C15
C17
C17
C15

ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0062

Date
Excavated
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 35 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78

70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1P
70-D19-00-1Q
70-D19-00-1Q
70-D19-00-1Q
70-D19-00-1Q
70-D19-00-1Q
70-D19-00-1R
70-D19-00-1R
70-D19-00-1T
70-D19-00-1T
70-D19-00-1T
70-D19-00-1W
70-D19-00-1W
70-D19-00-1W
70-D19-00-1W
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B

45
46
47
48
49
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71

C15
C15
C17
C25
C25
C16
C16
C16
C16
C15
C12
C21
C21
C21
C21
C35
C28
C01
C28
C20
C28
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C20
C20
C20
C21
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21

ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0057
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0059
ES-0058
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060

Date
Excavated
25-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
20-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 36 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU78
TU79
TU79
TU79

70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4B
70-D19-00-4D
70-D19-00-4D
70-D19-00-8D
70-D19-00-8D
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-1S
70-D19-00-1S
70-D19-00-3Q

72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
1

C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C21
C21
C21
C21
C17
C25
C17
C25
C25
C17
C25
C25
C28
C01
C21
C20
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C15
C15
C15
C21
C12
C20

ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0059

Date
Excavated
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
23-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 37 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79

70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

C21
C12
C12
C12
C12
C21
C21
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C21
C21
C21
C12
C12
C12
C21
C12
C12
C12
C12
C21
C12
C12
C12
C12
C15
C12
C12
C12
C12
C12
C15

ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0060
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0062
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0061
ES-0062

Date
Excavated
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 38 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79

70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3Q
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R

39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

C16
C16
C16
C15
C15
C15
C15
C16
C16
C16
C16
C16
C15
C16
C16
C16
C15
C15
C16
C16
C16
C16
C15
C01
C01
C01
C28
C28
C01
C01
C01
C28
C28
C28
C01
C01
C28

ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0062
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0063
ES-0062
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058

Date
Excavated
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 39 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79

70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51

C28
C01
C01
C01
C01
C01
C28
C28
C01
C01
C01
C28
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C20
C20
C20
C20

ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0058
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0054
ES-0058
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059
ES-0059

Date
Excavated
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 40 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU79
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80

70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3R
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-3S
70-D19-00-8E
70-D19-00-1Z
70-D19-00-1Z
70-D19-00-1Z
70-D19-09-1U
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-1Z
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E

52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
11
1
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2

C21
C21
C20
C21
C21
C21
C20
C21
C21
C17
C25
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C17
C25
C25
C25
C25
C15
C22
C22
C22
C19
C26
C26
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C37
C37

ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0059
ES-0060
ES-0060
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0064
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0065
ES-0062
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0053
ES-0041
ES-0042
ES-0042
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0040

Date
Excavated
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
23-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
26-Oct-07
25-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
30-Aug-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
05-Sep-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 41 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU80
TU81
TU81

70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-09-5E
70-D19-00-2F
70-D19-00-2F

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
1
2

C37
C37
C37
C37
C37
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C37
C37
C37
C19
C37
C19
C37
C37
C37
C19
C19
C19
C19
C37
C37
C37
C37
C19
C19
C19
C37
C37
C37
C37
C32
C32

ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0041
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0040
ES-0051
ES-0051

Date
Excavated
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
30-Aug-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
04-Sep-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 42 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81

70-D19-00-2F
70-D19-00-2F
70-D19-00-2F
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2G
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2H
70-D19-00-2J
70-D19-00-2K
70-D19-00-2K
70-D19-00-2K

3
4
5
18
19
20
21
22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
1
2
3

C32
C31
C31
C31
C32
C32
C32
C32
C13
C13
C09
C13
C09
C13
C09
C13
C13
C13
C09
C13
C09
C09
C13
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C24
C04
C13
C35
C35
C01

ES-0051
ES-0050
ES-0050
ES-0050
ES-0051
ES-0051
ES-0051
ES-0051
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0092
ES-0151
ES-0047
ES-0057
ES-0057
ES-0054

Date
Excavated
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
17-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
07-May-08
08-May-08
27-Aug-08
16-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
22-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19
19

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Page 43 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81
TU81

70-D19-00-2K
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2O
70-D19-00-2S
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-3Y
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-00-5D
70-D19-37-1F
70-D19-37-1F

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
2

C28
C10
C10
C13
C13
C09
C09
C13
C13
C13
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C07
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C13
C13
C13
C09
C13
C13
C13
C13
C13
C30
C30

ES-0058
ES-0046
ES-0046
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0162
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0045
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0047
ES-0048
ES-0048

Date
Excavated
22-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
09-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
06-Oct-08
06-Oct-08
06-Oct-08
06-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
07-Oct-08
10-Oct-07
10-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
15-Oct-07
16-Oct-07
16-Oct-07

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-3

Work
Area(s)
17, 18, 19, 27
17, 18, 19, 27
17, 18, 19, 27
17, 18, 19, 27
17, 18, 19, 27
17, 18, 19, 27

Page 115 of 115

PARCEL G EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
RSY
Trench
Assigned ES
Survey
Trench
Truck Screening Identification
Unit No.
Segment
Load No.
Pada
No.
TU204
TU204
TU204
TU204
TU204
TU204

70-E27-00-2A
70-E27-00-2A
70-E27-00-2A
70-E27-00-2A
70-E27-00-2A
70-E27-00-2A

13
14
15
16
17
18

E19
E19
E19
E19
E19
E19

ES-0509
ES-0509
ES-0509
ES-0509
ES-0509
ES-0509

Date
Excavated
13-Jun-11
13-Jun-11
13-Jun-11
13-Jun-11
13-Jun-11
13-Jun-11

Notes:
a

A "C" designation indicates that soil was radiologically processed in RSY2 and an "E" designation indicates that soil was
processed in RSY4.
Abbreviations and Acronyms:
ES – Excavated Soil Survey Unit
RSY2 – Radiological Screening Yard 2
RSY4 – Radiological Screening Yard 4
TU – Trench Survey Unit

Table 3-3 ES Summary.xlsx

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel G
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0179
CTO No. 0018

 AR_N00217_001435
HUNTERS POINT

SSIC NO. 5090.3.A

C_)

1

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD

2

RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING MINUTES

3

26 July 2007

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

These minutes summarize the discussions and presentations from the Restoration Advisory
Board (RAB) meeting held from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Thursday, July 26,2007, in the Earl P.
Mills Auditorium. A verbatim transcript was also prepared for the meeting and is available in
the information repository for Hunters Point Shipyard (HPS) and on the Internet at
http://www.navvbracpmo.orglbracbases/california/hps/default.aspx. The list of agenda topics is
provided below. Attachment A provides a list of attendees. Attachment B includes action items
that were requested or committed to by RAB members during the meeting.

11

AGENDA TOPICS:
(1) Welcome/Introductions/Agenda Review
(2) Approval of Meeting Minutes from the June 28,2007 RAB Meeting
(3) Navy Announcements
(4) Community Co-Chair Report/Other Announcements
(5) Upcoming Radiological Efforts at Parcel D
(6) Parcel F Feasibility Study (FS)
(7) Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Update
(8) RAB Community Co-Chair Nominations
(9) Subcommittee Reports
(10) Community Comment Period
(11) Adjournment

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
::) 22
23

MEETING HANDOUTS:

24
25
26
27

28

•
•
•
•
•

29

Welcome!Introductions!Agenda Review

30
31
32
33

Marsha Pendergrass, facilitator, called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. Ms. Pendergrass
welcomed everyone to the meeting. All attendees introduced themselves and the organization
they represent. She confirmed that there was a quorum of community RAB members present to
conduct business at the meeting.

34

Approval of Minutes from the June 28, 2007 RAB Meeting

35
36
37

Ms. Pendergrass said that approval of the minutes is needed for the RAB meeting on June 28,
2007. Raymond Tompkins, RAB member, stated that there is a section missing from the
meeting minutes. There was a unanimous RAB vote regarding the lack of information for the
Parcel E-2 Remedial Investigation (RI)/FS and that is not reflected in the minutes. Ms.
Pendergrass responded that the section Dr. Tompkins is referring to starts on page 14, line 12,
and it was an action item for the meeting. She asked if Dr. Tompkins would like to hold
approval of the meeting minutes until this issue is resolved. Dr. Tompkins indicated that the

38
39
.

\'40
41

Agenda for July 26,2007, RAB Meeting
Meeting Minutes from the June 28, 2007 RAB Meeting
Navy Monthly Progress Report, July 26,2007
Power Point Presentation, Upcoming Radiological Efforts at Parcel D
Power Point Presentation, Parcel F FS

lIPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
BAI.51 06.00 16.0003

Page 1 of 16

 1
2
3

June 28, 2007 RAB meeting minutes can be approved as long as there is an action item that can
be voted on by the RAB. The RAB meeting minutes were approved as written with one
abstention and were accepted into the record.

4

Ms. Pendergrass addressed the status of the action items:

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Carry-over Item Number 1: Michael Cohen, San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA),
to provide the RAB with the Conceptual Framework document for the combined project for
Candlestick Point and HPS. Dr. Tompkins indicated that he has not heard back on this
document. Keith Forman, HPS Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental
Coordinator (BEC) noted that this is an action item for Amy Brownell, San Francisco
Department of Public Health, to follow up with Mr. Cohen. He contacted Ms. Brownell after the
June 2007 RAB meeting and she indicated she would forward the action item to Mr. Cohen for
completion. He has not heard back from her and she is not here at the meeting tonight. Dr.
Tompkins asked that both he and Mr. Forman e-mail Ms. Brownell for follow up on this action
item. This action item will be carried over until August 2007.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

New Action Item Number 1: The HPS RAB will comment on the draft Parcel E-2 RI/FS that
the RAB cannot provide significant comments based on the inadequacy of information since the
Radiological Addendum has not yet been submitted. Sudeep Rao, RAB member, explained that
this action item involves the HPS RAB drafting a comment on the inadequacy of the Parcel E-2
RI/FS to submit to the Navy. It was his understanding that the RAB Community Co-Chair
would start the process to draft this comment. Mr. Forman noted that as a RAB member, Mr.
Rao could submit a comment to the Navy with the exact wording listed in the action item. Then
the comment would be codified and the Navy will respond in the Response to Comments for the
RI/FS. The comment should be reworded because it currently states the HPS RAB cannot
provide significant comments, and he has received comments on the Parcel E-2 RI/FS report
from the Community First Coalition and their TAG contractor.

26
27
28
29
30

Dr. Tompkins clarified that the intention behind this action item is to have the comment be a
reflection of the entire HPS RAB's position. Ms. Pendergrass clarified that Dr. Tompkins and
Mr. Rao would draft this comment and submit it to Leon Muhammad, Community RAB CoChair, for submittal to the Navy to make it official. This action item will be carried over until
August 2007.

31
32
33
34
35

New Action Item Number 2: The RAB will contact the San Francisco Police Chief via
telephone and request a response letter to be drafted to the RAB on their speeding concerns on
and around HPS. Ms. Pendergrass noted that Barbara Bushnell, RAB member, is not present this
evening. Mr. Muhammad will follow up with Ms. Bushnell on this action item. This action item
will be carried over until August 2007.

36
37
38
39
40
41

New Action Item Number 3: The RAB will draft a follow-up letter to the San Francisco
Mayors Office, the Police Chief, and the Police Department based at HPS requesting a written
response to the letter submitted in March 2007. Keith Tisdell, RAB member, stated that he
passed this action item on to Mr. Muhammad, the new RAB Community Co-chair, for
completion. Ms. Pendergrass clarified that Mr. Tisdell would draft the letter and send it to Mr.
Muhammad for distribution. This action item will be carried over until August 2007.

42

Navy Announcements

43
44

Mr. Forman thanked the nine RAB members who took part in the Environmental 101 class on
June 30,2007. He stated that RAB members attended the meeting on their off time as volunteers
lIPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
BAI.5106.0016.0003

Page 2 of16

()

U

(\

0

 1
2

(,-)
5
6

7

and that is appreciated. It was a full day class and attendees asked a lot of good questions. Mr.
Fonnan explained that he will be working on part two of that class, consisting of a tour of HPS
when the Navy has more activities in progress at the shipyard. That tour will most likely take
place during the work week, in the next few months while the weather is good. He will follow
up with a date for that tour.
Mr. Fonnan explained that he is looking forward to working with Mr. Muhammad, the new RAB
Community Co-Chair, over the next year.

18

Mr. Fonnan presented a plaque to Mr. Tisdell as is a token of appreciation from the Navy and the
RAB members for his time served as the Community Co-Chair from June 2006 through June
2007. Mr. Fonnan thanked Mr. Tisdell and stated that is has been a privilege working with him.
He thanked Mr. Tisdell for all his time as a volunteer not only for the RAB meetings, but also for
the Membership Bylaws and Community Outreach (MBCO) subcommittee meetings. Mr.
Tisdell took care of many issues in between RAB meetings as well that often went unrecognized
and all his efforts are appreciated. As a token of the HPS RAB's appreciation, Mr. Fonnan
presented Mr. Tisdell with a plague that reads, "Hunters Point Shipyard RAB proudly presents
this award of appreciation to Keith Tisdell for your faithful and dedicated service as the HPS
RAB Community Co-Chair, July 26, 2007." Mr. Fonnan shook hands with Mr. Tisdell and
Carolyn Hunter, Tetra Tech EMI, took a picture.

19

Community Co-Chair Report/Other Announcements

20
21

Mr. Muhammad stated that it is time to select new chairs for the HPS RAB subcommittees.
Anyone interested in chairing one of the subcommittees should contact Mr. Muhammad. Those
who have chaired the subcommittees have done a good job and the RAB thanks them for their
commitment. There is one chair who officially resigned, Ms. Bushnell, so there is a need to fill
the Technical Subcommittee chair position. Mr. Muhammad said that he would recommend Dr.
Tompkins or Mr. Rao, who would both make excellent chairs for the Technical Review
Subcommittee. He also talked to Mr. Frias who indicated he would be willing to chair the
Economic Subcommittee. He has not had a chance to talk to Robert VanHouten, RAB member,
who has been recommended to chair the Membership, Bylaws, and Community Outreach
(MBCO) subcommittee. Ms. Pendergrass explained that the process for the RAB members
recommended to be subcommittee chairs is to attend the August 2007 RAB Technical, Economic
and MBCO Subcommittee meetings and those in attendance will detennine the new chair for
each subcommittee.

8
9

10
11

12
13
14

15
16
17

22

(-J
23
"
24
25
26
27
28
29

30
31
32
33
34

35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42

43
' \ 44
"-) 45

Mr. Muhammad stated that he would like to extend an invitation to the Bay Area Air Quality
Management District (BAAQMD) to participate at the HPS RAB meetings since they coordinate
air quality management in the Bay Area.
Mr. Muhammad noted that a RAB member contact sheet was discussed at the Environmental
101 class. The list would provide contact infonnation so that RAB members could contact other
RAB members for infonnation and to discuss issues. Mr. Fonnan indicated that contact
infonnation is part of the HPS Community Notification Plan (CNP). The current protocol for the
CNP is to list a RAB members name, affiliation, telephone number, fax number, and email
address. It is easy to limit distribution of that infonnation if a RAB member does not want their
infonnation listed. Ms. Pendergrass clarified that the Mr. Rao is talking about a contact list that
would be internal to the HPS RAB, which is different than the CNP that goes out to the general
public. Mr. VanHouten noted that in his opinion, each RAB member should indicate if they
want to have contact infonnation provided to the HPS RAB.
HPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
BAI.5106.0016.0003

Page 3 of16

 1
2

3
4
5

6
7
8
9

10
11

12
13

14
15
16
17
18
19

20
21
22

23
24
25
26
27
28
29

30
31
32
33

Ms. Hunter stated that she would circulate a piece of paper with a pen this evening for RAB
members to indicate what information they want distributed within the RAB. A hard copy of the
contact list could then be available at the August 2007 RAB meeting. She added that the CNP
that is available to the public in the Information Repository and on the internet has all the RAB
and community members contact information blacked out. Only the Navy, regulatory agency,
and elected officials have contact information listed. The RAB and community members contact
information is only available to personnel who distribute community notifications.
Mr. Rao said that he would like to thank Mr. Forman and the Navy team for the Environmental
101 class. The RAB members got a lot out of that training and he would strongly recommend it
for all future RAB members.
Mr. Rao stated that he would also like to emphasize the necessity for RAB members to
communicate with each other. He added that he would also like to suggest providing the RAB
with a timeline of where activities are and the priorities for HPS. It would be a good idea for the
RAB members to know what is coming up for each RAB meeting.
Mr. Muhammad said that he would like to see if the HPS RAB would be interested in
establishing an advisory subcommittee that would be inclusive of all the disciplines needed to
make comprehensive decisions for the HPS RAB. This subcommittee would be able to provide
a consensus on what is the best model or approach for HPS activities. Ms. Pendergrass indicated
that this suggestion would need to be discussed at the MBCO subcommittee meeting and the
RAB bylaws would need to be changed to formally establish a new RAB subcommittee.
James Morrison, RAB member, stated that Mr. Cohen would like to provide a presentation on
the plans for Parcel B at the RAB meeting in September 2007. Mr. Forman indicated that the
RAB could take a vote and have Mr. Cohen provide a presentation depending on that vote. He
explained that he does not support having Mr. Cohen's presentation provided at the full RAB
meeting. Mr. Cohen represents the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA) and the
forum for redevelopment issues is the Citizens Advisory Committee (CAe). The focus for the
RAB meetings is the environmental cleanup program at HPS, and the monthly meetings need to
focus on HPS documents and the cleanup program. Mr. Forman said that if the HPS RAB would
like for him to attend a CAC meeting, he can do that and provide the Navy's perspective. He
indicated that he has attended the CAC meetings in the past. He does not recommend another
presentation from Mr. Cohen at the RAB meeting since there has already been one presentation
this year.

40
41

Dr. Tompkins asked, as an action item, to have Mr. Cohen attend the Technical Review
Subcommittee meeting to provide his presentation. That would provide the RAB with a
technical discussion of redevelopment plans so misinformation that has been circulated in the
community can be addressed. Mr. Forman responded that anyone can be invited to give a
presentation at the RAB subcommittee meetings, but he would like to keep presentations on
redevelopment out of the monthly RAB meetings. Part of the function for Ms. Brownell being
on the HPS RAB is as a liaison with the City of San Francisco. Ms. Brownell can be allowed
time at each RAB meeting to provide an update on redevelopment plans for HPS if RAB
members desire this.

42

Upcoming Radiological Efforts at Parcel D (Presentation)

43
44

Parcel B
Ralph Pearce, Navy Remedial Project Manager (RPM), reviewed the status of radiological
activities at Parcel B. A total of 56,788 cubic yards (cy) of soil, over 4,000 truck loads, has been

34
35

.36
37
38
39

45

HPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
BAl.51 06.0016.0003

Page 4 of16

r "
,,-)

 1

2
3
4
5
7
8
9

Mr. Pearce summarized the radiological levels identified at Parcel B. The highest radium-226
level to date has been 4.3 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) and the HPS limit is 1.5 pCi/g. The
highest cesium-137 level to date has been 2.0 pCi/g and the HPS limit is 0.1 pCi/g. No
strontium-90 has been found above the HPS limit (0.3 pCi/g) to date.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Mr. Pearce reviewed the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Parcel B. SWPPP
measures continue to be installed and maintained including silt fencing, hay tubes, hay bales,
plastic sheeting, and sandbags. These are all measures that help control stormwater to keep
sediment from entering the Bay. Silt fencing is a fabric placed along the ground that lets water
drain through, but prevents silt from entering the Bay. Soil piles are covered and continuously
monitored for compliance with dust and erosion control measures and to ensure they are properly
identified. Extensive dust control measures continue for Parcel B with trucks brushed down and
tarped, water trucks run continuously to minimize dust, and street sweepers used to keep the
streets clean. A product called Rhino Snot® is being sprayed on some of the soil piles and it
forms a crust that keeps soil from blowing away in the wind. It is fairly easy to apply and
reapply to the soil piles as needed to maintain dust control.

21
23
24
25
26

Parcel D
Laurie Lowman, Navy Radiological Affairs Support Office (RASO), stated that the main goal
for Parcel D is to develop a plan for Parcel 49. Technically, Parcel 49 only exists on paper and is
a contingency for a stadium location if the San Francisco 4gers came to HPS. There is no
confirmation that the 4gers will actually come to HPS, but the City of San Francisco has asked
the Navy to go ahead with radiological work in the Parcel 49 area.

27
28
29
30

Ms. Lowman explained that the Parcel D radiological work consists of removal of the sanitary
sewer and storm drain systems with associated soil. In addition, a second screening yard,
Radiological Screening Yard (RSY) 2 has been constructed. There is a screening yard in Parcel
B referred to as RSY-1, but that yard will be closed and the soil now screened in RSY-2.

31
32

Ms. Lowman explained that the Parcel D work planned for 2007 will be concentrated in four
work areas, Work Areas 17, 18, 19 and 27. The work areas are associated with streets as
follows: Morrell Street (Work Area 17), Cochrane Street (Work Area 18), Hussey Street (Work
Area 19), and H Street (Work Area 27). The plan is to start work in Work Area 17 then proceed
to Work Area 19, which allows the Navy to manage traffic flow so that the police have access to
the laboratory.

6

22

C)

excavated, and 4.25 miles of piping removed. There are only 2 out of 64 trenches left to
excavate in Parcel B. After the Navy gets radiological clearance that proves that the trenches are
radiologically clean, then they are backfilled. To date, 45 of the trenches have been backfilled.
There have been 138 bins of radiologically-contaminated soil identified and that is just over 3
percent of the total excavated soil. A bin is a large metal container that holds about 14 cy of soil.

33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
/- '\ 44

,,--.-/45

Ms. Lowman stated that the draft Design Plan for Work Areas 17, 18, 19, and 27 has been
published. The construction ofRSY 2 was completed on July 18, 2007 and use of RSY-1 ended
as of July 19, 2007. There will still be activities at RSY-1, however, to survey and release the
screening pads. Excavation activities for Parcel D began on July 19, 2007 in Work Area 17 and
Morrell Street is currently blocked to all traffic. All the asphalt was removed along Morrell
Street before excavation activities began. Security fence installation around the work areas and
RSY-2 construction is complete, and radiological warning signs have been posted. The Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires warning signs due to the radiological excavation and
screening process being conducted at HPS.
HPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
BAI.5106.0016.0003

Page 5 of16

 1
2
3

4
5
6

7
8
9
10

11
12
13

14
15
16
17

18
19
20
21

22
23

24
25

Ms. Lowman provided a map ofRSY-2 and noted that each of the screening pads is 1,000 square
meters. The pads and are used to spread out soil for radiological screening. RSY-2 significantly
increases the screening capacity compared to RSY-1 in Parcel B.
Ms. Lowman reviewed a tentative schedule for the Parcel D sewer removal. Pre-construction
activities began on June 21, 2007, and construction of RSY-2 was completed on July 18, 2007.
Pipe removal activities for Parcel D and use of RSY-2 began on July 19,2007. There are some
remaining Parcel B activities that have to be coordinated with Lennar, and all remaining work at
Parcel B is scheduled for completion by November 30, 2007. Beginning July 23, 2007, any
remaining Parcel B soil will be screened at RSY-2.
Dr. Tompkins asked how much water is being used per square foot for dust control at HPS, and
what is the ideal water content of the soil for dust control. Bill Dougherty, Tetra Tech ECl,
responded that there is no official formula or percentage of moisture content for the soil. The
goal is to minimize the amount of visible dust, so personnel visually determine if the soil is wet
enough for adequate dust control, but not so wet that there is muddy mess that prevents screening
work being performed. On the weekends, the soil piles are tarped or Rhino Snot® is applied. In
the excavation area there are below grade trenches and the depth of the trench prevents the wind
from blowing dust around.
Mr. McGowan stated that the radium-226 level is about three times the HPS limit and cesium137 is about 20 times the limit. He asked if those radiation levels can be explained in an easy to
understand context like the level of radiation from an x-ray. Ms. Lowman explained that
calculations are necessary to correlate picocuries per gram to a particular radiation dose. The
radiation levels at HPS, however, are very low. A radioluminescent device like a glowing clock
face has a significantly high radium level than the levels found in the HPS soils. She indicated
that she would search for a better correlation for picocuries per gram levels and provide that to
the RAB at a later meeting.

35
36
37

Mr. Rao asked for the work at Parcels B and D, are there passive monitors around the sites to
measure the dust in the air? Mr. Dougherty replied that during all the Radiological TCRA
activities there are ambient air monitors upwind and downwind that run continuously to measure
total dust and particulates. Those monitors have been monitoring the air for years during every
radiological excavation at HPS and have produced reams of air monitoring data. At Parcel B,
there are from eight to ten monitors running continuously both upwind and downwind and
radiological data from those monitors is turned in every morning. Data on total dust and
asbestos is collected in 54 hour cycles and that data is submitted once a month. Mr. Dougherty
referred to a presentation slide with a picture of radiological activities at HPS and pointed out the
location of a downwind monitor. He added that an additional radiological air monitor is running
at RSY-2 near the police laboratory boundary in response to concerns from Ms. Brownell and the
police.

38
39
40
41
42

Mr. Rao asked if there is a way to provide a one page long-term data map showing radiological
air monitoring data. Mr. Dougherty replied that there has never been an exceedance of
radiological air quality limits at HPS even with tens of thousands of results over the years. Ms.
Lowman noted that the HPS limit is ten percent of the limit set by NRC standards and that limit
has never been exceeded.

43
44
45
46

Mr. Muhammad asked what guarantees the Navy can provide for the Parcel D excavation
activities that the same mistakes will not be made as on the former Parcel A regarding dust
control by Lennar. Mr. Dougherty replied that he cannot provide any guarantees. The reason for
the current RSY-2 location, however, is because it is as far as possible from the community, and

26
27

28
29
30
31
32
33

34

HPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007
HAl.51 06.0016.0003

Page 6 of16

 _

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

near the edge of the water with the prevailing wind direction offshore. Mr. Forman added that
the Navy has a very effective dust control program in place. In addition, the nature of the Navy's
activities is different than the activities on a parcel being developed by Lennar. The work on the
former Parcel A is large-scale land-shaping activities where a large surface area is being leveled
for buildings and development. That is different than the narrow trenches being excavated for
the Radiological TCRA. Mr. Dougherty added that most of the radiological work is below
grade, so wind is not going down into the trenches and blowing dirt up into the air.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Dr. Tompkins stated that there was reference to activities at Parcel B that are being coordinated
with Lennar. How does Lennar playa role when this is still Navy property? Mr. Dougherty
responded that when the former Parcel A was transferred there was an agreement between the
Navy and Lennar for handling stormwater activities. The Lennar property is upgradient, so there
is going to be stormwater draining across Navy property. Lennar has a large stormwater outlet
that discharges onto Navy property into a surface water swale. When trenches are excavated
during the radiological work, stormwater flow is handled through a shallow trench. Stormwater
from the former Parcel A flows into that shallow trench and then out to the Bay. Lennar has yet
to build a large pipe that will tie into the Navy's surface water swale, and those efforts are being
coordinated between the Navy and Lennar.

18
19
20
21

In response to a question from Dr. Tompkins, Mr. Pearce confirmed that the majority of
stormwater from Parcel A flows into a large pipe located at the northern end of Parcel B. There
are also smaller drains located on the large hillside on the former Parcel A that drain to other
areas of Parcel B.

22
23
25
26
27
28

Dr. Tompkins asked for an action item, that the Navy use Rhino Snot® on all the soil piles in
RSY-2 rather than the plastic covers. That seems to be a more efficient system for soil piles that
lay dormant over a period of time. Ms. Lowman replied that Rhino Snot® will be used more
frequently at RSY-2. Mr. Dougherty explained that the soil piles will not be covered after the
Rhino Snot® has been applied, so a green tint has been added to avoid the appearance that these
are just uncovered soil piles. He noted that he can show RAB members the soil piles with Rhino
Snot® during the upcoming HPS site tour.

29
30
31
32
33

Ms. Pendergrass asked what is the composition of Rhino Snot®. Mr. Dougherty replied that
Rhino Snot® is non-toxic and consists of fibers with a binding agent. Mr. Forman added that it
forms a hardened, crusty surface and he has placed his hands on soil piles where Rhino Snot®
was applied to test the effectiveness of the coating. On a future site tour, RAB members will be
shown soil piles with Rhino Snot® applied to them.

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44

Mr. Rao asked if the air monitoring data for particulates (PMlO, PM2.5), and radiation levels has
been uploaded where RAB members could access it, similar to how the BAAQWMD provides
air monitoring data. Mr. Dougherty noted that the air monitoring data for HPS is not available
on the internet. There is a contract for preparing monthly reports for that data and he can provide
those reports to the Navy and then the Navy can decide if the reports should be provided to the
HPS RAB. There is a large database of air monitoring data, but due to the sheer volume of that
data it would be incomprehensible. Ms. Lowman noted that RASO reviews all the radiological
air monitoring data. Mr. Rao asked if the Navy could provide aggregate information on all the
radiological air monitoring data for HPS. Even if the radiation levels are low, it would be
reassuring to the community for the HPS RAB to get regular updates on this data. Mr. Forman
asked that Ms. Lowman meet with Mr. Pearce and Mr. Dougherty to determine what can be done
to provide air monitoring updates. Mr. Dougherty indicated that he would need time to

(,J 24

__) 45

HPS RAB Meeting Minutes - 26 July 2007.
BAI.51 06.0016.0003

Page 7 of16

 NICCOLI REPORTING

(650) 573-9339

1
I

.__..f. e

1
2
3
4
5
6

5

HUNTERS POINTSHIPVARD

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

7
RESTORATION ADVI50RY BOARD
8
9
10
REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF MEETING

11
12
JULY 26, 2007

13
14
15
16

Earl P. Mills Community center
Auditorium, Building C
100 Whitney Young Circle
San Francisco, California

17
18
19
Reported by Christine M. Niccoli, RPR, C.5.R. No. 4569
20
21
NICCOU REPORTING
22

619 Pilgrim Drive

23
Foster City, CA 94404-1707
24
(650) 573-9339

.)'t,

25

CERTIFIED SHORlliAND REPORTERS SERVING lliE BAY AREA

i

3

1
2
3
4

RAB MEMBERS [Cont.]:
ROBERT VAN HOUTEN - Morgan Heights Homeowners
Association
---000--PANEL OF REGULATORS
AMY D. BROWNELL - San Francisco Department of Public
Health
DANE JENSEN - United States Navy
TOM P. LANPHAR - California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (DTSC)
RALPH PEARCE - United States Navy
JAMES D. PONTON - San Francisco Bay Regional Water
Quality Control Board
MARK RIPPERDA - U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA)
---000--AUDIENCE
BRIAN BALTIMORE - Tetra Tech
RONALD CAMESE - Camese. Transportation
MATT CZAJKOWSKI - Better Bayview

.

,

\.

!

2

PARTICIPANTS
1
2
3 FACILITATOR:
MARSHA PENDERGRASS - Pendergrass & Associates
4
5 CO-CHAIRS:
KEITH FORMAN - United States Navy
6
Project Managers Office (PMO) West
7
LEON MUHAMMAD - Center For Self Improvement,
8
Muhammad
University of Islam
9
10

11

RAB MEMBERS

12
13

,
"

\'i

JI

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

CHARLES L. DACUS, SR. - Bayview-Hunters Point resident,
Residents of the Southeast Sector (R.O.S.E.S.)
KRISTINE ENEA - Bayview-Hunters Point resident
LARRY FRIAS - Waste Solutions Group, Bayview-Hunters
Point resident
JESSE MASON - Community Window on the Shipyard
MIKE McGOWAN - Arc Ecology
JAMES MORRISON - Environmental Technology, Residents of
the Southeast Sector (R.O.S.E.5.)
SUDEEP M. RAO - Literacy for Environmental Justice (LEJ)
KEITH TISDELL - Bayview-Hunters Point resident
RAYMOND J. TOMPKINS - Bayview-Hunters Point Coalition on
the Environment

4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

AUDIENCE [Cont.]:
GUSTAVO DE LEON - Eighteen Trucking Co.
THOMAS DIAS - Environmental Management Services, Inc.
(EMS)
BILL DOUGHERTY - Tetra Tech EO
GREGORY R. GRIST - Tech Physics
STEVEN HALL - Tetra Tech EMI
JIM HUNGER - Better Bayview
CAROLYN HUNTER - Tetra Tech EMI
NANCY JOHNSON - First Generation Inc.
LAURA L. LOWMAN - United States Navy Radiological
Affairs Support Office (RASO)
STEVE MARTINI - Eighteen Trucking Co.
LONNIE MASON - First Generation Inc.
JOHN V. McCARTHY - United States Army Reserve (retired)
PA1RICK OWENS - United States Navy
HARRELL POWELL - Bayview-Hunters Point resident
MATTHEW SLACK - United States Navy Radiological Affairs
Support Office (RASO)
pmR STROGANOFF - United States Navy ROICC Office
NEIL TSUBOTA - Tetra Tech
ELI VEDAGIRI - Barajas & Associates, Inc. (BAI)
ANGELA WILLIAMS Barajas & Associates, Inc. (BAI)
---000--1 (Pages 1 to 4)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

 NICCOLI REPORTING

1
2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9
10

11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

49
it's not -- it doesn't blow away the material.
The Rhino Snot material is pretty much sprayed
on all over the piles, and it hardens; it forms a type
of crust on top of the dirt, and this protects the dirt
from being blown away in the wind. And it's a little
bit easier to apply and reapply as needed in order to
maintain control of the dirt piles.
Okay. And then we're going to move on to
Parcel D and Laurie Lowman from Radiological Affairs
Support Office.
MS. LOWMAN: Thank you very much, Mr. Pearce.
We got some good news today on our Parcel D
presentation. So this is going to be kind of fun.
For Parcel D, our main goal here is to develop
a "Parcel 49" plan. Now, technically "Parcel 49" only
exists on paper. It is there as a contingency of an
area that -- where the stadium would be placed should
the 4gers come to Hunters Point.
The City has asked us to go ahead and do
radiological work in that area so that that property
would be ready should that happen. We have no
confirmation that that is happening. This is purely a
preparatory phase. So yes, we have a "Parcel 49" design
plan.
The other work that is going on, of course, is

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

(650) 573-9339

51
We will not be follOWing these numerically
'cause that would make far too much sense. So we are
going to start with Work Area 17 and then proceed to
Work Area 19, and that is so we can manage the traffic
flow so that the police have a good route to their
building, any number of things. But we will do Work
Area 17 followed by Work Area 19.
This shows the "Parcel 49" area, which is
bordered by H Street and Morrell Street there on
Parcel D. And if you look closely here -If you can show them on the slide itself.
-- you can see where the projected stadium
would be if that was -Yeah, show them where the stadium area is.
That's that little rectangle in the middle.
That would be the actual football field. So
the stadium would be built around that should that area
be used for that.
And so that's why we call this the "Parcel 49"
design area. And as I said, it's -- we are -- this is
where we're focusing right now.
Next slide, please.
So for the status right now, we had a design
plan for Work Area 17, 18, 19, and 27, and that has been
published. RSY 2 has been -- the construction was
52

50

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

now we are removing sanitary sewer and storm drain lines
from Parcel D and in particular right now the
"Parcel 49" design plan area.
We have also constructed and are now operating
a second radiological screening yard which we refer to
as RSY 2. There was one prior in Parcel B which we
referred to as RSY 1, and we will be closing that one
down.
ATTENDEE: Woo!
MS. LOWMAN: Yeah. I knew you would like
that.
And we will be screening all the soil now in
Parcel D at the new RSY 2.
And then we are also preparing plans to address
all the radiologically impacted sites that fall within
the "Parcel 49" area.
Next slide, please.
So for the work right now, we are going to
concentrate in four main areas, and these are identified
as work areas: Work Area 17, 18, 19, and 27. These are
streets.
The first one is Morrell Street. We're going
to be removing the sewers there. Cochrane Street is
Work Area 18. Hussey Street is Work Area 19, and H
Street is Work Area 27.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

completed on 18 July. And right away, as you can see,
on 19 July, we began excavation and started using
RSY 2. And from now on we will not be using RSY 1. So
that's for Mr. Van Houten personally. No, not really.
But we will be -- still be doing some work over
there to finish up surveying those sites and release
those pads. But it will not be the type of work that
we've been doing there previously.
So with the beginning of the excavation
activities, Morrell Street is now blocked to all
traffic. There is security fencing that's been
installed around the work areas and around RSY 2, and it
is posted with radiological warning signs. We have
removed all the asphalt, and' we've begun excavation in
that Work Area 17. We even have some pictures here.
Next slide.
This shows the actual RSY 2. It's located down
here where Matt is pointing for me and -- on the ma- -on the map. And there's -- as you can see, each of
these pads is 1,000 square meters. We spread the soil
out there, and we do the radiological screening of that
soil on those pads.
Next slide, please.
So this is what it looks like. We're very
proud of this. It's a beautiful screening yard, and it
13 (Pages 49 to 52)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

 (650) 573-9339

NICCOLI REPORTING

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

53
really increases our capacity significantly compared to
the one that was in Parcel B. We are very proud of
this.
Next slide, please.
And you can see the guy's putting the fencing
up and putting the radiation signs on the fencing.
We're required to do that by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission because of the screening process and
excavation we are doing.
Next slide, please.
That's where we have removed all the asphalt
off of Morrell Street. This is the head of Morrell
Street. You can see the police building, the blue
building, way down at the end of the street down there.
So ...
Next slide, please.
And there's where we started our excavation.
So we are rolling. We started last week. We are doing
really well. Things are moving along, and it's going to
be a good summer to finish this out.
Next slide.
So tentative schedule for sewer removal: We
have begun the construction activities on 21 June and
completed RSY 2 on 18 July, as I mentioned before. We
have started the pipe removals.

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

55
MS. LOWMAN: For dust control?
DR. TOMPKINS: Mm-hmm.
MS. LOWMAN: Mr. Dougherty, do you want to
answer that question? Do you have an answer for that
question?
We do an awful lot of watering. I don't know
that we have a specific -MR. DOUGHERTY: Watering is done on the
streets, and obviously there is no -- so I'm assuming
you're talking about when we use water to control when
we're actually doing the excavation.
DR. TOMPKINS: Correct. Dust-MR. DOUGHERTY: That is -DR. TOMPKINS: -- was stated in the
presentation -MR. DOUGHERTY: That's right. We use both.
DR. TOMPKINS: -- that we have water trucks for
dust control.
MR. DOUGHERTY: That's correct.
DR. TOMPKINS: So I'd like to know I -- what is
your goal that you'd like to obtain for moisture
content --?
MR. DOUGHERTY: Our goal is to minimize the
amount of visible dust we've generated in order to
control the dust leaving --

(0

?/

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

54
Parcel B work, however, it's going to take us a
little while to finish that because of coordination with
Lennar and some other activities in that area. So we
won't actually be out of Parcel B doing sewer work in
Parcel B probably until the end of November. But all
the Parcel B soils, as I've said before, are moving to
RSY2.
Okay. That's it.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Excellent.
MS. LOWMAN: Excellent. Do we ... ?
MS. PENDERGRASS: Do we have some questions?
I -- We'll start with Dr. Tompkins and then Mr. McGowan
and then Mr. Rao.
DR. TOMPKINS: Okay. I have two questions.
MS. PENDERGRASS: One.
MS. LOWMAN: Okay.
Okay. You can only have one.
DR. TOMPKINS: Let's cut one in half -MS. LOWMAN: Okay.
DR. TOMPKINS: -- and get two questions.
MS. LOWMAN: Okay.
DR. TOMPKINS: Jeez. For your presentation,
let's see, 1, 2, 3, water trucks, just how much water
are you using per square, and what is the moisture
content so -- that you feel is ideal for dust control?

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

56
Getting a lot of feedback here. Near the
speaker might be the issue.
Our goal is to control the -- so part of the -we don't have official like a percentage moisture in
the -- in the dirt. It's done -- It's Visually to see
if there is adequate -- if there is adequate dust
control at the time. So the test, if you will, is done
by obser- -- by observation.
DR. TOMPKINS: Just observation. There's no
formula?
MR. DOUGHERTY: There is no -- there is no
formula. It's just -- You can -- When you're there,
you can tell whether the soil is dry and being able to
be blown around or whether it's adequately wetted down;
and obviously, you can tell if it's too wet and turns
into a muddy mess where you can't really do the work you
need to do and the screening you need to do.
So we need to reach the right amount of
moisture, but it's very much a judgment call, and it's
done by our engineers in -DR. TOMPKINS: How --?
MR. DOUGHERTY: -- the field.
DR. TOMPKINS: How is that controlled over the
weekend?
MR. DOUGHERTY: How is it controlled over the

14 (Pages 53 to 56)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING. 7/26/07

'\

fC)
,.

 NICCOLI REPORTING (650) 573-9339

 

S7 59

1 weekend? 1 over that. So these are very, very low levels.

2 DR. TOMPKINS: Yes, sir. There's no work -- 2 If we were to have a radioluminescent device,

3 MR. DOUGHERTY: When there's no work going on, 3 like a clock that would glow with radium paint, that

4 our dust -- our piles of dirt are either tarped or 4 type of thing, you would have signi?cantly more radium

5 with -- has we talked about the Rhino Snot; some 5 in that than we are ?nding in these soils.

6 other method is used in order to control the ability of 6 So I will try to get you a better correlation

7 the wind to blow the dust around. 7 of what these numbers mean, and we'll provide that to

8 And actually, an excavation in an empty 8 the RAB. We'll try to get you a little better

9 excavation area like a low-grade trench would just be -- 9 correlation of the picocuries per gram to something that
10 if it's deep enough, it's below 6 or 8 foot, groundwater 10 . you could understand a little better.
11 would actually come in the trenches and be ?lled with 11 MR. Okay.
12 water. But otherwise, it would just be the depth 12 MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. Mr. --
13 underneath -- 13 MS. LOWMAN: How would that . . . 
14 DR. TOMPKINS: (Interrupting inaudibly.) 14 MR. That would be great. So if you
15 MR. DOUGHERTY: Underneath the parking lot, the 15 could ?nd a number for the concentration in a radium
16 trench protects itself. It prevents the wind from 16 dial, for example, or in a wrist watch, that would be
17 blowing around much dust out of that trench. 17 helpful.
18 DR. TOMPKINS: Okay. After the presentation 18 MS. LOWMAN: All right. Yeah, we remove the
19 others. 19 radium dials and gauges out there all the time, and they
20 MS. LOWMAN: We should clarify too that we 20 contain signi?cantly more radium than we are ?nding in
21 can't put too much water on the soil that we are 21 the soil.
22 screening, or it inhibits our ability to do the 22 But this picocuries per gram is for radium that
23 screening. 23 is spread throughout soil, and it's not a quantity in a
24 So the engineers out in the ?eld, the rad 24 single device. So it's very different than what you
25 contacts, actually?are very good at judging when we need 25 would ?nd.

58 60

1 to have the soil dampened and what are -- you know, what 1 But I'm going to -- I can take an action item

2 the moisture levels need to be. 2 for that even that will provide you with some more

3 MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. Mr. McGowan? 3 information to clarify what these levels actually

4 MR. I have a question about the 4 correlate to, something that would be a little more

5 Parcel rad levels. I think it was slide No. 5. 5 easily understood.

6 MS. LOWMAN: Okay. 6 MR. Great. Thanks.

7 MR. The radium. 7 MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. Mr. Rao.

8 MS. ENEA: Can you use the microphone? 8 MS. WILLIAMS: Can Ijust clarify an action

9 DR. TOMPKINS: Mike, use the -- 9 item? You actually want that an action item?
10 MS. LOWMAN: Ch. 10 MS. LOWMAN: Sure. Iassigned myself an action
11 DR. TOMPKINS: -- mic. 11 item.
12 MS. LOWMAN: I'm sorry. 12 MS. PENDERGRASS: Actually, Mr. McGowan
13 MR. The radium level is about 3 times 13 assigned you an action item.
14 the Shipyard limit, and the cesium is about 20 times the 14 Okay. Mr. Rao.
15 Shipyard limit. But can you put those numbers in 15 DR. RAO: For some of the work at Parcel and
16 something that's a little easier to understand? Like, 16 also D, is there some kind of -- I assume there is, but
17 is 4.3 picocuries per gram like an x-ray, or how much 17 is there some kind of monitoring to measure the amount
18 radiation is that? 18 of dust that's pa- -- I mean as passive monitors around
19 MS. LOWMAN: You can't really correlate between 19 the sites that we can actually collect to see how much
20 picocuries per gram and a radiation dose without doing 20 dust is coming off, maybe even something that could be
21 some calculations. These are very low levels. Our 21 collected in a ?lter or something on a flat slide,
22 background -- The limit there is based on -- for radium 22 something so we're actually monitoring?
23 is -- Our background radium level for naturally 23 MR. DOUGHERTY: Actually --
24 occurring radioactive material is the .5 picocuries per 24 THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry. Your name?
25 gram, and we're allowed to have 1 picocurie per gram 25 MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh. Dougherty,

 

15 (Pages 57 to 60)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

NICCOLI REPORTING

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

61
D-o-u-g-h-e-r-t-y.
During all these activities, we have ambient
air monitors which are basically doing total dust and
PM10 and various things which are basically up gradient
and down gradient, and they run 54 hours at a time.
They're on continuously. They have been for years, and
we have literally just reams of data from that, every
radiological excavation.
So at Parcel B, we'd be digging two sites
simultaneously plus the yard. Each one of those would
have an upwind and downwind radiological which is turned
in every day. We see results in the morning. So most
days I have anywhere from eight to ten air monitors
running on a continuous basis, okay.
The radiological I see on a daily basis. The
larger ones, which are total dust and asbestos and those
kind of things, I see that data around once a month; but
it is submitted to them -- it's every -- we run for
54 hours. It's some calculation, but basically -- so we
run. So whenever we're out there doing any work, there
is constant air monitoring going on.
DR. RAO: And I actually meant for radiation -MR. DOUGHERTY: Radiation?
DR. RAO: -- sense if any of those filter, for
example, when you do PM10 or PM2.5, you can also already

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

(650) 573-9339

63
happy.
DR. RAO: And just as a follow-up finally, is
there a way that when we talk about these things -- and
this is just a request for the Navy is when we talk
about some of the activities that we also have maybe
just a simple screen shot of a long-term data map so
that we can at least see that if it's really low, then
that's fine?
MR. DOUGHERTY: We've never -- we've never had
an exceedance in tens of thousands of results ever.
MS. LOWMAN: We-MS. PENDERGRASS: We can't hear you.
MS. LOWMAN: -- 10 percent of what they call a
DAC limit by the NRC standards, Nuclear Regulatory
Commission standards.
So we -- our maximum is 10 percent of those
standards, and we have never exceeded that 10 percent.
MR. DOUGHERTY: Ever.
MS. LOWMAN: Ever the tire -- entire time we've
been working out there.
MR. DOUGHERTY: And that's back in Parcel E,
years and years never.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay.
DR. RAO: And one last question. Sorry.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Mr. Rao?
64

62

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

8
9
10

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

measure the radiation -MR. DOUGHERTY: We actually do low vo- -- low
vols. and high vols. We do low volume and high volume
of this. But anyway -MS. SPEAKER: Go ahead.
MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh.
So basically, yeah, we're doing basically every
excavations. When you saw the excavation -- if you went
back to the picture, there's probably a picture of the
thing in there. They're digging.
Go ahead, point it out there, Keith.
MR. TISDELL: Sitting right over there.
MS. PENDERGRASS: can we talk into the mic,
please?
MR. DOUGHERTY: His eyes are better than mine.
MR. TISDELL: Right here.
MR. DOUGHERTY: Okay. And then there's
actually one downwind off to the left. In the rad yard,
we're actually running an additional air monitor because
of Amy and the police, but -- the character of the local
police.
So at the rad yard, we have -- typical wind is
this way. We've actually installed an additional
monitor over on the police boundary. So we're actually
doing additional air monitoring just to keep everyone

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

DR. RAO: Is-MS. PENDERGRASS: Mr. Rao? Mr. Rao? Two.
I'll come back to you. I'll come back to you.
promise you, I'll come back to you.
Mr. Muhammad?
MR. MUHAMMAD: What guarantees can you give to
the RAB board in regards to this excavation and this
intense work that you will not make the same mistakes
that were done on Parcel A in regards to --? because
they had a dust mitigation plan; they had a monitoring
system set up.
What guarantees are you giving to the RAB,
members of the RAB, in regards to this type of
excavation that we will not -- you will not make the
same mistakes that was made done on Parcel A? because I
see you still -- you have a dust mitigation plan.
MR. DOUGHERTY: I can't guarantee you anything
I guess is what I'm saying. But what I will say is the
reason we chose this area of the yard is the screening
is as far away from the community as we can physically
build. We are basically on the edge of the water, and
the prevailing wind that we have -- everyone has years
of data -- is offshore.
So we have basically put this -- we -- the
Parcel B old yard has been moved over here, and

16 (Pages 61 to 64)
HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

r-\

(V

to
_

..... ....

{8
....."'-

 NICCOLI REPORTING (650) 573-9339

 

65 67
1 basically, I guess I could say, is we -- what we then do 1 surface water swales, how we're controlling our storm
2 is distance. We put it as far away and downwind from 2 water, allowing all that storm water to ?ow out to the
3 the community as we can. 3 bay directly through an outfall, an existing Navy
4 MR. FORMAN: Well, and we have a very effective 4 outfall, which when we do our when we're taking our
5 program in place. I don't know if you could say the 5 trenches in and out, we rebuild an ability for the storm
6 same with the other site. 6 water to ?ow up. It's basically a shallow trench.
7 And -- but the nature of our activities -- 7 And their storm water is going to ?ow into the
8 It's important to know that the nature of our activities 8 Navy's shallow trench right along this area in and
9 is very, very different than the nature of those 9 then straight out through the Navy's trench.
10 activities on a parcel being developed. 10 And so the coordination of the -- they have yet
11 That activity is a large-scale, land-shaping 11 to build that large pipe that discharges their storm
12 type of activity with a very large surface area as level 12 water from When they did the redeveloping, they're
13 acreage is being created for building pads to do, you 13 focusing all that storm water into, one large pipe -- not
14 know, development. That's very different than the very 14 all of it, but most of it; and that one large pipe will
15 narrow trenches that we tend to dig in the rad world 15 discharge onto 
16 where we're doing very defined work in a very small 16 How their pipe ties into our swale, or our big
17 area. 17 low ditch, that allows it to screen out to the --
18 MR. DOUGHERTY: Well, and the physics of it are 18 there's some coordination efforts to allow that to
19 basic. Most of my stuff is below grade so the wind's 19 happen.
20 not going to go down and come back up, where theirs is 20 MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. So 
21 very much an exposed area, higher plateau, so when the 21 DR. TOMPKINS: Well, one -- so that on your
22 wind's going to pick it up. So I think just the nature 22 drawing up there dealing with to_the far left, and then
23 of what we do is signi?cantly different than what they 23 what about adjacent to Parcel 
24 a . do. 24 In other words, everything on after they
MR. FORMAN: Yeah, and that really the 25 reshaped the hill -- everything is going to drain into
66 68
1 challenges that they have are greater than our 1 that one pipe at the upper end of Parcel 
2 challenges in -- 2 MR. PEARCE: The vast majority of the -- this
3 MR. DOUGHERTY: Oh, yeah. 3 part -- I'm not referring to the parts -- of the other
4 MR. FORMAN: -- controlling this type of 4 parts -- there was another part, I think Parcel A West.
5 activity that we do. 5 But the vast majority of Parcel A is draining through
6 MS. PENDERGRASS: So Dr. Tompkins and then 6 one pipe to there.
7 Mr. Rao again. 7 There is some smaller drains from different
8 DR. TOMPKINS: Two quick points. Laurie, in 8 spots on the hillside where it's close enough on the
9 your presentation and your summary, last slide, that you 9 down gradient.
10 mentioned that in conjunction with Lennar on Parcel B, 10 This is a very large hill, and then it's a
11 what is it in conjunction that would prohibit -- or the 11 steep slope along the side. And on the steep slope,
12 transfer or whichever, what is it how does Lennar 12 there are some spots where some storm water does still
13 plan to -- a role here when this is still Navy's 13 drain down in other areas but that most of it ?ows
14 property? 14 through this large pipe out to this point.
15 MR. DOUGHERTY: That's a good question. And 15 DR. TOMPKINS: All that would be accounted for
16 the reality is when Parcel A transferred for Lennar, 16 when you do, I guess, negotiations with them?
17 there was an agreement between Lennar and the Navy for 17 MR. PEARCE: Yes. We've already negotiated
18 handling storm water, the water that ?ows from rain. 18 with them in order -- how their -- where their ?ow
19 And a great deal that's for water, they are basically up 19 will come and how it will tie in with our -- the ability
20 gradient from it. So there's storm water one way or 20 to manage the storm water --
21 another that's going to drain across the Navy property. 21 DR. TOMPKINS: One recommendation --
22 So foreseeing this we had an agreement with 22 MS. PENDERGRASS: So --
23 mem how the water was going to be routed. And they 23 DR. TOMPKINS: -- or action item for dirt
24 have a very large storm water outlet, or drain, that's 24 piles, especially since you start your excavation and
25 25 after observing the piles on -- from could you use

going to discharge onto Navy property and come into our

 

17 (Pages 65 to 68)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

NICCOLI REPORTING

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 .
22
23
24
25

69
the Rhino Snot on all of this rather than the covers,
the plastic material? It seemed to be a more efficient
system in terms when you -- the soil is laying dormant
for a period of time and probably would save you
man-hours as well in case when the wind blows it off,
you don't have to rush in; and it would reduce soil -- I
mean dust in the area as well.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay.
MS. LOWMAN: Yeah, we will be applying Rhino
Snot more frequently, and we have also colored it green.
MR. DOUGHERTY: Yes, we added some green
coloring just, you know, is that by it -- several
thousand gallons of it, basically, inbound. And so it
really was more of a test at this point. You know, it
was a great claim, did some piles, had to run through
some tests to make sure it compacted up; and basically
the contractor awarded its inbound that for Parcel D,
and in the future we'll be using it.
Now, understand, though, it's going to look
uncovered, which is why we were asking to add green
color to it. So I've got to avoid the problem is, "Oh,
it's an uncovered pile." It's a controlled engineered
thing, so just -DR. TOMPKINS: Yeah. It will be green per -MR. FORMAN: A green --

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

(650) 573-9339
71
MR. FORMAN: Yes.
MR. DOUGHERTY: -- fibers and a binder is all
it is. It's nontoxic.
MR. FORMAN: Yeah. But it's good. It's good
stuff. The only -- the only downfall to it is
perceptionwise if you were to be on top of the hill with
a set of binoculars, as Mr. Tisdell might, he would look
at those piles, and there's bit of a green tint to them,
but you would look at them from far away, and you'd say,

"Aha'"
MS. PENDERGRASS: "They're not covered." Okay.
MR. FORMAN: ''They're not covered."
MS. PENDERGRASS: So Mr. Rao, you have the last
question before we take a break.
DR. RAO: Going back to the issue of data in
terms of both PM10, PM2.5, and also the radiation levels
for the dust, is that data actually uploaded somewhere
so that if a member, RAB members, would like, is it
something that is done on a regular basis, sort of like
how the Air Quality Management District or -MR. FORMAN: No.
DR. RAO: -- the EPA does?
MR. FORMAN: They don't require us to do that.
MR. DOUGHERTY: It's -- No. It -- I mean,
it's not on some public Web page somewhere to be viewed
72

70

1
2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9
10
11
12

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

MR. DOUGHERTY: A green tint.
MR. FORMAN: But it's a -- yeah, with a
tint. And when we have the tour, I will take you -- I
will take you to a pile, and you can -DR. TOMPKINS: I see.
MR. FORMAN: -- put your hands on the Rhino
Snot.
MS. PENDERGRASS: What's the composition in
that?
MR. FORMAN: It's basically just sort of a
hardened surface. It feels like a -MS. PENDERGRASS: I mean, but is it-MR. FORMAN: -- surface that's being compacted.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Is it good for -- is it good
for us? Is it good for the environment?
MR. FORMAN: Yes. I touched it and put my
hands all over it today.
MS. PENDERGRASS: You swept it all over? I'm
sorry.
MR. FORMAN: Perfectly okay.
MR. DOUGHERTY: You can actually eat it.
MR. McGOWAN: Look at your shirt.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay.
MR. DOUGHERTY: It's a -- it's a paper product
with a binder. It's basically just --

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

I guess is what I'm saying is obviously -- actually,
Treasure Environmental, we have a contract; and we take
all the stuff; we send it back to, and they send us
reports. Their air specialists go through it and send
us reports on a monthly basis. And like I said,
literally it's mass amounts of data, but,
I mean, I'll provide it to the Navy. And, I guess, you
know, if they want to provide you, that's fine.
But again, it's just -- yes, there's a large
database for this information. But unless you know what
you're looking at, it is just massively cumbersome; just
because of the long-term nature and the sheer volume of
data out there, it would be -- you'd probably be better
off with summary reports. I mean, it's not that raw
data is incomprehensible, but it's just huge amounts.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay.
Mr. Rao, does that satisfy your question?
MS. LOWMAN: The other thing that we might want
to add is RASa reviews all the rad air monitoring also.
And so we are continually reviewing that information as
we get the reports in.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay.
DR. RAO: And as far -- for the Navy, Keith, is
there a way that at least the RAB can come -- can be
given some sort of update on a periodic basis, just -- I

18 (Pages 69 to 72)
HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING. 7/26/07

,--,..

'

 NICCOLI REPORTING

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

\,J.
1
2
3

4
5
6
7
8
9

.. J

'\

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

73
mean, not for individual data points, but just as an
aggregate in terms of, okay, here is for this area over
this period of time, this is what had happened?
Even if it's very low; even if it's 10 percent
of the NRC level, at least it's there on the record, and
we're all aware of it.
That's just a recommendation. I don't know if
any other RAB members feel that way, but I think if you
go a way to let people be reassured, especially in the
community, I can go back to the community and say that
we are periodically getting updates from the Navy from
monitoring sites on this while the construction is going
on.
And without having any data and without -- and
I trust -- I trust to a certain extent the professionals
who are being charged with that all, but it wiU also
help -MR. FORMAN: Okay. What -DR. RAO: -- to have some kind of data.
MR. FORMAN: What I'll do is I'll -.'
Laurie, if you can get with Ralph and Bill and
see what, you know, we can do to proVide an update. I
know you already do that. That's part of your job. You
review it and everything. And we haven't had a problem,
but --

74
MS. LOWMAN: That's fine. We can give -- you
know, every month or something give -- pass out a sheet
with those levels -MR. FORMAN: Okay.
MS. LOWMAN: -- on average, something like
that.
MR. FORMAN: Okay.
MS. LOWMAN: You know, the highest level we
have had that -MR. DOUGHERTY: Can I have one more -- can I
have one more period, though? My personal vacation, so
I don't have to come back. So give me one more period,
and I'll -- we will start to generally put together.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. All right.
So thank you, Miss Lowman and Mr. Pearce.
And can we take a ten-minute break and come
right back so we can stay right on schedule? Thank
you.
(Whereupon, a recess is taken from
7:14 p.m. to 7:24 p.m.)
MS. PENDERGRASS: All right.· We need to
reconvene, and we now have Mr. Jensen who's looking
anxious and ready -MR. JENSEN: Yes.
MS. PENDERGRASS: -- to do a 25 --

(650) 573-9339

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11

12
13
14

15
16
17
18
19
20

21
22

23
24

25

75
Twenty-minute?
MR. JENSEN: Twenty minutes or so on the-MS. PENDERGRASS: How about -MR. JENSEN: -- Parcel F -MS. PENDERGRASS: -- can I get you down to
15 minutes?
MR. JENSEN: -- Feasibility Study.
I think we can probably -MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. So-MR. JENSEN: Mr. Forman and I are going to give
this presentation. We'll really try for 15 minutes
here.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Okay. Just want to be as
concise as possible.
MR. JENSEN: Yes.
MS. PENDERGRASS: So we're going to talk about
Parcel F feasibility study here.
All right. Is everybody back?
MR. FORMAN: Testing.
MS. PENDERGRASS: You know, if we didn't have
to put blood in the fingers of Miss Christine, we could
just shove right through and not have the break. But we
have to have blood to her fingers.
MR. FORMAN: Yes.
MS. PENDERGRASS: All rightie, then.
76
MR. FORMAN: First of all, Christine, thank you
again. I think you have one of the toughest jobs I know
of.
MS. PENDERGRASS: Absolutely.
MR. FORMAN: You do a great job.
So -THE COURT REPORTER: Thank you.
MR. FORMAN: You need to remember that when we
talk here that Christine -- we need to sometimes slow
down and speak as clearly as you can because Christine
has to get it all down somehow.
Okay. Dane Jensen is project manager. He's
also currently the acting lead project manager for
Hunters Point environmental program. He and I are going
to present to you on something we haven't talked to you
about in years, and that's Parcel F. Parcel F -Thank you.
Can you see this? Is this too far away?
MS. PENDERGRASS: Yeah. It's okay.
MR. FORMAN: Parcel F is the portion of the San
Francisco Bay that the Navy owns as part of Hunters
Point, and it has proceeded slower than some of the
other parcels, and we have talked about this. There are
priorities for parcels on Hunters Point, and the top two
priorities have been liB" and "D."
19 (Pages 73 to 76)

HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD RESTORATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING, 7/26/07

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Pearce, Ralph E CIV NAVFAC SW <ralph.pearce@navy.mil>
Monday, August 06, 2007 4:39 PM
Karen Heckman

Sent:
To:

Cc:

Subject:

Vickie Wells; Tamara Davidson; bill.dougherty@tteci.com; Forman, Keith S CIV OASN
(I&E) BRAC PMO West; Jensen, Dane CCIV NAVFAC SW; Klimek, Ann CIV OASN (I&E)
BRAC PMO West; Larson, Elizabeth A CIV OASN (l&E) BRAC PMO West; McFadden,
Patricia A CIV OASN (I&E) BRAC PMO West; amy_brownell@dph.sf.ca.us
RE: Additional questions regarding soil screening area and potential concerns for
Building 606 Occupants.

Karen,
I wanted to get back to your list of questions you had previously sent.
Hope this email finds you well rested and your time off went well.
Below is the list of your questions with a response inserted for each.
Please give me a call with any further questions or issues.
Ralph
(619)532-0912 office
(814)883-3504 cell

As you know, I'm interested in obtaining information regarding work activities, monitoring data and control measures
pertaining to field work and soil screening activities at HP as they may impact potential Health concerns of SFPD staff
who occupy Building 606. During our phone conversation yesterday, we discussed some areas where I need additional
information and you agreed to help me fill in those gaps. Here's a
summary of those questions:
Has the soil screening activity already started? You indicated that you
thought it was beginning on 7 /19/07. What is the actual start date?
Response:
Soil screening was initiated with the start
excavation activities on 7 /19/07.
What air monitoring data will be collected or is already being collected
at the soil screening area? You indicated in our phone call that you
believed all of the contaminants in the Air Monitoring Plan (AMP) would apply to the soil screening area. Can you
confirm this?
Response:

Monitoring is being performed as outlined in the

AMP. Monitoring stations are positioned upwind and downwind of the radiological screening yard (RSV) to sample for
total suspended particulates (including Mn and Pb analyses), PMlO, and asbestos.
Monitors are also in use upwind and downwind of the RSV to sample for radionuclides of concern. All radiological
workers are required to wear dosimeters, which are changed out periodically for analysis. Consistent with the health
and safety plan, personal data rams are employed periodically upwind and downwind of the RSV to monitor total
respirable dust and metals and, if necessary, equip representative workers with personal air pumps to monitor for total
dust (results from this monitoring are available on-site).

1

 You indicated that Asbestos air monitoring was going to be performed at the soil screening area per the Air Monitoring
Plan. Can you confirm that this is correct since Amy Brownell had previously mentioned to me that she thought
Asbestos might not be included?
Response:
sampling is included.

Please refer to preceding response, asbestos

The Air Monitoring Plan, in Table 3-1, describes the materials that will be analyzed and their frequency, but the table
does not specifically include the soil screening yard. Does that scenario fall under the
Excavation and Soil Handling Test Scenario on Table 3-1? If not, what
air monitoring plans apply?
Response:
handling'.

Activities in the RSV are categorized as 'soil

Can you provide the air sampling results, taken at the soil screening area, to me on a weekly basis? If the soil screening
area has already started activity, can I be provided with any air sampling that has already taken place?
Response:

All monitoring results are maintained on site in

the project files. Rather than produce additional copies of results on a regular basis, it will be simpler and more timely
to make available current results for review. Tetratech EC (TtEC) is the Navy's prime contractor for the sewer excavation
work and RSV operation and has field offices at Hunters Point. You, or other representatives of the city, are invited to
examine the results at TtEC's field office located at Hunters Point. Please contact Bill Dougherty (TtEC Construction
Manager) at (415) 671-1990 to schedule an appointment time and he will make this information available.
What PPE is required for workers who are assigned to the soil screening area? Can we be provided with summarized
personnel monitoring results for those workers so that we can explain to the SFPD staff what exposure levels are being
encountered by soil screening workers?
Response:

RSV workers are required to wear Level D PPE,

consisting of a hard hat, leather work gloves (as needed), steel-toe boots, safety glasses, and a high-visibility safety vest.
Regarding monitoring results, they are available for review at TtEC's Hunters Point site office.
Who is the Site Health and Safety Specialist?

In the Health and Safety

Plan (HASP May 23, 2006), this person is identified as making decisions regarding worker PPE.
Response:
This position is filled by a fulltime, on-site,
TtEC health and safety professional (Mr. Neil Tsubota, C.S.P.).
Is the Health and Safety Plan (HASP) from May 23, 2006 the same document referred to in the Project Work Plan as a
Site Specific Health and Safety Plan (SHSP)?
Response:

Yes

What specific dust control measures are being used at the soil screening
pad? Is water spraying continuous? How often will the pad be sprayed?
Will the pads be covered at any point if conditions are windy or if prevailing winds change so that wind direction is
towards Building 606?
Response:

A water truck is used throughout the workday as

needed to minimize dust generation from the roadways located within the RSV. Because the soil that is excavated tends
to vary from moist to wet, dust generation during transport and placement on the screening pads is limited but carefully
2

 monitored. When the soil is removed from the pads following radiological clearance, a water spray is used to minimize
the potential for dust generation. Because excess water interferes with the radiological screening process, water cannot
be used on the pads between the time that the soil arrives in the RSV and it is cleared for release from the RSV. The
Navy has no plans to cover screening pads, as data to date indicate it is unnecessary and current practices are working
successfully. The air monitoring performed to date in association with the pipe removal and RSV operations has
produced no results to suggest that additional dust control efforts are warranted.
Can I get a copy of the relevant RWP (Radiation Work Permit)?
Response:
Yes, it is available for review in TtEC's
Hunters Point field office.
One of the most important concerns recently raised by SFPD staff is the dust accumulation on their vehicles. Can we
arrange for wipe sampling to be done at some interval on those vehicles to demonstrate to SFPD
staff that the dust does not present a hazard? I realize that there
could be concerns that vehicles are bringing in dust from outside of HP, but I'm sure we could minimize potential
conflicts with some procedures in place and by restricting the sampled contaminants to just those that would be most
likely originating at HP.
Response:

The Navy does not believe that additional

sampling of this nature is warranted, as the results of the air monitoring discussed above should provide representative
information necessary to dispel any concerns that the SFPD staff may have regarding dust accumulation on vehicles.
Further, analysis of residual dirt/dust on a vehicle has no associated comparison values.
Is there a procedure at HP for washing of vehicles?
Response:
No vehicle wash down procedures exist. Vehicles
with excessive dirt, such as a truck with caked on soils, are dry-swept prior to exiting the work area to minimize the
distribution of soils on the roadways.

-----Original Message----From: Karen Heckman [mailto:Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 12:35
To: Pearce, Ralph E CIV NAVFAC SW

Cc: Vickie Wells; Tamara Davidson
Subject: Additional questions regarding soil screening area and potential concerns for Building 606 Occupants.

Ralph,
Thanks again for your assistance in facilitating the forwarding of the
information I requested in my memo from May, 31, 2007. The documents
were very helpful in getting me up to speed on the work being conducted
at HP.
As you know, I'm interested in obtaining information regarding work
activities, monitoring data and control measures pertaining to field
work and soil screening activities at HP as they may impact potential
health concerns of SFPD staff who occupy Building 606. During our
phone conversation yesterday, we discussed some areas where I need
additional
3

 information and you agreed to help me fill in those gaps.
summary of those questions:

Here's a

Has the soil screening activity already started? You indicated
that
you thought it was beginning on 7 /19/07. What is the actual
start
date?
What air monitoring data will be collected or is already being
collected at the soil screening area? You indicated in our phone
call that you believed all of the contaminants in the Air
Monitoring
Plan (AMP) would apply to the soil screening area. Can you
confirm
this?
You indicated that Asbestos air monitoring was going to be
performed
at the soil screening area per the Air Monitoring Plan. Can you
confirm that this is correct since Amy Brownell had previously
mentioned to me that she thought Asbestos might not be included.
The Air Monitoring Plan, in Table 3-1, describes the materials
that
will be analyzed and their frequency, but the table does not
specifically include the soil screening yard. Does that scenario
fall under the Excavation and Soil Handling Test Scenario on Table
3-1? If not, what air monitoring plans apply?
Can you provide the air sampling results, taken at the soild
screening area, to me on a weekly basis? If the soil screening
area
has already started activity, can I be provided with any air
sampling
that has already taken place?
What PPE is required for workers who are assigned to the soil
screening area? Can we be provided with summarized personnel
monitoring results for those workers so that we can explain to the
SFPD staff what exposure levels are being encountered by soil
screening workers?
Who is the Site Health and Safety Specialist? In the Health and
Safety Plan (HASP May 23, 2006), this person is identified as
making
decisions regarding worker PPE.
Is the Health and Safety Plan (HASP) from May 23, 2006 the same
document referred to in the Project Work Plan as a Site Specific
Health and Safety Plan (SHSP)?

4

 What specific dust control measures are being used at the soil
screening pad? Is water spraying continuous? How often will the
pad be sprayed? Will the pads be covered at any point if
conditions
are windy or if prevailing winds change so that wind direction is
towards Building 606?
Can I get a copy of the relevant RWP (Radiation Work Permit)?
One of the most important concerns recently raised by SFPD staff
is
the dust accumulation on their vehicles. Can we arrange for wipe
sampling to be done at some interval on those vehicles to
demonstrate
to SFPD staff that the dust does not present a hazard? I realize
that there could be concerns that vehicles are bringing in dust
from
outside of HP, but I'm sure we could minimize potential conflicts
with some procedures in place and by restricting the sampled
contaminants to just those that would be most likely originating
at
HP.
Is there a procedure at HP for washing of vehicles?

I'm disappointed that I'll be out of town next week and unable to meet
with you when you're in the Bay Area. I'll actually be away from the
office until August 7th. So, if you need any clarification or
additional information from my office while I'm away, please contact
either of the following people:
Vickie Wells, OSH Section Director, 415-554-2797 Tamara Davidson, Safety
Officer, 415-554-2614

Thanks again, Ralph. I'll look forward to talking with you when I
return.
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section San Francisco Department of
Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415)554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email

Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
5

 From:
To:
Subject:
Date:

Vickie Wells
Tamara Davidson
Fw: Building 606 Hunters Point Shipyard
Wednesday, September 5, 2007 6:08:00 PM

----- Forwarded by Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV on 09/05/2007 06:05 PM ----Vickie Wells/DPH/SFGOV
09/05/2007 04:35 PM

To vbwells@pacbell.net
cc
Subject Building 606 Hunters Point Shipyard

Vickie,
FYI,
It is 4:30 pm and I still don't have anything from Tetra Tech. The draft response below is what I'll send to
Jerome Grady. He owes a response to Deputy Chief Keohane.

Jerome,
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 Senior Industrial Hygienist Karen Heckman and Safety Officer Tamara
Davidson met with Bill Doughtery of Tretra Tech (the Navy's contractor on the storm drain remediation
project.) Bill Doughtery took us on a tour of the Radiation Screening Yard (RSY) and nearby excavations.
The purpose of the meeting was to obtain the necessary data from Tetra Tech for review and to share
with the San Francisco Police Department and Building 606 occupants to address their health concerns
related to work activities near Building 606. These work activities include excavation sites and a large
fenced Radiological Screening Yard (RSY) near Building 606.
The following data and information were requested:
1. RAD personnel dosimetry for (RSY) workers (Tetra Tech employees) starting June 19th, 2007.
2. RAD sampling data for perimeter samplers located inside the (RSY) starting June 19th, 2007.
3. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for all non-radiological contaminants that are being monitored
at the (RSY).
4. Updwind and downwind air sampling data for the excavation areas nearby to Building 606.
5. Any other personnel monitoring results at either the excavation sites near Building 606 or the (RSY)
for metals, dust, asbestos or other materials.
On August 27th, 2007 Karen Heckman summarized the request for data and information in an email to
Bill Doughtery.
Bill Doughtery contacted the OSH office to indicate that the data and information would be made
available for our review on August 31, 2007. To date the data and information have not been provided.
I have continued to follow-up with Bill Doughtery regarding the availability of the requested data and

 information. I continue to be assured that it is forthcoming.

Alanna-Whom!

Frog-mm: Homers Point Sm 1

 

 

Nr Seraph. @th 

Madam. Hu rd

 


. uCF?-Wa?bfpummsr-
Dwn'mnmw. .
:1ng
343m

 

AtrSampraJcimMca?m Racz'm;

Hunters 

InRIathhoma

 

mommzummumw
her 
ID: mm mm- .
mama

{Him

 


M: Sample ldentt?m?nn Racor'd

- Pam?s 0,337, b4: 045 Av VQIWM

?gs 4

momma-on: Hunters Point 5113mm

    

mm N: Canemiwa?an

dam-Mum: W??a?mr
n; Wm.

may;

[was

?(WWI-term:

wem?cn

lD-Hmmn mm:
magi; -

{Mina

Mars Paint 

Air Samba iden??ca?on Record

9m 5?

 

 .. 7/90 kl/taf [6 111?s 7

194.7

I "maxim

mm

 

7(3: 3(3 

 

 

 

Bauxite-mi

..

?3 6 9C8 7 AirSampleldon?P-ca?an?amm

WW: Huniai?a Pam 



 

mm: weaacnnau?zn -
uchJ-atjuwmgermm- 
zit-11mm um:
MW

Mas:

 

Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:
Attachments:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:06 PM
Vickie Wells
Fw: Update
Memo to Keohane.doc

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/OPH/SFGOV on 10/18/2007 04:04 PM----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
To

Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV

10/16/2007 05:42 PM
cc
Subject

Fw: Update

fyi .....

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415)554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOVon 10/16/2007 05:40 PM----Amy Brownell/DPH/SFGOV
To

Karen Heckman/OPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

10/16/2007 04:03 PM
cc
Subject

Fw: Update

fyi
----- Forwarded by Amy Brownell/DPH/SFGOV on 10/16/2007 04:00 PM----Amy Brownell/DPH/SFGOV
To
10/16/2007 03:55 PM
cc

Michael Cohen/MAYOR/SFGOV

 "'Alex Andrade"' <Alex.Andrade@sfgov.org>, "James Mudge"
<jfmudge@gmail.com>, '"Nicole Franklin"' <Nicole.Franklin@sfgov.org>,
"'Patricia Maitland"' <PatriciaMaitland@sfgov.org>
Subject

Re: Update~)

Hi Michael:
Karen Heckman, IH from DPH Environmental Health, Occupational Health has been working for months with the Police
Officers and their management to address the concerns. She has been reviewing the Navy data - see attached memo in
response to their initial review of Navy air sampling data.
She is already in the process of setting up a meeting with Navy and RASO to brief the police/crime lab on the Navy's
work.
I'm checking with her right now to see the status of that meeting and it makes the most sense that me and possibly Rajiv
and SFRA reps attend that same meeting to assist. We could bring additional experts, if needed, to get into any detailed
discussions that the crime lab scientists might want to have.
I'll keep you posted on when it is scheduled.
thanks,
Amy Brownell, P.E.
San Francisco Health Department
1390 Market St., Suite 910
San Francisco, CA 94102
415-252-3967
fax 415-252-3964
amy.brownell@sfdph.org
Michael Cohen/MAYOR/SFGOV

Michael Cohen/MAYOR/SFGOV
To

"James Mudge" <jfmudge@gmail.com>

cc

'"Alex Andrade"' <Alex.Andrade@sfgov.org>, "'Nicole Franklin"'
<Nicole.Franklin@sfgov.org>, "'Patricia Maitland"'
<PatriciaMaitland@sfgov.org>, Amy Brownell/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

10/16/2007 03:02 PM

Subject

Re: Updater:J

Amy - can we work with Jim Mudge to set up a briefing for Crime Lab staff to help allay their dust fears,
Patty - Is there anything we can do to give staff car wash tickets or something?
Michael Cohen
Director, Base Reuse and Development
Office of Economic and Workforce Development
City Hall, Room 448
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102
Tel.: 415-554-6972
Fax: 415-558-7844
E-Mail: Michael.Cohen@SFGOV.ORG
"James Mudge" <jfmudge@gmail.com>

2

 "James Mudge" <jfmudge@gmail.com>
To

"'Alex Andrade"' <Alex.Andrade@sfgov.org>

cc

"'Nicole Franklin"' <Nicole.Franklin@sfgov.org>, "'Patricia Maitland"'
<PatriciaMaitland@sfgov.org>, "'Michael Cohen'"
<Michael.Cohen@sfgov.org>

10/16/2007 02:49 PM

Subject

Update

Hello Alex
Has there been any resolution to the issues out here at Crime Lab, building 606? Last I heard from you via voicemail was
trying to arrange some meetings. As I am sure you are aware, last week turned into quite a mess as we had no phones
for two days and three power outages. We are still experiencing phone problems, which OTIS is working on. Additionally,
health concerns were raised again by many of my staff. It is vital that fears, rumors, and valid health issues are
addressed. I have chemists on my staff who are quite aware of environmental chemistry; it would be good to bring a
knowledgeable scientist out here to speak to us about environmental concerns/risks/exposures.
And there is still the mud
and the rain, and with the rain there is significant puddling. The cars are a mess; can we get
some practical assistance please?
Thank you
Jim

.lamcs Mudge
Crime Laboratory Manager
San Francisco Police Department
d 415.671.3179
r 415.671.3~90
e jfmudge@gmail.com

(See attached.file: Memo to Keohane.doc)

3

 Occupational Safety and Health Section

MEMORANDUM
Date:

September 4, 2018

To:

Deputy Chief Charles Keohane, Administrative Bureau
San Francisco Police Department

From:

Vickie Wells
Director, Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section

Subject:

Building 606, Hunters Point

#"'~~ (/./4f'cL,l

As you know, the location of Building 606 at Hunters Point Shipyard puts building occupants in proximity
to base wide remediation activities and to grading and construction activities associated with residential
housing development. Due to their proximity to these activities, Building 606 occupants have expressed
concerns regarding their potential exposure to materials associated with the remediation as well as to
dust that may contain asbestos. Building occupants have also expressed concerns about dust
accumulating on their vehicles.
To address those concerns, the OSH Section requested air sampling plans and current monitoring data
prepared by the Navy to evaluate potential contaminant exposures to Building 606 occupants. The data
was provided by the Navy's contractor Tetra Tech, and includes personal dosimetry and air sampling
results for radiological materials as well as air sampling data for dust, asbestos and heavy metals.
The data we received show contaminant levels that are below recognized regulatory standards for all of
these materials. We've asked that the Navy to provide us with updated monitoring data as it becomes
available so that we can continue to review the results. We have some concerns regarding the length of
time to receive these results and will ask the Navy to provide the results in a more timely manner.
We've also asked that the Navy provide additional information about their asbestos sampling. There are
several methods for analyzing asbestos and we're requesting that the Navy re-analyze their samples
using a different method that is more sensitive. DPH OSH may also conduct additional air samples for
asbestos at Building 606 to address the occupant asbestos concerns.
As we discussed, it is not feasible to directly sample the dust that has settled onto vehicles. The more
appropriate method for evaluating exposure to dust, is through air sampling.
In addition, the Navy has also agreed to participate in an informational session for SFPD staff. We can
assist with coordination of this meeting but we'll need input from SFPD on the best dates and time for
scheduling this.
Both Tamara Davidson and Karen Heckman of my staff are working on this issue. Please feel free to
give anyone of us a call if you need additional information.

Cc: Steve Johnson, POA
Tamara Davidson, Safety Officer, DPH -OSH
Karen Heckman, Senior Industrial Hygienist, DPH-OSH
Amy Brownell, DPH Environmental Health

Occupational Safety and Health

s

101 Grove Street, Room 217 • San Francisco, CA 94102 • (415) 554-2793

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:10 AM
Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com
Updated Monitoring Data from HPS

Hi Bill,
Just wanted to check in with you to find out when we will receive the updated monitoring data that was previously
requested.
Thanks
Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 10/30/2007 09:06 AM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
08/27/2007 06:26 PM

To

Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com

cc

Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject

Follow-up to our meeting last weekl],

Bill,
I wanted to thank you and your staff for meeting with Tamara Davidson and myself last Thursday to discuss the sampling
data that SF DPH would like to have made available for regular review. As I mentioned in the meeting, we are trying to
address SFPD building 606 occupant concerns regarding potential exposures from work activities adjacent to their
facility. To minimize their concerns, we're interested in reviewing sampling data that evaluates contaminant
concentrations at excavation sites near building 606 and the adjacent radiological screening yard (RSY).
We are looking forward to receiving the following information that you indicated would be available for our review,
sometime this week.
1. RAD personnel dosimetry for RSY workers starting June 19th, 2007. If this data is reported quarterly, then RAD data
for the past quarter at the old RSY will be sufficient until data from the new RSY is available.
2. RAD sampling data for perimeter samplers located inside the RSY starting June 19th, 2007
3. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for all non-radiological contaminants that are being monitored at the RSY.
4. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for the excavation areas nearby to building 606
1

 5. Any other personnel monitoring results at either the excavation sites near 606 or the RSY, for metals, dust, asbestos
or other materials.
I did check the Air Monitoring Plan and Table 3-1 indicates that air sampling at the RSY should include analysis for TSP,
PM10, PCB's, and Asbestos.
Can you verify that the upwind and downwind sampling at the soil screening area is looking for all of those
contaminants? I don't show in my notes that PCB's are being considered.
Thanks again for all your help and for the tour of the RSY and nearby excavations. Having this information is a great
starting point for having the necessary data to share with SFPD and to help us to address their health concerns.
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone ( 415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

2

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Wednesday, November 07, 2007 5:27 PM
Tamara Davidson
Fw: Updated Monitoring Data from HPS

fyi

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone ( 415) 554-2762
Fax
(415)554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 11/07/2007 05:24 PM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
To

Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com

10/30/2007 09:10 AM
cc
Subject

Updated Monitoring Data from HPS

Hi Bill,
Just wanted to check in with you to find out when we will receive the updated monitoring data that was previously
requested.
Thanks
Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone ( 415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 10/30/2007 09:06 AM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
To

Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com

cc

Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

08/27/2007 06:26 PM

11·
Follow-up to our meeting last weeki...J

Subject

1

 Bill,
I wanted to thank you and your staff for meeting with Tamara Davidson and myself last Thursday to discuss the sampling
data that SF DPH would like to have made available for regular review. As I mentioned in the meeting, we are trying to
address SFPD building 606 occupant concerns regarding potential exposures from work activities adjacent to their
facility. To minimize their concerns, we're interested in reviewing sampling data that evaluates contaminant
concentrations at excavation sites near building 606 and the adjacent radiological screening yard (RSY).
We are looking forward to receiving the following information that you indicated would be available for our review,
sometime this week.
1. RAD personnel dosimetry for RSY workers starting June 19th, 2007. If this data is reported quarterly, then RAD data
for the past quarter at the old RSY will be sufficient until data from the new RSY is available.
2. RAD sampling data for perimeter samplers located inside the RSY starting June 19th, 2007
3. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for all non-radiological contaminants that are being monitored at the RSY.
4. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for the excavation areas nearby to building 606
5. Any other personnel monitoring results at either the excavation sites near 606 or the RSY, for metals, dust, asbestos
or other materials.
I did check the Air Monitoring Plan and Table 3-1 indicates that air sampling at the RSY should include analysis for TSP,
PM10, PC B's, and Asbestos.
Can you verify that the upwind and downwind sampling at the soil screening area is looking for all of those
contaminants? I don't show in my notes that PCB's are being considered.
Thanks again for all your help and for the tour of the RSY and nearby excavations. Having this information is a great
starting point for having the necessary data to share with SFPD and to help us to address their health concerns.
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415)554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

2

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Sent:
To:

Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:12 PM
Amy Brownell; Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com; Ralph.Pearce@navy.mil;
Laurie.Lowman@navy.mil
Vickie Wells; Tamara Davidson; Michael Harris/DPH/SFGOV
Responses from Bldg 606 Occupants regarding Health and Safety Issues to address on
11/28.
Crime Lab Health and Safety Concernsjpg

Amy, Bill, Ralph and Laurie,
I've attached an image file with a scanned document we received from the Crime Lab which summarizes their staff
questions that they would like to have addressed at the upcoming meeting on 11/28/07. In addition, I also
summarized the questions that are trickling in from the Tactical Unit. We gave them a deadline of 11/7, but the original
Police memo notifying staff of the meeting came out later than expected, so we may still receive more survey forms. The
questions should help to target the presentations. We'll forward any additional questions if they're different than what
appears below. I think you'll find that the questions are similar to the content we discussed at our earlier meeting. Based
on what I've seen so far, we'll need to make a clear distinction between what's happening at Parcel A and Navy related
activities since these boundaries aren't so clear to some of the Police Staff.
Amy and I also discussed the possibility for all of us to meet in San Francisco prior to the 28th to make any last minute
adjustments to the presentations. She is available on either 11/26 in the morning or 11/27 in the afternoon. Could you let
me know if either of these dates/times will work for you?
The Police Department has full multimedia capabilities and I think having some kind of presentation with visuals would be
very helpful. For discussing sampling data I think the use of tables or graphs with summarized information and some
means of comparison to regulatory standards would be especially useful. Many of the Police staff have a knowledge base
that is probably similar to that of the community, so for information about specific contaminants, starting at a basic level
with an introduction about the substance will allow the discussion to build up to more detailed discussion.

Also, we can certainly chat by phone as needed at any point. However, I will be on vacation starting 11/9 and return on
11/19. In my absence, please contact Tamara Davidson at (415) 554-2614 or by email: TamaraDavidson@sfdph.org

Tactical Unit Questions as of 11/8/07:
What kinds of radioactive materials are being removed at HP?
What are the health effects of radioactive materials?
My skin itches when I touch the dusUdirt, is this due to radioactive material?
Will the dirt and dust on my car expose my family to any hazardous materials?
Is the dirt at HP exposing me to any hazardous materials?
What are all of the potential contaminants at HP that are being remediated and what are the health concerns associated
with each contaminant?
What are the test results for air monitoring being conducted at HP including current results and results going back to the
beginning of construction? (it's not clear if this person is referring to Parcel A or Navy activities, or both).
What are the air testing results being conducted at HP and how do I understand what they mean? What standards do they
relate to? Are we exceeding any standards?
What triggers a shut down of construction ? Where does this level come from?

(See attached.file: Crime Lab Health and Safety Concerns.jpg)
1

·,

 Thanks again for everyone's participation
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 11/08/2007 01 :21 PM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
10/26/2007 08:53 AM

To

Amy Brown/ADMSVC/SFGOV, Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com,
Ralph.Pearce@navy.mil, Laurie.Lowman@navy.mil

cc

Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV, Vickie
Wells/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject

confirmed meeting date and time: Wed, November 28th, 1 PM -4 PM

Amy, Ralph, Laurie and Ralph,
The Police Department has confirmed Wed, 11/28 from 1 PM - 4 PM for the training.
DPH-OSH will provide survey forms to Building 606 staff next week for their input on what specific questions they would
like to have answered and I'll provide their responses to you as soon as we get the forms back.
-Thanks
Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

2

 Nov. 5. 2007

1: 0:)PM

~o. rntl3

~. l.

Questions from Martha Blake, Quality Assurance Manager and Health
and Safety Officer, Crime Lab, November 6, 2007 (671-3232)

I.

Health and Safety Issues

a. What criteria does Lennar use to mandate a shutdown of

operations?

b. How many times has construction been stopped, to date,
because particulate levels were over the limit?
c. How does Lennar communicate a shutdown to the Police
Department?
d. How does the Police Department communicate shutdowns to
the occupants of Building 606?
e. What are the duties and responsibilities of the Industrial
Hygienist assigned to Building 606?
f. What is being routinely measured by air-monitoring and how
are results communicated to occupants of Building 606?
g. How is the soil sampled and tested and how are results
communicated to occupants of Building 606?
h. Can the staff receive copies of lab-test results to date for the soil
and air samples?
1. Can staff get blood tests, at SF Occupational Health Services,
for environmental toxins such as Pb, PCBs? (for background
value if levels change)

Has Cal-OSHA been contacted regarding any health and safety
issues?
k. Can the staff be provided with a list of key contact personnel
for H&S issues?

J.

II.

Logistics and Planning Issues

a. What is nature of material on our vehicles?
b. How can our vehicles be safely washed (undercarriages, too)?

c. How will washing vehicles be compensated?
d,. How will damage to vehicles be compensated?
e. Who is responsible for tagging/coning/repairing large potholes?
f. Are there plans to prevent flash flooding of site?
g. Are there contingency plans for ex.its when flooding occurs?
h. Could a road be planned for vehicles only (no trucks)?
1. Can the staff be provided with a list of key contact personnel

for logistics and planning issues?

 Heckman, Karen (DPH)
From:

Sent:
To:

Subject:

Karen Heckman < karen.heckman@sfdph.org >
Tuesday, November 27, 2007 8:58 AM
Tamara Davidson
Fw: Updated Monitoring Data from HPS

Tamara,
You may want to have Mike continue to pursue the request for data. I've never heard anything back from Bill. I'll mention
this to him at the meeting today, but unless there gets raised to level of Ralph's attention, again, I don't think Bill will
respond.
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415)554~762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 11/27/2007 08:54 AM ----Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
10/30/2007 09:10 AM

To

Bill.Dougherty@tteci.com

cc
Subject

Updated Monitoring Data from HPS

Hi Bill,
Just wanted to check in with you to find out when we will receive the updated monitoring data that was previously
requested.
Thanks
Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone (415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org
----- Forwarded by Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV on 10/30/2007 09:06 AM-----

 Karen Heckman/DPH/SFGOV
08/27/2007 06:26 PM

To

Bill.Oougherty@tteci.com

cc

Tamara Davidson/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV

Subject

Follow-up to our meeting last week(:]

Bill,
I wanted to thank you and your staff for meeting with Tamara Davidson and myself last Thursday to discuss the sampling
data that SF DPH would like to have made available for regular review. As I mentioned in the meeting, we are trying to
address SFPD building 606 occupant concerns regarding potential exposures from work activities adjacent to their
facility. To minimize their concerns, we're interested in reviewing sampling data that evaluates contaminant
concentrations at excavation sites near building 606 and the adjacent radiological screening yard (RSY).
We are looking forward to receiving the following information that you indicated would be available for our review,
sometime this week.
1. RAD personnel dosimetry for RSY workers starting June 19th, 2007. If this data is reported quarterly, then RAD data
for the past quarter at the old RSY will be sufficient until data from the new RSY is available.
2. RAD sampling data for perimeter samplers located inside the RSY starting June 19th, 2007
3. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for all non-radiological contaminants that are being monitored at the RSY.
4. Upwind and downwind air sampling data for the excavation areas nearby to building 606
5. Any other personnel monitoring results at either the excavation sites near 606 or the RSY, for metals, dust, asbestos
or other materials.
I did check the Air Monitoring Plan and Table 3-1 indicates that air sampling at the RSY should include analysis for TSP,
PM10, PC B's, and Asbestos.
Can you verify that the upwind and downwind sampling at the soil screening area is looking for all of those
contaminants? I don't show in my notes that PCB's are being considered.
Thanks again for all your help and for the tour of the RSY and nearby excavations. Having this information is a great
starting point for having the necessary data to share with SFPD and to help us to address their health concerns.
-Karen

Karen Heckman MPH, CIH
Senior Industrial Hygienist
Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Section
San Francisco Department of Public Health
101 Grove Street, Room 217
San Francisco, CA 94102
Phone ( 415) 554-2762
Fax
(415) 554-2562
Email
Karen.Heckman@sfdph.org

2

 DPH Occupational Safety and
Health Presentation
Vickie L. Wells, MS, CIH, CSP
Director, Occupational Safety and Health

 Industrial Hygiene 101
n

What is “exposure” or “dose”?
Ø
Ø

n

Amount of material (usually inhaled)
Length of exposure

Routes of Exposure
Ø
Ø
Ø

Inhalation
Ingestion
Skin Contact

 Industrial Hygiene 101
n

Occupational exposure limits are
airborne concentrations of a substance
Ø
Ø

n

Parts Per Million (PPM)
Milligrams or Micrograms per Cubic Meter

Usually established as an 8 Hour Time
Weighted Average

 Introduction
n

n

Envirosurvey Inc collected samples from
4 vehicles at Bldg 606 and analyzed
them for lead, manganese, asbestos
and PCBs.
The report indicates that lead,
manganese and asbestos were present
in the samples. No PCBs were detected
in the wipe samples.

 Introduction
n

n

Lead is a very common environmental
contaminant and is present in many soil
or dust samples.
Asbestos and manganese occur
naturally in the soil, and their presence
in the dust samples is expected.

 Introduction
n

Water samples were collected in the
locker room and low to non-detectable
levels of regulated metals were found.

 Sampling Methods
n

n

Wipe samples were collected from four
vehicles and analyzed for lead,
manganese and PCBs.
MicroVac samples were also collected
from four vehicles and analyzed for
asbestos by Polarized Light Microscopy
(PLM).

 Sampling Methods
n

Water samples were collected from the
hot and cold water in the locker room
and analyzed for heavy metals.

 Sampling Results - Lead
n

n

Consultant reported total lead
concentrations ranged from 36.9 ug/ft2
to 365 ug/ft2
Consultant compared these levels to the
Department of Health Services (DHS)
Threshold Level of 40 ug/ft2 for floor
levels

 DHS Lead Regulations
n

Designed to protect children from lead
poisoning in residential settings.
Ø
Ø

n

Not appropriate as an occupational standard
Primary route of exposure for children is ingestion

DHS has several different lead-contaminated
dust levels:
Ø
Ø
Ø

40 ug/ft2 for interior floor surfaces
250 ug/ft2 for interior horizontal surfaces
400 ug/ft2 for exterior floor and horizontal surfaces

 Cal/OSHA Lead Regulations
n

n

Based on airborne levels of lead in air –
not levels in dust
Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) is 50
ug/M3
Ø
Ø

This is an airborne level – 8 Hour TWA
Does not correlate with dust/wipe sample data

 Cal/OSHA Lead Regulations
n

n

Requires a “Lead Compliance Program”
only if the PEL (50 ug/M3) or Action
Level (30 Ug/M3) is exceeded
Biological monitoring as also triggered
by the PEL/Action Level

 Sampling Results - Asbestos
n

Consultant reports that Chrysotile
asbestos was present in all four
samples:
Ø
Ø

§

Two samples 1-3% by weight
Two samples <1% by weight

Note: PLM analysis does not produce results in % by weight

 Cal/OSHA Asbestos
Regulations
n

n

Designed for employees working
directly with asbestos containing
material.
Not designed for naturally occurring
asbestos.

 Cal/OSHA Asbestos
Regulations
n

n

Construction Standard (8 CCR 1529)
referenced by the consultant does not
apply to personnel at Bldg 606.
Cal/OSHA General Industry Standard
establishes a Permissible Exposure Limit
(PEL) for asbestos of 0.1 fiber/cc.
Ø

Airborne exposure limit

 Asbestos
n

Many ways to sample and analyze for
asbestos:
Ø

Ø
Ø

§

Phase Contrast Microscopy: Required by
Cal/OSHA (PCM)
Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

Further sampling would be needed to
fully characterize exposure to SFPD

 Asbestos
n

n

Navy and Contractor data show low
levels of airborne asbestos.
Levels would be highest for personnel
actually working with the soil.

 Sample Results - Manganese
n

n

Consultant reports that manganese
levels ranged from 232 ug/ft2 to 2,220
ug/ft2.
Manganese was detected in all four
samples.

 Sample Results - Manganese
n

Consultant concludes that, “potential
exposure of personnel to metallic
manganese may be present during
various soil/dust disturbance activities
such as sweeping and/or cleaning the
vehicles.”

 Sample Results - Manganese
n

n

Wipe sampling data cannot be
translated to airborne exposure data.
Any potential exposure to manganese
would be to oxides of manganese, not
metallic manganese.

 Cal/OSHA Manganese
Regulations
n

n

No separate standard for manganese as
there is for lead and asbestos.
Cal/OSHA has a Permissible Exposure
Limit for manganese of 0.2 mg/M3

 Water Sample Results
n

n

Consultant reported very low to nondetectable concentrations of regulated
metals.
Questions???
Ø
Ø

Sample volume and detection limits
When and how samples were collected

 General Comments
n

n

Wipe samples show the presence or absence
of a substance.
Wipe sample results cannot be compared to
occupational exposure limits, such as the
Cal/OSHA PELs.
Ø

n

No way to translate wipe sample data to exposure data

There are no regulations that govern how
much lead, asbestos or manganese can be
present in the dust on a car.

 General Comments
n

n

Manganese and asbestos occur
naturally in the soil and are commonly
present in soil samples
Lead is a common environmental
contaminant

 Is Bldg 606 Safe?
n
n

n

Yes
Regulatory agencies have approved
lease of Bldg 606
Air sampling data indicates exposure to
contaminants is well within acceptable
levels

 How Can We Be Sure?
n

DPH Industrial Hygienist on-site.
Ø

n

n

Review monitoring data

DPH can conduct personal air monitoring to
evaluate exposure of Bldg 606 personnel to
asbestos, lead and manganese.
Sampling results can be compared to
occupational exposure standards.

 How Can We Be Sure?
n

Conduct biological monitoring for lead
for selected SFPD personnel who
potentially have the highest exposure to
dust.

  

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BASE REALIGNMENT AND CLOSURE
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE WEST
1455 FRAZEE RD, SUITE 900
SAN DIEGO, CA 92103-4310

Ser 
MAR 2 2011

 

Mr. Mark Ripperda (SFD 8-1)

Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX
75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Mr. Ryan Miya

Department of Toxic Substance Control
700 Heinz Avenue, Bldg. F, Suite 200
Berkeley, CA 94710

Mr. Larry Morgan

California Department of Public Health
1616 Capitol Avenue, MS 7402

PO. Box 997377

Sacramento, CA 95899~7377

Dear Regulatory Team Members:

Please ?nd enclosed the Final Removal Action Completion Report (RACR), Parcels 
and UC-2, Hunters Point Shipyard, San Francisco, California. Response to Comments (RTCs)
from the draft version of this report is included as Appendix K. Technical review of the enclosed
report has been completed by the Navy?s Radiological Affairs Support Of?ce.

The Navy requests a letter of concurrence on the enclosed RTCs and the Final RACR for
Parcels and no later than Monday, April 4.. 2011. If you have questions regarding
the enclosed report, please contact Mr. Chris Yantos at (619) 532-0912, or Mr. Keith Forman at
(619) 532-0913.

   

Sincerely,
3 

WKEITH FORMAN

BRAC Environmental Coordinator
By direction of the Director

Enclosures: 1. Final Removal Action Completion Report, Parcels and UC-2, Hunters
Point Shipyard, San Francisco, California.

Copy to:

Diane Silva (2 Hard Copies, 1 unbound, CD)
NAVFAC Southwest (Code EV33)

Naval Base San Diego

2965 Mole Rd., Bldg. 3519

San Diego, CA 92136

Laurie Lowman (3 Hard Copies and 3 CDs)
Building 1971

NWS PO. Drawer 260

Yorktown, VA. 23 69 1 -0260

Amy Brownell (CD Only)

SF Department of Public Health
1390 Market St., Suite 210

San Francisco, Ca 94102

Elaine Warren (CD only)
Of?ce of the City Attorney
City Hall, Room 234

1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4682

Leslie Lundgren (Hard Copy and CD)
33 New Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94105

Dorinda Shipman (Hard COpy and CD)
Treadwell and Rollo

555 Montgomery St., Suite 1300

San Francisco, CA 94111

Stephen Proud (CD Only)
Lennar/BVHP

1 California St, Suite 2700
San Francisco, CA 9411 1

Stan DeSouza (CD Only)
1680 Mission St., First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94103?2414 

Ser 
MAR 2 2011

Karla Brasaemle (Hard Copy and CD)
90 New Montgomery St, Suite 710
San Francisco, CA 94105

Janice Torbet (Hard Copy and CD)
100 Larkin Street

Gov. Information Ctr., 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102

Michael Sharpless (CD Only)
Paul Hastings, et a1.

55 2nd Street, 24th Floor

San Francisco, CA 94104?2635

Tamara Davidson (CD Only)
SF Health Department

101 Grove Street, Rm 217
San Francisco, CA 94102

Leon Muhammad (Hard COpy and CD)
5048 3rd Street
San Francisco, CA 94124

Linda Malvino (Hard COpy and CD)
Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
5341 Old Redwood Highway, Suite 300
Petaluma, CA 94954

Michael McGowan (CD only)
1331 Evans Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94124

Randy Brandt (CD Only)
475 14th Street, Suite 400
Oakland, CA 94612

Kristine Enea (CD Only)
951 Innes Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94124

Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310
CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
March 2, 2011
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174

PARCELS UC1 AND UC2
HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

 Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310

CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
March 2, 2011
PARCELS UC1 AND UC2
HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 750
San Diego, California 92101-8536

Bill Dougherty
TtEC Project Manager

Erik Abkemeier, CHP, PE, CSP, CHMM
TtEC Radiation Safety Officer

3/01/2011
Date

3/01/2011
Date

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The U.S. Department of the Navy (DON) directed the preparation of this Removal Action
Completion Report (RACR) to describe and summarize the Building 819 Final Status Survey
(FSS) and Utility Corridor 1 (UC1) and Utility Corridor 2 (UC2) storm drain and sanitary sewer
removal actions at Hunters Point Shipyard (HPS) located in San Francisco, California. The
purpose of the storm drain and sanitary sewer removal actions was to protect the public health,
welfare, and the environment from actual or potential releases of radiologic contaminants, meet
the currently specified removal action objectives, and achieve the unrestricted radiological
release of Parcels UC1 and UC2. This RACR does not address non-radiological contamination
on Parcels UC1 and UC2 or include or affect any other designated HPS parcels.
Parcels UC1 and UC2 are located in the north central portion of HPS and, along with Utility
Corridor 3 (UC3), constitute the main traffic corridor through HPS. The topography of the area
is hilly with the boundary line separating the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (SFRA)
property from the HPS property located at the fence line on the top of the slope above Fisher and
Spear Avenues and Robinson Street, and immediately adjacent to the east end of Building 101.
In addition, flat lowlands are located on the southern and western portions of Parcels UC1 and
UC2.
Parcel UC1 is approximately 3.9 acres in area and extends the length of Spear Avenue until it
connects to Parcel UC3 (Crisp Road) on the west and Parcel UC2 on the east. Parcel UC1
incorporates Buildings 819 and 823 at its western end. Parcel UC2 is approximately 3.9 acres in
area and encompasses a section of Robinson Street and the length of Fisher Avenue. The
boundary between the SFRA property and Parcel UC2 extends along the exterior east wall of
Building 101 with the associated asphalt parking lot located within Parcel UC2.
Based on its operational history and site-specific investigative data, the DON determined that
radioactive contamination in soils, debris, slag, buildings, and the storm drain and sanitary sewer
system at HPS required a response action. The DON deliberated over several removal options
before physical removal and proper off-site disposal was selected as the only viable alternative.
The present-day configuration of the HPS storm drain and sanitary sewer systems is the result of
an evolutionary process. The combined systems grew in sections and then underwent a series of
separation projects to provide for installation of dedicated sanitary sewer piping and pump
stations that would discharge sanitary sewer effluent off-site. Complete separation of the
combined systems was never achieved, and inspections revealed that cross-connections between
the two systems may still exist. Due to the evolutionary nature of the separation process,
radiological contamination from the same sources may have impacted piping and other
components of both systems.
ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

ES-1

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 A total of 42 storm drain line segments and 57 sanitary sewer line segments were excavated
during the removal actions. Fieldwork for the Parcels UC1 and UC2 removal actions were
initiated in March 2009 and continued through July 2010 during which a total of 20 survey units
were excavated and delineated. In total, 6,407 linear feet of trench (inclusive of excavated soil
and pipe/manholes) was excavated. The maximum depths of the excavated trenches ranged
between 2 feet and 20 feet below ground surface. The total area of the exposed trench surfaces
following the completion of excavation was 13,861 square meters with 6,141 linear feet of
trench. The storm drain and sanitary sewer removal actions resulted in 11 trench survey units
(SUs) identified as SU133, SU139, SU140, SU146, SU147, SU148, SU150, SU164, SU167,
SU168, and SU171 in Parcel UC1 and 9 trench survey units identified as SU136, SU137,
SU138, SU141 through SU145, and SU149 in Parcel UC2.
Excavated soil from Parcels UC1 and UC2 was transported to selected screening pads in
Radiological Screening Yard 2 (RSY2) for dewatering and radiological processing. The
radiological survey process resulted in a 100 percent surface scan. Radioactive material
identified during the screening process was collected, segregated, and stored in appropriate
containers for subsequent disposal by the DON’s low-level radiological waste (LLRW)
contractor. Areas of excavated soil placed on the screening pads that showed the potential
presence of radiation levels greater than the established investigation limits were further
evaluated, and biased soil samples were collected, as appropriate. Any contamination identified
was characterized and remediated. FSS soil samples were collected, evaluated, and with the
concurrence of the Radiological Affairs Support Office, segregated for use as backfill or for offsite disposal. A total of 2,631 soil samples were collected from the Parcels UC1 and UC2 storm
drains and sanitary sewer excavated soil during processing in RSY2. During radiological
processing in RSY2, approximately 876 cubic yards of soil from the screening pads that exceeded
the release criteria was remediated. The remediated soil was placed in LLRW bins for disposal
by the DON’s radiological waste contractor.
During the removal action activities, a total of 798 soil samples were collected from the 20
trench survey units that resulted from the excavation of the storm drain and sanitary sewers in
Parcels UC1 and UC2. Of these 798 samples, 438 were investigative and 360 were systematic
FSS soil samples. Based on the soil sample analytical results, approximately 262 cubic yards of
soil was remediated from the excavated storm drain and sanitary sewer trenches. The remediated
soil was placed in LLRW bins for disposal by the DON’s radiological waste contractor. A
minimum of 18 discrete FSS soil samples were collected from each of the 20 trench survey units
and analyzed during the removal action activities. In addition, radiological surface scans were
performed on the trench surfaces, and direct or static measurements were collected from each of
the 18 systematic FSS sample collection locations and evaluated for the potential presence of
radiological contamination.

ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

ES-2

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Sediment samples were collected from piping (pipe and manholes) during the Parcels UC1 and
UC2 removal actions when a sufficient volume of material was available and submitted to the
laboratory for analysis. A total of 55 sediment samples were collected from pipe, and 10 sediment
samples were collected from manholes during the Parcels UC1 and UC2 removal action
activities. Following laboratory analysis by gamma spectroscopy, 9 manhole sediment samples
and 26 pipe sediment samples did not indicate the presence of radioactivity above the release
criteria. While the majority of the pipe excavated from Parcels UC1 and UC2 disintegrated upon
removal and was transferred along with the excavated soil for processing in RSY2, the
remaining excavated pipe sections along with the bricks and/or concrete that formed the
sidewalls of the 35 excavated manholes was placed in LLRW bins for disposal by the DON’s
radiological waste contractor.
Dose and risk modeling using the most current version of RESRAD was performed for each of
the 20 trench survey units excavated in Parcels UC1 and UC2 using the larger of the method
detection limit or reported activity concentrations. The results of the modeling efforts for each of
the 20 trench survey units in Parcels UC1 and UC2 indicated that the residual activity
following the removal actions met the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency criterion of
less than 3 × 10-4, which supports free release. Based on the dose and risk modeling results, the
highest net residual dose to workers or members of the public as a result of exposures to
radioactive material in soil on Parcel UC1 was identified in SU171 at 5.702 millirem per year
(mrem/y) with an excess lifetime cancer risk of 9.317 × 10-5, and on Parcel UC2 in SU142 at
5.896 mrem/y with an excess lifetime cancer risk of 9.278 × 10-5.
Buildings 819 and 823 are included within the Parcel UC1 property boundary. Building 819 was
the former sewage lift station and Building 823 housed the emergency generator for Building
819. Building 819 was identified as a potentially radiologically impacted building; however,
Building 823 has never been associated with the use or storage of radioactive material. An FSS
was performed for Building 819 and the results were submitted to the DON and the regulatory
agencies in September 2007. The analysis of the collected field data showed that the residual
radioactivity in Building 819 met the release criteria and the structure was ready for
unconditional, unrestricted use. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the
California Department of Public Health, Environmental Management Branch concurred with the
unrestricted release of Building 819 on October 28, 2009.
Following the completion of the removal actions including backfilling of the trench survey units,
site restoration activities were performed for Parcels UC1 and UC2. These activities included
the asphalting of the road surfaces and installation of a temporary swale system to manage
stormwater flow.
The DON met its stated radiological removal action objectives to prevent or minimize exposure
to ROCs in concentrations that exceed remediation goals for all potentially complete exposure
ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

ES-3

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 pathways.. The completed remedial actions were protective of human health and the
environment, complied with federal and state statutes and regulations that are applicable or
relevant and appropriate, and were cost-effective. In addition, the removal actions resulted in a
reduction of the potential risks to levels below remediation goals associated with potential
exposures to the radionuclides of concern. Based on the results of the Parcels UC1 and UC2
storm drain and sanitary sewer removal actions, residual dose and risk modeling efforts,
implementation of the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) process, and the radiological
survey and release of Building 819, the classification of “radiologically impacted” may be
removed from Parcels UC1 and UC2 and no further actions are required.

ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

ES-4

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Historical figures indicate that Parcels UC1 and UC2 were located within the 1939 shoreline and
were not part of the fill areas that comprise the majority of the HPS site. Because TtEC
anticipated that the subsurface soil formations primarily would be serpentine rock, additional
dust mitigation measures were installed to reduce potential asbestos exposure to workers and the
community. These mitigation measures included a dust repression misting system, continuous
spraying by water trucks to minimize fugitive dust, applying fabric to temporary fences to reduce
windblown particulates, and applying a surfactant to open trenches. Wind socks were installed
to determine the prevailing wind direction and ensure proper placement of the radiological air
monitoring equipment on a daily basis. Air monitors were installed upwind and downwind of
the excavation activities to measure airborne asbestos, particulates, lead, and magnesium. No
exceedances were identified during the field activities.
As part of the pre-excavation activities, the DON directed TtEC to remove the standing gray
waters from the Parcels UC1 and UC2 sanitary sewer lines. These sanitary sewer lines received
wastes discharged from the SFRA property and subsequently were isolated to prevent illicit
discharges to the City of San Francisco’s sewer system or to San Francisco Bay. Following
isolation, the residual material in the sanitary sewer lines was pumped through the Crisp Road
sanitary sewer force main under a batch permit to the City of San Francisco’s sewer system.
Storm drain and sanitary sewer excavation activities commenced on March 20, 2009 in
Parcel UC1 and were completed on July 10, 2010. Excavation activities in Parcel UC2 were
completed on November 3, 2009.
3.2

EXCAVATED SOIL PROCESSING

Soil derived from the excavation of the Parcels UC1 and UC2 storm drain and sanitary sewer
systems was transported to RSY2 and placed on designated screening pads for dewatering and
radiological processing. Table 3-3 lists each truckload of soil excavated, the assigned screening
pad and stockpile number, and the excavation date. During processing, the excavated material
was spread on screening pads in lifts that did not exceed a thickness of 6 inches or 1,000 m2 in
area. Radiological surface surveys were performed and consisted of a high-density gamma scan
performed with the use of gamma scintillation detectors and supported by global positioning
equipment. A discussion of the various towed array systems used for the scanning activities is
provided in the Work Plan (TtEC 2008f) and the SUPRA (Appendix A). This survey process
resulted in a 100 percent surface scan. Radioactive material identified during the screening
activities were collected, segregated, and stored in appropriate containers for subsequent disposal
by the DON’s radiological waste contractor. Gamma scan data for the excavated soil processed
in RSY2 and used as backfill material are presented in the individual SUPRs included in
Appendices E and F.

ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

3-3

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Areas of excavated soil placed on the screening pads in RSY2 that showed the potential presence
of radiation levels greater than the established investigation limits were further evaluated, and
biased soil samples were collected, as appropriate. The systematic sample collection locations
were identified based on a random start point using the most current version of Visual Sample
Plan (VSP) software. A minimum of 18 systematic soil samples were collected from each
screening pad and analyzed by the on-site laboratory using gamma spectroscopy. Any soil
sample results exceeding a radionuclide-specific release criterion was remediated. The release
criteria for the storm drain and sanitary sewer removal actions are provided in Table 2-4.
Remedial action support surveys were performed until postremediation sample results were less
than the radionuclide-specific release criteria. The results of the analyses were provided to the
RASO for review. Following an evaluation of the laboratory analytical results for the 18 FSS
samples and with the concurrence of the RASO, the soil on the screening pads was stockpiled
pending the results of the off-site Sr-90 analysis. Once the off-site laboratory analytical results
were evaluated and the data provided to the RASO for review, the RASO concurred on whether
or not the excavated soil stockpile was acceptable for use as backfill material. Only those
stockpiles that received concurrence from the RASO were used as backfill material in the trench
survey units.
Approximately of 20,680 cubic yards of soil were generated during the excavation of the
Parcels UC1 and UC2 storm drain and sanitary sewers and placed on individual screening pads
for radiological processing in RSY2. Each truckload of excavated soil was assigned to an
appropriate screening pad, and each screening pad was assigned a unique identification number
for tracking purposes. These unique identification numbers were sequential and designated as
“ES” for the excavated soil units.
During the Parcels UC1 and UC2 removal actions, a total of 2,631 soil samples were collected
from the soil derived from the excavation of the storm drain and sanitary sewers and placed on
screening pads in RSY2 for radiological processing. About 876 cubic yards of radiologically
processed soil exceeded the release criteria and was remediated. The remediated soil was placed
in LLRW bins for disposal. The radiologically contaminated soil was shipped off-site to either
the U.S. Ecology facility in Idaho or the Energy Solutions facility in Clive, Utah by the DON’s
radiological waste contractor. Radionuclide concentrations above the release criteria in the
storm drain and sanitary sewer soil excavated from Parcels UC1 and UC2 and processed in
RSY2 included Cs-137 ranging from 0.11532 picocuries per gram (pCi/g) to 0.16916 pCi/g, and
Ra-226 ranging from 1.4909 pCi/g to 3.2976 pCi/g.
The majority of the stockpiles derived from Parcels UC1 and UC2 soils were backfilled into
appropriate trench survey units. One stockpile derived from soil excavated from the IR-36 area
and several other stockpiles that were not acceptable for use as backfill were staged pending offsite disposal by the DON’s non-radiological waste contractor. A total of 11 radiologically
ECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

3-4

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 processed and released soil stockpiles excavated from non-IR Program site areas of Parcels UC1
and UC2 were used as grading material on HPS. The DON’s non-radiological waste contractor
transported a total of seven radiologically processed and released soil stockpiles off-site because
they were either excavated from IR Program Site IR-36 or were observed to have staining and/or
odor that indicated the potential presence of chemical contamination. One radiologically
processed and released soil stockpile remains on HPS pending future use as grading material.
Table 3-4 shows each of the stockpiles that incorporate soil excavated from Parcels UC1 and
UC2 storm drains and sanitary sewers as well as pertinent information related to the radiological
processing of each stockpile in RSY2, contamination identified, soil remediated for disposal as
LLRW, and disposition of the soil.
3.3

TRENCH SURVEY UNIT AND PIPING SAMPLING ACTIVITIES

At the completion of excavation, numerous soil samples were collected from the trench survey
units to determine whether radionuclide contamination remained in place above the release
criteria in accordance with the Work Plan (TtEC 2008f). These samples were submitted to the
on-site laboratory for analysis by gamma spectroscopy with 10 percent sent to the off-site
laboratory for Sr-90 analysis and quality assurance verification. During the Parcels UC1 and
UC2 storm drain and sanitary sewer removal actions, a total of 798 soil samples were collected
from the 20 Parcels UC1 and UC2 trench survey units and analyzed by the on-site laboratory. Of
these 798 samples, 438 were investigative and 360 were systematic FSS soil samples. As
indicated in Table 3-1, the Cs-137 concentrations that exceeded the release limit ranged from
0.11564 pCi/g to 0.19605 pCi/g, and the Ra-226 concentrations that exceeded the release limit
ranged from 1.5045 pCi/g to 3.3780 pCi/g. The storm drain and sanitary sewer release criteria
are provided as Table 2-4.
Sediment samples were collected from piping (pipe and manholes) during the excavation
activities when a sufficient quantity was available for analysis by the on-site laboratory. A total
of 55 sediment samples were collected from pipes and 10 sediment samples were collected from
manholes for analysis by gamma spectroscopy. Nine manhole sediment samples and 26 pipe
sediment samples did not indicate the presence of radioactivity above the release criteria for any
ROC. In those sediment samples that displayed radioactivity above the release criteria, Cs-137
concentrations ranged from 0.11595 pCi/g to 0.34159 pCi/g and Ra-226 concentrations ranged
from 1.6422 pCi/g to 2.3489 pCi/g. Table 3-5 summarizes the contaminated sediment sample
analytical results for piping excavated from Parcels UC1 and UC2. Copies of the sediment
sample analytical reports are provided in Appendix C.
Swipe samples were collected from residual pipes that could not be removed from Parcels UC1
and UC2 due to the presence of structural or overhead obstructions such as active utility lines.
The purpose of the swipe samples was to assess the presence of alpha and beta/gamma
contamination readily removable from the surface. The swipe samples were processed in the onECSD-3211-0018-0174 Fnl RACR UC1_UC2.doc

3-5

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Page 1 of 48

TABLE 3-3
PARCELS UC1 AND UC2 EXCAVATED SOIL

Parcel
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1

Survey
Unit
ID No.
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133

Table 3-3_Excavated Soil.xls

IR
Trench Segment Truckload Program
ID No.
No.
Sitea
02-D26-00-2G
1
00
02-D26-00-2G
2
00
02-D26-00-2G
3
00
02-D26-00-2G
4
00
02-D26-00-2G
5
00
02-D26-00-2G
6
00
02-D26-00-2G
7
00
02-D26-00-2G
8
00
02-D26-00-2G
9
00
02-D26-00-2G
10
00
02-D26-00-2G
11
00
02-D26-00-2G
12
00
02-D26-00-2G
13
00
02-D26-00-2G
14
00
02-D26-00-2G
15
00
02-D26-00-2G
16
00
02-D26-00-2G
17
00
02-D26-00-2G
18
00
02-D26-00-2G
19
00
02-D26-00-2G
20
00
02-D26-00-2G
21
00
02-D26-00-2G
22
00
02-D26-00-2G
23
00
02-D26-00-2G
24
00
02-D26-00-2G
25
00
02-D26-00-2G
26
00
02-D26-00-2H
1
00
02-D26-00-2H
2
00
02-D26-00-2H
3
00
02-D26-00-2H
4
00
02-D26-00-2H
5
00
02-D26-00-2H
6
00
02-D26-00-2H
7
00
02-D26-00-2H
8
00
02-D26-00-2H
9
00
02-D26-00-2H
10
00
02-D26-00-2H
11
00

RSY2
Screening
Pad No.
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19

ES Unit
No.
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177

Date
Excavated
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
31-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Page 2 of 48

TABLE 3-3
PARCELS UC1 AND UC2 EXCAVATED SOIL

Parcel
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1

Survey
Unit
ID No.
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133

Table 3-3_Excavated Soil.xls

IR
Trench Segment Truckload Program
ID No.
No.
Sitea
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-2H
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
1
2
3
4
5
6

00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00

RSY2
Screening
Pad No.

ES Unit
No.

Date
Excavated

C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C19
C20
C20
C20
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C22
C22
C22

0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0177
0178
0178
0178
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0179
0180
0180
0180

26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
26-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
30-Mar-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Page 3 of 48

TABLE 3-3
PARCELS UC1 AND UC2 EXCAVATED SOIL

Parcel
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1

Survey
Unit
ID No.
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133
133

Table 3-3_Excavated Soil.xls

IR
Trench Segment Truckload Program
ID No.
No.
Sitea
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-3F
02-D26-00-5B
02-D26-00-5B
02-D26-00-5B
02-D26-00-5B
02-D26-00-5B
02-D26-00-5B

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
1
2
3
4
5
6

00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00

RSY2
Screening
Pad No.

ES Unit
No.

Date
Excavated

C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C22
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C23
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20
C20

0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0180
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0181
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178
0178

1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
1-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
3-Apr-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09
27-Mar-09

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Page 48 of 48

TABLE 3-3
PARCELS UC1 AND UC2 EXCAVATED SOIL

Parcel
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1
UC1

Survey
Unit
ID No.
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
171

IR
Trench Segment Truckload Program
ID No.
No.
Sitea
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1C
03-D16-00-1E
03-D16-00-1E
03-D16-00-1E
03-D16-00-1E
03-D16-00-8B
03-D16-00-8B
03-D16-00-8B
03-D16-00-8B
03-D16-00-8B
03-D16-00-8B

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
18
19
20
21
1
2
3
4
5
6

00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00

RSY2
Screening
Pad No.

ES Unit
No.

Date
Excavated

C36
C36
C36
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C35
C27
C22
C10
C10
C10
C10
C21
C21
C21
C21
C21
C27

0273
0273
0273
0275
0275
0275
0275
0275
0275
0274
0280
0281
0281
0281
0281
0272
0272
0272
0272
0272
0274

09-Apr-10
09-Apr-10
09-Apr-10
09-Apr-10
09-Apr-10
13-Apr-10
13-Apr-10
13-Apr-10
13-Apr-10
13-Apr-10
04-May-10
14-Jun-10
14-Jun-10
14-Jun-10
14-Jun-10
06-Apr-10
06-Apr-10
07-Apr-10
07-Apr-10
07-Apr-10
08-Apr-10

Notes:
“00” indicates the stockpile was not derived from an IR Program area.

a

Abbrevations and Acronyms:
ES – excavated soil
IR – Installation Restoration (Program)
RSY2 – Radiological Screening Yard 2

Table 3-3_Excavated Soil.xls

Final Removal Action Completion Report
Parcels UC1 and UC2
Hunters Point Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0174
CTO No. 0018

 Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310
CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

RADIOLOGICAL
REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
March 2, 2012
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182

PARCEL B
HUNTERS POINT NAVAL SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

 Base Realignment and Closure
Program Management Office West
1455 Frazee Road, Suite 900
San Diego, California 92108-4310

CONTRACT NO. N62473-07-D-3211
CTO NO. 0018

FINAL

RADIOLOGICAL
REMOVAL ACTION COMPLETION REPORT
March 2, 2012
PARCEL B
HUNTERS POINT NAVAL SHIPYARD
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182

1230 Columbia Street, Suite 750
San Diego, California 92101-8536

Erik Abkemeier, CHP, PE, CSP, CHMM
TtEC Radiation Safety Officer

Bill Dougherty
TtEC Project Manager

3/2/12
Date

3/2/12
Date

 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The U.S. Department of the Navy (DON) directed Tetra Tech EC, Inc. to prepare this
Radiological Removal Action Completion Report (RACR) to describe and summarize the
Parcel B building and former building site Final Status Survey (FSS) activities, and storm drain
and sanitary sewer time-critical removal action (TCRA) at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
(HPNS) located in San Francisco, California. The purpose of this Radiological RACR is to
describe and summarize the results of the radiological work performed on Parcel B to protect the
public health and welfare, and the environment from actual or potential releases of radiologic
contaminants and document the results of the implemented TCRA and FSS activities. The FSS
and TCRA activities were directed by the DON under multiple contracts and task orders. This
Parcel B Radiological RACR does not address chemical contamination except in relation to
reuse as potential backfill material or waste characterization for disposal of excavated soil and
does not include or affect any other designated HPNS parcels or sites. No sample collection
activities or laboratory analyses were performed during the Parcel B TCRA to meet any chemical
remediation goals.
Approximately 54 acres in size, Parcel B is located in the northeast quadrant of HPNS and is
composed of two areas of non-engineered fill identified as Installation Restoration (IR) Program
Sites IR-07 and IR-18 on the north and approximately 40 acres of property identified as Work
Areas 1 through 11 on the south. Initially, Parcel B was divided into 12 work areas (Work Areas
1 through 12) to expedite the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems removal action schedule
and tracking activities. Work Area 12 was later segregated from the Parcel B property to
become Parcel D-2. This Parcel B Radiological RACR is limited to the 40 acres of property
located in Work Areas 1 through 11 and does not include Parcel D-2 or IR Program Sites IR-07
and IR-18. The TCRA activities for Parcel D-2 were documented in a separate RACR (TtEC
2010a) and the radiological work performed for IR Program Sites IR-07 and IR-18 will be
reported in a future RACR. Throughout this Radiological RACR, references to Parcel B
specifically exclude Parcel D-2, IR-07, and IR-18.
Based on its radiological operational history, the DON determined that low-level radioactive
contamination potentially present in some buildings, storm drain and sanitary sewer lines, soil,
debris, and slag material at HPNS required a response action. This decision was documented in
the final “Base-wide Radiological Removal Action, Action Memorandum” (AM) (DON 2006).
Physical removal with proper off-site disposal was selected as the only viable remedial
alternative.
The radiological work for Parcel B was performed under the AM (DON 2006). The DON
subsequently prepared the Final Amended Parcel B Record of Decision (Amended ROD)
(ChaduxTt 2009), which addressed radiological contaminants found in soil and structures. For
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.Docx

ES-1

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 Parcel B, and as applicable to the radiological activities discussed in this Radiological RACR, the
selected remedial alternative included:
Decontaminate radiologically impacted structures and dismantle them if necessary.
Excavate radiologically impacted storm drain and sanitary sewer lines and other areas,
as necessary, throughout Parcel B. Survey buildings and former buildings sites.
Screen removed materials and transport contaminated material off-site to an
appropriate disposal facility.
Obtain unrestricted closure or “free release” for all radiologically impacted areas and
structures in Parcel B (except for the radiologically impacted portions of IR-07 and
IR-18).
The AM (DON 2006) identified the release criteria for radiologically impacted sites on Parcel B
that subsequently were included as remediation goals in the Amended ROD (ChaduxTt 2009).
The objective of the Parcel B TCRA activities was to substantially eliminate identified exposure
pathways to surrounding populations and nearby ecosystems by preventing exposure to
radionuclide contamination on building surfaces or in soil and achieve radiological release for
unrestricted use of the property.
The 40 acres of Parcel B (Work Areas 1 through 11) discussed in this Radiological RACR are
bordered by other designated HPNS parcels and local features including Parcel F and San
Francisco Bay on the north and east, Parcel C on the south, Parcel UC2 on the southwest, IR
Sites IR-07 and IR-18 on the northwest, and the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency
property (formerly Parcel A) on the west. The majority of Parcel B was once part of the HPNS
industrial support area and historically was used for shipping, ship repair, offices, housing, and
commercial activities. Radiologically impacted structures and former building sites were
identified on Parcel B. These structures/sites were used for various functions including:
Personnel barracks
Radioactive waste storage
General shops
Industrial laboratories
Maintenance and machine shop
Radioluminescent device collection points
In addition to the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems, six radiologically impacted buildings
(Buildings 103, 113, 113A, 130, 140, and 146), three former building sites (114, 142, and 157),
and the Building 140 Discharge Channel were identified in the final “Historical Radiological
Assessment, Volume II” (HRA) prepared by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) in
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-2

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 2004 (NAVSEA 2004) within Parcel B. The FSS documentation for the Parcel B buildings and
sites identified as radiologically impacted in the HRA are presented in Appendix T and
Appendices V through AC. The history, radiological activities, data evaluation, dose modeling,
and conclusions for Building 140 are presented in Appendix U of this Radiological RACR.
Site restoration activities were performed for Parcel B including the installation of temporary
drainage swales to manage overland stormwater flow. In addition, trench excavations outside of
Parcel B buildings were backfilled to grade followed by the application of road base material.
Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewer Systems
The present-day configuration of the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems is the result of an
evolutionary process. The combined systems grew in sections and then underwent a series of
separation projects to provide for installation of dedicated sanitary sewer piping and pump
stations that would discharge sanitary sewer effluent off-site to a publicly owned treatment plant
operated by the City and County of San Francisco. The planned separation of the combined
systems was never achieved, and subsequent inspections have revealed that cross-connections
may still exist. Due to the evolutionary nature of the separation process, radiological
contamination from the same sources may have impacted the HPNS storm drain and sanitary
sewer systems piping and other components. Based on historical documentation, the
radionuclides of concern (ROCs) selected for the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewer
systems included cesium-137, radium-226, and strontium-90.
The general approach to removing and surveying the storm drain and sanitary sewer systems
was:
1. Excavate soils.
2. Remove piping.
3. Conduct ex situ radiological screening and sampling of the piping.
4. Perform radiological screening and sampling of the excavated soil.
5. Conduct FSSs for the excavated soils and exposed excavated trench surfaces.
6. Backfill the trenches and perform site restoration.
Excavation of the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewers was initiated on May 23, 2006 and
the last truckload of Parcel B soil was excavated on September 23, 2010. During the Parcel B
removal action, 24,826 linear feet of storm drain and sanitary sewer lines (including soil, pipes,
and manholes) was excavated. The excavation of these trenches resulted in the transfer of 5,432
truckloads (approximately 65,184 cubic yards) of soil to the Radiological Screening Yards
(RSYs) for radiological processing.
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-3

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 The 5,432 truckloads of soil derived from the excavation of the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary
sewers transferred to the RSYs for radiological processing were spread on specially constructed
screening pads, and allowed to dewater. This excavated soil often included small sections of
crumbled pipe and crushed manhole pieces that were processed along with the soil. Each
screening pad of Parcel B soil was given a unique survey unit identification number. The
radiological survey process was initiated for each of these survey units once dewatering was
complete. During processing in the RSYs, gamma scans were performed for each of the survey
units processed in the RSYs. Radioactive material identified during the gamma scan activities
was collected, segregated, and stored in appropriate containers for subsequent disposal by the
DON radiological waste contractor. Areas of soil that showed the potential presence of radiation
levels greater than the established investigation limits were further evaluated, and biased soil
samples were collected, as appropriate. Identified radiological contamination was characterized
and remediated.
Following the completion of scanning activities, systematic and biased (if appropriate) soil
samples were collected from the Parcel B excavated soil survey units in the RSYs. During
radiological processing in the RSYs, a total of 6,610 soil samples (including biased,
characterization, verification, and systematic FSS samples) were collected from the excavated
soil survey units on the screening pads and submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Based on the
surface scan readings and soil sample analytical results, approximately 692 cubic yards of
peripheral material and 2,218 cubic yards of overburden/excavated soil were remediated from
the excavated soil survey units. The contaminated soil was placed in low-level radioactive waste
(LLRW) bins for off-site disposal by the DON radiological waste contractor.
Once the excavated soil survey units in the RSYs were verified to be free of residual
radioactivity above the release criteria, 18 systematic FSS soil samples were collected and the
analytical results evaluated. None of the final 18 systematic FSS soil sample analytical results
identified the presence of residual radioactivity above the release criteria for any ROC in the
overburden or excavated soil survey units. With the concurrence of the Radiological Affairs
Support Office (RASO), excavated soil survey units radiologically processed in the RSYs were
segregated for use as backfill soil or staged for off-site disposal by the DON non-LLRW disposal
contractor. The majority of the excavated soil survey units were backfilled into appropriate
trenches. Radiologically screened and released excavated soil survey units that were not
acceptable for use as backfill were transferred to the DON non-LLRW contractor for off-site
disposal.
A total of 180 manholes and 1,914 sections of pipe were removed from the Parcel B trenches and
placed on plastic pending further activities. The majority of the Parcel B piping crumbled during
removal and was transferred along with the surrounding soil to the RSYs for radiological
processing. The storm drain and sanitary sewer pipes removed from the Parcel B trenches
primarily consisted of 2-inch-diameter to 36-inch-diameter concrete, vitreous clay, metal, plastic,
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-4

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 or concrete-encased vitreous clay pipe located at depths between 1 foot and 15 feet below ground
surface. The manholes excavated during the Parcel B removal action typically were composed
of brick, concrete, or a combination of the two.
Sediment samples were collected from the excavated pipes and manholes when a sufficient
volume of material was available. During the storm drain and sanitary sewer excavation
activities, a total of 252 pipe and 69 manhole sediment samples were collected and analyzed.
The laboratory analytical results identified 53 sections of pipe and 12 manholes on Parcel B that
contained radiologically contaminated sediments. These pipe sections and the materials forming
the manholes were placed in LLRW bins for disposal by the DON radiological waste contractor.
The pipes and manholes that did not contain contaminated sediments as well as the excavated
piping that contained insufficient sediment for sample collection was radiologically surveyed
during the TCRA activities. Radiological surveys were performed on a total of 1,443 sections of
pipe and 137 manholes during the Parcel B removal action.
The majority of the storm drain and sanitary sewer pipe sections and bricks and/or concrete that
formed the manhole sidewalls were excavated during the Parcel B removal action activities.
However, small sections of piping were left in place following the completion of the TCRA.
Based on survey results and other data generated during the TCRA activities, the DON
concluded that the piping remaining in place was unlikely to be contaminated.
At the conclusion of the storm drain and sanitary sewer excavation activities, a total of 70 trench
survey units had been designated in the 11 Parcel B Work Areas. The total area of the exposed
trench surfaces in Parcel B was 37,356 square meters (m2) with 20,262 linear feet of trench.
Gamma scans were performed on the exposed trench surfaces and numerous soil samples were
collected from the sidewalls and bottom of the excavated trenches to determine whether
radiologic contamination was present. A minimum of 18 systematic soil samples were collected
from each of the 70 Parcel B trench survey units and analyzed by the laboratory using gamma
spectroscopy. As necessary, remediation was performed to remove any identified radiologic
contamination followed by the collection and analysis of verification soil samples. Once the
analytical results for the verification samples indicated that no additional radiologic
contamination was present, the final 18 FSS soil samples were collected from the sidewalls and
bottom of the Parcel B trench survey units and analyzed.
During the Parcel B removal action, a total of 5,588 soil samples (including investigative,
characterization, verification, and FSS samples) were collected from the 70 trench survey units
and analyzed by the laboratory. Of these 5,588 soil samples, 4,328 were investigative (including
characterization, investigative, and verification samples) and 1,260 were systematic FSS soil
samples. Based on the laboratory analytical results, approximately 3,731 cubic yards of
contaminated soil was remediated from the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewer trench
survey units during the TCRA activities. The contaminated soils were placed in LLRW bins that
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-5

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 were later transported off-site by the DON radiological waste contractor to either the U.S.
Ecology facility in Idaho or the Energy Solutions facility in Clive, Utah.
The objective of the storm drain and sanitary sewer FSS activities for Parcel B was to
demonstrate that identified residual radioactivity levels inside the excavated trenches and within
the materials used as backfill met the release criteria. These results were documented in a
Survey Unit Project Report (SUPR) prepared for each of the 70 trench survey units. None of the
FSS soil sample analytical results exceeded the release criteria specified in the AM (DON 2006)
or the remediation goals established in the Amended ROD (ChaduxTt 2009). Each of the Parcel
B draft SUPRs previously was provided to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and the Department of Public
Health, Environmental Management Branch (CDPH), who provided comments that were
addressed in the final SUPRs. Approval of these final SUPRs will occur as part of the regulatory
review and concurrence with this Radiological RACR.
Chemical contamination at HPNS is addressed through the IR Program Site process. During the
Parcel B TCRA, no sample collection activities or laboratory analyses were performed to meet
any chemical remediation goals. There are a total of 12 IR Program sites associated with Parcel
B. Samples of excavated soil derived from IR Program sites were collected and sent to the offsite laboratory for chemical analysis to verify whether the excavated material met the established
acceptance/reuse criteria. Based on the analytical results, soil that did not meet the appropriate
criteria was stockpiled for collection and off-site disposal by the DON non-LLRW contractor,
along with non-IR Program soil that exhibited odor or staining.
The environmental as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) process was implemented for each
of the 70 trench survey units in addition to the dose and risk modeling efforts. ALARA analyses
were performed based on recent estimates of dose to the public from HPNS operations. Based on
qualitative ALARA analyses, excavation projects that could cause the potential dose to the public
to exceed 1 millirem (individual) or 10 person-rem (collective) were subject to quantitative
ALARA analyses. To date, no Parcel B operations at HPNS have resulted in an individual dose to
the public greater than 1 millirem or a collective dose greater than 10 person-rem. In addition,
air monitoring results did not exceed 10 percent of the derived air concentration and the
processed personnel dosimetry badges did not identify a single gamma dose above background
levels.
Dose and risk modeling using the most current version of RESRAD software and the larger of
the method detection limit or reported activity was performed for each of the Parcel B trench
survey units and documented in the SUPRs. Dose and risk estimates were calculated by
applying the RESRAD default residential farmer scenario of 12 hours per day indoors and 6
hours per day outdoors occupancy. Based on the Parcel B trench survey unit dose and risk
modeling results, the highest net residual dose to workers or members of the public as a result of
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-6

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 exposure to radioactive material in soil was identified in Trench Survey Unit 56 at 7.133 millirems
per year with an excess lifetime cancer risk of 1.140 × 10-4. These results fall within the
acceptable National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan risk management
range of 10-6 to 10-4, which supports radiological free release.
Buildings, Former Building Sites, and Discharge Channel
In addition to the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewer systems, six buildings (Buildings 103,
113, 113A, 130, 140, and 146), three former building sites (114, 142, and 157), and the Building
140 Discharge Channel were identified in the HRA (NAVSEA 2004) as radiologically impacted.
Radiological surveys were performed for each of the impacted Parcel B buildings/structures and
former building sites, which typically included surface gamma scans, static measurements, and
swipe samples or soil samples collected at discrete locations.
The ALARA process was followed for each of the impacted buildings, former building sites, and
the Building 140 Discharge Channel. ALARA was implemented through identification of
potential radiological impacts, review of the radiological impacts, and the performance of
qualitative and quantitative analyses. The majority of the data and analysis used for the ALARA
evaluations were developed as part of routine work procedures. Results from radiological survey
activities, and air, swipe, and soil samples were used to assess the potential radiological impacts of
the Parcel B building/structure and site activities. These activities included a review of historical
radiological operations to facilitate investigations and characterization to ensure complete
removal of radioactive material exceeding the release criteria. Based on recent estimates of dose to
the public from the Parcel B building/structure and site survey activities, only qualitative ALARA
analyses were required. Qualitative ALARA analyses for radiologically impacted Parcel B
buildings/structures and former building sites resulted in no alpha or beta measurements above the
investigation levels and did not identify the presence of residual radioactivity above the release
criteria for any ROC.
At the conclusion of the activities for the impacted Parcel B buildings and sites, an FSS report was
prepared to document the radiological work performed and the survey results. For the Building
140 pump house, the DON directed TtEC to prepare the “Building 140 Technical Memorandum to
Support Unrestricted Radiological Release” (Technical Memorandum) to discuss the radiological
history and activities performed to support radiological release for unrestricted use. The FSS
reports and Technical Memorandum were submitted to the regulatory agencies for review.
Radiological release for unrestricted use of each of the Parcel B buildings, former building sites
114, 142, and 157, and the Building 140 Discharge Channel have been obtained from the DTSC
and the CDPH. According to statements by the EPA, their decision for radiological free release
of the Parcel B buildings/structures and former building sites will be based on the data and
analyses presented in this Radiological RACR.

ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-7

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 Conclusions and Recommendation
The DON met its stated radiological goals and achieved its removal action objective for the 40
acres of Parcel B property within designated Work Areas 1 through 11. The information
summarized in this Radiological RACR, each of the 70 SUPRs, and the building/structure and
former building site radiological results support the DON’s conclusion that Parcel B is ready for
unconditional, unrestricted radiological free release. The potential risks associated with exposure
to residual ROCs on Parcel B have been reduced to levels below the release criteria and
remediation goals and present no threat to human health or the environment. Based on the results
of the storm drain and sanitary sewer TCRA, the building and former building site FSS activities,
the Discharge Channel FSS activities, and the Building 140 Technical Memorandum, the DON
achieved the radiological removal action objective identified in the Amended ROD (ChaduxTt
2009). No further radiological action is required in Parcel B.

ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.docx

ES-8

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 the excavation, remediation, and backfill iterative cycle. A total of 279 storm drain line
segments and 128 sanitary sewer line segments were excavated in Parcel B during the TCRA
(Figure 3-1). Table 3-1 summarizes the radiological activities performed for each excavated
trench along with the Work Area location, associated trench segments, area and length, and
relevant data related to number of samples collected, contamination identified, remediation
performed, and dose and risk modeling results.
3.1.1

Pre-Excavation Field Activities

Pre-excavation field activities for the Parcel B removal action were initiated in April 2006 with
the construction of RSY1. Temporary fencing was installed or reconfigured around the
excavation locations to establish radiologically controlled areas (RCAs). RSY1 and its
associated haul roads were constructed as a separate RCA. Pre-excavation activities included the
development and refinement of the procedures to be used by the on-site laboratory, instrument
calibration and testing and establishing operational practices for coordinating radiological
screening and sampling activities. Geophysical surveys were performed and the storm drain and
sanitary sewer lines were marked out. Traffic controls were implemented prior to beginning
excavation of the storm drain and sanitary sewer lines. Wind socks were installed to determine
the prevailing wind direction and ensure proper placement of the radiological air monitoring
equipment on a daily basis. Air monitors were installed upwind and downwind of the excavation
activities to measure airborne asbestos, particulates, lead, and magnesium. The results were
uploaded to the DON’s website so that the information could be available to the public at:
http://www.bracpmo.navy.mil/basepage.aspx?baseid=45&state=&name=HPNS.
3.1.2

Storm Drain and Sanitary Sewer Excavation Activities

Excavation of the storm drain and sanitary sewer lines was initiated on May 23, 2006 in Work
Area 2, and the last truckload of Parcel B soil was excavated on September 23, 2010 also in
Work Area 2. In total, 21,344 linear feet of trench (inclusive of soil, pipes, and manholes)
identified on the Design Drawings (TtEC 2006d) was excavated during the TCRA. Although not
identified on the Design Drawings, an additional 3,482 linear feet of storm drain and sanitary
sewer systems piping was discovered during the excavation activities and removed in accordance
with the Work Plan (TtEC 2010b). These previously unidentified pipelines were assigned trench
segment identification numbers and incorporated into appropriate trench survey units for the
radiological survey activities. Table 3-2 identifies each trench survey unit and associated trench
segments, type of trench segments (storm or sanitary), piping material and diameter, and
minimum and maximum depths for both the trench excavation and the pipes.
3.1.2.1

Excavation of Peripheral Material and Overburden Soils

Excavated Parcel B soil was segregated as either peripheral material or overburden soil.
Peripheral material was defined in the Work Plan (TtEC 2006a) as the 1 foot of soil
ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.Docx

3-2

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 surrounding each storm drain and sanitary sewer pipe and the overburden designation was
applied to the remaining excavated soil. Excavated peripheral material often included small
sections of crumbled pipe and crushed manhole pieces that were processed along with the
surrounding soil in RSY1. In total, 2,367 truckloads (approximately 28,404 cubic yards) of
peripheral material were excavated from Parcel B and transferred to RSY1 for radiological
processing. In addition, 2,974 truckloads (about 35,688 cubic yards) of overburden soils were
excavated from Parcel B and transferred to either RSY1 or RSY2 for processing. Table 3-3
identifies each truckload of peripheral material excavated from Parcel B, its assigned screening
pad in RSY1, and its unique survey unit identification number. Table 3-4 summarizes each
truckload of overburden soil excavated from Parcel B, the associated screening pad and assigned
survey unit number, and the date the soil was excavated.
3.1.2.2

Excavated Soils

The DON and the RASO concurred with modifying the procedure for excavating and
segregating peripheral material and overburden soil in 2007. This modified procedure was
documented in revisions to the Work Plan (TtEC 2007a; 2008c; 2008d; 2010b) and was applied
to the storm drain and sanitary sewer lines associated with the Parcel B radiologically impacted
buildings or former building sites and those storm drain and sanitary sewer lines located outside
the original Work Areas 1 through 11 boundaries. Peripheral and overburden soil removed from
these trenches was not segregated. Excavated soil from these trenches was transferred to either
RSY2 or RSY4 and placed on screening pads for radiological processing. Each screening pad
with soil derived from excavation of the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewer lines was
assigned a unique excavated soil survey unit (ES) number. In total, 91 truckloads
(approximately 1,092 cubic yards) of excavated soil associated with storm drain and sanitary
sewer trenches were removed from Parcel B and transferred to RSY2 or RSY4 for radiological
processing. Table 3-4 summarizes each truckload of excavated soil, the associated screening pad
and unique ES number, and the date the soil was excavated.
3.1.3

Radiological Screening Yard Processing

Peripheral material, overburden, and excavated soils were radiologically processed in one of the
screening yards specifically constructed for this purpose. Overburden and excavated soils
removed from the Parcel B storm drain and sanitary sewer line trenches were radiologically
processed in the same manner, regardless of whether the material was transferred to RSY1,
RSY2, or RSY4.
3.1.3.1

Peripheral Material Radiological Processing

In general, each truckload of excavated peripheral material was transferred to RSY1 and placed
on a 14-cubic-yard screening pad. On the screening pad, the peripheral material was assigned a

ECSD-3211-0018-0182 Fnl Parcel B Rad RACR.Docx

3-3

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-4

Page 1 of 86

PARCEL B OVERBURDEN AND EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
Work
Area
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

Trench
Survey
Unit
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU1
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2

Table 3-4 OB ES Summary.xlsx

Trench
Segment
06-B02-26-2B
06-B02-26-2B
06-B02-26-2B
06-B02-26-2B
06-B02-26-2B
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2C
06-B02-26-2E
06-B02-26-2E
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-00-3C
06-B02-00-3C
06-B02-00-3C
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3A
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B

RSY
Truck Screening
Assigned
Load No.
Pad
Survey Unit No.
1
A16
0001
2
A16
0001
3
A16
0001
4
A16
0001
5
A15
0002
1
A16
0001
2
A16
0001
3
A16
0001
4
A16
0001
5
A16
0001
6
A16
0001
7
A16
0001
8
A16
0001
1
A15
0002
2
A15
0002
1
A15
0002
2
A15
0002
3
A15
0002
4
A15
0002
1
A10
0005
2
A10
0005
3
A10
0005
5
A15
0002
6
A15
0002
7
A15
0002
8
A15
0002
9
A15
0002
10
A15
0002
11
A13
0003
1
A13
0003
2
A13
0003
3
A13
0003
4
A13
0003
5
A13
0003
6
A13
0003
7
A13
0003

Date
Excavated
30-May-06
30-May-06
30-May-06
30-May-06
31-May-06
23-May-06
23-May-06
23-May-06
24-May-06
24-May-06
24-May-06
24-May-06
24-May-06
01-Jun-06
01-Jun-06
01-Jun-06
01-Jun-06
01-Jun-06
01-Jun-06
06-Jun-06
06-Jun-06
06-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
03-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-4

Page 2 of 86

PARCEL B OVERBURDEN AND EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
Work
Area

Trench
Survey
Unit

Trench
Segment

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1

TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU2
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU3
TU4
TU4
TU4
TU4
TU4

06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3B
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-3H
06-B02-26-1A
06-B02-26-1A
06-B02-26-1A
06-B02-26-1A
06-B02-26-1A
06-B02-26-1B
06-B02-26-1B
06-B02-26-1C
06-B02-26-1C
06-B02-26-1C
06-B01-26-1A
06-B01-26-1A
06-B01-26-1A
06-B01-26-1A
06-B01-26-1A

Table 3-4 OB ES Summary.xlsx

RSY
Truck Screening
Assigned
Load No.
Pad
Survey Unit No.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5

A13
A15
A15
A13
A13
A13
A13
A13
A12
A12
A12
A12
A12
A12
A10
A10
A10
A10
A10
A9
A9
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A8
A7
A6
A6
A7
A7

0003
0002
0002
0003
0003
0003
0003
0003
0004
0004
0004
0004
0004
0004
0005
0005
0005
0005
0005
0007
0007
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0006
0008
0014
0014
0008
0008

Date
Excavated
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
02-Jun-06
03-Jun-06
03-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
05-Jun-06
06-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
07-Jun-06
08-Jun-06
08-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
08-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
09-Jun-06
12-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
13-Jun-06
13-Jun-06

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-4

Page 84 of 86

PARCEL B OVERBURDEN AND EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
Work
Area

Trench
Survey
Unit

Trench
Segment

11
11
11
11
11
11
11
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

TU126
TU127
TU127
TU127
TU127
TU127
TU127
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128
TU128

72-B10-23-8B
72-B10-23-8F
72-B10-23-8F
72-B10-23-8F
72-B10-23-8F
72-B10-23-8F
72-B10-23-8H
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8C
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8D
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E
72-B05-42-8E

Table 3-4 OB ES Summary.xlsx

RSY
Truck Screening
Assigned
Load No.
Pad
Survey Unit No.
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C06
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C12
C12
C05
C05
C05
C05
C05
C12
C12
C12

0171
0171
0171
0171
0171
0171
0171
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0173
0173
0170
0170
0170
0170
0170
0173
0173
0173

Date
Excavated
30-Jan-09
02-Feb-09
02-Feb-09
03-Feb-09
03-Feb-09
04-Feb-09
03-Feb-09
09-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
13-Feb-09
13-Feb-09
13-Feb-09
13-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
17-Feb-09
17-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
11-Feb-09
11-Feb-09
11-Feb-09
19-Feb-09
20-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
10-Feb-09
11-Feb-09
11-Feb-09
12-Feb-09
19-Feb-09
19-Feb-09
20-Feb-09

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-4

Page 85 of 86

PARCEL B OVERBURDEN AND EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
Work
Area

Trench
Survey
Unit

Trench
Segment

5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2

TU128
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU130
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186

72-B05-42-8E
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8A
72-B04-24-8B
72-B04-24-8C
72-B04-24-8C
72-B04-24-8C
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-B02-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L

Table 3-4 OB ES Summary.xlsx

RSY
Truck Screening
Assigned
Load No.
Pad
Survey Unit No.
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3

C12
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
C09
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28
E28

0173
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0172
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335
0335

Date
Excavated
23-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
17-Feb-09
20-Feb-09
20-Feb-09
23-Feb-09
23-Feb-09
23-Feb-09
23-Feb-09
24-Feb-09
16-Feb-09
19-Feb-09
19-Feb-09
20-Feb-09
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 TABLE 3-4

Page 86 of 86

PARCEL B OVERBURDEN AND EXCAVATED SOIL SUMMARY
Work
Area

Trench
Survey
Unit

Trench
Segment

2
2
2
2
2

TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186
TU186

02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L
02-C35-00-1L

RSY
Truck Screening
Assigned
Load No.
Pad
Survey Unit No.
4
5
6
7
8

E28
E28
E28
E28
E28

0335
0335
0335
0335
0335

Date
Excavated
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10
23-Sep-10

Abbreviations and Acronyms:
RSY - Radiological Screening Yard
TU - Trench Survey Unit

Table 3-4 OB ES Summary.xlsx

Final Radiological Removal Action Completion Report
Parcel B
Hunters Point Naval Shipyard
DCN: ECSD-3211-0018-0182
CTO No. 0018

 RSY2 PAD STATUS REPORT
Daily Activity Report:

Pad
No.

01/03/11
Truckload Count
Total
Today
to
Date

Towed
Array
Date

First
18
Samples
Collected

Additional Sample Collection
Number
Date
Sample
of
Collected
Type
Samples

Pile
No.

IR
Site

Work
Area/
Client

0345

00

WA24/S

10/15/10

25

11/03/10

11/18/10

11/18/10

2

Biased

0347

35

WA24/S

10/13/10

25

10/27/10

11/18/10

11/18/10

2

Biased

0350

00

WA24/S

10/26/10

25

11/02/10

11/18/10

11/18/10

2

Biased

0353

00

WA30/S

4

0362

00

WA24/S

21

Date
Filled

Total
Remed.
CY

C01
C02

C03

C04

C05

C06
C07
C08
C09
C10
C11
C12

C13

C14
C15
C16
C17
C18
C19
C20
C21
C22
C23
C24

Page 1 of 5

 RSY2 PAD STATUS REPORT
Truckload Count
Total
Today
to
Date

Pad
No.

Pile
No.

IR
Site

Work
Area/
Client

C25

0363

00

WA24/S

11/19/10

25

12/02/10

C26

0364

00

WA24/S

11/24/10

25

12/02/10

C27

0365

00

WA24/S

C28

0366

32

WA24/S

11/30/10

25

C29

0367

32

WA24/S

12/01/10

25

C30

0368

32

WA24/S

14

C31

0369

32

WA24/S

15

C32

0370

32

WA28/S

12/02/10

23

C33

0371

32

WA28/S

12/07/10

25

C34

0372

32

WA28/S

12/07/10

25

C35

0373

32

WA28/S

Date
Filled

Towed
Array
Date

First
18
Samples
Collected

Additional Sample Collection
Number
Date
Sample
of
Collected
Type
Samples

Total
Remed.
CY

9

12/07/10

12/07/10

21

C36
C37
Daily Remediation Activity:
Pad
LLRW
No.
Bin #

Pile
No.

Cubic
Yards

Other

Co

1 FS = Fisher/Spear Utility Corridors 1 & 2
2 Towed array data collected pending RAS

3 After RAD cleared, Pad will be staged fo
4
T

Total
Current actives for the day

Needs layout of pads measured

Last sample taken 30 days or greate

Page 2 of 5

 RSY2 PAD STATUS REPORT

RASO
Concurs

Comments

11/18/10 Received map 1st Systematic 1-18, Biased
19-20. Samples taken. 11/03/10 Towed Array
complete (A). 10/20/10 Ready for Towed Array.
10/15/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pad is full. Pile
#0345.

11/18/10 Samples taken. 11/17/10 Received map
1st Systematic 1-18, Biased 19-20. 10/27/10 Towed
Array complete (A). 10/14/10 Ready for Towed Array.
10/13/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pad is full. Pile
#0347.

1/3/11

1/3/11

11/18/10 Received map 1st Systematic 1-18, Biased
19-20. Samples taken. 11/02/10 Towed Array
complete (A). 10/28/10 Ready for Towed Array.
10/26/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pile #0350.
01/03/11 Stockpile moved to MDR. Pad is clear. Pile
#0351.

01/03/11 Stockpile moved to MDR. Pad is clear. Pile
#0352.
10/26/10 Receiving soil WA30/Shaw. Visible
contamination on C18. Pile #0353.
12/13/10 Stockpile moved to SB3. Pad is clear. Pile
#0360.
12/13/10 Stockpile moved to SB3. Pad is clear. Pile
#0359.
12/13/10 Stockpile moved to SB3. Pad is clear. Pile
#0361.

11/29/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pile #0362.

Page 3 of 5

 RSY2 PAD STATUS REPORT

RASO
Concurs

Comments
01/03/11 Received map 1st Systematic 3-20, Biased
1-2. 12/02/10 Towed Array complete. 11/30/10 Ready
for Towed Array. 11/19/10 Receiving soil
WA24/Shaw. Visible contamination on C-25. Pad is
full. Pile # 0363.
12/02/10 Towed Array complete. 12/02/1012/01/10
Ready for Towed Array. 11/24/10 Receiving soil
WA24/Shaw. Pad is full. Visible contamination on Pad
C-26. Pile # 0364.
11/24/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Visible
contamination on Pad C-27. Pile # 0365
11/30/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pad is full. Pile
# 0366.
12/3/10 Ready for Towed Array. 12/01/10 Receiving
soil WA24/Shaw. Pad is full. Visible contamination on
Pad C-29. Pile # 0367.
12/01/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Pile #0368.
12/02/10 Receiving soil WA24/Shaw. Visible
contamination on C-31. Pile #0369.
01/03/11 Received map 1st Systematic 3-20, Biased
1-2. 12/07/10 Towed Array complete (GL). 12/03/10
Ready for Towed Array. 12/02/10 Receiving soil
WA28/Shaw. Pad is full. Pile #0370.
12/13/10 Ready for Towed Array. 12/7/2010 0
Receiving soil WA28/Shaw. Pad is full. Pile # 0371.
12/07/10 Receiving soil WA28/Shaw. Pad is full.
Towed Array complete (GL). Pile #0372.
12/07/10 Receiving soil WA28/Shaw. Pile #0373.

Comments
FS = Fisher/Spear Utility Corridors 1 & 2
Towed array data collected pending RASO approval
After RAD cleared, Pad will be staged for Waste Out.
TTEC Towed Array
Last sample taken 30 days or greater

Page 4 of 5

 .oz 8; 



Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 10:47:30 AM Pacific Standard Time

Subject: Navy BCT Brief of Anamolous Soil Samples at HPS
Date: Monday, April 7, 2014 at 10:27:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW
To:
Miya, Ryan@DTSC (Ryan.Miya@dtsc.ca.gov), Low, Tina@Waterboards
(Tina.Low@waterboards.ca.gov), ChesnuU.john@epa.gov, Amy.Brownell@sfdph.org
CC:
Dougherty, Bill (Bill.Dougherty@tetratech.com), Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW, Yantos,
Christopher N CTR NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO, hamide@marrscorp.com
BCT Members:
The Navy would like to hold a roundtable discussion on the Fall 2012 anomalous radiological soil sampling results
that were iden\fied during our internal QA/QC reviews and the subsequent internal inves\ga\on that TtEC
conducted in response. TtEC has developed a report that documents the inves\ga\on which has been under Navy
review up un\l last week. At this point, we feel it is prudent to share the informa\on with the rest of the team. TtEC
has already provided this report to the NRC and will also be providing copies to each of you before the mee\ng.
As for a \me and date, Melanie and I were thinking early a`ernoon on April 23rd at the HPS TtEC trailers would be
ideal as we will already be traveling up there for the Community Mee\ng. We could do a 1:30 PM mee\ng? Does this
work for everyone?
Ryan, please forward on to CDPH as you deem appropriate. If it is okay with you, I will most likely extend the
invita\on to Gene Forrer (RHB) too, as Melanie and I have already had some preliminary discussions with him on this
topic.
v/r,
Catherine Haran, PE
LRPM Hunters Point
619.532.0787
catherine.haran@navy.mil

Page 1 of 1

 Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 10:43:54 AM Pacific Standard Time

Subject: FW: Anomalous Soil Sampling Inves4ga4on - please plan on being on mute and not asking any
ques4ons
Date: Monday, April 21, 2014 at 11:13:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Brownell, Amy (DPH)
To:
Ryan Seelbach (RSeelbach@Geosyntec.com), jeff aus4n (JAus4n@Geosyntec.com), randy brandt
(rbrandt@geosyntec.com), Chris Glenn (cglenn@Langan.com), Chris4na Rain (crain@Langan.com),
Dorinda Shipman (dshipman@Langan.com), Sigrida Reinis (sreinis@Langan.com)
Ryan and whomever is going to be on this call from T&R (I can’t remember)
The Navy has asked that only one of you from each company
Please plan on being on mute and not asking any ques4ons during the call
Navy is trying to keep this as low key as possible and the purpose of the call/mee4ng is so that BCT and CDPH
can understand and get all their ques4ons answered
if there is anything of concern to us – the three of us can talk a^erwards and send/call Catherine a^erwards
based on everything I’ve heard – it is just a documenta4on issue at this point but it is sensi4ve because a
contractor made an error – which then got fixed later and they are just trying to figure out how to document
it correctly
thanks,
Amy Brownell, P.E.
Environmental Health Branch
Popula4on Health Division
San Francisco Department of Public Health
1390 Market St., Suite 410
San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfdph.org/dph/eh
415-252-3967
fax 415-252-3889
amy.brownell@sfdph.org
** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email message and any aiachments are solely for the intended recipient
and may contain confiden4al or privileged informa4on. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying, use or distribu4on of the informa4on included in this message and any aiachments is prohibited. If
you have received this communica4on in error, please no4fy the sender immediately and permanently delete
or otherwise destroy the informa4on.
From: Randy Brandt [mailto:RBrandt@Geosyntec.com]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 2:11 PM
To: Brownell, Amy (DPH)
Subject: RE: Anomalous Soil Sampling Investigation

Thanks, Amy. I will have Ryan sit in on the call. I appreciate you giving us a heads up.
Randy
Page 1 of 3

 -----Original Appointment----From: Amy.Brownell@sfdph.org [mailto:Amy.Brownell@sfdph.org] On Behalf Of Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC
SW
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 2:05 PM
To: Jeffrey Austin; Randy Brandt; Chris Glenn (cglenn@Langan.com); Christina Rain (crain@Langan.com); Dorinda
Shipman (dshipman@Langan.com); Sigrida Reinis (sreinis@Langan.com)
Subject: FW: Anomalous Soil Sampling Investigation
When: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:30 PM-3:00 PM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Where: TtEC Tralier (Conference Room) - Hunters Point Naval Shipyard

Dorinda and Chris4na:
It would be good to have someone from T&R listened in on the this discussion by phone. I’ll be there in
person. The Navy is going to present some informa4on on some radiological soil sampling . Catherine has
briefly explained the issue to me and it sounds to me like the scien4sts at Navy, RASO and CDPH are going to
have a long discussion about sta4s4cs and data valida4on. The end result is that all the data in ques4on was
collected again and all errors were fixed but there is a ques4on about what should be done with the first set
of data.
Randy and Jeff – you’ll welcome to listen and/or aiend too.
Thanks,
amy
-----Original Appointment----From: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW [mailto:catherine.haran@navy.mil]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 9:31 AM
To: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW; Miya, Ryan@DTSC (Ryan.Miya@dtsc.ca.gov); Low, Tina@Waterboards
(Tina.Low@waterboards.ca.gov); Eugene.ForrerII@cdph.ca.gov; Jue, Tracy (CDPH-DDWEM)
(Tracy.Jue@cdph.ca.gov); Chesnutt.john@epa.gov; Brownell, Amy (DPH); Edwards, Zachary L CIV SEA 04 04N;
Slack, Maihew L CIV SEA 04 04N; Dougherty, Bill <Bill.Dougherty@tetratech.com>
(Bill.Dougherty@tetratech.com); Orysia.MasnykBailey@nrc.gov; Yantos, Christopher N CTR NAVFACHQ, BRAC
PMO; hamide@marrscorp.com; Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW; Brooks, George P CIV NAVFAC SW, PACO
Subject: Anomalous Soil Sampling Inves4ga4on
When: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 1:30 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada).
Where: TtEC Tralier (Conference Room) - Hunters Point Naval Shipyard

All:
Looks like next Wednesday worked for the majority of people so we are going forward with the date and
4me. Please forward on to anyone I may have missed. If you are unable to aiend in person, I have set up the
following call-in informa4on:
Number: (866) 715-1957
Passcode: 6162227
See you all next week.
Page 2 of 3

  r,

Catherine Haran, PE
LRPM Hunters Point
619.532.0787

catherine.haran@navv.mil

Page 3 of 3

Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 10:46:33 AM Pacific Standard Time

Subject: RE: RAD concerns from BLDG.606
Date: Monday, April 21, 2014 at 2:42:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time
From: Brownell, Amy (DPH)
To:
Larson, Elizabeth A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO, Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW, Kito, Melanie
R CIV NAVFAC SW, Macchiarella, Thomas L CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
CC:
Mcfadden, Patricia A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Beth - I remember the Bldg 606 meeXng well - although I couldn't have told you the year - luckily we have you to
remember those details :)
Yes - let's discuss tomorrow on our call
I'm also going to be at HPS on Wednesday for the meeXng at the trailers
Would it be possible for someone to arrange for me and Zach to meet with the concerned individual a_er our soil
sample meeXng which is supposed to end at 3 pm? In the past I have found the crime lab personnel very recepXve
to understanding the science and accepXng of our assurances that there are no public health risks once we're able to
explain the concepts to them. Also the individual approach always works best when it is just one person asking the
quesXons.
We can always follow it up with a larger meeXng with the crime lab if Captain Connolly thinks having a refresher for
the whole crime lab group would be helpful. It has definitely been awhile since we've met with them.
thanks,
Amy Brownell, P.E.
Environmental Health Branch
PopulaXon Health Division
San Francisco Department of Public Health
1390 Market St., Suite 410
San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfdph.org/dph/eh
415-252-3967
fax 415-252-3889
amy.brownell@sfdph.org
** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email message and any akachments are solely for the intended recipient and
may contain confidenXal or privileged informaXon. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use
or distribuXon of the informaXon included in this message and any akachments is prohibited. If you have received
this communicaXon in error, please noXfy the sender immediately and permanently delete or otherwise destroy the
informaXon.
-----Original Message----From: Larson, Elizabeth A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO [mailto:elizabeth.larson@navy.mil]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 1:44 PM
To: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW; Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW; Brownell, Amy (DPH); Macchiarella, Thomas
L CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Cc: Mcfadden, Patricia A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Subject: RE: RAD concerns from BLDG.606
I think this is a good addiXon to our meeXng tomorrow. Patricia, Amy Brownell and I probably are the only ones le_
who remember doing a full presentaXon with quesXons and answers to the SFPD Bldg 606 tenants back in November

Page 1 of 4

 2007 to address RAD and dust control concerns. I'm sure it's a smaller group out there now, but it may be Xme to reengage and ease concerns.
Just my two cents,
Beth
-----Original Message----From: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW; Amy.Brownell@sfdph.org; Macchiarella, Thomas L CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Cc: Larson, Elizabeth A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO; Mcfadden, Patricia A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Subject: FW: RAD concerns from BLDG.606
Team,
FYI. See below. Can we briefly discuss this at tomorrow's call? Just want to determine who should be taking the lead.
Thank you!
Catherine
-----Original Message----From: Mcfadden, Patricia A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 11:59 AM
To: Dougherty, Bill; Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW; Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW; Delong, Douglas E CIV
NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Cc: Yantos, Christopher N CTR NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO; Abkemeier, Erik; Jensen, Jarvis; McWade, Dennis;
Montgomery, ShanX
Subject: RE: RAD concerns from BLDG.606
Thanks Bill.
This is also a role that Amy Brownell should be willing to do as she is the rep for the City on the BCT and Bldg 606 is
the City client. I can talk to Amy about it if you'd like.
If we have a fact sheet or something we can provide to all employees of 606 that would be ideal. With all the recent
news arXcles about Treasure Island I can see the rad signs may be concerning to 606 occupants as well.
If RASO is willing to talk to the person that is concerned that would also be helpful and my office and help connect
them.
Patricia
-----Original Message----From: Dougherty, Bill [mailto:Bill.Dougherty@tetratech.com]
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 11:54 AM
To: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW; Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW; Mcfadden, Patricia A CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC
PMO; Delong, Douglas E CIV NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO
Cc: Yantos, Christopher N CTR NAVFACHQ, BRAC PMO; Abkemeier, Erik; Jensen, Jarvis; McWade, Dennis;
Montgomery, ShanX
Subject: FW: RAD concerns from BLDG.606

Page 2 of 4

 All,
My construcXon manager, Dennis McWade was approached this morning outside of B606. He was informed
that one of the ladies that works there is pregnant and has raised concerns to her management a_er noXcing our
RAD posXngs. I told Dennis that we should not engage the SFPD and that I would pass this informaXon on to the
Navy. The SFPD POC informaXon is provided below.

Zack (RASO) and Erik are going to be on-site mid-week for other meeXng, it may be a good opportunity to
offer this individual an opportunity to talk to the experts?

Let me know if you need our support.

Bill sends.

Bill Dougherty   Senior Project Manager
San Diego: 619.471.3531
HPNS: 415.216.2731
Cell: 415.238.7006
bill.dougherty@tetratech.com

Tetra Tech   RemediaXon
200 Fisher Avenue   San Francisco, CA 94124   www.tetratech.com <hkp://www.tetratech.com/>

PLEASE NOTE: This message, including any akachments, may include confidenXal and/or inside informaXon. Any
distribuXon or use of this communicaXon by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and may
be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please noXfy the sender by replying to this message and then
delete it from your system.
P Think Green - Not every email needs to be printed.

From: McWade, Dennis

Page 3 of 4

 Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 10:17 AM
To: Dougherty, Bill
Cc: Montgomery, ShanX
Subject: RAD concerns from BLDG.606

This is the contact info for the concern I spoke to you about this morning.

Captain Michael Connolly

Michael.Connolly@sfgov.org

415-553-1005 office
415-602-1282 cell

Dennis

Page 4 of 4

 Wednesday, November 7, 2018 at 10:44:48 AM Pacific Standard Time

Subject:
Date:
From:
To:

FW: Presenta,on and Figure from Anomalous Soil Sampling
Thursday, May 1, 2014 at 10:47:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Brownell, Amy (DPH)
jeff aus,n (JAus,n@Geosyntec.com), randy brandt (rbrandt@geosyntec.com), Chris Glenn
(cglenn@Langan.com), Chris,na Rain (crain@Langan.com), Dorinda Shipman
(dshipman@Langan.com), Sigrida Reinis (sreinis@Langan.com)
AFachments: Figure sites from Table 2 and 3 of Inves,ga,on_04-23-14.pdf, TtEC Anomalous Soil
Sampling_R2.pdf
T&R and GeoSyntec:
Can't remember if I forwarded to you
As far as I'm concerned, for our purposes, this issue was a contractor error that has been corrected and has no
implica,ons for future
Other than more scru,ny and more money spent analyzing data that was close to background already - your tax
dollars hard at work...
thanks,
Amy Brownell, P.E.
Environmental Health Branch
Popula,on Health Division
San Francisco Department of Public Health
1390 Market St., Suite 410
San Francisco, CA 94102
www.sfdph.org/dph/eh
415-252-3967
fax 415-252-3889
amy.brownell@sfdph.org
** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE** This email message and any ahachments are solely for the intended recipient and
may contain confiden,al or privileged informa,on. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use
or distribu,on of the informa,on included in this message and any ahachments is prohibited. If you have received
this communica,on in error, please no,fy the sender immediately and permanently delete or otherwise destroy the
informa,on.
-----Original Message----From: Haran, Catherine M CIV NAVFAC SW [mailto:catherine.haran@navy.mil]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 5:20 PM
To: Miya, Ryan@DTSC (Ryan.Miya@dtsc.ca.gov); Low, Tina@Waterboards (Tina.Low@waterboards.ca.gov);
Eugene.ForrerII@cdph.ca.gov; Jue, Tracy (CDPH-DDWEM) (Tracy.Jue@cdph.ca.gov); Chesnuh.john@epa.gov;
Brownell, Amy (DPH); 'Orysia.MasnykBailey@nrc.gov'; 'Terry, Robert'; Johnson, Robert
Cc: Slack, Mahhew L CIV SEA 04 04N; Edwards, Zachary L CIV SEA 04 04N; Kito, Melanie R CIV NAVFAC SW
Subject: Presenta,on and Figure from Anomalous Soil Sampling
BCT Members and others,
Thank you for taking the ,me to meet with TtEC and the Navy last week. As promised, ahached is the presenta,on
and referenced figure. As we specified during the presenta,on, the inves,ga,on was conducted solely by TtEC,
although the Navy did provide inquiries into the inves,ga,on and data along the way. The Navy has taken this very

Page 1 of 2