- a. .. *v v.6. It?i' - ?m CHEEF OFFICERS of ENGLAND. WALES I, A?w ON and NORTHERN . - Office. 1. Gene'afsec?e?? New Scotland Yard, Broadway, TOL: 01.230 2456 LONDON, SW1H 036 My Ref.: Your Ref.: NOT FOR PUBLICATION, BROADCAST, OR USE ON CLUB TAPES BEFORE 17.00 hours, Wednesday, 2nd July, 1975. THIS DOCUMENT IS ISSUED IN ADVANCE ON THE STRICT UNDERSTANDING THAT NO APPROACH BE MADE TO ANY ORGANISATION OR PERSON ABOUT ITS CONTENTS BEFORE THE TIME OF PUBLICATION. General Secret-?1- Scanned by CamScanner by Deputy'assistant Col-issioner I a Gibson, Metropolitan Police, to the Joint Sun-er Conference of ABPO association of letropolitan authorities and ?sedation of counts councils on 2nd July, 1975 moms I an very pleased to have the opportunity of speakins ?0 Phil afternoon on uThe Problems of Public Disorderr in this country generally and the Metropolitan Police District in particular, and discussinl "1?5 you the varying categories into which these contentious can 5' sub-divided. In view of the current international situation a general statenent that IIpublic order had all but vanished fros the world. could well be thought to apply to the present day. However, such a statement was in fact made by a.Florentine Dominican in the early fifteenth century concerning the troubled tines in which he lived, so it would appear no problem is completely new, only the degree of seriousness alters. The main public order problems thesselves can, {Instilly'speekin[, be bronco down largely into the following categories: 1. political demonstrations; 2. student unrest; 3. industrial unrest; h. racial disturbances; 5. soccer hooliganism; 6. squatters. There are two other sub-headings one would normally use in connection with public disorder, is, urban guerrilla warfare and hi-Jacking and airport security, but in the main they require a different kind of police action and in the short time available this afternoon it is not possible to cover these items. To deal with political demonstrations first, Inndon as the capital city of the country attracts people from all over the world. It houses the seat of Government with its attendant offices as well as Embassies, consulates and Legations of countries with which we have diplomatic relations. all are targets for demonstrations; events happening anywhere in the world are quickly reflected in London. in attempted coup or unrest of any Kind in a country abroad.will almost certainly result in a desonstration at that particular country's representative prelises within A .H. . - . Scanned by CamScanner .2- a very short period of time. In addition, we have of course our own innumerable causes for people to demonstrate about and, although most of them do not attract much attention as they take place without incident, we do in fact deal on average with some major demonstrations in the Metropolitan Police area each year. at least thirty of the major demonstrations will require in excess of one thousand police officers to control them. This does not, of course, take into account the regular crowd violence problems which we, in common with most other countries, have - for example, at our eleven first- class football grounds and other similar venues. The demonstrators themselves are not normally part of a single coherent movement, but are mainly members of small groups of political activists, usually tending towards the far left or far right of the political spectrum. Moreover, many of these extremist supporters tend to turn out for whatever is the popular protest of the day, whether it be anti-apartheid, council rents, or anti-Common Market; in other words, a kind of Even major demonstrations such as the ones organised by the T.U.C. and other responsible bodies, in spite of considerable care taken by the organisers themselves, tend to attract the fringe elements, who will - if possible - try to capitalize on the publicity afforded by association with any large gathering of people. although the support of the public at large for police aims and methods is a major factor in keeping down the violence and temperature of these demonstrations, the lack of fatal and serious casualties has, to a certain extent, allowed unjustified complacency in the public . attitude towards them. To keep matters in perspective however, it i must be stated that society in this country does not as a whole accept i violence as a legitimate means of voicing protest. It is only a I minority of the population who are intent on violence and seek to I introduce an atmosphere of militancy to achieve their purposes. I nineteen sixty seven to nineteen sixty nine was a period of . particular importance so far as public order, especially in relation i to political demonstrations, in this country was concerned, as 7 throughout that period there was a considerable change in the tactics I employed by demonstrators. They became increasingly militant following the international pattern of that era and were prepared both to throw missiles at and physically attack police and police horses. That was i the period also that saw the mounting of our largest operation in the Metropolitan Police to date, which comprised almost nine thousand officers, including one hundred and fifty mounted. The demonstrators' "tactics" change from year to year however, and we are at present tending to get almost as many mass lobbies of Parliament during the week, as major marches and demonstrations. The basic principles we apply in dealing with public meetings, processions or demonstrations is to accept such gatherings provided:- 1. they are for lawful purposes. For example, inciting anned forces of the Crown to desert or inciting others to racial hatred is clearly'not lawful and.wonld not i be tolerated. Scanned by CamScanner -3- 2. they conform to any local regulations relating to particular places and circumstances. A good example of this is Trafalgar Square where the permission of the Department of Environment must first be obtained in writing before a meeting can be held. 3- they are not likely to cause a breach of the peace. This is the most difficult question of all to consider as it is sometimes advisable to accept the risk of minor breaches in order to show there is still freedom of speech and assembly. Of course, when clear evidence is forthcoming that any of these conditions are deliberately going to be flouted by the organisers, and this is surprisingly rare, we can resort to statutory powers to stop the persons responsible from carrying out their unlawful intentions. we try to avoid using these powers as much as possible as action taken before an event takes place tends to make of people. In any case, demonstrators who can rely on massive support are unlikely to be deterred by such restrictions and the extremists looking_for a confrontation situation would welcome them. as a result of the Red Lion Square Enquiry conducted by the Right Honourable Lord Justice Scarman in 197h, it was anticipated that some changes in police powers dealing with public order matters may have been made but only minimal variations in legislation were, in fact, recommended. These changes included the points that:- 1. the Public Order act, 19 56, be amended to confer upon the senior police officer present a power to give a direction as to the route to be followed by a demonstration if he thinks it necessary in the interests of public order; and 2. that local legislation should be brought into line with the Public Order act of 1956 (as amended). Other suggestions included that public meeting places should be provided in towns and cities and that police should provide a written notice of the agreed route to be followed to prevent misunderstandings by the organisers of demonstrations. swag-axe To deal with public order situations it is essential to know what the intentions of possible trouble-makers are. As organisers do not require police permission or permits for their demonstrations or meetings, to enable police to anticipate events it is necessary for us to keep abreast of current affairs. at New Scotland Yard for example, staff responsible for public order in the Metropolis have, in the course of their duties, to keep fully acquainted with all possible emotive aspects of the national and international situation. This is of course in addition to the usual information fed in by the police services themselves, is, other specialist branches, local divisions and other forces. Scanned by CamScanner In all cases however, when we know a demonstration or meeting of any kind is about to take place, we consult the organisers. Generally speaking, there is no reluctance by them to communicate with and nest police, to discuss arrangements, agree routes and select forming-up and dispersal areas. At the same time, we try to educate the organisers as to their own particular responsibilities, advising them how best to control their fellow demonstrators by the correct use of properly briefed stewards and what action to take if militants try to create incidents not intended by them as the organising body. We ourselves try'to be as flexible as possible, amending our arrangements up to the last possible moment to meet those of the organisers, provided the request is reasonable and does not affect police efficiency. One or the most difficult aspects of dealing with public order problems is the decision as to what is the correct police manpower requirement for any given situation. There are so many factors inyolved that it is not possible to lay down a yard stick or set formula, it depends entirely on the nature of organisations involved and their general background. considerations taken into account, therefore, includetype of demonstration; character of the organiser; purpose of the demonstration; area in which it is being held; political or public events currently topical; protection of Embassies or other vulnerable premises. as you will see, this is not an exact science but more a question or building up serial by serial to supervise the assembly, accompany the march and deal with the protection of premises. This must include both primary and secondary targets on the route or the demonstration. It is.or course always vital to ensure an adequate "mobile reserve" is available. what are the police problems in the field of student dissension within our Universities and colleges of Education? This subject can only rearhy?be dealt with by'ccnsidering the legal problems in respect of the two separate categories of internal i student demonstrations. These are;- mg; Scanned by ChniSbanner 7 -5- a) peaceful sit-ins; b) incidents involving some criminal offence or offences. it is in the former area that we have the most difficulty. In cases of peaceful sit-ins we must consider whether the person is a trespasser. If that person is not a student of the university, nor a member of the faculty, and his presence is not acceptable to the authorities he is Clearly a trespasser and can be dealt with accordingly. If, however, he is a student, the position in law is not so clear. It is for this reason that university authorities are well-advised to seek their civil remedy in order that if police involvement becomes essential, they will have the clear backing of a Court Order. Instances involving criminal offences give rise to much less question as to the Justification of police intervention owing to the stronger position of police when dealing with matters of criminal law. clearly police are, however, in an invidious position in these cases; we are unwilling - indeed it is not our function - to become deeply involved in civil disputes between individuals. Under these circumstances our duty is to preserve the queen's peace, to endeavour to bring to trial those who are alleged to have broken that peace and to prevent those who threaten to commit breaches of it from so doing. an ill-Judged police intervention could not only bring about a serious breach of the peace but could turn a quiet protest demonstration into an angry confrontation. In addition to causing unrest within some universities there is now the only too familiar student support of public demonstrations and their involvement in the field of industrial troubles. These young people usually belong to militant, extremist organisations and can in the main I suppose be classed as passing through their political growing-up pains. They have played an active part in a number of strikes both official and unofficial, offering assistance in manning picket lines, providing transport and producing strike literature. The students are usually quite frank about their sins which are "to use strikes because they are fertile grounds for their political aspirations". In the field of industrial unrest, I am reminded of the maxim attributed to Edmond Burke and I quote:- I'all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - a saying that appears very appropriate in view of some of the present day conflicts. There are many people who dismiss the idea that extremist militants can decisively influence industrial disputes on the grounds that they are usually' eut-anmhered on the Uhion Executive or Strike Committee. Iet events in this Scanned by Caniscanner - 6 - country and in other parts of the World are repeatedly remindinz ?9 0f the damage that can be done by determined and well-organised militant minorities. The police role in trade disputes must always be one of complete impartiality and they must not, under any circumstances, allow themselves to be drawn into a situation where they could be accused of bias in any direction. Their primary function is to maintain the queen's peace and preserve the legal rights of all parties involved in the dispute. The legislation affecting this important subject is at present contained in the Conspiracy and Protection of Property act, 1875, and the Trade Union and Labour Relations Act, 197a. Basically the emphasi- is still, as it always has been, on peaceful picketing and the right to withdraw labour. It could be said that persons merely picketing have never caused any problems, but difficulties usually arise from militants wishing by any means to prevent other people working, and this is one of the main causes of violence. In the past the numbers of pickets at any one site or gate was usually determined voluntarily by police and the union concerned, which in general was always acceptable. However, a considerable change came about in some areas as a result of the building workers' dispute in 1972 and the coal miners' strike in 1973/7h. During this period several different tactics were introduced by the strikers such as mass picketing, the picketing of premises not directly involved in the dispute and "flying pickets". As a result of these tactics it became necessary for the Home Office to strengthen the scheme for organising mutual aid between police forces on a widespread scale, with special reference to instances of industrial unrest. One must ask the question however, is the show of police strength the ultimate answer to the problem, can we expect legislation to support us in this situation? Where does peaceful persuasion and and intimidation by numbers or behaviour begin? It is difficult to imagine legislation that could specify the exact number of pickets permitted at any gate or site, or even to specify that only pickets employed by the parties in dispute with the union should be involved. Surely to be so pedantic would only create more confrontation with police who would have, on occasions, to attempt to enforce the unenforceable. RadIal DISTURBANUES Let us now turn to racial disturbances. A great deal has been written and said on the subject of race relations during the last ten to fifteen years, but most of what has been said or prepared on this subject has been produced by persons other than police officers. I will therefore try to briefly cover the particular problem of racial disturbances which presents itself to police in connection with public order and so far as we are concerned put the letter into its proper perspective. -J Scanned by??amSCanner -7- In order to appreciate the reasons for current problems regarding some immigrants, it is necessary to establish where they have settled and why. This has not in the main been in localities where the greatest economic growth is taking place, for this growth has been based on technological development and the work available there has required skills which many immigrants do not possess. Therefore, as the indigenou' white population has moved to these growth areas, they have left large declining neighbourhoods in parts of London, together With the unpleasant menial Jobs they no longer want. It is into these areas that a considOrShl? number of immigrants have settled. The first generation immigrants consisted in the main of the ambitious and adaptable elements. A small minority of them did become involved in criminal activities but the vast majority had the strength of character to Keep clear or crime, although in many cases they live in areas of above-average crime rates. It is with.the children of these immigrants however that our main problems lie. Many of these young people cannot feel a loyalty t0 either Britain or their parents' birth-place and it is upon these and others or their generation that the burden of immigration falls most heavily. In some cases, their employment expectations are frequently ambitious, far in excess of their lixely achievements. Disappointment is therefore inevitable, but they are reluctant to lower their sights. This usually results in a feeling that racialism is the cause of their lacs of opportunity and the pursuit of this concept often takes an aggresive form, mainly directed towards a society and its institutions which, so far as they are concerned, is the cause of their frustrated ambitions. The police uniform itself, therefore, to them becomes a symbol of authority in that society, which they believe is responsible for all their grievances. It is against this smouldering back-cloth of resentment that the police and some young immigrants appear to be, on occasions, in a conflict situation. This has created an almost insoluble 4 paradox in that the measures required to defuse a tense situation in some circumstances are in direct conflict with the measures traditionally used by police in this country to contain crime and preserve order. It will be readily seen therefore, that this problem creates a very delicate area so far as police action is concerned. However, in the interests of law and order in the country as a whole; race, creed or colour should not be allowed to create special privileges, or apparent privileges, and the law should be seen to be equally applicable to all, although the methods of obtaining this equality of application.will need constant re?appraisal. The subject of football crowd behaviour-is one which has been discussed almost ad nauseam during recent years by the press, by laymen and by committees which have been specially constituted to identify the causes and suggest the solutions to the phenomena of "soccer hooliganism". Historically, football games have been aggressive affairs, the old type of football played in the streets was often the occasion of free for all rights between one district and another. However, whilst the game itself Scanned by CamScanner This are from many factors for whenever lerze crowds the relaxed di 1 1 arly if the occasion is one of excitement then and his relatisg 2:133:15: ti: cmwd? a? ?ma?ter u" ?(imam irresp0nsible behaviour. the crowd, may we11 prOV1d? excu??' we have all seen examples of pre and after match hooli anism fans indulging in ?soccer mania" - that is, wandering the sEreets,?y causing damage, disrupting traffic and baitin the Opposing teams. 0 or no who support During the match "soccer mania" usually seems to be confined mainly to verbal taunts, and attempts to distract the opposition team is: particular the goal Keeper. This verbal distraction may be enforced by the use of missiles from the comparatively harmless toilet roll to the more dangerous bottles, stones, etc. Hatches such as the last European Cup Final however, show that this level of hooliganism cannot be relied upon. Research tends to indicate that on balance more offences are committed after the game than before. Fighting between rival gangs is more prevalent outside the ground after the match when the crowds have split into smaller groups and are therefore more vulnerable to attack from the larger groups. Incidents of damage also tend to be more prevalent after the match due to the elation or disappointment of the fans giving vent to their pent up feelings. If it is possible to categorise the hooligan he will probably fall into two main groups:- 1. the young offender of about 1h-17 year of age - who does not commit serious crime but gets carried away by the sense of the occasion; 2. the more determined hooligan aged 16-20 years who, whilst not gathering in much great numbers, tends to commit the more serious type of offence. ahilst it is suggested that there are two main groups I would remind you that even a respectable middle aged supporter subjected to the experience of seeing the team he supports robbed by what, in his opinion, is a combination of bad luck, incompetent refereeing and villianous opposition, he can come close to senseless violence. Like all the other issues I have spOken of, what is the cause? If there was one simple cause for soccer hooliganism there would be an equally simple solution. One may generalize and suggest that the cause is due to a social malaise, a consequence of lowering moral standards, the "Permissive Society", family up-bringing or linked with increased violence in other walks of life. Each suggestion has its merits and may be linked with more particular causes such as for example, . (?,l?lw . 7.- Scanned by CamScanner .9- alcohol. However, as hooliganism of some degree has the future will be me immemorial and there is nothing to indicate that to the problem different, there is certainly no immediate answer 1? crowd to st the traditional development of our society permits 5 gather on the occasions of public entertainment and whilst zzcz?i?ntim?es attract the support which it does, then it must also it tic pa ed that 3?39 supporters will misbehave. To control the ?a 0? t?raf?e positive action by police is necessary, backed up by the com-ta m1 mum-um inpo ing pe t1? that will deter this hoolim SQUATTERS Squatting is defined as "the unauthorised possession of unoccupied property" and was first seen in London in the immediate post-war 793?.- it did not, however, commence on a significant scale until 1963- No firm figures concerning squatting in London are available, but it is roughly estimated that there are at present about 1,000 prove-WA!a occupied by some 7,000 people. Essentially, a squatter is a trespasser which immediately confronts the police with the "grey area" of an unbiased ?peace keeper". They can be divided into six main categories: 1. homeless families - acting on individual initiative; 2. homeless families - put in by organised groups; 3. single persons - usually young - acting either individually' or in looselyhorganised groups; h. communes or similar groups seeking an unconventionnl life style; 5. anti-establishment groups seeking confrontation; 6. individuals with social problems seeking to form protective groups. These categories can again be roughly divided into the genuine homeless and anti-establishment groups and this can, to a large extent, dictate our difficulties and determine police action. Several squatters' organisations have produced detailed guides to squatting. They set out in simple terms the law relating to squatting, how to enter premises without ostensibly commiting a criminal offence, how to obtain gas, water, electricity and how to deal with the law. In general tenms, a property owner has little alternative to taking civil proceedings if he wishes to recover occupation of his property. The usual method is to obtain a court Order, and from the police point of view a high court Writ is preferable, as by virtue of the Sheriffs act 1387 if the Sheriff is resisted, police must assist his. There is no uhiguity no area of grey and they are able to control the situation to s.luol . greater degree. - . Scanned by CamSCanner -10- CRIHINAL Une interesting side issue here is that havi effected in mos gases their unlawful entry, the squatters immediaggly turn to the 1:1: ortprotection of their rights to remain in the property. The act 33 quoted by them in support of their contention is the Forceable try not of 1381. self-respecting group of well-arseni?ed squatters will usually have a. notice fixed to the door drawing attention to the Act. - gonomsIons well, gentlemen, to sum up very brie?y, police action in relation to public order so far as we are concerned is based on:- 1. adequate planning) 2. adequate chain of command; J. mobility; h. communications; 5. sufficient manpower. So far as manpower is concerned, I must however maxe it perfectly clear that owing to our present appalling manpower shortage, in order that we may deploy sufficient men to deal with major public order situations, it is necessary that officers are diverted from their normal policing duties all over the Metropolitan Police District and weekly leaves are regularly cancelled. Even this is not enough on- some occasions and our good friends in the Uity Police are from time to time asked to help us out in this respect. we, in our turn, are only' too happy to return the compliment whenever necessary. One of the main considerations we must always bear in mind however, as I stated earlier, is that in this country it is the accepted right of anyone who feels aggrieved to demonstratetbout his grievance and to try and influence others to support his cause. That ancient right is a precious heritage and one that is jealously guarded, not least by the police. The right to demonstrate however is not the right to behave in a violent or disorderly manner, it is not the right to commit acts of wilful damage or assault and it lost certainly is not the right to flout the law of the land. in?. Scanned by CamScanner